Abstract

In this study, sixty novel coumarin-monoterpene compounds were synthesized in two series [thirty-two compounds (12–43) bearing a triazole ring in the first series, and twenty-eight compounds (44–71) bearing an alkyl chain in the second one]. Their inhibitory effects on the human carbonic anhydrase (hCA) isoforms I, II, IX, and XII and anticancer potentials were determined. All synthesized molecules selectively inhibited CA IX and XII. 23 and 42 were found to be the strongest inhibitors, with Ki values of 1.9 nM against hCA IX. Also, 70 showed the highest inhibitory activity with a Ki value of 4.9 nM against hCA XII. Moreover, their cytotoxic effects on colon adenocarcinoma (HT-29), prostate adenocarcinoma (PC-3), and breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cell lines were evaluated. According to the cytotoxicity results, 14 (IC50 = 2.48 μM) and 63 (IC50 = 3.91 μM) exhibited the highest cytotoxicity on the MCF-7 cells, while 23 showed the strongest cytotoxic effect on both PC-3 (IC50 = 9.40 μM) and HT-29 (IC50 = 12.10 μM) cell lines. 14, 23, and 66 decreased CA IX and CA XII protein expression in HT-29 cells, while 23 and 66 showed the strongest reduction of both CA IX and CA XII in MCF-7 cells. All of the selected compounds increased total apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner in HT-29 and MCF-7 cells. 14 has the strongest apoptotic effect in MCF-7 cells. 23 increased early apoptosis primarily, while 14 and 66 increased total apoptosis in HT-29. In addition, PI/Hoechst staining proves that apoptotic cells are increased in HT-29 with an effect of 14, 23, and 66. As a result of the modeling studies, it has been shown that only the open coumarin form of the compounds can interact directly with the active-site Zn2+ ion. It has been shown that coumarin-monoterpene structures with different alkyl and monoterpene groups both specifically inhibit CA IX and XII and exhibit specific cytotoxicity in different cell lines.
1. Introduction
Cancer development in tissue develops through different mechanisms depending on the state of the tumor cells. Continuous division and growth of cells prevent access to oxygen through blood vessels in solid and metastatic tumors. In hypoxic conditions, cancer cells activate different metabolic pathways, such as general mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation or anaerobic glycolysis, leading to the production of acidic metabolites. Increased acidity of the extracellular environment provides a clear selective advantage for tumor mass growth.1 Low pH levels can disrupt a variety of biological activities; moreover, extracellular and intracellular acidosis threaten cell viability. However, cancer cells can adapt to these changes by upregulating important pH-regulating factors. Carbonic anhydrases (CA) IX and CA XII, which are among these factors, are overexpressed under hypoxia.2 Necrosis around the tumor is explained by the overexpression of the CA IX isoenzyme increasing in this region and the dependence of pH control on this enzyme.3
The known basic function of CAs is hydration of the physiological reaction CO2 to bicarbonate and proton. CAs reversibly catalyze this reaction in all living organisms, including bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes. CAs play a role in many pathological and physiological processes by providing pH and CO2 homeostasis as well as coping with the excess CO2 generated as a result of metabolic activities in all these organisms. Sixteen CA isoenzymes or CA-related proteins (CARPs) have been identified in mammals, and they differ in their catalytic activity, subcellular localization, and tissue distribution.4 CA I, CA II, CA III, CA VII, and CA XIII are cytosolic; CA IV, CA IX, CA XII, CA XIV, and CA XV are membrane-bound; CA VA and CA VB are mitochondrial; and CA VI shows intracellular localization as CA isoenzymes secreted in saliva, milk, and urine. Tissue distributions differ according to physio/pathological conditions, while there is an overproduction of CA IX and XII isoenzymes in hypoxic tumors, CA VA and XIV are predominant in the liver.5 Increased expression of CA IX is seen in most solid cancers including colorectal, breast, and pancreatic tumors.6 This overproduction of tumor-specific CA IX and XII isoenzymes has also been shown in cell culture studies. HT-29, MCF-7, and PC3 cell lines overexpressed, especially CA IX in hypoxic conditions.7 Studies have also shown that some natural/synthetic coumarin derivatives have high cytotoxicity on these cells.8
With the inhibition of the CA IX isoenzyme, the tumor growth activity of CA IX in hypoxic tumors is prevented, and the pH irregularity in tumors is controlled and allows for new applications in cancer diagnosis and treatment. CA IX, like other α-CAs, is inhibited by anionic inhibitors or sulfonamides and sulfamates that act by directly interacting with the Zn+2 ion in the active site space or by various interactions with hydrophilic/lipophilic amino acids in the active site.9,10 Among these inhibitors, it has been shown in vivo experiments that especially nonmembrane impermeable derivatives have selective inhibition of CA IX. In addition to derivatives that are membrane-impermeable, derivatives carrying a sugar structure also inhibit CA IX at low levels.9,11
In addition to these CA inhibitors (CAIs), coumarin derivatives are important molecules that show selective inhibition of CA IX and CA XII at low nanomolar concentrations (Figure 1). Due to the nucleophilicity of zinc hydroxide, coumarins can easily be hydrolyzed to the substituted 2-hydroxycinnamic acid during the preincubation process, which is the most important step in providing this activity.12 Many studies have been conducted where coumarins have shown selective CA inhibition. Substituted coumarins and thiocoumarin derivatives also inhibited the CAs in the low nanomolar-micromolar range.13
Figure 1.
Some coumarin derivatives known as CAIs.
The tail approach has been found to be the most successful design recently applied to obtain selective CAIs.14 Some researchers have also shown that this approach can increase the selective inhibition of CA IX and XII.15,16 The “tail approach” is a structure-based drug design approach and consists of adding “tail(s)” to an aromatic or heterocyclic scaffold equipped with a zinc linking group (ZBG), such as sulfonamides or their bioisosteres (Figure 2). Thus, it leads to an expanded molecule, and this structure can interact selectively between various isoforms (based on amino acid residues) with the middle or outer edge of the active site cavity. This affects the selectivity as well as the strength of the inhibitor.15,17
Figure 2.
Tail-approach-based design of coumarin monoterpene derivatives.
Based on these findings, we designed coumarins with different alkyl chain lengths as hybrid molecules with monoterpene compounds, such as thymol, carvacrol, and so forth, which are potential CAIs.18 After the CA inhibitions of the obtained compounds were determined, we examined the potential of the compounds to be developed as antitumor agents by selecting the cancer cell lines that were the most expressed CA IX and XII isoforms. The effects of compounds were first screened on the HT-29 cell line, and then, their effects on PC-3 and MCF-7 cell lines were examined by choosing a narrower compound scale according to enzyme inhibition results and HT-29 cytotoxicity results. Finally, apoptosis profiles and intracellular CA IX and XII protein levels of the most promising compounds were determined in HT-29 and MCF-7 cells. Furthermore, the binding interactions of these compounds with either hCA IX or XII were investigated with docking studies followed by molecular dynamics simulations.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Chemistry
New coumarin derivatives containing monoterpene moieties were designed as two series. The first one has a triazole ring, and the second has an alkyl chain as linkers between coumarin and monoterpenes. The synthesis of these series is given in Schemes 1 and 2, respectively.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Bearing Triazole Ring Coumarin-Monoterpene Derivatives.

Reaction conditions: (i) dibromoalkane, K2CO3, and CH3CN, reflux, 2 h; (ii) NaN3 and DMF, rt, 16 h; (iii) propargyl bromide, DMF, and K2CO3, rt, 16 h; (iv) NaH, THF, and TBAI, propargyl bromide, 70 °C, 4 h; (v) PMDETA, CuBr, and DMF, rt.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Coumarin-Monoterpene Derivatives.

Reaction conditions: (vi) KI, K2CO3, and DMF, 60 °C, 18 h for compounds 44–67; NaI and DIPEA, 150 °C, 2 h for compounds 68–71.
7-hydroxy coumarin (1) was reacted with dibromoalkane and then NaN3 to obtain coumarin derivatives bearing an azide moiety (3a–3h). On the other hand, monoterpenes [thymol (4), carvacrol (5), eugenol (6), and menthol (7)] were propargylated with propargyl bromide in DMF for binding the alkyne moiety to monoterpenes (8–11). The target compounds (12–43), bearing a triazole ring, in the first series were obtained by reacting 3a–3h with 8–11 via the azide–alkyne Huisgen cycloaddition method (Scheme 1).
The synthesis of target compounds (44–71) bearing alkyl chains in the second series (Scheme 2) was achieved via the substitution reaction of monoterpenes (4–7) with coumarin derivatives containing an alkyl bromide moiety (2a–2h).
From the 1H NMR spectra of compounds 8–11, the signals for propargyl protons were observed at 2.48–2.54, and 4.24–4.75 ppm. According to the IR spectra, the stretch signal of the alkyne group is seen around 2120 cm–1.
From the 1H NMR spectra of compounds 12–43, the coumarin and monoterpene ring protons as well as a proton signal belonging to the triazole ring formed were observed in the aromatic region. In general, aromatic protons signaled in approximately the same areas for thymol, carvacrol, and eugenol. The signals for aromatic protons were observed between 6.24 and 8.28 ppm, while aliphatic proton signals were observed about at 1.10–5.21 ppm. Among these signals, the (CH3)2CH– doublet seen around 1.10–1.20 ppm, the Ar–CH3 singlet seen around 2.20–2.30 ppm, and the (CH3)2CH– multiplet seen in the range of 3.00–3.30 ppm are signals of specific aliphatic protons belonging to thymol/carvacrol derivatives (12–27). For compounds 28–35 containing the eugenol ring, specific signals belonging to the allyl group of eugenol and the methoxy group were seen instead of these peaks. The signals of methoxy protons were determined at 3.90 ppm, and the signals of terminal alkene protons were observed between 5.00 and 5.10 ppm. The signal of the −CH proton of the allyl group was observed in the range of 5.80–6.00 ppm, while −CH2 proton signal was seen around 3.36 ppm. For compounds 36–43 bearing a menthol ring, specific signals of the menthol ring were seen in the range of 0.63–3.20 ppm. From the 13C NMR spectra, the signals of the aliphatic and aromatic carbons were observed at 16–80 and 101.5–162.7 ppm, respectively.
From the 1H NMR spectra of compounds 44–71, in the second series; the signals for aromatic protons were seen between 6.13 and 7.96 ppm, while the signals of aliphatic protons were observed between 0.69 and 4.25 ppm. From the 13C NMR spectra of them, the signals of aromatic carbon were observed in the range of 100.3–162.6 ppm, while the signals of aliphatic carbon were detected between 21.5 and 69.5 ppm.
2.2. CA Inhibition
The Ki values of the synthesized compounds 12–43 and 44–71 against hCA IX and hCA XII isoforms are given in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Generally, all synthesized compounds (12–71) selectively inhibited the hCA IX and hCA XII (the tumor-associated isoforms) with Ki values in the range of 1.9–3507.0 nM, while they inhibited the hCA I and II isoforms in the micromolar level (Ki > 10,000 nM, therefore not given in the Tables 1 and 2).
-
(i)
The Ki values of compounds 12–43, bearing a triazole moiety in the first series, were determined in the range of 1.9–1871.0 and 8.2–664.5 nM against hCA IX and hCA XII, respectively (Table 1). In the first series, seven compounds [12 (Ki = 2.9 nM), 23 (Ki = 1.9 nM), 29 (Ki = 2.4 nM), 30 (Ki = 3.1 nM), 37 (Ki = 2.2 nM), 42 (Ki = 1.9 nM), and 43 (Ki = 2.5 nM)] inhibited the tumor-associated isoform hCA IX approx. 10-fold stronger than acetazolamide (AAZ, Ki = 25.8 nM), used as a standard CAI. Moreover, eleven compounds (15 (Ki = 25.2 nM), 19 (Ki = 21.8 nM), 20 (Ki = 12.6 nM), 22 (Ki = 28.7 nM), 24 (Ki = 32.7 nM), 27 (Ki = 30.4 nM), 28 (Ki = 31.9 nM), 31 (Ki = 31.5 nM), 34 (Ki = 28.1 nM), 35 (Ki = 29.9 nM), and 39 (Ki = 20.7 nM)) exhibited hCA IX inhibitory activity similar to or higher than AAZ. In this series, compounds 14, 15, and 40 strongly inhibited the other tumor-associated isoform hCA XII with Ki values of 9.3, 9.5, and 8.2 nM, respectively, which are close to that of AAZ (Ki of 5.7 nM). The cytosolic isoforms hCA I and hCA II (with Ki >10,000 nM) were weakly inhibited by compounds 12–43.
-
(ii)
From Table 2, the Ki values of compounds 44–71, bearing alkyl chain in the second series, were defined in the range of 22.1–3507.0 and 4.9–83.6 nM against hCA IX and hCA XII, respectively. In the second series, only compound 63 (Ki = 22.1 nM) showed hCA IX inhibitory activity better than AAZ (Ki = 25.8 nM), whereas nine compounds (48, 51, 52, 55, 59, 61, 62, 69, and 71) inhibited hCA IX with Ki values of 31.3–38.3 nM, which are close to that of AAZ. On the other hand, the tumor-associated isoform hCA XII was strongly inhibited by twenty two of the twenty eight compounds with Ki values in the range from 4.9 to 9.4 nM. Among them, compound 70 (Ki = 4.9 nM) has the highest inhibitory activity against hCA XII. In this series, all synthesized compounds strongly inhibited hCA XII more than hCA IX.
-
(iii)
Comparing both series (from Tables 1 and 2), most of the synthesized compounds bearing a triazole ring in the first series exhibited more potent inhibitory activity against hCA IX, while the compounds bearing an alkyl chain in the second series showed stronger inhibitory activity against hCA XII. Compounds 40 (Ki = 8.2 nM) and 70 (Ki = 4.9 nM), which are the most potent hCA XII inhibitors in both series, contain menthol as the monoterpene group, while the most effective hCA IX inhibitors include different monoterpene groups [−OR: carvacrol for compound 23 (Ki = 1.9 nM); −OR: menthol for compounds 37 (Ki = 2.2 nM) and 42 (Ki = 1.9 nM); −OR: eugenol for compounds 29 (Ki = 2.4 nM) and 63 (Ki = 22.1 nM)].
Table 1. Ki (nM) for hCA IX and XII, IC50 (μM) Values for HT-29 Cell Line, and IC50 Values Calculated from Viability at MCF-7, PC-3, and HEK293T Cell Line Results of Selected Molecules (IC50, μM) of 12–43.

Mean from 3 different assays, by a stopped-flow technique (errors were in the range of ±5–10% of the reported values).
Table 2. Ki (nM) for hCA I, II, IX, and XII, IC50 (μM) Values for HT-29 Cell Line, and IC50 Values Calculated from Viability at MCF-7, PC-3, and HEK293T Cell Line Results of Selected Molecules (IC50, μM) of 44–71.

Mean from 3 different assays, by a stopped-flow technique (errors were in the range of ±5–10% of the reported values).
Regardless of monoterpene groups, compounds containing only straight alkyl chains exhibited higher inhibition of CA XII than compounds containing triazole groups. This difference is due to the triazole group reducing the lipophilic character.15,16,19 However, the same effect was not seen for CA IX inhibition. Different monoterpene structures forming the tail part also affected CA inhibition to different degrees. Binding sites and aromatic and aliphatic structure interactions have brought about this difference.
2.3. Cell Viability against Normal and Cancer Cell Lines
IC50 values showing cytotoxic effects of newly synthesized compounds tested against HT-29, MCF-7, PC3, and HEK293T cell lines by MTT assay were compiled in Tables 1 and 2. The compounds 12–43 exhibited similar cytotoxicity against HT-29 cells that IC50 values ranged from 12.10–65.6 μM. The most promising compounds in the series were 14 (IC50 = 25.11 μM), 16 (IC50 = 21.55 μM), 23 (IC50 = 12.10 μM), 29 (IC50 = 23.49 μM), and 35 (IC50 = 23.25 μM) (Table 1). The compounds 44–71 generally showed weaker cytotoxic activity against HT-29 cells except 66 (IC50 = 21.99 μM), 69 (IC50 = 12.13 μM), 70 (IC50 = 14.73 μM), and 71 (IC50 = 18.57 μM) (Table 2). All compounds tested against HT-29 cells showed weaker cytotoxic effects than doxorubicin (IC50 = 7.41 μM). Considering the results of CA IX and XII enzyme inhibitions and cytotoxicity on HT-29 cells, no significant linear relationship was observed. It is possible that the cytotoxicity of the substances occurs via different pathways other than CA IX and XII inhibition.
For this reason, a narrower group of compounds was selected from the compounds exhibiting both high CA IX and XII inhibition and high HT-29 cytotoxicity, and cytotoxic evaluation was performed in MCF-7, PC3, and HEK293T cell lines. 14, 23, 56, 63, 69, and 70 had lower IC50 values for cell cytotoxicity than others against MCF-7 cells (14; IC50 = 2.48 μM, 23; IC50 = 9.10 μM, 56; IC50 = 8.26 μM, 63; IC50 = 3.91 μM, 69; IC50 = 5.86 μM, 70; and IC50 = 7.53 μM). Against PC3 cell lines, 17 (IC50 = 12.49 μM) and 23 (IC50 = 9.40 μM) showed the strongest cytotoxic activity. Although these values are lower when compared to the effect of doxorubicin (dox) on cancer cells, the synthesized compounds are less cytotoxic than dox in healthy cell lines. If we compare the selectivities of dox and active compounds on cancer and healthy cells, for example, the selectivity of 23 on HT-29 is 3-fold greater than dox. Similarly, the selectivity of 63 in MCF-7 is again 15-fold higher than dox.
2.4. Effects of Some Selected Compounds on Protein Levels of CA IX and CA XII
We performed a western blot experiment to understand the effect of selected compounds 14, 23, 63, and 66 according to the results of experiments on protein expression of tumorigenic carbonic anhydrases CA IX and CA XII on two different cancer cell lines HT-29 and MCF-7. The effects of compounds 14, 23, and 66 on HT-29 cells and the effects of compounds 14, 23, and 63 on MCF-7 cells were evaluated. The results of western blot experiments showed that compounds 14, 23, and 66 decreased the CA IX and CA XII expression in HT-29 cells. The highest decreases in CA IX and CA XII expression were determined at the highest dose of 66 (Figure 3A). On the other hand, 63 decreased the normal expression level of CA IX and XII in MCF-7 cells, while 14 and 23 decreased both the level of CAIX and CA XII (Figure 3B).
Figure 3.
CA IX and CA II protein expression levels after the administration of compounds 14, 23, and 66 on HT-29 (A) and compounds 14, 23, and 63 on MCF-7 (B).
2.5. Apoptotic Effects of Some Selected Compounds
Apoptotic profiles of selected compounds 14, 23, 63, and 66 were evaluated in HT-29 (Figure 4) and MCF-7 cells (Figure 4). The results showed that 14, 23, and 66 generally increased late apoptotic cells (%) in HT-29, whereas 14, 23, and 63 mostly effected early apoptosis in MCF-7. A concentration-dependent increase in late apoptotic cells (%) in HT-29 depending on 14 and 66 was determined. On the other hand, treatment of 23 in HT-29 cells resulted in early apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Evaluation of apoptotic cell profiles of normal, hypoxic controls, and treated cells. (A) Live, early, and late apoptotic cell percentages of 14, 23, and 66 treated HT-29 cells compared to normal and hypoxic controls. (B) Apoptotic profiles of normal, hypoxic controls, and treated HT-29 cells at three different concentrations.
Compound 14 exhibited a strong apoptotic effect on MCF-7 cells with a significant increase in both early and late apoptotic cells (%) at 10 and 40 μM. Both 23 and 63 increased the early and late apoptotic cells (%) in rising concentrations (Figure 5).
Figure 5.
Evaluation of apoptotic cell profiles of normal, hypoxic controls, and treated cells. (A) Live, early, and late apoptotic cell percentages of 14, 23, and 63 treated MCF-7 cells compared to normal and hypoxic controls. (B) Apoptotic profiles of normal, hypoxic controls, and treated MCF-7 cells at three different concentrations.
To further validate the cell viability and apoptotic effects of the compounds, HT-29 cells were examined under fluorescence microscopy. After incubation with 14, 23, and 66, cells were stained with PI and Hoechst. As seen in Figure 6, PI did not penetrate normal control cells. However, it was determined that the cells stained with PI increased after hypoxic conditions. It can be said that compounds 14, 23, and 66 increased apoptotic/dead cells, as seen in Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Fluorescence imaging of controls and treated HT-29 cells. ×20 magnification. The first column shows Hoechst, the second column shows PI, and the last column shows the merged images of the two dyes.
2.6. Molecular Modelling Studies
Compounds 23 and 70 showed the lowest Ki values for hCA IX (1.9 nM) and hCA XII (4.9 nM), respectively. The binding interactions of these compounds with either hCA IX or XII were investigated with docking studies followed by 50 ns molecular dynamics simulations.
2.6.1. Investigation of Binding Interactions of Compound 23 with hCA IX
Compound 23 can form an interaction with the active site Zn2+ ion, only when it is in the open-coumarin form (Figure 7). The docked pose shows a hydrogen bond of the ligand’s hydroxyl group with the sidechain of Thr200, while the carboxylic acid group interacts with the Zn2+ ion. The ligand is in a folded conformation and the terminal phenyl group forms hydrophobic interactions with the sidechains of Trp5 and Pro202.
Figure 7.
Interactions of the hCA IX—compound 23 complex during a 50 ns MD simulation. (A) Overview of the observed binding interactions. Snapshots of the ligand binding pose at 0 (B), 17.2 (C), 26.8 (D), and 34 ns (E). The MM–GBSA binding energy of the ligand-enzyme complex (F). The Zn2+ ion is shown in a large yellow sphere. Hydrogen bonds are indicated in yellow dashed lines. Aromatic hydrogen bonds are indicated in turquoise dashed lines.
During the entire simulation, the ligand’s carboxylic acid interacts with the Zn2+ ion and Thr199 (Figure 7A). The interaction of the hydroxyl group with Thr200 is not stable instead, it forms hydrogen bonds with bridging water molecules with Gln67, Gln92, and Thr200. Due to the flexible alkyl chain, the ligand adopts several conformations in the active site with a near-extended alkyl chain conformation. As a result, the triazole and phenyl groups of the ligand form occasionally hydrogen bonds or aromatic hydrogen bonds with the active site. The calculated MM–GBSA ligand-enzyme binding energy fluctuates roughly between −220 and 190 kcal/mol (Figure 7F).
No docked pose was observed of the compound was observed for the closed coumarin form in which the ligand forms an interaction with the zinc ion.
2.6.2. Investigation of Binding Interactions of Compound 70 with hCA XII
Modeling studies indicated again that only the open-coumarin form of compound 70 was able to form a direct interaction with the active site Zn2+ ion, while the closed-coumarin form could not. The docked pose shows the interaction between the ligand’s carboxylic acid group and the Zn2+ ion as well as Thr199 (Figure 8). The ligand’s substituted cyclohexyl group is located close to Trp5 and His64 and forms hydrophobic interactions with these two amino acids.
Figure 8.
Interactions of the hCA XII—compound 70 complex during a 50 ns MD simulation. (A) Overview of the observed binding interactions. (B) MM–GBSA binding energy of the ligand-enzyme complex snapshots of the ligand binding pose at 0 (C), 10 (D), and 50 ns (E). The Zn2+ ion is shown in a large yellow sphere. Hydrogen bonds are indicated in yellow dashed lines. Aromatic hydrogen bonds are indicated in turquoise dashed lines.
During the 50 ns MD simulation, the interaction with Zn2+ is preserved, while the interaction with Thr199 is only present during 15% of the simulation time. However, the carboxylic acid forms interactions with Ser65, Leu95, and Asn244 via a bridging water molecule (Figure 8A). The ligand’s hydroxyl group can form direct interactions with Tyr7 and Asn62 and an interaction mediated by a bridging water molecule with Val66. The rest of the ligand is very flexible during the simulation and adopts different conformations in the active site. This part of the ligand mainly forms interactions via bridging water molecules. The calculated MM–GBSA binding energy between the ligand and active site ranges approximately from −190 to −160 kcal/mol.
3. Conclusions
In conclusion, 60 novel coumarin monoterpenes (12–71) were synthesized in two series (bearing a triazole ring and an alkyl chain) as CAIs. All the synthesized compounds in both series showed selective inhibitory activity at the nanomolar level against hCA IX and hCA XII (the tumor-associated isoforms). Compounds 23 and 42 exhibited the strongest inhibitory activity against hCA IX with Ki values of 1.9 nM, while compound 70 showed the highest hCA XII inhibition with a Ki of 4.9 nM. Moreover, seven compounds (12, 23, 29, 30, 37, 42, and 43) inhibited the tumor-associated isoform hCA IX with Ki values in the range 1.9–3.1 nM, which are approx. 10-fold lower than those of acetazolamide (AAZ, Ki = 25.8 nM). In addition, twenty-one compounds (15, 19, 20, 22, 24, 27, 28, 31, 34, 35, 39, 48, 51, 52, 55, 59, 61, 62, 63, 69, and 71; Ki = 12.6–38.3 nM) showed hCA IX inhibitory activity similar to or higher than AAZ. On the other hand, the tumor-associated isoform hCA XII was strongly inhibited by most synthesized compounds, with Ki values in the range from 4.9 to 9.5 nM. Among them, compound 70 (Ki = 4.9 nM) was found to be the most potent inhibitor against hCA XII. Docking studies in combination with molecular dynamics simulations have suggested the possible binding interactions of the target enzymes with compounds 23 and 70.
The cytotoxic properties of all compounds were determined on HT-29, one of the cells in which CA IX and XII were overexpressed. After this initial cytotoxic screening, a narrower compound scale was selected according to the enzyme inhibition results and the HT-29 cytotoxicity results, and their cytotoxic effects were determined on PC-3, MCF-7, and HEK293T cells. According to the cytotoxicity results, 14 (IC50 = 2.48 μM) and 63 (IC50 = 3.91 μM) had the highest cytotoxicity on the MCF-7 cells. 23 showed the strongest cytotoxic effect on both PC-3 (IC50 = 9.40 μM) and HT-29 (IC50 = 12.10 μM) cell lines. In addition, 69 (IC50 = 12.13 μM) exhibited a strong cytotoxic effect on HT-29. The apoptotic properties of the most effective ones were evaluated on these cell lines because the selected compounds showed high cytotoxic effects on HT-29 and PC-3 cell lines. 14, 23, 63, and 66 showed concentration-dependent apoptotic effects in HT-29 and MCF-7 cells. The most apoptotic compounds were 14 in MCF-7 and 23 in HT-29 cells. Additionally, both compounds decreased CA IX and CA XII protein expression in HT-29 cells, 23 and 66 showed the strongest decrement. However, 14 exhibited higher decrements of expression in MCF-7 cells.
It has been shown that hybrid molecules of specially designed coumarin-monoterpene structures with different linker and tail groups selectively inhibited the CA IX and XII and also exhibited specific cytotoxicity in different cell lines.
4. Experimental Section
4.1. Materials
The chemicals and solvents were bought from Fluka Chemie, Merck, Alfa Aesar, and Sigma-Aldrich. Melting points were determined on a STUART SMP40. IR spectra were measured on an Alfa Bruker spectrometer. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were acquired on a Varian spectrometer at 300 and at 75 Hz, respectively. Mass spectra were obtained using a Thermo Fisher Scientific LC–HRMS spectrometer. Spectrophotometric analyses were performed by a BioTek Power Wave XS (BioTek, USA). The cell line was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium-F12, RPMI Medium, fetal calf serum, and PBS were bought from GIBCO BRL, InVitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). All compounds used for biological assays were >95% pure, as determined by the Shimadzu HPLC system with acetonitrile: 0.5% formic acid in water (70:30, v/v).
4.2. Methods
4.2.1. General Procedures and Spectral Data
Compounds 2a–2h and 3a–3h were obtained using the synthesis procedures mentioned in previous studies.20
4.2.2. Synthesis of Propargyl Monoterpenes (8–11)
For compounds 8–10, the corresponding monoterpenes (thymol, carvacrol, and eugenol) (13 mmol), 1.48 mL of propargyl bromide (15.6 mmol), and 2.15 g of potassium carbonate (15.6 mmol) were taken into dry DMF and stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The mixture was poured onto crushed ice, and the residue was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 50 mL). The organic phase was washed with water (3 × 25 mL) and dried with sodium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in a vacuum. Compounds 8–10 were purified by column chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate).20
For compound 11, 0.44 g of sodium hydride (10.98 mmol) was added to 10 mL of dry THF. A solution of 1.56 g menthol (9.98 mmol) dissolved in 20 mL dry THF was dropped into the sodium hydride solution in the ice bath. After the gas evolution was completed, the mixture was stirred at 70 °C for 1.5 h and cooled; then, propargyl bromide (0.90 mmol) and tetrabutylammonium iodide (TBAI, 0.20 mmol) were added to this mixture. It was stirred at room temperature for 2.5 h. At the end of the period, 4 mL of cold water was dropped, and THF was evaporated under a vacuum. The remaining oily substance was dissolved with 50 mL of ether and washed with 2 × 25 mL of water. The organic phase was dried with sodium sulfate and removed under a vacuum. The liquid residue was purified by column chromatography with petroleum ether/ether in a ratio of 1:1.21
4.2.2.1. 1-Isopropyl-4-methyl-2-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)benzene (8)
Yellow liquid, 80% yield. IR: 3292, 2960, 2122, 1612, 1505, 1244, 1035, 811, 629 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.26 (6H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 2.39 (3H, s), 2.53–2.54 (1H, m), 3.32–3.41 (1H, m), 4.75 (2H, d, J = 2.3 Hz), 6.82–6.86 (2H, m), 7.17 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.6, 23.3, 26.6, 56.3, 75.2, 79.8, 113.2, 119.4, 125.7, 133.1, 136.0, 155.6.
4.2.2.2. 4-Isopropyl-1-methyl-2-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)benzene (9)
Yellow liquid, 82% yield. IR: 3291, 2959, 2122, 1613, 1511, 1239, 1033, 815, 639 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.24 (6H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 2.20 (3H, s), 2.49–2.50 (1H, m), 2.80–2.92 (1H, m), 4.70 (2H, d, J = 2.3 Hz), 6.76–6.81 (2H, m), 7.06 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.0, 24.3, 34.2, 56.2, 75.3, 79.3,110.5, 119.3, 124.7, 130.8, 148.0, 155.9.
4.2.2.3. 4-Allyl-2-methoxy-1-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)benzene (10)
Yellow liquid, 76% yield. IR: 3289, 2936, 2121, 1592, 1509, 1259, 1139, 1024, 799, 640 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 2.48–2.49 (1H, m), 3.34 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 3.85 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.72 (2H, d, J = 2.3 Hz), 5.05–5.12 (2H, m), 5.89–6.02 (1H, m), 6.71–6.73 (2H, m), 6.97 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 40.0, 56.0, 57.1, 75.8, 79.0, 112.6, 115.0, 115.9, 120.5, 134.4, 137.7, 145.3, 149.9.
4.2.2.4. 1-Isopropyl-4-methyl-2-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)cyclohexane (11)
Yellow powder, 60% yield. IR: 3312, 2953, 2920, 2117, 1453, 1368, 1084, 1045, 1024, 661, 597 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.64 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 0.84–0.97 (8H, m), 1.19–1.24 (1H, m), 1.26–1.41 (1H, m), 1.55–1.67 (2H, m), 1.87 (1H, s, br), 2.12–2.21 (2H, m), 2.48–2.49 (1H, m), 3.22 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.1 Hz), 4.24 (2H, d, J = 2.1 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.3, 21.1, 22.5, 23.5, 25.8, 31.6, 34.6, 40.4, 48.3, 49.5, 56.3, 75.7, 79.8.
4.2.3. Synthesis of Coumarin-Monoterpene Derivatives Bearing a Triazole Ring (12–43)
1 mmol of coumarin azide (3a–3h) was dissolved in 4 mL of dry DMF, and 1 mmol of corresponding monoterpene propargyl derivatives (8–11) was added in a Schlenk tube. 2 mmol PMDETA (N,N,N′,N″,N″-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine) and 1 mmol CuBr were added to this mixture, and the Schlenk tube was closed. It was degassed three times. At the end of this period, THF was added to remove the copper and was filtered by the neutralized alumina. Excess THF was evaporated under a vacuum. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) and washed with water (2 × 25 mL). The organic phase was dried with sodium sulfate, and the solvent was removed under a vacuum. The obtained compounds (12–43) were purified by column chromatography using hexane and ethyl acetate in a ratio of 2:1.22
4.2.3.1. 7-(2-(4-((2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (12)
Whitish powder, 333 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3a, 92% yield, mp 112–113 °C; IR: 3149, 3060, 2958, 2928, 1730, 1635, 1506, 1393, 1350, 1284, 1254, 1229, 1157, 1121, 892, 834 cm–1; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.10 (6H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 2.26 (3H, s), 3.11 (1H, m), 4.54 (2H, t, J = 4.6 Hz), 4.84 (2H, t, J = 4.6 Hz), 5.14 (2H, s), 6.30 (1H, d, J = 9.0 Hz), 6.71 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.88–7.05 (4H, m), 7.62 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.98 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 8.28 (1H, s); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.6, 23.2, 26.6, 49.4, 62.1, 67.5, 102.1, 113.3, 113.4, 113.7, 122.0, 125.4, 126.3, 130.2, 134.0, 136.5, 143.9, 144.9, 155.7, 155.9, 160.8, 161.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C24H25N3O4 [M+ + Na], 442.1743; found, 442.1738.
4.2.3.2. 7-(3-(4-((2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (13)
White powder, 314 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3b, 87% yield, mp 117–118 °C; IR: 3150, 3073, 2959, 2923, 1721, 1614, 1508, 1388, 1352, 1282, 1256, 1231, 1167, 1136, 1047, 838 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.15 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.31 (3H, s), 2.45–2.49 (2H, m), 3.20–3.25 (1H, m), 4.04 (2H, t, J = 5.8 Hz), 4.63 (2H, t, J = 6.7 Hz), 5.21 (2H, s), 6.26 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.76–6.83 (4H, m), 7.09 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.37 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.60 (1H, s), 7.64 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.5, 22.9, 26.7, 29.9, 47.2, 62.6, 64.8, 101.7, 112.7, 112.8, 113.1, 113.6, 122.0, 126.2, 129.1, 134.3, 136.7, 143.5, 155.4, 156.0, 161.3, 161.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C25H27N3O4 [M + Na]+, 456.1899; found, 456.1877.
4.2.3.3. 7-(4-(4-((2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)butoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (14)
Yellow liquid, 289 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3c, 84% yield. IR: 3151, 3080, 2957, 2872, 1722, 1612, 1556, 1505, 1468, 1399, 1353, 1288, 1254, 1231, 1129, 1032, 836 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.19 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.82–1.91 (2H, m), 2.12–2.21 (2H, m), 2.32 (3H, s), 3.25–3.30 (1H, m), 4.04 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz), 4.47 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 5.22 (2H, s), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 6.6 Hz), 6.76–6.83 (4H, m), 7.10 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.60 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.5, 23.0, 26.5, 26.8, 27.3, 30.5, 50.2, 62.7, 67.7, 101.5, 112.8, 112.9, 113.0, 113.4, 122.0, 122.4, 126.2, 129.0, 134.4, 136.7, 143.6, 145.3, 155.5, 156.0, 161.3, 162.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C26H29N3O4 [M + Na]+, 470.2056; found, 470.2034.
4.2.3.4. 7-((6-(4-((2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)hexyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (15)
Yellow liquid, 412 mg, starting from 290 mg of coumarin 3d, 85% yield. IR: 3150, 3080, 2942, 2866, 1710, 1609, 1506, 1394, 1350, 1283, 1230, 1122, 1016, 890, 810 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.18 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.22–1.46 (2H, m), 1.49–1.59 (2H, m), 1.76–1.86 (2H, m), 1.89–2.02 (2H, m), 2.32 (3H, s), 3.23–3.29 (1H, m), 3.99 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz), 4.39 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 5.21 (2H, s), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.76–6.85 (4H, m), 7.10 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.56 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.5, 23.0, 25.7, 25.9, 26.4, 26.8, 28.9, 30.4, 50.5, 62.7, 68.4, 101.5, 112.6, 113.0, 113.1, 113.2, 122.0, 126.2, 128.9, 134.4, 136.7, 143.6, 155.5, 156.1, 161.5, 162.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C28H33N3O4 [M + Na]+, 498.2369; found, 498.2354.
4.2.3.5. 7-((7-(4-((2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)heptyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (16)
Yellow liquid, 292 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3e, 92% yield. IR: 3150, 3060, 2924, 2856, 1720, 1607, 1504, 1391, 1347, 1277, 1250, 1227, 1118, 1093, 1015, 832, 811 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.18 (6H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 1.38–1.43 (6H, m), 1.75–1.84 (2H, m), 1.90–1.99 (2H, m), 2.31 (3H, s), 3.25–3.30 (1H, m), 3.99 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.37 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 5.21 (2H, s), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.76–6.84 (4H, m), 7.09 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.58 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 20.3, 21.7, 24.7, 25.3, 25.5, 27.6, 27.7, 29.1, 29.2, 49.3, 61.4, 67.3, 100.2, 111.3, 111.7, 111.8, 111.8, 120.7, 121.1, 124.9, 127.7, 133.1, 135.4, 142.4, 143.8, 154.2, 154.8, 160.2, 161.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C29H35N3O4 [M + Na]+, 512.2525; found, 512.2501.
4.2.3.6. 7-((9-(4-((2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)nonyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (17)
Yellow liquid, 226 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3f, 72% yield. IR: 3149, 3048, 2925, 2854, 1725, 1607, 1556, 1505, 1458, 1402, 1280, 1253, 1228, 1156, 1017, 832, 809 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.18 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.22–1.33 (8H, m), 1.40–1.45 (2H, m), 1.74–1.81 (2H, m), 1.90–1.94 (2H, m), 2.31 (3H, s), 3.25–3.30 (1H, m), 3.99 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.36 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 5.21 (2H, s), 6.22 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.75–6.84 (4H, m), 7.09 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.34 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.58 (1H, s), 7.61 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.5, 23.0, 26.1, 26.6, 26.8, 29.1, 29.4, 29.5, 30.5, 50.6, 62.7, 68.7, 101.5, 112.5, 113.0, 113.1, 122.0, 122.4, 126.2, 129.0, 134.4, 136.6, 143.7, 144.9, 155.5, 156.1, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C31H39N3O4 [M + Na]+, 540.2838; found, 540.2830.
4.2.3.7. 7-((10-(4-((2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)decyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (18)
White powder, 262 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3g, 85% yield, mp 72–73 °C; IR: 3154, 3050, 2968, 2850, 1727, 1617, 1553, 1507, 1403, 1348, 1295, 1255, 1192, 1097, 1053, 1011, 855, 822 cm–1; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.08 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.23–1.39 (12H, m), 1.69–1.73 (2H, m), 1.75–1.82 (2H, m), 2.26 (3H, s), 3.11–3.16 (1H, m), 4.04 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.36 (2H, t, J = 6.7 Hz), 5.11 (2H, s), 6.28 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.71 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.90–6.95 (3H, m), 7.03 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.60 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.97 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 8.18 (1H, s); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.6, 23.2, 26.0, 26.4, 26.7, 29.0, 29.1, 29.3, 29.5, 30.3, 50.0, 62.2, 68.9, 101.7, 112.8, 113.0, 113.3, 113.8, 122.0, 124.7, 126.2, 130.1, 134.0, 136.5, 143.7, 145.0, 155.7, 156.1, 160.9, 1612.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C32H41N3O4 [M + Na]+, 554.2995; found, 554.2980.
4.2.3.8. 7-((12-(4-((2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)dodecyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (19)
Yellow powder, 199 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3h, 66% yield, mp 68–69 °C; IR: 3142, 3048, 2959, 2850, 1727, 1618, 1578, 1553, 1505, 1469, 1379, 1255, 1118, 1091, 1046, 807 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.18 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.27–1.46 (16H, m), 1.74–1.83 (2H, m), 1.85–1.93 (2H, m), 2.32 (3H, s), 3.25–3.30 (1H, m), 4.00 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.35 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz), 5.21 (2H, s), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.76–6.84 (4H, m), 7.10 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.55 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.6, 23.0, 26.1, 26.7, 26.8, 29.2, 29.5, 29.6, 29.7, 30.5, 50.6, 62.7, 68.8, 101.4, 112.9, 113.1, 113.2, 122.0, 122.3, 126.2, 128.9, 134.4, 136.7, 143.7, 145.0, 155.5, 156.1, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C34H45N3O4 [M + Na]+, 582.3308; found, 582.3282.
4.2.3.9. 7-(2-(4-((5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (20)
Whitish powder, 246 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3a, 68% yield, mp 105–106 °C; IR: 3157, 3052, 2964, 2873, 1708, 1612, 1581, 1508, 1402, 1350, 1285, 1254, 1234, 1204, 1126, 1050, 896, 836, cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.21 (6H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 2.19 (3H, s), 2.83–2.87 (1H, m), 4.45 (2H, t, J = 4.9 Hz), 4.82 (2H, t, J = 4.9 Hz), 5.24 (2H, s), 6.27 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.74–6.79 (4H, m), 7.06 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.37 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 7.78 (1H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.1, 24.3, 34.2, 49.6, 62.5, 66.9, 102.0, 110.2, 112.6, 113.5, 114.0, 119.0, 123.7, 124.4, 129.2, 130.8, 143.3, 145.4, 148.2, 155.9, 156.4, 160.9, 161.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C24H25N3O4 [M + Na]+, 442.1743; found, 442.1732.
4.2.3.10. 7-(3-(4-((5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (21)
White powder, 254 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3b, 72% yield, mp 108–109 °C; IR: 3138, 3065, 2947, 2864, 1710, 1611, 1511, 1461, 1400, 1353, 1279, 1233, 1206, 1125, 1021, 938, 870, 834 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.22 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.14 (3H, s), 2.42–2.50 (2H, m), 2.83–2.88 (1H, m), 4.03 (2H, t, J = 5.5 Hz), 4.62 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 5.23 (2H, s), 6.25 (1H, dd, J = 4.9, 9.6 Hz), 6.74–6.87 (4H, m), 7.05 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.37 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.59 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.0, 24.3, 29.8, 34.2, 47.2, 62.5, 64.8, 101.8, 110.2, 112.7, 113.1, 113.7, 118.9, 122.9, 124.3, 129.1, 130.8, 143.5, 145.3, 148.2, 156.0, 156.4, 161.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C25H27N3O4 [M + Na]+, 456.1899; found, 456.1878.
4.2.3.11. 7-(4-(4-((5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)butoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (22)
Yellow powder, 230 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3c, 96% yield, mp 60–61 °C; IR: 3140, 3082, 2958, 2872, 1726, 1610, 1556, 1508, 1460, 1400, 1350, 1280, 1250, 1231, 1161, 1122, 1035, 892, 834 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.23 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.81–1.90 (2H, m), 2.11–2.16 (2H, m), 2.19 (3H, s), 2.81–2.91 (1H, m), 4.04 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz), 4.47 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 5.24 (2H, s), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.75–6.83 (4H, m), 7.07 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.61 (1H, s), 7.64 (1H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.1, 24.3, 26.2, 27.3, 30.5, 34.3, 50.1, 62.7, 67.7, 101.5, 110.3, 112.8, 112.9, 113.4, 118.9, 122.4, 124.4, 129.0, 130.8, 143.6, 145.3, 148.3, 156.0, 156.5, 161.4, 162.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C26H29N3O4 [M + Na]+, 470.2056; found, 470.2034.
4.2.3.12. 7-((6-(4-((5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)hexyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (23)
Yellow powder, 152 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3d, 46% yield, mp 132–133 °C; IR: 3130, 3079, 2948, 2874, 1710, 1609, 1556, 1507, 1393, 1351, 1284, 1236, 1202, 1160, 1124, 1020, 855, 811 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.23 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.35–1.59 (4H, m), 1.80 (2H, t, J = 6.7 Hz), 1.96 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz), 2.19 (3H, s), 2.81–2.88 (1H, m), 3.99 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz), 4.38 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz), 5.23 (2H, s), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.74–6.85 (4H, m), 7.06 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.35 (1H, dd, J = 3.5; 8.4 Hz), 7.57–7.64 (2H, m); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.1, 24.3, 25.6, 26.4, 28.9, 30.4, 34.2, 50.4, 62.7, 68.4, 101.5, 110.3, 112.6, 113.1, 118.9, 122.4, 124.4, 129.0, 130.7, 143.7, 145.1, 148.2, 156.1, 156.5, 161.4, 162.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C28H33N3O4 [M + Na]+, 498.2369; found, 498.2350.
4.2.3.13. 7-((7-(4-((5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)heptyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (24)
White powder, 243 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3e, 75% yield, mp 83–84 °C; IR: 3112, 3071, 2947, 2869, 1730, 1610, 1559, 1510, 1398, 1351, 1286, 1245, 1230, 1155, 997, 830 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.23 (6H, d, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.38–1.43 (6H, m), 1.75–1.82 (2H, m), 1.89–1.96 (2H, m), 2.19 (3H, s), 2.84–2.88 (1H, m), 3.99 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.37 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz), 5.24 (2H, s), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.75–6.84 (4H, m), 7.06 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.57 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.1, 24.3, 26.0, 26.6, 28.9, 29.0, 30.4, 34.3, 50.5, 62.7, 68.6, 101.4, 110.2, 112.6, 113.2, 118.9, 122.3, 124.4, 128.9, 130.7, 143.7, 145.1, 148.2, 156.1, 156.5, 161.5, 162.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C29H35N3O4 [M + Na]+, 512.2525; found, 512.2504.
4.2.3.14. 7-((9-(4-((5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)nonyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (25)
White powder, 194 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3f, 62% yield, mp 69–70 °C; IR: 3114, 3073, 2923, 2872, 1733, 1611, 1509, 1473, 1397, 1287, 1247, 1229, 1177, 1057, 1015, 856 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.23 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.33–1.38 (8H, m), 1.40–1.45 (2H, m), 1.77–1.82 (2H, m), 1.89–1.94 (2H, m), 2.19 (3H, s), 2.84–2.88 (1H, m), 4.00 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.36 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz), 5.24 (2H, s), 6.23(1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.75–6.84 (4H, m), 7.06 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.57 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.1, 24.3, 26.1, 26.6, 29.1, 29.4, 29.5, 30.5, 34.3, 50.6, 62.7, 68.7, 101.5, 110.3, 112.5, 113.1, 113.2, 118.9, 122.3, 124.4, 128.9, 130.7, 143.7, 145.1, 148.2, 156.1, 156.5, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C31H39N3O4 [M + Na]+, 540.2838; found, 540.2826.
4.2.3.15. 7-((10-(4-((5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)decyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (26)
Yellow powder, 300 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3g, 97% yield, mp 73–74 °C; IR: 3163, 3070, 2953, 2851, 1725, 1616, 1553, 1510, 1468, 1403, 1295, 1254, 1132, 1050, 1012, 891, 835 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.15 (6H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 1.17–1.24 (8H, m), 1.32–1.40 (4H, m), 1.70–1.77 (2H, m), 1.81–1.86 (2H, m), 2.12 (3H, s), 2.74–2.81 (1H, m), 3.92 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.28 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz), 5.16 (2H, s), 6.17 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.67–6.77 (4H, m), 7.0 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.28 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.49 (1H, s), 7.55 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 14.9, 23.0, 24.8, 25.4, 27.9, 28.2, 28.3, 29.2, 33.0, 49.3, 61.4, 67.5, 100.2, 109.0, 111.3, 111.8, 111.9, 117.6, 121.0, 123.1, 127.6, 129.5, 142.5, 143.8, 147.0, 154.8, 155.2, 160.3, 161.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C32H41N3O4 [M + Na]+, 554.2995; found, 554.2971.
4.2.3.16. 7-((12-(4-((5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)dodecyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (27)
Whitish powder, 168 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3h, 56% yield, mp 80–81 °C; IR: 3163, 3060, 2918, 2850, 1726, 1618, 1553, 1511, 1467, 1403, 1296, 1254, 1237, 1133, 1049, 833 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.17–1.46 (22H, m), 1.76–1.93 (4H, m), 2.19 (3H, s), 2.84–2.88 (1H, m), 4.01 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.35 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 5.23 (2H, s), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.75–6.84 (4H, m), 7.06 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.57 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.1, 24.3, 26.1, 26.7, 29.2, 29.5, 29.6, 29.7, 30.5, 34.3, 50.6, 62.7, 68.8, 101.5, 110.2, 112.5, 113.1, 113.2, 118.9, 122.3, 124.4, 128.9, 130.7, 143.7, 145.0, 148.2, 156.1, 156.5, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C34H45N3O4 [M + Na]+, 582.3308; found, 582.3282.
4.2.3.17. 7-(2-(4-((4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (28)
Whitish powder, 194 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3a, 52% yield, mp 118–119 °C; IR: 3149, 3083, 2957, 2877, 1708, 1612, 1518, 1456, 1399, 1348, 1281, 1234, 1155, 1126, 1038, 997, 836 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 3.32 (2H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 3.84 (3H, s), 4.42 (2H, t, J = 5.2 Hz), 4.79 (2H, t, J = 4.6 Hz), 5.03–5.10 (2H, m), 5.27 (2H, s), 5.86–5.98 (1H, m), 6.27 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.66–6.88 (4H, m), 6.95 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 7.84(1H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 40.0, 49.6, 56.0, 63.4, 66.9, 101.9, 112.4, 112.6, 113.4, 113.9, 114.4, 116.0, 120.6, 124.2, 129.2, 134.0, 137.7, 143.4, 144.9, 146.0, 149.6, 155.8, 160.9, 161.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C24H23N3O5 [M + Na]+, 456.1535; found, 456.1516.
4.2.3.18. 7-(3-(4-((4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (29)
Whitish powder, 240 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3b, 66% yield, mp 88–89 °C; IR: 3139, 3078, 2964, 2876, 1723, 1614, 1591, 1467, 1396, 1351, 1265, 1227, 1137, 1056, 1011, 858, 832 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 2.40–2.48 (2H, m), 3.32 (2H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 3.84 (3H, s), 4.03 (2H, t, J = 5.5 Hz), 4.58 (2H, t, J = 6.7 Hz), 5.04–5.10 (2H, m), 5.26 (2H, s), 5.89–5.98 (1H, m), 6.27 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.67–6.87 (4H, m), 6.94 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.37 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 7.65 (1H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 29.8, 40.0, 47.2, 56.0, 63.5, 64.9, 101.8, 112.4, 112.7, 113.1, 113.6, 114.3, 116.0, 120.7, 123.4, 129.1, 134.0, 137.7, 143.5, 144.9, 146.0, 149.6, 156.0, 161.3, 161.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C25H25N3O5 [M + Na]+, 470.1692; found, 470.1673.
4.2.3.19. 7-(4-(4-((4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)butoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (30)
Yellow powder, 255 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3c, 72% yield, mp 73–74 °C; IR: 3150, 3072, 2960, 2866, 1723, 1613, 1553, 1515, 1471, 1400, 1292, 1256, 1233, 1190, 1133, 1097, 1057, 1011, 836 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.80–1.89 (2H, m), 2.09–2.18 (2H, m), 3.32 (2H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 3.86 (3H, s), 4.03 (2H, t, J = 5.8 Hz), 4.47 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 5.04–5.10 (2H, m), 5.27 (2H, s), 5.87–5.99 (1H, m), 6.25 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.68–6.83 (4H, m), 6.96 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 7.68 (1H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 26.2, 27.3, 40.0, 50.1, 56.0, 63.5, 67.7, 101.5, 112.3, 112.8, 112.9, 113.4, 114.4, 115.9, 120.7, 129.0, 134.0, 137.7, 143.6, 146.0, 149.6, 156.0, 161.4, 162.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C26H27N3O5 [M + Na]+, 484.1848; found, 484.1826.
4.2.3.20. 7-((6-(4-((4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)hexyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (31)
Whitish liquid, 272 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3d, 80% yield. IR: 3149, 3074, 2942, 2865, 1746, 1611, 1554, 1509, 1464, 1405, 1338, 1290, 1258, 1126, 1025, 837 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.39–1.54 (4H, m), 1.75–1.84 (2H, m), 1.92–1.97 (2H, m), 3.32 (2H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 3.85 (3H, s), 3.99 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.35 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 5.04–5.10 (2H, m), 5.26 (2H, s), 5.90–5.99 (1H, m), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.68–6.72 (2H, m), 6.78–6.84 (2H, m), 6.95 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.62 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 24.4, 25.1, 27.7, 29.1, 38.7, 49.2, 54.8, 62.3, 67.2, 100.2, 111.1, 111.4, 111.8, 111.9, 113.2, 114.7, 119.4, 121.6, 127.7, 132.7, 136.4, 142.4, 143.4, 144.8, 148.3, 154.8, 160.2, 161.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C28H31N3O5 [M + Na]+, 512.2161; found, 512.2146.
4.2.3.21. 7-((7-(4-((4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)heptyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (32)
Yellow powder, 300 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3e, 90% yield, mp 101–102 °C; IR: 3145, 3070, 2966, 2858, 1726, 1609, 1512, 1471, 1426, 1398, 1283, 1251, 1229, 1137, 1122, 1026, 864, 824 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.25–1.47 (6H, m), 1.74–1.79 (2H, m), 1.82–1.94 (2H, m), 3.32 (2H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 3.86 (3H, s), 3.99 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.34 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz), 5.02–5.11 (2H, m), 5.27 (2H, s), 5.90–5.99 (1H, m), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.68–6.72 (2H, m), 6.78–6.84 (2H, m), 6.95 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.62 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 26.0, 26.6, 29.0, 30.4, 30.5, 40.0, 50.5, 56.0, 63.6, 68.6, 101.4, 112.3, 112.6, 113.2, 114.4, 115.9, 120.7, 122.8, 125.7, 128.9, 133.9, 137.7, 143.7, 144.7, 146.1, 149.6, 156.1, 161.5, 162.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C29H33N3O5 [M + Na]+, 526.2318; found, 526.2295.
4.2.3.22. 7-((9-(4-((4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)nonyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (33)
Yellow powder, 193 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3f, 60% yield, mp 83–84 °C; IR: 3136, 3072, 2995, 2850, 1730, 1611, 1512, 1473, 1398, 1350, 1287, 1258, 1231, 1036, 1015, 857, 826 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.32–1.47 (10H, m), 1.75–1.87 (4H, m), 3.32 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 3.85 (3H, s), 4.00 (2H, t, J = 6.7 Hz), 4.32 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz), 5.04–5.11 (2H, m), 5.26 (2H, s), 5.87–6.01 (1H, m), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.67–6.72 (2H, m), 6.79–6.85 (2H, m), 6.96 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 7.65 (1H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 26.1, 26.6, 29.1, 29.3, 29.4, 30.4, 40.0, 50.6, 56.0, 63.6, 68.7, 101.5, 112.4, 112.5, 113.1, 113.2, 114.4, 115.9, 120.7, 122.8, 128.9, 133.9, 137.7, 143.7, 144.6, 146.1, 149.6, 156.1, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C31H37N3O5 [M + Na]+], 554.2634; found, 554.2606.
4.2.3.23. 7-((10-(4-((4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)decyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (34)
Yellow powder, 273 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3g, 86% yield, mp 48–49 °C; IR: 3130, 3080, 2942, 2851, 1725, 1614, 1510, 1468, 1395, 1294, 1258, 1230, 1194, 1131, 1099, 1035, 1015, 835 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.12–1.34 (8H, m), 1.40–1.48 (4H, m), 1.71–1.91 (4H, m), 3.32 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 3.86 (3H, s), 4.00 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.32 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz), 5.02–5.11 (2H, m), 5.27 (2H, s), 5.90–5.99 (1H, m), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.68–6.74 (2H, m), 6.79–6.85 (2H, m), 6.95 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.61 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 24.8, 25.4, 27.9, 28.2, 28.2, 28.3, 29.2, 29.2, 38.7, 49.3, 54.8, 62.4, 67.5, 100.0, 111.1, 111.3, 111.8, 111.9, 113.2, 114.7, 119.4, 121.5, 127.6, 132.6, 136.4, 142.4, 143.4, 144.8, 148.3, 154.8, 160.3, 161.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C32H39N3O5 [M + Na]+, 568.2787; found, 568.2762.
4.2.3.24. 7-((12-(4-((4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)dodecyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (35)
Yellow powder, 258 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3h, 84% yield, mp 72–74 °C; IR: 3137, 3084, 2917, 2849, 1710, 1617, 1589, 1556, 1402, 1373, 1296, 1229, 1195, 1134, 1051, 994, 850 cm–1; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.28–1.45 (16H, m), 1.74–1.86 (4H, m), 3.34 (2H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 3.77 (3H, s), 4.10 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.39 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 5.06–5.14 (2H, m), 5.11 (2H, s), 5.94–6.03 (1H, m), 6.33 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.72 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 6.84 (1H, s), 6.92–7.08 (4H, m), 7.66 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz), 8.03 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 8.24 (1H, s); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 26.0, 26.4, 29.0, 29.3, 29.5, 29.6, 30.3, 31.0, 35.0, 50.0, 55.9, 62.5, 68.9, 101.7, 112.8, 112.9, 113.0, 113.3, 114.6, 116.2, 120.7, 125.0, 130.1, 133.5, 138.5, 143.4, 145.0, 146.3, 149.7, 156.0, 161.0, 162.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C34H43N3O5 [M + Na]+, 596.3100; found, 596.3070.
4.2.3.25. 7-(2-(4-(((2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (36)
Yellow powder, 316 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3a, 86% yield, mp 122–123 °C; IR: 3136, 3065, 2956, 2867, 1729, 1619, 1557, 1455, 1404, 1298, 1242, 1140, 1083, 1037, 834 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.63 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 0.84–0.97 (8H, m), 1.19–1.23 (1H, m), 1.26–1.41 (1H, m), 1.57–1.67 (2H, m), 1.87 (1H, s, br), 2.12–2.21 (2H, m), 3.20 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.1 Hz), 4.43 (2H, t, J = 5.2 Hz), 4.57 (2H, t, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.79 (1H, d, J = 11.7 Hz), 4.81 (2H, t, J = 4.3 Hz), 6.27 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.79–6.83 (2H, m), 7.38 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 7.73 (1H, s); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.3, 21.1, 22.5, 23.5, 25.8, 31.6, 34.6, 40.4, 48.3, 49.5, 62.1, 67.0, 79.0, 101.9, 112.6,113.4, 114.0, 123.6, 129.2, 143.4, 146.7, 155.9, 161.0, 161.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C24H31N3O4 [M + Na]+, 448.2212; found, 448.2192.
4.2.3.26. 7-(3-(4-(((2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (37)
Yellow powder, 308 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3b, 86% yield, mp 78–79 °C; IR: 3133, 3067, 2944, 2866, 1710, 1616, 1557, 1510, 1463, 1400, 1352, 1281, 1233, 1159, 1130, 1071, 1047, 832 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.65 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 0.76–1.14 (7H, m), 1.18–1.37 (3H, m), 1.57–1.66 (2H, m), 1.82 (1H, s, br), 2.04–2.21 (2H, m), 2.40–2.49 (2H, m), 3.19 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.3 Hz), 4.05 (2H, t, J = 5.8 Hz), 4.53–4.61 (3H, m), 4.77 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 6.26 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.78–6.84 (2H, m), 7.38 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.55 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.3, 21.1, 22.5, 23.5, 25.8, 29.9, 31.6, 34.6, 40.4, 47.0, 48.3, 62.1, 64.9, 79.0, 101.8, 112.7, 113.1, 113.6, 122.8, 129.1, 143.5, 146.5, 155.9, 161.2, 161.7. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C25H33N3O4 [M + Na]+, 462.2369; found, 462.2349.
4.2.3.27. 7-(4-(4-(((2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)butoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (38)
White powder, 322 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3c, 92% yield, mp 75–76 °C; IR: 3135, 3068, 2948, 2867, 1707, 1615, 1556, 1468, 1403, 1354, 1289, 1255, 1131, 1084, 1050, 862 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.68 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.82–0.99 (8H, m), 1.20–1.60 (3H, m), 1.62–1.66 (2H, m), 1.67–1.91 (2H, m), 2.09–2.21 (4H, m), 3.20 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.3 Hz), 4.04 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz), 4.45 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 4.57 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz), 4.78 (1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz), 6.25 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.77–6.84 (2H, m), 7.37 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.57 (1H, s), 7.64 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.4, 21.2, 22.5, 23.4, 25.8, 26.2, 27.3, 31.6, 34.7, 40.4, 48.3, 50.0, 62.2, 67.7, 79.0, 101.5, 112.8, 112.9, 113.3, 122.4, 129.0, 143.6, 146.6, 156.0, 161.4, 162.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C26H35N3O4 [M + Na]+, 476.2525; found, 476.2504.
4.2.3.28. 7-((6-(4-(((2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)hexyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (39)
Yellow liquid, 275 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3d, 82% yield. IR: 3134, 3048, 2947, 2865, 1729, 1610, 1556, 1508, 1456, 1400, 1394, 1279, 1229, 1199, 1120, 1047, 1021, 833 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.67 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 0.82–0.98 (8H, m), 1.20–1.25 (2H, m), 1.26–1.67 (7H, m), 1.77–1.86 (2H, m), 1.90–1.98 (2H, m), 2.14–2.22 (2H, m), 3.20 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.1 Hz), 4.00 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.37 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 4.57 (1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz), 4.78 (1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.78–6.84 (2H, m), 7.37 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.53 (1H, s), 7.64 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.3, 21.2, 22.5, 23.4, 25.7, 25.8, 26.4, 28.9, 30.4, 31.6, 34.7, 40.4, 48.3, 50.0, 62.2, 68.4, 78.9, 101.5, 112.6, 113.1, 113.1, 122.3, 128.9, 143.7, 146.4, 156.0, 161.5, 162.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C28H39N3O4 [M + Na]+, 504.2834; found, 504.2812.
4.2.3.29. 7-((7-(4-(((2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)heptyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (40)
Greenish liquid, 302 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3e, 92% yield. IR: 3132, 3040, 2923, 2864, 1729, 1610, 1556, 1508, 1456, 1393, 1349, 1279, 1229, 1199, 1120, 1048, 833 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.67 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 0.82–0.98 (8H, m), 1.20–1.60 (8H, m), 1.61–1.67 (2H, m), 1.76–1.85 (3H, m), 1.87–1.94 (2H, m), 2.14–2.22 (2H, m), 3.20 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.3 Hz), 3.99 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.35 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz), 4.56 (1H, d, J = 12.0 Hz),4.78 (1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz), 6.25 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.78–6.84 (2H, m), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.51 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.3, 21.2, 22.5, 23.4, 25.8, 26.0, 26.6, 28.9, 29.0, 30.4, 31.7, 34.7, 40.4, 48.4, 50.4, 62.2, 68.6, 78.9, 101.5, 112.6, 113.1, 113.1, 122.3, 128.9, 143.7, 146.4, 156.1, 161.5, 162.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C29H41N3O4 [M + Na]+, 518.2995; found, 518.2972.
4.2.3.30. 7-((9-(4-(((2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)nonyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (41)
Yellow liquid, 197 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3f, 62% yield. IR: 3140, 3070, 2923, 2856, 1730, 1611, 1556, 1508, 1457, 1393, 1349, 1279, 1230, 1199, 1120, 1047, 1020, 833 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.67 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.81–0.98 (8H, m), 1.20–1.46 (12H, m), 1.58–1.67 (2H, m), 1.75–1.92 (5H, m), 2.14–2.22 (2H, m), 3.20 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.1 Hz), 4.00 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.33 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 4.57 (1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz), 4.77 (1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.79–6.85 (2H, m), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.51 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.3, 21.2, 22.5, 23.4, 25.8, 26.1, 26.6, 29.1, 29.4, 29.5, 30.5, 31.7, 34.7, 40.4, 48.4, 50.5, 62.2, 68.7, 78.9, 101.5, 112.5, 113.1, 113.2, 122.3, 128.9, 143.7, 146.3, 156.1, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C31H45N3O4 [M + Na]+, 546.3308; found, 546.3282.
4.2.3.31. 7-((10-(4-(((2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)decyl) oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (42)
White powder, 263 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3g, 84% yield, mp 58–59 °C; IR: 3147, 3040, 2916, 2850, 1725, 1614, 1553, 1510, 1469, 1402, 1350, 1294, 1236, 1192, 1133, 1090, 1052, 1038, 835 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.66 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.79–0.98 (8H, m), 1.20–1.45 (14H, m), 1.58–1.67 (2H, m), 1.76–1.92 (5H, m), 2.14–2.21 (2H, m), 3.20 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.1 Hz), 4.00 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.33 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 4.57 (1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz), 4.77 (1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.79–6.85 (2H, m), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.51 (1H, s), 7.64 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.3, 21.2, 22.5, 23.4, 25.7, 26.1, 26.7, 29.1, 29.2, 29.4, 29.5, 29.6, 30.5, 31.6, 34.7, 40.4, 48.3, 50.5, 62.2, 68.8, 78.9, 101.5, 112.5, 113.1, 113.2, 122.3, 128.9, 143.7, 146.3, 156.1, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C32H47N3O4 [M + Na]+, 560.3464; found, 560.3445.
4.2.3.32. 7-((12-(4-(((2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)dodecyl) oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (43)
White powder, 268 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 3h, 88% yield, mp 59–60 °C; IR: 3147, 3040, 2917, 2849, 1726, 1617, 1554, 1510, 1468, 1403, 1350, 1296, 1193, 1134, 1100, 1050, 1005, 832 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.66 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.81–0.98 (8H, m), 1.20–1.46 (17H, m), 1.58–1.67 (3H, m), 1.76–1.91 (5H, m), 2.15–2.21 (2H, m), 3.20 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.1 Hz), 4.00 (2H, t, J = 6.4 Hz), 4.33 (2H, t, J = 7.3 Hz), 4.57 (1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz), 4.77 (1H, d, J = 12.3 Hz), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.79–6.85 (2H, m), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.51 (1H, s), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.3, 21.2, 22.5, 23.4, 25.7, 26.1, 26.7, 26.9, 29.1, 29.2, 29.3, 29.5, 29.6, 29.7, 30.5, 31.6, 34.7, 40.4, 48.4, 50.5, 62.2, 68.8, 78.9, 101.5, 112.5, 113.0, 113.2, 122.3, 128.9, 143.7, 146.3, 156.1, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C34H51N3O4 [M + Na]+, 588.3777; found, 588.3752.
4.2.4. Synthesis of Coumarin-Monoterpene Derivatives Bearing Alkyl Chain (44–71)
For compounds 44–67, the corresponding coumarin alkyl bromides (2a–2h; 1 mmol) and monoterpene derivatives (4–7; 1 mmol) were dissolved in dry DMF (5 mL). K2CO3 (2 mmol) and KI (0.1 mmol) were added to this solution, and the mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 18 h. It was poured into ice containing 10% HCl. The aqueous mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 50 mL). The organic phase was dried with sodium sulfate, and the solvent was removed under a vacuum. The compounds 44–67 were purified by column chromatography using hexane: ethyl acetate in a ratio of 4:2.23
For compounds 68–71, 1 mmol of coumarin alkyl bromide derivatives, 1 mmol menthol, 0.1 mmol NaI, and 1.5 mmol N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) were mixed and stirred at 150 °C for 2 h. It was cooled and 10 mL of 10% sodium bisulfate was added to this mixture. It was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 50 mL). The organic phase was dried with sodium sulfate, and the solvent was removed under a vacuum. The compounds 68–71 were purified by column chromatography using hexane/ethyl acetate in a ratio of 10:1.21
4.2.4.1. 7-(2-(2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)ethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (44)
White powder, 256 mg, starting from 300 mg of coumarin 2a, 68% yield, mp 181–182 °C; IR: 3040, 2963, 1732, 1614, 1405, 1289, 1232, 1134, 1097, 832, 753 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.17 (6H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 2.33 (3H, s), 3.20–3.27 (1H, m), 4.33–4.35 (2H, m), 4.36–4.61 (2H, m), 6.25–6.30 (1H, m), 6.70 (1H, s), 6.78 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.88–6.92 (2H, m), 7.10 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.37–7.42 (1H, m), 7.64 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.5, 22.9, 26.8, 66.7, 67.4, 101.8, 112.8, 113.2, 113.5, 122.0, 126.3, 129.0, 129.1, 134.6, 136.6, 143.6, 155.7, 156.0, 161.4, 162.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C21H22O4 [M + Na]+, 361.1416; found, 361.1394.
4.2.4.2. 7-(3-(2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (45)
White liquid, 99 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2b, 40% yield. IR: 3038, 2958, 1725, 1609, 1505, 1401, 1255, 1119, 831, 615 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.18 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.21–1.25 (2H, m), 2.31 (3H, s), 3.24–3.29 (1H, m), 4.16 (2H, t, J = 5.8 Hz), 4.25 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz), 6.24(1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.69 (1H, s), 6.75 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 6.83–6.87 (2H, m), 7.08 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.6, 23.0, 26.8, 29.4, 64.0, 65.4, 69.5, 101.5, 112.3, 112.7, 113.1, 113.3, 121.5, 126.1, 129.0, 134.1, 136.6, 143.7, 155.9, 156.0, 161.5, 162.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C22H24O4 [M + Na]+, 375.1572; found, 375.1551.
4.2.4.3. 7-(4-(2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)butoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (46)
White liquid, 128 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2c, 52% yield. IR: 3040, 2957, 1728, 1609, 1505, 1402, 1229, 1194, 994, 831, 730 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.22 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.04 (4H, s, br), 2.33 (3H, s), 3.29–3.33 (1H, m), 4.04 (2H, t, J = 5.5 Hz), 4.10 (2H, t, J = 5.8 Hz), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.68 (1H, s), 6.74–6.86 (3H, m), 7.10 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.60 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.6, 23.0, 26.3 × 2, 26.8, 67.4, 68.4, 101.5, 112.3, 112.7, 113.1, 113.1, 121.3, 126.1, 129.1, 134.1, 136.5, 143.7, 156.1, 156.1, 161.4, 162.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C23H26O4 [M + Na]+, 389.1729; found, 389.1707.
4.2.4.4. 7-((6-(2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)hexyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (47)
Yellow liquid, 140 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2d, 58% yield. IR: 3040, 2939, 1730, 1609, 1505, 1402, 1255, 1119, 1093, 831, 615 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.24 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.59–1.61 (4H, m), 1.83–1.89 (4H, m), 2.34 (3H, s), 3.30–3.34 (1H, m), 3.96–4.04 (4H, m), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.68 (1H, s), 6.73–6.85 (3H, m), 7.11 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.60 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.6, 23.0, 26.0, 26.3, 26.9, 29.2, 29.6, 67.7, 68.7, 101.5, 112.3, 112.6, 113.0, 113.1, 121.2, 126.0, 129.0, 134.1, 136.4, 143.7, 156.1, 156.3, 161.4, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C25H30O4 [M + Na]+, 417.2042; found, 417.2019.
4.2.4.5. 7-((7-(2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)heptyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (48)
White liquid, 150 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2e, 62% yield. IR: 3038, 2934, 1731, 1610, 1505, 1392, 1256, 1119, 831, 615 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.20 (6H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 1.41–1.56 (6H, m), 1.77–1.82 (4H, m), 2.31 (3H, s), 3.23–3.30 (1H, m), 3.92–4.03 (4H, m), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.65 (1H, s), 6.72 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.78–6.84 (2H, m), 7.07 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.62 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.6, 23.0, 26.2, 26.4, 26.8, 29.1, 29.3, 29.6, 67.8, 68.8, 101.5, 112.3, 112.6, 113.1, 113.2, 121.1, 126.0, 128.9, 134.2, 136.4, 143.7, 156.1, 156.3, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C26H32O4 [M + Na]+, 431.2198; found, 431.2176.
4.2.4.6. 7-((9-(2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)nonyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (49)
White liquid, 120 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2f, 48% yield. IR: 3040, 2926, 1731, 1610, 1505, 1349, 1256, 1119, 832, 615 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.20 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.23–1.48 (10H, m), 1.75–1.83 (4H, m), 2.31 (3H, s), 3.24–3.31 (1H, m), 3.91–4.01 (4H, m), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.65 (1H, s), 6.72 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 6.78–6.84 (2H, m), 7.08 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.33 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.60 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.6, 23.0, 26.2, 26.4, 26.8, 29.2, 29.5, 29.6, 29.7, 67.9, 68.8, 101.5, 112.3, 112.6, 113.0, 113.2, 121.0, 126.0, 129.0, 134.2, 136.4, 143.8, 156.1, 156.4, 161.7, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C28H36O4 [M + Na]+, 459.2511; found, 459.2487.
4.2.4.7. 7-((10-(2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)decyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (50)
White liquid, 122 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2g, 52% yield. IR: 3038, 2924, 1731, 1610, 1506, 1280, 1230, 1120, 1017, 831, 753 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.11 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.25–1.40 (12H, m), 1.66–1.77 (4H, m), 2.22 (3H, s), 3.15–3.24 (1H, m), 3.83–3.94 (4H, m), 6.13 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.56 (1H, s), 6.63 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.70–6.75 (2H, m), 6.99 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.25 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.53 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.6, 23.0, 26.2, 26.4, 26.8, 29.2, 29.5, 29.6, 29.7, 68.0, 68.8, 101.5, 112.4, 112.6, 113.1, 113.2, 121.0, 126.0, 129.0, 134.2, 136.4, 143.8, 156.1, 156.4, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C29H38O4 [M + Na]+, 473.2668; found, 473.2645.
4.2.4.8. 7-((12-(2-Isopropyl-5-methylphenoxy)dodecyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (51)
White liquid, 130 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2h, 56% yield. IR: 3038, 2923, 1732, 1611, 1506, 1279, 1119, 1094, 832, 753 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.12 (6H, d, J = 6.9 Hz), 1.18–1.34 (16H, m), 1.66–1.78 (4H, m), 2.23 (3H, s), 3.16–3.23 (1H, m), 3.84–3.95 (4H, m), 6.15 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.57 (1H, s), 6.63 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.72–6.77 (2H, m), 7.00 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.27 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.55 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 21.5, 22.9, 26.1, 26.4, 26.8, 29.2, 29.5, 29.6, 29.7 × 3, 68.0, 68.8, 101.5, 112.3, 112.5, 113.1, 113.2, 121.0, 125.9, 128.9, 134.2, 136.4, 143.6, 156.1, 156.4, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C31H42O4 [M + Na]+, 501.2981; found, 501.2957.
4.2.4.9. 7-(2-(5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)ethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (52)
White powder, 180 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2a, 72% yield, mp 172–173 °C; IR: 3050, 2955, 1726, 1608, 1508, 1396, 1228, 1109, 1058, 818, 614 cm–1; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.15 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.00 (3H, s), 2.77–2.81 (1H, m), 4.29–4.32 (2H, m), 4.41–4.43 (2H, m), 6.26 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.68 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.80 (1H, s), 6.95–7.00 (3H, m), 7.60 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 2.0 Hz), 7.96 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.2, 24.6, 34.0, 67.1, 67.9, 102.0, 110.7, 113.1, 113.2, 113.5, 118.8, 123.8, 130.2, 130.9, 145.0, 148.2, 156.0, 156.9, 161.0, 162.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C21H22O4 [M + Na]+, 361.1416; found, 361.1393.
4.2.4.10. 7-(3-(5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (53)
White liquid, 150 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2b, 60% yield. IR: 3052, 2958, 1725, 1609, 1508, 1400, 1229, 1120, 995, 831, 751 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.15 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.10 (3H, s), 2.21–2.25 (2H, m), 2.75–2.79 (1H, m), 4.09 (2H, t, J = 5.8 Hz), 4.16 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz), 6.15 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.63–6.67 (2H, m), 6.74–6.78 (2H, m), 6.97 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.27 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.55 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 14.8, 23.1, 28.1, 33.0, 62.7, 64.1, 100.3, 108.2, 111.4, 111.7, 111.9, 117.1, 122.9, 127.7, 129.4, 142.4, 146.9, 154.8, 155.6, 160.2, 161.0. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C22H24O4 [M + Na]+, 375.1572; found, 375.1550.
4.2.4.11. 7-(4-(5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)butoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (54)
White powder, 216 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2c, 88% yield, mp 74–75 °C; IR: 3040, 2957, 1724, 1608, 1556, 1396, 1230, 1124, 1027, 1000, 836, 615 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.24 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.97–2.07 (4H, m), 2.18 (3H, s), 2.83–2.88 (1H, m), 4.05 (2H, t, J = 5.5 Hz), 4.11 (2H, t, J = 5.8 Hz), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 9.0 Hz), 6.69 (1H, s), 6.73 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz), 6.81–6.85 (2H, m), 7.03 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.1, 24.4, 26.2, 34.3, 67.3, 68.4, 101.5, 109.5, 112.6, 113.1, 113.2, 118.2, 124.2, 128.9, 130.6, 143.7, 148.1, 156.1, 157.1, 161.5, 162.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C23H26O4 [M + Na]+, 389.1729; found, 389.1708.
4.2.4.12. 7-((6-(5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)hexyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (55)
White liquid, 150 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2d, 62% yield. IR: 3040, 2944, 1721, 1610, 1509, 1391, 1289, 1123, 1014, 833, 634 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.16 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.48–1.51 (4H, m), 1.75–1.78 (4H, m), 2.10 (3H, s), 2.73–2.80 (1H, m), 3.89–3.96 (4H, m), 6.16 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.61 (1H, s), 6.64 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.72–6.77 (2H, m), 6.97 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.27 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.56 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.1, 24.4, 26.0, 26.2, 29.2, 29.5, 34.4, 67.7, 68.7, 101.4, 109.5, 112.6, 113.1, 113.2, 118.0, 124.2, 128.9, 130.6, 143.8, 148.1, 156.1, 157.2, 161.6, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C25H30O4 [M + Na]+, 417.2042; found, 417.2020.
4.2.4.13. 7-((7-(5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)heptyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (56)
White liquid, 207 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2e, 86% yield. IR: 3038, 2933, 1731, 1610, 1508, 1279, 1229, 1110, 1018, 831, 615 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.23 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.43–1.56 (6H, m), 1.79–1.84 (4H, m), 2.18 (3H, s), 2.80–2.87 (1H, m), 3.94–4.02 (4H, m), 6.22 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.68–6.72 (2H, m), 6.77–6.83 (2H, m), 7.03 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.33 (1H, d, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.60 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.1, 24.4, 26.2, 26.3, 29.1, 29.3, 29.6, 34.4, 67.9, 68.8, 101.5, 109.6, 112.6, 113.1, 113.2, 118.0, 124.2, 129.0, 130.6, 143.7, 148.0, 156.1, 157.3, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C26H32O4 [M + Na]+, 431.2198; found, 431.2177.
4.2.4.14. 7-((9-(5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)nonyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (57)
White liquid, 147 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2f, 62% yield. IR: 3040, 2926, 1732, 1610, 1509, 1279, 1229, 1120, 995, 832, 615 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.23 (6H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 1.37–1.49 (10H, m), 1.75–1.83 (4H, m), 2.18 (3H, s), 2.80–2.87 (1H, m), 3.93–4.02 (4H, m), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.67–6.70 (2H, m), 6.72–6.84 (2H, m), 7.04 (1H, d, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.34 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.62 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.1, 24.4, 26.2, 26.4, 29.2, 29.5 × 2, 29.6, 29.7, 34.3, 68.0, 68.8, 101.5, 109.6, 112.5, 113.1, 113.2, 117.9, 124.3, 128.9, 130.5, 143.7, 148.0, 156.1, 157.3, 161.6, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C28H36O4 [M + Na]+, 459.2511; found, 459.2489.
4.2.4.15. 7-((10-(5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)decyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (58)
White powder, 203 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2g, 86% yield, mp 50–51 °C; IR: 3052, 2955, 1731, 1619, 1556, 1293, 1131, 1014, 839, 723 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.22 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.29–1.62 (12H, m), 1.74–1.85 (4H, m), 2.18 (3H, s), 2.80–2.90 (1H, m), 3.93–4.02 (4H, m), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.68 (1H, s), 6.70 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 6.80–6.84 (2H, m), 7.04 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.34 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.62 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.0, 24.3, 26.1, 26.3, 29.1, 29.5 × 2, 29.6, 29.7, 34.3, 68.0, 68.8, 101.5, 109.6, 112.5, 113.1, 113.2, 117.9, 124.3, 128.9, 130.5, 143.6, 148.0, 156.1, 157.3, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C29H38O4 [M + Na]+, 473.2668; found, 473.2645.
4.2.4.16. 7-((12-(5-Isopropyl-2-methylphenoxy)dodecyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (59)
White powder, 186 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2h, 80% yield, mp 58–59 °C; IR: 3040, 2917, 1727, 1616, 1510, 1397, 1237, 1120, 1025, 835, 720 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.23 (6H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.30–1.62 (16H, m), 1.74–1.86 (4H, m), 2.18 (3H, s), 2.83–2.88 (1H, m), 3.93–4.03 (4H, m), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.68 (1H, s), 6.71 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 6.80–6.85 (2H, m), 7.04 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.1, 24.4, 26.1, 26.4, 29.2, 29.5, 29.6, 29.8, 34.3, 68.0, 68.8, 101.5, 109.6, 112.5, 113.1, 113.2, 117.9, 124.3, 128.9, 130.5, 143.7, 148.0, 156.1, 157.3, 161.6, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C31H42O4 [M + Na]+, 501.2981; found, 501.2955.
4.2.4.17. 7-(2-(4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)ethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (60)
White powder, 280 mg, starting from 300 mg of coumarin 2a, 72% yield, mp 86–87 °C; IR: 3071, 2930, 1729, 1610, 1508, 1402, 1350, 1207, 1126, 1059, 914, 841, 751 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 3.34 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 3.85 (3H, s), 4.39 (4H, s), 5.05–5.11 (2H, m), 5.91–6.00 (1H, m), 6.25 (1H, d, J = 9.0 Hz), 6.70–6.74 (2H, m), 6.88–6.91 (3H, m), 7.37 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 7.64 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 40.0, 56.0, 67.4, 68.0, 101.9, 112.7, 112.9, 113.3, 113.4, 114.9, 116.0, 120.7, 128.9, 134.3, 137.7, 143.6, 146.3, 149.9, 156.0, 161.4, 162.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C21H20O5 [M + Na]+, 375.1208; found, 375.1188.
4.2.4.18. 7-(3-(4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (61)
White powder, 280 mg, starting from 300 mg of coumarin 2b, 72% yield, mp 70–71 °C; IR: 3072, 2915, 1718, 1608, 1510, 1398, 1251, 1227, 1116, 1026, 991, 832, 614 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 2.28–2.36 (2H, m), 3.33 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 3.84 (3H, s), 4.18–4.26 (4H, m), 5.04–5.10 (2H, m), 5.90–5.99 (1H, m), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.69–6.73 (2H, m), 6.83–6.86 (3H, m), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 29.2, 40.0, 56.0, 65.3, 65.6, 101.6, 112.5, 112.7, 113.1, 113.2, 113.7, 115.9, 120.6, 128.9, 133.5, 137.8, 143.7, 146.6, 149.6, 156.0, 161.5, 162.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C22H22O5 [M + Na]+, 389.1365; found, 389.1344.
4.2.4.19. 7-(4-(4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)butoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (62)
Yellow liquid, 314 mg, starting from 300 mg of coumarin 2c, 82% yield. IR: 3057, 2938, 1726, 1609, 1508, 1396, 1228, 1120, 1033, 831, 615 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 2.01–2.04 (4H, m), 3.33 (2H, d, J = 6.3 Hz), 3.85 (3H, s), 4.06–4.13 (4H, m), 5.03–5.11 (2H, m), 5.89–6.00 (1H, m), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 9.4 Hz), 6.69–6.72 (2H, m), 6.80–6.85 (3H, m), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.64 (1H, d, J = 9.5 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 26.0, 26.2, 40.0, 56.1, 68.4, 68.8, 101.5, 112.4, 112.6, 113.1, 113.2, 113.3, 115.8, 120.6, 128.9, 133.2, 137.8, 143.7, 146.8, 149.5, 156.1, 161.5, 162.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C23H24O5 [M + Na]+, 403.1521; found, 403.1500.
4.2.4.20. 7-((6-(4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)hexyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (63)
White liquid, 340 mg, starting from 300 mg of coumarin 2d, 90% yield. IR: 3040, 2937, 1726, 1609, 1508, 1258, 1228, 1119, 994, 832, 615 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.52–1.57 (4H, m), 1.84–1.87 (4H, m), 3.33 (2H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 3.85 (3H, s), 3.99–4.03 (4H, m), 5.04–5.11 (2H, m), 5.91–6.00 (1H, m), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.69–6.81 (2H, m), 6.82–6.85 (3H, m), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 26.0, 29.1, 29.3, 40.0, 56.1, 68.6, 69.0, 101.4, 112.2, 112.5, 113.0 × 2, 113.2, 115.8, 120.5, 129.0, 132.8, 137.9, 143.8, 146.9, 149.4, 156.0, 161.6, 162.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C25H28O5 [M + Na]+, 431.1834; found, 431.1816.
4.2.4.21. 7-((7-(4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)heptyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (64)
White powder, 322 mg, starting from 300 mg of coumarin 2e, 86% yield, mp 62–63 °C; IR: 3070, 2934, 1722, 1612, 1510, 1297, 1229, 1133, 1009, 836, 569 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.46–1.50 (6H, m), 1.80–1.85 (4H, m), 3.33 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 3.85 (3H, s), 3.97–4.08 (4H, m), 5.04–5.11 (2H, m), 5.91–6.02 (1H, m), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.69–6.71 (2H, m), 6.80–6.84 (3H, m), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 26.1, 29.1, 29.3, 40.0, 56.1, 68.7, 69.2, 101.4, 112.4, 112.5, 113.1, 113.2, 113.3, 115.8, 120.6, 128.9, 132.9, 137.9, 143.7, 147.0, 149.4, 156.1, 161.5, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C26H30O5 [M + Na]+, 445.1991; found, 445.1968.
4.2.4.22. 7-((9-(4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)nonyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (65)
White powder, 312 mg, starting from 300 mg of coumarin 2f, 85% yield, mp 56–57 °C; IR: 3085, 2917, 1723, 1613, 1510, 1296, 1227, 1132, 1019, 835, 731, 569 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.36–1.46 (10H, m), 1.70–1.87 (4H, m), 3.32 (2H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 3.85 (3H, s), 3.96–4.02 (4H, m), 5.03–5.11 (2H, m), 5.89–6.00 (1H, m), 6.23 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.68–6.71 (2H, m), 6.79–6.86 (3H, m), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 26.1, 29.1, 29.4 × 2, 29.5, 29.6, 40.0, 56.1, 68.8, 69.3, 101.5, 112.4, 112.5, 113.1 × 2, 113.2, 115.8, 120.6, 128.9, 132.8, 137.9, 143.7, 147.0, 149.4, 156.1, 161.6, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C28H34O5 [M + Na]+, 473.2304; found, 473.2280.
4.2.4.23. 7-((10-(4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)decyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (66)
White liquid, 252 mg, starting from 300 mg of coumarin 2g, 69% yield. IR: 3058, 2924, 1728, 1610, 1509, 139249, 1229, 1120, 1034, 833, 615 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.32–1.78 (10H, m), 1.81–1.88 (6H, m), 3.33 (2H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 3.85 (3H, s), 3.87–4.03 (4H, m), 5.04–5.11 (2H, m), 5.89–6.00 (1H, m), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.67–6.71 (2H, m), 6.79–6.86 (3H, m), 7.37 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 26.1, 29.1, 29.4, 29.5, 29.6 × 2, 40.0, 56.1, 68.8, 69.2, 101.4, 112.3, 112.5, 113.0, 113.2, 115.8, 120.6, 128.9, 132.8, 137.9, 143.8, 147.0, 149.4, 156.1, 161.6, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C29H36O5 [M + Na]+, 487.2460; found, 487.2434.
4.2.4.24. 7-((12-(4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenoxy)dodecyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (67)
White liquid, 151 mg, starting from 300 mg of coumarin 2h, 42% yield. IR: 3072, 2917, 1720, 1624, 1511, 1467, 1393, 1233, 1133, 1028, 836, 720 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 1.21–1.28 (12H, m), 1.41–1.46 (4H, m), 1.76–1.85 (4H, m), 3.33 (2H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 3.85 (3H, s), 3.95–4.02 (4H, m), 5.03–5.11 (2H, m), 5.91–6.00 (1H, m), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.68–6.71 (2H, m), 6.79–6.85 (3H, m), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.63 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 26.0, 26.2, 28.7, 29.2, 29.4, 29.5, 29.6, 29.8, 40.0, 56.1, 68.8, 69.2, 101.4, 112.2, 112.5, 112.9, 113.0, 113.2, 115.8, 120.5, 128.9, 132.7, 137.9, 143.8, 146.9, 149.3, 156.0, 161.6, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C31H40O5 [M + Na]+, 515.2773; found, 515.2754.
4.2.4.25. 7-(2-((2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)ethoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (68)
White liquid, 40 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2a, 16% yield. IR: 3052, 2958, 1725, 1609, 1508, 1400, 1229, 1120, 995, 831, 751 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.78 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.80–0.96 (5H, m), 1.12–1.28 (4H, m), 1.45–1.62 (4H, m), 1.98–2.21 (2H, m), 3.10 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.1 Hz), 3.60–3.70 (1H, m), 3.80–3.97 (1H, m), 4.10–4.20 (2H, m), 6.18 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.78–6.84 (2H, m), 7.36 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.60 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.1, 21.0, 22.2, 23.1, 25.8, 31.6, 34.5, 45.0, 64.6, 65.6, 104.2, 113.7, 114.3, 129.0, 143.1, 146.3, 155.5, 159.6, 160.8. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C21H28O4 [M + Na]+, 367.1885; found, 367.1868.
4.2.4.26. 7-(3-((2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)propoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (69)
White liquid, 91 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2b, 36% yield. IR: 3072, 2956, 2917, 1720, 1600, 1510, 1460, 1233, 1133, 1025, 840, 720 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.81 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz), 0.83–0.94 (7H, m), 1.09–1.30 (3H, m), 1.50–1.66 (3H, m), 1.95–2.11 (4H, m), 2.97 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.1 Hz), 3.36–3.43 (1H, m), 3.70–3.77 (1H, m), 4.01–4.10 (2H, m), 6.17 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz), 6.75–6.79 (2H, m), 7.30 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.58 (1H, d, J = 9.6 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.3, 21.1, 22.5, 23.5, 25.8, 30.0, 31.7, 34.7, 40.6, 48.4, 64.5, 65.7, 79.7, 101.6, 112.6, 113.0, 113.1, 128.9, 143.7, 156.1, 161.5, 162.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C22H30O4 [M + Na]+, 381.2042; found, 381.2021.
4.2.4.27. 7-(4-((2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)butoxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (70)
White liquid, 80 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2d, 32% yield. IR: 3060, 2976, 1718, 1610, 1500, 1209, 1130, 1028, 840, 720 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.70 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.80–0.92 (8H, m), 1.11–1.28 (3H, m), 1.51–1.69 (4H, m), 1.78–1.88 (2H, m), 2.01–2.16 (2H, m), 2.95 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.1 Hz), 3.22–3.29 (1H, m), 3.60–3.67 (1H, m), 3.97 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz), 6.17 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.73–6.78 (2H, m), 7.30 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.56 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.4, 21.2, 22.6, 23.5, 25.8, 26.2, 27.0, 31.7, 34.8, 40.6, 48.5, 68.1, 68.6, 79.5, 101.5, 112.6, 113.1, 113.2, 128.9, 143.7, 156.1, 161.6, 162.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C23H32O4 [M + H]+, 372.2301; found, 373.2359.
4.2.4.28. 7-((6-((2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl)oxy)hexyl)oxy)-2H-chromen-2-one (71)
White liquid, 49 mg, starting from 200 mg of coumarin 2e, 20% yield. IR: 3072, 2950, 1700, 1610, 1500, 1450, 1230, 1109, 1020, 832, 720 cm–1; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ/ppm 0.69 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 0.73–0.91 (10H, m), 1.09–1.45 (5H, m), 1.47–1.57 (4H, m), 1.60–1.99 (2H, m), 2.00–2.17 (2H, m), 2.91 (1H, td, J = 10.5, 4.1 Hz), 3.16–3.23 (1H, m), 3.53–3.60 (1H, m), 3.91–3.96 (2H, m), 6.17 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz), 6.72–6.78 (2H, m), 7.28 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.56 (1H, d, J = 9.3 Hz); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 75 MHz): δ/ppm 16.4, 21.2, 22.6, 23.5, 25.8, 26.0, 26.2, 29.1, 30.4, 31.7, 34.8, 40.7, 48.5, 68.5, 68.7, 79.4, 101.5, 112.5, 113.1, 113.2, 128.9, 143.7, 156.1, 161.6, 162.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: calcd for C25H36O4 [M + Na]+, 423.2511; found, 423.2489.
4.3. CA Inhibition Assays
In order to determine the CA inhibition of the compounds, the method mentioned in the previous studies was used, and inhibition results were obtained.24
4.4. Cell Cytotoxicity Assay
The cytotoxicity of the test compounds on the human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line (HT-29; HTB-38), human breast adenocarcinoma cell line (MCF7; HTB-22), human prostate adenocarcinoma cell line (PC3; CRL-1435), and human healthy kidney fibroblast cell line (HEK293T; CRL-3216) were evaluated by MTT (3-(4,5 dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5- diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay according to described methods.8 Briefly, the cell line was seeded in a flat-bottomed 96-well plate at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well in DMEM F12/DMEM containing 10% FBS. The plate was incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24 h, and then compounds were dissolved in DMSO and added to the medium to make final concentrations of 80, 40, 20, 10, 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.62, 0.31, 0.16, and 0.08 μM. Cells were further incubated for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2; then, medium-containing compounds were replaced with the fresh medium. 10 μL of filter-sterilized MTT solution (5 mg/mL in PBS) was added to each well and further incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 4 h. At the end of incubation, media was aspirated from the wells, and 100 μL of DMSO was added to dissolve the insoluble formazan crystals that formed. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a microtiter plate reader. The relative % cell viability was calculated from the following equation: relative percent cell viability = (Atest – Ablank/Acontrol – Ablank) × 100%. (Atest is the absorbance of the sample-treated cells, Acontrol is the absorbance of the untreated cells, and Ablank is the absorbance of the cell-free wells. Each absorbance was taken to be the mean of triplicate measurements). The cell viability was represented as a percentage relative to untreated cells as a control.
4.5. Western Blotting Assay
CA IX and CA XII protein expressions were evaluated in treated and control HT-29 and MCF7 cells after hypoxia induction. Cells were seeded in a 6-well plate in DMEM/F12 (normoxic cells) or DMEM/F12 containing 200 μM CoCl2 (hypoxic and treated cells) in order to create hypoxia.25 HT29 cells were treated with 14 (40, 10, and 1.25 μM), 23 (80, 20, and 1.25 μM), and 66 (80, 20, and 1.25 μM), and MCF7 cells were treated with 14 (40, 10, and 1.25 μM), 23 (80, 20, and 1.25 μM), and 63 (80, 20, and 1.25 μM) for 24 h at three different doses. After the treatment period, cells were washed with cold PBS and homogenized into Ripa cell lysis buffer (Santa Cruz, USA). Samples were prepared, electrophoresed, and transferred according to the literature.25 The membranes were blocked in 5% fat-free milk (w/v) for 1 h at RT, incubated with the corresponding antibody at 4 °C overnight, and then incubated with the horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled secondary antibody for 1 h at RT. The following antibodies were used: anti-CA IX (ab107257, Abcam), anti-CA XII (sc-374314, Santa Cruz), and anti-GAPDH (A19056, Abclonal). Finally, the membranes were stained with ECL reagents (LumiGLO, CST, USA), and then, imaging was performed with the Bio-Rad Chemidoc Imaging System. The bands were calculated with the Image Lab (Bio-Rad, USA) and analyzed with Graphpad Prism 9.00 (San Diego, CA, USA).
4.6. Apoptosis Assay
Apoptosis assay was performed using the Muse Annexin V & Dead Cell Assay kit (Merck Millipore, Germany) in Muse Cell Analyzer (Merck Millipore, Germany). HT29 cells were treated with 14 (40, 10, and 1.25 μM), 23 (80, 20, and 1.25 μM), and 66 (80, 20, and 1.25 μM), and MCF7 cells were treated with 14 (40, 10, and 1.25 μM), 23 (80, 20, and 1.25 μM), and 63 (80, 20, and 1.25 μM) for 24 h at three different doses. After the treatment period, cells were collected and resuspended in PBS with 1% FBS, mixed with the Muse Annexin V and Dead Cell reagents. Samples were incubated for 20 min at room temperature in the dark. Apoptotic cell ratios were analyzed by flow cytometry using the Muse cell analyzer system, and gating was adjusted according to the untreated sample. Results were presented as the percentage of cells that were viable (Ann-V– 7-AAD−), early apoptotic (Ann-V+ 7-AAD−), late apoptotic (Ann-V+ 7-AAD−), or dead (Ann-V– 7-AAD+).26
4.7. Microscopy
HT-29 cells were stained with propidium iodide (PI) and Hoechst 33342 for observation of cell viability under the microscope. HT29 cells were treated with 14, 23, and 66 for 24 h at 1.25 μM concentration. After the treatment period cells were rinsed with PBS, fixed with ice-cold ethanol (95%) at −20 °C for 2 h, and then rinsed with PBS again. Cells were incubated with PI and Hoechst for 10 min and observed by using a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axio Observer Z1) with the appropriate excitation/detection filters.
4.8. Molecular Modeling
4.8.1. Preparation of Protein Structures
The crystal structure of hCA IX and XII in complex with acetazolamide (pdb: 3iai and 1jd0) was obtained from the RCSB Protein Data Bank. Subsequently, the structures were prepared using the protein preparation tool of Schrödinger (v2021-1, Schrödinger, Inc., New York, USA). All water and buffer molecules were omitted. Subunit A was retained, and all other subunits, if present, were omitted. Subsequently, hydrogen atoms were added, and the system was minimized using the OPLS4 forcefield.
4.8.2. Docking Studies
Compounds 23 and 70 were prepared in the open and closed coumarin forms using the LigPrep tool of Schrödinger and minimized with the OPLS4 force field. Subsequently, both stereoisomers were docked into the active sites of hCA IX and hCA XII using the Glide tool of Schrödinger with the XP settings. The three highest-scoring poses were obtained for each ligand, and the poses were subsequently minimized using the Prime tool and MM–GBSA forcefield. To this end, the ligand and all residues within 4 Å were unrestrained, except the zinc ion and zinc-binding residues.
4.8.3. Molecular Dynamics Simulations
The ligand-enzyme complexes obtained with the docking procedure were subjected to a 50 ns MD simulation using Desmond. The complex was first placed in an orthorhombic box (at least 10 Å between the complex and boundary) and then filled with Tip5P water molecules and 0.15 M NaCl. The amount of Na or Cl atoms were adjusted to create a neutral system. Afterward, all heavy atoms were restrained, and the system was minimized for 100 ps using the OPLS4 forcefield. Finally, the system was simulated for 50 ns under isothermic (Nose–Hoover chain, 1 ps relaxation time) and isobaric (Martyna–Tobial–Klein, 2 ps relaxation time, isotropic coupling) conditions without restraints. Snapshots were saved every 100 ps.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (project number: 116Z779). The authors would like to thank Dr. Beyza Goncu for her assistance with the apoptosis experiments. A part of this study was conducted at the Drug Application and Research Center (İLMER) of Bezmialem Vakif University.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c07459.
1H, 13C NMR, and MS spectra of selected compounds and viability (%)—log concentration (μM) curves for the cytotoxic effects and graphs showing the CA inhibition of lead molecules and representative IR spectra (PDF)
Author Contributions
B.Z.K.: research, method development, synthesis, and writing; G.C.: synthesis and writing; D.O.C.: cell cytotoxicity, western blotting, apoptosis, microscopy, and writing; A.A.: CA inhibition assays; A.A.: molecular modeling and writing; F.S.: method development and writing; C.T.S.: CA inhibition assays and writing–reviewing.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Wang L. H.; Jiang X. R.; Yang J. Y.; Bao X. F.; Chen J. L.; Liu X.; Chen G. L.; Wu C. F. SYP-5, a novel HIF-1 inhibitor, suppresses tumor cells invasion and angiogenesis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 791, 560–568. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; a Horie K.; Kawakami K.; Fujita Y.; Sugaya M.; Kameyama K.; Mizutani K.; Deguchi T.; Ito M. Exosomes expressing carbonic anhydrase 9 promote angiogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 492, 356–361. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.08.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peerlings J.; Van De Voorde L.; Mitea C.; Larue R.; Yaromina A.; Sandeleanu S.; Spiegelberg L.; Dubois L.; Lambin P.; Mottaghy F. M. Hypoxia and hypoxia response-associated molecular markers in esophageal cancer: A systematic review. Methods 2017, 130, 51–62. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yusuf Z. S.; Uysal T. K.; Simsek E.; Nocentini A.; Osman S. M.; Supuran C. T.; Özensoy Güler O. The inhibitory effect of boric acid on hypoxia-regulated tumour-associated carbonic anhydrase IX. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2022, 37, 1340–1345. 10.1080/14756366.2022.2072837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Supuran C. T. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3467–3474. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petreni A.; Osman S. M.; Alasmary F. A.; Almutairi T. M.; Nocentini A.; Supuran C. T. Binding site comparison for coumarin inhibitors and amine/amino acid activators of human carbonic anhydrases. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 226, 113875. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Biernacki K.; Ciupak O.; Daśko M.; Rachon J.; Kozak W.; Rak J.; Kubiński K.; Masłyk M.; Martyna A.; Śliwka-Kaszyńska M.; et al. Development of Sulfamoylated 4-(1-Phenyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)phenol Derivatives as Potent Steroid Sulfatase Inhibitors for Efficient Treatment of Breast Cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 5044–5056. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; a Nannini G.; De Luca V.; D’Ambrosio C.; Scaloni A.; Taddei A.; Ringressi M. N.; Cianchi F.; Staderini F.; Capasso C.; Amedei A.; et al. A comparative study of carbonic anhydrase activity in lymphocytes from colorectal cancer tissues and adjacent healthy counterparts. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2022, 37, 1651–1655. 10.1080/14756366.2022.2085694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ilies M. A.; Winum J.-Y. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors for the treatment of tumors: therapeutic, immunologic, and diagnostic tools targeting isoforms IX and XII. Carbonic Anhydrases 2019, 2019, 331–365. 10.1016/B978-0-12-816476-1.00016-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zengin Kurt B.; Sonmez F.; Ozturk D.; Akdemir A.; Angeli A.; Supuran C. T. Synthesis of coumarin-sulfonamide derivatives and determination of their cytotoxicity, carbonic anhydrase inhibitory and molecular docking studies. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 183, 111702. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; a Yu Z. H.; Li M. R.; Wang K.; Gu Y. T.; Guo S. Q.; Wang W. J.; Ma Y. L.; Liu H. R.; Chen Y. Novel Hybrids of 3-Substituted Coumarin and Phenylsulfonylfuroxan as Potent Antitumor Agents with Collateral Sensitivity against MCF-7/ADR. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 65, 9328. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Guo Y.; Wang Y.; Li H.; Wang K.; Wan Q.; Li J.; Zhou Y.; Chen Y. Novel Nitric Oxide Donors of Phenylsulfonylfuroxan and 3-Benzyl Coumarin Derivatives as Potent Antitumor Agents. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 502–506. 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Angeli A.; Trallori E.; Carta F.; Di Cesare Mannelli L. D.; Ghelardini C.; Supuran C. T. Heterocoumarins Are Selective Carbonic Anhydrase IX and XII Inhibitors with Cytotoxic Effects against Cancer Cells Lines. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 947–951. 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.8b00362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tawfik H. O.; Petreni A.; Supuran C. T.; El-Hamamsy M. H. Discovery of new carbonic anhydrase IX inhibitors as anticancer agents by toning the hydrophobic and hydrophilic rims of the active site to encounter the dual-tail approach. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 232, 114190. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ewies E. F.; Sabry E.; Bekheit M. S.; Fouad M. A.; Vullo D.; Supuran C. T. Click chemistry-based synthesis of new benzenesulfonamide derivatives bearing triazole ring as selective carbonic anhydrase II inhibitors. Drug Dev. Res. 2022, 83, 1281. 10.1002/ddr.21957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mahon B. P.; Lomelino C. L.; Ladwig J.; Rankin G. M.; Driscoll J. M.; Salguero A. L.; Pinard M. A.; Vullo D.; Supuran C. T.; Poulsen S. A.; et al. Mapping Selective Inhibition of the Cancer-Related Carbonic Anhydrase IX Using Structure-Activity Relationships of Glucosyl-Based Sulfamates. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 6630–6638. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giovannuzzi S.; De Luca V.; Nocentini A.; Capasso C.; Supuran C. T. Coumarins inhibit eta-class carbonic anhydrase from Plasmodium falciparum. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2022, 37, 680–685. 10.1080/14756366.2022.2036986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; a Onyılmaz M.; Koca M.; Bonardi A.; Degirmenci M.; Supuran C. T. Isocoumarins: a new class of selective carbonic anhydrase IX and XII inhibitors. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2022, 37, 743–748. 10.1080/14756366.2022.2041630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maresca A.; Temperini C.; Pochet L.; Masereel B.; Scozzafava A.; Supuran C. T. Deciphering the Mechanism of Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibition with Coumarins and Thiocoumarins. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 335–344. 10.1021/jm901287j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; a Ferraroni M.; Carta F.; Scozzafava A.; Supuran C. T. Thioxocoumarins Show an Alternative Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibition Mechanism Compared to Coumarins. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 462–473. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Supuran C. T. Exploring the multiple binding modes of inhibitors to carbonic anhydrases for novel drug discovery. Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2020, 15, 671–686. 10.1080/17460441.2020.1743676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonardi A.; Nocentini A.; Bua S.; Combs J.; Lomelino C.; Andring J.; Lucarini L.; Sgambellone S.; Masini E.; McKenna R.; et al. Sulfonamide Inhibitors of Human Carbonic Anhydrases Designed through a Three-Tails Approach: Improving Ligand/Isoform Matching and Selectivity of Action. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 7422–7444. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andring J. T.; Fouch M.; Akocak S.; Angeli A.; Supuran C. T.; Ilies M. A.; McKenna R. Structural Basis of Nanomolar Inhibition of Tumor-Associated Carbonic Anhydrase IX: X-Ray Crystallographic and Inhibition Study of Lipophilic Inhibitors with Acetazolamide Backbone. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 13064–13075. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar K. S.; Siwach K.; Rom T.; Kumar R.; Angeli A.; Kumar Paul A.; Supuran C. T.; Sharma P. K. Tail-approach based design and synthesis of Arylthiazolylhydrazono-1,2,3-triazoles incorporating sulfanilamide and metanilamide as human carbonic anhydrase I, II, IV and IX inhibitors. Bioorg. Chem. 2022, 123, 105764. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2022.105764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; a Elbadawi M. M.; Eldehna W. M.; Nocentini A.; Somaa W. R.; Al-Rashood S. T.; Elkaeed E. B.; El Hassab M. A.; Abdel-Aziz H. A.; Supuran C. T.; Fares M. Development of 4-((3-oxo-3-phenylpropyl)amino)benzenesulfonamide derivatives utilizing tail/dual-tail approaches as novel carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 238, 114412. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Abdel-Mohsen H. T.; El Kerdawy A. M.; Omar M. A.; Petreni A.; Allam R. M.; El Diwani H. I.; Supuran C. T. Application of the dual-tail approach for the design and synthesis of novel Thiopyrimidine-Benzenesulfonamide hybrids as selective carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022, 228, 114004. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.114004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grande R.; Carradori S.; Puca V.; Vitale I.; Angeli A.; Nocentini A.; Bonardi A.; Gratteri P.; Lanuti P.; Bologna G.; et al. Selective Inhibition of Helicobacter pylori Carbonic Anhydrases by Carvacrol and Thymol Could Impair Biofilm Production and the Release of Outer Membrane Vesicles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11583. 10.3390/ijms222111583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Supuran C. T. Coumarin carbonic anhydrase inhibitors from natural sources. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2020, 35, 1462–1470. 10.1080/14756366.2020.1788009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurt B. Z.; Dag A.; Doğan B.; Durdagi S.; Angeli A.; Nocentini A.; Supuran C. T.; Sonmez F. Synthesis, biological activity and multiscale molecular modeling studies of bis-coumarins as selective carbonic anhydrase IX and XII inhibitors with effective cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma. Bioorg. Chem. 2019, 87, 838–850. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2019.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hogendorf W. F. J.; Verhagen C. P.; Malta E.; Goosen N.; Overkleeft H. S.; Filippov D. V.; Van der Marel G. A. The synthesis of a menthol derivative of 2-aminopurine as a fluorescent DNA lesion. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 10430–10435. 10.1016/j.tet.2009.10.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dag A.; Sahin H.; Durmaz H.; Hizal G.; Tunca U. Block-Brush Copolymers via ROMP and Sequential Double Click Reaction Strategy. J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. 2011, 49, 886–892. 10.1002/pola.24499. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Y.; Wang S. L.; Xu X. Q.; Liu X.; Yu M. Q.; Zhao S.; Liu S. C.; Qiu Y. L.; Zhang T.; Liu B. F.; et al. Synthesis and Biological Investigation of Coumarin Piperazine (Piperidine) Derivatives as Potential Multireceptor Atypical Antipsychotics. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 4671–4690. 10.1021/jm400408r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khalifah R. G. The carbon dioxide hydration activity of carbonic anhydrase. I. Stop-flow kinetic studies on the native human isoenzymes B and C. J. Biol. Chem. 1971, 246, 2561–2573. 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)62326-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; a Angapelly S.; Sri Ramya P. V.; Angeli A.; Supuran C. T.; Arifuddin M. Sulfocoumarin-, Coumarin-, 4-Sulfamoylphenyl-Bearing Indazole-3-carboxamide Hybrids: Synthesis and Selective Inhibition of Tumor-Associated Carbonic Anhydrase Isozymes IX and XII. Chemmedchem 2017, 12, 1578–1584. 10.1002/cmdc.201700446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Tars K.; Vullo D.; Kazaks A.; Leitans J.; Lends A.; Grandane A.; Zalubovskis R.; Scozzafava A.; Supuran C. T. Sulfocounnarins (1,2-Benzoxathiine-2,2-dioxides): A Class of Potent and Isoform-Selective Inhibitors of Tumor-Associated Carbonic Anhydrases. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 293–300. 10.1021/jm301625s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Grandane A.; Tanc M.; Žalubovskis R.; Supuran C. T. Synthesis of 6-aryl-substituted sulfocoumarins and investigation of their carbonic anhydrase inhibitory action. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 1430–1436. 10.1016/j.bmc.2015.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Bonardi A.; Falsini M.; Catarzi D.; Varano F.; Di Cesare Mannelli L. D.; Tenci B.; Ghelardini C.; Angeli A.; Supuran C. T.; Colotta V. Structural investigations on coumarins leading to chromeno[4,3-c] pyrazol-4-ones and pyrano[4,3-c]pyrazol-4-ones: New scaffolds for the design of the tumor-associated carbonic anhydrase isoforms IX and XII. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 146, 47–59. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Berrino E.; Bozdag M.; Del Prete S.; Alasmary F. A. S.; Alqahtani L. S.; AlOthman Z.; Capasso C.; Supuran C. T. Inhibition of alpha-, beta-, gamma-, and delta-carbonic anhydrases from bacteria and diatoms with N′-aryl-N-hydroxy-ureas. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2018, 33, 1194–1198. 10.1080/14756366.2018.1490733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu D. L.; Yotnda P. Induction and Testing of Hypoxia in Cell Culture. J. Visualized Exp. 2011, 12, 2899. 10.3791/2899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goncu B.; Sevgi E.; Hancer C. K.; Gokay G.; Ozten N. Correction: Differential anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects of lichen species on human prostate carcinoma cells. PLoS One 2020, 15, e0244831 10.1371/journal.pone.0244831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.









