Skip to main content
The Journal of International Medical Research logoLink to The Journal of International Medical Research
. 2023 Feb 7;51(2):03000605231153323. doi: 10.1177/03000605231153323

Clinical significance of galectin-3 expression in urinary bladder carcinoma

Jaudah Ahmed Al-Maghrabi 1,2, Mohamad Nidal Khabaz 3,✉
PMCID: PMC9909066  PMID: 36748414

Abstract

Objective

To uncover the clinical significance of galectin-3 in the evolution of urinary bladder cancer by defining galectin-3 expression and examining the relationship between its expression in a group of urothelial carcinomas versus normal tissues along with clinicopathological factors.

Methods

This retrospective study included histopathological reports and archival blocks and slides of all patients with urinary bladder cancer treated at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia). An anti-galectin-3 monoclonal antibody was used for immunohistochemical staining of tissue microarray slides comprising 128 cases of urothelium carcinoma and 24 specimens of normal bladder mucosa.

Results

Galectin-3 was downregulated during transformation, with positive expression found in 50 (39%) urinary bladder neoplasms, of which 33 (66%) showed weak immunostaining. All positively-stained malignant tumor and normal bladder mucosa samples showed cytoplasmic staining; a few samples also showed nuclear staining. No correlation was noted between galectin-3 and histotype, grade, stage, muscularis propria invasion, lymph node invasion, vascular invasion, or metastasis. A Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan–Meier survival curves did not show differences in survival on the basis of galectin-3 expression.

Conclusion

Galectin-3 is down-regulated in bladder cancer but is not a helpful marker for the diagnosis or prognosis of urinary bladder cancer.

Keywords: Galectin-3, urinary bladder cancer, urothelial carcinoma, immunohistochemistry, tissue microarray, retrospective study

Introduction

Galectin-3 is a member of a special family of glycoproteins called lectins. Lectins are distinguished by their specificity for binding carbohydrate sequences (β-galactosides).1–2 Galectin-3 is a 31-kDa protein that is encoded by the LGALS3 gene located on chromosome 14.1–2 Galectin-3 protein is expressed in several human organs and tissues as well as by some malignant tissues. Galectin-3 functions in several subcellular locations including the nucleus, cytoplasm, and cellular membranes. It also mediates cellular communications with components of the extracellular matrix.3–6 Galectin-3 has several functions because it is expressed in different locations and can attach to a variety of ligands.3,4,7–9 It also takes part in the transformation process and carcinogenesis. Several studies have shown that galectin-3 plays significant roles in a collection of neoplasm-associated biological activities including apoptosis, differentiation, adhesion, proliferation, migration, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis.5–11

Previous studies have reported galectin-3 expression in several neoplasms and have attempted to estimate its diagnostic utility as a predictive factor for malignant progression. However, there remains a significant debate because galectin-3 has been found to be both over- and under-expressed in cancerous tissues compared with non-malignant tissues. Several studies have also suggested that increased galectin-3 expression indicates poor prognosis while others have concluded otherwise.12 Increased galectin-3 expression has been found in mammary gland cancer,13 stomach cancer,14 liver cancer,15 skin cancer,16 cervical cancer,17 tongue cancer,18 and thyroid neoplasms.19 In different reports, galectin-3 was found to be under-expressed in various neoplasms such as head and neck cancer,20 prostatic carcinoma,21 mammary gland neoplasms,22 gastric cancer,23 colorectal cancer,24 and cervical cancer.25 These discrepancies suggest that the engagement of galectin-3 in the transformation process is tumor-specific. However, there is inadequate information regarding the clinical value of galectin-3 immunostaining in bladder carcinoma.

Urinary bladder tumors are the thirteenth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide.26 Urinary bladder carcinoma is the sixth most frequent tumor, with approximately 81,400 newly registered neoplasms and approximately 17,980 bladder cancer deaths in the USA in 2019.27 Despite the substantial progresses in cancer management, bladder neoplasms remain a huge challenge because of their high frequency of recurrence, with up to 70% of newly registered tumors recurring within 5 years, often developing into destructive, muscle-invasive, and metastatic tumors.28–29 Managing urinary bladder carcinoma greatly depends on the clinicopathological factors of patients, e.g., TNM stage and tumor grade are prognostic indicators. Still, these clinicopathological features are insufficient to forecast patients’ outcomes and generate considerable discrepancies within similar grades or stages. This is essentially linked to the heterogeneity of urinary bladder tumors.30 Therefore, there is an urgent need to discover better markers for diagnosis, treatment response, risk stratification, and clinical management.31–32 Most current markers are not reasonably sensitive or specific, which has increased interest in markers than can are specific for malignant cells and the neoplasm milieu to assist in prognosis and diagnosis and give indications for therapy.

Therefore, this report defines galectin-3 expression and examines associations between its expression and clinical factors to determine the clinical importance of galectin-3 in the development of urothelial carcinoma. Moreover, this report assessed whether galectin-3 expression could be a useful biomarker and/or predictive factor for survival in urinary bladder carcinoma patients.

Materials and methods

This project was performed in the Laboratory of Pathology over a 2-year period, ending on 15 April 2022 and was approved by the Unit of Biomedical Ethics, Research Committee at King Abdulaziz University (Reference No. 77-21, 11 April 2021). Informed consent was waived by the Biomedical Ethics Committee as the research project used archived material. The practices followed were consistent with the 1975 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Written informed consent is routinely obtained from all patients who undergo a surgical procedure at our institution for use of tissue samples in laboratory studies. This manuscript follows the guidelines of studies of diagnostic accuracy (STARD).

Cases with history of intravesical chemotherapy were excluded. Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were cut into 4-µm slices, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and reevaluated. Features of the neoplasm and patient clinicopathological information (sex and age, tumor histotype, stage, and metastasis) were gathered from the medical records of King Abdulaziz University Hospital. All normal bladder mucosa tissues were collected from patients who were biopsied for non-cancerous diseases. The World Health Organization recommendation was adapted for bladder cancer staging.

Tissue microarray (TMA) construction

The TMA was constructed as illustrated in an earlier paper.33 All 128 bladder carcinoma and 24 control specimens were used. TMA blocks were cut into 4-µm sections and placed on aminosilane-coated slides.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry was performed using an autostainer (BenchMark ULTRA, Ventana, AZ, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.34 A galectin-3 monoclonal antibody (Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA; 1:100) was used in the immunohistochemical staining protocol. Staining was visualized by the ULTRAVIEW TM DAB system. A 4-µm-section of placenta specimen was used as a positive control. A slide treated with Tris buffer in place of galectin-3 antibody was used in every run of staining as a negative control. Cases that showed brown granular cytoplasmic staining in >5% of malignant cells were considered positive. Immunohistochemical results were analyzed by two pathologists. The average rate of cells with galectin-3 expression was estimated using a semiquantitative technique (three fields of view using a 40× lens). Our laboratory scoring system for IHC was applied for galectin-3 staining intensity using 1, 2, 3, and 0 for negative. Grades of staining are displayed as two groups: negative (0) and positive (1, 2 and 3).

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS v21 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). All results are shown as numbers and percentages. Associations between clinicopathological data of bladder carcinoma patients and galectin-3 expression were investigated via the chi-squared and Fisher tests. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine if any clinicopathological factors had an important influence on survival. The assessment of survival distributions for different galectin-3 staining intensity scores was performed using a Kaplan–Meier survival curve. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Paraffin-embedded tissues of 128 selected cases out of 211 total urinary bladder carcinomas representing all grades and stages were collected from the archives of the Pathology Department along with a control group (24 normal bladder samples). All 128 urinary bladder cancer cases (105 males and 23 females) were revised; clinicopathological parameters of the cases are displayed in Table 1. The median age was 62.4 years (range: 31–93 years). The most common type was urothelial carcinoma (82%) and less frequently squamous differentiation variant (13.3%) and squamous cell carcinoma (4.7%). We staged 118 cases of bladder cancer, and 116 were graded. The total number of deaths from bladder cancer was 38 (29.7%). Sixty-four cases showed muscularis propria invasion, 19 had vascular invasion, 22 had lymph node involvement, and 25 had distant metastases (Table 1). Of note, male patients showed considerably increased galectin-3 immunohistochemical staining.

Table 1.

Distribution of various clinicopathological variables according to galectin-3 expression in malignant urothelial carcinoma patients.

Galectin3 expression in urothelial cells
P-Value
Negative
Positive
n (%) n (%)
Sex
 Female 18 (78.3) 5 (21.7) 0.060
 Male 60 (57.1) 45 (42.9)
Age at Diagnosis (Years)
 <60 Years 30 (57.7) 22 (42.3) 0.534
 ≥60 Years 48 (63.2) 28 (36.8)
Muscular Invasion
 MIBC 42 (65.6) 22 (34.4) 0.113
 NMIBC 29 (63.0) 17 (37.0)
 Undecided 7 (38.9) 11 (61.1)
Histotype (Urothelial or Squamous)
 Squamous 5 (83.3) 1 (16.7) 0.467
 Urothelial 62 (59.0) 43 (41.0)
 Urothelial/Squamous 11 (64.7) 6 (35.3)
Stage
 0a 12 (57.1) 9 (42.9) 0.455
 I 19 (61.3) 12 (38.7)
 II 23 (63.9) 13 (36.1)
 III 3 (42.9) 4 (57.1)
 IV 17 (73.9) 6 (26.1)
 Undecided 4 (40.0) 6 (60.0)
Grade
 High Grade 41 (62.1) 25 (37.9) 0.955
 Low Grade 30 (60.0) 20 (40.0)
 NA 7 (58.3) 5 (41.7)
Lymph Node
 No 61 (57.5) 45 (42.5) 0.084
 Yes 17 (77.3) 5 (22.7)
Vascular Invasion
 No 62 (57.4) 46 (42.6) 0.076
 Yes 15 (78.9) 4 (21.1)
Metastasis
 No 62 (60.8) 40 (39.2) 0.943
 Yes 15 (60.0) 10 (40.0)

Galectin-3 was down-regulated during transformation, with positive expression found in 50 (39%) urinary bladder neoplasms, of which 33 (66%) showed weak immunostaining (Figure 1). Ninety percent of positive tumor cases showed immunostaining in <50% of malignant cells. In contrast, among the 24 normal bladder mucosa samples, 12 (50%) had weak to moderate galectin-3 expression. All positive staining in both malignant tumors and normal bladder mucosa was cytoplasmic, with a few samples also showing nuclear staining.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Galectin-3 immunohistochemistry staining patterns in bladder cancer. a, negative galectin-3 staining in bladder cancer (10× magnification); b, weak galectin-3 staining in malignant urothelium of bladder cancer (10× magnification); c, moderate galectin-3 staining in malignant urothelium of bladder cancer (10× magnification); c2, moderate galectin-3 staining in malignant urothelium of bladder cancer (20× magnification).

Regarding the histologic type of bladder cancer, 86% of positive cancer cases were urothelial carcinomas, but no important correlation was noted between galectin-3 and tumor histotype (p = 0.467). Galectin-3 immunohistochemical staining showed similar patterns of frequency, intensity, and distribution in both low- and high-grade tumors. Statically, galectin-3 was not associated with tumor grade in urinary bladder cancer (Table 1).

Galectin-3 expression did not show a significant correlation with tumor stage or muscularis propria invasion. Most positive bladder tumors did not show lymph node involvement, blood vessel invasion, or metastasis (90%, 92%, and 80%, respectively). However, no substantial association was found between galectin-3 expression and invasion of lymph nodes, blood vessels, or distant organs.

Results of the Cox proportional hazards model were not significant. Thus, galectin-3, sex, age, histologic type, stage, grade, muscular invasion, lymph node involvement, vascular invasion, and metastasis could not adequately estimate survival. Kaplan–Meier curves also did not show differences in survival.

Discussion

Together histological type, grade, and tumor stage remain the most reliable prognostic features for urinary bladder cancer. Various tissue biomarkers have been examined for their diagnostic and prognostic importance. No urinary tumor marker examined to date offers satisfactory sensitivity and specificity. Improved predictive markers are needed to recognize indolent tumors from those that are possibly fatal.35–36

Intracellular galectin-3 expression has been found in different types of tumor cells, where it binds to its ligands. Elevated levels of galectin-3 have been correlated with cell proliferation and transformation, cellular adhesion processes, metastasis, and resistance to apoptosis.10,37 Subcellular localization appears to have a role in whether galectin-3 expression is involved in tumor development and death. Increased cytoplasmic galectin-3 expression has been correlated with tumor aggressiveness.38 Yu et al39 concluded that translocation of galectin-3 into perinuclear membranes leads to cytochrome c inhibition and the release of caspases from mitochondria.

The immunohistochemical expression of galectin-3 in urothelial tumors and its association with clinicopathological factors have rarely been investigated, only six studies were found in the literature to date. There is no consistency among the results of these studies including this work (Table 2). In 2007, Langbein et al.40 reported that galectin-3 expression was not homogenous in urinary bladder tumors. Staining was weak or absent in most early-stage and low-grade tumors; in contrast, high-risk tumors showed strong cytoplasmic staining. Most muscle-invasive tumors showed intense cytoplasmic immunoreactivity. They also found a significant correlation between tumor stage and galectin-3 expression, but not with grade or other clinicopathological factors.

Table 2.

Association between galectin-3 expression and clinicopathological variables from immunohistochemical studies.

Reference Year Location of stain Histotype of bladder cancer Neoplastic transformation Grade Stage Muscle-invasive tumors Survival
Langbein et al.40 2007 Cytoplasmic Not associated Associated Increased expression
Kramer et al.41 2008 Cytoplasmic with few cases of nuclear staining Negatively associated Associated
Canesin et al.42 2010 Associated Associated Increased expression
Gendy et al.43 2014 Increased expression Associated Increased expression
Raspollini et al.44 2016 Not associated
Fang et al.45 2018 Increased expression Inversely associated
Current study 2022 Cytoplasmic with few cases of nuclear staining Not associated Decreased expression Not associated Not associated Not associated Not associated

In 2008, Kramer et al.41 analyzed galectin-3 expression in 162 urothelial carcinomas and found that galectin-3 expression was negatively correlated with tumor grade. Furthermore, galectin-3 expression could predict the duration of recurrence-free survival. Cytoplasmic expression of galectin-3 was prominent in tumor cells, with a small number of cases showing nuclear immunostaining. In 2010, Canesin et al.42 observed enhanced cytoplasmic galectin-3 expression in urothelial cells of muscle-invasive tumors in contrast to non-muscle-invasive tumors. Galectin-3 expression showed statistically important correlations with tumor stage, grade, and progression into invasive disease. High galectin-3 expression was also detected in highly lethal tumors; decreased expression was found in cases with good survival. In 2014, Gendy et al.43 reported increased galectin-3 expression in urothelial tumors compared with normal bladder mucosa. Galectin-3 expression was also considerably greater in muscle-invasive tumors compared with non-invasive tumors. Furthermore, galectin-3 expression is significantly linked with tumor grade. In 2016, Raspollini et al.44 reported that galectin-3 was not correlated with survival outcomes. Later in 2018, Fang et al.45 found that galectin-3 was upregulated in urothelial tumors, and survival analysis showed that galectin-3 expression was inversely correlated with overall survival.

Discrepancies among the results of previous studies looking for associations between galectin-3 expression and clinicopathologic factors and this work could be attributable to the various histological types of bladder tumors, cases with different stages of tumors development, antibody and/or technique sensitivity, difference among patients and/or sample size, and the debatable anti- or pro-apoptotic function of galactin-3 in each tumor as demonstrated by in vitro overexpression studies in different types of cell lines.46–47 Alternatively, non-specific engagement of galectin-3 in tumor progression is possible. This and earlier studies have all had some weak points, e.g., relatively low sample sizes and semiquantitative immunostaining. More comprehensive studies are needed to evaluate the roles of galectin-3 in the development, diagnosis, and prognosis of bladder tumors.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that galectin-3 is downregulated in bladder cancer evolution but is not a useful marker for the diagnosis and prognosis of urinary bladder cancer.

Author Contributions: Jaudah Al-Maghrabi: conception, performance of work, interpretation of data, and writing the article.

Mohamad Nidal Khabaz: conception, performance of work, interpretation of data, and writing the article.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding: The authors disclose receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University (Jeddah, Saudi Arabia) (grant number G: 38-140-1440). The authors acknowledge with thanks DSR for technical and financial support.

Data availability statement

All authors have access to the data. All original research data are available upon request.

ORCID ID

Mohamad Nidal Khabaz https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5298-7690

References

  • 1.Barondes SH, Cooper DN, Gitt MA, et al. Galectins. Structure and function of a large family of animal lectins. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 20807–20810. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Raimond J, Zimonjic DB, Mignon C, et al. Mapping of the galectin-3 gene (LGALS3) to human chromosome 14 at region 14q21-22. Mamm Genome 1997; 8: 706–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Krześlak A, Lipińska A. Galectin-3 as a multifunctional protein. Cell Mol Biol Lett 2004; 9: 305–328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arthur CM, Baruffi MD, Cummings RD, et al. Evolving mechanistic insights into galectin functions. Methods Mol Biol 2015; 1207: 1–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thijssen VL, Heusschen R, Caers J, et al. Galectin expression in cancer diagnosis and prognosis: A systematic review. Biochim Biophys Acta 2015; 1855: 235–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Elola MT, Wolfenstein-Todel C, Troncoso MF, et al. Galectins: matricellular glycan-binding proteins linking cell adhesion, migration, and survival. Cell Mol Life Sci 2007; 64: 1679–1700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xin M, Dong XW, Guo XL. Role of the interaction between galectin-3 and cell adhesion molecules in cancer metastasis. Biomed Pharmacother 2015; 69: 179–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hsu DK, Yang RY, Saegusa J, et al. Analysis of the intracellular role of galectins in cell growth and apoptosis. Methods Mol Biol 2015; 1207: 451–463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ahmed H, Bandyopadhyaya G. Examination of the regulation of galectin-3 expression in cancer. Methods Mol Biol 2015; 1207: 355–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ruvolo PP. Galectin 3 as a guardian of the tumor microenvironment. Biochim Biophys Acta 2016; 1863: 427–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Newlaczyl AU, Yu LG. Galectin-3–a jack-of-all-trades in cancer. Cancer Lett 2011; 313: 123–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Van den Brûle F, Califice S, Castronovo V. . Expression of galectins in cancer: a critical review. Glycoconj J 2002; 19: 537–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Idikio H. Galectin-3 expression in human breast carcinoma: correlation with cancer histologic grade. Int J Oncol 1998; 12: 1287–1290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Baldus SE, Zirbes TK, Weingarten M, et al. Increased galectin-3 expression in gastric cancer: correlations with histopathological subtypes, galactosylated antigens and tumor cell proliferation. Tumour Biol 2000; 21: 258–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jiang SS, Weng DS, Wang QJ, et al. Galectin-3 is associated with a poor prognosis in primary hepatocellular carcinoma. J Transl Med 2014; 12: 273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brown ER, Doig T, Anderson N, et al. Association of galectin-3 expression with melanoma progression and prognosis. Eur J Cancer 2012; 48: 865–874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Punt S, Thijssen VL, Vrolijk J, et al. Galectin-1, -3 and -9 Expression and Clinical Significance in Squamous Cervical Cancer. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0129119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Honjo Y, Inohara H, Akahani S, et al. Expression of cytoplasmic galectin-3 as a prognostic marker in tongue carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6: 4635–4640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xu XC, El-Naggar AK, Lotan R. Differential expression of galectin-1 and galectin-3 in thyroid tumors. Potential diagnostic implications. Am J Pathol 1995; 147: 815–822. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Choufani G, Nagy N, Saussez S, et al. The levels of expression of galectin-1, galectin-3, and the Thomsen-Friedenreich antigen and their binding sites decrease as clinical aggressiveness increases in head and neck cancers. Cancer 1999; 86: 2353–2363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pacis RA, Pilat MJ, Pienta KJ, et al. Decreased galectin-3 expression in prostate cancer. Prostate 2000; 44: 118–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Castronovo V, Van Den Brûle FA, Jackers P, et al. Decreased expression of galectin-3 is associated with progression of human breast cancer. J Pathol 1996; 179: 43–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Okada K, Shimura T, Suehiro T, et al. Reduced galectin-3 expression is an indicator of unfavorable prognosis in gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 2006; 26: 1369–1376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sanjuán X, Fernández PL, Castells A, et al. Differential expression of galectin 3 and galectin 1 in colorectal cancer progression. Gastroenterology 1997; 113: 1906–1915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lee JW, Song SY, Choi JJ, et al. Decreased galectin-3 expression during the progression of cervical neoplasia. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2006; 132: 241–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020; 70: 7–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sylvester RJ, Van der Meijden APM, Oosterlinck W, et al. Predicting Recurrence and Progression in Individual Patients with Stage Ta T1 Bladder Cancer Using EORTC Risk Tables: A Combined Analysis of 2596 Patients from Seven EORTC Trials. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 466–477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Prout GR, Jr., Barton BA, Griffin PP, et al. Treated history of noninvasive grade 1 transitional cell carcinoma. The National Bladder Cancer Group. J Urol 1992; 148: 1413–1419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Youssef RF, Lotan Y. Predictors of Outcome of Non–Muscle-Invasive and Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Sci World J 2011; 11: 369–381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cheung G, Sahai A, Billia M, et al. Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. BMC Med 2013; 11: 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kelloff GJ, Sigman CC, Scher HI. Biomarker development in the context of urologic cancers. Urol Oncol 2015; 33: 295–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Al-Maghrabi J, Emam E, Gomaa W, et al. c-MET immunostaining in colorectal carcinoma is associated with local disease recurrence. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Khabaz MN, Butt NS, Al-Maghrabi B, et al. Leptin expression in stromal cells of endometrial carcinomas is associated with advanced stage and disease recurrence. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2016; 9: 11774–11780. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bhat A, Ritch CR. Urinary biomarkers in bladder cancer: where do we stand? Curr Opin Urol 2019; 29: 203–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Oeyen E, Hoekx L, De Wachter S, et al. Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Follow-Up: The Current Status and Possible Role of Extracellular Vesicles. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li YS, Li XT, Yu LG, et al. Roles of galectin-3 in metabolic disorders and tumor cell metabolism. Int J Biol Macromol 2020; 142: 463–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Van Den Brule FA, Waltregny D, Liu FT, et al. Alteration of the cytoplasmic/nuclear expression pattern of galectin-3 correlates with prostate carcinoma progression. Int J Cancer 2000; 89: 361–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yu F, Finley RL, Jr, Raz A, et al. Galectin-3 translocates to the perinuclear membranes and inhibits cytochrome c release from the mitochondria. A role for synexin in galectin-3 translocation. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 15819–15827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Langbein S, Brade J, Badawi JK, et al. Gene-expression signature of adhesion/growth-regulatory tissue lectins (galectins) in transitional cell cancer and its prognostic relevance. Histopathology 2007; 51: 681–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kramer MW, Kuczyk MA, Hennenlotter J, et al. Decreased expression of galectin-3 predicts tumour recurrence in pTa bladder cancer. Oncol Rep 2008; 20: 1403–1408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Canesin G, Gonzalez-Peramato P, Palou J, et al. Galectin-3 expression is associated with bladder cancer progression and clinical outcome. Tumour Biol 2010; 31: 277–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gendy HE, Madkour B, Abdelaty S, et al. Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Serum and Tissue Galectin 3 Expression in Patients with Carcinoma of the Bladder. Curr Urol 2014; 7: 185–190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Raspollini MR, Luque RJ, Menendez CL, et al. T1 high-grade bladder carcinoma outcome: the role of p16, topoisomerase-IIα, survivin, and E-cadherin. Hum Pathol 2016; 57: 78–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fang T, Liu DD, Ning HM, et al. Modified citrus pectin inhibited bladder tumor growth through downregulation of galectin-3. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2018; 39: 1885–1893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bergero N, De Pompa R, Sacerdote C, et al. Galectin-3 expression in parathyroid carcinoma: immunohistochemical study of 26 cases. Hum Pathol 2005; 36: 908–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Akahani S, Nangia-Makker P, Inohara H, et al. Galectin-3: a novel anti-apoptotic molecule with a functional BH1 (NWGR) domain of Bcl-2 family. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 5272–5276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All authors have access to the data. All original research data are available upon request.


Articles from The Journal of International Medical Research are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES