Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2023 Jan 25;9(2):e13075. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13075

Isolation and characterization of crude-oil-dependent bacteria from the coast of Ghana using oxford nanopore sequencing

Mark Kwasi Sarfo a,, Samuel Fosu Gyasi b,c, Amos Tiereyangn Kabo-Bah a, Bright Adu d, Quaneeta Mohktar d, Andrew Sarkodie Appiah f, Yaw Serfor-Armah e
PMCID: PMC9918745  PMID: 36785818

Abstract

The utilization and improper use of crude oil can have irreparable damage on the environment and human populations. This study sought to isolate hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria from 1% v/v pristine seawater and 1% v/v crude oil using enrichment culture techniques. Whole genome sequencing of DNA using the Oxford Nanopore sequencing technique with Fastq WIMP as the workflow at 3% abundance was undertaken. The results showed that the most abundant isolates identified using this technique at specific sampling sites were, Acinetobacter junii (51.9%), Alcanivarax pacificus (15.8%), Acinetobacter haemolyticus (21.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23.4%), Alcanivorax xenomutans (24.7%), Alcanivorax xenomutans (23.0%) Acinetobacter baumannii (40.0%) and Acinetobacter junii (14.2%). Cumulatively, the most abundant isolates in the 8 sampling sites were Acinetobacter junii (17.91%), Alcanivorax xenomutans (11.68%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7.68%), Escherichia coli (7.67%), Acinetobacter haemolyticus (3.40%), and Alkanivorax pacificus (3.10%). Spearman's rank correlation analysis to examine the strength of relationship between the physicochemical parameters and type of bacteria isolated, revealed that salinity (0.8046) and pH (0.7252) were the highest. Isolated bacteria from pristine seawater, especially Escherichia coli have shown their capacity for bioremediating oil spill pollution in oceanic environments in Ghana.

Keywords: Jubilee oil, Coast of Ghana, Hydrocarbon, Bacteria, Sequencing

Graphical abstract

Image 1

1. Introduction

No amount of emphasis can be placed enough on how crucial it is for mankind to utilize the natural environment on a global scale. However, the misuse, exploitation, and poor use of these resources have permanently damaged the ecosystem, which has had an impact on human populations. Several human endeavors including petroleum hydrocarbon extraction have contributed significantly to the release of pollutants into the environment [1]. Specifically, there have been concerns with heavy metal contamination, organic and inorganic compounds absorption, ingestion and their introduction into the food chain [2]. Also, the crude oil value chain spanning exploration, storage, transportation and final usage has the potential to exacerbate environmental pollution [3]. The crude oil is the original mixture of a variety of petroleum hydrocarbons including alkanes, cycloalkanes, and various aromatic hydrocarbons. Other organic compounds contain relatively higher amounts of nitrogen, oxygen, and sulfur, plus trace amounts of metals such as lead, iron, nickel, copper, and vanadium [4]. Crude oil is the most widespread contaminant within the marine environment [5]. There is ample evidence to support the devastating nature of these crude oil related issues, owing to spills and leakages from distribution channels and storage tanks as well as effluent discharge from production platforms into the immediate environment [3,6]. Pollution by hydrocarbons in marine environments may be the consequence of various natural (natural seepages), anthropogenic activities (discharge during tanks or ships transportation and pipeline failures) as well as other chronic pollution channels (ships, harbours, oil terminals, freshwater run-off, rivers and sewage systems) [7]. Spills from offshore drilling, pipelines and ships are equally significant contributions to the problem. Additionally, according to the Oil Spill Intelligence Report, spills in the size range of at least 34 tons have occurred in the waters of 112 nations since 1960 [5]. Commercial production of crude oil started in Ghana in late 2010 due to the discovery of the product in large quantities in 2007 at Cape Three Point in the Western Region. The first major spillage of 584 barrels in Ghana, made up of low-based mud drilling fluids occurred on December 26, 2009 in the drilling field of Cape Three Point. Another mud spill of 7 barrels took place on March 23, 2010 at the same location [8] (Ghanaian Daily Graphic, 2010). Additionally, a Ministerial Committee set up by the Ministry of Environment, Science and Technology recommended that Jubilee's partner, KOSMOS, was fined $35 million for negligent spilling of 699 barrels of oil mud which contains poisonous heavy metals (eg. arsenic, cadmium, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, zinc, etc.) on three occasions with the potential to affect Ghana's offshore ecosystem [9]. To mitigate these in an environmentally friendly and cost-effective manner, the use of oil eating microbes (bacteria) has been recommended [10,12].

Bacteria are the most predominant microbes in petroleum hydrocarbon biodegradation. They are the main degraders of spilt crude oil in several ecosystems [10]. Petroleum hydrocarbons can serve as the only carbon source for several bacteria for growth and respiration [11]. Bacterial species of genera Achromobacter, Acinetobacter, Arthrobacter, Azoarcus, Brevibacterium, Cellulomonas, Corynebacterium, Flavobacterium, Marinobacter, Micrococcus, Nocardia, Ochrobactrum, Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomaonas and some pieces of Vibrio are reported examples of hydrocarbon degraders. Their fungi counterpart also include genera Aspergillus, Amorphoteca, Fusarium, Graphium, Neosartoria, Paecilomyces, Penicillium, Sporobolomyces, Talaromyces. For yeast, the genera of Candida, Pichia, Pseudozyma Rhodotorula and Yarrowia also play vital roles in petroleum hydrocarbon pollutant degradation [12].

In Ghana, biodegradation of marine crude oil pollution using native bacterial consortium is yet to be fully exploited. The concept of microbial biodegradation has been successfully employed for soil pollutants remediation in mechanic workshops. This is also common for small scale refineries/processing units although this approach has rarely been employed on a large-scale basis for marine and oceanic pollution control.

In an attempt to remedy these challenges, oil waste management companies in Ghana have tried to employ conventional methods such as chemical stabilization, thermal treatment, precipitation and solidification. However, these approaches have failed to yield the needed results due to its high cost and potentially detrimental consequences to the environment [13,14]. There is therefore the need for a paradigm shift in combating this challenge. Till date, published data in relation to the use of bacteria to bioremediate oil polluted fields are yet to be fully explored. Studies to elicit empirical data in this area is urgently warranted. The present study investigated the capacity of indigenous bacterial strains to remediate crude oil spills in marine environments along the coast of Ghana.

2. Methodology

2.1. Study design

A cross sectional study design was employed for this study from February 2021 to May 2022.

2.2. Study area

Ghana has a coastline that is about 550 km long (Fig. 1). It is generally low lying with contours not exceeding 30 m above sea level. Coastal communities are mainly permanent indigenous settlements which are exposed to the varying conditions of the sea [15,16]. Several shores within coastal communities continue to serve as natural harbors aiding trade among the coastal communities. The beaches along the coast also attract tourist, whiles some are wetlands and estuaries serving as habitat for aquatic lives [17].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Map of Ghana showing the Jubilee Oil Field where oil samples were collected [21].

Over the years, Ghana's climate has become drier and unpredictable with rainfall patterns showing variation of high and low distributions along the coast and in the country at large. There has generally been a reduction in the average annual rainfall and a transfer of the heaviest rains to the south -western corner of the country [18]. The location of Ghana within the tropical region has caused weather phenomena from the mesoscale, like thunderstorms to El Nino Southern Oscillation on the larger scale [19] to influence its weather systems to varying degrees. However, the Inter Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) accounts for the June to September main rainy season. Also, the February to May rainy season which is the smaller of the two is as a result of the interaction between the eastward moving mid-latitude cold air and the tropical warm air, to create the appropriate moisture conditions that come into Ghana from the Atlantic Ocean to create rainfall [20].

2.3. Study approach

The study approach involved the In vitro bioaugmentation of microcosms, where simulated crude oil spills on the sea were remediated using indigenous cultured bacteria within specific time frames.

2.3.1. Crude oil sampling

Samples of Jubilee crude oil were obtained from the Radiation Protection Institute (RPI) of the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission (GAEC). The samples comprise oils from different wells within a specific geographical location (60 km offshore between the Deepwater Tano and West Cape Three Points blocks), pumped in sessions at different times (Fig. 1). The first batch of oils were pumped in December 2010 and the batch used for this analysis was the 31st composite obtained in February 2016 [22]. About 1 L of the crude oil sample was collected in a plastic bottle, clearly labeled and kept at room temperature in the laboratory without any treatments prior to the analysis.

2.3.2. Sea water sampling

Sea water samples were collected from the shores of Keta, Accra, Takoradi, Axim, Tema, Winneba, Saltpond and Cape Coast representing the 3 geological basins of the coast of Ghana (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Map Showing Three Distinct Oil Basins in Ghana where water samples were collected.

Sample collection was done on 3 consecutive occasions between the months of April and July 2021. The samples were collected using sterile plastic scoops into sterile 250 ml polyethylene bottles (Kane-EM Industries, Ghana) and immediately stored on ice. Prior to collection, the plastic bottles were autoclaved after washing and rinsing them with dilute nitric acid followed by distilled water. Sea water was collected onshore, at 10 M and 20 M offshore at each sampling location and homogenized to ensure a representative sample. Samples were kept on ice in an ice chest, transported to the laboratory and stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C [23]. Selected physicochemical parameters analyzed included; electrical conductivity, pH, temperature, salinity and Total dissolved solids (TDS). These were measured on site using a low range combo HANNA HI98129 m (Slovenia) following the manufacturer's instructions.

2.3.3. Laboratory analysis

Microbiological analyses were carried out within 24 h after sample collection according to International Standards organization (ISO) and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) standards [24,25].

2.3.3.1. Preparation of Mineral Salt Medium (MSM) for bacterial growth

Mineral salts medium (MSM) and Agar (without carbon content) used in this study was prepared using 10 g NaCl; 0.42 g MgSO4·7H2O; 0.29 g KCI; 0.83 g KH2PO4; 1.25 g K2HPO4; 0.42 g NaNO3 and dissolved in 1 L of distilled water. The mineral salt agar was prepared by dissolving 15 g of bacteriological Agar in 1 L MSM [26]. The media was autoclaved at a pressure of 15 pounds per square inch (psi) using a BST-PA20L portable autoclave (Bionics Scientific, India) for 30 min and readied for inoculation.

2.3.3.2. Isolation and selection of crude-oil-degrading bacteria

Enrichment culture techniques were employed for the isolation of bacteria [27]. A set of eight (8) 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 ml of sterile mineral salts medium (MSM) (autoclaved and allowed to cool) were inoculated with 1 ml of crude oil and 1 ml of sea water each. An IKA vortex GENIUS 3 (USA) was used to shake the mixture and stored at 28 °C for 7 days in an Avantor INCU-Line incubator, USA. The control set up did not include crude oil to test for contamination. A 1 ml aliquot of the set up was sub-cultured onto a fresh 100 ml MSM with 1 ml crude oil every 7 days for 4 consecutive times and incubated under the same conditions. After 4 cycles, 1 ml of the culture was pipetted into nutrient broth for storage and further analysis.

2.4. Identification of crude-oil -degrading bacteria

2.4.1. Gram staining

Preliminary bacterial identification was done using gram staining to determine the success of the bacteria culture and enrichment processes.

The Gram staining method by Coico [28] was adopted for this work.

The slides were then observed under a microscope of magnification: 100× 1.25 oil (Richter Optica).

2.5. DNA extraction and whole genome sequencing

2.5.1. Bacterial DNA extraction

Extraction of the genomic DNA from bacterial cultures was done using a Zymo DNA extraction kit (Zymo Research, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. This was carried out at the Biotechnology Center of the Biotechnology and Nuclear Agricultural Research Institute of the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission. The eluted DNA was stored at −20OC until further analysis. The quality of the extracted DNA was determined using 1% agarose gel and viewed under a high performance ultraviolet transilluminator (UVP, Cambridge, UK).

2.5.2. Whole genome sequencing of extracted DNA using the oxford nanopore sequencing method

The DNA extracted from the bacterial cultures were sequenced using an Oxford nanopore sequencer from the Noguchi Memorial Institute, Accra Ghana following the manufacturer's instructions.

2.5.2.1. Purification of DNA using AMPure XP beads

The AMPure XP beads were re-suspended in solution by vortexing. Molecular grade water was used to prepare fresh 80% ethanol from stock. About 10 mM of Tris-HCL (2-Amino-2-hydroxymethyl-propane-1,3-diol/C4H11NO3) buffer at pH 7.5–8.0 was prepared with 50 mM NaCl. About 25 μl of resuspended AMPure XP beads was added to each DNA sample (45 μl–50 μl), and mixed by flicking the tube. The mixture was incubated on a HulaMixer (Thermo Fisher Scientific-USA) for 5 min at room temperature. The sample was briefly spun down using a GCM series mini centrifuge (Thomas Scientific – USA) and pelletized on a magnet. The tube was kept on the magnet (DynaMag™-96 Side Skirted Magnet, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the supernatant pipetted off. The tube was kept on the magnet (DynaMag™-96 Side Skirted Magnet, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 200 μl of freshly prepared 80% ethanol used to wash the beads without disturbing the pellets. The ethanol was subsequently removed using a pipette and discarded. The preceding step was repeated once. The washed tube with beads was spun down (GCM Series Mini Centrifuge Thomas Scientific) and placed back on the magnet and residual ethanol pipetted off and briefly allowed to dry. The tube was removed from the magnetic rack and pellets were re-suspend in 22 μl of 10 mM Tris-HCI (pH 7.5–8.0) and incubated for 2 min at room temperature. The magnetic rack was used to pellet the beads from the eluate to obtain a clear and colourless liquid. About 20 μl of the eluate was pipetted into a clean 1.5 ml Eppendorf DNA LoBind tube.

2.5.2.2. Determination of concentration of DNA using qubit dsDNA Assay Fluorometer (thermofisher)

To determine of the concentration of DNA, the required number of Qubit assay tubes (0.5 ml) for standards and samples was obtained using the required standard tubes (2). The Qubit assay tube lids were labeled appropriately to prevent interference with the sample/standard reads. The Qubit working solution was prepared in a clean plastic tube by diluting the Qubit dsDNA (double stranded) HS reagent (Fluorophores) in the Qubit dsDNA HS (High sensitivity) buffer in the ratio 1:200. A 190 μl aliquot Qubit working solution was pipetted into the tubes to be used for standards 1 and 2. About 10 μl of Qubit working standards (1 and 2) was then added to the appropriate tubes and mixed by vortexing for 2–3 s. A 197 μl volume of Qubit working solution was pipetted into each sample assay tube. A 200 μl final volume for the sample was achieved by adding 3 μl of each sample to the sample assay tubes already containing 197 μl of Qubit working solution and mixed by vertexing for 2–3 s. All the tubes (Samples and standards) were allowed to incubate at room temperature for 2 min. DNA concentration in the samples were measured on the Qubit Fluorometer after calibration of the device with the standards.

2.5.2.3. Normalization of quantified DNA samples

Normalization is required to reduce the concentration of the DNA in each sample that was higher than 100 ng/μl for accurate sequencing reads. The normalization step was not required since all the Qbit values for the samples were all less than 100 ng/μl (Table 4). A 7.5 μl aliquot of DNA was pipetted for the next steps.

Table 4.

Qbit results showing concentration of DNA in samples.

Sample ID Qubit Conc. (ng/ml)
S1 31.00
S2 12192.65
Accra 4.99
Tema 6.04
Keta 10.40
Winneba 3.75
Saltpond 9.13
Cape Coast 3.80
Takoradi 1.96
Axim 2.47
Negative Control too low

Footnote: S1 (Standard 1), S2 (Standard 2).

2.5.2.4. Rapid barcoding

The 7.5 μl of DNA amplicons from the previous step were obtained. A 2.5 μl aliquot of fragmentation mix (Rb 01–12) was added to the sample. The content was mixed gently by flicking the tube and spun down using a portable bench-top centrifuge (GCM Series Mini Centrifuge, Thomas Scientific). The barcoded sample was incubated at 30 OC for 1 min and then at 80 OC for 1 min using Veriti™ Dx 96-well thermal cycler (Thermofisher Scientific-USA) and briefly cooled on ice. All the barcoded samples were pooled into a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube (super pool) and the total volume noted.

2.5.2.5. Concentration of the super pooled library and ligation of the rapid adapter (RAP)

A 1 μl aliquot of Rapid Sequencing Adapter (RAP) was added to 10 μl of barcoded DNA totalling 11 μl pool. The combination was gently mixed by flicking the tube and content spun down with a mini centrifuge. The mixture was incubated for 5 min at room temperature for complete reaction (ligation) between the RAP and barcoded DNA. The prepared library was stored on ice briefly before loading to the MinION (SpotOn) flow cell.

2.5.2.6. Priming and loading the SpotON flow cell

The MinION flow cell was obtained and MinKNOW GUI software opened on a computer making sure the device was connected to a reliable internet source. The flow cell was carefully inserted into the MinION. The number of active pores available for sequencing was checked (800 nanopores or above) to ensure a successful run. The sequencing buffer (SQB), loading beads (LB), flush tether (FLT) and one tube of flush buffer (FB) were thawed and shook thoroughly. The flow cell priming mix was prepared by adding 30 μl Flush tether (FLT) directly into one tube of flush buffer (FB) and mixed by pipetting up and down. The flow cell priming port cover was opened by turning the cover clockwise 90°. Air bubbles were eliminated using a P1000 pipette set at 200 μl. A continuous butter was ensured from the priming port across the sensor array. An 800 μl aliquot of the priming mix was loaded into the flow cell through the priming port. A mandatory 5-min pause was observed. The content of the loading beads (LB) was thoroughly mixed by pipetting up and down. The library (11 μl of barcoded DNA with RAP) was prepared for analysis by adding 34 μl of sequencing buffer (SQB), 25.5 μl of Loading Beads (LB) and 4.5 μl of Molecular grade water. The SpotON flow cell sample port was opened to make the SpotON port accessible. Additional 200 μl of the priming mix was loaded into the flow cell via priming port. The prepared library was mixed by pipetting up and down prior to loading. A 75 μl aliquot of the sample was added into the flow cell via SpotON sample port, in dropwise manner. The SpotON sample and priming ports were closed and MinION covered with lid. The sequencing run was started immediately using the MinKNOW software.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline characterization of sea water and crude oil samples

Table 1 below shows the results for physicochemical analysis of sea water samples from along the coast of Ghana. The parameters measured for the sea water included temperature, pH, conductivity, TDS and Salinity. There were no significant variations in the parameters measured for the sampling sites. The highest and lowest temperatures were 27.2 and 26.0 corresponding to Cape Coast and Keta respectively. The mean temperature recorded for all the sampling sites was 26.8. The highest electrical conductivity value was 53.12 (Cape Coast) while the lowest (51.28) was recorded at Tema. The mean EC value for all sampling sites obtained was 52.15. Salinity values ranged between 34.02 (Saltpond) and 31.94 (Tema) with the average salinity value for all sampling sites being 32.84.

Table 1.

Physicochemical Parameters of Sea water.

Community Temperature (oC) Conductivity (μS cm−1) pH TDS (mg L−1) Salinity (mg L−1)
Accra 26.8 51.42 8.04 26.74 32.51
Tema 27.2 51.28 8.26 26.95 31.94
Keta 26.0 52.83 7.91 25.90 32.01
Winneba 26.4 51.48 8.12 26.41 33.35
Saltpond 27.1 52.18 8.70 26.82 34.02
Cape Coast 27.2 53.12 8.51 27.53 33.29
Takoradi 26.9 52.73 8.06 26.15 32.91
Axim 26.5 52.19 8.11 25.28 32.7 5

Footnote: Data on physicochemical parameters are presented as means of three replicate measurements TDS (Total dissolved solids).

Spearman's Rank Correlation analyses were performed to examine the strength of relationship between the parameters (predictors) and the type of bacteria cultured at the various sites. The results are presented in Table 2. Salinity had the highest correlation (ρ=0.8046) with type of bacteria. This suggests a strong positive correlation between the two variables. Similarly, pH had a strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.7252. Both relationships were found to be statistically significant at significance level of 0.05. All the independent factors were found to have a positive correlation with the type of Bacteria with the exception of Electrical Conductivity which showed a negative but insignificant correlation with the type of bacteria.

Table 2.

Correlation Analyses to examine the strength of relationship between the parameters.

Parameter (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Temperature (1) 1.000
Electrical Conductivity (2) −0.0846 1.000
PH (3) 0.7245* 0.1158 1.000
TDS/g/L (4) 0.7269* −0.0456 0.6273* 1.000
Salinity (5) 0.3155 0.1801 0.7079* 0.2608 1.000
Type of Bacteria 0.3510 −0.1059 0.7252* 0.5396* 0.8046* 1.000

Footnote: Numbers attached to parameters correspond with type of bacteria on the last row.

Table 3 presents the result of a Dominance analysis performed to compare the relative importance of the predictors. The result clearly ranks salinity as the most important predictor of the type of bacteria followed by pH with electrical conductivity being the least important predictor.

Table 3.

Dominance Analysis on Relative Importance of factors for Bacterial Determination.

Parameters/Units Dominance Stat. Standardized Dominance Stat. Ranking
Salinity (mg L−1) 0.3808 0.4286 1
TDS (mg L−1) 0.1471 0.1656 3
pH 0.2434 0.2740 2
Electrical Conductivity (μS cm−1) 0.0442 0.0497 5
Temperature (oC) 0.0729 0.0820 4

3.2. Assessment of enrichment culture technique with crude oil as the sole carbon source using gram staining

Gram staining was the technique employed to ascertain the success of the bacteria culture and enrichment processes. Crude oil was the sole carbon source used for the isolation process. On the whole, the results (Fig. 3A–H) showed the presence of a mixture of gram positive (violet to blue) and gram negative (pink to red) bacteria present in most the samples at varying degrees. It also showed that some the cells were rod-like (bacillus) and others spherical (cocci). Some were joined in chains (streptobacillus and streptococcus) and others were clumped together (Staphylococcus).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Microscopic images of Gram-stained Bacteria Isolates. A: Accra isolate, B: Tema isolate, C: Weneba Isolate, D: Cape Coast isolate, E: Takoradi isolate, F: Axim isolate, G: Keta isolate, H: Saltpond isolate.

Specifically, results from Accra (Fig. 3A) showed that there were more spherical shaped (single and clumped together) bacteria compared to other features. There also appeared to show higher proportions of gram-positive bacteria compared to gram negative bacteria. Results from Tema (Fig. 3B) however had higher portions of streptococci compared to those from Accra. Another notable result showed that the bacteria from Winneba (Fig. 3C) had higher proportions of streptobacilli compared to the rest of the sampling sites. The rest had mixtures of different bacteria in varying degrees.

Assessment of Quality of Extracted DNA: Results from the Agarose gel electrophoresis of the extracted DNA of the samples are shown in Fig. 4. DNA bands were visualized for all the samples analyzed. All the 8 samples viewed in a high performance ultraviolet transilluminator showed tight bands with no detectable smearing. The negative control did not have any observable band.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Agarose gel electrophoresis of bacterial genomic DNA. 1: Accra isolate, 2: Tema isolate, 3: Negative control: 4: Weneba Isolate, 5: Cape Coast isolate, 6: Takoradi isolate, 7: Axim isolate, 8: Keta isolate, 9: Saltpond isolate.

3.3. Assessment of DNA concentration and normalization

The DNA concentrations were measured using Qubit dsDNA Assay Fluorometer (Thermofisher) and results shown in Table 4. The Standard solutions used to calibrate the equipment (S1 and S2) gave concentrations of 31.00 ng/ml and 12192.65 ng/m respectively on the fluorometer. A high proportion of extracted DNA had concentrations lower than 10.00 ng/ml. The highest and lowest concentration recorded were 10.40 and 1.96 ng/ml corresponding to Keta and Takoradi respectively. None of the readings exceeded the 100 ng/ml mark, indicating that there was no need for further dilution before proceeding to the next step.

3.4. Analysis of bacterial Community Composition -profiling of crude oil dependent bacteria

Bacterial diversity along the coast of Ghana was analyzed based on culture dependent methods and capacity to degrade crude oil. Bacterial isolates were obtained from 8 communities spanning the 3 geological basins of the coast of Ghana (Fig. 2). The types of bacteria isolated from each community in this study using the Oxford Nanopore Sequencing technique are presented in Table 5. The Oxford Nanopore sequencing technique using Fastq WIMP as the workflow at 3% abundance was used to analyse the DNA samples extracted from bacteria cultured on Mineral Salt Medium (MSM) with crude oil as the sole carbon source. A total of 1,468,046 reads were done and analyzed. Of this number, 1, 164, 690 reads were classified whiles 303,356 reads were unclassified. Out of the 1,164,690 bacteria classified using the Oxford Nanopore technique, the 6 most common bacteria species isolated at 3% abundance were Acinetobacter junii Alcanivorax xenomutans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli. Acinetobacter haemolyticus, and Alkanivorax pacificus (Fig. 6). The phylogenetic tree showing the relationships between the identified species of bacteria is shown in Fig. 5.

Table 5.

Bacteria Species identified in each community using the Oxford Nanopore Sequencing technique at 3% Abundance.

Bar Code Community Isolated Bacteria
66 Tema Escherichia coli, Alcanivorax xenomutans, Acinetobacter junii, Pseudomonas mendocina, Vibrio fluvialis,
67 Keta Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
72 Accra Escherichia coli, Alcanivorax xenomutans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila, Achromobacter xylosoxidans,
73 Winneba Escherichia coli, Alcanivorax xenomutans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila,
76 Saltpond Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Alcanivorax xenomutans,
83 Axim Escherichia coli, Alcanivorax pacificus, Acinetobacter haemolyticus,
84 Cape Coast Escherichia coli, Alcanivorax pacificus, Acinetobacter haemolyticus, Pseudomonas mendocina, Thalassospira marina
92 Takoradi Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter junii, Alcanivorax xenomutans,

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Combined total abundance of species taxon cumulative reads from sampling.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Phylogenetic Representation of the Most Dominant Bacterial Species Isolated from Eight Communities at 3% abundance Using Fastq WIMP as the Workflow.

At 3% species level, the total number of reads classified was 1,164,690. Majority of the Taxa classified were Acinetobacter junii with a percentage of 17.91, followed by Alcanivorax xenomutans representing 11.68% of the total number of taxa classified. The number of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli bacteria classified were nearly the same with a percentage of 7.68 and 7.67% respectively, followed by Acinetobacter haemolyticus (3.40%) and Alcanivorax pacificus (3.10%), shown in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

The six most abundant bacteria identified as aggregate from the eight sampling sites using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing.

In Fig. 8, each bar represents the percentage of the bacteria with the most counts for the site. More than half (51.9%) of the bacteria found in Takoradi (92) were Acinetobacter Junii. Similarly, Acinetobacter junii topped as the bacteria with the most counts in Tema (66) but with a percentage of 14.2%. In Keta (67), Acinetobacter baumannii had the most counts of bacteria with a percentage of 40. Whereas in Winneba (73), Alcanivorax xenomutans was the bacteria with the most counts, having a percentage of 24.7%.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Most abundant bacteria at each sampling site as identified by the Oxford Nanopore Sequencing.

4. Discussion

The isolation and use of microorganisms for the cleaning of petroleum pollutants has been of major interest to several researchers in recent times. This substantial interest has been due to the proliferation of environmental pollution from petroleum hydrocarbon pollutants and the environmental sustainability in addition to cost effectiveness associated with bioremediation, compared to other conventional (chemical and physical) methods [29]. In this study, microcosm tests were employed for the isolation and characterization of bacteria along the coast of Ghana capable of degrading crude oil. Sea water samples were collected from 8 coastal communities (Accra, Tema, Keta, Winneba, Saltpond, Cape Coast, Takoradi and Axim) where there has not been any crude oil spillage for isolation of bacteria using enrichment culture techniques with mineral salts medium (MSM) and crude oil as the sole carbon source.

The 6 most common bacteria species successfully isolated at 3% abundance using oxford Nanopore Sequencing were Acinetobacter junii Alcanivorax xenomutans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli. Acinetobacter haemolyticus, and Alkanivorax pacificus. The specially prepared Mineral Salts Medium (MSM) [26] containing essential nutrients and minerals coupled with the crude oil and enrichment techniques ensured that bacteria which utilized crude oil were isolated. Hossain et al. [30] utilized enrichment culture techniques using petroleum oil (diesel and burned engine oil) as the sole carbon source. Their research was successful in the isolation of three (3) bacteria species although they did not use pure crude oil. Sudiana et al. [31] also employed a two-step enrichment culture technique using crude oil as the sole carbon source to isolate some bacteria taxa including α-subclass Proteobacteria, β-subclass Proteobacteria and γ subclass Proteobacteria. Furthermore, Erdogan et al. [32] employed enrichment culture techniques using crude oil as the sole carbon source to isolate 33 strains of bacteria in his work on contaminated soils.

The capacity to isolate crude oil degrading bacteria from an uncontaminated area was initially confirmed using the gram staining method. The technique made it possible to characterize the isolated bacteria into gram-positive and gram-negative strains as well as other morphological characteristics such as the shapes of the isolated bacteria. The results showed a mixture of these traits throughout the sampling sites. Samuel et al. [33] employed this technique for the initial confirmation of some bacteria species including Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus, Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Also, Bhagobaty [34] employed gram staining in his work to gain a deeper insight into the microbial communities present in crude oil seeps located at Digboi oilfield in Assam, India. In their study, Zhuang et al. [35] demonstrated this technique by identifying 3 g-positive bacteria using the gram staining technique on naphthalene-degrading bacterial strains from oil-contaminated tropical marine sediments.

The Dominance Analysis performed in this work to compare the relative importance of the predictors (TDS, salinity, pH, conductivity, temperature, etc.) on type of bacteria, showed that salinity was the most important predictor of the type of bacteria to be isolated followed by pH at each sampling site. A similar result was obtained by Rath et al. [36], where salinity and pH were key in predicting the type of bacteria isolated. Additionally, Zhang et al. [37] ascertained the dependence of bacteria type on salinity. The reliability of this assertion was confirmed by the Spearman's Rank Correlation analyses, where the strength of relationship between the parameters measured and the type of bacteria cultured at the various sites was examined. The results clearly showed that Salinity had the highest correlation (ρ = 0.8046) with type of bacteria followed by pH with a positive correlation coefficient of 0.7252 with a statistical significance level of 0.05. Apart from the isolation and initial identification processes to confirm the success of the culturing process, there was the need for further characterization work using DNA sequencing to adequately place the bacteria in their proper genera and species levels.

The extraction was confirmed by gel electrophoreses where 7 out of the eight sampling sites gave tight bands when visualized in the high performance Ultraviolet transilluminator. The site that showed the faintest band was Takoradi which was corroborated by the gram staining results showing sparsely spaced bacterial isolates. Agarose gel Electrophoresis (2%) was utilized by Godini et al. [38] after the amplification of DNA fragments in their work. The Qubit fluorometric results for the concentration of DNA also showed the least concentration of 1.95 ng/ml corresponding to Takoradi. Successful isolation of bacteria and subsequent extraction of DNA suggests the capacity of the isolated bacteria to utilize crude oil for growth and energy requirements. These life processes lead to the mineralization of the crude oil into water and carbon dioxide (CO2). Furthermore, the sampling of sea water near the surface (less than 10 cm), coupled with the culture and isolation procedures being undertaken in oxygenated environments suggests that the bacteria isolated were either aerobic bacteria or facultative anaerobes. Grishchenkov et al. [39] in their work isolated bacterial strains (Pseudomonas sp. BS2201, BS2203 and Brevibacillus sp. BS2202) from petroleum-contaminated soil capable of degrading petroleum hydrocarbons under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

In this study, the Oxford Nanopore Sequencing technique was used to analyse bacterial isolates from the 8 sampling sites. This technique has previously been used to analyse crude oil degrading and other bacteria elsewhere [[40], [41], [42], [43]]. The technique identified several species of bacteria with the 6 most abundant from highest to lowest being; Acinetobacter junii, Alcanivorax xenomutans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter haemolyticus, and Alkanivorax pacificus, occurring in all 8 sampling sites in varying degrees. Similar work by Ohadi et al. [44], using mineral salts medium (MSM) and Iranian light crude oil (ILCO, 1%) as the sole carbon source also identified Acinetobacter junii as the most dominant bacterial isolate using 16S rDNA sequencing for identification.

Another study by Wang et al. [45] on Xiamen Island in China, identified Alcanivorax sp, Acinetobacter sp, and Pseudomonas sp as the most important oil degraders in the area. Ma et al. [46], whose work focused on isolating bacteria using culture-dependent enrichment methods from deep sea hydrothermal vents of the South Mid-Atlantic Ridge, among other isolates found Acinetobacter sp as the dominant bacteria isolate. The survival of these species on crude oil, despite the fact that there has not been any major oil spills persistent along the coast of Ghana implies their capacity to degrade crude oil. Other works have reported the degradation of crude oil by the following species; Acinetobacter junii (46), Alcanivorax xenomutans [47], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [48], Acinetobacter haemolyticus [49] and Alkanivorax pacificus [50]. Interestingly, Escherichia coli was found to have survived on the crude oil as the sole carbon source in all 8 sampling sites during the experiment. This indicates its potential for environmental remediation of crude oil spills. At the time of this work, the degradation of crude oil by Escherichia coli has yet to be reported. However, transformant Escherichia coli has been implicated in crude oil (phenanthrene) degradation [51], and was also isolated in a used engine-oil contaminated soil by Musa [52].

5. Conclusion

Oil spillage and petroleum pollution are now a major cause of environmental vulnerability and Ghana in particular, stands the risk of petroleum pollution. In this study, Acinetobacter junii, Alcanivorax xenomutans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter haemolyticus, and Alkanivorax pacificus isolated from pristine sea water conditions (no crude oil contamination), using enrichment culture techniques with crude oil as the sole carbon source have demonstrated the capacity for crude oil degradation. The findings of this research present a good opportunity for the formulation of environmentally friendly approaches for oil spill remediation in Ghana., Escherichia coli, although being reported for the first time, presents a unique opportunity for crude oil degradation due to its ability to survive on crude oil in all 8 samples in appreciable amounts. Thus, the use of E. coli may require additional study to further establish their involvement and efficiency in crude oil degradation. Although this study looked at the diversity of crude oil degrading bacteria at the coast of Ghana, it did not compare the efficiency of crude oil degradation by the individual isolated bacteria. This study is necessary to identify the best performing bacteria to be used for the management of crude oil spill. Furthermore, the genetic identity of the various bacteria isolated from the coast of Ghana should be assessed for possible existence of unique strains with potentially enhanced ability to degrade crude oil.

Author contribution statement

Mark Kwasi Sarfo, Ph.D.: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper. Samuel Fosu Gyasi, Ph.D.: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data. Amos Tiereyangn Kabo-Bah, Ph.D.: Conceived and designed the experiments. Bright Adu, Ph.D.; Andrew Sarkodie Appiah: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data. Quaneeta Mohktar, BSc.: Performed the experiments; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data. Yaw Serfor-Armah: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability statement

Data will be made available on request.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to the Biotechnology and Nuclear Agricultural Research Institute of the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission, the Regional Center for Energy and Environmental Sustainability (RCEES) of the University of Energy and Natural Resources (UENR) as well as the Noguchi Memorial Institute for their support during the research. Other thanks also go to the communities and fisherfolk for their support during the sampling campaigns.

References

  • 1.Al-Hawash A.B., Dragh M.A., Li S., Alhujaily A., Abbood H.A., Zhang X., Ma F. Principles of microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in the environment. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2018 Jun 1;44(2):71–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sonone S.S., Jadhav S., Sankhla M.S., Kumar R. Water contamination by heavy metals and their toxic effect on aquaculture and human health through food Chain. Lett. Appl. NanoBioSci. 2020;10(2):2148–2166. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rajabi H., Mosleh M.H., Mandal P., Lea-Langton A., Sedighi M. Emissions of volatile organic compounds from crude oil processing–Global emission inventory and environmental release. Sci. Total Environ. 2020 Jul 20;727 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bachmann R.T., Johnson A.C., Edyvean R.G. Biotechnology in the petroleum industry: an overview. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2014 Jan 1;86:225–237. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Webb CC. Bioremediation of Marine Oil Spill.
  • 6.Voon C.H., Yusop N.M., Khor S.M. The state-of-the-art in bioluminescent whole-cell biosensor technology for detecting various organic compounds in oil and grease content in wastewater: from the lab to the field. Talanta. 2022 Jan 29 doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mahjoubi M., Cappello S., Souissi Y., Jaouani A., Cherif A. Microbial bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon–contaminated marine environments. Rec. Insights Petrol. Sci. Eng. 2018 Feb 7;325:325–350. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lawson I., Nartey E. Microbial degradation potential of some Ghanaian soils contaminated with diesel oil. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2012;3(1):1–5. doi: 10.5251/abjna.2012.3.1.1.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Owusu E.K. 2014. Regulation of Operational Pollution from Offshore Oil and Gas Activities in Ghana: Tales from Norway (Master's Thesis, Graduate Studies) [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yang Z., Shah K., Fieldhouse B., Mirnaghi F., Hollebone B.P., Lambert P., Goldthorp M., Brown C.E., Yang C. Characterization, occurrence and natural attenuation of spilled light synthetic crude oil in a boreal freshwater ecosystem. Fuel. 2021 Feb 1;285 [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fakhrzadegan I., Hassanshahian M., Askari Hesni M., Saadatfar A. A study of crude oil‐degrading bacteria from mangrove forests in the Persian Gulf. Mar. Ecol. 2019 Apr;40(2) [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Varjani S.J. Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. Bioresour. Technol. 2017 Jan 1;223:277–286. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Asiedu N.Y., Asiedu Y.A., Bediako P.C. Isolation, identification and characterization of some petroleum metabolizers from soils contaminated with petroleum oils in Kumasi Metropolis-Ghana. J. Microbiol. Res. 2014;4:117–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lawson I.Y., Nartey E.K., Darko D.A., Okrah V.A., Tsatsu D. Microbial degradation potential of some Ghanaian soils contaminated with diesel oil. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2012;3(1):1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ankrah J. Coastal community's perception on climate change and its impacts: analysis of local coastal community of Winneba, Ghana. Asian Res. J. Arts Soc. Sci. 2020;12(1):43–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Oteng-Ababio M., Owusu K. The vulnerable state of the Ghana coast: the case of Faana-Bortianor. Jàmbá: J. Disaster Risk Stud. 2011 May 1;3(2):429–442. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Salm R.V., Salm R.V., Clark J.R., Siirila E. IUCN; 2000. Marine and Coastal Protected Areas: a Guide for Planners and Managers. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Logah FY, Obuobie E, Ofori D, Kankam-Yeboah K. Analysis of Rainfall Variability in Ghana.
  • 19.Cai Y., Fung I.Y., Edwards R.L., An Z., Cheng H., Lee J.E., Tan L., Shen C.C., Wang X., Day J.A., Zhou W. Variability of stalagmite-inferred Indian monsoon precipitation over the past 252,000 y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015 Mar 10;112(10):2954–2959. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424035112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tettey M., Oduro F.T., Adedia D., Abaye D.A. Markov chain analysis of the rainfall patterns of five geographical locations in the south eastern coast of Ghana. Earth Perspect. 2017 Dec;4(1):1. 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fragouli E., Danyi A.Y. Promoting local acceptability of international oil companies (IOCs) through corporate social responsibility (CSR): the case of tullow oil in Ghana. Financ. Risk Manag. Rev. 2015 Mar 16;1(1):27–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Assibey-Yeboah M. REPORT OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE ON THE 2016 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE (PIAC) ON THE MANAGEMENT OF PETROLEUM REVENUES.
  • 23.Cerqueira V.S., Hollenbach E.B., Maboni F., Vainstein M.H., Camargo F.A., Maria do Carmo R.P., Bento F.M. Biodegradation potential of oily sludge by pure and mixed bacterial cultures. Bioresour. Technol. 2011 Dec 1;102(23):11003–11010. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Obire O., Anyanwu E.C. Impact of various concentrations of crude oil on fungal populations of soil. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009 Mar;6(2):211–218. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ameko E., Achio S., Alhassan S., Sadique I. Identification of lubricating oil-degrading microorganisms in oil polluted soils from five auto-mechanic workshops in Accra, Ghana. Methodology. 2013;3(11) [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Osei-Twumasi D., Fei-Baffoe B., Anning A.K., Danquah K.O. Biodegradation of hydrocarbon-contaminated drill mud waste with compost and cow bile. Environ. Processes. 2020 Dec;7(4):1111–1127. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nocera F.P., Ambrosio M., Conte A., Di Palma T., Castaldo S., Pasolini M.P., Fiorito F., De Martino L. Importance of broth-enrichment culture in equine endometritis diagnosis. New Microbiol. 2021 Jan 1;44:19–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Coico Richard. Gram staining. Curr. Protocols Microbiol. 2006;1 doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mca03cs00. A-3C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Singh P., Borthakur A. A review on biodegradation and photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants: a bibliometric and comparative analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 Sep 20;196:1669–1680. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hossain M.F., Akter M.A., Sohan M.S., Sultana N., Reza M.A., Hoque K.M. Bioremediation potential of hydrocarbon degrading bacteria: isolation, characterization, and assessment. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022 Jan 1;29(1):211–216. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.08.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sudiana I.M., Idris I., Napitupulu T.P., Ikhwani A.Z., Sumerta I.N., Sugiharto A., Sulistiyani T.R., Meliah S., Kanti A., Purbani D.C., Noerdjito D.R. vol. 950. IOP Publishing; 2022. Diversity of Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacteria in Pulau Pari and Their Potential Roles for Bioremediation. InIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. No. 1. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Erdogan E.E., Sahin F., Karaca A. Determination of petroleum-degrading bacteria isolated from crude oil-contaminated soil in Turkey. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012;11(21):4853–4859. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Samuel O., Christian S., Frederick O. Effect of pig manure on the microbial remediation of crude oil-polluted soil. Am. J. Life Sci. Res. 2018;6(2):76–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bhagobaty R.K. Hydrocarbon-utilizing bacteria of natural crude oil seepages, Digboi oilfield, Northeastern region of India. J. Sediment. Environ. 2020 Jun;5(2):177–185. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhuang W.Q., Tay J.H., Maszenan A.M., Krumholz L.R., Tay S.L. Importance of Gram‐positive naphthalene‐degrading bacteria in oil‐contaminated tropical marine sediments. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2003 Apr;36(4):251–257. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01297.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rath K.M., Fierer N., Murphy D.V., Rousk J. Linking bacterial community composition to soil salinity along environmental gradients. ISME J. 2019 Mar;13(3):836–846. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0313-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang W.W., Chong W.A., Rui X.U., Wang L.J. Effects of salinity on the soil microbial community and soil fertility. J. Integr. Agric. 2019 Jun 1;18(6):1360–1368. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Godini K., Samarghandi M.R., Zafari D., Rahmani A.R., Afkhami A., Arabestani M.R. Isolation and identification of new strains of crude oil degrading bacteria from Kharg Island, Iran. Petrol. Sci. Technol. 2018;36(12):869–874. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Grishchenkov V.G., Townsend R.T., McDonald T.J., Autenrieth R.L., Bonner J.S., Boronin A.M. Degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons by facultative anaerobic bacteria under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Process Biochem. 2000;35(9):889–896. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chernikova T.N., Bargiela R., Toshchakov S.V., Shivaraman V., Lunev E.A., Yakimov M.M.…Golyshin P.N. Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria Alcanivorax and Marinobacter associated with microalgae Pavlova lutheri and Nannochloropsis oculata. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.572931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Davidov K., Iankelevich-Kounio E., Yakovenko I., Koucherov Y., Rubin-Blum M., Oren M. Identification of plastic-associated species in the mediterranean sea using DNA metabarcoding with nanopore MinION. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74180-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Piñar G., Poyntner C., Lopandic K., Tafer H., Sterflinger K. Rapid diagnosis of biological colonization in cultural artefacts using the MinION nanopore sequencing technology. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2020 Mar 1;148 [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kerkhof L.J. Is Oxford Nanopore sequencing ready for analyzing complex microbiomes? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2021 Mar;97(3) doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiab001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ohadi M., Dehghannoudeh G., Shakibaie M., Banat I.M., Pournamdari M., Forootanfar H. Isolation, characterization, and optimization of biosurfactant production by an oil-degrading Acinetobacter junii B6 isolated from an Iranian oil excavation site. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017 Oct 1;12:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang W., Wang L., Shao Z. Diversity and abundance of oil-degrading bacteria and alkane hydroxylase (alkB) genes in the subtropical seawater of Xiamen Island. Microb. Ecol. 2010 Aug;60(2):429–439. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9724-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ma M., Zheng L., Yin X., Gao W., Han B., Li Q., Zhu A., Chen H., Yang H. Reconstruction and evaluation of oil-degrading consortia isolated from sediments of hydrothermal vents in the South Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Sci. Rep. 2021 Jan 14;11(1):1–4. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-80991-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yakimov M.M., Golyshin P.N., Crisafi F., Denaro R., Giuliano L. Marine, aerobic hydrocarbon-degrading Gammaproteobacteria: the family Alcanivoracaceae. Taxon. Genom. Ecophysiol. Hydrocarbon-Degrad. Microbes. 2019:167–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Medić A., Lješević M., Inui H., Beškoski V., Kojić I., Stojanović K., Karadžić I. Efficient biodegradation of petroleum n-alkanes and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by polyextremophilic Pseudomonas aeruginosa san ai with multidegradative capacity. RSC Adv. 2020;10(24):14060–14070. doi: 10.1039/c9ra10371f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Diallo M.M., Vural C., Şahar U., Ozdemir G. Kurstakin molecules facilitate diesel oil assimilation by Acinetobacter haemolyticus strain 2SA through overexpression of alkane hydroxylase genes. Environ. Technol. 2021 Jun 7;42(13):2031–2045. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2019.1689301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhuang X., Shi J., Gao Y., Zhang S., Lin T. Strain SW-ap immobilized by microspheres to degrade marine oil spills. J. Coast Res. 2020;111(SI):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jia X., He Y., Jiang D., Liu C., Lu W. Construction and analysis of an engineered Escherichia coli-Pseudomonas aeruginosa co-culture consortium for phenanthrene bioremoval. Biochem. Eng. J. 2019 Aug 15;148:214–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Musa S.I. Isolation and identification of diesel oil-degrading bacteria in used engine oil contaminated soil. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2019 Apr 10;23(3):431–435. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES