Abstract
Cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) is a revolutionary technique for resolving the structure of subcellular organelles and macromolecular complexes in their cellular context. However, the application of the cryo-ET is hampered by the sample preparation step. Performing cryo-focused ion beam milling at an arbitrary position on the sample is inefficient, and the target of interest is not guaranteed to be preserved when thinning the cell from several micrometers to less than 300 nm thick. Here, we report a cryogenic correlated light, ion and electron microscopy (cryo-CLIEM) technique that is capable of preparing cryo-lamellae under the guidance of three-dimensional confocal imaging. Moreover, we demonstrate a workflow to preselect and preserve nanoscale target regions inside the finished cryo-lamellae. By successfully preparing cryo-lamellae that contain a single centriole or contact sites between subcellular organelles, we show that this approach is generally applicable, and shall help in innovating more applications of cryo-ET.
Subject terms: Cryoelectron tomography, Fluorescence imaging
Cryogenic correlated light, ion and electron microscopy (cryo-CLIEM) integrates three-dimensional confocal microscopy with focused ion beam–scanning electron microscopy for efficient preparation of lamellae containing target structures for in situ structural biology with cryo-electron tomography.
Main
Observing cellular events in their native state is a direct and important way to ultimately understand how life works. Cryo-ET1 is currently the principal technique for investigating the detailed structural biology of subcellular organelles and macromolecular complexes in situ2–6. However, the imaging depth of cryo-ET is restricted to a few hundred nanometers due to the limited penetration depth of electrons7. For high-resolution imaging, the sample thickness must be less than the inelastic mean free path of the electrons, which is approximately 300 nm in vitrified samples for the most widely used transmission electron microscopes (TEMs)8. Therefore, to investigate thicker samples, such as eukaryotic cells, thinning the specimen to lamellae in the thickness of roughly 200 nm or less is necessary.
Cryogenic-focused ion beam (cryo-FIB) milling is a recently developed method for preparing lamellae from vitrified biological samples for cryo-ET9–12. This technique avoids artifacts such as distortions, crevasses or compression when cryo-lamellae are prepared using traditional ultramicrotomy13,14. A big limitation of conventional FIB milling is the inability to determine the microfabrication region, and this is because both the FIB and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images only deliver the surface view of the sample, without providing further information for recognition and localization of targets of interest (TOIs) buried underneath before milling. Therefore, this approach is only suitable for preparing lamellae of abundant cellular structures that are highly likely to be preserved when milled at an arbitrary position. For dispersed targets, fabricating thin lamellae while preserving the TOI is very challenging.
Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM)15–18 has been developed to combine the specific labeling power of fluorescence microscopy (FM) with the high spatial resolution of electron microscopy (EM), allowing the identification and localization of fluorescently labeled biological events on the TEM images19–24 and SEM images25. Recently, FM has been combined with dual-beam FIB–SEM systems to locate the fluorescent TOI on the FIB image, which facilitates the FIB microfabrication of cryo-lamellae at specific sites26–30. In a conventional pipelined approach, in which FM and FIB–SEM are conducted successively in separated instruments26, it is necessary to transfer samples among microscopes and intermediate cryo-workstations. This makes the workflow time consuming and introduces risks of sample devitrification and ice contamination. A recently reported integrated FM and FIB–SEM system has demonstrated the capability to perform FM-guided FIB milling in the same vacuum chamber27. This integrated approach simplifies the operation of the CLEM experiment, and enables real-time FM inspection of the sample without the need to transfer the sample between FM and FIB–SEM. To date, most integrated FM–FIB–SEM systems, including commercially available systems such as integrative fluorescence light microscopy (Thermo Fisher Scientific)28 and METEOR (Delmic)29, mainly use widefield microscopy for fluorescence imaging and use fiducial markers to register the FM and FIB images. However, the lack of the axial information in these integrated FM–FIB–SEM systems hinders the precise three-dimensional (3D) localization of both the TOIs and fiducials, making it challenging to perform accurate FIB milling of small subcellular structures. Moreover, fiducial-based image registration requires enormous effort and complicated algorithms for fiducial recognition and/or selection and coordinate transformation26,31,32. The concentration and the distribution of the fiducials also need to be carefully controlled to deliver repeatable and accurate correlation results, and these steps add more complexity to the experiment.
In this Article, we report a new cryogenic correlated light, ion and EM (cryo-CLIEM) system that incorporates a 3D multicolor confocal microscope into a dual-beam FIB–SEM system. In addition, we developed a dedicated workflow to prepare cryo-lamellae that contain specific TOIs under the guidance of light microscopy (LM). Our approach features several advantages over existing solutions, including the following: (1) integrated confocal microscopy with a high numerical aperture (NA) (up to 0.9) objective provides images of whole cells with abundant subcellular information in 3D, allowing the on-site precise localization, preselection and preservation of TOI inside of the finished cryo-lamellae; (2) CLIEM uses an FIB-etched benchmark instead of conventional fiducial markers to correlate the LM and FIB images, and this technique simplifies the sample preparation and delivers high reproducibility; (3) the 3D confocal image is projected to a two-dimensional (2D) image along the FIB milling angle, and the projected image, named ‘LM via FIB’, is directly paired with the FIB image and is used to guide the FIB milling. This new image registration principle is far more efficient compared to the conventional fiducial-based coordinate transformation; (4) the high-resolution LM image of the prepared cryo-lamellae could be used to navigate cryo-ET data collection. Moreover, by correlating the fluorescence signal with the tomographic reconstruction, CLIEM also provides insightful information for the identification and localization of specific structures in the cryo-ET data analysis; and (5) the flexible optical and mechanical design of the integrated confocal microscope can be extended to a wide range of commercial FIB–SEM systems as an add-on module, and we have also proved the compatibility of our confocal module with FIB–SEM instruments from Zeiss and Thermo Fisher Scientific by 3D modeling. Using all these advances, we demonstrated the applications of CLIEM by investigating lipid droplet (LD)–mitochondria interactions, mitochondria-endoplasmic reticulum contact (MERC) and the microtubule-organizing center of mammalian cells in CLIEM-prepared cryo-lamellae using cryo-ET, which are all challenging tasks to perform with conventional cellular tomography.
Results
Design and implementation of CLIEM
We integrated a custom-built confocal microscope into a commercial dual-beam FIB–SEM system (Tescan S8000G) (Fig. 1, Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2 and Supplementary Video 1). The confocal scanning arm was mounted on an additional panel that was attached to the front door of the FIB–SEM, without the need of modifying the mechanical constructions of the original door. The confocal detecting arm and the laser combiner were outsourced onto a separate optical table to reduce the weight added to the suspended system. These two units were connected to the confocal scanning arm via optical fibers, which did not hinder the opening of the chamber door. An optical window was embedded in a vacuum flange and was mounted in an existing port of the vacuum chamber to allow light to pass through. The objective was installed vertically in the vacuum chamber on a piezo-stage for fine focusing and z-scanning. This arrangement prevented the objective from interfering with other modules and reduced the risk of objective contamination from platinum (Pt) coating or FIB milling. The objective did not require retraction or calibration during operation, which simplified the experiment and increased the system stability. The confocal microscope was equipped with customized six excitation lasers and three parallel detection channels for multicolor imaging. In addition to fluorescence imaging, we also established simultaneous bright-field imaging that was based on the back-reflected light to capture the surface profile of the sample. With this setup, we were able to use off-the-shelf high NA objectives to image vitrified biological samples on EM grids with a high optical quality (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 1). Confocal imaging also enabled the magnification to be flexibly adjusted and delivered a maximum field of view (FOV) of 145 × 145 μm (Supplementary Fig. 3e). To transfer cryogenic samples, we exploited a standard TEM multispecimen cryo-holder (Gatan 910) and developed a special mechanical interface to load/unload the sample onto/from the cryostage (Supplementary Fig. 4, Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Video 2). We modified the Gatan holder to accommodate three AutoGrid samples (Fig. 1d) and minimized the working distance of LM imaging to 1 mm by proper mechanical design (Fig. 1e).
In a CLIEM experiment, the sample was shifted among the following working positions: sample loading position, LM position and FIB–SEM position (Fig. 1a,c and Supplementary Video 1). In the sample loading and LM positions, the specimen lay horizontally, whereas during FIB milling, the stage was tilted to deliver a lower milling angle. Slots were carved on the sample holder to allow the FIB beam to pass through (Supplementary Fig. 4a,b), which enabled the milling on all the three AutoGrids. The LM and FIB–SEM positions were programmatically coupled so that the same TOI could be maintained within the FOV after the position was switched, allowing the fluorescence to be instantly checked during FIB milling. The FIB–SEM system was controlled by the original Tescan Essence software, and C++-based software was developed to control the stage movement and acquire LM images.
Workflow of CLIEM
Instead of fiducial-based coordinate transformation, we established a more efficient method to register the LM and FIB images (Fig. 2a). To establish a registration benchmark, we etched a cross-shaped reference pattern (RP) beside the TOI (typically on the grid bar), which took roughly 1 min to perform. After acquiring confocal images of the interested region, we projected the reconstructed 3D image onto a 2D plane along the direction of FIB milling (Methods), which was termed ‘LM via FIB’. The LM via FIB image could be easily correlated to the FIB image based on the position of the RP, thereby transforming the complicated registration between a 3D LM image and a 2D FIB image that were taken from different angles into a straightforward 2D correlation from the same view.
Based on these innovations, we developed a dedicated workflow to perform LM-guided FIB milling of vitrified samples using CLIEM. To demonstrate the work procedure, we froze roughly 10 nm sized quantum dots (QDs) in ice on the EM grid to simulate the TOIs and tried to prepare cryo-lamellae while preserving single QDs. First, the sample was screened by SEM and confocal imaging, and an appropriate milling region containing the QDs was selected. Then, the sample was sputter-coated with Pt using a gas injection system (GIS) to form a protective layer on the surface, and the RP was etched beside the selected region. Afterward, 3D confocal images of this region were acquired. On the projected LM via FIB image, we measured the distance between a selected QD (as the TOI) and the center of the RP (for pixel size calibration, see Supplementary Note 1). Using the measured distance, we located the QD on the FIB image with respect to the same RP (Fig. 2b(i)). This method for target localization did not require the LM and FIB images to be superimposed, which simplified the correlation process. The localization precision in this step was determined by the pixel sizes of the two imaging modalities, as well as the accuracy of the manual selection of the TOI and RP center positions. Typically, we used an FOV of 84 × 84 μm to cover both the TOI and the RP and acquired LM and FIB images with 1,536 × 1,536 pixels, yielding a pixel size of 54 nm in both imaging modalities. The error of manual position selection was typically 2–4 pixels, resulting in an overall localization precision of approximately 200 nm.
The localization precision only describes how precisely a TOI can be located on the FIB image. To accurately mill the TOI, mechanical sample drift must be considered. In our system, the sample drift was typically around 100 nm min−1 along the milling direction, resulting in an approximately 50–600 nm drift during milling processes, which took approximately 0.5–6 min to perform. To mill the TOI with a high accuracy, we introduced an FM-guided milling process in two steps. In the first step (Fig. 2b(ii)), a prelamella of roughly 1.3 μm thick was fabricated at the determined position after image registration. This prelamella tolerated the moderate registration precision as well as the relatively large sample drift (approximately 600 nm) during the coarse milling process (that took approximately 6 min to finish), guaranteeing the presence of the QD in the prelamella. In the second step (Fig. 2b(iii)), the prelamella was imaged by the LM again and the position of the QD to the lamella boundaries was determined (Supplementary Fig. 5). This position guided us to precisely trim from the upper and lower sides of the prelamella, leaving a final lamella of roughly 150 nm thick containing the QD, which was confirmed by the LM inspection of the prepared lamella.
In situ cryo-ET of subcellular organelle contact sites
Organelles physically interact with each other through membrane contact sites to coordinate the physiological activity of the cells33. Interorganelle membrane contacts are organized by tethers, which mainly consist of proteins to bridge the two organellar membranes33. Cryo-ET has been used to investigate the morphologies of the interfaces between organelles in situ34. By using CLIEM, we successfully prepared cryo-lamellae containing these contact sites with high efficiency, and we observed multiple tethering structures at high resolution between LDs and mitochondria, as well as in MERC.
LDs are highly dynamic organelles that store lipids in cells. Accumulating studies have shown that the interactions between LDs and mitochondria are essential in lipid metabolism and energy homeostasis35. EM has been a gold standard in resolving the LD–mitochondria contact that is in a typical range of less than 30 nm. Because LDs are relatively rare under normal physiological conditions, it is challenging to locate the contact sites with EM. We established a fluorescent reporter of LD–mitochondria contact by attaching the split fragments of superfolder green fluorescent protein (GFP) to the LD and the mitochondria outer membrane. The two fragments reconstituted into a complete GFP and became fluorescent when LDs and mitochondria came in close proximity, thus enabling the visualization of LD–mitochondria contact in LM36 (Supplementary Fig. 6).
To preview the lamellae contents, we computationally generated ‘virtual lamellae’ from the 3D confocal image at various milling positions (Fig. 3a–d and Supplementary Video 3). We chose the optimal milling position in which the signal of the contact sites was clearly visible (Fig. 3c), and we prepared the lamella at this position (Fig. 3e). The LM image of the prepared lamella (Fig. 3f) was consistent with the LM image of the corresponding virtual lamella (Fig. 3c), proving the validity of this approach. In addition, the LM image of the prepared lamella helped us to identify the TOI on the TEM image (Fig. 3g) by superimposing these two images (Fig. 3h), which facilitated the cryo-ET data collection. After tomographic reconstruction, the LDs and mitochondria were identified and their contact sites were resolved (Fig. 3i,j and Supplementary Video 4). At most contact sites, we observed tethering structures that connected the LDs and the mitochondria (Fig. 3k and Extended Data Fig. 1). Furthermore, we correlated the LM image of the cryo-lamella with the tomogram and found that the fluorescence signal consistently overlapped with the expected structures (Fig. 3l). This result indicated that confocal images could also be used to assist in the identification and segmentation of specific structures in the cryo-ET data.
Using the same method as that used for the LD–mitochondria experiments, we investigated the MERC as well to demonstrate the general applicability of CLIEM. MERC is the best characterized interorganelle membrane contact and functions as a central hub for a variety of biological processes, such as exchange of lipids and calcium, and mitochondria fission and fusion33. By establishing a fluorescent reporter of the MERC using split-GFP36 (Supplementary Fig. 7), we visualized the MERC in HepG2 cells in LM and prepared lamellae containing MERC. Using cryo-ET, we resolved MERC and observed the tethering structures between the endoplasmic reticulum and the mitochondrial outer membrane as well (Extended Data Fig. 2).
In situ cryo-ET of centrosomes in HeLa cells
The centrosome is an microtubule-organizing center that is present in most animal cells. It plays a crucial role in cell division, polarity regulation, signaling and various other biological processes37. The centrosome consists of a pair of centrioles that are surrounded by pericentriolar material. Normally, each cell maintains only one or two centrosomes in different phases of the cell cycle. Therefore, it has been challenging to investigate the in situ structure of the centrosome by cryo-ET. To target the centrosome, we used genetically modified HeLa cells that expressed mCherry-labeled pericentrin38, which is located in the pericentriolar material region of the centrosome. In LM, the centrosomes appeared as diffraction-limited spots (Fig. 4a), which could be easily located on the FIB image after registration (Fig. 4b). Using the two-step milling workflow, as described previously, we successfully prepared cryo-lamellae that contained a single centrosome (Fig. 4c), and its position was conveniently located on the TEM image (Fig. 4d) using the fluorescence signal.
After the tomographic reconstruction was performed, we observed a centriole that was surrounded by abundant cellular structures in the native state and resolved the classic ninefold symmetrical arrangement of microtubule triplets (MTTs) (Fig. 4e). From the projected cross-section of the centriole (Fig. 4g), we observed a ring structure, which had a diameter of approximately 100 nm and 27 evenly distributed density nodes on the ring. These density nodes displayed rod-like shapes with a diameter of approximately 7 nm and a length of approximately 25 nm (Fig. 4h and Supplementary Video 5), which were similar to the densities identified in a previous study39; however, the functions of these shapes were not clear. Furthermore, using a subtomogram averaging40 approach, we determined the polarity of each surrounding microtubule and confirmed that, as expected, most of the microtubules were grown out from the centriole41 (Fig. 4f and Supplementary Video 5).
Discussion
In summary, we have developed an integrated CLIEM system and a dedicated workflow to prepare cryo-lamellae of vitrified biological samples containing specific TOIs for in situ cryo-ET. Our approach features high accuracy and high efficiency and is easy to use. We demonstrated that CLIEM can not only determine the optimal milling position, such as organelle contact sites, but is also capable of targeting and preparing cryo-lamellae of rare biological structures or events, such as centrosomes. Furthermore, we showed that the LM image of the prepared lamella can assist in locating the TOI in TEM and provide complementary information about the species and locations of specific biomolecules in the tomogram.
Our approach of integrating a confocal microscope into an FIB–SEM as an add-on module is generally applicable to a wide range of commercial FIB–SEM systems. Our design does not require that the objective has a particular orientation or installation position, which makes the integration flexible in the crowded vacuum chamber. The LM module can be further improved in several aspects to increase the performance and extend the functionalities. (1) The confocal detectors can be upgraded from photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) to avalanche photodiodes or hybrid detectors to achieve a higher detection sensitivity42. (2) Confocal imaging can be modified to Airyscan43 or stimulated emission depletion44 imaging to further improve the optical resolution. (3) Single molecule localization microscopy45 can be added to CLIEM to provide versatile imaging capabilities, allowing specific molecules to be localized in a cryo-tomogram46.
CLIEM introduces a new efficient way of performing LM-guided FIB milling due to its multicolor 3D imaging capability and integrated design: (1) as the benchmark for image registration, FIB-etched RP can completely replace the fiducial markers that are randomly added to the sample before vitrification47. (2) The registration principle based on ‘LM via FIB’ projection and direct distance measurement circumvents the conventional time-consuming procedure and complicated algorithms using coordinate transformation26,31,32. This new registration process can be accomplished using the ready-to-use plugin (Volume Viewer) in open-source software (Fiji48) with minimal effort, and it can be adapted by other existing CLEM workflows to improve their performances. (3) CLIEM allows for an instant FM inspection of the prepared cryo-lamellae before sending them to the TEM, which increases the efficiency of cryo-ET experiments. (4) Besides high efficiency, CLIEM also delivers high success rate of targeted-FIB milling. We prepared in total 42 cryo-lamellae of biological samples in this work, and 40 of them contained the desired feature (Extended Data Fig. 3), which resulted in an overall success rate of 95% (Supplementary Table 2). For the MERC and centrosome experiments, 100% prepared lamellae contained the desired targets.
We also demonstrated that the high-resolution LM image of the final lamella was of great use for cryo-ET experiments. By correlating the LM and TEM images of the final lamella, it became straightforward and convenient to locate the desired targets in the crowded and low-contrast TEM image. This is particularly useful when investigating targets that are not clearly visible in a low magnification TEM image, such as protein complexes or phase separations. In the future, the relatively slow manual correlation between LM and TEM images can be automated by developing corresponding image processing software for more efficient and convenient operation.
CLIEM can be applied to a wide range of biological systems. Our method brings new insights into the organization of interorganelle membrane contacts. In the future, CLIEM could be used to perform the structural analysis of tethering proteins in situ at high resolution, hence promoting the understanding of interorganelle membrane contacts under physiological and pathological conditions. For point-like TOIs, the position of which can be determined by finding the maxima of its point spread function with high precision49, as demonstrated in the QD and centrosome experiments in this work. Therefore, CLIEM could also benefit the in situ investigation of cellular ultrastructures such as viruses, small vesicles and protein complexes.
CLIEM adopts a standard TEM cryo-holder to transfer cryogenic samples manually. In the future, developing a dedicated autoloader for CLIEM that is compatible with cryo-TEM could benefit this method and improve the user experience and working efficiency. And the introduction of super-resolution FM could further improve the performance of CLIEM. In conclusion, CLIEM has the potential to serve as an all-in-one solution for cryo-ET sample preparation and promote the developments of in situ structural biology50.
Methods
Integrating confocal microscopy into an FIB–SEM system
Mechanical design of CLIEM was performed using SolidWorks software (2019, Dassault Systems), and optical design of the integrated confocal microscope was performed using Zemax OpticStudio software (16.5 SP5, Zemax) (Supplementary Fig. 2a,b). Off-axis parabolic mirrors were used as relay optics between two galvo scanners to prevent pupil drifting without introducing chromatic aberrations51,52. Since the design parameters of commercial objectives were difficult to acquire, a paraxial lens with a corresponding focal lens was used to simulate the objective.
Design details are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2c. The integrated confocal microscope was composed of a custom-developed laser combiner, a confocal scanning arm, a confocal detecting arm and an objective module inside the vacuum chamber. The laser light from a multiwavelength laser combiner (405, 488, 532, 561, 638 nm) was directed through a single-mode fiber into the scanning arm that was attached to the FIB–SEM chamber door. The laser light was collimated by a collimator (CL1) and reflected by a dichroic mirror (DM1), scanned horizontally and vertically by two galvo scanners (GS1, GS2) and then relayed by a scan lens and a tube lens. The scanned illuminating beam passed through an optical window and reached the objective mounted within the vacuum chamber. The commercially available dry objective was mounted on a vacuum compatible piezo-stage, enabling 3D confocal imaging in the FIB–SEM chamber. To accommodate the limited traveling range of the sample stage, the optical path was folded by M1, M2 and M3 so that the sample could be moved to the area under the objective. The light emitted from the sample followed the same pathway as the exciting light, passed through DM1 and was focused by a collecting lens (CL2) before being passed through a pinhole, the size of which could be adjusted to optimize the resolution and light efficiency. After that, the reflected light and fluorescent light were coupled into a multimode fiber and entered the detecting arm. The detecting arm comprised three PMTs (PMT1, PMT2 and PMT2), two dichroic mirrors (DM2, DM3) and three emission filters (EM1, EM2 and EM3) dependent on the imaging channels. A bright-field imaging channel that used the reflected light from the sample and two fluorescent channels were used to precisely register the LM image and FIB image. To accommodate various imaging modes, the dichroic mirrors and emission filters could be switched as desired.
Sample preparation
QD
QDs (QD625, NajingTech) were diluted at 1,000× in distilled water. Then 14 µl of QD solution was added onto 200 mesh copper EM grids (BZ10022F1, Beijing Zhongjingkeyi Technology Co., Ltd) for vitrification.
LD–mitochondria
HepG2 cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco, catalog no. c11995500BT) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, catalog no. 16000-044) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (HyClone, catalog no. 30010). A GFP1-10 sequence was inserted into the N terminal of human PLIN2. The resulting GFP1-10-Plin2 was then inserted into a pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-Puro vector. The N terminal of human TOM20 (1-33 aa) was used as a mitochondria targeting sequence. Mito-GFP11 was inserted into a pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-Puro vector. Lentivirus was packaged as previously described53. Wildtype HepG2 cells were infected by lentiviruses to stably express mito-GFP11 and GFP1-10-Plin2. The LD–mitochondria contact reporter cells were selected and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 2 μg ml−1 puromycin. Then, the cells were grown on lacey 200 mesh gold EM grids (T10012Au, Beijing XXBR Technology Co., Ltd) overnight to promote adherence and spreading. Mitochondria were stained with 1 μM MitoTracker Deep Red (M22426, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37 °C for 30 min. For the validation of the LD–mitochondria contact reporter, LDs were stained with HCS LipidTox red (H34476, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a dilution of 1:1,000 at 37 °C for 30 min.
MERC
HepG2 cells were cultured and seeded onto EM grids as described above. To generate the MERC reporter, human SEC61B sequence was used as endoplasmic reticulum membrane targeting sequence. GFP1-10-Sec61b sequence was then inserted into a pCDH-CMV-MCS-EF1-Puro vector. Wildtype HepG2 cells were infected by lentiviruses to stably express mito-GFP11 and GFP1-10-Sec61b. The MERC reporter cells were selected and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 2 μg ml−1 puromycin. Mitochondria were stained with 1 μM MitoTracker Deep Red (M22426, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37 °C for 30 min. For the validation of the MERC, the cells were transiently transfected with ER-DsRed for endoplasmic reticulum labeling54.
Centrosome
HeLa cells that expressed mCherry in pericentrin were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. The cells were seeded onto the lacey 200 mesh gold EM grids as described above.
The EM grids used in all experiments were plasma-cleaned in Gatan Solarus (950, Gatan) for 90 s before use. The grids used for cell experiments were subsequently sterilized under ultraviolet light for 30 min.
Sample vitrification
All the samples were plunge-frozen into liquid ethane using a Leica EM GP2 automatic plunge-freezer. Cryogen temperature was set to −183 °C, and the chamber temperature was set to 37 °C with 85% humidity. Grids were blotted from the backside using Whatman Type 1 paper for 0.5 and 5 s for the QD experiments and the cell experiments, respectively. The vitrified grids were clipped into AutoGrids (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and mounted onto a multispecimen cryo-holder (Gatan 910) for further sample loading.
LM imaging
LM imaging was performed using the integrated confocal microscope and custom-developed control hardware and software. The synchronization of GS1, GS2, piezo-stage and image acquisition was controlled by an I/O device (PXIe-6341, National Instruments), and the multi-channel signals from PMTs were acquired using a DAQ device (PXIe-6396, National Instruments) in parallel. Coarse movement of the sample was accomplished by moving the original motorized stage of the FIB–SEM system, while fine focusing and z-scanning were accomplished by moving the objective using the piezo-stage. A commercial objective (MPLFLN ×100/NA 0.9, Olympus) was used for all LM imaging. Depending on the signal intensity and the purpose of the image, different FOV, scanning speeds, stepping sizes and pinhole sizes were chosen during image acquisition. In all bright-field imaging experiments, a 561 nm laser was used for illumination and PMT2 with a neutral density filter (NE01B-A, Thorlabs) was used for detection. For fluorescence imaging, different excitation wavelengths and filter combinations in the detecting arm were applied as follows.
In the QD experiments, a 488 nm laser was used for excitation, and PMT3 with EM3 (ZET405/488/561m, Chroma) was used for fluorescence detection. In the LD–mitochondria and MERC experiments, for imaging the contact sites that were labeled with superfolder GFP, a 488 nm laser was used for excitation and PMT1 with EM1 (ZET405/488m, Chroma) was used for fluorescence detection; for imaging the mitochondria that were labeled with MitoTracker Deep Red, a 638 nm laser was used for excitation and PMT3 with EM3 (ZET405/488/561/640m, Chroma) was used for fluorescence detection. In the centrosome experiments, the 561 nm laser that was used for bright-field imaging was also used for fluorescence excitation and PMT3 with EM3 (ZET405/488/561/640m, Chroma) was used for fluorescence detection.
LM image processing
Image projection and distance measurement
The LM images were projected onto a 2D plane along the FIB milling direction using open-source software Fiji48 (v.1.53f51, Volume Viewer plugin). A Tricubic sharp interpolation algorithm in the Volume Viewer plugin was applied on the projected image to generate cubic voxels. On the produced ‘LM via FIB’ images, the distance between the center of RP and the center of TOI was measured in pixels and converted into distance through pixel calibration (Supplementary Note 1).
Virtual lamellae generation
Virtual lamellae images were generated using Fiji’s Volume Viewer plugin as well. First, the 3D LM images were rotated perpendicular to the FIB angle, and Slice Mode was selected for the display window. Then, by adjusting the distance of the slice, a virtual lamella at the corresponding position was generated.
Image deconvolution
For displaying purposes of the LM images used in this paper, LM images were deconvoluted using the Huygens software (v.20.04, Scientific Volume Imaging). Templates were selected according to the imaging parameters and signal-to-noise ratio to improve the resolution and contrast without introducing artifacts.
Pt coating and FIB milling
The EM grids were coated with a 2–3 μm thick layer of Pt using GIS, which formed a protective layer on the surface to avoid lamellae damage during FIB milling. The coating was applied for 1–2 min at a GIS temperature of 30 °C, and the sample was placed 2 mm below the FIB–SEM coincidence point during coating.
FIB milling was conducted using various beam currents ranging from 10 to 500 pA. In particular, 500 pA was used to etch RPs and to perform coarse milling, 150 and 50 pA were used for fine milling and 10 pA was used for final polishing. The stage was tilted by 17° during milling, resulting in a milling angle of 18° between the FIB and the sample. Micro-expansion joints55 were applied for cell lamellae to release the internal tension and decrease lamellae bending or crack.
Cryo-ET data collection
All cryo-ET data were acquired on a Titan Krios cryo-TEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a BioQuantum energy filter and a K2 Summit Direct electron detector (Gatan). The TEM was operated at 300 kV in low-dose mode in all experiments, and tilt series data were collected unidirectionally using SerialEM v.3.8 software56. Detailed parameters of data acquisition are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Registration of cryo-LM and cryo-TEM images
The cryo-LM and cryo-TEM images were first scaled to the same magnification in accordance with the pixel size of each imaging modality. The scaled images were then manually registered according to the edge information of the lamella in the bright-field channel of the LM image and the TEM image. Registration only involved rotation and translation without introducing nonrigid deformations.
Cryo-ET reconstruction
All tilt series frames were motion-corrected using Motioncor2 (ref. 57) software. The produced tilt series was aligned with the patch-tracking method and back projected to obtain the tomogram in the IMOD v.4.11.0 software package58. For segmentation, tomograms were rescaled with a binning factor of four. A deconvolution filter was applied on the tomogram to improve the contrast59.
Segmentation and visualization
LD–mitochondria
The lipid membrane and mitochondrial outer membrane were manually segmented and polished using Imaris software (v.9.8.0, Oxford Instruments). The segmentations were rendered and displayed using Imaris as well.
Centrosome
For the centriole, MTTs were manually traced with B-tubules centered using IMOD. Subtomograms were extracted along each triplet with a spacing of 4 nm using the RELION60 helix toolbox, resulting in 339 subtomograms in total. Subtomogram averaging was performed with RELION v.2.1 (ref. 61).
A total of 111 microtubules were automatically traced with Amira62 followed by manual polishing. To prevent the effect of missing wedges, we applied helical symmetry during subtomogram averaging. As most microtubules contain 13 protofilaments63, we assumed the rise and twist to be 9.23 Å and 27.69°, respectively. Then, 50,580 subtomograms were then cropped with Dynamo v.1.1.532 software64 from bin2 tomograms. The microtubule polarity was determined using a previously published method65. In brief, with Dynamo, two iterations of shift search were applied without any angular search, which was followed by three iterations of the first two Euler angles (phi and theta) search and two iterations of the third Euler angles (psi) search. The shift search range along the microtubule was set to 1 pixel, and the in-plane rotation was limited to 27°. Then, we projected the averaging results along the filament to generate 2D images to determine the polarity.
Membrane segmentation was established with a tensor voting-based method66, followed by manual polishing in Amira. Only transport vesicles were retained for visualization. Segmentations were rendered and displayed with ChimeraX v.1.3 software67.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41592-022-01749-z.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to F. Sun from Institute of Biophysics (IBP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) for providing kind suggestions on our work and generous supports in the system development. We appreciate the help from J. Chen and F. Wang from Peking University on providing the HeLa cells expressing mCherry in centrosome. We thank X. Huang, J. Zhang, B. Zhu and S. Li from the Center for Biological Imaging (CBI), CAS on cryo-ET data collection; P. Wang from IBP and T. Niu from CBI for assisting in the cryo-ET data reconstruction; Y. Teng and Y. Feng from CBI for their help on cryo-ET data segmentation and visualization and L. Liu from CBI for helping with plunge freezing. We also thank P. Liu and X. Zhang from IBP for providing kind suggestions on the interpretation of the LD–mitochondria data; K. He from Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, CAS for providing SUM159 cells stably expressing EGFP-Rab5c; S. Gu from University of Electronic Science and Technology of China for the discussion on image processing of the prelamella. We also recognize the assistance of Q. Wang from IBP in photographing the system. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2021YFA1301500 to W.J.); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 32027901 to T.X. and 92254306 to W.J.); the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (grant no. T2225020 to W.J.); the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2022YFC3400600 to W.J.); the Strategic Priority Research Program of the CAS (grant no. XDB37040104 to W.J.); the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (grant nos. 2013066 to W.J., 2017135 to L.G. and 2021088 to Y.L.); Beijing Nova Program from Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (grant no. Z202003 to L.G.); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 31700743 to L.G., 32170704 to L.G., 32100536 to M.Z., 62105356 to J.L. and 32001075 to Y.L.); the Scientific Instrument Development Project of the CAS (grant no. GJJSTD20210001 to T.X.). This work is also an output of the National Project of Multi-mode, Multi-scale Biomedical Imaging.
Extended data
Author contributions
W.J., T.X., Q.G., W.L. and J.L. designed the experiments. W.J., W.L. and J.L. developed the CLIEM system. X.Z. wrote the control software. X.X. designed and constructed the laser combiner. M.Z. and Y.L. conducted cell culture and labeling. K.X. performed sample vitrification, cryo-lamellae preparation and cryo-ET data collection. W.L., J.L. and K.X. perform LM image processing. W.L. and Z.L. performed the cryo-ET data analysis and image processing. T.X., W.J., Q.G., W.L., J.L., K.X. and L.G. interpreted the results. W.J., T.X., Q.G., W.L. and J.L. wrote the manuscript, which was modified by all other authors.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Methods thanks Matthew Swulius, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Rita Strack, in collaboration with the Nature Methods team. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
The tomographic reconstructions in this work have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Database with the accession codes EMD-33496 (LD–mitochondria) and EMD-33495 (centrosome). Other source data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Code availability
The software for stage control and image acquisition, which is hardware-dependent, is available from the corresponding author upon request.
Competing interests
A CN patent (ZL 201920857325.X) has been issued describing the sample loading module used in this work; W.L., W.J. and T.X. are the coinventors. A CN patent describing the integration of a confocal microscope into an FIB–SEM system has been filed (202110469220.9); T.X., J.L., W.J., W.L., K.X. and X.Z. are the coinventors. A CN patent describing the CLIEM workflow has been filed (202211206312.9); T.X., W.J., W.L., J.L. and K.X. are the coinventors. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Weixing Li, Jing Lu, Ke Xiao, Maoge Zhou.
Contributor Information
Qiang Guo, Email: guo.qiang@pku.edu.cn.
Tao Xu, Email: xutao@ibp.ac.cn.
Wei Ji, Email: jiwei@ibp.ac.cn.
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41592-022-01749-z.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41592-022-01749-z.
References
- 1.Koster AJ, et al. Perspectives of molecular and cellular electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 1997;120:276–308. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1997.3933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mahamid J, Baumeister W. Cryo-electron tomography: the realization of a vision. Microsc. Anal. 2013;26:45–48. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lucic V, Rigort A, Baumeister W. Cryo-electron tomography: the challenge of doing structural biology in situ. J. Cell Biol. 2013;202:407–419. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201304193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Beck M, Baumeister W. Cryo-electron tomography: can it reveal the molecular sociology of cells in atomic detail? Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:825–837. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Oikonomou CM, Jensen GJ. Cellular electron cryotomography: toward structural biology in situ. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017;86:873–896. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Doerr A. Cryo-electron tomography. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:34. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shi SL, et al. Measurement of hydrated and dehydrated cryosections by EELS. Microsc. Res. Tech. 1996;33:241–250. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19960215)33:3<241::AID-JEMT1>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Frank, J. Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies (Oxford Univ. Press, 1996).
- 9.Marko M, et al. Focused-ion-beam thinning of frozen-hydrated biological specimens for cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods. 2007;4:215–217. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Villa E, et al. Opening windows into the cell: focused-ion-beam milling for cryo-electron tomography. Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 2013;23:771–777. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hsieh C, et al. Practical workflow for cryo focused-ion-beam milling of tissues and cells for cryo-TEM tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 2014;185:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schaffer M, et al. Cryo-focused ion beam sample preparation for imaging vitreous cells by cryo-electron tomography. Bio-Protoc. 2015;5:e1575. doi: 10.21769/bioprotoc.1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Al-Amoudi A, Studer D, Dubochet J. Cutting artefacts and cutting process in vitreous sections for cryo-electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 2005;150:109–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Han HM, Zuber B, Dubochet J. Compression and crevasses in vitreous sections under different cutting conditions. J. Microsc. 2008;230:167–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.01972.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sartori A, et al. Correlative microscopy: bridging the gap between fluorescence light microscopy and cryo-electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 2007;160:135–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.de Boer P, Hoogenboom JP, Giepmans BNG. Correlated light and electron microscopy: ultrastructure lights up! Nat. Methods. 2015;12:503–513. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Karreman MA, et al. Intravital correlative microscopy: imaging life at the nanoscale. Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:848–863. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hauser M, et al. Correlative super-resolution microscopy: new dimensions and new opportunities. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:7428–7456. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.van Driel LF, et al. Tools for correlative cryo-fluorescence microscopy 505 and cryo-electron tomography applied to whole mitochondria in human endothelial cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2009;88:669–684. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jun SM, et al. Direct visualization of HIV-1 with correlative live-cell microscopy and cryo-electron tomography. Structure. 2011;19:1573–1581. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schorb M, Briggs JAG. Correlated cryo-fluorescence and cryo-electron microscopy with high spatial precision and improved sensitivity. Ultramicroscopy. 2014;143:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu B, et al. Three-dimensional super-resolution protein localization correlated with vitrified cellular context. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:13017. doi: 10.1038/srep13017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Peddie CJ, et al. Correlative super-resolution fluorescence and electron microscopy using conventional fluorescent proteins in vacuo. J. Struct. Biol. 2017;199:120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li SG, et al. High-vacuum optical platform for cryo-CLEM (HOPE): a new solution for non integrated multiscale correlative light and electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 2018;201:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hoffman DP, et al. Correlative three-dimensional super-resolution and block-face electron microscopy of whole vitreously frozen cells. Science. 2020;367:265. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz5357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Arnold J, et al. Site-specific cryo-focused ion beam sample preparation guided by 3D correlative microscopy. Biophys. J. 2016;110:860–869. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.10.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gorelick S, et al. PIE-scope, integrated cryo-correlative light and FIB/SEM microscopy. eLife. 2019;8:e45919. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kuba J, et al. Advanced cryo-tomography workflow developments—correlative microscopy, milling automation and cryo-lift-out. J. Microsc. 2021;281:112–124. doi: 10.1111/jmi.12939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Smeets M, et al. Integrated cryo-correlative microscopy for targeted structural investigation in situ. Microsc. Today. 2021;29:20–25. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sexton DL, et al. Super-resolution confocal cryo-CLEM with cryo-FIB milling for in situ imaging of Deinococcus radiodurans. Curr. Res. Struct. Biol. 2022;4:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.crstbi.2021.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schellenberger P, et al. High-precision correlative fluorescence and electron cryo microscopy using two independent alignment markers. Ultramicroscopy. 2014;143:41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fukuda Y, et al. Coordinate transformation based cryo-correlative methods for electron tomography and focused ion beam milling. Ultramicroscopy. 2014;143:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Prinz WA, Toulmay A, Balla T. The functional universe of membrane contact sites. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;21:7–24. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0180-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Friedman JR, et al. ER tubules mark sites of mitochondrial division. Science. 2011;334:358–362. doi: 10.1126/science.1207385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Veliova M, et al. The biology of lipid droplet-bound mitochondria. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;108:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Calì T, Brini M. Quantification of organelle contact sites by split-GFP-based contact site sensors (SPLICS) in living cells. Nat. Protoc. 2021;16:5287–5308. doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00614-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bornens M. The centrosome in cells and organisms. Science. 2012;335:422–426. doi: 10.1126/science.1209037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gillingham AK, Munro S. The PACT domain, a conserved centrosomal targeting motif in the coiled-coil proteins AKAP450 and pericentrin. EMBO Rep. 2000;1:524–529. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kvd105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bowler M, et al. High-resolution characterization of centriole distal appendage morphology and dynamics by correlative STORM and electron microscopy. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:993. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08216-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wan W, Briggs JAG. Cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging. Method Enzymol. 2016;579:329–367. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lüders J, Stearns T. Microtubule-organizing centres: a re-evaluation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Bio. 2007;8:161–167. doi: 10.1038/nrm2100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pawley, J. B. Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy (Springer, 2006).
- 43.Huff J, et al. The new 2D Superresolution mode for ZEISS Airyscan. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:1223. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hell SW, Wichmann J. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Opt. Lett. 1994;19:780–782. doi: 10.1364/ol.19.000780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lelek M, et al. Single-molecule localization microscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 2021;1:39. doi: 10.1038/s43586-021-00038-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chang Y-W, et al. Correlated cryogenic photoactivated localization microscopy and cryo- electron tomography. Nat. Methods. 2014;11:737–739. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Van Hest JJHA, et al. Towards robust and versatile single nanoparticle fiducial markers for correlative light and electron microscopy. J. Microsc. 2019;274:13–22. doi: 10.1111/jmi.12778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-591 image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Thompson RE, Larson DR, Webb WW. Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. Biophys. J. 2002;82:2775–2783. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75618-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Strack R. Structures in situ. Nat. Methods. 2020;17:21–21. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0704-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Holdsworth, J. L. et al. Off-axis parabolic optical relays: almost perfect imaging. In Proc. 22nd Congress of the International Commission for Optics (ICO22): Light for the Development of the World (eds Rodríguez-Vera, R. et al.) 8011 (SPIE, 2011).
- 52.Negrean A, Mansvelder HD. Optimal lens design and use in laser-scanning microscopy. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2014;5:1588–1609. doi: 10.1364/BOE.5.001588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Li Z, et al. RNA-binding protein DDX1 is responsible for fatty acid-mediated repression of insulin translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:12052–12066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wang L, et al. WFS1 functions in ER export of vesicular cargo proteins in pancreatic beta cells. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:6996. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27344-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wolff G, et al. Mind the gap: micro-expansion joints drastically decrease the bending of FIB-milled cryo-lamellae. J. Struct. Biol. 2019;208:107389. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2019.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mastronarde DN. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 2005;152:36–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zheng SQ, et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:331–332. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 1996;116:71–76. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tegunov D, Cramer P. Real-time cryo-electron microscopy data preprocessing with Warp. Nat. Methods. 2019;16:1146–1152. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0580-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Scheres SHW. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 2012;180:519–530. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bharat TAM, Scheres SHW. Resolving macromolecular structures from electron cryo-tomography data using subtomogram averaging in RELION. Nat. Protoc. 2016;11:9–20. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rigort A, et al. Automated segmentation of electron tomograms for a quantitative description of actin filament networks. J. Struct. Biol. 2012;177:135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tilney LG, et al. Microtubules: evidence for 13 protofilaments. J. Cell Biol. 1973;59:267–275. doi: 10.1083/jcb.59.2.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Castano-Diez D, et al. Dynamo: a flexible, user-friendly development tool for subtomogram averaging of cryo-EM data in high-performance computing environments. J. Struct. Biol. 2012;178:139–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zhang R, Nogales E. A new protocol to accurately determine microtubule lattice seam location. J. Struct. Biol. 2015;192:245–254. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Martinez-Sanchez A, et al. Robust membrane detection based on tensor voting for electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol. 2014;186:49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2014.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 2021;30:70–82. doi: 10.1002/pro.3943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The tomographic reconstructions in this work have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Database with the accession codes EMD-33496 (LD–mitochondria) and EMD-33495 (centrosome). Other source data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
The software for stage control and image acquisition, which is hardware-dependent, is available from the corresponding author upon request.