Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2023 Feb 2;19(2):e1010884. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010884

A cercarial invadolysin interferes with the host immune response and facilitates infection establishment of Schistosoma mansoni

Jacob R Hambrook 1, Patrick C Hanington 1,*
Editor: Timothy G Geary2
PMCID: PMC9928134  PMID: 36730464

Abstract

Schistosoma mansoni employs immune evasion and immunosuppression to overcome immune responses mounted by its snail and human hosts. Myriad immunomodulating factors underlie this process, some of which are proteases. Here, we demonstrate that one protease, an invadolysin we have termed SmCI-1, is released from the acetabular glands of S. mansoni cercaria and is involved in creating an immunological milieu favorable for survival of the parasite. The presence of SmCI-1 in the cercarial stage of S. mansoni is released during transformation into the schistosomula. SmCI-1 functions as a metalloprotease with the capacity to cleave collagen type IV, gelatin and fibrinogen. Additionally, complement component C3b is cleaved by this protease, resulting in inhibition of the classical and alternative complement pathways. Using SmCI-1 knockdown cercariae, we demonstrate that SmCI-1 protects schistosomula from complement-mediated lysis in human plasma. We also assess the effect of SmCI-1 on cytokine release from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, providing compelling evidence that SmCI-1 promotes an anti-inflammatory microenvironment by enhancing production of IL-10 and suppressing the production of inflammatory cytokines like IL-1B and IL-12p70 and those involved in eosinophil recruitment and activation, like Eotaxin-1 and IL-5. Finally, we utilize the SmCI-1 knockdown cercaria in a mouse model of infection, revealing a role for SmCI-1 in S. mansoni survival.

Author summary

Schistosomiasis continues to afflict over 230 million people globally. The parasitic flatworms serving as the causative agents of this disease produce numerous factors to facilitate infection and survival in a human host. This is especially true during initial infection, where they penetrate through human skin in search of entry into the circulatory system. During migration through the skin, they must overcome the immune response. To do so, they produce numerous immunosuppressive factors. Here, we functionally characterize one such factor, a S. mansoni cercarial invadolysin (SmCI-1) that is released from penetrating cercaria during their transformation into schistosomula. We demonstrate that SmCI-1 aids in the degradation of both structural and immunologically-relevant proteins found in the skin and show that the cleavage of complement component C3b reduces complement mediated lysis of the developing parasite. We also show that treatment of human leukocytes with SmCI-1 reduces the release of key immunostimulatory cytokines in the presence S. mansoni-derived factors and LPS. Knockdown of SmCI-1 in cercaria reduces infection success and adult worm burden in a mouse model system.

Introduction

Despite significant investment into treatment and prevention programs, schistosomiasis continues to afflict an estimated 230 million people worldwide [1]. Key among the numerous ways in which schistosomes persist in human populations are immunomodulatory mechanisms that interfere with and suppress the immune response of their gastropod and human hosts [24]. While the strategies used to overcome immune responses are highly effective, they are not perfect. Schistosome-infected individuals (and animals) can develop low levels of non-sterilizing immunity to infection, and can produce immune factors capable of killing the larval worms [58]. Such findings demonstrate that an in-depth examination of the survival mechanisms at various stages of the intra-human schistosome life cycle merits investigation as possible targets for novel therapeutics and/or vaccine development efforts.

Proteases are prominently featured amongst the immunomodulatory mechanisms employed by Schistosoma mansoni during the snail and human infection process [911]. Various life cycle stages employ different types of proteases to several different ends, including degradation of host structural and immunological components, while also interfering with coagulation [1018]. Proteases are especially important during cercarial penetration of human skin, where both mechanical disruption of host cell-to-cell interactions as well as the release of proteases from the acetabular glands help facilitate movement of the parasite towards a host venule [15,1921]. The release of such factors from the parasite during penetration has been demonstrated to facilitate larval survival [22]. In S. mansoni, the most abundant protein released from these acetabular glands is a 28/30 kda serine protease termed S. mansoni cercaria elastase (SmCE) that makes up ~36% of the contents of the acetabular glands [23]. This protein cleaves key structural components in skin such as elastin, laminin, fibronectin, collagen type IV, and keratin, as well as complement component C3, highlighting a role in overcoming both structural and immune barriers in the skin [2427]. Broad inhibition of serine proteases, as well as SmCE specifically, substantially reduces cercarial penetration success, emphasizing the essential function of SmCE during the initial stages of S. mansoni infection of their human host [27,28].

Also present in cercaria are several metalloproteases that have yet to be functionally characterized [23,2931]. Key among the metalloproteases found in S. mansoni cercaria are a subset of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) known as invadolysins, which are known immunomodulators [3236]. Invadolysins are one of the most expanded gene families in schistosomes, and homologous invadolysins are present in all three of the predominant schistosomiasis-causing species [31,3741]. Seven invadolysins have been shown to be differentially regulated in S. mansoni to date, with five being most highly transcribed in the germ ball stage of development, during which the necessary products for skin penetration by cercaria are generated [31]. The other two are most highly upregulated in cercaria themselves [31]. The predominant generation of invadolysins during intramolluscan development of cercaria has been confirmed in avian schistosomes such as Trichobilharzia szidati, where emerged cercaria were found to feature high levels of invadolysin protein while transcript levels remained low [42]. Invadolysins are also found in S. japonicum cercaria, with the three upregulated invadolysin genes observed in an S. japonicum micro-array bearing high levels of amino acid similarity to three of the most highly upregulated invadolysins in S. mansoni [40]. The case for characterization of invadolysins during initial infection of a human host is bolstered by the observation that the second most prominent invadolysin in S. mansoni germ balls (Smp_090100.1) has also been identified as the second most abundant protein released from S. mansoni acetabular glands during transformation into schistosomula, comprising roughly 12.8% of the normalized volume of the acetabular glands [23,31]. While Curwen et al. referred to this invadolysin as SmPepM8, for the purposes of this work, we refer to Smp_090100.1 as S. mansoni cercarial invadolysin 1 (SmCI-1) in keeping with the nomenclature surrounding cercarial elastase (SmCE).

The utilization of invadolysins as tools for invasion of a host by a parasite has been extensively studied, especially in the case of kinetoplastid parasites such as Leishmania spp. and Trypanosoma spp. Invadolysins were initially characterized in Leishmania spp. and are often termed leishmanolysins, or glycoprotein 63kda (GP63) [43,44]. GP63 possesses numerous functions, including the degradation of key cell structure components, the degradation of relevant immune molecules such as IgG, CD4 and complement component C3, as well as the alteration of immune cell functions such as chemotaxis and ability to generate a respiratory burst response [4558]. Ultimately, these immunomodulatory roles are species dependent, and are often also dependent upon the obstacles faced by the respective life cycle stage of the parasite [48].

To our knowledge, the only helminth metalloprotease to have been functionally characterized as a known invadolysin is our previous work on a protein termed SmLeish (Smp_135530) that was shown to inhibit the movement of Biomphalaria glabrata haemocytes, and to negatively impact the kinetics of S. mansoni establishment within B. glabrata [13]. Other helminth metalloproteases have been implicated in immunomodulation as well, with Necator americanus metalloproteases demonstrating a specific anti-eosinophil mechanism of action via the cleaving of Eotaxin-1 [59].

Given the consistent immunomodulatory role played by invadolysins during parasite infection/establishment, and the presence of SmCI-1 as the second most abundant protein in S. mansoni acetabular glands, we set out to characterize SmCI-1 in the context of early S. mansoni infection of the human host. In this study, we demonstrate that SmCI-1 acts as a MMP and can cleave specific human proteins relevant to structural and immunological functions. Additionally, we examined the capacity of SmCI-1 to alter cytokine output of human polymorphic blood mononuclear cells. This assessment identified anti-inflammatory properties. To follow up on this observation we used a mutant form of SmCI-1 lacking MMP activity to demonstrate that reduction of key inflammatory cytokines required MMP activity, while eliciting IL-10 production did not. All of this was done with the intent of better understanding how S. mansoni is capable of surviving within human skin, as well as gaining a deeper knowledge of how parasitic organisms employ metalloproteases during infection and establishment within a host.

Methods

Ethics statement

Swiss-Webster mice were provided by the NIH/NIAID Schistosomiasis Resource Center at the Biomedical Research Institute [60]. All animal work observed ethical requirements and was approved by the Canadian Council of Animal Care and Use Committee (Biosciences) for the University of Alberta (AUP00000057).

Structure predictions and visualization

Homology modeling was performed by submitting the amino acid sequence for SmCI-1 (Smp_090100.1) to the Robetta Server (robetta.bakerlab.org). RoseTTAFold, a deep learning-based modeling method, was used for secondary/tertiary structure prediction. The prediction with the highest confidence (0.71) was uploaded to PyMol (PyMOL Version 2.4.1, Schrodinger) for visualization and labeling of key active site amino acids. For GP63 comparison, the GP63 protein databank file was obtained from the RCSB protein databank [61].

Production of recombinant SmCI-1 and purification

The complete mRNA sequence of SmCI-1 was synthesized as cDNA using GenScript’s gene synthesis service and inserted into a pHEK293 Ultra Expression Vector I. Transient transfection of HEK293 cells was performed as per the manufacturer’s recommendations. Briefly, 30μg of SmCI-1plasmid were added to 60μl of 293fectin Transfection Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and added to suspension HEK cells for 2 days. The recombinant protein was then purified via the anti-SmCI-1 polyclonal antibody generated against a recombinant SmCI-1 protein produced in a bacterial expression system (see below). A mutant form of SmCI-1 (SmCI-1Mut) was synthesized in an identical manner, with the Glu232 codon (GAA) replaced with a Glycine codon (GGG). This amino acid change was made because Glu232 possesses a carboxyl group which acts as a nucleophile during proteolysis, whereas glycine lacks a side chain, rendering it incapable of facilitating this process. rSmCI-1Mut was purified in an identical manner to the Wild Type (WT) rSmCI-1.

Production of Rabbit anti-SmCI-1 antibody

The synthesized SmCI-1 sequence was inserted into the pET-47b(+) bacterial expression vector (Novagen) following manufacturers specifications. BL21(DE3) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) cells were transfected with SmCI-1-containing pET-47b(+) vector, grown at 37°C in LB media (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 100μg/ml kanamycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and then induced with 1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) once the cells had grown to OD 600. Following ~4 hours of growth, the cells were concentrated by centrifugation at 10 000 rpm for 20 minutes at 4°C. The final weight of the bacteria pellet was measured and then the lysing reagent B-PER (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added at a concentration of 4 ml/g of bacteria in combination with phenylmethylsufonyl fluoride (PMSF, final concentration of 1 mM), mixed gently and left to incubate at room temperature for 15 minutes. Before application to the 5ml 6xHIS column (GE Healthcare) for purification, the supernatant was diluted to a total protein concentration of 100 μg/ml in binding buffer (GE Healthcare). Following purification, the 6x HIS tag region of the recombinant protein was removed following the vector manufacturers specifications (Novagen). This recombinant SmCI-1 was used to generate a rabbit anti-SmCI-1 polyclonal antibody using the Custom pAb service offered by Genscript.

S. mansoni culture

100 M-line Biomphalaria glabrata snails were experimentally infected with 10 Schistosoma mansoni (NMRI strain) miracidia in 12 well plates for 24 hours, before being raised in artificial spring water (ASW) for 6–8 weeks, at room temperature, on a diet consisting of red leaf lettuce. Snails were allocated into 6 well plates containing ASW and exposed to light for 5 hours during which cercaria emerged. Cercaria were mechanically transformed into schistosomula by vortexing for 60 seconds in 1.5 ml tubes. Parasites were kept on ice for 15 minutes, before being centrifuged for 5 minutes at 1000g, 4°C. Artificial spring water was removed, and 200 μl of RPMI 1640 was added. Cercaria were again vortexed for one minute, and visually inspected using microscopy to confirm detachment of their tails. Parasites were centrifuged again, supernatants were collected and frozen for western blotting to demonstrate that the vortexing process did not cause release of SmCI-1 by damaging of the parasite larvae, and 200 μl of RPMI 1640 (1% Penicillin/Streptomycin) was again added to the transformed schistosomula. Newly transformed schistosomula (NTS) were cultured at 37°C for 24 hours. Untransformed cercaria, NTS, and NTS excreted/secreted (E/S) products were all gathered for western blot analysis. E/S products were filtered using a 22μm filter prior to storage. An additional experiment was conducted in which schistosomula were cultured for 2 or 4 days, as well as the E/S products released from 0–2 days and 2–4 days, after which samples were collected as previously described, and used in western blotting.

Western blotting

Parasite samples were resuspended with PBS, to which 4X reducing Laemmli buffer was added, before being boiled at 95°C for 15 minutes. Samples consisting of 20 cercaria, 20 schistosomula, or the E/S products from 20 NTS were loaded into 12% SDS PAGE gels. Western blotting was performed as per the methods of Hambrook et al. [13], with the exception of 5% BSA being used instead of 5% milk. A 1:1000 dilution of the rabbit anti-SmCI-1 antibody (~0.3μg/ml) was used as a primary antibody. A 1:1000 dilution of a HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit polyclonal secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used as a secondary antibody. Development of the membranes was done using SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and chemiluminescent results were visualized using an ImageQuant LAS 4000 Gel Imaging System (GE Healthcare).

Immunofluorescence staining

Freshly shed cercaria were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 hour at room temperature in 1.5 ml tubes. Fixed cercaria were washed 2X using 1000 μl phosphate buffered saline + 0.1% Tween-20 (PBS-T). Permeabilization was performed using 500 μl of PBS + 5%BSA, 0.02% NaN3, 1% TritonX-100 for 1 hour at room temperature. Cercaria were then washed 2X as described above. Parasites were blocked for 1 hour at room temperature in PBS +5% BSA after which a 1:400 dilution of rabbit anti-SmCI-1 (0.8μg/ml) was added for 1 hour. Samples were washed 2X 20 minutes in PBS-T on a rocking platform, and then stained with a 1:400 dilution of donkey anti-rabbit Alexa 568 antibody and 10 μl of Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 4°C overnight. Samples were again washed 2X 20 minutes with 1000 μl PBS-T and 2X 20 minutes with 1000 μl PBS. Finally, samples were resuspended in 100 μl of PBS, to which one drop of Fluoroshield with DAPI (Millipore Sigma) was added. Fluorescence was visualized using a Leica TCS SP5 laser scanning confocal microscope before analysis via ImageJ (NIH).

Generic MMP assay

Generic MMP function was determined using a Generic MMP Activity Kit (AnaSpec, AS-72202) as per the kit’s instructions. Recombinant SmCI-1 and rSmCI-1Mut at concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 μg/ml were added to a kit specific reaction buffer (KSRB) and were either activated via incubation with 1mM 4-Aminophenylmercuric acetate (APMA) for one hour at 37°C or left at 37°C without activation. Inhibition was assessed via the addition of 250 μM of 1,10-phenanthroline (Sigma Aldrich). As a positive control, recombinant human MMP-8 (R&D Systems) was subjected to the same conditions. Substrate only, buffer only, and APMA controls were also added. 45 μl samples were then mixed with 45 μl of substrate (Mca/Dnp fluorescence resonance energy transfer peptide) in a clear-bottom black-welled 96 well plate and 330nm/390nm fluorescence readings were obtained after 1 hour using a SpectraMax M2 microplate reader (Molecular Devices). Differences between treatments were assessed via One-Way Anova.

An additional experiment was run to determine the activity levels of rSmCI-1 in various buffers of relevance to other assays. Generic MMP activity in KSRB, phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), RPMI 1640 (Gibco), DMEM (Gibco), Krebs-Ringer phosphate Buffer (KRPG, pH7.4), and MMP buffer (50mM Tris, 10mM CaCl2, 150mM NaCl, pH 7.5) was examined after 3 hours of incubation at 37°C.

Gelatin, collagen and elastin cleavage assay

Where possible, the capacity of rSmCI-1 to cleave structural molecules was assessed using commercially available kits. Due to the variability of activity between buffers, we elected to use the KSRB from the Generic MMP Activity Kit for these assays. All MMPs were activated via incubation with 1mM APMA as previously described. Gelatin and collagen type 4 cleavage were examined using an EnzChek Gelatinase/Collagenase Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), with MMP-2 (AnaSpec) and Clostridium histolyticum collagenase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) used as positive controls. Proteases were incubated with 100 μg/ml fluorescein labeled substrate in a clear-bottom black-welled 96 well plate and 495nm/515nm fluorescence readings were obtained after 20 hours incubations at 37°C using a SpectraMax M2 microplate reader (Molecular Devices). Differences between treatments were assessed via One-Way Anova.

Elastin cleavage was examined using a SensoLyte Green Elastase Assay Kit (AnaSpec). Porcine elastase (AnaSpec) and MMP-12 (R&D Systems) were used as positive controls. Cleavage of the 5-FAM/QXL 520 labeled elastin was measured in a clear-bottom black-welled 96 well plate and 490nm/520nm fluorescence readings were obtained after 1 hour at 37°C using a SpectraMax M2 microplate reader (Molecular Devices). Differences between treatments were assessed via One-Way Anova (Prism 9; GraphPad Software).

Silver stain cleavage assays

For relevant structural and immunological proteins for which no relevant cleavage assay was found, silver staining was used to determine the capacity of rSmCI-1 to cleave such molecules. Two μg of Human Fibrinogen (Sigma-Aldrich), Immunoglobulin G (Sigma-Aldrich), recombinant complement component C3 (Millipore Sigma), recombinant CD4 (Sigma Aldrich) were added to 20 μl of KSRB with 1mM APMA. Samples were then either left without protease or given 2 μg/ml rSmCI-1, or 2 μg/ml Trypsin as a positive control for cleavage. Samples were incubated at 37°C for 18 hours, before being treated with reducing Laemmli buffer, boiled at 95°C for 15 minutes, and run on 12% and 15% SDS PAGE gels using a Mini PROTEAN Tetra system (Bio-Rad) at 150 V and 180 mA. Silver staining was performed using a Pierce Silver Stain Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and images were obtained using an ImageQuant LAS 4000 Gel Imaging System (GE Healthcare).

Testing hemolytic activity of human sera pre-treated with rSmCI-1 and rSm-CI-1Mut

Human sera (Sigma Millipore; S7023) was preincubated with rSmCI-1 or rSmCI-1Mut at a concentration of 2μg/ml for 18 hours. Using pre-sensitized sheep erythrocytes(ssRBC) (CompTech, USA; B202), classical pathway mediated hemolysis was assessed following previously published protocols, with invadolysin treated serum diluted 1:50 and then further diluted 1:2 prior to its addition to a round bottom 96-well plate, prior to the addition of RBCs [62]. Plates were read using spectrophotometer at 412 nm, the cell blank absorbance was subtracted from each measurement to obtain correct absorbances. Fractional hemolysis in each well was calculated relative to the 100% lysis wells.

Alternative pathway-mediated hemolysis was assessed using rabbit erythrocytes (Innovative Research, USA; IRBRBC10ML) following a previously published protocol [62]. Briefly, a 1:25 dilution of the rSmCI-1 and rSmCI-1Mut preincubated sera prepared as described above was prepared and then diluted 1:3 to create a working solution that was added to the wells of a round-bottom 96-well plate, prior to the addition of RBCs. Plates were read using spectrophotometer at 412 nm. Fractional hemolysis in each well was calculated relative to the 100% lysis wells.

RNAi-mediated knock down of SmCI-1 in cercaria

Recent advances in RNA mediated interference have demonstrated that long dsRNA is taken up into cells via Class A scavenger receptors [63]. Once internalized, these long dsRNA strands are processed into siRNA by Dicer and loaded into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) which can then be used to silence gene expression [64]. In order to utilize long dsRNA to silence expression of SmCI-1 in S. mansoni cercaria, we injected 10 S. mansoni infected B. glabrata with 6nM of dsRNA with repeated sequences complementary to portions of the SmCI-1 transcript (S1 Table). From 7 to 12 days post infection, cercaria were shed from snails as described above, and 20 cercaria were collected for western blot analysis. Membranes were probed with the α-SmCI-1 antibody or using a commercially available α-actin antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 0.5μg/ml). A GFP KD dsRNA construct was used at an identical concentration as a dsRNA control for mouse infection assays (S1 Table).

Plasma-mediated killing of newly transformed schistosomula

Cercaria were isolated from snails injected with SmCI-1 dsRNA both 12 days post injection (SmCI-1 KD cercaria) as well as after only 8 days post injection as a SmCI-1 positive control. Cercaria were mechanically transformed as previously described and added to the wells of a 24 well plate in 100μl of DMEM at a concentration of 5 cercaria per well. Newly transformed schistosomula were exposed to 10% human serum, with or without the wild type or mutant form of rSmCI-1 at 2μg/ml, or 10% heat inactivated human serum. Larval parasite viability was measured using the previously established method published by Frahm et al., taking into account parasite motility, morphology and granularity [65]. Briefly, immobile, and highly granular parasites with non-intact teguments received a score of 0, while contracting parasites with no granulation and a smooth tegument were given a score of 3. Scoring was performed by a single individual, blind of the treatment.

Cytokine assessment

Initial exploratory assessments of the effect of rSmCI-1 on cytokine production were completed using THP-1 cells, Jurkat cells, and a combination of both Jurkat and THP-1 cells at a ratio of 3:1. Cells were cultured in RPMI, at 10-cells per treatment. THP-1 differentiation was performed as via treatment with 40nm Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) for 24 hours followed by a 24 hour rest period in RPMI. Cells were either left unstimulated, stimulated with 225 ng whole cercarial lysate (WCL), 150 ng/ml drained cercarial lysate (DCL), or 75 ng/ml of E/S products. WCL had been generated via 3x 15s sonification of freshly emerged cercaria in PBS, on ice, while DCL and E/S products were obtained in an identical manner after 24 hour culture of the larvae at 37°C. Protein concentration was determined via Pierce BCA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The effects rSmCI-1 on cytokine production were assessed by the addition of 2 μg/ml of either rSmCI-1 or rSmCI-1Mut 30 minutes prior to stimulation with S. mansoni-derived factors. Cytokine levels were measured 24 hours post stimulation using the Human Proteome Profiler Human Cytokine Array Kit (Bio-Techne/R&D systems). Analysis was performed by comparing the amount of signal produced relative to media-only treated cells.

Investigations into the effect of rSmCI-1 and rSmCI-1Mut on cytokine production from human blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were examined using a Human XL Cytokine Luminex Performance Assay 46-plex Fixed Panel (Bio-Techne/R&D systems). PBMCs (Cedarlane/ATCC) were cultured in RPMI at 10,000 cells per treatment. Cells were either left unstimulated, stimulated with S. mansoni materials as described above, or stimulated with 1 μg/ml of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The effects of the recombinants on cytokine production were assessed by the addition of rSmCI-1 or rSmCI-1Mut at a concentration of 2 μg/ml 30 minutes prior to stimulation. Cytokine levels were measured 24 hours post stimulation.

Western blot cytokine cleavage assay

Recombinant human Eotaxin-1 (R&D systems) and recombinant IL-5 (R&D systems) at an amount of 50 ng/sample were incubated overnight in kit specific reaction buffer with 1 μg/ml rSmCI-1, 1 μg/ml rSmCI-1Mut, or 1 μg/ml trypsin. Western blotting was performed as detailed above, using a 1:1000 (0.3 μg/ml) dilution of monoclonal mouse anti-Eotaxin-1 or IL-5 (R&D).

Infection and perfusion of mice

Swiss Webster mice were used in infection assays to determine the role of SmCI-1 in in vivo infections. Infections were performed using a previously established method during which mice were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbite, after which a suspension of 100 cercaria in 750 μl of water was placed in a plastic ring (1 cm in diameter) on the surface of the mouse for 1 hour [22]. Cercaria treatments included parasites 12 dpi from PBS injected snails, 12 dpi GFP KD controls, 8 dpi SmCI-1 KD larvae, and 12 dpi SmCI-1 KD larvae.

Five weeks post infection, mice were perfused via portal veins and adult worms were quantified using previously established methods [66,67]. Briefly, mice were euthanized using a euthanasia solution containing heparin sodium salt. They were then perfused with a perfusion solution (0.85% NaCl, 0.75% Na₃C₆H₅O₇) using a 20-gauge needle inserted into the descending aorta. Adult worms were collected from a small slit in the hepatic portal vein, and counted via stereomicroscope.

Statistical analysis

Differences in activity in all cleavage assays, cytokine levels, and adult worm recovery each assessed via One-Way Anova (Prism 9; GraphPad Software). Given the non-parametric nature of viability scores, difference between groups in the schistosomula survival assay were assessed using Kruskal-Wallace test at each timepoint, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison tests.

Results

Location and expulsion of SmCI-1

Western blot analysis of SmCI-1 released during transformation into NTS demonstrated both the presence of SmCI-1 in cercaria as well as its release during transformation (Fig 1A). Our antibody recognizes a protein appearing at the expected size of 65 kda. The 65 kda band was observed in untransformed cercaria, as well as 24 hr NTS and their E/S products. SmCI-1 protein levels decreased over time as schistosomula developed (S2 Fig). Immunofluorescence staining utilizing a polyclonal anti-SmCI-1 antibody revealed a concentrated fluorescence signal emanating from the head of the cercaria, consistent with localization in acetabular glands (Fig 1B). Staining with either primary or secondary antibodies only failed to elicit such a signal. The SmCI-1 antibody repeatedly recognized a similar region in cercaria consistent with localization in acetabular glands (Fig 1C).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

(A) Western blot showing SmCI-1 immunoreactivity as a ~65kda band in cercaria, 24 hour post transformation cercaria, and cercarial E/S products. (B) SmCI-1 is detected within the S. mansoni cercaria, in an area consistent with localization within the acetabular glands, as revealed by immunofluorescence imaging, with SmCI-1 signal appearing in red. (C) Additional immunofluorescence images feature varying levels of fluorescence with consistent localization within the cercaria.

SmCI-1 displays canonical features and activity of an MMP

SmCI-1 possess the canonical MMP-active site amino acids necessary for function as a matrix metalloprotease (S1 Fig). Recombinant SmCI-1 displays dose-dependent MMP activity and is inhibited via the addition of [250 μM] of 1,10-phenanthroline (Fig 2A). Samples left inactivated, and those of the same concentration that were activated with 1mM APMA did not differ significantly in their activity. The mutation of Glu232→Gly232 rendered the rSmCI-1 mutant completely inactive, with no concentration up to and including 1 μg/ml differing from the vehicle control with respect to general MMP function (Fig 2B). The positive control, human MMP8 also demonstrated MMP activity that was inhibited by the addition of 1,10-phenanthroline (Fig 2C). Unlike rSmCI-1, MMP8 activated with APMA had significantly higher MMP activity than those that were not activated. Among MMP8 samples that were not activated, only those at 1 μg/ml displayed activity levels that differed significantly from the vehicle control (S3 Fig).

Fig 2. Recombinant SmCI-1 is a functional matrix metalloprotease.

Fig 2

MMP activity of (A) human MMP8, (B) rSmCI-1, and (C) rSmCI-1Mut. All proteases were examined at three initial concentrations of 1μg/ml, 0.5μg/ml, and 0.25μg/ml. Whereas MMP8 and rSmCI-1 demonstrated activity, rSmCI-1Mut did not. Human MMP8 required activation with 1mM APMA(+), rSmCI-1 had similar activity levels with and without APMA-mediated activation. Significant inhibition via the addition of [50μM] (p) or [250μM] (P) of 1,10-phenanthroine is denoted by (#). Activated samples (+) that differ significantly from their non-activated counterparts of an identical concentration are denoted using (*). (n = 6).

Cleavage of structural substrates

To better understand the role of SmCI-1 in degradation of prominent components of the extracellular matrix of host skin cells and the basement membrane of human skin, we examined the capacity of SmCI-1 to cleave gelatin, collagen type IV, and elastin. In the case of each of these possible substrates, rSmCI-1 was able to weakly cleave each of them. In the cases of gelatin (Fig 3A) and collagen type IV (Fig 3B), rSmCI-1 cleavage activity significantly differed from the APMA negative control, but only at 2 μg/ml, and not 1 μg/ml. This activity was significantly lower than that observed in the positive control, Clostridium histolytica collagenase. In the case of elastin, rSmCI-1 displayed cleavage activity above that of the APMA control for both 2 μg/ml and 1 μg/ml treatments. This activity was again lower than established positive controls for the cleavage of elastin, such as porcine elastase and human MMP12 (Fig 3C).

Fig 3. SmCI-1 weakly cleaves key host ECM components.

Fig 3

Recombinant SmCI-1 cleaves gelatin (A), collagen type IV (B), and elastin (C). In all cases, known positive controls for collagen type 4 and gelatin cleavage (C. histolytica collagenase) and elastin (porcine elastase and human MMP12) displayed higher levels of cleavage. Differences from the APMA vehicle control are denoted using (*) and samples with significantly higher cleavage activity than rSmCI-1 are denoted using (#). (D) Silver stain demonstrating the capacity of trypsin to cleave all three subunits of fibrinogen, and that rSmCI-1 can cleave the alpha subunit of fibrinogen only (n = 12).

Under reducing SDS-PAGE conditions, fibrinogen separates into the three distinct subunits of which it is composed (α, β, and γ). Our positive control, trypsin cleaves all three subunits, as evidenced by the disappearance of the bands of all three subunits and the appearance of two bands roughly 40kDa in size. Recombinant SmCI-1, alternatively, cleaves only the alpha subunit of fibrinogen, as shown by the disappearance of the α-subunit band at ~70kDa (Fig 3D).

Cleavage of complement component C3 leads to increased parasite viability

Four immunologically relevant proteins were examined as possible substrates for SmCI-1: complement component C3, CD4, CR1, and Immunoglobulin G (IgG). The latter three were all cleaved by trypsin but were unaltered by rSmCI-1 treatment (Figs 4 and S4). The only immunologically-relevant protein examined that was affected by rSmCI-1 treatment was complement component C3b (Fig 4A). Trypsin was capable of cleaving both C3b and the C3a anaphylatoxin.

Fig 4. SmCI-1 Cleaves complement component C3.

Fig 4

Silver stain of 2μg of (A) human complement component C3 loaded into the lanes of a reducing SDS-Page Gel. Under such conditions, C3 is separated into a C3b band at roughly 110kda, and a C3a band of ~72kda. Trypsin treatment resulted in the degradation of both C3b and C3a, while rSmCI-1 degrades only C3b into fragments visible between 26kda and 55kda. (B) Silver stain of human IgG separated into heavy (~50kda), and light (~25kda) chains, with residual complete antibody at higher molecular weights. (C) Rabbit erythrocyte lysis via the alternative complement pathway and (D) Sheep erythrocyte lysis via the classical complement pathway using human serum is decreased by addition of rSmCI-1, but not rSmCI-1Mut. Significant differences from untreated cells indicated by (*). (n = 8).

The cleavage of complement component C3b led us to examine the effects of SmCI-1 on both the classical and alternative complement pathways (Fig 4C and 4D). Pre-treatment of human serum with rSmCI-1 caused a significant decrease in alternative pathway-mediated lysis from 26.1±1.3% to 5.3±1.0%. A similar observation was made of the classical pathway, which displayed a significant decrease in lysis from 74.8±1.4% to 46.0±1.4% when serum was treated with rSmCI-1. Treatment with rSmCI-1Mut did not result in a significant decrease in lysis, with 26.2±1.6% and 73.2±0.7% lysis seen in the alternative and classical pathway assays, respectively (Fig 4C and 4D).

Injection of the SmCI-1 targeting dsRNA construct was successful at reducing the amount of SmCI-1 protein detectable in S. mansoni cercaria. On days 7–10 post injection, isolated cercaria were observed possessing SmCI-1, while at 11- and 12-days dpi, SmCI-1 was drastically reduced despite comparable levels of loading control (S5 Fig).

Being able to partially knock down SmCI-1 allowed us to assess the ability of SmCI-1 knockdown (KD) parasites to survive plasma-mediated destruction. Newly transformed schistosomula with SmCI-1 (8 dpi) were as viable as SmCI-1 KD parasites (12 dpi) at 48, 72, and 96 hours post transformation (Fig 5). At all three of the timepoints measured, NTS treated with 10% human serum or 10% human serum + rSmCI-1Mut had viability scores significantly lower than those of NTS treated with 10% human serum + rSmCI-1. Additionally, SmCI-1 KD parasites treated with 10% plasma and rSmCI-1 failed to differ in their viability scores from those SmCI-1 KD parasites treated with heat inactivated human serum (Fig 5).

Fig 5. SmCI-1 KD schistosomula are more susceptible to plasma mediated killing Viability scores of SmCI-1 KD (8dpi) and SmCI-1 KD (12dpi) schistosomula at 2, 3 and 4 days post transformation.

Fig 5

Newly transformed schistosomula were treated with human serum (HS), and either the wild type rSmCI-1, or the catalytically inactive mutant rSmCI-1Mut. Parasites were alternatively treated with heat inactivated human serum (HIHS). (*) indicates where treatments differed significantly from SmCI-1 KD schistosomula exposed to 10% human serum and wild type rSmCI-1. (n = 5).

Cytokine profiles

Initial examinations of the effects of SmCI-1 on cytokine production were conducted in cell lines (S6 Fig). These assessments revealed the capacity of rSmCI-1 to significantly reduce production of IL-1β, IL-12, and TNF-α in THP-1 cells stimulated with either WCL or DCL. It also reduced IL-12 and TNF-α production by Jurkat cells stimulated with cercarial materials. Co-incubation of both THP-1 and Jurkat cells resulted in the production of Eotaxin-1 and IL-5 by WCL and DCL treated cells, and this production was also reduced via addition of rSmCI-1. Contrary to the other cytokines examined, IL-10 was increased via addition of rSmCI-1 in all three types of cell culture. For each of the aforementioned cytokines other than IL-10, DCL was significantly more immunostimulatory than E/S products, while the inverse was true for IL-10.

SmCI-1 was found to have the capacity to alter the cytokine profiles of human PBMCs, as revealed by cytokine array profiling (S2 Table). Amongst this data lie observations on the effect of rSmCI-1 on the production of key cytokines, as well as whether MMP activity is required for these effects (Fig 6). Eotaxin-1, IL-5, IL-1β and IL-12 release from WCL-stimulated cells was significantly reduced following treatment with rSmCI-1, but not rSmCI-1Mut (p<0.05). While a trend towards reduced TNF-α abundance in WCL-treated cells was observed after rSmCI-1 treatment, it failed to reach statistical significance. For DCL treated cells, a significant reduction after treatment with rSmCI-1 was observed for IL-5, IL-1β, IL-12, and TNF-α compared to controls, while Eotaxin-l production was not reduced significantly. Again, rSmCI-1Mut failed to cause a reduction in the abundance of these cytokines when applied to DCL stimulated cells. In the case of IL-5, IL-12, and TNF-α, DCL-only treated cells proved to be significantly more pro-inflammatory than WCL-only treated cells. E/S product stimulated cells were less inflammatory for these cytokines that WCL or DCL treated cells, with the exception of IL-1β.

Fig 6. SmCI-1 alters cytokine profiles in an activity dependent manner when stimulated with whole cercarial lysate.

Fig 6

Cytokine levels from human PBMCs as measured by Luminex panel presented in pg/ml. Differences in levels of key cytokines stimulated with whole cercarial lysate (WCL), drained cercarial lysate (DCL), or S. mansoni E/S products. Treatments with 2μg/ml of either wild type rSmCI-1 (WT) or mutant rSmCI-1 (Mut) effects levels of these cytokines. (A) Inflammatory cytokines and key chemokines for which effects are seen. (B) The effect of rSmCI-1 on the anti inflammatory cytokine IL-10 for both S. mansoni WCL and DCL-treated cells and cells exposed only to the recombinants. (*) Indicates significant differences between the treatment and either the relevant WCL/DCL control or (in the case of recombinant only treated cells) untreated negative control. (#) Indicates significant difference from WCL treated cells when comparing WCL, DCL and E/S only treated groups, while ($) indicates significant difference from DCL treated cells when comparing levels to E/S product stimulated cells. (n = 3).

We also examined how rSmCI-1 and rSmCI-1Mut affected the abundance of anti-inflammatory molecules such as IL-10. In the case of IL-10 generated by WCL-stimulated PMBCs, WT and Mut rSmCI-1 treatments failed to differ significantly from each other, although a trend towards higher IL-10 production is observed when the wild type is added (478±17 pg/ml vs 767±329 pg/ml at 24 hours). In DCL-stimulated cells, IL-10 levels were significantly lower than WCL stimulated cells (168±39 pg/ml). DCL-treated cells to which rSmCI-1 was added increased IL-10 output significantly (767±15pg/ml), while rSmCI-1Mut treatment did not result in a significant increased (169±40 pg/ml). Of note is that E/S products elicited the production of 877±55pg/ml IL-10, which was significantly higher than DCL-only treated cells, but not significantly different than WCL-treated cells.

In PBMCs that were not stimulated with S. mansoni factors, but only treated with recombinants, rSmCI-1Mut treatment resulted in the increased abundance of numerous cytokines, while rSmCI-1 did not (S2 Table). The only cytokine altered by both rSmCI-1 and rSmCI-1Mut was IL-10, the levels of which increased after 24 hours, with unstimulated levels of IL-10 seen at 54±8.8 pg/ml, increasing significantly to 303±68 pg/ml and 697±82 pg/ml via rSmCI-1 and rSmCI-1Mut treatment, respectively (p<0.01).

A similar pattern for cytokine alteration was also observed for pro-inflammatory molecules and IL-10 in the context of LPS stimulated cells at 24 hrs post stimulation (Fig 7). IL-1β production was significantly reduced, with LPS treated cells producing 1107.3±144.5 pg/ml, while cells treated with LPS and rSmCI-1 produced only 515.9±41.5 pg/ml. No significant reduction in IL-1β was seen for LPS+rSmCI-1Mut. LPS treatment resulted in higher IL-1α and TNF-α levels than those produced by cells exposed to WCL, with observed levels of 259.1±34.7 pg/ml and 14648.4±1878.8 pg/ml. Both IL-1α and TNF-α levels were significantly reduced via the addition of function rSmCI-1 (p<0.05), but not rSmCI-1Mut. IL-10 increases were also seen when adding either recombinant to LPS stimulated cells. These increases were all statistically significant, with the exception of LPS+rSmCI-1Mut (p = 0.057).

Fig 7. SmCI-1 alters cytokine profiles in an activity dependent manner when stimulated with lipopolysaccharides.

Fig 7

Cytokine levels from human PBMCs as measured by Luminex panel presented in pg/ml. Differences in levels of key cytokines stimulated with 1μg/ml lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Treatments with 2μg/ml of either wild type rSmCI-1 (WT) or mutant rSmCI-1 (Mut) effects levels of these cytokines. (*) Indicates significant differences between the treatment and either the WCL control or untreated negative control. (n = 3).

Cytokine cleavage

Given the capacity of rSmCI-1, but not rSmCI-1Mut, to lower Eotaxin-1 and IL-5 levels, as well as findings in other systems that metalloproteases can cleave Eotaxin-1, we set about examining whether rSmCI-1 is able to cleave Eotaxin-1 and IL-5. Neither recombinant cytokine was cleaved by rSmCI-1 (Fig 8). Trypsin completely degraded Eotaxin-1, and partially degraded IL-5.

Fig 8. S. mansoni invadolysins do not cleave key cytokines.

Fig 8

Western blots containing 50ng/lane recombinant human cytokines treated with 1μg/ml of the indicated proteases and probed with relevant monoclonal antibodies. Trypsin degrades Eotaxin-1 while the invadolysins do not. IL-5 was weakly affected by trypsin, and not degraded by either the wild type or mutant rSmCI-1.

SmCI-1 KD parasites displayed lower infection success in mice

SmCI-1 knockdown was able to significantly reduce adult worm burden 5 weeks post infection in Swiss Webster mice (Fig 9). From the 100 cercaria applied to each mouse, an average of 31.8 (SEM = 2.4) adult S. mansoni were recovered from the PBS 12 dpi group, 32.2 (SEM = 1.9) from the GFP KD 12 dpi group, 29.0 (SEM = 2.0) from the SmCI-1 KD 8dpi group, and 22 (SEM = 1.2) from the SmCI-1 KD 12 dpi group. The SmCI-1 KD 12 dpi group featured worm burdens significantly lower than those seen in both the PBS and GFP KD control groups, while the SmCI-1 KD 8 dpi group failed to differ significantly from controls (p<0.01).

Fig 9. SmCI-1 KD reduces adult worm burden in mouse model.

Fig 9

Infection of Swiss Webster mice using 100 S. mansoni cercaria results in different adult worm burdens 5 weeks post infection depending upon cercaria treatment. Cercaria emerged from B. glabrata 12 days post injection with a PBS control, a GFP KD dsRNA construct, a SmCI-1 KD dsRNA construct, or 8 days post injection with a SmCI-1 KD dsRNA construct. (*) Indicates a significantly lowered adult worm burden as compared to PBS 12 dpi and GFR KD 12 dpi groups. (n = 6).

Discussion

Surviving the early stages of infection in human skin, prior to the development of a multi-layered tegument that renders larval schistosomes highly resistant to immune mediated attack, is critical for S. mansoni survival [3,68]. We sought to characterize the function of the most abundantly produced invadolysin in S. mansoni cercaria [13,23]. We find compelling evidence that SmCI-1 is a potent immunomodulator that can create an environment conducive to survival of the cercaria during its transformation into a schistosomula.

SmCI-1 is found in S. mansoni acetabular glands and expulsed during transformation

The placement of SmCI-1 staining inside of the cercaria is in a location consistent with presence in acetabular glands, which is expected given previous observations in the literature [23,42]. The original identification of SmCI-1 suggested it is a prominent protein of the cercarial acetabular glands (23). Additionally, work by Vondráček et al. using laser microdissection of Trichobilharzia szidati revealed the presence of invadolysins in both post and pre-acetabular gland [42]. However, we were unable to ascertain the precise acetabular gland that SmCI-1 is contained within [42,6971].

Our analyses of cercarial bodies and E/S products confirm the release of SmCI-1, which is consistent with the expectation that cercaria expulse acetabular gland contents [23]. We detect the expected ~65kda protein by Western blot along with a faint second band roughly 49kda in size in cercaria samples. Cleavage of the zymogen into an active form is a near universal requirement for MMPs, thus the ~49kda likely reflects the presence of an activated form of SmCI-1 retained within the cercaria [35,72,73]. SmCI-1 is gradually released from the cercaria between 0- and 4-days post transformation. The exact kinetics of acetabular gland release and the location surrounding the parasite in the skin has long been contested [14,15,1921]. Previous research has demonstrated that acetabular gland contents can be present at the apical end of cercaria as they arrive in the dermis, wherein they are likely to encounter numerous immune cell types [74,75]. Additionally, these glands have been observed to atrophy between 48–72 hours post penetration, meaning they are still present as the parasite combats the immune response in the dermis [76]. The vortexing transformation method used in this study is not ideal for studying acetabular gland release kinetics given that the cercaria are not squeezed as they would be moving between skin cells. This more natural path likely facilitates a more rapid expulsion of E/S products. However, the more controlled context of culturing suggests that as the parasite releases SmCI-1 over time, it does not seem to continue to produce SmCI-1 to replace that which it has already expulsed (S2 Fig). This is consistent with the finding that SmCI-1 is most highly upregulated in the germ ball stage of development, as the cercaria prepares to exit the snail, and not in the emerged cercaria themselves [31].

MMP activity of SmCI-1 leads to the cleavage of key host proteins

SmCI-1 possesses all of the canonical amino acid residues of an invadolysin, including the three histidines employed in the coordination of a zinc ion (His231 His235 His336), the glutamic acid which acts as a nucleophile (Glu232), the methionine underneath the active site which aids in stabilizing metzincin proteases (Met347), and three cysteines serving as candidates for the “cysteine switch” mechanism of activation (Cys182, Cys194, Cys211) [34,61,7780]. These residues, as well as a 32.6% amino acid similarity to GP63 from Leishmania major, support classification of SmCI-1 as an invadolysin [61].

SmCI-1 clearly displays MMP activity that is inhibited by 1,10-phenanthroline further establishing it as a functional metalloprotease. APMA activation of MMP-8, but not SmCI-1, suggests that the latter exists in a pre-activated state. Possible explanations for this are SmCI-1 being self-activating or activating neighboring SmCI-1 molecules. There is precedent for self-activation, as inhibition of the active site of Leishmania sp. GP63 reduces maturation [46]. The concept of neighboring invadolysin molecules being responsible for such activation is less likely, given that addition of activated GP63 to GP63 zymogen does not facilitate increased activation of the zymogen [81]. Finally, mutation of the active site glutamic acid into a non-polar glycine completely abrogated the MMP activity of SmCI-1 given the resulting lack of a nucleophilic side chain [80,82].

Examination of the proteolysis of several host skin structural molecules by SmCI-1 was predicated upon the knowledge that S. mansoni products have been known to degrade host ECM at a distance from the invading larval schistosome, as well GP63’s ability to degrade host ECM proteins [45,83,84]. We elected to examine elastin and collagen type I V cleavage given their abundance in human skin [85,86]. SmCI-1 was capable of cleaving elastin, gelatin, collagen type IV, albeit at relatively low levels as compared to our a positive controls. As SmCE has been shown to be responsible for the majority of the activity required to enter through human skin, it is likely that the low elastase/collagenase activity demonstrated by SmCI-1 suggests aiding in movement through human skin may not be the primary function of this MMP [27]. Regarding fibrinogen, while not as abundant in the skin as either collagen or elastin, it may be present at the site of penetration to facilitate wound healing and blood clotting, a function that would likely be negatively impacted by the cleavage of the fibrinogen α-subunit by SmCI-1.

Our discovery that SmCI-1 cleaves complement component C3b aligns with studies of GP63 that demonstrate that it can cleave complement component C3 to help survive complement mediated lysis [48,52]. S. mansoni must also contend with complement-mediated killing by human serum, but only during the period in which the parasite is undergoing shedding of the immunostimulatory glycocalyx [87]. The degradation of C3b by SmCI-1 results in decreased complement mediated hemolysis via classical and alternative complement pathways, suggesting SmCI-1 may be employed by cercaria to avoid complement mediated lysis. Further support for a role in combatting the complement system is demonstrated in our NTS viability assay, where SmCI-1 KD parasites are damaged by human serum more so than controls. Given the inability of these parasites to generate typical levels of SmCI-1, and that addition of rSmCI-1 rescues parasite viability scores, we argue that there is compelling evidence that SmCI-1 functions in protecting larval schistosomes from the membrane attack complex. This argument is further supported by the inability of heat inactivated serum to reduce viability scores in the same significant manner as regular serum with or without the catalytically inactive rSmCI-1Mut. This is supported by previous work demonstrating membrane attack complex mediated killing of cercaria by normal human serum, but not heat inactivated serum [88]. The likelihood of complement enhanced killing of skin-stage S. mansoni is exacerbated by the presence of human eosinophils and neutrophils, which have displayed schistosome killing activity in vitro, and which is enhanced by the addition of complement factors [89]. SmCI-1 mediated cleavage of C3b would create an environment in which S. mansoni has less opsonizing factors to avoid, thereby reducing recognition by monocytes/granulocytes during the sensitive skin-penetration period of its lifecycle. That SmCI-1 does not cleave IgG, CD4, or CR1 is notable given L. major GP63 is able to cleave CD4, and schistosomula E/S product are known to cleave IgG. This merely points to a degree of specificity possessed by SmCI-1, as seen with other proteases [49,79,90,91].

The effect of SmCI-1 on cytokine profiles

In response to S. mansoni cercarial penetration of the skin, humans produce a variety of immunostimulatory cytokines with the aim of creating an inflammatory milieu in which invading parasites are destroyed [92]. Schistosomes respond to this inflammation by releasing numerous anti-immune factors [3]. These factors range in form and function, from increasing anti-inflammatory molecules such as IL-10 and reducing production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1α and IL-1β, to directly affecting various cell functions [3,9399].

Cytokine profiling following treatment of PBMCs with recombinant SmCI-1 revealed the alteration of numerous cytokines important for an immune response in the skin. The reduction of IL-1β and IL-12, as well as the first observed reduction of Eotaxin-1 and IL-5 by a cercaria specific factor, suggests both reduced inflammation and reduced recruitment/maturation of eosinophils. While drained cercarial lysate proved more immunostimulatory than whole cercarial lysate, addition of SmCI-1 back into the system in the form of the wild type recombinant resulted in cytokine levels comparable to those seen in cells treated with whole cercarial lysate, which would have contained endogenous SmCI-1. Given the importance of Eotaxin-1 in recruiting eosinophils to the site of infection, the function of IL-5 to activate eosinophils, and the capacity of eosinophils to kill schistosomulae in vitro, the downregulation of these cytokines by SmCI-1 likely assists in avoidance of eosinophil mediated destruction [89,100102]. Precedent in the form of hookworm metalloproteases cleaving Eotaxin-1 led us to believe that direct cleavage of cytokines may have been a mechanism of action, but our Eotaxin-1 and IL-5 cleavage assays suggest this not to be the case [59]. This finding suggests to us that another mechanism may be responsible for the downregulation of these cytokines. Possibilities include the cleavage of surface receptors, the targeting of intracellular signalling molecules or affecting upstream immune stimulating pathways that lead to the production of these cytokines. It is possible that SmCI-1 could cleave cell signalling molecules, given the ability of L. major GP63 to cleave MRP and NF-κB, and the recent observations that host macrophages, dendritic cells, and neutrophils are all capable of internalizing schistosome E/S products [74]. Given previous work showing TLR4 signalling through the MyD88 pathway is important in recognizing cercarial tegument, such a pathway serves as a possible target [103].

Regardless of the mechanism by which SmCI-1 enacts its effect, our initial investigations into cytokine production using THP-1 and Jurkat cells as model systems for macrophages and T cells revealed that it is likely to be a generic immunosuppressive mechanism in multiple cell types, and not merely the specific targeting of one subset of immune cell. Given macrophages and T-cells are known to be present at the site of cercarial penetration, they are likely targets for SmCI-1 during infection [3,74].

On top of treating PBMCs with recombinants or whole cercarial lysate, we also examined SmCI-1 ability to alter LPS mediated cytokine profiles. The reduction of IL-1β, IL-1α and TNF-α by the active recombinant suggests that SmCI-1 may be enacting its immunomodulatory role via the targeting of inflammatory pathways common to multiple pathogen types. The field of studying the anti-inflammatory properties of helminth antigens is continuously expanding, and seeks to exploit the hygiene/old friends hypothesis in an attempt to utilize worm antigens as anti-inflammatory factors for the treatment of numerous diseases [104107]. SmCI-1’s ability to reduce LPS mediated inflammation positions it within this growing group of anti-inflammatory worm antigens. While different receptors and signalling pathways could be suggested as possible targets for SmCI-1 interference, the identification of such remains to be performed, and will be a significant focus of our research moving forwards.

Our observation that both the catalytically active and inactive forms of rSmCI-1 upregulated IL-10 production suggests this production is elicited in a non-MMP activity dependent manner. Interestingly, the most significant increase in IL-10 levels was seen during treatment of the PBMCs with only the recombinants, and no other stimulant, suggesting that SmCI-1 promotes production independent of other parasite derived factors. Given the observation that S. mansoni E/S products have long been known to elicit IL-10, and that S. mansoni infection of IL-10 deficient mice results in increased inflammation and slowed parasite migration, the ability of SmCI-1 to induce its production remains intriguing [98]. Our future work will focus on determining what host factors SmCI-1 is interacting with in order to cause this increase in the production of IL-10.

Effects on S. mansoni mouse infection success

Our dsRNA construct injection marks the first successful knockdown of a S. mansoni cercarial factor prior to its emergence from the snail and allowed for the generation of parasites lacking normal levels of SmCI-1. Given the roughly 30.8% reduction in adult worm burden observed as compared to cercaria from PBS injected B. glabrata, SmCI-1 has demonstrated it enhances parasite survival. We believe the protective effect of SmCI-1 is likely due to a combination of degrading structural components of mammalian skin, overcoming complement mediated lysis, and downregulating inflammatory responses at the site of infection. All such functions are uniquely tailored to survival by the larval parasite during migration and maturation within the skin. Given that SmCI-1 transcript levels are significantly lower during other life cycle stages other than germball S. mansoni, it is likely that skin-stage parasites are the primary beneficiaries of the invadolysin’s protective effects [31].

Interestingly, infected human populations have been shown to possess antibodies to SmCI-1, although at lower levels than measured for numerous other key schistosome antigens such as cathepsin B [108]. It is possible that the inability of humans to mount a sufficient antibody response to this antigen allows the larval parasite to continue to employ the invadolysin in overcoming immune defense mechanism. Immunization against SmCI-1 to increase circulating antibody levels may prove beneficial, not in targeting the parasite itself, but rather in altering the immunological milieu in which the parasite resides, and increasing the likelihood of parasite death in the skin.

Conclusion

SmCI-1 is the second most abundant acetabular gland protein released by S. mansoni cercaria during penetration into human skin. This fact alone merits an examination of its roles during infection. Here, we show that SmCI-1 possesses the hallmark structure and sequences of an invadolysin, a family of proteases shown to be important for infection success in numerous parasites. We demonstrate that SmCI-1 has numerous functions relevant to survival in human skin (Fig 10), including cleavage of structural components, targeting of complement component C3b for cleavage, and subsequent reduction of complement pathway activity. This leads to a protective effect against complement mediated lysis of newly transformed cercaria. We also show that it can alter the immunological environment in human cells by reducing IL-1β, IL-12, IL-5, and Eotaxin-1 levels, but only while in possession of MMP activity. Additionally, it can increase IL-10 levels, and MMP activity is not necessary for this function. Finally, knockdown of SmCI-1 in cercaria results in reduced adult worm burdens in mice, confirming the importance of SmCI-1 in infection establishment. Future work should seek to determine the method by which SmCI-1 enacts its effect on cytokines, and seek to determine whether immunization against this factor induces protective immunity against S. mansoni infection.

Fig 10. SmCI-1 functions in numerous ways suggesting a key role in host penetration and survival during the initial stages of intra-human infection.

Fig 10

These include the degradation of host ECM factors involved in the integrity of the skin. It also includes the targeted cleaving of complement component C3b, which leads to the reduction of complement mediated lysis of the parasite. It also includes the reduction of IL-5 and Eotaxin-1 production, an observation suggesting a role in reducing eosinophil recruitment and development. Finally, the reduction of IL-1β and IL-12 caused by SmCI-1 is indicative of a reduction in inflammation in the skin, which might explain the lack of swelling and site-specific inflammation seen during most S. mansoni infections.

Supporting information

S1 Fig

A 3D visualization of the crystal structure of GP63 (A), and a magnified view of its active site (B). The predicted structure of the full amino acid sequence of SmCI-1 is also present (C) alongside a magnified view of its active site (D). Active site histidines are presented in red, holding a zinc ion (orange ball) in position. Nucleophilic glutamic acids are marked as green, with likely met-turn methionines marked as purple. All cysteines N-terminal to the active site have been coloured yellow.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. SmCI-1 protein levels in NTS are not continuously renewed.

Western blot of SmCI-1 levels in untransformed cercaria, newly transformed schistosomula (NTS) cultured for two days, and NTS culture for 4 days. Accompanying E/S products obtained from the RPMI cercaria were isolated in, as well as the RPMI supernatant of 0–2 NTS and 2–4 day NTS.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. SmCI-1 is active in various buffers.

Vehicle, APMA, and 1,10-phenanthroline controls for generic MMP assay fail to vary significantly from substrate controls (A). SmCI-1 activity as measured using a generic fluorometric MMP assay in a variety of buffers (B). The highest activity is seen in the Sensolyte MMP assay provided buffer. Activity is also seen in our lab made generic MMP buffer (50mM Tris, 10mM CaCl2, 150mM NaCl, pH 7.5), as well as RPMI and DMEM. Activity is not seen in Krebs-Ringer Phosphate Buffer (KRPG) (145mM NaCl, 6mM Na3PO4, 5mM KCl, 0.5mM CaCl2, 1mM MgSO4, pH 7.4) or PBS. Statistically significant differences from vehicle only controls indicated using (*).

(TIF)

S4 Fig. SmCI-1.

SmCI-1 fails to cleave CR1 (A), or CD4 (B). Trypsin does cleave these molecules, as evidenced by the appearance of novel bands such as the numerous bands located between 26 and 24kda when it is added to CR1, and the ~20kda bands seen when trypsin is added to CD4.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. dsRNA successfully knocks down production of SmCI-1.

Western blot using (A) α-SmCI-1 antibody or (B) α-actin antibody on samples of 20 cercaria at varying timepoints post dsRNA construct injection. At 11 and 12 days post injection, SmCI-1 levels are significantly reduced as compared to 7–10 days post injection.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. SmCI-1 effects cytokine production in both THP-1 and Jurkat cell lines.

rSmCI-1 alters the production of numerous cytokines produced in THP-1 cells, Jurkat cells, and a combination of the two. Stimulation was performed using whole cercarial lysate (WCL, n = 6), drained cercarial lysate (DCL, n = 3), or cercarial excretory/secretory (E/S, n = 3) products. Those samples treated with rSmCI-1 were given 2μg/ml. (*) Indicates a significant difference for rSmCI-1 treated cells as compared to the corresponding WCL- or DCL-only treated samples. (#) Indicates WCL and DCL treated samples with significantly different levels than E/S treated samples. ($) Indicates significantly different levels of production between WCL and DCL treated samples.

(TIF)

S1 Table. dsRNA sequence used for SmCI-1 KD in cercaria.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Cytokine array data for PBMCs.

Average pg/ml concentrations of individually indicated cytokines treated with S. mansoni whole cercarial lysate, E/S products, LPS, recombinant SmCI-1, or recombinant SmCI-1Mut. Values are indicated for both 24 and 12 hour timepoints. Accompanied by Standard error of the mean values (SEM). n = 3.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

Microscopy was performed in the University of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Cell Imaging Core. The authors would like to recognize Christina Bowhay as the artist and illustrator of the final summary figure.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC) grants 2018-05209 and 2018- 522661 to PCH. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. The Weekly Epidemiological Record (WER) WHO. (2018). (45):445–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pila EA, Li H, Hambrook JR, Wu X, Hanington PC. Schistosomiasis from a Snail’s Perspective: Advances in Snail Immunity Trends Parasitol.(2017) 33(11):845–57. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2017.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hambrook JR, Hanington PC. Immune Evasion Strategies of Schistosomes Front Immunol. (2021) 11(1):3820. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.624178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Angeles JMM, Mercado VJP, Rivera PT. Behind Enemy Lines: Immunomodulatory Armamentarium of the Schistosome Parasite. Vol. 11, Frontiers in Immunology. Frontiers Media S.A.; (2020) 2020. p. 1018. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mitchell KM, Mutapi F, Savill NJ, Woolhouse MEJ. Protective immunity to Schistosoma haematobium infection is primarily an anti-fecundity response stimulated by the death of adult worms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2012) 109(33):13347–52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1121051109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Butterworth AE. Immunological aspects of human schistosomiasis. Br Med Bull. (1998) 54(2):357–68. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Amaral MS, Santos DW, Pereira ASA, Tahira AC, Malvezzi JVM, Miyasato PA, et al. Rhesus macaques self-curing from a schistosome infection can display complete immunity to challenge. Nat Commun. (2021) 12(1):1–17. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26497-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Houlder EL, Costain AH, Cook PC, MacDonald AS. Schistosomes in the Lung: Immunobiology and Opportunity. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:1330. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.635513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McKerrow JH, Doenhoff MJ. Schistosome proteases. Parasitol Today. (1988) 4(12):334–40. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(88)90002-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vermeire JJ, Taft AS, Hoffmann KF, Fitzpatrick JM, Yoshino TP. Schistosoma mansoni: DNA microarray gene expression profiling during the miracidium-to-mother sporocyst transformation. Mol Biochem Parasitol. (2006) 147(1):39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Taft AS, Vermeire JJ, Bernier J, Birkeland SR, Cipriano MJ, Papa AR, et al. Transcriptome analysis of Schistosoma mansoni larval development using serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE). Parasitology. (2009) 136(5):469–85. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009005733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wu X-J, Sabat G, Brown JF, Zhang M, Taft A, Peterson N, et al. Proteomic analysis of Schistosoma mansoni proteins released during in vitro miracidium-to-sporocyst transformation. Mol Biochem Parasitol. (2009) 164:32–44. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hambrook JR, Kaboré AL, Pila EA, Hanington PC. A metalloprotease produced by larval Schistosoma mansoni facilitates infection establishment and maintenance in the snail host by interfering with immune cell function. Jolly ER, editor. PLoS Pathog. (2018) 14(10):e1007393. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bartlett A, Brown M, Marriott C, Whitfield PJ. The infection of human skin by schistosome cercariae : studies using Franz cells. Parasitology. (2000) 1121:49–54. doi: 10.1017/s0031182099006034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McKerrow JH, Salter J. Invasion of skin by Schistosoma cercariae. Trends Parasitol. (2002) 18(5):193–5. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)02309-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang Q, Da’dara AA, Skelly PJ. The human blood parasite Schistosoma mansoni expresses extracellular tegumental calpains that cleave the blood clotting protein fibronectin. Sci Rep. (2017) 7(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13141-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Leontovyč A, Ulrychová L, O’Donoghue AJ, Vondrášek J, Marešová L, Hubálek M, et al. SmSP2: A serine protease secreted by the blood fluke pathogen Schistosoma mansoni with anti-hemostatic properties. Greenberg RM, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2018) 12(4):e0006446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Da’dara AA, Bhardwaj R, Ali YBM, Skelly PJ. Schistosome tegumental ecto-apyrase (SmATPDase1) degrades exogenous pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic nucleotides. PeerJ. (2014) 2014(1):e316. doi: 10.7717/peerj.316 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Whitfield PJ, Bartlett A, Brown MB, Marriott C. Invasion by schistosome cercariae: Studies with human skin explants. Trends Parasitol. (2003) 19(8):339–40. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(03)00143-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Curwen RS, Wilson RA. Invasion of skin by schistosome cercariae: Some neglected facts. Trends Parasitol. (2003) 19(2):63–6. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(02)00019-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McKerrow JJ. Invasion of skin by schistosome cercariae: Some neglected facts—Response from James J. McKerrow. Trends Parasitol. (2003) 19(2):66–8. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)00018-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fallon PG, Teixeira MM, Neice CM, Williams TJ, Hellewell PG, Doenhoff MJ. Enhancement of Schistosoma mansoni infectivity by intradermal injections of larval extracts: A putative role for larval proteases. J Infect Dis. (1996) 173(6):1460–6. doi: 10.1093/infdis/173.6.1460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Curwen RS, Ashton PD, Sundaralingam S, Wilson RA. Identification of Novel Proteases and Immunomodulators in the Secretions of Schistosome Cercariae That Facilitate Host Entry. Mol Cell Proteomics. (2006) 5(5):835–44. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500313-MCP200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Marikovsky M, Fishelson Z, Arnon R. Purification and characterization of proteases secreted by transforming schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. Mol Biochem Parasitol. (1988) 30(1):45–54. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(88)90131-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chavez-Olortegu C, Tavares CAP, Resende M. Purification and characterization of a 47 kDa protease from Schistosoma mansoni cerearial secretion. Parasitology. (1992) 105(2):211–8. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000074138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Newport GR, McKerrow JH, Hedstrom R, Petitt M, McGarrigle L, Barr PJ, et al. Cloning of the proteinase that facilitates infection by schistosome parasites. J Biol Chem. (1988) 263(26):13179–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Salter JP, Lim KC, Hansell E, Hsieh I, McKerrow JH. Schistosome invasion of human skin and degradation of dermal elastin are mediated by a single serine protease. J Biol Chem. (2000) 275(49):38667–73. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M006997200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lim KC, Sun E, Bahgat M, Bucks D, Richard G, Hinz RS, et al. Blockage of skin invasion by schistosome cercariae by serine protease inhibitors. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (1999) 60(3):487–92. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1999.60.487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Verjovski-Almeida S, DeMarco R, Martins EAL, Guimarães PEM, Ojopi EPB, Paquola ACM, et al. Transcriptome analysis of the acoelomate human parasite Schistosoma mansoni. Nat Genet. (2003) 35(2):148–57. doi: 10.1038/ng1237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Berriman M, Haas BJ, Loverde PT, Wilson RA, Dillon GP, Cerqueira GC, et al. The genome of the blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni. Nature. (2009) 460(7253):352–8. doi: 10.1038/nature08160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Parker-Manuel SJ, Ivens AC, Dillon GP, Wilson RA. Gene expression patterns in larval Schistosoma mansoni associated with infection of the mammalian host. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2011) 5(8):e1274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Metalloproteases Nagase H. Encycl Biol Chem Second Ed.: (2013) 86–9. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-378630-2.00018–9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Klein T, Bischoff R. Physiology and pathophysiology of matrix metalloproteases. Amino Acids. (2011) 41(2):271–90. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0689-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tallant C, García-Castellanos R, Baumann U, Gomis-Rüth FX. On the relevance of the met-turn methionine in metzincins. J Biol Chem. (2010) 285(18):13951–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.083378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gomiz-Rüth FX. Catalytic domain architecture of metzincin metalloproteases. J Biol Chem. (2009) 284(23):15353–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R800069200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Olivier M, Atayde VD, Isnard A, Hassani K, Shio MT. Leishmania virulence factors: focus on the metalloprotease GP63. Microbes Infect. (2012) 14:1377–89. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2012.05.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Silva LL, Marcet-Houben M, Zerlotini A, Gabaldón T, Oliveira G, Nahum LA. Evolutionary histories of expanded peptidase families in Schistosoma mansoni. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. (2011) 106(7):864–77. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02762011000700013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Protasio A V., Tsai IJ, Babbage A, Nichol S, Hunt M, Aslett MA, et al. A systematically improved high quality genome and transcriptome of the human blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2012) 6(1):e1455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhou Y, Zheng H, Chen X, Zhang L, Wang K, Guo J, et al. The Schistosoma japonicum genome reveals features of host-parasite interplay. Nature. (2009) 460(7253):345–51. doi: 10.1038/nature08140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liu S, Cai P, Piao X, Hou N, Zhou X, Wu C, et al. Expression Profile of the Schistosoma japonicum Degradome Reveals Differential Protease Expression Patterns and Potential Anti-schistosomal Intervention Targets. PLoS Comput Biol. (2014) 10(10):e1003856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Young ND, Jex AR, Li B, Liu S, Yang L, Xiong Z, et al. Whole-genome sequence of Schistosoma haematobium. Nat Genet. (2012) 44(2):221–5. doi: 10.1038/ng.1065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vondráček O, Mikeš L, Talacko P, Leontovyč R, Bulantová J, Horák P. Differential proteomic analysis of laser-microdissected penetration glands of avian schistosome cercariae with a focus on proteins involved in host invasion. Int J Parasitol. (2022) 52(6):343–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2021.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bouvier J, Schneider P, Etges R. Leishmanolysin: Surface metalloproteinase of Leishmania. Methods Enzymol. (1995) 248:614–33. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(95)48039-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Etges R, Bouvier J, Bordier C. The major surface protein of Leishmania promastigotes is a protease. J Biol Chem. (1986) 261(20):9098–101. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)67621-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.McGwire BS, Chang KP, Engman DM. Migration through the extracellular matrix by the parasitic protozoan Leishmania is enhanced by surface metalloprotease gp63. Infect Immun. (2003) 71(2):1008–10. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.2.1008–1010.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bouvier J, Schneider P, Etges R, Bordier C. Peptide Substrate Specificity of the Membrane-Bound Metalloprotease of Leishmania. Biochem. (1990) 29:10113–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brittingham A, Morrison CJ, McMaster WR, McGwire BS, Chang KP, Mosser DM. Role of the Leishmania surface protease gp63 in complement fixation, cell adhesion, and resistance to complement-mediated lysis. J Immunol. (1995) 155(6):3102–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Joshi PB, Kelly BL, Kamhawi S, Sacks DL, Mcmaster WR. Targeted gene deletion in Leishmania major identifies leishmanolysin (GP63) as a virulence factor. Mol Biochem Parasitol. (2002) 120:33–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hey AS, Theander TG, Hviid L, Hazrati SM, Kemp M, Kharazmi A. The major surface glycoprotein (gp63) from Leishmania major and Leishmania donovani cleaves CD4 molecules on human T cells. J Immunol. (1994) 152(9):4542–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yao C, Donelson JE, Wilson ME. The major surface protease (MSP or GP63) of Leishmania sp. Biosynthesis, regulation of expression, and function. Mol Biochem Parasitol. (2003) 132:1–16. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(03)00211-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mosser DM, Edelson PJ. The mouse macrophage receptor for C3bi (CR3) is a major mechanism in the phagocytosis of Leishmania promastigotes. J Immunol. (1985) 135(4):2785–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chaudhuri G, Chang K-P. Acid protease activity of a major surface membrane glycoprotein (gp63) from Leishmania mexicana promastigotes. Mol Biochem Parasitol. (1988) 27:43–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chaudhuri G, Chaudhuri M, Pan A, Chang KP. Surface acid proteinase (gp63) of Leishmania mexicana. A metalloenzyme capable of protecting liposome-encapsulated proteins from phagolysosomal degradation by macrophages. J Biol Chem. (1989) 264(13):7483–9. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)83260-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Corradin S, Ransijn A, Corradin G, Roggero MA, Schmitz AAP, Schneider P, et al. MARCKS-related protein (MRP) is a substrate for the Leishmania major surface protease leishmanolysin (gp63). J Biol Chem. (1999) 274(36):25411–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.36.25411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gregory DJ, Godbout M, Contreras I, Forget G, Olivier M. A novel form of NF-κB is induced by Leishmania infection: Involvement in macrophage gene expression. Eur J Immunol. (2008) 38(4):1071–81. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ahmed AA, Wahbi A, Nordlind K, Kharazmi A, Sundqvist KG, Mutt V, et al. In vitro Leishmania major promastigote-induced macrophage migration is modulated by sensory and autonomic neuropeptides. Scand J Immunol. (1998) 48(1):79–85. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3083.1998.00380.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.SØRensen AL, Hey AS, Kharazmi A. Leishmania major surface protease Gp63 interferes with the function of human monocytes and neutrophils in vitro. APMIS. (1994) 102(1–6):265–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1994.tb04874.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lieke T, Nylén S, Eidsmo L, McMaster WR, Mohammadi AM, Khamesipour A, et al. Leishmania surface protein gp63 binds directly to human natural killer cells and inhibits proliferation. Clin Exp Immunol. (2008) 153(2):221–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03687.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Culley FJ, Brown A, Conroy DM, Sabroe I, Pritchard DI, Williams TJ. Eotaxin Is Specifically Cleaved by Hookworm Metalloproteases Preventing Its Action In Vitro and In Vivo (2000). J Immunol. 165(11):6447–53. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.11.6447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cody JJ, Ittiprasert W, Miller AN, Henein L, Mentink-Kane MM, Hsieh MH. The NIH-NIAID Schistosomiasis Resource Center at the Biomedical Research Institute: Molecular Redux. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2016) 10(10). doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Schlagenhauf E, Etges R, Metcalf P. The crystal structure of the Leishmania major surface proteinase leishmanolysin (gp63). Structure. (1998) 6(8):1035–46. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(98)00104-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Morgan BP. Complement Methods and Protocols. Complement Methods Protoc. (2000) doi: 10.1385/159259056x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.DeWitte-Orr SJ, Collins SE, Bauer CMT, Bowdish DM, Mossman KL. An accessory to the “Trinity”: SR-As are essential pathogen sensors of extracellular dsRNA, mediating entry and leading to subsequent type I IFN responses. PLoS Pathog. (2010) 6(3):e1000829. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Semple SL, Au SKW, Jacob RA, Mossman KL, DeWitte-Orr SJ. Discovery and Use of Long dsRNA Mediated RNA Interference to Stimulate Antiviral Protection in Interferon Competent Mammalian Cells. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:1. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.859749 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Frahm S, Anisuzzaman A, Prodjinotho F, Vejzagić N, Verschoor A, Prazeres da Costa C. A novel cell-free method to culture Schistosoma mansoni from cercariae to juvenile worm stages for in vitro drug testing. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2019) 13(1). doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Duvall RH, DeWitt WB. An improved perfusion technique for recovering adult schistosomes from laboratory animals. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (1967) 16(4):483–6. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1967.16.483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tucker MS, Karunaratne LB, Lewis FA, Freitas TC, Ysan Liang. Schistosomiasis. Curr Protoc Immunol. (2013) 103(SUPPL.103):19.1.1–19.1.58. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1901s103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hockley DJ, McLaren DJ. Schistosoma mansoni: Changes in the outer membrane of the tegument during development from cercaria to adult worm. Int J Parasitol. (1973) 3(1):13–20. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(73)90004-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ligasová A, Bulantová J, Šebesta O, Kašný M, Koberna K, Mikeš L. Secretory glands in cercaria of the neuropathogenic schistosome Trichobilharzia regenti—Ultrastructural characterization, 3-D modelling, volume and pH estimations. Parasites and Vectors. (2011) 4(1). doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Farias LP, Chalmers IW, Perally S, Rofatto HK, Jackson CJ, Brown M, et al. Schistosoma mansoni venom allergen-like proteins: phylogenetic relationships, stage-specific transcription and tissue localization as predictors of immunological cross-reactivity. Int J Parasitol. (2019) 49(8):593–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Collins JJ, King RS, Cogswell A, Williams DL, Newmark PA. An atlas for Schistosoma mansoni organs and life-cycle stages using cell type-specific markers and confocal microscopy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2011) 5(3):e1009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Massova I, Kotra LP, Fridman R, Mobashery S. Matrix metalloproteinases: structures, evolution, and diversification. FASEB J. (1998) 12(12):1075–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hasty KA, Pourmotabbed T, Goldberg GI, Thompson JP, Spinella DG, Stevens RM, et al. Human neutrophil collagenase. A distinct gene product with homology to other matrix metalloproteinases. J Biol Chem. (1990) 265(20):11421–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Paveley RA, Aynsley SA, Cook PC, Turner JD, Mountford AP. Fluorescent imaging of antigen released by a skin-invading helminth reveals differential uptake and activation profiles by antigen presenting cells. Jones MK, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2009) 3(10):e528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fishelson Z, Amiri P, Friend DS, Marikovsky M, Petitt M, Newport G, et al. Schistosoma mansoni: Cell-specific expression and secretion of a serine protease during development of cercariae. Exp Parasitol. (1992) 75(1):87–98. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(92)90124-S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Crabtree JE, Wilson RA. Schistosoma Mansoni: An Ultrastructural Examination Of Pulmonary Migration. Parasitology. (1986) 92(2):343–54. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000064118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Butler GS, Tam EM, Overall CM. The canonical methionine 392 of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (Gelatinase A) is not required for catalytic efficiency or structural integrity: Probing the role of the methionine-turn in the metzincin metalloprotease superfamily. J Biol Chem. (2004) 279(15):15615–20. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312727200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Pieper M, Betz M, Budisa N, Gomis-Rüth FX, Bode W, Tschesche H. Expression, purification, characterization, and X-ray analysis of selenomethionine 215 variant of leukocyte collagenase. J Protein Chem. (1997) 16(6):637–50. doi: 10.1023/a:1026327125333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ. Evolutionary families of metallopeptidases. Methods Enzymol. (1995) 248:183–228. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(95)48015-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Vallee BL, Auld DS. Active-site zinc ligands and activated H2O of zinc enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (1990) 87(1):220–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.1.220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Macdonald MH, Morrison CJ, McMaster WR. Analysis of the active site and activation mechanism of the Leishmania surface metalloproteinase GP63. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)/Protein Struct Mol. (1995) 1253 (2):199–207. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(95)00155-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Feliciano GT, Da Silva AJR. Unravelling the reaction mechanism of matrix metalloproteinase 3 using QM/MM calculations. J Mol Struct. (2015) 1091:125–32. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2015.02.079 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Keene WE, Jeong KH, McKerrow JH, Werb Z. Degradation of extracellular matrix by larvae of Schistosoma mansoni. II. Degradation by newly transformed and developing schistosomula. Lab Invest. (1983) 49(2):201–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Bruce JI, Pezzlo F, McCarty JE, Yajima Y. Migration of Schistosoma mansoni through mouse tissue. Ultrastructure of host tissue and integument of migrating larva following cercarial penetration. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (1970) 19(6):959–81. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1970.19.959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Breitkreutz D, Koxholt I, Thiemann K, Nischt R. Skin basement membrane: The foundation of epidermal integrity—BM functions and diverse roles of bridging molecules nidogen and perlecan. Biomed Res Int. (2013) doi: 10.1155/2013/179784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Smith LT, Holbrook KA, Byers PH. Structure of the dermal matrix during development and in the adult. J Invest Dermatol. (1982) 79:93–104. doi: 10.1038/jid.1982.19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Marikovsky M, Levi-Schaffer F, Arnon R, Fishelson Z. Schistosoma mansoni: Killing of transformed schistosomula by the alternative pathway of human complement. Exp Parasitol. (1986) 61(1):86–94. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(86)90138-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Da’dara AA, Krautz-Peterson G. New insights into the reaction of Schistosoma mansoni cercaria to the human complement system. Parasitol Res. (2014) 113(10):3685–96. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-4033-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Dessein A, Samuelson JC, Butterworth AE, Hogan M, Sherry BA, Vadas MA, et al. Immune evasion by Schistosoma mansoni: Loss of susceptibility to antibody or complement-dependent eosinophil attack by schistosomula cultured in medium free of macromolecules. Parasitology. (1981) 82(3):357–74. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000066890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Auriault C, Ouaissi MA, Torpier G, Eisen H, Capron A. Proteolytic cleavage of IgG bound to the Fc receptor of Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula. Parasite Immunol. (1981) 3(1):33–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1981.tb00383.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Pleass RJ, Kusel JR, Woof JM. Cleavage of human IgE mediated by Schistosoma mansoni. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. (2000) 121(3):194–204. doi: 10.1159/000024317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Bourke CD, Prendergast CT, Sanin DE, Oulton TE, Hall RJ, Mountford AP. Epidermal keratinocytes initiate wound healing and pro-inflammatory immune responses following percutaneous schistosome infection. Int J Parasitol. (2015) 45(4):215–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Chen L, Rao KVN, He YX, Ramaswamy K. Skin-stage schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni produce an apoptosis-inducing factor that can cause apoptosis of T cells. J Biol Chem. (2002) 277(37):34329–35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201344200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sanin DE, Mountford AP. Sm16, a major component of Schistosoma mansoni cercarial excretory/secretory products, prevents macrophage classical activation and delays antigen processing. Parasites and Vectors. (2015) 8(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13071-014-0608-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Ramaswamy K, Salafsky B, Lykken M, Shibuya T. Modulation of IL-1alpha, IL-1beta and IL-1RA production in human keratinocytes by schistosomulae of Schistosoma mansoni. Immunol Infect Dis. (1995) 5(2):100–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ramaswamy K, Potluri S, Ramaswamy P, Ebbing A. Immune evasion by Schistosoma mansoni: characterization of Sm 16.8 an anti-inflammatory protein produced by the skin stage schistosomulum. Proc 9th Int Conf Parasitol.: (1998) 597–603. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Holmfeldt P, Brännström K, Sellin ME, Segerman B, Carlsson SR, Gullberg M. The Schistosoma mansoni protein Sm16/SmSLP/SmSPO-1 is a membrane-binding protein that lacks the proposed microtubule-regulatory activity. Mol Biochem Parasitol. (2007) 156(2):225–34. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2007.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Ramaswamy K, Kumar P, He Y-X. A Role for Parasite-Induced PGE 2 in IL-10-Mediated Host Immunoregulation by Skin Stage Schistosomula of Schistosoma mansoni. J Immunol. (2000) 165(8):4567–74. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.8.4567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Hervé M, Angeli V, Pinzar E, Wintjens R, Faveeuw C, Narumiya S, et al. Pivotal roles of the parasite PGD2 synthase and of the host D prostanoid receptor 1 in schistosome immune evasion. Eur J Immunol. (2003) 33(10):2764–72. doi: 10.1002/eji.200324143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.McKean JR, Anwar ARE, Kay AB. Schistosoma mansoni: Complement and antibody damage, mediated by human eosinophils and neutrophils, in killing schistosomula in vitro. Exp Parasitol. (1981) 51(3):307–17. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(81)90118-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Kitaura M, Nakajima T, Imai T, Harada S, Combadiere C, Tiffany HL, et al. Molecular cloning of human eotaxin, an eosinophil-selective CC chemokine, and identification of a specific eosinophil eotaxin receptor, CC chemokine receptor 3. J Biol Chem. (1996) 271(13):7725–30. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.13.7725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wechsler ME, Munitz A, Ackerman SJ, Drake MG, Jackson DJ, Wardlaw AJ, et al. Eosinophils in Health and Disease: A State-of-the-Art Review. Mayo Clin Proc. (2021) 96(10):2694–707. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.04.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Durães F V., Carvalho NB, Melo TT, Oliveira SC, Fonseca CT. IL-12 and TNF-α production by dendritic cells stimulated with Schistosoma mansoni schistosomula tegument is TLR4- and MyD88-dependent. Immunol Lett. (2009) 125(1):72–7. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2009.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Matisz CE, Leung G, Reyes JL, Wang A, Sharkey KA, McKay DM. Adoptive transfer of helminth antigen-pulsed dendritic cells protects against the development of experimental colitis in mice. Eur J Immunol. (2015) 45(11):3126–39. doi: 10.1002/eji.201545579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Maizels RM, Balic A, Gomez-Escobar N, Nair M, Taylor MD, Allen JE. Helminth parasites—Masters of regulation. Immunol Rev. (2004) 201:89–116. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00191.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Rook GAW. Review series on helminths, immune modulation and the hygiene hypothesis: The broader implications of the hygiene hypothesis. Immunology. (2009) 126(1):3–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.03007.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Maizels RM, Yazdanbakhsh M. Immune regulation by helminth parasites: Cellular and molecular mechanisms. Nat Rev Immunol. (2003) 3(9):733–44. doi: 10.1038/nri1183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Crosnier C, Hokke CH, Protasio A V, Brandt C, Rinaldi G, Langenberg MCC, et al. Screening of a Library of Recombinant Schistosoma mansoni Proteins With Sera From Murine and Human Controlled Infections Identifies Early Serological Markers. J Infect Dis.: (2020) 1–12. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

P'ng Loke, Timothy G Geary

25 Oct 2022

Dear Dr. Hanington,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Schistosoma mansoni cercarial invadolysin cleaves complement C3 and suppresses proinflammatory cytokine production" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

Evaluation of this manuscript resulted in 3 divergent recommendations. While all reviewers found merit in the manuscript, significant concerns were also raised by all of them. Given the range of recommendations, I believe it is appropriate to allow the authors the chance to address these concerns, including by adding additional experimental data to bring the manuscript to the standards associated with publication in this journal. Please note that a final decision on the manuscript depends on the ability of the authors to address the concerns of the reviewers; a revised version of the manuscript will be returned to the reviewers for re-evaluation.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Timothy G. Geary, PhD

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

P'ng Loke

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Evaluation of this manuscript resulted in 3 divergent recommendations. While all reviewers found merit in the manuscript, significant concerns were also raised by all of them. Given the range of recommendations, I believe it is appropriate to allow the authors the chance to address these concerns, including by adding additional experimental data to bring the manuscript to the standards associated with publication in this journal. Please note that a final decision on the manuscript depends on the ability of the authors to address the concerns of the reviewers; a revised version of the manuscript will be returned to the reviewers for re-evaluation.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: The paper describes a good characterisation of an enzyme - a metalloproteinase termed invadolysin - is stored in the acetabular gland of the infective stage of Schistosoma mansoni and based on in vitro experiments is release during the invasion of the host skin. The production of a recombinant form of the enzymes that displays proteolytic activity is well describes and it is shown to degrade various protein stubstrates. The authors also produce a mutant (needs to explain why the particular substitution was chosen) as a control. The degradation studies are performed well as is the substrate studies, although detailed kinetics are not performed. Ii general, this is a well performed characterisation of an important parasite enzyme. There is also data covering the effect of the enzyme on cytokines and on human blood mononuclear cells but these are siply observational studies without follow up functional analysis.

The manuscript needs to be reduced considerably in Introduction and Discussion, and many of the methods are standard and could be written far more succinctly. The weakness is that the paper is a basic characterisation of an enzyme and does not provide anything of particular novelty. Much of the very long Discussion repeats the results and is laboured by lots of speculation but no focused attention of nay new finding.

The title gives the impression that this paper is focused on the complement system but little is done (part froma couple of non-specific assays) that would give any confidence that this protease actually plays a role in neutralising or inactivation this system. Little mention is given to this system in the Introduction, Discussion or Conclusion so why is it the major title?

The effect of the protease on HBMC is interesting but not followed up in detail. Which cell population(s) is targeted.

3D modelling was base on the GP63 structure because they share high homology so is it surprising that the enzyme turns out to have similarities in structure and enzyme activity to this Leishmania molecule.

Many studies are performed on substrate, cytokines, cells but the data in each are preliminary and it's difficult to understand what the authors thinks of all these results and how they fit together - they Conclusion does not make anything more clear apart from stating that the enzyme has many functions displayed in a schematic that is no focus (and certainly does not indicate that complement is a major target for the enzyme).

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: This manuscript is original and of importance to researchers in the field of schistosome biology as well as to those interested in host-parasite interactions. As praziquantel is not effective against larval schistosome stages, an increased knowledge of cercarial biology and how they interact with the host is of particular interest in case such research leads to the identification of a cercarial molecule that could be targeted and prevent cercarial survival in the human host. This manuscript represents a comprehensive investigation of the invadolysin SmCI-1, from modelling of its structure to its effects on cytokine release; it represents a substantial amount of experimental work. The study demonstrates the presence of SmCI-1 in cercariae. SmCI-1 demonstrates weak cleavage of ECM proteins but a major finding is that it can cleave C3b suggesting an immunomodulatory role. Furthermore, it can decrease the release of select cytokines when human PBMCs were stimulated with either LPS of whole cercarial lysate.

A few weaknesses of the study are that no marker is provided in the immunocytochemistry examination of SmCI-1 for the acetabulum and/or the acetabular glands. Interestingly the acetabulum did not react with phalloidin whereas it has in a previous study. In addition, whole cercarial lysates (WCL) were used to stimulate cytokine release from human PBMCs that could be reduced by SmCI-1. However, if immunochemistry demonstrates the presence of SmCI-1 I cercariae, the WCL would also include this invadolysin.

The manuscript is of a good quality though requires editing prior to publication. A few comments should also be addressed prior to publication.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: The paper needs to be much more focused.

1. complement inactivation - discover possible targets for the invadolysin in one or all pathways. The enzyme may degrade 3C in vitro but is there a way to show this in vivo and demonstrate that this is a mean by which the parasite evades the complement system. AS mentioned in the Introduction is release of invadolysin connected with glycocalyx shedding or blocking of 3C binding the the glyoccalyx?

2. The protease may cleave a range of protein in vitro but are these proteins degraded in vivo - could in vivo probing with antibodies show that the parasite secrets the enzyme into the tissues. Does blocking of the enzyme prevent invasion like it is mentioned that blocking the cercarial elastase blocks skin entry.

3. The cellular studies need further exploration - what cells could be targeted by the enzymes and are these relevant to the in vivo situation.

Reviewer #2: See the attached review

Reviewer #3: 1) The acetabulum did not react with phalloidin in the immunochemistry (see Fig 2A) yet it did in “An Atlas for Schistosoma mansoni Organs and Life-Cycle Stages Using Cell Type-Specific Markers and Confocal Microscopy” by Collins et al., 2011. It would be useful to co-stain the cercariae in order to visualize the acetabulum as well as the acetabular glands, or co-stain the acetabular glands with PNA lectin (see Collins et al., 2011). This would support that SmCI-1 immunoreactivity is indeed in the acetabular glands. The authors could then determine whether SmCI-1 is in pre- or post-acetabular glands or both.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: 1. Change title to suit data presented.

2. Shorten Introduction greatly

3. Make Discussion more succinct.

4. Remove modelling studies as no novel information has been gleamed from these.

5. Fig. 4D - please indicate a, b and Y fragments of fibrinogen.

6. Fig. 5 - please add what statistical package was used.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: 2) The naming of samples reacting with the anti-SmCI-1 in western blotting (Fig. 2B) does not necessarily match terminology used lines 177-183. Fig 2B is labelled with cercariae, 24 hour cercariae, and E/S. The labelling needs to correspond more closely to the methods as it is not clear whether the E/S were gathered from transformed schistosomula that had been incubated 24 hours at 37C, or if they are from cercariae immediately post-vortexing.

Also, it would help to be uniform in how to refer to transformed cercariae. It would be helpful to have a timepoint post-vortexing of cercariae that is considered full transformation of schistosomula.

It would be useful to include sample of schistosomula (without supernatant) that have been cultured for 5-6 days to determine that SmCI-1 no longer present in more mature or fully transformed schistosomula.

3) It was very interesting to see decrease in select cytokine release when PBMCs also incubated with whole cercarial lysate (WCL). I am confused by this experimental design. I assume WCL was used to stimulate cytokine release from human PBMCs as this represents cercariae entering the human host. However, WCL was generated by sonicating cercariae 3 x 15 seconds on ice so wouldn’t the WCL (from 5 cercariae) also contain SmCI-1? If so, then the reduction of cytokine release when also incubated with SmCI-1 is due to a high concentration of SmCI-1 that is not physiologically relevant. If WCL does not contain SmCI-1 the authors should clarify that and explain why. Furthermore, the total protein content of WCL should be included.

4) Ref 32 shows that Smp_090100.1 is more abundant in germ balls than cercariae as the authors refer to line 550-2. Might this suggest that SmCI-1 plays a role in emergence from snail? I think the authors should discuss the possible role(s) of SmCI-1 in the snail.

Editing notes

Line 4 if both authors from same institution * not necessary

Line 98 should also cite paper where referred to as Smp_090100.1 (ref 32). If in ref 26 SmCI-1 = SmPepM8 please include this nomenclature

Lines 106-7 should leishmania be Leishmania ?

Line 118 period missing after (54)

Line 148 clarify whether genetic sequence synthesized commercially or via PCR in house

Please include details of company for expression vector

Line 149 Please include details of how transfection performed

Line 153 It would be helpful to state the importance of this particular mutation to function. This is addressed in the conclusions but it would be helpful to include briefly in methods

Please clarify if mutant protein purified the same way as the WT was

Line 155 Please replace “Acetabular genetic sequence” with SmCI-1 for the purposes of uniformity and clarity

Line 158 Kanamycin does not need “K” if not first word of sentence

Please be uniform in use of Thermo Fisher Scientific, varies throughout methods

Line 169 replace “anti-Sm-CI-1” with anti-SmCI-1 for uniformity

Please clarify if antibody was affinity purified using recombinant protein

Line 171 Clarify how many snails were exposed to miracidia

Line 174 Clarify whether snails placed in artificial pond water for cercarial emergence

Line 175 Please include length of vortex step

Line 176 Please include temperature for centrifugation step

Line 179 What will these supernatants be used for?

Line 182 Please clarify whether E/S products were filtered and/or concentrated before use

Line 187 Please clarify quantification of ~ 20 parasites per lane, i.e., does it mean ~ 20 untransformed cercariae, ~ 20 schistosomula, and E/S from ~ 20 schistosomula?

Line 188 Please replace “blotted” with “transferred” and include details of transfer

Line 190 Bovine Serum Albumin does not require uppercase letters

Line 191 Please include the final concentration of the primary antibody in ug/ml

Line 194 Please include company secondary antibody sourced from

Line 201 Please be uniform in use of “cercariae” for plural of cercaria, most other times in manuscript given as cercaria

Line 201 phosphate does not require uppercase p

Line 205 Please include final concentration of antibody in μg/ml

Line 224 Please change “difference” to differences (lines 241 and 247 also)

Line 255 Please include software used for statistical analyses

Lines 228-9 PH should be pH

Line 249 Please change “whom” to which

Line 251 Can abbreviate “micrograms” to μg

Line 254 Why is mutant Sm-CI1 not included? Please be consistent in wording of Sm-CI1 as sometimes comes with “r” in front and other times does not

Line 265 Need punctuation between ingredients of buffer

Line 269-70 please remove “in”

Line 285 M of mM typically not italicized

Line 289 can replace 9g NaCl in 1L with 0.9% NaCl

Line 296 Should bio-techne be Bio-Techne?

Line 307 please insert comma after rMutSm-CI1

Line 308 please include final concentration of antibody used

In controls shown in Fig 2A in methods section

The figure legend for 2B figure states “SmCI-1 is expelled from the cercaria during the initial stages of maturation into schistosomula that occur in human skin”. I would consider this statement a conclusion that should be given in said section rather than in the results. If kept in results a description of the WB should be given first i.e., western blot showing Sm-CI-1 immunoreactivity in…..

Lines 436-8 state “ Eotaxin-1 (1138±301 pg/ml), IL-5 (332±42 437 pg/ml), IL-1β (394±102 pg/ml), and IL-12 (189±21pg/ml) levels all failed to differ from the WCL only treated cells in a significant manner”. Is this line supposed to state that the mutant SmCI-1 does not cause a significant reduction vs WCL stimulation?

Line 442 does “stimmed” mean stimulated? If so please change to latter

Lines 458-9 “The effect of rSmCI-1 on IL-10 levels features an increase is shown for both cells exposed to WCL”. Would change wording as does not flow well, perhaps “is shown” should be omitted.

Line 607 “which have display” should be should have displayed

Line 615 add “was” after “CD4”

Line 623 “factor” should be plural

Line 641 eotaxin starts with lower case e but it is uppercase throughout

Line 646 please give dendritic cells in full

Line 650 “suggest” should be suggests

Line 661 “mediate” should be mediated

Several references contained various formatting issues or lacked italicization of scientific names: 14, 15, 43, 44, 48, 52, 55, 64, 67, 68, 70, 76, 77

For supplementary table 1 please clarify if acetabular gland contents are the E/S from transforming cercariae.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review of manuscript by Hambrook and Hanington.docx

Decision Letter 1

P'ng Loke, Timothy G Geary

22 Jan 2023

Dear Dr. Hanington,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'A cercarial invadolysin interferes with the host immune response and facilitates infection establishment of Schistosoma mansoni' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Timothy G. Geary, PhD

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

P'ng Loke

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

The authors are thanked for the positive and constructive responses to the concerns of the reviewers, some of which were substantial. The reduction in length and increased focus of the Introduction and Discussion are notable. The additional experimental data included in the revision directly and thoroughly address the major concerns raised during the review process. Clear explanations have been provided for why some concerns could not be resolved (e.g., precise localization of the enzyme in the parasite), suggesting that additional experiments are unlikely to be useful in this case. The manuscript provides solid data on a protein important for the process of infection by S. mansoni and its ability to sustain infection in the host. It will be a valuable contribution to the field and to the journal.

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

P'ng Loke, Timothy G Geary

27 Jan 2023

Dear Dr. Hanington,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "A cercarial invadolysin interferes with the host immune response and facilitates infection establishment of Schistosoma mansoni," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig

    A 3D visualization of the crystal structure of GP63 (A), and a magnified view of its active site (B). The predicted structure of the full amino acid sequence of SmCI-1 is also present (C) alongside a magnified view of its active site (D). Active site histidines are presented in red, holding a zinc ion (orange ball) in position. Nucleophilic glutamic acids are marked as green, with likely met-turn methionines marked as purple. All cysteines N-terminal to the active site have been coloured yellow.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. SmCI-1 protein levels in NTS are not continuously renewed.

    Western blot of SmCI-1 levels in untransformed cercaria, newly transformed schistosomula (NTS) cultured for two days, and NTS culture for 4 days. Accompanying E/S products obtained from the RPMI cercaria were isolated in, as well as the RPMI supernatant of 0–2 NTS and 2–4 day NTS.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. SmCI-1 is active in various buffers.

    Vehicle, APMA, and 1,10-phenanthroline controls for generic MMP assay fail to vary significantly from substrate controls (A). SmCI-1 activity as measured using a generic fluorometric MMP assay in a variety of buffers (B). The highest activity is seen in the Sensolyte MMP assay provided buffer. Activity is also seen in our lab made generic MMP buffer (50mM Tris, 10mM CaCl2, 150mM NaCl, pH 7.5), as well as RPMI and DMEM. Activity is not seen in Krebs-Ringer Phosphate Buffer (KRPG) (145mM NaCl, 6mM Na3PO4, 5mM KCl, 0.5mM CaCl2, 1mM MgSO4, pH 7.4) or PBS. Statistically significant differences from vehicle only controls indicated using (*).

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. SmCI-1.

    SmCI-1 fails to cleave CR1 (A), or CD4 (B). Trypsin does cleave these molecules, as evidenced by the appearance of novel bands such as the numerous bands located between 26 and 24kda when it is added to CR1, and the ~20kda bands seen when trypsin is added to CD4.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. dsRNA successfully knocks down production of SmCI-1.

    Western blot using (A) α-SmCI-1 antibody or (B) α-actin antibody on samples of 20 cercaria at varying timepoints post dsRNA construct injection. At 11 and 12 days post injection, SmCI-1 levels are significantly reduced as compared to 7–10 days post injection.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. SmCI-1 effects cytokine production in both THP-1 and Jurkat cell lines.

    rSmCI-1 alters the production of numerous cytokines produced in THP-1 cells, Jurkat cells, and a combination of the two. Stimulation was performed using whole cercarial lysate (WCL, n = 6), drained cercarial lysate (DCL, n = 3), or cercarial excretory/secretory (E/S, n = 3) products. Those samples treated with rSmCI-1 were given 2μg/ml. (*) Indicates a significant difference for rSmCI-1 treated cells as compared to the corresponding WCL- or DCL-only treated samples. (#) Indicates WCL and DCL treated samples with significantly different levels than E/S treated samples. ($) Indicates significantly different levels of production between WCL and DCL treated samples.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. dsRNA sequence used for SmCI-1 KD in cercaria.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Cytokine array data for PBMCs.

    Average pg/ml concentrations of individually indicated cytokines treated with S. mansoni whole cercarial lysate, E/S products, LPS, recombinant SmCI-1, or recombinant SmCI-1Mut. Values are indicated for both 24 and 12 hour timepoints. Accompanied by Standard error of the mean values (SEM). n = 3.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review of manuscript by Hambrook and Hanington.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewer Comments - First Review[11411].docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES