Abstract
As a nontraditional T-cell subgroup, γδT cells have gained popularity in the field of immunotherapy in recent years. They have extraordinary antitumor potential and prospects for clinical application. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which are efficacious in tumor patients, have become pioneer drugs in the field of tumor immunotherapy since they were incorporated into clinical practice. In addition, γδT cells that have infiltrated into tumor tissues are found to be in a state of exhaustion or anergy, and there is upregulation of many immune checkpoints (ICs) on their surface, suggesting that γδT cells have a similar ability to respond to ICIs as traditional effector T cells. Studies have shown that targeting ICs can reverse the dysfunctional state of γδT cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and exert antitumor effects by improving γδT-cell proliferation and activation and enhancing cytotoxicity. Clarification of the functional state of γδT cells in the TME and the mechanisms underlying their interaction with ICs will solidify ICIs combined with γδT cells as a good treatment option.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12943-023-01722-0.
Keywords: γδT cells, Immune checkpoint molecules, Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), Tumor microenvironment (TME), Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT), Antitumor immunotherapy
Introduction
In recent years, many studies have shown that cytotoxic γδT cells have a strong killing ability toward autologous, allogeneic or xenogeneic tumor cells, and their concentration is often closely related to the clinical prognosis of patients [1–5]. In contrast to αβT cells, γδT cells can recognize antigens in a way that is not restricted by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules [6], and they mediate the killing of target cells in various ways, participate in immunomodulation, and have a broader tumor cell killing spectrum [7, 8]. As the “bridge” between innate immunity and adaptive immunity as well as the first line of defense against tumors, γδT cells play an important role in the occurrence and development of tumors and can be used to evaluate the prognosis of patients [8–10]. Therefore, immunotherapy based on γδT cells has been studied in many kinds of tumors [11, 12].
Although previous types of adoptive cell therapy and other treatment methods have been effective [11, 13], these types of treatments often have low efficiency, and the response rate is not high. The reason for this lack of efficacy may be that the tumor microenvironment (TME) inhibits effector γδT cells through various mechanisms, thus making γδT cells dysfunctional and aiding in tumor cell immune escape [4, 14, 15]. The safety of Vγ9Vδ2T cell immunotherapy in practical applications has been partially confirmed, but only 10% ~ 33% of patients with hematological and solid malignant tumors benefit from this therapy [16]. In some cancer patients, the number and function of γδT cells is decreased, and the infiltrating γδT cells show an increased apoptosis rate, limited antitumor ability and an exhausted immunophenotype; these shortcomings can be improved by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment [17–19]. These findings indicate that some TMEs are immunosuppressive, which affects the normal function of γδT cells. The inhibition of γδT cells in the TME is the main factor that hinders their excellent antitumor ability. Tumor cells can undergo tumor immunoediting [20–23] and downregulate the expression of MHC-I molecules [24]; at the same time, immune checkpoint ligands (ICLs) are highly expressed. Binding with their respective immune checkpoint receptors (ICRs) leads to phosphorylation of the immune receptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif (ITIM)/immune receptor tyrosine-based switch motif (ITSM), leading to the activation of Scr homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase (SHP-1/2), triggering a series of dephosphorylation events, and inhibiting cell activation [25]. To facilitate the immune escape of tumor cells, ICRs can inhibit cell activation by competing for ligands that bind to activated receptors [26, 27]. Therefore, it is very important to overcome the dysfunction of γδT cells in the inhibitory TME.
Targeting immune checkpoints (ICs) and reversing the inhibitory effects of the TME on cytotoxic γδT cells is the key to the success of immune checkpoint therapy (ICT). ICT has become the core pillar of tumor immunotherapy [28–30]. Studies have shown that the antitumor function of γδT cells can be recovered after ICIs are used [31]. In this paper, we hope that by describing the relationship between γδT cells, the TME and ICs, we can further reveal the antitumor potential of γδT cells and lay a theoretical foundation for the application of γδT cells in ICT.
Interaction between the TME and γδT cells
γδT cells are a relatively rare population in peripheral blood (PB) T cells and are one of the main types of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) of mucosal tissues [32]. γδT cells have many subgroups and high plasticity [33, 34] (Fig. S1–S4). According to differences in γ and δ chains, γδT cells can be divided into different structural subgroups. In the process of γδ T-cell receptor (TCR) rearrangement, Vδ2 is almost always coexpressed with Vγ9, so Vγ9VδT cells are the main type of γδT cells in human PB [35, 36]. Different functional subsets of γδT cells have diverse immune functions (Fig. 1). For example, depending on the cytokines they secrete and the microenvironment in which they are located, γδT17 cells, which mainly secrete interleukin (IL)-17, can have either immunosuppressive or immune-promoting properties; in an immunosuppressive microenvironment, the γδ regulatory T cell (γδTreg) subpopulation tends to play a role similar to that of αβTreg cells [37, 38]. In addition, the TME of tumor patients has a great influence on the phenotype and functional distribution of γδT cells [39, 40]. For example, the expression of ICs can be different in different γδT-cell subsets and may be determined by the stimulation of cytokines in the differentiation environment. PD-1 is evenly distributed across several subgroups with different functions in Vγ9Vδ2T cells, but compared with that in Vδ2 T cells, the proportion of TIGIT+, PD-1+ and TIM-3+ cells in Vδ1 T cells is higher [41, 42].
Many experimental and clinical studies have shown that γδT cells have antitumor effects [18, 43, 44]. High levels of γδT cells were positively correlated with clinical stage, overall survival (OS) time, and CD8+/CD4+ T-cell infiltration [45]. In metastatic colorectal cancer, γδT cells still show the ability to limit tumor progression [5]. By analyzing 25 kinds of cancers (other than brain cancers), it was found that a tumor-related γδT-cell gene signature was the factor most correlated with the OS rate of patients [46]. Furthermore, Vγ9Vδ2T cells can preferentially penetrate into basement membrane tissue, and preclinical studies have proven the ability of Vγ9Vδ2T cells to prevent brain tumor development [47, 48].
γδT cells are also involved in immunomodulation and indirectly exert antitumor effects mainly by interacting with other immune cells. For example, via interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) production, γδT cells are able to induce the activation of macrophages or monocytes [49]. γδT cells can promote the differentiation and maturation of monocytes, and they can also interact with dendritic cells (DCs) via cell-to-cell contact or soluble molecules (especially I/II IFNs and BTN3A) [50], thus promoting cross-regulation and mutual activation between γδT cells and DCs. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) stimulated by Toll-like receptor 7 and TLR9 ligand (TLR7/9-L) or zoledronate (ZOL) can activate γδT cells, promote their proliferation, enhance their secretion of Th1 cytokines, and enhance their cytotoxic activity [50]. γδT cells can trigger phenotypic changes and functional activation of pDCs [50, 51]. γδTAPC cells can assist antigen presentation, promote expression of MHC-I molecules by tumor cells, and enhance the expression of costimulatory molecules such as CD80/86, thus activating DCs and αβT cells and playing an important role in the activation of B cells [52]. In addition, γδT cells can also express the chemokine receptor CXCR5, and after binding with CXCL13, γδT cells regulate the recruitment of B cells and antigen-presenting cells, secrete cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-10, and participate in immunoglobulin class switching and somatic hypermutation (SHM) [53, 54]. IL-4 plays an important role in the homotypic transformation of IgA and maintaining the structure of the germinal center (GC) [55]. Through various interactions with other immune cells, γδT cells can activate immunity together with effector cells and resist the growth of tumor cells (Fig. 1).
Dysfunction of γδT cells in the TME
Continuous stimulation with tumor-associated phosphoantigens promotes the exhaustion of γδT cells
Due to the metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells, γδT cells gradually adapt to phosphoantigens (PAgs) in the TME, resulting in a low response state and ultimately exhaustion. PAgs usually originate from microbial I-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl pyrophosphate (HMBPP) or endogenous isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP), and HMBPP can double the binding affinity between extracellular butyrophilin 3A (BTN3A) and Vγ9Vδ2 TCR [56]. During tumor cell development, the activity of the intracellular mevalonate pathway is enhanced, and the production of PAgs in the TME is upregulated and reaches the threshold for antigen stimulation of γδT cells under physiological conditions; thus, tumor cells can become the target of γδT cells [50, 57]. PAgs can rapidly induce Ca2+ signal transduction and activate Vγ9Vδ2T cells after cell-to-cell contact occurs [58]. The BTN gene is located in the MHC gene region of humans and is the key molecule involved in PAg-mediated activation of Vγ9Vδ2T cells [59–61]. BTNs have the following three gene subfamilies in humans: BTN1, BTN2, and BTN3 [62–64]. BTN3A2 is abundant in tumor tissues and has been proven to have a negative regulatory effect on natural killer (NK) cells [65]. Further study showed that there was an interaction between isomers, and BTN3A2 could regulate the subcellular transportation, localization and optimal activity of BTN3A1 [66]. Some scholars have hypothesized that BTN3A2 may affect receptor binding by binding to the hypothesized ligand, which may decrease antigen recognition sensitivity or lead to the exhaustion of γδT cells [65]. The activation of Vγ9Vδ2T cells is also related to members of the ABC transport family [50, 67, 68]. ABCA1 is thought to be the key molecule needed for PAgs to enter Vγ9Vδ2T cells before the B30.2 domain of BTN3A1 is activated [69]. The participation of transcription factors such as HIF-1α in the multiple myeloma TME promotes the active function of myeloid suppressor cells and Tregs and upregulates the expression of PD-L1 and ABCA1 on the surface of tumor cells. Then, ABCA1, apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) and BTN3A1 play a synergistic role causing myeloma cells to secrete supraphysiological levels of IPP, which eventually leads to the exhaustion of Vγ9Vδ2T cells and a decrease in cytotoxicity and other related antitumor effects [70] (Fig. 2).
Immune-related inhibitory molecules and cells reduce the antitumor effects of γδT cells
Immunosuppressive cells and related inhibitory molecules infiltrating the TME can promote the exhaustion of γδT cells and reduce the antitumor function of γδT cells. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the TME can inhibit the secretion of IFN-γ by γδT cells, thus inhibiting their cytotoxic activity [71]. Mesenchymal cells, M2-type tumor-associated macrophages and Tregs can prevent the infiltration and/or activation of cytotoxic γδT cells through the synthesis and release of immunosuppressive molecules [72, 73]. Inhibitory neutrophils can affect the proliferation and activation of circulating γδT cells and the production of cytokines through reactive oxygen species (ROS). The increase in neutrophils and their related soluble mediators is related to a decrease in the survival rate of cancer patients [74–76].
Under the action of some cytokines, γδT cells can differentiate into other inhibitory phenotypes, and their antitumor function is reduced. IL-10 and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) in the TME can promote the transformation of γδT cells into tumor-promoting phenotypically distinct functional subgroups, such as γδT17 cells and γδTregs [72, 77]; in addition, inhibitory γδT cells tend to express CD39 and CD73 molecules [78–80], which can be signs of T-cell dysfunction [81–83]. For example, in breast tumors, the TME of tumor-bearing mice can induce γδT cells to differentiate into γδT17 cells and produce IL-17 [84]; when the production of IL-17 by Vδ1+ T cells in the lung increases, it promotes the infiltration of inhibitory neutrophils into lung adenocarcinoma and the development of tumors [85, 86]. CD39/CD73+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are defined as early dysfunctional T cells. They have significantly decreased secretion of IFN-γ and IL-2 and expression of perforin and granzyme, in addition to significantly increased expression of PD-1. Ultimately, these cells can hinder the activation of γδT cells mediated by PAgs and TCR [87]. Tumor-derived TGF-β is able to induce CD39/CD73+ γδT cells to differentiate into immunosuppressive T cells, which promote γδT cell dysfunction (Fig. 3).
Abnormal IC signaling promotes γδT-cell dysfunction
High expression of ICLs was observed in tumor cells, and aberrant signaling tends to cause anergy or exhaustion of γδT cells. The level of ICRs on the surface of γδT cells is higher than that of normal cells, which results in dysfunction and decreased cytotoxicity. Competition between inhibitory and costimulatory signals leads to γδT-cell anergy. Some ICs, such as PD-1, CTLA-4, and BTLA, can block TCR signaling and interfere with costimulatory signaling, ultimately blocking the activation of γδT cells and leading to γδT-cell dysfunction. Butyrophilin-like protein 2 (BTNL2) is highly expressed in many human tumor samples, BTN/BTNL can bind to the Vγ chain in γδTCR, and the interaction may affect TCR signal transduction [88, 89]. Castella et al. [90] found that the upregulation of the expression of multiple checkpoints, such as PD-1, TIM-3 and LAG-3, on γδT cells can even lead to a state of “super anergy”.
Prolonged peak expression and increased numbers of different ICs lead to the exhaustion of γδT cells. PD-1 expression, which is associated with methylation of the promoter DNA sequence, peaks 2 to 4 days after TCR activation in adult Vδ2 cells, but the peak expression remains longer in neonatal Vδ2 cells [91], after which it gradually drops to a moderate level [92]. However, γδT cells in the immune microenvironment mostly continuously express high levels of PD-1, suggesting that decreased cytotoxicity of γδT cells is related to overexpression of PD-1. PD-1 expression in Vδ2T cells is significantly increased in hepatocellular carcinoma [93], and LAG-3 is highly expressed in dysfunctional γδT cells [4, 94]. Double negative (DN) T cells infiltrating Merkel cell carcinoma are mainly composed of Vδ2T cells expressing PD-1 and LAG-3, which is consistent with the phenotype of exhausted and immunosuppressed γδT cells [95]. The expression of PD-1, TIM-3 and TIGIT may lead to the exhaustion or dysfunction of γδT cells in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and multiple myeloma (MM) [31]. The proportion of TIGIT+CD226– γδT cells is increased in AML patients [96], which suggests that increased expression of TIGIT and significantly decreased CD226 expression may be associated with γδT-cell dysfunction. The frequency of TIM-3 + Vδ2 T cells in AML patients was significantly higher than that in healthy controls, and the levels of PD-L1 and high mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB-1) were also higher [97]. Vδ2T cells highly express BTLA in the lymph nodes of lymphoma patients [98], and the circulating soluble BTLA (sBTLA) level can be used as an independent prognostic factor for the OS of patients after ICI treatment [99]. The expression of PD-1 and TIM-3 on CD39 + γδT cells in laryngeal carcinoma was significantly higher than that in paired normal tissues [100]. Furthermore, the expression of B7-H3 in PB and tumor tissues of colon cancer patients was also significantly increased, and the proportion of circulating tumor-infiltrating γδT cells expressing LAG-3 in melanoma patients was increased, indicating that LAG-3 may help tumor cells achieve immune escape by inhibiting γδT cells [101].
In addition to traditional ICs such as PD-1, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I inhibitory receptors also transmit inhibitory signals that interfere with the effector function of γδT cells. The downregulation of β2M gene expression in tumor cells leads to the downregulation of MHC-I molecule expression on the cell surface and high expression of HLA-G, which can decrease the clonality of Vγ9Vδ2T cells and the secretion of IFN-γ because HLA-G can bind to inhibitory leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors (LIRs) or Ig-like transcripts (ILTs), such as ILT2 [102–105]. After blocking the inhibitory signal transmitted by ILT2, γδT-cell proliferation and cytotoxicity are improved [104, 106]. Similarly, inflammatory factors in the TME tend to lead to overexpression of HLA-E, and the expression level is even higher than that of PD-L1. Furthermore, the continuous stimulation of TME-derived cytokines such as TGF-β and IL-15 and tumor antigens also upregulates the expression of CD94/NKG2A [61, 107]. In NK cells, NKG2A can inhibit cytotoxic effector function by disrupting the actin network at the immune synapse of the activating receptor NKG2D [108]. In γδT cells, NKG2A receptor-mediated inhibitory signaling tends to prevail [109]. NKG2A+ and NKG2A- cells can be formed from γδT cells during early thymic development and do not appear to change significantly with cell growth [110], and their expression kinetics are similar to those of cells expressing TIM-3 and CD39, which emerge late but are stably expressed [111]. The combination of HLA-E with NKG2A, dependent on the participation of ITIMs and SHP1/2, can transmit inhibitory signals to interfere with the activation of γδT cells and limit the function of effector γδT cells. NKG2A + Vδ2 T cells in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) have been shown to affect the OS of patients. Unlike its role in healthy tissues, HLA-E in tumor tissues significantly regulates the high reactivity of NKG2A + Vδ2 TILs, ultimately generating dysfunctional immune cells and tumor cell escape [110].
Glycoimmune checkpoints can also interfere with activation signals and transmit inhibitory signaling to γδT cells. Abnormal levels of carbohydrates are an important feature of cancer cells [112–114]. Many glycosyltransferases, including sialyltransferase, are often altered in malignant tumor cells, resulting in abnormal expression of sialoglycan [115]; high expression of sialoglycan can be recognized by sialic acid binding immunoglobulin-like lectin (Siglecs). Siglecs, which are highly expressed in TILs, can also transmit negative signals through ITIMs and SHP1/2, thus hindering the effector function of γδT cells. Tumor marker gangliosides (TMGs) can interfere with the binding of IL-2 and IL-2R, and sialylation of cancer cells can destroy the interaction between NKG2D and ligands, hinder the transmission of activation signals, and inhibit the proliferation and activation of T cells [116]. Galectins, members of the lectin family, are also regulatory glucose checkpoints. Gal-1 can interact with TCR and CD45, affect CD45 phosphatase activity and the downstream signaling pathway of effector T cells, and selectively promote Treg amplification and secretion of IL-10, eventually leading to T-cell exhaustion and promoting tumor cell immune escape [117]. Gal-9 is a ligand of TIM-3, which can affect the TCR activation threshold by binding to N-glycans and selectively binding to PD-1 in a manner mediated by glycans [118]. Blockade of Gal-3, a ligand of LAG-3, can reverse the exhaustion of T cells [119]. Furthermore, the P-selectin ligand PSGL-1 can inhibit antitumor immunity by interacting with the IC VISTA [119]. In addition, glycoimmune checkpoint molecules can act on myeloid regulatory cells. For example, MUC1 can bind to Siglec-9 on macrophages, leading to their differentiation into immunosuppressive M2 macrophages and upregulating the expression of PD-L1 [120]. It has been proven that decreasing the level of sialoglycan in melanoma and neuroblastoma mice with Ac53FaxNeu5Ac can inhibit tumor growth and significantly change the immune cell composition of the TME [121].
Effects of γδT cells on the TME
Studies have found that in addition to high expression of ICRs, exhausted γδT cells often show high expression of ICLs. When ICLs bind with ICRs on other immune effector cells, they provide inhibitory signals and negatively regulate the killing function of T cells [86, 122]. Preclinical data suggest that infiltrating γδT cells account for 40% of the infiltrating lymphocytes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and high expression of PD-L1 in these γδT cells inhibits the activation of other T cells [123]. PDAC tumor growth was inhibited in the presence of anti-PD-L1 antibodies, but anti-PD-L1 antibodies had no effect on tumor growth in mice lacking γδT cells (TCRγδ−/−) [124], highlighting the importance of the interaction between γδT cells and the TME.
Once activated in the TME, γδT17 cells can secrete immunosuppressive cytokines, promote the expression of PD-L1 and participate in the construction of an inhibitory TME [114, 125]. Driven by BTNL2, γδT17 cells secrete IL-17A and recruit myeloid suppressor cells, resulting in an increase in the number of TME mesenchymal stem cells, M2 macrophages and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) [126]. It has been confirmed that the main cell group producing IL-17A in laryngeal carcinoma is CD39 + Vδ1 T cells [100]. IL-17 supports tumor growth during early tumorigenesis [127], in addition to recruiting immunosuppressive cells, promoting angiogenesis and even directly promoting the proliferation and metastasis of tumor cells [128–130]. IL-17 also leads to granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mediated tumor-associated neutrophil expansion; blocking CCL2 in mice reduces the production of IL-17 by γδT17 cells, thus reducing the proliferation of neutrophils and enhancing the activity of CD8+ T cells. IL-17 also promotes the secretion of IL-6, activating the STAT3 pathway and inducing the expression of PD-L1 [131]. Furthermore, Vδ1T17 cells also secrete IL-8, IL-17 and GM-CSF to recruit immunosuppressive cells such as MDSCs to establish an immunosuppressive network.
High expression of CD39 and CD73 on the surface of dysfunctional γδT cells can inhibit other effector cells through the adenosine pathway. CD39 can hydrolyze eATP into adenosine monophosphate (AMP), while CD73 can convert AMP into immunosuppressive adenosine (ADO) [132, 133]. ADO inhibits antitumor immunity through the A2A receptor (A2AR) expressed on immune cells. A2AR can block the early signal transduction of TCR in a cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent manner, thus weakening the response of T cells and inhibiting the proliferation and the cytokine production of T cells; the A2AR antagonist CPI-444 can reverse the suppression of T-cell signal transduction and IL-2 and IFN-γ secretion [134]. Approximately 20% of the infiltrating γδT cells in human advanced breast cancer samples express CD73, and these cells may play an immunosuppressive role by producing immunosuppressive molecules such as IL-10, IL-8 and ADO, thus promoting tumor growth [135]. Regulatory CD39+ γδT cells inhibit the proliferation of other effector T cells in a concentration-dependent manner [80]. CD39 and CD73 are closely related to the prognosis of patients [136]. Moreover, researchers have confirmed that CD39+ γδTregs can directly inhibit effector T cells more strongly than CD4+ or CD8+ Tregs through the ADO pathway [137]. The inhibitory function of CD39 and CD73 is not particularly affected by the use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that block CTLA-4 or PD-1 [137, 138].
Targeting ICs can regulate the immune function of γδT cells
In the inhibitory TME, γδT cell dysfunction develops gradually. It is difficult to reverse for terminal exhaustion of γδT cells by antigen re-exposure or inhibition signal blockade, and dysfunctional γδT cells may even aid tumor cells [139–143]. Therefore, early intervention and reversal of the state of immunosuppressive γδT cell state are key to the success of ICT. Targeting ICs on the surface of γδT cells can reverse the immunosuppressive state of γδT cells or revive exhausted γδT cells.
Targeting BTN family proteins can affect the immune response of γδT cells
BTN and BTNL family proteins play an important role in antitumor immunity dominated by γδT cells and are also related to clinical prognosis. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast cancer, the expression of BTN1A and members of the BTNL family is significantly related to OS [144]. Overexpression of BTN2/3A is associated with poor prognosis in glioma [145]. In addition, in many tumor models, high expression of BTN3A in tissues and high levels of soluble BTN3A2 and BTN2A in plasma can be used as markers of the efficacy of Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell immunotherapy [65, 146–151]. BTN3A2 can also regulate the interaction between γδT-cell receptors and the NF-κB signaling pathway [148], which is related to the survival time of patients [152]. Studies have shown that specific BTNs have spatiotemporal specificity in shaping or selecting γδT-cell subsets [153]. Therefore, it is very important to further characterize the interaction between γδT cells and BTNs.
BTN3A/CD277 is an indispensable molecule in γδT-cell activation. Administration of a mAbs that activated BTN3A1 can enhance the activation of γδT cells and their cytotoxic effects [63]. By adding anti-CD277 mAbs and knocking down CD277, Harly et al. showed that CD277 plays a unique role in the response of Vγ9Vδ2T cells induced by PAgs, and the mechanism of γδT-cell activation depended on CD277 and was based on TCR signal transduction [154]. Without any other stimulation (such as anti-CD3 mAbs), administration of the soluble mAb 20.1 targeting BTN3A/CD277 indirectly increased the antigen recognition of Vγ9Vδ2T cells and mimicked PAgs to induce complete activation of Vγ9Vδ2T cells, accompanied by activation of Ca2+ signal transduction, upregulation of CD69 expression and increased IFN-γ secretion [154, 155]. The anti-BTN3A mAb 20.1 combined with Vγ9Vδ2T-cell immunotherapy restored the proliferation and cytotoxicity of Vγ9Vδ2T cells in tumors, prevented the exhaustion of adoptively transferred Vγ9Vδ2T cells, improved the survival rate of animals and reduced the tumor burden in blood and bone marrow [152]. Aude De Gassart and coworkers [156] also developed a new humanized anti-BTN3A mAb, ICT01, that can specifically activate Vγ9Vδ2T cells and upregulate the proportion of CD69+ Vγ9Vδ2T cells in a concentration-dependent manner. ICT01 can induce the degranulation of Vγ9Vδ2T cells and promote the production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-8, IL-1β, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and other proinflammatory cytokines. In addition, after the application of ICT01, the tumor growth rate of mice was obviously slowed. Importantly, the mAbs had no obvious effect on normal cells, highlighting the potential clinical value of the anti-BTN3A mAb ICT01.
After blocking BTN proteins, the response of γδT cells to PAgs was blocked, and there was no longer a tumor cell killing effect. Yamashiro et al. found that the expression level of BTN3 was inversely correlated to the activity of lymphocytes, and administration of the mAb 232-5 lead to phosphorylation of the BTN3A3 molecule and transduction of negative signals; these effects caused CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to act like CD4 + CD25+ Tregs, accompanied by a decrease in cell proliferation and cytokine secretion [157]. However, the mAb 20.1 has no significant stimulatory or costimulatory effect on αβT cells [154], suggesting that BTN proteins may jointly inhibit effector T cells through negative signal transmission and that BTN3A3 may be a novel target [158]. In addition, although the mAb 103.2 does not affect the proliferation and activation of CD8+ T cells, it can inhibit the response of γδT cells induced by PAgs and even inhibit the degranulation and cytokine secretion of Vγ9Vδ2T cells, decreasing their antitumor effects. Audrey Benyamine and coworkers also demonstrated that the mAbs 103.2 and 108.5 targeting the BTN3A molecule can completely inhibit the tumor cell lysis mediated by Vγ9Vδ2T cells [65, 152]. In addition to BTN3A, the B30.2 domain of BTN2A is required for the response of γδT cells to PAgs. The expression of the BTN2A1/BTN3A1 complex can trigger the activation of Vγ9Vδ2TCR, and the expression of BTN2A1 in cancer cells is related to the cytotoxicity of Vγ9Vδ2T cells. Anti-BTN2A1 mAbs can significantly inhibit the degranulation of Vγ9Vδ2T cells, and the inhibition of Vγ9Vδ2T-cell cytotoxicity induced by the 7.48 mAb generates an effect similar to the real TME [159].
Targeting BTN family proteins is beneficial for restoring the antitumor function of γδT cells and promoting their interaction with other immune cells, and they exert their antitumor effects synergistically. It has been reported that melanoma cells can hijack the interaction between pDCs and γδT cells to escape immune control, which is manifested as dysfunction of BTN3A and impaired ability of γδT cells to regulate ICs [160]. Conformational change of BTN3A1 is the key event of PAg perception [161], and BTN2A1 is the key ligand that binds to the Vγ9+ TCR γ chain; it can directly bind to the germline coding region of the Vγ9 chain in Vγ9Vδ2TCR and simultaneously bind to BTN3A1 on the cell surface. The synergistic effect of BTN3A1 and BTN2A1 enhances the recognition of target cells by Vγ9Vδ2T cells and plays an important role in PAg perception [162–166]. BTN3A1 can also recognize the N-mannosylated oligosaccharide in the near-membrane domain of CD45 and anchor the CD45 dimer near TCR, which may physically block the interaction of TCR-peptide-MHC-I complexes (pMHC), thus effectively inhibiting the separation of CD45 molecules from immune synapses and ultimately inhibiting the functions of TCRs and αβT cells [167]. Therefore, CD277-specific antibodies can restore the effector activity of αβT cells and induce BTN3A activity to mediate the synergistic killing of BTN3A1+ tumor cells by αβT cells and γδT cells in a BTN2A1-dependent manner. In summary, BTN family proteins are potential targets for fully exploiting the potential of γδT cells in IC therapy (Fig. 4).
Blocking inhibitory IC signaling can reverse the immunosuppressive state of γδT cells
ICIs can restore the proliferation and activation of γδT cells
The proliferation and activation of γδT cells were improved after administration of mAbs against ICs (Fig. 5). ICIs targeting B7-H3 and TIM-3 can improve the proliferation and/or activation of dysfunctional γδT cells. In colorectal cancer, knocking down or blocking B7-H3 can inhibit the apoptosis of Vδ2T cells, promote the proliferation of Vδ2T cells and induce the expression of the activation markers CD25 and CD69 in Vδ2T cells [168]. Caspase-3 participates in the activation of the TIM-3 signaling pathway, so γδT cells with upregulated TIM-3 are more prone to experience early apoptosis. After blocking TIM-3, the proliferation of Vγ9Vδ2T cells, the STAT phosphorylation level and the induction of IL-21 increased significantly [97, 169]. However, the expression of cyclin B1 and cyclin D1, which are related to cell proliferation, was not affected by TIM-3 blockade [170].
The expression of PD-1 may be one of the reasons for the failure of Vγ9Vδ2T-cell expansion in tumor patients. Blocking the PD-1 signaling pathway can partially restore the damaged proliferation of PD-1+ γδT cells and induce their activation. A study showed that the response of bone marrow-derived Vγ9Vδ2T cells to PAgs stimulation was weakened in MM patients, while the proliferation response of γδT cells was enhanced after zoledronic acid stimulation with anti-PD-1 mAbs in vitro [51]. In addition, researchers have found that the bispecific (PD-L1× CD3) antibody Y111, which can simultaneously recognize PD-L1 and CD3, can effectively connect T cells with tumor cells expressing PD-L1. In the presence of PD-L1+ tumor cells, Y111 can induce the activation of Vγ2Vδ2T cells in a dose-dependent manner [171]. Although some studies have shown that the inhibitory effects of the PD-1 signaling pathway on γδT cells may be reversed by the synergistic effects of TCR and IL-2 signaling, blocking PD-1 signal transduction with anti-PD-L1 antibodies alone does not affect IL-2 production by γδT cells [172, 173], and the inhibitory TME also weakens TCR signal transduction. Blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway, restoring the proliferation and activation of γδT cells and promoting their differentiation into antitumor effector cells in the early stage of γδT cell development are important for effective ICT.
Furthermore, some studies have shown that PD-1 is not the main molecule affecting the proliferation of γδT cells and that the proliferation of γδT cells is strictly regulated by BTLA [174]. BTLA and TCR are clustered at the synapse between Vγ9Vδ2T cells and target cells, and the close localization of BTLA and TCR suggests that BTLA may affect TCR-dependent signal transduction. γδT cells need TCR signals to maintain their stability [175], and it has been suggested that the interaction between BTLA and HVEM inhibits the proliferation of Vγ9VδT cells and their response to lymphoma cells. BTLA on PB γδT cells interacted with HVEM on leukemic cells and caused some cells to stagnate in S phase; however, this did not affect the percentage of G0 cells but did increase the percentage of cells in G2/M phase. After blocking the interaction between BTLA and HVEM with mAbs, PAg/TCR-mediated signal transduction can be enhanced, and the proliferation of γδT cells can be upregulated [51, 98, 176]. However, no synergistic effect was found after the combined blockade of BTLA and PD-1, suggesting that BTLA and PD-1 may have independent effects on the proliferation and cytotoxicity of human PB γδT cells [174]. That is, inhibition of the BTLA signaling pathway can promote the proliferation of γδT cells without affecting their cytotoxicity, the production of IFN-γ or the nontargeted degranulation induced by bromohydrin pyrophosphate (BrHPP) [176].
ICIs can enhance the cytotoxicity of exhausted γδT cells
After treatment with ICIs, the cytotoxicity of γδT cells was enhanced (Fig. 5). After blocking PD-1, the antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) effects of CD16+ Vγ9T cells on lymphoma cells was improved [177]. However, it has also been reported that in the environment of PD-L1+ tumor cells, blocking or knocking out PD-1 does not significantly increase the cytotoxicity of γδT cells. In contrast, anti-PD-L1 mAbs could enhance the cytotoxicity of γδT cells against some cancer cells, and the expression level of PD-L1 was positively correlated with the cytotoxicity of γδT cells [178].
Increased secretion of antitumor cytokines
After ICs are blocked, γδT cells can produce more inflammatory cytokines, especially IFN-γ and TNF-α. Inhibitory ICs may reduce the production of IFN-γ by inhibiting the key transcription factor Eomes [179]. The PD-1 signaling pathway may be involved in the regulation of IFN-γ production by γδT cells [180]. An in vitro study of γδT cells showed that, similar to that of traditional αβT cells, the cytotoxicity of activated PD1+ Vδ2T cells was inhibited, and the secretion of IFN-γ decreased after PD-L1 binding [172]. Blocking PD-1 with antibodies such as pembrolizumab can promote the secretion and release of IFN-γ and TNF-α by activated γδT cells. After the combined use of anti-LAG-3 and anti-PD-1 antibodies, the secretion of cytokines, especially IFN-γ, in γδT cells increased [92, 171, 177]. However, it should be noted that presensitization of target cells or γδT-cell activation is needed for the production of IFN-γ; that is, the regulatory effects of PD-1 signaling on the proliferation and cytokine secretion of γδT cells depends on costimulatory signals or early activation of γδT cells [92]. The TIM-3 signaling pathway also inhibits the secretion of IFN-γ and TNF-α by γδT cells. In vitro studies have shown that TIM-3+ γδT cells do not produce IFN-γ or TNF-α and have reduced cytotoxicity [96, 181]. In addition, the effects of B7-H3 on the cytokine profile of Vδ2T cells was studied. It was found that B7-H3 inhibited the expression of IFN-γ in Vδ2T cells by inhibiting T-bet [168], suggesting that the ability of γδT cells to produce cytokines would be restored after blocking TIM-3 and B7-H3 with ICIs.
The expression of effector genes in the IFN signaling pathway is negatively correlated with the degree of γδT-cell exhaustion. In exhausted T cells, several inhibitory receptors, including VSIR, KLRG1, LAG3 and TIGIT, as well as the transcription factors NR4A2 and ID2, are significantly upregulated, and IFN response genes, such as IFITM1, STAT1 and IFI6, are also upregulated [182].
Increased secretion of perforin and granzyme
After blocking ICs, the expression of perforin and granzyme is not inhibited, and cytotoxicity is enhanced. In vitro studies showed that after a PD-1 blocking drug was used and ZA was administered as stimulation, the cytotoxicity of Vγ9Vδ2T cells increased nearly 5 times, accompanied by an increase in the expression of the degranulation marker CD107 and an increase in the proportion of CD107+ Vγ9Vδ2T cells [51]. ERK1/2, STAT-3 and Wnt are known to regulate the expression of perforin and granzyme B in various immune cells. Some studies have found that increased expression of members of the TIM-3 pathway can significantly decrease the level of pERK1/2 in Vγ9Vδ2T cells activated by recombinant human (rh) Gal-9 but does not affect the level of pSTAT3 or Wnt [183]. Therefore, blocking TIM-3 can increase the killing effects of Vγ9VδT cells on colon cancer cells by activating the ERK1/2 pathway and upregulating the expression of perforin and granzyme B. B7-H3 also inhibits the cytotoxicity of Vδ2T cells by downregulating the expression of perforin and granzyme B [168], which can be reversed by using B7-H3 blockers. In tumor tissue, compared with PD-1 + LAG-3– cells, PD-1 + LAG-3+ T cells have a weaker ability to produce cytokines and/or undergo degranulation [177]. The cytotoxicity of Vδ2T cells against NSCLC tumor cell lines was enhanced after blocking PD-1 [171, 174], so the degranulation of γδT cells can be improved with the inhibition of the PD-1/PD-L1 or LAG-3 signaling pathway.
KIRs increase the threshold for Vγ9Vδ2T cell antigen-based activation, inhibiting the killing effects of cytotoxic Vγ9Vδ2T cells on MHC-I+ tumor cell lines. Blocking the binding of NKG2A to HLA-E can restore the high responsiveness of NKG2A+ Vδ2T cells. Low expression of NKG2A is usually accompanied by high expression of other ICs, such as PD-1 [141]. NKG2A is often coexpressed with PD-1, CTLA-4, LAG-3 and TIM-3 in CD8+ T cells, but they have different inhibition mechanisms [184]. The safety of humanized anti-NKG2A mAbs has been verified in clinical trials, and studies on HLA-E+ tumor cells have proven that combinations blocking the inhibitory signals of PD-1 and NKG2A have synergistic effects, which are characterized by enhanced ADCC and increased expression of CD107 and degranulation substances [108, 185].
ICIs can promote synergistic antitumor effects of γδT cells and other immune cells
When ICLs on the surface of γδT cells are blocked, the positive interaction between γδT cells and other immune cells becomes more efficient (Fig. 5). Studies have shown that γδT cells are the key source of immunosuppressive ICLs in tumor tissues and may have the ability to regulate αβT cells. Blocking PD-L1 on γδT cells in PDAC can enhance the levels of infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and improve immunotherapy efficacy [124]. Data from mouse models also indicate that specific γδT-cell subsets that express PD-L1 can inhibit αβT cell infiltration through PD-1/PD-L1 signaling and promote tumor growth. Vδ2T cells can also activate CTLA-4 and inhibit αβT cells through CD86. In individuals with normal γδT-cell function, the use of PD-L1 or Galectin-9 inhibitors can promote the expansion and activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, but this effect is not observed in the absence of γδT cells [92, 124, 186]. In addition, PD-L1 is a downstream target of HIF1α [187]. Hypoxia and coculture with γδT cells increased the apoptosis rate of CD8+ T cells, suggesting that γδT cells can induce the death of CD8+ T cells, and this effect was significantly changed after blocking PD-1. After blocking BTNL2, the number of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in the TME increased [126]. Monalizumab can inhibit the newly recognized IC NKG2A [188] and thus activate the antitumor effects of αβT, γδT and NK cells. Therefore, after using ICIs to reverse the immunosuppressive state of γδT cells, αβT cells can better promote tumor cell killing.
Targeting checkpoint molecules on γδT cells with ICIs can also inhibit Tregs. PD-L1 expressed by γδT cells can promote the production of Tregs and enhance the expression of the FOXP3 gene, thus maintaining the expression of TIGIT, which plays an important role in immune regulation; these effects promote Tregs to directly inhibit effector T cells through CTLA-4 and LAG-3 [71, 189]. A high TIGIT/DNAM-1 ratio was detected in Foxp3+ γδT cells of patients with AML and Tregs of patients with melanoma. High expression of TIGIT can promote the stability and inhibitory function of Tregs, which is highly correlated with poor clinical prognosis [190]. Therefore, treatment with anti-TIGIT mAbs can mediate the direct killing of tumor cells in patient tumor samples and preclinical mouse models and can also kill Tregs via Fc receptors (FCRs) [191].
In conclusion, after blocking ICR-ICL signaling with ICIs, γδT cells can gradually recover their functions and produce synergistic antitumor immune effects.
Relationship between ICI resistance and γδT cells
The rate of response to ICIs is related to many factors [192, 193], and ICT can be a good option for cancer patients who are likely to have an active immune response. However, tumor cells may evolve other mechanisms of resistance after a period of treatment [78, 194–198]. The mechanisms of drug resistance may not be failure of targeted drugs but rather compensatory changes in γδT cells leading to acquired resistance to drugs [72, 199]. For example, in EGFR- and KRAS-mutant mice and human lung cancer specimens, therapeutic PD-1-blocking antibodies still bind to T cells as the disease progresses; this finding suggests that mAbs still play a role when drug resistance occurs, so attention should be given to pathways other than PD-1/PD-L1 in adaptive drug resistance [200].
During the course of treatment with mAbs, compensatory and alternative suppressor receptors on γδT cells are upregulated, indicating that γδT cells may also be involved in the development of ICI tolerance in cancer patients. Some data show that anti-PD-1 inhibition significantly increases the frequency of TIM-3+ Vδ2T cells, indicating compensatory upregulation of TIM-3; additionally, combined inhibition of TIM-3 and PD-1 can significantly increase the production of TNF-α and IFN-γ [97]. CTLA-4 and BTNL2 are also upregulated [126, 201], which proves that BTNL2 may also be part of a novel immune escape mechanism in cancer. In addition, in melanoma, anti-PD-1 monotherapy or anti-PD-1× anti-CTLA-4 antibodies combination therapy increases the expression of VISTA on lymphocytes and thus reshapes the tumor immune microenvironment, resulting in increased expression of PD-L1 in TAMs, increased Treg infiltration and decreased MHC expression on DCs; these results indicate that the tumor cells have acquired drug resistance, which is related to poor prognosis of the patient [202].
After the use of ICIs, the lack of the ICR signaling can promote γδT cells to secrete tumor-promoting cytokines and change toward tumor-promoting functional subgroups, suggesting that γδT cells are part of another ICI resistance mechanism. Studies have shown that a lack of the ICR signaling promotes the expression of IL-17 by γδT cells. For example, defects in the PD-1 gene promote the production of IL-17A and IL-22 by γδT cells [203]. Lack of BTLA activity further activates γδTh17 cells [204]. Lack of VISTA expression also increased the expression of IL-17A in γδTh17 cells [205]. IL-17A is a proinflammatory factor that can induce γδT cells to express various ICRs [98] and IL-17A-producing γδT cells may instigate resistance to ICT [206]. Furthermore, blocking TIM-3 significantly increases the expression of IL-21R and negatively regulates the antitumor function of γδT cells by promoting the development of CD73+ γδT cells [169]. In ICI therapy-resistant patients, there were higher proportions of TGD-c21 γδT cell subsets, and the ligand-receptor binding ability, IFN signal transduction and pathway activity of these cells were significantly reduced. Therefore, TGD-c21 cells might be exhausted γδT cells with impaired antitumor immune function [207]. In summary, the heterogeneity of γδT cell subsets can lead to a lack of response to immunotherapy. The interaction between ICs and cytokines and abnormalities in the IFN-γ signaling pathway can also lead to secondary drug resistance in the context of an inhibitory TME [27, 208].
Another acquired resistance mechanism is compensatory upregulation of other ICs. A preclinical study evaluated the efficacy of checkpoint blockade combined with anti-PD-1 and anti-BTLA therapy in the treatment of GBM [209], and the combined treatment effectively limited the progression of tumors. Therefore, multitarget blockade may better restore the antitumor function of γδT cells, but the clinical rationale remains to be further explored.
The association between γδT cells and dysbiosis
Abnormal activation and increased numbers of γδT cells may induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs) or exacerbate preexisting autoimmune diseases of patients. As the immune system is activated, immune cells can become more active and secrete more proinflammatory cytokines, and this may lead to an increase in autoantibodies [210, 211], thus disrupting the balance between immunosuppression and immune activation. Studies have shown that irAEs caused by ICIs have a pathogenesis similar to that of autoimmune disorders, and hyperreactivity of Th17 cells and proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-17A, IL-21 and IL-22 have prominent roles in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases [212]. Among these mechanisms, increased levels of IL-17 were found to be associated with the development of irAEs such as colitis after receipt of ICI therapy [213], suggesting that dysfunctional γδT17 cells may also be involved in the occurrence and development of irAEs. IrAEs often manifest as gastrointestinal toxicity, and adverse reactions such as celiac disease have been reported [214]. Researchers found that the number of γδT cells in patients with celiac disease was higher than that in normal people [215, 216], suggesting that abnormally activated γδT cells may contribute to gastrointestinal dysfunction.
Microbiota participate in immune regulation and can affect patient response to ICI therapy. γδT cells can interact with microbiota and influence antitumor immunity. Given their larger tumor size and shorter survival time, antibiotic-treated (Abt) mice are more susceptible to B16/F10 melanoma and Lewis lung carcinoma due to the loss of protection from nonspecific commensal microbiota. Abt mice also showed increased sensitivity to tumor development, accompanied by decreased expression of IL-17A, IL-6 and IL-23 by γδT17 cells and partially inhibited function of CD8+ αβT cells. Supplementation of γδT cells and IL-17 restored the antitumor immune response of Abt mice [217]. Paradoxically, after antibiotic treatment in mice that received antitumor immunotherapy, the amino acid metabolism pathway changed, and the increased production of 3-indole propionic acid enhanced the cytotoxicity of γδT cells by promoting the secretion of granzyme B, perforin and IFN-γ instead of IL-17 without affecting the proliferation of γδT cells [218].
Previous studies have shown that IL-17+ γδT cells participate in dysbiosis, and IL-17+ γδT cells may be the effector T cells that regulate intestinal dysbiosis. Escherichia coli can promote the phagocytosis and killing capacity of γδT cells in a TCR-dependent manner [219]. After the onset of dysbiosis induced by ischemic brain injury, Th17 cells are not significantly affected, while the frequency of γδT17 cells in the intestinal tract is altered, and these cells are involved in injury repair and neuroprotection after homeostatic dysregulation [220]. Additionally, the proportion of γδT cells in the liver is 5–10 times higher than that in other tissues and organs, and some studies have suggested a tissue-specific interaction between the microbiota and immune cells in the liver. Hepatocyte-expressed CD1d can present lipid antigens from microbiota, stimulate TCRγδ and maintain homeostasis of liver-resident γδT17 cells. Moreover, in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, an overall high microbiota load can induce an increase in hepatic γδT17 numbers, which may be accompanied by a bystander effect. For example, inflammation induced by a high-fat diet (HFD) can stimulate γδT17 cells, and together, these factors exacerbate disease progression [221].
Microbiota and their metabolites affect the proliferation, cytokine secretion and cytotoxicity of γδT cells, and the interactions among γδT cells, microbiota and other immune cells are closely related to the maintenance of homeostasis and have significance for immune surveillance.
Future perspective
The binding of ICLs and ICRs is a means by which tumor cells escape immunity, and it is also the chief cause of the dysfunction of γδT cells. However, the relationship between γδT-cell-targeting ICIs and the TME is rarely discussed. ICT based on traditional cytotoxic T lymphocytes commonly has a low response rate due to MHC restriction. Therefore, it is important to exploit the antitumor potential of γδT cells. In regard to the relationship between γδT-cell-targeting ICIs and the TME, there are still many topics worthy of further study.
The heterogeneity of γδT-cell subsets needs to be further clarified. There are many subpopulations of γδT cells, but there is some overlap between subgroups characterized based on structural classifications and functional classifications. Moreover, γδT cells have high plasticity, and their specific functional state is easily controlled by the TME. Therefore, it is necessary to reveal the relationships between surface markers and functional changes in γδT cells with the help of techniques such as single-cell and spatial omics analyses [222]. For example, the upregulation of ICs does not mean the absolute exhaustion of γδT cells [141, 143]. As such, it remains to be determined how the specific epigenetic state of γδT cells changes as dysfunction develops. Furthermore, when chromatin remodeling occurs, is it reversible? How do γδT cells exhibit opposite effects under the influence of different TMEs, and can these effects be exploited? Are the changes in the expression patterns of γδT-cell ICs similar to those of αβT cells? If future research can identify a method for selective targeting of certain subsets, γδT cells will be able to play a more efficient antitumor role.
Tumor models used for the study of γδT cells urgently need to be improved for several reasons. First, the groups of γδT cells are different between humans and mice [37]. Therefore, the subgroup results obtained in mice cannot be perfectly applied to humans. Second, BTNs similar to those in humans have not been found in mice. Therefore, rodent models cannot completely represent the actual environment in humans [223]. Furthermore, the TME is different in different tumor models and is also different from that in humans.
The therapeutic prospects of targeting checkpoints on the surface of γδT cells are broad. However, resistance to ICT based on γδT can occur, which necessitates researches on the mechanism underlying resistance to γδT-cell therapy and multitarget combination therapy. Furthermore, the role of γδT cells in irAEs needs to be further clarified, which will pave the way for the inclusion of γδT cells in the arsenal of immunotherapy options.
First, MHC molecule independence and glycolipid antigen recognition activity are great advantages for γδT cells. In ICI-resistant tumor cells, a similarity between cells with ICI resistance and a hypermetabolic phenotype was observed. This phenotype included synergistic upregulation of glycolysis and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, which assists tumor cells in maintaining vigorous growth under hypoxia and resisting ICT [195, 224]. The associations between checkpoint molecules related to the internal metabolism of tumor cells and ICs is also an interesting topic [225].
Second, ICs can be either costimulatory or coinhibitory molecules. Agents targeting inhibitory molecules combined with αβT cell agonists have been shown to have synergistic antitumor effects [226–230]. As dysfunctional γδT cells can also express multiple ICs, it may be possible to restore the antitumor potential of γδT cells. In addition, given that the mechanism of action of CD39/CD73 is relatively independent of traditional ICs and that CD39/CD73 and its related ADO pathway have been proven to be related to the survival and prognosis of patients [231], the rationality of ICI combined with other targets, such as agents targeting CD39/CD73, deserves further discussion.
In addition to considering the combination of multitarget therapy with ICT, whether combination immunotherapy based on γδT cells can have a synergistic effect is also worth exploring. Vγ9Vδ2T cells can release a large number of cytokines and chemokines to induce the activation of other bystander immune cells after being activated by amino bisphosphonic acids such as ZA. With the help of MCP-2, γδT cells can activate the effector function of granulocytes [232]. Some studies have shown that the maturation of immature DCs may mainly result from a bystander process because immature DCs rely on the activation of Vγ9Vδ2T cells by TCR signal transduction and are able to promote Vγ9Vδ2T cells to secrete cytokines required for the maturation process [233]. Bystander activation of T cells is a type of antigen-independent activation that can occur through different receptors and costimulatory signals and has been observed in cancers [234]. Microorganism-related pattern recognition receptors, such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), and cytokines such as IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 are associated with activating bystander T-cell responses [235]. Thus, both the innate immune properties of γδT cells and their excellent cytokine and chemokine secretion abilities may aid in the recruitment of other immune cells [236] or interactions with other bystander cells in the TME and may be involved in bystander activation. Bystander T cells rarely show an exhausted status and have excellent innate killing ability [237]; therefore, reversing the immunosuppressive state of γδT cells may allow γδT cells to promote ICI responsiveness by activating bystander cells. ICT based on γδT cells combined with strategies that target bystander T cells (such as intratumoral injection of viral peptides) may have additional beneficial effects on antitumor immunity, but this hypothesis needs to be further experimentally verified and mechanistically explored.
In clinical applications, adoptive cell infusion based on γδT cells combined with ICIs or CAR-γδT cells may be promising future research directions. The feasibility and antitumor ability of CAR-γδT cells have been preliminarily proven [238, 239], and it has been shown that CAR-γδT cells can successfully migrate into the TME and cross-present tumor-associated antigens, providing more stable and durable antitumor immunity than conventional CAR-T cells in the solid tumor environment [240–242]. Compared with CAR-αβT cells, CAR-γδT cells have no alloreactivity and lower incidences of off-target toxicities and cytokine release syndrome [243, 244]. Arming CAR-T cells with bacterial-derived virulence factors with strong immunomodulatory properties can mediate bystander immunity through epitope spreading and can expand the therapeutic spectrum [245]. Antigen recognition by γδT cells is closely related to microbial metabolites, indicating that CAR-γδT cells may benefit from microbial engineering. CAR-γδT cells have just taken the first step toward clinical application [246, 247], and more clinical trials are required to determine the potential of CAR-γδT cells. In clinical trials, excellent antitumor activity and good patient tolerance were demonstrated for adoptive γδT-cell-based therapies after γδT cells were expanded in the presence of appropriate doses of ZA or BrHPP or infused with IL-2/IL-21 [248]. One study showed that Vδ2T cells were able to maintain a low PD-1 expression state in vivo after administration of immunotherapy [249]. However, not all patients respond to adoptive Vγ9Vδ2T-cell therapies. Considering that γδT cells present in the suppressive TME can display exhaustion or anergy, combination with ICIs might improve the cytotoxicity of γδT-cell immunotherapy and lead to better antitumor effects [250].
First describing the interaction between the TME and γδT cells, this paper has summarized the potential of γδT cells to participate in ICT by describing the functional regulation of ICs on γδT cells. Agents targeting ICs can significantly regulate the proliferation, activation and cytotoxicity of γδT cells, which provides a strategy to reverse the immunosuppressive state of γδT cells and supports the use of ICT based on γδT cells in clinical applications in the future.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- Abt
Antibiotic-treated
- ADCC
Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity
- ADO
Adenosine
- AML
Acute myelogenous leukemia
- AMP
Adenosine monophosphate
- A2AR
A2A receptor
- BrHPP
Bromohydrin pyrophosphate
- BTLA
B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator
- BTN2A
Butyrophilin 2A
- BTN3A
Butyrophilin 3A
- CAR
Chimeric antigen receptor
- CCL2
C-C motif chemokine 2
- CTLA-4
Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4
- DNT
Double-negative T cell
- eATP
Extracellular adenosine triphosphate
- FCR
Fc receptor
- GBM
Glioblastoma
- GC
Germinal center
- G-CSF
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
- GM-CSF
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
- HIF
Hypoxia-inducible factor
- HMBPP
(e)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enylpyrophosphate
- HMGB-1
High mobility group box protein 1
- IC
Immune checkpoint
- ICB
Immune checkpoint blockade
- ICI
Immune checkpoint inhibitor
- ICL
Immune checkpoint ligand
- ICR
Immune checkpoint receptor
- IFN-γ
Interferon-gamma
- IL
Interleukin
- ILT2
Ig-like transcript 2
- IPP
Isopentenyl pyrophosphate
- ITIM
Immune receptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif
- irAEs
Immune-related adverse events
- ITSM
Immune receptor tyrosine-based switch motif
- LAG-3
Lymphocyte-activation gene 3
- MCP-1
Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1
- MCP-2
Monocyte chemoattractant protein 2
- MHC
Major histocompatibility complex
- MM
Multiple myeloma
- MDSC
Myeloid-derived suppressor cell
- OS
Overall survival
- TAM
Tumor-associated macrophage
- TCR
T-cell receptor
- TGF
Transforming growth factor-beta
- TIM-3
T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3
- TIL
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte
- TLR
Toll-like receptor
- TME
Tumor microenvironment
- TMG
Tumor marker ganglioside
- TNF-α
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
- PAg
Phosphoantigen
- PB
Peripheral blood
- PDAC
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
- pDC
Plasmacytoid dendritic cell
- pMHC
Peptide-MHC-I complexes
- ROS
Reactive oxygen species
- SHM
Somatic hypermutation
- SHP
Scr homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase
- Siglec
Sialic acid binding immunoglobulin-like lectin
- STAT
Signal transducer and activator of transcription
- ZA
Zoledronic acid
Authors’ contributions
PL, JZ and XC conceived the study content and provided constructive guidance. ZFG, AQL, YFB and AMJ collected and organized the related references, and visualized the figures. ZFG wrote the manuscript. AQL corrected the manuscript. ZFG, AQL, YFB and AMJ made significant revisions to the manuscript. AQL and CZZ completed the additional analyses and prepared related figures. QC and ZQL complemented the manuscript. ZFG and AQL did the English editing, revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030313846 and 2021A1515012593), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2019A030317020) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81802257, 81871859, 81772457, 82172750 and 82172811). GuangDong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Guangdong - Guangzhou Joint Fouds) (2022A1515111212). This work was supported by Key Research and Development Projects of Sichuan Science and Technology (2022YFS0221, 2022YFS0074, 2022YFS0156 and 2022YFS0378). Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital Hospital Young Talent Fund (2021QN08).
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Zhifei Gao, Yifeng Bai, Anqi Lin and Aimin Jiang contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Xin Chen, Email: chen_xin1020@163.com.
Jian Zhang, Email: zhangjian@i.smu.edu.cn.
Peng Luo, Email: luopeng@smu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Zakeri N, Hall A, Swadling L, Pallett LJ, Schmidt NM, Diniz MO, et al. Characterisation and induction of tissue-resident gamma delta T-cells to target hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1372. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29012-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wu Y, Biswas D, Usaite I, Angelova M, Boeing S, Karasaki T, et al. A local human Vδ1 T cell population is associated with survival in nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Nat Cancer. 2022;3:696–709. doi: 10.1038/s43018-022-00376-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mikulak J, Oriolo F, Bruni E, Roberto A, Colombo FS, Villa A, et al. NKp46-expressing human gut-resident intraepithelial Vδ1 T cell subpopulation exhibits high antitumor activity against colorectal cancer. JCI Insight. 2019;4:125884. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.125884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.He W, Hu Y, Chen D, Li Y, Ye D, Zhao Q, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma-infiltrating γδ T cells are functionally defected and allogenic Vδ2+ γδ T cell can be a promising complement. Clin Transl Med. 2022;12:e800. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bruni E, Cimino MM, Donadon M, Carriero R, Terzoli S, Piazza R, et al. Intrahepatic CD69+Vδ1 T cells re-circulate in the blood of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and limit tumor progression. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10:e004579. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2022-004579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hayday AC. Gammadelta T cells and the lymphoid stress-surveillance response. Immunity. 2009;31:184–196. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vantourout P, Hayday A. Six-of-the-best: unique contributions of γδ T cells to immunology. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:88–100. doi: 10.1038/nri3384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Silva-Santos B, Serre K, Norell H. γδ T cells in cancer. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:683–691. doi: 10.1038/nri3904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sebestyen Z, Prinz I, Déchanet-Merville J, Silva-Santos B, Kuball J. Translating gammadelta (γδ) T cells and their receptors into cancer cell therapies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19:169–184. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0038-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Conejo-Garcia JR, Innamarato P. γδ T cells share the spotlight in cancer. Nat Cancer. 2022;3:657–658. doi: 10.1038/s43018-022-00396-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Xu Y, Xiang Z, Alnaggar M, Kouakanou L, Li J, He J, et al. Allogeneic Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell immunotherapy exhibits promising clinical safety and prolongs the survival of patients with late-stage lung or liver cancer. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18:427–439. doi: 10.1038/s41423-020-0515-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Natasja L, de Vries Joris, van de Haar Vivien, Veninga Myriam, Chalabi Marieke E, Ijsselsteijn Manon, et al. Voest γδ T cells are effectors of immunotherapy in cancers with HLA class I defects. Nature. 10.1038/s41586-022-05593-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Saura-Esteller J, de Jong M, King LA, Ensing E, Winograd B, de Gruijl TD, et al. Gamma Delta T-Cell based Cancer immunotherapy: past-present-future. Front Immunol. 2022;13:915837. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.915837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jaeger N, Colonna M. A γδ T–cell Imprint in a Rare Skin Tumor. Cancer Immunol Res. 2021;9:600. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-21-0270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Park JH, Kim H-J, Kim CW, Kim HC, Jung Y, Lee H-S, et al. Tumor hypoxia represses γδ T cell-mediated antitumor immunity against brain tumors. Nat Immunol. 2021;22:336–346. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-00860-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chabab G, Barjon C, Bonnefoy N, Lafont V. Pro-tumor γδ T cells in human Cancer: polarization, mechanisms of action, and implications for therapy. Front Immunol. 2020;11:2186. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Andreu-Ballester JC, Galindo-Regal L, Hidalgo-Coloma J, Cuéllar C, García-Ballesteros C, Hurtado C, et al. Differences in circulating γδ T cells in patients with primary colon cancer and relation with prognostic factors. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0243545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Janssen A, Villacorta Hidalgo J, Beringer DX, van Dooremalen S, Fernando F, van Diest E, et al. γδ T-cell receptors derived from breast Cancer-infiltrating T lymphocytes mediate antitumor reactivity. Cancer Immunol Res. 2020;8:530–543. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-0513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ou L, Wang H, Huang H, Zhou Z, Lin Q, Guo Y, et al. Preclinical platforms to study therapeutic efficacy of human γδ T cells. Clin Transl Med. 2022;12:e814. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Teng MWL, Galon J, Fridman W-H, Smyth MJ. From mice to humans: developments in cancer immunoediting. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:3338–3346. doi: 10.1172/JCI80004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nakamura K, Smyth MJ, Martinet L. Cancer immunoediting and immune dysregulation in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2020;136:2731–2740. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020006540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gupta RG, Li F, Roszik J, Lizée G. Exploiting tumor neoantigens to target cancer evolution: current challenges and promising therapeutic approaches. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:1024–1039. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jiang T, Shi T, Zhang H, Hu J, Song Y, Wei J, et al. Tumor neoantigens: from basic research to clinical applications. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:93. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0787-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jhunjhunwala S, Hammer C, Delamarre L. Antigen presentation in cancer: insights into tumour immunogenicity and immune evasion. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21:298–312. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00339-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Watanabe N, Gavrieli M, Sedy JR, Yang J, Fallarino F, Loftin SK, et al. BTLA is a lymphocyte inhibitory receptor with similarities to CTLA-4 and PD-1. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:670–679. doi: 10.1038/ni944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Binnewies M, Roberts EW, Kersten K, Chan V, Fearon DF, Merad M, et al. Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat Med. 2018;24:541–550. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0014-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bagchi S, Yuan R, Engleman EG. Immune Checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of Cancer: clinical impact and mechanisms of response and Resistance. Annu Rev Pathol. 2021;16:223–249. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-042020-042741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.de Miguel M, Calvo E. Clinical challenges of Immune Checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:326–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kubli SP, Berger T, Araujo DV, Siu LL, Mak TW. Beyond immune checkpoint blockade: emerging immunological strategies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20:899–919. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00155-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Morad G, Helmink BA, Sharma P, Wargo JA. Hallmarks of response, resistance, and toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade. Cell. 2021;184:5309–5337. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Brauneck F, Weimer P, Schulze zur Wiesch J, Weisel K, Leypoldt L, Vohwinkel G, et al. Bone marrow-resident Vδ1 T cells co-express TIGIT with PD-1, TIM-3 or CD39 in AML and myeloma. Front Med-Lausanne. 2021;8 Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.763773. Cited 2022 Aug 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.Haas W, Pereira P, Tonegawa S. Gamma/delta cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 1993;11:637–685. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.11.040193.003225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Reis BS, Darcy PW, Khan IZ, Moon CS, Kornberg AE, Schneider VS, et al. TCR-Vγδ usage distinguishes protumor from antitumor intestinal γδ T cell subsets. Science. 2022;377:276–284. doi: 10.1126/science.abj8695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lafont V, Sanchez F, Laprevotte E, Michaud H-A, Gros L, Eliaou J-F, et al. Plasticity of gamma delta T cells: impact on the anti-tumor response. Front Immunol. 2014;5 Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00622. Cited 2022 Aug 2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Bottino C, Tambussi G, Ferrini S, Ciccone E, Varese P, Mingari MC, et al. Two subsets of human T lymphocytes expressing gamma/delta antigen receptor are identifiable by monoclonal antibodies directed to two distinct molecular forms of the receptor. J Exp Med. 1988;168:491–505. doi: 10.1084/jem.168.2.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dang W, Pin W, Qiu F, Wei Q, Huang J. Human γδT-cell subsets and their involvement in tumor immunity. Cell Mol Immunol. 2017;14:245–253. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2016.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.O’Brien RL, Born WK. Two functionally distinct subsets of IL-17 producing γδ T cells. Immunol Rev. 2020;298:10–24. doi: 10.1111/imr.12905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Casetti R, Agrati C, Wallace M, Sacchi A, Martini F, Martino A, et al. Cutting edge: TGF-beta1 and IL-15 induce FOXP3+ gammadelta regulatory T cells in the presence of antigen stimulation. J Immunol. 2009;183:3574–3577. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Peters C, Meyer A, Kouakanou L, Feder J, Schricker T, Lettau M, et al. TGF-β enhances the cytotoxic activity of Vδ2 T cells. Oncoimmunology. 2019;8:e1522471. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1522471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lo Presti E, Toia F, Oieni S, Buccheri S, Turdo A, Mangiapane LR, et al. Squamous Cell tumors recruit γδ T cells producing either IL17 or IFNγ depending on the Tumor stage. Cancer Immunol Res. 2017;5:397–407. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ryan PL, Sumaria N, Holland CJ, Bradford CM, Izotova N, Capucine L, Grandjean, et al. Heterogeneous yet stable Vδ2(+) T-cell profiles define distinct cytotoxic effector potentials in healthy human individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:14378–14383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611098113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Paquin-Proulx D, Barsotti NS, Santos BAN, Ana KB, Marinho B, Kokron CM, Carvalho KI, et al. Inversion of the Vδ1 to Vδ2 γδ T cell ratio in CVID is not restored by IVIg and is associated with immune activation and exhaustion. Medicine. 2016;95:e4304. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lo Presti E, Dieli F, Fourniè JJ, Meraviglia S. Deciphering human γδ T cell response in cancer: lessons from tumor-infiltrating γδ T cells. Immunol Rev. 2020;298:153–164. doi: 10.1111/imr.12904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wu Y, Kyle-Cezar F, Woolf RT, Naceur-Lombardelli C, Owen J, Biswas D, et al. An innate-like Vδ1+ γδ T cell compartment in the human breast is associated with remission in triple-negative breast cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11:eaax9364. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax9364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lu H, Dai W, Guo J, Wang D, Wen S, Yang L, et al. High abundance of Intratumoral γδ T cells favors a better prognosis in head and neck squamous Cell carcinoma: a Bioinformatic analysis. Front Immunol. 2020;11:573920. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.573920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gentles AJ, Newman AM, Liu CL, Bratman SV, Feng W, Kim D, et al. The prognostic landscape of genes and infiltrating immune cells across human cancers. Nat Med. 2015;21:938–945. doi: 10.1038/nm.3909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lee M, Park C, Woo J, Kim J, Kho I, Nam D-H, et al. Preferential infiltration of unique Vγ9Jγ2-Vδ2 T cells into glioblastoma Multiforme. Front Immunol. 2019;10:555. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bryant NL, Gillespie GY, Lopez RD, Markert JM, Cloud GA, Langford CP, et al. Preclinical evaluation of ex vivo expanded/activated γδ T cells for immunotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme. J Neuro-Oncol. 2011;101:179–188. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0245-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chan KF, Duarte JDG, Ostrouska S, Behren A. γδ T cells in the Tumor Microenvironment-interactions with other Immune cells. Front Immunol. 2022;13:894315. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.894315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Girard P, Ponsard B, Charles J, Chaperot L, Aspord C. Potent bidirectional cross-talk between Plasmacytoid dendritic cells and γδT cells through BTN3A, type I/II IFNs and Immune checkpoints. Front Immunol. 2020;11:861. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Castella B, Foglietta M, Sciancalepore P, Rigoni M, Coscia M, Griggio V, et al. Anergic bone marrow Vγ9Vδ2 T cells as early and long-lasting markers of PD-1-targetable microenvironment-induced immune suppression in human myeloma. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4:e1047580. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1047580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Petrasca A, Melo AM, Breen EP, Doherty DG. Human Vδ3+ γδ T cells induce maturation and IgM secretion by B cells. Immunol Lett. 2018;196:126–134. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2018.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Horner AA, Jabara H, Ramesh N, Geha RS. Gamma/delta T lymphocytes express CD40 ligand and induce isotype switching in B lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1995;181:1239–1244. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.3.1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Caccamo N, Battistini L, Bonneville M, Poccia F, Fournié JJ, Meraviglia S, et al. CXCR5 Identifies a Subset of Vγ9Vδ2 T Cells which Secrete IL-4 and IL-10 and Help B Cells for Antibody Production. J Immunol. 2006;177:5290–5295. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.8.5290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ullrich L, Lueder Y, Juergens A-L, Wilharm A, Barros-Martins J, Bubke A, et al. IL-4-producing Vγ1+/Vδ6+ γδ T cells sustain germinal center reactions in Peyer’s patches of mice. Front Immunol. 2021;12:729607. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.729607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yang Y, Li L, Yuan L, Zhou X, Duan J, Xiao H, et al. A structural change in Butyrophilin upon Phosphoantigen binding underlies Phosphoantigen-Mediated Vγ9Vδ2 T Cell activation. Immunity. 2019;50:1043–1053.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Siyi G, Borowska MT, Boughter CT, Adams EJ. Butyrophilin3A proteins and Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;84:65–74. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Morita CT, Beckman EM, Bukowski JF, Tanaka Y, Band H, Bloom BR, et al. Direct presentation of nonpeptide prenyl pyrophosphate antigens to human gamma delta T cells. Immunity. 1995;3:495–507. doi: 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90178-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vavassori S, Kumar A, Wan GS, Ramanjaneyulu GS, Cavallari M, El Daker S, et al. Butyrophilin 3A1 binds phosphorylated antigens and stimulates human γδ T cells. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:908–916. doi: 10.1038/ni.2665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Riaño F, Karunakaran MM, Starick L, Li J, Scholz CJ, Kunzmann V, et al. Vγ9Vδ2 TCR-activation by phosphorylated antigens requires butyrophilin 3 A1 (BTN3A1) and additional genes on human chromosome. Eur J Immunol. 2014;44:2571–2576. doi: 10.1002/eji.201444712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Djaoud Z, Parham P. HLAs, TCRs, and KIRs, a triumvirate of human Cell-Mediated Immunity. Annu Rev Biochem. 2020;89:717–739. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-011520-102754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Boutin L, Scotet E. Towards deciphering the hidden mechanisms that contribute to the antigenic activation process of human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. Front Immunol. 2018;9:828. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rigau M, Uldrich AP, Behren A. Targeting butyrophilins for cancer immunotherapy. Trends Immunol. 2021;42:670–680. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2021.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sandstrom A, Peigné C-M, Léger A, Crooks JE, Konczak F, Gesnel M-C, et al. The intracellular B30.2 domain of butyrophilin 3A1 binds phosphoantigens to mediate activation of human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. Immunity. 2014;40:490–500. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Benyamine A, Loncle C, Foucher E, Blazquez J-L, Castanier C, Chrétien A-S, et al. BTN3A is a prognosis marker and a promising target for Vγ9Vδ2 T cells based-immunotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) Oncoimmunology. 2017;7:e1372080. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1372080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Vantourout P, Laing A, Woodward MJ, Zlatareva I, Apolonia L, Andrew W, Jones, et al. Heteromeric interactions regulate butyrophilin (BTN) and BTN-like molecules governing γδ T cell biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:1039–1044. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701237115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rhodes DA, Chen H-C, Williamson JC, Hill A, Yuan J, Smith S, et al. Regulation of human γδ T cells by BTN3A1 protein stability and ATP-binding cassette transporters. Front Immunol. 2018;9:662. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Riganti C, Castella B, Massaia M. ABCA1, apoA-I, and BTN3A1: a legitimate Ménage à trois in dendritic cells. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1246. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Laplagne C, Ligat L, Foote J, Lopez F, Fournié J-J, Laurent C, et al. Self-activation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells by exogenous phosphoantigens involves TCR and butyrophilins. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18:1861–1870. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00720-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Castella B, Riganti C, Massaia M. Metabolic approaches to rescue antitumor Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell functions in myeloma. Front Biosci-Landmrk. 2020;25:69–105. doi: 10.2741/4795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Miyashita M, Shimizu T, Ashihara E, Ukimura O. Strategies to improve the antitumor effect of γδ T Cell immunotherapy for clinical application. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:8910. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wesch D, Kabelitz D. Hans-Heinrich Oberg. Tumor resistance mechanisms and their consequences on γδ T cell activation. Immunol Rev. 2020;298:84–98. doi: 10.1111/imr.12925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Mao Y, Yin S, Zhang J, Hu Y, Huang B, Cui L, et al. A new effect of IL-4 on human γδ T cells: promoting regulatory Vδ1 T cells via IL-10 production and inhibiting function of Vδ2 T cells. Cell Mol Immunol. 2016;13:217–228. doi: 10.1038/cmi.2015.07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Peters C, Kabelitz D. Daniela Wesch. Regulatory functions of γδ T cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75:2125–2135. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2788-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Sabbione F, Gabelloni ML, Ernst G, Gori MS, Salamone G, Oleastro M, et al. Neutrophils suppress γδ T-cell function. Eur J Immunol. 2014;44:819–830. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kersten K, Coffelt SB, Hoogstraat M, Verstegen NJM, Vrijland K, Ciampricotti M, et al. Mammary tumor-derived CCL2 enhances pro-metastatic systemic inflammation through upregulation of IL1β in tumor-associated macrophages. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1334744. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1334744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zuberbuehler MK, Parker ME, Wheaton JD, Espinosa JR, Salzler HR, Park E, et al. The transcription factor c-Maf is essential for the commitment of IL-17-producing γδ T cells. Nat Immunol. 2019;20:73–85. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0274-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Chen S, Fan J, Zhang M, Qin L, Dominguez D, Long A, et al. CD73 expression on effector T cells sustained by TGF-β facilitates tumor resistance to anti-4-1BB/CD137 therapy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:150. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08123-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zhao H, Bo C, Kang Y, Li H. What Else can CD39 tell us? Front Immunol. 2017;8:727. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Otsuka A, Hanakawa S, Miyachi Y, Kabashima K. CD39: a new surface marker of mouse regulatory γδ T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132:1448–1451. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.05.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Yost KE, Satpathy AT, Wells DK, Qi Y, Wang C, Kageyama R, et al. Clonal replacement of tumor-specific T cells following PD-1 blockade. Nat Med. 2019;25:1251–1259. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0522-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Deng W-W, Li Y-C, Ma S-R, Mao L, Yu G-T, Bu L-L, et al. Specific blockade CD73 alters the “exhausted” phenotype of T cells in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2018;143:1494–1504. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Gallerano D, Ciminati S, Grimaldi A, Piconese S, Cammarata I, Focaccetti C, et al. Genetically driven CD39 expression shapes human tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T-cell functions. Int J Cancer. 2020;147:2597–2610. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Coffelt SB, Kersten K, Doornebal CW, Weiden J, Vrijland K, Hau C-S, et al. IL-17-producing γδ T cells and neutrophils conspire to promote breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2015;522:345–348. doi: 10.1038/nature14282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Jin C, Lagoudas GK, Zhao C, Bullman S, Bhutkar A, Hu B, et al. Commensal microbiota promote lung cancer development via γδ T cells. Cell. 2019;176:998–1013.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Wu P, Wu D, Ni C, Ye J, Chen W, Hu G, et al. γδT17 cells promote the accumulation and expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in human colorectal cancer. Immunity. 2014;40:785–800. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Gruenbacher G, Gander H, Rahm A, Idzko M, Nussbaumer O, Thurnher M. Ecto-ATPase CD39 inactivates isoprenoid-derived Vγ9Vδ2 T Cell Phosphoantigens. Cell Rep. 2016;16:444–456. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Jandke A, Melandri D, Monin L, Ushakov DS, Laing AG, Vantourout P, et al. Butyrophilin-like proteins display combinatorial diversity in selecting and maintaining signature intraepithelial γδ T cell compartments. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3769. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17557-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Willcox CR, Vantourout P, Salim M, Zlatareva I, Melandri D, Zanardo L, et al. Butyrophilin-like 3 directly binds a human Vγ4+ T Cell receptor using a modality distinct from clonally-restricted antigen. Immunity. 2019;51:813–825.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Castella B, Melaccio A, Foglietta M, Riganti C, Massaia M. Vγ9Vδ2 T cells as strategic weapons to improve the potency of Immune Checkpoint blockade and Immune interventions in human myeloma. Front Oncol. 2018;8:508. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Hsu H, Boudova S, Mvula G, Divala TH, Mungwira RG, Harman C, et al. Prolonged PD1 expression on neonatal Vδ2 lymphocytes dampens Proinflammatory responses: role of epigenetic regulation. J Immunol. 2016;197:1884–1892. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1600284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Hoeres T, Holzmann E, Smetak M, Birkmann J, Wilhelm M. PD-1 signaling modulates interferon-γ production by Gamma Delta (γδ) T-Cells in response to leukemia. OncoImmunology. 2019;8:1550618. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1550618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Yi H, Chen D, Hong M, Liu J, Li Y, Hao J, et al. Apoptosis, Pyroptosis, and Ferroptosis conspiringly induce immunosuppressive hepatocellular carcinoma Microenvironment and γδ T-Cell imbalance. Front Immunol. 2022;13:845974. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.845974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Macek JZ. Gamma delta T cells in hepatocellular carcinoma: sunrise of new therapy based on Vδ2 T cells? Clin Transl Med. 2022;12:e834. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Gherardin NA, Waldeck K, Caneborg A, Martelotto LG, Balachander S, Zethoven M, et al. γδ T cells in merkel cell carcinomas have a proinflammatory profile prognostic of patient survival. Cancer Immunol Res. 2021;9:612–623. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Jin Z, Lan T, Zhao Y, Jinxia D, Chen J, Lai J, et al. Higher TIGIT+CD226- γδ T cells in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Immunol Investig. 2022;51:40–50. doi: 10.1080/08820139.2020.1806868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wu K, Feng J, Xiu Y, Li Z, Lin Z, Zhao H, et al. Vδ2 T cell subsets, defined by PD-1 and TIM-3 expression, present varied cytokine responses in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;80:106122. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.106122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Catafal-Tardos E, Baglioni MV, Bekiaris V. Inhibiting the unconventionals: importance of immune checkpoint receptors in γδ T, MAIT, and NKT cells. Cancers. 2021;13:4647. doi: 10.3390/cancers13184647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Gorgulho J, Roderburg C, Heymann F, Schulze-Hagen M, Beier F, Vucur M, et al. Serum levels of soluble B and T lymphocyte attenuator predict overall survival in patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for solid malignancies. Int J Cancer. 2021;149:1189–1198. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zhan Y, Zheng L, Liu J, Dongzhi H, Wang J, Liu K, et al. PLA2G4A promotes right-sided colorectal cancer progression by inducing CD39+γδ Treg polarization. JCI Insight. 2021;6:148028. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.148028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Girard P, Charles J, Cluzel C, Degeorges E, Manches O, Plumas J, et al. The features of circulating and tumor-infiltrating γδ T cells in melanoma patients display critical perturbations with prognostic impact on clinical outcome. OncoImmunology. 2019;8:1601483. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2019.1601483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.López-Botet M, Bellón T, Llano M, Navarro F, García P, de Miguel M. Paired inhibitory and triggering NK cell receptors for HLA class I molecules. Hum Immunol. 2000;61:7–17. doi: 10.1016/S0198-8859(99)00161-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Crespí C. Skewed inhibitory receptors expression in a TAP2-deficient patient. Immunol Lett. 2003;86:149–153. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2478(03)00005-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Trichet V, Benezech C, Dousset C, Gesnel M-C, Bonneville M, Breathnach R. Complex interplay of activating and inhibitory signals received by Vgamma9Vdelta2 T cells revealed by target cell beta2-microglobulin knockdown. J Immunol. 2006;177:6129–6136. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.6129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Harly C, Peyrat M-A, Netzer S, Déchanet-Merville J, Bonneville M, Scotet E. Up-regulation of cytolytic functions of human Vδ2-γ T lymphocytes through engagement of ILT2 expressed by tumor target cells. Blood. 2011;117:2864–2873. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-309781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Lesport E, Baudhuin J, Sousa S, LeMaoult J, Zamborlini A, Rouas-Freiss N, et al. Inhibition of human gamma delta [corrected] T-cell antitumoral activity through HLA-G: implications for immunotherapy of cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68:3385–3399. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0632-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Mingari MC, Pietra G, Moretta L. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Anti-NKG2A Antibodies on Board. Trends Immunol. 2019;40:83–85. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2018.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Borst L, van der Burg SH, van Hall T. The NKG2A–HLA-E Axis as a Novel Checkpoint in the Tumor Microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:5549–5556. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Angelini DF, Zambello R, Galandrini R, Diamantini A, Placido R, Micucci F, et al. NKG2A inhibits NKG2C effector functions of γδ T cells: implications in health and disease. J Leukoc Biol. 2011;89:75–84. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0710413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Cazzetta V, Bruni E, Terzoli S, Carenza C, Franzese S, Piazza R, et al. NKG2A expression identifies a subset of human Vδ2 T cells exerting the highest antitumor effector functions. Cell Rep. 2021;37:109871. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Borst L, Sluijter M, Sturm G, Charoentong P, Santegoets SJ, van Gulijk M, et al. NKG2A is a late immune checkpoint on CD8 T cells and marks repeated stimulation and cell division. Int J Cancer. 2022;150:688–704. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Magalhães A, Duarte HO, Reis CA. Aberrant glycosylation in Cancer: a Novel molecular mechanism controlling metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:733–735. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Pinho SS, Reis CA. Glycosylation in cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:540–555. doi: 10.1038/nrc3982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Zhang Z, Yang C, Li L, Zhu Y, Su K, Zhai L, et al. “γδT Cell-IL17A-neutrophil” Axis drives immunosuppression and confers breast Cancer Resistance to high-dose anti-VEGFR2 therapy. Front Immunol. 2021;12:699478. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.699478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.van de Wall S, Santegoets KCM, van Houtum EJH, Büll C, Adema GJ. Sialoglycans and Siglecs can shape the Tumor Immune Microenvironment. Trends Immunol. 2020;41:274–285. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2020.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Bartish M, del Rincón SV, Rudd CE, Uri Saragovi H. Aiming for the sweet spot: Glyco-Immune checkpoints and γδ T cells in targeted immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2020;11 Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2020.564499. Cited 2022 Jun 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 117.Cagnoni AJ, Giribaldi ML, Blidner AG, Cutine AM, Gatto SG, Morales RM, et al. Galectin-1 fosters an immunosuppressive microenvironment in colorectal cancer by reprogramming CD8+ regulatory T cells. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:e2102950118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102950118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Yang R, Sun L, Li C-F, Wang Y-H, Yao J, Li H, et al. Galectin-9 interacts with PD-1 and TIM-3 to regulate T cell death and is a target for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Commun. 2021;12:832. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21099-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Manni M, Läubli H. Targeting glyco-immune checkpoints for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Biol Th. 2021;21:1063–1071. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1882989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Beatson R, Tajadura-Ortega V, Achkova D, Picco G, Tsourouktsoglou T-D, Klausing S, et al. The mucin MUC1 modulates the tumor immunological microenvironment through engagement of the lectin Siglec-9. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:1273–1281. doi: 10.1038/ni.3552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Büll C, Boltje TJ, Balneger N, Weischer SM, Wassink M, van Gemst JJ, et al. Sialic acid blockade suppresses tumor growth by enhancing T-cell–mediated tumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2018;78:3574–3588. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Gordon SR, Maute RL, Dulken BW, Hutter G, George BM, McCracken MN, et al. PD-1 expression by tumour-associated macrophages inhibits phagocytosis and tumour immunity. Nature. 2017;545:495–499. doi: 10.1038/nature22396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Garnier J, Turrini O, Chretien A-S, Olive D. Local ablative therapy associated with immunotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a solution to overcome the double trouble?-a comprehensive review. J Clin Med. 2022;11:1948. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Daley D, Zambirinis CP, Seifert L, Akkad N, Mohan N, Werba G, et al. γδ T cells support pancreatic oncogenesis by restraining αβ T Cell activation. Cell. 2016;166:1485–1499.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Lopes N, Silva-Santos B. Functional and metabolic dichotomy of murine γδ T cell subsets in cancer immunity. Eur J Immunol. 2021;51:17–26. doi: 10.1002/eji.201948402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Yanyun D, Qianwen Peng D, Cheng TP, Sun W, Wang H, et al. Cancer cell-expressed BTNL2 facilitates tumour immune escape via engagement with IL-17A-producing γδ T cells. Nat Commun. 2022;13:231. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27936-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Vitiello GA, Miller G. Targeting the interleukin-17 immune axis for cancer immunotherapy. J Exp Med. 2020;217:e20190456. doi: 10.1084/jem.20190456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Zhang H, Chai W, Yang W, Han W, Mou W, Xi Y, et al. The increased IL-17-producing γδT cells promote tumor cell proliferation and migration in neuroblastoma. Clin Immunol. 2020;211:108343. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2020.108343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Patil RS, Shah SU, Shrikhande SV, Goel M, Dikshit RP, Chiplunkar SV. IL17 producing γδT cells induce angiogenesis and are associated with poor survival in gallbladder cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2016;139:869–881. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Wakita D, Sumida K, Iwakura Y, Nishikawa H, Ohkuri T, Chamoto K, et al. Tumor-infiltrating IL-17-producing γδ T cells support the progression of tumor by promoting angiogenesis. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40:1927–1937. doi: 10.1002/eji.200940157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Aotsuka A, Matsumoto Y, Arimoto T, Kawata A, Ogishima J, Taguchi A, et al. Interleukin-17 is associated with expression of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 in ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2019;110:3068–3078. doi: 10.1111/cas.14174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Moesta AK, Li X-Y, Smyth MJ. Targeting CD39 in cancer. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20:739–755. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0376-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Zeng J, Ning Z, Wang Y, Xiong H. Implications of CD39 in immune-related diseases. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;89:107055. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Willingham SB, Ho PY, Hotson A, Hill C, Piccione EC, Hsieh J, et al. A2AR antagonism with CPI-444 induces antitumor responses and augments efficacy to anti-PD-(L)1 and anti-CTLA-4 in preclinical models. Cancer Immunol Res. 2018;6:1136–1149. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Chabab G, Barjon C, Abdellaoui N, Salvador-Prince L, Dejou C, Michaud H-A, et al. Identification of a regulatory Vδ1 gamma delta T cell subpopulation expressing CD73 in human breast cancer. J Leukoc Biol. 2020;107:1057–1067. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3MA0420-278RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Ni C, Fang Q-Q, Chen W-Z, Jiang J-X, Jiang Z, Ye J, et al. Breast cancer-derived exosomes transmit lncRNA SNHG16 to induce CD73+γδ1 Treg cells. Signal Transduct Tar. 2020;5:41. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0129-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Guoming H, Pin W, Cheng P, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Xiuyan Y, et al. Tumor-infiltrating CD39+γδTregs are novel immunosuppressive T cells in human colorectal cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1277305. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1277305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Weimer P, Wellbrock J, Sturmheit T, Oliveira-Ferrer L, Ding Y, Menzel S, et al. Tissue-specific expression of TIGIT, PD-1, TIM-3, and CD39 by γδ T cells in ovarian Cancer. Cells-Basel. 2022;11:964. doi: 10.3390/cells11060964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Wherry EJ. T cell exhaustion. Nat Immunol. 2011;12:492–499. doi: 10.1038/ni.2035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Schietinger A, Greenberg PD. Tolerance and exhaustion: defining mechanisms of T cell dysfunction. Trends Immunol. 2014;35:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Blank CU, Nicholas Haining W, Held W, Hogan PG, Kallies A, Lugli E, et al. Defining ‘T cell exhaustion’. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19:665–674. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0221-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.John Wherry E, Kurachi M. Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15:486–499. doi: 10.1038/nri3862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.ElTanbouly MA, Noelle RJ. Rethinking peripheral T cell tolerance: checkpoints across a T cell’s journey. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21:257–267. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00454-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Wang Y, Zhao N, Zhang X, Li Z, Liang Z, Yang J, et al. Bibliometrics analysis of Butyrophilins as Immune regulators [1992-2019] and implications for Cancer prognosis. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1187. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.He D, Qin Z, Liu Z, Ji X, Gao J, Guo H, et al. Comprehensive analysis of the prognostic value and Immune infiltration of Butyrophilin subfamily 2/3 (BTN2/3) members in Pan-glioma. Front Oncol. 2022;12:816760. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.816760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Blazquez J-L, Benyamine A, Pasero C, Olive D. New insights into the regulation of γδ T cells by BTN3A and other BTN/BTNL in Tumor Immunity. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1601. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Bian B, Fanale D, Dusetti N, Roque J, Pastor S, Chretien A-S, et al. Prognostic significance of circulating PD-1, PD-L1, pan-BTN3As, BTN3A1 and BTLA in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Oncoimmunology. 2019;8:e1561120. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1561120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Cai P, Lu Z, Wu J, Qin X, Wang Z, Zhang Z, et al. BTN3A2 serves as a prognostic marker and favors immune infiltration in triple-negative breast cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2020;121:2643–2654. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Incorvaia L, Fanale D, Badalamenti G, Porta C, Olive D, De Luca I, et al. Baseline plasma levels of soluble PD-1, PD-L1, and BTN3A1 predict response to nivolumab treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a step toward a biomarker for therapeutic decisions. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9:1832348. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1832348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Billon E, Chanez B, Rochigneux P, Albiges L, Vicier C, Pignot G, et al. Soluble BTN2A1 Is a potential prognosis biomarker in pre-treated advanced renal Cell carcinoma. Front Immunol. 2021;12:670827. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.670827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Fanale D, Incorvaia L, Badalamenti G, De Luca I, Algeri L, Bonasera A, et al. Prognostic role of plasma PD-1, PD-L1, pan-BTN3As and BTN3A1 in patients affected by metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: can Immune checkpoints act as a sentinel for short-term survival? Cancers. 2021;13:2118. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Benyamine A, Le Roy A, Mamessier E, Gertner-Dardenne J, Castanier C, Orlanducci F, et al. BTN3A molecules considerably improve Vγ9Vδ2T cells-based immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5:e1146843. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1146843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Di Marco BR, Roberts NA, Dart RJ, Vantourout P, Jandke A, Nussbaumer O, et al. Epithelia Use Butyrophilin-like Molecules to Shape Organ-Specific γδ T Cell Compartments. Cell. 2016;167:203–218.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Harly C, Guillaume Y, Nedellec S, Peigné C-M, Mönkkönen H, Mönkkönen J, et al. Key implication of CD277/butyrophilin-3 (BTN3A) in cellular stress sensing by a major human γδ T-cell subset. Blood. 2012;120:2269–2279. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-430470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Starick L, Riano F, Karunakaran MM, Kunzmann V, Li J, Kreiss M, et al. Butyrophilin 3A (BTN3A, CD277)-specific antibody 20.1 differentially activates Vγ9Vδ2 TCR clonotypes and interferes with phosphoantigen activation. Eur J Immunol. 2017;47:982–992. doi: 10.1002/eji.201646818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.De Gassart A, Le K-S, Brune P, Agaugué S, Sims J, Goubard A, et al. Development of ICT01, a first-in-class, anti-BTN3A antibody for activating Vγ9Vδ2 T cell-mediated antitumor immune response. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13:eabj0835. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj0835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Yamashiro H, Yoshizaki S, Tadaki T, Egawa K, Seo N. Stimulation of human butyrophilin 3 molecules results in negative regulation of cellular immunity. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88:757–767. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0309156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Chen S, Li Z, Huang W, Wang Y, Fan S. Prognostic and therapeutic significance of BTN3A proteins in tumors. J Cancer. 2021;12:4505–4512. doi: 10.7150/jca.57831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Cano CE, Pasero C, De Gassart A, Kerneur C, Gabriac M, Fullana M, et al. BTN2A1, an immune checkpoint targeting Vγ9Vδ2 T cell cytotoxicity against malignant cells. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109359. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Girard P, Sosa Cuevas E, Ponsard B, Mouret S, Gil H, Col E, et al. Dysfunctional BTN3A together with deregulated immune checkpoints and type I/II IFN dictate defective interplay between pDCs and γδ T cells in melanoma patients, which impacts clinical outcomes. Clin Transl Immunol. 2021;10:e1329. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Gu S, Sachleben JR, Boughter CT, Nawrocka WI, Borowska MT, Tarrasch JT, et al. Phosphoantigen-induced conformational change of butyrophilin 3A1 (BTN3A1) and its implication on Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E7311–E7320. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707547114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Karunakaran MM, Willcox CR, Salim M, Paletta D, Fichtner AS, Noll A, et al. Butyrophilin-2A1 directly binds germline-encoded regions of the Vγ9Vδ2 TCR and Is essential for Phosphoantigen sensing. Immunity. 2020;52:487–498.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Rigau M, Ostrouska S, Fulford TS, Johnson DN, Woods K, Ruan Z, et al. Butyrophilin 2A1 is essential for phosphoantigen reactivity by γδ T cells. Science. 2020;367:eaay5516. doi: 10.1126/science.aay5516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Hsiao C-HC, Nguyen K, Jin Y, Vinogradova O, Wiemer AJ. Ligand-induced interactions between butyrophilin 2A1 and 3A1 internal domains in the HMBPP receptor complex. Cell. Chem Biol. 2022;29:985–995.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2022.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Cano CE, Pasero C, De Gassart A, Hoet R, Scotet E, Mortier E, et al. BTN2A, a New Immune-Checkpoint Targeting Vg9Vd2 T Cell Cytotoxicity. Blood. 2019;134:1044. doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-128658. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Vyborova A, Beringer DX, Fasci D, Karaiskaki F, van Diest E, Kramer L, et al. γ9δ2T cell diversity and the receptor interface with tumor cells. J Clin Invest. 2020;130:4637–4651. doi: 10.1172/JCI132489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Payne KK, Mine JA, Biswas S, Chaurio RA, Perales-Puchalt A, Carmen M, Anadon, et al. BTN3A1 governs antitumor responses by coordinating αβ and γδ T cells. Science. 2020;369:942–949. doi: 10.1126/science.aay2767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Huimin L, Shi T, Wang M, Li X, Yanzheng G, Zhang X, et al. B7-H3 inhibits the IFN-γ-dependent cytotoxicity of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells against colon cancer cells. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9:1748991. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1748991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Barjon C, Michaud H-A, Fages A, Dejou C, Zampieri A, They L, et al. IL-21 promotes the development of a CD73-positive Vγ9Vδ2 T cell regulatory population. Oncoimmunology. 2017;7:e1379642. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1379642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Guo Q, Zhao P, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Hua Y, et al. TIM-3 blockade combined with bispecific antibody MT110 enhances the anti-tumor effect of γδ T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020;69:2571–2587. doi: 10.1007/s00262-020-02638-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Yang R, Shen S, Gong C, Wang X, Luo F, Luo F, et al. Bispecific antibody PD-L1 x CD3 boosts the anti-Tumor potency of the expanded Vγ2Vδ2 T cells. Front Immunol. 2021;12:654080. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.654080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Iwasaki M, Tanaka Y, Kobayashi H, Murata-Hirai K, Miyabe H, Sugie T, et al. Expression and function of PD-1 in human γδ T cells that recognize phosphoantigens. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41:345–355. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Hoeres T, Smetak M, Pretscher D, Wilhelm M. Improving the efficiency of Vγ9Vδ2 T-Cell immunotherapy in Cancer. Front Immunol. 2018;9:800. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Hwang HJ, Lee JJ, Kang SH, Suh JK, Choi ES, Jang S, et al. The BTLA and PD-1 signaling pathways independently regulate the proliferation and cytotoxicity of human peripheral blood γδ T cells. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2021;9:274–287. doi: 10.1002/iid3.390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Tani-Ichi S, Wagatsuma K, Hara T, Cui G, Abe S, Miyachi H, et al. Innate-like CD27+CD45RBhigh γδ T cells require TCR signaling for homeostasis in peripheral lymphoid organs. J Immunol. 2020;204:2671–2684. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Gertner-Dardenne J, Fauriat C, Orlanducci F, Thibult M-L, Pastor S, Fitzgibbon J, et al. The co-receptor BTLA negatively regulates human Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell proliferation: a potential way of immune escape for lymphoma cells. Blood. 2013;122:922–931. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-11-464685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Yang Z-Z, Kim HJ, Villasboas JC, Chen Y-P, Price-Troska T, Jalali S, et al. Expression of LAG-3 defines exhaustion of intratumoral PD-1 + T cells and correlates with poor outcome in follicular lymphoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:61425–61439. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Tomogane M, Sano Y, Shimizu D, Shimizu T, Miyashita M, Toda Y, et al. Human Vγ9Vδ2 T cells exert anti-tumor activity independently of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;573:132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Yang Q, Liu X, Liu Q, Guan Z, Luo J, Cao G, et al. Roles of mTORC1 and mTORC2 in controlling γδ T1 and γδ T17 differentiation and function. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27:2248–2262. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-0500-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Zhang H, Dai Z, Wu W, Wang Z, Zhang N, Zhang L, et al. Regulatory mechanisms of immune checkpoints PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:184. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-01987-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Schofield L, Ioannidis LJ, Karl S, Robinson LJ, Tan QY, Poole DP, et al. Synergistic effect of IL-12 and IL-18 induces TIM3 regulation of γδ T cell function and decreases the risk of clinical malaria in children living in Papua New Guinea. BMC Med. 2017;15:114. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0883-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Tirier SM, Mallm J-P, Steiger S, Poos AM, Awwad MHS, Giesen N, et al. Subclone-specific microenvironmental impact and drug response in refractory multiple myeloma revealed by single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Commun. 2021;12:6960. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26951-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Li X, Huimin L, Yanzheng G, Zhang X, Zhang G, Shi T, et al. Tim-3 suppresses the killing effect of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells on colon cancer cells by reducing perforin and granzyme B expression. Exp Cell Res. 2020;386:111719. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.van Montfoort N, Borst L, Korrer MJ, Sluijter M, Marijt KA, Santegoets SJ, et al. NKG2A blockade potentiates CD8 T Cell Immunity induced by Cancer vaccines. Cell. 2018;175:1744–1755.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.André P, Denis C, Soulas C, Bourbon-Caillet C, Lopez J, Arnoux T, et al. Anti-NKG2A mAb Is a Checkpoint inhibitor that promotes anti-tumor Immunity by unleashing both T and NK cells. Cell. 2018;175:1731–1743.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Peters C, Oberg H-H, Kabelitz D, Wesch D. Phenotype and regulation of immunosuppressive Vδ2-expressing γδ T cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71:1943–1960. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1467-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Noman MZ, Desantis G, Janji B, Hasmim M, Karray S, Dessen P, et al. PD-L1 is a novel direct target of HIF-1α, and its blockade under hypoxia enhanced MDSC-mediated T cell activation. J Exp Med. 2014;211:781–790. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.van Hall T, André P, Horowitz A, Ruan DF, Borst L, Zerbib R, et al. Monalizumab: inhibiting the novel immune checkpoint NKG2A. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:263. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0761-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Francisco LM, Salinas VH, Brown KE, Vanguri VK, Freeman GJ, Kuchroo VK, et al. PD-L1 regulates the development, maintenance, and function of induced regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2009;206:3015–3029. doi: 10.1084/jem.20090847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Jin Z, Ye W, Lan T, Zhao Y, Liu X, Chen J, et al. Characteristic of TIGIT and DNAM-1 expression on Foxp3+ γδ T cells in AML patients. BioMed Res Int. 2020, 2020:e4612952 Hindawi. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2020/4612952/. Cited 2022 May 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 191.Preillon J, Cuende J, Rabolli V, Garnero L, Mercier M, Wald N, et al. Restoration of T-cell effector function, depletion of Tregs, and direct killing of Tumor cells: The multiple mechanisms of action of a-TIGIT antagonist antibodies. Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20:121–131. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Lin A, Zhang H, Hu X, Chen X, Wu G, Luo P, et al. Age, sex, and specific gene mutations affect the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer. Pharmacol Res. 2020;159:105028. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Zhou C, Lin A, Cao M, Ding W, Mou W, Guo N, et al. Activation of the DDR pathway leads to the Down-regulation of the TGFβ pathway and a better response to ICIs in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Front Immunol. 2021;12:634741. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.634741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Tae Kon Kim, Esten N. Vandsemb, Roy S. Herbst, Lieping Chen. Adaptive immune resistance at the tumour site: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21:529–540. Nature Publishing Group. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41573-022-00493-5. Cited 2022 Aug 17 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 195.Jaiswal AR, Liu AJ, Pudakalakatti S, Dutta P, Jayaprakash P, Bartkowiak T, et al. Melanoma evolves complete immunotherapy resistance through the acquisition of a hypermetabolic phenotype. Cancer Immunol Res. 2020;8:1365–1380. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-0005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Turiello R, Capone M, Morretta E, Monti MC, Madonna G, Azzaro R, et al. Exosomal CD73 from serum of patients with melanoma suppresses lymphocyte functions and is associated with therapy resistance to anti-PD-1 agents. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10:e004043. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Lu J-C, Zhang P-F, Huang X-Y, Guo X-J, Gao C, Zeng H-Y, et al. Amplification of spatially isolated adenosine pathway by tumor-macrophage interaction induces anti-PD1 resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:200. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01207-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Li C, Phoon YP, Karlinsey K, Tian YF, Thapaliya S, Thongkum A, et al. A high OXPHOS CD8 T cell subset is predictive of immunotherapy resistance in melanoma patients. J Exp Med. 2022;219:e20202084. doi: 10.1084/jem.20202084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Lu H, Ma Y, Wang M, Shen J, Wu H, Li J, et al. B7-H3 confers resistance to Vγ9Vδ2 T cell-mediated cytotoxicity in human colon cancer cells via the STAT3/ULBP2 axis. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021;70:1213–1226. doi: 10.1007/s00262-020-02771-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Koyama S, Akbay EA, Li YY, Herter-Sprie GS, Buczkowski KA, Richards WG, et al. Adaptive resistance to therapeutic PD-1 blockade is associated with upregulation of alternative immune checkpoints. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10501. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Liao D, Wang M, Liao Y, Li J, Niu T. A review of efficacy and safety of Checkpoint inhibitor for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10 Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphar.2019.00609. Cited 2022 May 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 202.Li J, Smalley I, Chen Z, Wu J-Y, Phadke MS, Jamie K, Teer, et al. Single-cell Characterization of the Cellular Landscape of Acral Melanoma Identifies Novel Targets for Immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28:2131–2146. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Imai Y, Ayithan N, Xuesong W, Yuan Y, Wang L, Hwang ST. Cutting edge: PD-1 regulates Imiquimod-induced Psoriasiform dermatitis through inhibition of IL-17A expression by innate γδ-low T cells. J Immunol. 2015;195:421–425. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1500448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Kadekar D, Agerholm R, Viñals MT, Rizk J, Bekiaris V. The immune checkpoint receptor associated phosphatases SHP-1 and SHP-2 are not required for γδT17 cell development, activation, or skin inflammation. Eur J Immunol. 2020;50:873–879. doi: 10.1002/eji.201948456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Li N, Wenwen X, Yuan Y, Ayithan N, Imai Y, Xuesong W, et al. Immune-checkpoint protein VISTA critically regulates the IL-23/IL-17 inflammatory axis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1485. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01411-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Edwards SC, Hedley A, Hoevenaar WHM, Wiesheu R, Glauner T, Kilbey A, et al. PD-1 and TIM-3 differentially regulate subsets of mouse IL-17A-producing γδ T cells. J Exp Med. 2023;220:e20211431. doi: 10.1084/jem.20211431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Xiong D, Wang Y, You M. A gene expression signature of TREM2hi macrophages and γδ T cells predicts immunotherapy response. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5084. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18546-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Gao J, Shi LZ, Zhao H, Chen J, Xiong L, He Q, et al. Loss of IFN-γ Pathway Genes in Tumor Cells as a Mechanism of Resistance to Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy. Cell. 2016;167:397–404.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Choi J, Medikonda R, Saleh L, Kim T, Pant A, Srivastava S, et al. Combination checkpoint therapy with anti-PD-1 and anti-BTLA results in a synergistic therapeutic effect against murine glioblastoma. Oncoimmunology. 2021;10:1956142. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2021.1956142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune-related adverse events associated with Immune Checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:158–168. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Sullivan RJ, Weber JS. Immune-related toxicities of checkpoint inhibitors: mechanisms and mitigation strategies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21:495–508. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00259-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Ramos-Casals M, Brahmer JR, Callahan MK, Flores-Chávez A, Keegan N, Khamashta MA, et al. Immune-related adverse events of checkpoint inhibitors. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6:38. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0160-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Tarhini AA, Zahoor H, Lin Y, Malhotra U, Sander C, Butterfield LH, et al. Baseline circulating IL-17 predicts toxicity while TGF-β1 and IL-10 are prognostic of relapse in ipilimumab neoadjuvant therapy of melanoma. J Immunother Cancer. 2015;3:39. doi: 10.1186/s40425-015-0081-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Alsaadi D, Shah NJ, Charabaty A, Atkins MB. A case of checkpoint inhibitor-induced celiac disease. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:203. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0694-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Eggesbø LM, Risnes LF, Neumann RS, Lundin KEA, Christophersen A, Sollid LM. Single-cell TCR sequencing of gut intraepithelial γδ T cells reveals a vast and diverse repertoire in celiac disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2020;13:313–321. doi: 10.1038/s41385-019-0222-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Badran YR, Shih A, Leet D, Mooradian MJ, Coromilas A, Chen J, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated celiac disease. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8:e000958. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Cheng M, Qian L, Shen G, Bian G, Xu T, Xu W, et al. Microbiota modulate tumoral immune surveillance in lung through a γδT17 immune cell-dependent mechanism. Cancer Res. 2014;74:4030–4041. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Han J, Zhang S, Yi X, Pang Y, Xue Zhang YH, et al. Beneficial effect of antibiotics and microbial metabolites on expanded Vδ2Vγ9 T cells in hepatocellular carcinoma immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2020;11 Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01380. Cited 2022 Jul 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 219.Barisa M, Kramer AM, Majani Y, Moulding D, Saraiva L, Bajaj-Elliott M, et al. E. coli promotes human Vγ9Vδ2 T cell transition from cytokine-producing bactericidal effectors to professional phagocytic killers in a TCR-dependent manner. Sci Rep. 2017;7:2805. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02886-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Benakis C, Brea D, Caballero S, Faraco G, Moore J, Murphy M, et al. Commensal microbiota affects ischemic stroke outcome by regulating intestinal γδ T cells. Nat Med. 2016;22:516–523. doi: 10.1038/nm.4068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Li F, Hao X, Chen Y, Bai L, Gao X, Lian Z, et al. The microbiota maintain homeostasis of liver-resident γδT-17 cells in a lipid antigen/CD1d-dependent manner. Nat Commun. 2017;7:13839. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Xu L, Zou C, Zhang S, Chu TSM, Zhang Y, Chen W, et al. Reshaping the systemic tumor immune environment (STIE) and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) to enhance immunotherapy efficacy in solid tumors. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15:87. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01307-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Herrmann T, Fichtner AS, Karunakaran MM. An update on the molecular basis of Phosphoantigen recognition by Vγ9Vδ2 T cells. Cells. 2020;9:E1433. doi: 10.3390/cells9061433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Mu X, Xiang Z, Xu Y, He J, Lu J, Chen Y, et al. Glucose metabolism controls human γδ T-cell-mediated tumor immunosurveillance in diabetes. Cell Mol Immunol. 2022;19:944–956. doi: 10.1038/s41423-022-00894-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Lopes N, McIntyre C, Martin S, Raverdeau M, Sumaria N, Kohlgruber AC, et al. Distinct metabolic programs established in the thymus control effector functions of γδ T cell subsets in tumor microenvironments. Nat Immunol. 2021;22:179–192. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-00848-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Kim M, Min YK, Jang J, Park H, Lee S, Lee CH. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals distinct cellular factors for response to immunotherapy targeting CD73 and PD-1 in colorectal cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:e002503. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Taromi S, Firat E, Simonis A, Braun LM, Apostolova P, Elze M, et al. Enhanced AC133-specific CAR T cell therapy induces durable remissions in mice with metastatic small cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 2022;538:215697. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Laumont CM, Wouters MCA, Smazynski J, Gierc NS, Chavez EA, Chong LC, et al. Single-cell profiles and prognostic impact of Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes Coexpressing CD39, CD103, and PD-1 in ovarian Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:4089–4100. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Zhang T, Liu H, Jiao L, Zhang Z, He J, Li L, et al. Genetic characteristics involving the PD-1/PD-L1/L2 and CD73/A2aR axes and the immunosuppressive microenvironment in DLBCL. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10:e004114. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Leem G, Park J, Jeon M, Kim E-S, Kim SW, Lee YJ, et al. 4-1BB co-stimulation further enhances anti-PD-1-mediated reinvigoration of exhausted CD39+ CD8 T cells from primary and metastatic sites of epithelial ovarian cancers. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8:e001650. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Wang Y, Zhang H, Liu C, Wang Z, Wu W, Zhang N, et al. Immune checkpoint modulators in cancer immunotherapy: recent advances and emerging concepts. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15:111. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01325-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Agrati C, Cimini E, Sacchi A, Bordoni V, Gioia C, Casetti R, et al. Activated V gamma 9V delta 2 T cells trigger granulocyte functions via MCP-2 release. J Immunol. 2009;182:522–529. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.1.522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Devilder M-C, Maillet S, Bouyge-Moreau I, Donnadieu E, Bonneville M, Scotet E. Potentiation of antigen-stimulated V gamma 9V delta 2 T cell cytokine production by immature dendritic cells (DC) and reciprocal effect on DC maturation. J Immunol. 2006;176:1386–1393. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.3.1386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Whiteside SK, Snook JP, Williams MA, Weis JJ. Bystander T cells: a balancing act of friends and foes. Trends Immunol. 2018;39:1021–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2018.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Lee H, Jeong S, Shin E-C. Significance of bystander T cell activation in microbial infection. Nat Immunol. 2022;23:13–22. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-00985-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Paul S, Lal G. Regulatory and effector functions of gamma–delta (γδ) T cells and their therapeutic potential in adoptive cellular therapy for cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016;139:976–985. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Meier SL, Satpathy AT, Wells DK. Bystander T cells in cancer immunology and therapy. Nat Cancer. 2022;3:143–155. doi: 10.1038/s43018-022-00335-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Rozenbaum M, Meir A, Aharony Y, Itzhaki O, Schachter J, Bank I et al. Gamma-Delta CAR-T cells show CAR-directed and independent activity against leukemia. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1347. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Ye X, Deng X, Wen J, Li Y, Zhang M, Cai Z, et al. Folate receptor-alpha targeted 7x19 CAR-γδT suppressed triple-negative breast cancer xenograft model in mice. J Oncol. 2022;2022:2112898. doi: 10.1155/2022/2112898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Capsomidis A, Benthall G, Van Acker HH, Fisher J, Kramer AM, Abeln Z, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered human Gamma Delta T cells: enhanced Cytotoxicity with retention of cross presentation. Mol Ther. 2018;26:354–365. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Rotolo R, Leuci V, Donini C, Cykowska A, Gammaitoni L, Medico G, et al. CAR-based strategies beyond T lymphocytes: integrative opportunities for Cancer adoptive immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:2839. doi: 10.3390/ijms20112839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Fisher J, Sharma R, Don DW, Barisa M, Hurtado MO, Abramowski P, et al. Engineering γδT cells limits tonic signaling associated with chimeric antigen receptors. Sci Signal. 2019;12:eaax1872. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aax1872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Harrer DC, Simon B, Fujii S-I, Shimizu K, Uslu U, Schuler G, et al. RNA-transfection of γ/δ T cells with a chimeric antigen receptor or an α/β T-cell receptor: a safer alternative to genetically engineered α/β T cells for the immunotherapy of melanoma. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:551. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3539-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Harrer DC, Dörrie J, Schaft N. Chimeric antigen receptors in different Cell types: New vehicles join the race. Hum Gene Ther. 2018;29:547–558. doi: 10.1089/hum.2017.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Jin C, Ma J, Ramachandran M, Yu D, Essand M. CAR T cells expressing a bacterial virulence factor trigger potent bystander antitumour responses in solid cancers. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022;6:830–841. doi: 10.1038/s41551-022-00875-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Ferry GM, Agbuduwe C, Forrester M, Dunlop S, Chester K, Fisher J, et al. A simple and robust single-step method for CAR-Vδ1 γδT Cell expansion and transduction for Cancer immunotherapy. Front Immunol. 2022;13:863155. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.863155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Ganapathy T, Radhakrishnan R, Sakshi S, Martin S. CAR γδ T cells for cancer immunotherapy. Is the field more yellow than green? Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022; Available from: Cited 2022 Dec 13. 10.1007/s00262-022-03260-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 248.Thedrez A, Harly C, Morice A, Salot S, Bonneville M, Scotet E. IL-21-mediated potentiation of antitumor cytolytic and proinflammatory responses of human V gamma 9V delta 2 T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. J Immunol. 2009;182:3423–3431. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Zumwalde NA, Sharma A, Xuequn X, Ma S, Schneider CL, Romero-Masters JC, et al. Adoptively transferred Vγ9Vδ2 T cells show potent antitumor effects in a preclinical B cell lymphomagenesis model. JCI Insight. 2017;2 American Society for Clinical Investigation. Available from: https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/93179. Cited 2022 Jul 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 250.Nada MH, Wang H, Hussein AJ, Tanaka Y, Morita CT. PD-1 checkpoint blockade enhances adoptive immunotherapy by human Vγ2Vδ2 T cells against human prostate cancer. OncoImmunology. 2021;10:1989789. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2021.1989789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.