Skip to main content
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques logoLink to JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques
. 2022 Sep 14;12(3):e21.00014. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00014

Superior Pubic Ramus Screw Placement During Complex Acetabular Revision

Acetabular Distraction for Treatment of Pelvic Discontinuity

Yehuda E Kerbel 1, Kevin Pirruccio 2, Zachary Shirley 1, Samantha Stanzione 1, Krishna Kiran Eachempati 3, Christopher M Melnic 4, Neil P Sheth 1,a
PMCID: PMC9931038  PMID: 36816529

Background:

Insertion of a superior pubic ramus screw may be indicated for the treatment of a chronic pelvic discontinuity when utilizing acetabular distraction in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially in the setting of severe bone loss in the ischium. The aim of this procedure is to stabilize and prevent abduction failure of the acetabular component when utilizing acetabular distraction.

Description:

With the patient in the lateral decubitus position, the acetabulum is exposed from a standard posterior approach for a revision THA. The location of the superior pubic root is identified after making a recess within the anteroinferior capsule. In order to ensure that the appropriate trajectory is obtained, C-arm imaging (inlet view and orthogonal obturator outlet views) is utilized to safely predrill the screw trajectory into the superior pubic ramus. A Kirschner wire (K-wire) is then placed into the hole. With use of a metal-cutting burr on the back table, customized peripheral screw holes are placed and then the acetabular component is slid and impacted into place over the K-wire. After cup insertion, the K-wire is removed and the superior pubic ramus screw can be placed and confirmed on fluoroscopy.

Alternatives:

In general, chronic pelvic discontinuity requires surgical management with revision THA and has historically employed the use of a cup-cage construct, custom triflange implants, and/or jumbo acetabular cups with modular porous metal augments1-5. With these treatment options, it is typically necessary to insert “kickstand” screws, which function to prevent abduction failure of the acetabular cup4,5. However, in many cases of discontinuity, there may be severe ischial osteolysis, making ischial screw placement difficult or impossible. The superior pubic ramus, however, remains a reliable option that can be utilized for inferior screw fixation, even in cases of severe acetabular bone loss, and thus is especially beneficial in these difficult cases.

Rationale:

The technique of acetabular distraction was developed because of limitations with alternative techniques. This procedure achieves cementless biologic fixation and eventual discontinuity healing as a result of lateral or peripheral acetabular distraction and resultant medial or central compression across the pelvic discontinuity. Acetabular distraction allows for intraoperative customization and cement unitization of the acetabular construct. This procedure requires the use of a “kickstand” screw or of inferior screw fixation in order to prevent abduction failure of the cup. These screws may be placed into either the ischium or superior pubic ramus. If the patient has substantial ischial osteolysis, ischial screw fixation may not be possible. If not placed in a systematic manner, pubic ramus screws can be technically challenging, and incorrect placement can result in neurovascular injury. The present video article demonstrates a reproducible technical method for safely placing a screw in the superior ramus to aid in optimal fixation of the acetabular component in cases of pelvic discontinuity.

Expected Outcomes:

Thus far, short-term survivorship of acetabular distraction with use of a jumbo cup and kickstand screws has been about 95%. In the largest study to date assessing patients with chronic pelvic discontinuity who underwent revision THA with use of the acetabular distraction technique, only 1 of 32 patients required revision for aseptic loosening6. An additional 2 patients had evidence of radiographic loosening but did not undergo revision, and 3 had migration of the acetabular component into a more stable configuration. Radiographically, 22 of 32 patients in the study demonstrated healing of the discontinuity6. In another study assessing the survivorship of porous tantalum acetabular shells in revision THA to treat severe acetabular defects, patients with inferior screw fixation with superior pubic ramus or ischial screws had a significantly lower incidence of proximal translation of components compared with those without inferior screw fixation7.

Important Tips:

  • For reproducible, successful execution of this technique, it is important to confirm correct placement of the acetabular retractors at the correct anatomical locations to ensure adequate surgical visualization of the acetabulum for easy identification of the superior pubic root.

  • It is also critical to check placement of the drill via fluoroscopy with an inlet and obturator outlet views prior to drilling.

  • The drill should be advanced on the oscillate setting to avoid inadvertently perforating the cortical bone and damaging surrounding neurovascular structures.

Acronyms and Abbreviations:

  • OR = operating room

  • f/u = follow-up

  • vac = vacuum-assisted closure

  • RSA = radiostereometric analysis


Download video file (43.7MB, mp4)
Download video file (59.9MB, mp4)
Download video file (20.5MB, mp4)
Download video file (10.8MB, mp4)
Download video file (11.9MB, mp4)

Published outcomes of this procedure can be found at: Bone Joint J. 2018 Jul;100-B(7):909-14, J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):58-62, and J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 21;100(22):1926-33.

Investigation performed at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A382).

References

  • 1.Hasenauer MD, Paprosky WG, Sheth NP. Treatment options for chronic pelvic discontinuity. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018. Jan-Mar;9(1):58-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berasi CC, 4th, Berend KR, Adams JB, Ruh EL, Lombardi AV, Jr. Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. Feb;473(2):528-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Taunton MJ, Fehring TK, Edwards P, Bernasek T, Holt GE, Christie MJ. Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. Feb;470(2):428-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wind MA, Jr, Swank ML, Sorger JI. Short-term results of a custom triflange acetabular component for massive acetabular bone loss in revision THA. Orthopedics. 2013. Mar;36(3):e260-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Batuyong ED, Brock HS, Thiruvengadam N, Maloney WJ, Goodman SB, Huddleston JI. Outcome of porous tantalum acetabular components for Paprosky type 3 and 4 acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty. 2014. Jun;29(6):1318-22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sheth NP, Melnic CM, Brown N, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Two-centre radiological survivorship of acetabular distraction technique for treatment of chronic pelvic discontinuity: mean five-year follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2018. Jul;100-B(7):909-14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Solomon LB, Abrahams JM, Callary SA, Howie DW. The Stability of the Porous Tantalum Components Used in Revision THA to Treat Severe Acetabular Defects: A Radiostereometric Analysis Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018. Nov 21;100(22):1926-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES