Skip to main content
Poultry Science logoLink to Poultry Science
. 2023 Jan 6;102(4):102476. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102476

Mucosal phosphatase activity, phytate degradation, and mineral digestibility in 6-week-old turkeys and broilers at different dietary levels of phosphorus and phytase and comparison with 3-week-old animals

Moritz Novotny *, Vera Sommerfeld *, Jochen Krieg *,1, Imke Kühn , Korinna Huber *, Markus Rodehutscord *,2
PMCID: PMC9922952  PMID: 36716675

Abstract

Female turkeys (B.U.T. 6) and broilers (Ross 308) were compared at 6 wk of age to evaluate the effects of species, dietary P, Ca, and phytase levels on myo-inositol hexakisphosphate (InsP6) degradation along the digestive tract, gut mucosal phosphatase activity, P and Ca digestibility, and myo-inositol concentrations in the digesta and blood. The environmental conditions and experimental corn-soybean meal-based diets were the same for both species. Four diets with either combination of 2 levels of P and Ca (CaP–: 4.0 g P/kg, 5.4 g Ca/kg and CaP+: 6.0 g P/kg, 8.0 g Ca/kg) and 2 levels of phytase supplementation (0 and 1,500 FTU/kg) were fed to the animals for 7 d at their sixth wk of age. Each diet was randomly assigned to 6 pens per species, with 10 birds each. After slaughter, blood, digesta from the crop, gizzard, duodenum, lower ileum, and jejunal mucosa were collected. Endogenous mucosal phosphatase activity in the jejunum was higher in turkeys than in broilers. Prececal InsP6 disappearance was also higher in turkeys than in broilers when phytase was not supplemented. Phytase supplementation led to a higher prececal InsP6 disappearance in broilers than in turkeys, likely due to different crop conditions such as moisture content. However, prececal P digestibility was higher in turkeys than broilers. Different relationships between myo-inositol concentration in the ileum digesta and blood were found, depending on the species. A comparison of the results with those obtained in 3-wk-old birds of a companion study showed that in diets with low Ca and P levels, prececal InsP6 disappearance increased with age in turkeys, but not in broilers. This coincided with changes in the conditions of the digestive tract, such as the water content in the crop, gizzard pH, and mucosal phosphatase activity. In conclusion, occurrence of differences in phytate degradation between turkeys and broilers, fed the same feed, depended on age and can be explained by different physiological development of the digestive tract.

Key words: phytate degradation, digesta, age, broiler, turkey

INTRODUCTION

Utilization of plant-based P is a major issue in poultry nutrition, as the majority of this element is bound to phytate (any salt of myo-inositol hexakisphosphate [InsP6]), which requires enzymatic hydrolysis before the P can be absorbed in the digestive tract. The capacity of poultry to hydrolyze InsP6 via endogenous phytases is debatable. The high potential of endogenous InsP6 degradation has repeatedly been shown in broilers (Rodehutscord et al., 2022) with endogenous mucosal phytases and phosphatases as major contributing factors (Sommerfeld et al., 2019). Turkeys have been shown to have lower InsP6 degradation than broilers (Ingelmann et al., 2019; Olukosi et al., 2020). However, in these studies, species-specific experimental feeds were used, with substantial differences in dietary P and Ca concentrations. In a study using the same feed for different poultry species, total tract P retention when fed a low-P diet was 58% and 39% for broilers and turkeys, respectively (Rodehutscord and Dieckmann, 2005). However, InsP6 degradation was not studied. Thus, different endogenous InsP6 degradation in broilers and turkeys is likely to exist, but this has not yet been proven. Another factor that may influence endogenous InsP6 degradation is the age or age-dependent physiological development of animals (Morgan et al., 2015; Olukosi et al., 2020; Kriseldi et al., 2021).

The objective of this study was to compare the prececal InsP6 disappearance in 6-wk-old broilers and turkeys with respect to the effects of dietary Ca and P (CaP) concentrations and phytase supplementation (PHY) in order to elucidate which physiological differences between broilers and turkeys are causative for the dissimilarities previously found. Thus, the comparison was to be made using the same feed for both species. As two species with different maturation rates were compared (Zuidhof et al., 2014; Tůmová et al., 2020), it was unclear whether the observed differences could be solely attributed to species effects or if physiological development effects were confounding. Therefore, the results were compared with those obtained from 3-wk-old broilers and turkeys of a companion study (Novotny et al., 2023) to assess whether age affected the outcome of this species comparison. Another objective was to review the traits that might explain different endogenous InsP6 degradation in broilers and turkeys, such as gut length, pH of the digestive tract, jejunal mucosal phosphatase activity, and changes between the third and sixth wk of age. It was hypothesized that InsP6 degradation in broilers and turkeys is differently affected by age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The trial protocol was approved in accordance with German animal welfare legislation by the Regierungspräsidium Tübingen, Germany (Project No. HOH 59/19 TE) and was carried out at the experimental station “Unterer Lindenhof” of the University of Hohenheim, Germany. This was an extension of the trial described by Novotny et al. (2023). All procedures and analyses were the same as applied to 3-wk-old birds in that study and are therefore described only briefly in the present study.

Birds and Housing

A total of 530 female Ross 308 broiler hatchlings and 530 female B.U.T. 6 turkey hatchlings were raised in floor pens on wood shavings, and 240 birds from each species were used in the present study. Until 35 d of age, the animals were fed species-specific diets formulated according to the respective supply recommendations (Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie, 1999, 2004) without supplemented phytase. On d 35 of age, the birds were allocated to perforated floor pens (24 per species; 1.15 m × 2.3 m for broilers and 3 m × 4 m for turkeys, all in the same barn) with 10 birds per pen. Each pen was assigned to 1 of 4 experimental diets in a randomized complete block design, with 6 pens per diet and species. Feed and water were provided for ad libitum consumption until slaughter on d 42.

Experimental Diets and Treatments

A 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments (2 species, 2 CaP levels, and 2 levels of PHY addition) was chosen. Both species received the same experimental diet from d 35 of age until slaughter (Table 1). Corn-soybean meal-based diets were formulated to meet the supply recommendations for turkeys (Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie, 2004), with the exception of P and Ca. The CaP– diets had no mineral phosphate added, resulting in calculated P and Ca concentrations of 4.0 g/kg and 5.4 g/kg, respectively. Sand was used as the filler which was replaced by monocalcium phosphate (MCP) and limestone in the other diets. The CaP+ diets were supplemented with MCP and limestone to achieve P and Ca concentrations of 6.0 g/kg and 8.0 g/kg, respectively. The diets were either not supplemented with phytase on top (PHY–) or supplemented with 1,500 FTU/kg of a modified E. coli-derived 6-phytase (Quantum Blue, AB Vista, Marlborough, United Kingdom) (PHY+). All diets contained 5 g/kg TiO2 as an indigestible marker and were mixed and pelleted through a 3-mm die. Formulated levels of P, InsP6-P, and Ca were confirmed by analyses (Table 2). The analyzed phytase activity in the PHY+ diets was slightly lower than the calculated value (approximately 1,120 FTU/kg) but consistent in both diets.

Table 1.

Ingredient composition and calculated nutrient concentrations of the experimental diets.

Ingredient, g/kg CaP–PHY– CaP–PHY+ CaP+PHY– CaP+PHY+
Corn 487.0 487.0 487.0 487.0
Soybean meal 392.3 392.3 392.3 392.3
Rapeseed meal 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
Soybean oil 48.2 48.2 48.2 48.2
L-lysine-sulfate 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8
DL-methionine 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9
L-threonine 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Choline chloride 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
NaCl 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
NaHCO₃ 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Vitamin mix1 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Mineral mix2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Titanium dioxide 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Limestone 7.2 7.2 9.5 9.5
Monocalcium phosphate 0.0 0.0 9.5 9.5
Sand 11.8 11.8 0.0 0.0
Calculated (g/kg):
P 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Ca 5.4 5.4 8.0 8.0
Crude protein 242 242 242 242
Phytase (FTU/kg) 0 1,500 0 1,500
1

Vitamin mix (MIAVIT GmbH, Essen (Oldb.), Germany), provided per kg of complete diet: 10,000 IU vitamin A, 3,000 IU vitamin D3, 30 mg DL-α-Tocopherylacetate, 2.4 mg vitamin K3, 3 mg vitamin B1, 6 mg vitamin B2, 6 mg vitamin B6, 30 μg vitamin B12, 50 mg nicotinic acid, 14 mg pantothenic acid, 1 mg folic acid, 0.1 mg biotin.

2

Mineral mix (Gelamin, Gesellschaft für Tierernährung mbH, Memmingen, Germany), provided per kg of complete diet: 50 mg calcium from calcium carbonate, 80 mg manganese from manganese-(II)-oxide, 60 mg zinc from zinc oxide, 25 mg iron from ferrous-(II)-carbonate, 7.5 mg copper from cupric-(II)-sulfate pentahydrate, 0.6 mg iodine from calcium iodate, 0.2 mg selenium from sodium selenite.

Table 2.

Analyzed composition of the experimental diets.

Treatments1
Analyzed composition (g/kg2) CaP– PHY– CaP– PHY+ CaP+ PHY– CaP+ PHY+
InsP6 (µmol/g) 14.0 13.6 13.8 13.8
InsP5 (µmol/g) 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.6
Myo-inositol (µmol/g) 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.8
InsP6-P 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5
P 4.4 4.3 6.6 6.6
Ca 5.5 5.3 8.2 8.1
Crude protein 247 243 247 243
Phytase (FTU/kg) <50 1,110 <50 1,130
1

Calculated composition: CaP–, 4.0 g P/kg and 5.4 g Ca/kg; CaP+, 6.0 g P/kg and 8.0 g Ca/kg; PHY–, no supplemented phytase; PHY+: 1,500 FTU/kg supplemented phytase.

2Unless stated otherwise.

Procedures and Sampling

Animals and feed were weighed on d 35 and 42 to calculate ADG, ADFI, and gain per feed (G:F), considering the removed animals. On d 42, 1 h of feed deprivation was followed by 1 h of feeding prior to slaughter to standardize the gut fill. The animals were then stunned with a gas mixture (35% N2, 35% CO2, and 30% O2). Two stunned birds per pen were randomly selected, marked, and weighed individually. The birds were killed by decapitation, trunk blood was collected, and plasma was obtained. One of the birds was used for the determination of intestinal section lengths using a 1-cm grit. The jejunum was dissected from the second bird and the mucosa was obtained. The remaining birds were asphyxiated with CO2 after stunning. Digesta samples of crop, gizzard, duodenum, and lower two-thirds of the ileum were collected from all birds in a pen. The samples of each section were pooled on a by pen basis and frozen at –20°C after determination of the pH values of the crop, gizzard, and duodenum contents.

Sample Preparation and Chemical Analyses

The digesta samples were freeze-dried, pulverized, and stored in sealed containers at room temperature. Pulverized feed and digesta samples were analyzed for P, Ca, Ti, and InsP3-6 isomers (Zeller et al., 2015a; Sommerfeld et al., 2018) and myo-inositol (MI) was analyzed in the feed, digesta, and plasma samples (Sommerfeld et al., 2018). The activity of exogenous phytase in the feed was analyzed by AB Vista Lab Service (Ystrad Mynach, Wales, UK) using a validated product-specific ELISA method. Mucosal phosphatase activity was measured in enriched brush-border membrane samples according to the methods of Huber et al. (2015), with modifications described in the companion paper (Novotny et al., 2023). In brief, brush-border membrane sample aliquots containing 160 µg protein were incubated with 25 µg of sodium phytate (Sirius Fine Chemicals SiChem GmbH, Bremen, Germany) at pH 5.5 for 15 min. Free phosphate (Pi) was determined photometrically (655 nm, 40°C, Infinite 200 PRO M NANO+, Tecan Trading AG, Switzerland). The activity of mucosa associated phosphatases (including phytase, as substrate was sodium phytate) is the released Pi per g brush-border membrane protein per minute incubation time at pH 5.5 and 40°C.

Calculations and Statistical Analysis

Prececal digestibility of P, Ca, AA, and InsP6 disappearance were calculated using the marker method and the following equation:

y(X)=100100×(Xdigesta×TiO2feed)/(TiO2digesta×Xfeed)

where y is the disappearance or digestibility of X in %; X is the concentration of InsP6, P, or Ca in the feed and digesta; and TiO2 is the concentration of TiO2 in the feed and digesta.

The data were analyzed with a 3-way ANOVA using the MIXED procedure and pairwise t-tests using the software package SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Data without normal distribution were log-transformed. The results are presented as LSmeans and pooled SEM of the untransformed data. The pen was considered the experimental unit. The following model was used.

yijkl=μ+αi+βj+γk+(αβ)ij+(αγ)ik+(βγ)jk+(αβγ)ijk+δl+εijkl

where yijkl = response variable, µ = overall mean, αi = effect of species (fixed), βj = effect of CaP (fixed), γk = effect of PHY (fixed), (αβ)ij = interaction between species and CaP (fixed), (αγ)ik = interaction between species and PHY (fixed), (βγ)jk = interaction between CaP and PHY (fixed), (αβγ)ijk is the 3-way interaction between species, CaP, and PHY (fixed), δl = effect of block (random), and εijkl = residual error. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Crop pH was lower in broilers than in turkeys (P < 0.001, Table 3). For both species, the pH of the crop was slightly lower in the treatments with high CaP level (P = 0.030). In the gizzard, pH was higher in broilers than in turkeys (P < 0.001, Table 3). In the duodenum, pH was slightly lower in broilers than in turkeys for all treatments, except for CaP+Phy+, in which there was no difference in pH between broilers and turkeys, resulting in a 3-way interaction (P = 0.028). Jejunal mucosal phosphatase activity was only affected by phytase supplementation in turkeys, where it was generally higher than that in broilers, resulting in a species × PHY interaction (P = 0.010). When the CaP level was high, jejunal mucosal phosphatase activity was lower than that at low CaP level, irrespective of species or phytase supplementation (P = 0.034). Prececal InsP6 disappearance was lower in broilers than in turkeys when no phytase was supplemented. When phytase was supplemented, prececal InsP6 disappearance was higher in broilers than in turkeys and overall higher than that without phytase supplementation, resulting in a species × PHY interaction (P < 0.001). At the high CaP level, prececal InsP6 disappearance was lower than that at the low CaP level, irrespective of species or phytase supplementation (P < 0.001). Prececal P digestibility was higher in turkeys than in broilers, and it increased in turkeys with high CaP, but did not change in broilers, resulting in a species × CaP interaction (P = 0.004). Prececal P digestibility was also affected by species × PHY interaction (P < 0.001), with the lowest prececal P digestibility in broiler PHY– treatments, a higher digestibility in turkey PHY–, followed by broiler PHY+, and highest in turkey PHY+. Furthermore, prececal P digestibility was affected by the CaP × PHY interaction (P < 0.001). For prececal Ca digestibility, there was a trend for the species × CaP interaction (P = 0.050), where turkey treatments had the highest prececal Ca digestibility, followed by broiler CaP–, and broiler CaP+ with the lowest prececal Ca digestibility. Treatments with phytase supplementation always showed higher prececal Ca digestibility than those without phytase supplementation, irrespective of species or CaP level (P < 0.001).

Table 3.

Effect of Ca and P level (CaP) and phytase supplementation (PHY) on pH in crop, gizzard, and duodenum, jejunal mucosal phosphatase activity (MPA), prececal (pc) Ca and P digestibility, and prececal InsP6 disappearance of broilers and turkeys at 42 d of age (n = 6 pens per treatment).

Species Treatment1 pH crop pH gizzard pH duodenum MPA
(µmol Pi/g BBM protein/ min)
pc InsP6 disappearance (%) pc P digestibility (%) pc Ca digestibility (%)
Broiler CaP– PHY– 5.4 4.2 5.8b 1.1 27.2 29.2 26.1
PHY+ 5.3 4.4 5.8b 1.9 80.3 67.9 31.0
CaP+ PHY– 5.1 4.4 5.8b 0.8 15.5 36.5 20.8
PHY+ 5.1 4.4 5.9a 1.6 76.8 60.0 27.3
Turkey CaP– PHY– 6.0 3.8 6.0a 4.6 33.7 38.4 45.7
PHY+ 5.9 3.6 6.0a 8.0 70.3 66.7 56.9
CaP+ PHY– 5.8 3.8 5.9a 3.7 26.3 47.6 48.0
PHY+ 5.7 3.7 5.9a 6.2 64.8 67.3 57.5
SEM 0.15 0.10 0.03 0.77 2.77 1.57 2.65
Broiler CaP– 48.6c
CaP+ 48.3c
Turkey CaP– 52.5b
CaP+ 57.4a
Broiler PHY– 0.9c 21.4d 32.8d
PHY+ 1.7c 78.6a 64.0b
Turkey PHY– 4.2b 30.0c 43.0c
PHY+ 7.1a 67.5b 67.0a
CaP– PHY– 33.8d
PHY+ 67.3a
CaP+ PHY– 42.0c
PHY+ 63.6b
SEM 0.67 2.42 1.30
P-value
Species < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.385 < 0.001 < 0.001
CaP 0.030 0.082 0.396 0.034 < 0.001 0.009 0.319
PHY 0.512 0.893 0.396 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Species × CaP 0.986 0.845 0.031 0.185 0.674 0.004 0.050
Species × PHY 0.959 0.089 0.125 0.010 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.123
CaP × PHY 0.506 0.741 0.008 0.511 0.070 < 0.001 0.991
Species × CaP × PHY 0.831 0.296 0.028 0.527 0.268 0.058 0.599
1

Calculated composition: CaP–, 4.0 g P/kg and 5.4 g Ca/kg; CaP+, 6.0 g P/kg and 8.0 g Ca/kg; PHY–, no supplemented phytase; PHY+: 1,500 FTU/kg supplemented phytase.

a-d

Means within a column and within a significant interaction not sharing a common superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).

In the crop of turkeys fed with phytase, InsP6 and Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P5 concentrations were lower than in turkeys without phytase supplementation (Table 4). In broilers with phytase supplementation, InsP6 and Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P5 concentrations were even lower than in turkeys with phytase supplementation, resulting in a species × PHY interaction (P < 0.001). Ins(1,2,5,6)P4 was only quantifiable in broiler and turkey crops in treatments supplemented with phytase. Of these, broilers had higher Ins(1,2,5,6)P4 concentrations in the crop than turkeys (P < 0.001). Myo-inositol concentrations in the crop were lower in birds fed diets with high CaP level than in those fed diets with low CaP level (P < 0.001).

Table 4.

Effect of Ca and P level (CaP) and phytase supplementation (PHY) on the concentrations of myo-inositol and inositol phosphates1 (µmol/g DM) in the crop of broilers and turkeys at 42 d of age (n = 6 pens per treatment).

Species Treatment2 InsP6 Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P5 Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P5 Ins(1,2,5,6)P4 Myo-inositol
Broiler CaP– PHY– 13.9 1.1 0.6 <loq3 2.2
PHY+ 5.1 0.3 0.4 3.7 2.4
CaP+ PHY– 13.9 1.2 0.6 <loq 2.0
PHY+ 5.1 0.3 0.4 4.3 2.2
Turkey CaP– PHY– 14.5 1.2 0.6 <loq 2.1
PHY+ 12.5 0.9 0.6 1.3 2.2
CaP+ PHY– 14.6 1.2 0.6 <loq 1.9
PHY+ 12.5 0.9 0.6 1.4 1.8
SEM 0.97 0.07 0.05 0.47 0.08
Broiler PHY– 13.9ab 1.1a 0.6a
PHY+ 5.1c 0.3c 0.4b
Turkey PHY– 14.6a 1.2a 0.6a
PHY+ 12.5b 0.9b 0.6a
SEM 0.73 0.05 0.04
P-value
Species < 0.001 < 0.001 0.001 < 0.001 0.002
CaP 0.957 0.674 0.623 0.530 < 0.001
PHY < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.060
Species × CaP 0.941 0.815 0.806 0.552 0.355
Species × PHY < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.060
CaP × PHY 0.987 0.815 0.806 0.617
Species × CaP × PHY 0.947 0.963 1.000 0.355
1

Inositol phosphates at or below 0.2 µmol/g DM in concentration are not presented.

2

Calculated composition: CaP–, 4.0 g P/kg and 5.4 g Ca/kg; CaP+, 6.0 g P/kg and 8.0 g Ca/kg; PHY–, no supplemented phytase; PHY+: 1,500 FTU/kg supplemented phytase.

3

loq = limit of quantification (<0.2 µmol/g DM).

a-c

Means within a column and within a significant interaction not sharing a common superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).

In the gizzard content, InsP6 and Ins (1,2,4,5,6)P5 concentrations were lower in treatments with phytase supplementation than in treatments without phytase supplementation, irrespective of species (P < 0.001, Table 5). In treatments with high CaP level, InsP6 and Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P5 concentrations were higher than those in treatments with low CaP level, irrespective of the species (P = 0.008 and P = 0.005, respectively). Ins(1,2,5,6)P4 was only quantifiable in the gizzards of broilers and turkeys in treatments supplemented with phytase. Concentrations tended to be higher in treatments with high CaP level than in those with low CaP level (P = 0.051). The myo-inositol concentration in the gizzard of turkeys was lower than that in broilers and unaffected by phytase supplementation, whereas in broilers, the concentration was higher with phytase supplementation than without phytase supplementation, resulting in a species × PHY interaction (P < 0.001). Furthermore, MI concentrations were unaffected by CaP level in turkeys. However, concentrations were higher when the CaP level was low than when it was high in broilers, resulting in a species × CaP interaction (P = 0.049).

Table 5.

Effect of Ca and P level (CaP) and phytase supplementation (PHY) on the concentrations of myo-inositol and inositol phosphates1 (µmol/g DM) in the gizzard of broilers and turkeys at 42 d of age (n = 6 pens per treatment).

Species Treatment2 InsP6 Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P5 Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P5 Ins(1,2,5,6)P4 Myo-inositol
Broiler CaP– PHY– 6.2 0.4 0.3 n.d.3 2.1
PHY+ 0.5 n.d. n.d. 2.3 3.6
CaP+ PHY– 7.4 0.6 0.3 n.d. 1.6
PHY+ 0.8 n.d. 0.1 2.9 3.0
Turkey CaP– PHY– 6.6 0.5 0.3 n.d. 0.6
PHY+ <loq4 n.d. n.d. 1.9 1.0
CaP+ PHY– 7.2 0.5 0.3 n.d. 0.7
PHY+ 0.3 n.d. 0.3 2.8 1.0
SEM 0.28 0.03 0.03 0.37 0.22
Broiler CaP– 2.8a
CaP+ 2.3b
Turkey CaP– 0.8c
CaP+ 0.9c
Broiler PHY– 1.8b
PHY+ 3.3a
Turkey PHY– 0.6c
PHY+ 1.0c
SEM 0.16
P-value
Species 0.622 0.590 0.196 0.480 < 0.001
CaP 0.008 0.005 0.058 0.051 0.087
PHY < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Species × CaP 0.215 0.288 0.511 0.705 0.049
Species × PHY 0.466 < 0.001
CaP × PHY 0.102 0.677
Species × CaP × PHY 0.890
1

Inositol phosphates at or below 0.2 µmol/g DM in concentration are not presented.

2

Calculated composition: CaP–, 4.0 g P/kg and 5.4 g Ca/kg; CaP+, 6.0 g P/kg and 8.0 g Ca/kg; PHY–, no supplemented phytase; PHY+: 1,500 FTU/kg supplemented phytase.

3

n.d. = not detectable (<0.1 µmol/g).

4

loq = limit of quantification (<0.2 µmol/g).

a-c

Means within a column and within a significant interaction not sharing a common superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).

In the ileum, the concentrations of all InsP were divided by the respective TiO2 concentrations to normalize for different DM digestibility in turkeys and broilers. Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P5 concentrations were lower in turkeys than in broilers when phytase was not supplemented (Table 6). When phytase was supplemented, Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P5 concentrations were reduced to the same concentration in turkeys and broilers at CaP– level and to a lower concentration in broilers than in turkeys at CaP+ level, resulting in a three-way interaction (P < 0.001). Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P5 concentrations were lower in turkeys than in broilers without phytase supplementation, with higher concentrations in both species in CaP+ than in CaP–. With phytase supplementation, Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P5 concentrations increased in turkeys but decreased in broilers in CaP– and did not change in CaP+, resulting in a three-way interaction (P = 0.032). Ins(1,2,3,4,6)P5 concentrations were higher in broilers than in turkeys, and higher in CaP+ than in CaP– (P < 0.001). Ins(1,2,5,6)P4 concentrations were lower in PHY– than in PHY+ (P < 0.001), lower in CaP– than in CaP+ (P < 0.001), and lower in turkeys than in broilers. InsP3x was found in the broiler CaP+PHY+ treatment, but was not detectable in any other treatment. There was a significant three-way interaction between the MI concentrations in the ileum (P < 0.001). The MI concentration was the highest in broilers of the CaP–PHY+ treatment, followed by the broilers of the CaP+PHY+ treatment. The broiler CaP–PHY– treatment had lower concentrations than these treatments, but higher concentrations than broiler CaP+PHY–. The MI concentrations in all turkey treatments were at the same low level as the broiler CaP+PHY– treatment. However, the MI concentrations in the ileum of CaP–PHY+ turkeys were higher than those in CaP–PHY– turkeys. The MI concentrations in the blood were at the same level in turkeys and broilers without phytase supplementation. With phytase supplementation, the blood concentration was higher than that without, whereby with added phytase, turkeys had higher MI concentrations in the blood than broilers, resulting in a species × PHY interaction (P = 0.005). Irrespective of the species, the different combinations of CaP level and phytase led to 4 different MI concentrations in the blood, resulting in a CaP × PHY interaction (P = 0.037).

Table 6.

Effect of Ca and P level (CaP) and phytase supplementation (PHY) on the concentrations of TiO2 (mg/g DM), myo-inositol and inositol phosphates in the ileum (µmol/mg TiO2) and myo-inositol in blood plasma (µmol/ml) of broilers and turkeys at 42 d of age (n = 6 pens per treatment; in case of myo-inositol in blood n = 6 animals per treatment).

Species Treatment1 TiO2 InsP6 Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P5 Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P5 Ins(1,2,3,4,6)P5 Ins(1,2,5,6)P4 Ins(1,2,3,4)P4 InsP3x2 Ileum myo-inositol Blood myo-inositol
Broiler CaP– PHY– 18.0 1.90 0.06c 0.08c 0.04 <loq3 0.03 n.d.4 0.27c 0.27
PHY+ 19.0 0.52 0.03e 0.05d <loq 0.05 0.01 n.d. 1.00a 0.37
CaP+ PHY– 18.5 2.21 0.13a 0.10b 0.05 0.03 0.03 n.d. 0.12de 0.22
PHY+ 20.6 0.61 0.05d 0.09bc <loq 0.20 0.02 0.13 0.50b 0.32
Turkey CaP– PHY– 15.6 1.73 0.04d 0.06d 0.03 n.d. 0.01 n.d. 0.07e 0.25
PHY+ 15.0 0.78 0.03e 0.08c <loq 0.03 0.01 n.d. 0.16d 0.43
CaP+ PHY– 15.3 1.93 0.08b 0.08c 0.04 <loq 0.02 n.d. 0.08de 0.21
PHY+ 17.5 0.92 0.07c 0.16a <loq 0.12 0.03 n.d. 0.08de 0.33
SEM 0.45 0.072 0.005 0.008 0.038 0.015 0.003 0.011 0.027 0.013
Broiler PHY– 2.06a 0.03a 0.25c
PHY+ 0.56d 0.02bc 0.35b
Turkey PHY– 1.83b 0.01c 0.23c
PHY+ 0.85c 0.02b 0.38a
CaP– PHY– 16.8b 0.02b 0.26c
PHY+ 17.0b 0.01c 0.40a
CaP+ PHY– 16.9b 0.02ab 0.22d
PHY+ 19.0a 0.03a 0.32b
SEM 0.32 0.063 0.002 0.010
P-value
Species < 0.001 0.391 < 0.001 0.032 < 0.001 0.001 0.026 <0.001 0.265
CaP 0.002 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
PHY < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.007 < 0.001 0.299 <0.001 <0.001
Species × CaP 0.950 0.658 0.527 0.046 0.545 0.058 0.149 <0.001 0.380
Species × PHY 0.212 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.005
CaP × PHY 0.005 0.068 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.001 <0.001 0.037
Species × CaP × PHY 0.155 0.277 < 0.001 0.032 0.149 0.002 0.121
1

Calculated composition: CaP–, 4.0 g P/kg and 5.4 g Ca/kg; CaP+, 6.0 g P/kg and 8.0 g Ca/kg; PHY–, no supplemented phytase; PHY+: 1,500 FTU/kg supplemented phytase.

2

Ins(1,2,6)P3, Ins(1,4,5)P3, and Ins(2,4,5)P3 could not be differentiated due to co-elution and are thus referred to as InsP3x.

3

loq = limit of quantification (Ins(1,2,3,4,6)P5: 0.3 µmol/g; Ins(1,2,3,4)P4: 0.2 µmol/g).

4

n.d. = not detectable (<0.1 µmol/g).

a-e

Means within a column and within a significant interaction not sharing a common superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Average daily gain and ADFI were higher in broilers than in turkeys, and G:F was higher in turkeys than in broilers (P < 0.001, Table 7). Average daily gain, G:F, and ADFI were higher with phytase supplementation than without (P < 0.001, P = 0.023, and P < 0.001, respectively) and higher with high CaP level than with low CaP level (P < 0.001, P = 0.004, and P < 0.001, respectively). The absolute length of the small intestine was greater, whereas the relative length per BW was shorter in broilers than in turkeys (P < 0.001, Table 7).

Table 7.

Effect of Ca and P level (CaP) and phytase supplementation (PHY) on average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), gain to feed ratio (G:F) from d 35 and d 42 of age, and length of small intestine and BW of broilers and turkeys (one bird per pen) at 42 d of age (n = 6 pens per treatment).

Species Treatment1 ADG2 (g/d) ADFI (g/d) G:F (g/g) Small intestine length (cm) BW of the bird (g) Small intestine length (cm/kg BW)
Broiler CaP– PHY– 121 176 0.69 184 3,202 58
PHY+ 126 179 0.70 183 3,148 58
CaP+ PHY– 126 181 0.70 193 3,081 63
PHY+ 131 181 0.72 191 3,190 60
Turkey CaP– PHY– 112 156 0.71 161 2,292 71
PHY+ 120 165 0.73 154 2,240 70
CaP+ PHY– 121 165 0.73 152 2,274 67
PHY+ 127 168 0.75 157 2,359 67
SEM 3.0 3.5 0.007 4.6 91 2.5
P-value
Species < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
CaP < 0.001 0.004 < 0.001 0.449 0.927 0.962
PHY < 0.001 0.023 < 0.001 0.611 0.732 0.515
Species × CaP 0.261 0.394 0.504 0.067 0.475 0.057
Species × PHY 0.393 0.223 0.865 0.834 0.935 0.867
CaP × PHY 0.588 0.160 0.356 0.390 0.239 0.737
Species × CaP × PHY 0.661 0.703 0.853 0.306 0.918 0.476
1

Calculated composition: CaP–, 4.0 g P/kg and 5.4 g Ca/kg; CaP+, 6.0 g P/kg and 8.0 g Ca/kg; PHY–, no supplemented phytase; PHY+: 1,500 FTU/kg supplemented phytase.

2

Average initial body weights per bird on day 35: 2300 g (broilers) 1,465 g (turkeys).

DISCUSSION

In this study, jejunal mucosal phosphatase activity, prececal InsP6 disappearance, and prececal P and Ca digestibility were higher in 6-wk-old turkeys than in broilers without phytase supplementation. This is in contrast to the results obtained with 3-wk-old turkeys and broilers, where no differences between species were found in these traits in diets without phytase (Novotny et al., 2023). This indicated that InsP6 degradation in broilers and turkeys is affected differently by bird age. In addition, the causality of mucosal phosphatase activity as a main contributor to endogenous InsP6 degradation in broilers and turkeys has been indicated, albeit not proven. As already discussed by Novotny et al. (simultaneously submitted to Poultry Science), these results are in contrast to those of previous comparative studies with broilers and turkeys (Ingelmann et al., 2019; Olukosi et al., 2020), likely because these studies used species-specific diets with different concentrations of nutrients, such as P and Ca. Using species-specific feeds closely resembling industry standards may be advantageous when aiming to compare the effects of different feeding strategies (supplementation of phytase, reduction of supplemented Ca and P) in different production systems (broiler or turkey production). However, such experimental setups do not allow to study species specific traits responsible for the observed differences.

In treatments with phytase supplementation, prececal InsP6 disappearance was higher in broilers than in turkeys. This was also observed in 3-wk-old broilers and turkeys (Novotny et al., 2023). However, differences in prececal InsP6 disappearance between 6-wk-old turkeys and broilers were smaller than between 3-wk-old turkeys and broilers, as in broilers prececal InsP6 disappearance remained at a high level of approximately 80% in CaP–PHY+; while in turkeys, prececal InsP6 disappearance increased from 58.0% in wk 3 to 70.3% in wk 6 in CaP–PHY+ (Figure 1). Moisturizing crop content is important for exogenous enzyme activity (Kierończyk et al., 2016). Thus, this increase in prececal InsP6 disappearance between wk 3 and wk 6 in turkeys was likely caused by a higher water content in the crop of the 6-wk-old turkeys than in 3-wk-old turkeys (indicated by higher water loss during freeze-drying of crop-content samples, data not shown), leading to better substrate accessibility for the supplemented phytase. Additionally, during sampling, crops appeared to be much less developed in 3-wk-old turkeys than in 6-wk-old turkeys. As a result, in 6-wk-old turkeys, InsP6 concentrations in the crop were significantly lower in PHY+ treatments than PHY− treatments, whereas there was no difference between both treatments in 3-wk-old turkeys (Table 4, P < 0.001; Novotny et al., 2023). Among PHY+ treatments, the reduction in InsP6 concentration in the crop from wk 3 to wk 6 was greater in broilers than in turkeys (Figure 2). However, this did not lead to higher prececal InsP6 disappearance in 6-wk-old broilers compared to 3-wk-old broilers. This could partly be explained by an increase in gizzard pH in broilers between wk 3 and wk 6 from pH 4.0 (Novotny et al., 2023) to pH 4.3 (Table 3), as the lower pH in wk 6 was even further from the optimum pH of the supplemented phytase (Menezes-Blackburn et al., 2015) and associated with lower phytate solubility (Grynspan and Cheryan, 1983). Furthermore, the higher phytate degradation in the crop could have been counteracted by lower mucosal phosphatase activity in the jejunum of older broilers. This aspect is discussed in more detail later in this text.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effect of Ca and P level (CaP) and phytase supplementation (PHY) on prececal InsP6 disappearance (LSmeans ± SEM) of broilers and turkeys fed experimental diets at 21 d (Novotny et al., 2023) and 42 d of age. Bars not sharing the same letters are significantly different according to a one-factorial ANOVA (P < 0.05, n = 6 pens per treatment).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of Ca and P level (CaP) and phytase supplementation (PHY) on InsP6 concentration in the crop content (LSmeans ± SEM) of broilers and turkeys fed experimental diets at 21 d (Novotny et al., 2023) and 42 d of age. Bars not sharing the same letters are significantly different according to a one-factorial ANOVA (P < 0.05, n = 6 pens per treatment).

Different passage rates through the small intestine may have influenced phytate degradation. Although passage rates were not measured, differences in small intestine length between species decreased between wk 3, when turkeys had an almost 24% shorter small intestine than broilers (Novotny et al., 2023), and wk 6, when the small intestine was less than 17% shorter in turkeys than in broilers (Table 7). This could indicate that the retention time in the small intestine increased in turkeys relative to broilers between wk 3 and wk 6, resulting in more time for phytate degradation. Between wk 3 and wk 6, differences in dietary Ca and P concentrations were very small in CaP– treatments (5.7 g Ca/kg and 4.5 g P/kg [Novotny et al., 2023], and 5.3 g Ca/kg and 4.3 g P/kg [Table 2], respectively). However, a possible effect of dietary Ca and P concentrations on phytate degradation in CaP– treatments could not be ruled out entirely.

The effect of CaP level, which led to reduced prececal InsP6 disappearance in wk 6 when CaP level was increased, irrespective of species or phytase supplementation, can be attributed to end product inhibition of phytase by supplemented P (Greiner et al., 1993; Zeller et al., 2015b) and chelate formation caused by Ca2+ ions and consequent precipitation and inaccessibility for phytase (Walk et al., 2012; Sommerfeld et al., 2018). In wk 3, a high CaP level also led to lower prececal InsP6 disappearance compared to low CaP level (Novotny et al., 2023) but here the effect depended on species and phytase supplementation, as the 3-way-interaction of these effects was significant. Also, in the CaP+PHY+ treatment, prececal InsP6 disappearance increased in both turkeys and broilers from wk 3 to wk 6. This was most likely caused by lower dietary Ca and P concentrations in wk 6 (8.2 g Ca/kg and 6.6 g P/kg, Table 2) than in wk 3 (12.3 g Ca/kg and 9.8 g P/kg, Novotny et al., 2023), leading to lower end product inhibition of phytase by supplemented P and less chelate formation caused by Ca2+ ions in wk 6 compared to wk 3.

In wk 6, phytase supplementation led to an increase in prececal InsP6 disappearance of approximately 57 percentage points in broilers and 38 percentage points in turkeys, irrespective of CaP level. This resulted in an absolute higher prececal InsP6 disappearance in broilers than in turkeys when phytase was supplemented. However, supplementation with phytase led to an increase in prececal P digestibility of only 31 percentage points in broilers and 24 percentage points in turkeys, leaving prececal P digestibility higher in turkeys than in broilers even when phytase was supplemented. This could be due to the higher degradation of lower InsP in turkeys than in broilers, as indicated by lower concentrations of InsP3-5-P in the ileum. The markedly higher gut mucosal phosphatase activity of turkeys than that of broilers supports this assumption. It is also possible that the P released from phytate was absorbed at a higher proportion in turkeys than in broilers, as turkeys have shown higher P utilization than broilers when fed the same diets with high P concentrations (Rodehutscord and Dieckmann, 2005).

The MI concentration in the ileum was much lower in turkeys than in broilers, especially when phytase was supplemented, which is inconsistent with the higher degradation of lower InsP in turkeys. However, the MI concentration in the blood was higher in turkeys than in broilers when phytase was supplemented (species × PHY: P = 0.005, Table 6). When relating MI concentrations in the ileum digesta and blood (Figure 3), it was apparent that they were correlated in both species. However, the slope of the regression line of MI concentration in the ileum and blood of turkeys was much greater than that of broilers. Novotny et al. (2023) found very similar relations in 3-wk-old turkeys and broilers, and suggested that this may be caused by faster MI absorption or more anterior MI absorption in the digestive tract of turkeys than in broilers. A faster MI absorption in older birds is suggested by greater slope of regression lines of MI concentration in the ileum and blood of the respective species at wk 6 compared to wk 3, caused by lower MI concentration in the ileum and similar MI concentration in the blood at wk 6 compared to wk 3. This is further corroborated by the fact that prececal InsP6 disappearance was higher in wk 6 than wk 3; thus, more MI should have been completely dephosphorylated. However, causalities warrant investigation in future research.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Myo-inositol concentrations in ileum digesta (per g TiO2) and blood of broilers and turkeys fed the experimental diets at 42 d of age. Dots represent individual pen values for the ileum data and individual bird values for the blood data. Linear regression broilers: y = 0.15 x + 0.22, r2 = 0.69. Linear regression turkeys: y = 1.95 x + 0.12, r2 = 0.69.

Mucosal phosphatase activity in the jejunum was not only affected by species but also by dietary CaP level, as in CaP+ treatments, mucosal phosphatase activity was lower than that in CaP–. This is consistent with the previously reported effects of dietary P on mucosal phytase/phosphatase activity (Davies et al., 1970; Onyango et al., 2006). However, in 3-wk-old birds (Novotny et al., 2023), no significant effect of dietary CaP level on mucosal phosphatase activity was observed. Further, it appeared that 6-wk-old broilers had lower jejunal mucosal phosphatase activity (average of 1.4 µmol Pi/g BBM protein/min., Table 3) compared to 3-wk-old broilers (average of 4.1 µmol Pi/g BBM protein/min., Novotny et al., 2023). In contrast, jejunal mucosal phosphatase activity appeared to be similar among 3- and 6-wk-old turkeys, except in 6-wk-old turkeys fed PHY+, in which jejunal mucosal phosphatase activity was elevated. This elevated activity could have been triggered by the high concentrations of lower InsP found in turkeys in this treatment, as discussed by Walk et al. (2018). The effect of dietary P on measured mucosal phosphatase activity, when present, could have been caused by the downregulation of the expression (or substrate affinity) of phosphatases in BBM, based on the presence of absorbable phosphate (Onyango et al., 2006). As only the average mucosal phosphatase activity in the jejunum was measured and the retention time in the small intestine was not determined, the overall contribution of endogenous mucosal phosphatase activity to phytate degradation is unknown.

In conclusion, prececal InsP6 disappearance between wk 3 and wk 6 was affected by age in turkeys, but not in broilers when no mineral P was supplemented. This coincides with the observed differences in digestive tract development. Data from other age groups are required to deepen the understanding of the influence of crop, stomach, and gut development on phytate degradation. Moreover, digesta retention times in specific sections of the digestive tract require further research to better understand phytate degradation kinetics.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was partly funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 328017493/GRK 2366 (Sino-German International Research Training Group AMAIZE-P).

DISCLOSURES

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Davies M.I., Ritcey G.M., Motzok I. Intestinal phytase and alkaline phosphatase of chicks: influence of dietary calcium, inorganic and phytate phosphorus and vitamin D3. Poult. Sci. 1970;49:1280–1286. doi: 10.3382/ps.0491280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie . DLG-Verlag; Frankfurt am Main, Germany: 1999. Empfehlungen zur Energie- und Nährstoffversorgung der Legehennen und Masthühner (Broiler) [Google Scholar]
  3. Gesellschaft für Ernährungsphysiologie Empfehlungen zur Energie- und Nährstoffversorgung der Mastputen. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 2004;13:199–233. [Google Scholar]
  4. Greiner R., Konietzny U., Jany K.D. Purification and characterization of two phytases from Escherichia coli. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1993;303:107–113. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1993.1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grynspan F., Cheryan M. Calcium phytate: effect of ph and molar ratio on in vitro solubility. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1983;60:1761–1764. [Google Scholar]
  6. Huber K., Zeller E., Rodehutscord M. Modulation of small intestinal phosphate transporter by dietary supplements of mineral phosphorus and phytase in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:1009–1017. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ingelmann C.-J., Witzig M., Möhring J., Schollenberger M., Kühn I., Rodehutscord M. Phytate degradation and phosphorus digestibility in broilers and turkeys fed different corn sources with or without added phytase. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:912–922. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kierończyk B., Rawski M., Długosz J., Świątkiewicz S., Józefiak D. Avian crop function–a review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2016;16:653–678. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kriseldi R., Walk C.L., Bedford M.R., Dozier W.A. Inositol and gradient phytase supplementation in broiler diets during a 6-week production period: 2. Effects on phytate degradation and inositol liberation in gizzard and ileal digesta contents. Poult. Sci. 2021;100:10899. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Menezes-Blackburn D., Gabler S., Greiner R. Performance of seven commercial phytases in an in vitro simulation of poultry digestive tract. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2015;63:6142–6149. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Morgan N.K., Walk C.L., Bedford M.R., Burton E.J. Contribution of intestinal- and cereal-derived phytase activity on phytate degradation in young broilers. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:1577–1583. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Novotny M., Sommerfeld V., Krieg J., Kühn I., Huber K., Rodehutscord M. Comparison of mucosal phosphatase activity, phytate degradation, and nutrient digestibility in 3-week-old turkeys and broilers at different dietary levels of phosphorus and phytase. Poult. Sci. 2023;102:102457. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Olukosi O.A., González-Ortiz G., Whitfield H., Bedford M.R. Comparative aspects of phytase and xylanase effects on performance, mineral digestibility, and ileal phytate degradation in broilers and turkeys. Poult. Sci. 2020;99:1528–1539. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Onyango E.M., Asem E.K., Adeola O. Dietary cholecalciferol and phosphorus influence intestinal mucosa phytase activity in broiler chicks. Br. Poult. Sci. 2006;47:632–639. doi: 10.1080/00071660600963651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rodehutscord M., Dieckmann A. Comparative studies with three-week-old chickens, turkeys, ducks, and quails on the response in phosphorus utilization to a supplementation of monobasic calcium phosphate. Poult. Sci. 2005;84:1252–1260. doi: 10.1093/ps/84.8.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rodehutscord M., Sommerfeld V., Kühn I., Bedford M.R., et al. In: Pages 124-152 in Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition. 3rd ed. Bedford M., et al., editors. Wallinford; United Kingdom: 2022. Phytases: Potential and limits of phytate destruction in the digestive tract of pigs and poultry. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sommerfeld V., Schollenberger M., Kühn I., Rodehutscord M. Interactive effects of phosphorus, calcium, and phytase supplements on products of phytate degradation in the digestive tract of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2018;97:1177–1188. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sommerfeld V., van Kessel A.G., Classen H.L., Schollenberger M., Kühn I., Rodehutscord M. Phytate degradation in gnotobiotic broiler chickens and effects of dietary supplements of phosphorus, calcium, and phytase. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:5562–5570. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tůmová E., Gous R.M., Chodová D., Ketta M. Differences in growth and carcass composition of growing male and female turkeys. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2020;65:330–336. [Google Scholar]
  20. Walk C.L., Bedford M.R., McElroy A.P. Influence of limestone and phytase on broiler performance, gastrointestinal pH, and apparent ileal nutrient digestibility. Poult. Sci. 2012;91:1371–1378. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Walk C.L., Bedford M.R., Olukosi O.A. Effect of phytase on growth performance, phytate degradation and gene expression of myo-inositol transporters in the small intestine, liver and kidney of 21 day old broilers. Poult. Sci. 2018;97:1155–1162. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zeller E., Schollenberger M., Kühn I., Rodehutscord M. Hydrolysis of phytate and formation of inositol phosphate isomers without or with supplemented phytases in different segments of the digestive tract of broilers. J. Nutr. Sci. 2015;4:e1. doi: 10.1017/jns.2014.62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zeller E., Schollenberger M., Witzig M., Shastak Y., Kühn I., Hoelzle L.E., Rodehutscord M. Interactions between supplemented mineral phosphorus and phytase on phytate hydrolysis and inositol phosphates in the small intestine of broilers. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:1018–1029. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zuidhof M.J., Schneider B.L., Carney V.L., Korver D.R., Robinson F.E. Growth, efficiency, and yield of commercial broilers from 1957, 1978, and 2005. Poult. Sci. 2014;93:2970–2982. doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-04291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Poultry Science are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES