Abstract
Background
The majority of dental professionals currently recognize lithium disilicate E-max ceramic veneers as a the most widely used, conservative, and effective cosmetic materials in dentistry. This study aimed to compare the degree of surface changes – roughness (Ra), depth (Rz), and mean color changes (ΔE00) – of computer-aided design-computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) ceramic veneers materials of varying thicknesses caused by staining by green tea, coffee, and Coca-Cola using digital spectrophotometer.
Material/Methods
This study was conducted at King Khalid University, College of Dentistry. Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) material was used to create 60 rectangular slices using the CAD/CAM system. The material thickness and the type of beverage were measured. The specimens were immersed in beverages according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Specimen description and tomography were completed with a 3D noncontact surface metrology using interferometry. The “VITA Easy-Shade” spectrophotometer was used to measure ΔE00. It was recorded after 2 weeks for different material thicknesses after immersing samples in green tea, coffee, and Coca-Cola staining materials.
Results
Significant changes in ceramic thickness were found in Ra and Rz of 0.07 and 1.00 mm after 14 days of staining. Coca-Cola showed a significant difference in Ra and Rz with 1.00 mm thickness measurement compared to the 0.07 mm group with ≤ of 0.05, which was considered statistically significant. Highest ΔE00 were recorded among samples stained by Coca-Cola, followed by coffee, for both thicknesses.
Conclusions
Those findings support previous studies using spectrophotometric analysis of staining of CAD-CAM ceramic veneers that Coca-Cola followed by coffee resulted in the greatest color ΔE00 change.
Keywords: Coffee, Color Perception, Dental Materials, vita veneering ceramic D
Background
Aesthetic dental care has become one of the most common procedures in clinical settings, which can be attributed to high aesthetic perceptions of dental care among people, which ultimately leads to optimal health and enhanced aesthetics, with most patients now having serious concerns about color and shape of their teeth [1].
Computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) have become increasingly widespread in dentistry throughout the previous 35 years. This technology is used in dental clinics and laboratories and is practical for use with partial veneers such as labial veneers, inlays, onlays, and full veneers such as crowns, fixed partial prostheses, implant abutments, and even full-mouth rehabilitation [2].
Ceramic veneers are currently recognized by most dental professionals as a conservative, successful, and predictable cosmetic procedure. One of the most widely used materials for making porcelain veneers is the lithium disilicate E-max system [3,4]. Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) prosthetic materials dominate the field of dentistry because of their capacity to successfully replicate natural teeth with a high rate of long-term survival as compared to other ceramics [5]. LDGC is usually marketed as IPS e.max CAD and consists of a crystalline phase (70%) and a glassy matrix. After crystallization, the color of a substance is determined by the dispersion of coloring ions in its matrix [4,6,7].
The surface texture of the restoration as surface roughness (Ra) and surface depth (Rz) has a substantial impact on aesthetics and durability of this ceramic material [8,9]. A rough surface has a negative impact on color and light reflection. The rougher the surface, the lower the optical reflection [10]. Polished surfaces and the spread of subcritical cracks are strongly associated with Ra and Rz [11,12]. The roughness caused by restoration adjustment can exacerbate surface flaws and damage the porcelain [13,14]. Thus, glazing and polishing of ceramic materials reduces surface roughness (Ra) and increases its luster, ultimately decreasing plaque accumulation [9].
Visual color difference thresholds are useful as a tool for quality assurance and a reference for choosing aesthetic materials [15,16]. As a result, the examination of color changes with color-measuring devices, such as spectrophotometers, is now widespread. These devices can record and express hues numerically. The chromaticity of an object is measured using the Commission Internationale de l’Éclairage L*a*b* (CIELab) system. L* measures the color’s luminance or lightness, a* evaluates its red-green content, and b* evaluates its yellow-blue content [17]. Thus, the mean color change (ΔE*) values can be determined using L*a*b* [18,19]. Elamin et al described the use of digital spectrophotometry units in analysis the shade guided among different groups of patients [20].
Thus, developing a ceramic veneer with an appropriate aesthetic hue is important, but it is equally important to keep these veneers’ colors consistent in oral conditions. Numerous studies have assessed how surface texture affects color stability of ceramic materials [1,9,15,21]. Diet and popular drinks like tea, coffee, and Coca-Cola have a clear impact on the color stability of a porcelain material. According to reports, tea can significantly impact color stability [17,22]. Several studies indicated that coffee also has a significant impact on color change of restorative materials [23,24]. Additionally, coffee and Coca-Cola were reported to be the primary causes of porcelain material deterioration [25–33]. However, we found that very few studies have analyzed the alteration in color stability and surface manipulation of these ceramic materials of varying thicknesses by using all 3 beverages.
The combined effects of staining on the change in surface characteristics and mean color change due to different beverages have not been studied. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the degree of changes such as surface roughness (Ra), surface depth (Rz), and mean color changes (ΔE00) of computer-aided design-computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) ceramic veneers materials of varying thicknesses by green tea, coffee, and Coca-Cola using the VITA Easy-Shade V digital spectrophotometer. Our null hypothesis was that there would be no significant differences in the mean values of Ra, Rz, and ΔE00 of LDGC CAD/CAM ceramic restorative material with different thickness and stained with green tea, coffee, and Coca-Cola.
Material and Methods
Study Design and Sample Size Calculation
This study was conducted in the King Khalid University, College of Dentistry, in the end of 2022. Study objectives were to determine the effects of staining with tea, coffee, and Coca-Cola on different thicknesses of lithium disilicate glass ceramic CAD/CAM Veneer on surface topography as roughness (Ra) or depth (Rz) and mean color changes (ΔE00) after aging and staining for 14 days. Power analysis calculation was performed to determine the sample size required to obtain a statistically significant outcome. The result showed that 30 samples per group (10 samples for each subgroup) were required at a 95% confidence level, a power of 80%, and a standard deviation of 0.4 [34,35].
Specimen Fabrication and Grouping
Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LDGC) (IPS e.max CAD) CAD/CAM ceramic block material (VITA Zahnfabrik, H. Rauter Bad Säckingen, Germany) was used to create 60 specimens using the CAD/CAM system (Amann Girrbach, GmbH, Durrenweg 40 75177 Pforzheim, Germany). The specimens were in the form of rectangular ceramic disks had sizes of 12 mm in diameter and 0.07 and 0.10 mm in thickness. Using a digital caliper, the specimens’ thicknesses were determined (Figure 1). Prior to the final heat treatment in the furnace for complete crystallization, a glaze layer (IPS e.max Ceram Glaze paste, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan AG, Liechtenstein) was applied to all specimens on the experimental side (side of staining) for the LDGC group. The 2 thickness groups were divided into 3 subgroups according to the immersion beverages – green tea, coffee, and Coca-Cola – with 10 samples each.
Figure 1.
Measuring of thickness (0.07 and 1.00 mm) ceramic laminate veneer by using a digital micrometer.
Surface Topography Measurements
Specimen description and tomography were completed with 3D noncontact surface metrology using interferometry (Bruker Contour GTK, Bruker Nano Surfaces Division, Tucson, AZ, USA) in the materials laboratory of King Saud University. Through an upright scan interferometer with a 5 Michelson amplification lens, a field of interpretation of 1.5 mm, a Gaussian regression filter, a scan speed of 1, and a thresholding of 4, specimens were computed or measured. We used a microscope equipped with the Vision 64 (Bruker) software suite, which manages tool placements, which assess the statistics and generate graphical results. Assessments were reserved across the specimens at 3 time points – before immersion and staining (baseline), then after green tea, coffee, and Coca-Cola immersions, and 14-days aging (after) – and the differences were recorded as the Ra and Rz changes. Each specimen was scanned 3 times (at the center and both corners) and then averaged to calculate the surface roughness (Ra) and surface depth (Rz) values in μm, calculated in accordance with ISO 11562 recommendations for standardization [34–36].
Color Parameter Measurement
By placing the ceramic specimen on a gray background, the color of CAD/CAM ceramic samples was assessed as measured before or at baseline [17,37,38]. The digital spectrophotometer VITA Easy-Shade V (VITA Easy-Shade, V, Bad Säckingen, Germany) was used to measure color. Colors’ three-dimensional (3D) dimensions are numerically represented by CIELab values [37]. Spectrophotometers measure the color parameters such as L*, a*, and b* values, where L is the axis of lightness, a is the value representing the axes of chromaticity (green-red), and b is the value representing the axes of color (blue-yellow). The light reflected from the item is used to determine these 3 coordinates. The average change in color is ΔE*. These measures had previously been applied to research evaluating ceramic CAD/CAM material colors. For each specimen and in the center, readings of L*, a*, and b* were done twice, and the mean values were recorded. On the basis of baseline measurements, the specimens were evaluated for color change. Figure 2 shows a screenshot from the digital spectrophotometer used by VITA Easy-Shade. These measurements were used as a baseline before (L1, a1.b1) the specimens were immersed in green tea, coffee, and Coca-Cola and stained [17,37,38].
Figure 2.
Reading of color parameters from VITA Easy-Shade spectrophotometer.
An aging process was accomplished for all specimens during this staining and immersion time. After immersion, all CAD/CAM ceramic specimens were dipped in distilled water following removal from the different staining materials; the specimens were then checked several times to ensure that the staining material was completely removed. Then, specimens were dried with white tissue paper and left to air dry. All color parameters change measurements for L, a, and b were calculated and registered again by the same operator at time intervals of 14 days, with the same settings, and with a gray background and recorded as (L2, a2, b2). The average color changes (ΔE00) values were recorded after 2 weeks for the different material thickness and surface staining using the following equation: ΔE00 = ((L1* − L2*)2 + (a1* − a2*)2 + (b1* − b2*)2 “×½. ΔE00 values for staining types of beverages and the tested CAD/CAM materials were calculated as described earlier in the literature [17,37,38].
Specimens’ Immersion in Beverage Materials and Aging
The samples were submerged in different staining materials of Green Tea, Coffee, and Coca-Cola for Fortnight (Food Industrial Co., Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). The solutions utilized in this investigation were marketed for single use and were offered in a nitrogen-flushed box. According to the manufacturer’s recommendations, for green tea, and coffee, the staining of the different solutions made from each packet (30 g) was combined with 0.5 L of hot water (100°C) and allowed to continue boiling for 15 s (0.6 gm for each 1 mL), while for Coca-Cola, the samples with different thickness were totally immersed in containers. For all samples, 2 packets of 30 g each were used every day, and the Coca-Cola, green tea, and coffee were replaced every 12 h [9,15,24,30].
Statistical Analysis
The IBM SPSS 20.0 program for descriptive statistics was used to calculate the mean and standard deviation (SD) of Ra and Rz as well as mean color change (ΔE00) values of the LDGC material with different thickness in white backgrounds before and after staining and aging. The values were presented by tables as the means and SD of Ra, Rz, and ΔE00. For repetitive measurements, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by t tests, and/or Bonferroni test were performed to compare the cases exposed as different thickness (0.07 and 1.00 mm) of the tested materials and different immersion beverages (coffee, green tea, and Coca-Cola). P values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Descriptive Results
During the coffee, green tea, and Coca-Cola staining and aging process for surface topography and color measurements parameters, no specimens were missing or lost. Before and after beverage staining, the mean and SD of surface characteristics (Ra and Rz) and mean color changes (ΔE00) values of the studied CAD/CAM ceramic material with different thickness are shown in Table 1. Significant changes in ceramic thickness were measured in surface roughness (Ra) of 0.07 mm and 1.00 mm after 14 days immersion in different beverages (P value<0.01). Similarly, in surface depth (Rz), a significant difference was measured in material thickness of 0.07 mm and 1.00 mm (P value <0.01). Overall, the average mean color change was considered significantly different in both thickness of LDGC CAD/CAM material in the different immersion beverages, as shown in Table 1. Table 2 shows the ANOVA results between and within the groups. Figure 3 shows that the highest ΔE00 were recorded among samples stained by Coca-Cola, followed by coffee beverages for both thicknesses, with ΔE00 values are represented in the figure. As shown in Table 2 a significant difference was recorded and registered among and within the groups before and after immersion in different beverage solutions for LDGC samples ceramic in different thicknesses according to ANOVA with P values 0.001.
Table 1.
Mean and standard deviation of surface roughness (Ra) surface depth (Rz), mean color change (ΔE00) of different ceramic thickness groups, before, after, and the overall changes in relation to types of immersion materials.
Ceramic thickness | Immersion materials | Mean (SD) before | Mean (SD) after | Mean (SD) changes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ra | ||||
0.07 mm | Tea | 0.16 (0.033) | 0.19 (0.033) | 0.03 (0.063) |
Coffee | 0.22 (0.071) | 0.25 (0.081) | 0.03 (0.076) | |
Coca-Cola | 0.31 (0.033) | 0.36 (0.070) | 0.05 (0.054) | |
P-value | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
1.00 mm | Tea | 0.17 (0.040) | 0.18 (0.041) | 0.01 (0.041) |
Coffee | 0.36 (0.064) | 0.39 (0.74) | 0.03 (0.069) | |
Coca-Cola | 0.37 (0.042) | 0.44 (0.66) | 0.07 (0.054) | |
P-value | 0.138 | 0.088 | 0.062 | |
Rz | ||||
0.07 mm | Tea | 0.17 (0.054) | 0.19 (0.045) | 0.02 (0.051) |
Coffee | 0.25 (0.036) | 0.29 (0.042) | 0.04 (0.059) | |
Coca-Cola | 0.31 (0.053) | 0.39 (0.071) | 0.08 (0.062) | |
P-value | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
1.00 mm | Tea | 0.14 (0.044) | 0.18 (0.051) | 0.04 (0.080) |
Coffee | 0.27 (0.621) | 0.29 (0.028) | 0.02 (0.064) | |
Coca-Cola | 0.31 (0.032) | 0.40 (0.083) | 0.09 (0.088) | |
P-value | 0.001* | 0.030* | 0.050* | |
ΔE00 | ||||
0.07 mm | Tea | 1.16 (0.082) | 1.36 (0.083) | 1.20 (0.824) |
Coffee | 1.80 (0.286) | 2.60 (0.372) | 2.80 (0.329) | |
Coca-Cola | 2.81 (0.199) | 3.01 (0.370) | 3.20 (0.234) | |
P-value | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
1.00 mm | Tea | 1.10 (0.038) | 1.38 (0.018) | 1.28 (0.895) |
Coffee | 2.49 (0.162) | 3.11 (0.232) | 2.62 (0.923) | |
Coca-Cola | 3.14 (0.123) | 3.62 (0.173) | 3.18 (0.996) | |
P-value | 0.001* | 0.000* | 0.042* |
Table 2.
ANOVA test for calculating significant differences among the group and within groups.
Sum of squares | Mean difference | Mean square | Frequency | Significant difference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Between groups | .070 | 2 | .035 | 17.777 | .001* |
Within groups | .112 | 57 | .002 | ||
Total | .182 | 59 | |||
Between groups | .085 | 2 | .042 | 18.156 | .001* |
Within groups | .133 | 57 | .002 | ||
Total | .218 | 59 | |||
Between groups | .867 | 2 | .434 | 21.143 | .001* |
Within groups | 1.169 | 57 | .021 | ||
Total | 2.036 | 59 |
Figure 3.
Means of color changes in relation to material thickness and stained beverage.
Comparing Groups Using Bonferroni Test
According to the Bonferroni test, for all specimens with different thicknesses tested, the LDGC CAD/CAM material immersed in Coca-Cola has shown Ra and Rz as a significant difference in 1.00 mm thickness measurement compared to the 0.07mm group with maximum surface alteration were immersed in coffee and Coca-Cola as compared to green tea (P value <0.05), as shown in Table 3. Also, the Bonferroni test revealed that the specimens with maximum ΔE00 were LDGC samples immersed in green tea and coffee as compared to Coca-Cola samples (P value<0.05), and only for 0.07 mm thickness samples. According to the t test (Table 4), no significant difference was found in surface roughness (Ra) and surface depth (Rz) for material thickness and the different staining materials. The ΔE00 for the tested ceramic material with 0.07 mm and 1.00 mm and different staining materials showed a slightly significant difference in overall parameters (P value <0.05). Table 5 presents the interaction of Ra, Rz, and ΔE00 changes of different CAD/CAM ceramic material thicknesses and immersion materials. For Ra, a significant difference was noted in the tested parameters (P<0.001, 0.011). Similarly, a significant in Rz was found among the ceramic thicknesses and immersion materials (P<0.018, 0.010), while for mean color change (ΔE00), significant differences in all interactions were recorded (P<0.001) for all variables.
Table 3.
Bonferroni test to measure mean surface and color changes.
Ceramic thickness | Immersion materials | Tea | Coffee | Coca-Cola |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ra change | ||||
0.07 mm Ra | Tea | ----- | 0.258 | 0.000* |
Coffee | 0.258 | ----- | 0.000* | |
Coca-Cola | 0.000* | 0.000* | ----- | |
1.00 mm Ra | Tea | ----- | 0.125 | 0.065 |
Coffee | 0.125 | ----- | 0.000* | |
Coca-Cola | 0.065 | 0.000* | ----- | |
Rz change | ||||
0.07 mm Rz | Tea | ----- | 1.000 | 0.000* |
Coffee | 1.000 | ----- | 0.000* | |
Coca-Cola | 0.000* | 0.000* | ----- | |
1.00 mm Rz | Tea | ----- | 1.000 | 0.000* |
Coffee | 1.000 | ----- | 0.000* | |
Coca-Cola | 0.000* | 0.000* | ----- | |
ΔE00 change | ||||
0.07 mm ΔE00 | Tea | ----- | 0.000* | 0.000* |
Coffee | 0.000* | ----- | 0.290 | |
Coca-Cola | 0.000* | 0.290 | ----- | |
1.00 mm ΔE00 | Tea | ----- | 0.224 | 0.320 |
Coffee | 0.224 | ----- | 0.126 | |
Coca-Cola | 0.320 | 0.126 | ----- |
Table 4.
t test for all the different ceramic thicknesses in relation to immersion material.
Ceramic thickness | Immersion materials | Parameter | P-value |
---|---|---|---|
0.7 mm | Tea | Ra changes | 0.212 |
Coffee | |||
Coca-Cola | |||
1.0 mm | Tea | 0.182 | |
Coffee | |||
Coca-Cola | |||
0.7 mm | Tea | Rz changes | 0.076 |
Coffee | |||
Cock-Cola | |||
1.0 mm | Tea | 0.055 | |
Coffee | |||
Coca-Cola | |||
0.7 mm | Tea | ΔE00 changes | 0.006* |
Coffee | |||
Coca-Cola | |||
1.0 mm | Tea | 0.032* | |
Coffee | |||
Coca-Cola |
Table 5.
ANOVA interaction of tested parameters in relation to material thickness and immersion materials.
Ra changes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source | Type III sum of squares | Df | Mean square | F | Sig. |
Intercept | 0.120 | 1 | 0.120 | 62.313 | 0.000* |
Immersion materials | 0.21 | 2 | 0.010 | 5.315 | 0.011* |
Ceramic thickness | 0.000 | 0 | – | ––– | ––– |
Immersion materials × ceramic thickness | 0.000 | 0 | – | – | – |
Error | 0.052 | 27 | 0.002 | – | – |
Rz changes | |||||
Immersion materials | 18.060 | 2 | 9.030 | 1.350 | 0.269 |
Ceramic thickness | 40.439 | 1 | 40.439 | 6.046 | 0.018* |
Immersion materials × ceramic thickness | 67.538 | 2 | 33.769 | 5.049 | 0.010* |
Error | 321.066 | 48 | 6.689 | ||
ΔE00 changes | |||||
Immersion materials | .001 | 2 | 0.001 | 9.962 | 0.001* |
Ceramic thickness | .001 | 1 | 0.001 | 18.826 | 0.001* |
Immersion materials × ceramic thickness | .001 | 2 | 0.001 | 10.850 | 0.001* |
Error | .003 | 48 | 5.386E-5 |
Discussion
Many patients now prefer tooth-colored ceramic restorations. These patients’ needs have been partially satisfied by the significant advancements in the cosmetic and physical characteristics of all ceramic restorations. However, the most difficult aspect of cosmetic restorations is attaining color consistency, not only with natural tooth structure, but also in the oral environment [39]. LDGC ceramics are now widely used in dentistry, and we selected this ceramic as our study material due to its superior efficacy, cytocompatibility, and aesthetics [40]. To meet the increasing demands, these restorations need to be both color-stable and biocompatible in the oral environment [30]. However, these materials are vulnerable to a variety of oral conditions that can result in stains and minor color changes affecting surface topography [41]. Thus, the present study assessed the effect of 2 different thicknesses of lithium disilicate glass ceramic veneer on surface characteristics or topography as surface roughness (Ra) and surface depth (Rz) and mean color changes (ΔE00) after aging and immersion in different beverages.
The optical qualities of restorations can be modified in the oral environment [13,21]. Numerous studies have shown the significance of acidic solutions, altering the optical characteristics and surface roughness of different CAD/CAM restorative dental materials [15,17,25,34,42–46]. Green tea, coffee and Coca-Cola are the most regularly consumed acidic drinks in daily life. Green tea and coffee have a pH of 5.8 and consist of caffeine, tannates, citrates and chlorogenic acid, whereas Coca-Cola has a pH of 2.5 and is made up of phosphates, carbonated water, and caramel [47,48]. Staining of ceramics caused by these low-pH acidified beverages may compromise the cosmetic outcome [49–51], thereby reducing durability of the material, resulting in roughness, abrasion, and subsequent staining of teeth, ultimately causing patient dissatisfaction [52]. Therefore, we analyzed the effect of all 3 beverages on ceramic material of varying thicknesses in our study.
In addition, maintaining prothesis color is crucial in the oral environment. Numerous studies have evaluated the relationship between color stability and surface topography of various dental restorations. Research has revealed that porcelain discoloration is connected to diet, immersion time, and the type of surface treatment [9,16,24,26,28,30,35]. Gupta et al [53] evaluated the ceramic materials’ color stability after exposure to commonly consumed beverages: tea, coffee, and Coca-Cola. This differed from our study, as they measured only color changes after 1 day, 15 days, and 30 days for all the solutions. In our study, we analyzed color changes along with surface topography measurements after immersing for 14 days. In the present study, the baseline stain was carried out for 2 weeks to enhance stain absorption since ceramic materials quickly absorb fluids in the first 2 weeks. Additionally, 2 weeks of coffee staining were utilized, which, according to coffee producers, indicated 14 months’ worth of coffee consumption [36].
Surface roughness (Ra) was investigated in this study because it is a crucial aesthetic feature of ceramic restorations. Smooth surfaces are less likely to discolor and become colonized by bacteria, making them less vulnerable to periodontal and recurrent caries [36,54]. We utilized a digital caliper to evaluate the thickness of each sample, thereby excluding any variables that could affect the final results of color change and surface roughness. We observed significant changes in ceramic thickness measured in surface roughness (Ra) and surface depth (Rz) of 0.07-mm and 1.00-mm samples after 14 days of immersion in different beverages. Similar findings were reported by Al-Angari et al in 2021, who discovered a rise in Ra following the simulation of 1 year of coffee consumption [36]. Aldosari et al in 2021 [9] also found similar findings after 14 days of Arabic Qahwa immersion and stated that Ra values for zirconia, hybrid, and feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramics increased.
It has been shown that the ceramic thickness and the color change of ceramic restorations are related. Uludag et al [55] evaluated the impact of porcelain thickness on the color stability of porcelain restorations and discovered that as ceramic thickness increased, there was a perceived reduction in color change values (ΔE*). However, when varied thicknesses of all porcelain materials were employed, no significant difference in color change was seen [24]. Also, Abdelkader et al in 2020 found no discernible changes in color change while employing differing thicknesses of all materials (1.00 mm and 0.6 mm) [30]. However, this was contrary to our findings, as significant changes in ceramic thickness were measured in surface roughness (Ra) and surface depth (Rz) of 0.07 mm and 1.00 mm after 14 days of immersion in different beverages. We also found that overall, average mean color change was significantly different in both thicknesses of LDGC CAD/CAM material immersed in different beverages.
Mean color change was greatest with Coca-Cola. Also, the CAD/CAM material immersed in Coca-Cola and coffee was significantly different in Ra and Rz of 1.00 mm thickness compared to the 0.07 mm group. This finding was similar to the study done by Kara et al in 2022, where a similar finding was reported in mean color change values of sample groups having greater thickness [39]. This could be explained by the diverse settings utilized in each study. This finding could be attributed to the acidity of the Coca-Cola solution, dissolving silica and alkaline ions from the glaze layer, causing the surface to corrode, as evidenced by the increased roughness. Additionally, it is consistent with earlier research that found that CAD-CAM lithium disilicate and feldspathic ceramic surfaces became significantly rougher due to the low pH of acidic liquids and high temperatures, such as with coffee [14,42,49,56].
However, other studies evaluated the color porcelain materials stability concerning the surface texture, concluding that accurate polishing procedures could create smooth ceramic surfaces similar to glazed surfaces [51,53]. Glazing has been found to produce smoother surfaces than glass ceramic polishing [48]. Manufacturers also advocate glazing or polishing to improve the aesthetics of lithium disilicate [24]. This emphasizes significance of reglazing any ceramic material after making any alterations. In our study, we performed similar heat treatment in the furnace and a glaze layer was applied over ceramic specimens. The current study’s findings also concur with those of previous studies [24,26], and those by Sagsoz et al, Saba et al, Acar et al, and Palla et al, which came to the same conclusion and advised the reglazing step of samples after immersions in widely consumed beverages like tea and coffee [27,28,51,58].
Since color perception is a psychophysical phenomenon that varies both between individuals and within an individual at different times, the color measurements in the current study were conducted using a spectrophotometer. We used a spectrophotometer in our study to measure color change because it has been proved to be more precise than most other shade-taking methods. Instrumental measurement has the advantage of numerically expressing colors, thereby eliminating the subjective errors associated with color assessment [20,60]. Thus, in order to express the degree of color and relative color changes of all the specimens, we used the “VITA Easy-Shade” spectrophotometer to measure color. Colors’ three-dimensional (3D) dimensions are numerically represented by CIELab values [37,61]. It is difficult to determine the average color change ΔE* value that is noticeable or clinically acceptable. The detectable and clinically acceptable thresholds, however, were found to be ΔE* 2.8 and 4.2 units, respectively, in in vivo research [24,31,37]. In our study, we noticed significant differences among tested parameters. Overall, the average mean color change was significantly different in both thicknesses of LDGC CAD/CAM material in the different beverages. The highest ΔE00 was recorded among samples stained by Coca-Cola, followed by coffee for both thicknesses. Also, maximum ΔE00 values were found in LDGC samples immersed in green tea and coffee as compared to Coca-Cola and only for 0.07 mm thickness samples. This finding was also in accordance with studies by Alghazali et al in 2012 and Abdalkadeer et al in 2020, wherein they also found similar significant differences with Coco-Cola as compared to other beverages [30,37]. Adawi et al in 2021 also demonstrated similar results. On immersion in hot Arabic Qahwa and cold coffee, ΔE00 values for tested materials in glazed or polished specimens varied significantly [16]. For ΔE00 values recorded after 2 weeks, our results were comparable to those of previous studies conducted with glazed specimens immersed in hot coffee by AlMawash et al, Colombo et al, Özyılmaz et al, and Aydin et al [23,26,61,62]. However, our results differed from those of Yerliyurt and Sarikaya, Eldwakhly et al, Seyidaliyeva et al, and Aboushahba et al [10,63–65], as they did not observe maximum discoloration with Coca-Cola and coffee.
Despite the effective methods used, the current study was unable to replicate the identical in vivo conditions, since there is no uniform technique for simulating the physiological condition of the soft and hard tissues of the mouth. Furthermore, the generalizability of the study’s findings may be constrained by differences in nutrition, immersion time, and oral hygiene practices among individuals. Additional in vivo experiments are required to assess the vulnerability of different brands of ceramic materials to discoloration, analyzing various physical, mechanical, and optical properties of various CAD/CAM materials like translucencies, compressive or flexural strength, and compare it with various polishing materials or oral hygiene aids. Furthermore, the incorporation of specific color parameters and scanning electron microscopic studies are needed. Also, a major limitation was that these 3 beverages had various pH values, which was not evaluated.
Conclusions
We found significant changes in surface roughness (Ra) and surface depth (Rz) in 0.07 mm and 1.00 mm groups after 14 days of immersion in different beverages. For all specimens with different thicknesses tested, the CAD/CAM material immersed in Coca-Cola showed significant differences in Ra and Rz in the 1.00 mm thickness group compared to the 0.07 mm group. The ΔE00 was significantly different in both thicknesses of LDGC CAD/CAM material in the different beverages. Overall, the findings from this study support previous studies using spectrophotometric analysis of staining of CAD-CAM ceramic veneers, showing the highest ΔE00 in samples stained by Coca-Cola, followed by coffee, for both thicknesses.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None declared
Publisher’s note: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher
Declaration of Figures’ Authenticity
All figures submitted have been created by the authors, who confirm that the images are original with no duplication and have not been previously published in whole or in part.
Financial support: None declared
References
- 1.Al-Angari SS, Eckert GJ, Sabrah AHA. Color stability, roughness, and microhardness of enamel and composites submitted to staining/bleaching cycles. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33(4):215–21. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55(3):559–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Carrabba M, Vichi A, Vultaggio G, et al. Effect of finishing and polishing on the surface roughness and gloss of feldspathic ceramic for chairside CAD/CAM systems. Oper Dent. 2017;42(2):175–84. doi: 10.2341/15-174-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Alahmari NM, Adawi HA, Al M, et al. Bonding strength of lithium disilicate adhesive crowns with different occluso-cervical preparation heights and cement types. J Biomater Tissue Eng. 2022;12(3):533–43. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sasany R, Ergun-Kunt G, Yilmaz B. Effect of mouth rinses on optical properties of CAD-CAM materials used for laminate veneers and crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(4):648–53. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Willard A, Gabriel Chu TM. The science and application of IPS e.Max dental ceramic. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(4):238–42. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2018.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Alahmari NM, Adawi HA, Al Moaleem MM, et al. Effects of the cervical marginal relocation technique on the marginal adaptation of lithium disilicate CAD/CAM ceramic crowns on premolars. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(8):900–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Silva FP, Vilela ALR, Almeida MMG, et al. Surface topography, gloss and flexural strength of pressable ceramic after finishing-polishing protocols. Braz Dent J. 2019;30:164–70. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201902101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Aldosari LI, Alshadidi AA, Porwal A, et al. Surface roughness and color measurements of glazed or polished hybrid, feldspathic, and Zirconia CAD/CAM restorative materials after hot and cold coffee immersion. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01770-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yerliyurt K, Sarıkaya I. Color stability of hybrid ceramics exposed to beverages in different combinations. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02206-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Challakh N, Palsa D, Bemmann M, et al. Assessibility of different CAD/CAM ceramics with optical coherence tomography. J Dent. 2021;114:103836. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Alqahtani SM. Effect of Thermocycling on color, surface characteristics, compressive fracture, and fracture modes of prosthetic CAD/CAM ceramics after smokeless tobacco immersion. Med Sci Monit. 2022;28:e936885. doi: 10.12659/MSM.936885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alp G, Subasi MG, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Effect of surface treatments and coffee thermocycling on the color and translucency of CAD-CAM monolithic glass-ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;120(2):263–68. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Firouz F, Vafaee F, Khamverdi Z, et al. Effect of three commonly consumed beverages on surface roughness of polished and glazed zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramics. Front Dent. 2019;16(4):296. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i4.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adawi HA, Al Moaleem MM, Al Ahmari NM, et al. Assessment of color stainability of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials after hot and cold coffee immersion at different time intervals. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e932745. doi: 10.12659/MSM.932745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Şi Şmanoğlu S, Gürcan AT. Evaluation of stain susceptibility of different CAD/CAM blocks after immersion in coffee. DÜ Sağlık Bil Enst Derg. 2021;11(3):284–89. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Al Moaleem M, Alathwani A, Alamir A, et al. Effect of thermocycling and khat extract staining on the optical and mechanical properties of ceramic materials Peer-review Method. J Pharm Res Int. 2021;33:3146–56. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kanat-Ertürk B. Color stability of CAD/CAM ceramics prepared with different surface finishing procedures. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(2):166–72. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ozisci O, Kucukesmen H. Evaluation of color change before and after polymerization of laminate veneer restorations: A clinical study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022;25(6):841. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_1814_21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Elamin HO, Abubakr NH, Ibrahim YE. Identifying the tooth shade in group of patients using Vita Easyshade. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(2):213–17. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.156828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kursoglu P, Motro PFK, Kazazoglu E. Correlation of surface texture with the stainability of ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(2):306–13. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Haralur SB, Raqe S, Alqahtani N, Alhassan Mujayri F. Effect of hydrothermal aging and beverages on color stability of lithium disilicate and zirconia based ceramics. Medicina (Mex) 2019;55(11):749. doi: 10.3390/medicina55110749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.AlMawash A, Alyabis N, Alzaaqi N. An in vitro evaluation of the effect of polishing on the stainability of different CAD/CAM ceramic materials. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32(3):135–41. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alghazali N, Hakami AA, AlAjlan GA, et al. Influence of the Arabic-coffee on the overall color of glazed or polished porcelain veneers – study. Open Dent J. 2019;13:364–70. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hamza TA, Alameldin AA, Elkouedi AY, Wee AG. Effect of artificial accelerated aging on surface roughness and color stability of different ceramic restorations. Stomatol Dis Sci. 2017;1:8–13. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Colombo M, Cavallo M, Miegge M, et al. Color stability of CAD/CAM Zirconia ceramics following exposure to acidic and staining drinks. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(11):e1297. doi: 10.4317/jced.54404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sagsoz O, Demirci T, Demirci G, et al. The effects of different polishing techniques on the staining resistance of CAD/CAM resin-ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8(6):417–22. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.6.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Saba DA, Salama RA, Haridy R. Effect of different beverages on the color stability and microhardness of CAD/CAM hybrid versus feldspathic ceramic blocks: An in-vitro study. Future Dent J. 2017;3(2):61–66. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sarıkaya I, Yerliyurt K, Hayran Y. Effect of surface finishing on the colour stability and translucency of dental ceramics. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0508-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Abdalkadeer HK, Almarshedy SM, Al Ahmari NM, et al. Influence of the Coca-Cola drinks on the overall color of glazed or polished porcelain veneers fabricated from different materials and thicknesses: An in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020;21(1):56–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Quek SHQ, Yap AUJ, Rosa V, Tan KBC, Teoh KH. Effect of staining beverages on color and translucency of CAD/CAM composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(2):E9–E17. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barutçugil Ç, Bilgili D, Barutcigil K, et al. Discoloration and translucency changes of CAD-CAM materials after exposure to beverages. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;122(3):325–31. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kessler P, Türp JC. Influence of Coca-Cola on orthodontic materials. A systematic review. Swiss Dent J. 2020;130(12):983–93. doi: 10.61872/sdj-2020-12-02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Alzahrani AH, Aldosari LIN, Alshadidi AAF, et al. Influence of surface type with coffee immersion on surface topography and optical and mechanical properties of selected ceramic materials. Med Sci Monit. 2022;28:e938354. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Al-Ahmari MM, Alzahrani AH, Al-Qatarneh FA, et al. Effect of miswak derivatives on color changes and mechanical properties of polymer-based computer-aided design and computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) dental ceramic materials. Med Sci Monit. 2022;28:e936892. doi: 10.12659/MSM.936892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Al-Angari SS, Meaigel S, Almayouf N, et al. The Effects of a coffee beverage and whitening systems on surface roughness and gloss of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate glass ceramics. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2021;19:22808000211058864. doi: 10.1177/22808000211058866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Alghazali N, Burnside G, Moallem M, et al. Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth. J Dent. 2012;40:e10–e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Al Moaleem MM, Adawi HA, Alsharif KF, et al. Impact of smokeless tobacco on the color stability of zirconia, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate and feldspathic CAD/CAM restorative materials: An in vitro study. Coatings. 2022;12(2):207. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kara R. Evaluation of discoloration after thermocycling in CAD/CAM blocks of different thicknesses. J Health Med Sci. 2022;5(2):35–42. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Al-Thobity AM, Gad MM, Farooq I, et al. Acid effects on the physical properties of different CAD/CAM ceramic materials: An in vitro analysis. J Prosthodont. 2021;30(2):135–41. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rodrigues CRT, Turssi CP, Amaral FLB, et al. Changes to glazed dental ceramic shade, roughness, and microhardness after bleaching and simulated brushing. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(1):e59–67. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lee JH, Kim SH, Yoon HI, et al. Colour stability and surface properties of high-translucency restorative materials for digital dentistry after simulated oral rinsing. Eur J Oral Sci. 2020;128(2):170–80. doi: 10.1111/eos.12676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Derafshi R, Khorshidi H, Kalantari M, Ghaffarlou I. Effect of mouthrinses on color stability of monolithic zirconia and feldspathic ceramic: An in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0419-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Soygun K, Varol O, Ozer A, Bolayir G. Investigations on the effects of mouthrinses on the colour stability and surface roughness of different dental bioceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017;9(3):200–7. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Leal JP, da Silva JD, Leal RFM, et al. Effect of mouthwashes on solubility and sorption of restorative composites. Int J Dent. 2017;2017:5865691. doi: 10.1155/2017/5865691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pelino JEP, Passero A, Martin AA, Charles CA. In vitro effects of alcohol-containing mouthwashes on human enamel and restorative materials. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e25. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Scotti N, Ionescu A, Comba A, et al. Influence of low-pH Beverages on the two-body wear of CAD/CAM monolithic materials. Polymers. 2021;13(17):2915. doi: 10.3390/polym13172915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Alsilani RS, Sherif RM, Elkhodary NA. Evaluation of colour stability and surface roughness of three CAD/CAM materials (IPS e.max, Vita Enamic, and PEEK) after immersion in two beverage solutions: An in vitro study. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2022;8(1):439–49. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Alencar-Silva FJ, Barreto JO, Negreiros WA, et al. Effect of beverage solutions and toothbrushing on the surface roughness, microhardness, and color stainability of a vitreous CAD-CAM lithium disilicate ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(4):711–e1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Stamenković DD, Tango RN, Todorović A, et al. Staining and aging-dependent changes in color of CAD-CAM materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(5):672–78. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Acar O, Yilmaz B, Altintas SH, et al. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(1):71–75. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dos Santos DM, da Silva EVF, Watanabe D, et al. Effect of different acidic solutions on the optical behavior of lithium disilicate ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(3):430–36. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gupta R, Parkash H, Shah N, Jain V. A spectrophotometric evaluation of color changes of various tooth colored veneering materials after exposure to commonly consumed beverages. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2005;5(2):72. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yuan JCC, Barão VAR, Wee AG, et al. Effect of brushing and thermocycling on the shade and surface roughness of CAD-CAM ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(6):1000–6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Uludag B, Usumez A, Sahin V, et al. The effect of ceramic thickness and number of firings on the color of ceramic systems: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(1):25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kulkarni A, Rothrock J, Thompson J. Impact of gastric acid induced surface changes on mechanical behavior and optical characteristics of dental ceramics. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(3):207–18. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sarikaya I, Güler AU. Effects of different surface treatments on the color stability of various dental porcelains. J Dent Sci. 2011;6(2):65–71. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Palla ES, Kontonasaki E, Kantiranis N, et al. Color stability of lithium disilicate ceramics after aging and immersion in common beverages. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):632–42. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Elhelbawy N. Shade matching of CAD/CAM lithium silicate ceramics veneered on newly introduced foundation material. Egypt Dent J. 2021;67(1):563–70. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Su Y, Xin M, Chen X, Xing W. Effect of CAD-CAM ceramic materials on the color match of veneer restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(2):255e1–e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Özyılmaz ÖY, Sayın Özel G, Oğuz Ahmet BS. Effects of glazing procedures on the color stability of conventional and CAD/CAM hybrid ceramics: A comparative study. Meandros Med Dent J. 2020;20(3):209–18. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Aydın N, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Kılıçarslan MA. Investigating the color changes on resin-based CAD/CAM Blocks. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(2):251–56. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Eldwakhly E, Ahmed DRM, Soliman M, et al. Color and translucency stability of novel restorative CAD/CAM materials. Dent Med Probl. 2019;56(4):349–56. doi: 10.17219/dmp/111400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Seyidaliyeva A, Rues S, Evagorou Z, et al. Color stability of polymer-infiltrated-ceramics compared with lithium disilicate ceramics and composite. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(1):43–50. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Aboushahba ME, Younis SH, Afifi RH. Effect of different immersion solutions on color stability of one bulk-fill resin composite and two types of CAD/CAM ceramics. Egypt Dent J. 2020;66(3):657–65. [Google Scholar]