Skip to main content
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience logoLink to Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
. 2023 Feb 6;60:101211. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101211

Corpus callosum structural characteristics in very preterm children and adolescents: Developmental trajectory and relationship to cognitive functioning

Vanessa Siffredi a,b,c,, Maria Chiara Liverani a,d, Dimitri Van De Ville a,b,c, Lorena GA Freitas a,b,c, Cristina Borradori Tolsa a, Petra Susan Hüppi a,1, Russia Ha-Vinh Leuchter a,1
PMCID: PMC9925611  PMID: 36780739

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that structural alteration of the corpus callosum, i.e., the largest white matter commissural pathway, occurs after a preterm birth in the neonatal period and lasts across development. The present study aims to unravel corpus callosum structural characteristics across childhood and adolescence in very preterm (VPT) individuals, and their associations with general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning. Neuropsychological assessments, T1-weighted and multi-shell diffusion MRI were collected in 79 VPT and 46 full term controls aged 6–14 years. Volumetric, diffusion tensor and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) measures were extracted on 7 callosal portions using TractSeg. A multivariate data-driven approach (partial least squares correlation) and a cohort-based age normative modelling approach were used to explore associations between callosal characteristics and neuropsychological outcomes. The VPT and a full-term control groups showed similar trends of white-matter maturation over time, i.e., increase FA and reduced ODI, in all callosal segments, that was associated with increase in general intellectual functioning. However, using a cohort-based age-related normative modelling, findings show atypical pattern of callosal development in the VPT group, with reduced callosal maturation over time that was associated with poorer general intellectual and working memory functioning, as well as with lower gestational age.

Abbreviations: CC, Corpus Callosum; VPT, Very Preterm; DWI, Diffusion-Weighted Imaging; DTI, Diffusion Tensor Imaging; FA, Fractional Anisotropy; MD, Mean Diffusivity; NODDI, Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging; NDI, Neurite Density Index; ODI, Orientation Density Index; K-ABC-II, Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, 2nd Edition; FCI, Fluid-Crystallized Index; WISC-IV, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, 4th Edition; GAI, General Ability Index; NEPSY-II, Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment, 2nd Edition; MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging; FOD, Fibre Orientation Distributions; MSMT-CSD, Multi-Shell Multi-Tissue Constrained Spherical Deconvolution; fODF, Fibre Orientation Distribution Function; TractSeg, Tractography-Based Segmentation; LOESS Curve, Local Polynomial Regression Curve; PLSC, Partial Least Square Correlation

Keywords: Prematurity, Corpus callosum, Developmental trajectory, Neuropsychological functions: Structural characteristics

Highlights

  • Callosal development was explored in full-term and very preterm (VPT) aged 6–14 years.

  • Neuropsychological, callosal volumetric, DTI and NODDI measures were used.

  • Age-related normative modelling revealed atypical callosal development in VPT.

  • In VPT, atypical callosal maturation was associated with poorer cognitive functioning.

  • In VPT, greater prematurity was associated with increased atypical callosal maturation.

1. Introduction

With more than 190 million axon fibres, the corpus callosum (CC) is a major white matter commissural pathway that connects neurons between the two cerebral hemispheres of the human brain (Edwards et al., 2014). The CC plays a crucial role for interhemispheric communication of low-level sensory and motor information but also for higher-level cognitive information (Gazzaniga, 2000, Hofer and Frahm, 2006, Hofer et al., 2008). As a consequence, structural alteration of the CC has been associated with reduced general intellectual (Fryer et al., 2008, Hutchinson et al., 2009; Luders et al., 2007; Siffredi et al., 2018), executive (Brown et al., 2020, Hinkley et al., 2012, Kok et al., 2014, Lyoo et al., 1996, Siffredi et al., 2017) and socio-emotional functions (Badaruddin et al., 2007, Barnea-Goraly et al., 2004, Bridgman et al., 2014, Hardan et al., 2009, Paul et al., 2007). In typical foetal development, the basic structure and shape of the CC is completed by 20 gestational weeks (Edwards et al., 2014, Lindwall et al., 2007, Rakic and Yakovlev, 1968). However, it continues to increase in size over the third trimester of pregnancy and postnatally up until 2 years of age, when it reaches a size comparable to adults (Giedd et al., 1996, Malinger and Zakut, 1993, Pujol et al., 1993, Rauch and Jinkins, 1994). This developmental period is accompanied by axon growth, followed by a period of synaptic pruning (Innocenti and Price, 2005). Thus, very preterm (VPT) birth, i.e., before 32 completed weeks of gestation, occurs during a highly sensitive period of callosal development. Finally, the CC will then continue to developed during childhood and adolescence. By the age of 11, the CC has reached 90% of its maximum fibre directionality; and at 20 years old, it has achieved 90% of their maximum external axonal structures (Krogsrud et al., 2016, Lebel et al., 2010, Lebel et al., 2019). Thereby, the CC is among the last structures to complete postnatal maturation with myelination finally completed during early adulthood (Giedd et al., 1996, Pujol et al., 1993).

In VPT individuals, previous studies indeed showed structural alteration of the CC in the neonatal period that lasts across childhood, adolescence and young adulthood (de Bruïne et al., 2011, Hasegawa et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2020; Hüppi et al., 1998; Teli et al., 2018; Thompson et al., 2011; van Pul et al., 2012). Firstly, callosal volume reduction has been found in VPT individuals at different ages across childhood from 7 years old (Rademaker et al., 2004), adolescence and young adulthood up until 20 years of age (Caldú et al., 2006, Narberhaus et al., 2007, Narberhaus et al., 2008, Nosarti et al., 2014, Nosarti et al., 2004). Volumetric alteration is found more specifically in the posterior area of the CC and reduction in callosal volume is correlated with increased prematurity (Caldú et al., 2006, Narberhaus et al., 2007, Narberhaus et al., 2008, Nosarti et al., 2004). Using longitudinal data, Allin and colleagues (2007) showed increased volumetric growth from 15 to 19-year-old in preterm individuals compared to full-term controls (Allin et al., 2007). However, despite this accelerated growth, CC volume seems to stay reduced in this population. Secondly, structural alteration of the CC has been explored using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) model is known to provide insight into the microstructure and connectivity of white matter tracts (Pierpaoli et al., 1996). A reduction in callosal fractional anisotropy (FA) values was found at early ages in VPT children (de Almeida et al., 2020, Hüppi et al., 1998, Jo et al., 2012, O’Gorman et al., 2015, Thompson et al., 2015) as well as in young adolescents (Nagy et al., 2003), especially in posterior CC portions. FA is used as a measure of the directionality of diffusion. Within each voxel, FA values indicate the degree of water diffusion anisotropic motion, with eigenvalues varying between 0 and 1, with 1 being highly directional diffusion and 0 being completely isotropic diffusion. FA has been utilised to measure white-matter fibre properties and quantify microstructural characteristics of brain tissue (Lebel et al., 2019, Tamnes et al., 2018). Mean diffusivity (MD), a measure of overall diffusion (with a larger MD associated with reduced integrity of the white-matter (Thompson et al., 2011), was found to be increased in VPT during childhood (Jo et al., 2012) and young adulthood (Kontis et al., 2009). To explore CC microstructure, the neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI; (Zhang et al., 2012)) has also been used in preterm children. Findings showed that axon dispersion was increased in 6 and 7-year-old VPT children compared to full-term controls in the body, genu, splenium (Kelly et al., 2016, Young et al., 2019). Importantly, and in line with the implication of the corpus callosum in neurodevelopment, these volumetric and microstructural callosal alterations in VPT individuals have been consistently associated with poorer cognitive functioning, including general intellectual and executive outcomes (Kelly et al., 2016, Kontis et al., 2009, Narberhaus et al., 2007, Narberhaus et al., 2008, Nosarti et al., 2004, Rademaker et al., 2004).

While the DTI model and its indices of FA and MD are commonly used to study white matter microstructural properties, they lack specificity on informing on the underlying biological mechanisms. As an illustration, a reduction of FA in a white matter tract can be driven by multiple contributing factors such as decreased myelination or decreased axonal fibre density (Jones et al., 2013). Furthermore, lower FA will be evaluated in voxels containing crossing fibres compared to those without crossing fibres, a finding which might incorrectly be interpreted as reduced structural integrity (Nemanich et al., 2019). In this context, multi-shell diffusion imaging combined with the application of advanced statistical models provides an opportunity to measure more specific information regarding white matter microstructural properties. One such model is the NODDI model (Zhang et al., 2012) that captures neurite (dendrites and axons) morphology, providing parameters including neurite density index (NDI) and orientation dispersion index (ODI). More specifically, while NDI represents the intra-cellular volume fraction, estimating the density of axons within a voxel, ODI represents the angular variation of neurite orientations, reflecting the bending and fanning of axons (Zhang et al., 2012). This model has been found to be valuable in characterising early microstructural development (Kunz et al., 2014).

Building on previous findings and using advanced methodology, this study aimed to examine CC structural development in VPT children and adolescents aged 6–14 years using a comprehensive set of structural and microstructural measures and its association with general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning. Firstly, patterns of associations between callosal volumetric, DTI and NODDI measures, and age, gestational age and neuropsychological functioning were explored in full-term and VPT individuals. Secondly, we employed a cohort-based age-related normative modelling approach on callosal volumetric, DTI and NODDI measures. This approach consists of fitting a mathematical distribution that finds the relationship between age and a given callosal structural characteristic measure, as well as the variation in this relationship expected in a group of full-term controls (Bethlehem et al., 2020, Lefebvre et al., 2018, Marquand et al., 2016). Callosal structural characteristic measures of VPT individuals can then be understood in relation to this normative model and allows identification of deviations from normative callosal development for each individual. In the VPT group, we then used this approach to explore specific association between deviation from normative CC structural development with age, gestational age, neuropsychological functioning.

In summary, associations between CC structural development—using volumetric, DTI and NODDI measures—and age, gestational age and neuropsychological functioning, were explored in full-term and VPT individuals using both traditional and cohort-based normative modelling approaches. This procedure allowed us to, first, establish how callosal structural development is influenced by age and gestational age factors in full-term individuals, as well as association with general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning. Secondly, it allowed us to better capture atypical callosal structural development in VPT individuals and its association with general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning.

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

Participants of the current study were recruited as part of the “Geneva Preterm Cohort Study”, at the age of 6–14 years (including two sub-studies completed in children and adolescents from 6–14 years of age, the ‘Mindful preterm teens’ study (Siffredi et al., 2021); and ‘Vis-à-Vis’ study). Participants were recruited between January 2017 and July 2019. 392 VPT children and adolescents born < 32 gestational weeks between 01.01.2003 and 31.12.2012, in the Neonatal Unit at the Geneva University Hospital (Switzerland) and followed up at the Division of Child Development and Growth, were invited to participate. VPT children and adolescents were excluded if they had an intelligence quotient below 70, sensory or physical disabilities (cerebral palsy, blindness, hearing loss), or an insufficient understanding of French. A total of 108 VPT participants were enrolled. Of the 108 participants enrolled, 70 completed both the diffusion MR sequences and neuropsychological assessment (participants who only completed the neuropsychological assessment with no MRI scan, n = 29); participants who did not complete the diffusion MR sequence, n = 9). Five participants were further excluded because of high level of motion artefacts on the diffusion MR sequence. A total of 65 participants were included in the current study. Of note, we attribute the small percentage of participation in the VPT group, i.e., 27.6%, due to the fact that the data collected here were part of intervention studies mentioned above: the “Vis-à-vis interventional study” and the “Mindful preterm teens study”. The data used in the current study are the data collected at baseline, before any intervention were conducted. Moreover, 46 term-born children and adolescents aged between 6 and 14 years old were recruited through the community. Of the 46 participants, 41 completed both the brain MRI scan and neuropsychological assessment. A total of 39 were included in the current study (diffusion sequences not completed: n = 2).

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from the principal caregiver and from the participant.

2.2. Neuropsychological measures

Participants’ general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning were assessed using neuropsychological testing and computerised neurocognitive tasks, for detailed information see Supplementary Table S1.

  • (i)

    General intelligence measure

    In participants from 6 years to 9 years and 11 months old, the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children – 2nd Edition (K-ABC-II; (Kaufman and Kaufman, 2013)) was used to evaluate the Fluid-Crystallized Index (FCI) as a measure of general intellectual functioning. The FCI is derived from a linear combination of 10 core subtests that composed five first-order scale scores (i.e., Short-Term memory, Long-Term Storage and Retrieval, Visual Processing, Fluid Reasoning, and Crystallized Ability). For children younger than 7 years of age, a different subset combination is administered to calculate the FCI. In participants from 10 to 14 years of age, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – 4th Edition (WISC-IV; (Wechsler, 2003)) was used to evaluate the General ability index (GAI) as a measure of general intellectual functioning. The GAI is derived from the core verbal comprehension and perceptual reasoning subtests. Index scores of these measures of general intellectual functioning, FCI and GAI, have been found to correlate strongly (Naglieri and Jensen, 1987, Oliver, 2010, Reynolds et al., 2009). Both of these measures of general intellectual functioning, FCI and GAI, have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.

  • (ii)

    Executive functioning measures

    Executive functioning was assessed based on the model of Anderson (Anderson, 2002) using: a) the Letter-Number Sequencing subtest from the WISC-IV assessing working memory, which belongs to the cognitive flexibility subdomain (Anderson, 2002); and b) a computerised Flanker Visual Filtering Task, in which reaction time of the congruent condition was used to assess speed of processing, which belongs to the information processing subdomain; and the inhibition score (accuracy in incongruent conditions – accuracy in congruent conditions) was used as a measure of the attentional control subdomain (Anderson, 2002, Christ et al., 2011). Given that age-related increases in executive functioning are known to exist, raw scores were regressed on age at testing; the standardised residuals for the three executive measures were retained for following analysis, called working memory, processing speed and inhibition scores.

  • (iii)

    Socio-emotional functioning measures

    Socio-emotional functioning was assessed using subtests of the Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment - 2nd Edition (NEPSY-II; (Korkman et al., 2007)) including: a) the Affect Recognition subtest giving a total score assessing facial emotional recognition; and b) the Theory of Mind subtest giving a total score measuring the ability to understand mental contents, such as belief, intention or deception. Given age-related increases in socio-emotional functioning, raw scores were regressed on age at testing; the standardised residuals for the two socio-emotional measures were retained for following analysis, called affect recognition and theory of mind scores.

2.3. Magnetic resonance imaging

2.3.1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) acquisition

MRI data were acquired at the Campus Biotech in Geneva, Switzerland, using a Siemens 3 T Magnetom Prisma scanner. All participants completed a simulated “mock” MRI session prior to their MRI scan. This preparation process was conducted by trained research staff and allowed participants to familiarise themselves with the scanner and the scanning process, eventually raising any concerns they might have had prior to the MRI scan. Furthermore, this process is known to facilitated acquisition of good quality MRI images in children and adolescents (de Bie et al., 2010, Tamnes et al., 2018). Structural T1-weighted MP-RAGE (magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo) sequences was acquired using the following parameters: voxel size = 0.9 × 0.9 × 0.9 mm; repetition time (TR) = 2300 ms; echo time (TE) = 2.32 ms; inversion time (TI) = 900 ms; flip angle = 8°; and field of view (FOV) = 240 mm. A multi-shell diffusion‐weighted (DW) echo planar imaging (EPI) protocol was used and included four shells. The first sequence, referred to as ‘b200’, was acquired with b‐values of 200 s/mm2, 10 gradient directions, 4 b‐value = 0 s/mm2 images, TR = 7000 ms, TE = 87 ms, FOV = 234 × 243 mm, slice thickness = 1.3 mm, voxel size = 1.3 × 1.3 × 1.3 mm. The second sequence, referred to as ‘b1700’, was acquired with b‐values of 1700 s/mm2, 30 gradient directions, 4 b‐value = 0 s/mm2 images, TR = 7000 ms, TE = 87 ms, FOV = 234 × 243 mm, slice thickness = 1.3 mm, voxel size = 1.3 × 1.3 × 1.3 mm. The third sequence, referred to as ‘b4200a’, was acquired with b‐values of 4200 s/mm2, 26 gradient directions, 4 b‐value = 0 s/mm2 images, TR = 7000 ms, TE = 87 ms, FOV = 234 × 243 mm, slice thickness = 1.3 mm, voxel size = 1.3 × 1.3 × 1.3 mm. The forth sequence, referred to as ‘b4200b’, was acquired with b‐values of 4200 s/mm2, 24 gradient directions, 4 b‐value = 0 s/mm2 images, TR = 7000 ms, TE = 87 ms, FOV = 234 × 243 mm, slice thickness = 1.3 mm, voxel size = 1.3 × 1.3 × 1.3 mm.

2.3.2. Volumetry

Volumetric measurements of the CC were based on T1-weighted MP-RAGE images and obtained using Freesurfer 5.3.0 and the recon-all function. The CC was divided into five neuroanatomically based partitions (Fischl et al., 2002). Visual quality control of the original T1 image and of the CC segmentations was completed for all participants. More specifically, for each participant, the T1 anatomical image was examined for potential motion artefacts. The T1 image was then overlayed with the FreeSurfer segmented image (i.e., aseg image) and the quality of the callosal segmentation in regard to the T1 image was evaluated. This process was completed for all participants, by both a master student in neuroscience and the first author (VS).

2.3.3. Diffusion image preprocessing and models fitting

A flowchart summarizes diffusion image preprocessing, models fitting tractography and tractometry measures, see Fig. 1. Diffusion image preprocessing, model fitting and statistical analyses codes are available on the study’s OSF page: https://osf.io/h6t2k/.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Flowchart summarizing diffusion image preprocessing, model fitting, tractography and tractometry measures. FA, Fractional Anisotropy; MD, Mean Diffusivity; NDI, Neurite Density Index; ODI, Orientation Dispersion Index.

Visual inspection of raw data for brain coverage, spike artefacts, severe head motion, and other severe image artefacts was completed and participants were excluded if one of these was observed. The four diffusion shells (b200, b1700, b4200a, b4200b) were preprocessed independently using MRtrix3 (Tournier et al., 2019) and using the following pipeline: a) denoising (Cordero-Grande et al., 2019, Veraart et al., 2016, Veraart et al., 2016), b) Gibbs ringing removal (Kellner et al., 2016), c)correction for movement and eddy current‐induced geometric distortions using the eddy tool implemented in FSL (Jenkinson et al., 2012). The first b = 0 s/mm2 images of the b1700, b4200a, b4200b sequences were linearly registered to the first b = 0 s/mm2 image of the b200 sequence using FreeSurfer to bring them into b200 space before merging them together. The brain extraction tool (BET) from FSL (Smith, 2002) was then applied to the combined b200, b1700, b4200a, b4200b image to remove non-brain tissue and subsequently intensity normalisation was applied. Following Pines and colleagues’ recommendations (2020), the resulting multi-shell diffusion weighted image was then used for models fitting, including the DTI and the NODDI models.

The DTI model was applied to the resulting multi-shell diffusion weighted image, and whole-brain maps of FA and MD were calculated for each participant. FA (between 0 and 1) is a measure of the directionality of diffusion that characterise the variance of the three eigenvalues pairs that represent the direction and magnitude of diffusivity along the three orthogonal axes (ν1, λ1; ν2, λ2; ν3, λ3). MD is the mean of the 3 eigenvalues and represents the average magnitude of diffusion (Tamnes et al., 2018). In addition, the NODDI Matlab Toolbox was used to extract maps of neurite density index (NDI) and fibre orientation dispersion (ODI) across the brain for each participant, http://www.nitrc.org/projects/noddi_toolbox. NDI and ODI were estimated from the resulting multi-shell diffusion weighted image using the NODDI model (Zhang et al., 2012). ODI characterises the angular variation and spatial configuration of neurite structures. NDI represents the fraction of tissue that comprises axons or dendrites (also referred to as intra-neurite volume fraction).

2.3.4. Tractography and tractometry measures

Whole-brain fibre orientation distributions (FOD) were estimated using with the multi-shell multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution (MSMT-CSD) method (Jeurissen et al., 2014), resulting in a condensed representation of diffusion along three principal fibre directions per voxel according to tissue type (grey, white, cortico-spinal fluid). Tractography-based Segmentation (TractSeg) uses a supervised-learning approach with a convolutional neural network-based that directly segments tracts in the field of fibre orientation distribution function (fODF) peaks without using parcellation (Wasserthal et al., 2018, Wasserthal et al., 2019). TractSeg has achieved state-of-the-art performance and allows for an accurate reconstruction of fibre tracts in participant space, thus avoiding the problem of inaccurate coregistration of tracts with varying size and shape. Based on the available library of 72 anatomically well-defined white matter tracts, the 7 segments of the corpus callosum were defined as tracts of interest. Using the tractometry function, along-tract mean FA, MD, NDI and ODI were calculated for the 7 white-matter segments of the CC, as defined by Wasserthal and colleagues (2018) and Chandio and colleagues (2019).

2.4. Cohort-based normative age modelling

A cohort-based age-related normative modelling was completed for all measures of CC structural characteristics including: 5 volumetric measures, 7 along-tract CC mean FA measures, 7 along-tract CC mean MD measures, 7 mean NDI measures, 7 mean ODI measures. The cohort-based age-related normative modelling was done utilising participants from the full-term control group performed, using R version 4.0.3 (R. Team, 2019) and RStudio version 1.3.1093 (R. Team, 2020), and adopting the methods recently described by Bethlehem and colleagues (2020). A LOESS Curve (Local Polynomial Regression) was fitted on the CC structural characteristic measures of the full-term control group. LOESS is a nonparametric method that uses local weighted regression to fit a smooth curve through points in a scatter plot. The local width of the regression (smoothing kernel) was determined by the model using the R optim function from the stats package, in which the overall smallest sum of squared errors used hyper-parameter optimisation from 5% until 100% of the full age range using Brent’s method (Brent, 1971). This approach allows to fit a potentially nonlinear relationship between age and CC structural characteristics. In the current study, age ranges from 72 to 173 months, equivalent to 6 years to 14 years and 5 months old. As a trade-off between adequate representation of developmental trajectories of CC structural characteristics and ensuring large enough subsets of full-term individuals, four age bins of 25.5 months each were created to align the full-term and the VPT groups (i.e., 72–96.5 months; 96.6–122 months; 122.1–148 months; 148.1–173 months), see Supplementary Table S2. For each age bin and every CC structural characteristic, a normative mean and standard deviation from the full-term group was calculated. These statistical norms were then used to compute a W-score (analogous to a z-score) for every VPT participant and every CC structural characteristic:

WVPTcharacteristics=CCVPTcharacteristicsμnormcharacteristicsσnormcharacteristics

The W-score for a VPT participant quantified deviation from normative neurodevelopment for a given measure of CC structural characteristic. As W-scores are computed for every CC structural characteristics, we get a W-score for each VPT participant showing how each CC structural characteristic for that individual is atypical relative to full-term norms. See Fig. 2 for a schematic overview of the cohort-based age-related normative modelling procedure used here and based on Bethlehem and colleagues (2020).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Schematic overview of the cohort-based age-related normative modelling procedure based on Bethlehem and colleagues (2020). In Fig. 2, volumetric measures of posterior portion of the CC were used. Briefly, LOESS regression was used to estimate developmental trajectories in full-term (FT) controls for each callosal measure, i.e., volumetric, DTI and NODDI measures (A). Age-bins of 25.5 months were created to align the full-term (FT) and very-preterm (VPT) groups (B). A normative mean and standard deviation from the full-term group were then computed for each age-bin and each callosal characteristic measure. These statistical norms were then used to compute a W-score for every VPT individual and every callosal structural characteristic measure, called Char (C). VPT are represented in blue and FT in yellow.

2.5. Statistical analyses

Partial least square correlation analyses (PLSC) were performed to evaluate association between age, gestational age, general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning measures with CC structural characteristics. PLSC is a data-driven multivariate technique that maximizes the covariance between two matrices by identifying latent components which are linear combinations of the two matrices, i.e., clinical measures and CC structural characteristics measures (McIntosh and Lobaugh, 2004). A publicly available PLSC implementation in MATLAB was used: https://github.com/danizoeller/myPLS (Kebets et al., 2019, Zöller et al., 2019). PLSC have been specifically design to deal with the analysis of data sets that exhibit multicollinearity and found to have indeed considerable potential (Abdi and Williams, 2013, Delavari et al., 2021, Kebets et al., 2019, Krishnan et al., 2011; McIntosh and Mišić, 2013; Weaving et al., 2019; Zöller et al., 2019). In PLSC, singular value decomposition is used to establish the strength of any relationship that might exist between two matrices each containing usually more than one variables (Abdi and Williams, 2013). The use of singular value decomposition is immune to multicollinearity because it produces a set of orthogonal composite variables that are completely uncorrelated (Golub and Kahan, 1965; Anthony R McIntosh and Mišić, 2013; Till et al., 2016). It does this by using singular value decomposition to determine the inertia (i.e., sum of the singular values) of the covariance matrix of the two original matrices (Abdi and Williams, 2013, Krishnan et al., 2011; McIntosh and Mišić, 2013). Given that the singular values are proportional to the magnitude of any effect, the higher the value of the singular value inertia observed, the greater the amount of shared information between the original matrices and the stronger the relationship between the two (Anthony R McIntosh and Mišić, 2013). Because PLSC incorporates singular value decomposition, PLSC is immune to multicollinearity.

Three PLSCs were computed as follow:

  • In the full-term control group using CC structural characteristic measures:

    PLSC was used to evaluate association between age, gestational age, and general intellectual; executive; and socio-emotional functioning measures with CC structural characteristics in the full-term control group. Clinical data refers to: age, gestational age at birth and the 6 neuropsychological measures of general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning. Clinical data were stored in a 39 x 8 matrix denoted X. Each row of X represents one participant and the matrix's 8 columns consist of age, gestational age at birth and the 6 neuropsychological measures. CC structural characteristic measures were gathered in a 39 x 33 matrix denoted Y, with each row matching one participant and each column one CC structural characteristic measure. A cross-covariance matrix was then computed between X (participants x clinical values) and Y (participants x CC structural values). Singular value decomposition was then applied to this cross-covariance matrix, resulting in latent components. Each latent component is composed of a set of clinical loadings and CC structural characteristic loadings, akin to structure coefficients. Structure coefficients lie between –1 and 1, and can be interpreted similarly to correlation values. Structure coefficients or loadings reflect the direct contribution of a specific predictor to the predictor criterion independently of others, which can be critical when predictors are highly correlated between each other (i.e., in presence of multicollinearity (Sherry and Henson, 2005)). Here, loadings indicate how strongly each clinical measures and CC structural characteristic measures contribute to the multivariate association of clinical measures and CC structural characteristics. To assess the statistical significance of the LCs, we permuted the clinical data (1000 permutations) and repeated the PLS procedure to construct a null distribution of the singular values. The latent components were considered robust at p < 0.01. Stability of clinical loadings and CC structural characteristic loadings were estimated using bootstrapping (500 bootstrap samples with replacement). Bootstrapped z-scores for each clinical measures and CC structural characteristic measures were calculated by dividing each clinical and CC structural characteristics correlation coefficient by its bootstrap-estimated standard deviation, and a p-value was obtained for each bootstrap' z-score. Following the PLSC interpretation (Krishnan et al., 2011), the contribution of clinical loadings and CC structural characteristic loadings for a given latent component was considered robust at p < 0.01 (i.e., with a threshold of correlation coefficient above 0.4 or below −0.4).

  • In the VPT group using CC structural characteristic measures:

    PLSC was used to evaluate association between age, gestational age, general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning measures with CC structural characteristics in the VPT group. Clinical data refers to: age, gestational age at birth and the 6 neuropsychological measures of general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning. The clinical data were stored in a 65 x 8 matrix denoted X. Each row of X represents one participant and the matrix's 8 columns consist of age, gestational age at birth and the 6 neuropsychological measures. CC structural characteristic measures were gathered in a 65 x 33 matrix denoted Y, with each row matching one participant and each column one CC structural characteristic measure. A procedure similar to the previously described PLSC conducted in full-term control was then used in the VPT group.

  • In the VPT group using W-scores of CC structural characteristic:

    PLSC was used to evaluate association between age, gestational age, general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning measures with W-scores of CC structural characteristics in the VPT group. W-scores quantify deviation from normative neurodevelopment. Clinical data refers to: age, gestational age at birth and the 6 neuropsychological measures of general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning. The clinical data were stored in a 65 x 8 matrix denoted X. Each row of X represents one participant and the matrix's 8 columns consist of age, gestational age at birth and the 6 neuropsychological measures. W-scores of CC structural characteristic measures were gathered in a 65 x 33 matrix denoted Y, with each row matching one participant and each column one W-scores of CC structural characteristic. A procedure similar to the previously described PLSC conducted on original CC measurements in VPT individuals was then used with W-scores.

For all PLSC, robust results are reported in terms of bootstrapping mean and standard deviations.

2.6. Supplementary statistical analyses

Supplementary analyses were conducted to explore the potential impact of socio-economic status both in the full-term control and in the VPT groups. Three more PLSCs were computed using the same procedure as described above but adding socio-economic status, i.e., Largo scores, as an additional clinical variable:

  • In the full-term control group using CC structural characteristic measures: Clinical data were stored in a 39 x 9 matrix denoted X. Each row of X represents one participant and the matrix's 9 columns consist of age, gestational age at birth, socio-economic status (as measured by the Largo score) and the 6 neuropsychological measures. CC structural characteristic measures were gathered in a 39 x 33 matrix denoted Y, with each row matching one participant and each column one CC structural characteristic measure.

  • In the VPT group using CC structural characteristic measures: Clinical data were stored in a 65 x 9 matrix denoted X. Each row of X represents one participant and the matrix's 9 columns consist of age, gestational age at birth, socio-economic status (as measured by the Largo score) and the 6 neuropsychological measures. CC structural characteristic measures were gathered in a 65 x 33 matrix denoted Y, with each row matching one participant and each column one CC structural characteristic measure.

  • In the VPT group using W-scores of CC structural characteristic: Clinical data were stored in a 65 x 9 matrix denoted X. Each row of X represents one participant and the matrix's 9 columns consist of age, gestational age at birth, socio-economic status (as measured by the Largo score) and the 6 neuropsychological measures. W-scores of CC structural characteristic measures were gathered in a 65 x 33 matrix denoted Y, with each row matching one participant and each column one W-scores of CC structural characteristic.

3. Results

3.1. Participant characteristics

The final sample included 65 VPT and 39 full-term participants between 6 and 14 years of age, see Table 1. Baseline characteristics were similar between VPT and full-term participants for sex and age at assessment. Socioeconomic status, as measured by the Largo score, showed group difference, with lower socio-economic status (i.e., higher Largo score) in the VPT group compared to the full-term group. Of note, there was a significant correlation between age at assessment and gestational age in the VPT group (r(63) = −0.26, p = 0.04) but not in the full-term control group (r(37) = −0.02, p = 0.90).

Table 1.

Neonatal and demographic characteristics of the VPT and full-term participants.

VPT (n = 65) Full-term (n = 39) Group comparison
Birth weight mean (SD) in grams 1288.00 (378.62) 3438.72 (412.05) t(95.67) = −33.89, p < 0.001
Gestational Age mean (SD) in weeks 29.59 (1.73) 39.83 (1.33) t(74.85) = −26.56, p < 0.001
Age at assessment mean (SD) in months 122.97 (27.76) 122.46 (26.55) t(82.98) = 0.09, p = 0.93
Sex, n 33 females 32 males 17 females 22 males X2 (1, N = 104) = 0.5, p = 0.478
Socio-economic riskmean (SD) 4.44 (2.55) 2.89 (1.29) t(99.01) = 4.05, p < 0.001

Note: Socio-economic status of the parents was estimated using the Largo scale, a validated 12-point score based on maternal education and paternal occupation (Largo et al., 1989). Higher largo scores reflect lower socio-economic status. Independent-sample t-test or Chi-square, as appropriate, were used to compare the VPT and the full-term groups.

Corpus callosum structural characteristics and association with age, gestational age and neuropsychological functioning in full-term and VPT children and adolescents.

PLSC analysis applied on clinical measures (i.e., age, gestational age at birth and 6 neuropsychological measures of general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning) and CC structural characteristics measures identified:

  • a)

    in the full-term control group: one statistically significant latent component, latent component 1 (p = 0.001);

  • b)

    in the VPT group: one statistically significant latent component, latent component 1 (p = 0.001).

For the two groups, a comparable latent component 1 revealed an increase in age and in general intellectual functioning associated with a general increase in mean FA and decrease in mean ODI for all segments of the CC, as well as an increase in mean NDI in the rostrum. Moreover, in the VPT group only, latent component 1 also showed a significant decrease in reaction time of the congruent condition of the flanker task (i.e., increased processing speed); and an increase in number-letter sequencing (i.e., increased working memory), associated with the same pattern of increased FA and decreased ODI for all segments of the CC, along with an increase in volume for all portions of the CC, see Fig. 3. The bootstrapping mean and standard deviations are reported in Supplementary Table S3; Supplementary Fig. S2 and S3 illustrate the correlation between individual-specific CC structural characteristics and clinical composite scores of participants in the full-term and VPT groups.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Associations between clinical and CC structural characteristics measures (i.e., volume, FA, MD, NDI, ODI) based on the PLSC analysis. 1) In the full-term control group: 1.a) Clinical loadings: the diverging graph shows mean correlations averaged across bootstrap samples and their bootstrap-estimated standard deviations (x-axis) for each clinical measure (y-axis); robust loadings are represented in blue. Of note, gestational age is in the normative range for the full-term controls. 1.b) Robust CC structural characteristics loadings for each measure and concerned CC segment or portion. 2) In the VPT group: 2.a) Clinical loadings: the diverging graph shows mean correlations averaged across bootstrap samples and their bootstrap-estimated standard deviations (x-axis) for each clinical measure (y-axis); robust loadings are represented in blue. 2.b) Robust CC structural characteristics loadings for each measure and concerned CC segment or portion.

W-score of corpus callosum structural characteristics and association with age, gestational age and neuropsychological functioning in VPT.

PLSC analysis applied on clinical measures (i.e., age, gestational age at birth and the 6 neuropsychological measures of general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning) and W-scores of CC structural characteristics in the VPT group identified one statistically significant latent component: latent component 1 (p = 0.001), see Fig. 4. In the VPT group, latent component 1 revealed that decreased general intellectual functioning and working memory (i.e., measured by number-letter sequencing), were associated with deviations from normative CC structural characteristics, including reduced mean FA and increased mean ODI on all segments of the CC as well as reduced MD, increased NDI and increased volume on the mid-posterior and posterior portion. Interestingly, loadings of W-scores of CC structural characteristics also show robust association with age and gestational age. Increased age at testing and decreased gestational age were overall associated with deviations from normative CC structural characteristics for mean FA and MD, (i.e., below normative expectation) and mean ODI, NDI and volumes (i.e., above normative expectation). These results reflect that the older and the “more preterm” participants are, the more they show a deviation from typical development of callosal structural characteristics. Bootstrapping mean and standard deviations are reported in Supplementary Table S4; Supplementary Fig. S4 illustrates the correlation between individual-specific W-scores of CC structural characteristics and clinical composite scores of participants in the VPT group.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Associations between clinical measures and W-scores of CC structural characteristics measures (i.e., volume, FA, MD, NDI, ODI) based on the PLSC analysis. W-scores quantify deviation from normative neurodevelopment. a) Clinical loadings: the diverging graph shows mean correlations averaged across bootstrap samples and their bootstrap-estimated standard deviations (x-axis) for each clinical measure (y-axis); robust loadings are represented in blue. 1.b) Robust W-scores of CC structural characteristics loadings and concerned CC segment or portion.

3.2. Supplementary results

Supplementary analyses were conducted to explore the potential impact of socio-economic status both in the full-term control and in the VPT groups. The three additional PLSCs conducted gave one significant latent component each, similar to the previous results (latent component 1 for the three PLSCs, p = 0.001). Overall all PLSCs conducted in the full-term and VPT group gave patterns of associations comparable to the previous findings. Socio-economic status did not have a significant association with CC structural characteristics measures in the full-term neither in the VPT groups. Similarly, socio-economic status did not have a significant association with W-scores of CC structural characteristics in the VPT group. More specifically, in the full-term group, adding socio-economic status in the PLSC did not change the findings described above. In the VPT group, adding socio-economic status in the two PLSC using CC structural characteristics measures and W-scores of CC structural characteristics modulated the association of the significant clinical measures with callosal volumetric measures only. First, using CC structural characteristics measures in the VPT group, the pattern of significant clinical measures (i.e., age at testing, general intellectual functioning, working memory and processing speed) was only associated with the volume of the mid-anterior CC (in the previous results, the association was with whole CC volume). Secondly, using W-scores of CC structural characteristics in the VPT group, the pattern of significant clinical measures (i.e., gestational age, age at testing, general intellectual functioning and working memory) was not associated with the volume CC (in the previous results, the association was with the mid-posterior and posterior portion of the CC). Bootstrapping mean and standard deviations for each supplementary PLSC analyses are illustrated in Supplementary Figs. S5, S6 and S7.

4. Discussion

The present study aims to unravel CC structural characteristics across development in VPT children and adolescents aged 6–14 years, as well their associations with general intellectual, executive and socio-emotional functioning.

Using multi-modal structural measures of the CC, i.e., volume, DTI and NODDI measures, the VPT and full-term control group shows an overall comparable pattern of association between age and neuropsychological functioning with CC structural characteristics. In both the VPT and full-term control groups, age and general intellectual functioning were positively associated with FA and negatively associated with ODI in most segments of the CC. During typical development, the increase in FA in callosal regions and callosal white-matter tracts is well documented within the age-range of 6–15 years of age (Tamnes et al., 2018, Westlye et al., 2010). For both groups, this age-related increase in FA was dominated by decreasing ODI in most callosal segment, which points to increasing coherence of axons. The rostrum also showed a specific increase in NDI, reflecting an increase in fibre diameter (Mah et al., 2017, Tamnes et al., 2018). This coupling of increased FA and reduced ODI in most callosal tracts was also associated with general intellectual functioning in both the VPT and the full-term control groups. These findings, reflecting the important role of the CC in general intellectual development, are in line with previous studies conducted in typically developing and VPT populations (Allin et al., 2007, Kelly et al., 2016; Luders et al., 2007; Nosarti et al., 2004; Young et al., 2019). Specific to the VPT group, age, as well as general intellectual and executive functioning (i.e., working memory and processing speed), were positively associated with the volume of all portions of the CC. Conversely, this was not found in the full-term control group. These findings suggest a late or accelerated volumetric growth of the CC in VPT school-aged children as proposed in previous studies, that reconciles with delayed maturation at earlier stages of development (Karolis et al., 2017).

Overall, in light of advanced diffusion measures of the CC, the VPT and full-term control group showed comparable trends of callosal maturation reflecting increasing axonal coherence, as well as consistent association with general intellectual functioning. Regarding volumetric measurement, only VPT children and adolescents show a specific increase in callosal volumes with age, probably reflecting a late or accelerated volumetric growth absent in typical callosal development. Moreover, in the VPT group, the pattern of increase in volume and FA and decrease in ODI was not only associated with general intellectual functioning but also with executive functioning.

Despite apparent effective growth and maturation of callosal regions and white matter tracts in the VPT group, the cohort-based age-related normative modelling of CC structural characteristics unravels important patterns of deviations from normative neurodevelopment. In the VPT group, age was associated with a pattern of negative deviation from normative development of FA and positive deviation of ODI on all callosal segments. This reflects that despite an apparent white-matter callosal maturation similar to the full-term with respect to increasing FA and decreasing ODI over age, callosal maturation in the VPT group is significantly slower, and the deviation from normative callosal development increases as VPT children grow older. Lower gestational age was also associated with this atypical pattern of negative deviation of FA and positive deviation of ODI; meaning that the more prematurely VPT children are born, the more they deviate from normative callosal development. These findings are consistent with previous studies showing a significant impact of prematurity as well as the level of prematurity onto callosal structural development using both DTI and NODDI measures (Kelly et al., 2016, Narberhaus et al., 2007, Narberhaus et al., 2008, Young et al., 2019). Moreover, an atypical profile of callosal structural characteristics in VPT children was also associated with reduced general intellectual and working memory functioning. In addition to atypical developmental trajectories of FA and ODI measures for all callosal segment in VPT, posterior portions of the CC seem particularly altered in this population. Indeed, posterior portions showed positive deviation of NDI and volumes as well as negative deviation of MD associated with age. As mentioned above, these results could be interpreted as increased or accelerated maturation processes linked to increased fibre diameter and myelination (Karolis et al., 2017). Nevertheless, these neuroplastic processes that are probably in place to compensate for delayed maturation at an earlier age are not yet sufficient, as they were associated with poorer general intellectual and working memory functioning. Furthermore, the pronounced alteration of posterior portions of the CC is consistent with previous studies conducted in individuals born prematurely (Caldú et al., 2006, Nagy et al., 2003, Narberhaus et al., 2007, Narberhaus et al., 2008, Nosarti et al., 2004). Neuroimaging studies of human embryology and animal models indicate that the first callosal regions to form are the anterior body and the lamina rostralis crossing directly over the hippocampal commissure (Barkovich and Kjos, 1988, Barkovich et al., 1992, Kier and Truwit, 1996, Paul, 2011, Rakic and Yakovlev, 1968, Richards et al., 2004). From 15 gestational weeks, the body extends bi-directionally, with more prominent anterior growth (Huang et al., 2009; Keshavana et al., 2002; Lindwall et al., 2007; Paul, 2011; Richards et al., 2004). From 18 gestational weeks, the splenium, i.e., the most-posterior part of the CC, is the last to develop (Lindwall et al., 2007). It is possible that by being the last part to develop, the posterior portion of the CC is the most affected by a premature birth.

Environmental factors have been found to be closely related to brain development, including white-matter development (Bick et al., 2015). In VPT children and adolescents, environmental factors, such as socioeconomic status, have indeed been increasingly recognised as an important determinant of neurodevelopmental outcomes (Benavente-Fernández et al., 2019). In the current study, socio-economic status was not significantly associated with callosal structural characteristics neither in the VPT group nor in the full-term control group. Nevertheless, in the VPT group only, socio-economic status seems to modulate and to reduce the association between age, general intellectual and executive functioning with callosal volumetric measures (but not DWI and NODDI measures). Further investigations are needed to better understand the role of environmental factors in VPT children and adolescents. Going beyond socio-economic status and considering other factors such as family functioning, parental mental health and parenting strategies might contribute to better understand the impact of environment on brain development.

A limitation of the current study is the use of cross-sectional data to model callosal development. Individual variability in neurodevelopment not only occurs at inter-individual, but also intra-individual level (Foulkes and Blakemore, 2018). Therefore, characterising the factors that explain intra-individual variability during neurodevelopment is of high interest. In this context, future work should consider using longitudinal data and follow-up time points to better understand intra-individual variability. Secondly, despite both DTI and NODDI metrics have been suggested to be sensitive to age-related processes and the combination of NODDI with DTI allows to provide more biologically specific information (Chang et al., 2015, Genc et al., 2017, Lebel et al., 2019, Tamnes et al., 2018), these methods have inherent limitations. Since both DTI and NOODI metrics reveal one dominant fibre orientation in each voxel, it oversimplifies the underlying complex neural structures at voxels containing crossing or kissing fibre bundles (Pasternak et al., 2018). More advanced DWI tractography methods, such as Q-ball (Tuch et al., 2002) or fixel-based analysis (Raffelt et al., 2017), have been proposed to resolve complex fibre architecture in a given voxel and might bring further insight into callosal development in VPT children and adolescents. Indeed, recent studies showed alteration in fibre architecture of the corpus callosum and of callosal maturation compared to full-term controls using fixel-based analysis in 7–13-year-old VPT children. These callosal alterations, along with alteration in other main white-matter tracks, were related to internalised and externalised symptoms at 7 years of age (Gilchrist et al., 2022, Kelly et al., 2020). Thirdly, the use of a cohort-based age normative age modelling approach is debatable. Using the local full-term control group to complete a cohort-based age-related normative modelling approach allows to increase similarities between the VPT and full-term groups in terms of living environment (e.g., living in a similar region, attending similar school system). It also allows similar neuropsychological assessment and MRI acquisition procedures, with the same advanced DWI sequences. Nevertheless, previous studies have used larger normative groups to apply such methods (Bethlehem et al., 2020, Kelly et al., 2022, Parkes et al., 2020). It is possible that the use of such a small sample size (n = 46) to establish a normative group might reduce sensitivity to detect brain atypical properties across different VPT individuals as well as reduce our ability to fully capture developmental processes due to the restriction in the establishment of the age bins (Ziegler et al., 2014). Finally, even though PLSC analyses have been found to be reliable when applied to data sets that exhibit multicollinearity (i.e., when the measures are not linearly independent), the association between age at assessment and gestational age must be considered. The use of a larger sample size with larger inter-individuals’ variability in the VPT group might allow to explore further if the effect found in the current study stands (i.e., older and “more preterm” participants show increased deviation from typical development of callosal structural characteristics).

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the full-term control and VPT groups seem to show similar trends of white-matter maturation over time, i.e., increased FA and reduced ODI in all callosal segments, that were associated with increase in general intellectual functioning in both groups. However, despite apparent growth and maturation of callosal regions and white-matter tracts in school-aged VPT similar to full-term controls, a cohort-based age-related normative modelling of volumetric, DTI and NODDI diffusion measures unravel atypical patterns of callosal development in the VPT population. Callosal maturation appear to deviate from normative expectation with reduced maturation over time but also with an atypical developmental trajectory. Atypical developmental trajectory of callosal maturation was associated with poorer general intellectual and working memory functioning as well as with greater prematurity. The present study illustrates how normative age modelling approach allows to shed new insight into neurodevelopmental trajectory in the VPT population and its association with functional outcomes.

Funding

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation, No. 324730_163084 [PI: P.S. Hüppi].

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Vanessa Siffredi: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Maria Chiara Liverani: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. Dimitri Van De Ville: Methodology, Resources, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Lorena G. A. Freitas: Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Cristina Borradori Tolsa: Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. Petra Susan Hüppi: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. Russia Hà-Vinh Leuchter: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We thank and acknowledge all participating young adolescents and families who made this research possible. We also thank the Fondation Campus Biotech Geneva (FCBG), a foundation of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), the University of Geneva (UniGe), and the University Hospitals of Geneva (HUG); the Research Platform of the University Hospitals of Geneva (HUG) for their practical help.

Data statement

Ethical restrictions prevent us from making anonymised data available in a public repository. Data may be available to researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data by direct request to: Russia.Ha-VinhLeuchter@hcuge.ch. There are restrictions on data related to identifying participant information and appropriate ethical approval is required prior to release.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101211.

Appendix A. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (9.6MB, docx)

.

Data Availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Abdi H., Williams L.J. Computational Toxicology. Springer; 2013. Partial least squares methods: partial least squares correlation and partial least square regression; pp. 549–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allin M., Nosarti C., Narberhaus A., Walshe M., Frearson S., Kalpakidou A., Murray R. Growth of the corpus callosum in adolescents born preterm. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2007;161(12):1183–1189. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.12.1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson P. Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychol. 2002;8(2):71–82. doi: 10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Badaruddin D.H., Andrews G.L., Bolte S., Schilmoeller K.J., Schilmoeller G., Paul L.K., Brown W.S. Social and behavioral problems of children with agenesis of the corpus callosum. Child Psychiatry Hum. Dev. 2007;38(4):287–302. doi: 10.1007/s10578-007-0065-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barkovich A.J., Kjos B.O. Normal postnatal development of the corpus callosum as demonstrated by MR imaging. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1988;9(3):487–491. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barkovich A.J., Lyon G., Evrard P. Formation, maturation and disorder of white matter. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1992;13 447-441. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barnea-Goraly N., Kwon H., Menon V., Eliez S., Lotspeich L., Reiss A.L. White matter structure in autism: preliminary evidence from diffusion tensor imaging. Biol. Psychiatry. 2004;55(3):323–326. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.10.022. doi:S000632230301151X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Benavente-Fernández I., Synnes A., Grunau R.E., Chau V., Ramraj C., Glass T., Miller S.P. Association of socioeconomic status and brain injury with neurodevelopmental outcomes of very preterm children. JAMA Netw. Open. 2019;2(5) doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2914. e192914-e192914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bethlehem R.A., Seidlitz J., Romero-Garcia R., Trakoshis S., Dumas G., Lombardo M.V. A normative modelling approach reveals age-atypical cortical thickness in a subgroup of males with autism spectrum disorder. Commun. Biol. 2020;3(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01212-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bick J., Zhu T., Stamoulis C., Fox N.A., Zeanah C., Nelson C.A. Effect of early institutionalization and foster care on long-term white matter development: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(3):211–219. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brent R.P. An algorithm with guaranteed convergence for finding a zero of a function. Comput. J. 1971;14(4):422–425. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bridgman M.W., Brown W.S., Spezio M.L., Leonard M.K., Adolphs R., Paul L.K. Facial emotion recognition in agenesis of the corpus callosum. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2014;6(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1866-1955-6-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown W.S., Panos A., Paul L.K. Attention, impulsivity, and vigilance in agenesis of the corpus callosum. Neuropsychology. 2020;34(7):744. doi: 10.1037/neu0000685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Caldú X., Narberhaus A., Junqué C., Giménez M., Vendrell P., Bargalló N., Botet F. Corpus callosum size and neuropsychologic impairment in adolescents who were born preterm. J. Child Neurol. 2006;21(5):406–410. doi: 10.1177/08830738060210050801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chandio, B., Harezlak, J., Garyfallidis, E., 2019. Bundle Analytics: a computational and statistical analysis framework for tractometric studies. Paper presented at the Organization for Human Brain Mapping.
  16. Chang Y.S., Owen J.P., Pojman N.J., Thieu T., Bukshpun P., Wakahiro M.L., Sherr E.H. White matter changes of neurite density and fiber orientation dispersion during human brain maturation. PLoS One. 2015;10(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Christ S.E., Kester L.E., Bodner K.E., Miles J.H. Evidence for selective inhibitory impairment in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Neuropsychology. 2011;25(6):690–701. doi: 10.1037/a0024256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cordero-Grande L., Christiaens D., Hutter J., Price A.N., Hajnal J.V.J.N. Complex diffusion-weighted image estimation via matrix recovery under general noise models. Neuroimage. 2019;200:391–404. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Almeida J.S., Lordier L., Zollinger B., Kunz N., Bastiani M., Gui L., Hüppi P.S. Music enhances structural maturation of emotional processing neural pathways in very preterm infants. Neuroimage. 2020;207 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. de Bie H.M., Boersma M., Wattjes M.P., Adriaanse S., Vermeulen R.J., Oostrom K.J., Huisman J., Veltman D.J., Delemarre-Van de Waal H.A. Preparing children with a mock scanner training protocol results in high quality structural and functional MRI scans. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169(9):1079–1085. doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1181-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. de Bruïne F.T., van Wezel-Meijler G., Leijser L.M., van den Berg-Huysmans A.A., van Steenis A., van Buchem M.A., van der Grond J. Tractography of developing white matter of the internal capsule and corpus callosum in very preterm infants. Eur. Radiol. 2011;21(3):538–547. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1945-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Delavari F., Sandini C., Zöller D., Mancini V., Bortolin K., Schneider M., Eliez S. Dysmaturation observed as altered hippocampal functional connectivity at rest is associated with the emergence of positive psychotic symptoms in patients with 22q11 deletion syndrome. Biol. Psychiatry. 2021;90(1):58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Edwards T.J., Sherr E.H., Barkovich A.J., Richards L.J. Clinical, genetic and imaging findings identify new causes for corpus callosum development syndromes. Brain. 2014;137(6):1579–1613. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fischl B., Salat D.H., Busa E., Albert M., Dieterich M., Haselgrove C., Klaveness S. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 2002;33(3):341–355. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00569-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Foulkes L., Blakemore S.-J. Studying individual differences in human adolescent brain development. Nat. Neurosci. 2018;21(3):315–323. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0078-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fryer S.L., Frank L.R., Spadoni A.D., Theilmann R.J., Nagel B.J., Schweinsburg A.D., Tapert S.F. Microstructural integrity of the corpus callosum linked with neuropsychological performance in adolescents. Brain Cogn. 2008;67(2):225–233. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gazzaniga M.S. Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain. 2000;123(Pt 7):1293–1326. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.7.1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Genc S., Malpas C.B., Holland S.K., Beare R., Silk T.J. Neurite density index is sensitive to age related differences in the developing brain. Neuroimage. 2017;148:373–380. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Giedd J.N., Rumsey J.M., Castallanos F.X., Rajapakse J.C., Kaysen D., Vaituzis A.C., Rapoport J.L. A quantitative MRI study of the corpus callosum in children and adolescents. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1996;91:274–280. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(95)00193-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gilchrist C.P., Kelly C.E., Cumberland A., Dhollander T., Treyvaud K., Lee K., Anderson P.J. Fiber-specific measures of white matter microstructure and macrostructure are associated with internalizing and externalizing symptoms in children born very preterm and full-term. Biol. Psychiatry. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Golub G., Kahan W. Calculating the singular values and pseudo-inverse of a matrix. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Mathem. Ser. B: Numer. Anal. 1965;2(2):205–224. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hardan A.Y., Pabalan M., Gupta N., Bansal R., Melhem N.M., Fedorov S., Minshew N.J. Corpus callosum volume in children with autism. Psychiatry Res. 2009;174(1):57–61. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2009.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hasegawa T., Yamada K., Morimoto M., Morioka S., Tozawa T., Isoda K., Nishimura A. Development of corpus callosum in preterm infants is affected by the prematurity: in vivo assessment of diffusion tensor imaging at term-equivalent age. Pediatr. Res. 2011;69(3):249–254. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3182084e54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hinkley L.B., Marco E.J., Findlay A.M., Honma S., Jeremy R.J., Strominger Z., Sherr E.H. The role of corpus callosum development in functional connectivity and cognitive processing. PLoS One. 2012;7(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hofer S., Frahm J. Topography of the human corpus callosum revisited--comprehensive fiber tractography using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage. 2006;32(3):989–994. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hofer S., Merboldt K.D., Tammer R., Frahm J. Rhesus monkey and humans share a similar topography of the corpus callosum as revealed by diffusion tensor MRI in vivo. Cereb. Cortex. 2008;18(5):1079–1084. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Huang H., Xue R., Zhang J., Ren T., Richards L.J., Yarowsky P., Mori S. Anatomical characterization of human fetal brain development with diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 2009;29(13):4263–4273. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2769-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Huang H.-C., Chou H.-C., Tsao P.-N., Chen C.-Y. Linear growth of corpus callosum and cerebellar vermis in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2020;119(8):1292–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Hüppi P.S., Maier S.E., Peled S., Zientara G.P., Barnes P.D., Jolesz F.A., Volpe J.J. Microstructural development of human newborn cerebral white matter assessed in vivo by diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr. Res. 1998;44(4):584–590. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199810000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hutchinson A.D., Mathias J.L., Jacobson B.L., Ruzic L., Bond A.N., Banich M.T. Relationship between intelligence and the size and composition of the corpus callosum. Exp. Brain Res. 2009;192(3):455–464. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1604-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Innocenti G.M., Price D.J. Exuberance in the development of cortical networks. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005;6(12):955–965. doi: 10.1038/nrn1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Jenkinson M., Beckmann C.F., Behrens T.E., Woolrich M.W., Smith S.M.J.N. Fsl. 2012;62(2):782–790. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Jeurissen, B., Tournier, J.-D., Dhollander, T., Connelly, A., Sijbers, J.J.N. , 2014. Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data. 103, 411–426. [DOI] [PubMed]
  44. Jo H.M., Cho H.K., Jang S.H., Yeo S.S., Lee E., Kim H.S., Son S.M. A comparison of microstructural maturational changes of the corpus callosum in preterm and full-term children: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neuroradiology. 2012;54(9):997–1005. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1042-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jones D.K., Knösche T.R., Turner R. White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: the do's and don'ts of diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2013;73:239–254. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Karolis V.R., Froudist-Walsh S., Kroll J., Brittain P.J., Tseng C.-E.J., Nam K.-W., Thompson P.M. Volumetric grey matter alterations in adolescents and adults born very preterm suggest accelerated brain maturation. Neuroimage. 2017;163:379–389. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kaufman, A.S., Kaufman, N.L. , 2013. Kaufman assessment battery for children: Encyclopedia of Special Education: A Reference for the Education of Children, Adolescents, Adults with Disabilities Other Exceptional Individuals.
  48. Kebets V., Holmes A.J., Orban C., Tang S., Li J., Sun N., Yeo B.T.T. Somatosensory-motor dysconnectivity spans multiple transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology. Biol. Psychiatry. 2019;0(0) doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2019.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kellner, E., Dhital, B., Kiselev, V.G., Reisert, M.J.M. r i m , 2016. Gibbs‐ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel‐shifts. 76(5), 1574–1581. [DOI] [PubMed]
  50. Kelly C.E., Thompson D.K., Chen J., Leemans A., Adamson C.L., Inder T.E., Anderson P.J. Axon density and axon orientation dispersion in children born preterm. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2016;37(9):3080–3102. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kelly C.E., Thompson D.K., Genc S., Chen J., Yang J.Y.M., Adamson C., Anderson P.J. Long-term development of white matter fibre density and morphology up to 13 years after preterm birth: a fixel-based analysis. Neuroimage. 2020;220 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kelly C.E., Ball G., Matthews L.G., Cheong J.L., Doyle L.W., Inder T.E., Anderson P.J. Investigating brain structural maturation in children and adolescents born very preterm using the brain age framework. Neuroimage. 2022;247 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Keshavana M.S., Diwadkara V.A., DeBellisa M., Dickb E., Kotwala R., Rosenbergc D.R., Pettegrewa J.W. Development of the corpus callosum in childhood, adolescence and early adulthood. Life Sci. 2002;70:1909–1922. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(02)01492-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kier E.L., Truwit C.L. The normal and abnormal genu of the corpus callosum: an evolutionary, embryologic, anatomic, and MR analysis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1996;17(9):1631–1641. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kok R., Lucassen N., Bakermans-Kranenburg M.J., Van Ijzendoorn M.H., Ghassabian A., Roza S.J., Verhulst F.C. Parenting, corpus callosum, and executive function in preschool children. Child Neuropsychol. 2014;20(5):583–606. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2013.832741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Kontis D., Catani M., Cuddy M., Walshe M., Nosarti C., Jones D., Allin M. Diffusion tensor MRI of the corpus callosum and cognitive function in adults born preterm. Neuroreport. 2009;20(4):424–428. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328325a8f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Korkman M., Kirk U., Kemp S. NEPSY-II. Second ed. Pearson; San Antonio, Texas: 2007. A Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment. [Google Scholar]
  58. Krishnan A., Williams L.J., McIntosh A.R., Abdi H. Partial Least Squares (PLS) methods for neuroimaging: a tutorial and review. Neuroimage. 2011;56(2):455–475. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Krogsrud S.K., Fjell A.M., Tamnes C.K., Grydeland H., Mork L., Due-Tønnessen P., Johansen-Berg H. Changes in white matter microstructure in the developing brain—a longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging study of children from 4 to 11 years of age. Neuroimage. 2016;124:473–486. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kunz N., Zhang H., Vasung L., O'Brien K.R., Assaf Y., Lazeyras F., Hüppi P.S. Assessing white matter microstructure of the newborn with multi-shell diffusion MRI and biophysical compartment models. Neuroimage. 2014;96:288–299. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Largo R.H., Pfister D., Molinari L., Kundu S., Lipp A., Duc G. Significance of prenatal, perinatal and postnatal factors in the development of AGA preterm infants at five to seven years. Dev. Med Child Neurol. 1989;31(4):440–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1989.tb04022.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Lebel C., Caverhill-Godkewitsch S., Beaulieu C. Age-related regional variations of the corpus callosum identified by diffusion tensor tractography. Neuroimage. 2010;52(1):20–31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lebel C., Treit S., Beaulieu C. A review of diffusion MRI of typical white matter development from early childhood to young adulthood. NMR Biomed. 2019;32(4) doi: 10.1002/nbm.3778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lefebvre A., Delorme R., Delanoë C., Amsellem F., Beggiato A., Germanaud D., Dumas G. Alpha waves as a neuromarker of autism spectrum disorder: the challenge of reproducibility and heterogeneity. Front. Neurosci. 2018;12:662. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lindwall C., Fothergill T., Richards L.J. Commissure formation in the mammalian forebrain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007;17:3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2007.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Luders E., Narr K.L., Bilder R.M., Thompson P.M., Szeszko P.R., Hamilton L., Toga A.W. Positive correlations between corpus callosum thickness and intelligence. Neuroimage. 2007;37(4):1457–1464. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Lyoo I.K., Noam G.G., Lee C.K., Lee H.K., Kennedy B.P., Renshaw P.F. The corpus callosum and lateral ventricles in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a brain magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol. Psychiatry. 1996;40(10):1060–1063. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(96)00349-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Mah A., Geeraert B., Lebel C. Detailing neuroanatomical development in late childhood and early adolescence using NODDI. PLoS One. 2017;12(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Malinger G., Zakut H. The corpus callosum: normal fetal development as shown by transvaginal sonography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1993;161(5):1041–1043. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.5.8273605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Marquand A.F., Rezek I., Buitelaar J., Beckmann C.F. Understanding heterogeneity in clinical cohorts using normative models: beyond case-control studies. Biol. Psychiatry. 2016;80(7):552–561. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.12.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. McIntosh A.R., Lobaugh N.J. Partial least squares analysis of neuroimaging data: applications and advances. Neuroimage. 2004;23:S250–S263. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. McIntosh A.R., Mišić B. Multivariate statistical analyses for neuroimaging data. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2013;64:499–525. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Naglieri J.A., Jensen A.R. Comparison of black-white differences on the WISC-R and the K-ABC: Spearman's hypothesis. Intelligence. 1987;11(1):21–43. [Google Scholar]
  74. Nagy Z., Westerberg H., Skare S., Andersson J.L., Lilja A., Flodmark O., Forssberg H. Preterm children have disturbances of white matter at 11 years of age as shown by diffusion tensor imaging. Pediatr. Res. 2003;54(5):672–679. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000084083.71422.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Narberhaus A., Segarra D., Caldú X., Giménez M., Junqué C., Pueyo R., Botet F. Gestational age at preterm birth in relation to corpus callosum and general cognitive outcome in adolescents. J. Child Neurol. 2007;22(6):761–765. doi: 10.1177/0883073807304006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Narberhaus A., Segarra D., Caldú X., Giménez M., Pueyo R., Botet F., Junqué C. Corpus callosum and prefrontal functions in adolescents with history of very preterm birth. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(1):111–116. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Nemanich S.T., Mueller B.A., Gillick B.T. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging quantifies corticospinal tract microstructural organization in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2019;40(17):4888–4900. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Nosarti C., Rushe T.M., Woodruff P.W., Stewart A.L., Rifkin L., Murray R.M. Corpus callosum size and very preterm birth: relationship to neuropsychological outcome. Brain. 2004;127(9):2080–2089. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Nosarti C., Nam K.W., Walshe M., Murray R.M., Cuddy M., Rifkin L., Allin M.P. Preterm birth and structural brain alterations in early adulthood. NeuroImage: Clin. 2014;6:180–191. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. O’Gorman R.L., Bucher H.U., Held U., Koller B.M., Hüppi P.S., Hagmann C.F., Group S.E.N.T. Tract-based spatial statistics to assess the neuroprotective effect of early erythropoietin on white matter development in preterm infants. Brain. 2015;138(2):388–397. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Oliver, N.R. 2010. The Relationship between the WISC-IV GAI and the KABC-II. (Thesis 116).
  82. Parkes L., Satterthwaite T.D., Bassett D.S. Towards precise resting-state fMRI biomarkers in psychiatry: synthesizing developments in transdiagnostic research, dimensional models of psychopathology, and normative neurodevelopment. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2020;65:120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2020.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Pasternak O., Kelly S., Sydnor V.J., Shenton M.E. Advances in microstructural diffusion neuroimaging for psychiatric disorders. Neuroimage. 2018;182:259–282. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Paul L.K. Developmental malformation of the corpus callosum: a review of typical callosal development and examples of developmental disorders with callosal involvement. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2011;3(1):3–27. doi: 10.1007/s11689-010-9059-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Paul L.K., Brown W.S., Adolphs R., Tyszka J.M., Richards L.J., Mukherjee P., Sherr E.H. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007;8(4):287–299. doi: 10.1038/nrn2107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Pierpaoli C., Jezzard P., Basser P.J., Barnett A., Di Chiro G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. Radiology. 1996;201(3):637–648. doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Pines A.R., Cieslak M., Larsen B., Baum G.L., Cook P.A., Adebimpe A., Murtha K. Leveraging multi-shell diffusion for studies of brain development in youth and young adulthood. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2020;43 doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Pujol J., Vendrell P., Junque C., Marti-Vilalta J.L., Capdevila A. When does human brain development end? evidence of corpus callosum growth up to adulthood. Ann. Neurol. 1993;34:71–75. doi: 10.1002/ana.410340113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Rademaker K., Lam J., Van Haastert I., Uiterwaal C., Lieftink A., Groenendaal F., De Vries L. Larger corpus callosum size with better motor performance in prematurely born children. Seminars in perinatology. 2004;28(4):279–287. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2004.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Raffelt D.A., Tournier J.-D., Smith R.E., Vaughan D.N., Jackson G., Ridgway G.R., Connelly A. Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using fixel-based analysis. Neuroimage. 2017;144:58–73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Rakic P., Yakovlev P.I. Development of the corpus callosum and cavum septi in man. J. Comp. Neurol. 1968;132(1):45–72. doi: 10.1002/cne.901320103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Rauch R.A., Jinkins J.R. In: Callosal Agenesis: A Natural Split Brain? Lassonde M., Jeeves M.A., editors. Plenum; New York: 1994. Magnetic resonance imaging of corpus callosum dysgenesis; pp. 83–95. [Google Scholar]
  93. Reynolds C.R., Kamphaus R.W., Rosenthal B.L. Handbook of Clinical Child Neuropsychology. third ed. Springer (Ed.); NY: 2009. Applications of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) in neuropsychological assessment. [Google Scholar]
  94. Richards L.J., Planchez C., Ren T. Mechanisms regulating the development of the corpus callosum and its agenesis in mouse and human. Clin. Genet. 2004;66:276–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Sherry A., Henson R.K. Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: a user-friendly primer. J. Personal. Assess. 2005;84(1):37–48. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_09. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Siffredi V., Anderson V.A., McIlroy A., Wood A., Leventer R.J., Spencer-Smith M.M. A neuropsychological profile for agenesis of the corpus callosum? Cognitive, academic, executive, social, and behavioral functioning in school-age children. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2018;24(5):445–455. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717001357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Siffredi V., Spencer-Smith M.M., Barrouillet P., Vaessen M.J., Leventer R.J., Anderson V., Vuilleumier P. Neural correlates of working memory in children and adolescents with agenesis of the corpus callosum: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia. 2017;106:71–82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Siffredi V., Liverani M.C., Smith M.M., Meskaldji D.E., Stuckelberger-Grobéty F., Freitas L.G., De Albuquerque J., Savigny E., Gimbert F., Hüppi P.S., Merglen A., Borradori Tolsa C., Ha-Vinh Leuchter R. Improving executive, behavioural and socio-emotional competences in very preterm young adolescents through a mindfulness-based intervention: study protocol and feasibility. Early human development. 2021;161:105435. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2021.105435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Smith S.M. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17(3):143–155. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Tamnes C.K., Roalf D.R., Goddings A.-L., Lebel C. Diffusion MRI of white matter microstructure development in childhood and adolescence: methods, challenges and progress. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2018;33:161–175. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Team, R. (Producer). 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
  102. Team, R., Producer. 2020. RStudio. Integrated Development for R.
  103. Teli R., Hay M., Hershey A., Kumar M., Yin H., Parikh N.A. Postnatal microstructural developmental trajectory of corpus callosum subregions and relationship to clinical factors in very preterm infants. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25245-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Thompson D.K., Inder T.E., Faggian N., Johnston L., Warfield S.K., Anderson P.J., Egan G.F. Characterization of the corpus callosum in very preterm and full-term infants utilizing MRI. Neuroimage. 2011;55(2):479–490. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Thompson D.K., Lee K.J., van Bijnen L., Leemans A., Pascoe L., Scratch S.E., Doyle L.W. Accelerated corpus callosum development in prematurity predicts improved outcome. Hum Brain Mapp. 2015;36(10):3733–3748. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Till K., Jones B.L., Cobley S., Morley D., O'Hara J., Chapman C., Beggs C.B. Identifying talent in youth sport: a novel methodology using higher-dimensional analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Tournier J.-D., Smith R., Raffelt D., Tabbara R., Dhollander T., Pietsch M., Connelly A.J.N. MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation. Neuroimage. 2019;202:116137. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Tuch D.S., Reese T.G., Wiegell M.R., Makris N., Belliveau J.W., Wedeen V. High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002;48(4):577–582. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Veraart J., Fieremans E., Novikov D.S. Diffusion MRI noise mapping using random matrix theory. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2016;76(5):1582–1593. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Veraart J., Novikov D.S., Christiaens D., Ades-Aron B., Sijbers J., Fieremans E.J.N. Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. Neuroimage. 2016;142:394–406. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. van Pul C., van Kooij B.J., de Vries L.S., Benders M.J., Vilanova A., Groenendaal F. Quantitative fiber tracking in the corpus callosum and internal capsule reveals microstructural abnormalities in preterm infants at term-equivalent age. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2012;33(4):678–684. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Wasserthal J., Neher P., Maier-Hein K.H. TractSeg-Fast and accurate white matter tract segmentation. Neuroimage. 2018;183:239–253. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.07.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Wasserthal J., Neher P.F., Hirjak D., Maier-Hein K.H. Combined tract segmentation and orientation mapping for bundle-specific tractography. Med. Image Anal. 2019;58 doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.101559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Weaving D., Jones B., Ireton M., Whitehead S., Till K., Beggs C.B. Overcoming the problem of multicollinearity in sports performance data: a novel application of partial least squares correlation analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(2) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Wechsler D. Psychological Corporation; New York: 2003. Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV. [Google Scholar]
  116. Westlye L.T., Walhovd K.B., Dale A.M., Bjørnerud A., Due-Tønnessen P., Engvig A., Fjell A.M. Life-span changes of the human brain white matter: diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and volumetry. Cereb. Cortex. 2010;20(9):2055–2068. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Young J.M., Vandewouw M.M., Mossad S.I., Morgan B.R., Lee W., Smith M.L., Taylor M.J. White matter microstructural differences identified using multi-shell diffusion imaging in six-year-old children born very preterm. NeuroImage: Clin. 2019;23 doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Zhang H., Schneider T., Wheeler-Kingshott C.A., Alexander D.C. NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage. 2012;61(4):1000–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Ziegler G., Ridgway G.R., Dahnke R., Gaser C., Initiative A.S.D.N. Individualized Gaussian process-based prediction and detection of local and global gray matter abnormalities in elderly subjects. Neuroimage. 2014;97:333–348. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Zöller D., Sandini C., Karahanoğlu F.I., Padula M.C., Schaer M., Eliez S., Van De Ville D. Large-scale brain network dynamics provide a measure of psychosis and anxiety in 22q11. 2 deletion syndrome. Biol. Psychiatry.: Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging. 2019;4(10):881–892. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (9.6MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.


Articles from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES