Abstract
This study assessed support for commercial tobacco retail policies among adults. Data came from SpringStyles 2021, a web panel survey of adults in the US aged 18 years or older (N = 6,455). Overall, 62.3% of adults supported a policy prohibiting the sale of menthol cigarettes, and 57.3% supported a policy prohibiting the sale of all tobacco products. A majority of adults supported tobacco retail policies aimed at preventing initiation, promoting quitting, and reducing tobacco-related disparities. These findings can help inform federal, state, and local efforts to prohibit the sale of tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes.
Summary.
What is already known on this topic?
The tobacco retail environment contributes to commercial tobacco use initiation, tobacco consumption, tobacco product–related disparities, and lower likelihood of successful quitting.
What is added by this report?
In 2021, most adults supported a policy prohibiting the sale of menthol cigarettes and a policy prohibiting the sale of all tobacco products. We assessed support for these policies after some communities had already adopted local menthol sale prohibitions — a public health intervention that addresses racial and ethnic inequities in health.
What are the implications for public health practice?
Understanding population group differences in support for these policies can inform public health action and inform efforts to prohibit the sale of tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes.
Objective
Commercial tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, are disproportionately marketed and advertised to certain population groups (eg, people who are Black, youth, people who identify as LGBTQ+ [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning]), increasing the likelihood of use and risk for tobacco-related harms among people in these groups (1,2). This might help to explain why disparities in tobacco product use persist, despite considerable declines in US cigarette smoking (3). Additionally, disparities exist in who is covered by comprehensive policies that reduce tobacco product use (4). Public opinion can serve as a lever and influential factor in the acceleration of policy adoption (5). As such, we assessed support among adults for policies aimed at reducing tobacco product use and associated disparities.
Methods
We used data from SpringStyles, a web panel survey of adults in the US aged 18 years or older. Porter Novelli conducts SpringStyles via Ipsos’s KnowledgePanel; panel members are randomly recruited by mail by using address-based probability sampling. During late March to mid-April 2021, 6,455 participants completed SpringStyles (response rate, 59.1%). Data were weighted to match the US Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) proportions for demographic variables, including sex, age, household income, race and ethnicity, household size, education, census region, and metro status. The study was exempt from human subjects review because it was a secondary analysis of de-identified data.
To assess support for tobacco retail policies among adults, respondents were asked 1) “To what extent would you support a policy to prohibit the sale of menthol cigarettes?” and 2) “To what extent would you support a policy to prohibit the sale of all tobacco products?” Response options were “strongly support,” “somewhat support,” “somewhat oppose,” and “strongly oppose.” Adults who responded strongly support or somewhat support were considered to support such a policy, and adults who responded strongly oppose or somewhat oppose were considered to oppose such a policy.
Weighted point estimates and 95% CIs were calculated overall and by sociodemographic characteristics (sex, age, race and ethnicity, education, annual household income, US region), current tobacco product use (cigarette use, menthol cigarette use, and noncigarette tobacco product use), and support or opposition toward tobacco retail policies. We performed χ 2 tests to assess differences between support for policies, sociodemographic characteristics, and current tobacco product use. Significance was set at P < .05, and analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc).
Results
Demographic characteristics of respondents are shown in Table 1. Overall, 62.3% of adults supported a policy to prohibit the sale of menthol cigarettes (Table 2). Significant differences in support existed by sex (59.5% among men, 65.0% among women; P < .001); educational attainment (57.4% among adults with a high school diploma or less, 68.7% among adults with a college degree or higher; P < .001); annual household income (57.0% among adults with <$25,000 in annual household income, 64.4% among adults with ≥$75,000 in annual household income; P = .005); and by all 3 tobacco product-use variables (P < .001 for all). Approximately two-thirds of respondents who did not currently use tobacco products and more than one-third who currently used tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes, supported this policy. No differences in support for this policy were observed by age (P = .08), race and ethnicity (P = .44), or US region (P = .06) (Table 2).
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Participants, Study on Support for Policies to Prohibit the Sale of Menthol Cigarettes and the Sale of All Tobacco Products Among Adults in the US, SpringStyles, 2021.
| Characteristic | No. | Weighted % (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 6,455 | — |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 3,014 | 48.4 (46.9–49.9) |
| Female | 3,441 | 51.6 (50.1–53.1) |
| Age, y | ||
| 18−29 | 564 | 19.7 (18.2–21.2) |
| 30−44 | 1,785 | 25.4 (24.1–26.6) |
| 45−59 | 2,131 | 25.3 (24.1–26.4) |
| ≥60 | 1,975 | 29.7 (28.4–31.0) |
| Race and ethnicity | ||
| Hispanic | 730 | 16.6 (15.3–17.8) |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 517 | 11.8 (10.7–12.9) |
| Non-Hispanic other | 295 | 6.9 (6.1–7.8) |
| Non-Hispanic White | 4,710 | 64.7 (63.2–66.3) |
| Educational attainment | ||
| High school or less | 1,718 | 38.1 (36.5–39.6) |
| Some college | 1,972 | 30.2 (28.8–33.0) |
| College degree or higher | 2,765 | 31.8 (30.5–33.0) |
| Annual household income, $ | ||
| <25,000 | 604 | 12.3 (11.3–13.4) |
| 25,000–49,999 | 962 | 17.5 (16.3–18.7) |
| 50,000–74,999 | 1,121 | 17.3 (16.2–18.5) |
| ≥75,000 | 3,768 | 52.8 (51.3–54.3) |
| US Census regiona | ||
| Northeast | 1,133 | 17.3 (16.2–18.4) |
| Midwest | 1,527 | 20.8 (19.7–22.0) |
| South | 2,273 | 37.9 (36.5–39.4) |
| West | 1,522 | 24.0 (22.7–25.3) |
| Current cigarette useb | ||
| Yes | 659 | 11.0 (10.0–11.9) |
| No | 5,765 | 89.0 (88.1–90.0) |
| Current menthol cigarette usec | ||
| Yes | 352 | 6.4 (5.6–7.2) |
| No | 5,736 | 93.6 (92.8–94.4) |
| Current noncigarette tobacco used | ||
| Yes | 452 | 8.3 (7.4–9.2) |
| No | 5,433 | 91.7 (90.8–92.6) |
| Policy to prohibit the sale of menthol cigarettese | ||
| Strongly support | 2,018 | 31.2 (29.8–32.6) |
| Somewhat support | 1,958 | 31.1 (29.7–32.5) |
| Somewhat oppose | 1,275 | 19.9 (18.7–21.1) |
| Strongly oppose | 1,056 | 17.7 (16.6–18.9) |
| Policy to prohibit the sale of all tobacco productsf | ||
| Strongly support | 1,896 | 30.0 (28.7–31.4) |
| Somewhat support | 1,706 | 27.3 (26.0–28.7) |
| Somewhat oppose | 1,396 | 21.8 (20.5–23.0) |
| Strongly oppose | 1,355 | 20.9 (19.7–22.1) |
Abbreviation: — , not applicable.
Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont; Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia; West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
Current cigarette use was defined as respondents who reported cigarette use at least once during the past 30 days.
Respondents who reported cigarette use at least once during the past 30 days were asked “When you smoke cigarettes, how often do you smoke menthol cigarettes?” Current menthol cigarette use was defined as participant responses that included “all of the time,” “most of the time,” “sometimes,” or “rarely.” Noncurrent menthol use was defined as participants who responded “never.”
Respondents were asked about the current (past 30 days) use of the following noncigarette tobacco products: cigars, including large cigars, cigarillos, or little cigars that look like cigarettes; electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) or other electronic vaping products; heated tobacco products, also known as “heat-not-burn”; nicotine pouches, lozenges, tablets, or gum, not used as quit medications; smokeless tobacco (chewing tobacco, snuff, dip, snus, dissolvable tobacco); water pipes, also known as hookahs, filled with tobacco; or some other tobacco product (eg, pipes filled with tobacco).
Participants were asked, “To what extent would you support a policy to prohibit the sale of menthol cigarettes?”
Participants were asked, “To what extent would you support a policy to prohibit the sale of all tobacco products?”
Table 2. Sociodemographic Characteristics and Tobacco Product Use Status, Study on Support for Policies to Prohibit the Sale of Menthol Cigarettes and the Sale of All Tobacco Products Among Adults in the US, SpringStyles, 2021.
| Characteristic | No. | Weighted % (95% CI) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Policy to prohibit the sale of menthol cigarettesa |
P valueb | Policy to prohibit the sale of all tobacco productsc |
P valueb | ||||
| Support | Oppose | Support | Oppose | ||||
| Overall | 6,455 | 62.3 (60.9–63.8) | 37.7 (36.2–39.1) | — | 57.3 (55.9–58.8) | 42.7 (41.2–44.1) | — |
| Sex | |||||||
| Male | 3,014 | 59.5 (57.3–61.7) | 40.5 (38.3–42.7) | <.001 | 52.2 (50.0–54.4) | 47.8 (45.6–50.0) | <.001 |
| Female | 3,441 | 65.0 (63.0–67.0) | 35.0 (33.0–37.0) | 62.2 (60.2–64.2) | 37.8 (35.8–39.8) | ||
| Age, y | |||||||
| 18−29 | 564 | 63.7 (59.4–68.1) | 36.3 (31.9–40.6) | .08 | 61.7 (57.3–66.0) | 38.3 (34.0–42.7) | .03 |
| 30−44 | 1,785 | 60.2 (57.3–63.0) | 39.8 (37.0–42.7) | 55.7 (52.8–58.6) | 44.3 (41.4–47.2) | ||
| 45−59 | 2,131 | 60.6 (58.0–63.2) | 39.4 (36.8–42.0) | 55.1 (52.5–57.7) | 44.9 (42.3–47.5) | ||
| ≥60 | 1,975 | 64.8 (62.5–67.1) | 35.2 (32.9–37.5) | 57.7 (55.4–60.1) | 42.3 (39.9–44.6) | ||
| Race and ethnicity | |||||||
| Hispanic | 730 | 63.6 (59.4–67.8) | 36.4 (32.2–40.6) | .44 | 60.5 (56.2–64.8) | 39.5 (35.2–43.8) | <.001 |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 517 | 61.5 (56.5–66.5) | 38.5 (33.5–43.5) | 63.4 (58.4–68.3) | 36.6 (31.7–41.6) | ||
| Non-Hispanic other | 295 | 66.7 (60.3–73.0) | 33.3 (27.0–39.7) | 67.4 (61.1–73.8) | 32.6 (26.2–38.9) | ||
| Non-Hispanic White | 4,710 | 61.6 (60.0–63.3) | 38.4 (36.7–40.0) | 54.4 (52.7–56.1) | 45.6 (43.9–47.3) | ||
| Educational attainment | |||||||
| High school or less | 1,718 | 57.4 (54.7–60.2) | 42.6 (39.8–45.3) | <.001 | 56.3 (53.6–59.1) | 43.7 (40.9–46.4) | .008 |
| Some college | 1,972 | 61.7 (59.1–64.2) | 38.3 (35.8–40.9) | 55.1 (52.5–57.8) | 44.9 (42.2–47.5) | ||
| College degree or higher | 2,765 | 68.7 (66.7–70.8) | 31.3 (29.2–33.3) | 60.6 (58.5–62.8) | 39.4 (37.2–41.5) | ||
| Annual household income, $ | |||||||
| <25,000 | 604 | 57.0 (52.2–61.8) | 43.0 (38.2–47.8) | .005 | 54.3 (49.5–59.1) | 45.7 (40.9–50.5) | .54 |
| 25,000–49,999 | 962 | 59.0 (55.3–62.8) | 41.0 (37.2–44.7) | 57.4 (53.6–61.1) | 42.6 (38.9–46.4) | ||
| 50,000–74,999 | 1,121 | 63.0 (59.5–66.5) | 37.0 (33.5–40.5) | 58.3 (54.8–61.8) | 41.7 (38.2–45.2) | ||
| ≥75,000 | 3,768 | 64.4 (62.5–66.3) | 35.6 (33.7–37.5) | 57.7 (55.8–59.7) | 42.3 (40.3–44.2) | ||
| US Census regiond | |||||||
| Northeast | 1,133 | 64.4 (61.0–67.7) | 35.6 (32.3–39.0) | .06 | 61.1 (57.7–64.5) | 38.9 (35.5–42.3) | .004 |
| Midwest | 1,527 | 63.3 (60.3–66.4) | 36.7 (33.6–39.7) | 57.9 (54.8–61.0) | 42.1 (39.0–45.2) | ||
| South | 2,273 | 59.8 (57.3–62.3) | 40.2 (37.7–42.7) | 54.1 (51.6–56.6) | 45.9 (43.4–48.4) | ||
| West | 1,522 | 64.1 (61.0–67.1) | 35.9 (32.9–39.0) | 59.3 (56.2–62.3) | 40.7 (37.7–43.8) | ||
| Current cigarette usee | |||||||
| Yes | 659 | 36.7 (32.1–41.2) | 63.3 (58.8–67.9) | <.001 | 25.2 (21.1–29.3) | 74.8 (70.7–78.9) | <.001 |
| No | 5,765 | 65.4 (63.9–66.9) | 34.6 (33.1–36.1) | 61.2 (59.7–62.7) | 38.8 (37.3–40.3) | ||
| Current menthol cigarette usef | |||||||
| Yes | 352 | 35.4 (29.0–41.7) | 64.6 (58.3–71.0) | <.001 | 28.6 (22.6–34.6) | 71.4 (65.4–77.4) | <.001 |
| No | 5,736 | 65.9 (64.3–67.4) | 34.1 (32.6–35.7) | 61.3 (59.7–62.8) | 38.7 (37.2–40.3) | ||
| Current noncigarette tobacco useg | |||||||
| Yes | 452 | 33.9 (28.5–39.2) | 66.1 (60.8–71.5) | <.001 | 22.9 (18.1–27.8) | 77.1 (72.2–81.9) | <.001 |
| No | 5,433 | 67.4 (65.9–69.0) | 32.6 (31.0–34.1) | 63.6 (62.0–65.2) | 36.4 (34.8–38.0) | ||
Abbreviation: — , not applicable.
Participants were asked, “To what extent would you support a policy to prohibit the sale of menthol cigarettes?” Support included “strongly support” and “somewhat support” responses; oppose included “strongly oppose” and “somewhat oppose” responses.
P value determined from χ2 test.
Participants were asked, “To what extent would you support a policy to prohibit the sale of all tobacco products?” Support included “strongly support” and “somewhat support” responses; oppose included “strongly oppose” and “somewhat oppose” responses.
Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont; Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia; West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
Current cigarette use was defined as respondents who reported cigarette use at least once during the past 30 days.
Respondents who reported cigarette use at least once during the past 30 days were asked “When you smoke cigarettes, how often do you smoke menthol cigarettes?” Current menthol cigarette use was defined as participant responses that included “all of the time,” “most of the time,” “sometimes,” or “rarely.” Noncurrent menthol use is defined as participants who responded “never.”
Respondents were asked about the current (past 30 day) use of the following noncigarette tobacco products: cigars, including large cigars, cigarillos, or little cigars that look like cigarettes; electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) or other electronic vaping products; heated tobacco products, also known as “heat-not-burn”; nicotine pouches, lozenges, tablets, or gum, not used as quit medications; smokeless tobacco (chewing tobacco, snuff, dip, snus, dissolvable tobacco); water pipes, also known as hookahs, filled with tobacco; or some other tobacco product (eg, pipes filled with tobacco).
In addition, 57.3% of respondents supported a policy to prohibit the sale of all tobacco products (Table 2). Significant differences in support were found by sex (52.2% among men, 62.2% among women; P < .001); age (57.7% of respondents aged ≥60 y, 61.7% of respondents aged 18–29 y; P = .03); race and ethnicity (54.4% among non-Hispanic White adults, 60.5% among Hispanic adults, 63.4% among non-Hispanic Black adults, and 67.4% among non-Hispanic adults from other racial and ethnic population groups; P < .001); educational attainment (56.3% among adults with a high school diploma or less, 60.6% among adults with a college degree or higher; P = .008); US region (54.1% among respondents in the South, 61.1% among respondents in the Northeast; P = .004); and by all 3 tobacco product-use variables (P < .001). More than 61% of respondents who did not currently use tobacco products and about one-fourth of respondents who currently used tobacco products supported this policy. No differences in policy support existed by annual household income (P = .54) (Table 2).
Discussion
Nearly two-thirds of adults supported prohibiting menthol cigarette sales, while more than half of adults supported prohibiting all tobacco product sales. Support for these policies was similar, which may be explained by general support for tobacco retail policies. Policy support varied by certain demographic characteristics and current tobacco product use. Our findings are generally consistent with previous research showing support for menthol cigarette sales prohibitions, including among population groups historically targeted by unjust marketing practices and with a high prevalence of menthol cigarette use (eg, non-Hispanic Black adults) (6,7). No significant racial and ethnic group differences were found regarding support of a policy to prohibit menthol cigarette sales, highlighting broad support among all respondents. Although support for both policies was lower among people who reported current tobacco product use compared with those who did not, more than one-third of respondents who currently smoked cigarettes or menthol cigarettes still supported prohibiting menthol cigarette sales, and more than one-quarter of these respondents supported prohibiting all tobacco product sales. In April 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration announced plans to ban menthol cigarettes and all characterizing flavors in cigars (8). As of February 2022, at least 145 US communities prohibit menthol cigarettes and other flavored product sales, and 2 cities prohibit all tobacco product sales (9,10). Given variations in support and the potential of ongoing policy adoption, continued education can demonstrate how policies can reduce overall tobacco product use and related disparities.
Our study has limitations. SpringStyles is a web panel survey and is not representative of the US adult population. However, data were weighted to match the ACS proportions, and previous estimates are consistent with other cross-sectional national household surveys (11). Because data were self-reported, the possibility of underreporting of certain variables exists. Although some communities had already adopted local menthol sale prohibitions or prohibited all tobacco product sales, we could not assess whether respondents resided in areas covered by these prohibitions. Our study did not specify support for policies at a specific level of government (eg, local, state, federal). Finally, the survey did not include questions assessing demographic characteristics (eg, people who identify as LGBTQ+) of certain additional population groups that are disproportionately affected by tobacco product use.
Understanding population group differences in support for tobacco retail policies can inform public health education, surveillance, evaluation, and programs. Moreover, these findings can inform federal, state, and local efforts to prohibit all tobacco product sales, including menthol cigarettes, reduce tobacco use and tobacco-related disparities, and advance health equity.
Acknowledgments
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. No copyrighted materials or tools were used in this research.
Footnotes
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions.
Suggested citation for this article: Al-Shawaf M, Grooms KN, Mahoney M, Buchanan Lunsford N, Lawrence Kittner D. Support for Policies to Prohibit the Sale of Menthol Cigarettes and All Tobacco Products Among Adults, 2021. Prev Chronic Dis 2023;20:220128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd20.220128.
References
- 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Menthol tobacco products. Accessed August 5, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/menthol/index.html
- 2. Stevens P, Carlson LM, Hinman JM. An analysis of tobacco industry marketing to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) populations: strategies for mainstream tobacco control and prevention. Health Promot Pract 2004;5(3 Suppl):129S–34S. 10.1177/1524839904264617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking — 50 Years of Progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rose SW, Amato MS, Anesetti-Rothermel A, Carnegie B, Safi Z, Benson AF, et al. Characteristics and reach equity of policies restricting flavored tobacco product sales in the United States. Health Promot Pract 2020;21(1 suppl):44S–53S. 10.1177/1524839919879928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Pacheco J. The Social Contagion Model: exploring the role of public opinion on the diffusion of antismoking legislation across the American states. J Pol 2012;74(1):187–202. 10.1017/S0022381611001241 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Czaplicki L, Schillo B, Rose SW, Zhou Y, Vallone D. National support for a menthol cigarette sales ban [published correction appears in Public Health Rep 2021 Feb 18;33354920980421]. Public Health Rep 2021;136(2):183–91. 10.1177/0033354920966004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Truth Initiative. Measuring support for tobacco control policies in states with deadly smoking disparities. Accessed February 24, 2022. https://truthinitiative.org/research-resources/smoking-region/measuring-support-tobacco-control-policies-states-deadly-smoking
- 8. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA commits to evidence-based actions aimed at saving lives and preventing future generations of smokers. Accessed September 1, 2021. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-commits-evidence-based-actions-aimed-saving-lives-and-preventing-future-generations-smokers
- 9. Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. States and localities that have restricted the sale of flavored tobacco products. Accessed February 24, 2022. https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/assets/factsheets/0398.pdf
- 10. Action on Smoking and Health. Beverly Hills and Manhattan Beach, California, make history for public health. Accessed September 1, 2021. https://ash.org/california-jan1-2021/
- 11. King BA, Alam S, Promoff G, Arrazola R, Dube SR. Awareness and ever-use of electronic cigarettes among U.S. adults, 2010–2011. Nicotine Tob Res 2013;15(9):1623–7. 10.1093/ntr/ntt013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]