Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

ArXiv logoLink to ArXiv
[Preprint]. 2023 Apr 25:arXiv:2302.04939v2. Originally published 2023 Feb 9. [Version 2]

The Effects of leaflet material properties on the simulated function of regurgitant mitral valves

Wensi Wu 1, Stephen Ching 2, Patricia Sabin 3, Devin W Laurence 4, Steve A Maas 5, Andras Lasso 6, Jeffrey A Weiss 7, Matthew A Jolley 8
PMCID: PMC9934730  PMID: 36798457

Abstract

Advances in three-dimensional imaging provide the ability to construct and analyze finite element (FE) models to evaluate the biomechanical behavior and function of atrioventricular valves. However, while obtaining patient-specific valve geometry is now possible, non-invasive measurement of patient-specific leaflet material properties remains nearly impossible. Both valve geometry and tissue properties play a significant role in governing valve dynamics, leading to the central question of whether clinically relevant insights can be attained from FE analysis of atrioventricular valves without precise knowledge of tissue properties. As such we investigated 1) the influence of tissue extensibility and 2) the effects of constitutive model parameters and leaflet thickness on simulated valve function and mechanics. We compared metrics of valve function (e.g., leaflet coaptation and regurgitant orifice area) and mechanics (e.g., stress and strain) across one normal and three regurgitant mitral valve (MV) models with common mechanisms of regurgitation (annular dilation, leaflet prolapse, leaflet tethering) of both moderate and severe degree. We developed a novel fully-automated approach to accurately quantify regurgitant orifice areas of complex valve geometries. We found that the relative ordering of the mechanical and functional metrics was maintained across a group of valves using material properties up to 15% softer than the representative adult mitral constitutive model. Our findings suggest that FE simulations can be used to qualitatively compare how differences and alterations in valve structure affect relative atrioventricular valve function even in populations where material properties are not precisely known.

Keywords: valve function, valve mechanics, tissue properties, uncertainty analysis, valvular regurgitation

1. Introduction

Recent advances in cardiac imaging, such as 3D echocardiography (3DE), offer a noninvasive means to evaluate the structure of dysfunctional heart valves [1, 2]. 3D images allow intuitive visualization of valve anatomy, identification of mechanisms of valve dysfunction, and quantification of the size of the valve leak (e.g., regurgitant orifice area (ROA)). In addition, 3D images enable the association of quantitative metrics of 3D valve structure to valvular function (degree of regurgitation) [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], which in turn may inform valve repair [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. However, association cannot infer causation, and it is not feasible to perform a randomized controlled trial of each proposed valve intervention due to the heterogeneity of clinical populations and the duration and cost to complete such studies [14].

3D image-derived computational approaches have the potential to meet the need for valve structural assessment and identification of the optimal repair for an individual patient. Over the last 20 years, extensive progress has been made in FE modeling of the mitral valve (MV), and more recently, the tricuspid valve [15, 16, 17, 18, 14, 19]. These investigations have used 3D image-derived models to investigate how variations in valve structure influence valve closure as well as leaflet stress and strain in adult atrioventricular valves [20, 14, 21, 22]. In addition, a model of a dysfunctional valve can be realistically altered using computer-aided design (CAD) and FE analysis to precisely simulate the effect of adult atrioventricular valve repairs such as annuloplasty, leaflet resection, papillary muscle redirection, addition of prosthetic chords, and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair [23, 24, 25, 26, 17, 27, 28]. These seminal works provide a roadmap for the controlled and reproducible virtual manipulation of leaflet structure, annular structure, and papillary muscle head position beginning from an initial valve model. FE simulations can then be applied to determine the effect of variations in both native valve anatomy and virtual interventions on leaflet coaptation, stress and strain, relative to a baseline valve model.

While simulation of customized valve repairs is promising, patient-specific leaflet material properties cannot yet be noninvasively obtained, and the effect of variation in material properties on metrics of repair quality (leaflet coaptation, stress and strain) remains unknown. Notably, material properties may vary across individuals, and most modeling is currently performed using material parameters derived from animal or adult cadaveric tissue [14, 29, 30, 31]. Such variation is particularly relevant to the application of valve modeling in children, where valve leaflet material properties have not been described, and may differ across age and disease. Given both valve geometry and material properties are critical factors affecting leaflet mechanics and valve function [32, 33, 16, 14, 21], if the effect of variation in material properties is markedly greater than that of geometry, then evolving computationally derived optimizations of valve repair are less likely to be clinically informative. Specifically, this finding would compromise the otherwise promising development of image-derived computational modeling to inform atrioventricular valve repair until population or patient-specific material properties can be determined noninvasively. A schematic demonstrating the potential future application of image-derived finite element analysis and multi-physics simulation to inform surgical decision making in valve repair is shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1: Conceptual future application workflow.

Figure 1:

Potential future application workflow using image-derived simulation to explore and optimize the optimal repair for an individual patient. The workflow goes as follows 1) create a patient-specific 3D valve model from 3D image, 2) perform variations of virtual intervention to the valve model, and 3) identify the optimal repair by comparing the biomechanical and functional metrics for each option.

As such, we examined the effect of material properties on functional (leaflet coaptation area and ROA) and biomechanical (leaflet stress and strain) metrics across one normal (non-regurgitant) MV and six regurgitant MV model variants with different mechanisms of primary regurgitation characterized by abnormalities of the MV apparatus. We explored the influence of material properties on the relative magnitude of functional and biomechanical metrics across this range of valve geometry. We hypothesized that the relative ordering of the magnitude of functional and mechanical metrics of a group of valve models would be preserved across a range of leaflet material properties. This in turn would suggest that meaningful relative comparisons of valve function and mechanics could be obtained across variations of valve geometry (e.g., different interventions to repair a valve) even in the absence of precise knowledge of tissue material properties.

2. Methods

We aimed to evaluate the effects of varying soft tissue properties on mechanical and functional metrics of dysfunctional MVs using FE analysis. MV anatomy is shown in Fig. 2. We first explored the influence of tissue extensibility on the mechanical and functional metrics of MVs with common mechanisms of regurgitation (annular dilation, posterior leaflet prolapse in the P2 region, and posterior leaflet tethering) across varied grades of regurgitation. Subsequently, we studied the effects of individual material parameters and leaflet thickness on the mechanical and functional metrics across severely regurgitant MVs. Fig. 3 provides an overview of the valve types considered in the present work. The FE model creation and analysis procedure are summarized in the following subsections. Interested readers may refer to Wu et al. [22] for more details regarding the computational modeling framework.

Figure 2: Mitral valve geometry and anatomy.

Figure 2:

(A) Open mitral valve with annulus, free edge, leaflets, and chordae tendineae shown; (B) Closed mitral valve with regions of the anterior leaflet (A1, A2, A3) and posterior leaflet(P1, P2, P3) labeled.

Figure 3: Overview.

Figure 3:

We created models of one normal (non-regurgitant) and three regurgitant MV with different mechanisms of regurgitation ( posterior leaflet tethering, posterior leaflet prolapse in the P2 region, and symmetric annular dilation). For the three dysfunctional morphologies (Tethered, P2 prolapse, Annular dilation) we created morphologies with two degrees of regurgitation (moderate and severe). We used these MV morphologies to examine the effects of tissue extensibility and the individual material coefficient on the mechanical and functional metrics. Visualization of chordae omitted for clarity.

2.1. Finite element modeling procedure

The computational analyses in the present work leveraged three open-source platforms: SlicerHeart 1[9, 34], 3D Slicer 2 [35], and FEBio 3 [36, 37, 38]. Use of 3DE images for this work was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

To create a baseline FE mesh emulating realistic MV geometry, we used SlicerHeart to segment the valve leaflets of a normal adolescent male’s MV from 3DE images. Then, we defined periodic control point splines at the annulus and free edge to extract the medial surface from the valve segmentation. Finally, we lofted a NURBS grid surface between the splines and fitted the grid surface to the valve medial surface. From this baseline geometry, the NURBS grid surface was edited to create a normal MV with full coaptation upon closure in FEBio. Three abnormal MV variants were created with further adjustments to the NURBS grid surface, papillary muscle tip placement, and chordae tension: (1) for posterior leaflet tethering, chordae length was increased by lowering papillary muscle tips and chordae tension was increased, (2) for posterior leaflet prolapse, chordae tension was decreased in the P2 region, and (3) for annular dilation, the diameter of the annulus curve was increased without lengthening the leaflets. For each of these three morphologies, models with two degrees of regurgitation severity (moderate, severe) were created.

The mechanical behaviors of leaflets are complex with properties contingent on collagen fiber concentration, characteristics, and orientation [39]. Further, the collagen fiber distribution and organization variate across the four tissue layers within the leaflet structure [40]. In general, leaflet tissue exhibits an anisotropic behavior with the collagen fibers oriented with the circumferential direction, but in some cases, leaflets can be stiffer in the radial direction [41, 42]. However, prior studies have demonstrated that leaflet anisotropy has negligible effects on the global leaflet deformation response [43]. As such, we adopted the incompressible, isotropic, hyperelastic Lee-Sacks constitutive model [15] to model the MV leaflet tissue for its simplicity and efficient formulation. The Lee-Sacks model is characterized by an unconstrained constitutive model in which the contributions of the extracellular matrix and collagen fiber network were approximated by combining neo-Hookean and exponential terms. Details of the constitutive model formulation can be found in [15, 17].

The FE meshes were discretized into 4-node linear quadrilateral (Quad4) shell elements [44]. Pinned boundary conditions were applied to the annulus edge and the papillary muscle tips to restrict spatial translations in the valve models. A systolic pressure (100 mmHg) was prescribed to the ventricular surface of the leaflets to simulate valve closure. The leaflet contact was modeled using a potential-based formulation [17]. The chords were modeled as previously described [22]. Dynamic analyses were performed on the valve models using an implicit Newmark time integration scheme.

2.2. Mechanical and functional metrics

The mechanical and functional metrics considered include the average 1st principal stress and strain, contact area(CA), and regurgitant orifice area (ROA). ROA (the orifice that blood can leak through from the ventricle to the atrium during ventricular contraction) and coaptation area are indices of immediate valve function (degree of regurgitation). The first principal stress and strain are measures that connect valve function (and pathology) to the tissue mechanical environment and are increasingly thought to be related to longitudinal valve function [45, 46, 47]. Recent studies in adult mitral valves demonstrate that greater leaflet stress and strain are associated with moderate or greater regurgitation, clinical valve repair failure, and pathologic changes in valve leaflets.

The contact area for the Kamensky contact [17] was calculated by integrating the contact surface over the elements with non-zero traction applied to its integration points based on a force-separation law defined in Kamensky et al. [17]. We developed a new fully-automated method to accurately quantify the ROA by coupling a shrink-wrapping method [48, 49, 50] with raycasting. This novel technique can capture multiple regurgitant orifices, and we have released it open-source in the Orifice Area module of SlicerHeart extension for 3D Slicer [34]. The procedures are shown in Fig. 4. We included a tutorial video in the Supplement to demonstrate the pipeline for obtaining the biomechanical and functional metrics. In summary, we first imported the systolic frame of the valve FE model to 3D Slicer and inflated the surface mesh by the leaflet thickness. This step helps improve the accuracy of the quantification of the orifice opening. Second, we placed landmark points near the orifice opening to create a closed contour (Fig. 4A). Third, we warped a flat disk template to the closed contour to generate a continuous surface [51] represented the red and blue patches combined in Fig. 4BD. The red patches indicated areas where the continuous surface is in contact with the leaflet surface, whereas the blue patches represented the potential orifice surface. Fourth, we iteratively smoothed (via Laplacian method), remeshed (via Approximated Centroidal Voronoi Diagrams algorithm [52]), and displaced (in the direction of gradient vectors determined from the leaflet surface) the continuous surface towards the orifice opening, until the change in orifice surface area between iterations fell within a user-defined tolerance. The shrink-wrapping method may overestimate the potential orifice area in cases where the regurgitant opening is situated in a narrow and deep crease between the anterior and posterior leaflets. As such, we generated 400 rays in the surface normal direction of a 50-degree cone over the potential orifice surfaces to filter out invalid patches (Fig. 4F). In other words, any patches with rays intersecting the leaflet surface were considered invalid orifice areas. Finally, we summed up all valid patches as the final, confirmed ROAs (Fig. 4F). From our experience, we found 400 rays from each patch are sufficient for identifying small openings within reasonable computational time. Users may use fewer rays if desired.

Figure 4: ROA computation procedure.

Figure 4:

(A) Create a closed contour near the valve opening. (B) SlicerHeart automatically generates a continuous surface. The red region indicates the area where the continuous surface is in contact with the leaflet surface; blue indicates the potential orifice surface. (C to D) the potential orifice surface gradually descends toward the orifice opening in the valve model by a user-defined number of shrink-wrapping iterations. (E) Generate 400 rays (red lines) over the potential orifice surface to identify the streamlines that pass through the valve without intersecting the leaflets. (F) Compute the effective ROA by summing the areas around the rays that do not intersect the leaflet surface.

2.3. Numerical derivation of material variants

While there are representative material models to capture leaflet tissue properties in adults, characterizing tissue properties in children remains a challenging task due to the inaccessibility of human tissue. This limitation hinders meaningful studies of valve functions and closure. As many studies suggested that heart valve tissue is softer in children [53, 54, 55, 56], we performed uniaxial FE analysis on a single-element FE model and numerically derived five sets of material coefficients that yielded various degrees of increased extensibility from the adult mitral leaflet properties (Fig. 5). These models were used to represent the range of leaflet properties in children until more precise tissue material properties are available.

Figure 5: Material variants.

Figure 5:

We derived five material variants, each representing a gradual increase of tissue extensibility relative to the baseline mitral model, by performing a uniaxial test using FE analysis. The material constants are shown in (A), their corresponding stress-strain curves are shown in (B), and the percentage difference of the stretch ratio, λ, between each material variant and the mitral model (C).

2.4. Uncertainty analysis

In addition to evaluating the influence of tissue extensibility on the mechanical and functional metrics of a diverse set of regurgitant MVs, we also examined the sensitivity of material coefficients (c0, c1, and c2 in the Lee-Sack constitutive model) and leaflet thickness on the mechanical and functional outcomes of the normal and severely regurgitant MVs using 1) a traditional approach and 2) a statistical approach. In the traditional approach, for each mitral pathology, we uniformly sampled five data points in the range of ±50% of the reference value per model parameter (i.e., a total of 20 FE models were considered per valve model). Then, we performed FE analyses by varying one material coefficient at a time, while keeping the reference values for the remaining coefficients constant to identify the sensitivity of the mechanical and functional metrics with respect to individual material model coefficients. While traditional uncertainty analysis provides a systematic approach for evaluating model sensitivity with respect to uncertainty in individual input parameters, the statistical approach facilitates a more comprehensive assessment of the model outcomes from uncertainty across multiple parameters. The latter approach may be a more suitable choice for our application since the input parameters at play (material coefficients and tissue thickness) are dependent on each other nonlinearly. For example, a change in c0 would also necessitate a change in the other parameters to produce the same constitutive behavior. In the statistical approach, for each dysfunctional valve, we randomly generated 80 sets of input parameters in a 4-dimensional space, with each dimension spanning the range of ±50% of the reference value for each input parameter, using a polynomical chaos expansion function with a weighted approximate Fekete points (WAFP) method. The reference value for the input parameters and their ranges are shown in Table 1. This allowed us to assess the total-order sensitivity indices, a metric that measures the combined effect of each input parameter in a multi-parametric space from parameter interaction (the total contribution of multiple parameter variations) [57, 22]. This statistical uncertainty analysis was achieved via a newly developed Python subroutine called FEBioUncertainSCI that interfaces UncertainSCI [57] with the FEBio solver. The source code of the subroutine can be found at github.com/febiosoftware/FEBioUncertainSCI.

Table 1:

Uncertainty analysis sample points.

Mitral

Input parameter Reference value [15] Min. Max.

C0 (kPa) 200 100.00 300.00
C1 (kPa) 2968.4 1484.20 4452.60
C2 0.2661 0.13 0.40
Thickness (mm) 0.396 0.198 0.594

We sampled a total of five points uniformly between the minimum and maximum values for each parameter to identify the sensitivity of the mechanical and functional metrics with perturbation in the material constants and leaflet thickness.

3. Results

In Section 3.1, we altered material extensibility to examine the effects of tissue stretches on the mechanical and functional metrics for pathologic valves. In Section 3.2, we performed an uncertainty analysis for one normal and three severely regurgitant valves to discern the effects of individual material model parameters and the corresponding mechanical and functional metrics at valve closure.

3.1. Mechanical and functional metrics comparative studies

3.1.1. Similar regurgitant MV geometries

We applied five sets of material coefficients to regurgitant valves of moderate and severe regurgitant grades to assess the influence of tissue extensibility on the mechanical and functional metrics in MVs of similar geometries. We report our findings for the tethered MV in this section to save space; readers may refer to Appendix A for the remaining findings.

The top and side profiles of mechanical and functional metrics for the tethered mitral are shown in Fig. 6. We observed that the softer material coefficients led to higher 1st principal stress and strain, more contact area, and less ROA. In addition, as the regurgitation severity increased (i.e., ROA), so did the stress and strain. Again, the color red in the contact area panels represents the contact area, and the color blue in the ROA panels represents the ROA.

Figure 6: Mechanical and functional metric profiles for tethered models.

Figure 6:

We observed an increase in 1st principal stress, 1st principal strain, and contact area but a decrease in ROA in the softer material variants. Additionally, valves with severe regurgitation had higher stress, strain, and regurgitant area, but less contact area.

In Fig. 7, we provided a heatmap for each mechanical and functional metric to illustrate the pattern of the metric by regurgitation severity (across the columns) and by material extensibility (across the rows). In both cases, the relative orderings across the mechanical and functional metrics were maintained, except for the first principal stress where negligible ordering inconsistency across regurgitant severity was observed. Altogether, this suggested that the relative ordering of the mechanical and functional metrics was maintained across diseased valves of similar geometries, for the range of material properties considered in the present work. Therefore, imprecise approximation of in vivo leaflet tissue extensibility does not affect the validity of comparative mechanical and functional outcomes across MVs of similar geometries.

Figure 7:

Figure 7:

Mechanical and functional metric patterns for tethered models. The heatmaps demonstrated the trend of the mechanical and functional metrics by a) regurgitation severity (across the columns) and 2) by material variant (across the rows). The relative ordering of the mechanical and functional metrics was mostly preserved in both scenarios. Material variants: M-Mitral; V1-Variant 1; V2-Variant 2; V3-Variant 3; V4-Variant 4; V5-Variant 5.

3.1.2. Disparate regurgitant MV geometries

To understand whether valve geometries or material properties dominate the mechanical and functional metrics, we applied the five sets of material parameters to one normal and three severely regurgitated MVs (tethered, P2 prolapse, and annular dilation) representing a diverse range of MV geometries.

The top and side views of average 1st principal stress, average 1st principal strain, contact area, and ROA for each of the abnormal valves are shown in Fig. 8. Note, the color red in the contact area panels represent the contact area, and the color blue in the ROA panels represents the ROA. Across the four MVs, we observed higher stress, strain, and contact area, but lower ROA in material models with higher extensibility. While the stress and strain patterns were consistent across different material models within each type of regurgitant valve, the stress and strain profiles were significantly different across the regurgitant valves. The stresses and strains were highest in the A1 and A3 regions of the P2 prolapse and tethered valves, and A1 region of the annular dilation valves. This inconsistency suggested that valve geometries (i.e., the annular geometry, leaflet geometry, and subvalvular apparatus) had a considerable effect on the stress and strain profiles of the valves.

Figure 8: Mechanical and functional metric profiles for normal and severely regurgitant MVs.

Figure 8:

The average 1st principal stress, average 1st principal strain, contact area, and ROA of the normal and three diseased MVs were shown. Variants 1, 3, and 5 represent tissue material variants shown in Fig. 5, with variant 1 being the stiffest and 5 being the softest among the numerically derived material variants. Across the four valves, the 1st principal stress, 1st principal strain, and contact area increased with softer tissue; the opposite for the ROA. Regarding stress/strain patterns, the highest stress and strain were found in the A1 and A3 regions of the P2 prolapse and tethered valves, and A1 region of the annular dilation valves.

In Fig. 9, we provided a quantitative heatmap for each mechanical and functional metric to illustrate the pattern of the metric across mitral pathology (across the columns) and across material extensibility (across the rows). We observed excellent consistency in the patterns across valve pathology with tissue extensibility from mitral to Variant 3 in all metrics. In other words, the relative ordering of the metrics of valve mechanics and ROA were maintained for material models up to approximately 15% more stretchable than the mitral material properties. This finding indicated that the comparative mechanical and functional outcomes were still consistent in MVs of significantly dissimilar geometries, so long the true in vivo tissue softness was within 15% of the representative MVs material parameters. Further, the relative ordering of the mechanical and functional metrics was mostly preserved across material variants. This finding was consistent with our intuition that softer tissue yields higher stresses, strains, and contact area ratio but a lower ROA.

Figure 9: Mechanical and functional metric patterns for tethered models.

Figure 9:

The heatmaps demonstrated the trend of the mechanical and functional metrics by a) regurgitation MVs (across the rows) and 2)by material variant (across the columns). The relative ordering of the mechanical and functional metrics was mostly preserved in both scenarios. Valve types: N-normal; PP-P2 prolapse; T-tethered; AD-annular dilation. Material variants: M-Mitral; V1-Variant 1; V2-Variant 2; V3-Variant 3; V4-Variant 4; V5-Variant 5.

3.2. Uncertainty analyses for dysfunctional MVs

Fig. 10 and 11 shows the effects of material coefficients (c0, c1, c2) and leaflet thickness on the average 1st principal stress and strain at valve closure. In the traditional approach, where only one parameter was varied at a time, we observed that the material constants c0, c1, and c2 had similar influences on the mechanical and functional metrics across the four valves. Further, the metrics were comparatively more sensitive to changes in leaflet thickness. The line plots that demonstrated changes in mechanical and functional metrics concerning model parameters can be found in Appendix B.

Figure 10: Traditional sensitivity results.

Figure 10:

We evaluated the sensitivity of the mechanical and functional metrics to perturbation in model parameters for four valves: normal, tethered, P2 prolapse, and annular dilation. The box plots represented the spread of skewness in the mechanical and functional metrics for each modeling parameter. These results indicated the mechanical and functional metrics were most sensitive to leaflet thickness, consistent across the four valves. Additionally, all three material constants had a negligible effect on leaflet stresses.

Figure 11: Statistical sensitivity results.

Figure 11:

We evaluated total-sensitivity indices of the model input parameters to account for the effects of higher-order interactions between input parameters. These results indicated that all input parameters had an equal influence on the mechanical and functional metrics.

In our statistical approach (UncertainSCI), where multiple input parameters were varied simultaneously, the total sensitivity indices were similar across the input parameters across valve types. This result suggested that the parameter interactions had a significant contribution to the total sensitivity of the FE model, and provided a more thorough representation of the simulation results given the dependent nature of the material constants. This additional insight provided by the statistical approach highlights the importance of considering parameter interactions in sensitivity analysis.

Fig. 12 presents the sliced view of the dysfunctional valves to assess the effects of model parameters on leaflet deformation at systole. Our results indicated leaflet deformation was relatively insensitive to tissue coefficient c0. However, noticeable differences in leaflet deformation were observed in situations with varying c1, c2, and leaflet thickness; leaflet deformation reduced with higher c1, c2, and thicker leaflets.

Figure 12: Cross-sectional views of mitral models in systole.

Figure 12:

Cross-sectional views of the FE models were shown. The leaflet deformation was relatively insensitive to material coefficient c0, moderately sensitive to material coefficients c1 and c2, and most sensitive to leaflet thickness.

4. Discussion

4.1. Overall findings

In the present work, we sought to understand how uncertainty and variation in heart valve leaflet mechanical properties influence FE-derived predictions of valve function and mechanics. We found that the relative ordering of the magnitude of functional and mechanical metrics across a range of MV morphologies was consistent when a tissue extensibility within 15% of the baseline model was employed. This suggests that geometry is the dominant determinant of metrics of valve function and mechanics within this range of variation in material properties.

We explored how variations in tissue extensibility influenced FE metrics and comparisons across functional and dysfunctional MV morphology. As expected we noted that each individual MV geometry had similar stress and strain contours, with differing magnitudes, as constitutive model parameters were varied. Despite the clear influence of the gradual increase of tissue extensibility on the FE predictions, the relative ordering of the functional metrics was maintained across a range of leaflet material properties within 15% of the baseline mitral model stretch ratio. Further, the relative ordering of functional metrics for dysfunctional valves with increasing regurgitation severity was preserved across the leaflet material properties defined in this work. These results suggest that meaningful qualitative insights into the immediate (i.e., functional metrics) and long-term (i.e., mechanical metrics) valve function can be obtained in the absence of precise knowledge of leaflet tissue properties. This finding further supports the further development and validation of image-derived patient-specific computational modeling to inform the optimization of valve repair, as discussed further below.

We also explored the effects of uncertainty in tissue thickness and constitutive model parameters on the FE-derived valve metrics using traditional and statistical uncertainty analysis. In the traditional analysis, our results showed that the mechanical metrics (i.e., tissue stress and strain) and the functional metrics (i.e., valve contact area and ROA) were most sensitive to the tissue thickness. We noted that all three constitutive model parameters had a similar influence on the simulation results. These trends were consistent for all four MV geometries, but the magnitude of variation differed for each metric with tissue thickness having the most profound impact on the predicted leaflet stress. However, gleaned from statistical analysis results, it was inconclusive on which input parameter had the most dominant influence on the mechanical and functional metrics. We found that the leaflet thickness and the constitutive model parameters had similar total-order sensitivity indices, indicating that they had an equivalent influence on the relative effects of the mechanical and functional metrics in the FE analysis results. We noted that the statistical sensitivity analysis provided a more comprehensive representation of the model responses compared to traditional sensitivity analysis, as it took into account the combined effects from higher-order input parameter interactions. Although the statistical analysis results suggested that uncertainty in material constants had an influence on the resulting magnitude of each metric, this additional finding would not affect the overall conclusion on the relative ordering of the valve function and mechanics across normal and dysfunctional valves, as consistent constitutive parameters and material thickness were used when comparing metrics across valve types.

4.2. Comparisons with existing literature

Previous studies have used intricate animal models and experimental systems to determine heart valve leaflet mechanical properties for developing high-fidelity simulation tools. We noted that our predicted MV leaflet average stresses for the normal model (265.69 kPa) were within a similar range as the previous studies of Lee et al. [15] (240–600 kPa) and Rim et al. [58] (150 – 300 kPa). Furthermore, our predicted average principal strains (0.220) were within the range of previous experimental findings of Lee et al. [59] and Amini et al. [60] for porcine valves (10–35%), but were larger than the strains determined by Rausch et al. [61] for sheep valves (4–7%). Slight differences may be attributed to differing transvalvular pressures, constitutive model forms, assumed boundary conditions (e.g., dynamic annulus), and the lack of pre-strains.

There has been an emerging interest in using cardiac imaging to determine the functional mechanical properties of heart valves and better understand valve disease. Our predicted strains were larger than a recent clinical study that used cardiac imaging to determine functional MV leaflet strains of 7–9% [45]. However, our numerical results echoed their observation that diseased valves have larger strains than healthy valves. This suggests that underlying valve morphology is the most important determinant of valve deformation, and further illustrates that FE simulations may be used as an exploratory tool without precise a priori knowledge of constitutive model parameters. Ultimately, this expands on the versatility of image-derived investigations, such as the recent work by Narang et al. [46] that found differences in leaflet shear strains for adult MVs with recurrent ischemic mitral regurgitation.

4.3. Clinical implications

In this work, we sought to explore extending the application of FE methods to clinical applications (e.g., comparison of different repair strategies) where exact or patient-specific tissue material properties are unknown. Our results show that FE modeling predictions can be used to understand relative disease severity and the effect of alterations to the leaflet mechanical environment so long as material property parameters are maintained across the comparison group and fall within the range of ~ 15% of the baseline model. For example, comparing different valve repairs for atrioventricular valve disease could significantly contribute to the optimization of valve repairs in small and heterogeneous populations less likely to benefit from iterative clinical refinement, such as children with congenital heart disease. Future inverse methods leveraging patient-specific images may inform these developments, but the present work has illustrated that FE analysis can be used to derive meaningful comparisons in parallel with the maturation of our understanding of material properties of atrioventricular valves, and in particular pediatric atrioventricular valves.

An additional contribution of this work is a new method we have implemented in SlicerHeart that couples a shrink-wrapping method [48, 49, 50] with raycasting to automatically and reproducibly determine the ROA of heart valves. Previous simulation studies relied on simplifying the closed valve geometry to two-dimensional slices [21] or sampling different perspectives to find the largest orifice area [28]. Although both methods may provide reasonable approximations of the ROA, they are orientation dependent, may fail to accurately capture the complex closed valve geometry (e.g., multiple jets), and consequently often misrepresent the true ROA. Our methodology overcomes these limitations by employing an algorithm that is invariant to the view angle and can consider multiple regurgitant jets across the valve.

4.4. Study limitations and future directions

This study includes several convenient simplifications on the FE model representations of the MV sub-valvular apparatus and leaflet mechanical properties that do not detract from the quality of the findings. In terms of FE model simplifications, first, we assumed pinned boundary conditions for the annulus and papillary muscle tips rather than dynamic, from ventricular contraction and relaxation, as they would be in vivo. Considering dynamic annular and papillary motion in the FE simulation may reduce the predicted leaflet stresses [58], but this will not affect our comparisons as all FE simulations share this assumption. Second, we modeled each of the anterolateral and posteromedial papillary muscles with a single tip and assumed uniform chordae distribution over an anatomic area of chordal insertion extending inward from the leaflet edge. However, chordae and papillary muscle anatomy may differ in patients with functional and degenerative mitral regurgitation [62, 63]. Considering patient-specific sub-valvular components may provide a more accurate assessment of the functional and biomechanical metrics when such imaging becomes clinically feasible.

We used an isotropic form of the Lee-Sacks constitutive model with adult MV parameters that cannot capture the typical anisotropic mechanical behaviors of heart valve leaflets. Fortunately, Wu et al. [43] demonstrated that this anisotropy plays a minimal role in predicting large-scale tissue deformations and subsequent geometry-based functional metrics (e.g., contact area). Further, it is known that the heart valve leaflets have regionally heterogeneous properties (e.g., thickness [59] and stiffness [64]). Consideration of leaflet anisotropy and heterogeneous thickness may confound comparisons between healthy and diseased valve function. Notably, the valve leaflet mechanical behaviors are very complex and often described using several metrics including the low-tensile (toe) stiffness, high-tensile (calf) stiffness, or anisotropy index [65]. Consideration of these metrics would likely require a more complex structurally informed constitutive model [66] in which the parameters are directly connected to microstructural properties. As such, we chose to simplify the description of the leaflet mechanical behaviors to the general tissue extensibility since it is an overall descriptor of the valve mechanical behavior. However, future extensions of this work could consider how uncertainty or imprecise descriptions of the microstructural properties influence comparisons of valve simulations.

Notably, the valve tissue may adapt to changes in its functional environment, which could in turn change the valve functional environment and cyclically result in long-term progression towards “homeostasis”[67]. As such, studies into the multiscale properties of valve tissues are evolving, especially within the context of specific valve pathologies [68, 69, 70, 71]. However, currently, relatively little is understood about the interrelationship between valve pathology and tissue mechanical behaviors. Therefore, we assumed the same mechanical properties across valve pathology in our FE models as the disease-driven changes to the valve tissue mechanical behaviors are unknown. We have shown that these disease-driven differences in mechanics (so long as they are within 15% of a given reference) will not alter the relative ordering of valve pathologies. However, further work is needed regarding the relationship between tissue mechanics, valve pathology, and the durability of valve repair [45, 46, 47]. This is an exploratory study seeking to expand the applicability of computational tools to scenarios with no a priori knowledge of heart valve properties, but future applications of this open-source computational framework require further experimental validation.

5. Conclusion

This study has provided the first insight into how tissue extensibility influences FE simulations of atrioventricular valve function. We found that the relative ordering of metrics of valve function and mechanics remained consistent across valve models when varying tissue extensibility so long as the stretches remained within 15% of the reference MV leaflet stretches. As such, FE simulations of atrioventricular valve function may be used to explore how differences and alterations in valve structure affect heart valve function even in populations where material properties are not precisely known.

6. Acknowledgment

This work was funded by the Cora Topolewski Cardiac Research Fund At the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), The Pediatric Valve Center Frontier Program at CHOP, the Additional Ventures Single Ventricle Research Fund, an Additional Ventures Single Ventricle Research Fund Expansion Award, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH R01 HL153166, R01 GM083925, and U24 EB029007). In addition, both WW and DWL were supported by NHLBI T32 HL007915. The authors would also like to acknowledge Professor Akil Narayan from the University of Utah, for providing his expert insights on the statistical approach.

A. Additional results for regurgitant MVs with similar geometries

We provide additional profiles of mechanical and functional metrics for the P2 and annular dilation models.

Figure 13: Profiles of mechanical and functional metrics for P2 prolapse models.

Figure 13:

We observed an increase in 1st principal stress and strain, and contact area but a decrease in ROA as material variants became softer. Additionally, models with higher regurgitation had higher stress, strain, regurgitant area, and lower contact area.

Figure 14: Mechanical and functional metric profiles for annular dilation models.

Figure 14:

We observed an increase in 1st principal stress, 1st principal strain, and contact area but a decrease in ROA as the material variants became softer. The models appeared to have higher stresses on the posterior leaflets but lower on the anterior leaflets. The strains were similar across models with varying degrees of regurgitation. Lastly, we observed higher regurgitant and lower contact areas as regurgitation severity increased.

Figure 15: Mechanical and functional metric profiles for P2 prolapse models.

Figure 15:

The heatmaps demonstrated the trend of the mechanical and functional metrics by a) regurgitation severity (across columns) and 2) by material variant (across rows). The relative ordering of the mechanical and functional metrics was mostly preserved in both scenarios. Material variants: M-Mitral; V1-Variant 1; V2-Variant 2; V3-Variant 3; V4-Variant 4; V5-Variant 5.

B. Additional sensitivity analysis results

Figure 16: Mechanical and functional metric profiles for annular dilation models.

Figure 16:

The heatmaps demonstrated the trend of the mechanical and functional metrics by a) regurgitation severity (across columns) and 2) by material variant (across rows). The relative ordering of the mechanical and functional metrics was mostly preserved in both scenarios. Material variants: M-Mitral; V1-Variant 1; V2-Variant 2; V3-Variant 3; V4-Variant 4; V5-Variant 5.

Figure 17: Sensitivity results.

Figure 17:

The material constants appeared to have negligible effects on the average principal stress. Meanwhile, higher leaflet thickness yielded lower leaflet stress. Further, higher leaflet thickness, c0, c1, and c2 led to lower leaflet strain and contact area but higher ROA.

Footnotes

Contributor Information

Wensi Wu, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Stephen Ching, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Patricia Sabin, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Devin W. Laurence, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104

Steve A. Maas, Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112

Andras Lasso, Laboratory for Percutaneous Surgery, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON.

Jeffrey A. Weiss, Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112

Matthew A. Jolley, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104

References

  • [1].Qureshi Muhammad Yasir, Sommer Robert J., and Cabalka Allison K.. Tricuspid valve imaging and intervention in pediatric and adult patients with congenital heart disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 12(4):637–651, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Muraru Denisa, Hahn Rebecca T., Soliman Osama I., Faletra Francesco F., Basso Cristina, and Badano Luigi P.. 3-dimensional echocardiography in imaging the tricuspid valve. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 12(3):500–515, 2019. FOCUS ISSUE: IMAGING THE TRICUSPID VALVE–PART I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Utsunomiya Hiroto, Harada Yu, Susawa Hitoshi, Takahari Kosuke, Ueda Yusuke, Izumi Kanako, Itakura Kiho, Ikenaga Hiroki, Hidaka Takayuki, Fukuda Yukihiro, Shiota Takahiro, and Kihara Yasuki. Comprehensive evaluation of tricuspid regurgitation location and severity using vena contracta analysis: A color doppler three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic study. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 32(12):1526–1537.e2, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Oguz Didem, Eleid Mackram F., Dhesi Sumandeep, Pislaru Sorin V., Mankad Sunil V., Malouf Joseph F., Nkomo Vuyisile T., Oh Jae K., Holmes David R., Reeder Guy S., Rihal Charanjit S., and Thaden Jeremy J.. Quantitative three-dimensional echocardiographic correlates of optimal mitral regurgitation reduction during transcatheter mitral valve repair. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 32(11):1426–1435.e1, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Muraru Denisa, Addetia Karima, Guta Andrada C, Ochoa-Jimenez Roberto C, Genovese Davide, Veronesi Federico, Basso Cristina, Iliceto Sabino, Badano Luigi P, and Lang Roberto M. Right atrial volume is a major determinant of tricuspid annulus area in functional tricuspid regurgitation: a three-dimensional echocardiographic study. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging, 22(6):660–669, 12 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Karagodin Ilya, Addetia Karima, Singh Amita, Dow Alasdair, Rivera Lydia, De-Cara Jeanne M., Soulat-Dufour Laurie, Yamat Megan, Kruse Eric, Shah Atman P., Mor-Avi Victor, and Lang Roberto M.. Improved delineation of cardiac pathology using a novel three-dimensional echocardiographic tissue transparency tool. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 33(11):1316–1323, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Nam Hannah H., Herz Christian, Lasso Andras, Cianciulli Alana, Flynn Maura, Huang Jing, Wang Zi, Paniagua Beatriz, Vicory Jared, Kabir Saleha, Simpson John, Harrild David, Marx Gerald, Cohen Meryl S., Glatz Andrew C., and Jolley Matthew A.. Visualization and quantification of the unrepaired complete atrioventricular canal valve using open-source software. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 35(9):985–996.e11, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Williams Trevor R., Cianciulli Alana R., Wang Yan, Lasso Andras, Pinter Csaba, Pouch Alison M., Biko David M., Nuri Muhammad, Quartermain Michael D., Rogers Lindsay S., Chen Jonathan M., and Jolley Matthew A.. Truncal valve repair: 3-dimensional imaging and modeling to enhance preoperative surgical planning. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, 15(12):e014424, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Nguyen Alex V., Lasso Andras, Nam Hannah H., Faerber Jennifer, Aly Ahmed H., Pouch Alison M., Scanlan Adam B., McGowan Francis X., Mercer-Rosa Laura, Cohen Meryl S., Simpson John, Fichtinger Gabor, and Jolley Matthew A.. Dynamic three-dimensional geometry of the tricuspid valve annulus in hypoplastic left heart syndrome with a fontan circulation. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 32(5):655–666.e13, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Addetia Karima, Muraru Denisa, Veronesi Federico, Jenei Csaba, Cavalli Giacomo, Besser Stephanie A, Mor-Avi Victor, Lang Roberto M, and Badano Luigi P. 3-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of the tricuspid annulus provides new insights into tricuspid valve geometry and dynamics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 12(3):401–412, Mar 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Vratonjic Jelena, Jovanovic Ivana, Petrovic Olga, Paunovic Ivana, Boricic-Kostic Marija, Tesic Milorad, Nedeljkovic-Arsenovic Olga, Maksimovic Ruzica, Ivanovic Branislava, and Trifunovic-Zamaklar Danijela. Multimodality imaging for the management of patients with primary mitral regurgitation. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 50(8):1051–1059, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Pingitore Annachiara, Polizzi Vincenzo, Cardillo Ilaria, Lio Antonio, Ranocchi Federico, Pergolini Amedeo, and Musumeci Francesco. 3d mitral annulus echocardiography assessment in patients affected by degenerative mitral regurgitation who underwent mitral valve repair with flexible band. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, n/a(n/a), 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Khabbaz Kamal R, Mahmood Feroze, Shakil Omair, Warraich Haider J, Gorman Joseph H 3rd, Gorman Robert C, Matyal Robina, Panzica Peter, and Hess Philip E. Dynamic 3-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of mitral annular geometry in patients with functional mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg, 95(1):105–110, Jan 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Sacks Michael S., Drach Andrew, Chung Hao Lee Amir H. Khalighi, Rego Bruno V., Zhang Will, Ayoub Salma, Yoganathan Ajit P., Gorman Robert C., and Gorman Joseph H.. On the simulation of mitral valve function in health, disease, and treatment. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 141, 7 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Chung Hao Lee Rouzbeh Amini, Gorman Robert C., Gorman Joseph H., and Sacks Michael S.. An inverse modeling approach for stress estimation in mitral valve anterior leaflet valvuloplasty for in-vivo valvular biomaterial assessment. Journal of Biomechanics, 47:2055–2063, 6 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Khalighi Amir H., Drach Andrew, Bloodworth Charles H., Pierce Eric L., Yoganathan Ajit P., Gorman Robert C., Gorman Joseph H., and Sacks Michael S.. Mitral valve chordae tendineae: Topological and geometrical characterization. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 45:378–393, 2 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Kamensky David, Xu Fei, Chung Hao Lee Jinhui Yan, Bazilevs Yuri, and Hsu Ming Chen. A contact formulation based on a volumetric potential: Application to isogeometric simulations of atrioventricular valves. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 330:522–546, 3 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Kong Fanwei, Pham Thuy, Martin Caitlin, Raymond McKay Charles Primiano, Hashim Sabet, Kodali Susheel, and Sun Wei. Finite element analysis of tricuspid valve deformation from multi-slice computed tomography images. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 46:1112–1127, 8 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Shelly Singh-Gryzbon Vahid Sadri, Toma Milan, Pierce Eric L., Wei Zhenglun A., and Yoganathan Ajit P.. Development of a computational method for simulating tricuspid valve dynamics. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 47(6):1422–1434, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Biffi Benedetta, Gritti Maurizio, Grasso Agata, Milano Elena G., Fontana Marianna, Alkareef Hamad, Davar Joseph, Jeetley Paramijit, Whelan Carol, Anderson Sarah, Lorusso Donatella, Sauvage Emilie, Bosi Giorgia Maria, Schievano Silvia, and Capelli Claudio. A workflow for patient-specific fluid–structure interaction analysis of the mitral valve: A proof of concept on a mitral regurgitation case. Medical Engineering and Physics, 74:153–161, 12 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Laurence Devin W., Johnson Emily L., Ming Chen Hsu Ryan Baumwart, Mir Arshid, Burkhart Harold M., Holzapfel Gerhard A., Wu Yi, and Lee Chung Hao. A pilot in silico modeling-based study of the pathological effects on the biomechanical function of tricuspid valves. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 36, 7 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Wu Wensi, Ching Stephen, Maas Steve A., Lasso Andras, Sabin Patricia, Weiss Jeffrey A., and Jolley Matthew A.. A Computational Framework for Atrioventricular Valve Modeling Using Open-Source Software. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 144(10), 05 2022. 101012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Choi Ahnryul, Rim Yonghoon, Mun Jeffrey S., and Kim Hyunggun. A novel finite element-based patient-specific mitral valve repair: virtual ring annuloplasty. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, 24(1):341–347, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Choi Ahnryul, McPherson David D., and Kim Hyunggun. Neochordoplasty versus leaflet resection for ruptured mitral chordae treatment: Virtual mitral valve repair. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 90:50–58, 11 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Kong Fanwei, Pham Thuy, Martin Caitlin, Elefteriades John, McKay Raymond, Primiano Charles, and Sun Wei. Finite element analysis of annuloplasty and papillary muscle relocation on a patient-specific mitral regurgitation model. PLoS ONE, 13, 6 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Kong Fanwei, Caballero Andrés, McKay Raymond, and Sun Wei. Finite element analysis of mitraclip procedure on a patient-specific model with functional mitral regurgitation. Journal of Biomechanics, 104, 5 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Lee Chung Hao, Laurence Devin W., Ross Colton J., Kramer Katherine E., Babu Anju R., Johnson Emily L., Hsu Ming Chen, Aggarwal Ankush, Mir Arshid, Burkhart Harold M., Towner Rheal A., Baumwart Ryan, and Wu Yi. Mechanics of the tricuspid valve—from clinical diagnosis/treatment, in-vivo and in-vitro investigations, to patient-specific biomechanical modeling, 6 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Johnson Emily L., Laurence Devin W., Xu Fei, Crisp Caroline E., Mir Arshid, Burkhart Harold M., Lee Chung Hao, and Hsu Ming Chen. Parameterization, geometric modeling, and isogeometric analysis of tricuspid valves. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 384, 10 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Mathur M., Jazwiec T., Meador W. D., Malinowski M., Goehler M., Ferguson H., Timek T. A., and Rausch M. K.. Tricuspid valve leaflet strains in the beating ovine heart. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 18:1351–1361, 10 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Wang Qian and Sun Wei. Finite element modeling of mitral valve dynamic deformation using patient-specific multi-slices computed tomography scans. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 41:142–153, 1 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Pham Thuy, Kong Fanwei, Martin Caitlin, Wang Qian, Primiano Charles, McKay Raymond, Elefteriades John, and Sun Wei. Finite element analysis of patient-specific mitral valve with mitral regurgitation. Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology, 8:3–16, 3 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Sacks Michael S, David Merryman W, and Schmidt David E. On the biomechanics of heart valve function. Journal of biomechanics, 42(12):1804–1824, 08 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Hasan Anwarul, Ragaert Kim, Swieszkowski Wojciech, Šeila Selimović Arghya Paul, Camci-Unal Gulden, Mofrad Mohammad R.K., and Khademhosseini Ali. Biomechanical properties of native and tissue engineered heart valve constructs. Journal of Biomechanics, 47(9):1949–1963, 2014. Functional Tissue Engineering. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Lasso Andras, Herz Christian, Nam Hannah, Cianciulli Alana, Pieper Steve, Drouin Simon, Pinter Csaba, St-Onge Samuelle, Vigil Chad, Ching Stephen, Sunderland Kyle, Fichtinger Gabor, Kikinis Ron, and Jolley Matthew A.. Slicerheart: An open-source computing platform for cardiac image analysis and modeling. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9, 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Fedorov Andriy, Beichel Reinhard, Kalpathy-Cramer Jayashree Julien Finet, Fillion-Robin Jean-Christophe, Pujol Sonia, Bauer Christian, Jennings Dominique, Fennessy Fiona, Sonka Milan, Buatti John, Aylward Stephen, Miller James V., Pieper Steve, and Kikinis Ron. 3d slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 30(9):1323–1341, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Maas Steve A., Ellis Benjamin J., Ateshian Gerard A., and Weiss Jeffrey A.. Febio: Finite elements for biomechanics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 134(1), 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Maas Steve A., Ateshian Gerard A., and Weiss Jeffrey A.. Febio: History and advances. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 19(1):279–299, 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Ateshian Gerard A., Shim Jay J., Maas Steve A., and Weiss Jeffrey A.. Finite element framework for computational fluid dynamics in febio. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 140(021001), 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Hamed Alavi S., Ruiz Victor, Krasieva Tatiana, Botvinick Elliot L., and Kheradvar Arash. Characterizing the collagen fiber orientation in pericardial leaflets under mechanical loading conditions. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 41(3):547–561, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Goodwin Richard L., Kheradvar Arash, Norris Russell A., Price Robert L., and Potts Jay D.. Collagen fibrillogenesis in the mitral valve: It’s a matter of compliance. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 8(8), 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Sadeghinia Mohammad Javad, Skallerud Bjørn, Holzapfel Gerhard A., and Prot Victorien. Biomechanics of mitral valve leaflets: Second harmonic generation microscopy, biaxial mechanical tests and tissue modeling. Acta Biomaterialia, 141:244–254, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Pham Thuy and Sun Wei. Material properties of aged human mitral valve leaflets. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 102(8):2692–2703, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Wu Michael C.H., Zakerzadeh Rana, Kamensky David, Kiendl Josef, Sacks Michael S., and Hsu Ming Chen. An anisotropic constitutive model for immersogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves. Journal of Biomechanics, 74:23–31, 6 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Hou Jay C., Maas Steve A., Weiss Jeffrey A., and Ateshian Gerard A.. Finite element formulation of multiphasic shell elements for cell mechanics analyses in febio. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 140(12), 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Carlos El-Tallawi K., Zhang Peng, Azencott Robert, He Jiwen, Herrera Elizabeth L., Xu Jiaqiong, Chamsi-Pasha Mohammed, Jacob Jessen, Lawrie Gerald M., and Zoghbi William A.. Valve strain quantitation in normal mitral valves and mitral prolapse with variable degrees of regurgitation. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 14(6):1099–1109, 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Narang Harshita, Rego Bruno V, Khalighi Amir H, Aly Ahmed, Pouch Alison M, Gorman Robert C, Gorman Joseph H III, and Sacks Michael S. Pre-surgical prediction of ischemic mitral regurgitation recurrence using in vivo mitral valve leaflet strains. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 49(12):3711–3723, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Marsan Nina Ajmone and van Wijngaarden Aniek L.. Valve strain: A further step toward a full understanding of mitral valve function and dysfunction. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 14(6):1110–1112, 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Kobbelt Leif P., Vorsatz Jens, and Ulf and Labsik. A shrink wrapping approach to remeshing polygonal surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum, 18(3):119–130, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • [49].van Overveld Kees and Wyvill B.. Shrinkwrap: An efficient adaptive algorithm for triangulating an iso-surface. The Visual Computer, 20(6):362–379, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Weidert Simon, Andress Sebastian, Linhart Christoph, Eduardo M Suero Axel Greiner, Böcker Wolfgang, Kammerlander Christian, and Becker Christopher A. 3d printing method for next-day acetabular fracture surgery using a surface filtering pipeline: feasibility and 1-year clinical results. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 15(3):565–575, Mar 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Vigil Chad, Lasso Andras, Ghosh Reena M., Pinter Csaba, Cianciulli Alana, Nam Hannah H., Abid Ashraful, Herz Christian, Mascio Christopher E., Chen Jonathan, Fuller Stephanie, Whitehead Kevin, and Jolley Matthew A.. Modeling tool for rapid virtual planning of the intracardiac baffle in double-outlet right ventricle. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 111(6):2078–2083, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Valette Sébastien and Chassery Jean-Marc. Approximated centroidal voronoi diagrams for uniform polygonal mesh coarsening. Computer Graphics Forum, 23(3):381–389, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Stephens Elizabeth H., Nicky de Jonge Meaghan P. McNeill, Durst Christopher A., and Grande-Allen K. Jane. Age-related changes in material behavior of porcine mitral and aortic valves and correlation to matrix composition. Tissue Engineering Part A, 16(3):867–878, 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Kasyanov Vladimir, Moreno-Rodriguez Ricardo A., Kalejs Martins, Ozolanta Iveta, Stradins Peteris, Wen Xuejun, Yao Hai, and Mironov Vladimir. Age-related analysis of structural, biochemical and mechanical properties of the porcine mitral heart valve leaflets. Connective Tissue Research, 54(6):394–402, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].van Geemen Daphne, Soares Ana L F, Oomen Pim J A, Driessen-Mol Anita, Janssen-van den Broek Marloes W J T, van den Bogaerdt Antoon J, Bogers Ad J J C, Goumans Marie-JoséT H, Baaijens Frank P T, and Bouten Carlijn V C. Age-dependent changes in geometry, tissue composition and mechanical properties of fetal to adult cryopreserved human heart valves. PLoS One, 11(2):e0149020, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Wu Shaohua, Kumar Vikas, Xiao Peng, Kuss Mitchell, Lim Jung Yul, Guda Chittibabu, Butcher Jonathan, and Duan Bin. Age related extracellular matrix and interstitial cell phenotype in pulmonary valves. Scientific Reports, 10(1):21338, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Burk Kyle M., Narayan Akil, and Orr Joseph A.. Efficient sampling for polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis using weighted approximate fekete points. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 36(11):e3395, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Rim Yonghoon, McPherson David D, Chandran Krishnan B, and Kim Hyunggun. The effect of patient-specific annular motion on dynamic simulation of mitral valve function. Journal of biomechanics, 46(6):1104–1112, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Lee Chung Hao, Rabbah Jean Pierre, Yoganathan Ajit P., Gorman Robert C., Gorman Joseph H., and Sacks Michael S.. On the effects of leaflet microstructure and constitutive model on the closing behavior of the mitral valve. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 14:1281–1302, 11 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Amini Rouzbeh, Eckert Chad E, Koomalsingh Kevin, Jeremy McGarvey, Minakawa Masahito, Gorman Joseph H, Gorman Robert C, and Sacks Michael S. On the in vivo deformation of the mitral valve anterior leaflet: effects of annular geometry and referential configuration. Annals of biomedical engineering, 40(7):1455–1467, 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Rausch Manuel K, Bothe Wolfgang, Kvitting John-Peder Escobar, Göktepe Serdar, Miller D Craig, and Kuhl Ellen. In vivo dynamic strains of the ovine anterior mitral valve leaflet. Journal of biomechanics, 44(6):1149–1157, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Obase Kikuko, Weinert Lynn, Kesner Kimberly, Barry Aaron, Addetia Karima, Roberts Joseph D, Minhaj Mohammed M, Mor-Avi Victor, Jeevanandam Valluvan, and Lang Roberto M. Abstract 19024: Differences in mitral valve marginal chordae tendineae length in patients with functional and degenerative mitral regurgitation using 3d transesophageal echocardiography from the transgastric approach. Circulation, 130(suppl_2):A19024–A19024, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Rajiah Prabhakar, Fulton Nicholas Lim, and Bolen Michael. Magnetic resonance imaging of the papillary muscles of the left ventricle: normal anatomy, variants, and abnormalities. Insights into Imaging, 10(1):83, 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Fitzpatrick Daniel J., Pham Kevin, Ross Colton J., Hudson Luke T., Laurence Devin W., Yu Yue, and Lee Chung-Hao. Ex vivo experimental characterizations for understanding the interrelationship between tissue mechanics and collagen microstructure of porcine mitral valve leaflets. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 134:105401, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Meador William D., Mathur Mrudang, Sugerman Gabriella P., Jazwiec Tomasz, Malinowski Marcin, Bersi Matthew R., Timek Tomasz A., and Rausch Manuel K.. A detailed mechanical and microstructural analysis of ovine tricuspid valve leaflets. Acta Biomaterialia, 102:100–113, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Zhang Will, Ayoub Salma, Liao Jun, and Sacks Michael S.. A meso-scale layer-specific structural constitutive model of the mitral heart valve leaflets. Acta Biomaterialia, 32:238–255, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Meador William D., Mathur Mrudang, Sugerman Gabriella P., Malinowski Marcin, Jazwiec Tomasz, Wang Xinmei, Carla Mr Lacerda Tomasz A. Timek, and Rausch Manuel K.. The tricuspid valve also maladapts as shown in sheep with biventricular heart failure. eLife, 9:1–22, 12 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Thomas Vineet S., Lai Victor, and Amini Rouzbeh. A computational multi-scale approach to investigate mechanically-induced changes in tricuspid valve anterior leaflet microstructure. Acta Biomaterialia, 94:524–535, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Rossini G., Caimi A., Redaelli A., and Votta E.. Subject-specific multiscale modeling of aortic valve biomechanics. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 20(3):1031–1046, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Bakhaty Ahmed A., Govindjee Sanjay, and Mofrad Mohammad R. K.. A coupled multiscale approach to modeling aortic valve mechanics in health and disease. Applied Sciences, 11(18), 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Poulis N., Breitenstein P., Hofstede S., Hoerstrup S.P., Emmert M.Y., and Fioretta E.S.. Multiscale analysis of human tissue engineered matrices for next generation heart valve applications. Acta Biomaterialia, 158:101–114, 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ArXiv are provided here courtesy of arXiv

RESOURCES