Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine : IJNM : The Official Journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India logoLink to Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine : IJNM : The Official Journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
. 2022 Dec 2;37(4):370–372. doi: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_70_22

Incidental 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Avid Cardiac Mass on Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in a Patient with Head-and-Neck Carcinoma: Metastasis or Something Else?

Punit Sharma 1,, Ejaz Ahmad Bari 1
PMCID: PMC9930457  PMID: 36817201

Abstract

High 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake in a cardiac mass is considered to be a marker of malignancy, but that is not always true. We here present such a case of incidentally detected 18F-FDG cardiac mass on staging positron emission tomography-computed tomography in a woman with head-and-neck cancer, confirmed to be myxoma on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent histopathology.

Keywords: 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose, cardiac mass, magnetic resonance imaging, myxoma, positron emission tomography-computed tomography

Introduction

Cardiac masses are often incidental findings on echocardiography or imaging performed for some other indication.[1] Most of these masses are thrombus or vegetation rather than the tumor.[2] However, in the case of tumors, metastasis is much more likely than primary cardiac tumors, especially in the elderly.[3] Imaging plays an important role in the characterization of the masses, with computed tomography (CT),[4] magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),[5] and PET,[6] all shown to be useful. While a high 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake in a cardiac mass is considered to be a harbinger of malignancy,[7] it is not always true.[8,9] We present such a case of incidentally detected an 18F-FDG cardiac mass on staging positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT) in a woman with head-and-neck cancer, confirmed to be something else on histopathology.

Case Report

A 76-year-old woman presented with an ulceroproliferative growth of the left lower alveolus. She had a history of addiction to oral tobacco. There was no other significant medical history, including any cardiac ailment. Biopsy from the growth showed Grade II squamous cell carcinoma. She underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT for staging workup [Figure 1]. Maximum intensity projection PET images (a) showed focal 18F-FDG uptake in the left alveolar region (broken arrow). Furthermore, noted was another patchy area of 18F-FDG uptake in the cardiac region (arrow). Transaxial PET-CT image (b) showed the primary left lower alveolar and retromolar trigone lesion (arrow) with bony erosion (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] 6.3). Interestingly, two lesions were seen in the left atrium (c-f). The larger one (arrow) measured about 41 mm × 35 mm in size, with poor enhancement, focal internal calcifications, and intense 18F-FDG uptake (SUVmax 9.1). Another lesion (bold arrow) was smaller and elongated, showed no significant enhancement or 18F-FDG uptake. Differentials of atrial myxoma versus tumor thrombus were given for the 18F-FDG avid left atrial lesion, while the non-18F-FDG avid lesion was reported as bland thrombus. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed but was noncontributory. Contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI was further performed for characterization [Figure 2]. The 18F-FDG avid lesion (arrow) was hypointense on T1-weighted images (a), hyperintense on T2-weighted images (b and c), with heterogeneous enhancement on gadolinium-enhanced images (c), and was hyperintense relative to myocardium but hypointense relative to the blood pool in gradient-echo sequences (d). These findings suggested a diagnosis of atrial myxoma. The other non-18F-FDG avid left atrial lesion (broken arrow) was hypointense on both T1-weighted (f) and T2-weighted (g) images, with no significant gadolinium contrast enhancement (h), suggesting a chronic organized thrombus. There was no other nodal or distant metastasis. However, as the larger tumor was intensely 18F-FDG avid, a transcatheter biopsy was performed before starting curative-intent treatment for malignancy. The biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of myxoma. The patient then underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head-and-neck malignancy. The myxoma was observed, with plans for surgery later, if feasible.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Maximum intensity projection PET images (a) showing focal 18F-FDG uptake in the left alveolar region (broken arrow) with another patchy 18F-FDG uptake in the cardiac region (arrow). Transaxial PET-CT image (b) showing primary left lower alveolar and retromolar trigone lesion (arrow) with bony erosion. On transaxial (c and d) and coronal (e and f) contrast-enhanced CT and fused PET-CT images, two lesions are also seen in the left atrium. The larger one (arrow) measuring about 41 mm × 35 mm in size, with poor enhancement, focal internal calcifications, and intense 18F-FDG uptake, raising differentials of atrial myxoma versus tumor thrombus, while the other lesion (bold arrow) is smaller and elongated, showing no significant enhancement or 18F-FDG uptake, suggestive of bland thrombus. 18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, PET-CT: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The larger left atrial mass (arrow) is hypointense on transaxial T1-weighted images (a), hyperintense on transaxial (b) and sagittal (c) T2-weighted images, with heterogeneous enhancement on coronal gadolinium-enhanced images (c) and is hyperintense relative to myocardium but hypointense relative to the blood pool in transaxial gradient-echo sequences (d). These findings suggest a diagnosis of atrial myxoma. The other left atrial lesion (broken arrow) is hypointense on both transaxial T1-weighted (f) and transaxial T2-weighted (g) images, with no significant gadolinium contrast enhancement (h), suggesting a chronic organized thrombus

Discussion

18F-FDG PET-CT is now an integral part of the management of many cancers. However, given the nonspecific nature of 18F-FDG, some nonmalignant lesions can lead to false-positive findings.[7] In the present case, PET-CT performed for staging, showed an 18F-FDG avid and another non-18F-FDG mass in the left atrium. MRI has been done for further characterization and classified the 18F-FDG avid mass as myxoma and the non-18F-FDG lesion as chronic organizing thrombus. Diagnosis of myxoma was confirmed with biopsy.

Myxomas are the most common benign cardiac tumors, mostly manifesting in adulthood.[10] Most of them are sporadic, with about 7% associated with genetic syndromes such as the Carney complex.[11] While classical triad of symptoms such as obstruction to blood flow, embolic events, and fever/weight loss is seen in some, many remain asymptomatic. These are usually solitary and located in the atrium, most commonly left atrium.[12] On histopathology, myxomas present a heterogeneous appearance with cystic areas of polysaccharide-rich myxoid substance, hemorrhage and hemosiderin, fibrosis, and calcification. On PET-CT imaging, cardiac myxoma can show variable 18F-FDG uptake.[9,13,14] Therefore, making a diagnosis just on basis of 18F-FDG uptake could be fallacious. Contrast-enhanced MRI can be very helpful in such circumstances, as in the present case.[5] Surgery remains the treatment of choice and is curative. However, in the present case given the lack of symptoms, advanced age, and associated malignancy, observation was considered prudent.

In conclusion, cardiac myxoma can present as intensely 18F-FDG avid mass on oncological PET-CT, and should not be labeled as metastasis. Contrast-enhanced MRI is useful for better characterization of such masses, supplemented with biopsy if indicated.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient (s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initial s will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Leja MJ, Shah DJ, Reardon MJ. Primary cardiac tumors. Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38:261–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bruce CJ. Cardiac tumours: Diagnosis and management. Heart. 2011;97:151–60. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.186320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bussani R, De-Giorgio F, Abbate A, Silvestri F. Cardiac metastases. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:27–34. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.035105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kassop D, Donovan MS, Cheezum MK, Nguyen BT, Gambill NB, Blankstein R, et al. Cardiac masses on cardiac CT: A review. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2014;7:9281. doi: 10.1007/s12410-014-9281-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pazos-López P, Pozo E, Siqueira ME, García-Lunar I, Cham M, Jacobi A, et al. Value of CMR for the differential diagnosis of cardiac masses. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:896–905. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fathala A, Abouzied M, AlSugair AA. Cardiac and pericardial tumors: A potential application of positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging. World J Cardiol. 2017;9:600–8. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i7.600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rahbar K, Seifarth H, Schäfers M. Differentiation of malignant and benign cardiac tumors using 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:856–63. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.095364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jeph S, Thakur K, Shamim SA, Verma K, Aggarwal B, Aggarwal A. Giant cardiac tumour thrombus on staging contrast enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in a case of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2014;33:328–9. doi: 10.1016/j.remn.2013.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zeitouni M, Calais J, Ghodbane W, Ou P, Sannier A, Bouleti C. A cardiac myxoma with intense metabolic activity. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34:92.e11–92.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Markel ML, Waller BF, Armstrong WF. Cardiac myxoma. A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 1987;66:114–25. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198703000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carney JA, Gordon H, Carpenter PC, Shenoy BV, Go VL. The complex of myxomas, spotty pigmentation, and endocrine overactivity. Medicine (Baltimore) 1985;64:270–83. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198507000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grebenc ML, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Green CE, Burke AP, Galvin JR. Cardiac myxoma: Imaging features in 83 patients. Radiographics. 2002;22:673–89. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.22.3.g02ma02673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Okazaki Y, Yamada S, Kitada S, Matsunaga I, Nogami E, Watanabe T, et al. Significance of 18F-FDG PET and immunohistochemical GLUT-1 expression for cardiac myxoma. Diagn Pathol. 2014;9:117. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Agostini D, Babatasi G, Galateau F, Grollier G, Potier JC, Bouvard G. Detection of cardiac myxoma by F-18 FDG PET. Clin Nucl Med. 1999;24:159–60. doi: 10.1097/00003072-199903000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine : IJNM : The Official Journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES