ABSTRACT
Gut microbiota is one of the major elements in the control of host health. However, the composition of gut microbiota in koalas has rarely been investigated. Here, we performed 16S rRNA gene sequencing to determine the individual and environmental determinants of gut microbiota diversity and function in 35 fecal samples collected from captive koalas. Meanwhile, blood immune-related cytokine levels were examined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR to initially explore the relationship between the gut microbiota and the immune system in koalas. The relative abundance of many bacteria, such as Lonepinella koalarum, varies at different ages in koalas and decreases with age. Conversely, Ruminococcus flavefaciens increases with age. Moreover, bacterial pathways involved in lipid metabolism, the biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, and infectious disease show a significant correlation with age. Age affects the relationship between the microbiota and the host immune system. Among them, the gut microbiota of subadult and aged koalas was closely correlated with CD8β and CD4, whereas adult koalas were correlated with CLEC4E. We also found that sex, reproductive status, and living environment have little impact on the koala gut microbiota and immune system. These results shed suggest age is a key factor affecting gut microbiota and immunity in captive koalas and thus provide new insight into its role in host development and the host immune system.
IMPORTANCE Although we have a preliminary understanding of the gut microbiota of koalas, we lack insight into which factors potentially impact captive koalas. This study creates the largest koala gut microbiota data set in China to date and describes several factors that may affect gut microbiota and the immune system in captive koalas, highlighting that age may be a key factor affecting captive koalas. Moreover, this study is the first to characterize the correlation between gut microbiota and cytokines in koalas. Better treatment strategies for infectious disorders may be possible if we can better understand the interactions between the immune system and the microbiota.
KEYWORDS: koalas, age, gut microbiota, immune system, cytokines, animal models, immune markers
INTRODUCTION
Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) are solitary Australian mammals that eat virtually solely Eucalyptus leaves. However, Eucalyptus foliage is toxic or fatal to most other mammals. Koalas can break down plant matter through fermentation and enzymatic breakdown, extracting enough nutrients to keep their metabolisms running (1). On the one hand, several lignin- and tannin-degrading bacteria, such as Streptococcus bovis and Lonepinella koalarum, have been identified in the gastrointestinal tracts of koalas (2, 3). Gut microbiota is thus assumed to play a key part in this process. Koalas’ ability to detoxify Eucalyptus foliage, on the other hand, may be attributable to expansions within the cytochrome P450 gene family (4, 5).
The billions of microorganisms that live in the gut, known as the gut microbiota, are now recognized as one of the major elements in the control of host health (6–8), and they contribute significantly to the development of the immune system, behavior, and a number of other elements of host biology (9–13). According to earlier studies, normal gut microbiota variation is influenced by factors, such as diet, age, sex, genetics, and environmental exposure (14–21). Because herbivorous mammals lack the genetic coding for fiber degradation enzymes, they must form a symbiotic relationship with cellulolytic microbes in their gut to assist them to meet their nutritional needs (22). Complex anaerobic microbial communities can very efficiently digest ingested plant biomass due to the evolution of specific organs in herbivorous mammals, such as the rumen, cecum, and colon (23). Gut microbiota can also help the host detoxify secondary compounds from plants (24, 25). Giant and red pandas can adapt to bamboo containing cyanide-containing compounds, and desert woodrats can adapt to the highly toxic creosote bush containing creosote.
Infectious diseases such as chlamydial disease and koala retrovirus (KoRV) infections pose a significant danger to wild koala populations (26, 27). The immunological response of koalas to infectious illness is poorly understood (28). The immune system has been found to be a protective factor during infectious diseases, and cytokines are suitable targets for assessing local and systemic immune responses to intracellular infections (29). Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and other important cytokines in the koala that can serve as indicators for Th1 and Th2 immune responses, as well as a number of cell surface receptors and markers, such as CD4, CDβ, and CLEC4E, have been described in preliminary research (26, 28). Thus, we may deduce the koala immune response from blood cytokine levels. Furthermore, because the gut contains 70 to 80% of immune cells, there is a complicated interplay between the gut microbiota and the body’s cells and processes (such as the immune system) (30–32).
A recent study on koalas from Australia’s Featherdale Wildlife Park discovered that their gut microbiomes shift in response to a higher proportion of leaves in their meals, eventually reaching adult composition by independence (33). However, their gut microbiota shift in response to aging has rarely been investigated. Most functional investigations of the gut microbiota and immune system have thus far been limited to model organisms such as humans and mice, or laboratory animals in a controlled environment (34, 35). Few functional investigations have been conducted in nonmodel creatures, particularly endangered wild mammals. The captive koalas’ fecal microbiomes were similar to those found in wild koalas (36). As a result, captive koalas could be useful for functional research. Furthermore, research on gut microbiota and blood cytokine levels provides more specific insights into the koala’s unique biology without harming or disturbing an endangered animal. Study of the koala gut microbiota could provide better feeding regimens that take into account the species’ reproductive characteristics, as well as nutritional supplements such as probiotics.
We analyzed the gut microbiota composition in 35 fecal samples and the cytokine levels in 29 blood samples from the koalas living in the Guangzhou Chimelong Safari Park in China. We hypothesized that the gut microbiota of captive koalas is mainly influenced by age variation and describe the composition of the gut microbiota in different age groups. We also tried to investigate the possible interactions between the host immune system and the microbiota, as well as how age may affect these interactions. In addition, we analyzed whether sex, reproductive state, and living environment affected captive koalas.
RESULTS
The koala gut microbiota.
We discovered 12,741 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) using deep 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in 35 fecal samples (after rarefaction, mean ± the standard deviations [SD] ASVs/sample = 768.54 ± 132.94; range, 466 to 1,046). There were 12,741 ASVs from 31 phyla, 85 classes, 151 orders, 255 families, 486 genera, and 639 species among them. Bacteroidetes are the most numerous phyla at the phylum level (Fig. 1A), followed by Firmicutes and Synergistetes, in each sample. These three phyla were responsible for 93% of all sequences. The “core microbiota” of the koala gut microbial community, which made up 31.69% of the total ASVs, consisted of 12 genera (2.47% of the total identified genera) that were each present in 100% of the samples: Synergistes (abundance, 8.99%), Phascolarctobacterium (6.62%), Bacteroidaceae_Bacteroides (5.14%), Lachnospiraceae_Clostridium (4.09%), Ruminococcus (2.33%), Akkermansia (2.16%), Oscillospira (0.93%), Parabacteroides (0.6%), Desulfovibrio (0.32%), Fusobacterium (0.29%), Rikenella (0.11%) and Lactobacillus (0.11%) (Fig. 1B).
FIG 1.
Taxonomic composition of the koala gut microbiota at phylum and genus levels. (A) Ten most abundant phyla. (B) Twenty most abundant genera.
Age variation in gut microbiota diversity and composition.
To better describe the dynamic gut microbiota alterations of the captive koala, we investigated the relationship of ASVs (average relative abundance across samples of ≥0.01%) with noticeably varied abundance among age groups with age as a continuous variable. To begin, we found 6 phyla, 9 classes, 11 orders, 16 families, 23 genera, and 29 species that were significantly differentially abundant in different age groups (Fig. 2). Thus, age significantly correlated with 37% of the bacterial genera examined (and 39 to 60% of taxa at other taxonomic levels [Fig. 2]) and predicted the relative abundance of gut microbiota at all taxonomic levels.
FIG 2.
Age exerts the strongest effect on bacterial relative abundance. The percentages of taxa that are significantly associated with age, sex, living environment, or reproductive state, across six taxonomic levels are shown. The significance of the difference was verified by using a Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test (or Mann-Whitney U test [for two-sample groups]). Only taxa with P values <0.05 were considered significant. The numbers below the bars indicate the total taxa measured per level, while the numbers above depict the number of taxa significantly differentially abundant.
The Spearman correlation was then employed to determine the relationship between their abundance and age. Bacteroidetes, Synergistetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Fusobacteria were negatively linked with age at the phylum level (Fig. 3A and Table 1), whereas Firmicutes and Actinobacteria were positively associated with age. Thirteen genera were adversely linked with age at the genus level (Fig. 3B and Table 1), the majority of which were possible commensals. Three Bacteroidales genera (identified as S24-7, unclassified Bacteroidales, and unidentified Bacteroidales), two Lactobacillales genera (Lactobacillus and unclassified Lactobacillaceae), two Fusobacteriales genera (Fusobacterium and unidentified Fusobacteriaceae), unidentified YS2, Sutterella, Lonepinella, Synergistes, and Akkermansia. Five genera from the order Clostridiales (unidentified Lachnospiraceae, Clostridium, Oscillospira, Phascolarctobacterium, and unclassified Clostridiales), two genera from the order Burkholderiales (Delftia and Oxalobacter), unidentified Coriobacteriaceae, Rikenella, and unidentified Streptophyta were also positively associated with age. Furthermore, compared to subadults and adults, the aged had a significantly decreased Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes (B/F) ratio (Fig. 3C). The B/F ratio was highest in adults (median = 4.48); in subadults it was slightly lower than in adults (median = 3.57), and it decreased in the aged (median = 1.94).
FIG 3.
Correlation between differential abundant gut microbiota and age. (A) Six differential abundant taxa at the phylum level. (B) Top 10 differential abundant taxa in the genus. (C) Relative proportions of the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes (B/F) ratio. (D) LEfSe analysis generated differences in the abundance of the bacterial taxa of three age groups (P < 0.05, LDA > 2). Mean values ± the standard errors of the mean (SEM) are shown. The significance of the difference between groups was tested by the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001.
TABLE 1.
Significant correlation modeling between differentially abundant and age
| Species | Spearman r | P |
|---|---|---|
| p_Actinobacteria | 0.522 | 0.004 |
| p_Firmicutes | 0.526 | 0.003 |
| p_Fusobacteria | −0.715 | <0.001 |
| g_unidentified_Coriobacteriaceae | 0.527 | 0.003 |
| g_unidentified_Bacteroidales | −0.503 | 0.005 |
| g_unidentified_YS2 | −0.423 | 0.022 |
| g_Lactobacillus | −0.647 | <0.001 |
| g_unidentified_Lachnospiraceae | 0.454 | 0.013 |
| g_unclassified_Clostridiales | 0.486 | 0.007 |
| g_Allobaculum | −0.456 | 0.013 |
| g_Fusobacterium | −0.774 | <0.001 |
| g_unidentified_Fusobacteriaceae | −0.625 | <0.001 |
| g_Sutterella | −0.517 | 0.004 |
| g_Delftia | 0.425 | 0.021 |
| g_Oxalobacter | 0.413 | 0.026 |
| g_Lonepinella | −0.605 | 0.001 |
Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was used to find differential gut bacterial taxa that demonstrated the highest abundance in each of the three age groups (Fig. 3D). The diversity of gut microbiota differed significantly in each age group, which was consistent with the microbial composition data. At the phylum level, Fusobacteria, Synergistetes, and Verrucomicrobia showed the highest abundance in subadults, Bacteroidetes in adults, whereas Actinobacteria and Firmicutes showed the highest abundance in the aged. The gut microbiota of subadults and the aged had the most families and genera among the three age groups. The dominating genera in subadults were Fusobacterium, Synergistes, Lonepinella, and Akkermansia. Three genera showed the highest abundance in the aged: Dehalobacterium, Oscillospira, and Phascolarctobacterium. Only the genus Kaistobacter was highly enriched in the adults.
After that, we focused on the age-characterized bacterial taxa (species). In this study, Lonepinella koalarum was discovered and found in high relative abundance (average, >0.3%). Subadult koalas had the most L. koalarum, and there was a negative connection with age (Fig. 4A). Ruminococcus flavefaciens, on the other hand, was positively related to age, with the largest abundance in aged koalas (Fig. 4B). The abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila was higher in subadults, while Bacteroides fragilis was higher in aged koalas (Fig. 4C and D). We then discovered two unclassified or unidentified bacteria that were not detected in each subadult and aged koala (Fig. 4E and F). Unclassified Lactobacillaceae was only found in the feces of adults, whereas unidentified Fusobacteriaceae was found in the feces of subadults and adults but not the aged.
FIG 4.
Relative abundances of bacterial taxa in six species that are significantly associated with age. (A) Lonepinella koalarum. (B) Ruminococcus flavefaciens. (C) Akkermansia muciniphila. (D) Bacteroides fragilis. (E) Unidentified Fusobacteriaceae. (F) Unclassified Lactobacillaceae. Mean values ± the SEM are shown. The significance of the difference between groups tested by using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test with a Bonferroni post hoc test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.
Chao1 and observed species demonstrated significant differences in bacterial richness among the three age groups at the level of alpha diversity (Fig. 5A). Subadults and adults had significantly higher bacterial richness than aged koalas, but there was no significant difference between subadults and adults. Subadults and aged clustered differentially in the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on the Bray-Curtis distance matrix for beta diversity (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, the results of a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) (Table 2) based on the Bray-Curtis distance revealed significant variations across the three age groups (P = 0.001).
FIG 5.
Diversity differences in the gut microbiota among the three age groups. (A) Alpha-diversity index (Chao1 index and observed species diversity). (B) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). The significance of the difference between groups tested by using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test with a Bonferroni post hoc test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.
TABLE 2.
PERMANOVA of host factors and environment in the koalas’ data seta
| Factor | R2 (%) | P |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 20.34 | 0.001 |
| Sex | 5.12 | 0.11 |
| Reproductive state | 9.11 | 0.568 |
| Living environment | 3.62 | 0.418 |
n = 35 samples.
The functional profile of the gut microbiota is predicted by age. We identified 33 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) modules (see Fig. S2) to be significantly associated with age using the software Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt). The bacterial pathways at level 1 of KEGG Orthology (KO) were mainly enriched in the metabolism pathway, followed by genetic information processing and cellular processes. Bacterial functional pathways were mainly enriched in amino acids, carbohydrates, cofactors, and vitamins in metabolism at KO level 2.
Compared to the subadult koala, lipid metabolism (e.g., primary and secondary bile acid biosynthesis) showed higher proportions in the adult koala (Fig. 6A), while infectious diseases (e.g., epithelial cell signaling in Helicobacter pylori infection) showed higher proportions in the aged koala (Fig. 6B). Twelve pathways differed between adult and aged koalas (Fig. 6C). Of these, the largest significant differences were pathways for amino acid metabolism, lipid metabolism, and replication and repair. Amino acid metabolism (e.g., the metabolism of cysteine, methionine, arginine, proline, and histidine, and the biosynthesis of valine, leucine, isoleucine, lysine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan) and replication and repair (e.g., homologous recombination, DNA replication, base excision, and repair of nucleotide excision and mismatch) showed higher proportions in the aged koala, while lipid metabolism (e.g., fatty acid degradation, sphingolipid metabolism, and primary and secondary bile acid biosynthesis) showed higher proportions in the adult koala. Furthermore, three microbial functions, including lipid metabolism, the manufacture of various secondary metabolites, and the pathways for infectious diseases, were found to significantly correlate with age. The proportions of lipid metabolism and biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites pathways in the adult group were significantly higher than in the subadult and aged group, but there was no significant difference between subadults and adults. In addition, the proportions of infectious disease pathways (e.g., epithelial cell signaling in Helicobacter pylori infection) in the aged group were significantly higher than in the subadult and adult groups, but there was no significant difference between subadults and adult groups.
FIG 6.
Age predicts the functional profile of the gut microbiota. (A to C) Bacterial pathways at level 2 of KEGG Orthology (KO) differ in proportions in three age groups: subadult compared to adult (A), subadult compared to aged (B), and adult compared to aged (C). The bar plot shows the mean proportions of differential KEGG pathways predicted using PICRUSt2. The difference in proportions between the groups is shown with 95% confidence intervals. Only P values <0.05 (Welch’s t test, FDR adjusted) are shown, along with the composition.
Blood immune genes and relationship with gut microbiota.
We measured blood cytokine expression levels for CLEC4E, CD4, CD8β, IL-6, and TNF-α from 29 koalas and analyzed expression profiles with age. The expression of CLEC4E was significantly higher expression in the aged group (Fig. 7A). Instead, the Expression of CD8β and CD4 was significantly higher in subadults (Fig. 7B and C). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in IL-6 and TNF-α expression. However, adult koalas exhibited a nonsignificant trend of higher expression of IL-6 and TNF-α (see Fig. S1) compared to subadult and aged koalas.
FIG 7.
Expression of blood immune gene influence by age. (A to C) Effect of age on the koala inflammatory cytokines: CLEC4E (A), CD4 (B), and CD8β (C). Mean values ± the SEM are shown. The significance of the difference between groups was tested by ANOVA with an LSD post hoc test. Spearman correlations between gut microbiota abundances and the levels of host immune markers in blood samples from the three age groups are shown: subadult (D), adult (E), and aged (F). For each heat map, the rows correspond to gut microbiota taxa at the genus level, and the columns correspond to immune factors. The red and blue dots represent positive and negative correlations, respectively. The intensity of the colors denotes the degree of correlation between the genus abundances and the circulating levels of host blood immune factors. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.
To reveal the interplay between the gut microbiota and the host immune system, we calculated the correlations between the gut microbiota (at the genus level) and the host immune markers. Overall, the three age groups have quite different correlations between gut microbiota genera and host immune factors. The gut microbiota of subadult koalas was closely correlated with CD8β and IL-6, while little correlation with CLEC4E and CD4 (Fig. 7D). The gut microbiota of adult koalas was closely correlated with CLEC4E, CD4, and CD8β but showed little correlation with IL-6 and TNF-α (Fig. 7E). The gut microbiota of aged koalas was closely correlated with CD4, IL-6, and TNF-α, while little correlation with CLEC4E and CD8β (Fig. 7F).
Sex, reproductive state, and living environment.
Sex is the second factor affecting the gut microbiota of captive koalas, based on the percentage of taxa that are strongly related (8 to 30% of taxa at all taxonomic levels, Fig. 2). We found many bacterial species that differed in abundance by sex, second only to age (see Fig. S4A). Females had more Verrucomicrobia and Planctomycetes at the phylum level (particularly from class Verrucomicrobiae and vadinHA49). Females had more CF231, Bacteroides, Akkermansia, and Tannerella at the genus level. Firmicutes were found in greater numbers in males (particularly from class Clostridia). Furthermore, compared to males (median = 2.28), the B/F ratio was highest in females (median = 4.03; see also Fig. S4B). Sex had no significant effect on any of the alpha-diversity indicators and had little bearing on the beta diversity between samples (see Fig. S4C and Table 2). We discovered that sex was the second factor that impact the predicted function of the koala gut microbiota, just like our taxonomic study suggested. We found that the female group exhibited larger proportions in the pathways for glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, cofactor metabolism, and vitamin metabolism, whereas the male group exhibited higher proportions in the pathways for carbohydrate metabolism (see Fig. S5). Our results showed that male koalas exhibited a nonsignificant tendency toward increased expression of IL-6 and TNF-α (see Fig. S5C) compared to female koalas.
Only a small number of bacterial species were found to differ in abundance based on reproductive state (see Fig. S6A). Lactation females harbored more Lactobacillus than cycling females. Furthermore, the B/F ratio and beta diversity between samples were unaffected by the female reproductive state (Table 2; see also Fig. S6B). The gut microbiota of cycling females exhibited higher alpha diversity (Chao1) compared to lactation females (see Fig. S6C). There was no evidence that the predicted metabolic pathways varied according to reproductive status. Since we did not collect blood from lactating females, we do not know whether the reproductive status has any effect on the immune system.
The gut microbiota of koalas living in noisy (tourist regions, n = 19) and quiet habitats (not shown to tourists, n = 10) were also studied. Only a few taxa had varied abundances depending on their living conditions (see Fig. S7A). The living environment did not influence the B/F ratio between samples (see Fig. S7B). The living environment had no bearing on any alpha-diversity metric and beta diversity between samples (see Fig. S7C and Table 2). There was no evidence that the predicted metabolic pathways differed between noisy and quiet habitats. Interestingly, the expression of IL-6 was significantly greater in koalas living in noisy habitats than in koalas living in quiet habitats (see Fig. S7D).
DISCUSSION
We studied the role of host and environmental factors in influencing gut microbiota structure and the host immune system in a healthy captive koala population. Our findings implied that age affected koala microbiota composition and function the most, explaining a quarter of the variation of the koala microbiota, followed by sex, whereas other factors, such as reproductive status and environment, had little impact. We found that lipid metabolism, biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, and infectious disease pathways were significantly correlated with age. Furthermore, we found that age impacts the host immune system and that different age groups have different correlations between gut microbiota genera and host immune factors, whereas other factors had no impact. These data show that disturbed habitat and captivity conditions do not appear to be stressors for captive koalas.
The koala gut microbiota has been shown to have many microbial species that have dynamic changes after birth and could play different roles (33). The age-associated microbiota discovered in captive koalas may play a role in the growth and health of the host. Depending on the direction of their age correlation, these microbiotas could play different roles. The makeup of the koala gut microbiota is essentially comparable to that of other mammalian gut microbiotas (33, 37), with bacteria from the phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes being predominant (1, 38). Akkermansia muciniphila strains have been found in colostrum, breast milk, and young neonates and are generally regarded as helpful bacteria (39). Furthermore, A. muciniphila has been shown to improve the metabolic functioning and immunological responses of the host (40, 41). In contrast to earlier research (33), we discovered that the quantity of A. muciniphila varies between the three age groups. A. muciniphila abundance decreases with age and was highest in subadult koalas, whereas it declined in adult and aged animals. Bacteroides fragilis is a commensal Gram-negative obligate anaerobe that belongs to the Bacteroides family and maintains a complex and generally beneficial relationship with the host when retained in the gut, but when it escapes the gut it becomes an opportunistic pathogen (42–44). We discovered that aged koalas have more B. fragilis than adult and subadult koalas and the correlations between the gut microbiota and the host immune markers showed that Bacteroides in aged koalas showed a significant positive correlation with IL-6 (Fig. 7). Furthermore, Lonepinella koalarum, a Gram-negative bacterium found in koala feces, breaks down tannin protein complexes (45). This is a single species of the genus Lonepinella, which belongs to the Pasteurellaceae family. Here, the proportion of L. koalarum was highest in subadult koalas, with a negative correlation with age. We suggest that L. koalarum dominated the degraded tannin protein complexes in the subadult period, but that as the abundance of L. koalarum decreased in adults and aged periods, other methods of tannin degradation became dominant. However, we discovered that a bacterial species increased with age and was first reported in the feces of koalas in this study. Ruminococcus flavefaciens, a major plant cell wall-degrading bacteria, is the primary degrader of plant structural carbohydrates in the rumens of mammals (46–48). R. flavefaciens, we guess, dominates the bacterial breakdown of tannin complexes or fibers in adult and aged koalas.
The remarkable age-dependent changes, including the B/F ratio and beta diversity, emphasized the actual effects of age on the gut microbiota in captive koalas. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio is widely accepted to be involved in health-related conditions or diseases such as obesity (49, 50). In our study, Bacteroidetes was the most prevalent phylum, followed by Firmicutes and Synergistetes in each sample. So, we calculated the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes (B/F) ratio. The B/F ratio was higher in subadult and adult koalas and decreased in aged koalas, resembling observations in humans or other mammal animals (51, 52). As PCoA revealed, the gut microbiotas of samples within each group were remarkably similar, whereas different age groups clustered differentially. Captive individuals all had the same assigned diet, which explains why the compositions of gut microbiotas were quite similar at the same age (22, 53).
At the functional level, bacterial genes are involved in lipid metabolism and the biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites in adult koalas more than in subadult and aged koalas. Particularly, bile acid biosynthesis, fatty acid degradation, and sphingolipid metabolism became more prevalent, indicating that this was the time when both bacterial energy production and cellular activity were at their peak. The gut microbiota was strongly related to host metabolism (54). So, the increase in organismal metabolism reflects the richness of the gut microbiota system in adult koalas, which is consistent with the results of alpha diversity. However, under several conditions, an increase in bacteria that boost host metabolism may also stimulate inflammation or even inhibit immune response (55, 56). We showed here that adult koalas exhibited a trend toward higher expression of IL-6 and TNF-α or lower expression of CD4 and CD8β. Furthermore, bacterial genes are involved in infectious diseases in aged koalas more than in subadult and adult koalas, especially the epithelial cell signaling in Helicobacter pylori infection. On the one hand, H. pylori can influence the abundance and diversity of gut microbiota and be highly associated with cellular senescence (57, 58). On the other hand, H. pylori metabolites were reported that exacerbate gastritis through C-type lectin receptors such as C-type lectin domain family 4 member (CLEC4E) (59). This is consistent with the significantly greater CLEC4E expression observed in the aged group.
In addition, we investigated how the host immune system and the microbiota interact, as well as how age affects these interactions. More and more research has been conducted that reveals the immune system was a vital relationship with age and gut microbiota (31, 32, 60). Differences in the prevalence of infectious diseases across the age of the koalas were also noted (27, 61). CLEC4E is a surface marker expressed primarily on macrophages and acts as an activating receptor for cell wall components of bacterial species (28, 62). Previous studies have shown that significant upregulation of CLEC4E was seen in koalas with Chlamydia pecorum infection compared to those without infection (62). Our findings show that the expression of CLEC4E is highest in aged koalas, perhaps suggesting that aged koalas are at a higher risk of C. pecorum infection. Moreover, many microbial genera were highly related to the expression of functional lectins (63). Here, we found that the gut microbiota of adult koalas was closely correlated with CLEC4E. CD4 and CD8β are signals to immune cells and also allow discrimination between classic helper T cells and cytotoxic T-cell families (28). According to research, CD4 and CD8β levels were noticeably lower in koala retrovirus (KoRV)-positive koalas than in negative koalas (26, 64, 65). Compared to subadults, the expression of CD4 and CD8β were decreased in adult and aged koalas in this study. We suggest that adult and aged koalas are at a higher risk of KoRV infection.
Individual variables such as sex, living environment, and female reproductive status showed only a minor impact on the gut microbiota and immune system (14). Although female koalas have more bacterial taxa than males, this is not the main factor that influences gut microbiota composition. At the functional level, females had higher proportions of metabolism pathways than males, especially glycan biosynthesis and metabolism and the metabolism of cofactors and vitamins. These pathways were mainly involved in many organismal functions, such as immune and inflammation regulation (66, 67).
There were several limitations in our research. Although the captive koalas’ fecal microbiotas were similar to those found in wild koalas (1), our findings do not represent the entire species. Seasonal, spatial, lifestyle, and habitat environment factors all have an impact on animal gut microbiotas (14, 15, 36, 68).
In summary, we performed a comprehensive survey of the gut microbiota of different age koala populations. The gut microbiotas of koalas are typical for mammals and have a consistent core group of taxa. These core genera exhibited a remarkable change across different age periods. Our results reliably show the individual (age, sex, and reproductive status) and environmental factors that may affect captive koala microbiota composition and function. In addition, we also discovered age-associated changes in inflammation or immunity and the correlations between gut microbiota and host immune markers. To effectively prevent or treat infectious illnesses, we must have a thorough understanding of the koala microbiota and how the immune system and microbiota interact.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study subjects and fecal sample collection.
We collected 35 fecal samples and 29 blood samples over 3 months between November 2021 and January 2022 from captive koalas (the largest koala population outside Australia) living in the Guangzhou Chimelong Safari Park in China (23°00′N, 113°33′E). A controlled environment with a temperature range of 15 to 26°C and a relative humidity range of 40 to 70% was used to keep all koalas. The koalas shared the same assigned diet. Various forms of data, such as identification, sex, body mass, reproductive status, and food information, were gathered for each sample taken from captive koalas. A total of 35 fecal samples were collected from different ages, sex, living environments, and reproductive states captive koalas. These groups included subadults (1 to 3 years old, 5 females and 4 males, n = 9), adults (4 to 7 years old, 5 females and 5 males, n = 10), older animals (9 to 13 years old, 5 females and 5 males, n = 10), and lactating females (3 to 7 years old, n = 6). Fecal samples were transported at 4°C and kept at −80°C in the lab until DNA extraction was performed. We collected 29 blood samples from different-aged animals, including subadults (1 to 3 years old, n = 9), adults (4 to 7 years old, n = 10), and aged animals (9 to 13 years old, n = 10). To prevent causing stress in lactating female koalas, we did not collect blood from them. Portions (500 to 1,000 μL) of blood were collected and stored at 4°C until RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis on the same day. This study was performed in accordance with the protocols of the Chimelong Safari Park and South China Agriculture University.
16S rRNA sequencing and data processing.
After extracting microbial DNA, we used PCR primers to produce the V3 and V4 sections of the 16S rRNA gene (F, 5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3′ and R, 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). QIIME2(2019.4) (69) was used for microbiota bioinformatics, with minor modifications made according to the official tutorials (https://docs.qiime2.org/2019.4/tutorials/). Using the demux plugin, raw sequence data were demultiplexed, and primers were cut using the cutadapt tool (70). Using the DADA2 plugin (71), the sequences were then quality filtered, denoised, and combined, and chimeras were eliminated. We analyzed microbial diversity in QIIME2, including taxonomic composition, alpha-diversity measures (Chao1 and observed species), and beta-diversity metrics (Bray-Curtis dissimilarity). The beta diversity values were compared using the nonparametric method PERMANOVA. Bray-Curtis distances were used to perform principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the bacterial communities. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size was used to identify differences in community composition in different sample groups (LEfSe).
Isolation of total RNA and RT-qPCR.
A blood RNA isolate kit was used to extract total RNA from collected blood in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (Biodai). HiScript III RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper; Vazyme) was used to create cDNA from total RNA (1 g), and a ChamQ universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme) was used to perform real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) amplification (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Table 3 presents the primer sequences, and the 2−ΔΔCT method was used to analyze the data, which are presented as the gene expression to relative GAPDH.
TABLE 3.
The gene sequence for RT-qPCR
| Target gene | Direction | Sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|
| CD4 | Forward | CCTGCCAAATTCTCCTTCCCTCTG |
| Reverse | TCCACCTGCCACCTCAGTTCTC | |
| CD8β | Forward | AAGGTCACTCAACAGAATGGTTCCC |
| Reverse | GATCAGCAAAATCACAGCACATCCC | |
| CLEC4E | Forward | AGCAAAACCCAGTGGAAGAGAGTTC |
| Reverse | TTGTTGAATGGCGTACCATCTACCC | |
| IL-6 | Forward | GTGACGATAGCAATGAGGCACTAGC |
| Reverse | ACAATCCTTGGCAAGCATGTCTCC | |
| TNF-α | Forward | CTGCCTCTGCCTGTCACTTATCTTC |
| Reverse | ATCTGTGGACTCCTCTTCCTTCTGG | |
| GAPDH | Forward | GGCAAATTCAAGGGCACTGTCAAG |
| Reverse | CAACATACTCGGCTCCAGCATCTC |
Statistical analysis.
First, we combined the counts at the taxonomic level (i.e., the number of reads per taxonomy and per sample). Only taxa whose average relative abundance over samples was ≥0.01% were evaluated. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to find the correlations between ASVs and age as a continuous variable. Correlation analysis of gut microbiota in age and blood inflammatory cytokines was performed using Spearman’s correlation analysis. The differential abundance testing in age groups was verified by using a Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, while sex, reproductive state, and living environment groups were verified by using the Mann-Whitney U test. The differential functional profiling of microbiota in each group was verified by using Welch’s t test with the false discovery rate (FDR) adjusted. The significance of the expression of blood immune genes between age groups was tested by analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a least-significant-difference (LSD) post hoc test, while sex, reproductive state, and living environment groups were tested by using a Student t test. Differences were considered significant when the corrected P value was <0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics 22.
Data availability.
All 16S sequence data used in this study are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under BioProject number PRJNA871357. The data will be made public upon the acceptance of the manuscript.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Chimelong Group Co., along with the veterinary and animal care staff of the Chimelong Safari Park, for permission to conduct research and for ongoing support for our long-term research project.
Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, resources, investigation, and visualization (J.C.); methodology (J.C. and W.L.); collected samples (J.C., J.D., T.L., Z.W., and T.Z.), writing—original draft (J.C. and S.G.); writing—review and editing (all authors); funding acquisition (S.G. and G.D.); and supervision (X.Z., S.G., T.Z., P.Z., M.P., and G.D.). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We declare that we have no competing interests.
This project was totally supported by Guangdong Chimelong Philanthropic Foundation (5500-PH22008).
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Guixin Dong, Email: dgx@chimelong.com.
Shining Guo, Email: shining@scau.edu.cn.
Yunhe Fu, Jilin University.
Yi Wu, Nanjing Agricultural University.
Xiaolong Xu, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated with Capital Medical University.
REFERENCES
- 1.Alfano N, Courtiol A, Vielgrader H, Timms P, Roca AL, Greenwood AD. 2015. Variation in koala microbiomes within and between individuals: effect of body region and captivity status. Sci Rep 5:10189. doi: 10.1038/srep10189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dahlhausen KE, Jospin G, Coil DA, Eisen JA, Wilkins LGE. 2020. Isolation and sequence-based characterization of a koala symbiont: Lonepinella koalarum. PeerJ 8:e10177. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Osawa R. 1992. Tannin-protein complex-degrading enterobacteria isolated from the alimentary tracts of koalas and a selective medium for their enumeration. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1754–1759. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.5.1754-1759.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Johnson RN, O’Meally D, Chen Z, Etherington GJ, Ho SYW, Nash WJ, Grueber CE, Cheng Y, Whittington CM, Dennison S, Peel E, Haerty W, O’Neill RJ, Colgan D, Russell TL, Alquezar-Planas DE, Attenbrow V, Bragg JG, Brandies PA, Chong AY, Deakin JE, Di Palma F, Duda Z, et al. 2018. Adaptation and conservation insights from the koala genome. Nat Genet 50:1102–1111. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0153-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jones BR, El-Merhibi A, Ngo SN, Stupans I, McKinnon RA. 2008. Hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes belonging to the CYP2C subfamily from an Australian marsupial, the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 148:230–237. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2008.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.de Vos WM, Tilg H, Van Hul M, Cani PD. 2022. Gut microbiome and health: mechanistic insights. Gut 71:1020–1032. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Davenport ER, Sanders JG, Song SJ, Amato KR, Clark AG, Knight R. 2017. The human microbiome in evolution. BMC Biol 15:127. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0454-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lynch SV, Pedersen O. 2016. The human intestinal microbiome in health and disease. N Engl J Med 375:2369–2379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1600266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dominguez-Bello MG, Godoy-Vitorino F, Knight R, Blaser MJ. 2019. Role of the microbiome in human development. Gut 68:1108–1114. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shi N, Li N, Duan X, Niu H. 2017. Interaction between the gut microbiome and mucosal immune system. Mil Med Res 4:14. doi: 10.1186/s40779-017-0122-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rooks MG, Garrett WS. 2016. Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 16:341–352. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sampson TR, Mazmanian SK. 2015. Control of brain development, function, and behavior by the microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 17:565–576. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Simpson CA, Diaz-Arteche C, Eliby D, Schwartz OS, Simmons JG, Cowan CSM. 2021. The gut microbiota in anxiety and depression: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev 83:101943. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ren T, Boutin S, Humphries MM, Dantzer B, Gorrell JC, Coltman DW, McAdam AG, Wu M. 2017. Seasonal, spatial, and maternal effects on gut microbiome in wild red squirrels. Microbiome 5:163. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0382-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jin L, Huang Y, Yang S, Wu D, Li C, Deng W, Zhao K, He Y, Li B, Zhang G, Xiong Y, Wei R, Li G, Wu H, Zhang H, Zou L. 2021. Diet, habitat environment and lifestyle conversion affect the gut microbiomes of giant pandas. Sci Total Environ 770:145316. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dong TS, Gupta A. 2019. Influence of early life, diet, and the environment on the microbiome. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:231–242. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Badal VD, Vaccariello ED, Murray ER, Yu KE, Knight R, Jeste DV, Nguyen TT. 2020. The gut microbiome, aging, and longevity: a systematic review. Nutrients 12:3759. doi: 10.3390/nu12123759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Holingue C, Budavari AC, Rodriguez KM, Zisman CR, Windheim G, Fallin MD. 2020. Sex differences in the gut-brain axis: implications for mental health. Curr Psychiatry Rep 22:83. doi: 10.1007/s11920-020-01202-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Janiak MC, Montague MJ, Villamil CI, Stock MK, Trujillo AE, DePasquale AN, Orkin JD, Bauman Surratt SE, Gonzalez O, Platt ML, Martinez MI, Anton SC, Dominguez-Bello MG, Melin AD, Higham JP. 2021. Age and sex-associated variation in the multi-site microbiome of an entire social group of free-ranging rhesus macaques. Microbiome 9:68. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01009-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Garud NR, Pollard KS. 2020. Population genetics in the human microbiome. Trends Genet 36:53–67. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chiu K, Warner G, Nowak RA, Flaws JA, Mei W. 2020. The impact of environmental chemicals on the gut microbiome. Toxicol Sci 176:253–284. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaa065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Borbon-Garcia A, Reyes A, Vives-Florez M, Caballero S. 2017. Captivity shapes the gut microbiota of Andean bears: insights into health surveillance. Front Microbiol 8:1316. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.White BA, Lamed R, Bayer EA, Flint HJ. 2014. Biomass utilization by gut microbiomes. Annu Rev Microbiol 68:279–296. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhu L, Yang Z, Yao R, Xu L, Chen H, Gu X, Wu T, Yang X. 2018. Potential mechanism of detoxification of cyanide compounds by gut microbiomes of bamboo-eating pandas. mSphere 3:e00229-18. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00229-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kohl KD, Weiss RB, Cox J, Dale C, Dearing MD. 2014. Gut microbes of mammalian herbivores facilitate intake of plant toxins. Ecol Lett 17:1238–1246. doi: 10.1111/ele.12329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Maher IE, Griffith JE, Lau Q, Reeves T, Higgins DP. 2014. Expression profiles of the immune genes CD4, CD8β, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10 in mitogen-stimulated koala lymphocytes (Phascolarctos cinereus) by qRT-PCR. PeerJ 2:e280. doi: 10.7717/peerj.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nyari S, Waugh CA, Dong J, Quigley BL, Hanger J, Loader J, Polkinghorne A, Timms P. 2017. Epidemiology of chlamydial infection and disease in a free-ranging koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) population. PLoS One 12:e0190114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Madden D, Whaite A, Jones E, Belov K, Timms P, Polkinghorne A. 2018. Koala immunology and infectious diseases: how much can the koala bear? Dev Comp Immunol 82:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2018.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mathew M, Beagley KW, Timms P, Polkinghorne A. 2013. Preliminary characterization of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-10 responses to Chlamydia pecorum infection in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). PLoS One 8:e59958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wiertsema SP, van Bergenhenegouwen J, Garssen J, Knippels LMJ. 2021. The interplay between the gut microbiome and the immune system in the context of infectious diseases throughout life and the role of nutrition in optimizing treatment strategies. Nutrients 13:886. doi: 10.3390/nu13030886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tilg H, Zmora N, Adolph TE, Elinav E. 2020. The intestinal microbiota fuelling metabolic inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 20:40–54. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0198-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Clemente JC, Manasson J, Scher JU. 2018. The role of the gut microbiome in systemic inflammatory disease. BMJ 360:j5145. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Blyton MDJ, Soo RM, Hugenholtz P, Moore BD. 2022. Maternal inheritance of the koala gut microbiome and its compositional and functional maturation during juvenile development. Environ Microbiol 24:475–493. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wastyk HC, Fragiadakis GK, Perelman D, Dahan D, Merrill BD, Yu FB, Topf M, Gonzalez CG, Van Treuren W, Han S, Robinson JL, Elias JE, Sonnenburg ED, Gardner CD, Sonnenburg JL. 2021. Gut-microbiota-targeted diets modulate human immune status. Cell 184:4137–4153 e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kim N, Jeon SH, Ju IG, Gee MS, Do J, Oh MS, Lee JK. 2021. Transplantation of gut microbiota derived from Alzheimer’s disease mouse model impairs memory function and neurogenesis in C57BL/6 mice. Brain Behav Immun 98:357–365. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Brice KL, Trivedi P, Jeffries TC, Blyton MDJ, Mitchell C, Singh BK, Moore BD. 2019. The Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) faecal microbiome differs with diet in a wild population. PeerJ 7:e6534. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ley RE, Hamady M, Lozupone C, Turnbaugh PJ, Ramey RR, Bircher JS, Schlegel ML, Tucker TA, Schrenzel MD, Knight R, Gordon JI. 2008. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 320:1647–1651. doi: 10.1126/science.1155725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shiffman ME, Soo RM, Dennis PG, Morrison M, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P. 2017. Gene and genome-centric analyses of koala and wombat fecal microbiomes point to metabolic specialization for Eucalyptus digestion. PeerJ 5:e4075. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Luna E, Parkar SG, Kirmiz N, Hartel S, Hearn E, Hossine M, Kurdian A, Mendoza C, Orr K, Padilla L, Ramirez K, Salcedo P, Serrano E, Choudhury B, Paulchakrabarti M, Parker CT, Huynh S, Cooper K, Flores GE. 2022. Utilization efficiency of human milk oligosaccharides by human-associated Akkermansia is strain dependent. Appl Environ Microbiol 88:e0148721. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01487-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang T, Li Q, Cheng L, Buch H, Zhang F. 2019. Akkermansia muciniphila is a promising probiotic. Microb Biotechnol 12:1109–1125. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ansaldo E, Slayden LC, Ching KL, Koch MA, Wolf NK, Plichta DR, Brown EM, Graham DB, Xavier RJ, Moon JJ, Barton GM. 2019. Akkermansia muciniphila induces intestinal adaptive immune responses during homeostasis. Science 364:1179–1184. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw7479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sun F, Zhang Q, Zhao J, Zhang H, Zhai Q, Chen W. 2019. A potential species of next-generation probiotics? The dark and light sides of Bacteroides fragilis in health. Food Res Int 126:108590. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Marcobal A, Barboza M, Sonnenburg ED, Pudlo N, Martens EC, Desai P, Lebrilla CB, Weimer BC, Mills DA, German JB, Sonnenburg JL. 2011. Bacteroides in the infant gut consume milk oligosaccharides via mucus-utilization pathways. Cell Host Microbe 10:507–514. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wexler HM. 2007. Bacteroides: the good, the bad, and the nitty-gritty. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:593–621. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00008-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sinclair HA, Chapman P, Omaleki L, Bergh H, Turni C, Blackall P, Papacostas L, Braslins P, Sowden D, Nimmo GR. 2019. Identification of Lonepinella sp. in koala bite wound infections, Queensland, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis 25:153–156. doi: 10.3201/eid2501.171359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yeoman CJ, Fields CJ, Lepercq P, Ruiz P, Forano E, White BA, Mosoni P. 2021. Vivo Competitions between Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminococcus albus in a gnotobiotic sheep model revealed by multi-omic analyses. mBio 12:e03533-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03533-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Venditto I, Luis AS, Rydahl M, Schuckel J, Fernandes VO, Vidal-Melgosa S, Bule P, Goyal A, Pires VM, Dourado CG, Ferreira LM, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B, Knox JP, Basle A, Najmudin S, Gilbert HJ, Willats WG, Fontes CM. 2016. Complexity of the Ruminococcus flavefaciens cellulosome reflects an expansion in glycan recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:7136–7141. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601558113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bule P, Alves VD, Leitao A, Ferreira LM, Bayer EA, Smith SP, Gilbert HJ, Najmudin S, Fontes CM. 2016. Single binding mode integration of hemicellulose-degrading enzymes via adaptor scaffoldins in Ruminococcus flavefaciens cellulosome. J Biol Chem 291:26658–26669. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.761643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yang T, Santisteban MM, Rodriguez V, Li E, Ahmari N, Carvajal JM, Zadeh M, Gong M, Qi Y, Zubcevic J, Sahay B, Pepine CJ, Raizada MK, Mohamadzadeh M. 2015. Gut dysbiosis is linked to hypertension. Hypertension 65:1331–1340. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Magne F, Gotteland M, Gauthier L, Zazueta A, Pesoa S, Navarrete P, Balamurugan R. 2020. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio: a relevant marker of gut dysbiosis in obese patients? Nutrients 12:1474. doi: 10.3390/nu12051474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mariat D, Firmesse O, Levenez F, Guimarăes V, Sokol H, Doré J, Corthier G, Furet J-P. 2009. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio of the human microbiota changes with age. BMC Microbiol 9:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wei Z-Y, Rao J-H, Tang M-T, Zhao G-A, Li QC, Wu L-M, Liu S-Q, Li B-H, Xiao B-Q, Liu X-Y, Chen J-H. 2022. Characterization of changes and driver microbes in gut microbiota during healthy aging using a captive monkey model. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 20:350–365. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2021.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Blyton MDJ, Soo RM, Hugenholtz P, Moore BD. 2022. Characterization of the juvenile koala gut microbiome across wild populations. Environ Microbiol 24:4209–4219. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Visconti A, Le Roy CI, Rosa F, Rossi N, Martin TC, Mohney RP, Li W, de Rinaldis E, Bell JT, Venter JC, Nelson KE, Spector TD, Falchi M. 2019. Interplay between the human gut microbiome and host metabolism. Nat Commun 10:4505. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12476-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Reese AT, Kearney SM. 2019. Incorporating functional trade-offs into studies of the gut microbiota. Curr Opin Microbiol 50:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2019.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Vijendravarma RK, Narasimha S, Chakrabarti S, Babin A, Kolly S, Lemaitre B, Kawecki TJ. 2015. Gut physiology mediates a trade-off between adaptation to malnutrition and susceptibility to food-borne pathogens. Ecol Lett 18:1078–1086. doi: 10.1111/ele.12490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yao X, Smolka AJ. 2019. Gastric parietal cell physiology and Helicobacter pylori-induced disease. Gastroenterology 156:2158–2173. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Cai Q, Shi P, Yuan Y, Peng J, Ou X, Zhou W, Li J, Su T, Lin L, Cai S, He Y, Xu J. 2021. Inflammation-associated senescence promotes Helicobacter pylori-induced atrophic gastritis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:857–880. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nagata M, Toyonaga K, Ishikawa E, Haji S, Okahashi N, Takahashi M, Izumi Y, Imamura A, Takato K, Ishida H, Nagai S, Illarionov P, Stocker BL, Timmer MSM, Smith DGM, Williams SJ, Bamba T, Miyamoto T, Arita M, Appelmelk BJ, Yamasaki S. 2021. Helicobacter pylori metabolites exacerbate gastritis through C-type lectin receptors. J Exp Med 218:e20200815. doi: 10.1084/jem.20200815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rea IM, Gibson DS, McGilligan V, McNerlan SE, Alexander HD, Ross OA. 2018. Age and age-related diseases: role of inflammation triggers and cytokines. Front Immunol 9:586. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hashem MA, Kayesh MEH, Maetani F, Goto A, Nagata N, Kasori A, Imanishi T, Tsukiyama-Kohara K. 2022. Subtype distribution and expression of the koala retrovirus in the Japanese zoo koala population. Infect Genet Evol 102:105297. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2022.105297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Morris KM, Mathew M, Waugh C, Ujvari B, Timms P, Polkinghorne A, Belov K. 2015. Identification, characterization and expression analysis of natural killer receptor genes in Chlamydia pecorum-infected koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). BMC Genomics 16:796. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2035-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Shen H, Lu Z, Xu Z, Shen Z. 2017. Diet-induced reconstruction of mucosal microbiota associated with alterations of epithelium lectin expression and regulation in the maintenance of rumen homeostasis. Sci Rep 7:3941. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03478-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Maher IE, Patterson J, Curnick M, Devlin J, Higgins DP. 2019. Altered immune parameters associated with koala retrovirus (KoRV) and chlamydial infection in free ranging Victorian koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). Sci Rep 9:11170. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47666-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kayesh MEH, Hashem MA, Maetani F, Eiei T, Mochizuki K, Ochiai S, Ito A, Ito N, Sakurai H, Asai T, Tsukiyama-Kohara K. 2020. CD4, CD8b, and cytokines expression profiles in peripheral blood mononuclear cells infected with different subtypes of KoRV from koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) in a Japanese zoo. Viruses 12:1415. doi: 10.3390/v12121415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Peterson CT, Rodionov DA, Osterman AL, Peterson SN. 2020. B vitamins and their role in immune regulation and cancer. Nutrients 12:3380. doi: 10.3390/nu12113380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bao B, Kellman BP, Chiang AWT, Zhang Y, Sorrentino JT, York AK, Mohammad MA, Haymond MW, Bode L, Lewis NE. 2021. Correcting for sparsity and interdependence in glycomics by accounting for glycan biosynthesis. Nat Commun 12:4988. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Moeller AH, Suzuki TA, Lin D, Lacey EA, Wasser SK, Nachman MW. 2017. Dispersal limitation promotes the diversification of the mammalian gut microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:13768–13773. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700122114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, Alexander H, Alm EJ, Arumugam M, Asnicar F, Bai Y, Bisanz JE, Bittinger K, Brejnrod A, Brislawn CJ, Brown CT, Callahan BJ, Caraballo-Rodriguez AM, Chase J, Cope EK, Da Silva R, Diener C, Dorrestein PC, et al. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37:852–857. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Martin M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput. EMBnet j 17:10. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Fig. S1 to S7. Download spectrum.04101-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 1.4 MB (1.4MB, pdf)
Data Availability Statement
All 16S sequence data used in this study are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under BioProject number PRJNA871357. The data will be made public upon the acceptance of the manuscript.







