Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2022 Dec 14;11(1):e04755-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04755-22

Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors for Death following Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Jingli Lu a,b, Ailing Zhang a,b, Lu Han c, Zhen Guo d, Wenjing Cui e, Yuhua Jiang f, Haiyang Meng a,b,✉
Editor: Tulip A Jhaverig
PMCID: PMC9927413  PMID: 36515527

ABSTRACT

Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Among solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), clinical outcomes and risk factors for death following such infections remain not well documented. A single-center retrospective study was performed. All SOTRs with a CRKP infection at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2021 were included. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to determine risk factors for death following CRKP infection. We identified 94 SOTRs with CRKP infection, with a median age of 50 years old. CRKP infections resulted in 38.3% of overall 30-day mortality. On multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for death following CRKP infection included older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.044; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.007 to 1.083; P = 0.02), allograft failure (HR, 3.962; 95% CI, 1.628 to 9.644; P = 0.002), and septic shock (HR, 8.512; 95% CI, 3.294 to 21.998; P < 0.001). Receiving appropriate targeted therapy was associated with a reduced hazard of death (HR, 0.245; 95% CI, 0.111 to 0.543; P = 0.001). Our study characterized the clinical features and mortality in SOTRs with CRKP infection. The protective effects of appropriate targeted therapy highlight the importance of assessing how antibiotic choices affect the clinical outcomes among SOTRs.

IMPORTANCE Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections are increasingly identified in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs), but data on the clinical outcomes and risk factors for death following such infections remain limited. Here, we reported CRKP infection was associated with 38.3% of overall 30-day mortality in SOTRs. Independent risk factors for death after CRKP infection included older age, allograft failure, and septic shock. Appropriate targeted therapy was important for alleviating the impact of CRKP infections on these SOTRs.

KEYWORDS: carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, organ transplant, septic shock, allograft failure, appropriate targeted therapy

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are a public health concern; infections caused by these organisms are associated with high mortality and limited treatment options (1). Among them, the carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is of particular concern because it is the most common Enterobacterales species that is resistant to carbapenems (2). In China, K. pneumoniae strains account for up to 60% of CRE infections (3). According to the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET, http://www.chinets.com/), the prevalence of carbapenem resistance in clinical K. pneumoniae increased by nearly 8-fold in the past 15 years, from 2.9% in 2005 to 24.2% in 2020 (based on meropenem resistance) (4). Although global CRKP epidemics vary regionally, CRKP infection has emerged as a major threat in hospitals worldwide (5–7).

CRKP infections occur more frequently in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) (8, 9). SOTRs are exposed to broad-spectrum antibiotics, surgical interventions, and the use of immunosuppressants, which drive an increased risk of infection (8–10). In particular, clinical outcomes following CRKP infection in SOTRs are poor, with a mortality rate five times greater than those without CRKP infection (11). CRKP infection has reported a 71% overall mortality among liver transplant recipients (12). In 43 kidney transplant recipients with early CRKP infection, the rate of infection-related mortality was 37.2% (13). Another study of kidney transplant recipients found that CRKP bacteriuria was associated with increased overall mortality of 30% but not graft failure (14). It reveals that the rates of death vary depending on the type of organ transplant studied and infection types. As a result, it is crucial to identify risk factors for clinical outcomes following CRKP infection among SOTRs.

However, previous studies are limited by the small sample size and types of organ transplants. In this study, we sought to describe (i) the clinical characteristics, (ii) the impacts of different antibiotics on clinical outcomes, and (iii) the risk factors for mortality following CRKP infection, using a cohort of solid organ transplant types.

RESULTS

Study population and clinical characteristics.

Baseline characteristics of the cohort stratified by organ type are listed in Table 1. Of 94 unique individuals with CRKP infection after organ transplant, 53 received a liver transplant, 21 received a kidney transplant, and 20 received a lung transplant. The median age was 50 years (interquartile range [IQR], 42 to 57); 83.0% were male. The most commonly reported comorbidities included hypertension (29.8%) and diabetes (14.9%). In the 3 months prior to the CRKP infection, 72 (76.6%) had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and 78 (83.0%) had received carbapenem therapy. Median time from admission to the diagnosis of CRKP infection was 19 days (6 to 36 days). A total of 73.4% of patients developed CRKP infections within 3 months post-transplant, and 53.2% of patients received induction immunosuppression within 2 months before the CRKP infection. More than 70% of patients received corticosteroids, mycophenolate, and tacrolimus as maintenance immunosuppression. Lung recipients were more likely to have a longer stay in the ICU and longer duration of mechanical ventilation. Kidney recipients more often have diabetes and are more often hospitalized due to infection.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of solid organ transplant recipients with CRKP infectiona

Characteristics All patients (n = 94) Liver (n = 53) Kidney (n = 21) Lung (n = 20) P valueb
Demographics
 Age (yr) 50 (42 to 57) 49 (43 to 55) 49 (39 to 56) 54 (37 to 62) 0.339
 Sex, male 78 (83.0%) 49 (92.5%) 12 (57.1%) 17 (85.0%) 0.001
Comorbidities at the time of CRKP infection
 Diabetes mellitus 14 (14.9%) 10 (18.9%) 3 (14.3%) 1 (5.0%) 0.393
 Hypertension 28 (29.8%) 12 (22.6%) 15 (71.4%) 1 (5.0%) <0.001
 aCCI 3 (3 to 5) 5 (3 to 6) 3 (2 to 3) 3 (1 to 3) <0.001
Reason for admission
 Transplant operation 64 (68.1%) 42 (79.2%) 6 (28.6%) 16 (90.0%) 0.001
 Infection 18 (19.1%) 5 (9.4%) 10 (47.6%) 3 (15.0%)
 Allograft function declined 3 (3.2%) 2 (3.8%) 1 (4.8%) 0 (0)
 Other systemic symptoms 9 (9.6%) 4 (7.5%) 4 (19.0%) 1 (5.0%)
Healthcare and antibiotic exposures prior  to CRKP infection
 Carbapenem exposure within 3 mo 78 (83.0%) 45 (84.9%) 14 (66.7%) 19 (95.0%) 0.058
 Surgery within 30 days 65 (69.1%) 41 (77.4%) 7 (33.3%) 17 (85.0%) <0.001
 ICU admission within 3 mo 72 (76.6%) 43 (81.1%) 9 (42.9%) 20 (100%) <0.001
Transplant characteristics
 Time from admission to CRKP infection (days) 19 (6 to 36) 22 (11 to 43) 10 (2 to 23) 19 (6 to 48) 0.012
 Infection time <3 mo post-transplant 69 (73.4%) 46 (86.8%) 6 (28.6%) 17 (85.0%) <0.001
Use of induction immunosuppression within  2 mo before the CRKP infection
 Basiliximab/ATG 50 (53.2%) 43 (81.1%) 3 (14.3%) 4 (20.0%) <0.001
Use of immunosuppression during the time  of the CRKP infection
 Corticosteroids 70 (74.5%) 34 (64.2%) 17 (81.0%) 19 (95.0%) 0.019
 Mycophenolate 72 (76.6%) 50 (94.3%) 14 (66.7%) 8 (40.0%) <0.001
 Tacrolimus 82 (87.2%) 48 (90.6%) 17 (81.0%) 17 (85.0%) 0.497
 Sirolimus 14 (14.9%) 14 (26.4%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.001
 Cyclosporine 10 (10.6%) 2 (3.8%) 4 (19.0%) 4 (20.0%) 0.027
Location at the time of CRKP infection
 Medical ward, non-ICU 5 (5.3%) 4 (7.5%) 1 (4.8%) 0 (0) 0.104
 Surgical ward, non-ICU 38 (40.4%) 25 (47.2%) 9 (42.9%) 4 (20.0%)
 ICU 51 (54.3%) 24 (45.3%) 11 (52.4%) 16 (80.0%)
Severity of illness and complications during  the CRKP infection
 ICU admission 61 (64.9%) 32 (60.4%) 12 (57,1%) 17 (85.0%) 0.110
 Length of ICU (days) 2 (0 to 9) 2 (0 to 5) 2 (0 to 6.5) 9.5 (3.25 to 17) 0.002
 Mechanical ventilation 47 (50%) 24 (45.3%) 8 (38.1%) 15 (75.0%) 0.036
 Duration of mechanical ventilation (days) 10 (0 to 4) 0 (0 to 2) 0 (0 to 3) 7 (0 to 10) 0.003
 Respiratory failurec 29 (30.9%) 11 (20.8%) 9 (42.9%) 9 (45.0%) 0.061
 Requirement of CRRT 22 (23.4%) 11 (20.8%) 6 (28.6%) 5 (25.0%) 0.756
 Allograft failured 32 (34.0%) 16 (30.2%) 5 (23.8%) 11 (55.0%) 0.067
 Septic shock 26 (27.7%) 14 (26.4%) 7 (33.3%) 5 (25.0%) 0.817
Laboratory variables at the time of CRKP  infection
 Absolute neutrophil count (109 cells/liter) 6.3 (3.8 to 10.0) 5.2 (3.2 to 8.2) 5.5 (3.7 to 8.3) 11.8 (6.5 to 15.7) <0.001
 Absolute white blood cell count (109 cells/liter) 7.2 (4.7 to 11.0) 6.0 (4.0 to 9.1) 7.1 (4.6 to 9.9) 11.9 (7.4 to 16.4) 0.001
 Creatinine (mg/dL) 90.0 (61.8 to 158.0) 89.1 (61.5 to 134) 159.0 (114.7 to 390.0) 66.0 (39.8 to 84.8) <0.001
 Alkaline phosphatase (U/liter) 106.5 (67.0 to 162.0) 132.0 (80.0 to 185.0) 113 (55.0 to 165.1) 68 (51.75 to 114.5) 0.002
 Total bilirubin (μmol/L) 19.5 (10.0 to 67.7) 47.2 (21.1 to 166.3) 7.9 (5.5 to 12.8) 14.4 (9.7 to 19.3) <0.001
 Albumin (g/liter) 37.1 (32.8 to 42.4) 36.5 (33.1 to 40.9) 34.6 (27.2 to 38.4) 42.1 (38.4 to 46.5) <0.001
a

The data are n (%) or median (interquartile range). aCCI, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index; anti-thymocyte globulin; CRKP, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; ICU, intensive care unit.

b

P value comparing liver, kidney, and lung transplant, as well as distributions, where applicable.

c

A total of 29 patients experienced respiratory failure; 25 of them received mechanical ventilation.

d

Presence of allograft failure included graft failure prior to the CRKP infection (n = 19) and new-onset graft failure (n = 13).

Characteristics of CRKP infections.

Lung infections were the most common type occurring post-transplant (n = 60, 63.8%), followed by bloodstream infections (BSIs, n = 27, 28.7%), intra-abdominal infections (n = 9, 9.6%), and surgical site infections (n = 8, 8.5%). Five patients (5.3%) had genitourinary tract infections, five (5.3%) had hepatobiliary infections, and two (2.1%) had skin and soft tissue infections (Table 2). There were 15 patients of 94 (16%) who had infections in more than one site (Table 2). All isolates were resistant to imipenem, meropenem, and ciprofloxacin. The rate of susceptibility to aztreonam, amikacin, gentamicin, and TMP-SMX were, respectively, 2.2%, 31.9%, 21.8%, and 35.1%. Susceptibility to tigecycline was at relatively high levels (96.7%, 87 of 90). All isolates were susceptible to polymyxin B (Fig. 1).

TABLE 2.

Characteristics of CRKP infectionsa

Characteristics All patients (n = 94) Liver (n = 53) Kidney (n = 21) Lung (n = 20) P valueb
Infection types
 Lung infection 60 (63.8%) 33 (62.3%) 9 (42.9%) 18 (90.0%) 0.006
 Intra-abdominal infection 9 (9.6%) 9 (17.0%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.014
 BSI 27 (28.7%) 17 (32.1%) 7 (33.3%) 3 (15.0%) 0.335
 Genitourinary tract infection 5 (5.3%) 0 (0) 5 (23.8%) 0 (0) 0.001
 Skin and soft tissue infection 2 (2.1%) 1 (1.9%) 0 (0) 1 (5.0%) 0.430
 Hepatobiliary infection 5 (5.3%) 5 (9.4%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.226
 Surgical site infection 8 (8.5%) 4 (7.5%) 3 (14.3%) 1 (5.0%) 0.597
No. of infection sites
 1 79 (84.0%) 44 (83.0%) 18 (85.7%) 17 (85.0%) 0.962
 2 11 (11.7%) 5 (9.4%) 3 (14.3%) 3 (15.0%)
 3 2 (2.1%) 2 (3.8%) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 4 2 (2.1%) 2 (3.8%) 0 (0) 0 (0)
a

The data are n (%). BSI, bloodstream infection; CRKP, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae.

b

P value comparing liver, kidney, and lung transplant, as well as distributions, where applicable.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

In vitro antibiotic susceptibility. TMP/SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

Treatment and outcomes of CRKP infections.

Appropriate empirical therapy and targeted therapy were given to 30.9% and 71.3% of patients with CRKP infections, respectively; 26.6% received at least one active antibacterial agent within 24 h after infection; and 13.8% received two or three active antibiotics (n = 13). Tigecycline and carbapenems were the most common antimicrobials, with both used in 38 cases. Twelve patients (12.8%) received an antibiotic regimen containing polymyxin B, 27 (28.7%) ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI), and 28 (29.8%) other β-lactam antibiotics. Mortality rates at 14 days, 30 days, and 6 months after initial CRKP infections were 28.7%, 38.3%, and 46.8%, respectively (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Management of CRKP infection and outcomesa

Management All patients (n = 94) Liver (n = 53) Kidney (n = 21) Lung (n = 20) P valueb
Effective antibiotic received
 Appropriate empirical therapy 29 (30.9%) 15 (28.3%) 4 (19.0%) 10 (50.0%) 0.084
 Appropriate targeted therapyc 67 (71.3%) 38 (71.7%) 12 (57.1%) 17 (85.0%) 0.140
 Effective antibiotics within 24 hours 25 (26.6%) 13 (24.5%) 3 (14.3%) 9 (45.0%) 0.074
Targeted antibiotic therapy
 Tigecycline 38 (40.4%) 23 (43.4%) 8 (38.1%) 7 (35.0%) 0.812
 Polymyxin B 12 (12.8%) 1 (1.9%) 1 (4.8%) 10 (50.0%) <0.001
 CAZ-AVI 27 (28.7%) 17 (32.1%) 3 (14.3%) 7 (35.0%) 0.264
 Carbapenems 38 (40.4%) 22 (41.5%) 10 (47.6%) 6 (30.0%) 0.512
 Other β-lactam antibioticsd 28 (29.8%) 18 (34.0%) 5 (23.8%) 5 (25.0%) 0.620
 Aminoglycosides 6 (6.4%) 2 (3.8%) 1 (4.8%) 3 (15.0%) 0.212
 Fluoroquinolones 7 (7.4%) 4 (7.5%) 1 (4.8%) 2 (10%) 0.880
 TMP/SMX 5 (5.3%) 0 (0) 3 (14.3%) 2 (10%) 0.014
 Fosfomycin 1 (1.1%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (5.0%) 0.213
14-day mortality 27 (28.7%) 15 (28.3%) 7 (33.3%) 5 (25.0%) 0.864
30-day mortality 36 (38.3%) 19 (35.8%) 10 (47.6%) 7 (35.0%) 0.626
6-mo mortality 44 (46.8%) 22 (41.5%) 11 (52.4%) 11 (55.0%) 0.522
a

The data are n (%). CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam; CRKP, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae; TMP/SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

b

P value comparing liver, kidney, and lung transplant, as well as distributions, where applicable.

c

A total of 27 patients did not receive appropriate targeted therapy, 7 died prior to the availability of susceptibility results, and 1 patient was discharged alive prior to the availability of susceptibility results.

d

Other β-lactam antibiotics: aztreonam (n = 2); cefoperazone/sulbactam (n = 19); mezlocillin/sulbactam (n = 3); piperacillin-tazobactam (n = 3); and ceftizoxime (n = 1).

With regard to three active antibacterial agents, all-cause mortality at day 30 was 30.0% (6 of 20) for the CAZ-AVI monotherapy, 66.7% (4 of 6) for the polymyxin B monotherapy, and 27.6% (8 of 29) for the tigecycline monotherapy (Table 4). Regarding all-cause mortality in patients receiving CAZ-AVI monotherapy and tigecycline monotherapy, survival curves crossed, and no differences were observed (Fig. 2A). The numbers in other therapeutic regimens were too low for meaningful analysis.

TABLE 4.

Impacts of active antimicrobial regimens on the mortality of patients with CRKP infection in SOTRsa

Antimicrobial regimens All patients Infection sitesb
Respiratory infection BSI
CAZ-AVI 6/20 (30.0%) 4/15 (26.7%) 2/5 (40.0%)
CAZ-AVI + polymyxin B 0/2 (0) 0/1 (0) 0/1 (0)
CAZ-AVI + tigecycline 2/5 (40.0%) 0/1 (0) 0/1 (0)
Polymyxin B 4/6 (66.7%) 3/5 (60.0%) 1/2 (50.0%)
Polymyxin B + tigecycline 1/4 (25.0%) 1/4 (25.0%) 0/0 (0)
Tigecycline 8/29 (27.6%) 6/17 (35.3%) 2/8 (25.0%)
a

The data are n/N (%), where N is the number of patients receiving respective antimicrobial regimens, and n is the number of patients who died within 30 days. BSI, bloodstream infection; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam; CRKP, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae; SOTR, solid organ transplant recipient.

b

Other infection sites have been omitted due to limited numbers.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Kaplan-Meier curves for all-cause mortality. (A) Survival for solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) with carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) infection within 30 days by active antibacterial agent. (B) Survival for SOTRs with CRKP infection within 30 days by targeted therapy. (C) Survival for SOTRs with CRKP infection within 30 days by empirical therapy. (D) Survival for SOTRs with CRKP infection within 30 days by effective antibiotics within 24 h. (E) Survival for SOTRs with CRKP infection within 30 days by type of organ transplant. (F) Survival for SOTRs with CRKP infection within 30 days by infection site. BSI, bloodstream infection; CAZ-AVI, ceftazidime-avibactam.

All-cause 30-day mortality was lower in patients who received an appropriate targeted therapy than those who received inappropriate targeted therapy (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2B). No significant difference was found in 30-day mortality stratified by the appropriate empirical therapy (Fig. 2C), effective therapy within 24 h (Fig. 2D), types of organ transplant (Fig. 2E), and infection sites (BSI versus non-BSI) (Fig. 2F).

Risk factors for death following CRKP infection.

In the multivariable analysis, the independent risk factors for death within 30 days included older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.044; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.007 to 1.083; P = 0.02), allograft failure (HR, 3.962; 95% CI, 1.628 to 9.644; P = 0.002), and septic shock (HR, 8.512; 95% CI, 3.294 to 21.998; P < 0.001). Conversely, receiving appropriate targeted therapy was associated with a reduced hazard of death (HR, 0.245; 95% CI, 0.111 to 0.543; P = 0.001) (Table 5).

TABLE 5.

Multivariable Cox regression of risk factors for death following CRKP infectiona

Risk factors HR 95% CI P value
All patients
 Older age 1.044 1.007 to 1.083 0.02
 Allograft failure 3.962 1.628 to 9.644 0.002
 Septic shock 8.512 3.294 to 21.998 <0.001
 Appropriate targeted therapy 0.245 0.111 to 0.543 0.001
Liver transplant recipientsb
 Allograft failure 9.198 3.026 to 27.954 <0.001
Patients with lung infectionb
 Older age 1.117 1.030 to 1.212 0.008
 Allograft failure 6.660 2.026 to 21.892 0.002
 Septic shock 4.576 1.608 to 13.024 0.004
 Infection time less than 3 mo post-transplant 0.171 0.062 to 0.472 0.001
a

CI, confidence interval; CRKP, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae; HR, hazard ratio.

b

The values are for lung and kidney transplant recipients; other infection sites have been omitted due to insufficient numbers for analysis. The relevant analysis for other subgroups was not implemented because of the limited sample size.

We did a subgroup analysis. Among liver transplant recipients, there was a significant association between allograft failure and the hazard of mortality (HR, 9.198; 95% CI, 3.026 to 27.954; P < 0.001). After stratifying infection sites, in SOTRs with lung infection, older age (HR, 1.117; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.212; P = 0.008), allograft failure (HR, 6.66; 95% CI, 2.026 to 21.892; P = 0.002), and septic shock (HR, 4.576; 95% CI, 1.608 to 13.024; P = 0.004) were associated with greater hazard of mortality, whereas time to infection after transplant less than 3 months was associated reduced hazard of death (HR, 0.171; 95% CI, 0.062 to 0.472; P = 0.001) (Table 5).

DISCUSSION

In our retrospective cohort study, 94 CRKP cases were reported across three types of solid organ transplant populations, resulting in 38.3% overall 30-day mortality. This study represents the largest cohort of SOTRs with CRKP infection documented to date. Previous studies have found substantially higher rates of death (12, 15, 16), reaching up to 71% in liver transplant (12). The observed mortality difference might be attributed to the variation by types of organ transplant and infection sites, as well as the duration of follow-up and sample size (12–17). In addition, during the study period, the failure to access novel anti-CRKP antibiotics, such as CAZ-AVI, could have led to high mortality (12, 16).

In our multivariate analysis, the most predictive factor was septic shock, with an 8-fold increased risk of 30-day mortality. Septic shock has been shown to be a risk factor for mortality from CRKP infection in nontransplant patients (18–20) and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria among abdominal SOTRs (21). Septic shock is a life-threatening disorder defined as sepsis with hypotension and perfusion abnormalities, with in-hospital mortality rates approaching 30 to 50% (22). SOTRs with sepsis had a significant relative reduction in mortality outcomes compared with nontransplant patients, because the immunosuppression used in SOTRs could modulate dysregulated systemic inflammatory and immune response to microbial invasion (23). However, severe sepsis remains among the main causes of death in SOTRs (24). Thus, septic shock caused by CRKP infection may accelerate death in SOTRs.

In addition to septic shock, we identified other risk factors for death following CRKP infection that was important to the SOTR population. First, we found that older age was associated with an increased hazard of death in all SOTRs, which has been confirmed in nontransplanted patients with CRKP respiratory infection (4). Consistent with this, in our subgroup analysis of infection sites, older age was an attributable factor in death due to CRKP lung infection. These results underscored the importance of respiratory defenses in CRKP infection. Second, allograft failure was an independent risk factor for death. Indeed, since septic shock is accompanied by multiorgan failure, allograft dysfunctions may become more apparent during the sepsis episode. The presence of allograft failure likely reflects that these patients are more severely ill and require more hospital procedures, such as mechanical ventilation and CRRT, which were identified as potential risk factors in our univariable analysis.

Previous studies have found that appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy was an important protective factor in patients with CRKP infection (25, 26). Appropriate antibiotic therapy within 24 h results in 30% reduction in 30-day mortality rates (26). In our study, effective antibiotic therapy within 24 or 72 h did not show a protective effect on the prognosis of patients with CRKP infection. A similar result was observed in nontransplant patients from previous reports in China (4). Nevertheless, we indeed demonstrated appropriate targeted antibiotic therapy was associated with a reduced hazard of death in SOTRs, but we failed to identify specific antibiotics to use as a protective factor.

Regarding the active antibiotics used, treatments for CRKP infection were primarily based on tigecycline (40.4%). A similar antibiotic pattern was reported in a recent study that surveyed the clinical management of CRKP in mainland China; it reported that tigecycline was the most prescribed antibiotic (27). Our study included 64% of lung infection and 29% of BSI, which are not recommended indicators for tigecycline. It reinforced concerns that tigecycline may be associated with increased mortality, which has been confirmed in nontransplant patients (4). In contrast, CAZ-AVI—superior to polymyxins and tigecycline—is considered to be the preferred treatment for patients with severe CRKP infection (20, 28, 29). Thus, treatment of an antibiotic regimen containing CAZ-AVI was an independent protective factor for 30-day mortality in kidney transplant (30). However, only a subset of patients received CAZ-AVI as empirical (4.3%) and targeted therapy (28.7%) in our study. Unexpectedly, in multivariate analysis, we failed to observe the association between antibiotics and mortality; we found no difference in 30-day mortality among patients who received CAZ-AVI monotherapy and tigecycline monotherapy. This discrepancy may stem from the difference in disease severity. In our study, patients treated with tigecycline experienced less severe infection, whereas CAZ-AVI as salvage therapy was used in patients with higher disease severity. This hypothesis can be supported by the proportion of ICU admission (66.7%) and mechanical ventilation requirement (55.6%) in the CAZ-AVI group, compared with 55.2 and 31.0%, respectively, in the tigecycline group. Also, the small size of the sample population should be considered. Therefore, it is necessary to further evaluate the efficacy of active antibiotics in the treatment of CRKP infection in the SOTR population.

Interestingly, we found that the onset of infection within first 3 months after transplant was associated with reduced hazard of death in SOTRs with lung infection. This finding appears to be counterintuitive, given that the majority of infections occurred during the early post-transplant phase (31, 32), and these patients have had poorer survival outcomes due to their intensive immunosuppressive regimens and recent surgical procedures. Our results may be explained in several ways. First, nearly one-third of the patients with CRKP infection in our study developed septic shock. Patients with septic shock often present with massive proinflammatory cytokine-driven hyperinflammatory at the early phase; hence, intense levels of immunosuppression during the early post-transplant phase could limit excessive inflammation and protect these patients from entering an overwhelming hyperinflammatory phase, which substantially prevents disease progression and improves sepsis mortality (33, 34). Another possible explanation is the fact that allograft function declines progressively over time (35, 36), which is one important independent factor for death after infection (37). We found that 28.6% of infections (4 of 14) occurred in the 4- to 12-year period after transplant; therefore, it is possible that chronic allograft damage associated with the late post-transplant period could be attributed to the high mortality rate (37). This hypothesis is supported by our finding that we observed a trend toward high mortality in kidney transplant (47.6%) compared with lung transplant (35.0%) or liver transplant (35.8%). This is likely attributed to the longer time from kidney transplant to CRKP infection, with a median time of 1,518 days.

With regard to types of infection, lung (64%) is the most common source of CRKP infection, followed by BSI (29%). BSI likely accounted for the high overall mortality observed (48.1%), although no significant difference was found. Previous studies also have demonstrated a greater severity of illness and death in nontransplant patients with CRKP BSI, ranging from 30 to 50% (38, 39). Of note, in our analysis, BSI was not an independent predictor of death after controlling for severity of illness and therapeutic strategy.

This study had several limitations. First, the data were collected retrospectively; some variables, such as Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and the production of carbapenemase, were not included, and some variables, such as medicines, lacked in detail. Second, the underlying mechanisms of resistance were not routinely assessed. We cannot rule out the possibility of emergence of hypervirulent CRKP strains, which has occurred in Chinese hospitals (40, 41). Third, some data reflect the biases at our institution. For example, over the period of the study, a tigecycline-containing regimen was widely used, because CAZ-AVI and polymyxin B were not available in the early phase of the study.

Taken together, we found that in SOTRs, CRKP infection was associated with 38.3% overall 30-day mortality. Independent risk factors for death after CRKP infection included older age, allograft failure, and septic shock, while appropriate targeted therapy was an independent protective factor. Allograft failure was an important risk factor, even after stratifying by the site of infection and the type of organ transplant. Nevertheless, rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing and appropriate targeted therapy are urgently needed in the transplant population to alleviate the impact of CRKP infections on these SOTRs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population.

Eligible SOTRs who were adults (≥18 years old) admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January 2018 and December 2021 with CRKP infections were considered. CRKP infection was defined by any K. pneumoniae on cultures that exhibited in vitro nonsusceptibility to any carbapenem. Patients whose medical records lacked sufficient information were excluded. Recurrent infections were excluded; only the first episode of CRKP infection following transplantation was included in our study. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University with a waiver of informed consent because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Data collection.

Data on SOTR were collected retrospectively from the electronic medical records with a standardized report form. Information was collected on the following: demographics (age and gender), comorbidities at the time of CRKP infection (e.g., diabetes, hypertension), laboratory data (neutrophil counts, creatinine, alanine transaminase, total bilirubin, and albumin). For graft characteristics, medications (induction immunosuppression, maintenance immunosuppressants, and antibiotics), transplanted organs, and the date of transplant were collected. Complications that occurred from the diagnosis of CRKP infection to death were recorded and included: length of stay in the ICU, renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation, respiratory failure, septic shock, and graft dysfunction. For microbiology, details of the CRKP infection episode (including dates of positive cultures and in vitro susceptibilities) were recorded. For outcomes, all-cause 14-day, 30-day, and 6-month mortality were recorded.

Definition.

CRKP infection was defined by the presence of the microorganism from the blood cultures or other usually sterile body sites together with clinical and/or radiological signs of infection. Carbapenem exposure was defined as any carbapenem administered within 30 days prior to CRKP infection. Appropriate empirical treatment was defined as the use of at least one dose of an antibiotic to which the CRKP organism was susceptible in vitro during the first 72 h of infection onset. Appropriate targeted therapy was defined as the use of at least one active antimicrobial agent after the availability of susceptibility test results. Allograft failure was defined as the need for retransplantation of the same organ, return to dialysis for kidney transplant recipients (42), or need for persistent mechanical support in transplant recipients (43, 44). For statistical purposes, terminally ill patients discharged home to die were considered to have died at the time of hospital discharge (45).

Susceptibility testing of K. pneumoniae isolates.

All isolates identified from study subjects were tested for susceptibility to antibiotics. Strains were identified by the Vitek 2 compact system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and the Phoenix100 automated system (Becton, Dickinson, Spark, MD, USA). CRKP refers to isolated K. pneumoniae strains that exhibited in vitro nonsusceptibility to at least one of the carbapenems, including meropenem, ertapenem, or imipenem. MICs of aztreonam, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin, polymyxin B, tigecycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazol (TMP-SMX), and ciprofloxacin were tested. The results were interpreted using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints. For polymyxin B susceptibility testing, the data were interpreted using the clinical breakpoints published by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (version 6.0). This methodology represents the workflow in the microbiology laboratory at our institution.

Statistical analysis.

Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. Numerical variables were summarized as the median (IQR). To investigate the differences in characteristics, management of patients, and clinical outcomes, categorical variables were compared with the χ2 test, and continuous variables were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test. Kaplan-Meier survival probability estimates were calculated from the date of infection up to 30 days (all-cause mortality), stratified according to therapeutic strategies and infection sites, and assessed with the log-rank test. We assessed the associations between the exposure variable and clinical outcomes using Cox proportional hazards regression models, with the calculation of HRs and 95% CIs, presented in tables, in all patients and by the types of organ transplant and sites of infection. All analyses were done with SPSS software (version 25.0) and GraphPad software (version 9.4.1). A two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

H.M. and J.L. designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. A.Z., L.H., Z.G., W.C., and Y.J. collected the data. All authors take responsibility for the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

We declare no conflict of interest.

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 82073860.

Contributor Information

Haiyang Meng, Email: mhy_m@qq.com.

Tulip A. Jhaveri, University of Mississippi Medical Center

REFERENCES

  • 1.Guh AY, Bulens SN, Mu Y, Jacob JT, Reno J, Scott J, Wilson LE, Vaeth E, Lynfield R, Shaw KM, Vagnone PM, Bamberg WM, Janelle SJ, Dumyati G, Concannon C, Beldavs Z, Cunningham M, Cassidy PM, Phipps EC, Kenslow N, Travis T, Lonsway D, Rasheed JK, Limbago BM, Kallen AJ. 2015. Epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in 7 US communities, 2012–2013. JAMA 314:1479–1487. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.van Duin D, Arias CA, Komarow L, Chen L, Hanson BM, Weston G, Cober E, Garner OB, Jacob JT, Satlin MJ, Fries BC, Garcia-Diaz J, Doi Y, Dhar S, Kaye KS, Earley M, Hujer AM, Hujer KM, Domitrovic TN, Shropshire WC, Dinh A, Manca C, Luterbach CL, Wang M, Paterson DL, Banerjee R, Patel R, Evans S, Hill C, Arias R, Chambers HF, Fowler VG, Kreiswirth BN, Bonomo RA, Multi-Drug Resistant Organism Network Investigators . 2020. Molecular and clinical epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in the USA (CRACKLE-2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 20:731–741. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30755-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang R, Liu L, Zhou H, Chan EW, Li J, Fang Y, Li Y, Liao K, Chen S. 2017. Nationwide surveillance of clinical carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) strains in China. EBioMedicine 19:98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.04.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lou T, Du X, Zhang P, Shi Q, Han X, Lan P, Yan R, Hu H, Wang Y, Wu X, Jiang Y, Yu Y. 2022. Risk factors for infection and mortality caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: a large multicentre case-control and cohort study. J Infect 84:637–647. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang M, Earley M, Chen L, Hanson BM, Yu Y, Liu Z, Salcedo S, Cober E, Li L, Kanj SS, Gao H, Munita JM, Ordoñez K, Weston G, Satlin MJ, Valderrama-Beltrán SL, Marimuthu K, Stryjewski ME, Komarow L, Luterbach C, Marshall SH, Rudin SD, Manca C, Paterson DL, Reyes J, Villegas MV, Evans S, Hill C, Arias R, Baum K, Fries BC, Doi Y, Patel R, Kreiswirth BN, Bonomo RA, Chambers HF, Fowler VG, Arias CA, van Duin D, Multi-Drug Resistant Organism Network Investigators . 2022. Clinical outcomes and bacterial characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae complex among patients from different global regions (CRACKLE-2): a prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 22:401–412. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00399-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cassini A, Högberg LD, Plachouras D, Quattrocchi A, Hoxha A, Simonsen GS, Colomb-Cotinat M, Kretzschmar ME, Devleesschauwer B, Cecchini M, Ouakrim DA, Oliveira TC, Struelens MJ, Suetens C, Monnet DL, Strauss R, Mertens K, Struyf T, Catry B, Latour K, Ivanov IN, Dobreva EG, Tambic Andraševic A, Soprek S, Budimir A, Paphitou N, Žemlicková H, Schytte Olsen S, Wolff Sönksen U, Märtin P, Ivanova M, Lyytikäinen O, Jalava J, Coignard B, Eckmanns T, Abu Sin M, Haller S, Daikos GL, Gikas A, Tsiodras S, Kontopidou F, Tóth Á, Hajdu Á, Guólaugsson Ó, Kristinsson KG, Murchan S, Burns K, Pezzotti P, Gagliotti C, Dumpis U, et al. 2019. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: a population-level modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 19:56–66. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30605-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.David S, Reuter S, Harris SR, Glasner C, Feltwell T, Argimon S, Abudahab K, Goater R, Giani T, Errico G, Aspbury M, Sjunnebo S, Eu SWG, Group ES, Feil EJ, Rossolini GM, Aanensen DM, Grundmann H, ESGEM Study Group . 2019. Epidemic of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Europe is driven by nosocomial spread. Nat Microbiol 4:1919–1929. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0492-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Linares L, Cervera C, Hoyo I, Sanclemente G, Marco F, Cofan F, Ricart MJ, Navasa M, Moreno A. 2010. Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in solid organ transplant recipients: epidemiology and antibiotic resistance. Transplant Proc 42:2941–2943. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.07.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Simkins J, Muggia V, Cohen HW, Minamoto GY. 2014. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in kidney transplant recipients: a case-control study. Transpl Infect Dis 16:775–782. doi: 10.1111/tid.12276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Roberts MB, Fishman JA. 2021. Immunosuppressive agents and infectious risk in transplantation: managing the “net state of immunosuppression.” Clin Infect Dis 73:e1302–e1317. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Satlin MJ, Jenkins SG, Walsh TJ. 2014. The global challenge of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in transplant recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis 58:1274–1283. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kalpoe JS, Sonnenberg E, Factor SH, del Rio Martin J, Schiano T, Patel G, Huprikar S. 2012. Mortality associated with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl 18:468–474. doi: 10.1002/lt.23374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang F, Zhong J, Ding H, Pan J, Yang J, Lan T, Chen Y, Liao G. 2021. Analysis of risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection and its effect on the outcome of early infection after kidney transplantation. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:726282. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.726282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pouch SM, Kubin CJ, Satlin MJ, Tsapepas DS, Lee JR, Dube G, Pereira MR. 2015. Epidemiology and outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteriuria in kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis 17:800–809. doi: 10.1111/tid.12450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pereira MR, Scully BF, Pouch SM, Uhlemann AC, Goudie S, Emond JE, Verna EC. 2015. Risk factors and outcomes of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl 21:1511–1519. doi: 10.1002/lt.24207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mouloudi E, Massa E, Piperidou M, Papadopoulos S, Iosifidis E, Roilides I, Theodoridou T, Kydona C, Fouzas I, Imvrios G, Papanikolaou V, Gritsi-Gerogianni N. 2014. Tigecycline for treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections after liver transplantation in the intensive care unit: a 3-year study. Transplant Proc 46:3219–3221. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.09.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brizendine KD, Richter SS, Cober ED, van Duin D. 2015. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae urinary tract infection following solid organ transplantation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:553–557. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04284-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cao Z, Yue C, Kong Q, Liu Y, Li J. 2022. Risk factors for a hospital-acquired carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection: a five-year retrospective study. Infect Drug Resist 15:641–654. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S342103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tumbarello M, Viale P, Viscoli C, Trecarichi EM, Tumietto F, Marchese A, Spanu T, Ambretti S, Ginocchio F, Cristini F, Losito AR, Tedeschi S, Cauda R, Bassetti M. 2012. Predictors of mortality in bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae: importance of combination therapy. Clin Infect Dis 55:943–950. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shields RK, Nguyen MH, Chen L, Press EG, Potoski BA, Marini RV, Doi Y, Kreiswirth BN, Clancy CJ. 2017. Ceftazidime-avibactam is superior to other treatment regimens against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00883-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00883-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wu D, Chen C, Liu T, Jia Y, Wan Q, Peng J. 2021. Epidemiology, susceptibility, and risk factors associated with mortality in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections among abdominal solid organ transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study. Infect Dis Ther 10:559–573. doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00411-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hotchkiss RS, Moldawer LL, Opal SM, Reinhart K, Turnbull IR, Vincent JL. 2016. Sepsis and septic shock. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2:16045. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kalil AC, Syed A, Rupp ME, Chambers H, Vargas L, Maskin A, Miles CD, Langnas A, Florescu DF. 2015. Is bacteremic sepsis associated with higher mortality in transplant recipients than in nontransplant patients? A matched case-control propensity-adjusted study. Clin Infect Dis 60:216–222. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kalil AC, Opal SM. 2015. Sepsis in the severely immunocompromised patient. Curr Infect Dis Rep 17:487. doi: 10.1007/s11908-015-0487-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Micozzi A, Gentile G, Minotti C, Cartoni C, Capria S, Ballaro D, Santilli S, Pacetti E, Grammatico S, Bucaneve G, Foa R. 2017. Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in high-risk haematological patients: factors favouring spread, risk factors and outcome of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremias. BMC Infect Dis 17:203. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2297-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Falcone M, Bassetti M, Tiseo G, Giordano C, Nencini E, Russo A, Graziano E, Tagliaferri E, Leonildi A, Barnini S, Farcomeni A, Menichetti F. 2020. Time to appropriate antibiotic therapy is a predictor of outcome in patients with bloodstream infection caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Crit Care 24:29. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2742-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zha L, Li S, Ren Z, Li X, Zhang D, Zou Y, Pan L, Xu Q, Rui Z, Chen S, Yang G, Chen Z, Tefsen B, Guo J. 2022. Clinical management of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in critically ill patients: a nationwide survey of tertiary hospitals in mainland China. J Infect 84:e108–e110. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tumbarello M, Trecarichi EM, Corona A, De Rosa FG, Bassetti M, Mussini C, Menichetti F, Viscoli C, Campoli C, Venditti M, De Gasperi A, Mularoni A, Tascini C, Parruti G, Pallotto C, Sica S, Concia E, Cultrera R, De Pascale G, Capone A, Antinori S, Corcione S, Righi E, Losito AR, Digaetano M, Amadori F, Giacobbe DR, Ceccarelli G, Mazza E, Raffaelli F, Spanu T, Cauda R, Viale P. 2019. Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam salvage therapy in patients with infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae. Clin Infect Dis 68:355–364. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tumbarello M, Raffaelli F, Giannella M, Mantengoli E, Mularoni A, Venditti M, De Rosa FG, Sarmati L, Bassetti M, Brindicci G, Rossi M, Luzzati R, Grossi PA, Corona A, Capone A, Falcone M, Mussini C, Trecarichi EM, Cascio A, Guffanti E, Russo A, De Pascale G, Tascini C, Gentile I, Losito AR, Bussini L, Corti G, Ceccarelli G, Corcione S, Compagno M, Giacobbe DR, Saracino A, Fantoni M, Antinori S, Peghin M, Bonfanti P, Oliva A, De Gasperi A, Tiseo G, Rovelli C, Meschiari M, Shbaklo N, Spanu T, Cauda R, Viale P. 2021. Ceftazidime-avibactam use for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae infections: a retrospective observational multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis 73:1664–1676. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang F, Zhong J, Ding H, Liao G. 2021. Efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection after kidney transplantation. Infect Drug Resist 14:5165–5174. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S343505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lanini S, Costa AN, Puro V, Procaccio F, Grossi PA, Vespasiano F, Ricci A, Vesconi S, Ison MG, Carmeli Y, Ippolito G, Donor-Recipient Infection Collaborative Study Group . 2015. Incidence of carbapenem-resistant gram negatives in Italian transplant recipients: a nationwide surveillance study. PLoS One 10:e0123706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rostambeigi N, Kudva YC, John S, Mailankody S, Pedersen RA, Dean PG, Prieto M, Cosio FG, Kremers WK, Walker RC, Abraham RS, Stegall MD. 2010. Epidemiology of infections requiring hospitalization during long-term follow-up of pancreas transplantation. Transplantation 89:1126–1133. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181d54bb9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. 2013. Immunosuppression in sepsis: a novel understanding of the disorder and a new therapeutic approach. Lancet Infect Dis 13:260–268. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70001-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.van der Poll T, van de Veerdonk FL, Scicluna BP, Netea MG. 2017. The immunopathology of sepsis and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Rev Immunol 17:407–420. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kasiske BL, Gaston RS, Gourishankar S, Halloran PF, Matas AJ, Jeffery J, Rush D. 2005. Long-term deterioration of kidney allograft function. Am J Transplant 5:1405–1414. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00853.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gill JS, Tonelli M, Mix CH, Pereira BJ. 2003. The change in allograft function among long-term kidney transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 14:1636–1642. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000070621.06264.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Anesi JA, Lautenbach E, Thom KA, Tamma PD, Blumberg EA, Alby K, Bilker WB, Werzen A, Ammazzalorso A, Tolomeo P, Omorogbe J, Pineles L, Han JH. 2022. Clinical outcomes and risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Transplantation Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen Y, Chen Y, Liu P, Guo P, Wu Z, Peng Y, Deng J, Kong Y, Cui Y, Liao K, Huang B. 2022. Risk factors and mortality for elderly patients with bloodstream infection of carbapenem resistance Klebsiella pneumoniae: a 10-year longitudinal study. BMC Geriatr 22:573. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03275-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang Y, Guo LY, Song WQ, Wang Y, Dong F, Liu G. 2018. Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae bloodstream infection and predictors of mortality in Chinese paediatric patients. BMC Infect Dis 18:248. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3160-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gu D, Dong N, Zheng Z, Lin D, Huang M, Wang L, Chan EW, Shu L, Yu J, Zhang R, Chen S. 2018. A fatal outbreak of ST11 carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Chinese hospital: a molecular epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis 18:37–46. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30489-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yang X, Sun Q, Li J, Jiang Y, Li Y, Lin J, Chen K, Chan EW, Zhang R, Chen S. 2022. Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in China. Emerg Microbes Infect 11:841–849. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2049458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kabore R, Haller MC, Harambat J, Heinze G, Leffondre K. 2017. Risk prediction models for graft failure in kidney transplantation: a systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant 32:ii68–ii76. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kobashigawa J, Zuckermann A, Macdonald P, Leprince P, Esmailian F, Luu M, Mancini D, Patel J, Razi R, Reichenspurner H, Russell S, Segovia J, Smedira N, Stehlik J, Wagner F, Consensus Conference participants . 2014. Report from a consensus conference on primary graft dysfunction after cardiac transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 33:327–340. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Morrison MI, Pither TL, Fisher AJ. 2017. Pathophysiology and classification of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. J Thorac Dis 9:4084–4097. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.09.09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.GiVi TISC, Bertolini G, Nattino G, Tascini C, Poole D, Viaggi B, Carrara G, Rossi C, Crespi D, Mondini M, Langer M, Rossolini GM, Malacarne P, GiViTI Steering Committee . 2018. Mortality attributable to different Klebsiella susceptibility patterns and to the coverage of empirical antibiotic therapy: a cohort study on patients admitted to the ICU with infection. Intensive Care Med 44:1709–1719. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5360-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES