Abstract
Background
Nurses who play the leading role in caring for patients, especially nurses in the chemotherapy department who are constantly exposed to high-risk drugs and their side effects, should pay more attention to occupational safety. This study was performed to determine the effect of training chemotherapy safety standards using a smartphone application on nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and performance.
Methods
The whole enumeration of fifty oncology nurses was recruited who they worked in 3 hospitals affiliated with Lorestan University of Medical Sciences (west of Iran). The study was conducted from June to November 2021. The training was done for four weeks with a smartphone application, including six main courses of familiarity with hazardous drugs, Personal Protective Equipment, preparation, storage and transfer, spilling, and wastes disposal of hazardous drudges . The nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and performance questionnaire were completed before, immediately after, and one month after the intervention. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, descriptive and inferential statistical tests of independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, repeated measures analysis of variance, and the Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) model.
Results
Mean knowledge score of participants before, immediately after, and one month after the intervention was (47.18 ± 8.19), (60.08 ± 3.82), and (61.88 ± 3.45), respectively. The mean attitude score of participants before, immediately after, and one month after the intervention was (30.34 ± 3.94), (34.32 ± 3.25), and (34.98 ± 2.88), in order, and the mean performance score of participants before, immediately after, and one month after the intervention was (43.60 ± 5.11), (51.78 ± 3.15) and (52.88 ± 3.06), respectively. The mean nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and performance score increased significantly over time (P < 0.001).
Conclusions
Teaching chemotherapy safety standards using the application improved oncology nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and performance. Appropriate educational programs, especially by new methods such as E-learning, are recommended for providing safety for nurses.
Keywords: Chemotherapy, Education, Mobile application, Nurse, Safety
Background
Today, cancer is one of the leading health concerns of human societies [1]. The number of 19.3 million new cancer cases and approximately 10 million deaths were estimated worldwide in 2020 [2]. According to the estimation reported by the World Cancer Observatory in 2020, in Iran there has been 131,191 new cases of cancer in both sexes (70,704 Men and 60,487 Women) as well as 79,136 people died due to cancer [3]. Chemotherapy is the most common treatment for many cancers [4]. However, anticancer drugs are also teratogenic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic agents for humans [5]. Oncology nurses, who play the most critical role in the care of cancer patients, have the most exposure to antineoplastic drugs during the preparation, injection, transfer, storage, and elimination of waste [6, 7]. Exposure to these drugs may cause side effects such as primary DNA damage [8], increased risk of breast and rectal cancer [9], the presence of mutagenic agents in the urine [10], and adverse effects on the reproductive system [11], and skin disorders [12] for nurses. International organizations such as the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American Society of Hospital Pharmacists (ASHP), the Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recommend standard guidelines to prevent and minimize occupational accidents of health care providers [13, 14]. Despite the availability of these guidelines, many conducted studies report an inappropriate situation of observing safety standards by nurses in Egypt [14], Iran [15, 16], Iraq [17], and Cyprus [18], and show the need to implement the guidelines and training in this field in oncology units.
Non-compliance with safety proceedings when working with antineoplastic drugs can be due to nurses’ defects in knowledge, attitude, and performance (KAP). A study by Nwagbo et al. (2017) showed that oncology nurses needed to improve their knowledge in implementing standard guidelines [6]. People’s attitude can change their behavior and affect their safety culture directly or indirectly [19]. The third factor that indicates nurses’ non-compliance with safety standards is their performance with antineoplastic drugs. Gamal et al. [20] found that nurses had poor performance in this area and did not follow international standards properly. In Zayed et al. [14] study, two-thirds of nurses’ knowledge about the safe use of antineoplastic drugs was reported to be satisfactory, but only 36.4% of nurses had an appropriate performance. Koulounti et al. [18] also pointed out the need to implement educational programs with new techniques and methods to update nurses to protect them from antineoplastic drug side effects.
Various strategies have been used to improve the safety of nurses in oncology wards. In a systematic review performed by Crickman and Finnell [21], five methods were introduced to reduce antineoplastic drugs exposure, including the development of engineering controls, the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), medical and environmental monitoring of common antineoplastic drugs, and risk assessment and training for health care providers using a comprehensive hazardous drugs (HDs) control program for improving the occupational safety of nurses.
Choosing the teaching method can be influenced by the existing facilities to achieve educational goals [22]. One of the most critical changes in education in the new age of information is the paradigm change from teacher-centered to inclusive education [23]. E-learning is overgrowing as a new method and an alternative to providing education in nursing [24]. Due to the interference of face-to-face retraining with nurse’s working hours or their leisure time, their lots of commitments, intensive shifts, and lack of motivation, using E-learning as an alternative or a complement method of traditional training can be a good approach for nurses’ retraining; Mobile learning is an emerging form of educational technology that complements learning outcomes by creating conversations, and sharing information and knowledge, and assisting colleagues and educators regardless of their geographical distance [25].
Surveys show that many studies have been conducted in the field of chemotherapy safety standards, including the study of Alehashem and Baniasadi [26] to evaluate the KAP of oncology nurses for the safe use of antineoplastic drugs in Iran, cross-sectional study byAsefa et al. [27] in Ethiopia, and the interventional study of Mishra et al. [28]. Most of the reviewed studies were non-interventional or interventional with educational methods such as lecture [22], video [29], and PowerPoint [28]. However, there was no study teaching these standards through E-learning. Thus, the present study aimed to detect the effect of teaching chemotherapy safety standards using a smartphone application on the KAP of oncology nurses.
Method
Design, setting, and sample
This semi-experimental one-group posttest-pretest study was performed on three hospitals affiliated with Lorestan University of Medical Sciences (LUMS)/ (west of Iran) from June to November in 2021. We used the total population sampling method. The population was the whole oncology nurses (57 nurses), from which 50 nurses were selected as a sample.
The inclusion criteria were as follows; to be Iranian nurses who speak in Persian language, employment in the chemotherapy wards, having at least a bachelor’s degree, not participating in a similar research project concurrent or before, and access to a smartphone. Also, in case of unwillingness to continue cooperating with the study, not attending the orientation meeting for getting familiar with the application, and changing the wards where nurses worked, the participants were excluded from the study. Two participants did not enter the study due to not having a smartphone. Five nurses were excluded because of being transfered from the oncology ward to other hospital unites.
Data collection
We used a questionnaire developed by Alehashem and Baniasadi [26] to assess knowledge, attitude and perforamce (KAP) of oncology nurses in terms of safe handling of antineoplastic druges (ANPDs). This questionnaire is in Persian language and consistes of two below parts.
The part of demographic characteristices
This part of questionaire consistes of 13 questions about age, sex, marital status, level of education, employment status, nurse position, work experiences, work experiences in oncology unites, experiences of working with antineoplastic druges, membership in any oncology associations, the most common of work shifts (Morning, Evening or Night shifts), average working hours per week, and having previous refreshing courses in workplace.
Questionnaire to assess the KAP of nurses about oncology safety standards
This part of the questionnaire consistes of three components and 33 items totally. The commponets is in the 5-point Likert spectrum (strongly agree = 5, agree = 4, neutral = 3, disagree = 2 and strongly disagree = 1), which is completed as a self-report. The first component includes 13 questions to assess nurse’s knowledge about protocols and standards for the preparation, management, wasting disposal, and storage of antineoplastic drugs. The second section consists of 8 questions assessing nurse’s attitudes, feelings and concerns toward working at oncology unites. The last component contains 12 items evaluating participant’s performance in terms of preparation, management, wasting disposal, and storage of antineoplastic drugs. The mean scores were calculated for three sections of KAP, and the higher mean score indicated more agreement with the statements in the items. The mean score as cut-off point used to assess the level of KAP. This score was considered as 36 for knowledge with a range of 12–60, 24 for attitude with a range of 8–40, and 39 for performance with a range of 13–65. The scores greater than the mean score were considered sufficient for each components of KAP [26].
Content validity is a measure that shows how well an instrument measures all aspects of the desired construct. Two main types of Content Validity Index (CVI) are Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and Scale Content Validity Index (S-CVI). Moreover, a scale with excellent content validity should consist of I-CVIs of 0.78 or higher [30]. In the study by Alehashem and Baniasadi the content validity of the questionnaire was assessed by a panel of specialists, including two pharmacists, two toxicologists (with more than two years of experience in oncology units), and four oncology nurses (with more than five years of experience with antineoplastic drugs). The CVI-value was reported to be 0.78 which is acceptable. The internal consistency for different components of the instrument was measured separately using Cronbach’s alpha with a minimum internal stability requirement of 0.7 [26]. In this study, Cronbach’s alpha for knowledge, attitude, and performance were determined to be 0.87, 0.57, and 0.66, respectively.
Intervention
Pre-intervention: design and development of a smartphone application
The design process of educational application was carried out from March to June 2021 in two steps: 1. Developing and evaluating the content, and 2. Building and evaluating the application. It is worthy to note that Iranian community as well as all Iranian nurses are single-nationality. Therefore, the application desgined in just Persian version.
1. Developing and evaluating the content
One researcher (Z.H) extracted the scientific content of the software from reliable sources, including high-risk drug training protocols and standard instructions on how to work with these drugs. The scientific content was compiled based on reference books, recent articles, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard guidelines, and nursing interventions of Iran’s National Standard Organization [13, 31–36]. The structure and the sequence of the content of the software was determined based on the following sections:
Familiarity with hazardous drugs: types of cancer treatment, chemotherapy, ways of exposure to HDs, and complications of exposure with HDs
Personal Protective Equipment: the necessity of using PPE, gown, head covering, foot covering, gloves, mask, protective glasses, face protection
Handling of hazardous Drugs: physical conditions for drug preparation, drug preparation equipment
Storage and transfer of hazardous drugs: transfer or storage of prepared drugs and half-used vials
Spilling of hazardous drugs: leakage kit, necessary measures in case of leakage into the environment, necessary measures in case of cytotoxic contamination in biological cabinet or isolator
Disposal of hazardous drudges wastes
References
Many images and videos were used to make the educational content more exciting and compelling, adapted to the standard instructions. The content validity was confirmed by an oncologist, three nursing faculty members with the experiences of theoretical and clinical training in oncology, and an expert of educational design. Disagreements were discussed and exchanged until a consensus was reached. Following the necessary modification in the application’s content, the experts again approved the final version.
2. Building and evaluating the application
In this step, the team firstly provided a paper-based design of the format of the application. Therefore, based on the educational purposes and content defined in previous step, the team determined the order and structure of the content as well as the location of them. The consequences of the design stage was the components considered in the homepage of the application detailed in below:
The logo of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences: the research environments were oncology department affiliated with this university
An access menu (including the items of About us, App information, Content us and Exit)
Six icons for the main content included of Hazardous Drugs (HDs), Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), Handling of hazardous drugs, Storage and transfer of hazardous drugs, Spilling of hazardous drugs and Disposal of hazardous drudges wastes
The icon of References
Then based on paper-design of the application, a web designer specialist provided the application programming with Android language in the Android Studio environment based on Java. Since the cellphones of nurses were based on either Android or IOS platform, the application were prepared for both mentioned platforms. OncoNS was chosen for the app’s name, which stands for Oncology Nursing Safety. User-friendliness principles were considered in developing the software. To do this, the application was designed for installation with just one click and in a short time. Moreover, the users could work with the application in a simple and straightforward way. Users could quickly move between pages and click on each part of the content without needing technical information. Camtasia Studio used to dub the videos from English to Persian is a strong and popular application for professional and fast modification of films, video recording and constructing the educational videoes. In the application, all videoes were addressed by putting the Uniform Resource Locator (URL) next them. It was done to observe the ethical consideration and facilitate to access the original version of videoes. Futhuremore, in designing the application we used the opinions of a panel of experts and their comments were discussed until a consensus was reached. Finally, the expert panel approved the final version of the application (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Photos of the OncoNS application
The intervention
A 20-min face-to-face meeting was held with each participant before the intervention. At this meeting, they completed a questionnaire that assessed nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and performance regarding safety standards in oncology units. Next, the application was installed on the participants’ mobile phones with the help of the researcher. Explanations about the environment of the application were presented to them. After receiving the application, participants had four weeks to read it and view its content (Fig. 2). Nurses received reminders by texting message or phone call every week between 17:00 p.m. and 19:00 p.m. Immediately after four-week intervention and one month after finishing the intervention, nurses were assessed for their knowledge, attitude, and performance related to oncology safety standards by completing the questionnaire in self-report way and in-person again. Indeed, the questionnaire was fullfiled in three points of time included before, immediately after the intervention, and one month after the intervention.
Fig. 2.
The schedule flowchart for studying and observing the application
Data analysis
After collecting and entering the data in SPSS software version 26, the ratios, central tendency, and dispersion index were reported. We used the independent t-test, analysis of variance, and Mann-Whitney U to compare the mean KAP score of nurses before the intervention in terms of occupational and demographic characteristics. The repeated measures test was used to compare the mean changes in KAP scores of nurses before, immediately after, and one month after the intervention. The Generalized Estimated Equations (GEE) were used to model the effect of the intervention on the KAP score by adjusting other variables. The KAP score using the Spearman correlation coefficient determined the correlation between occupational and demographic characteristics. A significance level of 5% was reported.
Results
Overall, 50 of 55 eligible nurses worked in three oncology departements afilliated to LUMS participated in this study. All of them cooperated with doing reseach in all stages included intervention and fullfiling the questionnaire in mentioned three pointes of time. All participants competed the questionnaires completely. 92% of participants were female. The participants had a mean age of 29.88 ± 6.36 years and an average hospital work experience of 5.11 ± 5.00 years. Other demographic and educational characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Demographic and occupational characteristics of the participants
| Variable | N (%)a |
|---|---|
| M ± SDb | |
| Sex | |
| Women | 46 (92)a |
| Men | 4 (8)a |
| Marital status | |
| Single | 28 (56)a |
| Married | 22 (44)a |
| Level of education | |
| Bachelor Degree | 49 (98)a |
| Master’s degree | 1 (2)a |
| Employment Status | |
| Permanent employee | 17 (34)a |
| Temporary employee | 33 (66)a |
| Nurse position | |
| Nurse | 47 (94)a |
| Chief | 3 (6)a |
| The Oncology Association membership | |
| Yes | 7 (14)a |
| No | 43 (86)a |
| The most common of work shifts | |
| Morning | 26 (52)a |
| Evening | 9 (18)a |
| Morning- Evening | 11 (22)a |
| Morning- Night | 4 (8)a |
| Having previous refreshing courses | |
| Yes | 44 (88)a |
| No | 6 (12)a |
| Age | 29.88 ± 6.36b |
| Work experience (years) | 5.11 ± 5.00b |
| work experiences in oncology unites (years) | 2.28 ± 1.74b |
| Experiences of working with antineoplastic druges (years) | 2.28 ± 1.74b |
| Average working hours per week | 47.08 ± 7.57b |
N (%)a: Qualitative variables, M ± SDb: Quantitative variables
Based on univariate analysis, the mean attitude score of nurses with permanent employee official and contractual employment status in the baseline was significantly higher than that of temporary employee (p = 0.031). Also, in the baseline, there was no significant difference in the mean scores of nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and performance based on their sex, marital status, employment status, oncology association membership, the most common of work shifts, and Having previous refreshing courses (p > 0.05) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Mean comparison of nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and performance based on demographic characteristics at the baseline
| Variable | Knowledge | Attitude | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD | |
| Sex | |||
| Women | 47.17 ± 8.15 | 30.32 ± 3.94 | 43.50 ± 5.21 |
| Men | 47.25 ± 9.94 | 30.50 ± 4.43 | 44.75 ± 4.34 |
| P.Value | 0.986 | 0.934 | 0.644 |
| Marital status | |||
| Single | 45.46 ± 6.62 | 29.42 ± 3.39 | 42.60 ± 4.23 |
| Married | 49.36 ± 9.55 | 31.50 ± 4.35 | 44.86 ± 5.92 |
| P.Value | 0.095 | 0.064 | 0.123 |
| Employment status | |||
| Permanent employee | 50.88 ± 10.99 | 32 ± 4.87 | 44.82 ± 5.82 |
| Temporary employee | 45.27 ± 5.59 | 29.48 ± 3.11 | 42.96 ± 4.68 |
| P.Value | 0.062 | 0.031 | 0.229 |
| The Oncology association membership | |||
| Yes | 52.28 ± 11.20 | 32.42 ± 4.85 | 47.42 ± 6.42 |
| No | 46.34 ± 7.43 | 30.00 ± 3.72 | 42.97 ± 4.67 |
| P.Value | 0.218 | 0.132 | 0.120 |
| The most common of work shifts | |||
| Morning | 47.50 ± 9.63 | 31.26 ± 4.45 | 44.15 ± 6.04 |
| Evening | 45.44 ± 6.40 | 28.77 ± 3.23 | 41.88 ± 4.16 |
| Morning- Evening | 47.90 ± 7.14 | 29.72 ± 3.34 | 42.54 ± 2.29 |
| Morning- Night | 47 ± 5.59 | 29.50 ± 2.38 | 46.75 ± 5.56 |
| P.Value | 0.917 | 0.355 | 0.357 |
| Having previous refreshing courses | |||
| Yes | 47.11 ± 8.35 | 30.00 ± 4.06 | 43.70 ± 5.13 |
| No | 47.66 ± 7.60 | 32.83 ± 1.16 | 42.83 ± 5.38 |
| P.Value | 0.879 | 0.099 | 0.700 |
M Mean, SD Standard deviation
The Spearman correlation coefficient was used because the data distribution was not normal. There was a weak significant positive correlation between nurses’ age with knowledge score (P = 0.006) and attitude (P = 0.049) before the intervention, but the correlation between age and performance was insignificant. Also, a weak significant positive correlation was seen between nurses’ work experience with knowledge scores (P = 0.02). The correlation between nurses’ work experience and each of attitude and performance separately was insignificant (P > 0.05). There was a weak significant positive correlation between nurses’ work experience in the oncology ward with knowledge score (P = 0.04), but no statistically significant correlation was seen between attitude score and performance (P > 0.05). Also, there was a weak significant positive correlation between nurses’ work experience with antineoplastic drugs and knowledge score (P = 0.03). No significant correlation was seen between other variables with KAP scores before the intervention (P > 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Correlation of baseline scores of knowledge, attitude, and performance with demographic characteristics of the participants
| Base score / Variable | Knowledge | Attitude | Performance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | P | r | P | r | P | |
| Age (Year) | .38 | .006* | .28 | .049 | .07 | .62 |
| Work experience (Year) | .32 | .02* | .26 | .07 | .03 | .83 |
| Work experiences in oncology unites (years) | .29 | .04* | .19 | .179 | .23 | .108 |
| Experiences of working with antineoplastic druges (years) | .30 | .03* | .18 | .199 | .23 | .106 |
| Average working hours per week | _ .11 | .456 | .19 | .189 | .10 | .480 |
*p < .05
There was a significant difference between the mean score changes in nurses’ knowledge over time (P < 0.001). A significant increase was seen in the mean knowledge score during the periods before the intervention, immediately after the intervention (P < 0.001), and one month after the intervention (P = 0.001). Also, there was a significant difference between the mean score changes in nurses’ attitudes over time (P < 0.001). A significant increase was seen in the mean attitude score during the periods before the intervention, immediately after the intervention (P < 0.001), and one month after the intervention (P = 0.003). There was a significant difference between the mean score changes in nurses’ performance over time (P < 0.001). So that a significant increase was seen in the mean performance score during the periods before the intervention, immediately after the intervention (P < 0.001), and one month after the intervention (P = 0.001) (Table 4).
Table 4.
comparison of knowledge, attitude, and performance mean score changes of nurses at different times
| Variable | Before the intervention | Immediately after | One month after | F | P.Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M ± SD | M ± SD | M ± SD | |||
| Knowledge | 47.18 ± 8.19 | 60.08 ± 3.82 | 61.88 ± 3.45 | 146.77 | .001* |
| Attitude | 30.34 ± 3.94 | 34.32 ± 3.25 | 34.98 ± 2.88 | 109.78 | .001* |
| Performance | 43.60 ± 5.11 | 51.78 ± 3.15 | 52.88 ± 3.06 | 132.68 | .001* |
Abbreviations: M Mean, SD Standard Deviation
*p < .05
Then, Variables with P < 0.2 were considered for inclusion in the Generalized Estimated Equations (GEE) model as independent variables to adjust their effects over time on nurses’ knowledge, attitude, and performance scores.
The GEE model and the linear link function showed that the mean knowledge score increased to 12.90 and 14.70 in the times of immediately after and one month after, as well as the attitude score increased to 3.98 and 4.64. The performance score increased to 8.18 and 9.28 in comparison with the score before the intervention by adjusting the effect of age, sex, marital status, previous training, work position, and work experience,. All changes over time were statistically significant (P < 0.001) (Table 5).
Table 5.
Modeling changes in the average score of knowledge, attitude and performance of nurses over time by adjusting side variables using the GEE model
| Variable | Knowledge β[%95 CI] P.Value |
Attitude β[%95 CI] P.Value |
Performance β[%95 CI] P.Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | |||
| Before the intervention | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Immediately after the intervention |
12.9[10.91, 14.88] (< 0.001) |
3.98[3.19, 4.76] (< 0.001) |
8.18[6.85, 9.51] (< 0.001) |
| One month after the intervention |
14.7[12.47, 16.92] (< 0.001) |
4.64[3.92, 5.36] (< 0.001) |
9.28[7.77, 10.78] (< 0.001) |
| Marital status | |||
| Single | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Married |
0.021[− 2.24, 2.29] (0.985) |
− 0.07[−1.6, 1.4] (0.92) |
−0.99[−2.51, 0.53] (0.201) |
| Employment status | |||
| Permanent employee | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Temporary employee |
0.65[−2.59, 3.89] (0.351) |
1[−1.14, 3.14] (0.361) |
0.904[−1.01, 2.82] (0.355) |
| The Oncology association membership | |||
| Yes | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| No | – |
−0.6[− 2.5, 1.3] (0.535) |
−2 [−4.42, 0.41] (0.104) |
| Age | |||
| – |
0.07[−0.29, 0.4] (0.644) |
0.25[0.01, 0.5] (0.039) |
– |
| Work experience | |||
| – |
0.11[− 0.21, 0.43] (0.493) |
−0.01[− 0.33, 0.3] (0.914) |
– |
| Work experiences in oncology unites | |||
| – |
1.17[0.53, 1.81] (< 0.001) |
0.42[−0.002, 0.84] (0.049) |
0.86[0.17, 1.21] (0.01) |
Discussion
This study aimed to determine the effect of teaching chemotherapy safety standards on oncology nurses’ KAP using a smartphone application.
Knowledge
The results of the present study showed that oncology nurses’ knowledge about the safe use of antineoplastic druges was sufficient before the intervention. This result contradicted some studies. Only 4% of nurses had sufficient knowledge in a study by Bolbol et al. [37] in Egypt. However, in line with the present study, Zayed et al. [14] in Egypt showed that 67.3% of healthcare providers who administered antineoplastic drugs had adequate knowledge. Due to the implementation of the intervention, an increase in nurses’ awareness was observed from before the intervention till one month after. In line with this finding, a study by Crickman and Finnell [29] in Washington showed that a 30-min online training video for all nurses in the ward effectively increased their knowledge about improving treatment methods and reducing antineoplastic drug exposure. Also, in an interventional study, Bolbol et al. [37] found that after holding nine training sessions in the workplace, there was a significant increase in the knowledge level. Also, Elsayed Mahdy et al. [38] in Egypt found in a semi-experimental study that teaching standard instructions for working with antineoplastic drugs positively affected staff awareness about the standard principles of chemotherapy. In this study, the training was done theoretically and practically using a booklet guide and explaining its content during four face-to-face sessions [38]. Also, in consistent with the present study, a study by Ferguson et al. [39] in Australia showed that training through an online learning module delivered by mobile phone improved nurses’ knowledge of atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation. In the study of Nishimwe [40] in Rwanda, training based on mobile learning application improved the knowledge of nurses and midwives in the field of postpartum hemorrhage management and neonatal resuscitation.
Attitudes
The results of nurses’ attitudes toward the safe use of antineoplastic drugs were similar to the participants’ awareness. Alehashem and Baniasadi [26] in Iran, also reported the desired level of nurse attitude. Khan et al. [41] in a study in Pakistan reported a moderate level of nurses’ attitudes toward preparing and managing chemotherapy drugs. We can mention variables such as physical environment, personal characteristics, cultural environment, and attitude measurement tools as the reasons for these differences. Nurses’ reactions and behaviors towards various care issues generally influenced by various factors such as beliefs, values, customs, and culture indicate the type of nurses’ attitudes [42]. The findings of this study showed that training through mobile applications improved nurses’ attitudes toward chemotherapy safety standards before the intervention until one month after that. Along with the present study, Taghizadeh Kermani et al. [43] in Iran showed that holding a training course in the form of 30 h of lectures and practical training on the main concepts of nursing in oncology can improve nurses’ attitudes. In a study by Keat et al. [44] in Malaysia, a significant change in nurses’ attitudes toward the safe use of antineoplastic drugs was reported after a 9-month pharmacy-based intervention including a series of technical, educational, and managerial support measures consisting of administering antineoplastic drugs in a closed system, training courses, training workshops, and instruction updates that are consistent with the present study.
Performance
The results of the present study showed that oncology nurses’ performance regarding the safe use of antineoplastic druges was sufficient before the intervention. Consistent with this finding, in the study of Alehashem and Baniasadi [26] in Iran, the nurse’s performance score was reported to be satisfactory. However, according to the results obtained in the study of Zayed et al. [14] in Egypt and the study of Keat et al. [44] in Malaysia, nurses had poor performance in this field and did not correctly follow international standards. Possible reasons for this difference could be the different places of studies, the presence or absence of necessary equipment in the workplace, different tools used to measure staff performance, and previous training of the samples. An improvement in the performance level of nurses was observed before the intervention until one month after. Bolbol et al. [37] in Egypt also stated that participating in the training sessions can improve nurses’ performance in working with antineoplastic drugs. Also, Al-Attar and Al-Gannem [17] in Iraq stated that training positively affects nurses’ performance. The interventional study of Mishra et al. [28] in India also showed that the use of PowerPoint and discussion methods had improved the nurse’s performance regarding the safe use of antineoplastic drugs.
The nurses’ training has been done traditionally in most studies in this field. Continuing Medical Education (CME) is an essential principle in nursing professionalization, which can effectively improve nurses’ performance; E-learning can play an essential role in continuing medical education programs [45]. Due to the benefits of modern education, such as reduced training costs, accessibility in any time and place, reduced communication costs, and so on [46, 47], the use of E-learning, especially mobile applications for nurses who are busy with work, is more convenient and accessible. In confirmation of the contents mentioned in the study of Khoshnoodifar et al. [46] in Iran, it was found that the E-learning method can increase nurses’ knowledge scores more than traditional education. Also, in the study of Farshbaf-Khalili et al. [48] in Iran, multimedia electronic training during 1-h sessions for 4 weeks was more effective than lecture training in increasing the knowledge, attitude and performance of nursing staff regarding pain management. Also, many studies have shown high satisfaction among people and positive education results in using E-learning alone or with traditional education in medical sciences [24, 45].
Study limitations
The small sample size of the study due to the limited number of nurses in the chemotherapy unites was one of the study limitations. Furthermore, most of nurses had gotten training related to the chemotherapy hazardes and safety guidelines which is indispensable and is an crucial prerequisite to work with the chemical druge. Scince all nurses spoke in Persian languge, the application was designed just in Persian.
Conclusion
According to the results of the present study, the training of chemotherapy safety standards using the OncoNS smartphone application had a desirable effect on the KAP of oncology nurses. Due to the effectiveness of the application and, on the other hand, the problems of nurses such as high workload, interference of face-to-face retraining with their working hours, leisure, and family issues, the use of E-learning method is recommended for training nurses and other health care providers. We hope that nursing managers help nurses improve their knowledge, attitude, and performance in occupational safety by using proper educational planning, especially new educational methods such as E-learning in the form of a smartphone application.
Acknowledgments
This manuscript results from the master’s thesis in Medical-Surgical Nursing at Lorestan University of Medical Sciences. We Would like to thank the nurses who helped us to fulfill this research.
Abbreviations
- KAP
Knowledge, Attitude, and Performance
- HDs
Hazardous drugs
- NIOSH
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
- ASHP
American Society of Hospital Pharmacists
- ONS
Oncology Nursing Society
- OSHA
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
- PPE
Personal Protective Equipment
- CVI
Content Validity Index
- I-CVI
Item Content Validity Index
- S-CVI
Scale Content Validity Index
- URL
Uniform Resource Locator
Authors’ contributions
Study concept and design: H.Z., G.F., H.Sh., G.N., and B.M; analysis and interpretation of data: B.M., H.Z., and G.F.; drafting of the manuscript: H.Z., G.F., H.Sh., and B.M; Critical manuscript revision for important intellectual content: H.Z., G.F., H.Sh., G.N., and B.M. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Funding
None.
Availability of data and materials
Data is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was conducted with ethical considerations in line with the Helsinki Declaration. The ethics code was also obtained from the Research and Technology Department of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences (Code: 1324-99-1-1397). Researchers got permission of heads of the hospitals where the study was performed in. The aim and method of the study were explained to the nurses, and the first author answered their questions. They could withdraw from the study without affecting their caring process. The written informed consent form was signed by those nurses who willingly agreed to participate in this study. Confidentiality and anonymity were ensured throughout the study process.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Khanali J, Kolahi A-A. National and subnational cancer incidence for 22 cancer groups, 2000 to 2016: a study based on cancer registration data of Iran. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2021;2021:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2021/6676666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Soerjomataram I, Bray F. Global cancer observatory: cancer today. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kishore P, Meghana G, Reddy BP, Raghavaiah K. Pattern of adverse drug reactions and its management in female cancer patients in a private hospital in Telangana, India. Asian J Pharm Res Dev. 2018;6(4):45–53. doi: 10.22270/ajprd.v6i4.381. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rao I, Cheema PK. Antineoplastic drugs-knowledge, attitude and safe handling practice of nurses’ at cancer hospital. Int J Nur Edu and Res. 2020;8(1):1–5. doi: 10.5958/2454-2660.2020.00001.0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nwagbo SE, Ilesanmi RE, Ohaeri BM, Oluwatosin AO. Knowledge of chemotherapy and occupational safety measures among nurses in oncology units. J Clin Sci. 2017;14(3):131–137. doi: 10.4103/jcls.jcls_88_16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Topçu S, Beşer A. Oncology nurses’ perspectives on safe handling precautions: a qualitative study. Contemp Nurse. 2017;53(3):271–283. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1315828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gianfredi V, Nucci D, Fatigoni C, Salvatori T, Villarini M, Moretti M. Extent of primary DNA damage measured by the comet assay in health professionals exposed to antineoplastic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2):1–23. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ratner PA, Spinelli JJ, Beking K, Lorenzi M, Chow Y, Teschke K, Le ND, Gallagher RP, Dimich-Ward H. Cancer incidence and adverse pregnancy outcome in registered nurses potentially exposed to antineoplastic drugs. BMC Nurs. 2010;9(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-9-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hon C-Y, Teschke K, Shen H, Demers PA, Venners S. Antineoplastic drug contamination in the urine of Canadian healthcare workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015;88(7):933–941. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lawson CC, Johnson CY, Nassan FL, Connor TH, Boiano JM, Rocheleau CM, Chavarro JE, Rich-Edwards JW. CE: Original research: antineoplastic drug administration by pregnant and nonpregnant nurses: an exploration of the use of protective gloves and gowns. AJN. 2019;119(1):28–35. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000552583.69729.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Devi S, Sharma P. Safe handling of chemotherapeutic drugs in oncology nursing practice. Int J Practical Nurs. 2019;7(1):41–47. doi: 10.21088/ijpn.2347.7083.7119.7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Power LA, Coyne JW. ASHP guidelines on handling hazardous drugs. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2018;75(24):1996–2031. doi: 10.2146/ajhp180564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zayed H, Saied S, El-Sallamy R, Shehata W. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of safe handling of cytotoxic drugs among oncology nurses in Tanta university hospitals. Egypt J Occup Med. 2019;43(1):75–92. doi: 10.21608/ejom.2019.25119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.RafieManesh H, Panjali Z, Khani F, Habibi-Mohraz M, Borhani M. Knowledge and attitude about exposure to cytotoxic drugs in oncology nurses. AOH. 2019;3(3):371–379. doi: 10.18502/aoh.v3i3.1280. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Abbasi K, Hazrati M, Mohammadbeigi A, Ansari J, Sajadi M, Hosseinnazzhad A, Moshiri E. Protection behaviors for cytotoxic drugs in oncology nurses of chemotherapy centers in Shiraz hospitals, South of Iran. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2016;37(4):227–231. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.195748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Al-Attar W, Al-Gannem M. Effectiveness of the nursing educational program upon nurse’s knowledge and practices concerning chemotherapy precautions. IOSR-JNHS. 2015;4(6):7–13. doi: 10.9790/1959-04630713. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Koulounti M, Roupa Z, Charalambous C, Noula M. Assessment of nurse’s safe behavior towards chemotherapy management. Mater Sociomed. 2019;31(4):282–285. doi: 10.5455/msm.2019.31.282-285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat A-HS, Dellinger EP, Dziekan G, Herbosa T, Kibatala PL, Lapitan MCM. Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist-based surgical safety intervention. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(1):102–107. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.040022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gamal GA, Gamal LM, Eldessouki KH, Abozied AM. Chemotherapy health hazards among oncology nurses and its possible relation to malpractice and workplace environment. Evid Based Nurs. 2019;1(3):182–191. doi: 10.47104/ebnrojs3.v1i3.83. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Crickman R, Finnell D. Systematic review of control measures to reduce hazardous drug exposure for health care workers. J Nurs Care Qual. 2016;31(2):183–190. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Khoobi M, Mohammadi N, Ahmadi Hedayat M, Ghiyasvandiyan S, Varaei S. Comparison of the nursing students’ learning in two teaching methods using CD and training through traditional method. JNE. 2017;5(6):18–23. doi: 10.21859/jne-05063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee B-C, Yoon J-O, Lee I. Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: theories and results. Comput Educ. 2009;53(4):1320–1329. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rouleau G, Gagnon M-P, Côté J, Payne-Gagnon J, Hudson E, Dubois C-A, Bouix-Picasso J. Effects of E-learning in a continuing education context on nursing care: systematic review of systematic qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-studies reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(10):1–19. doi: 10.2196/15118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lall P, Rees R, Law GCY, Dunleavy G, Cotič Ž, Car J. Influences on the implementation of mobile learning for medical and nursing education: qualitative systematic review by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):1–16. doi: 10.2196/12895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Alehashem M, Baniasadi S. Safe handling of anti-neoplastic drugs in the university hospitals: a descriptive survey study among oncology nurses. Int J Cancer Manag. 2018;11(2):1–8. doi: 10.5812/ijcm.6482. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Asefa S, Aga F, Dinegde NG, Demie TG. Knowledge and practices on the safe handling of cytotoxic drugs among oncology nurses working at tertiary teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2021;13:71–80. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S289025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mishra R, Bhawana AK. Chemotherapy safe handling through educating nurses: a pre-experimental study. Int J Cancer Clin Res. 2021;8(1):1–5. doi: 10.23937/2378-3419/1410146. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Crickman R, Finnell DS. Chemotherapy safe handling. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2017;21(1):73–78. doi: 10.1188/17.CJON.73-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–467. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mahdy NE, Abdel Rahman A, Hassan HA. Cytotoxic drugs safety guidelines: its effect on awareness and safe handling practices of oncology nurses. J Nurs Hlth Sci. 2017;6(3):22–33. doi: 10.9790/1959-0603032233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.DeJoy DM, Smith TD, Woldu H, Dyal M-A, Steege AL, Boiano JM. Effects of organizational safety practices and perceived safety climate on PPE usage, engineering controls, and adverse events involving liquid antineoplastic drugs among nurses. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017;14(7):485–493. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2017.1285496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Faragollahy M. Oncology nurses and occupational hazardous. Iran J Nurs. 2002;15(32):63–67. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Hazardous-drugs. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/hazardous-drugs/controlling-occex. Accessed 24 Mar 2020.
- 35.Management guidelines for chemotherapy services. Available from: https://fdo.tums.ac.ir/darou/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/khadamat.pdf. Accessed 24 Mar 2020.
- 36.Polovich M, Olsen MM. Safe handling of hazardous drugs. Pittsburgh: Oncology Nursing Society; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bolbol S, Hassan A, El-Naggar S, Zaitoun M. Role of occupational health and safety program in improving knowledge and practice among nurses exposed to chemotherapy at Zagazig university hospitals. Egypt J Occup Med. 2016;40(2):219–235. doi: 10.21608/ejom.2016.842. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Elsayed Mahdy NE, Rahman A, Hassan HA. Cytotoxic drugs safety guidelines: its effect on awareness and safe handling practices of oncology nurses. IOSR-JNHS. 2017;6(3):22–33. doi: 10.9790/1959-0603032233. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ferguson C, Hickman LD, Phillips J, Newton PJ, Inglis SC, Lam L, Bajorek BV. An mHealth intervention to improve nurses’ atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation knowledge and practice: the EVICOAG study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019;18(1):7–15. doi: 10.1177/1474515118793051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nishimwe A, Ibisomi L, Nyssen M, Conco DN. The effect of an mLearning application on nurses’ and midwives’ knowledge and skills for the management of postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal resuscitation: pre–post intervention study. Hum Resour Health. 2021;19(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00559-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Khan N, Khowaja KZA, Ali TS. Assessment of knowledge, skill and attitude of oncology nurses in chemotherapy administration in tertiary hospital Pakistan. Open J Nurs. 2012;2(2):97–103. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2012.22015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Boozari M, Jafar Jalal E, Haghani H. Effects of pharmacovigilance training in the elderly on the knowledge, attitude, and performance of nurses. IJN. 2018;31(115):75–84. doi: 10.29252/ijn.31.115.75. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Taghizadeh Kermani A, Hosseini S, Salek R, Pourali L. Improving knowledge and attitude of nurses working in chemotherapy wards through a short educational course: a successful experience in Mashhad. Future Med Educ J. 2015;5(4):10–13. doi: 10.22038/fmej.2015.6298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Keat CH, Sooaid NS, Yun CY, Sriraman M. Improving safety-related knowledge, attitude and practices of nurses handling cytotoxic anticancer drug: pharmacists’ experience in a general hospital, Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(1):69–73. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.1.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bahrambeygi F, Shojaeizadeh D, Sadeghi R, Nasiri S, Ghazanchaei E. The effectiveness of an E-learning program on nurse’s knowledge and behavior for caring of patients with thromboembolism: a comparative study. J Nurs Healthcare Manag. 2018;1(1):1–7. doi: 10.18875/2639-7293.1.105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Khoshnoodifar M, Rafie S, Zeraati Nasrabadi M, Masoudi Alavi N. The effects of CPR training using two traditional and electronic training methods on the knowledge, skill, and satisfaction of nurses from in service education of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Qom Univ Med Sci J. 2019;13(9):34–43. doi: 10.29252/qums.13.9.34. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sinclair PM, Kable A, Levett-Jones T, Booth D. The effectiveness of internet-based E-learning on clinician behaviour and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;57:70–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Farshbaf-Khalili A, Jasemi M, Seyyedzavvar A. Comparing the effect of electronic and lecture education of pain management on the knowledge, attitude, and practice of nurses: a randomized-controlled trial. J Edu Health Promot. 2021;10:374. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_918_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.