Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
2023 Feb 14;10(1):143–157. doi: 10.1007/s42524-022-0236-y

Resilience strategies for sustainable supply chains under budget constraints in the post COVID-19 era

Jiaguo Liu 1, Yumeng Xi 1, Junjin Wang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC9926437

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak has caused uncertainty risk surges, increased sustainable supply chain vulnerabilities, and challenges to sustainable supply chain resilience (SSCR) management. Therefore, improving SSCR is necessary to alleviate vulnerabilities, and SSCR management must generate large capital investments. However, the economic downturn brought about by the COVID-19 epidemic has made some companies have limited budgets that can be used to improve SSCR. Therefore, the design of resilience solutions needs to fully consider the constraints of budgetary costs. Most of the existing related literature only discusses optimal resilience solutions under certain cost constraints, so such resilience solutions cannot be applied to most enterprises. In this study, we set the cost constraint as a variable quantity, using resilience efficiency and customer satisfaction as indicators, to determine the changing laws of optimal resilience strategies when cost constraints change. These rules can be applied to enterprises with different budgeted costs. Our findings suggest that companies should prioritize sacrificing resilience measures (RMs) related to adaptive capacity when budget costs gradually decline, and RMs related to absorptive capacity are indispensable at all budget levels. Furthermore, the pursuit of environmental and social sustainability cannot be abandoned, no matter how limited the flexible budget may be.

Keywords: sustainable supply chain, customer requirement, resilience efficiency, customer satisfaction, budget constraint

Footnotes

This research was supported by the Social Science Fund of Liaoning Province (Grant No. L21CGL004).

References

  1. Bastas A, Liyanage K. Sustainable supply chain quality management: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;181:726–744. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger C, Blauth R, Boger D. Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for Quality Management Journal. 1993;2(4):3–35. [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackhurst J V, Scheibe K P, Johnson D J. Supplier risk assessment and monitoring for the automotive industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2008;38(2):143–165. doi: 10.1108/09600030810861215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blos M F, Quaddus M, Wee H M, Watanabe K. Supply chain risk management (SCRM): A case study on the automotive and electronic industries in Brazil. Supply Chain Management. 2009;14(4):247–252. doi: 10.1108/13598540910970072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bode C, Wagner S M, Petersen K J, Ellram L M. Understanding responses to supply chain disruptions: Insights from information processing and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Journal. 2011;54(4):833–856. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.64870145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Büyüközkan G, Berkol Ç. Designing a sustainable supply chain using an integrated analytic network process and goal programming approach in quality function deployment. Expert Systems with Applications. 2011;38(11):13731–13748. [Google Scholar]
  7. Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G. An integrated QFD framework with multiple formatted and incomplete preferences: A sustainable supply chain application. Applied Soft Computing. 2013;13(9):3931–3941. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2013.03.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carnevalli J A, Miguel P C. Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD: Types of research, difficulties and benefits. International Journal of Production Economics. 2008;114(2):737–754. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.03.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chan L K, Wu M L. Quality function deployment: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research. 2002;143(3):463–497. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00178-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chowdhury M M H, Quaddus M. Supply chain readiness, response and recovery for resilience. Supply Chain Management. 2016;21(6):709–731. doi: 10.1108/SCM-12-2015-0463. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chowdhury M M H, Quaddus M. Supply chain resilience: Conceptualization and scale development using dynamic capability theory. International Journal of Production Economics. 2017;188:185–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chowdhury M M H, Quaddus M A. A multiple objective optimization based QFD approach for efficient resilient strategies to mitigate supply chain vulnerabilities: The case of garment industry of Bangladesh. Omega. 2015;57:5–21. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Christopher M, Peck H. Building the resilient supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Management. 2004;15(2):1–14. [Google Scholar]
  14. Colicchia C, Dallari F, Melacini M. Increasing supply chain resilience in a global sourcing context. Production Planning and Control. 2010;21(7):680–694. doi: 10.1080/09537280903551969. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cristiano J J, Liker J K, White C C., III Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment (QFD) IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2001;48(1):81–95. doi: 10.1109/17.913168. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Faisal M N. Managing risk in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) supply chains’ using quality function deployment (QFD) approach. International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems. 2013;4(1):64–83. doi: 10.4018/joris.2013010104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fennell M L, Alexander J A. Organizational boundary spanning in institutionalized environments. Academy of Management Journal. 1987;30(3):456–476. doi: 10.2307/256009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Florez-Lopez R, Ramon-Jeronimo J M. Managing logistics customer service under uncertainty: An integrative fuzzy Kano framework. Information Sciences. 2012;202:41–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. González M E, Quesada G, Picado F, Eckelman C A. Customer satisfaction using QFD: An e-banking case. Managing Service Quality. 2004;14(4):317–330. doi: 10.1108/09604520410546851. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Haq A N, Boddu V. Analysis of enablers for the implementation of leagile supply chain management using an integrated fuzzy QFD approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 2017;28(1):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10845-014-0957-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. He L, Wu Z, Xiang W, Goh M, Xu Z, Song W, Ming X, Wu X. A novel Kano-QFD-DEMATEL approach to optimise the risk resilience solution for sustainable supply chain. International Journal of Production Research. 2021;59(6):1714–1735. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1724343. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Heckmann I, Comes T, Nickel S. A critical review on supply chain risk: Definition, measure and modeling. Omega. 2015;52:119–132. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1973;4(1):1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jüttner U, Peck H, Christopher M. Supply chain risk management: Outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications. 2003;6(4):197–210. doi: 10.1080/13675560310001627016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kano N, Seraku N, Takahashi F, Tsuji S. Attractive quality and must-be quality. Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control. 1984;14(2):147–156. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kapranos P, Young K P. Manufacturing for value-customer satisfaction. Metallurgia. 1998;65(1):23–27. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kleindorfer P R, Saad G H. Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management. 2005;14(1):53–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00009.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lam J S L, Bai X. A quality function deployment approach to improve maritime supply chain resilience. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2016;92:16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu J G, Jiang X H, Zhao J L. Resilience of the supply chain system based on interpretative structural modeling. Journal of Systems & Management. 2015;24(4):617–623. [Google Scholar]
  30. March J G, Shapira Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science. 1987;33(11):1404–1418. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mitroff I I, Alpaslan M C. Preparing for evil. Harvard Business Review. 2003;81(4):109–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nooraie V, Fathi M, Narenji M, Parast M M, Pardalos P M, Stanfield P M. A multi-objective model for risk mitigating in supply chain design. International Journal of Production Research. 2020;58(5):1338–1361. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1633024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nyoman Pujawan I, Geraldin L H. House of risk: A model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal. 2009;15(6):953–967. doi: 10.1108/14637150911003801. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Park T, Kim K J. Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality. Journal of Operations Management. 1998;16(5):569–581. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00029-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pettit T J, Croxton K L, Fiksel J. Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development and implementation of an assessment tool. Journal of Business Logistics. 2013;34(1):46–76. doi: 10.1111/jbl.12009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pettit T J, Fiksel J, Croxton K L. Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics. 2010;31(1):1–21. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00125.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pires Ribeiro J, Barbosa-Povoa A. Supply Chain Resilience: Definitions and quantitative modelling approaches, a literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2018;115:109–122. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ponomarov S Y, Holcomb M C. Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Logistics Management. 2009;20(1):124–143. [Google Scholar]
  39. Qazi A, Dickson A, Quigley J, Gaudenzi B. Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018;196:24–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.11.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Song H. The implication of the novel coronavirus outbreak to supply chain flexibility management. China Business and Market. 2020;34(3):11–16. [Google Scholar]
  41. Svensson G. A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2000;30(9):731–750. doi: 10.1108/09600030010351444. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Vugrin E D, Warren D E, Ehlen M A. A resilience assessment framework for infrastructure and economic systems: Quantitative and qualitative resilience analysis of petrochemical supply chains to a hurricane. Process Safety Progress. 2011;30(3):280–290. doi: 10.1002/prs.10437. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wagner S M, Bode C. An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 2006;12(6):301–312. doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2007.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang Y Q, Gao Y, Teng C X. Literature review and research prospects of supply chain resilience under disruption. Management Review. 2017;29(12):204–216. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wasserman G S. On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process. IIE Transactions. 1993;25(3):59–65. doi: 10.1080/07408179308964291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Xie Y, He L, Xiang W, Peng Z, Ming X, Goh M (2022). Prioritizing risk factors in sustainable supply chain using fuzzy Kano and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy QFD. Kybernetes, in press, doi:10.1108/K-07-2021-0642
  47. Yazdani M, Wang Z X, Chan F T. A decision support model based on the combined structure of DEMATEL, QFD and fuzzy values. Soft Computing. 2020;24(16):12449–12468. doi: 10.1007/s00500-020-04685-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang Z, Awasthi A. Modelling customer and technical requirements for sustainable supply chain planning. International Journal of Production Research. 2014;52(17):5131–5154. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.899717. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zheng X, Pulli P. Improving mobile services design: A QFD approach. Computing and Informatics. 2012;26(4):369–381. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers of Engineering Management are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES