Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2022 Jun 22;24(31):5635–5640. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c01576

Attached Nitrogen Test by 13C-14N Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy for the Structure Determination of Heterocyclic Isomers

Rick W Dorn 1,2,, Brendan J Wall 1,, Sarah B Ference 1, Sean R Norris 1, Joseph W Lubach 3, Aaron J Rossini 1,2,*, Brett VanVeller 1,*
PMCID: PMC9933616  NIHMSID: NIHMS1868162  PMID: 35731042

Abstract

Differentiation of heterocyclic isomers by solution 1H, 13C and 15N NMR spectroscopy is often challenging due to similarities in their spectroscopic signatures. Here, 13C{14N} solid-state NMR spectroscopy experiments are shown to operate as an “attached nitrogen test”, where heterocyclic isomers are easy to distinguish based on 1D nitrogen-filtered 13C solid-state NMR. We anticipate that these NMR experiments will facilitate the assignment of heterocycle isomers during synthesis and natural product discovery.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1868162-f0001.jpg


The determination of molecular structure is a foundational pillar of synthetic chemistry and natural product discovery. Despite the suite of available techniques to probe molecular structure, we often still “see through a glass, darkly” when assigning spectroscopic data, where the vast possibilities of atomic connectivity may lead to errors in structural assignment. This ambiguity in structural assignment is particularly true in natural product discovery, where common spectroscopic techniques cannot often distinguish between isomeric products. For example, a 2011 review reported over 150 misassigned natural products between 2001–2010.1 Multiple other reviews have also discussed the misassignment of natural products.24 Several examples of natural products that were misassigned by solution NMR spectroscopy are shown in Figure 1.57

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Selected natural products (1-4) with originally proposed structures (upper) and revised structures (lower, highlighted in green).

Total synthesis of a target molecule is a classical avenue to confirm atomic connectivity and identify errors in originally proposed structures.24 A key drawback, however, is that total synthesis is a time and labor consuming endeavor. Further, even after total synthesis is completed, single crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) is sometimes required to unambiguously determine molecular structure, but diffraction quality single crystals are not obtainable in all cases. Solution NMR spectroscopy is the workhorse method for probing molecular structure within organic molecules and natural products. Nearly all organic systems are suitable for NMR spectroscopy, and isotropic chemical shifts and scalar (J-) couplings reveal unique information on the local chemical environment of the probed nuclei. Two-dimensional (2D) homonuclear and heteronuclear correlation NMR experiments are powerful tools to determine molecular structure. However, heteronuclear correlation solution NMR experiments on organic systems are often limited to 1H-13C, such that 13C NMR signal assignment is based solely on 13C chemical shifts and 1H-13C scalar (J-) couplings. The assignment of 13C NMR signals to a single isomer in systems containing nitrogen heterocycles may become ambiguous when using 2D 1H-1H and 1H-13C solution NMR spectroscopy techniques because changes in the nitrogen atom location within a heterocycle often does not alter the observed 1H-1H or 1H-13C J-couplings. Indeed, the misassigned natural products shown in Figure 1 differ from their corrected structures by the location and connectivity of the nitrogen atoms.

Thus, information about direct connectivity of carbon and nitrogen atoms would be immensely valuable to discriminate between possible heterocyclic isomers. Here, we report the application of 13C{14N} solid-state NMR experiments that exploit 13C-14N dipolar couplings to identify C atoms directly bonded to N atoms.815 This “attached nitrogen test” requires no isotopic labeling and the working organic chemist will find that such spectra are easily interpretable, akin to the interpretation of NOE difference spectra. We demonstrate the utility of 13C{14N} solid-state NMR spectroscopy for structure determination through model case studies that address the misassignments described in Figure 1. Lastly, we demonstrate the powerful utility of N-filtered 13C NMR spectra to aid in the accurate assignment of more complex molecular scaffolds relevant to natural products and pharmaceuticals.

Nitrogen has two NMR active isotopes, 14N and 15N, with 15N being the preferred nucleus to probe in NMR spectroscopy because it is a spin I = 1/2 nucleus, whereas 14N is spin I = 1 quadrupolar nucleus. Unfortunately, 13C-15N NMR experiments are challenging at natural isotopic abundance (0.004 % probability of having a 13C-15N spin pair) and are sometimes only feasible in concentrated systems and/or with sensitivity enhancement techniques, such as dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP).1622 13C-14N NMR experiments are attractive because 14N is 99.6 % abundant. However, the quadrupolar nature of 14N means that one-bond 13C-14N J-couplings (1J ~ 10–15 Hz) often cannot be observed in solution NMR spectra due to the self-decoupling of 14N that occurs because of the continuous alternation of the 14N spin states by rapid longitudinal (T1) relaxation.

Fortunately, 14N can be readily probed in solid-state NMR experiments. Here, we use the 13C{14N} Resonance Echo Saturation Pulse DOuble Resonance (RESPDOR) NMR experiment to obtain 1D N-filtered 13C NMR spectra (Figure 2A). We note that 13C{14N} solid-state NMR experiments have been used for over two decades to obtain structural information in organic and biomolecular systems.815 However, the goal of our work is to demonstrate the value and simplicity of 13C{14N} solid-state NMR experiments to the practicing chemist to differentiate heterocyclic isomers.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A) 13C{14N} PM-RESPDOR pulse sequence. (B) 13C{14N} RESPDOR curves for the 13C NMR signals of Hist at (orange) 173 ppm and (green) 128 ppm. The experimental data points are shown as circles and numerical simulations are shown as solid lines. (C) 13C{14N} RESPDOR spectra of Hist recorded (red, dashed) with or (black, solid) without a 14N PM saturation pulse. The difference spectrum is shown below.

We first optimized the experimental conditions for the “attached nitrogen” 13C{14N} RESPDOR experiments using histidine hydrochloride monohydrate (Hist) as a model compound. In the 13C{14N} RESPDOR experiment, two 13C NMR spectra are recorded; one with and one without a 14N phase-modulated (PM) saturation pulse.2324 Taking the difference of the two NMR spectra yields an N-filtered 13C NMR spectrum because the 13C NMR signal will have reduced intensity when pulsing on 14N if it is covalently bonded to N (see SI for more discussion). Experiments on Hist showed that ca. 1.3 ms of 13C REDOR recoupling (τrec) was optimal for maximizing the difference 13C NMR signal for C atoms covalently bonded to N atoms and minimizing dephasing for C atoms not bonded to N atoms (Figure 2B and S35). For Hist, a total of 1 hour of spectrometer time was required to obtain the 14N-filtered 13C NMR spectrum that shows only 13C NMR signals from C atoms exhibiting C-N covalent bonds (Figure 2C). We note that similar “attached nitrogen” 13C{14N} NMR spectra can be recorded without 13C dipolar recoupling to cause signal dephasing by evolution of 13C-14N J-couplings and residual dipolar splittings (Figure S36).2526 However, the RESPDOR experiment will generally be more sensitive because the dipolar coupling is over one order of magnitude larger than the J-coupling and residual dipolar splitting (Figure S37, see SI for more discussion). For Hist, the RESPDOR experiment with dipolar recoupling was ca. two times more sensitive (SNR min−1/2) than the analogous experiment without dipolar recoupling.

The core atoms of heterocycles typically do not display characteristic 1H or 13C chemical shifts that would allow for their straightforward identification through 1D 1H/13C NMR spectroscopy without prior knowledge of chemical shifts (Figure S38). Even with modern 2D 1H homonuclear and/or 1H-13C heteronuclear correlation solution NMR experiments, spectral interpretation is still often ambiguous due to similarities in the observed correlations for different isomers, making it challenging to differentiate isomers on unknown, highly substituted heterocyclic systems (see SI for solution NMR spectra).

For example, the structure of Aspernigrin A (1) was initially assigned via 1H{13C} HMBC but was later corrected by SCXRD (Figure 1).5, 2728 The ambiguity in assigning the 2- or 4-pyridone heterocyclic cores could have been easily addressed with an “attached nitrogen” 13C{14N} RESPDOR NMR experiment. To test this hypothesis, we recorded 13C{14N} RESPDOR NMR spectra of acridinone (5) and phenanthridinone (6) as model compounds for Aspernigrin A (Figure 3AB).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Comparison of 13C{14N} RESPDOR NMR spectra of (A) acridinone (5), (B) phenanthridinone (6), (C) pyrazole (7), (D) imidazole (8), (E) oxazole (10) and (F) isoxazole (11). 13C{14N} RESPDOR spectra were recorded with 1.28 ms of total dipolar recoupling and (red, dashed) with or (black, solid) without a 14N PM saturation pulse. The difference spectrum is shown below. NMR signals correspond to the highlighted C atoms on the structures.

The 14N-filtered 13C NMR spectra allow for clear differentiation of the 2- versus 4-pyridone core. Isomer 6 displays two 13C NMR signals exhibiting a C-N covalent bond (Figure 3B). Importantly, one of the 13C NMR signals attached to N in 6 clearly shows a diagnostic chemical shift associated with a carbonyl carbon (> 150 ppm), while that of 5 does not. 5 displays only one 13C NMR signal exhibiting a C-N covalent bond due to the C2 symmetry of the compound (Figure 3A). In the more substituted Aspernigin A (1a and 1b), the corrected structure will show two carbonyl 13C NMR signals in the 14N-filtered 13C NMR spectrum as opposed to one in the misassigned structure (Figure 1).

We next examined the differentiation of azole-type heterocycles using the “attached nitrogen” 13C{14N} RESPDOR experiment. Model heterocycles pyrazole (7) and imidazole (8) form the core of numerous drug scaffolds (Figure 3CD). Particularly for highly substituted rings, 1H-13C correlations can be ambiguous, and without prior knowledge of 1H and/or 13C chemical shifts, the assignment of the 1H/13C NMR spectra to a single isomer can lead to error (Figure S38). Alternatively, comparison of the 14N-filtered 13C NMR spectra enable the easy assignment of the two heterocyclic isomers, where 7 displays two 13C NMR signals exhibiting C-N covalent bonds, while imidazole 8 displays three 13C NMR signals exhibiting C-N covalent bonds (Figure 3CD).

Differentiation of isoxazole and oxazole heterocyclic isomers provide a compelling illustration of the utility of the “attached nitrogen” 13C{14N} RESPDOR NMR experiment. Even when assisted by 2D solution NMR experiments, conclusive assignment of the oxazole can be elusive without comparison to the isoxazole isomer (and vice versa), a form of structure determination by total synthesis (Figure S35 and S810). Alarmingly, however, such an approach is more complicated when one considers that both the oxazole and isoxazole can be prepared from the same starting ketoxime (9, Scheme 1).29

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Preparation of Oxazole and Isoxazole Heterocyclic Isomers from Ketoxime.

The 14N-filtered 13C NMR spectra of oxazole (10) and isoxazole (11) enable the straightforward differentiation of the heterocyclic isomers (Figure 3EF). 10 displays two 13C NMR signals with C-N bonds, while 11 only exhibits one 13C NMR signal with a C-N bond.

Finally, to illustrate the ability of “attached nitrogen” 13C{14N} RESPDOR experiments to aid in the determination of more complex molecules relevant to natural products and pharmaceuticals, we performed experiments on a multi-component API, where the free-base molecule forms a co-crystal with phosphoric acid (12, Figure 4A).30 The 13C{14N} RESPDOR experiments were performed with either conventional NMR at room temperature or with dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) at ca. 100 K. In a DNP experiment, the NMR signal intensity is enhanced by 1–2 orders of magnitude by transferring the polarization of electron spins from a polarizing agent (e.g., TEKPol) to the nuclear spins. 1H→13C CPMAS DNP enhancements were ≥ 10, meaning that a 1H→13C CPMAS NMR spectrum with the same signal-to-noise ratio could be acquired ca. 100 times faster with DNP than conventional room temperature NMR spectroscopy (Figure S39).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(A) Crystal structure of co-crystal 12. H, C, N, O, F, P and S atoms are white, grey, blue, red, green, orange and yellow, respectively. (B) DNP-enhanced 13C{14N} RESPDOR spectra recorded with 1.2 ms of dipolar recoupling and (red) with or (black) without a 14N saturation pulse. The difference spectrum is shown below. (C) DNP-enhanced 13C{14N} RESPDOR curves of co-crystal 12 (see Figure S42 for all RESPDOR curves). The circles correspond to the experimental data points and the solid lines correspond to numerical simulations.

1D 14N-filtered 13C NMR spectra of 12 were obtained in ca. 40 min with DNP and a 3.2 mm rotor or ca. 17 hours with conventional room temperature solid-state NMR spectroscopy and 2.5 mm rotor (Figure 4B and S40, respectively). The 1D 14N-filtered 13C NMR spectrum reveals all 13C NMR signals exhibiting C-N covalent bonds. We note that C14 has reduced intensity in the DNP spectrum due to 13C signal overlap with the DNP solvent (see SI for more discussion).

The large sensitivity gains provided by DNP also enabled the acquisition of 13C{14N} RESPDOR curves that provide detail as to the rate of signal build-up and the extent of signal dephasing (Figure 4C and S42). In turn, the shape of these curves are dependent on the type and number of nitrogen atoms within a ca. 4 Å radius (Table S2). Therefore, fitting of the experimental 13C{14N} RESPDOR curves with numerical simulations facilitates the assignment of all 13C NMR signals spatially proximate to nitrogen atoms (Figure 4C and S42). This capability permits complete 13C signal assignment by comparing the 13C{14N} RESPDOR curves with 1 13H- C heteronuclear correlation NMR spectra and plane-wave DFT GIPAW31 calculated 13C chemical shifts (Figure S4345).

In conclusion, the determination of molecular structure is a foundational pillar of organic synthesis and natural product discovery. However, typical 1H-1H and 1H-13C scalar (J-) correlation solution NMR experiments reveal the same homonuclear/heteronuclear correlations for many heterocyclic isomers, meaning that spectroscopic assignment to a single isomer without prior knowledge of 1H and/or 13C chemical shifts is often ambiguous. Here, 13C{14N} RESPDOR solid-state NMR spectroscopy experiments are shown to enable the easy acquisition of 1D 14N-filtered 13C solid-state NMR spectra, which effectively operates as an “attached nitrogen test”.

The practical utility of 13C{14N} RESPDOR solid-state NMR spectroscopy experiments to differentiate heterocyclic isomers was demonstrated for three different model systems. In all three examples, the heterocyclic isomers could be easily distinguished from the 14N-filtered 13C NMR spectra, where 1D and 2D 1H and 13C correlation solution NMR spectroscopy were ambiguous, particularly if one did not have prior knowledge of the molecular structure. We also demonstrated how 14N-filtered 13C NMR spectra can aid in the structural characterization of more complex molecular scaffolds relevant to natural products and pharmaceuticals.

We anticipate that 13C{14N} RESPDOR solid-state NMR spectroscopy experiments will provide practicing chemists with a simple method to obtain 1D 14N-filtered 13C solid-state NMR spectra that can greatly aid in 13C NMR signal assignment and differentiation of heterocyclic isomers. 1D 13C{14N} NMR experiments on 12 were performed at room temperature with 2.5 mm rotors, ca. 20 mg of material and 17 hours of spectrometer time. Therefore, even in the absence of sensitivity enhancement by DNP, 13C{14N} NMR experiments can be feasibly applied to molecules with comparable size and complexity as natural products. Therefore, “attached nitrogen tests” could be especially useful in natural product discovery because they will reduce structural ambiguities and misassignments.

Supplementary Material

SI

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Solid-state NMR spectroscopy experiments (R.W.D., S.F. and A.J.R.) were supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1709972. A.J.R. acknowledges additional support from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation through a Sloan research fellowship. We thank Genentech, Inc. and its Innovation Fund, for providing additional financial support for this work. Heterocyclic isomer syntheses and solution NMR spectroscopy experiments (B.J.W., S.N. and B.V.) were supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R35 GM142883. We are grateful to Dr. Paroma Chakravarty and Dr. Lauren Sirois (Genentech) for providing cocrystal 12.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website. Methods (synthesis, NMR and DFT), solid-state NMR experimental parameters, solution NMR spectra, additional solid-state NMR spectra and SIMPSON numerical simulation input files (ZIP)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Suyama TL; Gerwick WH; McPhail KL, Survey of marine natural product structure revisions: A synergy of spectroscopy and chemical synthesis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19 (22), 6675–6701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nicolaou KC; Snyder SA, Chasing Molecules That Were Never There: Misassigned Natural Products and the Role of Chemical Synthesis in Modern Structure Elucidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44 (7), 1012–1044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maier ME, Structural revisions of natural products by total synthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26 (9), 1105–1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yoo H-D; Nam S-J; Chin Y-W; Kim M-S, Misassigned natural products and their revised structures. Arch. Pharmacal Res. 2016, 39 (2), 143–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ye YH; Zhu HL; Song YC; Liu JY; Tan RX, Structural Revision of Aspernigrin A, Reisolated from Cladosporium herbarum IFB-E002. J. Nat. Prod. 2005, 68 (7), 1106–1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Castellanos L; Duque C; Zea S; Espada A; Rodríguez J; Jiménez C, Isolation and Synthesis of (−)-(5S)-2-Imino-1-methylpyrrolidine-5- carboxylic Acid from Cliona tenuis: Structure Revision of Pyrostatins. Org. Lett. 2006, 8 (21), 4967–4970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bao B; Sun Q; Yao X; Hong J; Lee C-O; Cho HY; Jung JH, Bisindole Alkaloids of the Topsentin and Hamacanthin Classes from a Marine Sponge Spongosorites sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70 (1), 2–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grey CP; Veeman WS, The detection of weak heteronuclear coupling between spin 1 and spin 1/2 nuclei in MAS NMR; 14N/13C/1H triple resonance experiments. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 192 (4), 379–385. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grey CP; Veeman WS; Vega AJ, Rotational echo 14N/13C/1H triple resonance solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance: A probe of 13C–14N internuclear distances. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98 (10), 7711–7724. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grey CP; Eijkelenboom APAM; Veeman WS, 14N Population transfers in two-dimensional 13C-14N-1H triple-resonance magic-angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 1995, 4 (2), 113–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gullion T, Measurement of Dipolar Interactions Between Spin-1/2 and Quadrupolar Nuclei by Rotational-Echo, Adiabatic-Passage, Double-Resonance NMR. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 246 (3), 325–330. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hughes E; Gullion T; Goldbourt A; Vega S; Vega AJ, Internuclear Distance Determination of S=1, I=1/2 Spin Pairs Using REAPDOR NMR. J. Magn. Reson. 2002, 156 (2), 230–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ba Y; Kao H-M; Grey CP; Chopin L; Gullion T, Optimizing the 13C–14N REAPDOR NMR Experiment: A Theoretical and Experimental Study. J. Magn. Reson. 1998, 133 (1), 104–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gan Z, Measuring multiple carbon–nitrogen distances in natural abundant solids using R-RESPDOR NMR. Chem. Commun. 2006, (45), 4712–4714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pope GM; Hung I; Gan Z; Mobarak H; Widmalm G; Harper JK, Exploiting 13C/14N solid-state NMR distance measurements to assign dihedral angles and locate neighboring molecules. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54 (49), 6376–6379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jackalin L; Kharkov BB; Komolkin AV; Dvinskikh SV, Experimental strategies for 13C–15N dipolar NMR spectroscopy in liquid crystals at the natural isotopic abundance. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20 (34), 22187–22196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cifelli M; Domenici V; Chizhik VI; Dvinskikh SV, 15N–13C Dipole Couplings in Smectic Mesophase of a Thermotropic Ionic Liquid. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2018, 49 (6), 553–562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cheatham S; Kline M; Kupče E, Exploiting natural abundance 13C–15N coupling as a method for identification of nitrogen heterocycles: practical use of the HCNMBC sequence. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2015, 53 (5), 363–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Märker K; Pingret M; Mouesca J-M; Gasparutto D; Hediger S; De Paëpe G, A New Tool for NMR Crystallography: Complete 13C/15N Assignment of Organic Molecules at Natural Isotopic Abundance Using DNP-Enhanced Solid-State NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (43), 13796–13799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cheatham S; Gierth P; Bermel W; Kupče Ē, HCNMBC – A pulse sequence for H–(C)–N Multiple Bond Correlations at natural isotopic abundance. J. Magn. Reson. 2014, 247, 38–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Smith AN; Märker K; Hediger S; De Paëpe G, Natural Isotopic Abundance 13C and 15N Multidimensional Solid-State NMR Enabled by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019, 10 (16), 4652–4662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smith AN; Märker K; Piretra T; Boatz JC; Matlahov I; Kodali R; Hediger S; van der Wel PCA; De Paëpe G, Structural Fingerprinting of Protein Aggregates by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization-Enhanced Solid-State NMR at Natural Isotopic Abundance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (44), 14576–14580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nimerovsky E; Gupta R; Yehl J; Li M; Polenova T; Goldbourt A, Phase-modulated LA-REDOR: A robust, accurate and efficient solid-state NMR technique for distance measurements between a spin-1/2 and a quadrupole spin. J. Magn. Reson. 2014, 244, 107–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Duong NT; Rossi F; Makrinich M; Goldbourt A; Chierotti MR; Gobetto R; Nishiyama Y, Accurate 1H-14N Distance Measurements by Phase-Modulated RESPDOR at Ultra-Fast MAS. J. Magn. Reson. 2019, 308, 106559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gan Z, Measuring Amide Nitrogen Quadrupolar Coupling by High-Resolution 14N/13C NMR Correlation under Magic-Angle Spinning. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (18), 6040–6041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cavadini S; Lupulescu A; Antonijevic S; Bodenhausen G, Nitrogen-14 NMR Spectroscopy Using Residual Dipolar Splittings in Solids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (24), 7706–7707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hiort J; Maksimenka K; Reichert M; Perović-Ottstadt S; Lin WH; Wray V; Steube K; Schaumann K; Weber H; Proksch P; Ebel R; Müller WEG; Bringmann G, New Natural Products from the Sponge-Derived Fungus Aspergillus niger. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67 (9), 1532–1543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hiort J; Maksimenka K; Reichert M; Perović-Ottstadt S; Lin WH; Wray V; Steube K; Schaumann K; Weber H; Proksch P; Ebel R; Müller WEG; Bringmann G, New Natural Products from the Sponge-Derived Fungus Aspergillus niger. J. Nat. Prod. 2005, 68 (12), 1821–1821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ning Y; Otani Y; Ohwada T, Contrasting C- and O-Atom Reactivities of Neutral Ketone and Enolate Forms of 3-Sulfonyloxyimino-2-methyl-1-phenyl-1-butanones. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83 (1), 203–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhao L; Hanrahan MP; Chakravarty P; DiPasquale AG; Sirois LE; Nagapudi K; Lubach JW; Rossini AJ, Characterization of Pharmaceutical Cocrystals and Salts by Dynamic Nuclear Polarization-Enhanced Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018, 18 (4), 2588–2601. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pickard CJ; Mauri F, All-Electron Magnetic Response with Pseudopotentials: NMR Chemical Shifts. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63 (24), 245101. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES