Abstract
Objective:
As an innate immune system component, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) exert various effects, such as anticancer properties. This study aimed to evaluate the LL37 AMP anticancer effect against colorectal cancer (CRC) cells and the expression of FOXE1 and lncRNA PTCSC2 genes.
Methods:
The LL37 AMP was purchased from GenScript USA, Inc. Various CRC cell lines (HCT-116, HT29, WiDr, and SW742) were cultured in the DMEM medium. Various concentrations ranging from (5-400) μg/mL of LL37 AMP were prepared, added to cell cultures, and incubated for (24 and 48) hours. A nontoxic level of 30 µg/mL of LL37 was investigated for FOXE1 and lncRNA PTCSC2 gene expression.
Results:
At 24 hours, the (50 and 90) % lethal concentrations of LC50 and LC90, respectively, of LL37 against NCM460 normal cells were (640 and > 640) g/mL. Additionally, these values at 48 hours included (160 and > 640) µg/mL, respectively. After 24 hours of treatment, the LC50 and LC90 of LL37 AMP against CRC cell lines included (20 and 200) µg/mL. The LC50 and LC90 of the LL37 at 48 hours included (20 and 50) µg/mL and at 72 hours. they included (~10 and 40) μg/mL, respectively. FOXE1 but not the PTCSC 2 gene expression was significantly higher in CRC cells than normal cells (NCM460 and HaCaT). The LL37 AMP significantly decreased FOXE1 gene expression by 1.95-fold in CRC cells (p < 0.001).
Conclusion:
The FOXE1 gene can be considered a biomarker of CRC development. The expression of FOXE1 but not the PTCSC2 gene was significantly affected by the LL37 AMP. The effects of LL37 AMP against CRC cells were time and dose-dependent. Future studies are warranted to verify these effects.
Key Words: Colorectal cancer, antimicrobial peptides, LL37, anticancer traits
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) occurs in two forms: sporadic 80 % and inherent 20 %, accounting for nearly 10 % of cancer deaths worldwide (D’asheesh et al., 2021; Graham et al., 2017). CRC is more likely to show up and get worse if you are overweight, eat much salt and not enough vegetables, get older, smoke, and don’t move around enough. Unfortunately, these behavioral changes have lowered the age of CRC to younger generations (Chen et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2021). Therefore, genetic and epigenetic factors play a role in CRC’s development. The alterations in the expression of various genes evoke epithelial inflammation and cell division. Non-coding RNAs (IncRNAs) include > 200 nucleotide sequences that inhibit gene expression via adenylation signals and regulatory transcription factors.
The effect of IncRNAs is exerted in specific regions and periods (Ding et al., 2014; Zhu et al., 2016; Statello et al., 2021). Furthermore, these sequences interact with DNA, RNA, and proteins and control various cellular functions. Considering the vital role of these biomolecules in normal cellular activities, the disturbance in their position and regulatory roles will lead to cell division and progress to malignancy and cancer (Carlevaro-Fita et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2017). Hence, their expression profiles are possibly different between normal and cancerous cells. Nonetheless, in some instances, the IncRNAs also cause the inhibition of cancer regulatory genes, thereby predisposing them to progression into tumor conditions. Moreover, the role of mutated IncRNAs in cancer development is unclear.
The FOXE1 gene is the thyroid-2 transcription factor, essential for normal thyroid function and healthy conditions. This factor has a diagnostic value in thyroid cancer. PTCS2 has several isoforms and exhibits low expression levels in thyroid cancer (Zhu et al., 2016; Statello et al., 2021; Carlevaro-Fita et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2017). Therefore, lncRNA PTCSC2 is a candidate possibly playing a role in this cancer, though related mechanisms have remained unclear. The IncRNAPTSC2 and FOXE1 genes are located on one chromosome near each other.
FOXE1 methylation has been shown to participate in CRC and is considered a biomarker (He et al., 2015; FOXE1 et al., 2015). The emergence of drug resistance to chemotherapy has increased interest in applying natural products such as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) (Chauhan et al. 2021). AMPs have exhibited antimicrobial and anticancer traits (Liu et al. 2015; Hoskin et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2016; Chu et al., 2015). The LL37 AMP is an alpha-helix peptide with proper structural and functional characteristics. This study assessed FOXE1 and lncRNA PTCSC 2 gene expression in the CRC and normal cells, and the effect of LL37 AMP was investigated.
Materials and Methods
LL37 AMP
The LL37 AMP was purchased from GenScript USA, Inc. The structural analysis and practical anticipation were conducted using the Hierarchical Neural Network (HNN) software.
Cell Culture
Various CRC cell lines (HCT-116, HT29, WiDr, and SW742) were cultured in the DMEM medium as previously described (Alghanim et al., 2020). Moreover, the NCM460 normal colon epithelial cell line was sophisticated as the control. After 24 hours of incubation, the cells were lysed, and RNA was extracted to evaluate the expression levels of FOXE1 and lncRNA PTCSC 2 genes for comparison between CRC and normal cells.
The effect of LL37 on Cells
Various concentrations ranging from (5-400) μg/mL of LL37 AMP were prepared, added to cell cultures, and incubated for (24 and 48) hours. The MTT (Sigma Aldrich, Germany) test was implemented to verify nontoxic levels of LL37 and its effects on CRC cells. The cells’ viability was measured using the ELISA (Biotek, USA) reader at 570 nm. The following is a formula evaluating the percentage of [absorbance of treated sample/absorbance of control] as previously described (Alghanimi et al., 2020).
FOXE1 and lncRNA PTCSC 2 Genes Expression
A nontoxic level of 30 µg/mL of LL37 was considered for adding to cell lines to investigate its effect on gene expression. The RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were performed as previously mentioned (Alghanimi et al., 2020).
The FOXE1 and lncRNA PTCSC 2 genes’ specific primer sequences have been shown in Table 1. The Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) technique was performed considering 40 cycles and the gene expression levels were calculated using this formula: the 2^(-ΔΔCt ) method [where: ΔCT = CT (target)-CT (control)].
Table 1.
The Sequence of Primers for Each Gene
| Gene | Sequence: 5'-3' | Annealing T (°C) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FOXE1 | F: GTAACCAGAGGGCAGCGTAG | 61 | This study |
| R: GCGTAAAAAGGCCCGAGTTC | |||
| GAPDH | F: GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC | 60 | |
| R: GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC | |||
| PTCSC2 | F: CCAGTCTGCAAATTCCCAAGC | 60 | |
| R: AGGCATCCCACTCTTCCTTG |
Statistical Analysis
The comparison of FOXE1 and lncRNA PTCSC 2 gene expression was done using various tests in the SPSS version 22, such as the Shapiro test, t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered a significant result.
Results
Cell Cytotoxicity
At 24 hours, the (50 and 90) % lethal concentrations (LC50 and LC90, respectively) of LL37 against NCM460 normal cells were (640 and > 640) g/mL. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 1, these values at 48 hours included (160 and > 640) g/mL, respectively.
Figure 1.
The MTT Test of LL37 AMP against NCM460 Normal Cells at (24 and 48) hours
Growth Inhibitory Against Cancer Cells During (24 – 72) hours
After 24 hours of treatment, the LC50 and LC90 of LL37 AMP against CRC cell lines included (20 and 200) µg/mL, respectively, which were significantly lower than those against normal cells (p < 0.05). The LC50 and LC90 of the LL37 at 48 hours. included (20 and 50) µg/mL.
These values at 72 hours of exposure included (~10 and 40) μg/mL, respectively; highlighting high anticancer potential (Figures 2, 3, and 4). Therefore, the anticancer effect of LL37 was increased by enhancement of concentration and time.
Figure 2.
The LL37 Anticancer Effect at 24 hours.
Figure 3.
The LL37 Anticancer Effect at 48 hours
Figure 4.
The LL37 Anticancer Effect at 48 hours
Gene Expression
Before exposure to the LL37 AMP, FOXE1 gene expression was significantly higher in CRC cells compared to that of normal cells (NCM460 and HaCaT). Moreover, the expression of the PTCSC 2 gene was not significantly different between CRC and normal cells (Figures 5 and 6).
Figure 5.
The Comparison of FOXE1 Gene Expression between CRC and Normal Cells
Figure 6.
The Comparison of PTCSC2 Gene Expression between CRC and Normal Cells
The LL37 AMP significantly decreased FOXE1 gene expression by 1.95-fold in CRC cells (p < 0.001). However, the expression of the PTCSC2 gene decreased 0.2-fold, which was non-significant (p = 0.177). There was no significant difference among cell lines regarding the expression of each gene.
Discussion
There are several mechanisms originating from genetic and epigenetic factors that evoke the progression of cancer. Regulatory mechanisms and responses to them are also vital to controlling the cells’ growth (D’asheesh et al., 2021; Graham et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2021; Ding et al., 2014). Treatment of cancers using chemotherapy has not always been successful. Various AMPs have been demonstrated to exert low toxicity against normal cells while conferring anticancer effects (Chauhan et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2015; Hoskin et al. 2008; Yu et al., 2016; Chu et al., 2015). Cancer cell membranes contain a negative charge which acts as proper targets for cationic peptides, causing cell death via various mechanisms (Chu et al., 2015). The AMPs have enough tolerance and their production does not require high costs (Liu et al. 2015; Hoskin et al. 2008, Yu et al. 2016; Chu et al., 2015). Alpha-helix AMPs have exhibited more efficient antimicrobial and anticancer effects (Yu et al., 2016, Chu et al., 2015; Alghanimi et al., 2020).
AMPs can be modified or combined with other compounds to improve or enhance their effects (Chu et al., 2015; Alghanimi et al., 2020). The LL37 AMP secreted in human respiratory and reproductive systems and skin has exerted wide effects (Liu et al., 2015; Hoskin et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2016; Chu et al., 2015).
In this study, the LL37 AMP had anticancer effects against various CRC lines at 24 hours (200 µg/mL), 48 hours (50 µg/mL), and 72 hours (40 µg/mL), while higher concentrations were nontoxic against NCM460 normal cells (160 µg/mL after 24 hours and 640 µg/mL after 48 hours).
Hence, the effect of LL37 AMP against CRC cells was significantly higher (p < 0.0001). Similar to our findings, L-K6, VmCT1, magainin 2 (12 µg/mL) and related analogs, and CA-MA-2 cationic peptide (20 µg/mL have exhibited significantly higher anticancer effects but low cytotoxicity against normal cells (200 and 100) µg/mL, respectively (Saleh et al., 2022; Emelianova et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2017). AMPs have conferred their effects through various mechanisms such as apoptosis, necrosis, and membrane disturbance as observed regarding Cecropin B (silk moth), Buforin IIb (frog), Alpha-defensin-1 (human), and lactoferricin B (bovine) (Wang et al., 2017, Zandsalimi et al., 2020; Tornesello et al., 2020; Jin et al., 2019; Tsai et al., 2015).
In our survey, before exposure to the LL37 AMP, the FOXE1 gene expression was significantly higher in CRC cells compared to that of normal cells (NCM460 and HaCaT). However, the expression of the PTCSC 2 gene was not significantly different between CRC and normal cells. Although the mechanisms of the PTCSC 2 gene in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) are unknown, myosin (MYH9) regulates both genes’ expression by binding to the promoter region (He et al., 2015; FOXE1 et al., 2021). Higher expression of the FOXE1 gene in our study possibly highlights lower regulatory effects from MYH9 or a lack of sufficient response. In a study by (He et al., 2015), the PTCSC2 gene expression was lower in cancer cells. (Melotte et al. 2015) discovered that methylation in the FOXE1 gene inhibits the binding and effect of regulatory factors in CRC cells.
They also proposed that this gene product in the bloodstream could be a biomarker of CRC. We also found that FOXE1 can be considered a biomarker of CRC. Fouad et al. did another study that showed that high expression of the FOXE1 gene is linked to advanced stages of cancer, heart attacks, getting older, and metastases. The FOXE1 gene promotes development, metastasis, and PTC progression (Fouad et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2019). The molecular docking analysis of the CXCL1 target protein in CRC using MREEKKERKRD and MVQGAKRGGRLHRV AMPs revealed their binding and anticancer effects of them (Kumar et al., 2021).
The LL37 AMP caused a significant decrease in the FOXE1 gene expression by 1.95-fold in CRC cells (p < 0.001). However, the expression of the PTCSC2 gene decreased 0.2-fold, which was non-significant (p = 0.177). There was no significant difference among CRC cell lines regarding the expression of each gene, and the mean level was considered for comparison. The limitations of our study mainly included the low number of genes and AMPs evaluated; a lack of in vivo studies; and also, the combination of LL37 with other compounds and anticancer drugs.
In conclusion, the FOXE1 gene can be considered a biomarker of CRC development. However, the PTCSC2 gene was not significantly different between CRC and normal cells. The effects of LL37 AMP against CRC cells were time and dose-dependent and exerted non-toxic effects against normal cells at significantly higher concentrations. The expression of FOXE1 but not the PTCSC2 gene was significantly affected by the LL37 AMP. Future studies are warranted to evaluate a higher number of cancer-related genes and AMPs, in vivo studies, and also the combination of LL37 with other compounds and anticancer drugs.
Author Contribution Statement
Conceptualization, Mustafa Nuhad Al-Darraji, Mohammed Rasheed, Abdolmajid Ghasemian; methodology, Mohammed Rasheed, Saade abdalkareem Jasim; investigation, Mustafa Nuhad Al-Darraji, Saade abdalkareem Jasim, Omer Dhia Aldeen Salah Aldeen, Abdolmajid Ghasemian, Mohammed Rasheed; writing-original draft preparation, Mustafa Nuhad Al-Darraji, Saade abdalkareem Jasim; writing-review and editing, Omer Dhia Aldeen Salah Aldeen, Abdolmajid Ghasemian, Mohammed Rasheed; funding acquisition, Mustafa Nuhad Al-Darraji, Abdolmajid Ghasemian, Mohammed Rasheed.
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgements
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the ethics committee of Al-Maarif University. All the authors had written consent to participate (those subjects without such consent had been excluded from the study).
Funding
This study was supported by Al-Maarif University College, Iraq.
Conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Alghanimi YK, Ghasemian A. Inhibitory traits of dendrosome curcumin (DNC) on breast cancer compared to curcumin single compound. J Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2020;51:527–33. doi: 10.1007/s12029-019-00273-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Carlevaro-Fita J, Lanzós A, Feuerbach L, et al. Cancer LncRNA Census reveals evidence for deep functional conservation of long noncoding RNAs in tumorigenesis. Commun Biol. 2020;3:1–16. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0741-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chauhan S, Dhawan D K, Saini A, Preet S. Antimicrobial peptides against colorectal cancer-a focused review. Pharmacol Res. 2021;167:105529. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen F, Zhang Y, Varambally S, Creighton CJ. Molecular correlates of metastasis by systematic pan-cancer analysis across the cancer genome AtlasPan-Cancer Metastasis correlates. Mol Cancer Res. 2019;17:476–87. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chu HL, Yip BS, Chen KH, et al. Novel antimicrobial peptides with high anticancer activity and selectivity. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0126390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.D’asheesh TIA, Hussen BM, Al-Marzoqi AH, Ghasemian A. Assessment of oncogenic role of intestinal microbiota in colorectal cancer patients. J Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2021;52:1016–21. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00531-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ding X, Zhu L, Ji T, et al. Long intergenic non-coding RNAs (LincRNAs) identified by RNA-seq in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2014;9:e103270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Emelianova AA, Kuzmin DV, Panteleev PV, et al. Anticancer activity of the goat antimicrobial peptide ChMAP-28. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1501. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fouad EM, Harb OA, Amin SR, Habib FM, Gertallah LM. The expression of FOXE-1 and STIP-1 in papillary thyroid carcinoma and their relationship with patient prognosis. Iran J Pathol. 2018;13:256. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Graham TA, Sottoriva A. Measuring cancer evolution from the genome. J Pathol. 2017;241:183–91. doi: 10.1002/path.4821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.He H, Li W, Liyanarachchi S, et al. Genetic predisposition to papillary thyroid carcinoma: involvement of FOXE1, TSHR, and a novel lincRNA gene, PTCSC2. J Clin Endocrinol Metabolism. 2015;100:164–72. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hoskin DW, Ramamoorthy A. Studies on anticancer activities of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2008;1778:357–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jin G, Weinberg A. Human antimicrobial peptides and cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019;88:156–62. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kumar PK, Piramanayagam S. Molecular docking analysis of antimicrobial peptides with the CXCL1 protein target for colorectal cancer. Bioinformation. 2021;17:369. doi: 10.6026/97320630017369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu X, Li Y, Li Z, et al. Mechanism of anticancer effects of antimicrobial peptides. J Fiber Bioeng Inform. 2015;8:25–36. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ma J, Huang X, Li Z, et al. FOXE1 supports the tumor promotion of Gli2 on papillary thyroid carcinoma by the Wnt/β-atenin pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:17739–48. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Melotte V, Yi JM, Lentjes MH, et al. Spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope 1 and forkhead box protein E1 are promising markers for the detection of colorectal cancer in blood novel methylation markers for colorectal cancer. Cancer Prev Res. 2015;8:157–64. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-14-0198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Saleh RO, Essia INA, Jasim SA. The anticancer effect of a conjugated antimicrobial peptide against colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. J Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2022;2022:1–6. doi: 10.1007/s12029-021-00799-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Statello L, Guo C J, Chen LL, Huarte M. Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22:96–118. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00315-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tornesello AL, Borrelli A, Buonaguro L, Buonaguro FM, Tornesello ML. Antimicrobial peptides as anticancer agents: functional properties and biological activities. Molecules. 2020;25:2850. doi: 10.3390/molecules25122850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tsai TL, Li AC, Chen YC, Liao YS, Lin TH. Antimicrobial peptide m2163 or m2386 identified from Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 can trigger apoptosis in the human colorectal cancer cell line SW480. Tumor Biol. 2015;36:3775–89. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-3018-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang C, Dong S, Zhang L, et al. Cell surface binding, uptaking and anticancer activity of L-K6, a lysine/leucine-rich peptide, on human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08963-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang Y, He H, Li W, et al. MYH9 binds to lncRNA gene PTCSC2 and regulates FOXE1 in the 9q22 thyroid cancer risk locus. Proceed Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:474–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619917114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wu Y, Jiao N, Zhu R, et al. Identification of microbial markers across populations in early detection of colorectal cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23265-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yu G, Baeder DY, Regoes RR, RolffJ Combination effects of antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:1717–24. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02434-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zandsalimi F, Talaei S, Noormohammad Ahari M, et al. Antimicrobial peptides: a promising strategy for lung cancer drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2020;15:1343–54. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2020.1791080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhu S, Li W, Liu J, et al. Genome-scale deletion screening of human long non-coding RNAs using a paired-guide RNA CRISPR–Cas9 library. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:1279–86. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






