Abstract
To solve the instrument loosening problem, we developed a fibroblast growth factor-2-calcium phosphate composite layer as a novel coating material to improve screw fixation strength. The primary aim of the present study was to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of screws coated with the FGF-2-calcium phosphate composite layer for posterior instrumented surgery of the cervical spine. The trial design was a single-arm, open-label, safety and feasibility study. Patients receiving fusion of the cervical spine from C2 (or C3) to C7 (or T1) were recruited. The primary endpoint to confirm safety was any screw-related adverse events. Seven patients who underwent posterior fusion surgery of the cervical spine were enrolled in the present study. The coated pedicle screws were inserted bilaterally into the lowest instrumented vertebrae. There was only one severe adverse event unrelated with the coated screw. Three out of the fourteen coated screws showed loosening. The present results prove the safety and feasibility of pedicle screws coated with the FGF-2-calcium phosphate composite layer for fusion surgery in the cervical spine. This is the first step to apply this novel surface coating in the field of spine surgery.
Keywords: ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, cervical spine, surgery, neck pain
1. Introduction
Recent advances in spinal instrumentation have improved clinical outcomes for various kinds of spinal pathologies. However, the increased usage of spinal instrumentation has led to the emergence of spinal instrumentation-specific surgical complications including increased risk of infection [1,2,3] instrumentation-related neuro-vascular injury [4,5,6,7,8] and loosening of implants [9,10,11]. Extensive efforts have been made to overcome these instrumentation-related surgical complications. Among these complications, implant loosening, which can lead to the failure of bony fusion potentially resulting in unfavorable clinical outcomes [12], is one emerging surgical complication, especially for older populations with osteoporosis in Japan [13].
To solve the instrument loosening problem, several countermeasures have been proposed. A combination with hook/wire [14] and penetrating endplate screws [15], both of which increase pull-out strength of the screws, has been used as techniques to prevent loosening. Other approaches include using materials, different screw configurations [16,17,18], cement augmentation [19], or various kinds of surface coating [20,21].
We developed an apatite basic fibroblast growth factor (Ap-FGF) coating device as a novel material to improve screw fixation strength [22]. It is composed of a surface coating of hydroxyapatite, which increases initial fixation strength, combined with basic FGF (bFGF) through co-precipitation, which can achieve the controlled release of bFGF and result in increased osteogenesis [23,24,25]. Although the FGF-apatite composite layer itself has an osteoconductive effect, the coated screw has no osteoconductive effects because the bonding between composite layer and screw surface is not so tight, as proven by the extraction test [23]. Therefore, the mechanism preventing screw loosening might promote bone formation around the screw without direct bonding, as shown in our previous basic animal study [23]. We previously performed a trial of Ap-FGF-coated external fixation pins for distal radius fractures in five patients that resulted in no severe adverse events, demonstrating safety and feasibility [26]. We propose that Ap-FGF-coated screws might prevent pedicle screws from loosening.
The primary aim of the present study was to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of Ap-FGF-coated screws for posterior instrumented surgery of the cervical spine.
2. Methods
The trial design was a single-arm, open-label, safety and feasibility study. The registration number was UMIN000026771 (https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000030735 (accessed on 1 August 2017)). Inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in Table 1. Patients receiving long fusion of the cervical spine from C2 (or C3) to C7 (or T1) were recruited. The primary endpoint to confirm safety was any screw-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints were the rate of loosening/breakage of the Ap-FGF-coated pedicle screws and duration until bony fusion, to assess efficacy. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) for neck/arm pain were used to assess clinical outcomes.
Table 1.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria
|
Exclusion criteria
|
Trial Protocol
Ap-FGF Coating
An outline of the steps for processing the Ap-FGF coating is shown in Figure 1. Processing was performed according to good manufacturing practice (GMP) standards in a cell processing facility at our institute. Three screws were coated with Ap-FGF at one time, one for a quality check and two for surgery. The diameter and length of the pedicle screws were determined using a preoperative CT measurement. Titanium alloy pedicle screws were used in the present study (Mounteneer®, DePuy Synthes spine, Bethesda, MA, USA). bFGF (Fiblast®, Kaken Pharma, Tokyo, Japan; 4 μg/mL) was dissolved in an over-saturated phosphate–Ca solution (Otsuka Pharma, Tokyo, Japan) and screws were soaked for 48 h at 37 °C. A specific jig was made to hold the screws within the solution (Figure 2A). After 48 h of soaking, white precipitate on the bottom of the cup and coating on the surface of the screws were confirmed (Figure 2B,C).
Figure 1.
Outline of apatite basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) coating. It is composed of a surface coating of hydroxyapatite, which increases initial fixation strength, combined with bFGF through co-precipitation.
Figure 2.
Apatite bFGF coating. Titanium alloy pedicle screws were used in the present study (Mounteneer®, DePuy Synthes spine, Bethesda, MA, USA). bFGF (Fiblast®, Kaken Pharma, Tokyo, Japan; 4 μg/mL) was dissolved in an over-saturated phosphate–Ca solution (Otsuka Pharma, Tokyo, Japan) and screws were soaked for 48 h at 37 °C. A specific jig was made to hold the screws within the solution (A). After 48 h of soaking, white precipitate on the bottom of the cup and coating on the surface of the screws were confirmed (B,C).
Thickness of the composite layer was approximately 500 nm. Although we did not perform scratch tests, bonding between the screw surface and composite layer was not so strong because most of composite layer remained screw hole after screw extraction test [23]. By histological examination, biodegradation of composite layer showed no difference with apatite alone [23].
One out of three coated screws then served to check quality. The Ap-FGF-coated layer was dissolved in citrate solution and a protein assay (Bradford method), Ca/P concentration (elementary analysis) and bFGF bioassay (NIH 3T3 cell proliferation) were performed. The solution was collected and checked for endotoxins.
Eight patients who underwent posterior fusion surgery of the cervical spine were recruited into the present study (Figure 3 and Table 2). Indications for surgery included ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (6 cases) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (2 cases). The average age at surgery was 59.6 years old (48–64 years old).
Figure 3.
Patient recruitment flow.
Table 2.
Patient demographics.
| Pt. No. | Age | Sex | Main Disease | Comorbidities |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 59 | M | OPLL | DM |
| 2 | 61 | M | OPLL | |
| 3 | 61 | M | OPLL | DM |
| 4 | 64 | M | CSM | RA |
| 5 | 52 | M | OPLL | DM, HT, HL |
| 6 | 74 | M | OPLL | CKD, HT |
| 7 | 48 | M | CSM | dystonia |
| 8 | 58 | M | OPLL | Liver dysfunction |
DM: diabetes mellitus; RA: Rheumatic arthritis; HT: hypertension, HL: hyperlipidemia; CKD: chronic kidney disease.
Ap-FGF-coated pedicle screws were inserted into the lower instrumented vertebrae. All the patients were followed by assessments of clinical outcomes, X-rays (~1 year after surgery), CT (1 week and 6 months after surgery), and laboratory investigations for 1 year after surgery. The definition of screw loosening was a result of observations of a lucent zone measuring 1 mm or more on the CT scan. Bony union was evaluated by continuity between facet joints on a sagittal reconstruction CT multiplanar image 6 months after surgery or motion of spinous process less than 2 mm in flexion–extension X-ray 1 year after surgery.
Adverse events were defined as any symptom or disease observed in a participant after informed consent with or without a causal relationship to the Ap-FGF screw. All adverse-event-related terminology was coded by the investigators according to the ICH International Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, Japanese version (MedDRA/J). Those determinations were performed by an independent data and safety monitoring committee.
All procedures used in this study were approved by the institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients to participate in this study and for publication. The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
3. Results
One patient (No. 2) was excluded because of an incomplete procedure of the screw coating process (saline for the soaking solution had expired, Figure 3). Therefore, seven patients received Ap-FGF-coated pedicle screw insertion.
One patient (No. 4) died from a rupture of an abdominal aneurism six months after surgery. This was considered to have “no relationship with the Ap-FGF screw” (Table 3).
Table 3.
Adverse events.
| Adverse Events (AE) | No. of Patients | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Severe AE | ||
| Death | 1 | rapture of AAA |
| AE | ||
| Laboratory data abnormalities | ||
| CPK elevation | 7 | |
| Liver dysfunction | 4 | |
| Amylase elevation | 1 | |
| Neurological | ||
| C5 palsy | 1 | recovered |
| Others | ||
| Urticaria | 1 | |
| Pneumonia | 1 | |
| Gonitis purulenta | 1 | |
Other adverse events included laboratory data abnormalities, elevation of creatin phospho-kinase (seven cases), liver dysfunction (four cases) and elevation of serum amylase (one case), all of which were considered to have “no relationship with the Ap-FGF-coated screw” (Table 3). As for neurological adverse events, one case of postoperative C5 palsy occurred, which was also considered to have “no relationship with the Ap-FGF-coated screw” (Table 3). Other types of adverse events included pneumonia (one case) and urticaria (one case), both of which was also considered to have “no relationship with the Ap-FGF-coated screw” (Table 3). There was no surgical site infection or malignant diseases during the follow-up period.
Three out of fourteen Ap-FGF screws showed loosening. One of those was positioned incorrectly, possibly influencing loosening. All loosening was detected with follow-up CT six months after surgery (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Bony union was achieved in all patients one year after surgery. All clinical outcomes were favorable. The average JOA score improved from 10.3 points preoperatively to 15.3 points one year after surgery (p = 0.03). Postoperative VAS arm pain was significantly reduced (71.7 mm to 25.6 mm, p = 0.001), although there was no significant difference between pre- and postoperative neck pain (61 mm to 48 mm, p = 0.65).
Figure 4.
Postoperative images of a patient without screw loosening. Patient number 1. Apatite-bFGF-coated pedicle screws were inserted to T1 bilaterally. X-ray (A) and CT (B) obtained 6 months after surgery showed no lucent zone around pedicle screws.
Figure 5.
Postoperative images of a patient with screw loosening. Patient number 3. Apatite-bFGF-coated pedicle screws were inserted to T1 bilaterally. X-ray (A,B) and CT (C) obtained 6 months after surgery showed an apparent lucent zone around pedicle screws (B,C) arrows.
4. Discussion
The present trial showed no adverse events associated with the Ap-FGF screws. The only severe adverse event (SAE) was death due to the rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurism. This SAE was considered to have “no relationship with the Ap-FGF-coated screw” because the patient died six months after surgery and a retrospective check of the preoperative CT revealed the aneurism.
Abnormalities detected by laboratory analyses were determined as “no relationship with the Ap-FGF-coated screw” because the number and degree of abnormalities was comparable to a standard postoperative course and rapidly resolved without any specific treatment. Therefore, they were possibly influenced by surgical invasiveness and/or drugs used in the perioperative period, including anesthetics, analgesics, and antibiotics, and the incidence of those postoperative laboratory abnormalities were similar in previous patients receiving instrumented fusion surgery of cervical spine. Those determinations were performed by independent data and safety monitoring committee. Previous reports revealed that bFGF is safe for the central nervous system because it had been used safely in laboratory investigations and clinical trials for spinal cord injury and brain infarction [27,28]. As for neurological adverse events, one case of postoperative C5 palsy occurred, which was considered to have “no relationship with the Ap-FGF-coated screw” (Table 3) because previous reports revealed incidence of C5 palsy after fusion surgery for cervical spine as approximately 10%, similar incidence in the present study [8].
Our previous report showed that screw loosening occurred up to 40% of the time at the caudal end of the long cervical fusion construct, possibly because long fusion leads to a longer lever arm [29]. Countermeasures for screw loosening at the end of the constructs are mandatory because mechanical stress concentrations can occur there. In the present study, 3 of 14 Ap-FGF pedicle screws inserted to the caudal end of the long fusion loosened. The rate of screw loosening was comparable to our previous series. However, we cannot draw a definitive conclusion because the present study was designed as a single-arm study without any control group. Further exploration using randomized controlled design is mandatory to elucidate the true efficacy of the Ap-FGF coating on the pedicle screw to counteract screw loosening.
5. Conclusions
The present results prove the safety and feasibility of Ap-FGF coating for pedicle screws for fusion surgery in the cervical spine. This is the first step to apply this novel surface coating in the field of spine surgery.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.H., H.M., A.I., M.K. and M.Y.; Methodology, K.N. and A.I.; Validation, Y.H.; Formal analysis, K.N., Y.H. and H.M.; Investigation, K.N., Y.T., E.O., K.M., Y.M., Y.Y., H.N. and Y.S.; Resources, Y.S.; Data curation, Y.S. and M.K.; Writing—original draft, K.N.; Writing—review & editing, Y.H., H.M., Y.T., E.O., K.M., Y.M., Y.Y., H.N., Y.S., A.I. and M.K.; Supervision, M.Y.; Project administration, A.I. and M.Y.; Funding acquisition, M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Tsukuba (protocol code H28-267 and date of approval was 7 April 2017) for studies involving humans.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science: 16K01434, University of Tsukuba grant and National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology grant.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Karczewski D., Pumberger M., Müller M., Andronic O., Perka C., Winkler T. Implications for diagnosis and treatment of peri-spinal implant infections from experiences in periprosthetic joint infections-a literature comparison and review. J. Spine Surg. 2020;6:800–813. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Prinz V., Vajkoczy P. Surgical revision strategies for postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) J. Spine Surg. 2020;6:777–784. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Daldal I., Senkoylu A. Strategies of management of deep spinal infection: From irrigation and debridement to vacuum-assisted closure treatment. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020;8:33. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.11.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peng C.W., Chou B.T., Bendo J.A., Spivak J.M. Vertebral artery injury in cervical spine surgery: Anatomical considerations, management, and preventive measures. Spine J. 2009;9:70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hicks J.M., Singla A., Shen F.H., Arlet V. Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: A systematic review. Spine. 2010;35:E465–E470. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d1021a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lall R., Patel N.J., Resnick D.K. A review of complications associated with craniocervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery. 2010;67 doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f1ec73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Elliott R.E., Tanweer O., Boah A., Morsi A., Ma T., Frempong-Boadu A., Smith M.L. Comparison of screw malposition and vertebral artery injury of C2 pedicle and transarticular screws: Meta-analysis and review of the literature. J. Spinal Disord. Tech. 2014;27:305–315. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31825d5daa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hitchon P.W., Moritani T., Woodroffe R.W., Abode-Iyamah K., El Tecle N.E., Noeller J., Elwy R.K., Nourski K.V. C5 palsy following posterior decompression and instrumentation in cervical stenosis: Single center experience and review. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2018;174:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Young P.M., Berquist T.H., Bancroft L.W., Peterson J.J. Complications of spinal instrumentation. Radiographics. 2007;27:775–789. doi: 10.1148/rg.273065055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rankine J.J. The postoperative spine. Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol. 2014;18:300–308. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1375571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marie-Hardy L., Pascal-Moussellard H., Barnaba A., Bonaccorsi R., Scemama C. Screw loosening in posterior spine fusion: Prevalence and risk factors. Glob. Spine J. 2020;10:598–602. doi: 10.1177/2192568219864341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Verla T., Xu D.S., Davis M.J., Reece E.M., Kelly M., Nunez M., Winocour S.J., Ropper A.E. Failure in cervical spinal fusion and current management modalities. Semin. Plast. Surg. 2021;35:10–13. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rometsch E., Spruit M., Zigler J.E., Menon V.K., Ouellet J.A., Mazel C., Härtl R., Espinoza K., Kandziora F. Screw-related complications after instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine: A systematic literature review with meta-analysis. Glob. Spine J. 2020;10:69–88. doi: 10.1177/2192568218818164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Karakaşlı A., Sekik E., Karaarslan A., Kızmazoğlu C., Havıtçıoğlu H. Are pedicular screws and lateral hook screws more resistant against pullout than conventional spinal hooks and screws in terminal vertebral segment fixation? Eklem Hastalik. Cerrahisi. 2016;27:22–28. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2016.05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Matsukawa K., Yato Y., Kato T., Imabayashi H., Asazuma T., Nemoto K. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbosacral fixation: Penetrating S-1 endplate screw technique: Technical note. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2014;21:203–209. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.SPINE13665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Giavaresi G., Fini M., Giardino R., Salamanna F., Sartori M., Borsari V., Spriano S., Bellini C.M., Brayda-Bruno M. In vivo preclinical evaluation of the influence of osteoporosis on the anchorage of different pedicle screw designs. Eur. Spine J. 2011;20:1289–1296. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1831-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bokov A., Pavlova S., Bulkin A., Aleynik A., Mlyavykh S. Potential contribution of pedicle screw design to loosening rate in patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: An observational study. World J. Orthop. 2021;12:310–319. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i5.310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu M.Y., Tsai T.T., Lai P.L., Hsieh M.K., Chen L.H., Tai C.L. Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw fixation strength in synthetic bones: Effects of screw shape, core/thread profile and cement augmentation. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0229328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ehresman J., Pennington Z., Elsamadicy A.A., Hersh A., Lubelski D., Lehner K., Cottrill E., Schilling A., Lakomkin N., Ahmed A.K., et al. Fenestrated pedicle screws for thoracolumbar instrumentation in patients with poor bone quality: Case series and systematic review of the literature. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2021;206:106675. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Upasani V.V., Farnsworth C.L., Tomlinson T., Chambers R.C., Tsutsui S., Slivka M.A., Mahar A.T., Newton P.O. Pedicle screw surface coatings improve fixation in nonfusion spinal constructs. Spine. 2009;34:335–343. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318194878d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ohe M., Moridaira H., Inami S., Takeuchi D., Nohara Y., Taneichi H. Pedicle screws with a thin hydroxyapatite coating for improving fixation at the bone-implant interface in the osteoporotic spine: Experimental study in a porcine model. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2018;28:679–687. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.SPINE17702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang X., Ito A., Li X., Sogo Y., Oyane A. Signal molecules–calcium phosphate coprecipitation and its biomedical application as a functional coating. Biofabrication. 2011;3:022001. doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/3/2/022001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mutsuzaki H., Ito A., Sakane M., Sogo Y., Oyane A., Ebihara Y., Ichinose N., Ochiai N. Calcium phosphate coating formed in infusion fluid mixture to enhance fixation strength of titanium screws. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2007;18:1799–1808. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3051-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mutsuzaki H., Ito A., Sogo Y., Sakane M., Oyane A., Ochiai N. Enhanced wound healing associated with Sharpey’s fiber-like tissue formation around FGF-2-apatite composite layers on percutaneous titanium screws in rabbits. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2012;132:113–121. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1381-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fujii K., Ito A., Mutsuzaki H., Murai S., Sogo Y., Hara Y., Yamazaki M. Reducing the risk of impaired bone apposition to titanium screws with the use of fibroblast growth factor-2-apatite composite layer coating. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2017;12:1. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0501-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mutsuzaki H., Ito A., Sakane M., Sogo Y., Oyane A., Ochiai N. Fibroblast growth factor-2-apatite composite layers on titanium screw to reduce pin tract infection rate. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2008;86:365–374. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Imagama S., Ogino R., Ueno S., Murayama N., Takemoto N., Shimmyo Y., Kadoshima T., Tamura S., Kuroda M., Matsuyama Y., et al. Systemic treatment with a novel basic fibroblast growth factor mimic small-molecule compound boosts functional recovery after spinal cord injury. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0236050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Paciaroni M., Bogousslavsky J. Trafermin for stroke recovery: Is it time for another randomized clinical trial? Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2011;11:1533–1541. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2011.616888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nagashima K., Koda M., Abe T., Kumagai H., Miura K., Fujii K., Noguchi H., Funayama T., Miyamoto T., Mannoji C., et al. Implant failure of pedicle screws in long-segment posterior cervical fusion is likely to occur at C7 and is avoidable by concomitant C6 or T1 buttress pedicle screws. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2019;63:106–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.





