Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2023 Jan 9;123(3):1040–1102. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00580

Primary Structure of Glycans by NMR Spectroscopy

Carolina Fontana , Göran Widmalm ‡,*
PMCID: PMC9912281  PMID: 36622423

Abstract

graphic file with name cr2c00580_0047.jpg

Glycans, carbohydrate molecules in the realm of biology, are present as biomedically important glycoconjugates and a characteristic aspect is that their structures in many instances are branched. In determining the primary structure of a glycan, the sugar components including the absolute configuration and ring form, anomeric configuration, linkage(s), sequence, and substituents should be elucidated. Solution state NMR spectroscopy offers a unique opportunity to resolve all these aspects at atomic resolution. During the last two decades, advancement of both NMR experiments and spectrometer hardware have made it possible to unravel carbohydrate structure more efficiently. These developments applicable to glycans include, inter alia, NMR experiments that reduce spectral overlap, use selective excitations, record tilted projections of multidimensional spectra, acquire spectra by multiple receivers, utilize polarization by fast-pulsing techniques, concatenate pulse-sequence modules to acquire several spectra in a single measurement, acquire pure shift correlated spectra devoid of scalar couplings, employ stable isotope labeling to efficiently obtain homo- and/or heteronuclear correlations, as well as those that rely on dipolar cross-correlated interactions for sequential information. Refined computer programs for NMR spin simulation and chemical shift prediction aid the structural elucidation of glycans, which are notorious for their limited spectral dispersion. Hardware developments include cryogenically cold probes and dynamic nuclear polarization techniques, both resulting in enhanced sensitivity as well as ultrahigh field NMR spectrometers with a 1H NMR resonance frequency higher than 1 GHz, thus improving resolution of resonances. Taken together, the developments have made and will in the future make it possible to elucidate carbohydrate structure in great detail, thereby forming the basis for understanding of how glycans interact with other molecules.

1. Introduction

1.1. Glycans in Biology

Glycans are the most abundant biomolecules found in nature and, without any known exception, they are present in all living cells either on their own (as “free” sugars) or, more commonly, covalently attached to other biomolecules to form glycoconjugates. Even though glycoproteins and glycolipids are among the most common glycoconjugates displayed on the cell surface, it has recently been demonstrated that some glycosylated small noncoding RNAs can also be found on the surface of mammalian cells.1 The glycan-containing biomolecules play essential roles in biological systems and are critical for the development and function of multicellular organisms, taking part in a variety of processes that involve interaction of a cell with other cells, molecules, or the environment. Glycans also play major roles in symbiotic relationships or as mediators in host–pathogen interactions, acting either as specific binding sites for viruses, bacteria, and parasites, or as antigen structures that are recognized by the host immune response.2

Except for lactose, structurally complex free oligosaccharides are among the main components of mammalian milk, with more than one hundred different oligosaccharide structures occurring in human breast milk. Because these oligosaccharides are minimally affected or absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract, once they reach the colon they act as prebiotics, conferring protection against pathogenic viruses or bacteria, either by shaping the microbiota of the infant or acting as soluble receptors that emulate the glycans from the gastrointestinal surface.3 The oligosaccharide diversity differs within mammalian species, and novel structures are continued to be reported, such as the sialylated nonasaccharide depicted in Figure 1a that was isolated from Asian elephant milk.4

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of glycan structures using the SNFG format (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/glycans/snfg.html#nomn):5,6 (a) oligosaccharide Em-1-2-19 isolated from Asian elephant milk,4 (b) the repeating unit of the O-antigen polysaccharide from E. coli O187,7 (c) structure of Tannerella forsythia ATCC 43037 S-layer O-glycan,8,9 (d) structure of the highly glycosylated Epstein–Barr virus major envelope glycoprotein gp350 (PDB 2H6O)10 in which the N-glycans are shown using 3D-SNFG symbols,11,12 based on the previously developed 3D-CFG symbols,13 and (e) sialoglycopeptide (SGP) isolated from yolk of hen eggs.14

Besides peptidoglycan, extracellular bacterial polysaccharides15 include lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from gram-negative bacteria,1618 capsular polysaccharides (CPS),19 exopolysaccharides (EPS),20 lipoteichoic acids (LTA),21 wall teichoic acids (WTA),22 and wall polysaccharides (WPS).23 These polymers are considered critical virulence factors because they protect the bacteria from the host immunity and phagocytosis, and promote adherence, colonization, and biofilm formation needed for their survival. Because the structures of many of these glycans are unique to bacteria, they can also be exploited to generate carbohydrate-based vaccines. Considering that most polysaccharides are poorly immunogenic, conjugation to immunogens (such as a carrier protein) has been strategically used to stimulate the host immune response. For instance, three different conjugate vaccines against S. pneumoniae have been licensed since 2000, with the latest including CPS from the 13 most prevalent or invasive serotypes. These vaccines have helped to reduce the incidence of the pneumococcal disease, and it is estimated that the latter alone has prevented more than half a million deaths during the first decade of use.24 CPS-based conjugate vaccines against Neisseria meningitidis and Haemophilus influenzae type b have also been commercially available during the last decades. In the case of noncapsulated gram-negative bacteria, the O-antigen polysaccharide region of the LPS can be used as the main target for vaccine development; however, a detoxification procedure that involves removal of the toxic lipid A region must be performed prior to its use. Alternatively, synthetic oligosaccharides representing the O-antigen repeating units can be employed. LPS-based conjugate vaccines against some gram-negative bacteria are currently in clinical or preclinical stages.25 Although diseases caused by pathogenic strains of E. coli are usually not as severe as those caused by other pathogenic bacteria, antibiotic-resistant strains are evolving rapidly becoming an alarming public health problem; thus, the development of vaccines against these pathogens has also been targeted as a priority for the WHO. Currently, the E. coli serogroups are defined based on the serological reactivity of their O-antigens, and they are labeled from O1 to O188; however, only a dozen of these O-antigen structures have been considered so far in the formulation of vaccines that are currently in clinical and preclinical trials. The structure of the O-antigen polysaccharides of the latest seven recognized E. coli serogroups (O182–O188) were recently reported,7,26,27 and the hexasaccharide repeating unit of the O-antigen from E. coli O187 is shown in Figure 1b.

Glycosylation is also the most important co- and post-translational modification of proteins, and it has been estimated that at least half of all proteins in nature undergo this modification. Glycans can be N-, O-, or C-linked to proteins, via specific amino acid residues. In human cells, N-glycosylation takes place when a GlcNAc residue located at the reducing end of an oligosaccharide is covalently linked to the amide nitrogen of an asparagine (Asn) residue of a protein. Only ten different monosaccharides are used to build the human glycome, and seven of them (viz. d-Glc, d-Gal, d-GlcNAc, d-GalNAc, d-Man, d-Xyl, and l-Fuc) can be found directly O-linked to the hydroxyl groups of serine (Ser), threonine (Thr), tyrosine (Tyr), or hydroxylysine (Hyl) residues.28 Interestingly, the glycome of bacteria comprises a more diverse variety of monosaccharides; for instance, it has been shown that the proteins of the surface of Tannerella forsythia are heavily O-glycosylated with a unique decasaccharide containing, inter alia, an uncommon 5-N-acetamidino-7-N-glyceroyl derivative of pseudaminic acid (Pse) (green flat diamond in Figure 1c).8,9 Glycosylation of the membrane proteins of enveloped viruses contribute to shield antigenic moieties of the virus surface and, consequently, protect the virus from the immune system of the host. For instance, the viral envelope glycoprotein (gp350) of the Epstein–Barr virus (Figure 1d) is highly N-glycosylated, containing only a single glycan-free surface that corresponds to the binding epitope of this protein with the host receptor.10 These modifications have also represented a challenge for the development of antiviral vaccines against HIV and Ebola viruses, which display dense N- and O-glycosylated glycoproteins on their surface, respectively.29 Recently emerged SARS-CoV-2 also express a highly N- and O-glycosylated spike (S) glycoprotein.30,31 Except for proteins, bioactive peptides such as hormones and neuropeptides can also be glycosylated.32 Among other things, these modifications can contribute to improve the peptide stability by reducing the susceptibility to enzymatic degradation and modulate the interaction with the receptor. The sialoglycopeptide shown in Figure 1e is a natural product that has gained popularity as starting material for semisynthetic approaches of N-glycans,33 and can be extracted with good yields from chicken egg yolk.34 This glycopeptide has also been suggested to possess antibacterial properties capable of providing protection against Salmonella infections.35

1.2. Scope of the Review

Structural analysis of glycans by NMR spectroscopy described herein refers to the “primary structure” of carbohydrates being of natural origin, such as biological samples, or synthesized by chemical or enzymatic methods. Thus, the challenge consists of unravelling and defining sugar components, their stereochemical arrangements, linkage positions and sequence, as well as noncarbohydrate substituents. To lay the basis for the subsequent description of NMR methods used in analysis of glycans, an overview of carbohydrate structure is first given. The current review covers structural elucidation of oligo- and polysaccharides, including monosaccharide components and their substituents, and is based on NMR spectroscopy developments during the last two decades continuing from the review published in the year 2000 in this journal.36 Pertinent examples of glycopeptides and glycoproteins carrying oligosaccharides or polysaccharides are also included. However, glycoconjugates such as glycolipids per se that require solvents other than water, e.g., mixtures of chloroform:methanol,37 or pyridine38 will not be covered. For structural studies on saponins of steroidal or alkaloid origin, which contain carbohydrate entities, as well as flavonol glycosides, either methanol,39 pyridine,40 or dimethyl sulfoxide:water,41,42 are commonly used as solvents, and some specific references to compounds from these classes will be made in the context of NMR spectroscopy methodology or applications. Furthermore, solid-state NMR spectroscopy is an important technique with great potential for structure elucidation of glycans, but as it is still emerging as a tool available to the community, we refer to recent publications using this technique for glycan structure determination.4347

Current complementary analytical techniques to NMR for the structural elucidation of glycans48,49 are, e.g., infrared spectroscopy (IR),50,51 liquid chromatography (LC),52 capillary electrophoresis (CE),53 and mass spectrometry (MS).54,55 The conformation of carbohydrates and three-dimensional (3D) structure of glycans are interlinked to the determination of the “primary structure” of a glycan molecule and some aspects and potential caveats will also be touched upon.5661

2. Representation of Glycan Structures

2.1. Monosaccharides

Monosaccharides are polyhydroxylated compounds that can be defined as aldoses or ketoses depending on whether they have an aldehyde or a ketone group in their chain of carbon atoms, respectively. They are also classified based on their chain length, with the smallest carbohydrates consisting of three carbon atoms. Aldoses and ketoses that contain three to seven carbon atoms are, respectively, denoted trioses/triuloses, tetroses/tetruloses, pentoses/pentuloses, hexoses/hexuloses, and heptoses/heptuloses; therefore, arabinose (Ara) is considered a pentose, galactose (Gal) a hexose and fructose (Fru) a hexulose (Figure 2). The aldehyde carbon in aldoses is always numbered as C1, whereas the ketone carbon in ketoses is given the lowest possible number. Except for dihydroxyacetone, all monosaccharides have at least one asymmetric carbon, and the number of possible stereoisomers is given by 2n (where n is the number of asymmetric carbons); thus, 16 different hexoses are possible. In the Fischer projection, the carbon backbone is represented vertically, with C1 on the top and the substituents that project toward the viewer depicted as horizontal bonds. In aldoses and ketoses formed up to six carbon atoms the hydroxyl group at the highest numbered asymmetric carbon is called the configurational carbon and determines the absolute configuration of each monosaccharide; when this group is pointing to the right in the Fischer projection the overall configuration is d (see Fisher projection of d-Gal in Figure 2 top), otherwise the absolute configuration is l (see Fischer projection of l-Ara and l-Fru in Figure 2, bottom left and right, respectively).62

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Ring–chain tautomerism of d-galactose showing the pyranose, furanose, open-chain, and hydrate forms (top). Open-chain and α-pyranose forms of l-arabinose (bottom left). Open-chain and β-pyranose forms of l-fructose (bottom right). The relative populations of each monosaccharide forms at 30 °C (d-Gal and l-Fru) and 31 °C (l-Ara) are shown in parentheses.6365

Monosaccharides can exist both as open chain or cyclic compounds. The open-chain hydrates are formed by a nucleophilic addition of water to the carbonyl carbon of the free aldehyde/ketone, whereas the cyclic forms are generated by a reversible intramolecular nucleophilic addition of one of the hydroxyl groups to the aldehyde/ketone to form a cyclic hemiacetal/hemiketal (Figure 2 top). Five- and six-membered rings are the most stable structures formed from acyclic monosaccharides, and they are called furanoses and pyranoses, respectively. A new asymmetric center (termed the anomeric carbon) is generated when the cyclic tautomer is produced; thus, two possible stereoisomers can be created. If the hydroxyl group from the anomeric and configurational carbons point in the same direction in the Fisher projection, the tautomeric form is defined as the α-anomer, otherwise it is denoted as the β-anomer. In the case of free monosaccharides, all of these forms are in equilibrium in aqueous solution (Figure 2 top), and the population of each species will depend on the temperature, the monosaccharide identity, and, in the case of ionic monosaccharides, also on the pH.66 These equilibria have been extensively studied for pentoses, pentuloses, hexoses, hexuloses, and 6-deoxyheptoses, using NMR spectroscopy63,67 and/or computational methods.68

The eight possible d-aldohexoses (Figure 3a) are represented by their respective β-anomeric and pyranose ring forms and displayed in the 4C1 chair conformation (in which C4 and C1 are above and below the plane of the chair, respectively). In this case, the β-d-glucopyranose tautomer has all its ring substituents in equatorial orientations; because d-Man, d-All, and d-Gal are the C2, C3, and C4 epimers of d-Glc, respectively, the corresponding hydroxyl groups at their epimeric positions are therefore in axial orientation. Considering that in most cases the major number of substituents can be allocated in the less bulky equatorial orientations, the dominant conformation in d-hexopyranoses is usually the chair conformation 4C1, whereas l-hexopyranoses prefer the 1C4 conformation. However, in those cases where the number of axial bulky substituents surpasses the number of equatorial substituents other conformations can also be present. In this regard, α-d-Altp, α-d-Gulp, α-d-Idop, and β-d-Idop have been shown to partially adopt the 1C4 chair conformation, whereas α-d-Gulp and α-d-Idop also have minor contributions from skew conformers.69 Other conformations such as boat (B), skew (S), and half-chair (H) may also occur when some specific substituents or double bonds are present.70 Furanose rings are more flexible than pyranoses and can be found in different envelope (E) and twist conformations (T).71 A few monosaccharides, such as xylulose and sorbose, have only be found in furanose form in nature, whereas monosaccharides, such as l-Ara, d-Rib, d-Gal, and d-Fuc, can be found as both five and six-membered ring tautomers.20

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) The eight β-d-aldohexopyranoses (4C1 conformer) shown in chemical representation (right); the stereocenters that differ from those of d-glucose are highlighted using colored circles. (b) The β-anomeric and pyranose ring form of selected monosaccharides of the d-galactose series shown in chemical representation (right); the moieties that differ from those of d-galactopyranose are highlighted in bold. (c) The α-pyranose forms of l-arabinose (aldopentose) and l-fructose (ketohexose) shown in chemical representation (right). In (a–c), the corresponding monosaccharides are also represented in SNFG notation (left).

The structural diversity of monosaccharides derivatives found in nature is increased by different modifications. When a hydroxyl group of a monosaccharide is replaced by a hydrogen atom or an amine group, deoxysugars and aminosugars are formed, respectively; the latter can be N-acetylated, N-sulfated, or remain unsubstituted. Furthermore, the hydroxyl groups can also undergo phosphorylation, sulfation, methylation, or O-acetylation. For instance, some lipoarabinomannans from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. kansasii are capped with an unusual 5-deoxy-5-methylthio-d-xylofuranose residue and its corresponding oxidized sulfoxide derivative.72,73 Carboxyl groups can be present and, in some cases, undergo lactonization or lactamization to nearby hydroxyl or amino groups, respectively. Some of these modifications are exemplified in Figure 3b with naturally occurring monosaccharides having the galacto-configuration. Moreover, when α-l-Arap and α-l-Frup are represented in the 4C1 chair conformation (Figure 3c), the hydroxyl groups located on the C1–C4 carbons are displayed in the same equatorial/axial orientation as those of β-d-Galp and β-d-Fucp (Figure 3b); as will be discussed in the following sections, these four analogous structures will display similar features in the NMR spectra (such as similar vicinal coupling constants patterns).

Even though more than one hundred different monosaccharides have been identified in bacterial polysaccharides, only a small number of them have been found in polysaccharides and glycoconjugates form plants and animals, with only ten of them present in the human glycome. For instance, Kdo and l,d-Hep residues are highly conserved sugar moieties found in the inner core oligosaccharides of the lipopolysaccharides from gram-negative bacteria (Figure 4). Furthermore, whereas l-rhamnose and l-fucose are ubiquitous in nature, the remaining 6-deoxyhexoses are rarer; in particular, 6-deoxy-l-idose has been reported only once in nature74 and both 6-deoxy-l-allose and 6-deoxy-d-idose have not been isolated from natural sources. Regarding the amino derivatives of 6-deoxy-hexoses, N-acetyl 6-deoxy-l-altrosamine (6d-l-AltNAc) was first isolated in 2017 from the O-antigen polysaccharide of a Fusobacterium nucleatum strain (Figure 4),75 whereas 6-deoxy-allosamine, 6-deoxy-gulosamine, and 6-deoxy-idosamine have not yet been found in nature. Besides apiose (Api), 3-C-methyl-branched monosaccharides are quite uncommon; Man3CMe was identified in 2000 as a component of the O-antigen polysaccharide of a Helicobacter pylori strain.76 Erwiniose (Erw), a novel C4-branched monosaccharide, was later obtained from the O-antigen polysaccharides of Erwinia carotovora and Pectobacterium atrosepticum strains,77,78 and a C4-branched higher carbon monosaccharide that shares structural similarities with caryophyllose (Car) was isolated from a Mycobacterium marinum lipooligosaccharide;79 the aforementioned monosaccharides differ in the presence and absence, respectively, of a hydroxyl group at the C3 position. Furthermore, a 3-O-methylated derivative of the former monosaccharide (Figure 4 right bottom) has recently been found in the O-antigen polysaccharide of a Rhodopseudomonas palustris strain.80 Interestingly, a ten-carbon bicyclic monosaccharide, namely bradyrhizose, was isolated as the only component of the O-antigen homopolysaccharide from a Bradyrhizobium strain.81 Besides Neu5Ac, Neu5Gc, and Kdn, 2-keto-3-deoxynononic acids also include rarer pseudaminic (Pse) and legionaminic (Leg) acids, as well as the C4 and C8 epimers of the latter (4eLeg and 8eLeg), fully characterized and confirmed in 2001 using a synthetic approach.82 Noteworthy, five novel non-2-ulosonic acids structures have been reported since 2015. Acinetaminic acid (Aci),83 its 8-epimer (8eAci),84 and the 8-epimer of Pse (8ePse)85 were all recently isolated from CPS of Acinetobacter baumannii strains. The former is the C5 epimer of Pse whereas 8eAci is the 7-epimer of Leg. Additionally, fusaminic acid (Fus) was isolated from the O-antigen polysaccharide of a Fusobacterium nucleatum strain and bears structural similarities with Pse, differing only in the stereochemistry at C4 and the functional group at 7 (i.e., in the former, a hydroxyl group is present at C7, whereas in the latter there is an amino group instead) (Figure 4).75 Furthermore, a presumed C8 epimer of the latter was isolated from another F. nucleatum, but its proposed configuration has not yet been confirmed.86

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Chemical structures of the recently reported novel monosaccharides: N-acetyl 6-deoxy-l-altrosamine (6d-l-AltNAc),75 3-C-methyl-d-mannose (Man3CMe),76 acinetaminic acid (Aci),83 8-epiacinetaminic acid (8eAci),84 fusaminic acid (Fus),75 erwiniose (Erw),77 and C4-branched monosaccharide from R. palustris.80 Note that Aci is the C5 epimer of pseudaminic acid (Pse), where the latter was identified in 1984.87 Ketodeoxyoctonic acid (Kdo) and l-glycero-d-manno-heptose (Hep) are major components of the LPS core of gram-negative bacteria.

Rapid identification and comparison of monosaccharides in polymeric structures have been facilitated by the implementation of the symbol nomenclature for functional glycomics (SNFG), in which the monosaccharides are represented by colored geometric shapes.5,6 The shape of these symbols represents the monosaccharide type, i.e., hexoses, N-acetylhexosamines, and 6-deoxyhexoses are represented as fully filled circles, squares, and triangles, respectively, whereas hexosamines, hexuronic acids, and 6-deoxy-N-acetylhexosamines are represented as half-filled squares, diamonds, and triangles, respectively; see Figure 3b left side. In the case of aldohexose derivatives, the color of the symbol represents the relative stereochemical configuration of the monosaccharide; thus, blue, green, purple, yellow, pink, orange, light blue, and brown are used for monosaccharides with gluco-, manno-, allo-, galacto-, altro-, gulo-, talo-, and ido-configuration, respectively (Figure 3a left side). The only exception to this rule are the fucose derivatives because they have historically been represented using red color (Figure 3b left side).

2.2. Oligosaccharides

A disaccharide is formed when a hydroxyl group of one monosaccharide reacts with the hemiacetal/hemiketal group of another to form an acetal/ketal moiety. The newly formed carbon–oxygen bond is termed a glycosidic bond and, in biological systems, these linkages are built by a subclass of enzymes known as glycosyltransferases. The term oligosaccharide is used to refer to carbohydrate compounds that contain between two and a dozen monosaccharide residues, whereas larger structures are considered polysaccharides. Glycosyltransferases are key enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of oligo- and polysaccharides, and most of them perform their action by transferring an activated sugar moiety utilizing a nucleotide-, lipid-phosphate-, or phosphate-based donor to a sugar acceptor (a mono-, oligo-, or polysaccharide).8890 In contrast, some glycosyltransferases are capable to use sucrose as nonactivated glucosyl or fructosyl donor, or accept non-natural activated donors (see o-nitrophenyl galactopyranoside in Scheme 1) as a convenient strategy for chemoenzymatic synthesis of oligosaccharides.91,92 These enzymes are not only highly specific to the aforementioned donors and acceptors, but they also display high regioselectivity toward the hydroxyl group of the acceptor and stereospecificity with respect to the resulting configuration of the anomeric carbon. A monosaccharide residue with an anomeric carbon that is not part of a glycosidic linkage in an oligosaccharide is referred to as the reducing end residue (see the glucose residue in the oligosaccharide of Figure 1a); in aqueous solution this residue is in an equilibrium between the different cyclic and open chain tautomeric forms. Internal (see galactose and N-acetylglucosamine residues in the oligosaccharide of Figure 1a) and nonreducing end monosaccharides (see sialyl and fucosyl residues in Figure 1a) are linked to other monosaccharides via glyosidic bonds; thus, they have defined tautomeric forms and anomeric configurations. If the reducing terminus of an oligosaccharide is linked to an aglycone moiety (see O- and N-glycans of panels c and e of Figure 1, respectively), this end is still referred as the reducing end because it has the potential to be released and recover its reducing capacity. Sucrose and trehalose are examples of nonreducing disaccharides in which the monosaccharide residues are linked to each other by their respective anomeric positions; furthermore, stachyose (vide infra, Figure 20) and raffinose are examples of nonreducing tetra- and trisaccharides, respectively.

Scheme 1. Enzymatic Transglycosylation Reactions Shown Schematically Using ortho-Nitrophenyl β-d-[1-13C;1-2H]galactopyranoside as the Donor and Galactose As the Acceptor (left) and ortho-Nitro-phenyl β-d-Galactopyranoside as Donor and d-[UL-13C;UL-2H]Glucopyranose as Acceptor (right).

Scheme 1

Isotope labeling is highlighted by red color. For the latter reaction, the disaccharide products referred to as A, B, and C have the corresponding labels for resonances from substitution positions in dDNP 13C NMR spectra; cf. Figure 43. Adapted with permission from refs (462 and 463). Copyright 2018 and 2020 American Chemical Society.

Figure 20.

Figure 20

1H,13C-ASAP-HSQC-TOCSY spectrum of a 250 mM stachyose sample in D2O for which 512  ×  1024 (t2, t1) data points were recorded. The experiment was acquired using one scan per t1 increment in ∼ 3.5 min and processed to give a digital resolution in the indirect dimension of 3.7 Hz. The patterns of correlation for the four sugars are highlighted with the color code given next to the structure of stachyose. Reproduced with permission from ref (300). Copyright 2019 Elsevier.

The description of the primary structure of oligosaccharides comprises the identification of the component monosaccharides (viz., their identities, absolute configurations, tautomeric forms, anomeric configurations, and the presence of additional modifications), as well as their sequence in the oligomer and their linkage positions. In contrast to other biopolymers (such as nucleic acids and amino acids), the glycosidic linkage between two monosaccharides can take place in different arrangements, with the possibility to form branched structures. Considering all of these structural features, the number of possible oligosaccharides that can be generated with a given number of monosaccharide building blocks is by far larger than for any other biopolymer.2,62 Furthermore, once the conformation(s) adopted by each monosaccharide have been established, the global shape of an oligosaccharide can be described as a function of the torsion angles around each glycosidic linkage. For the analysis of NMR data, and in the case of aldoses, the most suitable definition of these torsion angles is as follows: ϕ = H1′−C1′−Ox−Cx and ψ = C1′−Ox−Cx−Hx, where the primed numbers denote atoms of the monosaccharide located toward the nonreducing end, and the letter x denotes the linkage position. In the case of (1→6)-linkages between aldohexopyranoses, the latter torsion angle is defined as ψ = C1′–O6–C6–C5, and an additional torsion angle definition ω = O6–C6–C5–O5 is required. Even though oligosaccharides are considered highly flexible structures, some preferred conformations around these torsion angles can be established. As will be exemplified below, the outcome of NMR spectra used for elucidation of sequential arrangement between sugar residues rely either on three-bond trans-glycosidic coupling constants or the spatial proximity of atoms located on different residues, both of which are strongly dependent on the torsion angle preferences.

Oligosaccharides composed of Glc, Gal, GlcNAc, Fuc, and/or Neu5Ac residues are one of the main components of human milk. To date, more than one hundred different oligosaccharide structures have been identified,93 most of which contain a lactose moiety at their reducing end, exceptions being β-d-GalNAc-(1→4)-d-Glc and β-d-Gal-(1→4)-d-GlcNAc.94 Lactose represent ∼85% of the carbohydrate mass in human milk, and 90% of the remaining oligosaccharides consist of a mixture of lacto-N-tetraose (LNT) and lacto-N-neotetraose (LNnT). The composition and concentration of oligosaccharides vary between different mammals, and some species have been shown to display relatively low ratios of lactose. Sulfated and UDP-oligosaccharides have been found as minor components of both human and some nonhuman mammal milk, whereas phosphorylated oligosaccharides have been found in the milk/colostrum of some herbivorous mammals.3,94

Osmoregulated periplasmic glucans refer to naturally occurring oligosaccharides that are produced by gram-negative bacteria. In some species, they are found as highly branched oligosaccharides consisting of 6–13 glucose residues, where the backbone and the branches are joined via β-(1→2) and β-(1→6) glycosidic linkages, respectively. They can also be found as cyclic compounds and, depending on the bacterial species, display different degrees of polymerization, type of glycosidic linkages, and substituents. In some cases, the glucose residues are linked through a variable number of β-(1→2) and β-(1→6) glycosidic linkages, whereas in other cases only β-(1→2)-linked oligosaccharides are present.95 Interestingly, Ralstonia solanacearum, Xanthomonas campestris, and Rhodobacter sphaeroides have been shown to produce cyclic glucans with a unique degree of polymerization (13, 16, and 18, respectively) containing mainly β-(1→2)-linkages in their structures.9698 The enterobacterial common antigen is composed of conserved trisaccharide repeating units, produced by bacteria of the Enterobacteriaceae family, either as a linear polymer (ECALPS or ECAPG) or in a cyclic form (ECACYC). In the latter case, different polymerization degrees have been observed, ranging from three to six trisaccharide repeating units. Excluding ECACYC-3, which has only been identified using mass spectrometry,99 the other forms of ECACYC can readily be identified by their characteristic 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts.100,101

2.3. Polysaccharides

Polysaccharides are carbohydrate polymers that contain more than a dozen monosaccharide residues, and they can be found either as homopolysaccharides (comprising only one type of monosaccharide) or heteropolysaccharides (composed of more than one type of monosaccharides). Homopolysaccharides are usually named after the monosaccharide building block they are made of (i.e., glucans, mannans, etc.), and indeed the largest synthetic polysaccharide reported to date is a branched homopolymer composed of 152 mannose residues.102 Many bacterial heteropolysaccharides are based on the assembly of preformed oligosaccharide units. Although most of the monosaccharide building blocks are usually connected exclusively via glycosidic bonds, in some cases phosphodiester linkages can also be present, either connecting two monosaccharide residues or a monosaccharide residue with an alditol (such as in the case of WTA and LTA). As an example, only six of the currently 182 recognized E. coli serogroups display O-antigen polysaccharides, in which two monosaccharides of their repeating units are linked together through phosphodiester bridges (viz., the O-antigens of serogroups O84, O152, O160, O172, O173, and O181), whereas eleven additional serogroups exhibit polysaccharides with one phosphodiester linkage between a monosaccharide residue and an alditol, such as ribitol or glycerol or glyceric acid.26 Furthermore, secondary cell wall polysaccharides can be anchored to the peptidoglycan via a phosphodiester or diphosphodiester linkage. Teichoic and teichuronic acids have been shown to display a specific disaccharide at their reducing end, which is connected via a phosphodiester linkage to O6 of a MurNAc residue in the peptidoglycan.103 The secondary cell wall polymer of Geobacillus tepidamans and the Lancefield group A antigen polysaccharide of group A Streptococcus are also attached to the peptidoglycan using this kind of linkage.104,105 In addition, diphosphodiester moieties have been observed to connect the reducing end of the secondary cell wall polymer of a Paenibacillus alvei strain directly into the bacterial peptidoglycan (Figure 5a).106 Only a few examples describing other kinds of linkages present in polysaccharide structures have been revealed during the last decades. For instance, an EPS from Streptococcus thermophilus have been described to contain a 3,9-dideoxy-d-threo-d-altro-nononic acid residue that is connected to two glucose moieties through its O7 and O2 atoms, with the latter linkage involving an ether bond (Figure 5b).107,108 The core oligosaccharides of Shewanella oneidensis and Proteus penneri contain an open-chain d-GalNAc residue linked through a cyclic acetal to O4 and O6 of a d-Galp residue (Figure 5c) or a d-GalpN residue, respectively.109,110 This kind of linkage had previously been described in the triterpenoid saponins Anemoclemoside A and B, in which the aldehyde group of an open-chain l-Ara residue forms a cyclic acetal with the atoms O3 and O23 of the aglycone moiety.111,112 Furthermore, a novel type of WTA involving an amide linkage in its backbone has been described in a Bacillus subtilis strain (Figure 5d).113

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(a) Chemical structure of the secondary cell wall polymer of Paenibacillus alvei showing the diphosphodiester linkage to the bacterial peptidoglycan.106 (b) Representation of a selected region of the EPS from Streptococcus thermophilus, showing the residues that are connected to the 3,9-dideoxy-d-threo-d-altro-nononic acid moiety.107,108 (c) Representation of the open-chain d-GalNAc residue linked to a d-Galp residue via an acetal linkage, as present in the core oligosaccharides of Proteus penneri and Shewanella oneidensis.109,110 (d) Chemical structure of the WTA of Bacillus subtilis.113 (e) Selected region of the O-antigen polysaccharide of Proteus mirabilis O38 showing the N-acetyl-phosphoethanolamine and N-acetyl-l-aspartic acid substituents.114

2.4. Glycoconjugates

Glycoconjugates are formed when a carbohydrate moiety is covalently attached to another biomolecule. Different groups can be distinguished according to the nature of the noncarbohydrate moiety, which can be a either a protein, peptide, lipid, or, as recently revealed, a small noncoding RNA. Glycosylation is the most important co- and post-translational modification of proteins, with more than fifteen different monosaccharides directly involved in the linkage to peptides and proteins.28,115,116 Even though N- and O-glycosylation represent the most widely distributed bonds between carbohydrates and proteins, C-mannosylation, phosphoglycosyl linkages, and glypiation have also been described. N-Glycosylation typically takes place when a GlcNAc residue is directly attached to the side-chain amino group of an asparagine (Asn) moiety of a protein (Figure 1d) or peptide (Figure 1e). Less commonly, other monosaccharides (i.e., Glc, Rha, GalNAc, and Bac) and amino acids (i.e., Arg, Lys, His, and Trp) residues can be involved in this kind of linkages.115119 O-Glycosylation takes place when a monosaccharide is connected to a hydroxyl group of a serine (Ser), threonine (Thr), tyrosine (Tyr), hydroxyproline (Hyp), or hydroxylysine (Hyl). Besides GalNAc, GlcNAc, Gal, Man, Glc, Fuc, and Xyl, a few novel O-glycosidic linkages involving Pse, FucNAc, Leg, and Bac residues have recently been described in C. jejuni, P. aeruginosa, C. botulinum, and N. gonorrheae proteins, respectively.120123 It has been estimated that almost one-third of the human peptide hormones are O-glycosylated.32 C-Mannosylation is less common and takes place when a mannosyl residue is covalently linked via its anomeric carbon to the C2 atom of the indole ring of a tryptophan (Trp) residue. This type of modification has been observed mainly in mammalian proteins, but recently its presence was confirmed in the glycoprotein of the Ebola virus and in a peptide hormone of the insect Carausius morosus;124,125 the latter has been fully characterized using NMR spectroscopy, and the conformational preferences of the mannopyranosyl residue C-linked to Trp have been investigated in different glycoproteins using a combination of molecular dynamics simulations and NMR spectroscopy data.126,127 Phosphoglycosylation is quite rare, but it has been reported in proteins from parasitic protozoa of the Leshmania and Tripanosoma genera; in this case, the reducing end residue of a glycan is linked to a Ser residue via phosphodiester bond. An additional kind of glycosylation has been observed in the glycopeptides sublancin and glycocin F, which are produced by B. subtilis and L. plantarum, respectively, and have been shown to display a single monosaccharide residue S-linked to a cysteine (Cys).128,129 Glypiation is a strategy used by eukaryotic cells to anchor proteins to the cell membrane and involves the attachment of a phosphatidylinositol-containing glycolipid (GPI) to a protein. In these structures, the C-terminal end of the protein is covalently tied to a phosphoethanolamine linker via an amide bond, whereas a phosphodiester bridge connects the linker to an oligosaccharide moiety through the O6 atom of a nonreducing end mannosyl residue; in turn, the reducing end monosaccharide of the glycan core is linked to an inositol moiety containing a phospholipid tail.130 The structure and dynamics of GPI analogous embedded into micelles structures have been investigated using a combination of NMR spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulations.131 Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are a particular case of glycolipids found in the external leaflet of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. A smooth LPS consists of a polysaccharide structure (O-antigen) (Figure 1b) attached to a core oligosaccharide, which in turn is linked to a Lipid A moiety. The latter usually consists of a disaccharide moiety, made of GlcN or GlcN3N residues, linked to fatty acids chains through ester and/or amide bonds.132

3. NMR Spectral Characteristics of Glycans

3.1. NMR Active Nuclei and Spectral Ranges

NMR experiments on glycans commonly employ 1H, 13C, 15N, and 31P nuclei for detection of resonances and correlations between spins in multidimensional approaches. In 1H NMR spectra, nonexchangeable protons are usually found between δH ∼ 1.0–6.0 but, in H2O solutions, amine and amide protons can be observed at δH ∼ 8.0 and hydroxyl protons at δH ∼ 6.0–8.0. The limited spectral dispersion of proton chemical shifts usually leads to overlap of signals, and strong coupling effects may obscure the analysis in the bulk region of the 1H NMR spectrum. Alternatively, 13C resonances have a wider chemical shift dispersion (δC ∼ 15–180 ppm) and, consequently, the problem of overlap is less severe. In carbohydrates, NMR chemical shifts of 31P resonances are frequently found from ∼ 10 to −5 ppm (spectral region of phosphomonoester and phosphodiester groups) and 15N resonances can be observed at δN ∼ 30–125 (spectral region of amine, N-sulfate, and amide groups). Besides the direct recording of 1D 13C and 31P NMR spectra, in heteronuclear correlation experiments proton-detection is usually preferred for the analysis of carbohydrates at natural isotope abundance due to the higher sensitivity of proton nuclei. It may be noted that to obtain the maximum signal-to-noise ratio in an NMR experiment, sampling of the signal should be truncated at 1.26 times the transverse relaxation time constant T2 if it is assumed that the signal decays exponentially.133

In the case of naturally occurring glycans, NMR experiments are usually carried out in D2O solutions, and the residual HDO resonance can optionally be removed (or attenuated) using diffusion-edited experiments. Even though the best differentiation and performance (i.e., without a significant sacrifice of the signal-to-noise ratio with respect to a regular 1H NMR spectrum) are obtained in the case of large polysaccharides,134 this approach has also been employed in the analysis of oligosaccharides135 using both 1D 1H and 2D 1H,1H-TOCSY translational diffusion-filtered experiments. The strategy can also be used to remove interfering signals from low molecular weight impurities (vide infra section 5.3.3 on carbohydrate mixtures) or assign conspicuous signals that may correspond to moieties directly linked to polysaccharides and resonances from the terminal end of a polymer.136 In order to observe exchangeable protons of amide or hydroxyl groups, a H2O/D2O 98:2 mixture can be used as solvent instead of D2O; thus, a suitable water suppression scheme (e.g., presaturation, excitation sculpting, among others) has to be considered for recording proton-detected experiments. 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts can be referenced to 3-trimethylsilyl-(2,2,3,3-2H4)-propanoate (TSP) at δH 0.0 and δC – 2.1 ppm, respectively, or to acetone.137,138 Alternatively, if the spectrometer sample temperature has been carefully determined, the HDO resonance can be used as a reference for 1H chemical shifts.139 Because chemical shifts of ionic compounds are pH dependent, anionic compounds or their substituents are recommended to be analyzed at pD ∼ 8–9,140 whereas cationic compounds may benefit from using low pH (such as detection of amino protons of GlcN, that have been shown to display the sharpest line width at pH 3.2–4.2).141 Furthermore, 13C and 31P NMR chemical shifts can be referenced externally using 5% (v/v) 1,4-dioxane in D2O (δC 67.4) and 2% (v/v) H3PO4 in D2O (δP 0.0), respectively. Moreover, 15N chemical shifts can be indirectly referenced142 using the TSP proton resonance as the primary reference and considering γNH = 0.101329.138,143 Additional referencing strategies have been discussed previously.144

3.2. Characteristic Chemical Shifts

In the 1H NMR spectrum of carbohydrates, different groups of signals can be recognized: anomeric protons of aldoses resonate at δH ∼ 4.4–6.0, protons attached to carbons bearing hydroxyl or amide groups are usually found at δH ∼ 3.2–4.2, whereas methylene moieties can be observed at δH ∼ 1.6–2.8, methyl protons from N- or O-acetyl groups appear as singlets at δH ∼ 2.0–2.2, and methyl protons from 6-deoxy-hexoses as doublets at δH ∼ 1.2. Protons located at O-acylated positions are shifted by ∼ 0.5–1.7 ppm downfield when compared to nonsubstituted positions devoid of ester groups and may show up in the same region as the anomeric proton resonances.134 The signals of protons attached to carbons bearing unsubstituted and N-sulfated amine groups show variable chemical shifts at different pD,66,105,145,146 as exemplified for d-GlcN (δH2 ∼ 2.6–3.3) and d-GlcN3S (δH2 ∼ 1.8–3.5).141 The integration of the anomeric resonances can reveal the total number of monosaccharide residues, as well as the relative ratio of 6-deoxy-sugars, N- and/or O-acetylated derivatives when compared with the integrals of the corresponding methyl resonances. In H2O:D2O 98:2 mixture solutions, protons from amine and amide groups can be observed at δH ∼ 8.0, hydroxyl groups at δH ∼ 6.0–7.0 and anomeric OH at δH ∼ 7.0–8.0; because hydroxyl and amino protons exchange with the solvent at high rates, they are mainly observable at low temperatures,141,147,148 requiring in some cases supercooled aqueous solutions.149 The selection of the pH is also critical to obtain the best line width performance when observing exchangeable amino protons and anomeric OH resonances.141 The cis/trans isomerization of N-acetyl groups also has an influence on the amide proton chemical shifts as recently exemplified for d-GlcpNAc; the amide proton of the low populated cis isomer having the α-anomeric configuration is found ∼ 1 ppm upfield compared to the respective trans isomer, whereas for the β-anomeric configuration the chemical shift difference is ∼ 0.7 ppm.150

13C NMR chemical shifts of common aldohexopyranoses are presented in Figure 6. The anomeric carbons of reducing pyranoses are found at δC ∼ 90–100, with pyranoses having the β-anomeric configuration being usually less shielded than pyranoses having the α-anomeric configuration. Carbons of secondary hydroxyl groups are observed in the spectral region δC ∼ 65–85, hydroxymethyl carbons resonate at δC ∼ 60–65, and nitrogen bearing carbons at δC ∼ 50–60. Carbonyl carbons from carboxylic acids, esters, or amide groups appear at δC ∼ 170–180, methyl carbons from acetyl groups at δC ∼ 20–25, and those from 6-deoxy-sugars at δC ∼ 15–20. In furanose rings the anomeric carbon resonances are typically less shielded than their respective pyranose counterparts as exemplified for Glcf, 6d-Altf, 6d-Idof, 6d-IdofA, and AllfNAc.151154 When compared to the respective unsubstituted residues, glycosylated positions are perturbed downfield by ΔδC ∼ 5–10, whereas the neighboring positions show an upfield displacement of ΔδC ∼ 0–2.155,156

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Plots of 13C NMR chemical shifts of common aldohexopyranoses. The marker shapes correspond to the respective monosaccharide SNFG symbols, whereas the solid and dashed lines are used to differentiate the α and β configuration, respectively. The anomeric positions (C1), C5, and C6 are annotated in all cases and nitrogen-bearing carbons (C2) are also indicated in the case of amino sugars.

Splitting of 13C resonances may be evidence of the presence of phosphate groups. In the 31P spectrum, resonances from phosphomonoester groups are observed at δP ∼ 2–10, whereas phosphodiester groups are observed between 0 and −5 ppm. 15N chemical shifts from amido groups of GlcpNAc, GalpNAc, FucpNAc, Fucp3NAc, QuipNAc, AllpNAc, and AllfNAc residues have been found in the spectral region δN ∼ 115–125.141,143,146,154,157,158 When the amino groups are N-sulfated, the chemical shifts are expected at lower chemical shifts than their respective N-acetylated counterparts (e.g., δN ∼ 93 in the case of N-sulfo-glucosamine).146 Furthermore, the 15N chemical shifts of unsubstituted amino groups are observed at δN ∼ 30, as exemplified for GlcN, GlcN6S, and GlcN3S.141,159,160

3.3. Scalar Spin–Spin Coupling Constants

Scalar spin–spin coupling constants can be employed to establish the anomeric configuration, identity, and/or conformation of pyranose residues using NMR spectroscopy. For instance, the magnitude of the 3JH1,H2 coupling constants have classically been used to assign the stereochemistry of the anomeric carbon of aldopyranoses that have the gluco-, allo-, galacto-, and gulo-configuration. When these residues have d or l absolute configuration, they are expected to adopt the 4C1 or 1C4 conformations, respectively; thus, a large 3JH1,H2 ∼ 7.8–8.5 Hz indicates that the anomeric proton is oriented axially (thus, in an antiperiplanar orientation with respect to H2), whereas a small 3JH1,H2 ∼ 3.7 Hz implies that the anomeric proton is orientated equatorially (gauche orientation with respect to H2), defining the β- and α-anomeric configuration, respectively. Nevertheless, this approach is less suitable for residues with the manno-, altro-, talo-, and ido-configuration, where the H2 atoms are found in an equatorial orientation. In these cases, the 1JC1,H1 couplings (cf. NMR experiments below) can be used to assess the configuration of the anomeric carbons because their magnitudes are inversely influenced by the length of the carbon–proton bond, which depends on its s-character, as a result of the axial/equatorial orientation of the anomeric proton. Axially oriented C1–H1 bonds are longer due to a vicinal lone-pair effect161 than the respective equatorial ones and, as a consequence, in the aforementioned examples the β-anomeric configuration displays smaller 1JC1,H1 couplings (∼ 160 Hz) than those having the α-anomeric configuration (∼ 170 Hz). However, because residues with the α-d-ido-configuration tend to prefer the 1C4 conformation instead of the 4C1 conformation, a smaller 1JC1,H1 value of ∼160 Hz is observed for the α-anomeric configuration.162 This has also been observed in the case of l-IdoA and 6d-l-Ido, where the magnitude of the 1JC1,H1 couplings are consistent with axially oriented anomeric protons in both α- and β-anomeric forms in pyranose residues.152 Furanoses are generally more flexible than pyranoses, and the anomeric protons are typically displayed in pseudoaxial orientations, independently of the configuration of the anomeric carbons; consequently, the one-bond carbon–proton couplings are less variable, with differences < 4 Hz between the α- and β-furanose forms of a given monosaccharide (with values in the range 170–180 Hz).152,154,162 Furthermore, the one-bond carbon–proton couplings of nonanomeric atoms are ∼ 145 Hz on average;151,163,164 this information has to be taken into consideration when setting up the delays for optimum magnetization transfer from protons to directly attached carbons in NMR experiments that employ INEPT transfer schemes, or when one-bond carbon–proton couplings are to be suppressed using low-pass filters.

When establishing the identity of pyranose residues, a useful approach is to consider the monosaccharides in groups, according to the relative configuration of their asymmetric carbons. Monosaccharides with gluco-, manno-, allo-, galacto-, altro-, gulo-, talo-, and ido-configurations have a characteristic set of 3JH1,H2, 3JH2,H3, 3JH3,H4, and 3JH4,H5 coupling constant values, as illustrated for selected β-anomeric forms in pyranoses (Figure 7).153,162,165167 These coupling constants can also be used to assess the conformation of pyranose rings and, when deviations from canonical three-dimensional structures are observed, they can reveal the identity of the different conformers taking part in the conformational equilibria.168,169 Furthermore, the patterns of the eight possible 2JCH couplings related to endocyclic pyranose carbon atoms have also proven valuable to establish the identity and anomeric configuration of residues with the galacto-, gluco-, and manno-configuration (Figure 8); this distinction can be made either by considering the magnitude and/or the sign of the 2JCH couplings profiles, and the approach has the potential to be extended to residues with other configurations.170 Due to the low natural abundance of 13C nuclei, scalar carbon–carbon coupling constants are in practice only relevant in the case of 13C-isotopically labeled glycans (vide infra), and an average 1JCC ∼ 45 Hz is frequently observed for carbons of cyclic aldoses (with 1JC1,C2 ∼ 42–48 Hz and nonanomeric 1JCC ∼ 37–45 Hz), whereas the magnitude of endocyclic 2JCC and 3JCC are commonly < 5 Hz.171

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Representation of the 3JH1,H2, 3JH2,H3, 3JH3,H4, and 3JH4,H5 coupling constant values (left to right, respectively) of β-anomeric and pyranose ring forms of selected monosaccharides with gluco-, manno-, allo-, galacto-, altro-, talo-, and ido-configurations using bar charts.153,162,165167 The coupling constants values (Hz) are indicated at the top of each bar.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Representation of 2JCH of the α- and β-anomeric and pyranose ring forms of (4C1 conformer) of galactose, glucose, and mannose, where the magnitude of the coupling constants values correlate with the width of the bubbles.170 The dashed lines indicate 2JCH with positive signs.

Transglycosidic 3JCH couplings are of key relevance for sequence analysis of natural abundance glycans, whereas 2JCC and 3JCC couplings can be useful in the sequence analysis of 13C-labeled oligosaccharides.148 Different theoretical approaches have been developed to estimate the magnitude of these couplings based on the conformational preferences around the glycosidic linkage.161,172 In addition, when a phosphate group is linked to the anomeric position of aldoses, vicinal phosphorus–proton coupling constants can readily be measured from the respective anomeric proton resonances (3JP,H1 ∼ 6–7 Hz), and different sets of carbon–phosphorus couplings (2JPC3JPC ∼ 2–8 Hz) can be obtained from the 13C NMR spectrum of phosphorylated glycans.173176 In the case of amide groups 1JNH ∼ 93 Hz, and a small temperature dependence may indicate the presence of hydrogen bonds.177,178 Even though N-acetyl groups mainly prefer the trans-conformation, the minor cis-forms of α- and β-d-GlcpNAc have recently been characterized in solution, with the latter displaying slightly smaller 1JNH coupling constants (87–89 Hz) than the former (91–93 Hz).150

4. Identification of Structural Parts

4.1. Constituent Monosaccharides

Component analysis of oligo and polysaccharides requires the identification of the constituent monosaccharides. This analysis can be carried out by hydrolysis or methanolysis of the polymer to obtain a mixture of free monosaccharides or methyl glycosides, respectively, which can then be analyzed using NMR spectroscopy.179 Each monosaccharide will show distinctive sets of 1H and 13C resonances in the NMR spectra, corresponding to different cyclic and open chain forms. When NMR spectroscopic information on these compounds is available in literature or databases, the identity of the monosaccharide can be assigned readily, and preparation of reference samples for data comparison is not required. The intensity of each set of proton resonances will reflect the relative population of each species in the mixture; thus, integration of the anomeric resonances in the 1H NMR spectrum can be used to determine the relative proportion of each monosaccharide in the mixture. This strategy has gained popularity in the determination of monosaccharide contents of polysaccharides isolated from biomass because it offers an improvement in the analysis time when compared to classical chromatographic techniques such as GLC and HPLC.180,181 Because the residual HDO signal can interfere with the integration of the anomeric proton resonances in neutral D2O solution, the 3.2–4.0 ppm region of the 1H NMR spectrum can also be included in the analysis; in the latter case, partial least-squares models have been implemented to overcome problems due to the severe spectral overlap in the region where most of the carbohydrate resonances reside.182

When NMR spectroscopic information on a specific monosaccharide is not available, detailed analysis of chemical shifts and coupling constant patterns can be used to assess its identity. For instance, the structure of the bicyclic monosaccharide bradyrhizose could be established using this approach.81 However, signal overlap accompanied by strong coupling effects usually hamper the interpretation of the bulk region in the 1H NMR spectrum of monosaccharides, as well as the extraction of accurate JHH coupling constants; thus, if the monosaccharide can be isolated and purified, NMR spin simulation may assist to retrieve information on chemical shifts and coupling constants (cf. section 5.3.2 on NMR spin simulations). Once the structure of a novel monosaccharide has been inferred from the NMR analysis, the synthesis of authentic standards may help to confirm or revise its identity, as exemplified for Leg, 4eLeg, 8eLeg, and 6d-d-Alt.82,153,183 Sometimes, the depolymerization process can lead to the formation of unexpected bicyclic products, which conveniently can facilitate the assignment of the relative configuration of key asymmetric carbons. Examples of bicyclic compounds are the 1,5-intramolecular lactone of β-Aci5Ac7Ac that is formed under the acidic hydrolysis conditions83 and the intramolecular glycoside of the 4-C-branched monosaccharide isolated from the hydrolysate of the O-antigen polysaccharide from R. palustris.80 Interestingly, three different types of intramolecular hemiacetal ring closures have been observed in the case of bradyrhizose involving the aldehyde group at position 1 and the hydroxyl group of positions 4 (furanose) or 5 or 9 (pyranoses).184

Sugar analysis of glycosides can also be performed by hydrolyzing the native material directly in the NMR tube using deuterated sulfuric acid (2 M D2SO4), as was demonstrated for a flavonoid, a saponin, and two aminoglycosides.185 Even though the signal-to-noise of acidic samples is reduced when compared to neutral samples (i.e., due to the increased conductivity of the sample), an advantage with this solvent is that the HDO peak resonates at ∼ 6 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum. This facilitates straightforward identification of the anomeric resonances at lower chemical shifts in the spectral region ∼ 4.5–5.5 ppm as an α/β-mixture of each monosaccharide with characteristic chemical shifts, as well as their 3JH1,H2 coupling constants. The hydrolysis is typically carried out at an elevated temperature of ∼ 95 °C, but the duration depends to a great deal on the ease of release of the monosaccharides from the native material, as well as on the changes that may occur to the sugar residues during the strong acidic conditions, which for some sugars lead to formation of 1,6-anhydro derivatives, degradation, or complete decomposition. The optimum reaction conditions can be investigated through a time-course monitoring of the hydrolysis process directly in the NMR tube.186

Frequently, the identity of the monosaccharides residues can directly be assessed by analysis of NMR spectroscopic data of each monosaccharide spin system in the native oligo- or polysaccharide (vide infra section 4.3). In the case of bacterial polysaccharides, this kind of analysis is facilitated when biosynthetic information is available prior to the NMR analysis.26,187,188

4.2. Absolute Configuration

The absolute configuration of monosaccharide residues can be determined by NMR spectroscopy after derivatization of the hydrolyzed glycan (∼1 mg) with an optically active reagent. These reactions usually yield a mixture of products for each monosaccharide component (i.e., pyranosides and/or furanosides in α/β-anomeric configuration), which results in a characteristic set of 1H and 13C resonances in the NMR spectra. When the same enantiomeric form of the reagent is employed in the derivatization of an enantiomeric pair of monosaccharides, or vice versa, diastereomeric products are obtained; consequently, the respective sets of NMR resonances can be used as a fingerprint to identify both the identity and absolute configuration of each component. Even though the analysis of the anomeric region of a 1H NMR spectrum is usually enough to perceive the chemical shift differences of diastereomeric pairs, in some cases the analysis of 13C chemical shifts through an 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum will offer better resolution. A derivatization process that uses (S)-(+)-2-methylbutyric anhydride as reagent was first proposed by York et al.189 and has successfully been applied in the determination of the absolute configuration of different neutral monosaccharide components (viz., d-Glc, d-Gal, l-Rha, d-Rib, d-Xyl, l-Ara, and d-GlcN) present in the EPS of Nostoc commune DRH-1, S. thermophilus ST1 (Figure 9), the O-antigen polysaccharide of B. holmesii strain ATCC 51541, and glycosides from M. salicifolia bark.190193 An alternative derivatization method that involves the glycosylation of the free monosaccharides with (R)- or (S)-2-butanol was reported by Lundborg et al.,179 and has been employed in the absolute configuration analysis of the O-antigen polysaccharides of E. coli O59 and O155, and the EPS of L. plantarum C88.187,194,195 In the latter procedure, and when NMR spectroscopic data of standard derivatives are available, the analysis of the NMR data of the mixture can be carried out in a semiautomated manner using the component analysis module of the CASPER program.179

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Component analysis of the ST1 exopolysaccharide (EPS) from Streptococcus thermophilus by derivatization with chiral (S)-(+)-2-methylbutyryl (SMB) groups. 1H NMR spectra of the EPS-SMB hydrolysate (bottom), d-galactose-SMB (middle), and d-glucose-SMB (upper). Adapted and reproduced with permission from ref (191). Copyright 2010 Springer.

More recently, an in-NMR tube derivatization method was developed to determine the absolute configuration of monosaccharides whereby a hydrolysate was reacted with d- or l-cysteine methyl ester in pyridine-d5 at 60 °C for 1 h, resulting in thiazolidine derivatives.196 The characteristic pair of 1H NMR resonances from each diastereomeric derivative are in the spectral region ∼ 5–6 ppm, originating from the anomeric proton of the sugar residue, which makes it possible to determine the absolute configuration of sugars under the condition that the monosaccharides have been determined prior to the identification of their absolute configuration; the methodology was exemplified for sugar constituents of a saponin.

In some cases, when the absolute configuration of a specific monosaccharide residue of a glycan is known, the absolute configuration of the directly attached monosaccharides can be established through the analysis of 13C NMR glycosylation shifts.197,198 Interestingly, this strategy has proven useful to assign the absolute configuration of Rha residues linked to a structurally conserved N-glycan moiety of the major capsid protein of some chloroviruses. Depending on the virus species, the rhamnose residue that is linked to O3 of a trisubstituted l-Fucp residue can have the d- or l-configuration; as predicted, a larger glycosylation shift (displacement) is observed for C1 of the d-Rha residue when compared to that of l-Rha.199 Likewise, in some cases, the absolute configuration of an aglycone moiety directly attached to a glycan can be inferred from 1H chemical shifts analysis, provided that the absolute configuration of the reducing end monosaccharide of the glycan is known; this approach has been explored in the analysis of marine steroid glycosides linked to β-d-Glcp or α-l-Arap residues.200

4.3. Ring Forms, Open Form, or Alditol

Once the identity and absolute configuration of the monosaccharide components of a glycan have been established, different NMR experiments can be used to assess the form in which these residues are present in the native oligo- or polysaccharide (i.e., pyranose, furanose, or open chain). Even though 1H,1H-COSY correlations are useful to establish two- and three-bond proton–proton connectivities (Figure 10 top) from signals found in regions of the spectra devoid of spectral overlaps (such as correlations from anomeric protons, and those from methylene and methyl groups of deoxy sugars), 1H,1H-TOCSY experiments have proven more advantageous in assigning resonances in the crowded areas of the spectra, commonly found in carbohydrates. In this regard, the analysis of 1H,1H-TOCSY spectra recorded with increasing mixing times (usually in the range from 10 to 120 ms) is highly informative because the magnetization is progressively transferred from the neighboring to the most distant protons within each monosaccharide spin system. Considering that the propagation of the magnetization between protons occurs via direct scalar coupling constants, a characteristic pattern of correlations can be observed from the anomeric proton resonances of each monosaccharide depending on the magnitude of the set of 3JHH coupling constants present in the spin system.201 For instance, in pyranose residues with the gluco-configuration, where all the 3JHH coupling constants are large enough, complete magnetization transfer can be observed throughout the whole spin system when long mixing times (τmix ∼ 100 ms) are employed (see red colored protons in second panel from the top in Figure 10). Consequently, the patterns of correlations observed in these spectra are not only useful for spin system assignments, but also to assess the relative stereochemistry of the ring carbons. However, in monosaccharides with galacto- and manno-configuration, the magnetization is not easily transferred from H1 to the most distant proton atoms due to the small magnitude of 3JH4,H5 and 3JH1,H2, respectively (Figure 7). In pyranose residues with manno-configuration, the whole spin system can be traced in the 1H,1H-TOCSY spectra using the H2 resonance as a starting point for the assignments, which usually present a distinctive downfield chemical shift when compared to other ring protons. In spin systems with the galacto-configuration, the assignments of the H5 and H6 resonances can be achieved using 1H,1H-NOESY spectra, which correlate spins that are close in space such as H4–H5, H4–H6, and/or H3–H5; furthermore, aldohexopyranose residues with the β-anomeric configuration can display correlations between H1 and H5 (such as in the case of the β-d-Fucp3NAc residue of the O-antigen PS from E. coli O187 shown in Figure 1,7 and the β-d-GalpA and β-d-GalpNAc residues of the O-antigen PS from E. coli O155,194 as shown in Figure S4 in the Supporting Information of the original article). The proton resonances of the methyl groups of 6-deoxy-sugars are equally as useful as the anomeric resonances as starting points for the assignments because they are found in a characteristic region of the spectrum that is not overlapping with the ring protons. Likewise, the characteristic resonances from the axial and equatorial H3 protons of 3-deoxy-2-ulosonic acids can be used for the same purpose, as well as the H2 protons of 2-deoxyaldoses. In addition, 1H,1H-TOCSY correlations from amido protons can be employed for the assignment of proton spin systems of N-acetylated aminosugars dissolved in H2O:D2O 98:2 solution, using a water suppression scheme.158,175

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Summary of classical NMR experiments used for 1H and 13C chemical shifts assignments of carbohydrates, anomeric configuration determination, and sequence analysis; the key correlations observed in each spectrum are indicated in red and/or blue color.

Once the 1H signals have been assigned, correlations to the resonances of their directly attached 13C atoms can be achieved using 1H,13C-HSQC spectra. The multiplicity-edited version of this experiment is useful to discriminate resonances from hydroxymethyl groups because the carbons attached to an even and odd number of protons are phased with opposite sign (see red and blue colored proton–carbon pairs, respectively, in the third panel from the top in Figure 10). Alternatively, when a better resolution is needed in the 13C dimension, the 13C,1H-HETCOR experiment can be used instead but with the inherently lower sensitivity associated with a 13C detected experiment.140,202 In cases where severe overlap is observed in the 1H NMR spectrum, heteronuclear experiments such as 1H,13C-HSQC-TOCSY can facilitate the assignments of the individual spin systems due to the higher dispersion of chemical shifts in the carbon dimension. In addition, the 1H,13C-H2BC experiment (vide infra) can be used to correlate proton and carbon spins separated by two covalent bonds.203 Furthermore, the 1H,13C-HMBC experiment can give additional information on proton and carbon spins separated by two or three covalent bonds. The correlations observed in the latter experiment are based on heteronuclear 2JCH and 3JCH coupling constants, revealing complementary information to that of the aforementioned experiments. It is worth pointing out that this experiment also plays an important role in the assignment of 13C chemical shifts of nonprotonated carbon atoms such as anomeric carbon atoms of ketoses, carbonyl signals in uronic acids, and non-2-ulosonic acids, and quaternary carbons in branched monosaccharides.76,79 Moreover, the magnitude and the sign of the 2JCH couplings within each spin system can also give insights into the differentiation of aldohexopyranose residues (Figure 8), and this information can be retrieved from 1H,1H-HETLOC, 1H,13C-HSQC-HECADE, and/or spin-edited 1H,13C-HSQC-TOCSY experiments.170,202,204,205

Additionally, nitrogen bearing carbons can be identified by their characteristic 13C chemical shifts (∼ 50–60 ppm). Residues in pyranose and furanose form can usually be differentiated because of the characteristic chemical shifts of their anomeric carbon resonances. In addition, the C4 resonances of aldofuranose residues are found at distinctive downfield 13C chemical shifts (∼ 78–86 ppm). In the 1H,1H-NOESY spectra of aldohexopyranoses, correlations can be observed between axially oriented H1 and H5 protons, whereas in aldohexofuranoses, correlations from H1 to H4 protons located on the same face of the ring may also be detected. Likewise, in the 1H,13C-HMBC spectrum, correlations between H1–C5 and/or C1–H5 could be observed for aldohexopyranose residues, whereas correlations between H1–C4 and/or C1–H4 are characteristic of aldohexofuranoses. The presence of open-chain monosaccharide residues linked to other moieties via cyclic acetals can be inferred when inter-residue 1H,13C-HMBC correlations are observed from the anomeric resonances of this monosaccharide to two different positions of the same neighboring monosaccharide residue or aglycone moiety.109112 Alditols such as glycerol, ribitol, erythritol, mannitol, arabinitol, and glucitol can be found as components of teichoic acids;206 some of them can also be found as components of lipoteichoic acids, CPS, and repeating units of O-antigen polysaccharides. They can be identified by their lack of anomeric resonances and the presence of two sets of hydroxymethyl groups in their spin system. Even though all of the proton resonances of such residues are usually found in the bulky region of the 1H NMR spectrum, 1H,31P-hetero-TOCSY and/or 1H,31P-HMBC experiments can assist in the proton chemical shifts assignments because at least one of the hydroxyl groups is involved in a phosphodiester linkage to another residue.158,207209

4.4. Anomeric Configuration

The anomeric configuration of pyranoses that have an H2 proton positioned in an axial arrangement can be deduced from the magnitude of the 3JH1,H2 coupling constants observed in the 1H NMR spectrum. As discussed previously, this distinction is difficult to make in polysaccharides where the H2 proton is oriented equatorially because both α- and β-anomeric configurations give rise to small 3JH1,H2 coupling constants (e.g., ∼1.8 and ∼0.8 Hz, respectively, in the case of mannopyranose residues). Consequently, assessing whether a hexopyranose sugar residue has the α- or β-anomeric configuration is often readily performed by determining the magnitude of the 1JC1,H1 coupling constant from an F2-coupled 1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectrum (Figure 11c). As a rule of thumb, one has 1JC1,H1 < 168 Hz for an aldohexopyranose residue that has the β-anomeric configuration, whereas 1JC1,H1 > 168 Hz is observed for an α-anomeric configuration. Alternatively, these couplings constants can also be measured using an F1-coupled 1H,13C-CT-CE-HSQC NMR spectrum (Figure 11a), in which a scaling factor is used in the experiment to favor the accuracy of the measurement.158,210,211

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Comparison of the anomeric region of the 1H,13C-CT-CE-HSQC spectrum (a), 13C-decoupled 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum (b) and coupled 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum (c) of a polysaccharide of Vibrio parahemolyticus AN-16000.158

Heteronuclear carbon–proton one-bond coupling constants in saccharides can also be determined with high resolution from pure absorptive clean in-phase F2-coupled CLIP-HSQC spectra.212,213 However, the apparent 1JCH value measured from a 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum can deviate by as much as 7 Hz (Figure 12) and either under- or overestimation of the true coupling constant may occur regardless of whether it is measured in the 1H or 13C dimension.164 The peak separation corresponding to 1JCH for a proton HA is severely affected when the upfield satellite HAα(13C) significantly overlaps with the resonance from a scalar coupled proton HB(12C), resulting in a strongly coupled system. Because the 1H NMR chemical shifts of anomeric (H1) and vicinal (H2) protons coupled by 3JH1,H2 most often differ quite a bit the strong coupling artifact is seldom a problem. Nevertheless, for some sugar residues such as β-d-ManpNAc, one may need to take caution to avoid misinterpretation of data if the chemical shift difference results in spectral overlap and strong coupling as seen from the following example for β-d-ManpNAc-OMe, the 1H NMR chemical shifts of which were predicted by the CASPER program,152 resulting in δH1 ∼ 4.7 and δH2 ∼ 4.5, i.e., ΔδH = 0.2. Assuming a 1JC1,H1 of 160 Hz and a 1H spectrometer frequency of 400 MHz, this would result in spectral overlap and strong coupling between H1α(13C) and H2(12C) resonances with potential deviation of 1JC1,H1 from its true value, emphasizing the fact that the anomeric configuration may need to be further supported by information from additional NMR experiments. The presence of strongly coupled spin systems can also affect the outcome of other types of NMR experiments, resulting in artifacts in spectra (cf. section 5.1.7 on pure shift experiments).

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Detailed analysis of strong coupling effects on 1JCH values measured in the 1H dimension (blue) and 13C dimension (red) compared to the value predicted from theory. An AHBHXC spin system is used to simulate 2D coupled 1H,13C-HSQC spectra. The measured 1JCH values are plotted against (Δν/3JHH). 1JAX = 145 Hz, 3JAB = 10 Hz, and 2JBX = −5 Hz; a dashed black line is drawn at 145 Hz, the 1JCH value used in simulation. A significant discrepancy between 1JCH values measured in the 1H and 13C is found when 3 ≤ (Δν/3JHH) ≤ 12. Reproduced with permission from ref (164). Copyright 2011 Elsevier.

The α- and β-anomeric configuration of aldohexopyranosyl residues can also be inferred from the sign of their 2JC2,H1 coupling constants, which can be determined using either 1H,13C-HETLOC, 1H,13C-HSQC-HECADE, or spin-edited 1H,13C-HSQC-TOCSY experiments.170,204,205 As illustrated by Oikawa et al., residues with the β-anomeric configuration are expected to display 2JC2,H1 > 0 Hz, whereas those with the α-anomeric configuration have 2JC2,H1 < 0 Hz.170 Furthermore, the α- and β-anomeric configuration in residues with the manno-configuration can also be deduced from the magnitude of these coupling constants (−1.5 and +8.0 Hz, respectively), as depicted in Figure 8. In the case of Neu5Ac derivatives, the anomeric configuration of the C2 can be determined from heteronuclear geminal and vicinal coupling constants involving the axially oriented proton at position 3 (H3ax); thus, residues with the α-anomeric configuration are characterized by large 2JC2,H3ax ≈ −8 Hz and 3JC1,H3ax ≈ 7 Hz, whereas those with a β-anomeric configuration display medium 2JC2,H3ax ≈ – 4 Hz and small 3JC1,H3ax ≈ 1 Hz.214,215

Analysis of chemical shifts of key proton and carbon resonances can also provide information about the stereochemistry of the anomeric carbon. In aldohexopyranoses with the α-anomeric configuration the resonances of the C5 atoms are found ∼4–7 ppm upfield when compared to their respective counterparts with the β-anomeric configuration (Figure 6). The characteristic chemical shifts differences of the H3ax and H3eq protons of non-2-ulosonic acids can also be used to assess the stereochemical configuration of the anomeric C2 carbon; thus, a large ΔδH value of ∼ 0.7–1.0 ppm is indicative of the C1 carboxylic group oriented axially, whereas a small ΔδH value of ∼ 0.0–0.4 ppm usually implies that this moiety is oriented equatorially. Because the configuration of the anomeric C2 carbon in non-2-ulosonic acids is defined, using as reference the configuration of the C7 atom,216 a larger ΔδH between H3ax and H3eq protons is observed in the case of Neu5Ac, Leg, 4eLeg, and 8eLeg residues with the α-anomeric configuration, and Aci, 8eAci, Fus, Pse, and 8ePse residues with the β-anomeric configuration, when compared to their respective C2 epimers.75,8284,140,183,217 However, it is worth pointing out that approaches involving chemical shifts comparisons and 3JC1,H3ax may fail in some cases because these values can be affected by the aglycone substituents, particularly in synthetic derivatives.218

Moreover, experiments based on the nuclear Overhauser effect (such as 1H,1H-NOESY or 1H,13C-HSQC-NOESY) may also reveal information related to the configuration of the anomeric carbon, using key through-space correlations from the anomeric proton to nonvicinal intraresidue ring protons. Thus, all of the aldohexopyranoses with the β-anomeric configuration depicted in Figure 3 have the potential to show direct through-space correlations between H1 and H5, whereas only those with the gluco-, manno-, galacto-, and talo-configuration could show correlations from the anomeric proton to the axially oriented H3 atom.

4.5. Linkage Positions and Sequential Arrangement between Sugar Residues

Linkage positions in oligo- and polysaccharides may be identified by large 13C NMR glycosylation shifts, i.e., the difference in chemical shift of the substituted position when compared to that of the corresponding monosaccharide, being on the order of ΔδC ∼ 4–11 ppm.156,197 Because the resonances of carbon atoms adjacent to glycosylated positions can be shifted upfield by ∼ 2 ppm when compared to the corresponding monosaccharides, the combined effect of a double substitution at neighboring positions of the same monosaccharide residue may result in glycosylation shifts smaller than anticipated, as observed for the C4 carbon resonance of the →3,4)-α-d-GalpNAc-(1→ residue of the O-antigen PS of E. coli O181 (ΔδC4 ∼ 2.6), and the C3 resonances of the →3,4)-α-l-FucpNAc-(1→ and →3,4)-β-d-GlcpNAc-(1→ residues of the PS of V. parahemolyticus AN-16000 (ΔδC3 ∼ 2.2) and the O-antigen PS of E. coli O115 (ΔδC3 ∼ 2.8), respectively.134,158,175 Furthermore, when monosaccharide residues are linked to other moieties via a phosphodiester bonds, the linkage position can also be inferred from the splitting of proton and/or carbon resonances due to 3JHP and 2JCP coupling constants.

An alternative approach to distinguish linkage positions relies on the observation of hydroxyl protons in oligosaccharides in supercooled aqueous solutions, at −14 °C, and to use these as starting points for resonance assignments and structural determination. These protons resonate in the spectral region 5.5–8.5 ppm and the presence and absence of proton–proton correlations in 1H,1H-COSY or 1H,1H-TOCSY spectra with a long mixing time of 140 ms facilitates the determination of linkage positions.219 The hydroxyl-based approach was recently extended by using also 13C NMR correlations from 1H,13C-HSQC experiments resulting in regular one-bond correlations to nonexchangeable protons and 1H,13C-HSQC-TOCSY experiments, where the latter first used a short mixing time of only 8 ms to obtain correlations between hydroxyl groups and adjacent 13C nuclei, which taken together form constituent pieces, H–C–O–H, of a jigsaw puzzle.149 A series of longer isotropic mixing times of up to 90 ms enables both resonance assignments and identification of linkage positions, due to lack of correlations in the 1H,13C-HSQC-TOCSY spectrum when the short mixing time is used. Interestingly, to improve the signal-to-noise ratio three capillary NMR tubes were packed inside a 3 mm NMR tube. It is noteworthy that the 1H,13C–H2BC experiment offers an alternative for detection of correlations between hydroxyl groups and adjacent 13C nuclei, as demonstrated for the O-antigen PS of E. coli O142, where the OH signals readily could be assigned at 2 °C in a H2O/D2O 95:5 solution.148

The sequence of monosaccharide residues in glycans, and their linkage positions, can be established using proton–proton through-space inter-residue correlations from 1H,1H-NOESY, 1H,1H-ROESY, 1H,13C-HSQC-NOESY and/or 1H,13C-HSQC-ROESY experiments, as well as three-bond inter-residue proton–carbon correlations from 1H,13C-HMBC experiments (Figure 10 bottom). The outcome of these experiments is strongly influenced by the torsion angles preferences around the glycosidic linkage and, in the case of the 1H,13C-HMBC experiment, the intensity of the observed cross-peaks will depend on both the magnitude of the corresponding inter-residue 3JCH coupling constant and the selected long-range coupling evolution delay (Δ) of the experiment, with the maximum intensity observed when Δ = 1/(2·3JCH).220 In this regard, loss of magnetization due to fast T2 relaxation may limit signal-to-noise performance of small 3JCH-based correlations in the 1H,13C-HMBC spectrum of large polysaccharides. In ketose residues, the sequence analysis is restricted to the detection of 1H,13C-HMBC correlations from the anomeric carbons to the proton(s) located at the substitution positions. When different anomeric carbon resonances of a glycan fall close together in the 13C NMR spectrum, a 1H,13C-HMBC spectrum with improved resolution in the indirect dimension may be required to unambiguously assign the corresponding cross-peaks; thus, a band-selective constant-time version of this experiment can be employed (cf. selective excitation experiments in section 5.1.2).221 Experiments based on the nuclear Overhauser effect may be useful to establish through space correlations between an anomeric proton and a hydrogen atom at the substitution position; however, because the dipolar interaction depends on the proximity of the proton spins, additional cross-peaks could be observed to close in space neighboring positions and may lead to misinterpretation of the data. For instance, in the trisaccharide moiety, α-d-GalpNAc-(1→2)-β-d-Quip3NAc-(1→3)-β-d-Ribf, present in the O-antigen PS of E. coli O5ac, three different inter-residue 1H,1H-NOESY correlations were observed from the anomeric proton of the β-d-Quip3NAc residue to the H2, H3, and H4 atoms of the Ribf residue.222 In addition, two trough-space correlations from the anomeric proton of the GalpNAc residue are observed to H1 and H2 of the directly attached Quip3NAc residue, and an additional correlation is observed to H4 of the nondirectly linked β-d-Ribf residue. It is worth pointing out that to avoid misinterpretation of the data due to spin-diffusion artifacts, the 1H,1H-NOESY spectra employed for the analysis of large polysaccharides should be recorded using short mixing times of ∼ 50 ms and can be complemented by the 1H,13C-DDCCR experiment to correlate inter-residue proton–carbon pairs based on cross-correlated dipolar relaxation (cf. section 5.2.2).223,224 In oligo- and polysaccharides, where a monosaccharide residue is connected via a phosphodiester group to another monosaccharide residue or alditol, 1H,31P-hetero-TOCSY and/or 1H,31P-HMBC experiments can be useful to establish the sequence of the disaccharide moiety.105,175

Determination of the biological repeating unit of a polysaccharide can be achieved by NMR spectroscopy if the low intensity signals corresponding to the terminal nonreducing end of the polysaccharide can be identified, particularly in the anomeric proton region. These signals are sometimes sharper than those of the internal monosaccharides due to the higher flexibility of the polysaccharide terminus, facilitating the spin system assignments. Comparison of these resonances’ intensities with those of the respective internal residues can be used to estimate the degree of polymerization of the PS.136,194,225 Additionally, the average molecular weight of neutral polysaccharides can be estimated from their translational self-diffusion coefficients, measured using 1H NMR diffusion experiments and the approximation developed by Viel et al.226,227

4.6. Substituents Appended to Sugars

The diversity of glycans found in nature is increased by different structural alterations of the basic monosaccharide structures.228 In polysaccharide repeating units, these modifications can be homogeneously or heterogeneously distributed throughout the polymer or confined to the terminal end of the polysaccharide. Modification by hydroxyl groups through O-acetylation is quite common in glycans and, because acetyl migration229 or partial hydrolysis may take place in the natural environment in which these biomolecules are found, or during extraction and purification procedures, heterogeneous structures containing nonstoichiometric amounts of O-acetyl groups can be produced. For instance, different populations of O-acetylated rhamnose and galacturonic acid residues, six and two respectively, could be identified in the O-antigen PS of E. coli O115 (viz. Rhap2Ac, Rhap3Ac, Rhap4Ac, Rhap2Ac3Ac, Rhap2Ac4Ac, Rhap3Ac4Ac, GalpA2Ac, and GalpA3Ac) besides the corresponding non-O-acetylated moieties.134 In sialic acid derivatives, O-acetylation of the hydroxyl groups may typically be found at the O4, O7, O8, and/or O9 positions,230 and the presence of these substituents can be inferred by the observation of methyl proton resonances in the spectral region between ∼2.1–2.2 ppm. Additionally, other substituents such as lactic, succinic, and long-chain aliphatic acids can be linked via ester bonds to hydroxyl groups of monosaccharide residues. Sucrose esters isolated from fruits of different plant genera, and monosaccharide fatty acid esters obtained through enzymatic reactions are currently being explored as potential surfactants and antibacterial reagents in food industry applications.231233 In all of these cases, the chemical shifts of the hydrogen atoms located at the O-acetylated position are shifted downfield by ΔδH ∼ 0.5–1.7 when compared to the respective nonsubstituted monosaccharides and, in some cases, may show up in the same spectral region where the anomeric proton resonances reside; in the case of the O-antigen PS of E. coli O115, the H2 resonances of Rhap2Ac, Rhap2Ac3Ac, and Rhap2Ac4Ac are found at δH2 5.49, 5.61, and 5.54, respectively, whereas H3 of GalpA3Ac is found at δH3 ∼ 5.26.134 The location of these substituents can be determined through heteronuclear three-bond 1H,13C-HMBC correlations from the carbonyl resonances of the substituent to the proton spins located at the respective substitution positions. Because the carbonyl resonances appear in a narrow region of the 13C NMR spectrum (δC ∼ 170–180), a band-selective constant-time version of this experiment can be used to improve F1 resolution (see section 5.1.2).134,175,187,234

Pyruvic acid can be linked to monosaccharide constituents of polysaccharides and glycoconjugates via ether or cyclic acetal linkages. In the latter case, six-membered rings are formed when the O4 and O6 atoms of aldohexopyranose residues are involved in the linkage (such as in the case of the secondary cell wall polymer of P. alvei CCM 2051 illustrated in Figure 5a),106 whereas five-membered rings are characteristic of 2,3- or 3,4-O-linked ketal pyruvates. The occurrence of these entities can be inferred when resonances of methyl groups are present at δH ∼ 1.3–1.7 and δC ∼ 17–30, and quaternary ketal carbon resonances (C2) are observed at δC2 ∼ 100 (six-membered rings) or ∼110 ppm (five-membered rings). Furthermore, the linkage positions in the monosaccharide residue can be identified by analysis of glycosylation shifts, and the presence of three-bond 1H,13C-HMBC correlations from the ketal carbon of the pyruvic acid moiety to the hydrogen atoms at the substitution positions. Additionally, through space 1H,1H-NOESY correlations from the methyl proton resonances can be used to retrieve this information and the stereochemistry of the C2 carbon atom. In the case of 4,6-O-linked pyruvates, analysis of 1H and 13C chemical shifts of the methyl group resonances can also give insights into the stereochemistry of the ketal carbon (i.e., typical values of δH ∼ 1.65–1.68 and δC ∼ 17 are observed in the case of axially oriented CH3 groups, whereas δH ∼ 1.46–1.52 and δC ∼ 26 are observed when the methyl group is equatorially orientated).235

Substituents attached via ether bonds to hydroxyl groups of glycan structures are less common. For example, O-methylation of glycans have only been reported in bacteria, fungi, algae, plants, worms, and mollusks but not in mammals.236 In sialic acids derivatives, O-methylation has been observed at the O8 and O9 positions, such as in the case of the recently reported Kdn8Me and Neu5Gc8Me residues found in the glycome of the cephalochordate B. belcheri,237 and the Kdn9Me residue found in the O-antigen PS from P. sedimentorum KMM 9023T.238 The proton and carbon resonances of this substituent are observed at characteristic δH ∼ 3.4 and δC ∼ 59.239 Besides amide and ester linkages, lactic acid residues can be attached to glycans through ether bonds, and the N-acetyl muramic acid residue found in the peptidoglycan is an example of the latter (Figure 5a); in that case, the proton resonances of the lactyl group are observed at δH ∼ 1.4 (CH3) and 4.4 (CH), and the ether linkage can be recognized by the characteristic downfield chemical shift of the C2 resonance of the lactic acid moiety (δC2 ∼ 78 ppm).152 Interestingly, the repeating unit of the EPS from S. thermophilus contains a glucose residue that is 6-O-substituted with a nononic acid moiety through an ether linkage (Figure 5b).107,108 Furthermore, it has recently been demonstrated that hemicellulose chains can be covalently linked to lignin through ether bonds because long-range proton–carbon correlations could be observed in the 1H,13C-HMBC spectrum of a lignin–hemicellulose complex from the α-proton/α-carbon atoms of the lignin subunits to the C6/H6 nuclei of mannose residues present in a glucomannan polymer.240 Besides 1H,13C-HMBC experiments, 1H,1H-NOESY, and/or 1H,13C-HSQC-NOESY correlations can be useful to establish proton–proton correlations at the ether linkage.

Aminosugars can be recognized by the characteristic upfield chemical shifts of their nitrogen-bearing carbons (δC ∼ 50–60). The presence of methyl group resonances at δH ∼ 2.0 ppm and δC ∼ 23 ppm may indicate that the amino groups are N-acetylated, a modification that is widely distributed in nature. Amide linkages with carboxylic acid containing structures such as glyceric (GroA, see Figure 5d), glycolic (Gc), 3-hydroxybutyric (3Hb), 4-hydroxybutyric (4Hb), and succinic acid (Suc) can also be found in nature, in addition to diverse aliphatic acids and amino acids moieties (see N-acetyl aspartic acid moiety in Figure 5e).114 In an analogous manner to what was described for ester linked substituents, the location of these substituents can be determined through heteronuclear three-bond 1H,13C-HMBC correlations from the carbonyl resonances of the N-acyl groups to the protons at the substitution positions. Furthermore, the amide protons can be observed in H2O:D2O solution at δH ∼ 8 ppm and assist in the assignment of proton and carbon resonances of the directly attached moieties (i.e., monosaccharide and substituent) by employing homo- and heteronuclear 2D experiments. Lactyl groups linked via amide groups are rare, but some examples were recently reported in polysaccharides produced by bacteria of the T. fructosivorans, S. litorea, and P. marincola species, where they are respectively linked to Rha4N, Fuc3N, and Pse residues.241243 In contrast to what is observed for ether-linked lactyl groups, the C2 resonance of N-lactyl moieties is found upfield at δC2 ∼ 70. Furthermore, glyceric and 4-hydroxybutyric acid structures, connected via amide bonds to Qui4N (Figure 5d) and Pse residues, respectively, have been found as components of the backbone of some bacterial polysaccharides.113,244 The presence of N-acetimidoyl groups in E. coli O-antigen PS is restricted to only three serogroups (viz. O118, O145, and O151),26 and the corresponding methyl resonances are observed at δH ∼ 2.2 and δC ∼ 20.245 In some glycans, Pse, Leg, and 8eLeg residues can display this type of substituents at the N5 position and, in the particular case of the LPS of the wild-type strain RC1 of L. pneumophila, three further N-methylated derivatives of this substituent were reported: 5-N-(N,N-dimethylacetimidoyl), 5-N-(N-methylacetimidoyl), and 5-N-acetimidoyl-5-N-methyl.246N-Formyl groups (Fo) display a characteristic resonance in the 1H NMR spectrum at δH ∼ 8.0, and they can also be found as substituents of Pse residues.121 In addition, amino groups can be N-sulfated, such as in the case of heparan sulfate.247 Nitrogen–proton correlations from 1H,15N-HSQC and 1H,15N-HSQC-TOCSY spectra recorded using a H2O:D2O 98:2 solution, or long-range 1H,15N-HMBC or 1H,15N-HNMBC spectra recorded using D2O, can be employed to establish the substitution positions of amino, N-acyl, and N-sulfated derivatives; in the IMPACT version of the latter two experiments, constant-time (see description of constant-time 1H,13C-HMBC experiment in section 5.1.2) and ASAP features (see fast NMR experiments in section 5.1.5) have been implemented in order to offer improved sensitivity as well as enhanced resolution in the F1 dimension.159,160 In these spectra, the 15N chemical shifts of amido and N-sulfated moieties can be found at δN ∼ 115–125 and ∼93 ppm, respectively, whereas unsubstituted amino groups can be observed at δN ∼ 30.141,146,157,159,160

Hydroxyl groups of monosaccharide residues can undergo phosphorylation, or form phosphodiester bonds with other phosphorylated monosaccharides or substituents such as alditol phosphates, phosphoethanolamine (Figure 5e), phosphocholine, glycerol-1-phosphate (Figure 5d), glycerol-2-phosphate, 3- and 2-phosphoglyceric acid, among others.248 The number of phosphorus-containing moieties present in a glycan structure can readily be identified using a 1D 31P NMR spectrum; thus, phosphomonoesters (singlet at δP ≈ 10 to 0), phosphodiesters (singlet at δP ≈ 0 to −5), diphosphomonoesters (doublets at δP1 ≈ −5 and δP2 ≈ −10) and diphosphodiesters moieties (doublets at δP ≈ −10) can be differentiated because of their characteristic 31P chemical shifts and the presence/absence of a 2JPP coupling constant ∼21 Hz.249,250 Even though 1D 31P-decoupled 1H experiments can be employed to reveal the proton resonances at the substitution positions,106,248,251 2D experiments such as 1H,31P-HMBC105,252 and 1H,31P-hetero-TOCSY are more suitable when the target proton resonances are found in the bulk region of the 1H NMR spectrum or when multiple phosphate groups are present in the glycan. The latter experiment is also useful for assignment of proton spin systems connected to the phosphorus-containing group; in this case, magnetization transfer can be promoted from the neighboring to the more distant protons using mixing times of increased duration.158,175,207,208,248 Considering the relatively good sensitivity of 31P nuclei, heteronuclear detected versions of the aforementioned 2D experiments can be implemented when better resolution of the phosphorus resonances is required. It is noteworthy that some phosphate groups can characteristically be found at terminal ends of different polysaccharides, such as in the case of the methylated phosphate group linked to the anomeric carbon of the reducing end monosaccharide residue of Leptospira lipid A.251 Analogously, the O3 position of the mannose residue located at the nonreducing terminus the O-specific chains of the LPS from K. pneumoniae O3, H. alvei PCM 1223, and E. coli O9 is capped with a methyl phosphate group, which acts as a signal for termination of the chain elongation.253 In both cases, the methyl resonances are found at the characteristic chemical shifts of δH ∼ 3.6 (d, 3JHP = 11 Hz) and δC ∼ 54. In addition, pyrophosphate moieties can be found in the lipid A-core region of some LPS of gram-negative bacteria,249 whereas in gram-positive bacteria, both phosphodiester and diphosphodiester linkages (Figure 5a) can be involved in the covalent attachment of cell wall polysaccharides to the peptidoglycan.105,106

Lipoarabinomannans from M. tuberculosis and M. kansasii are capped with an unusual 5-deoxy-5-methylthio-d-xylofuranose residue and its corresponding oxidized sulfoxide derivative.72,73 The resonances of the methyl groups in these moieties are found at δHC ∼ 2.1/ ∼ 17 for SCH3 and δHC ∼ 2.8/∼ 40 for S(O)CH3, whereas the 13C chemical shifts of the C5 resonances of the xylofuranose residue were found at δC ∼ 34 and ∼ 56 for the thioether and sulfoxide derivatives, respectively. When unaccounted 1H and 13C chemical shift displacements are observed at specific positions of monosaccharide residues and key resonances and correlations from other substituents are absent in the 1H, 13C, 15N, and 31P based experiments, the presence of O-sulfation can be suspected.254 This modification can typically be found at O8 and O9 positions of some Neu5Ac derivatives and is heterogeneously distributed over different Fuc and GalNAc residues in the fucosylated chondroitin sulfate isolated form the sea cucumber P. pygmaea and Gal residues in the sulfated galactan obtained from the red alga B. occidentalis.255,256 Residues displaying this type of modification have also been found in several O-antigen polysaccharides isolated from marine bacteria, including α-d-GlcpA2S3Ac in the PS from P. sedimentorum KMM 9023T, β-d-Quip2S3N(4Hb) in the PS of I. abyssalis KMM 227T, α-d-Glcp2Ac3S and β-d-Galp3S residues in the PS of C. pacifica KMM 3879T, and β-d-Galp2S3S residue in the PS of C. pacifica KMM 3878.238,257259

5. NMR Experiments for Resonance and Sequence Assignments

5.1. General Considerations

2D NMR spectroscopy techniques were developed during the 1980s, followed by 3D and nD experiments, which were advanced during the 1990s, in particular, with 13C and/or 15N isotope labeling of proteins and nucleic acids, but also for carbohydrates.260262 On-cell NMR spectroscopy by high-resolution magic angle spinning was described for bacterial polysaccharides,263 1D 1H pure-shift NMR spectroscopy was developed and applied to sucrose,264 and Hadamard NMR spectroscopy was put forward as an efficient technique during 1990s.265 With these developments in hand, new NMR methods and applications emerged and have become established during the last two decades, described below for oligo- and polysaccharides as well as for glycopeptides and glycoproteins.

5.1.1. H2BC NMR Experiments

The classical 1H,13C-HMBC NMR experiment shows correlations over two and three bonds based on heteronuclear scalar coupling between the nuclei, which gives essential information in assigning NMR resonances in carbohydrates. However, because one a priori does not know how far, i.e., over how many bonds, these correlations occur, the interpretation of the data is still requiring additional information. A solution to this problem could be to carry out a complementary 2D 1H,13C-HMQC-COSY or a 1H,13C-HSQC-TOCSY experiment with a very short mixing time (τmix 10 ms), but the spectra may still be quite crowded when oligosaccharides or larger structures are to be analyzed. A remedy to this was proposed based on the HMQC-COSY combination and is referred to as a 1H,13C-H2BC NMR experiment relying on 1JCH and nJHH couplings for coherence transfer.266 The experiment, which is of constant-time type, suppresses both homo- and heteronuclear couplings in the indirect dimension and heteronuclear decoupling is carried out during the acquisition. Notably, the H2BC spectra show only cross-peaks involving 13C spins j, for which there is a nonvanishing nJHH coupling between spins Hj and Hk, where Hk is a vicinal or geminal proton. In the analysis of intraring correlations in sugar residues, one typically observes two correlations for each atom position n in the sugar residue along the F2 dimension corresponding to H(n – 1)/Cn and H(n + 1)/Cn and also two correlations along the F1 dimension corresponding to C(n – 1)/Hn and C(n + 1)/Hn. This information then facilitates a 1H,13C-heteronuclear “sequential walk” in the H2BC spectrum (Figure 13),267 unraveling in many cases the complete spin system of a monosaccharide entity in a glycan molecule. The limitation of H2BC technique is similar to that of 1H,1H-TOCSY experiments in that small coupling constants, such as 3JH4,H5 in pyranose sugars having the galacto-configuration, may hamper magnetization transfer. Further developments and applications of the H2BC experiment have been reported,268,269 one of which was a 3D H2BC NMR experiment.203,270

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Illustration of a 1H,13C-heteronuclear “sequential walk” in an H2BC spectrum for the assignment process of the complete spin system for a 3-substituted β-d-QuiN residue in an oligosaccharide from the LPS of Francisella victoria based on the overlaid HSQC (green) and H2BC (red) spectra starting from the anomeric H1/C1 cross-peak in the HSQC spectrum via correlations in the H2BC spectrum to H1/C2, but also to C1/H2, all the way to the H6/C6 cross-peak of the methyl group. Reproduced with permission from ref (267). Copyright 2011 Elsevier.

Combining the 1H,13C-H2BC NMR experiment with one-bond correlations from a 1H,13C-HSQC-type of experiment would obviate the separate acquisition of the latter and the 2BOB (two-bond one-bond) experiment with editing possibilities has been proposed to this end.271 If the experiment is performed such that all peaks appear in the spectrum, it is referred to as H2OBC (heteronuclear two-bond one-bond correlations), where the cross-peaks due to one or two bonds can be distinguished based on the π/2 phase difference in the proton dimension (F2).

5.1.2. Selective Excitations

Selective pulses as part of an NMR experiment can be used to efficiently carry out excitation at a specific resonance frequency, thereby facilitating, e.g., 1D experiments instead of relying on full 2D or higher dimensions in acquisition of NMR data. The selective excitation, inversion or refocusing may employ Gaussian, SNOB or BURP shaped pulses, or other profiles that efficiently pick out a narrow spectral region.272 Subsequent application of a 1H,1H-TOCSY spin-lock sequence may be used to identify carbohydrate components, such as those from polysaccharides of biofilms from Staphylococcus epidermidis.273 When applying these selective pulses at 1H frequencies where anomeric protons reside, multistep correlations can be identified from 2D selective-TOCSY-DQFCOSY and selective-TOCSY-NOESY experiments as shown by Sato et al. for lactose, di-, and triantennary N-glycan oligosaccharides.274276

However, if the frequency difference between resonances that are to be targeted is minute, the above-described selective pulses may not be sufficient in resolving peaks that only differ by a few hertz. Provided that the peaks from protons still have distinct chemical shifts, then a chemical shift selective filter (CSSF) may be utilized.277,278 In the pseudo 2D experiment, the variable time (VT) chemical shift evolution period is incremented up to a maximum value, which defines the selectivity of the filter, typically set as tmax = 0.5/Δν, where the chemical shift difference between the overlapping peaks is given by Δν and may be as low as 1.4 Hz.277 When the FIDs are added, the on-resonance magnetization is constructively enhanced, while the off-resonance magnetization, which differs in phase, is eliminated by destructive interference. The application of the CSSF technique is shown for the resonance assignments of the disaccharide rutinose in which the methyl group resonances of the terminal rhamnosyl residue differed by only ∼ 3 Hz, and application of a 1D 1H,1H-VT-CSSF-TOCSY readily resolved the NMR chemical shifts of both its H3 and H5 resonances of the anomeric mixture (Figure 14).279 The CSSF methodology has successfully been applied to assign chemical shifts in arabino-containing oligosaccharides using TOCSY experiments,485 and to resolve closely resonating methyl groups in an N-acetyl-containing trisaccharide using NOESY experiments.280

Figure 14.

Figure 14

(a) Selected regions of the 1H NMR spectrum of rutinose, α-l-Rhap-(1→6)-d-Glcp. (b) The corresponding regions of the 1D 1H,1H-CSSF-TOCSY spectrum in which the H6 resonance of rhamnose at 1.290 ppm was targeted. The mixing time used was 80 ms. (c) The corresponding 1D 1H,1H-CSSF-TOCSY spectrum in which the H6 resonance of rhamnose at 1.295 ppm was targeted. The intensities of the H6 resonances are reduced relative to those from the ring protons. Reproduced with permission from ref (279). Copyright 2011 Elsevier Publisher.

The VT-CSSF NMR experiments are effective but not efficient, and a constant-time method referred to as GEMSTONE (gradient-enhanced multiplet-selective targeted observation NMR experiment)281 was proposed to resolve the limitation of performing a pseudo-2D NMR experiment. GEMSTONE uses swept-frequency pulses to produce spatially dependent chemical shift evolution, which in turn leads to destructive interference of the off-resonance signals. The spatial encoding in the different parts of the sample in effect performs the incrementation used in the CSSF experiment and can be seen as a single scan analogue of the CSSF experiment. Subsequent to the GEMSTONE module, NOE281 or TOCSY282 modules can be added. The latter experiment was applied to the aminoglycoside antibiotic amikacin and the flavone glycosides hesperidin and naringin, containing α-l-Rhap-(1→6)-β-d-Glcp and α-l-Rhap-(1→2)-β-d-Glcp disaccharide structural elements.

The monosaccharide entities of glycans often contain a carbonyl group as part of a functional group, in particular N-acetyl groups, carboxylic acids, amino acids linked via an amide bond to the monosaccharide, O-acetyl, and more complex ester groups as substituents. The 13C NMR resonances of the different carbonyl groups reside in the quite narrow spectral region of ∼ 170–180 ppm and the 1H,13C-HMBC experiment can reveal important correlations to unravel structural information. To increase the resolution in the F1-dimension of a 1H,13C-HMBC spectrum, Nuzillard and co-workers developed a band-selective experiment, which covered a narrow spectral region of 16 ppm and applied it to an arabinoxylan pentasaccharide.283 This facilitated improved spectral interpretation and cross-peak identification thanks to improved resolution in the F1-dimension. However, by reducing the spectral width, a conspicuous and undesirable skew becomes evident along the F1-dimension of the 1H,13C-HMBC spectrum. A band-selective constant-time 1H,13C-HMBC experiment,221 which, e.g., uses a Q3 Gaussian cascade for the selective π-pulse on the 13C channel, alleviates the problem because no net modulation by JHH coupling evolution takes place, and as a result, the fine structure of the proton–proton couplings do not appear in the F1-dimension. The 1H,13C-BS-CT-HMBC experiment has been useful in elucidating carbohydrate-containing natural products and polysaccharides from different bacterial species.158,284,285 The concept of band-selective excitation was used to resolve complex NMR spectra of the core region of the LPS from Brucella melitensis, where the 1H,13C-BS-CT-HMBC experiment instead was applied on resonances at the anomeric region of an oligosaccharide mixture (Figure 15).135

Figure 15.

Figure 15

(a) Structure of the deacylated R-LPS of Brucella melitensis strain Bm_wbkD in SNFG format.135 (b) Selected section of the anomeric region of the 13C NMR spectrum and (c) band-selective constant-time 1H,13C-HMBC spectrum recorded over a spectral region of 5.4 ppm × 9.0 ppm with 2048 × 256 data points, using a selective 13C excitation pulse applied at the center of the region for anomeric carbons.

5.1.3. TILTed NMR Spectra

The limited 1H NMR spectral dispersion of glycans pose problems due to degenerate chemical shifts or highly overlapped spectral regions. The crowded spectra make assignment of resonances difficult when using 1H,1H-TOCSY experiments as well as for obtaining sequence information between sugar residues relying on 1H,1H-NOESY experiments. A conceptually straightforward remedy will be to record 3D spectra in which the proton resonance overlap can be resolved by distributing the 2D-planes along a third dimension, typically containing resonances from 13C nuclei, in, e.g., a 3D 1H,1H-TOCSY-1H,13C-HSQC NMR experiment. However, this will increase the experimental time significantly, by up to 2 orders of magnitude (unless nonuniform sampling is employed, vide infra). By still using the 13C-dimension, but to a lesser extent, and record a tilted projection where the plane makes an angle α to the F1/F3 plane (TOCSY or NOESY), the spectral overlap may be alleviated. The tilted projection is accomplished by linking the evolution increments Δt1 and Δt2 in a predefined ratio, given by tan α = Δt1t2, and the methodology was thus dubbed time-domain increments linked together (TILT).286 The projection plane is labeled F*/F3 (Figure 16), where the F* dimension contains mixed 1H and 13C frequencies, and therefore it is not displayed as ppm using the standard chemical shift scale. The F2/F3 plane (α = 90°) corresponds to the 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum, and the choice of the tilt angle α depends on the differences in 13C chemical shifts; the smaller the chemical shift difference is the larger is the tilt angle needed to bring about a chemical shift displacement significant enough to resolve spectral overlap. By acquiring two experiments, one with a positive tilt angle and one with the corresponding negative tilt angle (typically in the range α = ±10° – ±30°), the pure 1H and 13C frequencies can be derived by using trigonometric functions, and subsequently the NMR chemical shifts will be obtained.

Figure 16.

Figure 16

Schematic representation of a 3D 1H,1H-NOESY-1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectrum, where the F2 axis displays the carbon-13 frequencies and the tilted plane F*/F3 contains contributions from both 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts, thereby resolving spectral overlap present in a regular 2D NMR spectrum. Adapted with permission from ref (287). Copyright 2007 Elsevier Publisher.

The TILT methodology was applied to the O-antigen polysaccharide from Escherichia coli O147 to resolve spectral overlap using a 1H,1H-NOESY-1H,13C-HSQC NMR experiment with a tilt angle α = +10°, facilitating displacement of resonances as a result of the small degree of 13C frequencies mixed into the projection plane F*/F3.288 Not only will correlations be resolved by shifting resonances, but correlated peaks that are not shifted to any large extent may also be identified in the TILT spectrum due to the absence of cross-peaks with previously degenerate chemical shifts. For the exopolysaccharide (EPS) from Streptococcus thermophilus ST1 that only contains glucose and galactose residues in the repeating unit (RU), the TILT NOESY-HSQC experiment was carried out with α = ±15°, which aided 1H and 13C NMR chemical shift assignments of the EPS.191 It may be noted that the symmetrical diagonal present in a NOESY spectrum no longer exists in the TILT spectra but that a “pseudodiagonal” may be identified in the F*/F3 plane being dependent on the tilt angle (Figure 16). The TILT approach facilitates time savings in data acquisition of at least an order of magnitude.

5.1.4. Acquisition with Multiple Receivers

Acquiring FIDs from different nuclei can be made more efficient if two or several independent receivers are tuned to the specific Larmor frequencies of the individual nuclei. The experiments may be divided into three categories, viz., (i) parallel, (ii) sequential, and (iii) and interleaved acquisition executed such that several spectra are obtained in a single measurement.289,290 The parallel acquisition NMR spectroscopy (PANSY) methodology was shown for 2D NMR spectroscopy experiments, with 1H-detection by receiver 1 and 13C-detection by receiver 2, in which 1H,1H-COSY and 13C,1H-correlated experiments were recorded and detected in parallel.291 The resulting spectra showed not only nJHH and 1JCH (coupled) correlations but also long-range nJCH correlations; thus, the NMR experiments would in principle be useful for resonance assignments of mono- and disaccharides. A 2D NMR experiment with sequential acquisition is the combination of 1H,1H-TOCSY and 13C,1H-correlated experiments in which the latter 13C-detected FID is recorded during the spin-lock period (122 ms) of the first one, which leads to a 1H-decoupled 13C,1H-HETCOR spectrum from which 1JCH correlations are readily identified.291

An interleaved experiment utilizing two receivers is the 2D double-COSY experiment in which the 1H,1H-COSY FID is first recorded, without or with 19F-decoupling, followed by the 19F,19F-COSY experiment detected by the second receiver,292 which should be useful for characterization of 19F-substituted saccharides.293 For the α/β-anomeric mixture of 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-d-glucose the COCOHOESY experiment, in which both experiments share the same t1 evolution period and consequently the same F1-axis, was carried out by sequential acquisition whereby the 1H,1H-COSY FID is recorded by using the first receiver during the HOESY mixing time, followed by recording of the 19F FID employing the second receiver, leading to a time-saving by a factor of 2.292 Using the 1H,1H-TOCSY mixing period for decoupling of another spin-1/2 nucleus recorded as a 1D spectrum has been carried out with 13C-detection for polysaccharides (Figure 17),158,191,195 where the two types of NMR spectra give highly valuable information at the initial stages of a structural elucidation process. For guanosine triphosphate, four receivers were used to simultaneously record 1H, 13C, 15N, and 31P NMR spectra,289 i.e., from nuclei present in many polysaccharides,158 which underscores the potential of acquisition with multiple receivers.

Figure 17.

Figure 17

Spectra from a PANSY NMR experiment utilizing dual receivers. The 1H,1H-TOCSY spectrum, resulting from a 120 ms isotropic mixing time in the experiment, shows correlations from the six anomeric protons of the repeating unit in the ST1 EPS from Streptococcus thermophilus (top). During the spin-lock time, a separate one-dimensional 13C experiment with proton decoupling was acquired (bottom). Reproduced with permission from ref (191). Copyright 2010 Springer Publisher.

5.1.5. Fast NMR Experiments

Recording NMR spectra more efficiently will lead to shorter experimental times and/or higher resolution in spectra. Polarization-enhanced fast-pulsing techniques294 have facilitated the acquisition of 2D NMR spectra of [UL-13C;UL-15N]-labeled proteins in only a few seconds. The 1H,15N-SOFAST-HMQC band-selective optimized flip-angle short transient heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence (SOFAST-HMQC) experiment as well as the corresponding 1H,13C-correlated experiment relies on standard data sampling in the indirect F1 dimension and has been optimized for very short interscan delays.295 Notably, the first 1H excitation pulse is applied with a flip angle α ≈ 2π/3, which in the HMQC experiment leads to an effective flip angle β ≈ π/3 (cf. Ernst angle excitation), where the selective manipulation targets amide protons in the protein, while leaving all other protons unperturbed, resulting in significantly shortened T1 relaxation times. The duration of the acquisition time and recycle delay combined, is kept short, ∼ 100 ms, on the order of T1. Correlation of 1H, 15N, and 13C nuclei by band-selective excitation short-transient (BEST) 3D HNCA and HNCO experiments can be performed in a few minutes using [UL-13C;UL-15N]-labeled proteins. The 1H pulses target again the amide protons and dipolar interactions between these and other unperturbed protons ensure efficient longitudinal relaxation between successive scans, leading to an increased signal-to-noise ratio per unit time. These fast NMR experiments were applied to the 13C-labeled O-antigen from E. coli O142,148 in which four out of the five sugar residues in the RU of the polysaccharide were 2-acetamido-2-deoxy hexoses, i.e., having an N-acetyl group at position two of the sugar ring. The three types of experiments successfully revealed anticipated correlations and chemical shifts of the pertinent 1H, 13C, and 15N nuclei (Figure 18); it may be noted that the latter was present at its natural abundance of just 0.37%.

Figure 18.

Figure 18

(a) The amide proton region of the 1H NMR spectrum of the 13C-enriched O-specific polysaccharide from E. coli O142. Selected regions of the (b) 1H,13C plane of the 3D BEST-HNCA, (c) 1H,13C plane of the 3D BEST-HNCO, and (d) 1H,15N-SOFAST-HMQC spectra showing correlations from the amide protons. Adapted and reproduced with permission from ref (148). Copyright 2014 Springer.

2D 1H,13C-HMQC NMR spectra may also be recorded more rapidly by having the protons not directly bound to 13C nuclei sharing polarization through Hartmann–Hahn mixing with protons at 13C sites. This nonselective excitation and short cross-polarization within the spin-coupled network was dubbed acceleration by sharing adjacent polarization (ASAP).296 The short mixing sequence with a duration on the order of 40 ms achieves essentially the equivalent result of the relaxation delay d1 and may partially or in whole replace it. Relying on the polarization sharing principle the 1H,13C-ASAP-HSQC experiment was proposed, where unused proton magnetization is flipped by a π/2 pulse and stored along the z axis during acquisition.297 Additional efficiency was achieved by Ernst-angle type excitation, where instead the delays in the initial INEPT transfer module were optimized. The technique facilitates rapid recording of 1H,13C-HSQC spectra of high resolution in the F1 dimension when utilizing 15% nonuniform sampling (NUS, vide infra) as shown for the disaccharide maltose (Figure 19).298 Further developments led to the 1H,13C-ASAP-HSQC-TOCSY experiment in which the isotropic mixing sequence was shifted to provide the TOCSY period prior to the acquisition, resulting in both transfer of magnetization through the spin system and fast buildup of polarization sharing, as exemplified for the tetrasaccharide stachyose (Figure 20). It may be noted that in these ASAP experiments the close to continuous high-power pulsing will be demanding for the spectrometer hardware and an undesired heating of the sample may also take place. To mitigate these drawbacks, the extended acquisition time (EXACT) approach has been proposed and implemented in the 1H,13C-EXACT-ASAP-HSQC experiment in which time periods are introduced where the receiver is gated off.299 Broadband heteronuclear decoupling is turned off during the receiver-gated periods, and a pair of 13C π pulses are introduced to refocus the heteronuclear coupling during the discontinuity of the acquisition of the FID. The missing data points in the FID are then reconstructed using methods analogous to those used for NUS applications. The EXACT acquisition protocol thus reduces the high duty cycle imposed by the ASAP experiments.

Figure 19.

Figure 19

1H,13C-ASAP-HSQC NMR spectrum of a 200 mM maltose sample in D2O. The experiment was acquired in ∼ 7 min using one scan per t1 increment and 15% NUS sampling. The spectrum was processed using compressed sensing, linear prediction as well as zero filling. The high resolution thus obtained allows for the distinction of cross-peaks from 9α/β and from 11α/β of maltose, which both are approximately 3 Hz apart. Reproduced with permission from ref (298). Copyright 2017 Elsevier.

Rapid acquisition of homonuclear correlated spectra can be obtained by a clean in-phase experiment dubbed CLIP-COSY.301 The in-phase to in-phase coherence transfer between directly J coupled spins relies on the perfect echo302 as the mixing element and a duration Δ = 15–25 ms is suitable, although for smaller coupling constants, a longer delay may be required. The CLIP module has been utilized in CLIP-COSY relayed, 1H,13C-HSQC-CLIP-COSY and 1H,13C-HSQC-CLIP-COSY relayed experiments applied to tri- and pentasaccharides for NMR resonance assignments.303 Furthermore, the possibility to obtain 1H,13C-HSQC-CLIP-COSY spectra, where cross-peaks have different signs depending on whether they originate from direct HSQC responses or from COSY cross-peaks, have been described as an additional improvement.304

Hadamard NMR spectroscopy265 offers an efficient way to obtain correlations without incrementing indirect dimensions in n-dimensional experiments. Briefly, a Hadamard matrix contains entities of different signs (++ and +– for order 2) that can be combined to extract each encoded component via a decoding scheme. Direct frequency-domain multichannel excitation of NMR signals using an array of radiofrequencies encoded according to a Hadamard matrix305 has been used for rapid recording of 1H,1H-COSY spectra.306 The J evolution takes place during a soft polychromatic excitation pulse of fixed duration, and at the decoding stage, the components of the FIDs are separated. A number of N scans are required to decode the N columns of the Hadamard matrix. An order of 8 was used with Gaussian-shaped radiofrequency pulses at separate frequencies with a duration of ∼ 70 ms in the Hadamard 1H,1H-COSY experiment that was used to assign the five proton resonances from α-d-GlcpA-OMe in just 23 s, in contrast to the 1H,1H-COSY experiment with a duration of > 10 min.152 2D 1H,13C-HSQC NMR Hadamard transform (HT) experiments on disaccharides using encoding matrices of order 12 or 16 have been performed, leading to acquisition of spectra ∼ 45 times faster than for a regular t1-incremented experiment.265,279 The pure shift 1H,13C-HSQC NMR HT spectrum of the anomeric mixture of d-glucose was recorded one order of magnitude faster than the conventional 2D NMR experiment, with corresponding signal-to-noise ratios in the two spectra.307 Using Hadamard-encoded magnetic transfer (HMT) for 1H,1H-TOCSY or 1H,1H-NOESY experiments addressing solely the fast-exchanging labile hydroxyl protons by polychromatic saturations (NOESY only) or looped polychromatic inversions pulses signal-to-noise enhancement of almost one order of magnitude can be obtained, as exemplified for a sialic acid-containing tetrasaccharide.308 During these long magnetization-transfer processes, e.g., 600 ms in NOESY experiments, a three-way polarization transfer is effectuated, where the targeted protons are constantly repolarized by water resulting in magnetization transfer to nonlabile protons in the oligosaccharide.

5.1.6. Concatenated NMR Sequences

The developments by which 1H,1H-COSY and 1H,1H-NOESY pulse sequences were combined and concatenated into a single 2D NMR experiment were carried out independently (C. A. G. Haasnoot, personal communication) by Haasnoot et al., who dubbed it COCONOSY, and by Gurevich et al., who described it as a combined COSY-NOESY experiment. Interestingly, the two manuscripts were received by the Journal of Magnetic Resonance just a few days apart in 1983, and the two articles were published in the same volume of the journal the following year.309,310 Notably, the FID from the COSY experiment is collected during the mixing time of the NOESY experiment, whose FID is then acquired. The efficiency and time-saving are in particular due to the fact that the two experiments share a common recovery delay d1 prior to each subsequent scan of the 2D NMR experiment.

The concept of concatenation NMR experiments beyond the COCONOSY experiment by combining a series of multiple 2D experiments using modules and entangle these into supersequences with only one recovery delay was recently demonstrated, where each acquisition is based on 1H detection for optimum sensitivity referred to as NMR by ordered acquisition using 1H-detection (NOAH).311 Both heteronuclear 1H,X- and homonuclear 1H,1H-correlation modules can be incorporated as part of the supersequence that uses samples at natural isotope abundance. The least sensitive module is typically placed first in the sequence and bulk magnetization that is not used, is as far as possible preserved for subsequent NOAH sequence modules by keeping it along the +z axis. By extending the COCONOSY experiment by additional modules, where FID detection is carried out after each one, a NOAH-4 supersequence can be made by, e.g., a 1H,15N-HMQC followed by a 1H,13C-HSQC, a 1H,1H-COSY, and a 1H,1H-NOESY experiment denoted MSCN; a single letter notation is used for basic experiments and, when required, sub- and superscripts denote nuclei or subtype experiments, respectively.

The number of possible combinations for a NOAH experiment becomes very large as additional modules are added, although not all permutations are suitable from an NMR experimental point of view. The efficiency of the technique was exemplified on sucrose with NOAH-2 (SC), NOAH-3 (SCN), and NOAH-4 (SBCN).311 Another NOAH-4 experiment (BSCR) that gives a good deal of spectral and structural information for carbohydrate molecules is exemplified for the tetrasaccharide stachyose (Figure 21); note the vertical presentation of the 2D NMR spectra highlighting that all the experiments were 1H-detected using a single channel. The NOAH experiments can be optimized in different ways, e.g., by ordering and in the BSC experiment the initial part uses a zz-filter for the HMBC module acting as a π/2 excitation pulse on protons bound to 12C, while the protons bound to 13C are left along the +z axis.312 Furthermore, by applying a short spinlock296 to the COSY module prior to the start of the experiment differences in peak intensity due to variation in the longitudinal relaxation rates can be reduced313 as well as to decrease the presence of fast pulsing artifacts.312 Further developments of NOAH experiments include using nonuniform sampling schemes313 and multiple receivers.314,315

Figure 21.

Figure 21

NMR by ordered acquisition using 1H-detection (NOAH-4) supersequence BSCR records 2D spectra in a single experiment: (B) 1H,13C-HMBC, (S) multiplicity-edited 1H,13C-HSQC (cross-peaks from hydroxymethyl groups, at δC < 67, are shown in blue color), (C) 1H,1H-COSY, and (R) 1H,1H-ROESY with a mixing time of 300 ms (cross-peaks from dipolar interactions are shown in red color). The tetrasaccharide stachyose with a concentration of 48 mM in D2O was used for the experiment, which was performed in 22 min on a 600 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a cryoprobe.

By recording the NOAH experiments in parallel316 using time-sharing schemes317 in conjunction with the sequential data acquisition, the efficiency of the single measurement using ten modules was further improved. The time-shared modules for the p-NOAH-10 included, e.g., HSQC-COSY/HSQC, HSQC-TOCSY/HSQC, and IP-HSQC/AP-HSQC, and interleaved modules such as HMBC and TOCSY with different sets of mixing times in the heteronuclear and homonuclear experiments, respectively, as well as COSY and ROESY experiments. A tailor-made p-NOAH-5 supersequence relying on 1H and 13C nuclei, BSCSJT/S, consisting of HMBC, multiplicity-edited HSQC-COSY, F2-coupled HSQC, TOCSY, and multiplicity-edited HSQC was developed, resulting in NMR spectral data optimal for use with the structural elucidation program CASPER318 and presented using a methyl glycoside of the milk oligosaccharide lacto-N-neotetraose.316 Moreover, using a room temperature inverse detection probe a p-NOAH-10 experiment was carried out on a cyclic peptide at a concentration of 50 mM in less than 10 min. As different applications require different NMR experiments, the modular program generation of supersequences in silico (GENESIS) has been created, which systematically produces NMR pulse programs for arbitrary NOAH supersequences.319

A reminiscent approach to obtain two or more 2D NMR spectra from a single scan sharing the same t1 evolution period is to use multiple-FID acquisition and has been dubbed MFA.320 The technique was implemented for multiple relay 1H,1H-COSY experiments, where subsequent to the initial COSY experiment a pulse sequence train of [Δ – π/2]3 was applied, where Δ is the proton–proton relay transfer time (∼90 ms) during which also the FID is acquired. Each transfer step is stored and analyzed separately, and the stepwise development of cross-peaks in the 2D spectra can conveniently be followed as was shown for sucrose. The MFA methodology was additionally used to construct 1H,1H-COSY/TOCSY, 1H,13C-HMBC/HMBC-COSY and 1H,13C-HMBC/HMBC-TOCSY experiments. Furthermore, the MFA approach has been used in interleaved dual NMR acquisition of equivalent transfer pathways whereby each magnetization component is monitored by independent FIDs starting from either a 1H,1H-TOCSY or a 1H,13C-HSQC experiment.321 The methodology is based on the fact that, after the first acquisition of the FID (transverse plane component), the second nonobservable Iz component is utilized by a DIPSI-2 spin-lock for a TOCSY module or rotated to the transverse plane to be utilized in an HSQC module. The MFA experiments that have been created in this way are, e.g., 1H,1H-TOCSY/TOCSY, 1H,13C-HSQC/pure shift HSQC, 1H,13C-HSQC/HSQC-TOCSY, and 1H,13C-HSQC(F2-coupled)/HSQC, where for the latter dual experiment the F2-coupled spectrum is recorded first due to the intrinsically higher sensitivity of the decoupled version and that reduction in sensitivity takes place for the second FID due to translational diffusion of the molecules during acquisition of the first FID.

Concatenation of SEA X-LOC, which can distinguish between two- and three-bond correlations based on different multiplet widths in the indirect dimension,322,323 with H2OBC,271 thus sharing the relaxation delay, d1, can provide complete correlation maps, as shown for an O-methylated and O-sulfated trisaccharide with a complex substitution pattern.324 The concatenation approach was further extended to give a SEA XLOC-HMBC-H2OBC experiment for resonance assignments based on heteronuclear one-bond and long-range correlations.325 Interestingly, the modules of these experiments were subsequently utilized so that the magnetization of the first experiment relaxes toward equilibrium during the second one and vice versa. The experimental approach was dubbed NO relaxation delay (NORD),326 devoid of the commonly used relaxation delay, d1, and the NORD HMBC-H2OBC experiment was used for NMR spectral analysis of tri- and pentasaccharides.

5.1.7. Pure Shift Experiments

One-dimensional 13C NMR experiments are most often acquired with broadband 1H-decoupling and 2D 1H,13C-HSQC experiments are typically acquired such that the heteronuclear 1JCH couplings are refocused and broadband 13C-decoupled in the F1- and F2-dimensions, respectively. In the 1H NMR spectrum of a glycan, the homonuclear scalar coupling constants are a source of important structural information, but the low dispersion of signals from carbohydrate compounds in conjunction with the nJHH couplings further complicate resonance identification and assignments. The severe signal overlap in 1H NMR spectra of carbohydrates may be mitigated by homonuclear broadband (HOBB) decoupling as devised by Zangger and Sterk, who demonstrated the technique on sucrose.264 The original ZS experiment to obtain pure shift 1H NMR spectra is based on selective pulses and weak pulsed-field-gradients (PFGs), where each chemical shift arises from a different slice of the sample and a delay is incremented in the pseudo 2D experiment. Midway between excitation and acquisition, a homodecoupling block is implemented consisting of a combination of a nonselective π pulse and a selective inversion element in the presence of a PFG that only affects the active spins and leads to refocusing of the homonuclear coupling(s) between the active and the passive spins.327,328 At the beginning of the FID, the effects of J coupling have been refocused, and on the order of 32 data points are collected and saved as chunks. From each subsequent increment, a chunk is collected and 32–64 chunks are then concatenated to a new FID, followed by FT, resulting in a HOBB decoupled 1H NMR spectrum.

However, the need to reconstruct the FID poses practical problems in processing. This may be alleviated by instead using an approach whereby the acquisition is interrupted by decoupling blocks, approximately every 1/3(nJHH), which makes it possible to acquire the FID in real time essentially like in a regular 1D 1H NMR spectrum.329 In the ZS experiment, during the acquisition for a short period of time amounting to chunks of a few tens of ms a small amount of J evolution will take place. This causes a weak modulation of the signal with a period of 1/sw1, where sw is the width of the spectrum and sw1 is an integer submultiplier of sw. On FT, the spectrum will show small artifact sidebands periodically showing up at intervals sw1. The ZS-based NMR experiment sideband averaging by periodic phase incrementation of residual J evolution (SAPPHIRE) suppresses these sideband artifacts by manipulating the phase of the modulation by small changes in timing, such that an extra echo can be shifted slightly forward and backward in time as part of an averaging process, leading to ultraclean pure shift NMR spectra.330 To carry out the HOBB decoupling in a ZS experiment for J coupled spin-pairs with small chemical shift differences, long and highly selective pulses are required to obtain narrow individual slices along the NMR tube. This limitation, as well as HOBB decoupling for strongly coupled spin systems, may be resolved by utilizing a perfect echo in conjunction with the ZS experiment, referred to as perfect echo pure shift improved experiment (PEPSIE).331

In the pure shift yielded by chirp excitation (PSYCHE) NMR experiment, which belongs to the ZS class of broadband-decoupled 1H NMR experiments, all spins in the sample are irradiated and the refocusing of J couplings is carried out by low flip angle (β) swept-frequency pulses in the presence of weak PFGs, whereby the effect of the two β pulses is to refocus the active spins in a stimulated echo, whereas the passive spins are unaffected.332,333 Furthermore, as the frequency-swept pulses and the concomitant PFGs effectively lead to different ZQC evolution times throughout the sample, effects of ZQCs are suppressed. The extension to a 1D selective TOCSY-PSYCHE experiment makes it possible to differentiate peaks separated by just a few parts per billion because in the resulting pure shift 1H NMR spectrum, only resonances from a spin-system originating from a specific chemical shift will be identified, a finding that otherwise would have gone unnoticed in the PSYCHE spectrum, despite the fact that homonuclear J coupling had been removed.334 Furthermore, by combining the two modules in reverse order to the above, a 2D F1-PSYCHE-TOCSY experiment can be devised in which the homonuclear J evolution during t1 will be suppressed.335 This then facilitates conventional acquisition during t2, allowing for high resolution in the F2 dimension, where the multiplet structure of cross-peaks will remain. Notably, to benefit from the decoupling in the F1 dimension, a large number of t1 increments should be used. Subsequent indirect covariance processing can generate a 2D 1H,1H-TOCSY spectrum where all couplings have been removed and cross-peaks are singlets in both dimensions. The covariance processing technique has also been used to obtain decoupled 2D NMR spectra in both dimensions from F2-ZS-NOESY and CT-nQF-COSY experiments, where the latter is a multiple quantum-filtered constant time experiment resulting in decoupling in the F1-dimension, whereas the former results in decoupling in the F2-dimension by concatenating the NOESY sequence with a ZS block during the t2 period.336

Pure shift 1D 1H NMR spectra can alternatively be obtained by incorporating a BIRD module into the pulse sequence, which relies on utilizing the low natural abundance 1H,13C spin-pairs in a ZS-type pseudo 2D fashion, where halfway during the t1 evolution period, a 1H π pulse and the BIRD pulse sequence element have the effect that the J evolution of the passive spins (protons on 12C) is reversed during the second half of the t1 evolution period. Heteronuclear coupling of the 1H,13C spin-pairs will then be refocused at the beginning of the acquisition and homonuclear couplings refocus at 1/(2sw1); broadband 13C decoupling is applied during the acquisition period. Concatenation of the acquired data with different t1 evolution periods then leads to a 1D HOBB decoupled 1H NMR spectrum, as illustrated for n-hexanol337 and exemplified herein for d-quinovose (Figure 22a). However, the effects of strong coupling can be severe if one of the 1H,13C satellite components is J coupled to another proton, of which there are 99% bound to 12C nuclei. If the 1H NMR chemical shifts of both of these protons are degenerate at a specific spectrometer frequency, strong coupling can lead to artifacts in spectra acquired by pure shift ZS real-time BIRD experiments as observed for the H2 and H3 resonances from α-d-quinovose at a 1H NMR frequency of 600 MHz but not at, e.g., 700 MHz (Figure 23). Another approach using instead HOBB one-shot BIRD decoupling in a 1D fashion employing an initial INEPT-type isotope filter to select for 13C-bound protons followed by an array of looped BIRD-modules and acquisition blocks in a 1D NMR experiment also results in a pure shift 1H NMR spectrum. The importance of using frequency-swept 13C pulses and efficient heteronuclear decoupling during the experiment was stressed in order to obtain maximum resolution of signals in the HOBB decoupling experiment.338 It may be noted that a limitation of the BIRD approach is that proton decoupling fails for diastereotopic protons bound to the same 13C nucleus, where they exhibit a geminal 2JHH coupling, such as for H6pro-R and H6pro-S of glucose, as illustrated in the latter study. In contrast to pure shift 1H NMR spectra relying on the natural abundance 1H,13C spin-pairs, the 2D 1H,13C-HSQC NMR experiment can be performed without loss in sensitivity, and the acquisition is performed in real time using a windowed scheme. Acquisition is looped n times with n ≈ 30 under 13C-decoupling and a J refocusing element, consisting of a BIRD module and a 1H π pulse, is inserted midway during the acquisition period. The resulting pure shift 2D 1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectrum of d-fucose shows well resolved cross-peaks devoid of homonuclear 1H,1H couplings in comparison to the conventional counterpart (Figure 24).339 Additional improvements and recommendations have been made to decrease artifacts resulting from the chunked acquisition in order to obtain high-quality data for these types of real-time pure shift NMR experiments.340

Figure 22.

Figure 22

1H NMR analysis at 700 MHz of d-Qui (6-deoxy-d-glucose) in D2O 70 °C. The monosaccharide is present in the pyranose ring form with an anomeric α:β ratio of 1:2. Highlighted regions of (a) the experimental pure shift 1H spectrum (black), (b) the experimental 1H spectrum (blue), and (c) the corresponding simulated 1H spectrum by total-line shape analysis using the PERCH NMR software (red). Reproduced with permission from ref (140). Copyright 2013 Elsevier.

Figure 23.

Figure 23

(a) Selected region of the 1D 1H NMR spectrum of d-Quip showing the H2 and H3 resonances of the α-anomeric form (minor) and H3 and H5 resonances of the β-anomeric form (major). (b) Selected region of the 13C-coupled 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum showing one-bond proton–carbon correlations from the H2α, H3α, and H5β protons. The spectra of (a,b) were both recorded at a 1H frequency of 600 MHz. In the 2D NMR spectrum, strong coupling artifacts are observed for the higher frequency component of the 13C-coupled H2α resonance, and the lower frequency component of the 13C-coupled H3α resonance; these respective signals are 3J coupled to H3α and H2α protons attached to 12C atoms (see dashed lines). Note that this strong coupling phenomenon occurs at this specific magnetic field because Δ(νH3α – νH2α) ∼ 1JC3α,H3α/2 ∼ 1JC2α,H2α/2. Comparison of pure shift 1H NMR spectra recorded at a 1H frequency of 600 MHz (c) and 700 MHz (d) using the ZS real-time BIRD pulse sequence described by Aguilar et al.,337 employing 64 data chunks; the spectral region is the same as that in (a). Note that in the pure shift 1H spectrum of (c), the H2 and H3 resonances of α-d-Quip are not fully homodecoupled due to strong coupling effects mentioned above.

Figure 24.

Figure 24

Selected regions of 1H,13C-HSQC spectra of d-fucose in D2O: (a) conventional gHSQC and (b) real-time pure shift gHSQC. 1D traces are integral projections onto the F2 (1H) axis. Reproduced with permission from ref (339). Copyright 2013 Wiley.

5.1.8. Isotope Labeled Oligo- and Polysaccharides

Stable isotope labeling or enrichment in oligo- or polysaccharides have relied in particular on 13C and/or 15N nuclei for structural studies and analysis of NMR chemical shifts. These key isotopes were incorporated into the glycosaminoglycan polysaccharide hyaluronan (HA), [→4)-β-d-GlcpA-(1→3)-β-d-GlcpNAc-(1→]n, using an E. coli transfected with a recombinant HA synthase, 15NH4Cl and d-[UL-13C6]glucose.157 The shed polymeric material was purified and digested to give after purification 13C,15N-isotopically labeled even-numbered HA4–HA12 oligosaccharides with N-acetyl-d-glucosamine at the reducing end. In the 2D 1H,1H-TOCSY spectra of HA6 only cross-peaks from NH resonances of the reducing end residue (in a mixture α- and β-anomeric forms) could be resolved. From a 3D 1H,15N-TOCSY-HSQC experiment not only the resonances emanating from the reducing end residue but also the internal as well as d-GlcpNAc resonances in the terminal disaccharide element of HA6 were possible to identify. The 13C- and 15N-labeling permitted resonance assignments for the N-acetyl groups of HA6 using the triple resonance experiments HNCA and HNCO (vide infra) commonly used in NMR studies of 13C,15N-labeled proteins; in this particular HNCA experiment, standard 13C t1-incrementation was used to allow for a long acquisition time, resulting in 1JCC coupled multiplets. Subsequent studies of the [UL-13C;15N]-labeled HA4 and HA6 oligosaccharides focused on exploring the unique 13C NMR chemical shifts and J couplings of the carboxylate moiety of the β-d-GlcpA residues in order to filter out coherences from β-d-GlcpNAc residues.341 The 2D NMR experiments of the “out and back” type correlate via one-bond couplings the carboxylate carbon C6 with C5 and H5 (HC5C6 experiment) or C6 with C1 via a long-range coupling 3JC1,C6 ≈ 5 Hz (cf. the significant cross-peak between C1 and C6 in the 13C,13C-COSY spectrum from the terminal β-d-glucopyranosyl residue of [UL-13C12]cellobiose, Figure 39, vide infra), and H1 (HC1C6 experiment). An additional modification by insertion of a 1H,1H-TOCSY block with a mixing time duration of ∼ 40 ms in the HC5C6 experiment resulted in correlations between C6 of the carboxylate group and H2–H5 protons within the same residue (HC5C6-TOCSY experiment).

Figure 39.

Figure 39

Selected region of the 13C,13C-CT-COSY (CT = 11.1 ms) and band-selective 13C,13C-TOCSY (τmix = 144 ms) of [UL-13C12]-cellobiose (left and right, respectively), showing intra- and inter-residue correlations from the anomeric carbon of the terminal β-d-glucosyl residue in the disaccharide.

13C-Direct detection NMR experiments of partially or uniformly enriched biomolecules facilitates, inter alia, identification of quaternary carbons without additional transfer steps to adjacent protons, whether one-bond or over multiple bonds, as well as avoiding solvent suppression schemes.342 For 13C NMR resonance assignments of oligo- and polysaccharides, a number of NMR experiments are available, making use of the fact that for glycopyranose residues 1JCC ≈ 45 Hz which facilitates homonuclear correlations of uniformly labeled glycans to be traced via 13C nuclei by relying on either 13C-based experiments only (oligosaccharides), or “proton-start” (polysaccharides in particular) implementation.148 Thus, the ease of magnetization transfer can be used to unravel the spin-systems using 13C,13C-COSY or 13C,13C-TOCSY experiments with short mixing times, τmix = 5–20 ms, in the latter case.

In the following, we exemplify in some detail how 13C isotope labeling can be made highly useful in the structural analysis of glycans by 13C,13C-TOCSY NMR experiments. The use of in-phase antiphase (IPAP) or double in-phase antiphase (DIPAP) schemes can be applied to obtain virtually decoupled 13C,13C-TOCSY spectra of 13C-uniformly labeled carbohydrates. These spectra can be recorded in a 2D manner, using the pulse sequences described previously by Richter et al.343 for the study of 13C-enriched RNA samples. The IPAP scheme (Figure 25a,b) can be employed to virtually decouple homonuclear 1JC1,C2 scalar couplings of anomeric carbon resonances in the direct dimension. In this case, two selective on-resonance pulses (90° excitation and 180° refocusing) are applied at the center of the anomeric carbon resonances (C1 ∼ 100 ppm), whereas two selective 180° off-resonance refocusing pulses are applied in a region of the spectrum that comprises the C2 resonances; for practical reasons, the off-resonance pulse can be set at the center of the hexose and hexosamine ring carbon resonances (∼ 62 ppm). This scheme includes a constant time delay T = 1/4·1JCC. Because the experiment is recorded in an interleaved manner, the in-phase and antiphase spectra need to be split and processed separately (Figure 25c,d, respectively). The combined spectra (Figure 25e,f) are then shifted (downfield and upfield, respectively) by 0.5·1JCC to obtain the correct chemical shift (Figure 25g,h); once the latter spectra are combined, the virtually decoupled spectrum is obtained (Figure 25i and Figure 26 bottom). 1H- and 15N-decoupling (in the case of 15N-enriched carbohydrates) can be performed using state-of-the-art decoupling schemes (i.e., WALTZ65 and GARP4, respectively). The DIPAP scheme can be useful to observe 13C,13C-TOCSY correlations from nitrogen-bearing C2 carbons (∼ 50 ppm) with simultaneous virtual decoupling of the 1JC1,C2 and 1JC2,C3 couplings (Figure 27). In this case, three different 180° selective carbon refocusing pulses are employed in the scheme: an on-resonance pulse centered at the middle of the C2 carbon resonances (∼ 50 ppm, Figure 27a,d), an on/off-resonance pulse centered both at the middle of the C1 (∼ 100 ppm) and nitrogen bearing C2 carbon (∼ 50 ppm) resonances (Figure 27b), and an on/off-resonance pulse centered at the middle of the C2 and C3 resonances (Figure 27c); for practical reasons, the latter can be set at the center of the hexose and hexosamine ring carbon resonances (∼ 62 ppm). In this case, four different subspectra are obtained (Figure 27e–h); in an analogous manner to what was described above, after combining the spectra and shifting the resonances by 0.5·1JCC, the virtual decoupled spectrum is obtained (Figure 27i and Figure 26 top).

Figure 25.

Figure 25

Graphic representation of (a) in-phase (IP) and (b) antiphase (AP) schemes employed in the virtual decoupling of the 13C,13C-TOCSY spectrum of the 13C-enriched O-antigen PS of E. coli O142,148 where T = 1/4·1JCC. Selected region of the IP (c) and AP (d) 13C,13C-TOCSY spectra (τm = 20 ms) showing the cross-peak correlation between the C6 and C1 of the β-d-GlcpNAc residue. In (d) the cross-peak in red color has an opposite sign than the cross-peak indicated in black. (e,f) Spectra resulting from the linear combinations of the IP and AP spectra of (c,d). The cross-peaks are then shifted downfield (e) and upfield (f) by 0.5·1JCC; the resulting spectra (g and h, respectively) are added up to achieve the homonuclear virtual decoupled spectrum (i).

Figure 26.

Figure 26

Overlay of selected regions of 13C,13C-TOCSY spectra (τm = 20 ms) of the 13C-enriched O-antigen PS of E. coli O142 showing correlations from (a) anomeric carbons and (b) nitrogen-bearing C2 carbons. The spectrum recorded using the IPAP scheme with virtual decoupling of 1JC1,C2 in the direct dimension is shown in red color, whereas the spectrum recorded using the DIPAP scheme with simultaneous decoupling of 1JC1,C2 and 1JC2,C3 in the direct dimension is shown in cyan color. The classical 13C,13C-TOCSY spectrum is shown in gray color.

Figure 27.

Figure 27

Graphic representation of the double in-phase antiphase (DIPAP) schemes added to the 13C,13C-TOCSY experiment for the virtual decoupling of the 1JC1,C2 and 1JC2,C3 couplings of nitrogen bearing C2 carbons resonances.148 During this experiment, four different spectra (e–h) with different magnetization components (IP-IP, IP-AP, AP-IP, and AP-AP) are obtained after the execution of the respective schemes (a,b). A selective on-resonance refocusing pulse centered at the middle of the C2 carbon resonances (∼ 50 ppm) is used during the IP-IP and AP-AP schemes (a and d, respectively). A shaped refocusing on/off-resonance pulse centered at the middle of both the C1 (∼ 100 ppm) and nitrogen bearing C2 resonances (∼ 50 ppm) is used in the IP-AP scheme (b). For practical reasons, the on/off-resonance pulse required for the refocusing of the C2 and C3 resonances during the AP-IP scheme (c) can be set at the center of the hexose and hexosamine ring carbon resonances (∼ 62 ppm). Finally, a linear combination of the spectra (e–h) is used to obtain the virtual decoupled spectrum (i).

With the 13C NMR chemical shifts and spin-systems identified, the assignment of 1H resonances can subsequently be performed by analysis of chemical shift correlations in 1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectra. However, due to evolution of 1JCC couplings, the cross-peaks will be split into multiples along the F1-dimension, which may be alleviated by performing a constant-time version of the experiment referred to as 1H,13C-CT-HSQC (Figure 28). Interestingly, and in contrast to multiplicity-edited 1H,13C-HSQC spectra of glycans at natural isotope abundance in which the cross-peaks of the methylene carbons have opposite phase that makes it possible to easily distinguish these correlations from those of methyl and methine carbons, for the 1H,13C-CT-HSQC spectra of uniformly 13C-labeled glycans the differentiation can be made based on the number of neighboring non-carbonyl carbons, e.g., C1 and C6 in glucose and fructose residues of [UL-13C12]sucrose, if a refocusing delay corresponding to 1/1JCC (2T = 22 ms) is used in the experiment (Figure 28). Thus, not only are the resonances from the hydroxymethyl groups identified and differentiated but also the anomeric carbon atom of glucose in sucrose. 13C uniform labeling, as well as site-specific 13C labeling, was used in analysis of N-linked glycans released from glycoproteins.344,345 The oligosaccharides analyzed were of the high-mannose type and 2-aminopyridine labeled at the reducing end, one of them being an undecasaccharide referred to as M9 (nine d-mannose and two N-acetyl-d-glucosamine residues) and the other a decasaccharide denoted M8B devoid of one of the mannosyl residues. Besides 2D NMR experiments used for 1H and 13C resonance assignments 3D 13C-edited NOESY experiments with a mixing time of 200 ms were acquired from which identification of the presence (or absence) of 1H,1H-connectivities at specific 13C NMR chemical shifts could be made for the M8B and M9 oligosaccharides.

Figure 28.

Figure 28

Overlay of the 1H,13C-HSQC (black color) and the 1H,13C-CT-HSQC spectra (green and red color) of [UL-13C]-sucrose, showing the anomeric and ring atoms regions, as well as that of the hydroxymethyl groups (a–c, respectively). The latter spectrum was recorded with a constant time delay (2T) of 22 ms and the 1H chemical shifts are displaced by −0.045 ppm for clarity; the sign of the cross-peaks are opposite for carbons directly attached to an odd versus an even number of neighboring non-carbonyl carbons (shown in red and green color, respectively).

Detection of α-(2→8)polysialic acid homopolymers on cells in a relatively short experimental time, ∼ 20 min for recording a 1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectrum, was made possible by 13C,15N-isotope enrichment.346 Notably, the capsular polysaccharide was produced by addition of Neu5Ac (labeled or unlabeled) to the culture medium. NMR spectra of α-(2→8)polysialic acid polymers and the corresponding cell-associated polysaccharides were closely similar, although the 13C line widths of the latter were 2–3 times larger. Distinction of 13C-neighbors in highly or uniformly 13C-labeled glycans from analysis of 1H,13C-CT-HSQC NMR spectra becomes very informative for polysaccharides that have different types of sugars as well as substituents as shown for the 13C-labeled O-antigen polysaccharide from E. coli O91 (Figure 29). The O-antigen from E. coli O142 was 13C- and/or 15N-isotope labeled, and NMR studies of this polysaccharide employed, inter alia, TROSY-based 1H,15N-HSQC and HNCO experiments on 13C,15N-isotopically labeled material for resonance assignments.177 Temperature dependence of coupling constants of the amino sugars in the polysaccharide was investigated from a series of F1-coupled 1H,15N-HSQC spectra.

Figure 29.

Figure 29

1H,13C-CT-HSQC spectra (2T = 22 ms) of the 13C-enriched O-antigen polysaccharide from E. coli O91 showing the anomeric region (a), the region for the ring atoms and those from the hydroxymethyl groups (b), and the region of the methyl groups (c). Representation of the structure of the aforementioned polysaccharide in schematic representation (d), where the carbon atoms directly attached to an odd number of neighboring non-carbonyl carbons are indicated with red dots; in the 1H,13C-CT-HSQC spectrum, the cross-peaks from these atoms have an opposite sign that those from carbons directly attached to an even number of neighboring non-carbonyl carbons (shown in red and black, respectively in a–c).

5.1.9. Glycopeptides and Glycoproteins

In glycosylated peptides and proteins, the sugar residue forming the glycosyl–amino acid connectivity is in many cases linked to asparagine in N-linked structures or to serine/threonine in O-linked structures, although other amino acids can be the aglycone, and a good number of different monosaccharide–amino acid combinations have been reported.115 High-resolution one-dimensional 1H NMR spectroscopy can shed light on, e.g., the structure of O-linked glycans from glycoproteins by relying the concept of structural-reporter-group resonances that are characteristic for specific structural elements, because besides well-resolved resonances from anomeric protons also those from protons of the sugar ring may be utilized, if they are shifted from the bulk of the signals due to glycosylation or substituent effects.347 Importantly, even though overlap between sugar and amino acid resonances can occur in NMR spectra depending on the specific sugar and amino acid in the oligo/polysaccharide and glycopeptide/glycoprotein, respectively, the resonances can be found in different regions in 1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectra (Figure 30).

Figure 30.

Figure 30

(a) Structure of the tetrasaccharide–decapeptide reported by Šardzík et al.348 (b–d) Selected regions of the 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum (700 MHz), where the correlations from the carbohydrate and peptide moieties are indicated in black and red color, respectively. (b) The region for the side-chain protons of amino acids, H3 of sialic acid and acetyl methyl groups. (c) The region for the ring atoms and hydroxymethyl groups of carbohydrates (highlighted with a dashed line) and that for α-protons of amino acids; (d) the anomeric region.

NMR analysis of glycan post-translational modifications of proteins at natural abundance carried out under denaturing conditions, using 7 M urea in D2O, eliminates molecular mass restrictions for the proteins.349 Deviations from the random-coil NMR chemical shifts for the amino acids in the protein indicate that modifications have taken place. The anomeric region of a 1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectrum (Figure 31) is of particular interest, as these cross-peaks give information on glycan structure and complemented with 1H,1H-TOCSY spectra a good deal of information can be obtained on constituent sugar residues. Analysis of glycosylation patterns in monoclonal antibody therapeutics by NMR spectroscopy employed denaturing conditions and focused on the fingerprint characteristics of anomeric region in purified Fc domains from digested mAb molecules in order to profile and differentiate glycan composition.350,351 An alternative approach in analysis of intact glycoproteins at natural isotope abundance is to rely on the differences in nuclear spin relaxation of the NMR signals from the protein and the glycan(s).352 The analysis was performed on two glycoforms of RNase B containing high-mannose M5 and M9 N-linked glycan variants. Based on line widths, the 13C transverse relaxation times of the glycans were ∼ 25% longer than those from the protein resonances. The corresponding difference for the 1H T2 values were ∼ 80%, i.e., almost 2-fold, and this information was used to select a mixing time of 90 ms in 1H,13C-HSQC-TOCSY experiments. The resulting 2D NMR spectra were essentially devoid of signals from the protein, thus mainly showing cross-peaks from glycans.

Figure 31.

Figure 31

Glycosylation detected by a 1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectrum in the denatured plant protein bromelain. The spectral region covers cross-peaks from the anomeric resonances of the sugar residues in the N-linked hexasaccharide, shown by SNFG representation. Note that the 13C NMR chemical shift of the proximal GlcNAc residue linked to Asn resonates at ∼ 81 ppm, whereas the other sugar residues have their 13C chemical shifts for anomeric carbons in the range 101–108 ppm. Adapted and reproduced with permission from ref (349). Copyright 2015 Wiley.

The high complexity of glycoprotein NMR spectra may be alleviated by stable isotope labeling, which in addition increases the sensitivity when 13C- and/or 15N-labeling is utilized. Several labeling schemes have been devised, including uniform labeling, segmental labeling of either the glycan or the protein, and residue specific labeling353 performed by, inter alia, metabolic labeling or in vitro labeling.354,355 The segmental labeling approach was chosen in a study of an N-linked glycoprotein from Campylobacter jejuni, in which the protein was uniformly 13C,15N-labeled, whereas the glycan heptasaccharide at natural isotope abundance was in vitro glycosylated.356 This labeling scheme enabled 15N-filtered-filtered 1H,1H-NOESY and 13C-filtered-filtered 1H,1H-NOESY experiments to be carried out, whereby all protein signals are suppressed and only the resonances from the unlabeled glycan are observed. The use of these 2D filtered/edited NOESY experiments357 and 3D 13C-filtered-edited 1H,1H-NOESY experiments facilitated identification of a large number of NOEs used for structural characterization of the glycoprotein.

Enzymatic glycan remodeling was carried to label the sialic acid-containing N-glycan of the α-2,6-sialyltransferase (ST6Gal-I) with site specifically 13C-labeled Neu5Ac.358 After neuraminidase treatment and removal of the terminal sialic acids, the enzyme was resialylated using CMP-β-[1,2,3,10,11-13C5]Neu5Ac. The α-2,6-sialyltransferase now containing terminal 13C-labeled Neu5Ac residue(s) as part of its N-glycan showed only one set of cross-peaks at δC3 48.8 to δH3ax 1.72 and δH3eq 2.68 in the 1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectrum, but from a 3D 1H–13C–13C correlated NMR experiment, it was possible to show the presence of two different sets of C2–H3ax and C2–H3eq correlations in the plane, corresponding to the 13C chemical shift of C3 in the sialic acids. In another study, the Fc fragment of an immunoglobulin G was remodeled using ST6Gal-I, and the terminal sialic acid was introduced in a specific manner preferentially on the α-(1→3)-branch.359 Subsequent developments introduced d-[UL-13C6]galactose terminally at N-glycans of IgG1 and its Fab fragment; NMR chemical shift as well as intensity differences were identified in 1H,13C-HMQC spectra.360 Furthermore, Fc fragments were remodeled to include uniformly 13C-labeled galactose residues at both the 3- and 6-branches of the N-glycan. Additionally, also d-[1,2-13C2]galactose labeling was performed in a corresponding way, thereby identifying resonances from C2 atoms. This labeling scheme also made it possible to better examine the 1H resonance line widths from the two different galactosyl residues. By relying on the fact that ST6Gal-I preferentially sialylates galactose on the α-(1→3)-branch, it was feasible to remodel the glycan to have a terminal d-[UL-13C6]galactose specifically on the α-(1→6)-branch. Taken together, it was then possible to deduce that a sharper set of peaks originate from the galactosyl residue on the α-(1→3)-branch and that broad peaks emanate from the galactosyl residue on the α-(1→6)-branch. The various substitution patterns and 13C-labeling approaches are well illustrated by the different combinations and cross-peak regions in 1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectra (Figure 32).361

Figure 32.

Figure 32

NMR spectra of terminal Gal and/or terminal N-acetylneuraminic acid residues of Fc-conjugated N-glycan show distinct 1H,13C-correlations. (A) [UL-13C6]Gal resonances observed in a 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum of Gal-terminated Fc. (B) A corresponding spectrum in which the Fc has an N-acetyl-[1,2,3-13C3]neuraminic acid residue attached to the Gal residue of the α-(1→3)-Man branch in the N-glycan structure. (C) 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum of glycosylated Fc domain in which both branches of the N-glycan have been isotopically labeled with [UL-13C6]Gal and N-acetyl-[1,2,3-13C3]neuraminic acid. (D,E) 1H,13C-HSQC spectra of the region for C3–H3 correlations from terminal N-acetylneuraminic acid residues of the α-(1→3/6)-Man branches. Reproduced with permission from ref (361). Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.

The complex N-glycan structures typically have N-acetyl-d-glucosamine residues in both branches, where they are β-(1→2)-linked to the mannosyl residues at the branching region. Starting from an M5 N-glycan structure on an Fc fragment from an IgG1, enzymatic remodeling using UDP-[13C,15N]GlcNAc (where the isotope labeling was obtained from [UL-13C6]Glc and [15N-amido]glutamine) and the glycosyltransferase Gnt1 the isotope labeled d-GlcNAc residue could be added to the α-(1→3)-branch of the N-glycan on the Fc fragment.362 In comparison to the released N-glycan, 1H NMR chemical shift displacements occur for the N-acetyl-d-glucosamine resonances of the Fc-linked form as a result of interactions with the protein (Figure 33). Pruning of the N-glycan on the Fc fragment down to an M3F structure facilitated installation of isotope labeled d-GlcNAc residues on both branches of the N-glycan, employing first Gnt1 as described and subsequently Gnt2 in conjunction with UDP-[13C,15N]GlcNAc, resulting in an N-acetyl-d-glucosamine residue also at the α-(1→6)-branch. A suite of 2D NMR experiments was developed to correlate H3–C2, H3–C1, and C1–C2 nuclei in terminal [1,2,3-13C3]Neu5Ac isotope labeled N-glycan on the 55 kDa IgG1 Fc domain.363 The labeling scheme was also applied to α-(2→8)polysialic acid polymers, and the three 2D NMR experiments were as suitable for purified polysaccharides as for the corresponding cell-associated polymers.

Figure 33.

Figure 33

1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectra of IgG1 Fc with a Man5 N-glycan following addition of [13C,15N]GlcNAc, denoted by *N in the glycan name and shown as a blue square with a white star in the SNFG representation. (A) A 2D 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum of the *N-Man5 N-glycan following EndoF1-catalyzed hydrolysis is shown as gray contours. Blue contours show the positions of peaks from IgG1 Fc bearing a *N-Man5 N-glycan. 1JCC couplings are not resolved because of the limited resolution in the 13C dimension. (B) 1D 13C-observe NMR spectrum of *N-Man5 Fc with 1JCC values indicated. (C) 2D 1H,15N-HSQC spectra before and after N-glycan hydrolysis with the same colors used in (A). Reproduced with permission from ref (362). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.

Uniform 13C-isotope labeling of a mouse monoclonal IgG2b antibody was carried out using d-[UL-13C6]Glc, and after cleavage by protease digestion and purification, a 56 kDa Fc fragment was isolated containing an octasaccharide N-linked glycan.364 At a 13C NMR frequency of 125 MHz, a mixing time of 600 ms was chosen for detecting one-bond correlations in the 13C,13C-NOESY spectrum (Figure 34) as longer mixing times gave fewer cross-peaks. Variation in relative intensities of the C1,C2 cross-peaks were proposed to be due to different local mobilities of the sugar residues. Additionally, a 13C,13C-TOCSY NMR experiment was carried out with a mixing time of 1200 ms, and whereas the N-acetyl-d-glucosamine residue on the α-(1→3)-branch exhibited extensive intraresidue C1–C5 correlations, the corresponding ones for the d-GlcNAc residue on the α-(1→6)-branch were barely observed. In glycoprofile analysis of an intact uniformly 13C,15N-labeled glycoprotein from an IgE high-affinity receptor, the anomeric region of a 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum was analyzed to map the constituent glycoforms of the N-linked glycans.365 Interestingly, the H1,C1 cross-peak of the proximal d-GlcNAc residue linked to asparagine in the protein was not detected in the native folded state. However, using denaturing conditions, it could readily be observed, highlighting the complementarity of the latter approach in analysis of glycoproteins. Uniform 13C-labeling was used to study the glycans at two N-glycosylations sites in the domain B of subunit S1 from the receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2.366 Like for other glycoproteins, the anomeric region in the 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum was essential in identification of glycan structures present (Figure 35). In addition, a type of edited 3D HCCH-TOCSY experiment367,368 could unravel the complete C1–C6 spin-systems of d-GalNAc residues in the N-glycans (note that in d-GalNAc the 3JH4,H5 coupling constant is small and limits 1H,1H-TOCSY transfer, which is alleviated by using 13C,13C-TOCSY transfer in the experiment).

Figure 34.

Figure 34

Full spectral region (A) and oligosaccharide region (B) of the 2D 13C,13C-NOESY spectrum of 13C-labeled IgG-Fc acquired at 125 MHz with a mixing time of 600 ms and (C) 13C,13C-TOCSY spectrum, in which the magnetization transfer was performed with the FLOPSY pulse sequence with a mixing time of 1.2 s. Adapted and reproduced with permission from ref (364). Copyright 2009 Elsevier.

Figure 35.

Figure 35

NMR identification of glycan structures on SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) glycoprotein. (A) Anomeric region of the 1H,13C-HSQC spectrum of RBD (left); selected planes for C1 GalNAc on the 4SulLDN fragment and for C1 GalNAc on 6′SLDN from an edited 3D HCCH-TOCSY spectrum showing the correlations to all 13C atoms within the pyranose spin system (right). (B) GalNAc, Gal and GlcNAc containing epitopes in N-linked glycans on RBD. Reproduced with permission from ref (366). Copyright 2020 The Authors.

Sparse isotope labeling of glycoproteins using d-[UL-13C6]glucose has been shown to be an alternative approach, as standard commercial growth media can be complemented by an equal amount of isotope labeled glucose to that present in the growth medium.369 This was exemplified for a ∼ 12 kDa protein that has high levels of Man5GlcNAc2 N-glycan structures at its three N-glycosylation sites. Theoretically, half of the sugars should be 13C-enriched; experimentally this was observed to be ∼ 40%, also for the N-acetyl groups of the glucosamine residues. Alanine methyl groups were labeled to a decent level of ∼ 20%. The study explored both 1H,13C-HSQC experiments, where the 1JCC couplings in the F1-dimension still evolve, and for the N-acetyl methyl groups, this resulted in a doublet with a peak separation of ∼ 50 Hz. In the 1H,13C-CT-HSQC experiment, the one-bond couplings in the F1-dimension are refocused, but this experiment causes loss of sensitivity, in particular, for resonances broadened by lack of internal motion.

5.2. Correlations between Sugar Residues

5.2.1. HMBC and NOESY NMR Experiments

To obtain sequence information between sugar residues, the 1H,1H-NOESY NMR experiment is useful for polysaccharides, whereas 1H,1H-ROESY or 1H,1H-T-ROESY experiments are the experiments of choice for oligosaccharides with a few sugar residues. Detection of dipolar interactions of protons close in space, and as such not only protons within the same residue but also between sugar residues, then facilitates sequential information to be obtained. Thus, for proximate protons at the glycosidic linkage, observed NOEs will reveal information on sequence between sugar residues. However, for some stereochemical arrangements, the NOE between the anomeric proton in one residue and the proton on the glycosyloxylated carbon atom in the subsequent sugar residue may not be the pair of protons closest in space, which may instead be a proton vicinal to the substitution position, e.g., in the disaccharide structural elements α-d-Fucp-(1→3)-d-Galp and α-l-Fucp-(1→3)-β-d-Manp, where the inter-residue distance H1′–H4 and H1′–H2, respectively, is shorter than the transglycosidic distance H1′–H3.370 Sequence information can still be deduced, although linkage position may not be determined without a detailed analysis.

The spectral quality of 1H,1H-NOESY spectra has been shown to be increased significantly by elimination of zero-quantum coherence, as this gives rise to antiphase dispersive components.371 The improved methodology to obtain pure absorption line shapes in spectra is based on the simultaneous application of a swept-frequency π pulse and a pulsed-field-gradient during the mixing time of the experiment. After the spin–echo, which initially refocuses the evolution of the zero-quantum coherence, a continued evolution of the zero-quantum coherence takes place, leading to that different parts of the sample have accrued a different phase of the zero-quantum coherence, resulting in its cancellation. Further developments to improve spectral quality from 1H,1H-NOESY experiments have been based on pure echo302 decoupling during the t1 period of the 2D NMR experiment372 and is best performed in conjunction with the zero-quantum coherence suppression technique.

The 1H,13C-HMBC NMR experiment commonly detects two- and three-bond correlations for which nJCH < 10 Hz, and transglycosidic correlations have 3JCH in the range 3–6 Hz. Besides revealing sequence information between sugar residues, this experiment can also be used to establish the glycosylation sites of glycopeptides (Figure 36b). Furthermore, the peptide sequential information can readily be obtained in D2O solution from a 1H,13C-BS-CT-HMBC spectrum recorded with a selective excitation pulse centered at the carbonyl carbon resonances, which provides a correlation map in which each carbonyl resonance of the peptide bonds is correlated via 2JCH and 3JCH coupling constants to intra- and inter-residual protons, respectively (Figure 36c−e).348 This strategy was recently implemented in DMSO-d6 solution for sequence assignment of cyclic lipoglycopeptides isolated from the cyanobacterium D. muscorum.373

Figure 36.

Figure 36

(a) Structure of the disaccharide–decapeptide reported by Šardzík et al.,348 showing carbon–proton long-range inter-residue correlations from the 1H,13C-HMBC and 1H,13C-BS-CT-HMBC spectra. (b) Selected region of the 1H,13C-HMBC spectrum showing correlations from anomeric carbons. (c–e) Different regions of the 1H,13C-BS-CT-HMBC spectrum showing correlations from carbonyl carbons.

Further developments from the original HMBC pulse sequence374 include BIRD-HMBC, with a two-step low-pass J filter (LPJF).375 In the experiment, 1JCH coupled proton signals evolve into pure in-phase coherence and long-range nJCH coupled proton signals evolve into pure antiphase coherence for subsequent dephasing and evolution, respectively. By accordion-type spectroscopy376 where NMR parameters are synchronously incremented and/or decremented as in the constant-time accordion BIRD-HMBC experiment,377 further improvements are possible with a variable long-range delay optimized to cover a range of J values in conjunction with the constant time element, by which the modulation, due to 1H,1H scalar couplings, is suppressed along the F1 dimension.

Elimination of cross-peaks due to 1JCH couplings in HMBC spectra may be performed with a third-order LPJF, subsequent to the first 1H pulse of the experiment, for which the delays are set according to the range of one-bond couplings to be suppressed. In the presence of strong coupling among protons, which occurs for carbohydrates, one-bond artifacts arise in HMBC spectra and may be a nuisance for the interpretation of long-range correlations. This may be alleviated by adding a third-order LPJF, with two of the steps at the end in a four-step LPJF cycle based on different delays. The experiment was dubbed clean HMBC and was shown to decrease one-bond strong coupling artifacts in a sample of d-mannose.378 A further development of the clean HMBC experiment employed for a third-order LPJF an initial conventional second-order LPJF, whereas for the last LPJF dephasing of magnetization from 1H nuclei, one-bond coupled to 13C was performed by an adiabatic frequency swept π pulse on 13C that inverts the latter at different positions in the sample at different times when carried out in the presence of a pulsed-field-gradient.379 Excellent artifact suppression was in this case shown for clean HMBC spectra of the trisaccharide raffinose and a mannan polysaccharide. The technique implemented as clean HMBC has been applied to complex carbohydrate compounds to purge artifacts due to strong coupling.203,380

In NMR spectroscopy studies of carbohydrate molecules, the protons of the omnipresent hydroxyl groups are to a large extent an untapped source of information, as these are exchanging rapidly with water. Looped projected spectroscopy (L-PROSY) in the form of a 1H,1H-NOESY NMR experiment alleviates difficulties in utilizing and detecting cross-relaxation peaks in 2D NOESY spectra.381 By utilizing frequency selective π/2 pulses bracketing the t1 evolution time and targeting only the exchangeable hydroxyl protons in a looping scheme carried out several times, this enables significant intensity buildup of cross-peaks (∼ 4.5×) with nonlabile protons in the L-PROSY-NOESY spectrum, as shown for a sialic acid tetrasaccharide (Figure 37). Hydroxyl groups in carbohydrates exchange with water at a rate of 10–103 s–1 at room temperature, and in order to estimate the number of loops nloop for optimal acquisition parameters, the following relationship is useful: nloop × τmixT1(nonlabile), where the optimal mixing time τmix is dependent on the rate of chemical exchange, which should be fast enough to facilitate adequate repolarization of the labile protons; thus τmix ≈ (kex)−1, where kex is the exchange rate of the hydroxyl protons. For the protons of amide groups, the exchange is slower, although significant NOE enhancements (∼ 2.5×) can still be obtained, which enables inter-residue correlations to be observed also for these protons.

Figure 37.

Figure 37

Conventional and L-PROSY NOESY experiments acquired on an N-acetylated α-(2→8)-linked sialic acid tetramer (a) at 5 °C and 1 GHz. (b) Hydroxyl group region of a conventional NOESY, optimized with a single mixing time of 100 ms, which is the upper boundary when considering the fast chemical exchange of hydroxyl groups with water; conventional NOESY spectrum shows only short-range cross-peaks of hydroxyl groups. (c) Homonuclear L-PROSY NOESY spectrum acquired under similar conditions, with 10 loops and 40 ms per loop, yielding an average enhancement of ∼ 4.5× over the conventional NOESY as well as the multiple new long-range correlations labeled in red. Placed along the F1 axes are the hydroxyl proton regions acquired using 1D excitation sculpting. Adapted and reproduced with permission from ref (381). Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society.

5.2.2. DDCCR NMR Experiments

NMR dipole–dipole cross-correlated relaxation (DDCCR) between nuclei that form a pair of internuclear vectors have been used in conformational studies of proteins and nucleic acids in solution.382,383 As the cross-correlation rates depend linearly on the overall rotational correlation time, the methodology should also be beneficial in studies of polysaccharides with high molecular mass such as exopolysaccharides.384 Thus, based on the DDCCR principle, an NMR experiment was developed to facilitate analysis of cross-correlated relaxation of polysaccharides at 13C natural abundance between two dipoles centered on the same carbon atom in order to investigate the interactions across glycosidic linkages, which will give information on sequential arrangement between sugar residues.2231H,13C-correlations in the 2D NMR spectrum will be decoupled in the F1-dimension and antiphase with respect to the small long-range proton–carbon scalar couplings along F2 (Figure 38). Because also scalar one-bond proton–carbon couplings will be present in the F2-dimension of the spectrum, this can be used to determine the magnitude of 1JC1,H1, which is indicative of the anomeric configuration of hexopyranosides (vide supra).

Figure 38.

Figure 38

(a) Representation of the structure of the repeating unit, →4)-α-d-Manp-(1→2)-α-d-Manp-(1→2)-β-d-Manp-(1→3)-α-d-GlcpNAc(1→ , of the O-antigen polysaccharide of Escherichia coli O176, where the dipole pairs whose cross-correlations are observed in the spectrum of (b) are represented in green, orange, and purple colors. Selected regions of the proton–carbon dipole–dipole cross-correlated relaxation spectrum (1H,13C-DDCCR) recorded with a constant time period (2T) of 10 ms, showing correlations from (b) anomeric protons and (c) the anomeric carbon of residue C. (d) Representation of the structure of the →4)-α-d-Manp-(1→2)-α-d-Manp-(1→ moiety of the aforementioned O-specific polysaccharide, where the two dipoles whose correlation is observed in the spectrum of (c) are shown in blue color. The asterisk indicates a tentative assignment due to spectral overlap.

In cases where the transverse relaxation is fast, a short constant-time period of only 10 ms in the DDCCR experiment has been shown to be sufficient to mediate magnetization transfer, compared to a delay of ∼ 60 ms commonly used for the 1H,13C-HMBC experiment. Detection of cross-peaks in the spectrum employing the DDCCR experiment is limited by a (3cos2θ – 1)/2 term, where θ is the projection angle between the two pairs of C–H vectors such that it vanishes for θ = ±54° and ±126°, whereas in the 1H,13C-HMBC experiment, the glycosidic torsion angles depend on Karplus-type relationships, where for ϕ ≈ ±90° and ψ ≈ ±90°, the corresponding 3JCH ≈ 0. In application of the DDCCR experiment to the O-antigen polysaccharide from E. coli O126, the sugar residues having the α-gluco/galacto configuration showed intraresidue C3,H3/C3,H1 and C5,H5/C5,H1 as well as transglycosidic correlations emanating from the glycosyloxylated carbon atom, i.e., Cn,Hn/Cn,H1′ where n is the substitution position and H1′ is the anomeric proton at the glycosidic linkage; the 1H,13C-HMBC experiment based on scalar couplings resulted in the corresponding cross-peaks in the 2D NMR spectrum.224 The E. coli O176 O-polysaccharide has four sugar residues in its repeating unit (Figure 38a),385 and in the DDCCR spectrum, correlations were observed between glycosyloxylated carbons and anomeric protons (Figure 38b) as well as between an anomeric carbon and a proton at the linkage position (Figure 38c). The DDCCR experiment is a good complement or alternative to the HMBC experiment, but a caveat may be warranted because as in using the 1H,1H-NOESY experiment, the linkage position may be misinterpreted if the conformation at the glycosidic linkage is such that the anomeric proton and the proton at the glycosyloxylated carbon are not proximate in space.

5.2.3. Isotope Labeled Glycans

In determination of the sequential arrangement of uniformly 13C-labeled sugar residues in oligo- and polysaccharides, the large intraresidue 1JCC coupling constants should be considered in choosing, implementing, utilizing, and developing NMR experiments. For the [UL-13C,15N]-labeled α-(2→8)-linked sialic acid tetrasaccharide the 1H,13C-HSQC-NOESY experiment identified correlations between H7 in one residue and the H3 protons of the contiguous residue.386 Even though this type of experiment does not necessarily single out proton pairs at the glycosidic linkage, it can be useful in identifying adjacent sugar residues as was shown for [UL-13C12]sucrose using a 1H,13C-CT-HSQC-NOESY experiment (τmix = 500 ms) showing 1H,1H-NOE connectivities between H1 in glucose and H1 proton(s) in fructose, detected as an H1g–C1f cross-peak in the 2D NMR spectrum.148 Transglycosidic nJCC coupling constants can be up to ∼ 5 Hz and in a 13C,13C-CT-COSY experiment on [UL-13C12]cellobiose correlations from the anomeric carbon C1 of the terminal glucosyl residue via 2JCC to the A4/B4 carbons of the reducing end glucosyl residue and via 3JCC to the A5/B5 carbons can be obtained (Figure 39 bottom left), besides intraresidue correlations, in a similar way to what has been observed for [UL-13C12]sucrose.148 Alternatively, a “proton-start” 13C,13C-TOCSY experiment with a selective spin-lock (τmix = 144 ms) on the anomeric carbon C1 of the uniformly 13C-labeled cellobiose showed transglycosidic correlation(s) to A4/B4 of the reducing end residue (Figure 39 bottom right); the use of a relatively long spin-lock was required because the 2J magnitude of the C1–A4/B4 correlation is ∼ 2 Hz. The long-range 1H,13C-CT-HSQC experiment optimized with a significantly larger nominal 3JCH of 12 Hz than observed across glycosidic linkages revealed a transglycosidic H1g–C2f cross-peak in the heteronuclear 2D NMR spectrum of [UL-13C12]sucrose.

For the elucidation of sequential connectivities in uniformly 13C-labeled polysaccharides the 1H-detected 1H,13C-CT-HSQC and 1H,13C-CT-HSQC-NOESY experiments were the NMR techniques of choice.148 The former experiment gives linkage information and a nominal value of ∼ 20 Hz for nJCH is suitable to define the delay required for the long-range evolution. The latter experiment using a mixing time of ∼ 100 ms identifies spatial proximities between sugar residues, in many cases also defining sequential relationships between sugar residues. However, the determination of the primary sequence in highly or uniformly 13C-labeled polysaccharides is best made by acquiring both experiments as exemplified for the 13C-enriched O-antigen polysaccharide from E. coli O142 (Figure 40).

Figure 40.

Figure 40

(a) Structure of the O-antigen polysaccharide of E. coli O142 in SNFG notation. Selected regions of (b,c) a 1H,13C-CT-HSQC-NOESY (2T = 22 ms, τm = 100 ms) and (d) a 1H,13C-LR-CT-HSQC (2T = 22 ms, and optimized for nJCH = 20 Hz) spectra of the 13C-enriched O-specific polysaccharide from E. coli O142 showing correlations from anomeric protons. The intensity of the cross-peak shown within the green box has been multiplied by a factor of 2. The asterisks denote resonances of minor impurities.

5.3. Miscellaneous

5.3.1. Aliasing and NUS

In order not to cover large spectral widths in indirect dimensions of multidimensional NMR experiments, spectral aliasing or folding may be applied. To improve the spectral resolution in a heteronuclear 2D NMR spectrum, the spectral width in the indirect F1-dimension is decreased. Signals residing outside of detection in the chosen spectral region will then, depending on whether, e.g., echo/antiecho or states-TPPI quadrature detection is used in F1, be aliased, resulting in that signals just outside of one end of the spectral window will appear inside the opposite end, whereas if TPPI quadrature detection is used signals are folded, i.e., they are mirrored just inside the edge of the spectrum “close to” the original resonance.387 For carbohydrates, the approach may be used to position methyl resonances of 6-deoxy-hexoses or N-acetyl groups in 1H,13C-HSQC spectra or carbonyl resonances in 1H,13C-HMBC spectra such that they appear in the indirect 13C-dimension similar to ring-carbon resonances, although a deconvolution step is required to obtain the true 13C NMR chemical shift. The true chemical shift δ0 can be obtained from the apparent chemical shift δa according to δ0 = δa ± n × SWppm where n is the unknown aliasing order and SWppm is the spectral width in ppm. For moderate aliasing where n is a low number manual calculation of the true chemical shift works very well, but for small spectral regions in the F1-dimension computer-aided analysis388 is deemed necessary. Application of the technique has been used to resolve 13C NMR chemical shifts of glucose in a 1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectrum. The spectral width in F1 was reduced to < 1 ppm, and in the aliased spectrum the resonances from the two C4 nuclei of the α- and β-anomeric forms of the monosaccharide were differentiated while being only ∼ 5 Hz apart at 125 MHz.387 Similarly, the 13C NMR chemical shifts in the trisaccharide melezitose could in an aliased 1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectrum be resolved by using a small number of increments in the F1-dimension.388

An alternative methodology to increase the spectral resolution in the F1-dimension of a 2D NMR experiment without increasing the number of data points and consequently the experimental time is to use sparse sampling techniques.389 Nonuniform sampling (NUS)390 facilitates improved resolution by extending the time in the indirect dimension(s) during which sampling takes place, but without collecting all of the data points in an equal and stepwise manner,391 which as a benefit can lead to a 2-fold increase in sensitivity per unit-time of measurement.392,393 There are several different ways to sample less data points followed by reconstruction of the FIDs,394396 prior to Fourier transformation to obtain the NMR spectrum. The NUS technique works very well when the sampling density is matched with the envelope of the decaying signal and any modulation caused by, e.g., one-bond 1H,13C scalar couplings, being on the order of ∼ 150 Hz in carbohydrates. Thus, NUS 1H,13C-HSQC NMR experiments with a coverage of 10% and 20% have been reported for poly- and oligosaccharides, respectively.397,398 However, applying NUS to 1H,1H-NOESY experiments is significantly more demanding due to the high dynamic range where spectra contain peaks of both high and low intensity.397,399,400 Aliasing artifacts in NUS NMR spectra have been investigated and ways to minimize these have been proposed.401

5.3.2. NMR Spin Simulations

The limited 1H NMR spectral dispersion of glycans lead to second-order effects that appear as changes in intensities as well as in splitting of J coupled nuclei, in comparison to first-order spectra where the chemical shift difference ΔνAB between nuclei A and B is one order of magnitude larger than JAB. To obtain accurate 1H chemical shifts with high decimal place precision402 and nJHH coupling constants, quantum mechanical computerized spectral analysis can be performed.4031H NMR spectra are then simulated by an iterative process using, e.g., PERCH404 and compared to an experimental spectrum (Figure 41), and once the residual root-mean-square has been minimized between the observed and calculated spectra, both chemical shifts (δH) and nJHH values can be obtained with confidence.

Figure 41.

Figure 41

(a) Schematic structure of 2-naphthyl 4-C-methyl-β-d-xylopyranoside. Selected regions from the 1H NMR spectrum of the monosaccharide glycoside in methanol-d4 at 37 °C showing the resonance from the anomeric proton using (b) NMR spin simulation (PERCH) and (c) from experiment, and resonances from ring protons using (d) NMR spin simulation and (e) from experiment. The 1H NMR chemical shift for H2 is 3.562 ppm, and that of H3 is 3.560; at temperatures of either 60 or 10 °C, the anomeric proton retains its simple doublet appearance due to the 3JH1,H2 coupling constant of 7 Hz.

As anomeric 1H NMR resonances most often resonate at a higher chemical shift than those from other nonexchangeable protons of a carbohydrate molecule, virtual coupling is conspicuous if present.405 The presence of virtual coupling may be due to subtle and small changes in chemical shifts due to, e.g., temperature changes and can thus produce different spectral appearances as seen for β-d-GlcpNAc-(1→4)-β-d-GlcpNAc-OMe,406,407 where for the reducing end residue at 5 °C δH2 3.73 and δH3 3.68 differ in chemical shifts and δH1 4.43 with 3JH1,H2 = 8.6 Hz appears as a regular resolved doublet. However, at a higher temperature of 70 °C, the corresponding chemicals shifts of H2 and H3 both resonate at 3.71 ppm, and virtual coupling appears at H1 due to the degenerate chemical shifts with 3JH2,H1 = 8.4 Hz and 3JH2,H3 = 10.0 Hz in the spin system.

An even more extreme appearance of the resonance from an anomeric proton was observed for 2-naphthyl 4-C-methyl-β-d-xylopyranoside408 in the 1H NMR spectrum at 37 °C, where it showed five peaks (Figure 41b,c) instead of the simple doublet which is present at both 10 and 60 °C. The chemical shift difference between H2 and H3 is a mere 0.002 ppm at 37 °C with δH2 3.562 and δH3 3.560 (Figure 41d,e) and 3JH2,H1 = 6.8 Hz and 3JH2,H3 = 8.7 Hz, as deduced by NMR spin simulation using PERCH.

By parametrizing 1H NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for a compound into a “spin system matrix” the characterization will be independent of spectrometer frequency and line shape, which subsequently facilitates simulation of spectra at other magnetic field strengths than originally acquired. This approach has been implemented in GISSMO, which enables calculation and refinement of spin system matrices.409 In the analysis of the 1H NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants of sucrose, the spins of the two sugar residues were divided into submatrices, one for the glucose residue and one for the fructose residue. For those spins that showed spectral overlap in the 1H NMR spectrum traces from the 2D 1H,13C-HSQC NMR spectrum made it possible to separate the overlapping resonances and to optimize them individually. Subsequent merging of submatrices produced a simulated spectrum in very good agreement with the experimental 1H NMR spectrum of sucrose.

Quantum mechanical 1H iterative full spin analysis (HiFSA) has been used to analyze in detail the 1H NMR spectra of the bidesmosidic flavonol triglycoside kaempfenrol-3-O-robinoside-7-O-glucoside, in which there are two points of attachment for saccharide components, one of which being β-d-Glcp and the other is the disaccharide α-l-Rhap-(1→6)-β-d-Galp.42 Spectral analysis was performed at low 60 MHz, intermediate 600 MHz as well as high 900 MHz 1H resonance frequencies using different polar deuterated binary solvent mixtures of DMSO-d6 with methanold-d4 or D2O in comparison to neat DMSO-d6, which simplified the analysis and facilitated structure elucidation. The HiFSA methodology was also applied in the structural investigation of monoterpene diglycosides containing α-l-Arap-(1→6)-β-d-Glcp or α-l-Araf-(1→6)-β-d-Glcp linked to different C10-aglycones.410 The NMR spin simulation analysis was used for interpretation of 1H NMR spectra, where small chemical shift changes of ∼0.1 ppm were observed between protons in the methylene group of the primary carbon atom of the aglycone at the glycosidic linkage in comparison to (−)-myrtenyl α-l-arabinopyranosyl-(1→6)-β-d-glucopyranoside. It was concluded that the compound investigated was (+)-myrtenyl α-l-arabinopyranosyl-(1→6)-β-d-glucopyranoside, i.e., the aglycone moiety was the enantiomeric counterpart to that previously determined. The study underscored the importance of relative chemical shifts as indirect structural evidence.

5.3.3. Carbohydrate Mixtures

Determination of saccharide components as mixtures employ a range of NMR techniques depending on whether monosaccharide hydrolysates, a distribution of oligosaccharides or different polysaccharides are to be analyzed. Quantitative determination of the sugar components in cellulose and hemicellulose polysaccharides was optimized by using a two-step hydrolysis procedure employing deuterated sulfuric acid and analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy.411 For the complex saccharide mixtures present in honey consisting of mono-, di-, and trisaccharides, an approach based on 1H,1H-CSSF-TOCSY NMR experiments was chosen.412 Prior to analysis of the unknown mixture, optimal frequencies for selective excitation at a resonance frequency characteristic of each sugar residue, typically from the anomeric protons, were determined on standard solutions of saccharides and the identity of > 20 mono- to trisaccharides could be ascertained as well as quantified. In an alternative approach, monosaccharide composition of glycans was investigated by quantitative 1H,13C-HSQC NMR experiments, which focused on the spectral region for anomeric resonances; a 1JC1,H1 value of 155 Hz was judged suitable for the Q-HSQC experiment.413 Using this methodology, sugar components were determined in hydrolysates of complex polysaccharides from gum in plants and from an exopolysaccharide of a plant-associated bacterium. Focus on the anomeric region was also the case in resolving starch fragments by 1H,13C-HSQC NMR experiments using a narrow 3 ppm 13C spectral width, which allows sampling the indirect F1 dimension at high resolution.414

To unravel differently sized glycans in a mixture, one may rely on the variation in their translational diffusion coefficients and 1H NMR experiments based on diffusion-ordered spectroscopy (DOSY), in which the second dimension is encoded by the translational diffusion coefficient (Dt), offers a powerful approach. Differentiation of maltooligosaccharides with a degree-of-polymerization (dp) of 3–4 and arabinoglycan with dp > 50 in beer,415 as well as analysis of glucose in fruit juices,416 have utilized DOSY NMR experiments to this end. 2D-DOSY experiments were also successfully used to differentiate the α- and β-anomeric forms of d-glucose, other monosaccharides, the anomeric forms of cellobiose, and different phenyl d-glucosides.417 The additional use of transverse (x,y) pulsed-field gradients (PFGs) in conjunction with the standard z-axis PFG can be used to reduce the impact of sample convection and to minimize gradient-dependent line shape distortions in 2D-DOSY NMR experiments, as exemplified for a mixture of mono- and oligosaccharides.418

In cases where the translational diffusion coefficients are closely similar and a DOSY experiment will not differentiate the components, one would need to rely on a different physicochemical property such as NMR spin relaxation, referred to as relaxation-ordered spectroscopy (ROSY). In the relaxation-encoded selective TOCSY (REST) class of experiments one combines selective excitation and isotropic mixing to label each spin system with the same relaxation weighting based on, e.g., transverse T2 or longitudinal T1 relaxation times.419 Using selective excitation at ∼ 5.24 ppm of the reducing end glucosyl residue (α-anomeric form) of the (1→4)-linked lactose and the (1→6)-linked melibiose, the REST2 experiment facilitated differentiation between the two disaccharides based on their transverse relaxation times when analyzed in combination with multivariate processing. By combining REST with pure shift using the PSYCHE J-refocusing element, 2D NMR experiments referred to a PUREST-T1 or PUREST-T2, depending of the relaxation mechanism, can be obtained. A mixture of d-xylose and l-arabinose containing five major species could unambiguously be distinguished from 2D PUREST spectra.420 Other developments along these lines are described in a methodology referred to as SCALPEL,421 in which proton spins are first TOCSY-t1 encoded using only a small number of t1-increments, followed by translational diffusion encoding and T1 or T2 relaxation encoding in a block that also contains 180° selective refocusing pulses, and finally a TOCSY block in the pulse sequence prior to acquisition of the FID. The effect of the narrow bandwidth selective TOCSY pulse sequence in conjunction with multivariate analysis makes it possible to extract contributions from each of the different species in a mixture, whether they are oligosaccharides present in beer or in any other combination of saccharides where a single property would not suffice to differentiate the components.

A mixture of the three monosaccharides, d-glucose, d-mannose, and l-rhamnose, presents a quite complex 1H,1H-TOCSY NMR spectrum when a long mixing time of ∼ 100 ms is employed, i.e., six spin systems with 6 or 7 signals for each anomeric form. In order to speed up the acquisition of the 2D PSYCHE-TOCSY NMR experiment,335 retaining homonuclear decoupling in the indirect dimension where best needed, a band-selective excitation version (BSE-PSYCHE-TOCSY) NMR experiment422 was proposed whereby an F1-decoupled spectral region was obtained for chemical shifts within the excited band, such as between 3–4 ppm for carbohydrates, where the ring-protons and those from hydroxymethyl groups reside. The well-resolved anomeric protons and those from the methyl group of rhamnose are left unperturbed with respect to the homodecoupling. Subsequent application of indirect covariance matrix processing results in that also the F2-dimension becomes decoupled and a pure shift spectral region is attained within the excited band. The gain in acquisition time for the BSE-PSYCHE-TOCSY experiment is one order of magnitude in comparison to the broadband version of the experiment. In another approach, a mixture of d-glucose and d-xylose in high and low concentration, respectively, was used as a test case for complete chemical shift assignments using the NOAH-AST experiment,423 where the AST abbreviation refers to: A, 1,1-ADEQUATE; S, multiplicity-edited HSQC; T, TOCSY. For d-glucose, the anticipated correlations were observed in all spectra, whereas due to the low concentration of d-xylose in the sample preparation, only the proton-detected experiments showed correlations from the latter sugar under the experimental conditions used. In a study using model compounds, such as glucose, glucitol, and mannitol to represent biomass-derived complex mixtures, it was shown that a combination of 1D PSYCHE and 1D TOCSY-PSYCHE experiments were powerful in 1H NMR resonance assignments of the constituents of the mixture.424

6. Computer-Assisted Structural Elucidation of Glycans

6.1. Databases

NMR chemical shifts of carbohydrates in databases are valuable assets in elucidating and identifying glycan structures. In the GLYCOSCIENCES.de database, > 3000 NMR spectra have been deposited, and these are stored as lists of chemical shifts.425 By defining an NMR chemical shift range, the database can be queried for a specific carbohydrate residue. Furthermore, the peak search option compares a user-provided list of chemical shifts to be compared to those in the database to obtain NMR spectral information best matching the input data for the query. The carbohydrate structure database (CSDB) is based on ∼ 10000 covering > 25000 compounds from 13000 organisms.426 There are several ways to make a search query, inter alia, “(sub)structure” or “composition” as well as “NMR signals”. For the latter, a list of either 13C or 1H NMR chemical shifts can be entered in the query, which then returns both glycan structure and chemical shifts if matching data can be found.

A different approach was used for the database sum of anomeric chemical shifts (SOACS) and SOACS-ol, where the latter is to be used when the glycan has been reduced, e.g., for mucin type O-linked glycans released by β-elimination.427 An index number is calculated based on the sum of the 1H NMR chemical shifts of the anomeric protons as well as H3ax resonances if sialic acids are present. With increasing number of constituent monosaccharides, the values of the SOACS and SOACS-ol indexes increase. The database has a focus of multibranched oligosaccharides containing a GalNAc-ol residue. In the database Escherichia coli O-Antigen Database (ECODAB), structures are stored of the O-polysaccharides of the lipopolysaccharides from E. coli.188,428 In addition, 1H and 13C NMR chemical shift data of the O-antigens together with a search query function makes it possible to retrieve structures with corresponding chemical shifts, which may be highly useful for clinical isolates that have not been serotyped and may belong to an already defined O-antigen group.429

Based on the GLYCOSCIENCES.de database, which contains > 16000 monosaccharide entries, a search algorithm was developed, viz., GlycoNMRSearch.430 Matching is performed using either subsets or the entire set of chemical shifts for monosaccharide spin systems. Connectivities rely on 1H,13C-HSQC spectra in combination with, e.g., 1H,1H-TOCSY or 1H,13C-HSQC-TOCSY spectra to assign carbohydrate spin systems by 2D NMR spectra. The results consist of top-ranked structures containing sugar residue(s), linkage position(s), and anomeric configuration(s).

6.2. NMR Chemical Shift Predictions

Tools for 1H and 13C NMR chemical shift predictions are valuable for structural confirmation of synthesized glycans, support of NMR resonance assignments, and approaches for structural elucidation relying on acquired NMR data. GlyNest uses the GLYCOSCIENCES.de database to estimate chemical shift, and it is based on a spherical environment encoding scheme for each atom.425,431 A semiautomated NMR-based method that uses unassigned 13C NMR spectra in conjunction with other methods is known as Generation, Ranking and Assignment of Saccharide Structures (GRASS).432 It performs a two-step procedure in which a rough ranking against the 13C NMR spectrum is carried out first, followed by an accurate simulation method for refinement of the chemical shifts. Besides the 13C NMR spectrum, additional NMR data should be added, if available, to enhance the accuracy of the chemical shift prediction. GRASS has been implemented as part of CSDB, and for top-ranked structure suggestions one can obtain predicted 13C and 1H NMR chemical shifts. The NMR-based structure elucidation can be complemented by visualization of 2D NMR spectra using the software Glycan Optimized Dual Empirical Spectrum Simulation (GODESS),433 also being a part of CSDB. CASPER predicts 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts318 based on increment rules434 and uses all chemical shifts in a monosaccharide in conjunction with chemical shift differences of disaccharides vs monosaccharides, i.e., glycosylation shifts, as well as any chemical shift changes in trisaccharides compared to those of the constituent disaccharides to estimate the chemical shifts of oligo- and polysaccharides. The web-based program435 can be used in three main ways: (i) prediction of NMR chemical shifts for a given glycan structure, (ii) component analysis based on NMR chemical shifts of saccharide mixtures from an oligo- or polysaccharide hydrolysate giving reducing monosaccharides, or methanolysis resulting in methyl glycosides or butanolysis using optically active 2-butanol with ensuing 2-butyl glycosides. Analysis of unassigned 1H,13C-HSQC spectra (peak-picked cross-peaks to obtain chemical shifts and one-bond correlations) of the diastereomeric glycosides facilitates determination of both the sugars present in the mixture and their absolute configuration(s) by NMR spectroscopy.179 (iii) Structural determination of a glycan can be performed by using as input a component analysis performed by NMR spectroscopy (vide infra) or any other method and unassigned 1D 1H and/or 13C NMR chemical shifts in conjunction with connectivities between nuclei obtained from 2D NMR experiments such as 1H,13C-HSQC or 13C,1H-HETCOR, 1H,1H-TOCSY with several mixing times or a long mixing time (∼ 80 ms), 1H,13C-H2BC or 1H,13C-HSQC-TOCSY with a short mixing time (10 ms), and 1H,13C-HMBC experiments. Additional NMR data such as coupling constants of anomeric protons, 3JH1,H2 and 1JH1,C1, may be utilized to speed up the calculations and to rule out structural combinations that are not consistent with experimental data. Structural suggestions are ranked according to best fit between experimental and predicted NMR data, resulting also in that tentative 1H and 13C NMR chemical shift assignments are obtained. Predefined structural elements such as the N-glycan pentasaccharide core Man3GlcNAc2, the tetrasaccharide repeating unit of Shigella flexneri O-antigen polysaccharides, or biosynthetic considerations for the O-antigen assembly in, e.g., E. coli, may be applied. Different substituents at sugar residues and methyl glycosides as well as some glycan-amino acid structures are also handled by the CASPER program.436,437 3D model of the proposed structure of the glycan investigated can subsequently be generated by CarbBuilder438,439 as part of the output results and visualized by a standalone molecular graphics program.

7. Technological Developments

7.1. Cryogenically Cooled Probes and Microcoils

NMR spectroscopy has been limited by its low sensitivity, which to some extent can be alleviated by signal averaging, although this leads to long experimental times. A significant improvement in sensitivity took place with the introduction of cryogenically cooled probes, in which the thermal noise in the radiofrequency coil is reduced by lowering the temperature to ∼ 20 K as well as by cooling the preamplifier electronics.440,441 An NMR sample can, however, be analyzed in the temperature range −40 °C to +80 °C. The sensitivity gain is on the order of a factor of 4 but will be reduced if sample solutions have a high ionic content. To mitigate the loss of sensitivity, low conductivity buffers may be used442 or NMR tubes of a smaller diameter such as 3 mm in a probe designed for 5 mm NMR tubes may be employed, as exemplified for sucrose in D2O devoid of salt or in the presence of 4 M NaCl.443 Using a 3 mm tube in a “5 mm probe” is highly beneficial for sample-limited studies of oligosaccharides because the signal-to-noise ratio is only affected to a small extent, even though the amount of material is reduced by one-third for the smaller diameter sample.444 Dedicated cryogenic probes with a sample tube diameter of 1.7 mm gives a sensitivity gain by more than one order of magnitude, compared to a standard 5 mm probe operating at room temperature. Cryogenically cooled broadband probes have increased signal-to-nose ratio compared to those operating at room temperature, and when optimized for carbon nuclei, the improved resolution due to direct 13C-detection offers a valuable complement or even an alternative to the 1H-detected heteronuclear correlation experiments in studies of carbohydrate structure.

Small amounts of sample are favorably analyzed using 3 mm outer diameter NMR tubes in probes dedicated to this end and a narrower 1.7 mm NMR tube may also be used in the same probe; the approach was employed in the analysis of large hydroxy-proline arabinogalactans having branched side-chains with different substitution patterns.445 For the smallest amount of material microcoil NMR probe technology can be utilized to obtain improved mass sensitivity.446 This methodology was applied for characterization of mass-limited heparin-derived oligosaccharides analyzed by 1H and standard 2D 1H,1H-correlated NMR experiments. Glycan structure can thus be investigated from microgram quantities of material, e.g., tetrasaccharides with a molecular mass of ∼ 1100–1200 Da were analyzed using ∼ 20 μg of sample in 3 μL of D2O.447

7.2. Dynamic Nuclear Polarization

The sensitivity of the NMR technique is low, and for spin-1/2 nuclei commonly used to investigate carbohydrate structure only a small fraction of the nuclear spins will contribute to the NMR signal, i.e., the polarization (P) of spins is low. This can be described by P = (NαNβ/Nα + Nβ), where Nα and Nβ are the number of spins in the lower and higher energy states, respectively, and at thermal equilibrium, the population of the spins follow a Boltzmann distribution. For the two energy levels, the polarization can also be given by P = tanh(ℏγB0/2kBT), where is Planck’s constant divided by 2π, γ is the nuclear magnetogyric ratio, B0 is the applied magnetic field, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absolute temperature.448 Thus, as the magnetic field increases and the temperature decreases, the nuclear spin polarization increases but is still low for the nuclei with a resonance frequency in the MHz range. However, the frequency in electron spin resonance employing microwave irradiation is significantly higher by a few orders of magnitude.

Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP)449451 relies on the fact that microwave irradiation of an electron paramagnetic agent (EPA, which is in the form of an organic free radical) together with the target substance, both of which are dispersed in a glassy state at low temperature of ∼ 1 K, leads to a close to unit polarization transfer from the electrons to the nuclei of interest; as a result, an increase of the nuclear polarization occurs, improving the sensitivity of the resonances when detected by NMR spectroscopy. The polarization transfer in the dissolution DNP (dDNP) technique448,452 is often carried out in a separate system, e.g., with a relatively low magnetic field of 3.35 T and an irradiation frequency of 94 GHz, although higher magnetic fields (6.7 T) and irradiation frequencies (188 GHz) have also been used.453 This is followed by dissolution using a superheated solvent and transfer via a “magnetic tunnel” to an NMR spectrometer, where the experiment is carried out (Figure 42).454,455 The nuclei chosen, 13C or 15N, have a relatively low γ and the target compounds are present in M concentration, whereas the organic compound with a free radical is present in mM concentration. Perdeuteration of the target molecule naturally extends the 13C longitudinal relaxation time T1 due to the absence of heteronuclear 1H,13C dipolar relaxation, and this is beneficial both during and after the transfer from the polarizer.453 An alternative way to transfer the hyperpolarized sample is to keep it frozen, transfer it via the “magnetic tunnel” (duration ≤ 70 ms) using pressurized helium gas, and upon arrival in the second magnet let it dissolve rapidly in a preheated solvent, whereafter the sample solution is drawn into the NMR tube (duration < 1 s) and the recoding of NMR spectra is initiated; the technique has been dubbed “bullet-DNP”.456,457 Furthermore, 13C NMR signals from small biological molecules, exemplified inter alia by [UL-13C6]glucose, can be enhanced by in situ Overhauser DNP in water at room temperature,458 and hyperpolarized water in a dDNP experiment can be used for acquiring in a single scan a 15N NMR spectrum of urea at natural abundance;459 likewise, hyperpolarized water is able to boost sensitivity in biomolecular NMR by acting as a hyperpolarization agent, whereby labile protons on the target molecule are exchanged with those of the hyperpolarized solvent.460

Figure 42.

Figure 42

Schematic diagram of a combined dynamic nuclear polarization setup for liquid state NMR spectroscopy. The sample is hyperpolarized in the cold magnet system (left) and transferred by a stream of hot solvent into the NMR system (right) for data acquisition with improved sensitivity. The magnetic field strength during the transfer of the hyperpolarized fluid through a magnetic tunnel (black line) or without tunnel (red line) is shown as an insert. Reprinted with permission from ref (455). Copyright 2015 Authors.

The dDNP technique has been used successfully to study enzymatic reactions involving sugars, where the outstanding sensitivity and speed of the experiments made it possible to observe products and intermediates not previously detected. In a study of phosphorylation of glucose by hexokinase in the presence of magnesium ions and ATP resulting in d-glucose-6-phosphate, which also is an inhibitor of the enzyme, the dDNP methodology was employed.461 Specifically, to investigate the kinase reaction d-[UL-13C6;UL-2H7]glucose and the radical TEMPOL were mixed, frozen, and subjected to microwave irradiation at ∼ 1 K. After rapid dissolution, the hyperpolarized substrate was transferred to the second magnet and injected into a buffer solution containing reactants and the hexokinase enzyme. The 13C NMR spectra were acquired every second, with deuterium decoupling using 10° radio frequency pulses, for ∼ 20 s; the uniformly 13C and 2H labeled reactant d-glucose and product d-glucose-6-phosphate, both present in equilibrium between the α- and β-anomeric forms, had 13C T1 relaxation times in the range of 2–4 s. The presence of products and kinetics of the reaction were monitored using signals from the anomeric carbon-13 nuclei, where the products showed small chemical shift displacements toward higher chemical shifts, e.g., the C1-signal of the β-anomeric form of d-glucose-6-phosphate was shifted by ∼ 0.2 ppm compared to the corresponding signal from d-glucose, a chemical shift difference that was sufficient to distinguish resonances and to follow the time course of the reaction. Importantly, both anomeric forms of glucose, which interconvert on a time scale of several minutes, were phosphorylated, and it was possible to extract kinetic parameters for the kinase reaction from the NMR experiments lasting only ∼ 20 s.

Glycosidases hydrolyze oligo- and polysaccharides, but this class of enzymes can also be used in transglycosylation reactions whereby a new glycosidic linkage is formed to an acceptor sugar, as shown by recent dDNP NMR studies of β-galactosidases.462,463 Enzymes from glycoside hydrolase family 2 have a double displacement mechanism with retention of anomeric configuration, and consequently any transglycosylation products from the action of lacZ β-galactosidase or the enzyme mixture Lactozyme 2600L should lead to galactosyl-containing products having the β-anomeric configuration. The experimental setup included after polarization and dissolution, inter alia, 20° or 30° 13C radio frequency pulses applied with a repetition time of 2 s to the sample mixture containing the enzyme β-galactosidase and the reactants being a donor glycoside and a monosaccharide acceptor molecule, one of which was a 13C,2H-isotopically labeled monosaccharide entity. Notably, in the first scan, the signal enhancement was ∼ 104, thereby facilitating detection of products and transient intermediates that would not have been possible to reveal otherwise. The transglycosylation reactions and subsequent hydrolysis of products formed were first studied462 using the site specifically isotope labeled o-nitrophenyl β-d-[1-13C;1-2H]galactopyranoside as a donor molecule and galactose as an acceptor (Scheme 1). Analysis of the region in 13C NMR spectra where anomeric carbon resonances reside revealed β-d-[1-13C;1-2H]Galp-(1→6)-d-Galp as the major transglycosylation product, β-d-[1-13C;1-2H]Galp-(1→4)-d-Galp, and/or β-d-[1-13C;1-2H]Galp-(1→3)-d-Galp and most interestingly the trehalose-type disaccharide β-d-[1-13C;1-2H]Galp-(1↔1)-β-d-Galp. Further analysis of acquired NMR data enabled the determination of relative transglycosylation and hydrolysis rates, where β-d-[1-13C;1-2H]Galp-(1→6)-d-Galp was formed at the highest rate and β-d-[1-13C;1-2H]Galp-(1↔1)-β-d-Galp was hydrolyzed at the highest rate of the disaccharides produced. The second study used instead natural abundance o-nitrophenyl β-d-galactopyranoside and d-[UL-13C6;UL-2H7]glucose (Scheme 1), together with lacZ β-galactosidase as well as with the enzyme mixture Lactozyme 2600L.463 In this case, the uniformly 13C and 2H labeled glucose allowed for analysis of the 13C spectral region 65–85 ppm, thereby identifying β-d-Galp-(1→6)-d-[UL-13C6;UL-2H7]Glcp (allolactose) as the major product, β-d-Galp-(1→4)-d-[UL-13C6;UL-2H7]Glcp (lactose) and β-d-Galp-(1→3)-d-[UL-13C6;UL-2H7]Glcp (Scheme 1, Figure 43). In particular, the latter disaccharide was observed as β-d-Galp-(1→3)-β-d-[UL-13C6;UL-2H7]Glcp, i.e., the anomeric configuration of the reducing end sugar was β for the transglycosylation product, demonstrating that the enzyme has selectivity for that anomeric form of the acceptor. Moreover, the obtained NMR data were used to determine the relative formation ratios as well as the hydrolysis rates for the three disaccharides.

Figure 43.

Figure 43

Dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization (dDNP) NMR spectroscopy in which the 13C spectra are summed 4–18 s after transfer to the NMR tube. (top) Hyperpolarized d-[UL-13C;UL-2H]glucopyranose without enzyme or donor molecule, (middle) mixed with ortho-nitro-phenyl β-d-galactopyranoside and lactozyme 2600L, and (bottom) mixed with the donor and lacZ β-galactosidase. The 13C resonances labeled by A, B, and C correspond to the substitution position in 6-substituted glucose, 4-substituted glucose, and 3-substituted β-d-glucose, respectively. Reproduced with permission from ref (463). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.

7.3. Low Field Magnets, High-Temperature Superconductors, and High Field Magnets

The revival of NMR spectrometers operating at low 1H Larmor frequencies in the range 43–100 MHz464 has during the past decade opened a niche complementing the NMR spectrometers with 1H frequencies of 300 MHz or higher. These low frequency benchtop systems have permanent magnets, in contrast to the higher frequency systems that utilize low-temperature superconducting (LTS) magnets at 4.2 K. The benchtop NMR spectrometers are compact with a small size and do not require cryogens for their operation. Most of the commercially available benchtop spectrometers utilize standard 5 mm outer diameter NMR tubes and can detect 1H and/or different NMR active nuclei such as 13C, 15N, or 31P present in glycans. Notably, the common homo- and heteronuclear 2D NMR experiments have also been implemented. The recent development for benchtop systems that facilitates NMR spectra to be acquired at different elevated temperatures is a very important improvement because for the NMR analysis of carbohydrates molecules in D2O, the fact that the 1H chemical shift of the HDO peak is very sensitive to temperature makes it possible to avoid spectral overlap between, in particular, the HDO peak and resonances from anomeric protons of an oligosaccharide. However, the dispersion of resonances in 1H NMR spectra is low at 60 MHz as compared to, e.g., 600 MHz (Figure 44), but the anomeric configuration of pyranosides with the gluco/galacto configuration can readily be determined at the lower frequency.

Figure 44.

Figure 44

Low and medium magnetic fields used for 1H NMR spectra of methyl β-maltoside in D2O at 26 °C and a 1H spectrometer frequency of 60 MHz (top) and 600 MHz (bottom). The 1H NMR chemical shift at 3 ppm was set to 0 Hz.

In the early 2000s, high field NMR LTS magnets operating at a 1H frequency of 800 MHz had become available to researchers in the field. The earlier wires used for construction of LTS magnets were made from alloys of niobium and titanium which facilitated operation at 400 MHz, but switching to alloys made from niobium and titanium complemented with other elements such as tantalum made it possible to reach significantly higher magnetic fields.465 Further increase of the magnetic field strength corresponding to a 1H frequency of 900 MHz was promoted by cooling the NMR coil using subcooled superfluid helium at a temperature of ∼ 2 K. At a 1H frequency of 900 MHz, the dispersion of resonances increases significantly, which is highly beneficial in structural studies of complex oligosaccharides,466 although some spectral overlap of resonances still occurs for closely similar structural elements in oligosaccharides originating from polysaccharides with repeating units (Figure 45). A decade later, the first 1 GHz NMR spectrometer made its appearance.467 However, above this magnetic field of ∼ 23.5 T, the critical current density for Nb3Sn-based alloys decreases steeply and superconductivity will disappear. To reach even higher magnetic fields with ultra-high field NMR spectrometers operating at 1.1 and 1.2 GHz hybrid designs have been developed, whereby high-temperature superconductors (HTS) using “copper-oxides” are utilized in the inner section of the solenoid magnet and LTS in the outer portion of the magnet. 1H,15N-SOFAST-HMQC and 1H,15N-BEST-TROSY NMR spectra of proteins at 1.2 GHz have been acquired and were compared with respect to resolution and sensitivity to spectra obtained at 900 and 950 MHz, which resulted in clear improvements at the highest magnetic field;468 these results are promising for future applications to glycans using ultra-high field NMR spectroscopy at > 1 GHz. To obtain even higher magnetic field strengths for NMR spectrometers operated in a persistent mode, it will be essential to construct high quality superconducting joints between HTS coils as well as between HTS and LTS wires in order to reach such goals.469,470 Furthermore, the HTS can be used in another very interesting area of NMR spectroscopy, viz., in the construction of cryogen-free power-driven magnets, as was shown by an HTS magnet operating at 9.4 T corresponding to a 1H frequency of 400 MHz.471 The operation temperature of the magnet is 14–18 K, which allows the magnet to maintain the superconducting state, using a high-stability power supply and a helium compressor.

Figure 45.

Figure 45

High magnetic field used for 1H (a) and 1H,13C-HSQC (b) NMR spectra (anomeric region) of the dodecasaccharide (anomeric mixture at the reducing end) in D2O at 25 °C and a 1H spectrometer frequency of 900 MHz. Its structure corresponds to three repeating units of the Salmonella enteritidis O-antigen with the sequence →3)-α-d-Galp-(1→2)-α-d-Manp-(1→4)-α-l-Rhap-(1→, to which tyvelose (3,6-dideoxy-d-arabino-hexopyranose) groups are α-(1→3)-linked to each of the mannosyl residues. The rhamnosyl residue at the reducing end of the dodecasaccharide is present as a mixture of anomeric forms.

8. Summary and Outlook

Knowledge of carbohydrate structure forms the basis of understanding glycan function in biology and medicine. The developments of (i) NMR pulse sequences improving speed of experiments, (ii) hardware enhancing signal-to-noise ratio, and (iii) magnetic field strengths surpassing 1 GHz, thereby increasing spectral resolution, have during the last two decades materialized such that tools for liquid-state NMR spectroscopy are available to efficiently elucidate glycan structure of highly complex oligo- and polysaccharides as well as of glycopeptides and glycoproteins. As reviewed herein, the advancements have led to considerable progress in the field of biomolecular systems containing glycans, exemplified by the progression that has taken place since the turn of the century up to today’s state-of-the-art NMR technologies. Complementary to this, strategies for NMR spectral analysis of oligosaccharides and carbohydrate polymers have been described using specific examples in a tutorial way,472,473 illustrating the wealth of information available from 1D, 2D, and 3D NMR experiments, whereby chemical shifts and spin–spin coupling constants can be obtained and connectivities in and between sugar residues may be established.

Future developments in structural analysis of glycans will include the use of machine learning techniques to predict NMR chemical shifts from structure or vice versa to determine the structure of carbohydrates from NMR spectra. Machine learning methods related to NMR spectroscopy are to this end presently being developed based on data-driven approaches474 and density functional theory quantum chemical computed values475477 of organic molecules as well as by using deep neural networks (DNN) for peak picking of biomolecular NMR spectra.478 NMR spectroscopy was employed in conjunction with supervised machine learning models, which map input data and via an inferred function produces output data to detect in an automatic fashion adulteration in honey, such as invert sugar, i.e., hydrolyzed sucrose.479 The classification methods included a logistic regression classifier, DNN, and a light gradient boosting machine; interestingly, by combining the results through a voting method using all of the classifiers, the tested data sets were correctly identified, whether they came from samples containing adulterated or pure honey. One can foresee that machine learning approaches will have great potential to complement already existing NMR chemical shift prediction methods based on increment rules (vide supra, section 6.2).

The post-translational modification of proteins by glycans may take place by multiply O-glycosidically linked N-acetyl-d-galactosamine residues480 or by larger complex oligosaccharides.481 Chemical shift displacements upon glycosylation of peptides and proteins, monitored by, e.g., 1H,15N-HSQC480 or 1H,1H-TOCSY482 NMR experiments, can be utilized as specific identifiers on sites of modification and the process of sequential addition of glycans to the polypeptide chain. The importance of glycosylation in biochemical systems will in future studies be further unraveled by the detailed analysis of the interplay between glycans and polypeptides, where NMR spectroscopy will play an essential role. NMR chemical shift assignments of glycans in large glycoproteins such as antibodies and glycan-substituted Fab fragments thereof or of multiply glycan-substituted proteins in general are highly challenging problems to be solved, whether it be by selective mutation of N- or O-linked positions or complemented by stable isotope labeling. Not only will stable isotope incorporation of 13C and/or 15N nuclei, in particular, as uniform, site/residue specific, or sparse labeling157,369,483,484 lead to enhanced sensitivity in detecting glycan resonances, but metabolic aspects and biosynthesis pathways can also be investigated effectively.

Aided by increased spectral resolution from ultrahigh field NMR spectrometers and specific ultraselective excitation of resonances in crowded spectral regions, NMR experiments will be able to unravel and identify different sugar residues in polysaccharides, i.e., those from the reducing end, primer–adaptor region if present, backbone constituents and terminal end entities, in conjunction with spacing between and partial substitution of side-chains, all of which can give valuable knowledge about biosynthesis. Insight into structure and biosynthesis increases the potential of being able to interfere with polysaccharide assembly, which may help in combatting pathogenic bacteria in general and antimicrobial resistance in particular. Whether it may be the development of experiments based on novel NMR pulse sequences, further enhancement of sensitivity or continued advancement of ultrahigh field magnets, solution-state NMR spectroscopy will be vital for successful research on glycans.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council, The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the National Research and Innovation Agency of Uruguay (ANII), the Basic Sciences Development Program (PEDEClBA), and the Sectoral Scientific Research Commission of the University of the Republic of Uruguay. We thank Dr E̅riks Kupče for kindly recording the NOAH-4 spectra of stachyose. The Swedish NMR Centre at University of Gothenburg is acknowledged for support.

Biographies

Carolina Fontana was born in Paysandú (Uruguay) in 1980. After receiving a M.Sc. degree in Pharmaceutical Chemistry in 2005, she obtained a M.Sc. degree in Medicinal Chemistry in 2009, both at the University of the Republic (Uruguay). In the period between 2006 and 2009, she carried out organic synthesis of bioactive natural products analogues with Prof. Eduardo Manta and performed structural analysis of synthetic products using NMR spectroscopy with Prof. Guillermo Moyna. She obtained her Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry at Stockholm University in 2013, working with Prof. Göran Widmalm. Her doctoral thesis dealt with the structural analysis of polysaccharides, including of 13C uniformly labeled materials, using mainly NMR spectroscopy. During this period, she was an early stage research fellow of the FP7 Marie Curie Initial Training Network EuroGlycoArrays. Thereafter, she was a postdoctoral fellow at the Department of Medicinal Biochemistry and Biophysics of the Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, 2014–2015), where she worked with 13C and 15N relaxation dispersion experiments of uniformly labeled small RNA with Prof. Katja Petzold. She returned to the University of the Republic as an Assistant Professor in 2015 and became an Associate Professor in 2022. Her current research is focused on the isolation of carbohydrates from natural sources and their structural and conformational analysis using NMR spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulations.

Professor Göran Widmalm carried out his graduate studies during the mid-1980s, a period when 2D NMR spectroscopy techniques developed rapidly, and he received a Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry at Stockholm University in 1988 under the supervision of Prof. P.-E. Jansson. His thesis work involved structural elucidation of polysaccharides by chemical methods, NMR spectroscopy, and the development of a computerized approach to structural determination of oligo- and polysaccharides using data from NMR experiments. At the turn of the decade, when 3D and nD NMR techniques emerged, he was a postdoctoral fellow at the Biophysics Laboratory, CBER/FDA, in Bethesda (NIH campus), MD, USA. During this period, he carried out molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules having Dr Richard W. Pastor as a mentor and performed NMR experiments under the guidance of Dr William M. Egan and Dr R. Andrew Byrd. He subsequently returned to Stockholm University as an assistant professor, became Docent in 1991, and during 1995–1998 he was an associate professor. Since 1999, he holds a position as full professor of Bioorganic Chemistry. His research interests span from structural investigation of complex glycans, complemented by bioinformatics, to ligand–receptor interaction studies by employing a range of NMR spectroscopy techniques and computational chemistry methods.

Special Issue

This paper is an additional review for Chem. Rev. 2022, volume 122, issue (20), , “Glycosciences”.

Author Contributions

CRediT: Carolina Fontana conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, writing-original draft, writing-review & editing; Göran Widmalm conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, writing-original draft, writing-review & editing.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Flynn R. A.; Pedram K.; Malaker S. A.; Batista P. J.; Smith B. A. H.; Johnson A. G.; George B. M.; Majzoub K.; Villalta P. W.; Carette J. E.; et al. Small RNAs Are Modified with N-Glycans and Displayed on the Surface of Living Cells. Cell 2021, 184, 3109–3124. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Essentials of Glycobiology, 4th ed.; Varki A., Prestegard J. J., Schnaar R. L., Seeberger P. H., Cummings R. D., Esko J. D., Hart G. W., Aebi M., Mohnen D., Kinoshita T., et al. , Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor: New York, 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Urashima T.; Asakuma S.; Messer M.. Milk Oligosaccharides. In Comprehensive Glycoscience; Kamerling J. P., Ed.; Elsevier, 2007; Vol. 4, pp 695–724. [Google Scholar]
  4. Uemura Y.; Asakuma S.; Yon L.; Saito T.; Fukuda K.; Arai I.; Urashima T. Structural Determination of the Oligosaccharides in the Milk of an Asian Elephant (Elephas Maximus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A 2006, 145, 468–478. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Varki A.; Cummings R. D.; Aebi M.; Packer N. H.; Seeberger P. H.; Esko J. D.; Stanley P.; Hart G.; Darvill A.; Kinoshita T.; et al. Symbol Nomenclature for Graphical Representations of Glycans. Glycobiology 2015, 25, 1323–1324. 10.1093/glycob/cwv091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Neelamegham S.; Aoki-Kinoshita K.; Bolton E.; Frank M.; Lisacek F.; Lütteke T.; O’Boyle N.; Packer N. H.; Stanley P.; Toukach P.; et al. Updates to the Symbol Nomenclature for Glycans Guidelines. Glycobiology 2019, 29, 620–624. 10.1093/glycob/cwz045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Senchenkova S. N.; Guo X.; Naumenko O. I.; Shashkov A. S.; Perepelov A. V.; Liu B.; Knirel Y. A. Structure and Genetics of the O-Antigens of Escherichia coli O182-O187. Carbohydr. Res. 2016, 435, 58–67. 10.1016/j.carres.2016.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tomek M. B.; Maresch D.; Windwarder M.; Friedrich V.; Janesch B.; Fuchs K.; Neumann L.; Nimeth I.; Zwickl N. F.; Dohm J. C.; et al. A General Protein O-Glycosylation Gene Cluster Encodes the Species-Specific Glycan of the Oral Pathogen Tannerella forsythia: O-Glycan Biosynthesis and Immunological Implications. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2008. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Posch G.; Pabst M.; Brecker L.; Altmann F.; Messner P.; Schäffer C. Characterization and Scope of S-Layer Protein O-Glycosylation in Tannerella forsythia. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 38714–38724. 10.1074/jbc.M111.284893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Szakonyi G.; Klein M. G.; Hannan J. P.; Young K. A.; Ma R. Z.; Asokan R.; Holers V. M.; Chen X. S. Structure of the Epstein-Barr Virus Major Envelope Glycoprotein. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 996–1001. 10.1038/nsmb1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Thieker D. F.; Hadden J. A.; Schulten K.; Woods R. J. 3D Implementation of the Symbol Nomenclature for Graphical Representation of Glycans. Glycobiology 2016, 26, 786–787. 10.1093/glycob/cww076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sehnal D.; Grant O. C. Rapidly Display Glycan Symbols in 3D Structures: 3D-SNFG in LiteMol. J. Proteome Res. 2019, 18, 770–774. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pendrill R.; Jonsson K. H. M.; Widmalm G. Glycan Synthesis, Structure, and Dynamics: A Selection. Pure Appl. Chem. 2013, 85, 1759–1770. 10.1351/pac-con-12-10-17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Seko A.; Koketsu M.; Nishizono M.; Enoki Y.; Ibrahim H. R.; Juneja L. R.; Kim M.; Yamamoto T. Occurrence of a Sialylglycopeptide and Free Sialylglycans in Hen’s Egg Yolk. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1997, 1335, 23–32. 10.1016/S0304-4165(96)00118-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bazaka K.; Crawford R. J.; Nazarenko E. L.; Ivanova E. P.. Bacterial Extracellular Polysaccharides. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Linke D., Goldman A., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, 2011; Vol. 715, pp 213–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides: Structure, Chemical Synthesis, Biogenesis and Interaction with Host Cells; Knirel Y. A., Valvano M. A., Eds.; Springer: Wien, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ståhle J.; Widmalm G. Lipopolysaccharides of Gram-Negative Bacteria: Biosynthesis and Dtructural Aspects. Trends Glycosci. Glycotechnol. 2019, 31, E159 10.4052/tigg.1749.7E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Di Lorenzo F.; Duda K. A.; Lanzetta R.; Silipo A.; De Castro C.; Molinaro A. A Journey from Structure to Function of Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 15767–15821. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Whitfield C.; Wear S. S.; Sande C. Assembly of Bacterial Capsular Polysaccharides and Exopolysaccharides. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 74, 521–543. 10.1146/annurev-micro-011420-075607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Knirel Y. A.; Van Calsteren M.-R.. Bacterial Exopolysaccharides. In Comprehensive Glycoscience; Barchi J. J., Ed.; Elsevier, 2021; Vol. 1, pp 21–95. [Google Scholar]
  21. Schneewind O.; Missiakas D.. Lipoteichoic Acid Synthesis and Function in Gram-Positive Bacteria. In Biogenesis of Fatty Acids, Lipids and Membranes; Geiger O., Ed.; Springer, 2017; pp 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  22. van Dalen R.; Peschel A.; van Sorge N. M. Wall Teichoic Acid in Staphylococcus aureus Host Interaction. Trends Microbiol. 2020, 28, 985–998. 10.1016/j.tim.2020.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Szymczak P.; Filipe S. R.; Covas G.; Vogensen F. K.; Neves A. R.; Janzen T. Cell Wall Glycans Mediate Recognition of the Dairy Bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus by Bacteriophages. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e01847-18 10.1128/AEM.01847-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Anderluh M.; Berti F.; Bzducha-Wróbel A.; Chiodo F.; Colombo C.; Compostella F.; Durlik K.; Ferhati X.; Holmdahl R.; Jovanovic D.; et al. Recent Advances on Smart Glycoconjugate Vaccines in Infections and Cancer. FEBS J. 2022, 289, 4251–4303. 10.1111/febs.15909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhu H.; Rollier C. S.; Pollard A. J. Recent Advances in Lipopolysaccharide-Based Glycoconjugate Vaccines. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2021, 20, 1515–1538. 10.1080/14760584.2021.1984889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu B.; Furevi A.; Perepelov A. V.; Guo X.; Cao H.; Wang Q.; Reeves P. R.; Knirel Y. A.; Wang L.; Widmalm G. Structure and Genetics of Escherichia coli O Antigens. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 44, 655–683. 10.1093/femsre/fuz028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Furevi A.; Ståhle J.; Muheim C.; Gkotzis S.; Udekwu K. I.; Daley D. O.; Widmalm G. Structural Analysis of the O-Antigen Polysaccharide from Escherichia coli O188. Carbohydr. Res. 2020, 498, 108051. 10.1016/j.carres.2020.108051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schjoldager K. T.; Narimatsu Y.; Joshi H. J.; Clausen H. Global View of Human Protein Glycosylation Pathways and Functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 729–749. 10.1038/s41580-020-00294-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bagdonaite I.; Wandall H. H. Global Aspects of Viral Glycosylation. Glycobiology 2018, 28, 443–467. 10.1093/glycob/cwy021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tian W.; Li D.; Zhang N.; Bai G.; Yuan K.; Xiao H.; Gao F.; Chen Y.; Wong C. C. L.; Gao G. F. O-Glycosylation Pattern of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Reveals an “O-Follow-N” Rule. Cell Res. 2021, 31, 1123–1125. 10.1038/s41422-021-00545-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Campos D.; Girgis M.; Sanda M. Site-specific Glycosylation of SARS-CoV-2: Big Challenges in Mass Spectrometry Analysis. Proteomics 2022, 22, e2100322 10.1002/pmic.202100322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Madsen T. D.; Hansen L. H.; Hintze J.; Ye Z.; Jebari S.; Andersen D. B.; Joshi H. J.; Ju T.; Goetze J. P.; Martin C.; et al. An Atlas of O-Linked Glycosylation on Peptide Hormones Reveals Diverse Biological Roles. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4033. 10.1038/s41467-020-17473-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fairbanks A. J. Synthetic and Semi-Synthetic Approaches to Unprotected N-Glycan Oxazolines. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 416–429. 10.3762/bjoc.14.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Alagesan K.; Kolarich D. Improved Strategy for Large Scale Isolation of Sialylglycopeptide (SGP) from Egg Yolk Powder. MethodsX 2019, 6, 773–778. 10.1016/j.mex.2019.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sugita-Konishi Y.; Sakanaka S.; Sasaki K.; Juneja L. R.; Noda T.; Amano F. Inhibition of Bacterial Adhesion and Salmonella Infection in BALB/c Mice by Sialyloligosaccharides and Their Derivatives from Chicken Egg Yolk. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3607–3613. 10.1021/jf0116451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Duus J.; Gotfredsen C. H.; Bock K. Carbohydrate Structural Determination by NMR Spectroscopy: Modern Methods and Limitations. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 4589–4614. 10.1021/cr990302n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Klement M. L. R.; Öjemyr L.; Tagscherer K. E.; Widmalm G.; Wieslander Å. A Processive Lipid Glycosyltransferase in the Small Human Pathogen Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Involvement in Host Immune Response. Mol. Microbiol. 2007, 65, 1444–1457. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05865.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rosas-Ramírez D.; Pereda-Miranda R. Batatins VIII-XI, Glycolipid Ester-Type Dimers from Ipomoea batatas. J. Nat. Prod. 2015, 78, 26–33. 10.1021/np500523w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mair C. E.; Grienke U.; Wilhelm A.; Urban E.; Zehl M.; Schmidtke M.; Rollinger J. M. Anti-Influenza Triterpene Saponins from the Bark of Burkea africana. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 515–523. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.7b00774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Su X. D.; Jang H. J.; Wang C. Y.; Lee S. W.; Rho M. C.; Kim Y. H.; Yang S. Y. Anti-Inflammatory Potential of Saponins from Aster tataricus via NF-ΚB/MAPK Activation. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 1139–1148. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.8b00856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ariga T.; Suzuki M.; Yu R. K.; Kuroda Y.; Shimada I.; Inagaki F.; Miyatake T. Accumulation of Unique Globo-Series Glycolipids in PC 12h Pheochromocytoma Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 1516–1521. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)94217-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Bhavaraju S.; Taylor D.; Niemitz M.; Lankin D. C.; Bzhelyansky A.; Giancaspro G. I.; Liu Y.; Pauli G. F. NMR-Based Quantum Mechanical Analysis Builds Trust and Orthogonality in Structural Analysis: The Case of a Bisdesmosidic Triglycoside as Withania somnifera Aerial Parts Marker. J. Nat. Prod. 2021, 84, 836–845. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c01131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kang X.; Kirui A.; Muszyński A.; Widanage M. C. D.; Chen A.; Azadi P.; Wang P.; Mentink-Vigier F.; Wang T. Molecular Architecture of Fungal Cell Walls Revealed by Solid-State NMR. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2747. 10.1038/s41467-018-05199-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Laguri C.; Silipo A.; Martorana A. M.; Schanda P.; Marchetti R.; Polissi A.; Molinaro A.; Simorre J. P. Solid State NMR Studies of Intact Lipopolysaccharide Endotoxin. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 13, 2106–2113. 10.1021/acschembio.8b00271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Arnold A. A.; Bourgouin J. P.; Genard B.; Warschawski D. E.; Tremblay R.; Marcotte I. Whole Cell Solid-State NMR Study of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Microalgae. J. Biomol. NMR 2018, 70, 123–131. 10.1007/s10858-018-0164-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ghassemi N.; Poulhazan A.; Deligey F.; Mentink-Vigier F.; Marcotte I.; Wang T. Solid-State NMR Investigations of Extracellular Matrixes and Cell Walls of Algae, Bacteria, Fungi, and Plants. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 10036–10086. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Deligey F.; Frank M. A.; Cho S. H.; Kirui A.; Mentink-Vigier F.; Swulius M. T.; Nixon B. T.; Wang T. Structure of In Vitro-Synthesized Cellulose Fibrils Viewed by Cryo-Electron Tomography and 13C Natural-Abundance Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Solid-State NMR. Biomacromolecules 2022, 23, 2290–2301. 10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Alley W. R.; Mann B. F.; Novotny M. V. High-Sensitivity Analytical Approaches for the Structural Characterization of Glycoproteins. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 2668–2732. 10.1021/cr3003714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gray C. J.; Migas L. G.; Barran P. E.; Pagel K.; Seeberger P. H.; Eyers C. E.; Boons G. J.; Pohl N. L. B.; Compagnon I.; Widmalm G.; et al. Advancing Solutions to the Carbohydrate Sequencing Challenge. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 14463–14479. 10.1021/jacs.9b06406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mucha E.; Stuckmann A.; Marianski M.; Struwe W. B.; Meijer G.; Pagel K. In-Depth Structural Analysis of Glycans in the Gas Phase. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 1272–1284. 10.1039/C8SC05426F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Maitre P.; Scuderi D.; Corinti D.; Chiavarino B.; Crestoni M. E.; Fornarini S. Applications of Infrared Multiple Photon Dissociation (IRMPD) to the Detection of Posttranslational Modifications. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 3261–3295. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Veillon L.; Huang Y.; Peng W.; Dong X.; Cho B. G.; Mechref Y. Characterization of Isomeric Glycan Structures by LC-MS/MS. Electrophoresis 2017, 38, 2100–2114. 10.1002/elps.201700042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lu G.; Crihfield C. L.; Gattu S.; Veltri L. M.; Holland L. A. Capillary Electrophoresis Separations of Glycans. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 7867–7885. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ruhaak L. R.; Xu G.; Li Q.; Goonatilleke E.; Lebrilla C. B. Mass Spectrometry Approaches to Glycomic and Glycoproteomic Analyses. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 7886–7930. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Grabarics M.; Lettow M.; Kirschbaum C.; Greis K.; Manz C.; Pagel K. Mass Spectrometry-Based Techniques to Elucidate the Sugar Code. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 7840–7908. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Imberty A.; Pérez S. Structure, Conformation, and Dynamics of Bioactive Oligosaccharides: Theoretical Approaches and Experimental Validations. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 4567–4588. 10.1021/cr990343j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wormald M. R.; Petrescu A. J.; Pao Y. L.; Glithero A.; Elliott T.; Dwek R. A. Conformational Studies of Oligosaccharides and Glycopeptides: Complementarity of NMR, X-Ray Crystallography, and Molecular Modelling. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 371–386. 10.1021/cr990368i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Taha H. A.; Richards M. R.; Lowary T. L. Conformational Analysis of Furanoside-Containing Mono- and Oligosaccharides. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 1851–1876. 10.1021/cr300249c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Widmalm G. A Perspective on the Primary and Three-Dimensional Structures of Carbohydrates. Carbohydr. Res. 2013, 378, 123–132. 10.1016/j.carres.2013.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Woods R. J. Predicting the Structures of Glycans, Glycoproteins, and Their Complexes. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 8005–8024. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Perez S.; Makshakova O. Multifaceted Computational Modeling in Glycoscience. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 15914–15970. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kamerling J. P.Basics Concepts and Nomenclature Recommendations in Carbohydrate Chemistry. In Comprehensive Glycoscience; Kamerling J. P., Ed.; Elseiver, 2007; Vol. 1, pp 1–38. [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhu Y.; Zajicek J.; Serianni A. S. Acyclic Forms of [1-13C]Aldohexoses in Aqueous Solution: Quantitation by 13C NMR and Deuterium Isotope Effects on Tautomeric Equilibria. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 6244–6251. 10.1021/jo010541m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Angyal S. J.; Pickles V. A. Equilibria between Pyranoses and Furanoses: II. Aldoses. Aust. J. Chem. 1972, 25, 1695–1710. 10.1071/CH9721695. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Que L.; Gray G. R. 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra and the Tautomeric Equilibria of Ketohexoses in Solution. Biochemistry 1974, 13, 146–153. 10.1021/bi00698a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Virués C.; Hernández J.; Higuera-Ciapara I.; Martínez-Benavidez E.; Olivares-Romero J. L.; Navarro R. E.; Inoue M. Formulation of Anomerization and Protonation in d-Glucosamine, Based on 1H NMR. Carbohydr. Res. 2020, 490, 107952. 10.1016/j.carres.2020.107952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Shashkov A. S.; Pakulski Z.; Grzeszczyk B.; Zamojski A. Distribution of Pyranose and Furanose Forms of 6-Deoxyheptoses in Water Solution. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 330, 289–294. 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)00309-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Gaweda K.; Plazinski W. Tautomeric and Epimeric Equilibria of Aldo- and Ketohexoses Studied by the MD Simulations and QM Calculations. Carbohydr. Res. 2019, 474, 8–15. 10.1016/j.carres.2019.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rao V. S. R.; Qasba P. K.; Balaji P. V.; Chandrasekaran R.. Conformation of Carbohydrates, 1st ed.; Harwood Academic Publishers: Amsterdam, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  70. Gerbst A. G.; Krylov V. B.; Nifantiev N. E. Conformational Changes in Common Monosaccharides Caused by Per-O-Sulfation. Pure Appl. Chem. 2019, 91, 1223–1229. 10.1515/pac-2018-1212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Grindley T. B.Structure and Conformation of Carbohydrates. In Glycoscience; Fraser-Reid B., Tatsuta K., Thiem J., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2008; pp 3–55. [Google Scholar]
  72. Treumann A.; Xidong F.; McDonnell L.; Derrick P. J.; Ashcroft A. E.; Chatterjee D.; Homans S. W. 5-Methylthiopentose: A New Substituent on Lipoarabinomannan in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 316, 89–100. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Joe M.; Sun D.; Taha H.; Completo G. C.; Croudace J. E.; Lammas D. A.; Besra G. S.; Lowary T. L. The 5-Deoxy-5-Methylthio-Xylofuranose Residue in Mycobacterial Lipoarabinomannan. Absolute Stereochemistry, Linkage Position, Conformation, and Immunomodulatory Activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5059–5072. 10.1021/ja057373q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Uchio Y.; Nagasaki M.; Eguchi S.; Matsuo A.; Nakayama M.; Hayashi S. Labdane Diterpene Glycosides with 6-Deoxy-l-Idose from Aster spathulifolius Maxim. Tetrahedron Lett. 1980, 21, 3775–3778. 10.1016/0040-4039(80)80175-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Vinogradov E.; St. Michael F.; Cox A. D. The Structure of the LPS O-Chain of Fusobacterium nucleatum Strain 25586 Containing Two Novel Monosaccharides, 2-Acetamido-2,6-Dideoxy-l-Altrose and a 5-Acetimidoylamino-3,5,9-Trideoxy-Gluco-Non-2-Ulosonic Acid. Carbohydr. Res. 2017, 440–441, 10–15. 10.1016/j.carres.2017.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Kocharova N. A.; Knirel Y. A.; Widmalm G.; Jansson P. E.; Moran A. P. Structure of an Atypical O-Antigen Polysaccharide of Helicobacter pylori Containing a Novel Monosaccharide 3-C-Methyl-d-Mannose. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 4755–4760. 10.1021/bi992635k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Senchenkova S. N.; Shashkov A. S.; Knirel Y. A.; Ahmed M.; Mavridis A.; Rudolph K. Structure of the O-Polysaccharide of Erwinia carotovora ssp. atroseptica GSPB 9205 Containing a New Higher Branched Monosaccharide. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2005, 54, 1276–1281. 10.1007/s11172-005-0394-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Gorshkov V.; Islamov B.; Mikshina P.; Petrova O.; Burygin G.; Sigida E.; Shashkov A.; Daminova A.; Ageeva M.; Idiyatullin B.; et al. Pectobacterium atrosepticum Exopolysaccharides: Identification, Molecular Structure, Formation under Stress and in Planta Conditions. Glycobiology 2017, 27, 1016–1026. 10.1093/glycob/cwx069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Rombouts Y.; Burguière A.; Maes E.; Coddeville B.; Elass E.; Guérardel Y.; Kremer L. Mycobacterium marinum Lipooligosaccharides Are Unique Caryophyllose-Containing Cell Wall Glycolipids That Inhibit Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Secretion in Macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 20975–20988. 10.1074/jbc.M109.011429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Marchetti R.; Bedini E.; Gully D.; Lanzetta R.; Giraud E.; Molinaro A.; Silipo A. Rhodopseudomonas palustris Strain CGA009 Produces an O-Antigen Built up by a C-4-Branched Monosaccharide: Structural and Conformational Studies. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3656–3660. 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b01439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Silipo A.; Leone M. R.; Erbs G.; Lanzetta R.; Parrilli M.; Chang W. S.; Newman M. A.; Molinaro A. A Unique Bicyclic Monosaccharide from the Bradyrhizobium Lipopolysaccharide and Its Role in the Molecular Interaction with Plants. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12610–12612. 10.1002/anie.201106548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Tsvetkov Y. E.; Shashkov A. S.; Knirel Y. A.; Zähringer U. Synthesis and NMR Spectroscopy of Nine Stereoisomeric 5,7-Diacetamido-3,5,7,9-Tetradeoxynon-2-Ulosonic Acids. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 335, 221–243. 10.1016/S0008-6215(01)00235-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kenyon J. J.; Marzaioli A. M.; De Castro C.; Hall R. M. 5,7-Di-N-Acetyl-Acinetaminic Acid: A Novel Non-2-Ulosonic Acid Found in the Capsule of an Acinetobacter baumannii Isolate. Glycobiology 2015, 25, 644–654. 10.1093/glycob/cwv007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Kenyon J. J.; Notaro A.; Hsu L. Y.; De Castro C.; Hall R. M. 5,7-Di-N-Acetyl-8-Epiacinetaminic Acid: A New Non-2-Ulosonic Acid Found in the K73 Capsule Produced by an Acinetobacter baumannii Isolate from Singapore. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11357. 10.1038/s41598-017-11166-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Shashkov A. S.; Arbatsky N. P.; Senchenkova S. N.; Perepelov A. V.; Chizhov A. O.; Dmitrenok A. S.; Shneider M. M.; Knirel Y. A. Identification of 5,7-Diacetamido-3,5,7,9-Tetradeoxy-d-Glycero-l-Manno-Non-2-Ulosonic Acid (Di-N-Acetyl-8-Epipseudaminic Acid) in the Capsular Polysaccharide of Acinetobacter baumannii Res546. Carbohydr. Res. 2022, 513, 108531. 10.1016/j.carres.2022.108531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Vinogradov E.; St Michael F.; Cox A. D. Structure of the LPS O-Chain from Fusobacterium nucleatum Strain ATCC 23726 Containing a Novel 5,7-Diamino-3,5,7,9-Tetradeoxy-l-Gluco-Non-2-Ulosonic Acid Presumably Having the d-Glycero-l-Gluco Configuration. Carbohydr. Res. 2018, 468, 69–72. 10.1016/j.carres.2018.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Knirel Y. A.; Vinogradov E. V.; L’vov V. L.; Kocharova N. A.; Shashkov A. S.; Dmitriev B. A.; Kochetkov N. K. Sialic Acids of a New Type from the Lipopolysaccharides of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Shigella boydii. Carbohydr. Res. 1984, 133, C5–C8. 10.1016/0008-6215(84)85213-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Hao Y.; Lam J. S.. Pathways for the Biosynthesis of NDP Sugars. In Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides; Knirel Y. A., Valvano M. A., Eds.; Springer, 2011; pp 195–235. [Google Scholar]
  89. Weijers C. A. G. M.; Franssen M. C. R.; Visser G. M. Glycosyltransferase-Catalyzed Synthesis of Bioactive Oligosaccharides. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008, 26, 436–456. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Schmid J.; Heider D.; Wendel N. J.; Sperl N.; Sieber V. Bacterial Glycosyltransferases: Challenges and Opportunities of a Highly Diverse Enzyme Class Toward Tailoring Natural Products. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 182. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Seibel J.; Beine R.; Moraru R.; Behringer C.; Buchholz K. A New Pathway for the Synthesis of Oligosaccharides by the Use of Non-Leloir Glycosyltransferases. Biocatal. Biotransformation 2006, 24, 157–165. 10.1080/10242420500538274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Seibel J.; Jördening H. J.; Buchholz K. Glycosylation with Activated Sugars Using Glycosyltransferases and Transglycosidases. Biocatal. Biotransformation 2006, 24, 311–342. 10.1080/10242420600986811. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Urashima T.; Hirabayashi J.; Sato S.; Kobata A. Human Milk Oligosaccharides as Essential Tools for Basic and Application Studies on Galectins. Trends Glycosci. Glycotechnol. 2018, 30, SE51–SE65. 10.4052/tigg.1734.1SE. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  94. Urashima T.; Messer M.; Oftedal O. T.. Oligosaccharides in the Milk of Other Mammals. In Prebiotics and Probiotics in Human Milk–Origins and Functions of Milk-Borne Oligosaccharides and Bacteria; Mcguire M. K., McGuire M. A., Bode L., Eds.; Elsevier Inc., 2017; pp 45–139. [Google Scholar]
  95. Bontemps-Gallo S.; Bohin J.-P.; Lacroix J.-M. Osmoregulated Periplasmic Glucans. EcoSal Plus 2017, 7, 0001. 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0001-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Cho E.; Lee S.; Jung S. Novel Acetylated α-Cyclosophorotridecaose Produced by Ralstonia solanacearum. Carbohydr. Res. 2008, 343, 912–918. 10.1016/j.carres.2008.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Jung Y.; Park H.; Cho E.; Jung S. Structural Analyses of Novel Glycerophosphorylated α-Cyclosophorohexadecaoses Isolated from X. campestris pv. campestris. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 673–677. 10.1016/j.carres.2004.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Talaga P.; Cogez V.; Wieruszeski J. M.; Stahl B.; Lemoine J.; Lippens G.; Bohin J. P. Osmoregulated Periplasmic Glucans of the Free-Living Photosynthetic Bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 2464–2472. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02906.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Vinogradov E. V.; Knirel Y. A.; Thomas-Oates J. E.; Shashkov A. S.; L’vov V. L. The Structure of the Cyclic Enterobacterial Common Antigen (ECA) from Yersinia pestis. Carbohydr. Res. 1994, 258, 223–232. 10.1016/0008-6215(94)84088-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Erbel P. J. A.; Barr K.; Gao N.; Gerwig G. J.; Rick P. D.; Gardner K. H. Identification and Biosynthesis of Cyclic Enterobacterial Common Antigen in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 1995–2004. 10.1128/JB.185.6.1995-2004.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Fregolino E.; Ivanova R.; Lanzetta R.; Molinaro A.; Parrilli M.; Paunova-Krasteva T.; Stoitsova S. R.; De Castro C. Occurrence and Structure of Cyclic Enterobacterial Common Antigen in Escherichia coli O157:H. Carbohydr. Res. 2012, 363, 29–32. 10.1016/j.carres.2012.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Joseph A. A.; Pardo-Vargas A.; Seeberger P. H. Total Synthesis of Polysaccharides by Automated Glycan Assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 8561–8564. 10.1021/jacs.0c00751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Holst O.; Moran A. P.; Brennan P. J.. Overview of the Glycosylated Components of the Bacterial Cell Envelope. In Microbial Glycobiology; Holst O., Brennan P. J., von Itzstein M., Eds.; Academic Press, 2009; pp 3–13. [Google Scholar]
  104. Steindl C.; Schäffer C.; Smrečki V.; Messner P.; Müller N. The Secondary Cell Wall Polymer of Geobacillus tepidamans GS5–97T: Structure of Different Glycoforms. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 2290–2296. 10.1016/j.carres.2005.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Rush J. S.; Parajuli P.; Ruda A.; Li J.; Pohane A. A.; Zamakhaeva S.; Rahman M. M.; Chang J. C.; Gogos A.; Kenner C. W.; et al. PplD Is a De-N-Acetylase of the Cell Wall Linkage Unit of Streptococcal Rhamnopolysaccharides. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 590. 10.1038/s41467-022-28257-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Schäffer C.; Müller N.; Mandal P. K.; Christian R.; Zayni S.; Messner P. A Pyrophosphate Bridge Links the Pyruvate-Containing Secondary Cell Wall Polymer of Paenibacillus alvei CCM 2051 to Muramic Acid. Glycoconj. J. 2000, 17, 681–690. 10.1023/A:1011062302889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Faber E. J.; Van Kuik J. A.; Halkes K. M.; Kamerling J. P.; Vliegenthart J. F. G. A Novel Open-Chain Nononic Acid Linked by an Ether Bond to Glucose as a Polysaccharide Constituent. Chem.—Eur. J. 2002, 8, 4498–4505. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Faber E. J.; Van Haaster D. J.; Kamerling J. P.; Vliegenthart J. F. G. Characterization of the Exopolysaccharide Produced by Streptococcus thermophilus 8S Containing an Open Chain Nononic Acid. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 5590–5598. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03266.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Vinogradov E.; Korenevsky A.; Beveridge T. J. The Structure of the Rough-Type Lipopolysaccharide from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, Containing 8-Amino-8-Deoxy-Kdo and an Open-Chain Form of 2-Acetamido-2-Deoxy-d-Galactose. Carbohydr. Res. 2003, 338, 1991–1997. 10.1016/S0008-6215(03)00325-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Vinogradov E.; Sidorczyk Z. The Structure of the Carbohydrate Backbone of the Core-Lipid A Region of the Lipopolysaccharide from Proteus penneri Strain 40: New Proteus Strains Containing Open-Chain Acetal-Linked N-Acetylgalactosamine in the Core Part of the LPS. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 330, 537–540. 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)00312-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Li X. C.; Yang C. R.; Liu Y. Q.; Kasai R.; Ohtani K.; Yamasaki K.; Miyahara K.; Shingu K. Triterpenoid Glycosides from Anemoclema glaucifolium. Phytochemistry 1995, 39, 1175–1179. 10.1016/0031-9422(95)00107-I. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Bouillon M. E.; Bertocco K.; Bischoff L.; Buri M.; Davies L. R.; Wilkinson E. J.; Lahmann M. Synthesis of Anemoclemosides A and B, Two Saponins Isolated from Anemoclema glaucifolium Marc. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 2020, 7470–7473. 10.1002/ejoc.202001317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  113. Shashkov A. S.; Streshinskaya G. M.; Kozlova Y. I.; Senchenkova S. N.; Arbatsky N. P.; Kudryashova E. B. A Novel Type of Teichoic Acid from the Cell Wall of Bacillus subtilis VKM B-762. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 1173–1177. 10.1016/j.carres.2011.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Kocharova N. A.; Senchenkova S. N.; Kondakova A. N.; Gremyakov A. I.; Zatonsky G. V.; Shashkov A. S.; Knirel Y. A.; Kochetkov N. K. d- and l-Aspartic Acids: New Non-Sugar Components of Bacterial Polysaccharides. Biochem. (Moscow) 2004, 69, 103–107. 10.1023/B:BIRY.0000016358.14670.ad. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Spiro R. G. Protein Glycosylation: Nature, Distribution, Enzymatic Formation, and Disease Implications of Glycopeptide Bonds. Glycobiology 2002, 12, 43R–56R. 10.1093/glycob/12.4.43R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Schäffer C.; Messner P. Emerging Facets of Prokaryotic Glycosylation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 49–91. 10.1093/femsre/fuw036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Young N. M.; Brisson J. R.; Kelly J.; Watson D. C.; Tessier L.; Lanthier P. H.; Jarrell H. C.; Cadotte N.; St. Michael F.; Aberg E.; et al. Structure of the N-Linked Glycan Present on Multiple Glycoproteins in the Gram-Negative Bacterium, Campylobacter jejuni. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 42530–42539. 10.1074/jbc.M206114200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Morrison M. J.; Imperiali B. The Renaissance of Bacillosamine and Its Derivatives: Pathway Characterization and Implications in Pathogenicity. Biochemistry 2014, 53, 624–638. 10.1021/bi401546r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Lafite P.; Daniellou R. Rare and Unusual Glycosylation of Peptides and Proteins. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 729–738. 10.1039/c2np20030a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Thibault P.; Logan S. M.; Kelly J. F.; Brisson J. R.; Ewing C. P.; Trust T. J.; Guerry P. Identification of the Carbohydrate Moieties and Glycosylation Motifs in Campylobacter jejuni Flagellin. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 34862–34870. 10.1074/jbc.M104529200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Castric P.; Cassels F. J.; Carlson R. W. Structural Characterization of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1244 Pilin Glycan. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 26479–26485. 10.1074/jbc.M102685200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Twine S. M.; Paul C. J.; Vinogradov E.; McNally D. J.; Brisson J. R.; Mullen J. A.; McMullin D. R.; Jarrell H. C.; Austin J. W.; Kelly J. F.; et al. Flagellar Glycosylation in Clostridium botulinum. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 4428–4444. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06589.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Hartley M. D.; Morrison M. J.; Aas F. E.; Børud B.; Koomey M.; Imperiali B. Biochemical Characterization of the O-Linked Glycosylation Pathway in Neisseria gonorrhoeae Responsible for Biosynthesis of Protein Glycans Containing N,N’-Diacetylbacillosamine. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 4936–4948. 10.1021/bi2003372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Falzarano D.; Krokhin O.; Van Domselaar G.; Wolf K.; Seebach J.; Schnittler H. J.; Feldmann H. Ebola SGP-The First Viral Glycoprotein Shown to Be C-Mannosylated. Virology 2007, 368, 83–90. 10.1016/j.virol.2007.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Munte C. E.; Gäde G.; Domogalla B.; Kremer W.; Kellner R.; Kalbitzer H. R. C-Mannosylation in the Hypertrehalosaemic Hormone from the Stick Insect Carausius Morosus. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 1163–1173. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06277.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Frank M.; Beccati D.; Leeflang B. R.; Vliegenthart J. F. G. C-Mannosylation Enhances the Structural Stability of Human RNase 2. iScience 2020, 23, 101371. 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Jonker H. R. A.; Saxena K.; Shcherbakova A.; Tiemann B.; Bakker H.; Schwalbe H. NMR Spectroscopic Characterization of the C-Mannose Conformation in a Thrombospondin Repeat Using a Selective Labeling Approach. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 20659–20665. 10.1002/anie.202009489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Stepper J.; Shastri S.; Loo T. S.; Preston J. C.; Novak P.; Man P.; Moore C. H.; Havlíček V.; Patchett M. L.; Norris G. E. Cysteine S-Glycosylation, a New Post-Translational Modification Found in Glycopeptide Bacteriocins. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585, 645–650. 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Oman T. J.; Boettcher J. M.; Wang H.; Okalibe X. N.; Van Der Donk W. A. Sublancin Is Not a Lantibiotic but an S-Linked Glycopeptide. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 78–80. 10.1038/nchembio.509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Kinoshita T. Biosynthesis and Biology of Mammalian GPI-Anchored Proteins. Open Biol. 2020, 10, 190290. 10.1098/rsob.190290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Chevalier F.; Lopez-Prados J.; Groves P.; Perez S.; Martín-Lomas M.; Nieto P. M. Structure and Dynamics of the Conserved Protein GPI Anchor Core Inserted into Detergent Micelles. Glycobiology 2006, 16, 969–980. 10.1093/glycob/cwl015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Raetz C. R. H.; Whitfield C. Lipopolysaccharide Endotoxins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2002, 71, 635–700. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Kupče E.; Kay L. E.; Freeman R. Detecting the “Afterglow” of 13C NMR in Proteins Using Multiple Receivers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 18008–18011. 10.1021/ja1080025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Fontana C.; Ramström K.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Structural Studies of the O-Antigen Polysaccharide from Escherichia coli O115 and Biosynthetic Aspects Thereof. Glycobiology 2013, 23, 354–362. 10.1093/glycob/cws161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Fontana C.; Conde-Álvarez R.; Ståhle J.; Holst O.; Iriarte M.; Zhao Y.; Arce-Gorvel V.; Hanniffy S.; Gorvel J. P.; Moriyón I.; et al. Structural Studies of Lipopolysaccharide-Defective Mutants from Brucella melitensis Identify a Core Oligosaccharide Critical in Virulence. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 7727–7741. 10.1074/jbc.M115.701540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Wu E. L.; Engström O.; Jo S.; Stuhlsatz D.; Yeom M. S.; Klauda J. B.; Widmalm G.; Im W. Molecular Dynamics and NMR Spectroscopy Studies of E. coli Lipopolysaccharide Structure and Dynamics. Biophys. J. 2013, 105, 1444–1455. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. De Marco A. pH Dependence of Internal References. J. Magn. Reson. 1977, 26, 527–528. 10.1016/0022-2364(77)90104-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  138. Wishart D. S.; Bigam C. G.; Yao J.; Abildgaard F.; Dyson H. J.; Oldfield E.; Markley J. L.; Sykes B. D. 1H, 13C and 15N Chemical Shift Referencing in Biomolecular NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 1995, 6, 135–140. 10.1007/BF00211777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Gottlieb H. E.; Kotlyar V.; Nudelman A. NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents as Trace Impurities. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7512–7515. 10.1021/jo971176v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Rönnols J.; Pendrill R.; Fontana C.; Hamark C.; D’Ortoli T. A.; Engström O.; Ståhle J.; Zaccheus M. V.; Säwén E.; Hahn L. E.; et al. Complete 1H and 13C NMR Chemical Shift Assignments of Mono- to Tetrasaccharides as Basis for NMR Chemical Shift Predictions of Oligosaccharides Using the Computer Program CASPER. Carbohydr. Res. 2013, 380, 156–166. 10.1016/j.carres.2013.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Beecher C. N.; Larive C. K. 1H and 15N NMR Characterization of the Amine Groups of Heparan Sulfate Related Glucosamine Monosaccharides in Aqueous Solution. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 6842–6848. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Harris R. K.; Becker E. D.; Cabral de Menezes S. M.; Goodfellow R.; Granger P. NMR Nomenclature. Nucelar Spin Properties and Conventiones for Chemical Shifts. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001, 73, 1795–1818. 10.1351/pac200173111795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Jonsson K. H. M.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Structural Determination of the O-Antigenic Polysaccharide from Escherichia coli O74. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 1592–1595. 10.1016/j.carres.2009.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Bubb W. A. NMR Spectroscopy in the Study of Carbohydrates: Characterizing the Structural Complexity. Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A 2003, 19A, 1–19. 10.1002/cmr.a.10080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  145. Nawaji M.; Izawa H.; Kaneko Y.; Kadokawa J. Enzymatic α-Glucosaminylation of Maltooligosaccharides Catalyzed by Phosphorylase. Carbohydr. Res. 2008, 343, 2692–2696. 10.1016/j.carres.2008.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Pomin V. H. 1H and 15N NMR Analyses on Heparin, Heparan Sulfates and Related Monosaccharides Concerning the Chemical Exchange Regime of the N-Sulfo-Glucosamine Sulfamate Proton. Pharmaceuticals 2016, 9, 58. 10.3390/ph9030058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Battistel M. D.; Pendrill R.; Widmalm G.; Freedberg D. I. Direct Evidence for Hydrogen Bonding in Glycans: A Combined NMR and Molecular Dynamics Study. J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 4860–4869. 10.1021/jp400402b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Fontana C.; Kovacs H.; Widmalm G. NMR Structure Analysis of Uniformly 13C-Labeled Carbohydrates. J. Biomol. NMR 2014, 59, 95–110. 10.1007/s10858-014-9830-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Brown G. D.; Bauer J.; Osborn H. M. I.; Kuemmerle R. A Solution NMR Approach to Determine the Chemical Structures of Carbohydrates Using the Hydroxyl Groups as Starting Points. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 17957–17975. 10.1021/acsomega.8b02136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Xue Y.; Nestor G. Determination of Amide Cis/Trans Isomers in N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine: Tailored NMR Analysis of the N-Acetyl Group Conformation. ChemBioChem 2022, 23, e202200338. 10.1002/cbic.202200338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Alexandersson E.; Nestor G. Complete 1H and 13C NMR Spectral Assignment of d-Glucofuranose. Carbohydr. Res. 2022, 511, 108477. 10.1016/j.carres.2021.108477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Furevi A.; Ruda A.; Angles d’Ortoli T.; Mobarak H.; Ståhle J.; Hamark C.; Fontana C.; Engström O.; Apostolica P.; Widmalm G. Complete 1H and 13C NMR Chemical Shift Assignments of Mono-to Tetrasaccharides as Basis for NMR Chemical Shift Predictions of Oligo- and Polysaccharides Using the Computer Program CASPER. Carbohydr. Res. 2022, 513, 108528. 10.1016/j.carres.2022.108528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Tako M.; Shimabukuro J.; Jiang W.; Yamada M.; Ishida H.; Kiso M. Rare 6-Deoxy-d-Altrose from the Folk Medicinal Mushroom Lactarius akahatsu. Biochem. Compd. 2013, 1, 5. 10.7243/2052-9341-1-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  154. Plazinski W.; Roslund M. U.; Säwén E.; Engström O.; Tähtinen P.; Widmalm G. Tautomers of: N-Acetyl-d-Allosamine: An NMR and Computational Chemistry Study. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 7190–7201. 10.1039/D1OB01139A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Jansson P. E.; Kenne L.; Widmalm G. Computer-Assisted Structural Analysis of Polysaccharides with an Extended Version of Casper Using 1H- and 13C-N.M.R. Data. Carbohydr. Res. 1989, 188, 169–191. 10.1016/0008-6215(89)84069-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Söderman P.; Jansson P. E.; Widmalm G. Synthesis, NMR Spectroscopy and Conformational Studies of the Four Anomeric Methyl Glycosides of the Trisaccharide d-Glcp-(1→3)-[d-Glcp-(1→4)]-α-d-GlcP. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1998, 1998, 639–648. 10.1039/a707346a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  157. Blundell C. D.; DeAngelis P. L.; Day A. J.; Almond A. Use of 15N-NMR to Resolve Molecular Details in Isotopically-Enriched Carbohydrates: Sequence-Specific Observations in Hyaluronan Oligomers up to Decasaccharides. Glycobiology 2004, 14, 999–1009. 10.1093/glycob/cwh117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Fontana C.; Zaccheus M.; Weintraub A.; Ansaruzzaman M.; Widmalm G. Structural Studies of a Polysaccharide from Vibrio parahaemolyticus Strain AN-16000. Carbohydr. Res. 2016, 432, 41–49. 10.1016/j.carres.2016.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Limtiaco J. F. K.; Langeslay D. J.; Beni S.; Larive C. K. Getting to Know the Nitrogen next Door: HNMBC Measurements of Amino Sugars. J. Magn. Reson. 2011, 209, 323–331. 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Langeslay D. J.; Beni S.; Larive C. K. A Closer Look at the Nitrogen next Door: 1H-15N NMR Methods for Glycosaminoglycan Structural Characterization. J. Magn. Reson. 2012, 216, 169–174. 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Hadad M. J.; Zhang W.; Turney T. S.; Sernau L.; Wang X.; Woods R. J.; Incandela A.; Surjancev I.; Wang A.; Yoon M. K.; et al. NMR Spin-Couplings in Saccharides: Relationships Between Structure, Conformation and the Magnitudes of JHH, JCH and JCC Values. In NMR in Glycoscience and Glycotechnology; Kato K., Peters T., Eds.; The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017; Vol. 10, pp 20–100. [Google Scholar]
  162. Snyder J. R.; Serianni A. S. d-Idose: A One- and Two-Dimensional NMR Investigation of Solution Composition and Conformation. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2694–2702. 10.1021/jo00364a014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  163. Uhrínova S.; Uhrín D.; Liptaj T.; Bella J.; Hirsch J. Measurement of One-bond Proton-carbon Coupling Constants of Saccharides. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1991, 29, 912–922. 10.1002/mrc.1260290909. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  164. Yu B.; Van Ingen H.; Vivekanandan S.; Rademacher C.; Norris S. E.; Freedberg D. I. More Accurate 1JCH Coupling Measurement in the Presence of 3JHH Strong Coupling in Natural Abundance. J. Magn. Reson. 2012, 215, 10–22. 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.09.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Bock K.; Thøgersen H.. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in the Study of Mono- and Oligosaccharides. In Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy; Webb G. A., Ed.; Academic Press, 1983; Vol. 13, pp 1–57. [Google Scholar]
  166. Shashkov A. S. 13C NMR Spectra of Parent Hexopyranoses. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. 1983, 32, 1200–1207. 10.1007/BF00953157. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  167. Snyder J. R.; Johnston E. R.; Serianni A. S. d-Talose Anomerization: NMR Methods To Evaluate the Reaction Kinetics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 2681–2687. 10.1021/ja00189a050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  168. Haasnoot C. A. G.; de Gelder R.; Kooijman H.; Kellenbach E. R. The Conformation of the Idopyranose Ring Revisited: How Subtle O-Substituent Induced Changes Can Be Deduced from Vicinal 1H-NMR Coupling Constants. Carbohydr. Res. 2020, 496, 108052. 10.1016/j.carres.2020.108052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Rönnols J.; Walvoort M. T. C.; Van Der Marel G. A.; Codée J. D. C.; Widmalm G. Chair Interconversion and Reactivity of Mannuronic Acid Esters. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 8127–8134. 10.1039/c3ob41747f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Oikawa M.; Adachi S.; Kusumoto S. 2JC,H Index: A Nondestructive NMR Method for Differentiation of Aldohexopyranosyl Residues. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 661–664. 10.1021/ol047358a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Bose-Basu B.; Klepach T.; Bondo G.; Bondo P. B.; Zhang W.; Carmichael I.; Serianni A. S. 13C-13C NMR Spin-Spin Coupling Constants in Saccharides: Structural Correlations Involving All Carbons in Aldohexopyranosyl Rings. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7511–7522. 10.1021/jo0706776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Zhang W.; Turney T.; Meredith R.; Pan Q.; Sernau L.; Wang X.; Hu X.; Woods R. J.; Carmichael I.; Serianni A. S. Conformational Populations of β-(1→4) O-Glycosidic Linkages Using Redundant NMR J-Couplings and Circular Statistics. J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121, 3042–3058. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b02252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Landersjö C.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Structural Analysis of the O-Antigen Polysaccharide from Escherichia coli O172. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 268, 2239–2245. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02095.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Olsson U.; Lycknert K.; Stenutz R.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Structural Analysis of the O-Antigen Polysaccharide from Escherichia coli O152. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 167–171. 10.1016/j.carres.2004.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Fontana C.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Structural Elucidation of the O-Antigen Polysaccharide from Escherichia coli O181. ChemistryOpen 2015, 4, 47–55. 10.1002/open.201402068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Knirel Y. A.; Qian C.; Senchenkova S. N.; Guo X.; Shashkov A. S.; Chizhov A. O.; Perepelov A. V.; Liu B. Structure of the β-l-Fucopyranosyl Phosphate-Containing O-Specific Polysaccharide of Escherichia coli O84. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 88, 578–585. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Norris S. E.; Landström J.; Weintraub A.; Bull T. E.; Widmalm G.; Freedberg D. I. Transient Hydrogen Bonding in Uniformly 13C,15N-Labeled Carbohydrates in Water. Biopolymers 2012, 97, 145–154. 10.1002/bip.21710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Battistel M. D.; Azurmendi H. F.; Freedberg D. I.. Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonding in Glycans in Aqueous Solution. In NMR in Glycoscience and Glycotechnology; Kato K., Peters T., Eds.; The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017; Vol. 10, pp 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  179. Lundborg M.; Fontana C.; Widmalm G. Automatic Structure Determination of Regular Polysaccharides Based Solely on NMR Spectroscopy. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 3851–3855. 10.1021/bm201169y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Alves E. F.; Bose S. K.; Francis R. C.; Colodette J. L.; Iakovlev M.; Van Heiningen A. Carbohydrate Composition of Eucalyptus, Bagasse and Bamboo by a Combination of Methods. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 82, 1097–1101. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.06.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  181. Kiemle D. J.; Stipanovic A. J.; Mayo K. E.. Proton NMR Methods in the Compositional Characterization of Polysaccharides. In Hemicelluloses: Science and Technology; Gatenholm P., Tenkanen M., Eds.; American Chemical Society, 2003; pp 122–139. [Google Scholar]
  182. Gjersing E.; Happs R. M.; Sykes R. W.; Doeppke C.; Davis M. F. Rapid Determination of Sugar Content in Biomass Hydrolysates Using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013, 110, 721–728. 10.1002/bit.24741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Tsvetkov Y. E.; Shashkov A. S.; Knirel Y. A.; Zähringer U. Synthesis and Identification in Bacterial Lipopolysaccharides of 5,7-Diacetamido-3,5,7,9-Tetradeoxy-d-Glycero-d-Galacto- and -d-Glycero-d-Talo-Non-2-Ulosonic Acids. Carbohydr. Res. 2001, 331, 233–237. 10.1016/S0008-6215(01)00041-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Li W.; Silipo A.; Molinaro A.; Yu B. Synthesis of Bradyrhizose, a Unique Inositol-Fused Monosaccharide Relevant to a Nod-Factor Independent Nitrogen Fixation. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 6964–6967. 10.1039/C5CC00752F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Giner J. L.; Feng J.; Kiemle D. J. NMR Tube Degradation Method for Sugar Analysis of Glycosides. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 2413–2417. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Daikoku S.; Pendrill R.; Kanie Y.; Ito Y.; Widmalm G.; Kanie O. Synthesis and Structural Investigation of a Series of Mannose-Containing Oligosaccharides Using Mass Spectrometry. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018, 16, 228–238. 10.1039/C7OB02723K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Fontana C.; Lundborg M.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Rapid Structural Elucidation of Polysaccharides Employing Predicted Functions of Glycosyltransferases and NMR Data: Application to the O-Antigen of Escherichia coli O59. Glycobiology 2014, 24, 450–457. 10.1093/glycob/cwu011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Rojas-Macias M. A.; Ståhle J.; Lütteke T.; Widmalm G. Development of the ECODAB into a Relational Database for Escherichia coli O-Antigens and Other Bacterial Polysaccharides. Glycobiology 2015, 25, 341–347. 10.1093/glycob/cwu116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. York W. S.; Hantus S.; Albersheim P.; Darvill A. G. Determination of the Absolute Configuration of Monosaccharides by 1H NMR Spectroscopy of Their per-O-(S)-2-Methylbutyrate Derivatives. Carbohydr. Res. 1997, 300, 199–206. 10.1016/S0008-6215(97)00050-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  190. Helm R. F.; Huang Z.; Edwards D.; Leeson H.; Peery W.; Potts M. Structural Characterization of the Released Polysaccharide of Desiccation-Tolerant Nostoc commune DRH-1. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 974–982. 10.1128/JB.182.4.974-982.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Säwén E.; Huttunen E.; Zhang X.; Yang Z.; Widmalm G. Structural Analysis of the Exopolysaccharide Produced by Streptococcus thermophilus ST1 Solely by NMR Spectroscopy. J. Biomol. NMR 2010, 47, 125–134. 10.1007/s10858-010-9413-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Ucieklak K.; Koj S.; Niedziela T. Bordetella holmesii Lipopolysaccharide Hide and Seek Game with Pertussis: Structural Analysis of the o-Specific Polysaccharide and the Core Oligosaccharide of the Type Strain ATCC 51541. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6433. 10.3390/ijms21176433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Makule E.; Schmidt T. J.; Heilmann J.; Kraus B. Diarylheptanoid Glycosides of Morella salicifolia Bark. Molecules 2017, 22, 2266. 10.3390/molecules22122266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Fontana C.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Facile Structural Elucidation of Glycans Using NMR Spectroscopy Data and the Program CASPER: Application to the O-Antigen Polysaccharide of Escherichia coli O155. ChemPlusChem. 2013, 78, 1327–1329. 10.1002/cplu.201300273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Fontana C.; Li S.; Yang Z.; Widmalm G. Structural Studies of the Exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus plantarum C88 Using NMR Spectroscopy and the Program CASPER. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 402, 87–94. 10.1016/j.carres.2014.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Inagaki M.; Iwakuma R.; Kawakami S.; Otsuka H.; Rakotondraibe H. L. Detecting and Differentiating Monosaccharide Enantiomers by 1H NMR Spectroscopy. J. Nat. Prod. 2021, 84, 1863–1869. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c01120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Shashkov A. S.; Lipkind G. M.; Knirel Y. A.; Kochetkov N. K. Stereochemical Factors Determining the Effects of Glycosylation on the 13C Chemical Shifts in Carbohydrates. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1988, 26, 735–747. 10.1002/mrc.1260260904. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  198. Davidson J.; Gauthier-Signore C.; Bishop K. P.; Wicks C.; Monteiro M. A.; Roy P. N.; Auzanneau F. I. ROESY and 13C NMR to Distinguish between d- and l-Rhamnose in the α-d-Manp-(1→4)-β-Rhap-(1→3) Repeating Motif. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2022, 20, 2964–2980. 10.1039/D2OB00131D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. de Castro C.; Speciale I.; Duncan G.; Dunigan D. D.; Agarkova I.; Lanzetta R.; Sturiale L.; Palmigiano A.; Garozzo D.; Molinaro A.; et al. Chloroviruses N-Linked Glycans Share a New Type of Conserved Core Architecture Unprecedented in Any Form of Life. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 654–658. 10.1002/anie.201509150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Makarieva T. N.; Shubina L. K.; Guzii A. G.; Ivanchina N. V.; Denisenko V. A.; Afiyatullov S. S.; Dmitrenok P. S.; Kalinovsky A. I.; Stonik V. A. Determination of Absolute Stereochemistry of Natural Alicyclic Glycosides by 1H NMR Spectroscopy without Application of Chiral Reagents - An Indication. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2011, 6, 1934578X1100600. 10.1177/1934578X1100600520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Gheysen K.; Mihai C.; Conrath K.; Martins J. C. Rapid Identification of Common Hexapyranose Monosaccharide Units by a Simple TOCSY Matching Approach. Chem.—Eur. J. 2008, 14, 8869–8878. 10.1002/chem.200801081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Jonsson K. H. M.; Pendrill R.; Widmalm G. NMR Analysis of Conformationally Dependent nJC,H and nJC,C in the Trisaccharide α-l-Rhap-(1→2)[α-l-Rhap-(1→3)]-α-l-Rhap-OMe and a Site-Specifical. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2011, 49, 117–124. 10.1002/mrc.2723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Meier S.; Petersen B. O.; Duus J.; Sørensen O. W. Recent Progress in Heteronuclear Long-Range NMR of Complex Carbohydrates: 3D H2BC and Clean HMBC. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 2274–2278. 10.1016/j.carres.2009.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Koźmiński W.; Nanz D. Sensitivity Improvement and New Acquisition Scheme of Heteronuclear Active-Coupling-Pattern-Tilting Spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 2000, 142, 294–299. 10.1006/jmre.1999.1939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Nolis P.; Parella T. Spin-Edited 2D HSQC-TOCSY Experiments for the Measurement of Homonuclear and Heteronuclear Coupling Constants: Application to Carbohydrates and Peptides. J. Magn. Reson. 2005, 176, 15–26. 10.1016/j.jmr.2005.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Potekhina N. V.; Streshinskaya G. M.; Tul’skaya E. M.; Shashkov A. S.. Cell Wall Teichoic Acids in the Taxonomy and Characterization of Gram-Positive Bacteria. In Methods in Microbiology; Rainey F., Oren A., Eds.; Elsevier, 2011; Vol. 38, pp 131–164. [Google Scholar]
  207. Edgar R. J.; van Hensbergen V. P.; Ruda A.; Turner A. G.; Deng P.; Le Breton Y.; El-Sayed N. M.; Belew A. T.; McIver K. S.; McEwan A. G.; et al. Discovery of Glycerol Phosphate Modification on Streptococcal Rhamnose Polysaccharides. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2019, 15, 463–471. 10.1038/s41589-019-0251-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Fontana C.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Structural Studies and Biosynthetic Aspects of the O-Antigen Polysaccharide from Escherichia coli O42. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 403, 174–181. 10.1016/j.carres.2014.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Bush C. A.; Cisar J. O.; Yang J. Structures of Capsular Polysaccharide Serotypes 35F and 35C of Streptococcus pneumoniae Determined by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Their Relation to Other Cross-Reactive Serotypes. J. Bacteriol. 2015, 197, 2762–2769. 10.1128/JB.00207-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Tian F.; Al-Hashimi H. M.; Craighead J. L.; Prestegard J. H. Conformational Analysis of a Flexible Oligosaccharide Using Residual Dipolar Couplings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 485–492. 10.1021/ja002900l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Kapla J.; Engström O.; Stevensson B.; Wohlert J.; Widmalm G.; Maliniak A. Molecular Dynamics Simulations and NMR Spectroscopy Studies of Trehalose-Lipid Bilayer Systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 22438–22447. 10.1039/C5CP02472B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Enthart A.; Freudenberger J. C.; Furrer J.; Kessler H.; Luy B. The CLIP/CLAP-HSQC: Pure Absorptive Spectra for the Measurement of One-Bond Couplings. J. Magn. Reson. 2008, 192, 314–322. 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Reinsperger T.; Luy B. Homonuclear BIRD-Decoupled Spectra for Measuring One-Bond Couplings with Highest Resolution: CLIP/CLAP-RESET and Constant-Time-CLIP/CLAP-RESET. J. Magn. Reson. 2014, 239, 110–120. 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Prytulla S.; Lauterwein J.; Klessinger M.; Thiem J. Configurational Assignment of N-Acetylneuraminic Acid and Analogues via the Vicinal C,H Coupling Constants. Carbohydr. Res. 1991, 215, 345–349. 10.1016/0008-6215(91)84033-B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  215. Prytulla S.; Lambert J.; Lauterwein J.; Klessinger M.; Thiem J. Configurational Assignment in N-acetylneuraminic Acid and Analogues via the Geminal C,H Coupling Constants. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1990, 28, 888–901. 10.1002/mrc.1260281011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  216. Schauer R.; Kamerling J. P.. Exploration of the Sialic Acid World. In Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry; Baker D. C., Ed.; Elsevier, 2018; Vol. 75, pp 1–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Knirel Y. A.; Shashkov A. S.; Tsvetkov Y. E.; Jansson P.-E. E.; Zähringer U.. 5,7-Diamino-3,5,7,9-tetradeoxynon-2-ulosonic Acids in Bacterial Glycopolymers: Chemistry and Biochemistry. In Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry; Horton D., Ed.; Elsevier, 2003; Vol. 58, pp 371–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Kancharla P. K.; Crich D. Influence of Side Chain Conformation and Configuration on Glycosyl Donor Reactivity and Selectivity as Illustrated by Sialic Acid Donors Epimeric at the 7-Position. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 18999–19007. 10.1021/ja410683y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Sheng S.; Cherniak R.; Van Halbeek H. A 1H NMR Spectroscopic Approach to the Unambiguous Determination of Glycosyl Linkage Positions in Oligosaccharides. Anal. Biochem. 1998, 256, 63–66. 10.1006/abio.1997.2454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Bigler P.; Furrer J. Measurement of Long-Range Heteronuclear Coupling Constants Using the Peak Intensity in Classical 1D HMBC Spectra. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2018, 56, 329–337. 10.1002/mrc.4713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Claridge T. D. W.; Pérez-Victoria I. Enhanced 13C Resolution in Semi-Selective HMBC: A Band-Selective, Constant-Time HMBC for Complex Organic Structure Elucidation by NMR. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3632–3634. 10.1039/B307122G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Sarkar A.; Fontana C.; Imberty A.; Pérez S.; Widmalm G. Conformational Preferences of the O-Antigen Polysaccharides of Escherichia coli O5ac and O5ab Using NMR Spectroscopy and Molecular Modeling. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 2215–2224. 10.1021/bm400354y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Vincent S. J. F.; Zwahlen C. Dipole-Dipole Cross-Correlation at 13C Natural Abundance: A Structural Tool for Polysaccharides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8307–8308. 10.1021/ja001462f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  224. Larsson E. A.; Urbina F.; Yang Z.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Structural and Immunochemical Relationship between the O-Antigenic Polysaccharides from the Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli Strain 396/C-1 and Escherichia coli O126. Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 1491–1496. 10.1016/j.carres.2004.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Fontana C.; Lundborg M.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Structural Studies and Biosynthetic Aspects of the O-Antigen Polysaccharide from Escherichia coli O174. Carbohydr. Res. 2012, 354, 102–105. 10.1016/j.carres.2012.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Viel S.; Capitani D.; Mannina L.; Segre A. Diffusion-Ordered NMR Spectroscopy: A Versatile Tool for the Molecular Weight Determination of Uncharged Polysaccharides. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4, 1843–1847. 10.1021/bm0342638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Mally M.; Fontana C.; Leibundgut-Landmann S.; Laacisse L.; Fan Y. Y.; Widmalm G.; Aebi M. Glycoengineering of Host Mimicking Type-2 LacNAc Polymers and Lewis X Antigens on Bacterial Cell Surfaces. Mol. Microbiol. 2013, 87, 112–131. 10.1111/mmi.12086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Muthana S. M.; Campbell C. T.; Gildersleeve J. C. Modifications of Glycans: Biological Significance and Therapeutic Opportunities. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012, 7, 31–43. 10.1021/cb2004466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Lassfolk R.; Rahkila J.; Johansson M. P.; Ekholm F. S.; Wärnå J.; Leino R. Acetyl Group Migration across the Saccharide Units in Oligomannoside Model Compound. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1646–1654. 10.1021/jacs.8b11563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Schauer R.; Srinivasan G. V.; Wipfler D.; Kniep B.; Schwartz-Albiez R.. O-Acetylated Sialic Acids and Their Role in Immune Defense. In The Molecular Immunology of Complex Carbohydrates-3; Wu A. M., Ed.; Springer, 2011; pp 525–548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Maldonado E.; Torres F. R.; Martínez M.; Pérez-Castorena A. L. Sucrose Esters from the Fruits of Physalis nicandroides Var. Attenuata. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 1511–1513. 10.1021/np060274l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Zhao L.; Zhang H.; Hao T.; Li S. In Vitro Antibacterial Activities and Mechanism of Sugar Fatty Acid Esters against Five Food-Related Bacteria. Food Chem. 2015, 187, 370–377. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Giorgi V.; Botto E.; Fontana C.; Della Mea L.; Vaz S.; Menendez P.; Rodriguez P. Enzymatic Production of Lauroyl and Stearoyl Monoesters of d-Xylose, l-Arabinose, and d-Glucose as Potential Lignocellulosic-Derived Products, and Their Evaluation as Antimicrobial Agents. Catalysts 2022, 12, 610. 10.3390/catal12060610. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  234. Chassagne P.; Fontana C.; Guerreiro C.; Gauthier C.; Phalipon A.; Widmalm G.; Mulard L. A. Structural Studies of the O-Acetyl-Containing O-Antigen from a Shigella flexneri Serotype 6 Strain and Synthesis of Oligosaccharide Fragments Thereof. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 2013, 4085–4106. 10.1002/ejoc.201300180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  235. Hager F. F.; Sützl L.; Stefanović C.; Blaukopf M.; Schäffer C. Pyruvate Substitutions on Glycoconjugates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4929. 10.3390/ijms20194929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Staudacher E. Methylation - an Uncommon Modification of Glycans. Biol. Chem. 2012, 393, 675–685. 10.1515/hsz-2012-0132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Guérardel Y.; Chang L. Y.; Fujita A.; Coddeville B.; Maes E.; Sato C.; Harduin-Lepers A.; Kubokawa K.; Kitajima K. Sialome Analysis of the Cephalochordate Branchiostoma belcheri, a Key Organism for Vertebrate Evolution. Glycobiology 2012, 22, 479–491. 10.1093/glycob/cwr155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Kokoulin M. S.; Kuzmich A. S.; Romanenko L. A.; Menchinskaya E. S.; Mikhailov V. V.; Chernikov O. V. Sulfated O-Polysaccharide with Anticancer Activity from the Marine Bacterium Poseidonocella sedimentorum KMM 9023T. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 202, 157–163. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Ruda A.; Widmalm G.; Wohlert J. O-Methylation in Carbohydrates: An NMR and MD Simulation Study with Application to Methylcellulose. J. Phys. Chem. B 2021, 125, 11967–11979. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c07293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Nishimura H.; Kamiya A.; Nagata T.; Katahira M.; Watanabe T. Direct Evidence for α Ether Linkage between Lignin and Carbohydrates in Wood Cell Walls. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6538. 10.1038/s41598-018-24328-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Kawasaki Y.; Kondo K.; Narizuka R.; Endo T.; Katahira M.; Kawamura I.; Sato M.; Takeda M. Presence of N-l-Lactyl-d-Perosamine Residue in the Sheath-Forming Polysaccharide of Thiothrix fructosivorans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 82, 772–779. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Kokoulin M. S.; Romanenko L. A.; Mikhailov V. V. Structure of 3,6-Dideoxy-3-[(R)-2-Hydroxypropanoylamino]-d-Galactose-Containing O-Polysaccharide from Marine Bacterium Simiduia litorea KMM 9504T. Carbohydr. Res. 2018, 461, 76–79. 10.1016/j.carres.2018.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Kokoulin M. S.; Kuzmich A. S.; Romanenko L. A.; Chikalovets I. V.; Chernikov O. V. Structure and in Vitro Bioactivity against Cancer Cells of the Capsular Polysaccharide from the Marine Bacterium Psychrobacter marincola. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 268. 10.3390/md18050268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Tul’skaya E. M.; Streshinskaya G. M.; Shashkov A. S.; Senchenkova S. N.; Avtukh A. N.; Baryshnikova L. M.; Evtushenko L. I. Novel Teichulosonic Acid from Cell Walls of Some Representatives of the Genus Kribbella. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 2045–2051. 10.1016/j.carres.2011.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Liu B.; Perepelov A. V.; Guo D.; Shevelev S. D.; Senchenkova S. N.; Feng L.; Shashkov A. S.; Wang L.; Knirel Y. A. Structural and Genetic Relationships between the O-Antigens of Escherichia coli O118 and O151. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 199–207. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00738.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Kooistra O.; Lüneberg E.; Knirel Y. A.; Frosch M.; Zähringer U. N-Methylation in Polylegionaminic Acid Is Associated with the Phase-Variable Epitope of Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 Lipopolysaccharide. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 560–572. 10.1046/j.0014-2956.2001.02683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Gardini C.; Urso E.; Guerrini M.; Van Herpen R.; De Wit P.; Naggi A. Characterization of Danaparoid Complex Extractive Drug by an Orthogonal Analytical Approach. Molecules 2017, 22, 1116. 10.3390/molecules22071116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  248. Vilchez S.; Lundborg M.; Urbina F.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Structural Studies of the O-Antigenic Polysaccharides from the Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli Strain 94/D4 and the International Type Strain Escherichia coli O82. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 2528–2532. 10.1016/j.carres.2009.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Zhou Z.; Ribeiro A. A.; Raetz C. R. H. High-Resolution NMR Spectroscopy of Lipid a Molecules Containing 4-Amino-4-Deoxy-l-Arabinose and Phosphoethanolamine Substituents. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 13542–13551. 10.1074/jbc.275.18.13542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Cade-Menun B. J. Improved Peak Identification in 31P-NMR Spectra of Environmental Samples with a Standardized Method and Peak Library. Geoderma 2015, 257–258, 102–114. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.12.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  251. Que-Gewirth N. L. S.; Ribeiro A. A.; Kalb S. R.; Cotter R. J.; Bulach D. M.; Adler B.; Saint Girons I.; Werts C.; Raetz C. R. H. A Methylated Phosphate Group and Four Amide-Linked Acyl Chains in Leptospira interrogans Lipid A: The Membrane Anchor of an Unusual Lipopolysaccharide That Activates TLR2. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 25420–25429. 10.1074/jbc.M400598200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  252. Zartler E. R.; Martin G. E. The Use of 1H-31P GHMBC and Covariance NMR to Unambiguously Determine Phosphate Ester Linkages in Complex Polysaccharide Mixtures. J. Biomol. NMR 2011, 51, 357–367. 10.1007/s10858-011-9563-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  253. Kubler-Kielb J.; Whitfield C.; Katzenellenbogen E.; Vinogradov E. Identification of the Methyl Phosphate Substituent at the Non-Reducing Terminal Mannose Residue of the O-Specific Polysaccharides of Klebsiella pneumoniae O3, Hafnia alvei PCM 1223 and Escherichia coli O9/O9a LPS. Carbohydr. Res. 2012, 347, 186–188. 10.1016/j.carres.2011.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  254. Meneghetti M. C. Z.; Naughton L.; O'Shea C.; Koffi Teki D. S.; Chagnault V.; Nader H. B.; Rudd T. R.; Yates E. A.; Kovensky J.; Miller G. J.; et al. Using NMR to Dissect the Chemical Space and O-Sulfation Effects within the O- and S-Glycoside Analogues of Heparan Sulfate. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 24461–24467. 10.1021/acsomega.2c02070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  255. Dwivedi R.; Samanta P.; Sharma P.; Zhang F.; Mishra S. K.; Kucheryavy P.; Kim S. B.; Aderibigbe A. O. O.; Linhardt R. J.; Tandon R.; et al. Structural and Kinetic Analyses of Holothurian Sulfated Glycans Suggest Potential Treatment for SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 297, 101207. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  256. Kim S. B.; Zoepfl M.; Samanta P.; Zhang F.; Xia K.; Thara R.; Linhardt R. J.; Doerksen R. J.; McVoy M. A.; Pomin V. H. Fractionation of Sulfated Galactan from the Red Alga Botryocladia occidentalis Separates Its Anticoagulant and Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Properties. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 101856. 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  257. Kokoulin M. S.; Komandrova N. A.; Kalinovskiy A. I.; Tomshich S. V.; Romanenko L. A.; Vaskovsky V. V. Structure of the O-Specific Polysaccharide from the Deep-Sea Marine Bacterium Idiomarina Abyssalis KMM 227T Containing a 2-O-Sulfate-3-N-(4-Hydroxybutanoyl)-3,6-Dideoxy-d-Glucose. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 413, 100–106. 10.1016/j.carres.2015.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  258. Kokoulin M. S.; Kalinovsky A. I.; Komandrova N. A.; Tomshich S. V.; Romanenko L. A.; Vaskovsky V. E. The Sulfated O-Specific Polysaccharide from the Marine Bacterium Cobetia Pacifica KMM 3879T. Carbohydr. Res. 2014, 387, 4–9. 10.1016/j.carres.2014.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  259. Kokoulin M. S.; Kalinovsky A. I.; Komandrova N. A.; Tomshich S. V.; Romanenko L. A.; Vaskovsky V. E. The New Sulfated O-Specific Polysaccharide from Marine Bacterium Cobetia Pacifica KMM 3878, Containing 3,4-O-[(S)-1-Carboxyethylidene]-d-Galactose and 2,3-O-Disulfate-d-Galactose. Carbohydr. Res. 2014, 397, 46–51. 10.1016/j.carres.2014.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  260. Jones D. N. M.; Sanders J. K. M. Biosynthetic Studies Using 13C-COSY: The Klebsiella K3 Serotype Polysaccharide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5132–5137. 10.1021/ja00196a017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  261. Gitti R.; Long G.; Bush C. A. Measurement of Long-range2 13C-1H Coupling Constants of 95% Uniformly 13C-labeled Polysaccharide from Streptococcus mitis J22. Biopolymers 1994, 34, 1327–1338. 10.1002/bip.360341005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  262. Kjellberg A.; Nishida T.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. NMR Spectroscopy of 13C-Enriched Polysaccharides: Application of 13C-13C TOCSY to Sugars of Different Configuration. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1998, 36, 128–131. . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  263. Jachymek W.; Niedziela T.; Petersson C.; Lugowski C.; Czaja J.; Kenne L. Structures of the O-Specific Polysaccharides from Yokenella regensburgei (Koserella trabulsii) Strains PCM 2476, 2477, 2478, and 2494: High-Resolution Magic-Angle Spinning NMR Investigation of the O-Specific Polysaccharides in Native Lipopol. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 11788–11795. 10.1021/bi990673y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  264. Zangger K.; Sterk H. Homonuclear Broadband-Decoupled NMR Spectra. J. Magn. Reson. 1997, 124, 486–489. 10.1006/jmre.1996.1063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  265. Kupče E.; Nishida T.; Freeman R. Hadamard NMR Spectroscopy. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2003, 42, 95–122. 10.1016/S0079-6565(03)00022-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  266. Nyberg N. T.; Duus J.; Sørensen O. W. Heteronuclear Two-Bond Correlation: Suppressing Heteronuclear Three-Bond or Higher NMR Correlations While Enhancing Two-Bond Correlations Even for Vanishing 2JCH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6154–6155. 10.1021/ja050878w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  267. Petersen B. O.; Vinogradov E.; Kay W.; Würtz P.; Nyberg N. T.; Duus J.; Sørensen O. W. H2BC: A New Technique for NMR Analysis of Complex Carbohydrates. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 550–556. 10.1016/j.carres.2005.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  268. Nyberg N. T.; Duus J.; Sørensen O. W. Editing of H2BC NMR Spectra. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2005, 43, 971–974. 10.1002/mrc.1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  269. Benie A. J.; Sørensen O. W. HAT HMBC: A Hybrid of H2BC and HMBC Overcoming Shortcomings of Both. J. Magn. Reson. 2007, 184, 315–321. 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  270. Meier S.; Benie A. J.; Duus J.; Sørensen O. W. 3D H2BC: A Novel Experiment for Small-Molecule and Biomolecular NMR at Natural Isotopic Abundance. J. Magn. Reson. 2009, 200, 340–343. 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  271. Kupče E̅.; Sørensen O. W. 2BOB - Extracting an H2BC and an HSQC-Type Spectrum from the Same Data Set, and H2OBC - a Fast Experiment Delineating the Protonated 13C Backbone. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2017, 55, 515–518. 10.1002/mrc.4584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  272. Veshtort M.; Griffin R. G. High-Performance Selective Excitation Pulses Solid- and Liquid-State NMR Spectroscopy. ChemPhysChem 2004, 5, 834–850. 10.1002/cphc.200400018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  273. Wagstaff J. L.; Sadovskaya I.; Vinogradov E.; Jabbouri S.; Howard M. J. Poly-N-Acetylglucosamine and Poly(Glycerol Phosphate) Teichoic Acid Identification from Staphylococcal Biofilm Extracts Using Excitation Sculptured TOCSY NMR. Mol. Biosyst. 2008, 4, 170–174. 10.1039/B715242F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  274. Sato H.; Kajihara Y. 2D Selective-TOCSY-DQFCOSY Experiment for Identification of Individual Sugar Components in Oligosaccharides. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 2003, 22, 339–345. 10.1081/CAR-120023477. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  275. Sato H.; Kajihara Y. An Unambiguous Assignment Method by 2D Selective-TOCSY-HSQC and Selective-TOCSY-DQFCOSY and Structural Analysis by Selective-TOCSY-NOESY Experiments of a Biantennary Undecasaccharide. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 469–479. 10.1016/j.carres.2004.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  276. Sato H.; Fukae K.; Kajihara Y. 2D Selective-TOCSY-DQFCOSY and HSQC-TOCSY NMR Experiments for Assignment of a Homogeneous Asparagine-Linked Triantennary Complex Type Undecasaccharide. Carbohydr. Res. 2008, 343, 1333–1345. 10.1016/j.carres.2008.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  277. Robinson P. T.; Pham T. N.; Uhrín D. In Phase Selective Excitation of Overlapping Multiplets by Gradient-Enhanced Chemical Shift Selective Filters. J. Magn. Reson. 2004, 170, 97–103. 10.1016/j.jmr.2004.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  278. Duncan S. J.; Lewis R.; Bernstein M. A.; Sandor P. Selective Excitation of Overlapping Multiplets; the Application of Doubly Selective and Chemical Shift Filter Experiments to Complex NMR Spectra Sara. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2007, 45, 283–288. 10.1002/mrc.1962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  279. Roslund M. U.; Säwén E.; Landström J.; Rönnols J.; Jonsson K. H. M.; Lundborg M.; Svensson M. V.; Widmalm G. Complete 1H and 13C NMR Chemical Shift Assignments of Mono-, Di-, and Trisaccharides as Basis for NMR Chemical Shift Predictions of Polysaccharides Using the Computer Program CASPER. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 1311–1319. 10.1016/j.carres.2011.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  280. Liu C.; Richards M. R.; Lowary T. L. Synthesis and NMR Spectroscopic Analysis of Acetylated Pentasaccharide Fragments of Mycobacterial Arabinogalactan. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 165–176. 10.1039/C0OB00423E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  281. Zaccheus M.; Pendrill R.; Jackson T. A.; Wang A.; Auzanneau F. I.; Widmalm G. Conformational Dynamics of a Central Trisaccharide Fragment of the LeaLex Tumor Associated Antigen Studied by NMR Spectroscopy and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 2012, 4705–4715. 10.1002/ejoc.201200569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  282. Kiraly P.; Kern N.; Plesniak M. P.; Nilsson M.; Procter D. J.; Morris G. A.; Adams R. W. Single-Scan Selective Excitation of Individual NMR Signals in Overlapping Multiplets. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 666–669. 10.1002/anie.202011642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  283. Kiraly P.; Nilsson M.; Morris G. A.; Adams R. W. Single-Scan Ultra-Selective 1D Total Correlation Spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 2368–2371. 10.1039/D0CC08033K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  284. Gaillet C.; Lequart C.; Debeire P.; Nuzillard J. M. Band-Selective HSQC and HMBC Experiments Using Excitation Sculpting and PFGSE. J. Magn. Reson. 1999, 139, 454–459. 10.1006/jmre.1999.1808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  285. Obendorf R. L.; McInnis C. E.; Horbowicz M.; Keresztes I.; Lahuta L. B. Molecular Structure of Lathyritol, a Galactosylbornesitol from Lathyrus odoratus Seeds, by NMR. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 1441–1446. 10.1016/j.carres.2005.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  286. Svensson M. V.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Structural Elucidation of the O-Antigenic Polysaccharide from Escherichia coli O175. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 449–453. 10.1016/j.carres.2010.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  287. Kupče E.; Freeman R. Resolving Ambiguities in Two-Dimensional NMR Spectra: The “TILT” Experiment. J. Magn. Reson. 2005, 172, 329–332. 10.1016/j.jmr.2004.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  288. Widmalm G.General NMR Spectroscopy of Carbohydrates and Conformational Analysis in Solution. In Comprehensive Glycoscience; Kamerling J. P., Ed.; Elsevier, 2007; Vol. 2, pp 101–132. [Google Scholar]
  289. Kupče E̅.; Nishida T.; Widmalm G.; Freeman R. Resolving Overlap in Two-Dimensional NMR Spectra: Nuclear Overhauser Effects in a Polysaccharide. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2005, 43, 791–794. 10.1002/mrc.1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  290. Kupče E̅.NMR with Multiple Receivers. In Modern NMR Methodology; Topics in Current Chemistry; Heise H., Matthews S., Eds.; Springer, 2013; Vol. 335, pp 71–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  291. Kupče E̅. NMR with Multiple Receivers. eMagRes. 2015, 4, 721–731. 10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  292. Kupče E̅.; Freeman R.; John B. K. Parallel Acquisition of Two-Dimensional NMR Spectra of Several Nuclear Species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9606–9607. 10.1021/ja0634876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  293. Kovacs H.; Kupče E̅. Parallel NMR Spectroscopy with Simultaneous Detection of 1H and 19F Nuclei. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2016, 54, 544–560. 10.1002/mrc.4428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  294. Linclau B.; Ardá A.; Reichardt N. C.; Sollogoub M.; Unione L.; Vincent S. P.; Jiménez-Barbero J. Fluorinated Carbohydrates as Chemical Probes for Molecular Recognition Studies. Current Status and Perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 3863–3888. 10.1039/C9CS00099B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  295. Brutscher B.; Solyom Z.. Polarization-Enhanced Fast-Pulsing Techniques. In New Developments in NMR–Fast NMR Data Acquisition: Beyond the Fourier Transform; Mobli M., Hoch J. C., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Croydon, 2017; Vol. 11, pp 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  296. Schanda P.; Brutscher B. Very Fast Two-Dimensional NMR Spectroscopy for Real-Time Investigation of Dynamic Events in Proteins on the Time Scale of Seconds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8014–8015. 10.1021/ja051306e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  297. Kupce E.; Freeman R. Fast Multidimensional NMR by Polarization Sharing. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2007, 45, 2–4. 10.1002/mrc.1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  298. Schulze-Sünninghausen D.; Becker J.; Luy B. Rapid Heteronuclear Single Quantum Correlation NMR Spectra at Natural Abundance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1242–1245. 10.1021/ja411588d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  299. Schulze-Sünninghausen D.; Becker J.; Koos M. R. M.; Luy B. Improvements, Extensions, and Practical Aspects of Rapid ASAP-HSQC and ALSOFAST-HSQC Pulse Sequences for Studying Small Molecules at Natural Abundance. J. Magn. Reson. 2017, 281, 151–161. 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  300. Ndukwe I. E.; Shchukina A.; Kazimierczuk K.; Butts C. P. Rapid and Safe ASAP Acquisition with EXACT NMR. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 12769–12772. 10.1039/C6CC07140F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  301. Becker J.; Koos M. R. M.; Schulze-Sünninghausen D.; Luy B. ASAP-HSQC-TOCSY for Fast Spin System Identification and Extraction of Long-Range Couplings. J. Magn. Reson. 2019, 300, 76–83. 10.1016/j.jmr.2018.12.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  302. Koos M. R. M.; Kummerlöwe G.; Kaltschnee L.; Thiele C. M.; Luy B. CLIP-COSY: A Clean In-Phase Experiment for the Rapid Acquisition of COSY-Type Correlations. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7655–7659. 10.1002/anie.201510938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  303. Parella T. Towards Perfect NMR: Spin-Echo versus Perfect-Echo Building Blocks. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2019, 57, 13–29. 10.1002/mrc.4776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  304. Gyöngyösi T.; Timári I.; Haller J.; Koos M. R. M.; Luy B.; Kövér K. E. Boosting the NMR Assignment of Carbohydrates with Clean In-Phase Correlation Experiments. ChemPlusChem. 2018, 83, 53–60. 10.1002/cplu.201700452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  305. Gyöngyösi T.; Timári I.; Sinnaeve D.; Luy B.; Kövér K. E. Expedited Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Assignment of Small- To Medium-Sized Molecules with Improved HSQC-CLIP-COSY Experiments. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 3096–3102. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  306. Kupče E̅.; Freeman R. Frequency-Domain Hadamard Spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 2003, 162, 158–165. 10.1016/S1090-7807(02)00194-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  307. Kupče E̅.; Freeman R. Two-Dimensional Hadamard Spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 2003, 162, 300–310. 10.1016/S1090-7807(02)00196-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  308. Kakita V. M. R.; Kupče E̅.; Bharatam J.; Hosur R. V. Rapid Elucidation of Chemical Shift Correlations in Complex NMR Spectra of Organic Molecules: Two-Dimensional Hadamard Pure Shift NMR Spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 2018, 293, 77–81. 10.1016/j.jmr.2018.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  309. Novakovic M.; Kupče E.; Oxenfarth A.; Battistel M. D.; Freedberg D. I.; Schwalbe H.; Frydman L. Sensitivity Enhancement of Homonuclear Multidimensional NMR Correlations for Labile Sites in Proteins, Polysaccharides, and Nucleic Acids. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5317. 10.1038/s41467-020-19108-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  310. Haasnoot C. A. G.; van de Ven F. J. M.; Hilbers C. W. COCONOSY, Combination of 2D Correlated and 2D Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement Spectroscopy in a Single Experiment. J. Magn. Reson. 1984, 56, 343–349. 10.1016/0022-2364(84)90114-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  311. Gurevich A. Z.; Barsukov I. L.; Arseniev A. S.; Bystrov V. F. Combined COSY-NOESY Experiment. J. Magn. Reson. 1984, 56, 471–478. 10.1016/0022-2364(84)90311-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  312. Kupče E̅.; Claridge T. D. W. NOAH - NMR Supersequences for Small Molecule Analysis and Structure Elucidation. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 11779–11783. 10.1002/anie.201705506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  313. Kupče E̅.; Claridge T. D. W. Molecular Structure from a Single NMR Supersequence. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 7139–7142. 10.1039/C8CC03296C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  314. Claridge T. D. W.; Mayzel M.; Kupče E̅. Triplet NOAH Supersequences Optimised for Small Molecule Structure Characterisation. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2019, 57, 946–952. 10.1002/mrc.4887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  315. Kupče E.; Claridge T. D. W. New NOAH Modules for Structure Elucidation at Natural Isotopic Abundance. J. Magn. Reson. 2019, 307, 106568. 10.1016/j.jmr.2019.106568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  316. Kupče E̅.; Mote K. R.; Webb A.; Madhu P. K.; Claridge T. D. W. Multiplexing Experiments in NMR and Multi-Nuclear MRI. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2021, 124–125, 1–56. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2021.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  317. Kupče E̅.; Yong J. R. J.; Widmalm G.; Claridge T. D. W. Parallel NMR Supersequences: Ten Spectra in a Single Measurement. JACS Au 2021, 1, 1892–1897. 10.1021/jacsau.1c00423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  318. Parella T.; Nolis P. Time-Shared NMR Experiments. Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A 2010, 36A, 1–23. 10.1002/cmr.a.20150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  319. Lundborg M.; Widmalm G. Structural Analysis of Glycans by NMR Chemical Shift Prediction. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 1514–1517. 10.1021/ac1032534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  320. Yong J. R. J.; Kupce E.; Claridge T. D. W. Modular Pulse Program Generation for NMR Supersequences. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 2271–2278. 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c04964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  321. Motiram-Corral K.; Pérez-Trujillo M.; Nolis P.; Parella T. Implementing One-Shot Multiple-FID Acquisition into Homonuclear and Heteronuclear NMR Experiments. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 13507–13510. 10.1039/C8CC08065H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  322. Nolis P.; Motiram-Corral K.; Pérez-Trujillo M.; Parella T. Interleaved Dual NMR Acquisition of Equivalent Transfer Pathways in TOCSY and HSQC Experiments. ChemPhysChem 2019, 20, 356–360. 10.1002/cphc.201801034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  323. Gyöngyösi T.; Nagy T. M.; Kövér K. E.; Sørensen O. W. Distinguishing between Two- and Three-Bond Correlations for All13C Multiplicities in Heteronuclear NMR Spectroscopy. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 9781–9784. 10.1039/C8CC05156A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  324. Gyöngyösi T.; Kövér K. E.; Sørensen O. W. Resolution Enhancement in SEA XLOC for Heteronuclear NMR Long-Range Correlation. ChemistryOpen 2019, 8, 1048–1051. 10.1002/open.201900136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  325. Nagy T. M.; Gyöngyösi T.; Kövér K. E.; Sørensen O. W. BANGO SEA XLOC/HMBC-H2OBC: Complete Heteronuclear Correlation within Minutes from One NMR Pulse Sequence. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 12208–12211. 10.1039/C9CC06253J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  326. Nagy T. M.; Kövér K. E.; Sørensen O. W. Double and Adiabatic BANGO for Concatenating Two NMR Experiments Relying on the Same Pool of Magnetization. J. Magn. Reson. 2020, 316, 106767. 10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  327. Nagy T. M.; Kövér K. E.; Sørensen O. W. NORD: NO Relaxation Delay NMR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 13587–13590. 10.1002/anie.202102487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  328. Adams R. W. Pure Shift NMR Spectroscopy. eMagRes. 2014, 3, 295–309. 10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  329. Castañar L.; Parella T. Broadband 1H Homodecoupled NMR Experiments: Recent Developments, Methods and Applications. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2015, 53, 399–426. 10.1002/mrc.4238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  330. Meyer N. H.; Zangger K. Simplifying Proton NMR Spectra by Instant Homonuclear Broadband Decoupling. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 7143–7146. 10.1002/anie.201300129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  331. Moutzouri P.; Chen Y.; Foroozandeh M.; Kiraly P.; Phillips A. R.; Coombes S. R.; Nilsson M.; Morris G. A. Ultraclean Pure Shift NMR. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 10188–10191. 10.1039/C7CC04423B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  332. Ilgen J.; Kaltschnee L.; Thiele C. M. A Pure Shift Experiment with Increased Sensitivity and Superior Performance for Strongly Coupled Systems. J. Magn. Reson. 2018, 286, 18–29. 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  333. Foroozandeh M.; Adams R. W.; Meharry N. J.; Jeannerat D.; Nilsson M.; Morris G. A. Ultrahigh-Resolution NMR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 6990–6992. 10.1002/anie.201404111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  334. Foroozandeh M.; Morris G. A.; Nilsson M. PSYCHE Pure Shift NMR Spectroscopy. Chem.—Eur. J. 2018, 24, 13988–14000. 10.1002/chem.201800524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  335. Dal Poggetto G.; Castañar L.; Morris G. A.; Nilsson M. A New Tool for NMR Analysis of Complex Systems: Selective Pure Shift TOCSY. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 100063–100066. 10.1039/C6RA22807K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  336. Foroozandeh M.; Adams R. W.; Nilsson M.; Morris G. A. Ultrahigh-Resolution Total Correlation NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11867–11869. 10.1021/ja507201t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  337. Aguilar J. A.; Colbourne A. A.; Cassani J.; Nilsson M.; Morris G. A. Decoupling Two-Dimensional NMR Spectroscopy in Both Dimensions: Pure Shift NOESY and COSY. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 6460–6463. 10.1002/anie.201108888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  338. Aguilar J. A.; Nilsson M.; Morris G. A. Simple Proton Spectra from Complex Spin Systems: Pure Shift NMR Spectroscopy Using BIRD. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 9716–9717. 10.1002/anie.201103789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  339. Lupulescu A.; Olsen G. L.; Frydman L. Toward Single-Shot Pure-Shift Solution 1H NMR by Trains of BIRD-Based Homonuclear Decoupling. J. Magn. Reson. 2012, 218, 141–146. 10.1016/j.jmr.2012.02.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  340. Paudel L.; Adams R. W.; Király P.; Aguilar J. A.; Foroozandeh M.; Cliff M. J.; Nilsson M.; Sándor P.; Waltho J. P.; Morris G. A. Simultaneously Enhancing Spectral Resolution and Sensitivity in Heteronuclear Correlation NMR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 11616–11619. 10.1002/anie.201305709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  341. Kiraly P.; Morris G. A.; Quanxiu L.; Nilsson M. Sharpening up Your Spectra: Broadband Homonuclear Decoupling in Hsqc by Real-Time Pure Shift Acquisition. Synlett 2019, 30, 1015–1025. 10.1055/s-0037-1612057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  342. Colebrooke S. A.; Blundell C. D.; DeAngelis P. L.; Campbell I. D.; Almond A. Exploiting the Carboxylate Chemical Shift to Resolve Degenerate Resonances in Spectra of 13C-Labelled Glycosaminoglycans. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2005, 43, 805–815. 10.1002/mrc.1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  343. Bermel W.; Bertini I.; Felli I. C.; Piccioli M.; Pierattelli R. 13C-Detected Protonless NMR Spectroscopy of Proteins in Solution. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2006, 48, 25–45. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2005.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  344. Richter C.; Kovacs H.; Buck J.; Wacker A.; Fürtig B.; Bermel W.; Schwalbe H. 13C-Direct Detected NMR Experiments for the Sequential J-Based Resonance Assignment of RNA Oligonucleotides. J. Biomol. NMR 2010, 47, 259–269. 10.1007/s10858-010-9429-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  345. Kamiya Y.; Yamamoto S.; Chiba Y.; Jigami Y.; Kato K. Overexpression of a Homogeneous Oligosaccharide with 13C Labeling by Genetically Engineered Yeast Strain. J. Biomol. NMR 2011, 50, 397–401. 10.1007/s10858-011-9525-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  346. Kamiya Y.; Yanagi K.; Kitajima T.; Yamaguchi T.; Chiba Y.; Kato K. Application of Metabolic 13C Labeling in Conjunction with High-Field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for Comparative Conformational Analysis of High Mannose-Type Oligosaccharides. Biomolecules 2013, 3, 108–123. 10.3390/biom3010108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  347. Azurmendi H. F.; Vionnet J.; Wrightson L.; Trinh L. B.; Shiloach J.; Freedberg D. I. Extracellular Structure of Polysialic Acid Explored by on Cell Solution NMR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 11557–11561. 10.1073/pnas.0704404104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  348. Vliegenthart J. F. G.High Resolution 1H-NMR Spectroscopy as a Tool in Disclosing the Structure of: O-Linked Glycans from Glycoproteins. In Carbohydrate Chemistry: Chemical and Biological Approaches; Rauter A. P., Lindhorst T. K., Queneau Y., Eds.; The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2021; Vol. 44, pp 195–206. [Google Scholar]
  349. Šardzík R.; Green A. P.; Laurent N.; Both P.; Fontana C.; Voglmeir J.; Weissenborn M. J.; Haddoub R.; Grassi P.; Haslam S. M.; et al. Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of O-Mannosylpeptides in Solution and on Solid Phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4521–4524. 10.1021/ja211861m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  350. Schubert M.; Walczak M. J.; Aebi M.; Wider G. Posttranslational Modifications of Intact Proteins Detected by NMR Spectroscopy: Application to Glycosylation. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 7096–7100. 10.1002/anie.201502093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  351. Peng J.; Patil S. M.; Keire D. A.; Chen K. Chemical Structure and Composition of Major Glycans Covalently Linked to Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies by Middle-Down Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 11016–11024. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  352. Zhuo Y.; Keire D. A.; Chen K. Minor N-Glycan Mapping of Monoclonal Antibody Therapeutics Using Middle-Down NMR Spectroscopy. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2021, 18, 441–450. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c01083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  353. Hargett A. A.; Marcella A. M.; Yu H.; Li C.; Orwenyo J.; Battistel M. D.; Wang L. X.; Freedberg D. I. Glycosylation States on Intact Proteins Determined by NMR Spectroscopy. Molecules 2021, 26, 4308. 10.3390/molecules26144308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  354. Skrisovska L.; Schubert M.; Allain F. H. T. Recent Advances in Segmental Isotope Labeling of Proteins: NMR Applications to Large Proteins and Glycoproteins. J. Biomol. NMR 2010, 46, 51–65. 10.1007/s10858-009-9362-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  355. Kato K.; Yamaguchi Y.; Arata Y. Stable-Isotope-Assisted NMR Approaches to Glycoproteins Using Immunoglobulin G as a Model System. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2010, 56, 346–359. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2010.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  356. Yanaka S.; Yagi H.; Yogo R.; Yagi-Utsumi M.; Kato K. Stable Isotope Labeling Approaches for NMR Characterization of Glycoproteins Using Eukaryotic Expression Systems. J. Biomol. NMR 2018, 71, 193–202. 10.1007/s10858-018-0169-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  357. Slynko V.; Schubert M.; Numao S.; Kowarik M.; Aebi M.; Allain F. H. T. NMR Structure Determination of a Segmentally Labeled Glycoprotein Using in Vitro Glycosylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1274–1281. 10.1021/ja808682v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  358. Peterson R. D.; Theimer C. A.; Wu H.; Feigon J. New Applications of 2D Filtered/Edited NOESY for Assignment and Structure Elucidation of RNA and RNA-Protein Complexes. J. Biomol. NMR 2004, 28, 59–67. 10.1023/B:JNMR.0000012861.95939.05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  359. Macnaughtan M. A.; Tian F.; Liu S.; Meng L.; Park S.; Azadi P.; Moremen K. W.; Prestegard J. H. 13C-Sialic Acid Labeling of Glycans on Glycoproteins Using ST6Gal-I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11864–11865. 10.1021/ja804614w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  360. Barb A. W.; Brady E. K.; Prestegard J. H. Branch-Specific Sialylation of IgG-Fc Glycans by ST6Gal-I. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 9705–9707. 10.1021/bi901430h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  361. Barb A. W.; Prestegard J. H. NMR Analysis Demonstrates Immunoglobulin G N-Glycans Are Accessible and Dynamic. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011, 7, 147–153. 10.1038/nchembio.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  362. Barb A. W.; Meng L.; Gao Z.; Johnson R. W.; Moremen K. W.; Prestegard J. H. NMR Characterization of Immunoglobulin G Fc Glycan Motion on Enzymatic Sialylation. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 4618–4626. 10.1021/bi300319q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  363. Barb A. W. Intramolecular N-Glycan/Polypeptide Interactions Observed at Multiple N-Glycan Remodeling Steps through [13C,15N]-N-Acetylglucosamine Labeling of Immunoglobulin G1. Biochemistry 2015, 54, 313–322. 10.1021/bi501380t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  364. Barb A. W.; Freedberg D. I.; Battistel M. D.; Prestegard J. H. NMR Detection and Characterization of Sialylated Glycoproteins and Cell Surface Polysaccharides. J. Biomol. NMR 2011, 51, 163–171. 10.1007/s10858-011-9550-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  365. Yamaguchi Y.; Wälchli M.; Nagano M.; Kato K. A 13C-Detection NMR Approach for Large Glycoproteins. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 535–538. 10.1016/j.carres.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  366. Unione L.; Lenza M. P.; Ardá A.; Urquiza P.; Laín A.; Falcón-Pérez J. M.; Jiménez-Barbero J.; Millet O. Glycoprofile Analysis of an Intact Glycoprotein As Inferred by NMR Spectroscopy. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5, 1554–1561. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  367. Lenza M. P.; Oyenarte I.; Diercks T.; Quintana J. I.; Gimeno A.; Coelho H.; Diniz A.; Peccati F.; Delgado S.; Bosch A.; et al. Structural Characterization of N-Linked Glycans in the Receptor Binding Domain of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and Their Interactions with Human Lectins. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 23763–23771. 10.1002/anie.202011015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  368. Fesik S. W.; Eaton H. L.; Olejniczak E. T.; Zuiderweg E. R. P.; McIntosh L. P.; Dahlquist F. W. 2D and 3D NMR Spectroscopy Employing 13C-,13C Magnetization Transfer by Isotropic Mixing. Spin System Identification in Large Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 886–888. 10.1021/ja00158a069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  369. Kay L. E.; Xu G.-Y.; Singer A. U.; Muhandiram D. R.; Forman-Kay J. D. A Gradient-Enhanced HCCH-TOCSY Experiment for Recording Side-Chain 1H and 13C Correlations in H2O Samples of Proteins. J. Magn. Reson. - Ser. B 1993, 101, 333–337. 10.1006/jmrb.1993.1053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  370. Rogals M. J.; Yang J. Y.; Williams R. V.; Moremen K. W.; Amster I. J.; Prestegard J. H. Sparse Isotope Labeling for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) of Glycoproteins Using 13C-Glucose. Glycobiology 2021, 31, 425–435. 10.1093/glycob/cwaa071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  371. Baumann H.; Jansson P. E.; Kenne L. N.m.r. and Conformational Studies on Some 1,3-Linked Disaccharides. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1988, 209–217. 10.1039/p19880000209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  372. Thrippleton M. J.; Keeler J. Elimination of Zero-Quantum Interference in Two-Dimensional NMR Spectra. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3938–3941. 10.1002/anie.200351947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  373. Baishya B.; Verma A. Elimination of Zero-Quantum Artifacts and Sensitivity Enhancement in Perfect Echo Based 2D NOESY. J. Magn. Reson. 2015, 252, 41–48. 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  374. Freitas S.; Castelo-Branco R.; Wenzel-Storjohann A.; Vasconcelos V. M.; Tasdemir D.; Leao P. N. Structure and Biosynthesis of Desmamides A-C, Lipoglycopeptides from the Endophytic Cyanobacterium Desmonostoc muscorum LEGE 12446. J. Nat. Prod. 2022, 85, 1704–1714. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.2c00162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  375. Bax A.; Summers M. F. 1H and 13C Assignments from Sensitivity-Enhanced Detection of Heteronuclear Multiple-Bond Connectivity by 2D Multiple Quantum NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2093–2094. 10.1021/ja00268a061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  376. Burger R.; Schorn C.; Bigler P. Bird-HMBC: Improved Detection of Heteronuclear Long-Range Couplings. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2000, 38, 963–969. . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  377. Bodenhausen G.; Ernst R. R. The Accordion Experiment, a Simple Approach to Three-Dimensional NMR Spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 1981, 45, 367–373. 10.1016/0022-2364(81)90137-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  378. Furrer J. Accordion BIRD-HMBC Experiments: Improved One-Bond Correlation Suppression in Accordion Heteronuclear Multiple-Bond Correlation-Type Experiments. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2006, 44, 845–850. 10.1002/mrc.1857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  379. Würtz P.; Permi P.; Nielsen N. C.; Sørensen O. W. Clean HMBC: Suppression of Strong-Coupling Induced Artifacts in HMBC Spectra. J. Magn. Reson. 2008, 194, 89–98. 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  380. Meier S.; Benie A. J.; Duus J.; Sorensen O. W. Adiabatic Low-Pass J Filters for Artifact Suppression in Heteronuclear NMR. ChemPhysChem 2009, 10, 893–895. 10.1002/cphc.200900072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  381. Hocking H. G.; Gerwig G. J.; Dutertre S.; Violette A.; Favreau P.; Stöcklin R.; Kamerling J. P.; Boelens R. Structure of the O-Glycosylated Conopeptide CcTx from Conus Consors Venom. Chem.—Eur. J. 2013, 19, 870–879. 10.1002/chem.201202713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  382. Novakovic M.; Battistel M. D.; Azurmendi H. F.; Concilio M. G.; Freedberg D. I.; Frydman L. The Incorporation of Labile Protons into Multidimensional NMR Analyses: Glycan Structures Revisited. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 8935–8948. 10.1021/jacs.1c04512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  383. Reif B.; Hennig M.; Griesinger C. Direct Measurement of Angles between Bond Vectors in High-Resolution NMR. Science. 1997, 276, 1230–1233. 10.1126/science.276.5316.1230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  384. Felli I. C.; Richter C.; Griesinger C.; Schwalbe H. Determination of RNA Sugar Pucker Mode from Cross-Correlated Relaxation in Solution NMR Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1956–1957. 10.1021/ja983434r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  385. Dalheim M. Ø.; Arnfinnsdottir N. B.; Widmalm G.; Christensen B. E. The Size and Shape of Three Water-Soluble, Non-Ionic Polysaccharides Produced by Lactic Acid Bacteria: A Comparative Study. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 142, 91–97. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  386. Olsson U.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Structural Determination of the O-Antigenic Polysaccharide from the Verocytotoxin-Producing Escherichia coli O176. Carbohydr. Res. 2008, 343, 805–809. 10.1016/j.carres.2008.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  387. Battistel M. D.; Shangold M.; Trinh L.; Shiloach J.; Freedberg D. I. Evidence for Helical Structure in a Tetramer of α2–8 Sialic Acid: Unveiling a Structural Antigen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10717–10720. 10.1021/ja300624j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  388. Jeannerat D.Rapid Multidimensional NMR: High Resolution by Spectral Aliasing. In Encyclopedia of Magnetic Resonance. Harris R. K., Wasylishen R. L., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: Chichester UK, 2011. 10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1187. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  389. Jeannerat D. Computer Optimized Spectral Aliasing in the Indirect Dimension of 1H-13C Heteronuclear 2D NMR Experiments. A New Algorithm and Examples of Applications to Small Molecules. J. Magn. Reson. 2007, 186, 112–122. 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  390. Mobli M.; Maciejewski M. W.; Schuyler A. D.; Stern A. S.; Hoch J. C. Sparse Sampling Methods In Multidimensional NMR. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 10835–10843. 10.1039/C2CP40174F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  391. Robson S.; Arthanari H.; Hyberts S. G.; Wagner G.. Nonuniform Sampling for NMR Spectroscopy. In Methods in Enzymology; Wand A. J., Ed.; Elsevier, 2019; Vol. 614, pp 263–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  392. Miljenović T. M.; Jia X.; Mobli M. Nonuniform Sampling in Biomolecular NMR. Mod. Magn. Reson. 2018, 2035–2054. 10.1007/978-3-319-28388-3_118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  393. Palmer M. R.; Suiter C. L.; Henry G. E.; Rovnyak J.; Hoch J. C.; Polenova T.; Rovnyak D. The Sensitivity of Non-Uniform Sampling NMR. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 6502–6515. 10.1021/jp5126415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  394. Palmer M. R.; Gupta R. A.; Richard M. E.; Suiter C. L.; Polenova T.; Hoch J. C.; Rovnyak D. Application of Non-Uniform Sampling for Sensitivity Enhancement of Small-Molecule Heteronuclear Correlation NMR Spectra. Mod. NMR Approaches to Struct. Elucidation Nat. Prod. 2015, 1, 93–118. 10.1039/9781849735186-00093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  395. Orekhov V. Y.; Jaravine V. A. Analysis of Non-Uniformly Sampled Spectra with Multi-Dimensional Decomposition. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2011, 59, 271–292. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2011.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  396. Kazimierczuk K.; Orekhov V. Non-Uniform Sampling: Post-Fourier Era of NMR Data Collection and Processing. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2015, 53, 921–926. 10.1002/mrc.4284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  397. Bostock M.; Nietlispach D. Compressed Sensing: Reconstruction of Non-Uniformly Sampled Multidimensional NMR Data. Concepts Magn. Reson. Part A 2017, 46A, e21438 10.1002/cmr.a.21438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  398. Patel D. S.; Blasco P.; Widmalm G.; Im W. Escherichia coli O176 LPS Structure and Dynamics: A NMR Spectroscopy and MD Simulation Study. Curr. Res. Struct. Biol. 2020, 2, 79–88. 10.1016/j.crstbi.2020.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  399. Battistel M. D.; Freedberg D. I. Dispersing the Crowd: Adopting 13C Direct Detection for Glycans. J. Magn. Reson. 2020, 318, 106792. 10.1016/j.jmr.2020.106792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  400. Kazimierczuk K.; Orekhov V. Y. Accelerated NMR Spectroscopy by Using Compressed Sensing. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5556–5559. 10.1002/anie.201100370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  401. Wieske L. H. E.; Erdélyi M. Non-Uniform Sampling for NOESY? A Case Study on Spiramycin. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2021, 59, 723–737. 10.1002/mrc.5133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  402. Maciejewski M. W.; Qui H. Z.; Rujan I.; Mobli M.; Hoch J. C. Nonuniform Sampling and Spectral Aliasing Mark. J. Magn. Reson. 2009, 199, 88–93. 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  403. Pauli G. F.; Chen S. N.; Lankin D. C.; Bisson J.; Case R. J.; Chadwick L. R.; Gödecke T.; Inui T.; Krunic A.; Jaki B. U.; et al. Essential Parameters for Structural Analysis and Dereplication by 1H NMR Spectroscopy. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 1473–1487. 10.1021/np5002384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  404. Laatikainen R.; Tiainen M.; Korhonen S. P.; Niemitz M.. Computerized Analysis of High-Resolution Solution-State Spectra. In Encyclopedia of Magnetic Resonance. Harris R. K., Wasylishen R. L., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK, 2011. 10.1002/9780470034590.emrstm1226. [DOI]
  405. Laatikainen R.; Niemitz M.; Weber U.; Sundelin J.; Hassinen T.; Vepsalainen J. General Strategies for Total-Lineshape-Type Spectral Analysis of NMR Spectra Using Integral-Transform Iterator. J. Magn. Reson. - Ser. A 1996, 120, 1–10. 10.1006/jmra.1996.0094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  406. Dahmén J.; Frejd T.; Grönberg G.; Magnusson G.; Noori G. Virtual Long-Range Coupling of the Anomeric Proton of Carbohydrates: An n.m.r. Spin-Simulation Study. Carbohydr. Res. 1984, 125, 161–164. 10.1016/0008-6215(84)85151-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  407. Brisson J.-R.; Carver J. P. Virtual Coupling in the 1H NMR Spectrum of N,N’-Diacetyl Chitobiose. J. Biol. Chem. 1982, 257, 11207–11209. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)33741-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  408. Landström J.; Bergström M.; Hamark C.; Ohlson S.; Widmalm G. Combining Weak Affinity Chromatography, NMR Spectroscopy and Molecular Simulations in Carbohydrate-Lysozyme Interaction Studies. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 3019–3032. 10.1039/c2ob07066a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  409. Siegbahn A.; Manner S.; Persson A.; Tykesson E.; Holmqvist K.; Ochocinska A.; Rönnols J.; Sundin A.; Mani K.; Westergren-Thorsson G.; et al. Rules for Priming and Inhibition of Glycosaminoglycan Biosynthesis; Probing the β4GalT7 Active Site. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 3501–3508. 10.1039/C4SC01244E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  410. Dashti H.; Westler W. M.; Tonelli M.; Wedell J. R.; Markley J. L.; Eghbalnia H. R. Spin System Modeling of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra for Applications in Metabolomics and Small Molecule Screening. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 12201–12208. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  411. Tang Y.; Friesen J. B.; Lankin D. C.; McAlpine J. B.; Nikolić D. S.; Niemitz M.; Seigler D. S.; Graham J. G.; Chen S. N.; Pauli G. F. Quantum Mechanics-Based Structure Analysis of Cyclic Monoterpene Glycosides from Rhodiola rosea. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 1950–1959. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c00212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  412. De Souza A. C.; Rietkerk T.; Selin C. G. M.; Lankhorst P. P. A Robust and Universal NMR Method for the Compositional Analysis of Polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 95, 657–663. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  413. Schievano E.; Tonoli M.; Rastrelli F. NMR Quantification of Carbohydrates in Complex Mixtures. A Challenge on Honey. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 13405–13414. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  414. Sassaki G. L.; Guerrini M.; Serrato R. V.; Santana Filho A. P.; Carlotto J.; Simas-Tosin F.; Cipriani T. R.; Iacomini M.; Torri G.; Gorin P. A. J. Monosaccharide Composition of Glycans Based on Q-HSQC NMR. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 104, 34–41. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.12.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  415. Bøjstrup M.; Petersen B. O.; Beeren S. R.; Hindsgaul O.; Meier S. Fast and Accurate Quantitation of Glucans in Complex Mixtures by Optimized Heteronuclear NMR Spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 8802–8808. 10.1021/ac401980m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  416. Petersen B. O.; Nilsson M.; Bøjstrup M.; Hindsgaul O.; Meier S. 1H NMR Spectroscopy for Profiling Complex Carbohydrate Mixtures in Non-Fractionated Beer. Food Chem. 2014, 150, 65–72. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.10.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  417. Cao R.; Komura F.; Nonaka A.; Kato T.; Fukumashi J.; Matsui T. Quantitative Analysis of d-(+)-Glucose in Fruit Juices Using Diffusion Ordered-1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Anal. Sci. 2014, 30, 383–388. 10.2116/analsci.30.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  418. Yamanoi T.; Oda Y.; Katsuraya K. Separation of the α-and β-Anomers of Carbohydrates by Diffusion-Ordered NMR Spectroscopy. Magnetochemistry 2017, 3, 38. 10.3390/magnetochemistry3040038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  419. Kiraly P.; Swan I.; Nilsson M.; Morris G. A. Improving Accuracy in DOSY and Diffusion Measurements Using Triaxial Field Gradients. J. Magn. Reson. 2016, 270, 24–30. 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  420. Dal Poggetto G.; Castañar L.; Adams R. W.; Morris G. A.; Nilsson M. Relaxation-Encoded NMR Experiments for Mixture Analysis: REST and Beer. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 7461–7464. 10.1039/C7CC03150E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  421. Smith M. J.; Castañar L.; Adams R. W.; Morris G. A.; Nilsson M. Giving Pure Shift NMR Spectroscopy a REST-Ultrahigh-Resolution Mixture Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 12757–12761. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  422. Dal Poggetto G.; Castanar L.; Adams R. W.; Morris G. A.; Nilsson M. Dissect and Divide: Putting NMR Spectra of Mixtures under the Knife. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 5766–5771. 10.1021/jacs.8b13290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  423. Kakita V. M. R.; Vemulapalli S. P. B.; Bharatam J. Band-Selective Excited Ultrahigh Resolution PSYCHE-TOCSY: Fast Screening of Organic Molecules and Complex Mixtures. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2016, 54, 308–314. 10.1002/mrc.4376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  424. Rao Kakita V. M.; Hosur R. V. All-in-One NMR Spectroscopy of Small Organic Molecules: Complete Chemical Shift Assignment from a Single NMR Experiment. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 21174–21179. 10.1039/D0RA03417G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  425. Zhao Q.; Ma H.; Pedersen C. M.; Dou M.; Qiao Y.; Hou X.; Qi Y.; Wang Y. Pure Shift NMR: Application of 1D PSYCHE and 1D TOCSY-PSYCHE Techniques for Directly Analyzing the Mixtures from Biomass-Derived Platform Compound Hydrogenation/Hydrogenolysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 2456–2464. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06882. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  426. Loss A.; Lütteke T.. Using NMR Data on GLYCOSCIENCES.de. In Methods in Molecular Biology–Glycoinformatics; Lütteke T., Frank M., Eds.; Springer, 2015; Vol. 1273, pp 87–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  427. Toukach P. V.; Egorova K. S. Carbohydrate Structure Database Merged from Bacterial, Archaeal, Plant and Fungal Parts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D1229–D1236. 10.1093/nar/gkv840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  428. Maes E.; Bonachera F.; Strecker G.; Guerardel Y. SOACS Index: An Easy NMR-Based Query for Glycan Retrieval. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 322–330. 10.1016/j.carres.2008.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  429. Lundborg M.; Modhukur V.; Widmalm G. Glycosyltransferase Functions of E. coli O-Antigens. Glycobiology 2010, 20, 366–368. 10.1093/glycob/cwp185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  430. Stenutz R.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. The Structures of Escherichia coli O-Polysaccharide Antigens. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 30, 382–403. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00016.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  431. Klukowski P.; Schubert M. Chemical Shift-Based Identification of Monosaccharide Spin-Systems with NMR Spectroscopy to Complement Untargeted Glycomics. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 293–300. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  432. Loss A.; Stenutz R.; Schwarzer E.; von der Lieth C. W. GlyNest and CASPER: Two Independent Approaches to Estimate 1H and 13C NMR Shifts of Glycans Available through a Common Web-Interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W733–W737. 10.1093/nar/gkl265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  433. Kapaev R. R.; Toukach P. V. GRASS: Semi-Automated NMR-Based Structure Elucidation of Saccharides. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 957–963. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  434. Kapaev R. R.; Toukach P. V. Simulation of 2D NMR Spectra of Carbohydrates Using GODESS Software. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016, 56, 1100–1104. 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  435. Ståhle J.; Widmalm G.. NMR Chemical Shift Predictions and Structural Elucidation of Oligo- and Polysaccharides by the Computer Program CASPER. In New Developments in NMR–NMR in Glycoscience and Glycotechnology; Kato K., Peters T., Eds.; The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017; Vol. 10, pp 335–352. [Google Scholar]
  436. Jansson P. E.; Stenutz R.; Widmalm G. Sequence Determination of Oligosaccharides and Regular Polysaccharides Using NMR Spectroscopy and a Novel Web-Based Version of the Computer Program Casper. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 1003–1010. 10.1016/j.carres.2006.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  437. Lundborg M.; Widmalm G.. NMR Chemical Shift Prediction of Glycans: Application of the Computer Program CASPER in Structural Analysis. In Methods in Molecular Biology–Glycoinformatics; Lütteke T., Frank M., Eds.; Springer, 2015; Vol. 1273, pp 29–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  438. Lisacek F.; Mariethoz J.; Alocci D.; Rudd P. M.; Abrahams J. L.; Campbell M. P.; Packer N. H.; Ståhle J.; Widmalm G.; Mullen E.; et al. Databases and Associated Tools for Glycomics and Glycoproteomics. In Methods in Molecular Biology–Databases and Associated Tools for Glycomics and Glycoproteomics; Lauc G., Wuhrer M., Eds.; Springer, 2017; Vol. 1503, pp 235–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  439. Kuttel M.; Mao Y.; Widmalm G.; Lundborg M. CarbBuilder: An Adjustable Tool for Building 3D Molecular Structures of Carbohydrates for Molecular Simulation. 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on eScience 2011, 395–402. 10.1109/eScience.2011.61. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  440. Kuttel M. M.; Ståhle J.; Widmalm G. CarbBuilder: Software for Building Molecular Models of Complex Oligo- and Polysaccharide Structures. J. Comput. Chem. 2016, 37, 2098–2105. 10.1002/jcc.24428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  441. Kovacs H.; Moskau D.; Spraul M. Cryogenically Cooled Probes - A Leap in NMR Technology. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2005, 46, 131–155. 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2005.03.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  442. Kovacs H.; Moskau D.. Cryogenic NMR Probes. In Encyclopedia of Biophysics; Roberts G. C. K., Ed.; Springer, 2013; pp 392–396. [Google Scholar]
  443. Kelly A. E.; Ou H. D.; Withers R.; Dötsch V. Low-Conductivity Buffers for High-Sensitivity NMR Measurements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12013–12019. 10.1021/ja026121b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  444. Voehler M. W.; Collier G.; Young J. K.; Stone M. P.; Germann M. W. Performance of Cryogenic Probes as a Function of Ionic Strength and Sample Tube Geometry. J. Magn. Reson. 2006, 183, 102–109. 10.1016/j.jmr.2006.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  445. Fellenberg M.; Çoksezen A.; Meyer B. Characterization of Picomole Amounts of Oligosaccharides from Glycoproteins by 1H NMR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2630–2633. 10.1002/anie.200906680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  446. Leonard R.; Petersen B. O.; Himly M.; Kaar W.; Wopfner N.; Kolarich D.; van Ree R.; Ebner C.; Duus J. Ø.; Ferreira F.; et al. Two Novel Types of O-Glycans on the Mugwort Pollen Allergen Art v 1 and Their Role in Antibody Binding. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 7932–7940. 10.1074/jbc.M410407200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  447. Korir A. K.; Larive C. K. On-Line NMR Detection of Microgram Quantities of Heparin-Derived Oligosaccharides and Their Structure Elucidation by Microcoil NMR. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 388, 1707–1716. 10.1007/s00216-007-1400-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  448. Limtiaco J. F. K.; Beni S.; Jones C. J.; Langeslay D. J.; Larive C. K. The Efficient Structure Elucidation of Minor Components in Heparin Digests Using Microcoil NMR. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 2244–2254. 10.1016/j.carres.2011.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  449. Pinon A. C.; Capozzi A.; Ardenkjær-Larsen J. H. Hyperpolarization via Dissolution Dynamic Nuclear Polarization: New Technological and Methodological Advances. Magn. Reson. Mater. Physics, Biol. Med. 2021, 34, 5–23. 10.1007/s10334-020-00894-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  450. Ardenkjær-Larsen J. H.; Fridlund B.; Gram A.; Hansson G.; Hansson L.; Lerche M. H.; Servin R.; Thaning M.; Golman K. Increase in Signal-to-Noise Ratio of > 10,000 Times in Liquid-State NMR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100, 10158–10163. 10.1073/pnas.1733835100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  451. Plainchont B.; Berruyer P.; Dumez J. N.; Jannin S.; Giraudeau P. Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Opens New Perspectives for NMR Spectroscopy in Analytical Chemistry. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 3639–3650. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  452. Abhyankar N.; Szalai V. Challenges and Advances in the Application of Dynamic Nuclear Polarization to Liquid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 2021, 125, 5171–5190. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c10937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  453. Ardenkjaer-Larsen J. H. On the Present and Future of Dissolution-DNP. J. Magn. Reson. 2016, 264, 3–12. 10.1016/j.jmr.2016.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  454. Vuichoud B.; Milani J.; Bornet A.; Melzi R.; Jannin S.; Bodenhausen G. Hyperpolarization of Deuterated Metabolites via Remote Cross-Polarization and Dissolution Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 1411–1415. 10.1021/jp4118776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  455. Frydman L.; Blazina D. Ultrafast Two-Dimensional Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Hyperpolarized Solutions. Nat. Phys. 2007, 3, 415–419. 10.1038/nphys597. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  456. Milani J.; Vuichoud B.; Bornet A.; Miéville P.; Mottier R.; Jannin S.; Bodenhausen G. A Magnetic Tunnel to Shelter Hyperpolarized Fluids. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2015, 86, 024101. 10.1063/1.4908196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  457. Kouřil K.; Kouřilová H.; Bartram S.; Levitt M. H.; Meier B. Scalable Dissolution-Dynamic Nuclear Polarization with Rapid Transfer of a Polarized Solid. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1733. 10.1038/s41467-019-09726-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  458. Kouřil K.; Gramberg M.; Jurkutat M.; Kouřilová H.; Meier B. A Cryogen-Free, Semi-Automated Apparatus for Bullet-Dynamic Nuclear Polarization with Improved Resolution. Magn. Reson. 2021, 2, 815–825. 10.5194/mr-2-815-2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  459. Dai D.; Wang X.; Liu Y.; Yang X. L.; Glaubitz C.; Denysenkov V.; He X.; Prisner T.; Mao J. Room-Temperature Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy of Small Biological Molecules in Water. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6880. 10.1038/s41467-021-27067-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  460. Pinon A. C.; Capozzi A.; Ardenkjær-Larsen J. H. Hyperpolarized Water through Dissolution Dynamic Nuclear Polarization with UV-Generated Radicals. Commun. Chem. 2020, 3, 57. 10.1038/s42004-020-0301-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  461. Hilty C.; Kurzbach D.; Frydman L. Hyperpolarized Water as Universal Sensitivity Booster in Biomolecular NMR. Nat. Protoc. 2022, 17, 1621–1657. 10.1038/s41596-022-00693-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  462. Miclet E.; Abergel D.; Bornet A.; Milani J.; Jannin S.; Bodenhausen G. Toward Quantitative Measurements of Enzyme Kinetics by Dissolution Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 3290–3295. 10.1021/jz501411d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  463. Kjeldsen C.; Ardenkjær-Larsen J. H.; Duus J. O. Discovery of Intermediates of LacZ β-Galactosidase Catalyzed Hydrolysis Using DDNP NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3030–3034. 10.1021/jacs.7b13358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  464. Kjeldsen C.; Ardenkjær-Larsen J. H.; Duus J. Unexpected Anomeric Acceptor Preference Observed Using DDNP NMR for Transglycosylation Studies of β-Galactosidases. Biochemistry 2020, 59, 2903–2908. 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  465. Giberson J.; Scicluna J.; Legge N.; Longstaffe J.. Developments in Benchtop NMR Spectroscopy 2015–2020. In Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy; Elsevier Ltd., 2021; Vol. 102, pp 153–246. [Google Scholar]
  466. Maeda H.; Yanagisawa Y. Future Prospects for NMR Magnets: A Perspective. J. Magn. Reson. 2019, 306, 80–85. 10.1016/j.jmr.2019.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  467. Blundell C. D.; Reed M. A. C.; Overduin M.; Almond A. NMR Spectra of Oligosaccharides at Ultra-High Field (900 MHz) Have Better Resolution than Expected Due to Favourable Molecular Tumbling. Carbohydr. Res. 2006, 341, 1985–1991. 10.1016/j.carres.2006.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  468. Wikus P.; Frantz W.; Kümmerle R.; Vonlanthen P. Commercial Gigahertz-Class NMR Magnets. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2022, 35, 033001. 10.1088/1361-6668/ac4951. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  469. Luchinat E.; Barbieri L.; Cremonini M.; Banci L. Protein In-Cell NMR Spectroscopy at 1.2 GHz. J. Biomol. NMR 2021, 75, 97–107. 10.1007/s10858-021-00358-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  470. Yanagisawa Y.; Piao R.; Suetomi Y.; Yamazaki T.; Yamagishi K.; Ueno T.; Takao T.; Ohki K.; Yamaguchi T.; Nagaishi T.; et al. Development of a Persistent-Mode NMR Magnet with Superconducting Joints between High-Temperature Superconductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2021, 34, 115006. 10.1088/1361-6668/ac2120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  471. Park D.; Bascunan J.; Li Y.; Lee W.; Choi Y.; Iwasa Y. Design Overview of the MIT 1.3-GHz LTS/HTS NMR Magnet with a New REBCO Insert. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2021, 31, 1–6. 10.1109/TASC.2021.3064006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  472. Silva Elipe M. V.; Donovan N.; Krull R.; Pooke D.; Colson K. L. Performance of New 400-MHz HTS Power-Driven Magnet NMR Technology on Typical Pharmaceutical API, Cinacalcet HCl. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2018, 56, 1052–1053. 10.1002/mrc.4795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  473. Shi Q.; Yan J.; Jiang B.; Chi X.; Wang J.; Liang X.; Ai X. A General Strategy for the Structural Determination of Carbohydrates by Multi-Dimensional NMR Spectroscopies. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 267, 118218. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  474. Speciale I.; Notaro A.; Garcia-Vello P.; Di Lorenzo F.; Armiento S.; Molinaro A.; Marchetti R.; Silipo A.; De Castro C. Liquid-State NMR Spectroscopy for Complex Carbohydrate Structural Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 277, 118885. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  475. Jonas E.; Kuhn S.; Schlörer N. Prediction of Chemical Shift in NMR: A Review. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2022, 60, 1021–1031. 10.1002/mrc.5234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  476. Gerrard W.; Bratholm L. A.; Packer M. J.; Mulholland A. J.; Glowacki D. R.; Butts C. P. IMPRESSION-Prediction of NMR Parameters for 3-Dimensional Chemical Structures Using Machine Learning with near Quantum Chemical Accuracy. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 508–515. 10.1039/C9SC03854J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  477. Gao P.; Zhang J.; Peng Q.; Zhang J.; Glezakou V. A. General Protocol for the Accurate Prediction of Molecular 13C/1H NMR Chemical Shifts via Machine Learning Augmented DFT. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2020, 60, 3746–3754. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  478. Gerrard W.; Yiu C.; Butts C. P. Prediction of 15N Chemical Shifts by Machine Learning. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2022, 60, 1087–1092. 10.1002/mrc.5208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  479. Li D. W.; Hansen A. L.; Bruschweiler-Li L.; Yuan C.; Brüschweiler R. Fundamental and Practical Aspects of Machine Learning for the Peak Picking of Biomolecular NMR Spectra. J. Biomol. NMR 2022, 76, 49–57. 10.1007/s10858-022-00393-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  480. Rachineni K.; Rao Kakita V. M.; Awasthi N. P.; Shirke V. S.; Hosur R. V.; Chandra Shukla S. Identifying Type of Sugar Adulterants in Honey: Combined Application of NMR Spectroscopy and Supervised Machine Learning Classification. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 272–277. 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  481. Coelho H.; de las Rivas M.; Grosso A. S.; Diniz A.; Soares C. O.; Francisco R. A.; Dias J. S.; Compañon I.; Sun L.; Narimatsu Y.; et al. Atomic and Specificity Details of Mucin 1 O-Glycosylation Process by Multiple Polypeptide GalNAc-Transferase Isoforms Unveiled by NMR and Molecular Modeling. JACS Au 2022, 2, 631–645. 10.1021/jacsau.1c00529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  482. Ma W.; Deng Y.; Xu Z.; Liu X.; Chapla D. G.; Moremen K. W.; Wen L.; Li T. Integrated Chemoenzymatic Approach to Streamline the Assembly of Complex Glycopeptides in the Liquid Phase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 9057–9065. 10.1021/jacs.2c01819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  483. Singh J.; Her C.; Supekar N.; Boons G. J.; Krishnan V. V.; Brooks C. L. Role of Glycosylation on the Ensemble of Conformations in the MUC1 Immunodominant Epitope. J. Pept. Sci. 2020, 26, e3229 10.1002/psc.3229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  484. Delbianco M.; Kononov A.; Poveda A.; Yu Y.; Diercks T.; Jiménez-Barbero J.; Seeberger P. H. Well-Defined Oligo- and Polysaccharides as Ideal Probes for Structural Studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 5421–5426. 10.1021/jacs.8b00254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  485. Kjellberg A.; Weintraub A.; Widmalm G. Structural Determination and Biosynthetic Studies of the O-Antigenic Polysaccharide from the Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O91 Using 13C-Enrichment and NMR Spectroscopy. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 12205–12211. 10.1021/bi9910629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Chemical Reviews are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES