Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2023 Feb 16;13:2763. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29370-w

The impacts of mining on soil pollution with metal(loid)s in resource-rich Mongolia

Václav Pecina 1,, David Juřička 2, Josef Hedbávný 3, Martin Klimánek 4, Jindřich Kynický 5, Martin Brtnický 1,6, Renata Komendová 1
PMCID: PMC9935523  PMID: 36797312

Abstract

As Mongolia is considered one of the most resource extraction-dependent countries globally, significant mining-related environmental and human health risks are expected. The aim of this study was to (I) assess the impacts of mining on soil pollution with metals in Mongolia's key coal mining towns (Baganuur, Nalaikh and Sharyn Gol) and (II) review the current knowledge on soil pollution with metal(loid)s and related health risks in Mongolia. The results showed predominantly low soil contents of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn and a related absence of severe pollution and potential health risk in the coal mining towns. Urban design, rather than the presence of mines, controlled the pollution distribution. Despite the methodological shortcomings of several studies on soil pollution in Mongolia, their results suggest a similarly low threat in the three largest cities (Ulaanbaatar, Darkhan, Erdenet) and several mining areas. While the generally highlighted risk of As seems like an artificially escalated issue, the content of Cr in urban soil may be a neglected threat. Further pollution research in Mongolia should focus on street dust and drinking water pollution.

Subject terms: Environmental sciences, Environmental impact

Introduction

Mongolia is considered one of the most resource extraction-dependent countries globally1, and the mining industry has been a major contributor to its economy over recent decades2,3. The mining industry's origin is dated to 1924 when the first coal mine was opened in Nalaikh2. Its rapid development associated with the intensive release of mining licensing began in the 1990s after the transition to an open economy and is ongoing4,5. Simultaneously, the expansion of major official mining operations has been accompanied by artisanal and small-scale mining6,7. There are approximately 3,000 deposits and 50 different minerals explored and researched in Mongolia1, with the most economically important and mined commodities being black and brown coal, fluorite, Au, Cu, Ag, Mo, Pb and Zn8,9.

However, mining development and related economic growth have accelerated land degradation10. According to UNDP5, 77% of Mongolian land is classified as degraded or desertified. While mining-related environmental pollution in Mongolia has been intensively studied in recent years7, this is still insufficient because of the country's size and the number of mining areas. In the semi-arid to arid conditions of Mongolia11 with limited water resources12, water pollution poses a critical risk3,4,1216. Insufficient scientific attention is paid to soil pollution, although mining of most minerals can be associated with soil contamination with metal(loid)s. Furthermore, there is no effective management system to assess the environmental health of mining sites9.

In recent decades, mining areas in Mongolia have been urbanised by originally nomadic inhabitants12. The concentration of people in these areas may be risky due to daily exposure to potentially hazardous substances in the environment released from mining operations and stored mining waste materials. Lkhasuren et al.2 stated that the high levels of dust associated with coal and gold mining are behind the high and growing number of lung diseases in Mongolia. Suvd et al.6 found typical chronic Hg intoxication symptoms in artisanal miners from gold mining areas in two sums. Recently, Surenbaatar et al.9 identified different patterns of mining's impact on children's health in areas of southern Mongolia. However, the results generally indicated the local effect of mining on the content of Pb in blood, As in urine and Hg in blood and hair.

The most resonant issue in urban soil pollution studies in Mongolia is coal combustion. Coal combustion can lead to a significant release of metal(loid)s into the environment and is ranked among the primary sources of contamination in the capital of Ulaanbaatar1720, other cities21 and environments22. Other typical and frequently mentioned sources of contamination in Mongolia include transport and various industries20,23. However, the studies carried out so far on urban soil pollution with metal(loid)s in Mongolia strictly focus on the three largest cities (Ulaanbaatar, Darkhan, Erdenet), of which only Erdenet is directly linked to mining.

The pollution-related health risk may not only concern the immediate vicinity of mines. Due to aeolian dispersion and water erosion, the most common means of pollutants transport in arid and semi-arid environments24, metal(loid)s can be deposited over considerable distances. For example, mining activities in Mongolia are associated with the contamination of Lake Baikal in the Russian Federation13,14. Another problem may be traditional livestock grazing4,11. The accumulation of metal(loid)s in plants growing on polluted soils that livestock graze can endanger the vitality of the animals and the quality of food produced, leading to another human health risk24,25.

Given that the impacts of mining on soil pollution are serious and pose high health risks to the public in neighbouring, similarly highly mining-dependent China26, it can be assumed that mining also poses serious environmental and health risks in Mongolia. The absence of relevant studies on this issue points to the need for extensive research. The aims of this study are to: (1) assess the pollution of urban soils with metals in the key coal mining towns of Baganuur, Nalaikh and Sharyn Gol; (2) summarise and evaluate studies on soil pollution with metal(loid)s in Mongolia; and (3) assess the human health risks posed by soil pollution in Mongolia.

Materials and methods

Study area

Mongolia is characterised by extreme semi-arid to arid climate conditions, with an average annual rainfall reaching about 400 mm. Average annual temperatures range from approximately − 50 °C to 40 °C27. Strong winds that can easily enhance dust particles dispersion from mining areas significantly influence Mongolian steppe and desert areas. Wind erosion affects up to 90% of the country to some extent. The major soil types are Kastanozem soils, Cambisols and Chernozems28.

For this study, three key coal mining towns were sampled: Baganuur, Nalaikh and Sharyn Gol (also referred to as Sharyngol or Shariin Gol) (Fig. 1). These towns are or were main coal suppliers to the three largest Mongolian cities: Ulaanbaatar, Erdenet and Darkhan17,29,30. While official mining in Nalaikh has already ended22, small-scale illegal mining continues7. The open-pit (Baganuur, Sharyn Gol) or underground (Nalaikh) coal mines are to the south of the towns. The quality of mined coal varies between lignite and sub-bituminous31,32.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Location of the studied towns and three largest cities in the context of Mongolia. ArcGIS Desktop 10.8.1 software (Esri, CA, USA; https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-desktop) was used to create the map. The layers of satellite imagery were generated using Esri World Imagery basemap.

Furthermore, the available studies (up to 2021) were reviewed to evaluate the status of metal(loid) soil pollution in Mongolia.

Soil sampling, preparation and analysis

Topsoil (0–10 cm) samples composited from three sub-samples from approximately 1 m2 were taken in each town according to a regular hexagonal sampling network. Forty-four samples were taken from Sharyn Gol, 50 from Nalaikh and 48 from Baganuur: 142 samples in total. The samples were air-dried at room temperature and sieved through a 2.0 mm nylon sieve following the standard ČSN ISO 11464.

The decomposition of the samples was performed in two replications according to ČSN EN 16174 by microwave extraction with aqua regia at the microwave extractor ETHOS ONE (Milestone, Italy). Half gram of soil sample was weighed to Teflon tubes, and 2 ml of Suprapur nitric acid (65%) and 6 ml of hydrochloric acid (37%) in ACS quality (Sigma Aldrich) were added. Extraction was performed at 175 °C for 20 min. Total metal (Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) contents in soil samples were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrometry using Varian SpectrAA-30 (Varian, Australia). Air-acetylene flame atomisation (gas flow 13.5 L/min and 2.0 L/min) and an ultrasensitive hollow cathode lamp for Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn (Agilent Technologies, USA) were used. Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn were measured at 228.8 nm, 324.7 nm, 217.0 nm and 213.9 nm, respectively. For calibration, standard solutions of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn (1 g/L) (Merck) and MilliQ water (Millipore, USA) were used. Certified reference material METRANAL 31 (light sandy soil; Analytika, Czech Republic) was used for quality control.

Based on the analysis of these basic metal pollutants, additional As, Cr, Hg and Ni content measurements were performed in several samples to verify the possibility of severe town-scale pollution with these metal(loid)s. The test samples were selected with regard to their increased content of Cd, Cu, Pb or Zn and diverse spatial distribution; up to fifteen samples were analysed in total. Contents of As, Cr and Ni in the soil samples were analysed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer Agilent 7900 (Agilent, USA) with the SPS 4 autosampler (Agilent, USA) after microwave extraction with aqua regia at the microwave extractor ETHOS ONE (Milestone, Italy). Half gram of soil sample was weighed to Teflon tubes, and 3 ml of nitric acid (67–69%) and 9 ml of hydrochloric acid (36%) (both ANALPURE; Analytika, Czech Republic) were added. Extraction was performed at 200 °C for 15 min. For total Hg content analysis, a single-purpose atomic absorption spectrophotometer AMA-254 (Advanced Mercury Analyser; Altec, Czech Republic) was used without the necessity of further sample pre-treatment or pre-concentration. The quality control was the same as in the previous measurements. The median values of As, Cr, Hg and Ni in test samples were 10.9, 31.3, 0.03 and 17.4 mg/kg, respectively. Due to their prevailing contents being below the limits of the soil pollution standard33, they were not analysed in the remaining samples with the expectation of a low probability of pollution risk at the town scale.

Soil pollution indicators and indices

The content of the metal(loid)s in soils was assessed in compliance with the permissible value of the Mongolian standard on soil quality (MNS 5850:2019)34 and the internationally recognised target and intervention values of the Dutch Soil Guidelines (DSG)33. Contamination/pollution indicators (indices) calculate the level of environmental contamination/pollution based mainly on local background values. However, the level of pollution determined in this way only weakly indicates the severity of the threat. Therefore, the adapted Integrated Nemerow Pollution Index (IPIN)35 with the Mongolian standard values (3, 100, 100 and 300 mg/kg for Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn, respectively) considered was chosen:

PIi=CiTi
IPIN=PIavg2+PImax2/21/2

PIi is the pollution index for a metal(loid), Ci is the content of the metal(loid), Ti is the permissible content of the soil pollutant given by MNS 5850:201934, PIavg is the mean value of all the PIi of the metal(loid)s, and PImax is the maximum PIi value of the metal(loid)s. IPIN classes are as follows: ≤ 0.7: safe; 0.7–1: precaution; 1–2: slight pollution; 2–3: moderate pollution; ≥ 3: heavy pollution.

Human health risk assessment

The Hazard Index (HI) and Carcinogenic Risk (CR) were calculated to assess the potential health risk posed by metal(loid)s in Mongolian soils. The HI and CR calculations are based on average daily dose (ADD), reference dose (RfD), and slope factor (SF) values of metal(loid)s. Human exposure to metal(loid)s in soils (Csoil) arises through ingestion (ADDing), dermal contact (ADDderm) and inhalation. However, because ingestion and dermal contact pose the greatest health risks35, attention was paid only to these two pathways. An explanation of the input parameters and the values used for the calculations are summarised in Tables 1 and 2. To refine the authenticity of the calculation considering different physical features, national values (adult BW, LT) and values used in neighbouring China (children BW, SA) were used instead of the conventional ones. The following equations were used for the intake estimations via each exposure pathway36:

ADDing=Csoil×IngR×EF×EDBW×AT×10-6
ADDderm=Csoil×SA×AF×ABS×EF×EDBW×AT×10-6

Table 1.

Calculation parameters.

Factor Description Unit Adult Children References
IngR Ingestion rate of soil mg/day 100 200 USEPA38
EF Exposure frequency days/year 350 350 MEP39
ED Exposure duration years 24 6 USEPA38
BW Bodyweight kg 65.0a 15.9a MEP39
AT Average time days 8760b 2190b Pecina et al.35
SA Exposed skin surface area cm2 4350 1600 Pecina et al.35
AF Skin adherence factor for soil mg/cm2 0.07 0.20 Pecina et al.35

aBW was calculated as the average of the adult Mongolian weights reported in WHO40, Otgontuya et al.41, and WHO42 studies. The Mongolian children's weight values were not found; therefore, the values from neighbouring China39 were used.

bFor carcinogenic effects43: LT (lifetime) × 365. In Mongolia44, LT = 70. For carcinogenic effects, AT = 25 550.

Table 2.

The relative toxicity values used (based on the literature summary in Pecina et al.36).

Metal RfDing RfDderm ABSa SFing
Cd 1.00E-03 1.00E-05 0.001 1.50E+01
Cu 4.00E-02 1.20E-02 0.001
Pb 3.50E-03 5.25E-04 0.001 8.50E−03
Zn 3.00E-01 6.00E-02 0.001

aDermal absorption factor.

Total non-carcinogenic health risk, HI, was determined as a sum of calculated individual hazard quotients (HQ)30,37:

HI=HQi=ADDiRfDi

HI values > 1 indicate the probability of non-carcinogenic adverse health effects.

The carcinogenic risk was calculated for considered carcinogenic metals (Cd and Pb) as follows35:

CR=ADDi×SFi

CR values ≤ 10–6 indicate virtual safety, whereas values ≥ 10–4 indicate an unacceptable risk. The acceptable risk range for regulatory purposes is 10–6 to 10–4.

Spatial data analysis

Statistica 12® was used for statistical analyses of the dataset. Differences in the soil contents of metals between the towns were tested. Data normality was investigated using the Shapiro–Wilk normality test (P > 0.01). One-way ANOVA was used for normal series; if at least one of the series did not pass the normality test, a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA was used. Spatial data of the pre-processing and geostatistical analysis were conducted in SW ESRI ArcGIS Desktop 10.8 using the Geostatistical Analyst extension. All output rasters of the interpolated values were calculated with a spatial resolution of 10 m. The geostatistical kriging method was selected for spatial data interpolation, specifically, Empirical Bayesian Kriging where the mean prediction errors are more accurate for small data sets compared to other kriging methods. Spatial data transformation (with any base function) was not applied. The thin Plate Spline semivariogram model was chosen by testing several different models of semivariogram. Setting the semivariogram has always been simulated for 100 models, and the results for the map outputs were checked by cross-validation. A smooth circular interpolation option with a radius of 500 m and a smoothing factor of 0.5 was selected in search neighbourhood parameters to control the output.

Results and discussion

Soil pollution in the coal mining towns

The average contents of metals did not exceed the Mongolian standard34 in any of the studied towns (Fig. 2). The standard was rarely exceeded, once in Cu (Baganuur) and three times in Pb (Sharyn Gol). Cd exceeding the target value33 in Baganuur, Nalaikh and Sharyn Gol (Fig. 2) indicates contamination with this element. Pb exceeded the intervention value, suggesting severe pollution, only once (Sharyn Gol). IPIN assessment classified all the towns as safe according to average IPIN values (Table S1). Therefore, despite the ongoing open-pit mining (Baganuur, Sharyn Gol) or historical underground mining (Nalaikh) of coal enriched with chalcophile elements7,17,23,29, the results suggest minor pollution with Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Metal contents (mg/kg) in the urban soils of the coal mining towns.

Dependence of the soil contamination to pollution distribution on the mine's proximity is rather indirect or none (Fig. 3), with predominantly other determining factors. Similarly, Nottebaum et al.7 did not find an immediate or even dominating impact of mining on soil contamination with As in Nalaikh. Thus, mining does not cause pollution there (Fig. 2, Table S1) and can hardly even be associated with local contamination tentatively indicated by slightly increased IPIN values (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Integrated Nemerow Pollution Index (IPIN) assessment-based pollution distribution in the coal mining towns: (A) Baganuur, (B) Nalaikh, and (C) Sharyn Gol. ArcGIS Desktop 10.8 software (Esri, CA, USA; https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-desktop) was used to create the map. The layers of satellite imagery were generated using Esri World Imagery basemap.

With Baganuur and Sharyn Gol, the signs of contamination to pollution are mainly in the original town centre with paved roads and multi-storey buildings (Fig. 3). The assumption is that there has been more intensive traffic that is associated with higher emissions of metals. Furthermore, the general coverage of the soil with impermeable surfaces (e.g. buildings, parking lots) could increase the occurrence of pollution hotspots in limited places that have long allowed the retention and accumulation of contaminating particles. However, the situation was the opposite in Nalaikh, with higher IPIN values in ger areas.

The division of residential areas into areas with multi-storey buildings and gers is such a unique Mongolian phenomenon that it is addressed in other studies. Coal is the primary energy source in ger areas, and burning-generated ash is becoming one of the primary sources of in situ soil pollution due to improper disposal45,46. Kasimov et al.47 stated that the soils of the districts with multi-storey buildings are more polluted than the ger districts. Chonokhuu et al.37 found different pollution patterns in this regard, as in Ulaanbaatar and Erdenet, ger area > apartment area, while in Darkhan, apartment area > ger area; and explain them by different socio-economic features and ageing of cities. However, Bilguun et al.20 found the opposite pollution order in Ulaanbaatar as downtown > suburban settlement > ger area. These results suggest that there may be considerable variability or inappropriate sampling methodology even within one city. An additional verifying statistical comparison was not applicable for the studied towns due to the limited number of samples from the areas with multi-storey buildings or their borderline characters.

The reason for the different patterns in urban design-moderated pollution distribution in Nalaikh compared to Baganuur and Sharyn Gol may be the utilisation of low-quality coal with a higher content of metals. Due to frequent small-scale illegal mining in Nalaikh7, such coal without quality control may be often utilised in ger areas, dispersing more contaminated ash and increasing pollution.

Only an increase in IPIN values in the north-eastern part of Sharyn Gol (Fig. 3C) can be directly linked to mining. Generally, the higher IPIN values in this town (Table S1) may be related to the mining waste heaps deposited near it in the east. The contents of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn are mostly increased there, about 1.91, 40.5, 58.4 and 104 mg/kg, respectively (own unpublished data). Due to the absence of vegetation cover or other protection against aeolian transport, dust particles containing metal(loid)s can be easily introduced into the town. Hills form the northern and western borders of the town, and a mine and other heaps form the southern one. The town's location in this valley increases the risk of sedimentation and accumulation of contaminants.

Urban soil pollution in Mongolia

So far, studies performed on urban soil contamination with metal(loid)s in Mongolia have focused strictly on the three largest cities (Table 3). In addition, the limit of these studies is a low number of samples, and the limited sampling design only focused on some parts of the city or a specific phenomenon (e.g. roadside soils, ger areas). Therefore, they do not provide a comprehensive view of the actual pollution situation in the cities. The quality of some may also be questioned due to insufficient or unreliable descriptions of results or methodologies. However, their results suggest that soil pollution in Mongolia is less severe than expected.

Table 3.

Summary of studies on contamination of Mongolian urban soils with metal(loid)s (average values in mg/kg).

City/Town n As Cd Cr Cu Hg Ni Pb Zn References
Baganuur 48 0.87 13.6 29.6 51.7 This study
Darkhan 25* 704** 50.8 0.06 32 29.2 63.6 Kosheleva et al.21
21 3.33 31.9 19.5 20.9 67.3 Chonokhuu et al.37
18*1 5.22 0.23 32.1 18.5 15.2 29.9 82.3 Timofeev et al.30
Erdenet 18* 113 450 0.10 35 24.7 62.2 Kosheleva et al.21
30 12.8 65.7 29.3 18.1 155 Chonokhuu et al.37
Nalaikh 50 1.21 13.8 36.4 73.7 This study
Sharyn Gol 44 1.46 22.1 69.0 87.6 This study
Ulaanbaatar 22 14 0.8 20.3 35.9 18.7 63.9 159 Batjargal et al.17
23* 72.6 56.5 0.19 30.6 59.4 105 Kosheleva et al.21
90 10.8 0.25 32.7 22.4 17.0 45.9 120 Kasimov et al.47
29 0.09 Chung and Chon19
10 39.1 Tserenpil et al.48
x*** 10.3 685 33.0 113 Naidansuren et al.49
27 28.0 16.6 21.3 43.1 106 Chonokhuu et al.37
42 22.9 0.2 29.0 28.9 34.5 136 Battsengel et al.45
22 9.41 0.25 30.0 20.8 45.1 116 Bilguun et al.20
28 16.4 1987 53.5 13.6 33.2 111 Oyunbat et al.50
Mongolian standard 20 3 150 100 2 150 100 300 MNS 5850:201934
DSG target value 29 0.8 100 36 0.3 35 85 140 VROM33
DSG intervention value 55 12 380 190 10 210 530 720 VROM33

n number of samples, DSG Dutch Soil Guidelines; studies exceeding all the standards are bold.

*Data selected from the study's category with the most samples.

**Possible incorrect value inconsistent with the text of the article.

***XRF readings on 340 points.

Cadmium is one of the most important contaminants in urban soils35; however, its contents were atypically low (≤ 0.25 mg/kg) in most studies or have not been studied (Table 3). The exceptions are the coal mining towns, which exceeded the DSG target value. Arsenic in the urban soils (Table 3), originating mainly from coal combustion20,47,51, regularly (80%) exceeded the former Mongolian limit (6 mg/kg; MNS 5850:2008), which was usually used in the studies concerned. However, the value given by that standard can generally be considered extremely low, even compared to background values. In the context of DSG target value and current Mongolian standard34, the urban soils content of As is rather low. In addition, Nottebaum et al.7, partly studying urban soils of Nalaikh, stated that As does not pose a ubiquitous risk there. Extreme Cr contents (Table 3) exceeding DSG intervention value in Ulaanbaatar (reaching 1987 mg/kg) and possibly in Darkhan (704 mg/kg) are associated with local pollution by the leather processing industry21,49,50. Given the importance of the leather processing industry using Cr-based technology in traditionally pastoral Mongolia52, similarly significant pollution with Cr can be expected elsewhere.

Increased Cu content (450 mg/kg) compared to other cities and standards (Table 3) was found only in Erdenet, where Cu-Mo mining occurs. Timofeev et al.51 also found soil contamination with Cu in the Erdenet area. The Hg contents (Table 3) commonly associated with coal combustion are surprisingly low19. This finding may be misrepresented by the low number of studies addressing this element. However, Chung and Chon19 explain that Ulaanbaatar's Hg contamination is lower than in other cities with analogous circumstances because of the lower Hg content in the coal used and the spatial and temporal trends in coal usage. The contents of Ni and Pb (Table 3) are also low and balanced between cities, which indicates their low anthropogenic emissions or similar contamination patterns without risk expectations. The increased Zn values in Ulaanbaatar compared to other cities (Table 3) may be related to: (I) different natural backgrounds, (II) long-range transport of Zn emissions from the heavy industry area in China potentially affecting Ulaanbaatar18 or (III) higher local emissions of Zn. However, we can relatively reject hypotheses I and II, given the possible background values (Table 4). Therefore, an important local source of Zn is expected. This may be related to heavy traffic53 and various industries because these sources of Zn are expected to be important in Ulaanbaatar20. However, Zn contents are also low compared to the standards (Table 3).

Table 4.

Background values (mg/kg) used in the studies on urban soil pollution in Mongolia together with generalised level of contamination/pollution calculated based on these background values (where clearly indicated).

graphic file with name 41598_2023_29370_Tab4_HTML.jpg

Colours signals "contamination/pollution" level found/indicated in the respective study: green = none, yellow = low/minor, orange = moderate, red = high/heavy; Igeo = geoaccumulation index, EF enrichment factor, PI pollution index.

*Based on the references (local studies) and the composition of the continental crust.

**Cited from the local source studying background concentration of microelements in Ulaanbaatar's regional natural surface soil.

Due to the different calculation methods, the pollution level mentioned in the summarised studies is not comparable. Despite the oft-cited moderate or high contamination or pollution (the ambiguity is mainly based on incorrectly used terminology) by at least one element (Table 4), comparisons with the standards (Table 3) suggest considerably low contamination and no pollution. A notable exception is the study of Chonokhuu et al.37, reporting the predominant absence of contamination in the three largest Mongolian cities. However, there is no discussion of other studies' results concerning these cities or a better explanation of the results, reducing the credibility of the conclusions.

An overall weakness in the soil contamination assessment is the lack of knowledge of background values or their usage inconsistency, which can distort the actual situation significantly. Studies assessing local contamination often used general standardised values, such as Kosheleva et al.21, Chonokhuu et al.37 and Bilguun et al.20. Using local background values is less common, and the values for the same cities vary considerably in different studies (Table 4). As a result, for example, Cr values ranging from 13.0 to 115 mg/kg are used as a background in the Ulaanbaatar. The disagreement emphasises the need for a better methodological basis for sampling. This finding also indicated that the reality of contamination of Mongolian urban soils might differ from what the studies suggest, as there is no credible background that the authors agree with at the local level.

Soil pollution in Mongolian mining areas

Studies on soil pollution related to mining in Mongolia can be divided into two groups: I) accompanying soil assessment in the study of water contamination and II) assessment of mining areas partly including urban units. The studies concern three basic mineral resources: Au (Boroo, Zaamar) Cu (Erdenet) and coal (Baganuur, Nalaikh).

  • Au The results of Inam et al.54 suggest that, except for As (3.4–261 mg/kg), soil metal(loid) contents are within the acceptable levels of the Mongolian standard34 in the vicinity of the Boroo gold mine. However, the authors pointed out that the waste material may be a source of future contamination. Later, Oyuntsetseg et al.55 found Cu, As and Pb enrichment in soils at the Boroo small-scale mining area that exceeded the standard in As (167 mg/kg) and Cu (109 mg/kg) in the gold washing location. In Zaamar Goldfield, Jarsjö et al.56 found elevated soil contents of As (13 mg/kg), Ni (28 mg/kg), Cu (25 mg/kg) and Cr (69 mg/kg) compared to non-local backgrounds; however, no metal(loid) exceeded the current standard. Thus, only As can pose a potential threat in limited and extreme cases of gold mining operations.

  • Cu Most attention has been focused on Cu-Mo mining in Erdenet. Battogtokh et al.57 stated that the soils in the Erdenet mining area are highly contaminated with Cu. While Timofeev et al.51 designated the studied soils as urban, we assigned the overall study conclusions to this chapter due to the predominance of out-of-city sampling. The authors found contamination and potential environmental risk related to Cu and As exceeding the former Mongolian standard. Yondonjamts et al.58 achieved the same conclusions. Dust production by grinding and transportation associated with the mine operation and wind erosion of technogenic sands of the tailings were highlighted as important factors for contamination of the mining area51,57,59.

  • Coal Park et al.60 expect the risk of As poisoning due to above-standard (former) As contents (5.57–14.2 mg/kg) in the soil dust from the Baganuur mine; however, they draw conclusions only from five samples and still low As contents in the context of other standards (Table 3). Nottebaum et al.7 found As contents in Kastanozem topsoil and fluvial-alluvial sediments of the Nalaikh area ranging from 4.6 to 16 mg/kg, and consider them low and not a serious threat to the environmental compartments. Differences in conclusions, despite similar values, highlight the inconsistency in the evaluation of results reported in Mongolian studies.

Risk assessment and future perspectives

Although many of the mentioned studies highlighted the issue of soil pollution with As in particular, its content is predominantly low by other international standards (Table 3). Assumedly, the threat of As in the Mongolian soils is considerably artificially escalated in the context of a low value of the former Mongolian standard.

Given that soil contents of metal(loid)s in Mongolia are predominantly low (Table 3, Chapter 3.3), a low health risk may be expected. Chonokhuu et al.37 confirmed this assumption, not finding serious health threats based on potential health risk assessments in Ulaanbaatar, Darkhan or Erdenet. Conversely, Battsengel et al.45 emphasised possible health risks in Ulaanbaatar. However, the description of the results in both studies suggests a partial misunderstanding of the calculation, as the authors present the generally applicable facts arising from the calculation methodology as unique results. In addition, errors can be found in both cases. The conclusions of Battsengel et al.45 can, therefore, be considered incorrect.

According to a potential human health risk assessment (Table 5), there are no non-carcinogenic or carcinogenic risks in the coal mining towns posed by the soil contents of the metals. Only CR values of Cd indicated a possible threat as they fell into the acceptable total risk category for regulatory purposes.

Table 5.

Average values of human health risk assessment via potential non-carcinogenic (HI) and carcinogenic risk (CR) following different exposure pathways in the coal mining towns.

Cd Cu
HQingest HQdermal HI CR HQingest HQdermal HI
Baganuur Adult 1.28E−03 3.90E−04 1.67E−03 6.59E−06 5.03E−04 5.11E−06 5.09E−04
Children 1.05E−02 1.68E−03 1.21E−02 1.35E−05 4.12E−03 2.20E−05 4.14E−03
Nalaikh Adult 1.79E−03 5.44E−04 2.33E−03 9.19E−06 5.09E−04 5.16E−06 5.14E−04
Children 1.46E−02 2.34E−03 1.69E−02 1.88E−05 4.16E−03 2.22E−05 4.18E−03
Sharyn Gol Adult 2.15E−03 6.55E−04 2.81E−03 1.11E−05 8.16E−04 8.28E−06 8.24E−04
Children 1.76E−02 2.82E−03 2.04E−02 2.26E−05 6.67E−03 3.56E−05 6.71E−03
Pb Zn
HQingest HQdermal HI CR HQingest HQdermal HI
Baganuur Adult 1.25E−02 2.53E−04 1.27E−02 1.27E−07 2.54E−04 3.87E−06 2.58E−04
Children 1.02E−01 1.09E−03 1.03E−01 2.60E−07 2.08E−03 1.66E−05 2.10E−03
Nalaikh Adult 1.53E−02 3.12E−04 1.57E−02 1.57E−07 3.62E−04 5.52E−06 3.68E−04
Children 1.25E−01 1.34E−03 1.27E−01 3.20E−07 2.96E−03 2.37E−05 2.99E−03
Sharyn Gol Adult 2.91E−02 5.91E−04 2.97E−02 2.97E−07 4.31E−04 6.56E−06 4.37E−04
Children 2.38E−01 2.54E−03 2.40E−01 6.07E−07 3.52E−03 2.82E−05 3.55E−03

Low metal contents in Mongolian mining areas (Fig. 2, Table 3, Chapter 3.3) and the associated low health risks contrast sharply with other mining areas of the world26,36. The reason may be a short history of mining. While intensive mining and mineral processing has been taking place for several centuries in some countries, the mining industry is still a young sector in Mongolia2. Limited precipitation and low humidity typical for Mongolia and the sorption stability of elements in lignite and sub-bituminous coal likely reduce weathering of mining waste and release of metal(loid)s into the environment within such a short time. Furthermore, limited local ore processing followed by direct export could also contribute to the current favourable situation. The last important factor is probably the wind erosion and wind transport of dust particles far from the deposits. However, the positives of this phenomenon can be ambiguous as particle accumulation must occur somewhere, and the creation of pollution hotspots can be expected.

A significant threat posed by the aeolian dispersion of contaminated dust particles from mining waste heaps is indicated in Sharyn Gol (Fig. 3C) and mentioned as risky in other related studies7,57,59. Park et al.60 even stated that all waste soil samples from Baganuur appeared to have desertification potential. A possible solution for the dust risk decrease is phytostabilisation. Extreme conditions of mining waste, such as acidic pH, lack of nutrients, unsuitable substrate structure, and instability61,62, can be mitigated using available organic materials, such as wood chips or manure24. This topic should be addressed by the relevant authorities and further research.

Poor management of mining sites often leads to livestock grazing on sparse vegetation of heaps and drinking from tailings dams in Mongolia (own observation). The risk of livestock intoxication and unsuccessful phytostabilisation must be reduced by fencing and permanent monitoring.

Conclusions

The results showed that the contents of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn are low without significant pollution and health risk in the coal mining towns of Baganuur, Nalaikh and Sharyn Gol. Based on the available studies, the same conclusions can be drawn for other Mongolian cities. Only the Cr content associated with the leather industry can likely pose a significant threat and, therefore, warrants increased attention. The generally highlighted risk of As contamination, on the contrary, acts more like a virtual problem. Many soil contamination studies focused on Mongolia are based on the inappropriate methodology or an insufficient number of samples, reducing their results' quality and conclusions' relevance. Due to the potential for the long-term growth of the Mongolian mining sector, a precise metal(loid)s contamination assessment is highly needed. Given the results, future research on pollution in Mongolia should focus more on drinking water and street and mining dust pollution.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under the project FCH-S-22-8001 and the project 22-ČRA19-02_05 of the Czech Development Agency. The authors would like to thank the Czech Embassy in Ulaanbaatar for their support and active cooperation, especially to Ing. Oldřich Zajíček and Jiří Brodský, M.Sc.

Author contributions

V.P.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Methodology, Writing - original draft. D.J.: Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing - review & editing. J.H.: Validation, Writing - review & editing. M.K.: Visualization, Software. J.K.: Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. M.B.: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Project administration. R.K.: Supervision, Project administration, Writing - review & editing.

Funding

This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under the project FCH-S-22-8001 and the project 22-ČRA19-02_05 of the Czech Development Agency.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-023-29370-w.

References

  • 1.MRPAM, The annual report 2016: Geology, mining, petroleum, heavy industry. Mineral Resources and Petroleum Authority of Mongolia (MRPAM), Ulaanbaatar. https://www.mrpam.gov.mn/public/pages/66/MPRAMreport2016EN.pdf (2017).
  • 2.Lkhasuren O, Takahashi K, Dash-Onolt L. Occupational lung diseases and the mining industry in Mongolia. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health. 2007;13(2):195–201. doi: 10.1179/oeh.2007.13.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Batbayar G, Pfeiffer M, von Tümpling W, Kappas M, Karthe D. Chemical water quality gradients in the Mongolian sub-catchments of the Selenga River basin. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017;189(8):1–28. doi: 10.1007/s10661-017-6123-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McIntyre N, Bulovic N, Cane I, McKenna P. A multi-disciplinary approach to understanding the impacts of mines on traditional uses of water in Northern Mongolia. Sci. Total Environ. 2016;557:404–414. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.UNDP, About Mongolia. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). https://www.mn.undp.org/content/mongolia/en/home/countryinfo/ (2022), Accessed 10 December 2021.
  • 6.Suvd D, Davaadorj R, Baatartsol D, Unursaikhan S, Tsengelmaa M, Oyu T, Yunden S, Hagan-Rogers AM, Böse-O’Reilly S. Toxicity assessment in artisanal miners from low-level mercury exposure in Bornuur and Jargalant soums of Mongolia. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2015;30:97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nottebaum V, Walk J, Knippertz M, Karthe D, Batbayar G, Pötter S, Lehmkuhl F. Arsenic distribution and pathway scenarios for sediments and water in a peri-urban Mongolian small-scale coal mining area (Nalaikh District, Ulaanbaatar) Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020;27(6):5845–5863. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07271-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.MRPAM, Mineral resources and petroleum statistics 2020/11. Mineral Resources and Petroleum Authority of Mongolia (MRPAM), Ulaanbaatar. https://www.mrpam.gov.mn/public/pages/165/2020-11-stat-report-eng.pdf (2020).
  • 9.Surenbaatar U, Kim BG, Seo JW, Lim HJ, Kwon JY, Kang MK, Altangerel E, Byambaa T, Batbaatar S, Myagmardorj O, Lee CW. Environmental health survey for children residing near mining areas in South Gobi, Mongolia. Ann. Occup. Environ. Med. 2021 doi: 10.35371/aoem.2021.33.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Batkhishig O. Human impact and land degradation in Mongolia. In: Chen J, Wan S, Henebry G, Qi J, Gutman G, Sun G, Kappas M, editors. Dryland East Asia: Land Dynamics amid Social and Climate Change. De Gruyter; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Juřička D, Pecina V, Kusbach A, Vlček V, Novotná J, Pařílková J, Otgonsuren B, Brtnický M, Kynický J. Thermal regime of semi-natural dew collector’s perspective for afforestation of semi-arid landscapes. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020;20:101125. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Regdel D, Dugarzhav C, Gunin PD. Ecological demands on socioeconomic development of Mongolia under climate aridization. Arid. Ecosyst. 2012;2(1):1–10. doi: 10.1134/S2079096112010076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Thorslund J, Jarsjö J, Chalov SR, Belozerova EV. Gold mining impact on riverine heavy metal transport in a sparsely monitored region: The upper Lake Baikal Basin case. J. Environ. Monit. 2012;14(10):2780–2792. doi: 10.1039/C2EM30643C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nadmitov B, Hong S, Kang SI, Chu JM, Gomboev B, Janchivdorj L, Lee CH, Khim JS. Large-scale monitoring and assessment of metal contamination in surface water of the Selenga River Basin (2007–2009) Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015;22(4):2856–2867. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3564-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pfeiffer M, Batbayar G, Hofmann J, Siegfried K, Karthe D, Hahn-Tomer S. Investigating arsenic (As) occurrence and sources in ground, surface, waste and drinking water in northern Mongolia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015;73(2):649–662. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-3029-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Batsaikhan B, Kwon JS, Kim KH, Lee YJ, Lee JH, Badarch M, Yun ST. Hydrochemical evaluation of the influences of mining activities on river water chemistry in central northern Mongolia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017;24(2):2019–2034. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7895-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Batjargal T, Otgonjargal E, Baek K, Yang JS. Assessment of metals contamination of soils in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. J. Hazardous Mater. 2010;184(1–3):872–876. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Davy PK, Gunchin G, Markwitz A, Trompetter WJ, Barry BJ, Shagjjamba D, Lodoysamba S. Air particulate matter pollution in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: Determination of composition, source contributions and source locations. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2011;2(2):126–137. doi: 10.5094/APR.2011.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chung S, Chon HT. Assessment of the level of mercury contamination from some anthropogenic sources in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. J. Geochem. Explor. 2014;147:237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.07.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bilguun U, Namkhainyambuu D, Purevsuren B, Soyol-Erdene TO, Tuuguu E, Daichaa D. Sources, enrichment, and geochemical fractions of soil trace metals in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2020;79(2):219–232. doi: 10.1007/s00244-020-00748-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kosheleva N, Kasimov N, Dorjgotov D, Bazha S, Golovanov D, Sorokina O, Enkh-Amgalan S. Assessment of heavy metal pollution of soils in industrial cities of Mongolia. Geogr. Environ. Sustain. 2010;3(2):51–65. doi: 10.24057/2071-9388-2010-3-2-51-65. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Soyol-Erdene TO, Lin S, Tuuguu E, Daichaa D, Huang KM, Bilguun U, Tseveendorj EA. Spatial and temporal variations of sediment metals in the Tuul River, Mongolia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019;26(31):32420–32431. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06428-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kosheleva NE, Timofeev IV, Kasimov NS, Sandag EA. Geochemical transformation of soil cover and woody vegetation in the largest industrial and transport center of Northern Mongolia (Darkhan) Appl. Geochem. 2019;107:80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.05.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mendez MO, Maier RM. Phytostabilization of mine tailings in arid and semiarid environments—an emerging remediation technology. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008;116(3):278–283. doi: 10.1289/ehp.10608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cheng J, Zhang X, Tang Z, Yang Y, Nie Z, Huang Q. Concentrations and human health implications of heavy metals in market foods from a Chinese coal-mining city. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2017;50:37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2017.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li Z, Ma Z, van der Kuijp TJ, Yuan Z, Huang L. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: Pollution and health risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2014;468:843–853. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marin A. Riders under storms: Contributions of nomadic herders’ observations to analysing climate change in Mongolia. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2010;20(1):162–176. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.10.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mandakh N, Tsogtbaatar J, Dash D, Khudulmur S. Spatial assessment of soil wind erosion using WEQ approach in Mongolia. J. Geog. Sci. 2016;26(4):473–483. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1280-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kasimov N, Kosheleva N, Gunin P, Korlyakov I, Sorokina O, Timofeev I. State of the environment of urban and mining areas in the Selenga Transboundary River Basin (Mongolia Russia) Environ. Earth Sci. 2016;75(18):1–20. doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-6088-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Timofeev I, Kosheleva N, Kasimov N. Health risk assessment based on the contents of potentially toxic elements in urban soils of Darkhan, Mongolia. J. Environ. Manag. 2019;242:279–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.MNEC, Coal Mine Methane (CMM) Resource Assessment and Emissions Inventory Development in Mongolia. Mongolian Nature and Environment Consortium (MNEC), Ulaanbaatar (2014).
  • 32.Trippi, M. H., & Belkin, H. E., USGS compilation of geographic information system (GIS) data of coal mines and coal-bearing areas in Mongolia (No. 2015-1144). US Geological Survey. (2015). 10.3133/ofr20151144.
  • 33.VROM, Circular on Target Values and Intervention Values for Soil Remediation. Dutch Ministry of Housing Spatial Planning and Environment (VROM) (2013).
  • 34.MASM, MNS 5850:2019 Soil quality - Soil pollutants permissible values (Mongolian national standard). Mongolian Agency for Standardization and Meteorology (MASM), Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia (2019). (In Mongolian)
  • 35.Pecina V, Brtnický M, Baltazár T, Juřička D, Kynický J, Galiová MV. Human health and ecological risk assessment of trace elements in urban soils of 101 cities in China: A meta-analysis. Chemosphere. 2021;267:129215. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pecina V, Juřička D, Galiová MV, Kynický J, Baláková L, Brtnický M. Polluted brownfield site converted into a public urban park: A place providing ecosystem services or a hidden health threat? J. Environ. Manag. 2021;291:112669. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chonokhuu S, Batbold C, Chuluunpurev B, Battsengel E, Dorjsuren B, Byambaa B. Contamination and health risk assessment of heavy metals in the soil of major cities in Mongolia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16(14):2552. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16142552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.USEPA, Baseline human health risk assessment. Vasquez Boulevard and I-70 superfund site Denver. US Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII, Denver (2001).
  • 39.MEP, Technical Guidelines for Risk Assessment of Contaminated Sites. HJ 25.3–2014. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People's Republic of China (MEP) (2014). (In Chinese).
  • 40.WHO, Mongolian STEPS survey on the prevalence of noncommunicable disease risk factors 2006. World Health Organization (WHO), Ulaanbaatar (2007).
  • 41.Otgontuya D, Khor GL, Lye MS, Norhaizan ME. Obesity among Mongolian Adults from Urban and Rural Areas. Malaysian J. Nutrit. 2009;15(2):85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.WHO, Third national STEPS Survey on the Prevalence of Noncommunicable Disease and Injury Risk Factors-2013. World Health Organization (WHO), Ulaanbaatar (2013).
  • 43.Luo XS, Ding J, Xu B, Wang YJ, Li HB, Yu S. Incorporating bioaccessibility into human health risk assessments of heavy metals in urban park soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2012;424:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.World Bank Group, Life expectancy at birth, total (years). Data for Mongolia from 2019. The World Bank Group. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.LE00.IN (2021), Accessed 8 December 2021.
  • 45.Battsengel E, Murayama T, Fukushi K, Nishikizawa S, Chonokhuu S, Ochir A, Tsetsgee S, Davaasuren D. Ecological and human health risk assessment of heavy metal pollution in the soil of the ger district in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17(13):4668. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Battsengel E, Murayama T, Nishikizawa S, Chonokhuu S. Evaluation of daily behaviors related to health risks of the Ger Residents in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Sustainability. 2021;13(9):4817. doi: 10.3390/su13094817. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kasimov NS, Kosheleva NE, Sorokina OI, Bazha SN, Gunin PD, Enkh-Amgalan S. Ecological-geochemical state of soils in Ulaanbaatar (Mongolia) Eurasian Soil Sci. 2011;44(7):709–721. doi: 10.1134/S106422931107009X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tserenpil S, Sapkota A, Liu CQ, Peng JH, Liu B, Segebade PC. Lead isotope and trace element composition of urban soils in Mongolia. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2016;49(8):879–889. doi: 10.1134/S1064229316080147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Naidansuren E, Dondog A, Erdenesaikhan B, Byambanyam E. Heavy metal pollution near a tannery in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. J. Health Pollut. 2017;7(16):2–11. doi: 10.5696/2156-9614-7.16.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Oyunbat P, Batkhishig O, Batsaikhan B, Lehmkuhl F, Knippertz M, Nottebaum V. Spatial distribution, pollution, and health risk assessment of heavy metal in industrial area soils of Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci. 2021;43:123–133. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2021-123-2021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Timofeev IV, Kosheleva NE, Kasimov NS, Gunin PD, Sandag EA. Geochemical transformation of soil cover in copper–molybdenum mining areas (Erdenet, Mongolia) J. Soils Sediments. 2016;16(4):1225–1237. doi: 10.1007/s11368-015-1126-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Greene LE, Riederer AM, Marcus M, Lkhasuren O. Associations of fertility and pregnancy outcomes with leather tannery work in Mongolia. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health. 2010;16(1):60–68. doi: 10.1179/107735210800546100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Huang YK, Luvsan ME, Gombojav E, Ochir C, Bulgan J, Chan CC. Land use patterns and SO2 and NO2 pollution in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Environ. Res. 2013;124:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2013.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Inam E, Khantotong S, Kim KW, Tumendemberel B, Erdenetsetseg S, Puntsag T. Geochemical distribution of trace element concentrations in the vicinity of Boroo gold mine, Selenge Province, Mongolia. Environ. Geochem. Health. 2011;33(1):57–69. doi: 10.1007/s10653-010-9347-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Oyuntsetseg, B., Kawasaki, K., Watanabe, M., & Ochirbat, B., Evaluation of the pollution by toxic elements around the small-scale mining area, Boroo, Mongolia. International Scholarly Research Notices (2012). 10.5402/2012/153081.
  • 56.Jarsjö J, Chalov SR, Pietroń J, Alekseenko AV, Thorslund J. Patterns of soil contamination, erosion and river loading of metals in a gold mining region of northern Mongolia. Reg. Environ. Change. 2017;17(7):1991–2005. doi: 10.1007/s10113-017-1169-6.55. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Battogtokh B, Lee JM, Woo N. Contamination of water and soil by the Erdenet copper–molybdenum mine in Mongolia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014;71(8):3363–3374. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-2727-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yondonjamts J, Oyuntsetseg B, Bayanjargal O, Watanabe M, Prathumratana L, Kim KW. Geochemical source and dispersion of copper, arsenic, lead, and zinc in the topsoil from the vicinity of Erdenet mining area, Mongolia. Geochem. Explor. Environ. Anal. 2019;19(2):110–120. doi: 10.1144/geochem2018-025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kosheleva NE, Kasimov NS, Timofeev IV. Potentially toxic elements in urban soil catenas of W-Mo (Zakamensk, Russia) and Cu-Mo (Erdenet, Mongolia) mining areas. J. Soils Sediments. 2018;18(6):2318–2334. doi: 10.1007/s11368-017-1897-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Park J, Kwon E, Chung E, Kim H, Battogtokh B, Woo NC. Environmental sustainability of open-pit coal mining practices at Baganuur, Mongolia. Sustainability. 2020;12(1):248. doi: 10.3390/su12010248. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wong MH. Ecological restoration of mine degraded soils, with emphasis on metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere. 2003;50(6):775–780. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00232-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Alday JG, Marrs RH, Martínez-Ruiz C. Vegetation succession on reclaimed coal wastes in Spain: the influence of soil and environmental factors. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2011;14(1):84–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01104.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES