Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2023 Jan 23;8(6):5672–5682. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07161

Borane-Protecting Strategy for Hydrosilylation of Phosphorus-Containing Olefins

Yuki Naganawa 1,*, Akira Fujita 1, Kei Sakamoto 1, Shinji Tanaka 1, Kazuhiko Sato 1, Yumiko Nakajima 1,*
PMCID: PMC9933236  PMID: 36816693

Abstract

graphic file with name ao2c07161_0009.jpg

Ir-catalyzed hydrosilylation of the alkenyl phosphine borane complex 1 was achieved to give the corresponding products 2. Because the phosphino group coordinates with metals and is unstable under aerobic conditions, the formation of the corresponding borane adduct was effective not only to promote the target hydrosilylation but also to keep 1 stable under aerobic conditions. The removal of coordinated borane from 2 was readily performed with the treatment by 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane to apply to further transformations. The immobilization and following deprotection of 2 on the surface of mesoporous silica were also examined.

Introduction

The considerable value of the actions of phosphines in organic synthesis such as metal ligands, reducing agents, and useful reactants has been established.1 Immobilization of such useful phosphine functionalities upon solid materials is also attractive toward the application of heterogeneous catalysts and metal trapping agents.2 Owing to the good affinity of organosilicon functionality with inorganic materials, such as silicas and aluminas, bifunctional compounds bearing alkoxy silyl groups and phosphino groups have been utilized for their immobilization on inorganic surfaces.3 Typical construction of such bifunctional structures has been realized by a C–P bond-forming process between various phosphorus reactants and organosilanes, such as the nucleophilic substitution of alkyl halide with metal phosphide3 (Scheme 1a) and the catalytic hydrophosphination of the C–C unsaturated bonds4 (Scheme 1b). Alternatively, we aimed to access the target structures based on the C–Si bond formation. Transition-metal-catalyzed hydrosilylation of olefins is one of the most common strategies to obtain via the C–Si bond formation of various useful organosilicon compounds.5

Scheme 1. Synthesis of Bifunctional Compounds with Alkoxy Silyl and Phosphino Groups.

Scheme 1

Although hydrosilylation reactions have matured substantially since the discovery of conventional platinum catalysts, the challenging issue still lies in the development of catalysts that effectively achieve hydrosilylation of olefins with coordinating functional groups, which might cause suppression of their catalytic activity.6 Hydrosilylation of olefins with a series of heteroatoms, such as oxygen,7 nitrogen,8 and sulfur,9 has been well performed by finding efficient transition-metal catalysts. However, despite their broad utility, because of their strong coordinating ability to metal catalysts as well as their reduced stability toward oxidation to phosphine oxide, hydrosilylation of olefins bearing a phosphino group rarely has been documented.10 We devised the use of an appropriate protecting method to maintain phosphorus atoms intact under hydrosilylation conditions. One of the reliable candidates is the employment of phosphine borane complexes, expanding the powerful utility of phosphines in organic synthesis.11 Protection of phosphine moieties is readily performed with the treatment by borane-dimethyl sulfide or borane-tetrahydrofuran complexes, and the removal protocols of coordinating borane have been well established to form the free phosphines.12 Herein, we report iridium-catalyzed hydrosilylation9,13 of olefins with phosphine borane complexes (Scheme 1c). The removal of coordinating borane and further transformations of the hydrosilylated products were also examined.

Results and Discussion

Initially, we sought to discover an appropriate candidate for the metal catalyst (4 mol % metal) for the model reaction of allyldiphenylphosphine borane complex (1a) and triethoxysilane (Table 1). The starting compound 1a was prepared through a one-pot reaction comprising the protection of chlorodiphenylphosphine with a borane-dimethyl sulfide complex and the substitution reaction with an allyl Grignard reagent (see the Experimental Section). The hydrosilylation reaction of 1a using conventional platinum catalysts, such as Speier’s catalyst or Karstedt′s catalyst, resulted in the formation of the target compound 2a in low yields (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). Instead, we observed the reduction of 1a to give 3a as a major side product along with other unidentified byproducts. Therefore, we next moved on to examine other transition-metal catalysts. Because our group has investigated Rh(I)14 and Ir(I)9a catalysis for hydrosilylation of olefins, the reaction with [RhCl(cod)]2 or [IrCl(cod)]2 was tested (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). Gratifyingly, the iridium-catalyzed reaction furnished 2a in an 88% yield with suppression of the production of 3a (Table 1, entry 4; Figure S1), whereas the rhodium-catalyzed reaction did not provide the desired product (Table 1, entry 3). Furthermore, the reaction with other Ir catalysts such as [Ir(OMe)(cod)]2 or [Ir(cod)2]BF4 resulted in poorer yields and selectivity (Table 1, entries 5 and 6). To ensure the necessity of the borane complex, the reaction of allyldiphenylphosphine with [IrCl(cod)]2 was conducted under an atmosphere of argon, and no desired product was observed (Table 1, entry 7). In addition, the catalytic activity of [IrCl(cod)]2 was dramatically suppressed in the presence of triphenylphosphine, which is one of the most common phosphine ligands (Table 1, entry 8). These results supported the importance of the protection of the phosphino group with borane for iridium-catalyzed hydrosilylation of allyl phosphorus compounds. A satisfactory yield could not be achieved with 1.0 equiv of hydrosilane (Table 1, entry 9). The addition of TEMPO gave almost the same results, which could rule out a reaction mechanism via radical pathways (Table 1, entry 10).

Table 1. Catalyst Screening for Hydrosilylation of 1aa.

graphic file with name ao2c07161_0006.jpg

entry catalyst % conv. (1a)b % yield (2a)b % yield (3a)b
1 Speier’s 15 7 7
2 Karstedt’s 54 14 12
3 [RhCl(cod)]2 6 n.d. <5
4 [IrCl(cod)]2 >99 88 <5
5 [IrOMe(cod)]2 25 4 10
6 [Ir(cod)2]BF4 18 n.d. 7
7c [IrCl(cod)]2 18 n.d. <5
8d [IrCl(cod)]2/PPh3 7 n.d. n.d.
9e [IrCl(cod)]2 36 10 <5
10f [IrCl(cod)]2 >99 84 10
a

Reaction conditions: catalyst (4 mol % metal), 1a (0.5 mmol), triethoxysilane (0.75 mmol) in dichloromethane (2.0 mL), r.t., 3 h.

b

Determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy with hexamethyldisiloxane (0.5 mmol) as an internal standard.

c

Allyldiphenylphosphine was used instead of 1a. Products 2a and 3a should be without borane protection.

d

Performed with triphenylphosphine (20 mol %).

e

Performed with 1.0 equiv of triethoxysilane (0.5 mmol).

f

Performed with 1.0 equiv of TEMPO (0.5 mmol).

We optimized the reaction conditions after screening the effects of deviations from standard conditions for time, reaction temperature, ratios of substrates, amounts of catalyst loading, and solvent used (see Table S1). With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we checked the scope of hydrosilylation of allyl phosphorus-borane complex 1 bearing various substituents on the phosphorus atom (Table 2). Products 2 were obtained as a pure form after chromatography on silica gel. For example, compound 2a was isolated in a 74% yield. Concerning the position of aromatic substituents, the reaction of 1b and 1c with p-tolyl and 3,5-xylyl groups proceeded smoothly to afford 2b and 2c in 59 and 70% yields, respectively. Moreover, the reaction of 1d, which contains a bulky 2,4,6-mesityl group also proceeded without problems to give 2d in a 74% yield. The electron-donating 3,5-dimethyl-4-methoxyphenyl ring was tolerated to furnish 2e in a 97% yield.15 Because the trialkylphosphines act as highly electron-donating, yet oxidatively unstable ligands,16 we next studied the hydrosilylation of 1 with a trialkylphosphine-borane complex. While the reaction of 1f with the isopropyl group resulted in a moderate 26% yield, the reaction of 1g–i with larger alkyl substituents such as cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, and tert-butyl proceeded to give 2g–i in a 72–85% yield. We tested 1j with diethylphosphite moiety to obtain 2j in a 31% yield. Several alkenyl groups other than the allyl group were examined, and the corresponding products 2k and 2l were obtained in good yields from 1k with the 1-butenyl and 1l with 1-pentenyl groups. In contrast, the reaction of vinyl diphenylphosphine borane (1m) did not proceed, probably due to the steric hindrance. As another hydrosilane, the reaction of 1a with methyldiethoxysilane was also successful to give 2n in a 41% yield.

Table 2. Scope of Substratea.

graphic file with name ao2c07161_0007.jpg

graphic file with name ao2c07161_0008.jpg

a

Reaction conditions: [IrCl(cod)]2 (2 mol %), 1 (0.5 mmol), triethoxysilane (0.75 mmol) in dichloromethane (2.0 mL), r.t., 3 h. Yield was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy with hexamethyldisiloxane (0.5 mmol) as an internal standard. The isolated yield is shown in parentheses.

According to the literature,12 the deprotection of borane complex from 2a was conducted with the treatment by 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2] octane (DABCO) in toluene at room temperature to afford 4 in a 90% yield (Scheme 2a). In combination with the treatment by hydrogen peroxide or elemental sulfur, the in situ transformation of 4 proceeded to give phosphine oxide 5a and phosphine sulfide 5b, which are useful as extractants,17 flame retardants,18 metal ligands,19 and organocatalysts20 (Scheme 2b).

Scheme 2. (a) Borane Deprotection of 2a. (b) In Situ Transformation of 2a.

Scheme 2

We also performed a gram-scale reaction of 1a (5 mmol) with triethoxysilane to furnish 1.43 g of 2a in a 71% yield (Scheme 3a). With the borane-protecting silane-coupling agent in large quantity, the immobilization of mesoporous silica, FSM-16,21 was examined (Scheme 3b). The treatment of 2a (0.5 mmol) with FSM-16 (1.0 g) in toluene at 60 °C gave functionalized mesoporous silica 6. Subsequently, the removal of a coordinating borane from 6 (0.52 g) was conducted with DABCO (2.0 mmol) to provide 7 with free phosphine (Scheme 3c).

Scheme 3. (a) Gram-Scale Synthesis of 2a. (b) Immobilization of 2a on FSM-16. (c) Borane Deprotection of Immobilized 2a.

Scheme 3

The phosphorus species on the surfaces of 6 and 7 was analyzed with solid-state 31P CP/MAS NMR (Figure 1). The NMR spectrum of 6 and 7 showed signals at 12.3 and −18.5 ppm, which are almost consistent with preimmobilized analogs 2a (15.5 ppm, CDCl3) and 4 (−17.1 ppm, C6D6), respectively. This observation indicated that immobilization and deprotection of 2a proceeded cleanly on the silica surface. The infrared spectra of 6 and 7 also showed that the characteristic B–H stretching band at 2385 cm–1 in 6 completely disappeared in 7 (Figure S2).22 Although the immobilization of silane-coupling agents bearing free phosphines significantly suffers from undesired oxidation reactions on phosphorus,23 the present method with borane protection could almost suppress the formation of phosphine oxide, which was observed around 30.0 ppm in the solid-state 31P CP/MAS NMR spectrum to allow for more precise synthesis of solid-state phosphorus compounds.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

31P CP/MAS NMR spectra of 2a immobilized on 6 and 7.

Hydrosilylation reaction of functionalized olefins by [IrCl(cod)]2 has been reported previously,9a,13,24 and the present reactions are supposed to follow a similar mechanism.

Conclusions

In summary, we achieved hydrosilylation of the alkenyl phosphorus compound 1, enabled by the strategy using a borane complex to protect the phosphorus atom from coordinating with metal atoms. [IrCl(cod)]2 was found to be an effective catalyst for the target hydrosilylation of 1 with triethoxysilane to furnish 2, which was readily purified by silica gel chromatography and sufficiently stable under aerobic conditions. The deprotection of borane from 2 could be performed using a conventional method by treatment with DABCO. As an application to material chemistry, we demonstrated the immobilization of 2a on a silica surface. The borane deprotection of silica-supported phosphorus-borane complex in 6 was successfully applied to the synthesis of pure solid-state phosphorus compound 7 without undesirable oxidation. The major advantage of the present hydrosilylation over previous methods is the ability to introduce multiple alkoxy silyl groups at once to phosphine boranes containing multiple olefins. Such compounds can be used as precursors for the mesoporous organosilica (PMO)25 synthesis, and our research group is actually investigating the possibility of using them to report in the future.

Experimental Section

General Information

All experiments were performed under an argon atmosphere using Schlenk techniques or a glovebox unless otherwise noted. CH2Cl2 toluene and Et2O were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., as “super dehydrated” and used as received. FSM-16 was kindly donated from Taiyo Kagaku Co. Ltd. Other reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. 1H, 13C{1H}, and 31P{1H} NMR spectra (1H, 600 MHz; 13C, 150 MHz; 31P, 243 MHz) were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III HD 600 spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in δ (ppm) and referenced to the residual solvent signals for 1H and 13C and 85% H3PO4 for 31P as external standards. Solid-state 31P CP/MAS NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE II+ 400 spectrometer using a 4 mm diameter ZrO2 rotor (31P, 162 MHz), and the rotation frequency was set to 12.5 kHz. Standard ramped cross-polarization (CP) was used to transfer polarization from the 1H nuclei to the nucleus of interest (31P), and the CP contact time was set to 5 ms. SPINAL-64 1H heteronuclear decoupling was applied during acquisition. 31P chemical shifts were referenced to H3PO4 at 0 ppm using (NH4)2HPO3 as an external standard (−1.6 ppm). High-resolution ESI mass spectra were obtained on a Bruker micrOTOF II. Column chromatography was performed with silica gel (Kanto Chemical Co., Inc. Silica gel 60 N, 100–210 μm). GPC chromatography was performed on a YMC multiple preparative HPLC LC-forte/R with YMC-GPC T4000-40 and T2000-40 as GPC columns. FT-IR spectra were measured on a Bruker α FT-IR Spectrometer. Elemental analyses were performed with a Yanaco CHN CORDER MT-6 instrument.

General Procedure for Catalyst Screening for Hydrosilylation of 1a (Table 1)

In a test tube with a PTFE screw cap, a catalyst (0.01 mmol/metal) was equipped. CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL), 1a (120.0 mg, 0.5 mmol), and triethoxysilane (136.9 μL, 0.75 mmol) were successively added to the test tube. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. Then, hexamethyldisiloxane (105 μL, 0.5 mmol) was added to the crude mixture to determine the yield of 2a by 1H NMR spectroscopy.

Allyldiphenylphosphine Borane (1a)26

To a solution of chlorodiphenylphosphine (10.0 mL, 54 mmol) in Et2O (50 mL), dimethyl sulfide borane (2.0 M in Et2O, 32.5 mL, 65 mmol) was added dropwise at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at room temperature. After cooling at 0 °C, allylmagnesium bromide (2.0 M in Et2O, 32.5 mL, 65 mmol) was then added dropwise to the mixture. After stirring for 18 h at room temperature, the reaction mixture was quenched with saturated NH4Cl solution and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/EtOAc = 40/60) afforded 1a in a 75% yield (9.7 g) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.69–7.66 (m, 4H), 7.50–7.43 (m, 6H), 5.78 (m, 1H), 5.11 (m, 1H), 5.06 (m, 1H), 3.06 (dd, J = 12.5, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.36–0.62 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 132.4 (d, 2JC,P = 8.9 Hz), 131.3 (d, 4JC,P = 2.3 Hz), 128.9 (d, 1JC,P = 54.1 Hz), 128.8 (d, 3JC,P = 9.9 Hz), 128.3 (d, 2JC,P = 5.2 Hz), 120.4 (d, 3JC,P = 10.9 Hz), 31.9 (d, 1JC,P = 31.9 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 15.6 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C30H32BP2]+ (2M – BH3 – H): 465.2072; found, 465.2084.

Allyldi(p-tolyl)phosphine Borane (1b)

Compound 1b was prepared from chlorodi(p-tolyl)phosphine (0.50 g, 2 mmol) by the procedure for the preparation of 1a. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 92/8) afforded 1b in a 40% yield (0.22 g) as a colorless oil (97% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.62–7.57 (m, 4H), 7.29–7.23 (m, 4H), 5.80 (m, 1H), 5.11 (m, 1H), 5.09 (m, 1H), 3.05 (dd, J = 12.6, 7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.38 (s, 6H), 1.44–0.68 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 141.6 (d, 4JC,P = 2.3 Hz), 132.4 (d, 2JC,P = 9.0 Hz), 129.6. (d, 3JC,P = 10.2 Hz), 128.6 (d, 2JC,P = 4.9 Hz), 125.7 (d, 1JC,P = 56.4 Hz), 120.2 (d, 3JC,P = 11.0 Hz), 32.1 (d, 1JC,P = 35.9 Hz), 21.5. 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 14.0 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C34H40BP2]+ (2M – BH3 – H): 521.2699; found, 521.2680.

Allyldi(3,5-dimethylphenyl)phosphine Borane (1c)

Compound 1c was prepared from chlorobis(3,5-dimethylphenyl)phosphine (0.50 g, 1.8 mmol) by the procedure for the preparation of 1a. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane) afforded 1c in a 37% yield (0.22 g) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.24 (d, J = 11.4 Hz, 4H), 7.09 (s, 2H), 5.76 (m, 1H), 5.10 (m, 1H), 5.06 (m, 1H), 3.01 (dd, J = 12.8, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.32 (s, 12H), 1.32–0.56 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 138.3 (d, 3JC,P = 10.3 Hz), 133.0 (d, 4JC,P = 2.4 Hz), 129.9 (d, 2JC,P = 8.9 Hz), 128.72 (d, 1JC,P = 53.8 Hz), 128.69 (d, 2JC,P = 5.0 Hz), 120.0 (d, 3JC,P = 11.0 Hz), 31.9 (d, 1JC,P = 35.6 Hz), 21.3. 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 14.4 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C19H26BP2Na]+ (M + N a): 319.1761; found, 319.1767.

Allyldimesitylphosphine Borane (1d)

To a solution of chlorodimesitylphosphine (0.85 g, 2.8 mmol) in Et2O (50 mL) cooled at 0 °C, allylmagnesium bromide (2.0 M in Et2O, 1.7 mL, 3.4 mmol) was added dropwise. The resulting mixture was warmed up to room temperature and stirred for 18 h. After cooling at 0 °C again, dimethyl sulfide borane (2.0 M in Et2O, 1.7 mL, 3.4 mmol) was then added dropwise to the mixture. After the additional 1 h at room temperature, the reaction was quenched with saturated NH4Cl solution and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/EtOAc = 90/10) afforded 1d in a 20% yield (0.19 g) as a white solid (97% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.79 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 4H), 5.53 (m, 1H), 4.99–4.92 (m, 2H), 3.38 (dd, J = 11.6, 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.27 (s, 12H), 2.24 (s, 6H), 1.76–0.92 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 141.5 (d, 2JC,P = 8.1 Hz), 140.0 (d, 4JC,P = 2.3 Hz), 130.9 (d, 3JC,P = 8.6 Hz), 129.2 (d, 2JC,P = 4.7 Hz), 126.4 (d, 1JC,P = 49.7 Hz), 120.4 (d, 3JC,P = 11.9 Hz), 35.8 (d, 1JC,P = 33.8 Hz), 23.3 (d, 3JC,P = 4.6 Hz), 20.9. 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 15.8 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C21H28P]+ (M – BH3 + H): 311.1923; found, 311.1934.

Allyldi(3,5-dimethyl-4-methoxyphenyl)phosphine Borane (1e)

Compound 1e was prepared from bis(3,5-dimethyl-4-methoxyphenyl)chlorophosphine (0.59 mL, 2 mmol) by the procedure for the preparation of 1a. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 67/33) afforded 1e in a 45% yield (0.32 g) as a colorless oil (95% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.29 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 4H), 5.76 (m, 1H), 5.11 (m, 1H), 5.08 (m, 1H), 3.73 (s, 6H), 2.98 (dd, J = 12.8, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.29 (s, 12 H), 1.42–0.48 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.5 (d, 4JC,P = 2.7 Hz), 132.9 (d, 2JC,P = 9.6 Hz), 131.6 (d, 3JC,P = 11.0 Hz), 128.7 (d, 2JC,P = 5.1 Hz), 123.6 (d, 1JC,P = 56.0 Hz), 120.0 (d, 3JC,P = 11.0 Hz), 59.6, 32.2 (d, 1JC,P = 36.1 Hz), 16.3. 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 12.6 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C21H27O2PNa]+ (M – BH3 + Na): 365.1641; found, 365.1635.

Allyldiisopropylphosphine Borane (1f)

Compound 1f was prepared from diisopropylchlorophosphine (0.31 mL, 2 mmol) by the procedure for the preparation of 1d. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 90/10) afforded 1f in a 35% yield (0.12 g) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.85 (m, 1H), 5.17 (m, 1H), 5.15 (m, 1H), 2.48 (m, 2H), 2.04 (m, 2H), 1.22–1.16 (m, 12H), 0.70 to −0.09 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 130.1 (d, 2JC,P = 6.3 Hz), 119.0 (d, 3JC,P = 9.2 Hz), 26.0 (d, 1JC,P = 30.3 Hz), 21.5 (d, 1JC,P = 32.1 Hz), 17.01 (d, 2JC,P = 6.7 Hz), 17.00 (d, 2JC,P = 8.2 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 31.6 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C18H44B2P2Na]+ (2M + Na): 367.3003; found, 367.3000.

Allyldicyclopentylphosphine Borane (1g)27

Compound 1g was prepared from dicyclopentylchlorophosphine (0.38 mL, 2 mmol) by the procedure for the preparation of 1a. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 90/10) afforded 1g in a 34% yield (0.15 g) as a colorless oil (92% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.81 (m, 1H), 5.19–5.11 (m, 2H), 2.48 (m, 2H), 2.05 (m, 2H), 1.90–1.50 (m, 16H), 0.72 to −0.15 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 129.7 (d, 2JC,P = 7.9 Hz), 119.0 (d, 3JC,P = 8.6 Hz), 32.3 (d, 1JC,P = 34.4 Hz), 28.8 (d, 1JC,P = 31.8 Hz), 27.9 (d, 3JC,P = 2.1 Hz), 27.8, 26.5 (d, 2JC,P = 9.0 Hz), 26.0 (d, 2JC,P = 8.6 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 28.0 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C26H52B2P2Na]+ (2M + Na): 471.3632; found, 471.3638.

Allyldicyclohexylphosphine Borane (1h)28

Compound 1h was prepared from dicyclohexylchlorophosphine (0.44 mL, 2 mmol) by the procedure for the preparation of 1a. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 95/5) afforded 1h in a 59% yield (0.30 g) as a white solid (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.83 (m, 1H), 5.18–5.11 (m, 2H), 2.47 (ddt, J = 11.7, 7.6, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 1.92–1.65 (m, 12H), 1.48–1.32 (m, 4H), 1.30–1.15 (m, 6H), 0.84 to −0.79 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 130.4 (d, 2JC,P = 6.2 Hz), 118.9 (d, 3JC,P = 9.2 Hz), 31.3 (d, 1JC,P = 31.4 Hz), 26.9 (d, 2JC,P = 6.4 Hz), 26.83 (d, 2JC,P = 7.3 Hz), 26.79, 26.7 (d, 3JC,P = 1.1 Hz), 26.0 (d, 3JC,P = 1.0 Hz), 25.8 (d, 1JC,P = 30.7 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 23.7 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C15H30BPNa]+ (M + Na): 275.2073; found, 275.2063.

Allyldi(tert-butyl)phosphine Borane (1i)

Compound 1i was prepared from di(tert-butyl)chlorophosphine (1.9 mL, 10 mmol) by the procedure for the preparation of 1d. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 90/10) afforded 1i in a 73% yield (1.47 g) as a colorless oil (93% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.02 (m, 1H), 5.15 (m, 1H), 5.12 (m, 1H), 2.54 (ddt, J = 11.9, 7.1, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 1.26 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 18H), 0.78–0.04 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 132.3 (d, 2JC,P = 3.8 Hz), 118.2 (d, 3JC,P = 9.8 Hz), 32.5 (d, 1JC,P = 25.6 Hz), 28.0, 25.0 (d, 1JC,P = 28.7 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 43.1 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C22H49BP2Na]+ (2M – BH3 + Na): 409.3299; found, 409.3292.

Allyldiethoxyphosphine Borane (1j)29

Compound 1j was prepared from diethyl chlorophosphite (0.29 mL, 2 mmol) by the procedure for the preparation of 1a. Purification by GPC chromatography (eluent: CH2Cl2) afforded 1j in a 60% yield (0.21 g) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.76 (m, 1H), 5.24–5.16 (m, 2H), 4.13–3.97 (m, 4H), 2.60 (dd, J = 11.9, 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.29 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H), 0.82–0.06 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 127.0 (d, 2JC,P = 5.0 Hz), 120.3 (d, 3JC,P = 11.5 Hz), 63.4 (d, 2JC,P = 4.5 Hz), 36.0 (d, 1JC,P = 68.5 Hz), 16.5 (d, 3JC,P = 5.5 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 143.3 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C14H32BO4P2]+ (2M – BH3 – H): 337.1866; found, 337.1867.

3-Butenyldiphenylphosphine Borane (1k)30

To a suspension of Mg (1.0 g, 41 mmol) in Et2O (40 mL), 4-bromo-1-butene (3.0 mL, 30 mmol) was added dropwise at room temperature. After stirring for 1 h, chlorodiphenylphosphine (3.6 mL, 20 mmol) was added dropwise at 0 °C. The resulting mixture was warmed up to room temperature and stirred for 18 h. After cooling at 0 °C again, dimethyl sulfide borane (2.0 M in Et2O, 12 mL, 24 mmol) was then added dropwise to the mixture. After the additional 1 h at room temperature, the reaction was quenched with saturated NH4Cl solution and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/EtOAc = 50/50) afforded 1k in an 80% yield (4.06 g) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.71–7.64 (m, 4H), 7.53–7.40 (m, 6H), 5.82 (m, 1H), 5.04 (m, 1H), 4.98 (m, 1H), 2.33–2.22 (m, 4H), 1.45–0.62 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 137.4 (d, 3JC,P = 15.3 Hz), 132.2 (d, 2JC,P = 9.0 Hz), 131.2 (d, 4JC,P = 2.4 Hz), 129.3 (d, 1JC,P = 54.7 Hz), 128.9 (d, 3JC,P = 9.8 Hz), 115.3, 27.1 (d, 2JC,P = 0.7 Hz), 25.0 (d, 1JC,P = 36.4 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 16.0 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C32H36BP2]+ (2M – BH3 – H): 493.2385; found, 493.2361.

4-Pentenyldiphenylphosphine Borane (1l)31

Compound 1l was prepared from diphenylchlorophosphine (3.6 mL, 20 mmol) by the procedure for the preparation of 1k. Grignard reagent was prepared from Mg (1.0 g, 41 mmol) and 5-bromo-1-pentene (3.6 mL, 30 mmol) in Et2O (40 mL). Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 80/20) afforded 1l in a 6% yield (0.3 g) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.71–7.62 (m, 4H), 7.52–7.41 (m, 6H), 5.72 (m, 1H), 5.03-4.97 (m, 2H), 2.27–2.10 (m, 4H), 1.63 (m, 2H), 1.36–0.60 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 137.3, 132.2 (d, 2JC,P = 9.0 Hz), 131.1 (d, 4JC,P = 2.4 Hz), 129.6 (d, 1JC,P = 54.6 Hz), 128.8 (d, 3JC,P = 9.8 Hz), 115.9, 34.8 (d, 2JC,P = 14.2 Hz), 25.0 (d, 2JC,P = 37.2 Hz), 22.2. 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 16.0 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C17H22BPNa]+ (M + Na): 291.1447; found, 291.1445.

Diphenylvinylphosphine Borane (1m)32

Compound 1l was prepared from diphenylchlorophosphine (3.6 mL, 20 mmol) and vinylmagnesium bromide (1.0 M in THF, 30.0 mL, 30 mmol) by the procedure for the preparation of 1d. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 40/60) afforded 1m in a 49% yield (2.23 g) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.72–7.60 (m, 4H), 7.55–7.41 (m, 6H), 6.58 (ddd, J = 18.3, 14.3, 12.1 Hz, 1H), 6.27 (ddd, J = 39.5, 12.1, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.11 (ddd, J = 20.0, 18.3, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 1.48–0.63 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 135.2 (d, 2JC,P = 4.6 Hz), 132.6 (d, 2JC,P = 9.5 Hz), 131.3 (d, 4JC,P = 2.3 Hz), 128.93 (d, 1JC,P = 58.4 Hz), 128.86 (d, 3JC,P = 10.1 Hz), 128.3 (d, 1JC,P = 54.0 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 15.4 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C14H16BPNa]+ (M + Na): 249.0977; found, 249.0980.

General Procedure for Iridium-Catalyzed Hydrosilylation of Allyl Phosphine Borane Complex 2 (Table 2)

In a test tube with a PTFE screw cap, [IrCl(cod)]2 (6.7 mg, 0.01 mmol) was equipped. CH2Cl2 (2.0 mL), 1 (0.5 mmol), and triethoxysilane (136.9 μL, 0.75 mmol) were successively added to the test tube. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. Then, hexamethyldisiloxane (105 μL, 0.5 mmol) was added to the crude mixture to determine the yield of 2 by 1H NMR spectroscopy. After the removal of volatile in vacuo, the crude mixture was directly purified by column chromatography on silica gel or GPC chromatography to obtain the target compound (2).

Diphenyl[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine Borane (2a)

Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 84/16) afforded 2a in a 74% yield (150.3 mg) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.70–7.63 (m, 4H), 7.49–7.40 (m, 6H), 3.76 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 2.29 (m, 2H), 1.67 (m, 2H), 1.32–0.61 (m, 3H), 1.17 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 9H), 0.73 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 132.2 (d, 2JC,P = 8.9 Hz), 131.0 (d, 4JC,P = 2.3 Hz), 129.7 (d, 1JC,P = 54.4 Hz), 128.8 (d, 3JC,P = 9.8 Hz), 58.4, 28.4 (d, 1JC,P = 35.7 Hz), 18.3, 16.9, 12.2 (d, 2JC,P = 13.5 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 15.5 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C21H34BO3PSiNa]+ (M + Na): 427.2004; found, 427.2013.

Di(p-tolyl)[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine Borane (2b)

Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 90/10) afforded 2b in a 59% yield (127.4 mg) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.55–7.52 (m, 4H), 7.23–7.21 (m, 4H), 3.76 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 2.36 (s, 6H), 2.24 (m, 2H), 1.65 (m, 2H), 1.39–0.54 (m, 3H), 1.18 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 9H), 0.73 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 141.3 (d, 4JC,P = 2.4 Hz), 132.1 (d, 2JC,P = 9.2 Hz), 129.5 (d, 3JC,P = 10.1 Hz), 126.5 (d, 1JC,P = 56.3 Hz), 58.4, 28.4 (d, 1JC,P = 36.1 Hz), 21.3, 18.3, 16.9, 12.2 (d, 2JC,P = 13.5 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 13.8 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C23H38BO3PSiNa]+ (M + Na): 455.2318; found, 455.2312.

Di(3,5-dimethylphenyl)[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine Borane (2c)

Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 95/5) afforded 2c in a 70% yield (161.6 mg) as a white solid (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.24 (m, 4H), 7.07 (s, 2H), 3.77 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 2.32 (s, 12H), 2.24 (m, 2H), 1.65 (m, 2H), 1.36–0.58 (m, 3H), 1.18 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 9H), 0.74 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 138.3 (d, 3JC,P = 10.2 Hz), 132.8 (d, 4JC,P = 2.3 Hz), 129.7 (d, 2JC,P = 8.9 Hz), 129.5 (d, 1JC,P = 54.2 Hz), 58.4, 28.6 (d, 1JC,P = 36.2 Hz), 21.5, 18.3, 16.9, 12.2 (d, 2JC,P = 13.5 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 14.2 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C25H41BO3PSi]+ (M – H): 459.2655; found, 459.2643.

Dimesityl[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine Borane (2d)

Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 90/10) afforded 2d in a 74% yield (180.6 mg) as a white solid (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 6.78 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 4H), 3.71 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 2.61 (m, 2H), 2.27 (s, 12H), 2.22 (s, 6H), 1.76–0.99 (m, 3H), 1.42 (m, 2H), 1.13 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 9H), 0.70 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 141.6 (d, 2JC,P = 8.2 Hz), 139.8 (d, 4JC,P = 2.2 Hz), 130.9 (d, 3JC,P = 8.4 Hz), 126.7 (d, 1JC,P = 50.3 Hz), 58.3, 33.3 (d, 1JC,P = 34.6 Hz), 23.2 (d, 3JC,P = 4.8 Hz), 20.8, 18.24, 18.21, 12.4 (d, 2JC,P = 15.6 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 16.7 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C27H43O3PSiNa]+ (M – BH3 + Na): 497.2611; found, 497.2602.

Di(3,5-dimethyl-4-methoxyphenyl)[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine Borane (2e)

Purification by GPC chromatography (eluent: CH2Cl2) afforded 2e in a 97% yield (254.8 mg) as a white solid (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.27 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, 4H), 3.77 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 3.72 (s, 6H), 2.27 (s, 12H), 2.20 (m, 2H), 1.63 (m, 2H), 1.40–0.54 (m, 3H), 1.18 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 0.73 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.4 (d, 4JC,P = 2.6 Hz), 132.6 (d, 2JC,P = 9.6 Hz), 131.5 (d, 3JC,P = 10.8 Hz), 124.4 (d, 1JC,P = 56.2 Hz), 59.5, 58.4, 28.6 (d, 1JC,P = 36.5 Hz), 18.2, 16.9, 16.2, 12.1 (d, 2JC,P = 13.5 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 12.4 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C27H45BO5PSi]+ (M – H): 519.2867; found, 519.2847.

Diisopropyl[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine Borane (2f)

Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 90/10) afforded 2f in a 26% yield (42.9 mg) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.81 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 1.98 (m, 2H), 1.72–1.67 (m, 4H), 1.22 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 9H), 1.20–1.13 (m, 12H), 0.73 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 0.61 to −0.04 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 58.4, 22.5 (d, 1JC,P = 30.1 Hz), 21.7 (d, 1JC,P = 32.9 Hz), 18.3, 17.5 (d, 2JC,P = 1.5 Hz), 17.2, 17.0 (d, 2JC,P = 1.6 Hz), 12.8 (d, 2JC,P = 11.6 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 31.2 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C15H38BO3PSiNa]+ (M + Na): 359.2316; found, 359.2324.

Dicyclopentyl[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine Borane (2g)

Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 90/10) afforded 2g in a 74% yield (194.2 mg) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.81 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 2.02 (m, 2H), 1.88–1.48 (m, 20H), 1.22 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 9H), 0.71 (m, 2H), 0.60 to −0.06 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 58.4, 32.8 (d, 1JC,P = 35.1 Hz), 28.0 (d, 3JC,P = 1.3 Hz), 27.8, 26.4 (d, 2JC,P = 8.8 Hz), 26.1 (d, 2JC,P = 8.5 Hz), 25.6 (d, 1JC,P = 32.0 Hz), 18.3, 17.1 (d, 3JC,P = 2.6 Hz), 12.7 (d, 2JC,P = 11.3 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 26.3 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C19H42BO3PSiNa]+ (M + Na): 411.2630; found, 411.2644.

Dicyclohexyl[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine Borane (2h)

Purification by GPC chromatography (eluent: CH2Cl2) afforded 2h in a 72% yield (150.0 mg) as a white solid (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.82 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 1.99–1.76 (m, 8H), 1.75–1.59 (m, 8H), 1.43–1.15 (m, 10H), 1.22 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 9H), 0.71 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 0.65 to −0.09 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 58.4, 31.6 (d, 1JC,P = 32.4 Hz), 26.954 (d, 2JC,P = 10.0 Hz), 26.952, 26.92 (d, 2JC,P = 10.8 Hz), 26.7, (d, 3JC,P = 2.3 Hz), 26.0 (d, 4JC,P = 0.9 Hz), 22.4 (d, 1JC,P = 30.5 Hz), 18.3, 17.6 (d, 3JC,P = 1.3 Hz), 12.7 (d, 2JC,P = 11.7 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 23.8 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C21H44O3PSi]+ (M – BH3 + H): 403.2792; found, 403.2784.

Di(tert-butyl)[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine Borane (2i)

Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 90/10) afforded 2i in an 85% yield (154.7 mg) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.82 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 1.80 (m, 2H), 1.67 (m, 2H), 1.24 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 18H), 0.73 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 0.69–0.03 (m, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 58.4, 32.0 (d, 1JC,P = 26.9 Hz), 27.9 (d, 2JC,P = 0.8 Hz), 21.1 (d, 1JC,P = 27.8 Hz), 19.0, 18.3, 12.8 (d, 2JC,P = 12.1 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 43.2 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C17H42BO3PSiNa]+ (M + Na): 387.2630; found, 387.2639.

Diethoxy[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine Borane (2j)

Purification by GPC chromatography (eluent: CH2Cl2) afforded 2j in a 31% yield (52.9 mg) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.05 (m, 2H), 3.98 (m, 2H), 3.80 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 1.79 (m, 2H), 1.69 (m, 2H), 1.27 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H), 1.20 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 9H), 0.79–0.11 (m, 3H), 0.71 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 62.9 (d, 2JC,P = 4.8 Hz), 58.4, 32.8 (d, 1JC,P = 54.2 Hz), 18.3, 16.5 (d, 3JC,P = 5.6 Hz), 15.5, 11.8 (d, 2JC,P = 13.1 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 147.2 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C13H33BO5PSi]+ (M – H): 339.1925; found, 339.1935.

Diphenyl[4-(triethoxysilyl)butyl]phosphine Borane (2k)

Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 84/16) afforded 2k in a 73% yield (152.7 mg) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.72–7.65 (m, 4H), 7.54–7.43 (m, 6H), 3.80 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 2.22 (m, 2H), 1.63-1.48 (m, 4H), 1.40–0.61 (m, 3H), 1.22 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 9H), 0.63 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 132.2 (d, 2JC,P = 8.9 Hz), 131.1 (d, 4JC,P = 2.3 Hz), 129.7 (d, 1JC,P = 54.5 Hz), 128.8 (d, 3JC,P = 9.7 Hz), 58.4, 26.3, 25.4 (d, 1JC,P = 36.9 Hz), 24.6 (d, 2JC,P = 14.9 Hz), 18.3, 10.1. 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 15.9 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C22H36BO3PSiNa]+ (M + Na): 441.2161; found, 441.2169.

Diphenyl[5-(triethoxysilyl)pentyl]phosphine Borane (2l)

Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 84/16) afforded 2l in an 85% yield (184.8 mg) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.68–7.63 (m, 4H), 7.50–7.40 (m, 6H), 3.79 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 2.19 (m, 2H), 1.51 (m, 2H), 1.35–1.34 (m, 4H), 1.33–0.52 (m, 3H), 1.20 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 9H), 0.59 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 132.1 (d, 2JC,P = 8.9 Hz), 131.1 (d, 4JC,P = 2.4 Hz), 129.7 (d, 1JC,P = 54.5 Hz), 128.8 (d, 3JC,P = 9.7 Hz), 58.3, 34.6 (d, 3JC,P = 13.7 Hz), 25.7 (d, 2JC,P = 36.8 Hz), 22.3 (d, 1JC,P = 49.3 Hz), 18.3, 10.2. 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 15.9 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C23H38BO3PSiNa]+ (M + Na): 455.2318; found, 455.2325.

Diphenyl[3-(diethoxymethylsilyl)propyl]phosphine Borane (2n)

Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 84/16) afforded 2n in a 41% yield (77.6 mg) as a colorless oil (91% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.73–7.62 (m, 4H), 7.52–7.40 (m, 6H), 3.70 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 4H), 2.27 (m, 2H), 1.63 (m, 2H), 1.41–0.65 (m, 3H), 1.16 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 0.71 (m, 2H), 0.06 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 132.2 (d, 2JC,P = 9.0 Hz), 131.1 (d, 4JC,P = 2.4 Hz), 129.7 (d, 1JC,P = 54.4 Hz), 128.8 (d, 3JC,P = 9.7 Hz), 58.2, 28.7 (d, 1JC,P = 35.4 Hz), 18.4, 17.0, 15.9 (d, 2JC,P = 12.8 Hz), −4.8. 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 15.4 (m). HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C20H32BO2PSiNa]+ (M + Na): 397.1898; found, 397.1906.

Diphenyl[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine (4)33

In a test tube with a PTFE screw cap, DABCO (56.0 mg, 0.5 mmol) was equipped. Toluene (2.5 mL) and 2a (100.0 mg, 0.25 mmol) were successively added to the test tube. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. After the removal of volatile in vacuo, the crude mixture was directly purified by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/AcOEt = 84/16) to obtain 4 in a 90% yield (87.8 mg) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, C6D6): δ 7.48–7.45 (m, 4H), 7.09–7.02 (m, 6H), 3.75 (q, 2JH,H = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 2.12 (m, 2H), 1.81 (m, 2H), 1.12 (t, 2JH,H = 7.0 Hz, 9H), 0.89 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, C6D6): δ 140.0 (d, 1JC,P = 14.6 Hz), 133.2 (d, 2JC,P = 18.5 Hz), 128.6 (d, 3JC,P = 6.4 Hz), 128.5, 58.5, 32.0 (d, 1JC,P = 12.5 Hz), 20.2 (d, 3JC,P = 17.9 Hz), 18.6, 12.8 (d, 2JC,P = 12.4 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, C6D6): δ −17.1. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C21H32O3PSi]+ (M + H): 391.1853; found, 391.1850.

Diphenyl[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine Oxide (5a)34

In a test tube with a PTFE screw cap, DABCO (56.0 mg, 0.5 mmol) was equipped. Toluene (2.5 mL) and 2a (100.0 mg, 0.25 mmol) were successively added to the test tube. The resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. Then, H2O2 (30%, 60.0 μL) was added to the mixture. After stirring for 1 h at room temperature, the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: EtOAc) afforded 5a in a 71% yield (72.4 mg) as a colorless oil (95% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, C6D6): δ 7.85–7.77 (m, 4H), 7.06–7.02 (m, 6H), 3.72 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 2.19 (m, 2H), 2.01 (m, 2H), 1.11 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 9H), 0.82 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, C6D6): δ 135.4 (d, 1JC,P = 95.0N Hz), 131.2 (d, 4JC,P = 2.2 Hz), 131.1 (d, 2JC,P = 8.9 Hz), 128.6 (d, 3JC,P = 11.2 Hz), 58.5, 33.0 (d, 1JC,P = 70.5 Hz), 18.5, 16.1 (d, 3JC,P = 3.7 Hz), 12.4 (d, 2JC,P = 12.8 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, C6D6): δ 27.7. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C21H32O4PSi]+ (M + H): 407.1802; found, 407.1822.

Diphenyl[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]phosphine Sulfide (5b)

In a test tube with a PTFE screw cap, DABCO (56.0 mg, 0.5 mmol) and S8 (16.5 mg, 0.065 mmol) were equipped. Toluene (2.5 mL) and 2a (200.0 mg, 0.5 mmol) were successively added to the test tube. The resulting mixture was stirred at 40 °C for 4 h. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was treated with pH2 buffer solution (0.5 M H2SO4 and 1.5 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution),35 and then the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc. The organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: hexane/toluene = 84/16) afforded 5b in an 84% yield (176.5 mg) as a colorless oil (>99% purity).

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.86–7.78 (m, 4H), 7.50–7.41 (m, 6H), 3.76 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 2.54 (m, 2H), 1.78 (m, 2H), 1.17 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 9H), 0.74 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 133.1 (d, 1JC,P = 79.0 Hz), 131.3 (d, 4JC,P = 2.8 Hz), 131.1 (d, 2JC,P = 10.0 Hz), 128.6 (d, 3JC,P = 11.8 Hz), 58.4, 35.2 (d, 1JC,P = 55.1 Hz), 18.3, 16.2 (d, 3JC,P = 2.1 Hz), 11.5 (d, 2JC,P = 16.1 Hz). 31P{1H} NMR (243 MHz, CDCl3): δ 42.0. HRMS (ESI): m/z calcd for [C21H32O3PSSi]+ (M + H): 423.1574; found, 423.1581.

Immobilization of 2a on FSM-16 (Scheme 3b)

A two-neck flask connected to a condenser was charged with a stir bar and FSM-16 (1.0 g). Toluene (25 mL) and 2a (202.2 mg, 0.5 mmol) were successively added to the flask. The resulting suspension was vigorously stirred at 60 °C for 5 h. The suspension was then filtered and washed with toluene using a Soxhlet extractor. The material was dried under reduced pressure to give functionalized mesoporous silica 6 (1.08 g).

Anal. Found: C, 10.03; H 1.43.

Removal of Coordinating Borane from 6 (Scheme 3c)

A two-neck flask connected to a condenser was charged with a stir bar, 6 (0.52 g), and DABCO (224.3 mg, 2.0 mmol). Toluene (20 mL) was added to the flask, and then the resulting suspension was vigorously stirred at reflux temperature for 16 h. The suspension was then filtered and washed with toluene using a Soxhlet extractor. The material was dried under reduced pressure to give functionalized mesoporous silica 7 (0.47 g).

Anal. Found: C, 10.69; H 1.09.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported partly by JST-CREST (Core Research for Evolutionary Science and Technology Grant Numbers, JPMJCR21B1).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c07161.

  • Optimization of the reaction conditions (Table S1); identification of main product 2a and byproduct 3a by crude NMR (Figure S1); infrared spectra of the functionalized mesoporous silica 6 and 7 (Figure S2); and copies of 1H, 13C, and 31P NMR spectra (Figures S3–S31) (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao2c07161_si_001.pdf (5.7MB, pdf)

References

  1. Musina E. I.; Balueva A. S.; Karasik A. A. Phosphines: Preparation, Reactivity and Applications. Organophosphorus Chem. 2019, 48, 1–63. 10.1039/9781788016988-00001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. a McNamara C. A.; Dixon M. J.; Bradley M. Recoverable Catalysts and Reagents Using Recyclable Polystyrene-Based Supports. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 3275–3300. 10.1021/cr0103571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Leadbeater N. E.; Marco M. Preparation of Polymer-Supported Ligands and Metal Complexes for Use in Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 3217–3274. 10.1021/cr010361c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Guinó M.; Hii K. K. Applications of Phosphine-Functionalised Polymers in Organic Synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 608–617. 10.1039/B603851B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. a Shyu S.-G.; Cheng S.-W.; Tzou D.-L. Immobilization of Rh(PPh3)3Cl on Phosphinated MCM-41 for Catalytic Hydrogenation of Olefins. Chem. Commun. 1999, 2337–2338. 10.1039/a907207a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Gao H.; Angelici R. J. Rhodium–Phosphine Complex Catalysts Tethered on Silica-Supported Heterogeneous Metal Catalysts: Arene Hydrogenation Under Atmospheric Pressure. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1999, 149, 63–74. 10.1016/S1381-1169(99)00182-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Merckle C.; Blümel J. Bifunctional Phosphines Immobilized on Inorganic Oxides. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 3617–3623. 10.1021/cm011018r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Merckle C.; Haubrich S.; Blümel J. Immobilized Rhodium Hydrogenation Catalysts. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 627, 44–54. 10.1016/S0022-328X(01)00696-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Tsiavaliaris G.; Haubrich S.; Merckle C.; Blümel J. New Bifunctional Chelating Phosphine Ligands for Immobilization of Metal Complexes on Oxidic Supports. Synlett 2001, 2001, 391–393. 10.1055/s-2001-11386. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Wang L.; Jia M.; Shylesh S.; Philippi T.; Seifert A.; Ernst S.; Singh A. P.; Thiel W. R. A Covalently Immobilized Triphenylphosphine Rhodium Complex: Synthesis, Characterization, and Application in Catalytic Olefin Hydrogenation. ChemCatChem 2010, 2, 1477–1482. 10.1002/cctc.201000133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; g Bogár K.; Krumlinde P.; Bacsik Z.; Hedin N.; Bäckvall J.-E. Heterogenized Wilkinson-Type Catalyst for Transfer Hydrogenation of Carbonyl Compounds. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 2011, 4409–4414. 10.1002/ejoc.201100339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; h Gan W.; Dyson P. J.; Laurenczy G. Heterogeneous Silica-Supported Ruthenium Phosphine Catalysts for Selective Formic Acid Decomposition. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 3124–3130. 10.1002/cctc.201300246. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; i Tran Q. T.; Bergamini J.-F.; Mangeney C.; Lagrost C.; Pellon P. Grafting of Borane-Protected Aliphatic and Aromatic Aminophosphine Ligands to Glassy Carbon Electrodes. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 844–847. 10.1016/j.elecom.2011.05.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. a Glueck D. S. Metal-Catalyzed P–C Bond Formation via P–H Oxidative Addition: Fundamentals and Recent Advances. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 14276–14285. 10.1021/acs.joc.0c00667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Koshti V.; Gaikwad S.; Chikkali S. H. Contemporary Avenues in Catalytic P–H Bond Addition Reaction: A Case Study of Hydrophosphination. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014, 265, 52–73. 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Rosenberg L. Mechanisms of Metal-Catalyzed Hydrophosphination of Alkenes and Alkynes. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 2845–2855. 10.1021/cs400685c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Mimeau D.; Delacroix O.; Join B.; Gaumont A.-C. Easy Acess to Alkoxyphosphine Boranes Starting from Unactivated Alkenes. C. R. Chim. 2004, 7, 845–854. 10.1016/j.crci.2004.02.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. a Sunada Y.; Nagashima H.. Hydrosilylation Catalyzed by Base Metals. In Organosilicon Chemistry: Novel Approaches and Reactions; Hiyama T.; Oestreich M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2019; pp 417–437. [Google Scholar]; b Hofmann R.; Vlatković M.; Wiesbrock F. Fifty Years of Hydrosilylation in Polymer Science: A Review of Current Trends of Low-Cost Transition-Metal and Metal-Free Catalysts, Non-Thermally Triggered Hydrosilylation Reactions, and Industrial Applications. Polymers 2017, 9, 534. 10.3390/polym9100534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Du X.; Huang Z. Advances in Base-Metal-Catalyzed Alkene Hydrosilylation. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 1227–1243. 10.1021/acscatal.6b02990. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Nakajima Y.; Shimada S. Hydrosilylation Reaction of Olefins: Recent Advances and Perspectives. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 20603–20616. 10.1039/C4RA17281G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Troegel D.; Stohrer J. Recent Advances and Actual Challenges in Late Transition Metal Catalyzed Hydrosilylation of Olefins from an Industrial Point of View. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 1440–1459. 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.12.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Marciniec B.Hydrosilylation: A Comprehensive Review on Recent Advances; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  6. Naganawa Y.; Inomata K.; Sato K.; Nakajima Y. Hydrosilylation Reactions of Functionalized Alkenes. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020, 61, 151513 10.1016/j.tetlet.2019.151513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. a Jakoobi M.; Dardun V.; Veyre L.; Meille V.; Camp C.; Thieuleux C. Developing a Highly Active Catalytic System Based on Cobalt Nanoparticles for Terminal and Internal Alkene Hydrosilylation. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 11732–11740. 10.1021/acs.joc.0c01439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Inomata K.; Naganawa Y.; Guo H.; Sato K.; Nakajima Y. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Selective Hydrosilylation Reaction of Allyl-Functionalized PEG Derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019, 60, 151086 10.1016/j.tetlet.2019.151086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Shin H.; Moon B. Careful Investigation of the Hydrosilylation of Olefins at Poly(ethylene glycol) Chain Ends and Development of a New Silyl Hydride to Avoid Side Reactions. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polm. Chem. 2018, 56, 527–536. 10.1002/pola.28924. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Bouvet-Marchand A.; Chatard C.; Graillot A.; Boutevin G.; Loubat C.; Grosso D. Influence of Experimental Parameters on the Side Reactions of Hydrosilylation of Allyl Polyethers Studied by a Fractional Factorial Design. React. Chem. Eng. 2018, 3, 696–706. 10.1039/C8RE00062J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. a Wu H.; Zheng C.; Chen N.; Zhu J.; Gao D. (Dicyclopentadiene) Platinum(II) Dichloride: An Efficient Catalyst for the Hydrosilylation Reaction between Alkenes and Triethoxysilane. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 1576–1578. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.03.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Sabourault N.; Mignani G.; Wagner A.; Mioskowski C. Platinum Oxide (PtO2): A Potent Hydrosilylation Catalyst. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2117–2119. 10.1021/ol025658r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. a Srinivas V.; Nakajima Y.; Sato K.; Shimada S. Iridium-Catalyzed Hydrosilylation of Sulfur-Containing Olefins. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 12–15. 10.1021/acs.orglett.7b02940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Song L.-J.; Ding S.; Wang Y.; Zhang X.; Wu Y.-D.; Sun J. Ir-Catalyzed Regio- and Stereoselective Hydrosilylation of Internal Thioalkynes: A Combined Experimental and Computational Study. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 6157–6164. 10.1021/acs.joc.6b00854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhu J.; Cui W.-C.; Wang S.; Yao Z.-J. Visible Light-Driven Radical trans-Hydrosilylation of Electron-Neutral and -Rich Alkenes with Tertiary and Secondary Hydrosilanes. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 14600–14609. 10.1021/acs.joc.8b02409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. a Bouhadir G.; Amgoune A.; Bourissou D.. Phosphine-Boranes and Related Ambiphilic Compounds. In Advances in Organometallic Chemistry; Hill A. F.; Fink M. J., Eds.; Academic Press, 2010; Vol. 58, pp 1–107. [Google Scholar]; b Staubitz A.; Robertson A. P. M.; Sloan M. E.; Manners I. Amine- and Phosphine-Borane Adducts: New Interest in Old Molecules. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 4023–4078. 10.1021/cr100105a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Brunel J. M.; Faure B.; Maffei M. Phosphane-Boranes: Synthesis, Characterization and Synthetic Applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 178–180, 665–698. 10.1016/S0010-8545(98)00072-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. a Lloyd-Jones G. C.; Taylor N. P. Mechanism of Phosphine Borane Deprotection with Amines: The Effects of Phosphine, Solvent and Amine on Rate and Efficiency. Chem.–Eur. J. 2015, 21, 5423–5428. 10.1002/chem.201406585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Imamoto T.; Kusumoto T.; Suzuki N.; Sato K. Phosphine Oxides and Lithium Aluminum Hydride-Sodium Borohydride-Cerium(III) Chloride: Synthesis and Reactions of Phosphine-Boranes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 5301–5303. 10.1021/ja00304a061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. a Gao W.; Ding S. Progress on Iridium-Catalyzed Hydrosilylation of Alkenes and Alkynes. Synthesis 2020, 52, 3549–3563. 10.1055/s-0040-1707239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Xie X.; Zhang X.; Yang H.; Ji X.; Li J.; Ding S. Iridium-Catalyzed Hydrosilylation of Unactivated Alkenes: Scope and Application to Late-Stage Functionalization. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 1085–1093. 10.1021/acs.joc.8b02838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Inomata K.; Naganawa Y.; Wang Z. A.; Sakamoto K.; Matsumoto K.; Sato K.; Nakajima Y. Selective Hydrosilylation of Allyl Chloride with Trichlorosilane. Commun. Chem. 2021, 4, 63. 10.1038/s42004-021-00502-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. In contrast, the preparation of 1 with the electron-withdrawing p-trifluoromethylphenyl group was failed probably due to the instability of the corresponding product, allyldi(p-trifluoromethylphenyl)phosphine-borane complex attributed to the weak coordination between phosphorus and borane; Taylor N. P.; Gonzalez J. A.; Nichol G. S.; García-Domínguez A.; Leach A. G.; Lloyd-Jones G. C. A Lewis Base Nucleofugality Parameter, NBF, and Its Application in an Analysis of MIDA-Boronate Hydrolysis Kinetics. J. Org. Chem. 2022, 87, 721–729. 10.1021/acs.joc.1c02729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Valentine D. H. Jr.; Hillhouse J. H. Electron-Rich Phosphines in Organic Synthesis II. Catalytic Applications. Synthesis 2003, 2437–2460. 10.1055/s-2003-42460. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. a Flett D. S. Solvent Extraction in Hydrometallurgy: The Role of organophosphorus Extractants. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 690, 2426–2438. 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2004.11.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Baker R. J.; Fuchs J.; Richards A. J.; Ogilvie H. V. Perfluorinated Phosphine Oxide and Sulfides as Extractants for Heavy Metals and Radionuclides. J. Environ. Manage. 2011, 92, 2781–2785. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Turanov A. N.; Karandashev V. K.; Baulin D. V.; Baulin V. E. Extraction of Uranium(VI), Thorium(IV), and Trivalent Rare Earths from Nitric Acid Solutions with {[2-(2-Diphenylphosphoryl)-4-ethylphenoxy]ethyl}diphenylphosphine Oxide. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 90, 1012–1019. 10.1134/S1070363220060122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Batchu N. K.; Li Z.; Verbelen B.; Binnemans K. Structural Effects of Neutral Organophosphorus Extractants on Solvent Extraction of Rare-Earth Elements from Aqueous and Non-Aqueous Nitrate Solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 255, 117711 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. a Yao C.; Yang H.; Li Y. A Review on Organophosphate Flame Retardants in the Environment: Occurrence, Accumulation, Metabolism and Toxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 795, 148837 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Alam M. M.; Biswas B.; Nedeltchev A. K.; Han H.; Ranasinghe A. D.; Bhowmik P. K.; Goswami K. Phosphine Oxide Containing Poly(pyridinium salt)s as Fire Retardant Materials. Polymers 2019, 11, 1141. 10.3390/polym11071141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Liu Y. L.; Liu Y. L.; Jeng R. J.; Chiu Y.-S. Triphenylphosphine Oxide-Based Bismaleimide and Poly(bismaleimide): Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties. J. Polym. Sci., Part A Polym. Chem. 2001, 39, 1716–1725. 10.1002/pola.1149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. a Platt A. W. G. Lanthanide Phosphine Oxide Complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 340, 62–78. 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.09.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Grushin V. V. Mixed Phosphine-Phosphine Oxide Ligands. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1629–1662. 10.1021/cr030026j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. a Xie C.; Smaligo A. J.; Song X.-R.; Kwon O. Phosphorus-Based Catalysis. ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 536–558. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Guo H.; Fan Y. C.; Sun Z.; Wu Y.; Kwon O. Phosphine Organocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 10049–10293. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. a Yanagisawa T.; Shimizu T.; Kuroda K.; Kato C. The Preparation of Alkyltrimethylammonium–Kanemite Complexes and Their Conversion to Microporous Materials. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63, 988–992. 10.1246/bcsj.63.988. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Inagaki S.; Koiwai A.; Suzuki N.; Fukushima Y.; Kuroda K. Syntheses of Highly Ordered Mesoporous Materials, FSM-16, Derived from Kanemite. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1996, 69, 1449–1457. 10.1246/bcsj.69.1449. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rudolph R. W.; Parry R. W.; Farran C. F. The Structure of Phosphine Borane. Inorg. Chem. 1966, 5, 723–726. 10.1021/ic50039a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. a Bluemel J. Reactions of Phosphines with Silicas: A Solid-State NMR Study. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 5050–5056. 10.1021/ic00100a033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Kramer J.; Nöllen E.; Buijs W.; Driessen W. L.; Reedijk J. Investigations into the Recovery of Wilkinson′s Catalyst with Silica-Immobilised P-Donor Ligands. React. Funct. Polym. 2003, 57, 1–11. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2003.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. It was also reported that the nanoparticle generated from [IrCl(cod)]2 was almost inactive in the hydrosilylation reaction, and this reaction proceeds in a homogeneous catalysis; Riener K.; Meister T. K.; Gigler P.; Herrmann W. A.; Kühn F. E. Mechanistic Insights into the Iridium-Catalyzed Hydrosilylation of Allyl Compounds. J. Catal. 2015, 331, 203–209. 10.1016/j.jcat.2015.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. a Naganawa Y.; Maegawa Y.; Guo H.; Gholap S. S.; Tanaka S.; Sato K.; Inagaki S.; Nakajima Y. Heterogenous Hydrosilylation Reaction Catalysed by Platinum Complexes Immobilized on Bipyridine-Periodic Mesoporous Organosilicas. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 5534–5540. 10.1039/c9dt00078j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Waki M.; Maegawa Y.; Hara K.; Goto Y.; Shirai S.; Yamada Y.; Mizoshita N.; Tani T.; Chun W.-J.; Muratsugu S.; Tada M.; Fukuoka A.; Inagaki S. A Solid Chelating Ligand: Periodic Mesoporous Organosilica Containing 2,2‘-Bipyridine within the Pore Walls. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 4003–4011. 10.1021/ja4131609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schirmer M.-L.; Jopp S.; Holz J.; Spannenberg A.; Werner T. Organocatalyzed Reduction of Tertiary Phosphine Oxides. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 26–29. 10.1002/adsc.201500762. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kasák P.; Widhalm M. An Expedient Synthesis of Dialkylphosphane-Borane Complexes from Sodium Phosphide, and Their Alkylation under Phase-Transfer Conditions. Synthesis 2007, 2007, 2987–2994. 10.1055/s-2007-990777. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Toste F. D.; Chatterjee A. K.; Grubbs R. H. Functional Group Diversity by Ruthenium-Catalyzed Olefin Cross-Metathesis. Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74, 7–10. 10.1351/pac200274010007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Belabassi Y.; Antczak M. I.; Tellez J.; Montchamp J.-L. Borane Complexes of The H3PO2 P(III) Tautomer: Useful Phosphinate Equivalents. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 9181–9190. 10.1016/j.tet.2008.07.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmidbaur H.; Sigl M.; Schier A. Synthesis and Structure of Cyclic Phosphine-Boranes. J. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 529, 323–327. 10.1016/S0022-328X(96)06616-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sigl M.; Schier A.; Schmidbaur H. Temperature-dependent Ring-Opening and -Closure of a Cyclic Phosphane-Borane. Chem. Ber. 1997, 130, 951–954. 10.1002/cber.19971300722. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ortial S.; Thompson D. A.; Montchamp J.-L.. Mixed 1,1-Bisphosphorus Compounds: Synthesis, Alkylation, and Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons Olefination Reactions. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 8166–8179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu J.; Yan L.; Ding Y.; Jiang M.; Dong W.; Song X.; Liu T.; Zhu H. Promoting Effect of Al on Tethered Ligand-Modified Rh/SiO2 Catalysts for Ethylene Hydroformylation. Appl. Catal., A 2015, 492, 127–132. 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.12.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Castro A.; Alonso J. C.; Neves P.; Valente A. A.; Ferreira P. Dioxomolybdenum(VI) Epoxidation Catalyst Supported on Mesoporous Silica Containing Phosphane Oxide Groups. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 2010, 602–607. 10.1002/ejic.200900918. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Clarke C.; Fox D. J.; Pedersen D. S.; Warren S. The Lithiation and Acyl Transfer Reactions of Phosphine Oxides, Sulfides and Boranes in the Synthesis of Cyclopropanes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 1329–1336. 10.1039/b817436a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao2c07161_si_001.pdf (5.7MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES