Background:
Surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) remains challenging as no definitive surgical technique has emerged as the single best option in this varied patient population1-3. Although the available surgical techniques may differ substantially, they all share the same goals of achieving and maintaining deformity correction, allowing physiological spinal growth, and reducing the number of operations and complications. Herein, we present a modified self-growing rod technique that represents a valid alternative to the existing surgical procedures for EOS.
Description:
The patient is positioned prone on a radiolucent table, and the spine is prepared and draped in a standard fashion. A posterior midline skin incision is made from the upper to the lower instrumented level. Subperiosteal exposure of the spine is carried out, ensuring that capsules of the facet joints are spared. Pedicle screws are inserted bilaterally at the cranial and caudal ends of the instrumentation. Fixation with pedicle screws of at least 3 levels at the top and bottom end is usually advised; in nonambulatory patients with pelvic obliquity, caudal fixation can be extended to the pelvis with bilateral iliac screws. Sublaminar wires are positioned bilaterally at every level between the cranial and caudal ends of the instrumentation and are passed as medially as possible to avoid damage to the facet joints. Four 5-mm cobalt-chromium rods are cut, contoured, and inserted at each end of the construct. Ipsilateral rods are secured with use of sublaminar wires, making sure that they overlap over a sufficient length to allow for the remaining spinal growth. Correction of the deformity is achieved with use of a combination of cantilever maneuvers and apical translation by progressive and sequential tightening of the sublaminar wires. The wound is closed in layers over a subfascial drain. The patient is allowed free mobilization after surgery. No postoperative brace is required.
Alternatives:
Nonoperative alternative treatment for EOS includes serial cast immobilization and bracing4. Alternative surgical treatments include traditional growing rods5, magnetically controlled growing rods6, the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib-expansion technique7, and the Shilla technique8. The use of compression-based systems (i.e., staples or tether)9 or early limited fusion has also been reported by other authors.
Rationale:
The main advantage of our technique is that it relies on physiological spinal growth and does not require surgery or external devices for rod lengthening, which is particularly beneficial in frail patients with a neuromuscular disease in whom repeated surgery is not advised. Segmental fixation by sublaminar wires allows good control of the deformity apex during growth. Concerns regarding early fusion of the spine have not been confirmed in our mid-term follow-up study10.
Expected Outcomes:
This technique allows correction of the deformity and continuous spinal growth in the years following surgery. At 6.0 years postoperatively, the average main curve correction was reported to be 61% and the average pelvic obliquity correction was 69%. The spine was reported to lengthen an average of 40.9 mm (range, 14.0 to 84.0 mm) immediately postoperatively, and the T1-S1 segment was reported to continue growing at 10.5 mm/year (range, 3.6 to 16.5 mm/year) thereafter10. The most common complication is rod breakage at the thoracolumbar junction, which seems to be more common in patients with idiopathic or cerebral palsy EOS and during the pubertal growth spurt10.
Important Tips:
Subperiosteal exposure of the spine should be carried out, making sure to preserve facet joints in the unfused area of the spine.
Achieve segmental fixation with use of sublaminar wires at every level and pedicle screws at the top and bottom ends of the instrumentation.
If pelvic imbalance is present and the patient is nonambulatory, pelvic fixation with iliac screws is advised.
First round correction of the deformity is achieved with a cantilever technique; correction fine-tuning can be performed by tightening sublaminar wires.
Consider utilizing thicker rods in cases of idiopathic or cerebral palsy EOS.
Acronyms and Abbreviations:
EOS = early-onset scoliosis
AP = anteroposterior
EV = end vertebra
SSEP = somatosensory evoked potentials
MEP = motor evoked potentials
PJK = proximal junctional kyphosis
SMA = spinal muscular atrophy
CP = cerebral palsy
PACU = post-anesthesia care unit
Published outcomes of this procedure can be found at: Bone Joint J. 2020 Nov;102-B (11):1560-66.
Investigation performed at The Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSEST/A377).
Contributor Information
Hossein Mehdian, Email: mehdianspine@hotmail.com.
Sleiman Haddad, Email: haddadsleiman@gmail.com.
Dritan Pasku, Email: paskudr@hotmail.com.
Craig Masek, Email: craigamasek@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Tsirikos AI, Roberts SB, Bhatti E. Incidence of spinal deformity surgery in a national health service from 2005 to 2018: an analysis of 2,205 children and adolescents. Bone Jt Open. 2020. Oct 27;1(3):19-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tis JE, Karlin LI, Akbarnia BA, Blakemore LC, Thompson GH, McCarthy RE, Tello CA, Mendelow MJ, Southern EP; Growing Spine Committee of the Scoliosis Research Society. Early onset scoliosis: modern treatment and results. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012; Oct-Nov;32(7):647-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wijdicks SPJ, Tromp IN, Yazici M, Kempen DHR, Castelein RM, Kruyt MC. A comparison of growth among growth-friendly systems for scoliosis: a systematic review. Spine J. 2019. May;19(5):789-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Canavese F, Samba A, Dimeglio A, Mansour M, Rousset M. Serial elongation-derotation-flexion casting for children with early-onset scoliosis. World J Orthop. 2015. Dec 18;6(11):935-43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Akbarnia BA, Breakwell LM, Marks DS, McCarthy RE, Thompson AG, Canale SK, Kostial PN, Tambe A, Asher MA; Growing Spine Study Group. Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008. Apr 20;33(9):984-90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Calderaro C, Labianca L, Dolan LA, Yamashita K, Weinstein SL. Early-Onset Scoliosis Treated With Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods. Orthopedics. 2020. Nov 1;43(6):e601-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Campbell RM, Jr, Smith MD, Hell-Vocke AK. Expansion thoracoplasty: the surgical technique of opening-wedge thoracostomy. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004. Mar;86 Suppl 1:51-64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McCarthy RE, Luhmann S, Lenke L, McCullough FL. The Shilla growth guidance technique for early-onset spinal deformities at 2-year follow-up: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014. Jan;34(1):1-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Crawford CH, 3rd, Lenke LG. Growth modulation by means of anterior tethering resulting in progressive correction of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010. Jan;92(1):202-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mehdian H, Haddad S, Pasku D, Nasto LA. Mid-term results of a modified self-growing rod technique for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. Bone Joint J. 2020. Nov;102-B(11):1560-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
