Skip to main content
Clinical Case Reports logoLink to Clinical Case Reports
. 2023 Feb 8;11(2):e6121. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.6121

Transcatheter arterial embolization of the common hepatic artery for pseudoaneurysm after a laparoscopic‐assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: A case report

Lifeng Xu 1, Guosheng Gu 1,2,, Yongxiang Li 3,
PMCID: PMC9909167  PMID: 36789327

Abstract

Common hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm is a rare and potentially life‐threatening complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and the possible cause is unclear. We report a case of intraperitoneal hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy who was discharged after embolization under digital subtraction angiography. We conside that this complication may be related to iatrogenic injury.

Keywords: digital subtraction angiography, laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, microcoil embolization, postoperative complications, pseudoaneurysm of common hepatic artery


Intraperitoneal hemorrhage is one of the serious postoperative complications. We found the pseudoaneurysm of common hepatic artery after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy by digital subtraction angiography and used microcoil embolization for cure. We reviewed the procedure of laparoscopic surgery and identified several factors that might reduce postoperative bleeding.

graphic file with name CCR3-11-e6121-g001.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the main procedure for some surgeries related to the pancreas. Due to the advance of the surgical technology in recent two decades, mortality decreased considerably. 1 However, the morbidity rate for the major complication after PD remains high. 2 In the various complications, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a fatal complication, which is linked with 11%–38% of the overall mortalities. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 According to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery, 7 late PPH is caused by a ruptured pseudoaneurysm. Once the pseudoaneurysm ruptures, laparotomy and endovascular intervention are the main treatment to be done.

Here, we report the clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of a case of pseudoaneurysm formation due to massive hemorrhage in the common hepatic artery (CHA) after PD. Finally, we used the microcoils under DSA to block the CHA, to prevent further bleeding.

2. CASE REPORT

A 48‐year‐old male patient underwent a modified Child PD for the malignant tumor of the descending duodenum. He had right upper quadrant pain for 3 months. The pain started 30 min after eating and relieved after defecation. There was no chills, fever, and diarrhea. Physical examination revealed a blood pressure = 144/90 mmHg, pulse = 84 beats/min, and BMI = 27.40. The whole abdomen was slightly distended, tender to palpation, no tenderness, no rebound tenderness, and no pulsatile abdominal mass. Digital rectal examination was negative. CA19‐9 was 14.15 U/ml, and CEA was 2.38 ng/ml. The gastroscope and abdominal enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative examinations are displayed in Figure 1. The related index and laboratory values of the patient showed no abnormal outcomes. Standard modified child PD was performed after excluding the surgical contraindications. No adverse events occurred during the operation. Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered in the postoperative treatment. On postoperative day (POD) 2, the patient suffered from fever and abdominal pain. Persistent peritoneal lavage and drainage were conducted to prevent anastomotic leakage. On POD 8, the continuous drainage stopped because of disappearing abdominal pain. On POD 10, the patient had a sudden abdominal pain and showed 50 ml loss of blood from the drain of cholangiojejunostomy. Hemoglobin concentration decreased to 85 g/L, which had dropped by 45 g/L compared to the last inspection. At the same time, the amylase level measured in the intra‐abdominal drainage fluid was 1480 μ/L. In terms of diagnosis, pancreatic fistula, and intra‐abdominal bleeding were considered. Conservative treatment, including fluid infusion, use of hemostatic agents, and blood transfusion, was used for this patient. Then, the patient's condition was stabilized gradually. Abdominal CT was performed on the POD 19, which revealed the existence of bloody fluid collection around the perihepatic area (Figure 2). On POD 21, the patient underwent catheter drainage under the guidance of ultrasonic from the perihepatic area. Abdominal distension of the patient improved. However, on POD 25, the patient abruptly developed melena and hematemesis and vomited about 300 ml of bloody fluid. A total of 200 ml bright red bloody fluid drained from the abdominal tube. Then, the patient suffered from a shock with hypotension and tachycardia. Hence, active abdominal bleeding was considered. Urgent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) performed on the basis of a joint decision between the interventional radiologist and a surgeon. DSA revealed a pseudoaneurysm after the rupture of the CHA (Figure 3A, Video S1). Then, embolization of the hepatic artery with microcoil was performed successfully (Figure 3B, Video S2). The patient's blood pressure returned to normal after embolization. And then the patient regained hemodynamic stability and was transferred to the Intensive Care Unit. The patient was successfully discharged from the hospital on POD 38. Postoperative pathology showed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma in the duodenal papilla, with a size of 2.5 × 2.0 × 1.6 cm, invading the whole layer of the duodenal wall and nerves. The pancreatic margin, duodenal margin, gastric margin, and common bile duct margin were negative (cutting edge > 5 mm). And no metastasis was found in the four lymph nodes. Postoperative pathological stage was pT3N0M0. The patient refused the genetic testing due to economic problems, so there was no diagnosis of MSI or MMR. Followed up for 3–6 months, there were no obvious recurrence or metastasis in abdominal CT.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Plain abdominal CT scan revealed lesion of the descending duodenum (yellow arrow). (A) Coronal plane view. (B) Horizontal plane view.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Emergency abdominal CT plain scan showed perihepatic effusion.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Urgent digital subtraction angiography (DSA). (A) pseudoaneurysm of CHA (yellow arrow). (B) Successful embolization of hepatic artery with microcoil.

2.1. DSA procedure

The patient lied supine on the DSA table; a puncture in the right femoral artery was performed after local anesthesia. The 5FRH catheter was placed into the right femoral artery, the catheter head was inserted into the celiac trunk artery for DSA, and the super‐selected microcatheter (Terumo Progreat Microcatheter) was inserted into the hepatic artery. After the hepatic artery, its branches were identified by contrast; the embolization microcoil was placed, followed by the injection of the histoacryl (B.Braun Closure Specialities) into the hepatic artery. Ultimately, the hepatic artery and its branches did not develop again and hence were not visualized under DSA.

3. DISCUSSION

Commonly, complications develop after PD; there is no doubt that PPH is dangerous and fatal. Furthermore, a ruptured pseudoaneurysm is the most severe and fatal cause of PPH. 8 The formation of the pseudoaneurysm is associated with the damage to the vascular wall. Although adequate lymph node dissection and skeletonization of the vessels in surgery may significantly improve the patient's prognosis, the dissection and skeletonization make the arterial wall weak and vulnerable, which is susceptible to erosion by trypsin and elastase from the digestive juice. 9

We made a systematic review of the literature over the 20 years. This descriptive systematic review formulated its research question based on PICO: P – Participants, I – Intervention, C – Comparator, O – Outcomes. The inclusion criteria were P: Patients with pseudoaneurysm after PD (including laparoscopic assisted), I: Common hepatic artery embolization under DSA, C: Surgery, O: Stop bleeding. Type of article: Multicenter clinical trial, RCT, and Original article. The exclusion criteria were (i) Not all conditions are met (only one or more of the search conditions are met). (ii) Full text not retrieved. Iii, The type of article is case report or review. The search strategy was “(((embolization) AND (common hepatic artery)) AND (pseudoaneurysm)) AND (pancreaticoduodenectomy)”. We systematically searched the following databases: PubMed, Coherane, Elsevier, Science Direct (SDOS), Springer Link, Online library Wiley, EBSCO, and OvidEmbase. The initial literature search identified 623 articles and the remaining 25 after reweighting. No relevant text was retrieved from the bibliography. After screening and data extraction, 8 articles were eligible, we added 2 articles by searching citations, and 10 were finally included in this systematic review. Figure 4 is the flowchart of study selection. The information of all articles included is shown in Table 1. Unfortunately, we were unable to retrieve meaningful reports related to laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. From these 10 articles, 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 a total of 389 postoperative patients has been included. Only 38.5% of patients with pseudoaneurysms occurred in CHA. The average time from postoperative to diagnosis of pseudoaneurysm was 18.05 ± 1.22 days. Coil embolization was used in about 50% of patients. Combining all articles, we found that the use of coil embolization and covered stent are the two most common treatment methods. However, it is still inconclusive which of the two methods is better or worse. Coil embolization is one of the most common treatment methods, which can effectively block the blood supply of pseudoaneurysm, but it is easy to lead to hepatic artery ischemia. However, the covered stent can take good care of the blood supply of the liver, but the cost is high, and it also needs technology and well anesthesia conditions. 10

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram

TABLE 1.

Basic information for all articles

Author Year Patients (n) CHA a (n) POD b Consequence c (n) Micro coil d (n)
Yoshitsugu 17 2007 4 3 (75.0%) 24.5 0 4 (100%)
Lee 18 2010 27 8 (29.6%) 18.3 2 8 (29.6%)
Ding 19 2011 23 3 (13.0%) 17.7 11 20 (87.0%)
Gwon 20 2011 35 7 (0.2%) 15.7 1 3 (8.6%)
Lee 21 2012 27 8 (29.6%) 21 6 21 (77.8%)
Cui 22 2020 17 16 (94.1%) 15.3 6 0
Hwang 23 2020 37 10 (27.0%) 21 0 16 (43.2%)
Habib 24 2022 130 18 (13.8%) 12 21 59 (45.4%)
Tetsuya 25 2017 27 19 (70.4%) 21 8 17 (63.0%)
You 26 2019 62 20 (32.3%) 14 5 30 (48.4%)
a

The bleeding occurred in the common hepatic artery (CHA).

b

Days from postoperative to intervention.

c

Number of patients who eventually died.

d

Number of patients treated with micro coils.

Then, we analyzed the pathogenesis of this case, which may be related to laparoscopic instrument operation. Especially, the dissociation of vessels and dissection of the lymph nodes caused excessive skeletonization, and then the Hem‐o‐lock ligation damaged the arterial wall, which may lead to the formation of the pseudoaneurysm in the stump of the ligated artery.

In this case, intraperitoneal hemorrhage occurred after surgery, and the measured drainage liquid amylase was 1480 μ/L; thus, it was considered that the digestive fluid leak caused by the pancreatic fistula, corroded the blood vessels and eventually led to bleeding. After conservative treatment, there is a possibility of hemodynamic instability that would require emergency DSA examination; the formation of a pseudoaneurysm of the CHA and arterial embolism are also considered. Microcoil was chosen given the hemodynamic instability of the patient; while the liver has a double blood supply, a simple embolism is not likely to cause liver ischemia necrosis. Microcoil and histoacryl embolization were chosen given.

A recent meta‐analysis revealed that endovascular treatment of a ruptured pseudoaneurysm had low mortality and morbidity and high success rate than surgical intervention. 11 , 12 Endovascular treatment is considered the first choice in the treatment of pseudoaneurysm recently. Endovascular treatment consists of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) and stent‐graft placement. Coil embolization as a TAE is an effective approach for the treatment of a pseudoaneurysm. 13 , 14

In this case, we summarized several experiences for the iatrogenic traumatic pseudoaneurysm. Based on these experiences, we give some possible suggestions on how to avoid and reduce this complication. First, excessive skeletonization of the blood vessels should be avoided, which leads to the injury of the endangium. In addition, when dealing with the stump of the gastroduodenal artery, the lymph node should be proper to avert excessive skeletonization. Second, compression, avulsion, clamping, or stretching of the skeletonization vessels in the laparoscopic operation increases the risk of bleeding and may cause injury of the endangium. Therefore, accurate vascular localization is the key to a successful operation, and improper operation should be avoided especially when ligating the arteries. Third, when using the Hem‐o‐lock to ligate the artery, it should be closed slowly, which avoids the shearing action to vessels in the closure process, and damage to the arterial stump. Finally, the vessels and lymph nodes should be skeletonized with laparoscopic instruments by blunt dissection. According to our experience, the skeletonization of the blood vessels tends to be covered with an omental flap to prevent hemorrhage after the PD. Several studies 15 , 16 revealed that the omental flap or falciform ligament placement over a skeletonization of blood vessels could be an effective measure for the prevention of pseudoaneurysm formation after PD.

In conclusion, this case demonstrated the successful experience for the treatment of delayed PPH by TAE. Endovascular treatment is the first choice for the diagnosis and treatment of a ruptured pseudoaneurysm after PD. Although a stent‐graft placement is considered a first‐line treatment in the endovascular treatment, coil embolization is a reliable, safe, and effective method particularly when unstable hemodynamics of the patient was observed. In a word, when making the treatment plan, the patient's condition, presentation, and clinical history should be taken into consideration.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Lifeng Xu collect all the article data and is responsible for writing the full text. Guosheng Gu participated in the writing of the article and the modification of the article format. Yongxiang Li provided the ideas for the research and all the funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81874063) and Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2008085QH408). Key research and development projects in Jiangsu Province (BE2021727).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

CONSENT

The author has obtained the patient’s handwritten informed consent. All authors agree to publish the paper. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this report in accordance with the journal's patient consent policy.

Supporting information

Video S1

Video S2

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Thanks to Xin Xu, Youliang Wu for guiding the format modification and submission of the magazine.

Xu L, Gu G, Li Y. Transcatheter arterial embolization of the common hepatic artery for pseudoaneurysm after a laparoscopic‐assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: A case report. Clin Case Rep. 2023;11:e06121. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.6121

Contributor Information

Guosheng Gu, Email: guguoshengde@163.com.

Yongxiang Li, Email: liyongxiang@ahmu.edu.cn.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data sets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Yoon YS, Kim SW, Her KH, et al. Management of postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;50(54):2208‐2212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Min W, Peng B, Liu J, et al. Practice patterns and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in China: a retrospective multicenter analysis of 1029 patients. Ann Surg. 2021;273(1):145‐153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sowmya N, Martin AN, Turrentine FE, et al. Mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: assessing early and late causes of patient death. J Surg Res. 2018;231:304‐308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Izumo W, Higuchi R, Yazawa T, Uemura S, Shiihara M, Yamamoto M. Evaluation of preoperative risk factors for post pancreatectomy hemorrhage. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019;404(8):967‐974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Uggeri F, Nespoli L, Sandini M, et al. Analysis of risk factors for hemorrhage and related outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy in an intermediate‐volume center. Updates Surg. 2019;71(4):659‐667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wellner UF, Kulemann B, Lapshyn H, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage‐incidence, treatment, and risk factors in over 1,000 pancreatic resections. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(3):464‐475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Wente M. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery. 2007;142:761‐768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Tessier DJ, Fowl RJ, Stone WM, et al. Iatrogenic hepatic artery pseudoaneurysms: an uncommon complication after hepatic, biliary, and pancreatic procedures. Ann Vasc Surg. 2003;17(6):663‐669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Puppala S, Patel J, Mcpherson S, et al. Hemorrhagic complications after Whipple surgery: imaging and radiologic intervention. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(1):192‐197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Massimo Venturini M, Marra P, Colombo M, et al. Endovascular treatment of visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms in 100 patients: covered stenting vs transcatheter embolization. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24(5):709‐717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Limongelli P, Khorsandi SE, Pai M, et al. Management of delayed postoperative hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta‐analysis. Arch Surg. 2008;143(10):1001‐1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Adam G, Tas S, Cinar C, et al. Endovascular treatment of delayed hemorrhage developing after the pancreaticoduodenectomy procedure. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2014;126(13–14):416‐421. doi: 10.1007/s00508-014-0557-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Reber PU. Superselective microcoil embolization: treatment of choice in high‐risk patients with extrahepatic pseudoaneurysms of the hepatic arteries. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;186:325‐330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Otah E. Visceral artery pseudoaneurysms following pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg. 2002;137(1):55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ray S, Sanyal S, Ghatak S, et al. Falciform ligament flap for the protection of the gastroduodenal artery stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single center experience. J Visc Surg. 2016;153(1):9‐13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Matsuda H, Sadamori H, Umeda Y, et al. Preventive effect of omental flap in pancreaticoduodenectomy against postoperative pseudoaneurysm formation. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;59(114):578‐583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Cui L, Kong L, Bai YH, et al. Covered stent placement for hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45(10):3337‐3341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ding X, Zhu J, Zhu M, et al. Therapeutic management of hemorrhage from visceral artery pseudoaneurysms after pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(8):1417‐1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Gwon DI, Ko GY, Sung KB, Shin JH, Kim JH, Yoon HK. Endovascular management of extrahepatic artery hemorrhage after pancreatobiliary surgery: clinical features and outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization and stent‐graft placement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(5):W627‐W634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Habib JR, Gao S, Young AJ, et al. Incidence and contemporary management of delayed bleeding following pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2022;46(5):1161‐1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hasegawa T, Ota H, Matsuura T, et al. Endovascular treatment of hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors associated with mortality and complications. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(1):50‐59 e55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hwang K, Lee JH, Hwang DW, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of endovascular treatment of latent pseudoaneurysmal bleeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2020;90(12):E148‐E153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Lee HG, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW. Management of bleeding from pseudoaneurysms following pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(10):1239‐1244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lee JH, Hwang DW, Lee SY, et al. Clinical features and management of pseudoaneurysmal bleeding after pancreatoduodenectomy. Am Surg. 2012;78(3):309‐317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Tajima Y, Kuroki T, Tsutsumi R, Sakamoto I, Uetani M, Kanematsu T. Extrahepatic collaterals and liver damage in embolotherapy for ruptured hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm following hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(3):408‐413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. You Y, Choi SH, Choi DW, et al. Long‐term clinical outcomes after endovascular management of ruptured pseudoaneurysm in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019;96(5):237‐249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Video S1

Video S2

Data Availability Statement

The data sets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Clinical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES