Abstract
The intrinsic photochemistry of the isoxazole, a common heterocycle in medicinal chemistry, can be applied to offer an alternative to existing strategies using more perturbing, extrinsic photo-crosslinkers. The utility of isoxazole photo-crosslinking is demonstrated in a wide range of biologically relevant experiments, including common proteomics workflows.
Photo-crosslinking or photoaffinity labeling (PAL) connects small molecule drug discovery to proteomics, providing detailed information like ligand binding sites or global information like off-target profiling.1 Despite wide usage of photo-crosslinking in chemical biology, few advancements have been made regarding the photochemistry employed. Emphasis has been on time-tested photoreactive groups such as aryl azides, diazirines, and benzophenones.2–4 However, the synthesis and attachment of these motifs is not always straightforward and may alter binding of the parent molecule. Recently, the Woo and Parker laboratories have investigated how the selectivity of these existing methods function and how it can be optimized.5–7 A study from GlaxoSmithKline also enforced the utility of photo-crosslinkers in drug discovery, using diazirines in fragment-based screening to identify binders of protein targets.8 There have been some recent expansions of the photo-crosslinking toolbox, but the collection is still limited.9–11 Considering all of this, we sought to develop new photo-crosslinkers that could potentially be embedded in bioactive molecules.
Isoxazoles represent a common motif in medicinal chemistry.12 Intriguingly, several studies have highlighted the labile nature of the isoxazole N-O bond. The Khlebnikov group has achieved transformations such as: rearrangement of vinyl-isoxazoles to pyrroles13, isoxazole-azirine and isoxazole-oxazole isomerization14, and azirine-oxazole conversion followed by reductive isoxazole ring-opening.15 The majority of these reactions utilized a catalyst. However, there is significant precedent for light-activated ring opening of isoxazoles.16 The isoxazole produce intermediates reminiscent of photo-crosslinking motifs during these transformations, including nitrenes and azirines (Scheme 1).17 Indeed, muscimol and thiomuscimol, isoxazole-containing substrates of the gamma amino butyric acid receptor, have been shown to crosslink, presumably due to the photoreactivity of the isoxazole.18–20 Isoxazoles represent an untapped functional group in terms of their innate ability to act as a minimalist photo-crosslinker and their presence in a wide variety of molecules in medicinal chemistry. We therefore sought to establish proof-of-principle for isoxazoles as photo-crosslinkers/PAL probes by demonstrating their utility in binding site validation and off-target analysis with implications for drug repurposing.
Scheme 1.
Isoxazole photo-crosslinking mechanisms
α-Synuclein (αS) is a 14.5 kDa protein that is implicated in several neurodegenerative diseases. αS insoluble aggregates (fibrils) are highly concentrated in Lewy Bodies, the pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease.21 In our efforts to develop positron emission tomography (PET) imaging probes for Parkinson’s disease, isoxazole-containing molecules have been shown to bind to in vitro generated αS pre-formed fibrils with nM affinity.22 We therefore used derivatives of these molecules as a first test of isoxazole crosslinking. We were excited to find that our PET leads could photo-crosslink to αS (ESI, Fig. S1)
We then synthesized a series of compounds to systematically assess electronic effects on isoxazole crosslinking by varying the ring at the 3-position of the isoxazole. Inclusion of a propargyl ether enables subsequent copper-catalyzed 3+2 cycloaddition (click) chemistry functionalization.23, 24 The series AS1–7 was validated against fibrils via matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) and fluorescent SDS-PAGE analysis. Upon irradiation with 254 nm light, all probes formed covalent adducts with αS that were labeled using an Alexa Fluor 488 (AF488) azide probe. (Fig. 1B) Thus, isoxazole crosslinking is not significantly affected by the electronic nature of the pendant ring system. Alternative wavelengths (365 nm, 427 nm) were examined as well, but resulted in decreased labeling efficiency. (ESI, Fig. S2–S3) A mass adduct corresponding to isobaric labeling was noted via whole protein MALDI-TOF MS, as well as an additional peak, possibly due to in-source decay (Fig. 1D).
Fig. 1.
A. AS1–7 isoxazole probes. B. Fluorescent SDS-PAGE of isoxazole-containing photo-crosslinkers irradiated at 254 nm in the presence of fibrillar αS. AF488: Fluorescent detection of αS photoproducts click labeled with AF488. CBB: Coomassie staining showing protein present in each lane. C. Crosslinking of fibrillar αS to AS7 in the presence and absence of HEK cell cytosolic lysate. D. Whole protein MALDI-TOF MS of AS3 crosslinking to fibrillar αS. E. αS fragment crosslinked to AS3 identified via Orbitrap LC-MS/MS (extracted and parent ion chromatograms.) DMSO controls show spectra for un-crosslinked αS. F. Fragment (MS/MS) spectrum of AS3 crosslinked peptide with annotated b and y ion series.
To demonstrate that our molecules enable target enrichment, cross-linked αS was labeled with desthiobiotin azide (DTBA), disaggregated by boiling, bound to streptavidin beads, and eluted with excess biotin. A product with the additional mass of DTBA was observed in the elution fraction, indicating successful enrichment. (ESI, Fig. S5) Probe AS7 was examined in more detail for the ability to label αS in the presence of human embryonic kidney (HEK) cell lysate. 100 μM AS7 in the presence of 2 mg/ml HEK cell lysate showed little decrease in labeling efficiency, with a detection limit of 1–5 μM αS, demonstrating utility of isoxazoles as photo-labeling motifs even in the complex milieu of cell lysates. (Fig. 1C)
Given the efficiency of in vitro photo-crosslinking, we wished to determine whether we could obtain binding site information for our probe molecules by performing bottom-up proteomics. αS contains a variety of small-molecule binding sites,25 and it is not obvious which of these are targeted by a given ligand. Upon irradiation of AS3, a substantial adduct was noted by whole-protein MALDI-TOF MS (Fig. 1D). Upon tryptic digest, Orbitrap liquid chromatograph MS/MS (LC-MS/MS) was used to identify a match for residues 24–43 of αS (Fig. 1E). Analysis of the fragment MS/MS spectrum allowed us to confirm the identity of this crosslinked peptide and localize the crosslink to Gly31 (Fig. 1F). The majority of the other identified crosslinked peptides were also localized to this region (ESI, Fig. S6), consistent with previous mapping of the binding site of a similar molecule to this site using a diazirine.22 Amino acid selectivity of the isoxazole can be inferred via detailed analysis of the identified crosslinks. Lysine and glycine showed the most reactivity, with minor crosslinks also identified to threonine, serine, alanine, and glutamine. (ESI, Fig. S6–S8) These results demonstrate the utility of isoxazole as a minimal photo-crosslinking motif in protein binding site analysis with a suitably promiscuous reactivity for proteomic applications.
To validate the use of isoxazole photo-crosslinkers more broadly, we shifted focus to FDA-approved drugs, where at least 15 compounds are currently or have previously been approved. Amongst these molecules, sulfisoxazole (SFX, Fig. 2A) is an antibacterial agent that functions as a competitive inhibitor of dihydropteroate synthase, which is necessary to bacterial folate biosynthesis.26 In addition to its role as an antibiotic, SFX has been identified as a hit in anticancer drug repurposing screens, where it is proposed to inhibit extracellular vesicle (exosome) release.27 There has been some debate as to the mechanism of reduction in tumor burden,28, 29 motivating SFX PAL studies. Regardless of previously identified targets, novel binders of SFX would be useful for drug-repurposing as well as benchmarking of isoxazole photochemistry.
Fig. 2.
A. Structures of sulfisoxazole probes. B. Schematic representation of the chemoproteomic workflow utilized in this study. C. Volcano plot representing SFX-1 enrichment of proteins with an andromeda score greater than 15 colored in blue and the enrichment region for the top domains highlighted in green. D. Pie chart representing proteins targeted by SFX-1, organized by k-means clustering of specific protein domains, with sections sized depending on number of proteins. See ESI for details.
A sulfisoxazole probe (SFX-1, Fig. 2A) was synthesized to contain an alkyne for subsequent labeling and enrichment studies. SFX-1 was first validated by photo-crosslinking in the presence of 2 mg/mL HEK cell lysate with subsequent conjugation to tetramethyl rhodamine (TAMRA) azide. From this, the optimal irradiation time was determined to be ~10 min, as a time-dependent decrease in protein banding upon prolonged UV exposure was observed. (ESI, Fig. S9) The application of this probe in a chemoproteomic workflow was then examined quantitatively in cytosolic MDA-MB-231 cell lysate via stable isotopic labeling using amino acids in cell culture (SILAC).30 Freshly prepared lysate was chosen as a model, as the current isoxazole crosslinkers require 254 nm light, which may be damaging to cells and lead to altered protein profiles. The SILAC lysates were treated with either 250 μM probe (heavy “H” samples, SFX-1) or 250 μM probe and 1 mM competitor (light “L” samples, SFX-1 + SFX). The resulting samples were then crosslinked, labeled with a photo-cleavable biotin azide, enriched on streptavidin beads, eluted by 365 nm irradiation, and analyzed via LC-MS/MS. (Fig. 2B) It should be noted that the SILAC experiments focused on cytosolic targets (Triton-soluble fraction) to enable optimal enrichment on streptavidin beads without denaturing the proteome.
A robust list of proteins was identified after filtering of contaminants (1555 total) that was further enriched (785 total) via thresholding (H/L ≥ 1.5, Andromeda score > 15, p-value < 0.05). (Fig. 2C) Given the remaining complexity of the target list, a bioinformatic similarity-based approach was adopted to select potential high-value targets of SFX. Proteins were analyzed via domain annotation in Uniprot (60% of initial hits annotated), and the proteins pertaining to the top-10 enriched domains (122 total) were one-hot encoded and grouped using k-means clustering. (Fig. 2D; ESI, Table S1)
The enriched domains all represent interesting targets with potential ties to exosome biogenesis, the proposed mechanism of SFX as an anti-cancer agent. The top enriched domain was the RNA recognition motif (RRM), followed by thioredoxin and EF-hand. The RRM domain protein list was mainly composed of heterogenous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs), which have been shown to be enriched and shuttled in extracellular vesicles.31 Thioredoxins, which maintain the proper oxidation of cysteine residues, are primarily intracellular proteins, but have been shown to be secreted, and thioredoxin-associated proteins are found in exosomes.32, 33 The EF-hand domain is found in a variety of calcium-binding proteins, typified by calmodulin (CaM), which are implied in exosome biogenesis.34 Aside from the EF-hand domain proteins, a number of other calcium-modulating proteins were enriched that have been tied to exosome formation including: synaptotagmin,35 calpain,36 and annexin family proteins.37, 38 Additional gene-ontology (GO) analysis39 revealed prominent enrichment of exosome cellular compartmentalization in the identified proteins. (ESI, Fig. S10)
To validate the observed targets, we attempted in vitro photo-crosslinking with RRM protein hnRNP A1, thioredoxin, and CaM. CaM and thioredoxin both showed photo-crosslinking with SFX-1 and competition with various dosages of SFX. (ESI, Fig. S10). We did not see crosslinking to hnRNP A1, but this may be because the protein is not in its bioactive conformation in the absence of its cognate RNA. All of the targets will require further study to understand the basis for their interactions with SFX and the implications for its anti-cancer potential. More broadly, the discovery of novel targets for SFX reinforces the ability of isoxazole photo-crosslinking methods to spearhead drug-repurposing screens.
In this initial report, we have demonstrated that isoxazole compounds can be activated with UV light for photo-crosslinking to proteins and that this is compatible with several chemoproteomic workflows, including photo-cleavable biotin tags, with the addition of a bio-orthogonal reaction handle elsewhere on the molecule. We have validated isoxazole crosslinking in αS fibril experiments and showed that we identify the same binding site previously observed with a conventional diazirine tag. Isoxazole crosslinking has also provided insight into the interactome of SFX, with several novel targets identified. Certainly, there are some limitations to isoxazoles, such as the requirement for UV light, which may limit their application in live cells and tissues. As we broaden our understanding of the crosslinking mechanism, we may be able to address this, as well as further determine amino acid crosslinking preferences and the effects of pendant functional groups. We note that alkyl substituted isoxazoles have also shown promise, and preliminary proof of principle has been demonstrated with crosslinking of Valdecoxib (VCOX-1) in whole-cell lysates. (ESI, Fig. S31)
We have focused on the use of the isoxazole as an intrinsic crosslinker, but optimized versions could also be used as novel extrinsic crosslinkers to complement diazirines, aryl azides, and benzophenones. The immediate usefulness of isoxazoles as a photochemical motif emphasizes the need for the identification and development of additional novel photo-crosslinkers, further enabling chemists to utilize functional, minimalist, and easily accessible small molecule probes. Indeed, studies of the photo-reactivity of other common medicinal chemistry heterocycles is already underway in our laboratory.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH R01-NS103873 to E.J.P., NIH U19-NS110456 to R.H.M. and E.J.P., and P01-CA196539 and R01-AI118891 to B.A.G.). Instruments supported by the NIH and National Science Foundation include NMR (NSF CHE-1827457) and mass spectrometers (NIH RR-023444 and NSF MRI-0820996) M.G.L. was supported by an Age Related Neurodegenerative Disease Training Grant fellowship (NIH T32-AG000255). H.J.K. was supported by an NIH Predoctoral Fellowship (NIH F31-AG069390). S.X.P. thanks the Vagelos Molecular Life Science Scholars program for support.
Footnotes
Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Synthesis and character-rization of all probes, protein expression and purification, all molecular biology protocols, proteomics methods and analysis. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x
Notes and references
- 1.Smith E and Collins I, Future Med. Chem, 2015, 7, 159–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dorman G and Prestwich GD, Biochemistry, 1994, 33, 5661–5673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dubinsky L, Krom BP and Meijler MM, Bioorg. Med. Chem, 2012, 20, 554–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Murale DP, Hong SC, Haque MM and Lee J-S, Proteome Sci, 2017, 15, 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gao J, Mfuh A, Amako Y and Woo CM, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2018, 140, 4259–4268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.West AV, Muncipinto G, Wu H-Y, Huang AC, Labenski MT, Jones LH and Woo CM, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2021, 143, 6691–6700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Conway LP, Jadhav AM, Homan RA, Li W, Rubiano JS, Hawkins R, Lawrence RM and Parker CG, Chem. Sci, 2021, 12, 7839–7847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Grant EK, Fallon DJ, Hann MM, Fantom KGM, Quinn C, Zappacosta F, Annan RS, Chung CW, Bamborough P, Dixon DP, Stacey P, House D, Patel VK, Tomkinson NCO and Bush JT, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2020, 59, 21096–21105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Herner A, Marjanovic J, Lewandowski TM, Marin V, Patterson M, Miesbauer L, Ready D, Williams J, Vasudevan A and Lin Q, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2016, 138, 14609–14615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Page ACS, Scholz SO, Keenan KN, Spradlin JN, Belcher BP, Brittain SM, Tallarico JA, McKenna JM, Schirle M, Nomura DK and Toste FD, Chem. Sci, 2022, 13, 3851–3856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cauwel M, Guillou C, Renault K, Schapman D, Bénard M, Galas L, Cosette P, Renard P-Y and Sabot C, Chem. Commun, 2021, 57, 3893–3896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhu J, Mo J, Lin H.-z., Chen Y and Sun H.-p., Bioorg. Med. Chem, 2018, 26, 3065–3075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Galenko EE, Bodunov VA, Galenko AV, Novikov MS and Khlebnikov AF, J. Org. Chem, 2017, 82, 8568–8579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Serebryannikova AV, Galenko EE, Novikov MS and Khlebnikov AF, J. Org. Chem, 2019, 84, 15567–15577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Galenko EE, Bodunov VA, Kryukova MA, Novikov MS and Khlebnikov AF, J. Org. Chem, 2021, 86, 4098–4111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Galenko EE, Khlebnikov AF and Novikov MS, Chem. Heterocylcic Compounds, 2016, 52, 637–650. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pavlik JW, Martin HST, Lambert KA, Lowell JA, Tsefrikas VM, Eddins CK and Kebede N, J. Heterocycl. Chem, 2005, 42, 273–281. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Smith GB and Olsen RW, J. Biol. Chem, 1994, 269, 20380–20387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nielsen M, Witt M-R, Ebert B and Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Eur. J. Pharmacol, 1995, 289, 109–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huh KH, Delorey TM, Endo S and Olsen RW, Mol. Pharmacol, 1995, 48, 666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Spillantini MG, Schmidt ML, Lee VMY, Trojanowski JQ, Jakes R and Goedert M, Nature, 1997, 388, 839–840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ferrie JJ, Lengyel-Zhand Z, Janssen B, Lougee MG, Giannakoulias S, Hsieh C-J, Pagar VV, Weng C-C, Xu H, Graham TJA, Lee VMY, Mach RH and Petersson EJ, Chem. Sci, 2020, 11, 12746–12754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Parker CG and Pratt MR, Cell, 2020, 180, 605–632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rostovtsev VV, Green LG, Fokin VV and Sharpless KB, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2002, 41, 2596–2599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hsieh C-J, Ferrie JJ, Xu K, Lee I, Graham TJA, Tu Z, Yu J, Dhavale D, Kotzbauer P, Petersson EJ and Mach RH, ACS Chem. Neurosci, 2018, 9, 2521–2527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hong YL, Hossler PA, Calhoun DH and Meshnick SR, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother, 1995, 39, 1756–1763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Im EJ, Lee CH, Moon PG, Rangaswamy GG, Lee B, Lee JM, Lee JC, Jee JG, Bae JS, Kwon TK, Kang KW, Jeong MS, Lee JE, Jung HS, Ro HJ, Jun S, Kang W, Seo SY, Cho YE, Song BJ and Baek MC, Nat. Commun, 2019, 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Fonseka P, Chitti SV, Sanwlani R and Mathivanan S, Nat. Commun, 2021, 12, 977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lee C-H, Bae J-H, Kim J-I, Park J-M, Choi E-J and Baek M-C, Nat. Commun, 2021, 12, 976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mann M, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 2006, 7, 952–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fabbiano F, Corsi J, Gurrieri E, Trevisan C, Notarangelo M and D’Agostino VG, J. Extracell. Vesicles, 2020, 10, e12043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Plugis Nicholas M, Weng N, Zhao Q, Palanski Brad A, Maecker Holden T, Habtezion A and Khosla C, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2018, 115, 8781–8786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kowal J, Arras G, Colombo M, Jouve M, Morath Jakob P, Primdal-Bengtson B, Dingli F, Loew D, Tkach M and Théry C, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2016, 113, E968–E977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chazin WJ, Acc. Chem. Res, 2011, 44, 171–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tucker WC and Chapman ER, Biochem. J, 2002, 366, 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Taylor J, Jaiswal R and Bebawy M, Curr. Cancer Drug Targets, 2017, 17, 486–494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Théry C, Boussac M, Véron P, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P, Raposo G, Garin J and Amigorena S, J. Immunol, 2001, 166, 7309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Koumangoye RB, Sakwe AM, Goodwin JS, Patel T and Ochieng J, PLOS ONE, 2011, 6, e24234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schölz C, Lyon D, Refsgaard JC, Jensen LJ, Choudhary C and Weinert BT, Nat. Methods, 2015, 12, 1003–1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.