ABSTRACT
The genomes of seven Aeromonas veronii strains isolated from tissues of healthy or diseased channel catfish obtained from Alabama, USA, fish farms were sequenced and annotated. These genome sequences will enable comparative analyses to determine the roles these bacteria play in catfish aquaculture and the development of new preventative or management strategies.
ANNOUNCEMENT
Aeromonas veronii, a Gram-negative bacterium, is ubiquitous in various aquatic environments, including fishponds. The bacterium is frequently isolated from both apparently healthy fish and diseased fish in which A. veronii was recognized as either a primary or secondary pathogen. Multiple types of virulence factors have been identified in A. veronii isolates (1–5). During a study that surveyed farmed catfish with disease symptoms indicative of motile Aeromonas septicemia (MAS) caused by hypervirulent Aeromonas hydrophila (vAh) in Alabama, USA, many isolates of A. veronii were cultured from internal tissues of either diseased or apparently healthy fish (Table 1). All bacteria were isolated at the Alabama Fish Farming Center (32.69084, −87.59172) between 2009 and 2014 from fish provided by farms in the local area. Fish were aseptically dissected, a sterile loop was inserted into a tissue, and the sample was spread onto tryptic soy agar supplemented with sheep blood (Remel, Lenexa, KS, USA). Plates were then incubated at 28°C for ~24 h. Isolates were confirmed by blastn analyses of PCR-generated 16S rRNA and gyrB gene sequences, using primer pairs 16S_f and 16S_r (5′-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′ and 5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′, respectively) and gyrB_f and gyrB_r (5′-CCCAGACCAAGGACAAGCTGGT-3′ and 5′-CCAGCCCTTTATAGCGCTGGAT-3′, respectively) and the PCR protocol described previously (6).
TABLE 1.
Details from the sequencing and assembly effort for seven strains of Aeromonas veroniia
| Isolate | Read count | Coverage (×) | No. of scaffolds (>500 bp) | GC content (%) | Total length (bp) | N 50 | No. of predicted genes | Tissue | 16S top hit by BLAST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALD17-04 | 9,512,505 | 314 | 70 | 58.62 | 4,588,282 | 168,651 | 4,254 | Gut (H) | NR_119045.1 |
| ALG10-089 | 7,834,582 | 259 | 50 | 58.54 | 4,609,237 | 204,327 | 4,172 | Kidney (D) | NR_119045.1 |
| ALH17-19 | 5,201,984 | 172 | 85 | 58.38 | 4,828,371 | 126,561 | 4,479 | Gut (D) | NR_044845.1 |
| ALH17-23 | 6,810,867 | 225 | 73 | 58.47 | 4,693,559 | 145,811 | 4,418 | Kidney (D) | NR_044845.1 |
| ALP17-17 | 9,736,740 | 322 | 251 | 58.56 | 4,789,795 | 163,362 | 4,539 | Kidney (D) | NR_044845.1 |
| ALP17-18 | 7,967,005 | 263 | 78 | 58.82 | 4,605,149 | 134,287 | 4,206 | Kidney (D) | NR_044845.1 |
| ML10-202 | 7,651,987 | 253 | 88 | 58.64 | 4,633,676 | 122,253 | 4,324 | Kidney (D) | NR_104824.1 |
Read counts are total numbers of paired-end reads from Illumina sequencing. The number of scaffolds, GC content, total length, and N50 are the results from SPAdes analyses. The total numbers of genes were predicted from PGAP analyses. “Tissue” indicates the tissue from which bacteria was isolated and whether the fish was asymptomatic (healthy [H]) or symptomatic for MAS (diseased [D]). The 16S top hit by BLAST indicates the accession number from top-hit blastn results using the identified 16S rRNA gene sequence from each strain as a query.
For sequencing, individual bacterial strains were cultured in tryptic soy broth at 29°C while shaking at 200 rpm for 16 h. Bacterial cells were harvested following centrifugation at 10,000 × g and were subjected to genomic DNA isolation using a DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). Quality control (QC) analysis of DNA was performed using the Qubit DNA assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and gel electrophoresis. Sequencing libraries were prepared for all samples using the Nextera XT DNA library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) per the manufacturer’s instructions. QC of sequencing libraries was performed by Bioanalyzer high-sensitivity DNA analysis (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Paired-end sequencing (2 × 75 bp) on an Illumina NextSeq 1000 was performed via a service provider (Applied Biological Materials, Vancouver, Canada). The sequencing output is shown in Table 1. For computational analyses, unless otherwise noted, software was executed within the OmicsBox platform (7) with default parameters selected. Preprocessing and QC of raw reads prior to genome assembly were performed using Trimmomatic v.0.38 (8). SPAdes v.3.15.5 (9) was used for de novo assembly of QC reads (pipeline option: --careful). The resultant scaffolds for each isolate were annotated via the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v.6.3 with the annotation method best-placed reference protein set (GeneMarkS-2+) (10).
Assuming an A. veronii genome size of ~4.54 Mb, the final genome sequencing coverage ranged from 172× to 322× (Table 1). For all seven strains, GC content was an average of 58%. Information on the number of predicted genes is found in Table 1. BUSCO analysis (11–13) of coding sequences against the lineage data set gammaproteobacterial_odb10 indicated substantial completeness of these genomes, with estimates ranging from 82.79% to 83.06%. Characterization of the functional genomic diversity of these strains will assist in our understanding of the roles A. veronii plays in aquaculture and particularly in pathogenesis of MAS, which will aid in the development of new disease management strategies.
Data availability.
This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession numbers JAOTOB000000000, JAOTPP000000000, JAOTPQ000000000, JAOTPR000000000, JAOTPS000000000, JAOTPT000000000, and JAOTPU000000000. The versions described in this paper are versions JAOTOB010000000, JAOTPP010000000, JAOTPQ010000000, JAOTPR010000000, JAOTPS010000000, JAOTPT010000000, and JAOTPU010000000, respectively. Raw reads can be found at the NCBI SRA under accession numbers SRR21799103, SRR21802829, SRR21802948, SRR21803002, SRR21803011, SRR21803683, and SRR21803762.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (research project number 6010-32000-027-00D).
We thank William Hemstreet (Alabama Fish Farming Center, School of Fisheries, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA) for providing isolates.
Contributor Information
Jason W. Abernathy, Email: Jason.Abernathy@usda.gov.
J. Cameron Thrash, University of Southern California
REFERENCES
- 1.Li H, Ma X, Tang Y, Wang D, Zhang Z, Liu Z. 2021. Network-based analysis of virulence factors for uncovering Aeromonas veronii pathogenesis. BMC Microbiol 21:188. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02261-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li T, Raza SHA, Yang B, Sun Y, Wang G, Sun W, Qian A, Wang C, Kang Y, Shan X. 2020. Aeromonas veronii infection in commercial freshwater fish: a potential threat to public health. Animals (Basel) 10:608. doi: 10.3390/ani10040608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ran C, Qin C, Xie M, Zhang J, Li J, Xie Y, Wang Y, Li S, Liu L, Fu X, Lin Q, Li N, Liles MR, Zhou Z. 2018. Aeromonas veronii and aerolysin are important for the pathogenesis of motile aeromonad septicemia in cyprinid fish. Environ Microbiol 20:3442–3456. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tekedar HC, Kumru S, Blom J, Perkins AD, Griffin MJ, Abdelhamed H, Karsi A, Lawrence ML. 2019. Comparative genomics of Aeromonas veronii: identification of a pathotype impacting aquaculture globally. PLoS One 14:e0221018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yang B, Chen C, Sun Y, Cao L, Zhang D, Sun W, Zhang L, Wang G, Shan X, Kang Y, Qian A. 2021. Comparative genomic analysis of different virulence strains reveals reasons for the increased virulence of Aeromonas veronii. J Fish Dis 44:11–24. doi: 10.1111/jfd.13262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang D, Xu D-H, Shoemaker CA, Beck BH. 2020. The severity of motile Aeromonas septicemia caused by virulent Aeromonas hydrophila in channel catfish is influenced by nutrients and microbes in water. Aquaculture 519:734898. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734898. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.OmicsBox. 2019. OmicsBox—bioinformatics made easy, BioBam Bioinformatics (version 2.2.4). https://www.biobam.com/omicsbox.
- 8.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kriventseva EV, Kuznetsov D, Tegenfeldt F, Manni M, Dias R, Simao FA, Zdobnov EM. 2019. OrthoDB v10: sampling the diversity of animal, plant, fungal, protist, bacterial and viral genomes for evolutionary and functional annotations of orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D807–D811. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seppey M, Manni M, Zdobnov EM. 2019. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. Methods Mol Biol 1962:227–245. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simao FA, Zdobnov EM. 2021. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol 38:4647–4654. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession numbers JAOTOB000000000, JAOTPP000000000, JAOTPQ000000000, JAOTPR000000000, JAOTPS000000000, JAOTPT000000000, and JAOTPU000000000. The versions described in this paper are versions JAOTOB010000000, JAOTPP010000000, JAOTPQ010000000, JAOTPR010000000, JAOTPS010000000, JAOTPT010000000, and JAOTPU010000000, respectively. Raw reads can be found at the NCBI SRA under accession numbers SRR21799103, SRR21802829, SRR21802948, SRR21803002, SRR21803011, SRR21803683, and SRR21803762.
