Skip to main content
ACS Materials Au logoLink to ACS Materials Au
. 2022 Jul 8;2(6):665–685. doi: 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.2c00029

Strategies for Controlled Growth of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides by Chemical Vapor Deposition for Integrated Electronics

Ting Kang , Tsz Wing Tang , Baojun Pan , Hongwei Liu , Kenan Zhang , Zhengtang Luo †,*
PMCID: PMC9928416  PMID: 36855548

Abstract

graphic file with name mg2c00029_0011.jpg

In recent years, transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD)-based electronics have experienced a prosperous stage of development, and some considerable applications include field-effect transistors, photodetectors, and light-emitting diodes. Chemical vapor deposition (CVD), a typical bottom-up approach for preparing 2D materials, is widely used to synthesize large-area 2D TMD films and is a promising method for mass production to implement them for practical applications. In this review, we investigate recent progress in controlled CVD growth of 2D TMDs, aiming for controlled nucleation and orientation, using various CVD strategies such as choice of precursors or substrates, process optimization, and system engineering. We then survey different patterning methods, such as surface patterning, metal precursor patterning, and postgrowth sulfurization/selenization/tellurization, to mass produce heterostructures for device applications. With these strategies, various well-designed architectures, such as wafer-scale single crystals, vertical and lateral heterostructures, patterned structures, and arrays, are achieved. In addition, we further discuss various electronics made from CVD-grown TMDs to demonstrate the diverse application scenarios. Finally, perspectives regarding the current challenges of controlled CVD growth of 2D TMDs are also suggested.

Keywords: transition metal dichalcogenides, chemical vapor deposition, wafer-scale, heterostructures, arrays, electronics

1. Introduction

The study of two-dimensional (2D) van der Waals (vdW) materials represented by graphene is one of the most interesting research topics because of their extraordinary solid-state physics14 and application potential for next-generation nanoelectronics.5,6 However, graphene as a zero band gap semimetal fails to play a role as a semiconducting active channel in electronics. Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), with a layered structure similar to that of graphene, complement this disadvantage. Previous research has extensively investigated group VIB TMDs such as MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, MoTe2, etc., in both fundamental research711 and industry.1214 The majority of these group VIB TMDs are thermodynamically stable semiconductors with a sizable band gap and are commonly used as active channels in optoelectronics. In recent years, due to the development of producing technology, much research is also devoted to other novel TMDs. For instance, 2D ferromagnetism15,16 and 2D ferroelectricity17 have been found on VSe2 and twisted TMDs, respectively. Due to its large family and diverse nature, TMDs are undoubtedly one of the most promising branches of two-dimensional vdW to realize versatile applications in various scenarios like optoelectronics,18,19 electrocatalysis,20 membrane filtration,21 memories,22 etc.

Many synthesis routes for 2D TMDs have been widely explored, including mechanical exfoliation, chemical exfoliation, molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), and chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Mechanical exfoliation operated with Scotch tape obtains samples with high crystallinity, cleanliness, low defects, and controllable thickness.23 However, this manual operation obviously cannot meet the needs of large-scale production, thus it is rarely used outside of cutting-edge fundamental research. Chemical exfoliation, such as liquid exfoliation24 and intercalation exfoliation,25 weakens the interlayer vdW force of TMDs by polar molecules or ions to exfoliate bulk TMDs to few-layer equivalents using a top-down method. Although mass production is achievable by chemical exfoliation, limited surface area, poor controllability, and toxicity remain challenges of this approach. CVD, the most representative “bottom-up” method, is perhaps the most promising route among these for efficient production. The CVD growth of TMDs still obeys classical nucleation theory (CNT)26 and is mainly divided into two stages, nucleation and growth. Therefore, by reasonably controlling the growth conditions of the crystals, the synthesis of large-sized high-quality TMD thin films is completely possible by CVD. However, the controllable CVD growth of 2D TMDs is still a huge challenge, despite nearly 10 years of development. The main reason is that the CVD process involves a series of complex chain chemical reactions involving vapors and also involves complicated interactions between the vapor precursors, formed crystals, and the substrate. Generally, the CVD process is extremely sensitive to the local environment in the reaction chamber, and thus most studies related to the controllable CVD growth are based on experimental results, supplemented by an explanation of the mechanisms, although computational simulations related to it have only been preliminarily explored so far.2729 In this regard, we review the recent works reporting the synthesis of 2D TMDs and 2D TMD heterostructures, with a focus on the strategies made to achieve a high degree of growth controllability via the CVD method. In addition, mechanistic insights are also provided to understand the chemistry in the controllable CVD growth. To better understand the necessity and significance of synthesizing 2D TMDs, the structure and properties of 2D TMDs are introduced first. Then several of the most common types of CVD are discussed, with a focus on how to achieve controllable growth of pure TMDs by choosing and designing precursors or substrates. To further illustrate the advantage of CVD for controlled synthesis, the growth of more complex products such as TMD heterostructures and patterned TMD arrays are presented, involving various technologies, smart strategies, and design routes. At the end of this review, a brief summary of the CVD-grown TMD applications is presented to better understand what practical use can be achieved by controlled CVD growth.

2. Structure and Properties of 2D TMDs

Transition metal dichalcogenides have structures adopting the MX2 formula, where M and X refer to transition metal atoms (M = Mo, W, Nb, V, Re, Ta, etc.) and chalcogen atoms (X = S, Se, Te) separately. Unlike graphene, which is composed of only carbon atoms in a plane, TMDs have a sandwich structure with chalcogen atoms on top and bottom and are covalently bonded to transition metal atoms in the middle. According to the coordination, TMD monolayers are classified into 1H (trigonal prismatic) phase and 1T (octahedral) phase. Beyond basic 1H and 1T phases, polymorphs including 1T′ (distorted 1T), Td (orthorhombic), 2H, and 3R are discovered. 1T′ and Td are derivatives of 1T, and they differ from 1T in intralayer coordination between chalcogen atoms and transition metal atoms. 2H and 3R originate from multilayers stacked with 1H monolayers by ABA and ABC sequences,30,31 respectively. Generally, phase transition leads to the change but is not the decisive factor in the electrical properties of TMDs. The most typical example is the phase transition of MoTe2, from the metallic 1T′ phase to the semiconducting 2H phase.32 The difference in electronic properties comes from the filling level of nonbonding d orbitals of transition metals. When no partially occupied nonbonding orbital exists, the TMD is semiconducting, e.g., 2H-WS2 and 1T-PtS2; otherwise, it is metallic like 1T-ReS2 and 2H-TaS2.33 The phase of TMDs could be engineered by diverse approaches such as intercalation,34 strain,35 and thermal treatment.32

3. Controllable CVD Growth of TMDs

TMDs with wafer-scale size, uniform thickness, and high crystallinity are the main considerations for future material development, aiming for optimizing the fabrication and performance of electrical and optoelectronic devices. The morphology of the TMD films will be easily modified by the growth parameters, such as the type and structure of the substrate,36 reaction temperature,37 flow rate,37 type of precursors,38 etc. To reach the controllable CVD growth of wafer-scale, grain-boundary-free, and highly uniform TMDs, precise research should focus on atmospheric pressure CVD (APCVD), low-pressure CVD (LPCVD), and metal-organic CVD (MOCVD).

3.1. Thermodynamics and Kinetics in CVD Growth of TMDs

In CVD synthesis, very small change in parameters may largely vary the kinetics and thermodynamics of TMD growth, leading to drastic changes in the products. It is necessary to explore a deeper understanding of the kinetic and thermodynamic factors in the CVD growth mechanism of such 2D materials. The impact of thermodynamics and kinetics on the vapor deposition process is mainly reflected in two local parameters: (1) reaction temperature and (2) partial pressure around the substrate.

To date, thermodynamic and kinetic studies based on the gradient temperature growth of TMDs via the CVD mechanism have been explored.26,39 Detailed thermodynamic and kinetic studies based on the CVD mechanism were performed and found that the crystal nucleation density significantly depends on the temperature.40 This phenomenon can be explained by the classical nucleation theory.

3.1.

where N is the nucleation rate, T is the zone temperature, P is the partial pressure of the Mo species, Edes is the desorption energy for molecules back to the vapor phase, Es is the activation energy for surface diffusion, and ΔG* is the CNT free energy. The nucleation growth of monolayer MoS2 in the low-temperature range, in which crystal nucleation density increased, is in contrast to the high-temperature range. For a high-temperature reaction, the partial pressure of the precursor is regarded as a constant due to almost complete sublimation, thus the nucleation rate is exclusively determined by temperature (Figure 1g).41 The nucleation density undergoes inhibition as substrate temperature increases, whereas the supersaturation is satisfied.42 In contrast, both partial pressure and temperature contribute to the nucleation rate and density and thus the grain size of MoS2 at a relatively low temperature, due to the unsaturated local concentration of the precursor (Figure 1a–f).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Thermodynamics and kinetics in CVD growth of TMDs. (a–e) Optical images of monolayer MoS2 with growth temperature from 290 to 430 °C and growth time of 6 h. (f) Evolution of nucleation density of CVD-grown MoS2 with temperatures. Reprinted with permission from ref (40). Copyright 2021 Wiley-VCH. (g) Relationship between average flake size and growth temperature of monolayer WSe2, showing suppressed nucleation density with high temperature. Reprinted from ref (41). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (h) Plot of edge length of WSe2 against time, showing the growth rate is affected by temperature-dependent partial pressure of the precursors. Reprinted with permission from ref (45). Copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH. The temperature and partial pressure as parameters jointly affect the nucleation and growth in the CVD process of TMDs.

The partial pressures of the vaporized solid precursors can be controlled by different approaches, such as gas flow rate adjustment,42 zone temperature modification,40 precursor concentration modulation,43 etc., and different kinetic regimes exist, leading to the production of the desired TMD monolayers. For instance, the stable TMD crystal growth under thermodynamic and kinetic control can be balanced by an increasing gas flow rate, thus modifying the partial pressure of the transition metal source along the gas flow, and the result shows a strong dependence of TMDs’ crystal growth rate on the precursors’ partial pressure.44 A study investigated the effect of precursor partial pressure on the MoS2 growth rate and crystal domain shape and found that increasing the MoO3 mass transfer under a high gas flow rate has an impact on the faster crystal growth rate and showed the influence on the kinetic growth dynamics of edges.42 Moreover, the partial pressures of precursors depend on the temperature, which determines the decomposition and sublimation rates of the precursors. As shown in Figure 1h, faster W source supply can be achieved by increasing the growth temperature while ensuring sufficient Se feeding, leading to a higher growth rate of WSe2.45

3.2. Atmospheric Pressure CVD

APCVD is a vapor deposition process under a normal pressure environment. The TMD materials were grown by delivering evaporated precursors, usually inorganic and less toxic, to the substrate surface.46 The control of nucleation density, oriented growth, numbers of layers, crystal shapes, domain size, etc. is considered to be the major direction for desired TMD growth. In order to control the nucleation and oriented growth in APCVD, in addition to the parameters, such as temperature, airflow, etc., the main consideration is to select a proper substrate and its placement.

Recent research discussed the distribution of a suitable substrate in TMD growth by controlling desired nucleation density, orientation, and domain size. As shown in Figure 2a, the highly uniform, epitaxial wafer-scale, single-crystalline growth of a MoS2 monolayer was obtained on a Au(111) substrate.47 Gold foil was melted and resolidified on tungsten foil to obtain the single-crystalline Au(111) film and to produce unidirectional nucleation–growth of the single-crystalline MoS2 wafer. Similarly, recent research achieved the production of millimeter-sized MoSe2 crystals with high uniformity on a molten glass substrate.48 An ultrasmooth and liquid-like isotropic surface was generated by increasing the temperature to 750 °C. The successful growth of a large domain crystalline MoSe2 monolayer on the molten glass substrate is due to the suppression of nucleation (Figure 2b). As a result, the nucleation density reduction led to a large-sized crystalline TMD, illustrating the importance of a suitable substrate for the APCVD system.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Controllable nucleation and epitaxial growth of TMDs via APCVD. (a) Evolution of wafer-scale unidirectional MoS2 monolayer on a Au(111) substrate. Reprinted from ref (47). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. (b) Growth scheme of large-scale single-crystalline MoSe2 on a molten glass substrate. Reprinted from ref (48). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (c) Growth manner of MoS2 film via substrate control. Reprinted with permission from ref (49). Copyright 2016 IOP Publishing Ltd. (d) Schematic illustration of the growth of MoSe2 with the use of PTAS seed promoter. Reprinted with permission from ref (50). Copyright 2018 The Royal Society of Chemistry. Using a suitable substrate and adjusting the substrate locations and orientations, the morphology of the TMD grains can be effectively controlled.

Other than the substrate selection, the location, position, and orientations of the substrate also play an important role. The production of large-scale monolayer molybdenum disulfide film, up to centimeter scale, was achieved on the surface of a vertically positioned silicon substrate.49 Unlike the horizontal substrate, the vertical substrate enables uniform seeding of the MoO3 precursor on the substrate (Figure 2c). The position height between the substrate and the precursor is another key factor in the APCVD system that determines nucleation density and shape. The growth of different types of MoSe2 nanosheets, including two-dimensional triangle domains, hexagons, three-dimensional pyramids, and vertically aligned grains, was achieved. The CVD growth of MoSe2 was processed at 750 °C with the help of a seed promoter (tetrapotassium perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylate). The tailored morphologies were achieved by adjusting the height between the silicon substrate and solid precursor, resulting in the production of differently shaped TMDs (Figure 2d).50 Moreover, the role of distance between the precursor source and substrate in CVD morphology was also shown to be vital. Another TMD shape-controlling method, by varying the spatial locations of the silicon substrates in the furnace tube, was reported,42 and it found that the shape of the MoS2 domain was highly associated with the locations of the SiO2/Si substrate. The shape of MoS2 changed from triangular to hexagonal when the distance from the substrate away from the MoO3 powder was varied. Compared to the silicon substrate, recent research showed a significant development in domain size and uniformity of TMD films using other types of substrates. Further development of the APCVD engineering system to fabricate the TMD materials with better uniformity and quality is still highly desired. APCVD is the most widely explored CVD technique and has potential for the development of high efficiency, simple setup, and low-cost 2D TMD film fabrication with large-scale and high uniformity. However, the sulfurization and selenization process requires a high growth temperature of greater than 750 °C, where the high processing temperature limited the use of some specific substrates,51 like polymeric substrates. The melting temperature of many polymeric substrates, such as polyamide, was below the CVD processing temperature of TMD synthesis.52 The additional transfer is necessary and thus limits the applications of polymeric films in TMD flexible devices.

3.3. Low-Pressure CVD

LPCVD growth of TMD films is processed under a low-pressure environment. Lower pressure can reduce unnecessary gas-phase reactions, leading to the increase of the uniformity of TMD films on the wafer.53 As the domain size of TMDs is highly related to the nucleation density, the concentration of precursors and the type of substrates are the noteworthy factors to control the nucleation, to enable epitaxial growth, and to eliminate the grain boundaries of CVD-grown TMDs. Based on the recent development of LPCVD synthesis technology, the growth of large domain size single-crystalline TMDs with limited grain boundary films can be obtained.

In LPCVD, the selection of a suitable pretreated substrate still plays a significant role in the synthesis of TMDs with controlled domain orientation and alignment. Many research groups discovered that the use of suitable single-crystalline substrates, such as a-plane sapphire,54 c-plane sapphire,55 GaN,56 etc., is the key factor in the growth of satisfactory oriented and aligned TMD films. A dual-coupling-guided epitaxy growth of WS2 on a step-edged a-plane sapphire under a 300 Pa Ar atmosphere demonstrated the formation of large-sized single-crystalline WS2 grains with unidirectional alignment and seamless stitching.54 They found that the epitaxial stitching of WS2 on the substrate of a-plane Al2O3 depends on the dual-coupling-guided mechanism, and the theoretical calculation was analyzed by density functional theory (DFT). Due to the coupling between WS2 grains and a-plane Al2O3 and the coupling between WS2 and a step-edged substrate, unidirectional alignment of WS2 with a 2 in. single-crystalline monolayer was achieved (Figure 3a). Similarly, another report demonstrated the TMDs’ epitaxial growth of unidirectionally aligned MoS2 single crystals on step-edged c-plane sapphire (0001) under the LPCVD processing system.55 The orientation of step-edging was perpendicular to the standard sapphire substrate, and MoS2 was grown on the C/A αA = 0.89° sapphire substrate (Figure 3b–d). Using another single-crystalline substrate, β-Ga2O3 film, a controlled MoS2 growth via ledge-directed epitaxy-assisted chemical vapor deposition processing under 30 Torr was achieved.57 The single-crystalline monolayer MoS2 was formed as a high-quality nanoribbon with continuous arrays and aligned orientation. It is demonstrated that the nucleation of MoS2 occurred at the ledges of the β-gallium(III) oxide substrate, followed by the merging of an aligned MoS2 domain, and the synthesis of self-aligned continuous nanoribbons was achieved ultimately (Figure 3e).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Controllable nucleation and oriented growth of TMDs via LPCVD. (a) Schematic of the CVD processing of large-size unidirectionally aligned WS2 on step-edged a-plane sapphire. Reprinted with permission from ref (54). Copyright 2022 Springer Nature. Schematic of MoS2 domains growth on (b) C/M and (c) C/A sapphire and (d) optical image of MoS2 monolayer growth in step-edged C/A sapphire. Reprinted with permission from ref (55). Copyright 2021 Springer Nature. (e) Schematic of the self-aligned growth of continuous MoS2 nanoribbons on β-gallium(III) oxide substrate. Reprinted with permission from ref (57). Copyright 2020 Springer Nature. (f) Schematic diagram of the face-to-face precursors feeding LPCVD growth of MoS2 on the soda-lime glass substrate. Reprinted with permission from ref (58). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature, open access. (g) Schematic diagram of multisource CVD system for large-size MoS2 kinetic controllable LPCVD growth. (h) Optical image of wafer-scale (4 in.) monolayer MoS2. Reprinted from ref (60). Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society. The controllable nucleation and oriented LPCVD growth were developed by the use of suitable substrates and reaction programming, leading to the improvement in uniformity and quality of TMD films.

Apart from the oriented growth, a suitable substrate efficiently determines nucleation density, similar to APCVD growth. Batch production of MoS2 is demonstrated by an efficient growth of MoS2 by face-to-face precursor feeding.58 Using soda-lime glass as the substrate and oversaturated S precursor, the evaporation of Mo source can be limited and fabricate large domain size 6 in. MoS2 (Figure 3f). It is concluded that selecting a suitable substrate controls the nucleation density, and the single-crystalline substrate with the pretreated surface can promote the oriented and aligned growth of high uniformity TMDs.59

Moreover, the growth of TMDs with high uniformity and large size can be obtained by modulation of the reaction system, e.g., process optimization, and system engineering. The production of high-quality and large domain size monolayer MoS2 film on the sapphire wafers by multisource system design of LPCVD was reported.60 To ensure steady evaporation, the multipocket sources were designed to achieve facile evaporation of precursors and growth of TMD films. As shown in Figure 3g,h, S and MoO3 sources were loaded in several inner-miniature quartz tubes to achieve the precise kinetic control for the growth of single-crystalline MoS2. To control the nucleation density by adjusting the precursor concentration,61 a partial pressure programming LPCVD system was reported.62 The concentration and distribution were controlled by changing the amount of solid MoO3 and the height between substrate and precursor. By controlling the flux of the Mo species, a reaction transition for MoS2 growth was achieved, and the MoS2 crystal was changed from a gradient-distributed triangular shape to a large-sized continuous monolayer. The vitality of metal precursors in the LPCVD-growth system was well-proven due to its role in controlling the layer number and thickness uniformity.

The low processing pressure leads to the improvement in the uniformity and purity of the produced TMD films. In contrast to APCVD, LPCVD is able to reduce the rate of gas-phase prereaction and film deposition and thus facilitates the TMD synthesis with better quality and uniformity and has the potential to produce a large-scale continuous film.62 Nevertheless, for growth control of wafer-sized TMD films, from isolated domains to a large continuous film, the systematic understanding of the growth mechanism is still not clear.63 The commercial purposes of the semiconductor industry prefer the high uniformity and continuous films up to wafer-scale, but most LPCVD-grown TMDs still cannot meet the requirement. The controllable LPCVD fabrication of high uniformity and wafer-scale TMD films is still a key challenge and prospective direction in further research. In addition, the high processing temperature of the LPCVD system also limits the use of low melting temperature substrates.

3.4. Metal-Organic CVD

MOCVD is the CVD technology that uses organic metals, such as metallocene complexes, metal carbonyls, cyclopentadienyl ligands, etc., as the precursors.64 The nucleation, epitaxial growth, and control of film thickness are the major prospective directions in recent MOCVD research that contribute to the improvement of coverage and quality of TMD films.65 To control the lateral epitaxial growth in the MOCVD system, the precursor and the process must be designed elaborately.

The variety of precursors directly correlates with the concentration of metal source and chalcogen source and results in the varying of morphology, lateral growth, and quality of the films. A recent report demonstrated the production of few-layered MoS2 growth by a pulsed MOCVD system with the use of bis(tert-butylimido)bis(dimethylamindo)molybdenum [(NtBu)2(NMe2)2Mo] and diethyl disulfide (Et2S2) as the precursors.66 To achieve thickness control of the MoS2 film, the deposition process was conducted by several precursor injections (n = 0, 15, 50, 100) and resulted in the achievement of 1–25 nm MoS2 film in a very short deposition time (Figure 4a). Apart from the selection of precursors, the precursor flow ratio also plays a role in the MOCVD system. The synthesis of WSe2 films with outstanding improvement in surface coverage, thickness uniformity, and crystalline quality was reported.67 The extreme precursor ratio of (CH3)2Se/W(CO)6 was set at 14000, and the lateral growth and nucleation of the TMD were controlled, resulting in the fabrication of high uniformity films (Figure 4b–d).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Controllable lateral epitaxial growth of TMDs via MOCVD. (a) Overview of the pulsed MOCVD processing design for thickness-controlled MoS2 growth. Reprinted from ref (66). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. (b) AFM scan of WSe2 film on the scale of 1–2 μm without a nucleation step (low density and coverage). (c,d) AFM scan of WSe2 film with nucleation and growth steps, showing an increase in density and coverage with different temperatures. Reprinted with permission from ref (67). Copyright 2016 IOP Publishing Ltd. (e) Schematic of the top view of the substrate with unidirectional WS2 domains. (f) Composite dark-field TEM image and the inset with higher resolution confirms well-aligned crystal orientation. Reprinted from ref (69). Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society. (g) Schematic of the MOCVD reactors shows the sapphire in a hot-wall tube reactor and hypothesized mechanism of NaCl-assisted growth of early stage and late stage. Reprinted from ref (68). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. In order to obtain the wafer-size and high-uniformity TMD films, the MOCVD growth was developed by the use of suitable precursors and well-designed growth programming and processing steps.

The important role of alkali-assisted precursors in CVD processing is also demonstrated, which leads to the impacts in growth morphology, including growth rate, loss of epitaxy, nucleation density, etc. Production of two-dimensional TMD films with a large domain size and fully coalesced polycrystalline structure was successfully achieved.68 The MoS2 film was synthesized in the MOCVD hot-wall tube reactor using Mo(CO)6 and DES as the metal and chalcogen precursors with the utilization of alkali salts, such as sodium chloride and potassium iodide. Comparing the epitaxial growth of MoS2 under alkali-free growth and alkali-assisted growth, the dramatic increase in the domain size of the MoS2 monolayer by ∼20-fold was achieved by NaCl alkali-assisted growth. However, the alkali-assisted growth led to the saturation of Na–O bonding on the substrate surface and resulted in the reduction of substrate surface energy, weakening of the epitaxial growth, and the occurrence of multilayered MoS2 film (Figure 4g).

In order to control the epitaxial growth of TMD films in the MOCVD system, modifying the reaction process is also important to promote large-scale TMD films. A production of large-scale single-crystalline WS2 continuous monolayer films with control of epitaxial growth and stitching of the oriented domains was realized.69 With the use of a variable-temperature multistep process, the coalesced unidirectional WS2 film grew on the 2 in. diameter c-plane sapphire by MOCVD. With the help of multistep programming, control of the surface diffusion, epitaxial domain growth, and self-stitching of domain growth were achieved (Figure 4e,f).

In addition to the controlled epitaxial growth, the TMD growth on the selective area can also be achieved using the well-designed processing treatment. A recent report demonstrated a method for controlling the TMD lateral growth on desired regions by a seed-free, site-specific nucleation MOCVD.70 In order to achieve the selective area growth of TMDs, a multistep surface functionalization approach was developed. The polymer functional layer was formed by the conventional lithographic process, and the sapphire surface is used as the original photoresist mask, followed by MOCVD growth at 825 °C. A route for the controlled TMD growth with exact patterns was demonstrated, and the device performance of the TMD film is comparable to that of the film produced by mechanical exfoliation.

The MOCVD method provides a new approach for manufacturing TMD films with a faster deposition rate. The significant advantages of MOCVD are its capability for large-scale TMD film fabrication with excellent conformal coverage and its ability to synthesize new metastable materials, including oxide,71 carbides,72 silicide,73 etc. MOCVD also showed the potential for versatile TMD growth under relatively low temperatures40,74 and its ability to promote the use of a wide range of low melting temperature substrates, including polymeric film. However, it is worth noting that the organic metal precursors and other reaction sources are usually highly toxic. Apart from the toxic precursors, the deposition process will also lead to the emission of highly hazardous exhaust gas, such as arsine, phosphine, etc. The low production rate, high production cost, and toxic organic precursors limit its application and prohibit its development.

4. Controllable CVD Growth of TMD Heterostructures

The conventional transfer method cannot satisfy the scalable production of TMD heterostructures, limiting its potential in practical technologies. In order to solve this problem, the current approach is to achieve the direct growth of heterostructures via the CVD method. In terms of the way of stacking, the CVD method not only fabricates vertical heterobilayers or multilayers like mechanical exfoliation but also prepares the in-plane (lateral) heterojunctions. To date, obtaining these two structures by rational design of the synthesis steps and parameters is an important issue in controllable synthesis because of the huge differences in performances of the devices.

4.1. Vertical TMD Heterostructures

2D materials with a dangling-bond-free van der Waals structure break the limitation of the lattice-matching condition of heteroepitaxial growth and thus are promising candidates for vertical heterostructures.75,76 The growth of TMD-based vertical heterostructures has been intensively developed in the past few years, including TMD/graphene,7779 TMD/h-BN,80,81 TMD/perovskite,82,83 TMD/iodide,84,85 TMD/TMD, etc. Among them, TMD/TMD is worthy of great attention, as TMDs with a wide range of band gaps86 enable heterojunctions with distinct interfaces to be obtained, including metal–metal, semiconductor–semiconductor, and semiconductor–metal, adapting the requirements of diverse electronics and optoelectronics. The growth of the TMD heterostructure is mainly classified into one-step and two-step (or multistep) routes, which were first implemented in 201487 and 2015,88 respectively. One-step growth is more suitable for constructing heterojunctions with two TMDs of similar growth chemistry, including MoS2–WS2/WS2,89 NbS2/MoS2,90 ReS2/WS2,91 and MoTe2/MoS2.92

Considering the huge differences in the synthesis conditions of the various TMDs, the two-step route is more universal for vertical TMD heterostructures, although its procedures and growth strategies are more complex. The bottom layer should resist high temperatures and complex chemical changes in the second growth process, thus a growth temperature not too high in the second step is crucial to protect the bottom layer. However, the temperature of the second growth process is not as low as possible. Some attempts93 have been made to change the growth sequence of WS2 and MoS2 in a two-step approach, and they found, when following the WS2–MoS2 growth sequence, that MoS2 tended toward in-plane epitaxial growth at the edges of the existing WS2 triangular single crystal. It was found that while using the MoS2–WS2 sequence, WS2 nucleated from the edge to the crystal center of the MoS2 triangle to form a vertical bilayer (Figure 5a,b). In the second growth, when MoS2 is produced under a relatively lower temperature (660 °C), the nucleation rate of MoS2 on silicon wafers is greater than that on WS2, so the formation of in-plane heterojunctions is energetically favored. Meanwhile, the second growth temperature is set to a higher growth temperature for WS2 (800 °C), and the nucleation of MoS2 is promoted faster, leading to the formation of a rotation misfit-free heterobilayer. In addition to temperature, hydrogen flow is another key factor as well in determining whether a vertical bilayer can be formed, and the absence of hydrogen during the growth process is more conducive to vertical heteroepitaxy94 in a two-step route.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Controllable growth path of vertical TMD heterostructures. Growth mode of (a) WS2–MoS2 using WS2–MoS2 growth sequence and (b) WS2/MoS2 using MoS2–WS2 growth sequence, with the optical images. Reprinted with permission from ref (93). Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH. Optical images of (c) partially covered and (d) fully covered VSe2/WSe2. Reprinted from ref (96). Copyright 2019 American Chemical Society. (e) Schematic illustration of substitution of sulfur to multilayer 2H-MoTe2. (f) Cross-sectional STEM image of symmetrical MoS2/MoTe2(1–x)S2x/MoS2. Reprinted from ref (99). Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society. The two-step method is the main CVD method to obtain vertical heterobilayer and the top layer usually starts their growth from the edge of the bottom. Other ways such as chalcogen substitution also enable the preparation of vertical heterostructures.

The two-step route is more versatile and flexible in terms of the product in preparing vertical TMD heterostructures. First, compared to the one-step method, the two-step method avoids cross-contamination and alloying during deposition. Second, the two-step method has realized the tuning of staking modes, providing an optimized platform to study twist-angle-dependent optical physics.9,95 Third, it also promotes the stacking of TMDs with distinct lattices and phases, implying that metal–semiconductor contact is possible. Several groups have used the two-step approach to obtain a metallic semiconducting vertical heterostructure. A direct synthesis of metallic 1T-VSe2 onto semiconducting 1H-WSe2 has been reported and found an inward growth mode of VSe2 from the edge of WSe2 to the center (Figure 5c,d).96 Similar work has been carried out extensively in recent years, including the preparation of VSe2/MoSe2,96 NbS2/WS2,97 and ReS2/MoS2.98 According to their band alignments, these heterojunctions either with Schottky or Ohmic contact are valuable for different electronics applications.

In addition to directly depositing TMDs layer by layer with one- or two-step routes, partial substitution is a reliable way to synthesize vertical heterojunctions, as well. In our recent work,99 Te atoms of crystal 2H-MoTe2 multilayer were replaced inward from the top and bottom layers sequentially, and a sub-centimeter-scale single MoS2/MoTe2(1–x)S2x/MoS2 sandwich structure was obtained, as presented in Figure 5e,f. This provides an efficient way to obtain large-scale vertical TMD heterostructures with scant grain boundaries.

4.2. Lateral TMD Heterostructures

The lateral TMD heterostructures arouse great scientific interest for their unique atomically sharp interface, where the two sides connect covalently and share one crystal orientation showing a clear and regular boundary without much atomic diffusion.100102 Therefore, they are selected candidates in building blocks for diodes and other junction devices utilized in photovoltaics and photodetection.103,104

For the preparation of lateral TMD heterostructures, the one-step approach is widely accepted for its high efficiency and controllability. The growth of MoSe2–WSe2 with lateral heteroepitaxy was reported by physical vapor transport.101 Later, the preparation of MoS2–MoSe2 and WS2–WSe2 lateral heterostructures via an in situ modulation of the vapor-phase precursors was systematically reported.105 MoS2 (WS2) was synthesized at the first stage to expose peripheral edges where fresh dangling bonds form and serve as the active sites of the following growth of MoSe2 (WSe2) (Figure 6a). The authors concluded that there are two key factors for the successful synthesis of lateral TMD heterostructures. The first factor is the in situ modulation, which means a rapid switch of the precursor vapor after the first-stage growth and prevents the termination and passivation of edges of TMD formed first. The second factor is optimized growth conditions for both sides of the lateral heterostructures, as already formed 2D TMDs are very sensitive to the changes in the chamber environment. Almost at the same time, MoS2/WS2 in-plane heterojunctions were successfully synthesized by the CVD method, as well.102 It is interesting that they found MoS2/WS2 growth can be tuned by adjusting the deposition temperature (Figure 6b). A higher temperature (850 °C) is preferable to obtain a vertical bilayer, while a lower temperature (650 °C) enables the formation of a lateral monolayer. The temperature-selective growth may be explained thermodynamically and kinetically. While ensuring sufficient nucleation and growth rates of both MoS2 and WS2, the vertical stacking is more thermodynamically favored, thus it is more stable at a high enough temperature. However, the low temperature significantly prevents the nucleation and growth of WS2, which causes the epitaxial domain growth from the edge of MoS2 with less nucleation energy.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Controllable growth path of lateral TMDs heterostructures. (a) Illustration of in-plane epitaxy of MS2–MSe2 (M = Mo or W) in one-pot growth. Reprinted with permission from ref (105). Copyright 2014 Springer Nature. (b) Growth-temperature-dependent architecture of heterostructure based on WS2 and MoS2. Reprinted with permission from ref (102). Copyright 2014 Springer Nature. (c) Reconstruction of edge epitaxy in WS2–MoSe2, influenced by temperature. Reprinted from ref (106). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. PL mapping of MoSe2–WSe2 (d), MoSe2–WS2 (e), and MoS2(1–x)Se2x–WS2(1–y)Se2y (f,g). Reprinted with permission from ref (110). Copyright 2018 Springer Nature. To synthesize in-plane TMD heterojunctions with aimed core-ring structure, the control of temperature and vapor sources is significant.

The growth of in-plane TMDs heterojunctions is achievable via two-step CVD method, as well. In 2015, in-plane MoS2–WSe2 heterojunctions were successfully synthesized via a two-step method.88 First, the WSe2 triangle monolayer was deposited at a higher temperature, and it could serve as a seed for the lateral epitaxy growth of MoS2 at a lower temperature in the second step. This method requires the TMD to grow at a higher temperature as a seed to avoid alloying caused by substitution and decomposition caused by high temperature in the second step. The most typical feature of two-step growth is that it avoids the alloying of the junction at the interface since the growth of inner part and outer part is completed in two different stages separately. Moreover, compared with one-step growth in which similar growth conditions of the two sides are required, it is more universal for controllable in-plane epitaxial growth. It seems that the chronology determines the composition distribution of the heterojunction; that is, the first grown TMD constitutes the core part, and the subsequent in-plane epitaxial growth starts from the edges of the core. However, it has been found that this process is also thermodynamically driven.106 As illustrated in Figure 6c, the two-step route was used to grow a WS2 seed and a MoS2 outer ring, but the product was not WS2–MoS2. Instead, the composition distribution was strongly determined by the growth temperature. When the growth temperature was 650 °C, the core was MoS2 and the ring was Mo1–xWxS2. When the growth temperature was varied from 680 to 710 °C, core-ring structures disappeared, followed by the formation of a uniformly distributed Mo1–xWxS2 alloy. This phenomenon can be explained by the interdiffusion of Mo from the edge to the core and W from the core to the edge to reduce its interfacial energy to a minimum, followed by Mo’s replacement for W at the core. At higher temperature, the entropic part has a greater effect on the Gibbs free energy, so the products tend to mix more. In contrast, the enthalpic part has more influence on the Gibbs free energy at a relatively lower temperature, and phase segregation is preferable and thus the MoS2 core surrounded by an alloy ring was synthesized. However, the interdiffusion and alloying could be avoided by system design. MoS2–WS2 and MoSe2–WSe2 in-plane heterojunctions were also fabricated with 1D interfaces clearly along the zigzag direction using a homemade quartz reactor to separate the Mo vapor and the W vapor.107

On this basis, more elaborate in-plane heterojunctions have been synthesized in recent years. The composition-tunable WSe2–WS2(1–x)Se2x and WS2–WS2(1–x)Se2x was obtained via a two-step route,108,109 and such a precise modulation of composition of the heterojunction can be exploited for band alignment engineering. The sequential edge-epitaxy realizing a multijunction lateral heterostructures was reported.110 Both MoX2 and WX2 (X = S or Se) powders were sublimated into oxides and hydroxides at the flow of N2 and H2O(g), but the most gaseous W source was hydroxides, thus only the deposition of MoX2 occurred. When the gas flow was Ar + H2, the reduction reaction consumed the gaseous Mo oxides, there were relatively more W oxides, and the chemical deposition started due to its low reduction rate.By switching the flow gas back and forth, controllable growth of a striped TMD pattern without complex design was achieved, as shown in Figure 6d–g. WS2 with WSe2 nanodots were synthesized by partially damaging the monolayer WS2 to create growth sites of WSe2 via O2 plasma.111 Moreover, precisely patterning the in-plane TMD heterojunctions is successfully achieved by a lithography-like strategy, which is discussed in detail in the next section.

5. Design and Growth of TMD-Based Arrays

In order to implement large-scale production of TMD-based heterojunctions and put them into practice, highly ordered TMD arrays need to be realized and integrated. TMD arrays are divided into two types: (1) homogeneous TMD arrays112 and (2) heterogeneous TMD arrays.113 To prepare TMD arrays, there are mainly four approaches: (1) patterned etching of wafer-scale 2D TMDs,74,114 (2) in situ sulfurization/selenization/tellurization,115 (3) selective sulfurization/selenization,116 and (4) selective area growth.117,118

5.1. Patterned Etching of Wafer-Scale 2D TMDs

The most straightforward method for preparing TMD arrays is to etch wafer-scale 2D TMDs by plasma as required for array patterning.12,119 The biggest challenge of this route is the preparation of wafer-scale TMDs. In terms of wafer-scale polycrystalline 2D TMD preparation, as shown in Figure 7a–c, molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) was used to thermally combine evaporated Se sources with electron-beam-evaporated Hf sources at a pressure lower than 10–8 Torr to prepare 2 in. HfSe2 for arrayed memristors.120 Compared with MBE, MOCVD does not require a high vacuum. As shown in Figure 7d–f, MOCVD was used with Mo(CO)6 and (C2H5)2S2 as precursors for the preparation of 6 in. monolayer MoS2 at 5.0 Torr,121 and an array of MoS2 devices was obtained, with an average carrier mobility of 3.4 cm2 V–1 s–1 by testing the electrical properties of 900 MoS2 field-effect transistors (FETs). Compared with the MOCVD, LPCVD with a higher reaction temperature for the preparation of TMDs generally obtains high-quality crystals. The 4 in. monolayer MoS2 films were prepared using precursor multisource distributed vapor deposition, and the monolayers’ average room temperature device mobility was ∼70 cm2 V–1 s–1.60 The wafer-scale TMDs synthesized above are all polycrystalline materials with more grain boundaries. The grain boundaries of polycrystalline MoS2 were utilized to fabricate multiterminal memtransistors.122

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Engineerable fabrication of wafer-scale TMDs and TMD arrays. (a) Schematic of setups and configuration of MBE system for growing wafer-scale HfSe2 thin film. Optical images of (b) MBE-grown HfSe2 on a 2 in. SiO2/Si substrate and (c) crossbar array as memristors. Reprinted with permission from ref (120). Copyright 2022 Wiley-VCH. (d) Schematic of the MOCVD system with a cyclical supply of gaseous precursors for growing wafer-scale monolayer MoS2 and WS2. Optical images of (e) monolayer MoS2 and WS2 on 6 in. quart and (f) MoS2 FET array fabricated by photolithography with Al2O3 as the gate dielectric. Reprinted with permission from ref (121). Copyright 2020 Wiley-VCH. Various ways to synthesize wafer-scale TMDs has been explored, and devices fabricated based on these samples are easily arrayed by conventional lithography.

The more grain boundaries there are, the more electron scattering occurs. The small crystal defects and high carrier mobility of single-crystal TMDs make them suitable for a wide range of applications in optoelectronic devices. The controllability of single-crystal 2D TMDs at the wafer-scale plays a pivotal role in moving TMDs toward practical applications. In the preparation of wafer-scale single-crystal 2D TMDs, the phase transition of MoTe2 was used to introduce the crystalline species 2H-MoTe2 in the center of a wafer-scale 1T′-MoTe2 film to transform metallic 1T′-MoTe2 into wafer-scale single-crystal semiconducting 2H-MoTe2 under a Te atmosphere.32 The FET arrays, based on 1T′/2H/1T′ MoTe2 obtained from seed-induced phase transition, have effectively reduced contact resistance at the 1T′/2H interface. However, this method is highly limited to TMDs which can easily achieve phase transition.

Array etching of wafer-scale TMDs, which can be achieved directly by a laser beam,123,124 should minimize the impacts of traditional photolithography glue residue on device performance. Moreover, the high growth temperature destroys the marked substrate, making the transfer of material inevitable before the fabrication of devices. However, the transfer without folding and defects put forward many requirements, such as the use of small molecule polymer transfer125 or gold film-assisted transfer.126,127

5.2. In Situ Sulfurization/Selenization/Tellurization

In situ sulfurization refers to patterning the metal precursor source, followed by sulfurizing the patterned metal precursor.128 As shown in Figure 8a,b, well-aligned vertical Mo/W layers were deposited by E-beam lithography and sputtering, respectively,129 and sulfurized into MoS2/WS2 vertical heterojunctions. To avoid the phase mixing in the interface, a two-step method was used to in situ sulfide WO3 and Mo metal precursors sequentially to obtain vertical MoS2/WS2 arrays with a photoresponsivity of 2.3 A W–1.128 It is likely that precursors prepatterned by common mask or lithography possess a poorly defined profile or organic residual adhesive. For this reason, precursor arrays were written with (NH4)2MoS4 ink with an atomic force microscopy (AFM) tip on graphene-covered SiO2/Si substrates130 and annealed in a CVD chamber with sulfur flow to obtain arrays of MoS2 (Figure 8c,d). In situ tellurization/selenization is suitable for synthesizing TMDs that are chemically unstable. The patterned W/Mo was used as the metal source with a NixTey alloy as the Te source to synthesize patterned WTe2 on a 4 in. SiO2/Si substrate, and the Schottky–Mott limit of the metal–semiconductor was achieved (Figure 8e,f).131 Moreover, as shown in Figure 8g,h, to fabricate NbSe2–WSe2 metal–semiconductor heterojunction arrays, the Nb2O5 pattern and WO3 thin films were selenized for the formation of NbSe2 arrays and WSe2 films, respectively.132

Figure 8.

Figure 8

TMD arrays synthesized by in situ sulfurization, selenization, or tellurization. (a) Schematic of patterned W and Mo seeds and their sulfurization to form WS2/MoS2 vertical heterojunctions. (b) Optical image of a micron-scale WS2/MoS2 vdW heterostructure array. Reprinted from ref (129). Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society. (c) Drawing shows the pattern writing using liquid–metal precursor ink by AFM tips. (d) AFM images of MoS2 dot arrays with submicron accuracy. Reprinted with permission from ref (130). Copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH. (e) Schematic diagram of the CVD setup to convert W or Mo patterned beforehand by photolithography to WTe2 or MoTe2 arrays. (f) Optical images of diverse WTe2 patterns. Scale bar, 100 μm. Reprinted with permission from ref (131). Copyright 2020 Springer Nature. (g) Schematic of Nb2Se3 pattern and WSe2 film through selenization of Nb2O3 pattern and WO3 film. (h) Side view and optical images of NbSe2–WSe2 patterned heterojunctions. Scale bar, 1 mm. Reprinted from ref (132). Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society. In situ sulfurization/selenization/tellurization is suitable for metal precursors that are easily patterned in a regular way.

5.3. Selective Sulfurization/Selenization

Selective sulfurization is essentially the localized substitution of chalcogen atoms of TMDs in the atmosphere of the desired gas.133 Mimicking the lithography process, TMDs are masked with an inert material pattern and converted to other TMDs in a specific gas flow, thus an artificially designed pattern is realized. As present in Figure 9a,b, striped SiO2 was deposited as a mask on the MoSe2 nanosheet, and the sulfur source was evaporated to transform exposed MoSe2 to MoS2 at 700 °C, constructing the MoSe2–MoS2 lateral array with a type I alignment.134 Such a method involves a covered layer, inevitably introducing impurities that affect the performance of the device, so a high energy laser is used to achieve selective conversion of the TMD. Laser-assisted selective conversion of MoSe2 to MoS2 in H2S/H2 mixed gas was completed,135 suggesting that the laser is able to provide a new platform to extend the controllability of TMD array growth. Figure 9c–e demonstrates the preparation of MoS2/MoS2–xOδ heterojunctions by creating multiple S vacancies on MoS2 and slightly oxidizing it to MoS2–xOδ by high-energy laser treatment.116 The MoS2/MoS2–xOδ heterojunction was used to fabricate synaptic devices, which exhibited both short- and long-term plasticity in response to electricity and light-based stimulation simultaneously. On this basis, as presented in Figure 9f,g, the pattern on MoS2 was directly written and oxidized to MoOX, followed by the selenization to MoSe2 to form the MoSe2/MoS2 in-plane heterostructure,136 implying that a nanoscale precise patterning is available.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

TMD patterns by selective sulfurization. (a) Schematic diagram showing the formation of striped MoSe2/MoS2 in-plane heterostructures. The SiO2 mask patterned onto MoSe2 by E-beam lithography protects partial MoSe2 from being converted to MoS2 by a laser-vaporized sulfur plume. (b) Optical images and Raman mapping of two predefined MoS2–MoSe2 patterns. Scale bar, 5 μm. Reprinted with permission from ref (134). Copyright 2015 Springer Nature, open access. (c) Schematic view of boundary-editable technology via laser treatment. (d) Optical images of MoS2/MoS2–xOδ later heterojunctions with various types of boundaries. Scale bar, 10 μm. (e) Elemental mapping at the boundary between MoS2 and MoS2–xOδ. Reprinted with permission from ref (116). Copyright 2021 Wiley-VCH. (f) Schematic diagram of irradiation-induced selective oxidation of MoS2 followed by selenization and (g) optical image of junction device based on as-prepared in plane MoS2–MoSe2. Reprinted from ref (136). Copyright 2021 American Chemical Society. Selective sulfurization finely edits TMDs, enabling the preparation of elaborate in-plane heterojunctions at a small size.

5.4. Selective Area Array Growth

Selective area growth is mainly achieved by surface treatment of the growth substrate137 to create differentiated local growth environment for TMDs138140 to selectively grow TMD arrays directly. As demonstrated in Figure 10a,b, SiO2/Si substrates were treated with oxygen plasma to enhance the surface energy, followed by the preparation of MoS2 using the CVD method, where MoS2 would selectively grow in the arrayed regions with high surface energy, and polycrystalline MoS2 arrays were achieved.141 The oxygen plasma was used to etch SiO2/Si substrates partially covered with graphene to enhance the hydrophilicity of the SiO2 surface so that MoS2 was selectively grown on the plasma-treated SiO2 surface, and MoS2-graphene lateral heterojunction arrays were obtained consequently.142 Based on this, graphene could serve as source-drain electrodes of the FET, and the measured carrier mobility was about 17 cm2 V–1 s–1. This method is universal for the preparation of TMD-based lateral interfacial heterojunctions. Moreover, surfactant-mediated concept of using Na ions as surfactants was proposed to prepare monolayer TMD materials.143 The 6 × 6 arrays of NaBr were deposited on a 4 × 1 cm–2 SiO2/Si substrate, and subsequently MoS2 would selectively grow in the NaBr region to realize patterning of MoS2. As shown in Figure 10c, a rubbing tool was utilized to introduce triboelectric charge of the surface of SiO2/Si substrate, and MoS2 would selectively grow on the areas with frictional charges to produce arrayed MoS2 in CVD growth.144 The arrays, with an average carrier mobility of 0.18 ± 0.17 cm2 V–1 s–1 and high switching ratio of ∼8, could be cost-efficient for MoS2 memristors.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Selective array growth of TMDs arrays via surface treatments. (a) Schematic of selective growth of MoS2 on energy-differentiated SiO2/Si surface after O2 plasma treatment. (b) Optical images of FET fabricated on the MoS2 array. Reprinted with permission from ref (141). Copyright 2017 Wiley-VCH. (c) Schematic of the formation of triboelectric charge line pattern caused by rubbing, which serves as the nucleation sites for growing MoS2 in the CVD process. Reprinted from ref (144). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. (d) Schematic of inkjet printing of DI water pattern as designated growth sites of MoS2. (e) Transfer curve of MoS2-based FET at Vds = 3 V with optical images of FET arrays in the inset. Reprinted with permission from ref (145). Copyright 2020 The Royal Society of Chemistry. (f) Schematic flow of a general way to prepare m-TMD/s-TMD arrays, where irradiation creates defective surfaces to form well-ordered nucleation sites of heteroepitaxy in a two-step CVD method. (g,h) Optical images of VSe2/WSe2 vertical heterostructure arrays. Scale bar, 10 μm. Reprinted with permission from ref (146). Copyright 2020 Springer Nature. Diverse treatments can be implemented to create differentiated surfaces for region-selective growth of TMDs.

Through preparation of nucleation sites for arrays, Figure 10d,e illustrates the inkjet printing technique145 to define an array of microscale deionized (DI) water droplets on substrates, leaving arrays of water traces when the water evaporates. Then MoS2 will selectively grow on the array’s water traces and FETs based on the array was tested with a carrier mobility of approximately 0.15 cm2V–1s–1. The ink printing technique greatly improves the efficiency of preparation of array precursor, but the crystal quality of MoS2 needs to be further improved. In 2020, a general approach was proposed to prepare a series TMD arrays grown on WSe2 including VSe2 (Figure 10f–h),146 NiTe2, CoTe2, NbTe2, and VS2. The matrix of defect spots was created on s-TMD by laser beam to form nucleation sites for the second TMD. The nucleation sites etched by laser avoid the influence of photolithographic glue residue, and high-quality TMD single crystals were prepared directly by CVD to obtain arrays of TMD heterojunctions.

6. Applications of CVD-Grown TMDs

2D TMDs are particularly attractive in the field of micro/nanoelectronics due to their superior mechanical, transport, and optoelectronic properties. For mechanical properties, the 2D nature overcomes the shortcomings of rigidness and brittleness, making 2D TMDs outstanding candidates for flexible electronics including FETs,147 supercapacitors,148 logic gates, and oscillators.149 In terms of transport performance, theoretical mobility of TMDs ranges from 10 to 1000 cm2 V–1 s–1, an impressive upper limit.150 2D TMDs are especially competitive in optoelectronics among low-dimensional materials for several reasons: (1) 2D TMDs realize photoresponse to a broad spectrum. On one hand, due to the wide variety of TMDs, wavelengths from visible to near-infrared can be realized.151 On the other hand, methods such as modulation by alloying152,153 and external force154158 are highly applicable to 2D TMDs, enabling the artificial band gap with tunability. Moreover, the photodetection range of TMDs can be efficiently expanded by means of heterojunctions. The recently reported interlayer excitons detected in various TMD heterostructures have revealed great potential of TMDs for long-wavelength infrared photodetection.159,160 (2) A considerable part of the 2D TMDs is materials with strong light–matter coupling.161,162 When the TMD film is a monolayer, there is a conversion from an indirect band gap to a direct band gap for TMD materials, such as MoS2, WSe2, or MoTe2. (3) 2D TMDs enable an ultrafast photodetection with response times of low to hundreds of nanoseconds.19,163 In addition, the strong spin–orbit coupling and broken inversion symmetry of TMDs reveal non-negligible potential for applications in spintronics and valleytronics.53 To illustrate the application scenarios of 2D TMDs more concretely, Tables 13 summarize TMD materials included in this review and their representative electronics reported.

Table 1. Summary of CVD-Grown Large-Scale TMDs.

materials architecturesa methods characteristics applications ref
MoS2 ML APCVD wafer-scale thin film flexible FETs (164)
  ML LPCVD wafer-scale thin film FETs, logic inverters (60)
  ML APCVD centimeter-scale thin film, single crystallinity FETs (47)
  ML LPCVD wafer-scale thin film, single crystallinity FET array (55)
  multilayer MOCVD thin film on glass low-power photodetectors (170)
  ML MOCVD wafer-scale thin film   (66)
  ML MOCVD centimeter-scale thin film FETs (68)
MoS2 or MoSe2 ML APCVD millimeter-scale single crystals FETs (48)
WS2 ML MOCVD wafer-scale thin film, single crystallinity FETs (69)
  ML LPCVD wafer-scale thin film, single crystallinity   (54)
WSe2 ML or BL APCVD millimeter-scale single crystals FETs (166)
MoSe2 ML APCVD centimeter-scale thin film,   (49)
MoTe2 multilayer APCVD centimeter-scale single crystals FETs (32,99,167)
a

ML, monolayer; BL, bilayer.

Table 3. Summary of CVD-Patterned TMDs.

materials architectures methods applications ref
MoS2 array selective-area growth FET array (145)
  array selective-area growth FETs (141)
  patten selective sulfurization FETs, memristors (144)
  array patterned etching FET array (122)
MoS2 or WS2 array patterned etching FET array (121)
MoS2/WS2 array in situ sulfurization transistor, hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts (128,129)
NbSe2–WSe2 array in situ selenization FETs (132)
MoS2–MoSe2 patten selective sulfurization/selenization FETs (134,136)
WTe2 or MoTe2 array in situ tellurization FETs (131)
MoS2/MoS2–xOδ patten selective sulfurization synaptic devices (116)
VSe2 (NiTe2, CoTe2, NbTe2,VS2)/WSe2 array selective sulfurization FET array (146)

Table 1 focuses on examples of large-scale highly crystalline semiconducting TMDs, which shows great potential for monolithic integration of chips. For the fabrication of TMD-based electronics, one of the most pressing tasks is to realize the synthesis of boundary-free wafer-scale TMDs with uniform and low thickness. In fact, it is not difficult to meet any of these requirements individually, but the key is to satisfy them simultaneously. It is noted that recent progress has been made in preparing single-crystal wafer-scale monolayer MS2 (M = Mo, W),47,54,55,69 while no other TMD with such features has been synthesized successfully. These wafer-scale TMDs with high quality are used as semiconductor channels in FETs and FET arrays on the whole. Moreover, large-scale integrated arrays can be transferred onto flexible polymer substrates to form flexible FET devices.164 It is believed that, in the next few years, similar work and applications based on other TMD materials will significantly increase, as millimeter-scale monolayer single crystals such as MoSe2165 and WSe2166 have been successfully obtained. Specifically, wafer-scale multilayer MoTe2 with centimeter-scale single-crystal domains can be synthesized by phase transition.32,99,167

Table 2 lists CVD-grown TMD heterostructures, in which it is found that one-step or one-pot methods are preferable for the synthesis of lateral heterojunctions, whereas the two-step route satisfies the demands of preparation of both lateral and vertical heterostructures. Devices based on bare TMDs are extremely limited in both functionality and performance. For instance, there is no effect rectification found in devices made of pure individually CVD-grown monolayer MoSe2 or WSe2, but the in-plane MoSe2–WSe2 heterostructure exhibits IV characteristics of a typical p–n junction and can be applied as both self-powered photodetectors and electroluminescent photon emitters.168 Moreover, a heterostructure composed of two types of TMDs is commonly a type II band alignment, which is highly efficient to separate photoexcited electrons and holes and suitable for photodetectors.163 In addition to being used as active channels, TMDs can act as metal electrodes, as well. For example, in the lateral VS2–MoS2 heterostructure, the metallic VS2 serves as the contact between the Ni/Au electrode and MoS2, decreasing the Schottky barrier to ∼30 meV.169

Table 2. Summary of CVD-Grown TMD Heterostructures.

materials architecturesa methods (step) characteristics applications ref
MoS2/WS2 LHS or VHS APCVD (1) clean interface FETs (102,171)
  LHS or VHS LPCVD (2) clean interface   (93,94)
  LHS APCVD (1) photovoltaic effect self-powered photodetector (90)
MoSe2/WSe2 LHS LPCVD (1) p–n junction photovoltaic effect photodetectors, light emitting diodes (168)
  VHS APCVD (2) p–n junction, strongly coupled vdW heterostructures excitonic devices (88,172)
WSe2/MoS2 LHS LPCVD (2) p–n junction photovoltaic effect photodetectors (88)
WSe2/WS2 LHS APCVD (2) WSe2 puddle in WS2 photogating photodetectors (111)
WSe2/WS2(1–x)Se2 VHS APCVD (2) strongly coupled vdW heterostructures   (96)
WS2/WS2(1–x)Se2 VHS APCVD (2)     (97)
MS2-MSe2 (M= Mo, W) LHS APCVD (2) clean interface FETs, complementary metal–oxide semiconductor (105)
MoX2-WX2 (X= S, Se) LHS APCVD (1) clean interface   (107)
  VHS APCVD (2) strongly coupled vdW heterostructures   (95,173)
MoS2–WS2/WS2 LHS and VHS APCVD (1) LHS and VHS achieved in one structure   (89)
VS2/WS2 LHS APCVD (2) 1T-2H metal–semiconductor contact FETs (169)
VSe2/MX2 (M = Mo, W; X = S, Se) VHS APCVD (2) 1T-1H metal–semiconductor contact   (96)
MoTe2/MoS2 VHS APCVD (2) p–n junction UV–vis–IR photodetectors (92)
MoTe2/MoTe2 LHS APCVD (2) 1T′-2H-1T′ metal–semiconductor–metal contact FET array (32)
MTe2 (M = V, Nb, Ta)/ WSe2 (WS2) VHS APCVD (2) 1T-2H metal–semiconductor contact FETs (174)
CrSe2/WSe2 VHS APCVD (2) thickness-dependent magnetic order Hall devices (175)
NbS2/MoS2 VHS APCVD (1) R-type stacking metal–semiconductor contact   (90)
NbS2/WS2 VHS APCVD (2) 1T-1H metal–semiconductor contact   (97)
ReS2/WS2 VHS APCVD (1) fully covered twinned bilayer   (91)
ReS2/MoS2 LHS APCVD (2) 2H-1T′ type I band alignment   (98)
MoS2/MoTe2(1–x)S2x/MoS2 VHS APCVD (2) centimeter-scale heterostructure   (99)
a

VHS, vertical heterostructure; LHS, lateral vertical heterostructure.

Table 3 shows TMD-based arrays and patterns obtained via the four approaches mentioned. Patterned etching relies on proven synthesis technology for large-scale TMDs, thus it is mostly used in the fabrication of well-aligned active channels on wafers.121,122 To achieve more complex and wide-ranging application scenarios, heterostructures with a wafer size as well as a well-defined boundary are required as discussed above, which is expected to be achieved by in situ sulfurization/selenization/tellurization,128,129,131,132 selective sulfurization/selenization,116,134,144,146 and selective area growth.141,145

7. Perspectives for CVD Growth of TMDs

In general, CVD is currently one of most promising approaches to meet the practical demand for production of 2D TMDs, due to its ability to produce large-area thin film and high controllability. The related research concentrates on the synthesis of wafer-scale and boundary-free TMD thin films, TMD heterostructures with designed architectures, and pattered TMD arrays. Although the recent decade has seen a boom in engineering of TMDs and TMD heterostructures, there remains a lot of tough problems to be solved. The primary issue is the scarcity of a general method to mass produce wafer-scale single-crystal TMDs, with limited varieties and substrates failing to satisfy the demands in various applications. To date, the success made in the synthesis of high-quality wafer-scale TMDs mainly comes from common species like MoS2 and WS2, and the research on most other TMDs has not progressed. Although highly oriented TMD domains could be achieved by the selection of growth substrates, few of these substrates support a transfer-free route to fabricate electronics, and it may bring transfer-induced imperfections including defects, wrinkles, folds, impurities, and bubbles.

Moreover, further improvement of controllability of the CVD process is urgently required, as well. Although many studies in recent years have emphasized that defects can be effectively improved, defects are a prominent shortcoming of CVD-grown materials which are not competitive with those exfoliated equivalents. Further thermodynamic and kinetic studies related to CVD growth mechanisms need to be developed to assist the refinement of CVD-grown crystal structures. In addition, further improvement of controllability is urgently required, as well. Twist angle, as one of the hottest trending topics in the field of 2D materials due to unconventional physical phenomena originating from it, is extensively studied using artificially stacked TMDs. However, the transfer process inevitably destroys the interlayer interface, and the size of such samples is usually less than 100 μm, resulting in deviations in related measurements. Therefore, a twist-angle-tunable synthesis approach of bilayer or multilayer TMDs is pursued. Moreover, the poor reproducibility of experiments is still a great challenge, and this undoubtedly impedes their further commercialization. Thus, how to create a stable local growth environment under vapor flow by improving equipment setup is a key consideration in future work.

Acknowledgments

Z.L. acknowledge supports by the RGC (16304421), the Innovation and Technology Commission (ITC-CNERC14SC01), Guangdong Science and Technology Department (Project# 2020A0505090003), Research Fund of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Intelligent Micro-Nano Optoelectronic Technology (No. 2020B1212030010), the IER Foundation (HT-JD-CXY-201907), “International science and technology cooperation projects” of Science and Technological Bureau of Guangzhou Huangpu District (2019GH06), and Shenzhen Special Fund for Central Guiding the Local Science and Technology Development (2021Szvup136).

Author Contributions

§ T.K., T.W.T., and B.P. contributed equally.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Cao Y.; Fatemi V.; Fang S.; Watanabe K.; Taniguchi T.; Kaxiras E.; Jarillo-Herrero P. Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 2018, 556 (7699), 43–50. 10.1038/nature26160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Yoo H.; Engelke R.; Carr S.; Fang S.; Zhang K.; Cazeaux P.; Sung S. H.; Hovden R.; Tsen A. W.; Taniguchi T.; Watanabe K.; Yi G. C.; Kim M.; Luskin M.; Tadmor E. B.; Kaxiras E.; Kim P. Atomic and electronic reconstruction at the van der Waals interface in twisted bilayer graphene. Nat. Mater. 2019, 18 (5), 448–453. 10.1038/s41563-019-0346-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu H.; Mendelson N.; Abidi I. H.; Li S.; Liu Z.; Cai Y.; Zhang K.; You J.; Tamtaji M.; Wong H.; Ding Y.; Chen G.; Aharonovich I.; Luo Z. Rational control on quantum emitter formation in carbon-doped monolayer hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14 (2), 3189–3198. 10.1021/acsami.1c21781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu H.; You C. Y.; Li J.; Galligan P. R.; You J.; Liu Z.; Cai Y.; Luo Z. Synthesis of hexagonal boron nitrides by chemical vapor deposition and their use as single photon emitters. Nano Mater. Sci. 2021, 3 (3), 291–312. 10.1016/j.nanoms.2021.03.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu L.; Kong L.; Li Q.; He C.; Ren L.; Tao Q.; Yang X.; Lin J.; Zhao B.; Li Z.; Chen Y.; Li W.; Song W.; Lu Z.; Li G.; Li S.; Duan X.; Pan A.; Liao L.; Liu Y. Transferred van der Waals metal electrodes for sub-1-nm MoS2 vertical transistors. Nat. Electron. 2021, 4 (5), 342–347. 10.1038/s41928-021-00566-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu Y.; Weiss N. O.; Duan X.; Cheng H.-C.; Huang Y.; Duan X. Van der Waals heterostructures and devices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1 (9), 16042. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.42. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu Z.; Zhou B. T.; Cai X.; Cheung P.; Liu G. B.; Huang M.; Lin J.; Han T.; An L.; Wang Y.; Xu S.; Long G.; Cheng C.; Law K. T.; Zhang F.; Wang N. Intrinsic valley Hall transport in atomically thin MoS2. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10 (1), 611. 10.1038/s41467-019-08629-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cai X.; An L.; Feng X.; Wang S.; Zhou Z.; Chen Y.; Cai Y.; Cheng C.; Pan X.; Wang N. Layer-dependent interface reconstruction and strain modulation in twisted WSe2. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (32), 13624–13630. 10.1039/D1NR04264E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yuan L.; Zheng B.; Kunstmann J.; Brumme T.; Kuc A. B.; Ma C.; Deng S.; Blach D.; Pan A.; Huang L. Twist-angle-dependent interlayer exciton diffusion in WS2–WSe2 heterobilayers. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19 (6), 617–623. 10.1038/s41563-020-0670-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang Z.; Rhodes D. A.; Watanabe K.; Taniguchi T.; Hone J. C.; Shan J.; Mak K. F. Evidence of high-temperature exciton condensation in two-dimensional atomic double layers. Nature 2019, 574 (7776), 76–80. 10.1038/s41586-019-1591-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang L.; Wu Y.; Yu Y.; Chen A.; Li H.; Ren W.; Lu S.; Ding S.; Yang H.; Xue Q. K.; Li F. S.; Wang G. Direct observation of one-dimensional Peierls-type charge density wave in twin boundaries of monolayer MoTe2. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (7), 8299–8306. 10.1021/acsnano.0c02072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Xu H.; Zhang H.; Guo Z.; Shan Y.; Wu S.; Wang J.; Hu W.; Liu H.; Sun Z.; Luo C.; Wu X.; Xu Z.; Zhang D. W.; Bao W.; Zhou P. High-performance wafer-scale MoS2 transistors toward practical application. Small 2018, 14 (48), 1803465 10.1002/smll.201803465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yu L.; El-Damak D.; Radhakrishna U.; Ling X.; Zubair A.; Lin Y.; Zhang Y.; Chuang M. H.; Lee Y. H.; Antoniadis D.; Kong J.; Chandrakasan A.; Palacios T. Design, modeling, and fabrication of chemical vapor deposition grown MoS2 circuits with E-mode FETs for large-area electronics. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (10), 6349–6356. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim Y.; Lee S.; Song J. G.; Ko K. Y.; Woo W. J.; Lee S. W.; Park M.; Lee H.; Lee Z.; Choi H.; Kim W. H.; Park J.; Kim H. 2D transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures for p-and n-type photovoltaic self-powered gas sensor. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30 (43), 2003360. 10.1002/adfm.202003360. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bonilla M.; Kolekar S.; Ma Y.; Diaz H. C.; Kalappattil V.; Das R.; Eggers T.; Gutierrez H. R.; Phan M.-H.; Batzill M. Strong room-temperature ferromagnetism in VSe2 monolayers on van der Waals substrates. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13 (4), 289–293. 10.1038/s41565-018-0063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fu S.; Kang K.; Shayan K.; Yoshimura A.; Dadras S.; Wang X.; Zhang L.; Chen S.; Liu N.; Jindal A.; Li X.; Pasupathy A. N.; Vamivakas A. N.; Meunier V.; Strauf S.; Yang E. H. Enabling room temperature ferromagnetism in monolayer MoS2 via in situ iron-doping. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11 (1), 2034. 10.1038/s41467-020-15877-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weston A.; Castanon E. G.; Enaldiev V.; Ferreira F.; Bhattacharjee S.; Xu S.; Corte-Leon H.; Wu Z.; Clark N.; Summerfield A.; Hashimoto T.; Gao Y.; Wang W.; Hamer M.; Read H.; Fumagalli L.; Kretinin A. V.; Haigh S. J.; Kazakova O.; Geim A. K.; Fal’ko V. I.; Gorbachev R. Interfacial ferroelectricity in marginally twisted 2D semiconductors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2022, 17 (4), 390–395. 10.1038/s41565-022-01072-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu D.; Guo J.; Wang C.; Ren X.; Chen Y.; Lin P.; Zeng L.; Shi Z.; Li X. J.; Shan C. X.; Jie J. Ultrabroadband and high-detectivity photodetector based on WS2/Ge heterojunction through defect engineering and interface passivation. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (6), 10119–10129. 10.1021/acsnano.1c02007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang Y.; Ma K.; Zhao C.; Hong W.; Nie C.; Qiu Z.-J.; Wang S. An ultrafast WSe2 photodiode based on a lateral pin homojunction. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (3), 4405–4415. 10.1021/acsnano.0c08075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhuang M.; Xu G.-L.; Gan L.-Y.; Dou Y.; Sun C.-J.; Ou X.; Xie Y.; Liu Z.; Cai Y.; Ding Y.; Abidi I. H.; Tyagi A.; Amine K.; Luo Z. Sub-5 nm edge-rich 1T′-ReSe2 as bifunctional materials for hydrogen evolution and sodium-ion storage. Nano Energy 2019, 58, 660–668. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu Y.; Su Y.; Guan J.; Cao J.; Zhang R.; He M.; Gao K.; Zhou L.; Jiang Z. 2D heterostructure membranes with sunlight-driven self-cleaning ability for highly efficient oil–water separation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28 (13), 1706545. 10.1002/adfm.201706545. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ko C.; Lee Y.; Chen Y.; Suh J.; Fu D.; Suslu A.; Lee S.; Clarkson J. D.; Choe H. S.; Tongay S.; Ramesh R.; Wu J. Ferroelectrically gated atomically thin transition-metal dichalcogenides as nonvolatile memory. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (15), 2923–30. 10.1002/adma.201504779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li H.; Lu G.; Wang Y.; Yin Z.; Cong C.; He Q.; Wang L.; Ding F.; Yu T.; Zhang H. Mechanical exfoliation and characterization of single-and few-layer nanosheets of WSe2, TaS2, and TaSe2. Small 2013, 9 (11), 1974–1981. 10.1002/smll.201202919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hai X.; Chang K.; Pang H.; Li M.; Li P.; Liu H.; Shi L.; Ye J. Engineering the edges of MoS2 (WS2) crystals for direct exfoliation into monolayers in polar micromolecular solvents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (45), 14962–14969. 10.1021/jacs.6b08096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fan X.; Xu P.; Li Y. C.; Zhou D.; Sun Y.; Nguyen M. A. T.; Terrones M.; Mallouk T. E. Controlled exfoliation of MoS2 crystals into trilayer nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 (15), 5143–5149. 10.1021/jacs.6b01502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ohring M.; Zarrabian S.; Grogan A. The materials science of thin films. Appl. Opt. 1992, 31 (34), 7162. [Google Scholar]
  27. Xu M.; Tang B.; Lu Y.; Zhu C.; Lu Q.; Zhu C.; Zheng L.; Zhang J.; Han N.; Fang W.; Guo Y.; Di J.; Song P.; He Y.; Kang L.; Zhang Z.; Zhao W.; Guan C.; Wang X.; Liu Z. Machine learning driven synthesis of few-layered WTe2 with geometrical control. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143 (43), 18103–18113. 10.1021/jacs.1c06786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gan L.; Luo Z. Turning off hydrogen to realize seeded growth of subcentimeter single-crystal graphene grains on copper. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (10), 9480–9488. 10.1021/nn404393b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tang B.; Lu Y.; Zhou J.; Chouhan T.; Wang H.; Golani P.; Xu M.; Xu Q.; Guan C.; Liu Z. Machine learning-guided synthesis of advanced inorganic materials. Mater. Today 2020, 41, 72–80. 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang R.; Yu Y.; Zhou S.; Li H.; Wong H.; Luo Z.; Gan L.; Zhai T. Strategies on phase control in transition metal dichalcogenides. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28 (47), 1802473. 10.1002/adfm.201802473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Luxa J.; Spejchalová L.; Jakubec I.; Sofer Z. MoS2 stacking matters: 3R polytype significantly outperforms 2H MoS2 for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nanoscale 2021, 13 (46), 19391–19398. 10.1039/D1NR03284D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Xu X.; Pan Y.; Liu S.; Han B.; Gu P.; Li S.; Xu W.; Peng Y.; Han Z.; Chen J.; Gao P.; Ye Y. Seeded 2D epitaxy of large-area single-crystal films of the van der Waals semiconductor 2H MoTe2. Science 2021, 372 (6538), 195–200. 10.1126/science.abf5825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Chhowalla M.; Shin H. S.; Eda G.; Li L.-J.; Loh K. P.; Zhang H. The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5 (4), 263–275. 10.1038/nchem.1589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Leng K.; Chen Z.; Zhao X.; Tang W.; Tian B.; Nai C. T.; Zhou W.; Loh K. P. Phase restructuring in transition metal dichalcogenides for highly stable energy storage. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (10), 9208–9215. 10.1021/acsnano.6b05746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang Z.; Shen Y.; Ito Y.; Zhang Y.; Du J.; Fujita T.; Hirata A.; Tang Z.; Chen M. Synthesizing 1T-1H two-phase M1–xWxS2 monolayers by chemical vapor deposition. ACS Nano 2018, 12 (2), 1571–1579. 10.1021/acsnano.7b08149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yin H.; Zhang X.; Lu J.; Geng X.; Wan Y.; Wu M.; Yang P. Substrate effects on the CVD growth of MoS2 and WS2. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55 (3), 990–996. 10.1007/s10853-019-03993-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang Y.; Yao Y.; Sendeku M. G.; Yin L.; Zhan X.; Wang F.; Wang Z.; He J. Recent progress in CVD growth of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides and related heterostructures. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31 (41), 1901694. 10.1002/adma.201901694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Thangaraja A.; Shinde S. M.; Kalita G.; Tanemura M. Effect of WO3 precursor and sulfurization process on WS2 crystals growth by atmospheric pressure CVD. Mater. Lett. 2015, 156, 156–160. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.05.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ling X.; Lee Y.-H.; Lin Y.; Fang W.; Yu L.; Dresselhaus M. S.; Kong J. Role of the seeding promoter in MoS2 growth by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Lett. 2014, 14 (2), 464–472. 10.1021/nl4033704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Park J. H.; Lu A. Y.; Shen P. C.; Shin B. G.; Wang H.; Mao N.; Xu R.; Jung S. J.; Ham D.; Kern K.; Han Y.; Kong J. Synthesis of high-performance monolayer molybdenum disulfide at low temperature. Small Methods 2021, 5 (6), 2000720 10.1002/smtd.202000720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu B.; Fathi M.; Chen L.; Abbas A.; Ma Y.; Zhou C. Chemical vapor deposition growth of monolayer WSe2 with tunable device characteristics and growth mechanism study. ACS Nano 2015, 9 (6), 6119–6127. 10.1021/acsnano.5b01301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang S.; Rong Y.; Fan Y.; Pacios M.; Bhaskaran H.; He K.; Warner J. H. Shape evolution of monolayer MoS2 crystals grown by chemical vapor deposition. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26 (22), 6371–6379. 10.1021/cm5025662. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang X.; Zhang Y. P.; Chen Z. Q. Effect of MoO3 constituents on the growth of MoS2 nanosheets by chemical vapor deposition. Mater. Res. Express. 2016, 3 (6), 065014 10.1088/2053-1591/3/6/065014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang Q.; Shi R.; Zhao Y.; Huang R.; Wang Z.; Amini A.; Cheng C. Recent progress on kinetic control of chemical vapor deposition growth of high-quality wafer-scale transition metal dichalcogenides. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3 (12), 3430–3440. 10.1039/D1NA00171J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gao Y.; Hong Y. L.; Yin L. C.; Wu Z.; Yang Z.; Chen M. L.; Liu Z.; Ma T.; Sun D. M.; Ni Z.; Ma X. L.; Cheng H. M.; Ren W. Ultrafast growth of high-quality monolayer WSe2 on Au. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29 (29), 1700990. 10.1002/adma.201700990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mandyam S. V.; Kim H. M.; Drndić M. Large area few-layer TMD film growths and their applications. J.Phys. Mater. 2020, 3 (2), 024008 10.1088/2515-7639/ab82b3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yang P.; Zhang S.; Pan S.; Tang B.; Liang Y.; Zhao X.; Zhang Z.; Shi J.; Huan Y.; Shi Y.; Pennycook S. J.; Ren Z.; Zhang G.; Chen Q.; Zou X.; Liu Z.; Zhang Y. Epitaxial growth of centimeter-scale single-crystal MoS2 monolayer on Au (111). ACS Nano 2020, 14 (4), 5036–5045. 10.1021/acsnano.0c01478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Chen J.; Zhao X.; Tan S. J.; Xu H.; Wu B.; Liu B.; Fu D.; Fu W.; Geng D.; Liu Y.; Liu W.; Tang W.; Li L.; Zhou W.; Sum T. C.; Loh K. P. Chemical vapor deposition of large-size monolayer MoSe2 crystals on molten glass. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (3), 1073–1076. 10.1021/jacs.6b12156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang S.; Pacios M.; Bhaskaran H.; Warner J. H. Substrate control for large area continuous films of monolayer MoS2 by atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition. Nanotechnology 2016, 27 (8), 085604 10.1088/0957-4484/27/8/085604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sial M. N.; Usman M.; Zheng B.; Yu Y.; Mavrič A.; Qing F.; Valant M.; Wang Z. M. CVD growth of molybdenum diselenide surface structures with tailored morphology. CrystEngComm 2018, 20 (33), 4867–4874. 10.1039/C8CE00917A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gong Y.; Zhang X.; Redwing J. M.; Jackson T. N. Thin film transistors using wafer-scale low-temperature MOCVD WSe2. J. Electron. Mater. 2016, 45 (12), 6280–6284. 10.1007/s11664-016-4987-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mun J.; Park H.; Park J.; Joung D.; Lee S.-K.; Leem J.; Myoung J.-M.; Park J.; Jeong S.-H.; Chegal W.; Nam S.; Kang S.-W. High-mobility MoS2 directly grown on polymer substrate with kinetics-controlled metal–organic chemical vapor deposition. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2019, 1 (4), 608–616. 10.1021/acsaelm.9b00078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Xu X.; Yao W.; Xiao D.; Heinz T. F. Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 2014, 10 (5), 343–350. 10.1038/nphys2942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang J.; Xu X.; Cheng T.; Gu L.; Qiao R.; Liang Z.; Ding D.; Hong H.; Zheng P.; Zhang Z.; Zhang Z.; Zhang S.; Cui G.; Chang C.; Huang C.; Qi J.; Liang J.; Liu C.; Zuo Y.; Xue G.; Fang X.; Tian J.; Wu M.; Guo Y.; Yao Z.; Jiao Q.; Liu L.; Gao P.; Li Q.; Yang R.; Zhang G.; Tang Z.; Yu D.; Wang E.; Lu J.; Zhao Y.; Wu S.; Ding F.; Liu K. Dual-coupling-guided epitaxial growth of wafer-scale single-crystal WS2 monolayer on vicinal a-plane sapphire. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2022, 17 (1), 33–38. 10.1038/s41565-021-01004-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Li T.; Guo W.; Ma L.; Li W.; Yu Z.; Han Z.; Gao S.; Liu L.; Fan D.; Wang Z.; Yang Y.; Lin W.; Luo Z.; Chen X.; Dai N.; Tu X.; Pan D.; Yao Y.; Wang P.; Nie Y.; Wang J.; Shi Y.; Wang X. Epitaxial growth of wafer-scale molybdenum disulfide semiconductor single crystals on sapphire. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16 (11), 1201–1207. 10.1038/s41565-021-00963-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ruzmetov D.; Zhang K.; Stan G.; Kalanyan B.; Bhimanapati G. R.; Eichfeld S. M.; Burke R. A.; Shah P. B.; O’Regan T. P.; Crowne F. J.; Birdwell A. G.; Robinson J. A.; Davydov A. V.; Ivanov T. G. Vertical 2D/3D Semiconductor Heterostructures Based on Epitaxial Molybdenum Disulfide and Gallium Nitride. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (3), 3580–3588. 10.1021/acsnano.5b08008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Aljarb A.; Fu J. H.; Hsu C. C.; Chuu C. P.; Wan Y.; Hakami M.; Naphade D. R.; Yengel E.; Lee C. J.; Brems S.; Chen T. A.; Li M. Y.; Bae S. H.; Hsu W. T.; Cao Z.; Albaridy R.; Lopatin S.; Chang W. H.; Anthopoulos T. D.; Kim J.; Li L. J.; Tung V. Ledge-directed epitaxy of continuously self-aligned single-crystalline nanoribbons of transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19 (12), 1300–1306. 10.1038/s41563-020-0795-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yang P.; Zou X.; Zhang Z.; Hong M.; Shi J.; Chen S.; Shu J.; Zhao L.; Jiang S.; Zhou X.; Huan Y.; Xie C.; Gao P.; Chen Q.; Zhang Q.; Liu Z.; Zhang Y. Batch production of 6-in. uniform monolayer molybdenum disulfide catalyzed by sodium in glass. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 979. 10.1038/s41467-018-03388-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Feijó T. O.; Copetti G.; Gerling E. R. F.; Hanke M.; Lopes J. M. J.; Radtke C.; Soares G. V. The role of substrate on the growth of 2D heterostructures by CVD. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 539, 148226. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang Q.; Li N.; Tang J.; Zhu J.; Zhang Q.; Jia Q.; Lu Y.; Wei Z.; Yu H.; Zhao Y.; Guo Y.; Gu L.; Sun G.; Yang W.; Yang R.; Shi D.; Zhang G. Wafer-scale highly oriented monolayer MoS2 with large domain sizes. Nano Lett. 2020, 20 (10), 7193–7199. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Tong X.; Liu K.; Zeng M.; Fu L. Vapor-phase growth of high-quality wafer-scale two-dimensional materials. InfoMat 2019, 1 (4), 460–478. 10.1002/inf2.12038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Cheng J.; Shen C.; He Y.; Wei H.; Liu S.; Qiu P.; Song Y.; Wei S.; Wang Z.; Zheng X.; Peng M. Reaction mechanism transformation of LPCVD-grown MoS2 from isolated triangular grains to continuous films. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 853, 157374. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157374. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ji Q.; Kan M.; Zhang Y.; Guo Y.; Ma D.; Shi J.; Sun Q.; Chen Q.; Zhang Y.; Liu Z. Unravelling orientation distribution and merging behavior of monolayer MoS2 domains on sapphire. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (1), 198–205. 10.1021/nl503373x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Maury F. Recent trends in the selection of metal-organic precursors for MOCVD process. J. Phys. IV 1995, 5 (C5), 449–463. 10.1051/jphyscol:1995552. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Schaefer C. M.; Caicedo Roque J. M.; Sauthier G.; Bousquet J.; Hébert C.; Sperling J. R.; Pérez-Tomás A.; Santiso J.; del Corro E.; Garrido J. A. Carbon incorporation in MOCVD of MoS2 thin films grown from an organosulfide precursor. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33 (12), 4474–4487. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00646. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kalanyan B.; Kimes W. A.; Beams R.; Stranick S. J.; Garratt E.; Kalish I.; Davydov A. V.; Kanjolia R. K.; Maslar J. E. Rapid wafer-scale growth of polycrystalline 2H-MoS2 by pulsed metal–organic chemical vapor deposition. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29 (15), 6279–6288. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b01367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Eichfeld S. M.; Colon V. O.; Nie Y.; Cho K.; Robinson J. A. Controlling nucleation of monolayer WSe2 during metal-organic chemical vapor deposition growth. 2D Mater. 2016, 3 (2), 025015 10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/025015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zhang K.; Bersch B. M.; Zhang F.; Briggs N. C.; Subramanian S.; Xu K.; Chubarov M.; Wang K.; Lerach J. O.; Redwing J. M.; Fullerton-Shirey S. K.; Terrones M.; Robinson J. A. Considerations for utilizing sodium chloride in epitaxial molybdenum disulfide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10 (47), 40831–40837. 10.1021/acsami.8b16374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Chubarov M.; Choudhury T. H.; Hickey D. R.; Bachu S.; Zhang T.; Sebastian A.; Bansal A.; Zhu H.; Trainor N.; Das S.; Terrones M.; Alem N.; Redwing J. M. Wafer-scale epitaxial growth of unidirectional WS2 monolayers on sapphire. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (2), 2532–2541. 10.1021/acsnano.0c06750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Bersch B. M.; Eichfeld S. M.; Lin Y.-C.; Zhang K.; Bhimanapati G. R.; Piasecki A. F.; Labella M.; Robinson J. A. Selective-area growth and controlled substrate coupling of transition metal dichalcogenides. 2D Mater. 2017, 4 (2), 025083 10.1088/2053-1583/aa6beb. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang T.; Li Y.; Zhang Y.; Feng Q.; Ning J.; Zhang C.; Zhang J.; Hao Y. Investigation of β-Ga2O3 thin films grown on epi-GaN/sapphire (0001) substrates by low pressure MOCVD. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 859, 157810. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157810. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Michau A.; Maury F.; Schuster F.; Boichot R.; Pons M.; Monsifrot E. Chromium carbide growth at low temperature by a highly efficient DLI-MOCVD process in effluent recycling mode. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 332, 96–104. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.06.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Akiyama K.; Nojima S.; Takahashi R.; Matsumoto Y.; Funakubo H. MOCVD growth of β-FeSi2 film on modified Si surface by silver and enhancement of luminescence. J. Cryst. Growth 2019, 506, 131–134. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2018.10.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Kang K.; Xie S.; Huang L.; Han Y.; Huang P. Y.; Mak K. F.; Kim C.-J.; Muller D.; Park J. High-mobility three-atom-thick semiconducting films with wafer-scale homogeneity. Nature 2015, 520 (7549), 656–660. 10.1038/nature14417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Koma A. Van der Waals epitaxy—a new epitaxial growth method for a highly lattice-mismatched system. Thin Solid Films 1992, 216 (1), 72–76. 10.1016/0040-6090(92)90872-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Li B.; Huang L.; Zhong M.; Li Y.; Wang Y.; Li J.; Wei Z. Direct vapor phase growth and optoelectronic application of large band offset SnS2/MoS2 vertical bilayer heterostructures with high lattice mismatch. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2016, 2 (11), 1600298. 10.1002/aelm.201600298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Biroju R. K.; Pal S.; Sharma R.; Giri P.; Narayanan T. N. Stacking sequence dependent photo-electrocatalytic performance of CVD grown MoS2/graphene van der Waals solids. Nanotechnology 2017, 28 (8), 085101 10.1088/1361-6528/aa565a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Paradisanos I.; McCreary K. M.; Adinehloo D.; Mouchliadis L.; Robinson J. T.; Chuang H.-J.; Hanbicki A. T.; Perebeinos V.; Jonker B. T.; Stratakis E.; Kioseoglou G. Prominent room temperature valley polarization in WS2/graphene heterostructures grown by chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116 (20), 203102. 10.1063/5.0002396. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wang Y.-Y.; Chen D.-R.; Wu J.-K.; Wang T.-H.; Chuang C.; Huang S.-Y.; Hsieh W.-P.; Hofmann M.; Chang Y.-H.; Hsieh Y.-P. Two-dimensional mechano-thermoelectric heterojunctions for self-powered strain sensors. Nano Lett. 2021, 21 (16), 6990–6997. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhang Z.; Ji X.; Shi J.; Zhou X.; Zhang S.; Hou Y.; Qi Y.; Fang Q.; Ji Q.; Zhang Y.; Hong M.; Yang P.; Liu X.; Zhang Q.; Liao L.; Jin C.; Liu Z.; Zhang Y. Direct chemical vapor deposition growth and band-gap characterization of MoS2/h-BN van der Waals heterostructures on Au foils. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (4), 4328–4336. 10.1021/acsnano.7b01537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Okada M.; Sawazaki T.; Watanabe K.; Taniguch T.; Hibino H.; Shinohara H.; Kitaura R. Direct chemical vapor deposition growth of WS2 atomic layers on hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Nano 2014, 8 (8), 8273–8277. 10.1021/nn503093k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Erkılıç U.; Solís-Fernández P.; Ji H. G.; Shinokita K.; Lin Y.-C.; Maruyama M.; Suenaga K.; Okada S.; Matsuda K.; Ago H. Vapor phase selective growth of two-dimensional perovskite/WS2 heterostructures for optoelectronic applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (43), 40503–40511. 10.1021/acsami.9b13904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Guan W.; Li Y.; Zhong Q.; Liu H.; Chen J.; Hu H.; Lv K.; Gong J.; Xu Y.; Kang Z.; Cao M.; Zhang Q. Fabricating MAPbI3/MoS2 composites for improved photocatalytic performance. Nano Lett. 2021, 21 (1), 597–604. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Ai R.; Guan X.; Li J.; Yao K.; Chen P.; Zhang Z.; Duan X.; Duan X. Growth of single-crystalline cadmium iodide nanoplates, CdI2/MoS2 (WS2, WSe2) van der Waals heterostructures, and patterned arrays. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (3), 3413–3419. 10.1021/acsnano.7b01507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zheng W.; Zheng B.; Yan C.; Liu Y.; Sun X.; Qi Z.; Yang T.; Jiang Y.; Huang W.; Fan P.; Jiang F.; Ji W.; Wang X.; Pan A. Direct vapor growth of 2D vertical heterostructures with tunable band alignments and interfacial charge transfer behaviors. Adv. Sci. (Weinh) 2019, 6 (7), 1802204. 10.1002/advs.201802204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Rasmussen F. A.; Thygesen K. S. Computational 2D materials database: electronic structure of transition-metal dichalcogenides and oxides. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119 (23), 13169–13183. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02950. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Gong Y.; Lin J.; Wang X.; Shi G.; Lei S.; Lin Z.; Zou X.; Ye G.; Vajtai R.; Yakobson B. I.; Terrones H.; Terrones M.; Tay B. K.; Lou J.; Pantelides S. T.; Liu Z.; Zhou W.; Ajayan P. M. Vertical and in-plane heterostructures from WS2/MoS2 monolayers. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13 (12), 1135–42. 10.1038/nmat4091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Gong Y.; Lei S.; Ye G.; Li B.; He Y.; Keyshar K.; Zhang X.; Wang Q.; Lou J.; Liu Z.; Vajtai R.; Zhou W.; Ajayan P. M. Two-step growth of two-dimensional WSe2/MoSe2 heterostructures. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (9), 6135–6141. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Zhang X.; Xiao S.; Nan H.; Mo H.; Wan X.; Gu X.; Ostrikov K. K. Controllable one-step growth of bilayer MoS2–WS2/WS2 heterostructures by chemical vapor deposition. Nanotechnology 2018, 29 (45), 455707. 10.1088/1361-6528/aaddc5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Fu Q.; Wang X.; Zhou J.; Xia J.; Zeng Q.; Lv D.; Zhu C.; Wang X.; Shen Y.; Li X.; Hua Y.; Liu F.; Shen Z.; Jin C.; Liu Z. One-step synthesis of metal/semiconductor heterostructure NbS2/MoS2. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30 (12), 4001–4007. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  91. Zhang T.; Jiang B.; Xu Z.; Mendes R. G.; Xiao Y.; Chen L.; Fang L.; Gemming T.; Chen S.; Rummeli M. H.; Fu L. Twinned growth behaviour of two-dimensional materials. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7 (1), 13911. 10.1038/ncomms13911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Ding Y.; Zhou N.; Gan L.; Yan X.; Wu R.; Abidi I. H.; Waleed A.; Pan J.; Ou X.; Zhang Q.; Zhuang M.; Wang P.; Pan X.; Fan Z.; Zhai T.; Luo Z. Stacking-mode confined growth of 2H-MoTe2/MoS2 bilayer heterostructures for UV–vis–IR photodetectors. Nano Energy 2018, 49, 200–208. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Heo H.; Sung J. H.; Jin G.; Ahn J. H.; Kim K.; Lee M. J.; Cha S.; Choi H.; Jo M. H. Rotation-misfit-free heteroepitaxial stacking and stitching growth of hexagonal transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers by nucleationkinetics controls. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (25), 3803–3810. 10.1002/adma.201500846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Yoo Y.; Degregorio Z. P.; Johns J. E. Seed crystal homogeneity controls lateral and vertical heteroepitaxy of monolayer MoS2 and WS2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (45), 14281–14287. 10.1021/jacs.5b06643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wu X.; Wang X.; Li H.; Zeng Z.; Zheng B.; Zhang D.; Li F.; Zhu X.; Jiang Y.; Pan A. Vapor growth of WSe2/WS2 heterostructures with stacking dependent optical properties. Nano Res. 2019, 12 (12), 3123–3128. 10.1007/s12274-019-2564-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhang Z.; Gong Y.; Zou X.; Liu P.; Yang P.; Shi J.; Zhao L.; Zhang Q.; Gu L.; Zhang Y. Epitaxial growth of two-dimensional metal–semiconductor transition-metal dichalcogenide vertical stacks (VSe2/MX2) and their band alignments. ACS Nano 2019, 13 (1), 885–893. 10.1021/acsnano.8b08677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Gong X.; Zhao X.; Pam M. E.; Yao H.; Li Z.; Geng D.; Pennycook S. J.; Shi Y.; Yang H. Y. Location-selective growth of two-dimensional metallic/semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (10), 4183–4189. 10.1039/C8NR08744J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Yao J.; Liu H.; He Q.; Chen K.; Wu Y.; Li X.; Zhang C.; Wu Z.; Kang J. Controllable growth of 2H-1T’ MoS2/ReS2 heterostructures via chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 572, 151438. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  99. Liu Z.; Feng S.; Cai X.; Liu H.; Li J.; Amjadian M.; Cai Y.; Wong H.; Tamtaji M.; An L.; Zhang K.; Chen G.; Wang N.; Xu Z.; Luo Z. Large-size superlattices synthesized by sequential sulfur substitution-induced transformation of metastable MoTe2. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33 (24), 9760–9768. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03663. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  100. Li M. Y.; Shi Y.; Cheng C. C.; Lu L. S.; Lin Y. C.; Tang H. L.; Tsai M. L.; Chu C. W.; Wei K. H.; He J. H.; Chang W. H.; Suenaga K.; Li L. J. Epitaxial growth of a monolayer WSe2-MoS2 lateral p–n junction with an atomically sharp interface. Science 2015, 349 (6247), 524–8. 10.1126/science.aab4097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Huang C.; Wu S.; Sanchez A. M.; Peters J. J.; Beanland R.; Ross J. S.; Rivera P.; Yao W.; Cobden D. H.; Xu X. Lateral heterojunctions within monolayer MoSe2–WSe2 semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13 (12), 1096–1101. 10.1038/nmat4064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Gong Y.; Lin J.; Wang X.; Shi G.; Lei S.; Lin Z.; Zou X.; Ye G.; Vajtai R.; Yakobson B. I.; Terrones H.; Terrones M.; Tay B. K.; Lou J.; Pantelides S. T.; Liu Z.; Zhou W.; Ajayan P. M. Vertical and in-plane heterostructures from WS2/MoS2 monolayers. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13 (12), 1135–1142. 10.1038/nmat4091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Wu W.; Zhang Q.; Zhou X.; Li L.; Su J.; Wang F.; Zhai T. Self-powered photovoltaic photodetector established on lateral monolayer MoS2-WS2 heterostructures. Nano Energy 2018, 51, 45–53. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  104. Tsai T.-H.; Liang Z.-Y.; Lin Y.-C.; Wang C.-C.; Lin K.-I.; Suenaga K.; Chiu P.-W. Photogating WS2 photodetectors using embedded WSe2 charge puddles. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (4), 4559–4566. 10.1021/acsnano.0c00098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Duan X.; Wang C.; Shaw J. C.; Cheng R.; Chen Y.; Li H.; Wu X.; Tang Y.; Zhang Q.; Pan A.; Jiang J.; Yu R.; Huang Y.; Duan X. Lateral epitaxial growth of two-dimensional layered semiconductor heterojunctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9 (12), 1024–1030. 10.1038/nnano.2014.222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Bogaert K.; Liu S.; Chesin J.; Titow D.; Gradecak S.; Garaj S. Diffusion-mediated synthesis of MoS2/WS2 lateral heterostructures. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (8), 5129–5134. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Zhang X.-Q.; Lin C.-H.; Tseng Y.-W.; Huang K.-H.; Lee Y.-H. Synthesis of lateral heterostructures of semiconducting atomic layers. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (1), 410–415. 10.1021/nl503744f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Li L.; Zheng W.; Ma C.; Zhao H.; Jiang F.; Ouyang Y.; Zheng B.; Fu X.; Fan P.; Zheng M.; Li Y.; Xiao Y.; Cao W.; Jiang Y.; Zhu X.; Zhuang X.; Pan A. Wavelength-tunable interlayer exciton emission at the near-infrared region in van der Waals semiconductor heterostructures. Nano Lett. 2020, 20 (5), 3361–3368. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Zheng B.; Ma C.; Li D.; Lan J.; Zhang Z.; Sun X.; Zheng W.; Yang T.; Zhu C.; Ouyang G.; Xu G.; Zhu X.; Wang X.; Pan A. Band alignment engineering in two-dimensional lateral heterostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (36), 11193–11197. 10.1021/jacs.8b07401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Sahoo P. K.; Memaran S.; Xin Y.; Balicas L.; Gutiérrez H. R. One-pot growth of two-dimensional lateral heterostructures via sequential edge-epitaxy. Nature 2018, 553 (7686), 63–67. 10.1038/nature25155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Tsai T.-H.; Liang Z.-Y.; Lin Y.-C.; Wang C.-C.; Lin K.-I.; Suenaga K.; Chiu P.-W. Photogating WS2 photodetectors using embedded WSe2 charge puddles. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (4), 4559–4560. 10.1021/acsnano.0c00098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Zhang T.; Wang Y.; Xu J.; Chen L.; Zhu H.; Sun Q.; Ding S.; Zhang D. W. High performance few-layer MoS2 transistor arrays with wafer level homogeneity integrated by atomic layer deposition. 2D Mater. 2018, 5 (1), 015028 10.1088/2053-1583/aa9ea5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  113. Seok H.; Megra Y. T.; Kanade C. K.; Cho J.; Kanade V. K.; Kim M.; Lee I.; Yoo P. J.; Kim H. U.; Suk J. W.; Kim T. Low-temperature synthesis of wafer-scale MoS2–WS2 vertical heterostructures by single-step penetrative plasma sulfurization. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (1), 707–718. 10.1021/acsnano.0c06989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Chen J.; Shao K.; Yang W.; Tang W.; Zhou J.; He Q.; Wu Y.; Zhang C.; Li X.; Yang X.; Wu Z.; Kang J. Synthesis of wafer-scale monolayer WS2 crystals toward the application in integrated electronic devices. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (21), 19381–19387. 10.1021/acsami.9b04791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Wang X.; Kang K.; Chen S.; Du R.; Yang E.-H. Location-specific growth and transfer of arrayed MoS2 monolayers with controllable size. 2D Mater. 2017, 4 (2), 025093 10.1088/2053-1583/aa6e69. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  116. Wang X.; Wang B.; Zhang Q.; Sun Y.; Wang E.; Luo H.; Wu Y.; Gu L.; Li H.; Liu K. Grain-boundary engineering of monolayer MoS2 for energy-efficient lateral synaptic devices. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33 (32), 2102435. 10.1002/adma.202102435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Guimaraes M. H. D.; Gao H.; Han Y.; Kang K.; Xie S.; Kim C.-J.; Muller D. A.; Ralph D. C.; Park J. Atomically thin ohmic edge contacts between two-dimensional materials. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (6), 6392–6399. 10.1021/acsnano.6b02879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Kang W. T.; Phan T. L.; Ahn K. J.; Lee I.; Kim Y. R.; Won U. Y.; Kim J. E.; Lee Y. H.; Yu W. J. Selective pattern growth of atomically thin MoSe2 films via a surface-mediated liquid-phase pomoter. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (15), 18056–18064. 10.1021/acsami.1c04005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Zhou X.; Tian Z.; Kim H. J.; Wang Y.; Xu B.; Pan R.; Chang Y. J.; Di Z.; Zhou P.; Mei Y. Rolling up MoSe2 nanomembranes as a sensitive tubular photodetector. Small 2019, 15 (42), 1902528 10.1002/smll.201970229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Li S.; Pam M. E.; Li Y.; Chen L.; Chien Y. C.; Fong X.; Chi D.; Ang K. W. Wafer-scale 2D hafnium diselenide based memristor crossbar array for energy-efficient neural network hardware. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2103376. 10.1002/adma.202103376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Seol M.; Lee M. H.; Kim H.; Shin K. W.; Cho Y.; Jeon I.; Jeong M.; Lee H. I.; Park J.; Shin H. J. High-throughput growth of wafer-scale monolayer transition metal dichalcogenide via vertical ostwald pipening. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32 (42), 2003542. 10.1002/adma.202003542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Sangwan V. K.; Lee H. S.; Bergeron H.; Balla I.; Beck M. E.; Chen K. S.; Hersam M. C. Multi-terminal memtransistors from polycrystalline monolayer molybdenum disulfide. Nature 2018, 554 (7693), 500–504. 10.1038/nature25747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Poddar P. K.; Zhong Y.; Mannix A. J.; Mujid F.; Yu J.; Liang C.; Kang J.-H.; Lee M.; Xie S.; Park J. Resist-free lithography for monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 726–732. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Rho Y.; Pei J.; Wang L.; Su Z.; Eliceiri M.; Grigoropoulos C. P. Site-selective atomic layer precision thinning of MoS2 via laser-assisted anisotropic chemical etching. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (42), 39385–39393. 10.1021/acsami.9b14306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Wang P.; Song S.; Najafi A.; Huai C.; Zhang P.; Hou Y.; Huang S.; Zeng H. High-fidelity transfer of chemical vapor deposition grown 2D transition metal dichalcogenides via substrate decoupling and polymer/small molecule composite. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (6), 7370–7379. 10.1021/acsnano.0c02838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Meng W.; Xu F.; Yu Z.; Tao T.; Shao L.; Liu L.; Li T.; Wen K.; Wang J.; He L.; Sun L.; Li W.; Ning H.; Dai N.; Qin F.; Tu X.; Pan D.; He S.; Li D.; Zheng Y.; Lu Y.; Liu B.; Zhang R.; Shi Y.; Wang X. Three-dimensional monolithic micro-LED display driven by atomically thin transistor matrix. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16 (11), 1231–1236. 10.1038/s41565-021-00966-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Villaos R. A. B.; Crisostomo C. P.; Huang Z.-Q.; Huang S.-M.; Padama A. A. B.; Albao M. A.; Lin H.; Chuang F.-C. Thickness dependent electronic properties of Pt dichalcogenides. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2019, 3 (1), 2. 10.1038/s41699-018-0085-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  128. Xue Y.; Zhang Y.; Liu Y.; Liu H.; Song J.; Sophia J.; Liu J.; Xu Z.; Xu Q.; Wang Z.; Zheng J.; Liu Y.; Li S.; Bao Q. Scalable production of a few-layer MoS2/WS2 vertical heterojunction array and its application for photodetectors. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (1), 573–80. 10.1021/acsnano.5b05596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Woods J. M.; Jung Y.; Xie Y.; Liu W.; Liu Y.; Wang H.; Cha J. J. One-step synthesis of MoS2/WS2 layered heterostructures and catalytic activity of defective transition metal dichalcogenide films. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (2), 2004–2009. 10.1021/acsnano.5b06126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Dong R.; Moore L.; Ocola L. E.; Kuljanishvili I. Enabling quality interfaces with mask-free approach to selective growth of MoS2/graphene stacked structures. Adv. Funct. Inter. 2016, 3 (16), 1600098. 10.1002/admi.201600098. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  131. Song S.; Sim Y.; Kim S.-Y.; Kim J. H.; Oh I.; Na W.; Lee D. H.; Wang J.; Yan S.; Liu Y.; Kwak J.; Chen J.-H.; Cheong H.; Yoo J.-W.; Lee Z.; Kwon S.-Y. Wafer-scale production of patterned transition metal ditelluride layers for two-dimensional metal–semiconductor contacts at the Schottky–Mott limit. Nature Electronics 2020, 3 (4), 207–215. 10.1038/s41928-020-0396-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  132. Son S. B.; Kim Y.; Kim A.; Cho B.; Hong W.-K. Ultraviolet wavelength-dependent optoelectronic properties in two-dimensional NbSe2–WSe2 van der waals heterojunction-based field-effect transistors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9 (47), 41537–41545. 10.1021/acsami.7b11983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Zhu J.; Wang Z.; Yu H.; Li N.; Zhang J.; Meng J.; Liao M.; Zhao J.; Lu X.; Du L.; Yang R.; Shi D.; Jiang Y.; Zhang G. Argon plasma induced phase transition in monolayer MoS2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (30), 10216–10219. 10.1021/jacs.7b05765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Mahjouri-Samani M.; Lin M. W.; Wang K.; Lupini A. R.; Lee J.; Basile L.; Boulesbaa A.; Rouleau C. M.; Puretzky A. A.; Ivanov I. N.; Xiao K.; Yoon M.; Geohegan D. B. Patterned arrays of lateral heterojunctions within monolayer two-dimensional semiconductors. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7749. 10.1038/ncomms8749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Afaneh T.; Sahoo P. K.; Nobrega I. A.; Xin Y.; Gutiérrez H. R. Laser-assisted chemical modification of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28 (37), 1802949. 10.1002/adfm.201802949. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  136. Wang X.; Wang B.; Wu Y.; Wang E.; Luo H.; Sun Y.; Fu D.; Sun Y.; Liu K. Two-Dimensional Lateral Heterostructures Made by Selective Reaction on a Patterned Monolayer MoS2Matrix. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (22), 26143–26151. 10.1021/acsami.1c00725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Chen X.; Park Y. J.; Das T.; Jang H.; Lee J.-B.; Ahn J.-H. Lithography-free plasma-induced patterned growth of MoS2 and its heterojunction with graphene. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (33), 15181–15188. 10.1039/C6NR03318K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Zhang K.; Ding C.; Pan B.; Wu Z.; Marga A.; Zhang L.; Zeng H.; Huang S. Visualizing van der Waals epitaxial growth of 2D heterostructures. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33 (45), 2105079. 10.1002/adma.202105079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Mohapatra P. K.; Ranganathan K.; Ismach A. Selective area growth and transfer of high optical quality MoS2 layers. Adv. Funct. Inter. 2020, 7 (24), 2001549. 10.1002/admi.202001549. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  140. Wan W.; Zhan L.; Shih T.-M.; Zhu Z.; Lu J.; Huang J.; Zhang Y.; Huang H.; Zhang X.; Cai W. Controlled growth of MoS2 via surface-energy alterations. Nanotechnology 2020, 31 (3), 035601 10.1088/1361-6528/ab49a2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Kim H. J.; Kim H.; Yang S.; Kwon J. Y. Grains in selectively grown MoS2 thin films. Small 2017, 13 (46), 1702256. 10.1002/smll.201702256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Zhao M.; Ye Y.; Han Y.; Xia Y.; Zhu H.; Wang S.; Wang Y.; Muller D. A.; Zhang X. Large-scale chemical assembly of atomically thin transistors and circuits. Nat. Nanotechnol 2016, 11 (11), 954–959. 10.1038/nnano.2016.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Li X.; Kahn E.; Chen G.; Sang X.; Lei J.; Passarello D.; Oyedele A. D.; Zakhidov D.; Chen K. W.; Chen Y. X.; Hsieh S. H.; Fujisawa K.; Unocic R. R.; Xiao K.; Salleo A.; Toney M. F.; Chen C. H.; Kaxiras E.; Terrones M.; Yakobson B. I.; Harutyunyan A. R. Surfactant-mediated growth and patterning of atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (6), 6570–6581. 10.1021/acsnano.0c00132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Ryu B.; Li D.; Park C.; Rokni H.; Lu W.; Liang X. Rubbing-induced site-selective growth of MoS2 device patterns. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10 (50), 43774–43784. 10.1021/acsami.8b15108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Ryu B.; Yoon J. S.; Kazyak E.; Chen K. H.; Park Y.; Dasgupta N. P.; Liang X. Inkjet-defined site-selective (IDSS) growth for controllable production of in-plane and out-of-plane MoS2 device arrays. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (32), 16917–16927. 10.1039/D0NR04012F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Li J.; Yang X.; Liu Y.; Huang B.; Wu R.; Zhang Z.; Zhao B.; Ma H.; Dang W.; Wei Z.; Wang K.; Lin Z.; Yan X.; Sun M.; Li B.; Pan X.; Luo J.; Zhang G.; Liu Y.; Huang Y.; Duan X.; Duan X. General synthesis of two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructure arrays. Nature 2020, 579 (7799), 368–374. 10.1038/s41586-020-2098-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Lee G. H.; Yu Y. J.; Cui X.; Petrone N.; Lee C. H.; Choi M. S.; Lee D. Y.; Lee C.; Yoo W. J.; Watanabe K.; Taniguchi T.; Nuckolls C.; Kim P.; Hone J. Flexible and transparent MoS2 field-effect transistors on hexagonal boron nitride-graphene heterostructures. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (9), 7931–6. 10.1021/nn402954e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Feng J.; Sun X.; Wu C.; Peng L.; Lin C.; Hu S.; Yang J.; Xie Y. Metallic few-layered VS2 ultrathin nanosheets: high two-dimensional conductivity for in-plane supercapacitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (44), 17832–17838. 10.1021/ja207176c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Li N.; Wang Q.; Shen C.; Wei Z.; Yu H.; Zhao J.; Lu X.; Wang G.; He C.; Xie L.; Zhu J.; Du L.; Yang R.; Shi D.; Zhang G. Large-scale flexible and transparent electronics based on monolayer molybdenum disulfide field-effect transistors. Nat. Electron. 2020, 3 (11), 711–717. 10.1038/s41928-020-00475-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  150. Yu Z.; Ong Z. Y.; Li S.; Xu J. B.; Zhang G.; Zhang Y. W.; Shi Y.; Wang X. Analyzing the carrier mobility in transition-metal dichalcogenide MoS2 field-effect transistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27 (19), 1604093. 10.1002/adfm.201604093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  151. Dushaq G.; Rasras M. Planar multilayered 2D GeAs schottky photodiode for high-performance visible–near-infrared photodetection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (18), 21499–21506. 10.1021/acsami.1c01773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Duan X.; Wang C.; Fan Z.; Hao G.; Kou L.; Halim U.; Li H.; Wu X.; Wang Y.; Jiang J.; Pan A.; Huang Y.; Yu R.; Duan X. Synthesis of WS2xSe2–2x alloy nanosheets with composition-tunable electronic properties. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (1), 264–9. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Taghinejad H.; Taghinejad M.; Eftekhar A. A.; Li Z.; West M. P.; Javani M. H.; Abdollahramezani S.; Zhang X.; Tian M.; Johnson-Averette T.; Ajayan P. M.; Vogel E. M.; Shi S. F.; Cai W.; Adibi A. Synthetic engineering of morphology and electronic band gap in lateral heterostructures of monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (5), 6323–6330. 10.1021/acsnano.0c02885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Johari P.; Shenoy V. B. Tuning the electronic properties of semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides by applying mechanical strains. ACS Nano 2012, 6 (6), 5449–5456. 10.1021/nn301320r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Lloyd D.; Liu X.; Christopher J. W.; Cantley L.; Wadehra A.; Kim B. L.; Goldberg B. B.; Swan A. K.; Bunch J. S. Band gap engineering with ultralarge biaxial strains in suspended monolayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2016, 16 (9), 5836–5841. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Conley H. J.; Wang B.; Ziegler J. I.; Haglund R. F. Jr; Pantelides S. T.; Bolotin K. Bandgap engineering of strained monolayer and bilayer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2013, 13 (8), 3626–3630. 10.1021/nl4014748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Santos E. J.; Kaxiras E. Electrically driven tuning of the dielectric constant in MoS2 layers. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (12), 10741–10746. 10.1021/nn403738b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Habib M. R.; Wang S.; Wang W.; Xiao H.; Obaidulla S. M.; Gayen A.; Khan Y.; Chen H.; Xu M. Electronic properties of polymorphic two-dimensional layered chromium disulphide. Nanoscale 2019, 11 (42), 20123–20132. 10.1039/C9NR04449C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Lukman S.; Ding L.; Xu L.; Tao Y.; Riis-Jensen A. C.; Zhang G.; Wu Q. Y. S.; Yang M.; Luo S.; Hsu C.; Yao L.; Liang G.; Lin H.; Zhang Y. W.; Thygesen K. S.; Wang Q. J.; Feng Y.; Teng J. High oscillator strength interlayer excitons in two-dimensional heterostructures for mid-infrared photodetection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15 (8), 675–682. 10.1038/s41565-020-0717-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Hong X.; Kim J.; Shi S.-F.; Zhang Y.; Jin C.; Sun Y.; Tongay S.; Wu J.; Zhang Y.; Wang F. Ultrafast charge transfer in atomically thin MoS2/WS2 heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9 (9), 682–686. 10.1038/nnano.2014.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Britnell L.; Ribeiro R. M.; Eckmann A.; Jalil R.; Belle B. D.; Mishchenko A.; Kim Y. J.; Gorbachev R. V.; Georgiou T.; Morozov S. V.; Grigorenko A. N.; Geim A. K.; Casiraghi C.; Castro Neto A. H.; Novoselov K. S. Strong light-matter interactions in heterostructures of atomically thin films. Science 2013, 340 (6138), 1311–4. 10.1126/science.1235547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Kumar A.; Ahluwalia P. Electronic structure of transition metal dichalcogenides monolayers 1H-MX2 (M= Mo, W; X= S, Se, Te) from ab-initio theory: new direct band gap semiconductors. Eur.Phys. J. B 2012, 85 (6), 186. 10.1140/epjb/e2012-30070-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  163. Huo N.; Konstantatos G. Recent progress and future prospects of 2D-based photodetectors. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30 (51), 1801164. 10.1002/adma.201801164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Yang P.; Zou X.; Zhang Z.; Hong M.; Shi J.; Chen S.; Shu J.; Zhao L.; Jiang S.; Zhou X. Batch production of 6-in. uniform monolayer molybdenum disulfide catalyzed by sodium in glass. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 979. 10.1038/s41467-018-03388-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Chen J.; Zhao X.; Tan S. J. R.; Xu H.; Wu B.; Liu B.; Fu D.; Fu W.; Geng D.; Liu Y.; Liu W.; Tang W.; Li L.; Zhou W.; Sum T. C.; Loh K. P. Chemical vapor deposition of large-size monolayer MoSe2 crystals on molten glass. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (3), 1073–1076. 10.1021/jacs.6b12156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Zhang Z.; Liu Y.; Dai C.; Yang X.; Chen P.; Ma H.; Zhao B.; Wu R.; Huang Z.; Wang D.; Liu M.; Huangfu Y.; Xin S.; Luo J.; Wang Y.; Li J.; Li B.; Duan X. Highly selective synthesis of monolayer or bilayer WSe2 single crystals by pre-annealing the solid precursor. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33 (4), 1307–1313. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  167. Xu X.; Chen S.; Liu S.; Cheng X.; Xu W.; Li P.; Wan Y.; Yang S.; Gong W.; Yuan K.; Gao P.; Ye Y.; Dai L. Millimeter-scale single-crystalline semiconducting MoTe2 via solid-to-solid phase transformation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (5), 2128–2134. 10.1021/jacs.8b12230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Najafidehaghani E.; Gan Z.; George A.; Lehnert T.; Ngo G. Q.; Neumann C.; Bucher T.; Staude I.; Kaiser D.; Vogl T.; Hübner U.; Kaiser U.; Eilenberger F.; Turchanin A. 1D p–n junction electronic and optoelectronic devices from transition metal dichalcogenide lateral heterostructures grown by one-pot chemical vapor deposition synthesis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31 (27), 2101086. 10.1002/adfm.202101086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  169. Leong W. S.; Ji Q.; Mao N.; Han Y.; Wang H.; Goodman A. J.; Vignon A.; Su C.; Guo Y.; Shen P. C.; Gao Z.; Muller D. A.; Tisdale W. A.; Kong J. Synthetic lateral metal-semiconductor heterostructures of transition metal disulfides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (39), 12354–12358. 10.1021/jacs.8b07806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Nasr J. R.; Simonson N.; Oberoi A.; Horn M. W.; Robinson J. A.; Das S. Low-power and ultra-thin MoS2 photodetectors on glass. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (11), 15440–15449. 10.1021/acsnano.0c06064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Zhu J.; Li W.; Huang R.; Ma L.; Sun H.; Choi J.-H.; Zhang L.; Cui Y.; Zou G. One-pot selective epitaxial growth of large WS2/MoS2 lateral and vertical heterostructures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (38), 16276–16284. 10.1021/jacs.0c05691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Xia J.; Yan J.; Wang Z.; He Y.; Gong Y.; Chen W.; Sum T. C.; Liu Z.; Ajayan P. M.; Shen Z. Strong coupling and pressure engineering in WSe2-MoSe2 heterobilayers. Nat. Phys. 2021, 17 (1), 92–98. 10.1038/s41567-020-1005-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  173. Yuan L.; Zheng B.; Kunstmann J.; Brumme T.; Kuc A. B.; Ma C.; Deng S.; Blach D.; Pan A.; Huang L. Twist-angle-dependent interlayer exciton diffusion in WS2–WSe2 heterobilayers. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19 (6), 617–624. 10.1038/s41563-020-0670-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Wu R.; Tao Q.; Dang W.; Liu Y.; Li B.; Li J.; Zhao B.; Zhang Z.; Ma H.; Sun G.; Duan X.; Duan X. van der Waals epitaxial growth of atomically thin 2D metals on dangling-bond-free WSe2 and WS2. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29 (12), 1806611. 10.1002/adfm.201806611. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  175. Li B.; Wan Z.; Wang C.; Chen P.; Huang B.; Cheng X.; Qian Q.; Li J.; Zhang Z.; Sun G.; Zhao B.; Ma H.; Wu R.; Wei Z.; Liu Y.; Liao L.; Ye Y.; Huang Y.; Xu X.; Duan X.; Ji W.; Duan X. Van der Waals epitaxial growth of air-stable CrSe2 nanosheets with thickness-tunable magnetic order. Nat. Mater. 2021, 20 (6), 818–825. 10.1038/s41563-021-00927-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Materials Au are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES