ABSTRACT
With the development and reduced costs of high-throughput sequencing technology, environmental dark matter, such as novel metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) and viruses, is now being discovered easily. However, due to read length limitations, MAGs and viromes often suffer from genome discontinuity and deficiencies in key functional elements. Here, by applying long-read sequencing technology to sediment samples from a Tibetan saline lake, we comprehensively analyzed the performance of high-fidelity (HiFi) reads and the possibility of integration with short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. In total, 207 full-length nonredundant 16S rRNA gene sequences and 19 full-length nonredundant 18S rRNA genes were directly obtained from HiFi reads, which greatly surpassed the retrieval performance of NGS technology. We carried out a cross-sectional comparison among multiple assembly strategies, referred to as ‘NGS’, ‘Hybrid (NGS+HiFi)’, and ‘HiFi’. Two MAGs and 29 viruses with circular genomes were reconstructed using HiFi reads alone, indicating the great power of the ‘HiFi’ approach to assemble high-quality microbial genomes. Among the 3 strategies, the ‘Hybrid’ approach produced the highest number of medium/high-quality MAGs and viral genomes, while the ratio of MAGs containing 16S rRNA genes was significantly improved in the ‘HiFi’ assembly results. Overall, our study provides a practical metagenomic resolution for analyzing complex environmental samples by taking advantage of both the short-read and HiFi long-read sequencing methods to extract the maximum amount of information, including data on prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and viruses, via the ‘Hybrid’ approach.
IMPORTANCE To expand the understanding of microbial dark matter in the environment, we did the first comparative evaluation of multiple assembly strategies based on high-throughput short-read and HiFi data from lake sediments metagenomic sequencing. The results demonstrated great improvement of the ‘Hybrid’ assembly method (short-read next-generation sequencing data plus HiFi data) in the recovery of medium/high-quality MAGs and viral genomes. Further analysis showed that HiFi data is important to retrieve the complete circular prokaryotic and viral genomes. Meanwhile, hundreds of full-length 16S/18S rRNA genes were assembled directly from HiFi data, which facilitated the species composition studies of complex environmental samples, especially for understanding micro-eukaryotes. Therefore, the application of the latest HiFi long-read sequencing could greatly improve the metagenomic assembly integrity and promote environmental microbiome research.
KEYWORDS: HiFi long-read technology, MAGs, virome, hybrid assembly, 16S/18S rRNA gene, saline lake sediment
INTRODUCTION
With the rapid development of high-throughput short-read DNA sequencing technologies, generally referred to as next-generation sequencing (NGS), many novel species have been discovered in various habitat contexts, such as human-associated (1, 2), animal-associated (3, 4), and environmental samples (5, 6). Moreover, the genomes of unculturable species have been assembled at a large scale based on advances in binning bioinformatics tools (7–9). Many successfully recovered metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) can not only provide genes/enzymes with novel functions and/or physiochemical properties (3, 10) but also shed light on the special metabolic pathways associated with extreme habitats on Earth (11, 12). The performance of MAG binning depends on the complexity of the habitats, the presence or absence of closely related strains within the metagenomic data set (13), and different binning algorithms (14, 15). The recovery of nearly complete or complete MAGs is the key step in reliable downstream analyses with objectives such as the identification of genes related to specific metabolism (16), novel species identification (17), the evolutionary mechanisms underlying horizontal gene transfer (HGT) (18), and prokaryotic intrapopulation diversity quantification (19). However, many intermediate- or even high-quality MAGs with estimated high completeness and low contamination are often discontinuous and chimeric because of repetitive sequences and mobile gene elements (7). In addition, a great challenge related to MAG construction is the lack of 16S rRNA gene sequences because of the great difficulty in assembling sequences with high similarity (20). An investigative report showed that only 7% of MAGs contained 16S rRNA genes, and it was difficult to link MAGs to the large body of 16S rRNA-based microbiome studies conducted around the world (21). These shortcomings of MAGs generated by short-read sequencing technology in genome assembly limit their application in further metagenome analyses (19).
Compared to next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology based on short-reads (usually less than 300 bp), typically covering only partial gene fragments, third-generation sequencing technologies (TGS) can produce much longer reads, often spanning multiple genes and intergenic regions. Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) have been the most popular long-read sequencing platforms recently. The development of TGS and corresponding advanced bioinformatics tools, along with affordable sequencing costs, has revolutionized de novo genome assembly, which may now retrieve the complete circular genomes of prokaryotes (22). These technologies have also increased the contiguity of assemblies of complex eukaryotic genomes by orders of magnitude, with read lengths exceeding 10 kbp (23). Introducing TGS into metagenomic studies would provide an advantage in contig assembly based on much longer reads (22, 24–26). For example, 20 circularized complete MAGs (cMAGs) from 13 human stool samples were assembled using ONT long-reads, which provided opportunities to investigate the potential functions of repeat elements, although these cMAGs showed lower nucleotide accuracy (24). Moreover, hybrid approaches combining NGS and TGS technologies to perform metagenomic assembly present high potential, including the generation of longer contigs and more complete MAGs for various habitats, such as the human gut, sludge, and soil (25–27). Additionally, genetic variations among microbial genomes in the gut have been identified by hybrid approaches and compared with data from healthy humans (22).
More recently, PacBio high-fidelity (HiFi) read sequencing technology has become popular for assembling complex animal and plant genomes (28, 29). In contrast to the previously available TGS long-reads with a high base error rate, the base-level resolution of HiFi reads is greater than 99%, and assemblies based on HiFi reads include considerably fewer errors at the level of single nucleotides and small insertions and/or deletions than those obtained with ONT technology (30). A total of 428 MAGs with more than 90% completeness, including 44 cMAGs, were recovered from sheep fecal metagenomes using HiFi long reads in a previous study (31). The hybrid strategy of metagenome assembly has been systematically evaluated by assessing the quality of metagenomic sequences (27, 32). However, these evaluations have been focused on the quality of the assembled contigs and gene completeness. The quality of MAGs and the resolution of taxonomic classification based on read levels have been poorly investigated. Moreover, ‘hifiasm-meta’, a recently released specialized HiFi long read assembler, was shown to be able to reconstruct hundreds of complete circular bacterial genomes based on seven empirical data sets (33). The performance of HiFi read assemblers and ‘NGS + HiFi’ hybrid approaches need to be reassessed in complex environmental samples.
Here, we applied NGS (Illumina NovaSeq 6000) and TGS (PacBio Sequel IIe, HiFi sequencing mode) sequencing platforms to perform sequencing in sediment samples from Lake Cuochuolong (CCL, 29°07’45’’ N, 85°24’ 11’’ E), an alkaline saline lake (Table S1 and Fig. S1) located on the Tibetan Plateau (34). As shown in Fig. 1, metagenomes were assembled with 8 different assemblers, including 3 independent HiFi assemblers (HiCanu, HiFiasm-meta, and metaFyle), 3 hybrid assemblers (MaSuRCA, hybridmetaSPAdes, and Operams), and 2 individual NGS assemblers (Megahit and metaSPAdes with NGS mode). The main objectives of this study were to: (i) evaluate the taxonomic classification abilities of the NGS and HiFi platforms; (ii) comprehensively evaluate the quality of MAGs generated via the NGS, HiFi, and hybrid approaches; and (iii) compare the advantages of virome studies and biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) detection among different assembly strategies for metagenomes from lake sediment.
RESULTS
Sequencing statistics and taxonomic classification.
Two types of sequencing technologies (NGS and HiFi) were applied to obtain metagenomic information for the sediment samples from Lake Cuochuolong. We obtained 39.98 Gbps of paired-end short-read data and 9.17 Gbps of HiFi data, with an average read length of 4,510 bp and an average base accuracy of more than 99% (also called HiFi Q20 reads). There was no PCR step in HiFi sequencing library construction, and the duplication rate of HiFi Q20 reads was 2.1%. A total of 28.9% of the NGS reads could be assigned to known taxonomic ranks, while the read assignment rate of HiFi data was 90.8% (1.85 million reads), which was approximately three times higher than that of NGS (Fig. 2A). The species level assignment rate of HiFi reads was 67.19% (1,366,306/2,033,496), while the corresponding rate of short-reads was only 5.59%, indicating the great power of HiFi reads in taxonomic classification. A total of 17 phyla with a minimum relative abundance greater than 0.1% were identified, and Alphaproteobacteria was the most abundant group in this sediment sample (Fig. S2). Although there were large differences in the ratios of reads with taxonomic information, a comparison of the community composition at the phylum level revealed high overall similarity (correlation coefficient = 0.988) between the short-read and long-read data sets (Fig. S3).
Since the average length of the HiFi reads was longer than that of 16S/18S rRNA genes, we extracted complete 16S/18S sequences directly from the read data set. For eukaryotes, 311 complete 18S rRNA sequences were successfully extracted, and most of them (97.43%, 303/311) were novel at the species level. Nineteen 18S operational taxonomic units (18S-OTUs, > 98.65% identity, and > 95% coverage cutoff) (35) were generated. Based on these 18S-OTUs, we assessed the eukaryote distribution in saline lake sediment, which included the phyla Ciliophora (44.05%), Opisthokonta (5.14%), Centrohelida (3.21%), Diatomea (1.93%), Phragmoplastophyta (1.93%), Mollusca (1.29%), Prymnesiophyceae (1.29%), Chytridiomycota (0.96%), and Pavlovophyceae (0.64%) (Fig. 2B). One 18S-OTU affiliated with phylum Ciliophora, subclass Hypotrichia, was the most abundant eukaryotic species (36.33%, 113/311) in the CCL sediment sample. Three 18S-OTUs with unknown taxonomic information were also abundant (39.55%, 123/311). Additionally, 2,845 complete 16S rRNA sequences were successfully extracted from the HiFi reads, among which one quarter (726/2,845) of the 16S rRNA genes could be assigned to known species, and 74.48% (2,119/2,845) and 5.59% (159/2,845) were novel at the species and family levels, respectively. A total of 207 16S-OTUs were generated, spanning 1 archaeal phylum (two 16S-OTUs) and 13 bacterial phyla (Fig. 2C). The most abundant 16S-OTU was identified as Loktanella sp. (20.74%, 590/2,845), classified in Alphaproteobacteria.
Sequence assembly programs.
In this study, we applied 3 different strategies to assemble contigs, categorized as the ‘NGS’, ‘Hybrid’, and ‘HiFi’ modes, with 8 assemblers (Fig. 3). The programs HiCanu, HiFiasm-meta, and metaFyle were used to assemble the PacBio HiFi reads and generate contigs with sizes ranging from 56.21 Mb to 505.17 Mb (contigs > 500 bp) and N50 values ranging from 12.68 kb to 109.02 kb (Fig. 3 and Table 1). The average contig size generated with HiCanu was extremely small, corresponding to approximately 25% of the sizes obtained from the other 2 ‘HiFi’ assemblers. However, the mapping rate of NGS reads to HiCanu assemblies was approximately 50% of the rates for the HiFiasm-meta and metaFyle assemblies, indicating that HiCanu might only generate microbial genomes with a relatively high abundance in the sediment sample. The performance of multiple metagenomic assemblers supporting long-read data exhibited huge differences and the same phenomenon was also found in human fecal samples indicating a lack of widely accepted analysis pipelines currently (36). Additionally, 248 circular contigs (> 5 kb), ranging from 5 kb to 3.03 Mb in size, were produced with the HiFiasm-meta and metaFyle. The programs MaSuRCA, hybridmetaSPAdes, and Operams were used to assemble short-read and long-read data simultaneously and generated contigs with sizes ranging from 352.47 Mb to 1,828.59 Mb (contigs > 500 bp) and N50 values ranging from 6.54 kb to 53.97 kb (Table 1). The programs Megahit and metaSPAdes were used to assemble NGS data and generated shorter contigs with sizes ranging from 1,099.89 Mb to 1,795.67 Mb (contigs > 500 bp) and N50 values ranging from 4.69 kb to 4.97 kb. The MaSuRCA and hybridmetaSPAdes pipelines produced a large number of contigs > 100 kb (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
HiFi |
Hybrid |
NGS |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assembler | HiCanu | metaFlye | HiFiasm_meta | MaSuRCA | HybridmetaSPAdes | Operams | Megahit | metaSPAdes |
ContigNumber | 4813 | 4611 | 33749 | 17008 | 3283225 | 1762307 | 712192 | 3446523 |
Largest contig(Mb) | 0.10 | 4.66 | 4.51 | 8.68 | 3.72 | 2.77 | 1.11 | 1.53 |
ContigNumber(>100kb) | 0 | 420 | 215 | 515 | 496 | 254 | 215 | 266 |
Total size(Mb) | 56.21 | 229.77 | 505.17 | 352.47 | 1828.59 | 1486.96 | 1099.89 | 1795.67 |
N50(kb) | 12.68 | 109.02 | 16.57 | 53.97 | 6.81 | 6.54 | 4.69 | 4.97 |
N90(kb) | 6.51 | 24.03 | 7.52 | 7.83 | 1.37 | 1.35 | 1.27 | 1.26 |
GC% | 60.79 | 55.94 | 57.06 | 54.00 | 51.93 | 51.84 | 51.45 | 51.29 |
NGS-reads-mapping rate%a | 25.52 | 59.04 | 55.45 | 64.87 | 83.13 | 82.48 | 81.77 | 83.03 |
Detailed calculation of ‘NGS-reads-mapping rate%’ was introduced in the method section.
Thus, the ‘HiFi’ methods produced much longer contigs than the other 2 strategies; however, the assembly sizes of ‘HiFi’ contigs were much smaller, accounting for only 25.52 to 59.04% of the NGS read mapping rates. among the ‘Hybrid’-assembled results, MaSuRCA was prominent, with a maximum contig length of 8.68 Mb, and had a higher N50 than the HiCanu and HiFiasm-meta ‘HiFi’ assemblers. In general, when longer contig lengths were generated, smaller contig sizes were obtained accordingly (Fig. 3). Detailed statistics of the various assembly evaluations are listed in Table 1.
We also investigated the occurrence of 16S/18S rRNA sequences in the assembled contigs. HiFiasm-meta generated the highest number of 16S rRNA genes and completed 16S rRNA numbers, followed by MaSuRCA and Operams. Overall, HiFiasm-meta and MaSuRCA showed outstanding performance for 16S/18S rRNA gene detection (Table S2 and Fig. 3). After dereplication, 130 complete 16S-OTUs and 9 complete 18S-OTUs were identified from eight assembled contigs, including 14 prokaryotic phyla and 7 eukaryotic phyla, largely matching the taxonomic results obtained with HiFi reads (Table S2). According to the 207 complete 16S-OTUs and 19 complete 18S-OTUs identified directly from HiFi reads, MaSuRCA recovered 62.80% of the 16S-OTUs (130/207), and both HiFiasm-meta and metaFlye recovered 36.84% of the 18S-OTUs (7/19) (Table S2). Based on the comprehensive evaluation of the N50 lengths, read usage ratios, and contig sizes of the assemblies and the identification of complete 16S/18S rRNA sequences, we suggest the application of multiple assembly tools simultaneously to improve the assembled metagenome quality.
MAG retrieval and comparison of MAG characteristics.
Initially, 1,215 raw MAGs were individually obtained from 8 assemblies, including 184 high-quality (>90% completeness and <5% contamination), 242 medium-quality (≥ 50% completeness and <10% contamination) and 789 low-quality MAGs. Among the 8 programs, ‘Hybrid’ metaSPAdes produced the highest number of MAGs (Table 2). Considering the potential errors caused by incompleteness and contaminant sequences in MAGs, low-quality MAGs were discarded from further analysis. Then, 426 high/medium-quality MAGs were used to determine the performance of different assembly strategies. Thus: (i) The MAG size ranged from 675 kb to 8.76 Mb, with an average of 2.87 Mb. There was no statistically significant difference in genome size (Fig. 4A) or heterozygosity (Fig. 4B) among the 3 groups. (ii) The GC content was significantly different between ‘NGS’- and ‘HiFi’-generated MAGs (Fig. 4C), but no significant difference was found between the ‘Hybrid’ assemblies and the others. (iii) The evaluation of genome continuity showed significant differences; for example, the average contig number of ‘NGS’ MAGs was 239, which was more than three times larger than that of ‘HiFi’ MAGs (Fig. 4D). (iv) The N50 length of ‘HiFi’ MAGs was approximately 458 kb, which was > 10 times that of ‘NGS’ MAGs (Fig. 4E). (v) Although the average contig number of the ‘Hybrid’ assemblies was 180, which was > 3 times that of ‘HiFi’ MAGs, the N50 length was close to half of that of the ‘HiFi’ MAGs. (vi) In addition, the relative abundance of ‘HiFi’ MAGs was significantly higher than those of other genomes, and there was no significant difference in relative abundance between ‘NGS’ and ‘Hybrid’ MAGs (Fig. 4F).
TABLE 2.
HiFi |
Hybrid |
NGS |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assembler | HiCanu | metaFlye | HiFiasm_meta | MaSuRCA | HybridmetaSPAdes | Operams | Megahit | metaSPAdes |
High-quality | 0 | 16 | 8 | 15 | 41 | 30 | 37 | 37 |
Medium-quality | 1 | 19 | 15 | 36 | 43 | 49 | 40 | 39 |
Low-qualitya | 14 | 61 | 132 | 91 | 144 | 131 | 106 | 110 |
GenomeSize (Mb) | 2.61 | 0.86 to 8.71 | 1.68 to 8.64 | 0.74 to 5.08 | 0.68 to 6.10 | 0.61 to 8.49 | 0.68 to 8.76 | 0.64 to 8.81 |
No. of Contigs in one genome | 166 | 1 to 116 | 2 to 191 | 1 to 214 | 6 to 968 | 9 to 693 | 26-962 | 12 to 849 |
N50(kb) | 17.38 | 34.06 to 4657.02 | 13.09 to 4511.23 | 15.49 to 3805.86 | 5.02 to 1110.41 | 4.81 to 2765.81 | 3.97-420.02 | 4.64 to 357.97 |
No. of MAGs with Complete 16S rRNA genes | 1 | 25 | 18 | 31 | 20 | 21 | 14 | 10 |
No. of representative MAGs | 1 | 35 | 23 | 51 | 84 | 79 | 77 | 76 |
Low-quality MAGs were not used in further statistics.
Thereafter, 426 high/medium-quality MAGs were clustered into 102 representative MAGs (>95% ANI) spanning 11 phyla according to the GTDB-TK taxonomic classification system (Table S3 and Fig. 5A). The most commonly identified taxa were members of Proteobacteria (43.14%), including Alphaproteobacteria (31.37%), and Gammaproteobacteria (11.76%), followed by members of Bacteroidota (22.55%), Firmicutes (13.73%) and Actinobacteriota (5.88%). Twenty-one MAGs were found to be novel at the genus level, and the most abundant MAG was affiliated with Loktanella spp., in accord with the 16S-OTU results (Fig. 2C and 5A). Among the 102 representative MAGs, the ‘Hybrid’ strategy exhibited the best performance, recovering the majority of the representative MAGs (96.1%) (Fig. 5B). Only one-third (34/102) of the MAGs could be recovered by all assemblers. Moreover, most high/medium-quality ‘NGS’ MAGs (84.3%, 129/153) lacked complete 16S rRNA sequences. In contrast, 90% (54/60) of the high/medium-quality ‘HiFi’ MAGs contained full-length 16S rRNA elements, and 38.3% (23/60) even included more than one copy. Among 214 high/medium-quality ‘Hybrid’ MAGs, 29 (13.6%) MAGs contained at least 2 copies of 16S rRNA, and 56 (26.2%) had a single copy (Fig. 5C).
Complete MAG (cMAG) assembly ability.
Twenty-four circular contigs (excluding plasmids and viruses) larger than 100 kb were first filtered with the ‘HiFi’ programs HiFiasm-meta (16/24) and metaFyle (8/24), whereas no circular contigs were identified by HiCanu. After further MAG construction and genome reduplication, 2 representative cMAGs including all types of rRNA elements were successfully recovered from the sediment samples (Fig. 1) (see methods for more details).
The first cMAG ‘ccl-hifiasmmeta.153’ aligned with the genus Psychroflexus in the family Flavobacteriaceae. Psychroflexus sp. is a Gram-negative, nonmotile, obligatory aerobic bacterium that is frequently identified in saline environments for which there is currently no complete genome available in the NCBI GenBank database (37, 38). Compared with 24 known draft genomes of Psychroflexus spp. (Fig. S4), ‘ccl-hifiasmmeta.153’ showed a relatively divergent genome (ANI < 85%) except strain CCL10WT (GCF_020164535.1, ANI > 99.99%, 15 scaffolds), which was isolated from the same lake (Table S4). These 2 genomes were nearly identical according to genome-wide collinearity analysis (Fig. 6A). Remarkably, unlike most bacterial genomes, ‘ccl-hifiasmmeta.153’ had 2 circular chromosomes (Fig. S5A) with genome sizes of 2.56 Mb and 463.56 Kb, respectively. Moreover, chromosome I contained the replication initiator protein DnaA (Fig. S5A).
The second cMAG, ‘ccl-flye.84’, was identified as a novel Methylovirgula species based on the GTDB-Tk toolkit with an ANI > 95% cutoff (Table S4). Comparison with known species from the NCBI RefSeq database revealed that the most closely related species (ANI = 82.09%) was Methylovirgula ligni (Fig. 6B), which is a methanotroph with high abundance in tropical peat domes (39). M. ligni can utilize methane (CH4) and might be a factor contributing to low CH4 gas emissions (40). Therefore, we investigated the genes involved in methane metabolism (KEGG: ko00680). In contrast to the most closely related genomes, ‘ccl-flye.84’ lacked mxaACGKL proteins, which are encoded by large gene clusters involved in methanol oxidation (41), indicating that ‘ccl-flye.84’ might have lost the capacity for methanol oxidation (Fig. 6B). In addition, ‘ccl-flye.84’ contained the dmd-tmd [EC:1.5.8.1], fdhA [EC:1.2.1.46], and AGXT [EC:2.6.1.44] genes, which were absent in the M. ligi genomes.
Identification of viral genomes.
A total of 1,486 putative viral genomes (> 10 kb) were identified from the 8 assemblies (Table 3). All viral genomes were classified as double-stranded DNA phages, and most of the (97.11%, 1,443/1,486) were linear. The viral genomes from the ‘Hybrid’ assemblies ranged from 10 kb to 331.4 kb, with an average size of 31.9 kb; these genomes were significantly longer than those obtained via the ‘NGS’ (average size: 27.7 kb) approach and nearly identical to those obtained via the ‘HiFi’ approach (average size: 31.4 kb) (Fig. 7A). GC contents (Fig. 7B) and relative abundance (Fig. 7C) significantly differed among the 3 groups. The viral genomes obtained from the ‘HiFi’ assemblies showed higher GC contents than those from ‘Hybrid’ and ‘NGS’ assemblies. Similar to the findings for MAGs, the ‘NGS’ methods can identify more low-abundance viral genomes than the other methods. In addition, the genome completeness patterns of the obtained viral genomes were similar between the ‘HiFi’ and ‘Hybrid’ results, while the ratio of low-quality viral genomes was highest in the ‘NGS’ results (Fig. 7D). Moreover, 506 viral operational taxonomic units (vOTUs) were clustered according to MIUViG standards (42). Consistent with the status of MAG recovery, the ‘Hybrid’ strategy exhibited the best performance, recovering the majority of the representative vOTUs (84.6%) among the 506 representative vOTUs (Fig. 7E and Table S5). Among the 8 assemblies, the ‘hybrid’ tool MaSuRCA generated 176 (34.8%) vOTUs and was the most important contributor to vOTU identification, followed by hybridmetaSPAdes (116, 22.9%) and HiFiasm-meta (72, 14.2%) (Fig. 7F).
TABLE 3.
HiFi |
Hybrid |
NGS |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assembler | HiCanu | metaFlye | HiFiasm_meta | MaSuRCA | HybridmetaSPAdes | Operams | Megahit | metaSPAdes |
High-qualitya | 0 | 32 | 11 | 44 | 25 | 13 | 10 | 16 |
Medium-quality | 1 | 35 | 34 | 70 | 47 | 23 | 28 | 24 |
Low-quality | 7 | 42 | 178 | 167 | 182 | 165 | 154 | 178 |
No. of viral genomes | 8 | 109 | 223 | 281 | 254 | 201 | 192 | 218 |
No. of circular genomes | 0 | 29 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
GenomeSize ± s.e. (kb) | 15.60 ± 1.75 | 46.73 ± 3.75 | 24.53 ± 1.67 | 35.97 ± 2.21 | 33.15 ± 2.09 | 24.71 ± 1.21 | 27.60 ± 1.56 | 27.80 ± 1.97 |
The quality of viral genomes was calculated by CheckV.
To assess the advantages of long-read sequencing technology in virome research, 29 complete viral operational taxonomic units (cvOTUs), including 43 circular viral genomes, were subjected to further analysis (Fig. 7F). The length of the cvOTUs ranged from 24.4 kb to 331.5 kb, and 3 dominant viral families, Siphoviridae, Podoviridae, and Myoviridae, constituted the core circular viromes (Table S6). Remarkably, a total of the 29 cvOTUs compared against known viral databases, such as NCBI RefSeq viral genomes, marine viral database GOV 2.0, and IMG/VR, were found to be novel viruses (Fig. S6). Approximately two-thirds of the cvOTUs did not contain any auxiliary metabolic genes (AMGs), and 18 AMGs identified by VIBRANT were found across 9 cvOTUs (Fig. S7A). The number of AMGs within each cvOTU ranged from 1 to 4, and the longest cvOTU, ‘congtig_4947’, included 4 AMGs involved in nicotinate/nicotinamide metabolism, methane metabolism and folate biosynthesis (Fig. S7A). We found 2 cvOTUs (‘contig_4601’ and ‘contig_4636’) with AMGs related to microbial biogeochemical cycling, and both contained phnP (EC 3.1.4.55, 5-phospho-α-d-ribose 1,2-cyclic phosphate 2-phosphohydrolase), which was classified as being related to phosphonate/phosphinate metabolism and can participate in the degradation of methylphosphonate. In addition to phnP, ‘contig_4601’ also included a DNMT3A gene (EC:2.1.1.37, DNA 5-cytosine methylase), encoding a product involved in methane metabolism (Fig. S7B). ‘contig_4636’ contained cysH (EC:1.8.4.8, phospho-adenosine phosphosulfate reductase), whose product plays a role in the assimilation of sulfate and the catalysis of the reduction of 3′-phospho-adenylylsulfate (PAPS) to sulfite (Fig. S7C) (43).
Identification of BGCs.
Finally, we investigated the advantage of HiFi sequencing technology in BGC detection. BGCs are notoriously difficult to identify in NGS-based metagenomic studies, mainly due to the need for long gene regions and complex gene structures (44). We identified 2,883 BGCs by using antiSMASH (45), including 1,821 complete ones and 1,062 partial BGCs across the eight assemblies. Most of the BGCs (91.2%) were identified as novel, demonstrating the ability to employ the tested assembly strategies for the exploration of novel natural products (Fig. S8A). The HiFiasm-meta, hybridmetaSPAdes, and Operams assemblies showed the greatest numbers of complete BGCs (Fig. S8B). Regarding partial BGCs, the ‘HiFi’ and ‘Hybrid’ assemblies included more BGCs than those generated from ‘NGS’ methods (Fig. S8C). The 28 complete secondary metabolite BGCs included terpene (30.4%), nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS, 12.3%), hserlactone (12.1%), bacteriocin (10.3%), and polyketide synthase (PKS, T3PKS and T1PKS, 12.3%).
DISCUSSION
The advantage of long reads for taxonomic classification.
Our study extracted thousands of complete 16S/18S rRNA gene sequences and determined the number of different microbes in the environmental sample based on whole metagenome sequencing by using HiFi reads directly. To our knowledge, this work represents the first survey of eukaryotic species in saline lake sediment using long-read-based metagenome data (46, 47). We applied the selected method rather than previously applied rRNA-based species community survey technologies for the following reasons: (i) There is no requirement for PCR in HiFi sequencing library construction, while there are at least 2 PCR steps in the NGS sequencing protocol, which introduces community bias caused by high GC contents and complex gene structures (48). (ii) NGS-based rRNA gene recovery requires multiple types of primers to amplify hypervariable regions, and profiling performance varies in different habitats (49). Moreover, rRNA reads from metagenomic studies provide a source of sequences that are not subject to PCR primer bias and therefore cover taxa that might be missed with existing primer sets (50). In contrast, our method extracted rRNA sequences directly from long reads without considering possible suitable primers. (iii) Although most NGS-based metagenomic studies ignore rRNA genes, which are often missing or difficult to recover, it is notable that tools such as REAGO (20) and EMIRGE (51) can reconstruct full-length rRNA genes from short-read sequencing data. Due to the lower gene accuracy and recovery efficiency of such tools, they would not have been popular in previous studies. Within our pipeline, as many full-length 16S/18S rRNA sequences as possible were identified without any assembly process. Of course, the HiFi sequencing depth of samples from different habitats should be evaluated in the future to meet the requirements of various further analyses.
MAG construction via the hybrid assembly strategy.
Recently, long-read sequences have commonly been combined with short-read data to assemble metagenomes, which are also known as ‘Hybrid’ assemblies (32, 52). This hybrid sequencing strategy takes advantage of both NGS and TGS and overcomes the limitations of long reads (PacBio CLR or Nanopore platform), which show higher error rates and low throughput. Long-read-only assemblies (specifically based on HiFi reads) of metagenomes are still rare, but the advantages of this method are obvious, including a high recovery rate of complete 16S rRNA genes, longer MAG N50, and higher nucleotide accuracy of MAGs (25). Here, in addition to comparing the quality MAGs from different assembly strategies, we also evaluated the effect factors for MAG construction. First, ‘HiFi’ contigs recovered more genome regions with a higher GC content, where the performance of NGS technology was relatively poor (Fig. 4C). Next, the intraspecies diversity of bacteria and the heterozygosity rate of eukaryotes are among the most important factors affecting genome assembly quality (53). However, the effect of intraspecies diversity, mainly reflected by SNP density, was not as high as expected in our sample (Fig. 4B). Finally, since the cost of HiFi technology is still much higher (> 10-fold) than that of NGS technology, the amount of our HiFi data was only one quarter the amount of our NGS data. Therefore, the ability to identify more MAGs was highest when applying ‘Hybrid’ methods (Fig. 5B) and only MAGs with relatively high abundance could be identified in ‘HiFi’ mode (Fig. 4F). Overall, our results suggested that until HiFi sequencing prices drop significantly, combining ‘HiFi’ and ‘Hybrid’ assembly strategies will present obvious advantages in MAG identification and could be the best choice in metagenome studies.
Improvement of virome and BGC research.
HiFi-based metagenomic technology has resulted in great improvements in the discovery of functional genes, such as viral genes and BGCs. To date, the interpretation of complete viromes has been a significant issue because 75 to 95% of published viral metagenomic reads from the human gut remain unclassified (54, 55), and 58 to 66% of environmental viral genomes are extremely incomplete and defined as low-quality viral genomes by CheckV (5, 42, 56). Moreover, incomplete viral genomes limit host prediction, and MAG and phage-prophage identification (57, 58). Deep metagenomic sequencing would be a plausible solution to this problem, and we analyzed large amounts of short-read data in this study (39.98 Gbps). The estimated coverage of our NGS data (Fig. S9A) and the ‘Megahit’ (‘NGS’ method) (Fig. S9B) assembly size were simultaneously close to saturation. However, the corresponding average length of the viral genomes was only 27.7 kb, which was much shorter than the ‘HiFi’ and ‘Hybrid’ outputs. Additionally, our pipeline produced complete circular viral genomes, which cannot be achieved based on a short-read data set. Here, the cvOTUs ‘contig_4601’ and ‘contig_4636’ contained different P-metabolism genes (phnP), indicating that viruses can affect P cycling in lake sediment. Of course, future studies involving HiFi sequencing technology will be needed to investigate the roles of other virus types, including single-stranded DNA and RNA viruses, in lake sediment.
The products of BGCs are sources of antibiotics and cancer therapies, and tens of thousands of novel BGCs have been identified from published MAGs; however, most MAGs have been generated by using short-read NGS technology (59). Due to the high diversity of core genes and relatively high GC content across the PKS/NRPS regions, most novel BGCs could not be extracted efficiently by NGS methods (60). Long-read technologies, such as Nanopore and PacBio sequencing, have been successfully applied to the analysis of soil and animal gut metagenomes to identify BGCs (31, 61). Interestingly, under the ‘HiFi’ assembly strategy, HiFiasm-meta performed best both in virus and BGC detection, suggesting that this recently designed tool was the most suitable for assembling high-fidelity long reads. A similar phenomenon was not observed under the ‘Hybrid’ and ‘NGS’ assembly strategies. Therefore, our results demonstrated that combining HiFiasm-meta, hybridmetaSPAdes, and Operams could generate more complete BGCs than a single assembly tool.
Conclusions.
The results obtained here demonstrate that there are different benefits of bioinformatical assembly tools in identifying multiple types of genome elements. ‘HiFiasm-meta’ within the ‘HiFi’ assembly strategy produced more complete viruses, BGCs, and cMAGs with a genome accuracy almost equivalent to those of single isolated genomes. The quantity and quality of the obtained MAGs were both better under ‘Hybrid’ approaches. ‘NGS’ methods generated the maximum gene numbers and contig sizes. Therefore, combining the ‘NGS’, ‘HiFi’, and ‘Hybrid’ assembly strategies could be the best way to extract the maximum information of complex metagenomic samples until the cost of long reads drops significantly. We also revealed that the full-length 16S and 18S rRNA sequences could be extracted directly from HiFi reads to evaluate microbial and eukaryotic diversity, and in the future, this method might be used in ecological community research.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection and genomic DNA extraction.
The altitude of the alkaline Lake Cuochuolong is 4610 m above sea level and the average water depth was 2.5 m (34). Surface sediment was collected from 5 sites on September 17th, 2021 with a water temperature of 14.4°C and pH of 9.24, respectively (Table S1 and Fig. S1). Five grams of sediment was transferred into the freezing tube and stored at −20°C. Metagenomic DNA extraction was performed using a QIAamp DNA Stool minikit (Qiagen, cat. no. 51604) for each sample and the genomic DNA was mixed for metagenomic sequencing. Because of the extremely high salinity (>100‰) of Lake CCL and the fact that the salt concentration has a great effect on the stability of DNA molecules (62), the length of the DNA fragments, ranging from 200 bp to 8000 bp, was shorter than those from freshwater sediments. We made some minor protocol modifications to extract longer DNA fragments to meet the requirements of long-read sequencing technology. Briefly, in the second step, we followed the major instructions for the ‘Isolation of DNA from stool for pathogen detection’ and added 1 mL of Inhibit EX Buffer. A sterile 1 mL pipette tip was used to grind the sediment, and 0.5 mm sterile glass beads were added to help homogenize the sample. To reduce short DNA fragments, 0.4× AMPure XP beads were used. The quality and quantity of the obtained DNA were evaluated by running it in a 0.5% agarose gel and using the Qubit dsDNA assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Finally, DNA samples with a high molecular weight (modal size >2 kbp) and sufficient quantity (>10 μg) were used for sequencing.
Library construction and sequencing.
For Illumina sequencing, a metagenomic shotgun sequencing library was constructed and sequenced at Shanghai Biozeron Biological Technology Co. Ltd. In brief, 1 μg of genomic DNA from each sample was sheared with a Covaris S220 Focused-ultrasonicator, and sequencing libraries with a fragment length of approximately 400 bp were prepared. The libraries were sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 instrument (Illumina) in paired-end 150-bp mode. Finally, raw NGS reads were trimmed using the JAVA program Trimmomatic (version 0.33, www.usadellab.org/cms/?page=trimmomatic) to remove sequencing adapters and low-quality sequences (default parameters). The estimated coverage of the NGS and HiFi data was evaluated by using Nonpareil 3 with the ‘kmer’ option (63).
For PacBio sequencing, 5 μg of DNA was used to prepare a SMRTbell library with the PacBio SMRTbell prep kit 3.0 (Pacific Biosciences, Part Number: 102-182-700) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Damaged double-stranded DNA in the initial DNA sample was repaired using the New England BioLabs PreCR Repair Mix Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions before library preparation. Then, the repaired DNA was size-selected by using the BluePippin system (Sage Science) to obtain molecules larger than 3 kb. The SMRTbell library was sequenced with v3 chemistry on a PacBio Sequel IIe instrument (Pacific Biosciences) using SMRT 8M cells (Part Number: 101-389-001). A total of raw 359.80 Gb of long-read data were obtained, and HiFi reads were then generated with the ‘ccs’ module (parameters: –min-length 200 –min-passes 3 –min-rq 0.99) within the SMRT Link v10.0 package (Pacific Biosciences).
HiFi, Hybrid, and NGS assembly processes.
In this study, we applied 3 strategies to assemble NGS and/or HiFi reads. First, ‘HiFi’ mode involved 3 tools: HiCanu (https://github.com/marbl/canu, version 2.1, key parameters: ‘genomeSize = 1000m maxMemory = 500 useGrid=false -pacbio-hifi’) (64), HiFiasm-meta (https://github.com/lh3/hifiasm-meta, version 0.2-r053, default parameters) (33), and metaFyle (https://github.com/fenderglass/Flye, version 2.8.1-b1676, key parameters: ‘–pacbio-hifi –meta -g 1g’) (65). ‘Hybrid’ mode also involved 3 tools: MaSuRCA (https://github.com/alekseyzimin/masurca, version 4.0.3, corrected long-read mode with the default parameters) (66), hybridmetaSPAdes (https://github.com/ablab/spades, version 3.15.3, key parameters: ‘–meta –pacbio -m 500’) (67), and Operams (https://github.com/CSB5/OPERA-MS, version: 2.11-r797, default parameters) (68). ‘NGS’ mode involved 2 tools, Megahit (https://github.com/voutcn/megahit, version: 1.1.1, parameters: ‘–min-contig-len 500 –k-min 21 –k-max 141’) (69), and metaSPAdes (https://github.com/ablab/spades, version 3.15.3, key parameters: ‘–meta -m 500’) (67). Contigs of less than 500 bp were discarded from all assembles.
MAG construction and genome comparison.
The sequencing depth of each contig was calculated using the functional script ‘jgi_summarize_bam_contig_depths’, a tool of the MetaBAT2 (v.2.12.1) package (70), based on the sorted BAM files generated by using BWA-MEM (v.0.7.17, http://biobwa.sourceforge.net/) and SAMtools (v1.546, http://www.htslib.org/). Then, MetaBAT2 was applied to bin the assemblies with contig depth results under the default parameters (minimum contig length ≥1500 bp). CheckM (v.1.0.7) with the lineage_wf workflow was used to estimate the quality of MAGs (completeness and contamination), and retrieve the assembly information of MAGs (71). dRep was applied to cluster MAGs under an ANI > 95%, and the final representative MAGs with the highest quality score values (defined as completeness - 5X contamination) were selected (72). The GTDB Toolkit (GTDB-Tk, version r202) was introduced to obtain taxonomic information for each MAG (73). A Mummer plot comparing the MAGs and their closest genomes was drawn with the ‘nucmer’ and ‘mummerplot’ packages from MUMmer (https://github.com/mummer4/mummer, version 4.0), generally with the default options (74).
Taxonomic classification and 16S/18S rRNA gene identification.
The taxonomy of NGS/HiFi reads was determined by Kraken2 (75) using the standard database (version: PlusPF-16, May 2021) with default parameters except for ‘–quick –report-zero-counts’. All reads were classified at 7 phylogenetic levels (domain, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species) or recorded as unclassified, and the abundances of different taxonomic groups were estimated with Bracken (https://ccb.jhu.edu/software/bracken/). In silico, 16S/18S rRNA gene sequences and completeness were extracted by using barrnap (https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap, version 0.9). Different from the partial rRNA genes, the OTU clustering cutoff of the full-length rRNA genes should be higher than 97% and 98.65% was used as the clustering threshold in this study (76, 77). The 16S/18S-OTUs were clustered by using cd-hit-est with the following parameter option: -c 0.9865 -G 0 -M 0 -d 0 -aS 1 -r 1 (35, 78). Then, we annotated and aligned 16S/18S-OTUs against the Silva (Release 135, http://www.arb-silva.de) database by uclust algorithm within the usearch v11 software package (https://www.drive5.com/usearch/) with default parameters.
BGC prediction.
The assemblies were used as the input for the BGC prediction tool antiSMASH (https://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org, version 5). BGCs were classified as ‘Partial’ (when they were found at a contig edge) or ‘Complete’ (when this was not the case) based on the annotated GenBank files. BGCs in which fewer than 50% of the genes showed hits with the best KnownClusterBlast hit was considered ‘novel’ BGCs, and others were defined as ‘known’ BGCs.
Viral genome identification.
Contigs (≥10 kb) were used to predict viral genomes with VirSorter2 (https://github.com/jiarong/VirSorter2, version 2.2.3) (79). Hits with scores >0.9 and hallmarks >2 were considered positive viral genomes. Viral sequences sharing more than 95% nucleotide identity across more than 85% of the whole genome were dereplicated into groups, and the longest sequence within each group was chosen as the nonredundant viral operational taxonomic unit (vOTU) (80).
Data availability.
The raw sequence read data analyzed in this study are available at China National GenBank (CNGB, https://db.cngb.org/) database under project number CNP0003352, while the accession numbers for the short-read and long-read data were CNX0487694 and CNX0487864, respectively.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Peixin Gao for his help in the Tibet sampling champion.
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31722008), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (STEP) program (Grant No. 2021QZKK0102 and 2019QZKK0503), Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDJ-SSW-DQC030), Science & Technology Basic Resources Investigation Program of China (2017FY100300), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (2014273).
P.X. and Q.L.W. designed the experiments. Y.T., F.X., C.Z., and B.L. performed the experiments. Y.T. analyzed the data and wrote the main manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
We declare that there are no competing interests.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Peng Xing, Email: pxing@niglas.ac.cn.
Jinxin Liu, Nanjing Agricultural University.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pasolli E, Asnicar F, Manara S, Zolfo M, Karcher N, Armanini F, Beghini F, Manghi P, Tett A, Ghensi P, Collado MC, Rice BL, DuLong C, Morgan XC, Golden CD, Quince C, Huttenhower C, Segata N. 2019. Extensive unexplored human microbiome diversity revealed by over 150,000 genomes from metagenomes spanning age, geography, and lifestyle. Cell 176:649–662. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tierney BT, Yang Z, Luber JM, Beaudin M, Wibowo MC, Baek C, Mehlenbacher E, Patel CJ, Kostic AD. 2019. The landscape of genetic content in the gut and oral human microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 26:283–295. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xie F, Jin W, Si H, Yuan Y, Tao Y, Liu J, Wang X, Yang C, Li Q, Yan X, Lin L, Jiang Q, Zhang L, Guo C, Greening C, Heller R, Guan LL, Pope PB, Tan Z, Zhu W, Wang M, Qiu Q, Li Z, Mao S. 2021. An integrated gene catalog and over 10,000 metagenome-assembled genomes from the gastrointestinal microbiome of ruminants. Microbiome 9:137. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01078-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhu J, Ren H, Zhong H, Li X, Zou Y, Han M, Li M, Madsen L, Kristiansen K, Xiao L. 2021. An expanded gene catalog of mouse gut metagenomes. mSphere 6:e01119-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.01119-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li Z, Pan D, Wei G, Pi W, Zhang C, Wang JH, Peng Y, Zhang L, Wang Y, Hubert CRJ, Dong X. 2021. Deep sea sediments associated with cold seeps are a subsurface reservoir of viral diversity. ISME J 15:2366–2378. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00932-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marathe NP, Pal C, Gaikwad SS, Jonsson V, Kristiansson E, Larsson DGJ. 2017. Untreated urban waste contaminates Indian river sediments with resistance genes to last resort antibiotics. Water Res 124:388–397. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sangwan N, Xia F, Gilbert JA. 2016. Recovering complete and draft population genomes from metagenome datasets. Microbiome 4:8. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0154-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sieber CMK, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, Thomas BC, Hess M, Tringe SG, Banfield JF. 2018. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol 3:836–843. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0171-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pan S, Zhu C, Zhao XM, Coelho LP. 2022. A deep siamese neural network improves metagenome-assembled genomes in microbiome datasets across different environments. Nat Commun 13:2326. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29843-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vanni C, Schechter MS, Acinas SG, Barberán A, Buttigieg PL, Casamayor EO, Delmont TO, Duarte CM, Eren AM, Finn RD, Kottmann R, Mitchell A, Sánchez P, Siren K, Steinegger M, Gloeckner FO, Fernàndez-Guerra A. 2022. Unifying the known and unknown microbial coding sequence space. Elife 11:e67667. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhou Z, Liu Y, Pan J, Cron BR, Toner BM, Anantharaman K, Breier JA, Dick GJ, Li M. 2020. Gammaproteobacteria mediating utilization of methyl-, sulfur- and petroleum organic compounds in deep ocean hydrothermal plumes. ISME J 14:3136–3148. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00745-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tandon K, Lu CY, Chiang PW, Wada N, Yang SH, Chan YF, Chen PY, Chang HY, Chiou YJ, Chou MS, Chen WM, Tang SL. 2020. Comparative genomics: dominant coral-bacterium Endozoicomonas acroporae metabolizes dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP). ISME J 14:1290–1303. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-0610-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rodriguez-R LM, Tsementzi D, Luo C, Konstantinidis KT. 2020. Iterative subtractive binning of freshwater chronoseries metagenomes identifies over 400 novel species and their ecologic preferences. Environ Microbiol 22:3394–3412. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Meziti A, Rodriguez-R LM, Hatt JK, Peña-Gonzalez A, Levy K, Konstantinidis KT. 2021. The reliability of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) in representing natural populations: insights from comparing MAGs against isolate genomes derived from the same fecal sample. Appl Environ Microbiol 87:e02593-20. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02593-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sczyrba A, Hofmann P, Belmann P, Koslicki D, Janssen S, Dröge J, Gregor I, Majda S, Fiedler J, Dahms E, Bremges A, Fritz A, Garrido-Oter R, Jørgensen TS, Shapiro N, Blood PD, Gurevich A, Bai Y, Turaev D, DeMaere MZ, Chikhi R, Nagarajan N, Quince C, Meyer F, Balvočiūtė M, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ, Chia BKH, Denis B, Froula JL, Wang Z, Egan R, Don Kang D, Cook JJ, Deltel C, Beckstette M, Lemaitre C, Peterlongo P, Rizk G, Lavenier D, Wu YW, Singer SW, Jain C, Strous M, Klingenberg H, Meinicke P, Barton MD, Lingner T, Lin HH, Liao YC, et al. 2017. Critical assessment of metagenome interpretation-a benchmark of metagenomics software. Nat Methods 14:1063–1071. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Galambos D, Anderson RE, Reveillaud J, Huber JA. 2019. Genome-resolved metagenomics and metatranscriptomics reveal niche differentiation in functionally redundant microbial communities at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Environ Microbiol 21:4395–4410. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Parks DH, Rinke C, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil PA, Woodcroft BJ, Evans PN, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2017. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat Microbiol 2:1533–1542. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Douglas GM, Langille MGI. 2019. Current and promising approaches to identify horizontal gene transfer events in metagenomes. Genome Biol Evol 11:2750–2766. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Meziti A, Tsementzi D, Rodriguez-R LM, Hatt JK, Karayanni H, Kormas KA, Konstantinidis KT. 2019. Quantifying the changes in genetic diversity within sequence-discrete bacterial populations across a spatial and temporal riverine gradient. ISME J 13:767–779. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0307-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yuan C, Lei J, Cole J, Sun Y. 2015. Reconstructing 16S rRNA genes in metagenomic data. Bioinformatics 31:i35–i43. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hiseni P, Snipen L, Wilson RC, Furu K, Rudi K. 2021. Questioning the quality of 16S rRNA gene sequences derived from human gut metagenome-assembled genomes. Front Microbiol 12:822301. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.822301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chen L, Zhao N, Cao J, Liu X, Xu J, Ma Y, Yu Y, Zhang X, Zhang W, Guan X, Yu X, Liu Z, Fan Y, Wang Y, Liang F, Wang D, Zhao L, Song M, Wang J. 2022. Short- and long-read metagenomics expand individualized structural variations in gut microbiomes. Nat Commun 13:3175. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30857-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.van Dijk EL, Jaszczyszyn Y, Naquin D, Thermes C. 2018. The third revolution in sequencing technology. Trends Genet 34:666–681. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2018.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moss EL, Maghini DG, Bhatt AS. 2020. Complete, closed bacterial genomes from microbiomes using nanopore sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 38:701–707. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0422-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Adler A, Poirier S, Pagni M, Maillard J, Holliger C. 2022. Disentangle genus microdiversity within a complex microbial community by using a multi-distance long-read binning method: example of Candidatus Accumulibacter. Environ Microbiol 24:2136–2156. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brown CL, Keenum IM, Dai D, Zhang L, Vikesland PJ, Pruden A. 2021. Critical evaluation of short, long, and hybrid assembly for contextual analysis of antibiotic resistance genes in complex environmental metagenomes. Sci Rep 11:3753. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83081-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xu G, Zhang L, Liu X, Guan F, Xu Y, Yue H, Huang JQ, Chen J, Wu N, Tian J. 2022. Combined assembly of long and short sequencing reads improve the efficiency of exploring the soil metagenome. BMC Genomics 23:37. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08260-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hon T, Mars K, Young G, Tsai YC, Karalius JW, Landolin JM, Maurer N, Kudrna D, Hardigan MA, Steiner CC, Knapp SJ, Ware D, Shapiro B, Peluso P, Rank DR. 2020. Highly accurate long-read HiFi sequencing data for five complex genomes. Sci Data 7:399. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00743-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li X, Ellis E, Plotkin D, Imada Y, Yago M, Heckenhauer J, Cleland TP, Dikow RB, Dikow T, Storer CG, Kawahara AY, Frandsen PB. 2021. First annotated genome of a mandibulate moth, Neomicropteryx cornuta, generated using PacBio HiFi sequencing. Genome Biol Evol 13:evab229. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evab229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lang D, Zhang S, Ren P, Liang F, Sun Z, Meng G, Tan Y, Li X, Lai Q, Han L, Wang D, Hu F, Wang W, Liu S. 2020. Comparison of the two up-to-date sequencing technologies for genome assembly: HiFi reads of Pacific Biosciences Sequel II system and ultralong reads of Oxford Nanopore. Gigascience 9:giaa123. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bickhart DM, Kolmogorov M, Tseng E, Portik DM, Korobeynikov A, Tolstoganov I, Uritskiy G, Liachko I, Sullivan ST, Shin SB, Zorea A, Andreu VP, Panke-Buisse K, Medema MH, Mizrahi I, Pevzner PA, Smith TPL. 2022. Generating lineage-resolved, complete metagenome-assembled genomes from complex microbial communities. Nat Biotechnol 40:711–719. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01130-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ye L, Dong N, Xiong W, Li J, Li R, Heng H, Chan EWC, Chen S. 2022. High-resolution metagenomics of human gut microbiota generated by Nanopore and Illumina hybrid metagenome assembly. Front Microbiol 13:801587. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.801587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Feng X, Cheng H, Portik D, Li H. 2022. Metagenome assembly of high-fidelity long reads with hifiasm-meta. Nat Methods 19:671–674. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01478-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lu H, Xing P, Phurbu D, Tang Q, Wu Q. 2018. Pelagibacterium montanilacus sp. nov., an alkaliphilic bacterium isolated from Lake Cuochuolong on the Tibetan Plateau. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:2220–2225. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. 2014. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:346–351. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.059774-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim CY, Ma J, Lee I. 2022. HiFi metagenomic sequencing enables assembly of accurate and complete genomes from human gut microbiota. Nat Commun 13:6367. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34149-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhong YL, Zhang R, Zhang XY, Yu LX, Zhao MF, Du ZJ. 2020. Psychroflexus maritimus sp. nov., isolated from coastal sediment. Arch Microbiol 202:2127–2133. doi: 10.1007/s00203-020-01933-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhong ZP, Liu Y, Wang F, Zhou YG, Liu HC, Liu ZP. 2016. Psychroflexus salis sp. nov. and Psychroflexus planctonicus sp. nov., isolated from a salt lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:125–131. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vorob'ev AV, de Boer W, Folman LB, Bodelier PL, Doronina NV, Suzina NE, Trotsenko YA, Dedysh SN. 2009. Methylovirgula ligni gen. nov., sp. nov., an obligately acidophilic, facultatively methylotrophic bacterium with a highly divergent mxaF gene. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:2538–2545. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.010074-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dom SP, Ikenaga M, Lau SYL, Radu S, Midot F, Yap ML, Chin MY, Lo ML, Jee MS, Maie N, Melling L. 2021. Linking prokaryotic community composition to carbon biogeochemical cycling across a tropical peat dome in Sarawak, Malaysia. Sci Rep 11:6416. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81865-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Toyama H, Inagaki H, Matsushita K, Anthony C, Adachi O. 2003. The role of the MxaD protein in the respiratory chain of Methylobacterium extorquens during growth on methanol. Biochim Biophys Acta 1647:372–375. doi: 10.1016/S1570-9639(03)00097-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nayfach S, Camargo AP, Schulz F, Eloe-Fadrosh E, Roux S, Kyrpides NC. 2021. CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes. Nat Biotechnol 39:578–585. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-00774-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Badri A, Williams A, Xia K, Linhardt RJ, Koffas MAG. 2019. Increased 3'-phosphoadenosine-5'-phosphosulfate levels in engineered Escherichia coli cell lysate facilitate the in vitro synthesis of chondroitin sulfate A. Biotechnol J 14:e1800436. doi: 10.1002/biot.201800436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Howe AC, Jansson JK, Malfatti SA, Tringe SG, Tiedje JM, Brown CT. 2014. Tackling soil diversity with the assembly of large, complex metagenomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:4904–4909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402564111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Blin K, Wolf T, Chevrette MG, Lu X, Schwalen CJ, Kautsar SA, Suarez Duran HG, de Los Santos ELC, Kim HU, Nave M, Dickschat JS, Mitchell DA, Shelest E, Breitling R, Takano E, Lee SY, Weber T, Medema MH. 2017. antiSMASH 4.0-improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification. Nucleic Acids Res 45:W36–W41. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Karst SM, Dueholm MS, McIlroy SJ, Kirkegaard RH, Nielsen PH, Albertsen M. 2018. Retrieval of a million high-quality, full-length microbial 16S and 18S rRNA gene sequences without primer bias. Nat Biotechnol 36:190–195. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Orr RJS, Zhao S, Klaveness D, Yabuki A, Ikeda K, Watanabe MM, Shalchian-Tabrizi K. 2018. Enigmatic Diphyllatea eukaryotes: culturing and targeted PacBio RS amplicon sequencing reveals a higher order taxonomic diversity and global distribution. BMC Evol Biol 18:115. doi: 10.1186/s12862-018-1224-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Krehenwinkel H, Wolf M, Lim JY, Rominger AJ, Simison WB, Gillespie RG. 2017. Estimating and mitigating amplification bias in qualitative and quantitative arthropod metabarcoding. Sci Rep 7:17668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17333-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Heidrich V, Inoue LT, Asprino PF, Bettoni F, Mariotti ACH, Bastos DA, Jardim DLF, Arap MA, Camargo AA. 2022. Choice of 16S ribosomal RNA primers impacts male urinary microbiota profiling. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:862338. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.862338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hamady M, Knight R. 2009. Microbial community profiling for human microbiome projects: tools, techniques, and challenges. Genome Res 19:1141–1152. doi: 10.1101/gr.085464.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Miller CS, Baker BJ, Thomas BC, Singer SW, Banfield JF. 2011. EMIRGE: reconstruction of full-length ribosomal genes from microbial community short read sequencing data. Genome Biol 12:R44. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-r44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jin H, You L, Zhao F, Li S, Ma T, Kwok LY, Xu H, Sun Z. 2022. Hybrid, ultra-deep metagenomic sequencing enables genomic and functional characterization of low-abundance species in the human gut microbiome. Gut Microbes 14:2021790. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.2021790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pryszcz LP, Gabaldón T. 2016. Redundans: an assembly pipeline for highly heterozygous genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 44:e113. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Aggarwala V, Liang G, Bushman FD. 2017. Viral communities of the human gut: metagenomic analysis of composition and dynamics. Mob DNA 8:12. doi: 10.1186/s13100-017-0095-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Roux S, Hallam SJ, Woyke T, Sullivan MB. 2015. Viral dark matter and virus-host interactions resolved from publicly available microbial genomes. Elife 4:e08490. doi: 10.7554/eLife.08490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cook R, Hooton S, Trivedi U, King L, Dodd CER, Hobman JL, Stekel DJ, Jones MA, Millard AD. 2021. Hybrid assembly of an agricultural slurry virome reveals a diverse and stable community with the potential to alter the metabolism and virulence of veterinary pathogens. Microbiome 9:65. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01010-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Young F, Rogers S, Robertson DL. 2020. Predicting host taxonomic information from viral genomes: a comparison of feature representations. PLoS Comput Biol 16:e1007894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Coclet C, Roux S. 2021. Global overview and major challenges of host prediction methods for uncultivated phages. Curr Opin Virol 49:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2021.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gavriilidou A, Kautsar SA, Zaburannyi N, Krug D, Müller R, Medema MH, Ziemert N. 2022. Compendium of specialized metabolite biosynthetic diversity encoded in bacterial genomes. Nat Microbiol 7:726–735. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01110-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Loureiro C, Medema MH, van der Oost J, Sipkema D. 2018. Exploration and exploitation of the environment for novel specialized metabolites. Curr Opin Biotechnol 50:206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2018.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Rajwani R, Ohlemacher SI, Zhao G, Liu HB, Bewley CA. 2021. Genome-guided discovery of natural products through multiplexed low-coverage whole-genome sequencing of soil Actinomycetes on Oxford Nanopore Flongle. mSystems 6:e0102021. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.01020-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Singh A, Singh N. 2015. Effect of salt concentration on the stability of heterogeneous DNA. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 419:328–334. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.10.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rodriguez-R LM, Gunturu S, Tiedje JM, Cole JR, Konstantinidis KT. 2018. Nonpareil 3: fast estimation of metagenomic coverage and sequence diversity. mSystems 3:e00039-18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00039-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Nurk S, Walenz BP, Rhie A, Vollger MR, Logsdon GA, Grothe R, Miga KH, Eichler EE, Phillippy AM, Koren S. 2020. HiCanu: accurate assembly of segmental duplications, satellites, and allelic variants from high-fidelity long reads. Genome Res 30:1291–1305. doi: 10.1101/gr.263566.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kolmogorov M, Bickhart DM, Behsaz B, Gurevich A, Rayko M, Shin SB, Kuhn K, Yuan J, Polevikov E, Smith TPL, Pevzner PA. 2020. metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome assembly using repeat graphs. Nat Methods 17:1103–1110. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-00971-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zimin AV, Puiu D, Luo MC, Zhu T, Koren S, Marçais G, Yorke JA, Dvořák J, Salzberg SL. 2017. Hybrid assembly of the large and highly repetitive genome of Aegilops tauschii, a progenitor of bread wheat, with the MaSuRCA mega-reads algorithm. Genome Res 27:787–792. doi: 10.1101/gr.213405.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. 2017. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res 27:824–834. doi: 10.1101/gr.213959.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bertrand D, Shaw J, Kalathiyappan M, Ng AHQ, Kumar MS, Li C, Dvornicic M, Soldo JP, Koh JY, Tong C, Ng OT, Barkham T, Young B, Marimuthu K, Chng KR, Sikic M, Nagarajan N. 2019. Hybrid metagenomic assembly enables high-resolution analysis of resistance determinants and mobile elements in human microbiomes. Nat Biotechnol 37:937–944. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0191-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, Wang Z. 2019. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7:e7359. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. 2017. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J 11:2864–2868. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil PA, Hugenholtz P. 2018. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 36:996–1004. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Marçais G, Delcher AL, Phillippy AM, Coston R, Salzberg SL, Zimin A. 2018. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput Biol 14:e1005944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wood DE, Salzberg SL. 2014. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol 15:R46. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Gao F, Guo R, Ma Q, Li Y, Wang W, Fan Y, Ju Y, Zhao B, Gao Y, Qian L, Yang Z, He X, Jin X, Liu Y, Peng Y, Chen C, Chen Y, Gao C, Zhu F, Ma X. 2022. Stressful events induce long-term gut microbiota dysbiosis and associated post-traumatic stress symptoms in healthcare workers fighting against COVID-19. J Affect Disord 303:187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Edgar RC. 2018. Updating the 97% identity threshold for 16S ribosomal RNA OTUs. Bioinformatics 34:2371–2375. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. 2012. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28:3150–3152. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Guo J, Bolduc B, Zayed AA, Varsani A, Dominguez-Huerta G, Delmont TO, Pratama AA, Gazitúa MC, Vik D, Sullivan MB, Roux S. 2021. VirSorter2: a multi-classifier, expert-guided approach to detect diverse DNA and RNA viruses. Microbiome 9:37. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00990-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Roux S, Adriaenssens EM, Dutilh BE, Koonin EV, Kropinski AM, Krupovic M, Kuhn JH, Lavigne R, Brister JR, Varsani A, Amid C, Aziz RK, Bordenstein SR, Bork P, Breitbart M, Cochrane GR, Daly RA, Desnues C, Duhaime MB, Emerson JB, Enault F, Fuhrman JA, Hingamp P, Hugenholtz P, Hurwitz BL, Ivanova NN, Labonté JM, Lee KB, Malmstrom RR, Martinez-Garcia M, Mizrachi IK, Ogata H, Páez-Espino D, Petit MA, Putonti C, Rattei T, Reyes A, Rodriguez-Valera F, Rosario K, Schriml L, Schulz F, Steward GF, Sullivan MB, Sunagawa S, Suttle CA, Temperton B, Tringe SG, Thurber RV, Webster NS, Whiteson KL, et al. 2019. Minimum information about an uncultivated virus genome (MIUViG). Nat Biotechnol 37:29–37. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw sequence read data analyzed in this study are available at China National GenBank (CNGB, https://db.cngb.org/) database under project number CNP0003352, while the accession numbers for the short-read and long-read data were CNX0487694 and CNX0487864, respectively.