Skip to main content
STAR Protocols logoLink to STAR Protocols
. 2023 Feb 1;4(1):102084. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102084

Efficient bi-allelic tagging in human induced pluripotent stem cells using CRISPR

Xingjie Ren 1,3,, Maya Asami Takagi 1, Yin Shen 1,2,4,∗∗
PMCID: PMC9918420  PMID: 36853689

Summary

Allelic tagging of endogenous genes enables studying gene function and transcriptional control in the native genomic context. Here, we present an efficient protocol for bi-allelic tagging of protein-coding genes with fluorescent reporters in human iPSCs using the CRISPR-Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair. We detail steps for design, cloning, electroporation, and single-cell clone isolation and validation. The tagging strategy described in this protocol is readily applicable for knockin of other reporters in diverse cell types for biomedical research.

Subject areas: Cell Culture, Genetics, Molecular Biology, CRISPR, Stem Cells

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • Genome editing in human iPSCs using CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein

  • Tagging genes on both alleles with distinct reporters in iPSCs

  • Deriving clonal iPSC lines leveraging single-cell FACS


Publisher’s note: Undertaking any experimental protocol requires adherence to local institutional guidelines for laboratory safety and ethics.


Allelic tagging of endogenous genes enables studying gene function and transcriptional control in the native genomic context. Here, we present an efficient protocol for bi-allelic tagging of protein-coding genes with fluorescent reporters in human iPSCs using the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair. We detail steps for design, cloning, electroporation, and single-cell clone isolation and validation. The tagging strategy described in this protocol is readily applicable for knockin of other reporters in diverse cell types for biomedical research.

Before you begin

Preparation one: Design and order DNA oligos

Inline graphicTiming: 1 h (excluding the time of ordering and delivery of DNA oligos)

Here, we describe the design of gene-specific sgRNA and donor vector for tagging gene of interest with CRISPR-Cas9 mediated homology directed repair.1,2 The sgRNA will be synthesized via in vitro transcription, and the donor vectors will be constructed using Gibson assembly.

  • 1.
    Design the sgRNA.
    • a.
      Find the genomic coordinate of the region centered on the knock-in site.
      Note: The protein tags can be inserted into the N-terminal or C-terminal of the protein of your interest for specific purposes. We inserted EGFP and mCherry tags into C-terminal of SIN3A, and selected the 50 bp upstream and downstream of stop codon of SIN3A as target site for sgRNA design.
    • b.
      Design the sgRNA using online CRISPR sgRNA design program, such as CHOPCHOP (https://chopchop.cbu.uib.no)3 or GuideScan (https://guidescan.com).4
      Note: Select sgRNA based on the following two criteria: (1) specificity with least predicted off-target effects (without perfectly matched or one to two mismatched off-target sites) and (2) located within 50 bp upstream or downstream of knock-in site. As shown in Figure 1A, we picked two sgRNAs for gene SIN3A.
    • c.
      Design the DNA oligos for in vitro sgRNA transcription using the template in Figure 1B.
      Note: The sgRNA search window can be increased to 100 bp upstream or downstream of knock-in site of gene of interest if no sgRNA available from the design. Please note that the knock-in efficiency is decreased rapidly with increasing distance between knock-in site and sgRNA cut site.5 Two sgRNAs can increase the knock-in efficiency, however, the second sgRNA is not necessary if only one high-quality sgRNA can be designed.
  • 2.
    Design the donor vector.
    • a.
      Design the left and right homology arms.
      Note: The homology arms are approximately 500–1,000 bp upstream and downstream of the knock-in site. See Figure 1C for a schematic of donor vectors used for SIN3A as an example. To pick the genomic region as homology arm, we designed two pairs of primers 500–1,000 bp upstream of SIN3A stop codon and 500–1,000 bp downstream of SIN3A stop codon, respectively, by using Primer-BLAST (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/). The primers can also be designed by using other programs. The regions between the forward and reverse primers are used as homology arms. We chose a 501 bp sequence upstream of SIN3A stop codon as the left homology arm (SIN3A left in Figures 2A and 2B), and a 612 bp sequence downstream of SIN3A stop codon as the right homology arm (SIN3A right in Figures 2A and 2B).
    • b.
      Design the DNA oligos for Gibson assembly mediated donor vector cloning.
      Note: Each oligo should contain a partial sequence from donor vector and partial sequence from homology arm of the target gene. Figure 2 and Table 1 illustrate the oligo design for the donor vector used for SIN3A bi-allelic tagging. To prevent the cutting of donor vectors from CRISPR-Cas9 system, we introduced point mutations in the sgRNA spacer or PAM sequence in DNA oligos (Figures 2C–2E).

      Table 1.

      Oligos for amplifying the homology arms and Sanger sequencing
      Oligo name Sequence
      SIN3A-L-F tactgagagtgcaccccgggGAACAGCGAGCTTTTTCAGCC
      SIN3A-L-R gatccgccaccgcccccgggAGGGGCTTTGAATACTGTGCCGTACTTCACACGATACTTG
      SIN3A-R-Neo-F acgagttcttctgaaagcttCTGCAAAGGCAGAGCAGATAACTTGG
      SIN3A-R-Blast-F tatgtgtgggagggctaagcggccgcCTGCAAAGGCAGAGCAGATAAC
      SIN3A-R-R ccatgattacgccgcggccgcAGGCAGCAAGGGAATCGTC
      Sanger-Fs1 agcgggtgttggcgggtgtcgg
      Sanger-Rs1 ccggctcgtatgttgtgtgg
    • c.
      Design the primers for Sanger sequencing to check the sequences of homology arms in donor vectors.
      Note: The location of Sanger sequencing primers is about 50 bp away from the insert. See Figure 2 and Table 1 for the examples of the Sanger sequencing primers used for SIN3A donor vectors.
      Note: For the bi-allelic tagging purpose, two donor vectors have different tags but same homology arms. For example, we designed two donor vectors with the same homology arms, but one contains EGFP and another contains mCherry for SIN3A bi-allelic tagging. Several studies have demonstrated that incorporating blocking mutation in sgRNA PAM or spacer sequence in donor template can increase knock-in efficiency.5,6,7 Consider using synonymous mutations when introducing mutations at sgRNA spacer or PAM sequences in the homology arms to prevent editing to the donor vector. The knock-in efficiency positively correlates with the length of homology arms.8,9 Larger vectors lead to decreased transfection efficiency and cell viability.10
      Note: Basic cloning vector can be used as backbone for donor vector, for example pUC19. Here, we used the vectors containing fluorescent proteins as backbone for SIN3A donor vectors cloning. For each DNA oligo, the capital letters indicate the sequences from homology arms, the lowercase letters indicate the sequences from donor vector backbone, and the underlined capital letters indicate the introduced mutations for preventing the cutting of donor vector from CRISPR-Cas9 system. Please check Figures 2A and 2B for the position of each oligo.
  • 3.

    Order DNA oligos for in vitro sgRNA transcription and Gibson assembly as 25 nmol DNA oligos with standard desalting from IDT or other companies. In addition, order Cas9-NLS protein from NEB, Synthego, or other alternative vendor. You can also order Cas9-NLS protein from QB3 MacroLab in University of California, Berkeley.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic of the sgRNA design for SIN3A bi-allelic tagging

(A) Two sgRNAs were designed for SIN3A bi-allelic tagging. sgRNA-1 is located in upstream of the SIN3A stop codon, and sgRNA-2 is located in downstream of the SIN3A stop codon.

(B) The oligos used for in vitro transcription of sgRNA-1 and sgRNA-2. The T7 promoter in the forward primers is labeled skyblue, and the partial sgRNA scaffold sequence in the reverse primers is labeled purple.

(C) Schematic of the EGFP and mCherry donor design for SIN3A bi-allelic tagging. The sequences upstream and downstream of the SIN3A stop codon were selected as the left and right homology arms for C-terminal bi-allelic tagging.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Design of EGFP and mCherry donor vectors

(A and B) The EGFP and mCherry donor vectors for SIN3A bi-allelic tagging. The left homology arm is the sequence preceding the SIN3A stop codon, and the right homology arm is the sequence following the SIN3A stop codon. EGFP, mCherry, neomycin, and blasticidin sequences are used for the bi-allelic tagging of SIN3A. T2A and P2A self-cleaving peptides are used for the translation of multiple proteins from the same mRNA transcript.

(C) Example of a primer for left homology arm insertion. Silent mutations are made in the sgRNA spacer to inhibit the cutting of donor vectors by the CRISPR-Cas9 system.

(D and E) Examples of primers for right homology arm insertion. A point mutation is made in the PAM sequence to disrupt the cutting of donor vectors by the CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Preparation two: Human induced pluripotent stem cells maintenance

Inline graphicTiming: 1–2 weeks

Here, we describe the procedure for thawing, passaging, and cryopreserving human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines. The information is provided for optimizing iPSCs growth, nucleofection, and isolating single clones with desired genotyping. We use WTC11-i3N iPSC line11 as an example for bi-allelic tagging of SIN3A.

  • 4.
    Cell culture plate preparation with Matrigel coating.
    • a.
      Thaw Corning Matrigel hESC-qualified Matrix on ice in a 4°C refrigerator for >12 h.
    • b.
      Once the Matrigel is thawed, swirl the vial to ensure that Matrigel is homogeneous.
    • c.
      Dispense each aliquot with the amount making 25 mL Matrigel after dilution in pre-cooled 50 mL conical tubes.
    • d.
      Store the aliquot in −80°C.
    • e.
      Thaw one frozen aliquot of the Matrigel on ice for at least 2 h. Dilute the aliquot with 25 mL of cold DMEM/F-12 medium, and processed to the next step or store at 4°C for up to 1 week.
    • f.
      Coat a cell culture plate with prepared Matrigel by adding an appropriate amount of Matrigel into the plate (Table 2). Incubate the plate with Matrigel in a 37°C / 5% CO2 incubator for at least 30 min before use.

Optional: The Matrigel can be collected and reused if the incubation time is less than 2 h.

  • 5.
    Thawing iPSCs.
    • a.
      Prepare Matrigel coated plate as described in steps 4e-4f.
    • b.
      Label the plate with cell line, passage number, date, and operator initials.
    • c.
      Remove vial of frozen iPSC from the liquid nitrogen tank and place it on dry ice.
    • d.
      Add 10 mL DMEM/F-12 medium into a 15 mL conical tube.
    • e.
      Thaw vial in a 37°C water bath until only a small ice pellet can be seen. Quickly transfer the cell suspension to the prepared 15 mL conical tube using P1000 and mix 2–3 times.
    • f.
      Centrifuge the conical tube for 5 min in a swinging-bucket centrifuge at 200 × g and 20°C–25°C.
    • g.
      Carefully aspirate the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in an appropriate volume (see Table 2 for volume) mTeSR1 medium with Rock inhibitor (final concentration is 10 μM).
    • h.
      Remove the Matrigel from coated well and add cell suspension to the well.
    • i.
      Place in a 37°C / 5% CO2 incubator, gently shaking plate left/right and up/down to ensure even seeding.
    • j.
      Replace media daily with mTeSR1 (without Rock inhibitor). Once until cells reach 80%–90% confluency, they need to be passaged.
  • 6.
    Passaging iPSCs.
    • a.
      Prepare a Matrigel coated plate as described in steps 4e-4f.
    • b.
      Label the plate with cell line, passage number, date, and operator initials.
    • c.
      Remove 80%–90% confluent plate from incubator and aspirate spent media. Wash the plate with DPBS, using a volume equal to the volume of culture medium.
    • d.
      Aspirate DPBS and add Accutase (see Table 2 for volume).
    • e.
      Incubate the plate at 37°C for 5 min. Check cells for detachment by gently shake the plate. If < 90% detachment is observed, incubate the plate for an additional 1–2 min, and check again until 90% detachment is observed.
    • f.
      Add DMEM/F12 (2× of the volume of Accutase) and mix the cell suspension up and down. Transfer the cell suspension to an appropriately sized conical tube. Wash the plate with DMEM/F12 again (2× the volume of Accutase) and transfer into the same conical tube.
    • g.
      Centrifuge at 200 × g for 5 min at 20°C–25°C.
    • h.
      Aspirate supernatant and resuspend cell pellet in an appropriate volume of mTeSR1 with Rock inhibitor (see Table 2 for volume).
    • i.
      Aspirate the Matrigel from coated well and seed cells into the well with splitting ratio of 1:6 to 1:10.
    • j.
      Place in a 37°C / 5% CO2 incubator, gently shaking plate left/right and up/down to ensure even seeding.
    • k.
      Replace media daily with mTeSR1 (without Rock inhibitor) until cells reach 80%–90% confluence.
  • 7.
    Freezing iPSCs.
    • a.
      Prepare cryovials by labeling with cell line, passage number, number of cells per vial, date, and operator initials.
    • b.
      Collect the cells from the plate as cell pellet using the same procedure in passaging step.
    • c.
      Aspirate supernatant and resuspend cell pellet in an appropriate volume of freezing medium.
    • d.
      Dispense cell suspension into pre-labeled cryovials and place vials in a freezing container.
    • e.
      Freeze the container at −80°C for 24 h then transfer the vials to liquid nitrogen for long-term storage.

Table 2.

The amount of reagents used for iPSC maintenance and passaging

Matrigel (mL/well) Medium (mL/well) Accutase (mL/well)
6-well plate 1 mL 2 mL 0.5 mL
24-well plate 0.25 mL 0.5 mL 0.15 mL
96-well plate 0.05 mL 0.15–0.2 mL N/A

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Bacterial and virus strains

Stellar Chemically Competent Cells Takara Cat# 636763

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Matrigel Corning Cat# 354277
mTeSR1 STEMCELL Technologies Cat# 85850
DMEM/F-12 Gibco Cat# 11330032
Y-27632 (Rock inhibitor) STEMCELL Technologies Cat# 72304
DPBS Life Technologies Cat# 14190-144
LB broth Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# BP9722-500
LB agar Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# BP9745-500
QuickExtract DNA Extraction Solution Lucigen Cat# QE09050
Ampicillin sodium salt Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# BP1760-25
Penicillin-Streptomycin Gibco Cat# 15070063
EDTA Invitrogen Cat# 15575020
HEPES Gibco Cat# 15630080
Fetal bovine serum HyClone Cat# SH30396.03
CloneR STEMCELL Technologies Cat# 05888
CloneR 2 STEMCELL Technologies Cat# 100-0691
Essential 8 Medium Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A1517001
XmaI NEB Cat# R0180S
NotI NEB Cat# R0189S
Accutase STEMCELL Technologies Cat# 07920
TE buffer Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 12090015
Nuclease-free water Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# R0582

Critical commercial assays

Human Stem Cell Nucleofector Kit 1 Lonza Cat# VPH-5012
E.Z.N.A. Plasmid DNA Mini Kit Omega Bio-tek Cat# D6942-02
Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System Promega Cat# A9282
QIAGEN Plasmid Plus Midi Kit QIAGEN Cat# 12943
Wizard SV Genomic DNA Purification System Promega Cat# A2360
NEBNext High-Fidelity 2× PCR Master Mix NEB Cat# M0541S
NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly Master Mix NEB Cat# E2621S
GoTaq Green Master Mix Promega Cat# M7123
Precision sgRNA Synthesis Kit Invitrogen Cat# A29377
QIAGEN RNeasy Plus Mini Kit QIAGEN Cat# 74134
iScript cDNA synthesis kit Bio-Rad Cat# 1708891
Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# Q32851
0.22 μm filtration system Millipore Cat# SCGP00525

Experimental models: Cell lines

WTC11-i3N From Gan Lab PMID: 28966121

Oligonucleotides

sgRNA-1-forward: TAATACGACTCACTATAGAACAAGTATCGTGTCAAATA IDT N/A
sgRNA-1-reverse: TTCTAGCTCTAAAACTATTTGACACGATACTTGTT IDT N/A
sgRNA-2-forward: TAATACGACTCACTATAGACACCCCAAGTTATCTGCTC IDT N/A
sgRNA-2-reverse: TTCTAGCTCTAAAACGAGCAGATAACTTGGGGTGT IDT N/A
SIN3A-L-F: tactgagagtgcaccccgggGAACAGCGAGCTTTTTCAGCC IDT N/A
SIN3A-L-R: gatccgccaccgcccccggg
AGGGGCTTTGAATACTGTGCCGTACTTCACACGATACTTG
IDT N/A
SIN3A-R-Neo-F: acgagttcttctgaaagcttCTGCAAAGGCAGAGCAGATAACTTGG IDT N/A
SIN3A-R-Blast-F: tatgtgtgggagggctaagcggccgcCTGCAAAGGCAGAGCAGATAAC IDT N/A
SIN3A-R-R: ccatgattacgccgcggccgcAGGCAGCAAGGGAATCGTC IDT N/A
Sanger-Fs1: agcgggtgttggcgggtgtcgg IDT N/A
Sanger-Rs1: ccggctcgtatgttgtgtgg IDT N/A
gF1: TCCCTCGGTTATACTAACGCATG IDT N/A
gR1: AGCTGGTGGATGGCACTAAG IDT N/A
EGFP-R: CTTCATGTGGTCGGGGTAGC IDT N/A
mCherry-R: CAAGTAGTCGGGGATGTCGG IDT N/A
Neo-F: CGATGATCTCGTCGTGACCC IDT N/A
BSD-F: GTACCGCCACCATGGCCAAGCCTTTGTCTCA IDT N/A
NANOG-F: GTCCCAAAGGCAAACAACCC IDT N/A
NANOG-R: GCTGGGTGGAAGAGAACACA IDT N/A
POU5F1-F: TGCAGGCCCGAAAGAGAAAG IDT N/A
POU5F1-R: GATCTGCTGCAGTGTGGGTT IDT N/A
SOX2-F: TACAGCATGATGCAGGACCAG IDT N/A
SOX2-R: AGCCGTTCATGTAGGTCTGC IDT N/A

Recombinant DNA

SIN3A EGFP donor This paper N/A
SIN3A mCherry donor This paper N/A

Software and algorithms

SnapGene SnapGene https://www.snapgene.com/

Other

6-well plate GenClone Cat# 25-105
24-well plate GenClone Cat# 25-107
96-well plate GenClone Cat# 25-109
PCR 8-tube stripes USA Scientific Cat# 1402-4700
Nucleofector 2b Device Lonza Cat# AAB-1001
FACS tubes Falcon Cat# 352235
15 mL polystyrene conical tube Corning Cat# 352096
Freezing tubes Greiner Bio-One Cat# 122277
NanoDrop Thermo Fisher Scientific N/A
Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer Invitrogen Cat# Q32866

Materials and equipment

DNA oligo solution

Reagent Amount Final stock concentration Final working stock concentration
DNA oligo Whole oligo 100 μM 20 μM
TE buffer Variable N/A N/A

Note: Store the resuspended DNA oligos at −20°C for up to years.

Matrigel solution

Reagent Final concentration Amount
Matrigel 100 μg/mL Variable
DMEM/F-12 N/A 25 mL

Note: Store the Matrigel solution at 4°C for up to 1 week. The amount of Matrigel is calculated based on the protein concentration of Matrigel stock.

iPSC culture medium

Reagent Final concentration Amount
mTeSR1 basal medium N/A 400 mL
mTeSR1 5× supplement 100 mL
Total N/A 500 mL

Note: Store the medium at 4°C for up to 2 weeks and −20°C for up to 6 months.

FACS buffer

Reagent Final concentration Amount
0.5 M EDTA 2 mM 0.2 mL
1 M HEPES pH 7.0 25 mM 1.25 mL
Fetal Bovine Serum 1% 0.5 mL
Penicillin-Streptomycin 1% 0.5 mL
DPBS N/A 47.55 mL
Total N/A 50 mL

Note: The FACS buffer should be filtered with 0.22 μm filtration system and stored at 4°C for up to 2 months.

Step-by-step method details

Cloning donor vectors

Inline graphicTiming: 1–2 weeks (for steps 1 to 17)

The purpose of this step is to clone the donor vectors for tagging the target gene. The left and right homology arms are inserted into the donor using Gibson assembly.

Note: The isolated genomic DNA will be used as template for amplification of homology arms. We isolated genomic DNA from WTC11-i3N iPSCs,11 which is the parental line we used for SIN3A bi-allelic tagging.

  • 2.

    Amplify the left and right homology arms from the isolated genomic DNA using NEBNext High-Fidelity 2× PCR Master Mix and DNA oligos listed in Table 1. Set up two PCR reactions for each homology arm as below.

Component Amount (50 μL reaction)
20 μM forward primer 0.5 μL
20 μM reverse primer 0.5 μL
Genomic DNA (200 ng) Variable
NEBNext High-Fidelity 2× PCR Master Mix 25 μL
Nuclease-free water To 50 μL

Note: The homology arms can be amplified using other high fidelity DNA polymerase.

  • 3.

    Perform amplification using the cycling parameters below.

Steps Temperature Time Cycles
Initial Denaturation 98°C 1 min 1
Denaturation 98°C 15 s 30
Annealing 55°C 30 s
Extension 72°C 1 min
Final extension 72°C 1 min 1
Hold 4°C Forever

Note: The temperature used for amplification depends on DNA polymerase and DNA oligos.

  • 4.

    Digest the backbone (the EGFP donor and mCherry empty donor vectors without homology arm) using the reaction below for left homology arm insertion (Figure 3A). Incubate the digestion reaction at 37°C for 1 h.

Component Amount (50 μL reaction)
EGFP / mCherry empty donor 2,000 ng
XmaI 1 μL
rCutSmart buffer (10×) 5 μL
Nuclease-free water To 50 μL

Note: The backbones we used are two premade pUC57 based empty donor vectors in our lab, which contain either EGFP or mCherry fluorescent protein without homology arms. Other basic cloning vectors can also be used as backbone for donor vector cloning, for example pUC19. The reporters used for tagging can be inserted into the basic cloning vector before homology arms cloning, or together with homology arms using multiple fragment assembly.

Component Amount
EGFP / mCherry empty donor fragment 50 ng
Left homology arm fragment 2–5 fold molar ratio to donor fragment
NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly Master Mix 10 μL
Nuclease-free water To 20 μL
  • 7.

    Transform Stellar chemically competent cells with 2 μL of the chilled assembled product, following the transformation protocol (https://www.takarabio.com/documents/User Manual/PT5055/PT5055-2.pdf).

  • 8.

    Perform 8 or 16 colony PCR reactions for each donor vector and set up the colony PCR reactions as below. The use of one primer targeting backbone and one primer targeting insert can reduce the false positive colonies.

Component Amount (20 μL reaction)
20 μM forward primer 0.5 μL
20 μM reverse primer 0.5 μL
GoTaq Green Master Mix 10 μL
Nuclease-free water 9 μL

Note: We used Sanger-Fs1 and SIN3A-L-R for left homology arm confirmation, SIN3A-R-Neo-F, SIN3A-R-Blast-F and Sanger-Rs1 for right homology arm confirmation (see Table 1 for oligo sequences).

  • 9.

    Perform amplification using the cycling parameters below. Run the PCR product on the agarose gel and select the colonies with successful insertion based on the size of PCR product.

Steps Temperature Time Cycles
Initial Denaturation 95°C 2 min 1
Denaturation 95°C 30 s 32
Annealing 55°C 30 s
Extension 72°C 1 min
Final extension 72°C 5 min 1
Hold 4°C Forever
  • 10.

    Culture 3–5 positive colonies using 6 mL LB broth with Ampicillin for each and extract plasmid DNA by E.Z.N.A. Plasmid DNA Mini Kit using the manufacturer’s protocol (https://ensur.omegabio.com/ensur/contentAction.aspx?key=Production.3647.S2R4E1A3.20190204.67.4680522).

  • 11.

    Confirm the sequence of left homology arm by Sanger sequencing using the Sanger sequencing primer Sanger-Fs1 in Table1.

  • 12.

    Analyze the Sanger sequencing results and confirm the sequence of left homology arm in both EGFP and mCherry donors with Snapgene.

  • 13.

    Pick one EGFP donor and one mCherry donor with the correct left homology arm sequence for right homology arm insertion.

  • 14.

    Prepare the digestion reaction for the EGFP and mCherry donor vectors with left homology arm with NotI (Figure 3B). Incubate the reaction at 37°C for 1 h.

Component Amount (50 μL reaction)
EGFP / mCherry donor vector with left homology arm 2,000 ng
NotI 1 μL
NEBuffer r3.1 (10×) 5 μL
Nuclease-free water To 50 μL

Note: We will add the donor plasmids together with Cas9/sgRNA ribonuclease protein complex into nucleofection reaction in later step. Their volume should not exceed 10% of the total reaction volume. We usually elute the donor vectors from midi-prep with 100 μL elution buffer to make the final concentration of each donor vector around 2,000 ng/μL. The quality of donor plasmid is important for successful tagging. We checked the integrity of donor vectors before use by using agarose gel electrophoresis.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The cloning strategy for SIN3A donor vectors

(A) Insertion of the left homology arm by Xmal linearization of backbone followed by left homology arm insertion with Gibson assembly.

(B) Insertion of the right homology arm by NotI linearization of the vectors from step A followed by right homology arm insertion with Gibson assembly.

Synthesis of sgRNA

Inline graphicTiming: 1 day (for steps 18 to 20)

The purpose of this step is to synthesize sgRNA using the precision sgRNA synthesis kit, which is a complete in vitro transcription system for rapid synthesis and purification of sgRNA ready for nucleofection.

  • 18.
    PCR assemble the sgRNA DNA template.
    • a.
      Set up the PCR assembly reaction as below to amplify the sgRNA DNA template. The DNA oligos are listed in Figure 1B.
      Component Amount
      Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix (2×) 12.5 μL
      Tracr Fragment + T7 Primer Mix 1 μL
      0.3 μM sgRNA forward and reverse oligo mix 1 μL
      Nuclease-free water 10.5 μL
    • b.
      Perform assembly PCR using the cycling parameters below.
      Steps Temperature Time Cycles
      Initial Denaturation 98°C 10 s 1
      Denaturation 98°C 5 s 32
      Annealing 55°C 15 s
      Final extension 72°C 1 min 1
      Hold 4°C Forever
    • c.
      Confirm the template assembly by running 5 μL of the PCR product against a DNA ladder on a 2% Agarose Gel. The correct size of sgRNA DNA template is about 120 bp.
  • 19.
    Perform in vitro transcription.
    • a.
      Set up the following in vitro transcription (IVT) reaction, adding the reaction components in the order given.
      Component Amount
      NTP mix (100 mM each of ATP, GTP, CTP, UTP) 8 μL
      sgRNA DNA template (from step 18) 6 μL
      5× TranscriptAid Reaction Buffer 4 μL
      TranscriptAid Enzyme Mix 2 μL
    • b.
      Mix the reaction components thoroughly, centrifuge briefly to collect all drops, and incubate at 37°C for 2 h.
      Note: You can set up multiple transcription reactions or extend the incubation up to 4 h for higher sgRNA yields. In our hand, each transcription reaction can produce about 40 μg sgRNA at 2 h of incubation.
    • c.
      Add 1 μL of DNase I into the reaction mix after the transcription reaction, mix by pipetting, and incubate at 37°C for 15 min to remove the sgRNA DNA template.
    • d.
      Dilute 0.5 μL of the IVT product in 10 μL of nuclease-free water, and mix with RNA loading dye.
    • e.
      Heat the sample at 70°C for 10 min to denature the sgRNA and chill on ice, then run on a 2% Agarose Gel against an RNA Ladder to check the integrity of synthesized sgRNA. The expected sgRNA transcript size is 100 bases.
  • 20.
    Purify in vitro transcribed sgRNA.
    • a.
      Adjust the volume of the IVT product to 200 μL with nuclease-free water.
    • b.
      Add 100 μL of Binding Buffer. Mix thoroughly by pipetting.
    • c.
      Add 300 μL of ethanol (>96%) and mix by pipetting.
    • d.
      Transfer the mixture to the GeneJET RNA Purification Micro Column and centrifuge for 30–60 s at 14,000 × g. Discard the flow-through.
    • e.
      Add 700 μL Wash Buffer 1 and centrifuge for 30–60 s at 14,000 × g. Discard the flow-through.
    • f.
      Add 700 μL Wash Buffer 2 and centrifuge for 30–60 s at 14,000 × g. Discard the flow-through and repeat.
    • g.
      Centrifuge the empty purification column for an additional 60 s at 14,000 × g to completely remove any residual Wash Buffer and transfer the purification column to a clean 1.5 mL collection tube.
    • h.
      Add 15 μL of nuclease-free water to the center of the purification column filter, and centrifuge for 60 s at 14,000 × g to elute the sgRNA.
    • i.
      Check the concentration of the sgRNA with NanoDrop or Qubit. Make 4 μg aliquots for each sgRNA with PCR tubes and freeze them at −80°C. sgRNA is generally stable at −80°C for more than one year without degradation.

Deliver CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing reagents into cells using nucleofection

Inline graphicTiming: 3–4 days (for steps 21 to 36)

The purpose of this step is to deliver the in vitro assembled Cas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complex and donor vectors into the cells using nucleofection. We used the Lonza Nucleofector 2b Device and Human Stem Cell Nucleofector Kit 1 for nucleofection of iPSCs.

  • 21.

    Prepare the iPSCs for nucleofection. Grow 1 million iPSCs for 1 nucleofection.

Note: High quality iPSCs with normal morphology and growth rate are very important for successful tagging. The iPSCs are ready for nucleofection when they reach to 80%–90% confluency. Meanwhile, maintain the growth of iPSC, which will be used as control in the cell sorting step.

  • 22.

    Prepare the Matrigel coated well for seeding nucleofection cells.

Note: We usually prepare 2 wells of a 6-well plate for 1 nucleofection.

  • 23.

    Assemble the Cas9/sgRNA ribonuclease protein complex in vitro (Tube 1) and prepare donor plasmids (Tube 2) as below. Incubate them at 20°C–25°C for 15–20 min.

Tube 1: Cas9/sgRNA complex Tube 2: Donor plasmids
Cas9-NLS protein 16 μg EGFP donor 3 μg
sgRNA 1 4 μg mCherry donor 3 μg
sgRNA 2 4 μg

Note: Make sure the total volume of tube 1 and tube 2 does not exceed 10 μL.

  • 24.
    Harvest the cells by following steps 6c–6f in before you begin part.
    • a.
      Count and aliquot 1 million cells into one 15 mL conical tube.
    • b.
      Centrifuge the 1 million cells at 200 × g for 5 min at 20°C–25°C.
  • 25.

    During centrifuging, prepare 4 mL mTeSR1 medium with Rock inhibitor for 1 nucleofection.

  • 26.

    Remove the Matrigel from the 6-well plate and add 1 mL of the prepared medium into each well.

  • 27.

    Transfer the conical tube with cell pellet back to cell culture hood when centrifuging is done and proceed to the next step.

  • 28.

    Combine 82 μL nucleofector solution with 18 μL supplement from Lonza Human Stem Cell Nucleofector Kit 1, and then combine with Cas9/sgRNA complex and donor plasmids together.

  • 29.

    Remove the supernatant completely from the cell pellet. Resuspend the cell pellet carefully with the mixed nucleofection reagents from step 28.

  • 30.

    Transfer the cell suspension into the nucleofector cuvette using a P200 pipet and avoid creating any bubbles.

Note: Any bubbles in the cuvette will destroy the nucleofection reaction or decrease the transfection efficiency.

  • 31.

    Gently tap the nucleofector cuvette to make sure the sample covers the bottom of the cuvette.

  • 32.

    Transfer the cuvette with a closed lid to Lonza nucleofector and start nucleofection process.

Note: We used Lonza nucleofector 2b device with program A-023.

  • 33.

    Take out the cuvette immediately when nucleofection process is finished.

  • 34.
    Resuspend the cells in the cuvette with the prepared mTeSR1 medium.
    • a.
      Add 1 mL of the prepared mTeSR1 medium from step 25 into the cuvette.
    • b.
      Transfer the cell suspension to the prepared Matrigel coated wells from step 26 using the provided single use pipet by adding 0.5 mL into each well.
    • c.
      Wash the cuvette with 1 mL medium again and transfer 0.5 mL to each well.

Note: In this step, we seed the 1 million cells after nucleofection into 2 wells of a 6-well plate with 0.5 million per well.

  • 35.

    Gently shake the plate left/right and forward/backward to ensure even seeding. Incubate the cells in a 37°C / 5% CO2 incubator.

  • 36.

    24 h after nucleofection, change the culture medium daily with mTeSR1 medium without Rock inhibitor and grow the nucleofection cells for 3–4 days to let them reach 80%–90% confluency.

Note: Lonza 4D-Nucleofector system can also be used for human iPSC nucleofection. We tested Lonza 4D-nucleofector with P3 Primary Cell 4D-Nucleofector X Kit L for WTC11 iPSCs and turned out with successful nucleofection.

Generating tagged clonal cell lines with single-cell sorting

Inline graphicTiming: 4 h (for steps 37 to 41)

The purpose of this step is to sort the bi-allelically tagged single cell into 96-well plate by Fluorescence-activated Cell Sorting (FACS) and establish the bi-allelically tagged iPSC clones.

  • 37.

    Prepare Matrigel coated 96-well plate.

  • 38.

    Remove the Matrigel when the coating is done and add 150 μL of the mTeSR1 medium (with Rock inhibitor and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin) into each well of the 96-well plate.

Note: We usually prepare 2 plates for one target gene.

  • 39.

    Detach the nucleofection cells and control cells without nucleofection with Accutase. Resuspend the cells with FACS buffer to 2 × 106 cells/mL.

  • 40.
    Sort the bi-allelically tagged single cells into the prepared 96-well plate by using BD FACSAria II cell sorter. Please ensure the cell sorter has lasers to detect the fluorescent proteins used for tagging, for example, 488 nm laser for detecting EGFP, 561 nm laser for detecting mCherry (Figure 4).
    • a.
      Use the control cells and set the gate to separate the cells from debris based on the forward scatter area (FSC-A) and side scatter area (SSC-A).
    • b.
      Use the control cells and set the gate for single cells using forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC).
    • c.
      Set the baseline for EGFP and mCherry signal using control cells.
    • d.
      Switch to the nucleofection cells and set the gate for EGFP and mCherry double positive cells.
    • e.
      Sort the EGFP and mCherry double positive cells from nucleofection cells into 96-well plate with 1 cell/well using single cell mode.

Note: For successful bi-allelic tagging, you should see four cell populations in FACS plot, two single positive populations, one double positive population and one double negative population (Figure 4B). The bi-allelic tagging efficiency may vary among different targets. The percentage of the double positive population for SIN3A bi-allelic tagging is about 0.15%.

Note: Plate alignment is a crucial step for plate-based single cell sorting. We noticed the plate sizes vary from different manufacturers. To ensure cells are appropriately collected at the center of each well, please check the plate position by releasing testing droplets to the wells.

  • 41.

    Incubate 96-well plates in a 37°C / 5% CO2 incubator.

Note: Refresh half media with 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin every 3 days for the first week with a 200 μL multichannel pipette without perturbing the cells. The Penicillin-Streptomycin will inhibit any contamination from sorting. Clones become visible after 1 week. Check the clones with a microscope and mark the clones with only one colony in the well. After one week, refresh half or whole media every 2 days for another week.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Single-cell sorting strategy of the SIN3A bi-allelically tagged cells

(A and B) Cells were separated from the debris of various sizes based on the forward scatter area (FSC-A) and side scatter area (SSC-A) (Gata 1: SSC-A versus FSC-A). Then, single cells were separated using a single cell gate based on the width and area metrics of the forward scatter (Gate 2: FSC-W verse FSC-A) and side scatter (Gate 3: SSC-W versus SSC-A). Further, the gata for EGFP and mCherry negative cells were set using control cells without nucleofection (Gate 4: EGFP versus mCherry). Four cell populations were observed in the SIN3A nucleofection cell pool compared to the control cells. The EGFP and mCherry double positive population contains the cells with allelic tagging for two alleles of SIN3A.

Validating tagged cell lines by genotyping PCR

Inline graphicTiming: 1 day (for steps 42 to 52)

The purpose of this step is to verify the bi-allelically tagged clones with genotyping PCR.

  • 42.

    Design the genotyping primers to confirm the successful bi-allelic tagging.

Note: We designed 4 pairs of genotyping primers for SIN3A bi-allelic tagging (Figure 5A, Table 3). For each pair, one primer should target the genomic sequence outside of the homology arm, and another primer should target the insertion sequence, for example, the EGFP, mCherry, neomycin, and blasticidin sequences for SIN3A bi-allelic tagging.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Validation of SIN3A bi-allelically tagged clone with genotyping PCR

(A) Schematic of the primers designed for genotyping.

(B) PCR results demonstrating the successful knock-in of EGFP and mCherry reporters into the SIN3A locus.

(C) PCR results demonstrating the successful bi-allelic tagging of SIN3A.

Table 3.

Oligos for genotyping PCR of SIN3A bi-allelically tagged clone

Oligo name Sequence
gF1 TCCCTCGGTTATACTAACGCATG
gR1 AGCTGGTGGATGGCACTAAG
EGFP-R CTTCATGTGGTCGGGGTAGC
mCherry-R CAAGTAGTCGGGGATGTCGG
Neo-F CGATGATCTCGTCGTGACCC
BSD-F GTACCGCCACCATGGCCAAGCCTTTGTCTCA
  • 43.

    Start the experimental validation of the clones when they reach about 80% confluency (usually takes 2 weeks). Check the labeled clones in step 41 with a microscope and select the clones with normal morphology for genotyping.

Note: We usually pick 24 clones at one time.

  • 44.

    Prepare Matrigel coated 24-well plates and add 0.5 mL mTeSR1 medium with Rock inhibitor into each well.

  • 45.

    Directly scratch the marked wells in a vertical, horizontal, and circular way using a P200 pipet to detach the cells in the well.

  • 46.

    Pipet up and down gently to mix the cell suspension, then transfer half to the prepared 24-well plate for passaging, and half to the PCR tube for genomic DNA extraction.

  • 47.
    Extract the genomic DNA.
    • a.
      Spin down the PCR tube with a mini centrifuge to get the cell pellet.
    • b.
      Remove the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet with 50 μL QuickExtract DNA Extraction Solution.
    • c.
      Incubate the cell suspension at 65°C for 15 min, 98°C for 5 min, and 4°C forever. Then, the lysis can be directly used as PCR template.
  • 48.

    Set up the genotyping PCR reaction as below.

Component Amount (20 μL reaction)
20 μM forward primer 0.5 μL
20 μM reverse primer 0.5 μL
Genomic DNA lysis 5 μL
GoTaq Green Master Mix 10 μL
Nuclease-free water 4 μL
  • 49.

    Perform amplification using the cycling parameters below.

Steps Temperature Time Cycles
Initial Denaturation 95°C 2 min 1
Denaturation 95°C 30 s 32
Annealing 55°C 30 s
Extension 72°C 1 min
Final extension 72°C 5 min
Hold 4°C Forever
  • 50.

    Check the PCR product with agarose gel electrophoresis.

Note: We checked the SIN3A bi-allelic tagging clone with two types of PCR, either amplify the left part and right part of the insertion (Figure 5B), or amplify the whole insertion region (Figure 5C). The amplification of the left part and right part of the insertion confirms the insertion happened in correct genomic location. The amplification of the whole insertion region confirms the whole insertion happed in a bi-allelic manner.

  • 51.

    Check the DNA sequence of the PCR product with Sanger sequencing (Figure 6).

  • 52.

    Expand the correct clones based on the genotyping PCR and Sanger sequencing, and make cryogenic stock for them.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Sanger sequencing results of the genotyping PCR product for the SIN3A bi-allelically tagged clone

(A–C) Results displaying the successful insertion of designed sequences into the SIN3A locus.

Functional characterization of the tagged cell lines

Inline graphicTiming: 2 weeks (for steps 53 to 55)

The purpose of this step is to characterize the bi-allelically tagged clones using different functional assays. Here, we checked the expression of fluorescent reporters in iPSCs, iPSCs-derived glutamatergic neurons and iPSCs with different passages to confirm the genetic stability of the reporters. We also checked the expression of pluripotency markers in the tagged clones to verify that the reporters do not change the pluripotency of iPSCs.

  • 53.
    Check the expression of fluorescent reporters from the bi-allelically tagged clones by flow cytometry.
    • a.
      Collect the bi-allelically tagged clones and control cells with Accutase and resuspend the cells with FACS buffer to 2 × 106 cells/mL.
    • b.
      Perform flow cytometry analysis for the clones with BD LSRFortessa cell analyzer, or other flow cytometry cell analyzer. Set the single cell gate and baseline of each fluorescent protein by using the control cells same as step 40.

Note: For SIN3A bi-allelically tagged clone, we saw both EGFP signal and mCherry signal, which indicate the successful expression of fluorescent reporters from SIN3A locus (Figures 7A and 7B).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Functional characterization of the SIN3A tagged cell line

(A and B) Flow cytometry analysis of the SIN3A bi-allelically tagged clone. The iPSCs of SIN3A clone show positive EGFP and mCherry signals in the 2D plot (A) and histogram (B) of the flow cytometry analysis.

(C) RT-qPCR results show the expression levels of NANOG, POU5F1, and SOX2 are the same between the SIN3A bi-allelically tagged clone and the parental cell line. Error bars represent the s.d.

(D and E) Flow cytometry analysis of the differentiated neurons from SIN3A bi-allelically tagged clone. The neurons show positive EGFP signal and mCherry signals in the 2D plot (D) and histogram (E) of the flow cytometry analysis.

Note: We checked the expression of NANOG, POU5F1 and SOX2 in the parental cell line and the bi-allelically tagged clone and did not observe a significant difference, which indicates the insertion of fluorescent reporters do not influence the pluripotency of the tagged clone (Figure 7C).

  • 55.
    Check the genetic stability of the bi-allelically tagged clones during cell culture cycle and differentiation.
    • a.
      Thaw the clone from the cryogenic stock made in step 52 by following the step 5 in before you begin part.
    • b.
      Passage the clone 3 times and check the expression of fluorescent reporters by flow cytometry to make sure the tagged fluorescence reporters can be stably maintained during cell culture cycle.
    • c.
      Check the genetic stability of the bi-allelically tagged clones during differentiation. The detailed protocol for differentiation is available from ENCODE portal (https://www.encodeproject.org/documents/d74fb151-366c-4450-9fa0-31cc614035f9/).
    • d.
      Seed 2 × 106 cells of the bi-allelically tagged clone in one Matrigel-coated well in 6-well plate, and feed the cells with Pre-differentiation Medium for three days.
    • e.
      Dissociate the pre-differentiated cells using Accutase. Seed the dissociated cells into Poly-L-Ornithine-coated plates with 1 × 106 cells per well in 6-well plate. Maintain the differentiation culture for two weeks.
    • f.
      Perform flow cytometry analysis for the differentiated glutamatergic neurons with BD LSRFortessa cell analyzer, or other flow cytometry cell analyzer. Set the single cell gate and baseline of each fluorescent proteins by using the control cells same as step 40.

Note: For the differentiated glutamatergic neurons from SIN3A bi-allelically tagged clone, we saw both EGFP signal and mCherry signal, which indicate the fluorescent reporters can be maintained during neuronal differentiation (Figures 7D and 7E).

Expected outcomes

Tagging endogenous genes is a powerful technology for monitoring gene expression and characterizing protein function. The bi-allelic tagging enables real-time monitoring gene expression and protein subcellular localization in an allelic manner, characterizing cis vs. trans elements that affect the gene expression, and facilitate pooled CRISPR screening to identified genetic components essential for phenotypes associated with target gene expression. The expected outcome of this protocol will be the bi-allelically tagged clones for the gene-of-interest. Tagging the target gene with one fluorescent protein results in both homozygous and heterozygous knock-in. The cells with heterozygous knock-in could have undesired indel on the non-tagged allele. Two alleles tagging can minimize such unwanted editing events. Furthermore, this protocol can be applied to simultaneously tag two genes.

We usually get about 0.1% positive rate of double positive cells in human iPSC 3–4 days after transfection without any selection. Compared to double positive cells, the positive rate of cells with only one fluorescent protein is about 6 to 16-fold higher. For any batch of transfection, we only need 100,000 cells to sort a full plate of single cells into a 96-well plate. From a 96-well plate, we usually get about 30 survival clones and 80% of the established clones have successful knock-in of both EGFP and mCherry fluorescent reporters, making entire tagging strategy highly efficient.

Limitations

The gene expression level varies among different genes and diverse cell types. We select the positive allelic tagging cells based on the expression of fluorescent proteins driven by the promoter of the gene-of-interest. This strategy is not suitable for silent genes. To solve this problem, an additional promoter can be added upstream of fluorescent proteins and flanked by loxP sites. The additional promoter can be removed by Cre-mediated excision in the final clones. Additional optimization includes using efficient sgRNA, increasing the transfection efficiency, and antibiotic selection will further increase the success rate.

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

Rampant cell death after nucleofection (section “deliver CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing reagents into cells using nucleofection”, steps 35, 36).

Potential solution

Double check the nucleofection program is optimized for your cell line. Double check the quality of donor vectors by gel electrophoresis and NanoDrop. Purify the donor vectors again if the quality is not good for nucleofection.

Problem 2

The bi-allelic tagging efficiency is low (section “generating tagged clonal cell lines with single cell sorting”, step 40).

Potential solution

Grow the nucleofection cells longer to get more cells for sorting. Treat the nucleofection cells with antibiotics when antibiotic resistance genes are added in the donor vector to enrich the cells with successful tagging. Use longer homology arms to increase tagging efficiency. Test sgRNA cutting efficiency in vitro and select the effective sgRNA for nucleofection. Reduce the size of the donor vectors to increase the transfection efficiency of donor vectors. Test the transfection efficiency using a control plasmid, for example the pmaxGFP vector in LONZA human stem cell nucleofector kit.

Problem 3

The low survival rate from single cell sorting in 96-well plate (section “generating tagged clonal cell lines with single cell sorting”, step 41).

Potential solution

Sort single cells into multiple 96-well plates to get more survival clones. Add live cell marker in cell suspension for sorting, for example, SYTOX Blue or DAPI, and exclude the dead cells based on the signal of the live cell marker when setting up the gate for single cell sorting. Use the media specifically designed for improving the survival of human iPSCs in single-cell workflows, for example, CloneR, CloneR 2.

Problem 4

No band or only non-specific band is amplified (section “validating tagged cell lines by genotyping PCR”, step 50).

Potential solution

Optimize the PCR program or use another DNA polymerase. Purify or clean the extracted genomic DNA to provide the high quality DNA template for PCR. Design and order more oligos for PCR.

Problem 5

The Sanger sequencing reaction is failed or shows mixed peaks (section “validating tagged cell lines by genotyping PCR”, step 51).

Potential solution

Amplify more PCR product and clear the PCR product using gel extraction. Extract the genomic DNA using other genomic DNA traction kit. Make sure the cell population is clonal.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Yin Shen (yin.shen@ucsf.edu).

Materials availability

The EGFP and mCherry donor backbone used in this study are available on request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Cooper Beaman, Xi Chen, Ian R. Jones, Vivek Narayan, Han Yang, and Xiekui Cui for their comments and suggestions. This work was supported by the NIH grant UM1HG009402. This work was made possible in part by the NIH grants P30DK063720 and S101S10OD021822-01 to the UCSF Parnassus Flow Cytometry Core.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S., X.R.; investigation, X.R.; writing – original draft, X.R.; writing – review & editing, X.R., M.T., Y.S.; supervision, Y.S.; funding acquisition, Y.S.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Contributor Information

Xingjie Ren, Email: xingjie.ren@ucsf.edu.

Yin Shen, Email: yin.shen@ucsf.edu.

Data and code availability

This study did not generate or analyze any datasets or code.

References

  • 1.Mali P., Yang L., Esvelt K.M., Aach J., Guell M., DiCarlo J.E., Norville J.E., Church G.M. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013;339:823–826. doi: 10.1126/science.1232033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cong L., Ran F.A., Cox D., Lin S., Barretto R., Habib N., Hsu P.D., Wu X., Jiang W., Marraffini L.A., Zhang F. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339:819–823. doi: 10.1126/science.1231143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Labun K., Montague T.G., Krause M., Torres Cleuren Y.N., Tjeldnes H., Valen E. CHOPCHOP v3: expanding the CRISPR web toolbox beyond genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W171–W174. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schmidt H., Zhang M., Mourelatos H., Sánchez-Rivera F.J., Lowe S.W., Ventura A., Leslie C.S., Pritykin Y. Genome-wide CRISPR guide RNA design and specificity analysis with GuideScan2. bioRxiv. 2022 doi: 10.1101/2022.05.02.490368. Preprint at. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Paquet D., Kwart D., Chen A., Sproul A., Jacob S., Teo S., Olsen K.M., Gregg A., Noggle S., Tessier-Lavigne M. Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9. Nature. 2016;533:125–129. doi: 10.1038/nature17664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Okamoto S., Amaishi Y., Maki I., Enoki T., Mineno J. Highly efficient genome editing for single-base substitutions using optimized ssODNs with Cas9-RNPs. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:4811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41121-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schubert M.S., Thommandru B., Woodley J., Turk R., Yan S., Kurgan G., McNeill M.S., Rettig G.R. Optimized design parameters for CRISPR Cas9 and Cas12a homology-directed repair. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:19482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98965-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oh S.A., Senger K., Madireddi S., Akhmetzyanova I., Ishizuka I.E., Tarighat S., Lo J.H., Shaw D., Haley B., Rutz S. High-efficiency nonviral CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing of human T cells using plasmid donor DNA. J. Exp. Med. 2022;219:e20211530. doi: 10.1084/jem.20211530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shy B.R., MacDougall M.S., Clarke R., Merrill B.J. Co-incident insertion enables high efficiency genome engineering in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:7997–8010. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Søndergaard J.N., Geng K., Sommerauer C., Atanasoai I., Yin X., Kutter C. Successful delivery of large-size CRISPR/Cas9 vectors in hard-to-transfect human cells using small plasmids. Commun. Biol. 2020;3:319. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-1045-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang C., Ward M.E., Chen R., Liu K., Tracy T.E., Chen X., Xie M., Sohn P.D., Ludwig C., Meyer-Franke A., et al. Scalable production of iPSC-derived human neurons to identify tau-lowering compounds by high-content screening. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9:1221–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This study did not generate or analyze any datasets or code.


Articles from STAR Protocols are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES