ABSTRACT
Central nervous system (CNS) infections can cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially in children. Rapid and accurate pathogenic detection in suspected CNS infections is essential for disease control at the early stage of infection. To evaluate the performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in pediatric patients, we retrospectively analyzed the efficiency of cfDNA mNGS in children with CNS infections (n = 257) or noninfectious neurological disorders (n = 81). The CSF samples of 124 random subjects were used to evaluate the accuracy between mNGS of cfDNA and whole-cell DNA (wcDNA). In total, cfDNA mNGS detected a wide range of microbes with a detection rate of 71.0%, and the sensitivity and total coincidence rate with clinical diagnosis reached 68.9% and 67.5%, respectively. Compared with wcDNA mNGS, cfDNA mNGS had a higher efficacy in detecting viruses (66 versus 13) and Mycobacterium (7 versus 1), with significantly higher reads per million. The dominant causative pathogens were bacteria and viruses in CNS infections, but these presented with different pathogen spectra in different age categories. The best timing for the mNGS test ranged from 1 to 6 days after the start of anti-infection therapy, and the earlier mNGS started, the better was identification of bacterial CNS infections. This study emphasized that cfDNA mNGS had overall superiority to conventional methods on causative pathogen detection in pediatric CNS infections, and it was even better than wcDNA mNGS. Furthermore, research needs to be better validated in large-scale clinical trials to improve the clinical applications of cfDNA mNGS.
IMPORTANCE Our study emphasized that cfDNA mNGS had overall superiority to conventional methods on causative pathogen detection in CNS-infected children, and it was even better than wcDNA mNGS. cfDNA mNGS detected a wide range of pathogens with a high total coincidence rate (67.5%) against clinical diagnosis. The best timing for cfDNA mNGS detection ranged from 1 to 6 days, rather than 0 days, after the start of empirical anti-infection therapy. The earlier mNGS started, the better the identifications of bacterial CNS infections. To the best of our knowledge, this research is the first report evaluating the clinical utility of mNGS with different methods (cfDNA versus wcDNA) of extracting DNA from CSF specimens in diagnosing pediatric CNS infections. Meanwhile, this is the largest cohort study that has evaluated the performance of mNGS using cfDNA from CSF specimens in pediatric patients with CNS infections.
KEYWORDS: mNGS, pediatric, cell-free DNA, whole-cell DNA, neurological infections
INTRODUCTION
Central nervous system (CNS) infection presents a severe life-threatening condition that can disseminate and lead to inflammatory disorders, such as meningitis, encephalitis, meningoencephalitis, and transverse myelitis (1), causing significant morbidity and mortality (2), especially in pediatric patients (3). All the microbial pathogen types are able to cause a variety of CNS infections (4), of which bacteria and viruses are more frequent in children (5, 6). A multinational study of community-acquired CNS infections from 37 referral centers in 20 countries found that the most frequent infecting pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (8%) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (5.9%) (7). A hospital-based study in Beijing reported that approximately 39% of 1,212 children admitted for tuberculosis treatment had tuberculous meningitis (8). Other common organisms that cause childhood meningitis are Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Streptococcus agalactiae (5). In addition, several viruses, such as Japanese encephalitis virus, enteroviruses (EVs), herpes simplex viruses (HSVs), arboviruses, and influenza viruses, can cause CNS infections in sporadic, endemic, epidemic, or pandemic patterns (9).
The positive rate in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture is less than 20% (10), while other approaches, such as serological antibody tests and PCR assays (11), require several prior assumptions that limit their application. In fact, studies have shown that an etiological diagnosis is not obtained in 40 to 50% of CNS infections when using these conventional methods (3, 12). The undiagnosed proportion of pediatric CNS infections is even greater due to nonspecific symptoms and physical signs (3, 13), which may lead to the inappropriate usage of antibiotics or even adverse progress (14). Therefore, rapid and accurate detection of pathogens is essential for disease control at the early stage of suspected CNS infections (15). Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) (16, 17) has been proven to detect nearly all known pathogens from clinical samples (18, 19). Using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to perform mNGS has also proven to be a promising tool in detecting pathogens from body fluids, with higher sensitivities (75 to 91%) and specificities (81 to 100%) (20) for extracellular pathogens as well as intracellular pathogens (17).
A growing body of evidence suggests that mNGS might improve the diagnostic efficiency of pathogen identification in pediatric CNS infections (21–23), among which the reported sensitivity of cfDNA mNGS has reached up to 90% (24, 25), but most of these were case reports or small cohort studies with limited reference values. Human DNA contamination remains a major challenge to detect pathogens by mNGS, as a high background of host DNA greatly reduces the sequence coverage of the pathogens in most clinical specimens (26). The differential lysis method can filter human DNA from high human DNA background specimens and increase the pathogen DNA ratio, but at the expense of some viruses, parasites, and bacteria (20, 27). Compared to cfDNA mNGS, although the mNGS of whole-cell DNA (wcDNA) obtained from the differential lysis method can detect more reads per million (RPM) of Cryptococcus neoformans, its detection of trace M. tuberculosis was hindered (28). Moreover, the detection rate of mNGS directly using the wcDNA of CSF samples without differential lysis was only ~50% (29). On the other hand, the locations of proliferation and infection between intracellular and extracellular pathogens also exhibit long-term contradictions, and the DNA of intracellular pathogens can exist in body fluids in the form of cfDNA (30). Therefore, we hypothesized that the performance of cfDNA mNGS is better than that of wcDNA mNGS in CNS infections. A recent study showed that the sensitivity of cfDNA mNGS was higher than that with wcDNA when using CSF samples in adults, especially for viral and mycobacterial pathogens (31), but evidence for children with CNS infections is still lacking. Moreover, there is little published information on the contribution of mNGS to noninfectious disease pathologies.
Hence, we retrospectively analyzed the performance and efficiency of cfDNA mNGS in pediatric patients with CNS infections (n = 257) and noninfectious neurological disorders (n = 81), and pathogen profiles were also summarized. To evaluate the accuracy between cfDNA and wcDNA mNGS, we randomly selected 124 CSF samples from all the enrolled subjects to perform mNGS tests using both cfDNA and wcDNA simultaneously.
RESULTS
Clinical conditions and symptoms.
A total of 338 participants were retrospectively enrolled, with a median age of 3.0 years (range, 0.1 to 14.8 years), of whom 199 (58.8%) were male. In the entire group, 257 pediatric patients (74.3%) were diagnosed with CNS infections, including bacterial meningitis in 132 patients (38.2%), viral encephalitis or meningoencephalitis in 110 (31.8%), and other CNS infections in 15 (4.3%). Additionally, 81 pediatric patients were diagnosed with noninfectious neurological diseases, such as autoimmune encephalitis, toxic encephalopathy, and epilepsy. Table 1 presents the demographic information, clinical symptoms, and clinical diagnoses of these pediatric patients. Most children reported at least one prodromal symptom, including 262 cases (77.5%) of fever, 128 (37.9%) of vomiting, 80 (23.7%) of headaches, 143 (42.3%) of convulsion, 195 (57.7%) of focal neurological dysfunction, 156 (46.2%) of meningeal irritation, and so on. A total of 235 (67.9%) and 123 (36.4%) children had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities, respectively.
TABLE 1.
Characteristic | No. (%) |
---|---|
Patient demographics (n = 338) | |
Gender | |
Male | 199 (58.8) |
Female | 139 (41.1) |
Age | 3.0 yrs (IQR, 0.5–7.8) |
Clinical diagnosis | |
CNS infection | |
Bacterial meningitis | 132 (38.2) |
Viral encephalitis/meningoencephalitis | 110 (31.8) |
Mycobacterial meningitis | 8 (2.3) |
Mycoplasma encephalitis | 4 (1.2) |
Fungal meningitis | 2 (0.6) |
Uncertain CNS infectious disease | 1 (0.3) |
Noninfectious encephalopathy | |
Autoimmune encephalitis | 28 (34.6) |
Infectious toxic encephalopathy | 11 (13.6) |
Epilepsy | 9 (11.1) |
Other disorders | 33 (40.7) |
Concomitant disease | |
Pulmonary infection | 92 (26.6) |
Hyponatremia | 18 (5.2) |
Myelitis | 16 (4.6) |
Clinical symptoms | |
Fever | 262 (77.5) |
Vomiting | 128 (37.9) |
Headaches | 80 (23.7) |
Convulsion | 143 (42.3) |
Spasm | 142 (42.0) |
Focal neurological dysfunction | 199 (57.5) |
Meningeal irritation | 156 (45.1) |
Conscious disturbance | 85 (25.1) |
Dystonia | 74 (21.9) |
Abnormal MRI | 235 (67.9) |
Abnormal EEG | 123 (36.4) |
Abnormal parameters of CSF examinations | |
Increased CSF leukocyte counts | 209 (61.8) |
Elevated CSF protein level (>0.4 g/liter) | 173 (51.2) |
Decreased CSF glucose level (<2.8 nmol/liter) | 112 (33.1) |
Clinical metagenomes of cfDNA versus wcDNA for CNS infections.
To compare the clinical utility of different extraction methods for microbial DNA, we randomly selected 124 CSF samples from all the enrolled subjects to perform mNGS tests using both cfDNA and wcDNA simultaneously. Our data showed that the detection rate of cfDNA mNGS (59.68%, 74/124) was significantly higher than that of wcDNA mNGS (32.26%, 40/124) (P < 0.001, chi-square test) (Fig. 1A), especially for viral and intracellular microbes. In addition, the total coincidence rate (TCR) and sensitivity of cfDNA mNGS were much higher than those of wcDNA mNGS (65.32% versus 55.65%, P = 0.119, chi-square test; and 67.8% versus 41.4%, P < 0.01, chi-square test, respectively) (Fig. 1B). Although the performance of wcDNA mNGS (n = 34) for detecting bacteria was close to that of cfDNA mNGS (n = 46), Mycobacterium in 85.7% of patients (6/7) could only be detected by cfDNA mNGS (Fig. 1C), and the remaining bacteria detected only by cfDNA mNGS in the 19 patients were Rickettsia felis, Enterococcus spp., and Mycoplasma hominis. Higher efficacy of cfDNA mNGS could also be found in detecting viruses (66 versus 13), including cytomegalovirus (CMV; 15 versus 4), human alphaherpesvirus 1 (HSV-1; 13 versus 3), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV; 8 versus 2) (Fig. 1C). Additionally, for microbes from the same patients detected by both strategies, the detected RPM by cfDNA mNGS was significantly higher than that by wcDNA mNGS (Fig. 1D). These results revealed that the accuracy and sensitivity of cfDNA mNGS were better than those of wcDNA mNGS in the diagnosis of CNS infections, especially for viral and mycobacterial CNS infections.
Performance and efficiency of cfDNA mNGS.
The positive rate of cfDNA mNGS detection was 71.0% (240/338), and two or more microbes were detected in 44 patients (Fig. 2A). Bacteria (n = 43) were the most common microbes detected in 53.3% (128/240) of pediatric patients, and 33 bacterial species were consistent with clinical diagnosis, including S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, S. agalactiae, Escherichia coli, and M. tuberculosis (Fig. 2B). Twenty-seven viruses were detected in 44.2% (106/240) of patients, and at the top of the list of 20 clinically relevant viruses was CMV, followed by HSV-1, human betaherpesvirus 6B (HHV-6B), and EBV (Fig. 2B). Additionally, for only two of seven fungi, Aspergillus fumigatus and Lichtheimia corymbifera, were identifications in agreement with clinical diagnosis. Conventional methods, including CSF cultures, smears, and viral serologies, only identified pathogens in 11.8% (40/338) of the CSF samples, of which 23 CSF cultures were positive. Rare and intracellular pathogens, such as N. meningitidis and M. tuberculosis, were detected solely by mNGS.
Among the 257 children with CNS infections, 207 patients had positive mNGS results, with 85.5% (177/207) accuracy. Further analysis of 81 noninfectious neurological diseases revealed that the true-negative (TN) rate of mNGS was 63% (51/81) (Fig. 2C). Considering the clinical diagnosis as a unified standard (Fig. 2C), the sensitivity and specificity of cfDNA mNGS were found to be 68.9% and 63.0%, respectively, whereas those of conventional methods were 12.8% and 98.8%, respectively. In addition, 67.5% of the mNGS results were consistent with clinical diagnosis, whereas conventional methods obtained a concordance rate of 33.4%. These data demonstrated that cfDNA mNGS had significantly greater sensitivity and coincidence for detecting potential pathogens than conventional methods and was superior in diagnosing suspected CSF infections.
Pathogen profiles and etiology of pediatric CNS infections.
In total, 29 (54.7%), 21 (39.6%), and 20 (37.7%) of 53 causative pathogens were detected in 126 infants (0 to 1 years), 97 preschool children (1 to 6 years), and 115 school-aged children (>6 years), respectively (Fig. 3A). The main causative pathogens identified in bacterial infections were S. pneumoniae, with contributions of 22.54%, 20.75%, and 23.4% in infants, preschool children, and school-aged children, respectively. However, H. influenzae was only identified in infants and preschool children, with contributions of 22.54% and 13.21%, respectively. The numbers of bacterial species were the highest (n = 20) among infants, and rare pathogens were more likely to be detected in school-aged children. The proportions of viral infections in the three age categories were 22.54%, 60.38%, and 68.09%, respectively. CMV, HSV-1, and human mastadenovirus F were identified in all age categories, while 10 other viruses were detected in children of all ages except infants. Additionally, among the 44 patients in which two or more microbes were detected, CMV, HSV-1, EBV, etc., were also detected with a wide range of RPM (1 to 500) in 33 bacterial infections (Fig. 3B). However, we found that bacteria or fungi were rarely detected in viral infections. Moreover, we found that the detected RPM of bacteria and viruses in school-aged children were significantly lower than that in children in the other two age categories (Fig. 3C).
Relationship between cfDNA mNGS and clinical management.
All pediatric patients were treated with empirical therapy at the onset of admission, and the duration before mNGS tests ranged from 0 to 60 days. To determine the best time to perform mNGS in CNS infections, the sampling times of CSF specimens for mNGS after disease onset and medication time of the TP and FP results were compared. Our data indicated that there was a significant difference (5.9 ± 7.5 versus 9.1 ± 10.5; P = 0.02) in the medication time of the two groups (Table 1). Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between sampling-medication time and cfDNA mNGS results in the bacterial infection subgroup. However, the time showed no significance in the viral infection subgroup (Fig. 4A, B). Based on local polynomial regression, we observed that the detection and compliance ratios of cfDNA mNGS decreased when the antibiotics were administered for longer than 4 days (Fig. 4C). The positive coincidence rate (PCR) of cfDNA mNGS peaked at 85% on day 4 and remained above 70% from 0.9 to 5.7 days. Then, the PCR fell to the lowest point on day 8, but the curve remained higher than the rate of the conventional methods from day 1. Consequently, we proposed that cfDNA mNGS tests should be performed during a duration of 1 to 6 days, and the earlier that mNGS is started, the better bacterial CNS infections can be identified in pediatric patients.
DISCUSSION
To the best of our knowledge, this research is the largest cohort study evaluating the performance of cfDNA mNGS in the diagnosis of pediatric CNS infections. Our data imply that cfDNA mNGS using CSF specimens is a practical tool for the diagnostic evaluation of children with neurological infection but may not be appropriate to rule out noninfectious disorders. The bacterial and viral pathogens presented with different pathogen profiles in different age categories. The best timing for cfDNA mNGS ranged from 1 to 6 days after the start of anti-infection therapy, and the earlier that mNGS was started, the better the identification of bacterial CNS infections in pediatric patients.
CNS infection is a severe disease with high morbidity and disability, while limited sample volumes and low detection efficiency (32) hinder the comprehensive detection of such pathogens using conventional methods. Meanwhile, the detection performance of conventional methods was sensitive to anti-infective therapy, which had a hysteresis effect on mNGS results (29, 33). Molecular multiplex CNS infection diagnosis panels have been developed and present several absorbing features, including ease of use and low turnaround time (34). A fully automated multiplex PCR, the BioFire FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (FA-ME) panel, which was the first nucleic acid-based CSF test cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in October 2015, detects 14 common pathogens simultaneously in an hour (35). Although FA-ME testing is feasible, timely, and convenient, studies investigating the performance and clinical applications of FA-ME are scarce, especially for pediatric patients (36). In our cohort, more than 40 pathogens, including M. tuberculosis and EBV, were not included in the FA-ME panel, indicating that commercially available kits are not the optimal method for use in northwest China. Studies have documented that cfDNA mNGS has a better performance in detecting pathogens in body liquids (37), plays a unique role in identifying rare pathogens in CSF specimens (20, 33, 38), and displays high sensitivity that is less affected by the human background (39). Our current study confirmed that cfDNA mNGS was superior to conventional methods in pathogen detection, with a high TCR (67.5%) and sensitivity (68.9%), which presented similar performance in previous studies (40). However, one of the shortcomings of mNGS is still its cost compared to conventional methods and other commercially available molecular diagnostic tools. For full potential of cfDNA mNGS to be realized, the cost of the test will have to decrease to be available to a wider range of patients.
Unexpectedly, 30/81 noninfectious patients (~40%) had false-positive (FP) results, of whom 24 had viruses with a low RPM (1 to 490), including CMV, HHV-6B, EBV, HSV-1, etc. Although it has been reported that the microbes detected in CSF specimens of healthy people are probably from exogenous contamination, such as normal saline, DNA extraction buffer, and related tissues (skin, muscle, and blood vessels) during lumbar puncture (41), it is still difficult to collect muscle and blood specimens during the collection of CSF specimens from large numbers of people, especially healthy people. Thus, it remains unclear whether the microbes detected in our noninfectious patients presented latent infections in immune cells or not. Despite the high sensitivity of cfDNA mNGS of trace microbes, viruses, and parasites, clinicians should perform strict disinfection measures before puncture and construct a colonizing microorganism database to filter out noise signals and reduce false-positive results.
In our study, mNGS tests were performed using cfDNA and wcDNA without host depletion to evaluate the performance of extraction methods in diagnosing pediatric CNS infections. Previous reports showed that both the detection rate (29) and TCR (21) of wcDNA mNGS using CSF samples (42) were only approximately 50%, consistent with our data. As reported, the lysis of the cell wall in wcDNA extraction could increase the risk of DNA degradation and bring in contamination of engineered strains from reagents (20, 27), which can significantly influence pathogen DNA recovery, especially for trace pathogens such as viruses and mycobacteria (27, 42–44). On the other hand, the sensitivity of mNGS was determined by the pathogen DNA ratio in the sample. The extraction of wcDNA without host depletion can increase the release of human DNA (20). The cfDNA was directly extracted from the low-cellularity supernatant, resulting in the pathogen DNA ratio of cfDNA being higher than that of wcDNA in the same sample (28). The above might explain why the sensitivity and TCR of cfDNA mNGS were higher than those of wcDNA mNGS. One unexpected finding was that wcDNA mNGS had a higher specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). This result could be explained by the fact that the viruses were detected by cfDNA mNGS in all the FP cases, but patients were asymptomatic, possibly due to the latent status of the viruses. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the different mNGS methodologies in CSF samples from children, and mNGS using CSF cfDNA may be a preferred examination in the diagnosis of pediatric CNS infections.
In-depth etiological analysis showed that the distribution of pathogenic bacteria and viruses detected was basically consistent with the epidemiology of pathogens in pediatric CNS infections (45). The development of the human immune system is a continuous process, potentially gaining peak function during adolescence (46), which makes young children at greater risk of developing infections than older children and adults and makes them more vulnerable to disseminated infections (47, 48), including CNS infections. Consistently, we found that infants had the highest abundance of pathogenic species and rates of meningitis secondary to H. influenzae, and S. pneumoniae was highest among children <5 years of age (49–51). Meanwhile, S. pneumoniae was the main causative pathogen identified in all three age categories, and H. influenzae was only identified in infants and preschool children, which was in accordance with a previous Chinese report from Yunnan (52) and other studies from Sweden (53), Brazil (54), and England and Wales (55) but differed from data collected in mainland China (56). Most children and adolescents with viral CNS infections can recover completely in ~7 to 10 days without specific treatments (9). However, the prognosis depends on the patient’s age and the pathogen (57); for example, the mortality rates of encephalitis caused by HSV reach 70% in untreated children, and long-term sequelae are common (~30%) in treated pediatric patients (58). CNS infection caused by CMV may be a severe complication in immunocompromised children, with high rates of morbidity and mortality (9). In fact, in a previous large study, researchers observed that 91.4% of children with viral meningitis or encephalitis were immunocompetent and had no reported underlying conditions (59). HSV and CMV were the main causative pathogens involved in our patients with viral infections (89.1% were previously healthy), but only 4 children had sequelae, such as epilepsy and cognitive impairment. EVs can be detected in 85% of meningitis cases in children, while we did not identify RNA viruses, including EVs, by conventional methods (PCR and viral serologic tests). Thus, we did not perform RNA mNGS to validate the potential RNA viruses in this study. In addition, viruses were detected in more than 33 bacterial infections, and studies have shown that viruses and bacteria can exploit cross-kingdom interactions to their mutual benefit, which may lead to an increase in both the susceptibility to secondary bacterial infections and the severity of the bacterial infections (60, 61). Although studies remain somewhat limited, these findings suggest that viruses might establish a latent infection and that additional antiviral therapy needs to be considered in some respects. Hence, children cannot simply be treated as “little adults” but rather need pediatric-specific treatment strategies that should be stratified by age to cover the most likely organisms.
Researchers have pointed out that mNGS results are not influenced by prior antibiotic administration (62). However, PCR of mNGS in our study changed with the duration of empirical therapy, which was consistent with a published study (29). Tomasz et al. (63) pointed out that empirical therapy can cause lysis in the cell wall of some pathogens or directly kill some pathogens, which might explain why the concentrations of cfDNA and PCR of mNGS increased in CSF in a short time. Our data also showed a significant difference between the TP and FN groups in the sampling-medication time of children with bacterial CNS infections. However, this finding was contrary to those from previous studies, which suggested that mNGS results were not affected by empirical treatment in bacterial CNS infections (56). The positive rate of mNGS showed a downward trend from 4 days after empirical therapy in our study, because long-term and continuous antimicrobial therapy inhibited the growth of pathogens. Consistently, Zhang et al. (29) demonstrated that anti-infection treatment of >4 days on adults with CNS infections significantly influenced the detection rate of mNGS. Hence, the dynamic process suggested that mNGS should be conducted at the right time to improve the efficiency.
Several limitations need to be noted regarding the present study. First, the research was retrospective and was limited by the single-center nature of the study, with a relatively small population of subjects. The CSF microbiome data were not obtained from a healthy population as a baseline; therefore, it was difficult to generate an optimal threshold for pathogen identification. Our results need further validation in larger-scale clinical trials. Second, due to the preference of subjects with DNA pathogenic infections and constraints of laboratory conditions, our current mNGS test targeted only DNA, and future efforts should be made to incorporate neuroinvasive RNA virus detection. Third, pathogens detected by mNGS were not validated with an additional molecular method at the genetic level. More samples from multiple hospitals are needed to evaluate the performance between mNGS of cfDNA and wcDNA and to orthogonally validate the infections identified by mNGS. Finally, the ability of cfDNA mNGS to help with the timely adjustment of treatments should also be evaluated in the future.
Conclusion.
Our study emphasized that mNGS had overall superiority to conventional methods on causative pathogen detection in CNS-infected pediatric patients, and it was even better than wcDNA mNGS. The best timing for cfDNA mNGS detection ranged from 1 to 6 days after the start of empirical anti-infection therapy, but pediatric-specific treatment strategies need to be tailored to their pathogen profiles at different ages. The earlier mNGS is started, the better bacterial CNS infections can be identified. This research needs to be further validated in large-scale clinical trials to improve the clinical applications of cfDNA mNGS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Trial design and oversight.
We retrospectively studied a cohort of 338 children with definite clinical diagnoses, including 257 patients with CNS infections and 81 patients with noninfectious neurological disorders, who were admitted to the Department of Pediatric Neurology, Xi’an Children’s Hospital, between January 2019 and September 2021. The inclusion criteria were in line with guidelines from the International Encephalitis Consortium and SCMID Study Group for Infections of the Brain (29, 64, 65). The enrollment criteria of final diagnosis of CNS infection were as follows: (i) patients with altered mental status (decrease or change in awareness level or personality change lasting at least 24 h) and with at least 2 of the characteristics of fever (body temperature over 38.2°C within 72 h before and after the onset of symptoms), seizures (confirmed by clinical symptoms or EEG), newly occurring focal neurological deficits, elevated numbers of cells in CSF (white blood cell count greater than 5 cells/mm3), and EEG or neuroimaging consistent with encephalitis changes; and (iii) at least one etiology criterion should be met, i.e., (a) a positive CSF culture of pathogenic microbes, (b) a specific positive result by polymerase chain reaction, specific antibody test, or pathological examination. Noncentral nervous system infection was defined as clinical characteristics that did not meet the above clinical criteria. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) age ≤28 days or >18 years; (ii) not undergoing lumbar puncture and CSF examination or with incomplete clinical data; and (iii) intracranial infection caused by trauma or surgery.
Conventional microbiological methods, such as smear, culture, serologic tests, enyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the tuberculin skin test/ (T-spot), TB test, and so on, were performed according to clinical necessity. Viral ELISA can detect specific IgM and IgG of 13 common viruses including norovirus, human gammaherpesvirus 4 (EBV), human betaherpesvirus 5 (CMV), human alphaherpesvirus (HSV), human orthopneumovirus (RSV), adenovirus, influenza A virus, influenza B virus, enteroviruses, echoviruses, etc. Microbes reported by the clinical laboratory as representing laboratory, skin, or environmental contaminants were not included. Clinical data of all patients, including baseline demographic characteristics, chronic illnesses and disabilities, laboratory test results, clinical diagnosis, antibiotic administration, and prognosis, were collected and subjected to subsequent statistical analysis. Meanwhile, we established age categories as follows: infants (0 to 1 years), preschool children (1 to 6 years), and school-aged children (>6 years), according to the development of the human immune system (46).
Ethics statement.
The research was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Xi’an Children’s Hospital, Xi'an, China (approval number 20220023). Written consent was obtained from the subjects or their guardians.
DNA extraction and metagenomic next-generation sequencing.
Approximately 1 to 2 mL of CSF from each subject was shipped on dry ice to Hugobiotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) to perform mNGS detection. According to the manufacturer's instructions for the QIAamp DNA Micro kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), cfDNA and wcDNA were extracted from CSF samples. For cfDNA extraction, the cells from CSF samples were removed through centrifugation at 1,600 × g for 10 min, followed by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. cfDNA was extracted and purified from the supernatant. For wcDNA extraction, CSF samples were directly homogenized using a TGrinder H24R grinding instrument (Tiangen, Beijing, China). Then, the treated specimens were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min, and the supernatant was used for wcDNA extraction using a QIAamp DNA Micro kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). In this study, the extractions of cfDNA and wcDNA were performed in 338 and 124 samples, respectively. The quality and concentration of DNA samples were monitored by a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), and metagenomics libraries were constructed by a QIAseq Ultralow input library kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Library quality control was performed with a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The qualified libraries with different barcode labeling were pooled and sequenced on an Illumina Nextseq 550 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). In parallel with the clinical samples, positive controls and negative controls (including a nontemplate control [NTC]) were also set for mNGS detection with the same procedure and bioinformatics analysis. The NTC samples enabled estimation of the number of background reads except for each taxon (46). High-quality data were generated after filtering out adapter, low-quality, low-complexity, and shorter reads (17). Next, human reads were removed by mapping reads to the human reference genome (GRCh38) using Bowtie2 (66). The remaining data were aligned to the microbial genome database (https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/) using Burrows-Wheeler alignment (67). The read number and RPM of each detected pathogen were calculated, and the microbial composition was determined. The formula for calculating RPM was as follows: RPM of pathogen = (number of reads mapped to the pathogen × 106)/(total number of mapped reads from given library).
We developed an NTC-based strategy to filter reagents and prevent laboratory contamination (68). Further details on sequencing and reporting methods are provided in Text S1 in the supplemental material.
Diagnostic assessment.
The researchers performing mNGS were blinded to the diagnosis that was made on the basis of conventional methods and clinical symptoms, and the mNGS results were evaluated by at least two experienced physicians. For the infectious diagnosis group, mNGS-positive and mNGS-negative results were classified into true-positive (TP) and false-negative (FN) results, respectively. For the noninfectious diagnosis group, we defined the mNGS-positive and mNGS-negative results as false-positive (FP) and true-negative (TN) results, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value of different methods were compared in pairs. The total coincidence rates (TCRs) of mNGS and conventional tests were evaluated based on clinical diagnosis.
Statistical analyses.
SPSS 22.0 statistical software was applied for data processing, and measurement data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The count data were expressed as cases or percentages, and a t test was used for the comparisons between two groups. The chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate independent binomial variables, and a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Data availability.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available at National Genomics Data Center (http://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn), reference number PRJCA009189.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by Shaanxi Key Science and Technology Innovation Team Project (CN, 2020SF-006), CAAE Epilepsy Research Fund (CX-A-2021-12), the Science and Technology Project of Xi'an (21RGSF0013), and Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission (z211100002921063). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
We declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Han Xia, Email: xiahan@hugobiotech.com.
Dong Wang, Email: WDhope20@163.com.
Oliver Laeyendecker, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
REFERENCES
- 1.Singhi S, Angurana SK. 2019. Principles of management of central nervous system infections. Indian J Pediatr 86:52–59. doi: 10.1007/s12098-017-2583-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vezzani A, Fujinami RS, White HS, Preux PM, Blumcke I, Sander JW, Loscher W. 2016. Infections, inflammation and epilepsy. Acta Neuropathol 131:211–234. doi: 10.1007/s00401-015-1481-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Li ZY, Dang D, Wu H. 2021. Next-generation sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid for the diagnosis of unexplained central nervous system infections. Pediatr Neurol 115:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.GBD 2016 Meningitis Collaborators. 2018. Global, regional, and national burden of meningitis, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 17:1061–1082. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30387-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Singhi P. 2019. Central nervous system infections in children: an ongoing challenge! Indian J Pediatr 86:49–51. doi: 10.1007/s12098-018-2745-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Oordt-Speets AM, Bolijn R, van Hoorn RC, Bhavsar A, Kyaw MH. 2018. Global etiology of bacterial meningitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 13:e0198772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Erdem H, Inan A, Guven E, Hargreaves S, Larsen L, Shehata G, Pernicova E, Khan E, Bastakova L, Namani S, Harxhi A, Roganovic T, Lakatos B, Uysal S, Sipahi OR, Crisan A, Miftode E, Stebel R, Jegorovic B, Fehér Z, Jekkel C, Pandak N, Moravveji A, Yilmaz H, Khalifa A, Musabak U, Yilmaz S, Jouhar A, Oztoprak N, Argemi X, Baldeyrou M, Bellaud G, Moroti RV, Hasbun R, Salazar L, Tekin R, Canestri A, Čalkić L, Praticò L, Yilmaz-Karadag F, Santos L, Pinto A, Kaptan F, Bossi P, Aron J, Duissenova A, Shopayeva G, Utaganov B, Grgic S, Ersoz G, et al. 2017. The burden and epidemiology of community-acquired central nervous system infections: a multinational study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 36:1595–1611. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-2973-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wu XR, Yin QQ, Jiao AX, Xu BP, Sun L, Jiao WW, Xiao J, Miao Q, Shen C, Liu F, Shen D, Shen A. 2012. Pediatric tuberculosis at Beijing Children's Hospital: 2002-2010. Pediatrics 130:e1433-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Autore G, Bernardi L, Perrone S, Esposito S. 2021. Update on viral infections involving the central nervous system in pediatric patients. Children (Basel) 8:782. doi: 10.3390/children8090782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Abdullahi AM, Sarmast ST, Jahan N. 2020. Viral infections of the central nervous system in children: a systematic review. Cureus 12:e11174. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kuchar E, Nitsch-Osuch A, Rorat M, Namani S, Pabianek D, Topczewska-Cabanek A, Zycinska K, Wardyn K, Szenborn L. 2014. Etiology and complications of central nervous system infections in children treated in a pediatric intensive care unit in Poland. J Child Neurol 29:483–486. doi: 10.1177/0883073813477689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ramachandran PS, Wilson MR. 2020. Metagenomics for neurological infections: expanding our imagination. Nat Rev Neurol 16:547–556. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0374-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Diallo K, Feteh VF, Ibe L, Antonio M, Caugant DA, Du Plessis M, Deghmane AE, Feavers IM, Fernandez K, Fox LM, Rodrigues CMC, Ronveaux O, Taha MK, Wang X, Brueggemann AB, Maiden MCJ, Harrison OB. 2021. Molecular diagnostic assays for the detection of common bacterial meningitis pathogens: a narrative review. EBioMedicine 65:103274. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Başpınar EÖ, Dayan S, Bekçibaşı M, Tekin R, Ayaz C, Deveci Ö, Hoşoğlu S. 2017. Comparison of culture and PCR methods in the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. Braz J Microbiol 48:232–236. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.06.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Varadi L, Luo JL, Hibbs DE, Perry JD, Anderson RJ, Orenga S, Groundwater PW. 2017. Methods for the detection and identification of pathogenic bacteria: past, present, and future. Chem Soc Rev 46:4818–4832. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00693k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chiu CY, Miller SA. 2019. Clinical metagenomics. Nat Rev Genet 20:341–355. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0113-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chen Y, Feng W, Ye K, Guo L, Xia H, Guan Y, Chai L, Shi W, Zhai C, Wang J, Yan X, Wang Q, Zhang Q, Li C, Liu P, Li M. 2021. Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of pulmonary infectious pathogens from bronchoalveolar lavage samples. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:541092. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.541092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gu W, Miller S, Chiu CY. 2019. Clinical metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pathogen detection. Annu Rev Pathol 14:319–338. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Simner PJ, Miller S, Carroll KC. 2018. Understanding the promises and hurdles of metagenomic next-generation sequencing as a diagnostic tool for infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis 66:778–788. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gu W, Deng X, Lee M, Sucu YD, Arevalo S, Stryke D, Federman S, Gopez A, Reyes K, Zorn K, Sample H, Yu G, Ishpuniani G, Briggs B, Chow ED, Berger A, Wilson MR, Wang C, Hsu E, Miller S, DeRisi JL, Chiu CY. 2021. Rapid pathogen detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing of infected body fluids. Nat Med 27:115–124. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1105-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wilson MR, Sample HA, Zorn KC, Arevalo S, Yu G, Neuhaus J, Federman S, Stryke D, Briggs B, Langelier C, Berger A, Douglas V, Johnson SA, Chow FC, Fulton BD, DeRisi JL, Gelfand JM, Naccache SN, Bender J, Dien Bard J, Murkey J, Carlson M, Vespa PM, Vijayan T, Allyn PR, Campeau S, Humphries RM, Klausner JD, Ganzon CD, Memar F, Ocampo NA, Zimmerman LL, Cohen SH, Polage CR, DeBiasi RL, Haller B, Dallas R, Maron G, Hayden R, Messacar K, Dominguez SR, Miller SR, Chiu CY. 2019. Clinical metagenomic sequencing for diagnosis of meningitis and encephalitis. N Engl J Med 380:2327–2340. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rossoff J, Chaudhury S, Soneji M, Patel SJ, Kwon S, Armstrong A, Muller WJ. 2019. Noninvasive diagnosis of infection using plasma next-generation sequencing: a single-center experience. Open Forum Infect Dis 6:ofz327. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Guo LY, Li YJ, Liu LL, Wu HL, Zhou JL, Zhang Y, Feng WY, Zhu L, Hu B, Hu HL, Chen TM, Guo X, Chen HY, Yang YH, Liu G. 2019. Detection of pediatric bacterial meningitis pathogens from cerebrospinal fluid by next-generation sequencing technology. J Infect 78:323–337. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hogan CA, Yang S, Garner OB, Green DA, Gomez CA, Dien Bard J, Pinsky BA, Banaei N. 2021. Clinical impact of metagenomic next-generation sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA for the diagnosis of infectious diseases: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 72:239–245. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Miller S, Naccache SN, Samayoa E, Messacar K, Arevalo S, Federman S, Stryke D, Pham E, Fung B, Bolosky WJ, Ingebrigtsen D, Lorizio W, Paff SM, Leake JA, Pesano R, DeBiasi R, Dominguez S, Chiu CY. 2019. Laboratory validation of a clinical metagenomic sequencing assay for pathogen detection in cerebrospinal fluid. Genome Res 29:831–842. doi: 10.1101/gr.238170.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hasan MR, Rawat A, Tang P, Jithesh PV, Thomas E, Tan R, Tilley P. 2016. Depletion of human DNA in spiked clinical specimens for improvement of sensitivity of pathogen detection by next-generation sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 54:919–927. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03050-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Thoendel MJ, Jeraldo PR, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Yao JZ, Chia N, Hanssen AD, Abdel MP, Patel R. 2018. Identification of prosthetic joint infection pathogens using a shotgun metagenomics approach. Clin Infect Dis 67:1333–1338. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ji XC, Zhou LF, Li CY, Shi YJ, Wu ML, Zhang Y, Fei XF, Zhao G. 2020. Reduction of human DNA contamination in clinical cerebrospinal fluid specimens improves the sensitivity of metagenomic next-generation sequencing. J Mol Neurosci 70:659–666. doi: 10.1007/s12031-019-01472-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang Y, Cui P, Zhang HC, Wu HL, Ye MZ, Zhu YM, Ai JW, Zhang WH. 2020. Clinical application and evaluation of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in suspected adult central nervous system infection. J Transl Med 18:199. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02360-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Casadevall A, Fang FC. 2020. The intracellular pathogen concept. Mol Microbiol 113:541–545. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yu L, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Qi X, Bai K, Lou Z, Li Y, Xia H, Bu H. 2022. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of cell-free and whole-cell DNA in diagnosing central nervous system infections. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:951703. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.951703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Leber AL, Everhart K, Balada-Llasat JM, Cullison J, Daly J, Holt S, Lephart P, Salimnia H, Schreckenberger PC, DesJarlais S, Reed SL, Chapin KC, LeBlanc L, Johnson JK, Soliven NL, Carroll KC, Miller JA, Dien BJ, Mestas J, Bankowski M, Enomoto T, Hemmert AC, Bourzac KM. 2016. Multicenter evaluation of BioFire FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel for detection of bacteria, viruses, and yeast in cerebrospinal fluid specimens. J Clin Microbiol 54:2251–2261. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00730-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ge M, Gan M, Yan K, Xiao F, Yang L, Wu B, Xiao M, Ba Y, Zhang R, Wang J, Cheng G, Wang L, Cao Y, Zhou W, Hu L. 2021. Combining metagenomic sequencing with whole exome sequencing to optimize clinical strategies in neonates with a suspected central nervous system infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:671109. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.671109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vetter P, Schibler M, Herrmann JL, Boutolleau D. 2020. Diagnostic challenges of central nervous system infection: extensive multiplex panels versus stepwise guided approach. Clin Microbiol Infect 26:706–712. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Trujillo-Gomez J, Tsokani S, Arango-Ferreira C, Atehortua-Munoz S, Jimenez-Villegas MJ, Serrano-Tabares C, Veroniki AA, Florez ID. 2022. Biofire FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel for the aetiological diagnosis of central nervous system infections: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 44:101275. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lin GY, Lin CY, Chi H, Huang DT, Huang CY, Chiu NC. 2022. The experience of using FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel for the diagnosis of meningitis and encephalitis in pediatric patients. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 55:1180–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2022.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Armstrong AE, Rossoff J, Hollemon D, Hong DK, Muller WJ, Chaudhury S. 2019. Cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing successfully detects infectious pathogens in pediatric oncology and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients at risk for invasive fungal disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer 66:e27734. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Blauwkamp TA, Thair S, Rosen MJ, Blair L, Lindner MS, Vilfan ID, Kawli T, Christians FC, Venkatasubrahmanyam S, Wall GD, Cheung A, Rogers ZN, Meshulam-Simon G, Huijse L, Balakrishnan S, Quinn JV, Hollemon D, Hong DK, Vaughn ML, Kertesz M, Bercovici S, Wilber JC, Yang S. 2019. Analytical and clinical validation of a microbial cell-free DNA sequencing test for infectious disease. Nat Microbiol 4:663–674. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0349-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wang S, Chen Y, Wang D, Wu Y, Zhao D, Zhang J, Xie H, Gong Y, Sun R, Nie X, Jiang H, Zhang J, Li W, Liu G, Li X, Huang K, Huang Y, Li Y, Guan H, Pan S, Hu Y. 2019. The feasibility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing to identify pathogens causing tuberculous meningitis in cerebrospinal fluid. Front Microbiol 10:1993. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Camargo JF, Ahmed AA, Lindner MS, Morris MI, Anjan S, Anderson AD, Prado CE, Dalai SC, Martinez OV, Komanduri KV. 2019. Next-generation sequencing of microbial cell-free DNA for rapid noninvasive diagnosis of infectious diseases in immunocompromised hosts. F1000Res 8:1194. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19766.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kang Y, Ji X, Guo L, Xia H, Yang X, Xie Z, Shi X, Wu R, Feng D, Wang C, Chen M, Zhang W, Wei H, Guan Y, Ye K, Zhao G. 2021. Cerebrospinal fluid from healthy pregnant women does not harbor a detectable microbial community. Microbiol Spectr 9:e0076921. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00769-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zida S, Kolia-Diafouka P, Kania D, Sotto A, Foulongne V, Bollore K, Ouangraoua S, Meda N, Carrere-Kremer S, Van de Perre P, Tuaillon E. 2019. Combined testing for herpes simplex virus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with aseptic meningitis in Burkina Faso, West Africa. J Clin Lab Anal 33:e22719. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Carbo EC, Buddingh EP, Karelioti E, Sidorov IA, Feltkamp MCW, Borne P, Verschuuren J, Kroes ACM, Claas ECJ, de Vries JJC. 2020. Improved diagnosis of viral encephalitis in adult and pediatric hematological patients using viral metagenomics. J Clin Virol 130:104566. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brown J, Clark K, Smith C, Hopwood J, Lynard O, Toolan M, Creer D, Barker J, Breen R, Brown T, Cropley I, Lipman M. 2016. Variation in C-reactive protein response according to host and mycobacterial characteristics in active tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis 16:265. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1612-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ramchandar N, Coufal NG, Warden AS, Briggs B, Schwarz T, Stinnett R, Xie H, Schlaberg R, Foley J, Clarke C, Waldeman B, Enriquez C, Osborne S, Arrieta A, Salyakina D, Janvier M, Sendi P, Totapally BR, Dimmock D, Farnaes L. 2021. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for pathogen detection and transcriptomic analysis in pediatric central nervous system infections. Open Forum Infect Dis 8:ofab104. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Singh G, Tucker EW, Rohlwink UK. 2021. Infection in the developing brain: the role of unique systemic immune vulnerabilities. Front Neurol 12:805643. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.805643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kollmann TR, Levy O, Montgomery RR, Goriely S. 2012. Innate immune function by Toll-like receptors: distinct responses in newborns and the elderly. Immunity 37:771–783. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Diamond MS, Shrestha B, Marri A, Mahan D, Engle M. 2003. B cells and antibody play critical roles in the immediate defense of disseminated infection by West Nile encephalitis virus. J Virol 77:2578–2586. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.4.2578-2586.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yaramiş A, Gurkan F, Elevli M, Söker M, Haspolat K, Kirbaş G, Taş MA. 1998. Central nervous system tuberculosis in children: a review of 214 cases. Pediatrics 102:E49. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.5.e49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.O'Brien KL, Wolfson LJ, Watt JP, Henkle E, Deloria-Knoll M, McCall N, Lee E, Mulholland K, Levine OS, Cherian T, Hib, Pneumococcal Global Burden of Disease Study T . 2009. Burden of disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in children younger than 5 years: global estimates. Lancet 374:893–902. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61204-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Watt JP, Wolfson LJ, O'Brien KL, Henkle E, Deloria-Knoll M, McCall N, Lee E, Levine OS, Hajjeh R, Mulholland K, Cherian T, Hib, Pneumococcal Global Burden of Disease Study T . 2009. Burden of disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae type B in children younger than 5 years: global estimates. Lancet 374:903–911. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61203-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jiang H, Su M, Kui L, Huang H, Qiu L, Li L, Ma J, Du T, Fan M, Sun Q, Liu X. 2017. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance profiles of cerebrospinal fluid pathogens in children with acute bacterial meningitis in Yunnan Province, China, 2012-2015. PLoS One 12:e0180161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Block N, Naucler P, Wagner P, Morfeldt E, Henriques-Normark B. 2022. Bacterial meningitis: aetiology, risk factors, disease trends and severe sequelae during 50 years in Sweden. J Intern Med 292:350–364. doi: 10.1111/joim.13488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Russo DO, Torres BR, Romanelli RMC, Rocha FSV, Viegas ECC, Diniz LMO. 2022. Haemophilus influenzae serotype A as a cause of meningitis in children in Brazil. Pediatr Infect Dis J 41:108–111. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Okike IO, Ribeiro S, Ramsay ME, Heath PT, Sharland M, Ladhani SN. 2014. Trends in bacterial, mycobacterial, and fungal meningitis in England and Wales 2004-11: an observational study. Lancet Infect Dis 14:301–307. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70332-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Peng X, Zhu Q, Liu J, Zeng M, Qiu Y, Zhu C, Cheng Y, Zhou Y, Xu Y, Chen M, Wen Z, Chen Y, Li R, Tong J, Shan Q, Lin D, Wu S, Zhuo Z, Wang C, Zhao S, Qi Z, Sun X, Maihebuba B, Jia C, Gao H, Li S, Zhu Y, Wan C, Collaborative Working Group of the Pediatric Subgroup of the China Society of Infectious Diseases . 2021. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacteria isolated from cerebrospinal fluid among children with bacterial meningitis in China from 2016 to 2018: a multicenter retrospective study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 10:24. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-00895-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Logan SA, MacMahon E. 2008. Viral meningitis. BMJ 336:36–40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39409.673657.AE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Steiner I, Budka H, Chaudhuri A, Koskiniemi M, Sainio K, Salonen O, Kennedy PG. 2010. Viral meningoencephalitis: a review of diagnostic methods and guidelines for management. Eur J Neurol 17:999.e57. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.02970.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hasbun R, Wootton SH, Rosenthal N, Balada-Llasat JM, Chung J, Duff S, Bozzette S, Zimmer L, Ginocchio CC. 2019. Epidemiology of meningitis and encephalitis in infants and children in the United States, 2011–2014. Pediatr Infect Dis J 38:37–41. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rowe HM, Meliopoulos VA, Iverson A, Bomme P, Schultz-Cherry S, Rosch JW. 2019. Direct interactions with influenza promote bacterial adherence during respiratory infections. Nat Microbiol 4:1328–1336. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0447-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Verkaik NJ, Nguyen DT, de Vogel CP, Moll HA, Verbrugh HA, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, van Wamel WJ, van den Hoogen BG, Buijs-Offerman RM, Ludlow M, de Witte L, Osterhaus AD, van Belkum A, de Swart RL. 2011. Streptococcus pneumoniae exposure is associated with human metapneumovirus seroconversion and increased susceptibility to in vitro HMPV infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 17:1840–1844. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03480.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhang XS, Wang XX, Yu DS, Jiang JX, Zhang GY, Wang F, Li H. 2013. Analysis of pathogen spectrum of encephalitis/meningitis in northwestern area of China. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 47:924–927. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tomasz A, Waks S. 1975. Mechanism of action of penicillin: triggering of the pneumococcal autolytic enzyme by inhibitors of cell wall synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:4162–4166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.10.4162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Venkatesan A, Tunkel AR, Bloch KC, Lauring AS, Sejvar J, Bitnun A, Stahl JP, Mailles A, Drebot M, Rupprecht CE, Yoder J, Cope JR, Wilson MR, Whitley RJ, Sullivan J, Granerod J, Jones C, Eastwood K, Ward KN, Durrheim DN, Solbrig MV, Guo-Dong L, Glaser CA, International Encephalitis Consortium . 2013. Case definitions, diagnostic algorithms, and priorities in encephalitis: consensus statement of the international encephalitis consortium. Clin Infect Dis 57:1114–1128. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.van de Beek D, Cabellos C, Dzupova O, Esposito S, Klein M, Kloek AT, Leib SL, Mourvillier B, Ostergaard C, Pagliano P, Pfister HW, Read RC, Sipahi OR, Brouwer MC, ESGfIot B, ESCMID Study Group for Infections of the Brain (ESGIB) . 2016. ESCMID guideline: diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Infect 22(Suppl 3):S37–S62. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Chen H, Zhang Y, Zheng J, Shi L, He Y, Niu Y, Lei J, Zhao Y, Xia H, Chen T. 2021. Application of mNGS in the etiological diagnosis of thoracic and abdominal infection in patients with end-stage liver disease. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:741220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available at National Genomics Data Center (http://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn), reference number PRJCA009189.