Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2023 Feb 16;13:2803. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29568-y

Optimization of green and environmentally-benign synthesis of isoamyl acetate in the presence of ball-milled seashells by response surface methodology

Amir Hossein Fattahi 1, Mohammad G Dekamin 1,, James H Clark 2
PMCID: PMC9935880  PMID: 36797437

Abstract

Ball-milled seashells, as a nano-biocomposite catalyst and natural source of CaCO3 in its aragonite microcrystalline form with fixed CO2, was optimized for the synthesis of isoamyl acetate (3-methylbutyl ethanoate) by response surface methodology with a five-level three-factor rotatable circumscribed central composite design. The seashells nano-biocomposite has proved to be an excellent heterogeneous multifunctional catalyst for the green and environmentally-benign synthesis of isoamyl acetate from acetic acid and isoamyl alcohol under solvent-free conditions. A high yield of 91% was obtained under the following optimal conditions: molar ratio of alcohol: acetic acid (1:3.7), catalyst loading (15.7 mg), the reaction temperature (98 °C), and the reaction time (219 min). The outstanding advantages of this protocol are the use of an inexpensive, naturally occurring and easily prepared nano-biocomposite material having appropriate thermal stability and without any modifications using hazardous reagents, lower catalyst loading and reaction temperature, no use of corrosive Bronsted acids as well as toxic azeotropic solvents or water adsorbents, and simplicity of the procedure.

Subject terms: Environmental economics, Molecular ecology, Climate sciences, Environmental sciences, Ocean sciences, Solid Earth sciences, Chemistry, Biosynthesis, Catalysis, Chemical biology, Chemical engineering, Energy, Environmental chemistry, Green chemistry, Inorganic chemistry, Materials chemistry, Organic chemistry, Process chemistry, Surface chemistry, Chemical synthesis

Introduction

With regarding to environmental concerns and its direct influence on humans and living organisms, the designing, development and application of environmentally friendly and atom efficient chemical from procedures, safely and appropriate catalysts, reagents and solvents has received considerable attention from both academia and industry in line with the principles of green and sustainable chemistry15. The ball milling technique and using of heterogeneous catalytic systems containing nano-biocomposites and biopolymers are some of these interesting and useful procedures or concepts. The ball milling is an interesting and green mechanical technique in nano-biocomposite preparation. It is an exciting election for the manufacturing of new nanostructured materials from eco-friendly sources compared to conventional methods for preparation of nano-biocomposites. This method has the advantages including the sharp decline of environmental disposal, the synchronous creation and homogeneous dispersion of nanoparticles, coating of inorganic nanoparticles and the possibility of parallel processes (surface grafting, embedding, and polymerization), which are particularly suitable in the case of biodegradable polymers. Furthermore, the possibility of in situ creating of the nanoparticles and promoting chemical reactions between both the organic molecules and activated nanoparticles as well as the use of solvent-free conditions represent another important advantages of this technique610.

The esterification of carboxylic acids with alcohols is one of the most important, straightforward and challenging reactions from both academic and industrial points of view11,12. Esters are mainly produced from the reactions between the corresponding acids and alcohols or alkyl halides that are traditionally using acid or base catalysis conditions, respectively13. Indeed, esterification under acidic conditions is typically a reversible and slow reaction, which requires a higher amount of alcohol to be achieved. Hence, in the case of low alcohol concentration, the conversion requires a long time reaction14,15. Interestingly, short-chain esters are important organic compounds that are widely used in different fields of chemical industry such as lubricants, plasticizers, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, beverages, perfumes, solvents, and food preservatives1618. They are commonly produced from short-chain acids and alcohols with the chain lengths of less than 10 carbon atoms19. One of these important esters is isoamyl acetate (3-methylbutyl ethanoate), which is widely used in medicinal, cosmetic, perfume, nuts ices, beverage, candies, bakery products, and other food industries. Other applications of this ester are in honey bee farms, as an alarm pheromone, as well as extraction of penicillin16,1921. Furthermore, isoamyl acetate has high antifungal, antibacterial and antimicrobial activity and is effective in inhibiting and deactivating growth of various micro-organisms and yeasts such as Escherichia coli22. These applications are very important due to global population growth and its food chain. While a large number of commercial esters can be extracted from natural sources or produced by fermentation, products obtained through these methods have low volumes and high prices. Therefore, more convenient and less costly alternative processes including esterification of carboxylic acids are in high demand23,24. Esterification of carboxylic acids with alcohols usually involves homogeneous acid catalysts such as H2SO4, HCl, HF, H3PO4 and p-toluenesulfonic acid via a chemical synthesis path25. Although these catalysts are often inexpensive, they have disadvantages such as toxicity, corrosion and difficulty in their separation26. In this regard, heterogeneous catalytic systems have emerged as a suitable alternative for the homogeneous ones. They offer a lot of advantages including higher purity of the products, easy separation, recovery of the catalysts and the potential for reactions under solvent-free conditions2729. A literature review shows that various heterogeneous catalytic systems have been presented for the production of isoamyl acetate from acetic acid and isoamyl alcohol. For example, cation exchange resins such as purolite CT-175, Amberlyst-15 or Amberlite IR-120, tungstophosphoric or molybdophosphoric acid supported on zirconia, poly(vinyl alcohol) containing sulfonic acid, Candida antarctica immobilized lipase, Candida antarctica lipase B onto resin Purolite@MN102, Bacillus aerius lipase immobilized on silica gel matrix3035, hybrid membrane process36, polyoxometalate-based sulfonated ionic liquid37 and β-MnO2 nanorods38 can be stated. Also, acidic ionic liquids such as 1-sulfobutyl-3-methylimidazolium hydrogen sulfate ([HSO3bmim][HSO4]), trihexyl(tetradecyl)phosphonium cation and mixed chloride and bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide anion have been reported39. In most of these methods, only kinetic factors for the optimal synthesis of isoamyl acetate have been investigated. Moreover, some of these protocols have difficulties such as high catalyst loading and the use of organic solvents32,34,35. On the other hand, a few of these procedures have used experimental design in order to optimize production of isoamyl acetate30,31. Along this line, different bioploymeric macromolecules have received a lot of interest, as support, in heterogeneous catalytic systems or in composite materials. In particular, bioploymeric macromolecules such as chitin (poly[β-(1 → 4)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine]; a member of the polysaccharides family), which is ranked as the second most abundant resource after cellulose with an annual production estimated to be of several thousand tones, or its deacylated product (chitosan) are very popular for this purpose4046. Other biopolymers including starch, cellulose, alginates, collagen, fibroin, and wool may demonstrate similar role in the corresponding nano-bicomposite catalytic systems40,4657.

Response surface methodology (RSM) is an efficient statistical method in order to optimize multiple variables to predict optimal conditions with minimum number of experiments. The use of this method, compared to the conventional techniques of one variable at a time, leads to a decrease of time and expense as well as a reduction in the consumption of reagents and materials16,5864.

In continuation of our interest to explore biopolymeric or nano-ordered catalysts for organic transformation4246,5457, herein we wish to report ball-milled seashells (3), as a nano-biocomposite catalyst and natural source of CaCO3 in aragonite microcrystalline form reinforced by chitin fibers and protein chains (3%)6567, for the synthesis of isoamyl acetate (4) from isoamyl alcohol (1) and acetic acid (2) under solvent-free conditions. Moreover, response surface methodology (RSM) with a five-level three-factor rotatable circumscribed central composite design (RCCCD) was performed to estimate the effective parameters including reaction time, reaction temperature and molar ratio of alcohol: acid, and catalyst loading (Fig. 1). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the catalytic activity of the pure ball-milled seashells for organic transformations.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Synthesis of isoamyl acetate (4) catalyzed by the ball-milled seashells nanocomposite (3) under solvent-free conditions.

Results and discussion

Catalyst characterization

Natural CaCO3 has microcrystalline forms such as calcite, aragonite, dolomite or vaterite. Among them, aragonite structure has biocompatibility properties. This microcrystalline form can be found naturally in the crust of all clams and often in bivalves (pH = 10.32). Compared to natural CaCO3 particles in the microcrystalline form of calcite (pH = 9.91), seashells are layered. Layers are composed of two parts, an inorganic section inclusive CaCO3 and an organic section containing chitin, protein or polysaccharides chains, which make them a natural nano-sized biocomposite. This biocomposite can show its unique catalytic activity for organic transformations when its highly ordered and compact layers are crushed by milling to afford a material offering more surface area. In this study, seashells were collected from the southern coast of Caspian Sea, Babolsar, Iran. The shells were thoroughly washed with distilled water, refluxed in EtOH for 30 min and then oven-dried at 50 °C for 1 h. The obtained dried-seashells were ball-milled in a stainless steel ball mill vessels at 25 Hz and ambient temperature.

The FTIR spectra of the ball-milled seashells (3), commercial CaCO3 and chitin are shown in Fig. 2. The absorption bands observed at 1452, 1081, 840 and 710 cm−1 are related to the aragonite CaCO3 nanocrystals6567. By comparing of the FTIR spectra of the catalyst and commercial calcite CaCO3, it can be found that the biocomposite catalyst 3 is mainly comprised of CaCO3. Furthermore, results of energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis showed that the nano-biocomposite seashells (3) includes elements including calcium, carbon and oxygen (Fig. 3). Moreover, the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the catalyst 3 showed an almost uniform spherical particles distribution by the average of particles size about 28–43 nm (Fig. 4).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Comparison of FTIR spectra of ball-milled seashells (3), commercial calcite CaCO3 and chitin.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis of the ball-milled seashells nano-biocomposite (3).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

SEM image of the ball-milled seashells nano-biocomposite (3).

Also, the atomic force microscopy analysis of the ball-milled seashell nano-biocomposite shows the topology of the catalyst 3 surface. AFM images confirms that the catalyst particles are at the nanoscale (Fig. 5). On the other hand, the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the ball-milled seashells nano-biocomposite (3) demonstrated that the crystalline quality of aragonite CaCO3 in the obtained powder is maintained throughout the ball milling process (Fig. 6)6567.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) of the ball-milled seashells nano-biocomposite (3).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

X-Ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the ball-milled seashells nano-biocomposite (3).

In addition, the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the catalyst 3 demonstrated that significant reduction of the weight of the seashells was not observed until around 600 °C. This indicates that seashells have high thermal stability and more than commercial CaCO3 in the calcite microcrystalline from (Fig. 7).

Figure7.

Figure7

Thermogravimetric (TG) of the ball-milled seashells nano-biocomposite (3).

Optimization of the esterification of isoamyl alcohol (1) with acetic acid (2) by RSM

Our aim in this research was the improvement of the RSM model for finding the best effective relationship between four variables including reaction time, reaction temperature, molar ratio of acid: alcohol, and catalyst loading. Therefore, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was assessed with regard to significance of the effect of operational parameters and their interactions on the yield of esterification of isoamyl alcohol (1) with acetic acid (2). The raw isoamyl acetate (4) yield data did not well fit to various models (linear, quadratic, and cubic). Accordingly, a convenient data transformation was required60,68,69. With this transformation, the experimental data well fit to the quadratic model finally. The model equation, in terms of the variables, is shown in Eq. 1. Generally, it is favorable to fit the lowest order polynomials that sufficiently describe the system. Therefore, a quadratic polynomial model was fitted to obtain the yield of isoamyl acetate (4). The quadratic model has been chosen based on stepwise procedure, and the model terms have been selected according to their p values (> 0.05). The obtained results of ANOVA analysis are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

ANOVA table of the quadratic response surface model.

Source SSa Dfb MSc F-value Prob > F
Model 9258.76 10 925.88 30.66  < 0.0001 (significant)
A-Temp 5342.73 1 5342.73 176.91  < 0.0001
B-Time 1993.69 1 1993.69 66.02  < 0.0001
C-Cat 99.53 1 99.53 3.30 0.0853
D-Molar ratio of acid: alcohol 341.95 1 341.95 11.32 0.0033
AB 191.20 1 191.20 6.33 0.0210
AC 264.88 1 264.88 8.17 0.0100
AD 278.31 1 278.31 9.22 0.0068
A2 308.62 1 308.62 10.22 0.0047
B2 119.34 1 119.34 3.95 0.0614
D2 575.79 1 575.79 19.07 0.0003
Residual 673.34 19 30.20  –  –
Lack of fit (Not significant) 566.39 14 33.35 1.56 0.3278
Pure Error 106.95 5 21.39
Cor Total 983,257 29

aStand for sum of square.

bDegree of freedom.

cMean of source.

The ANOVA analysis, as shown in Table 1, confirmed the adequacy of quadratic model to demonstrate the actual relationship between the response and the significant variables, since the probability value was lower than 0.0001. Moreover, it can be seen from Table 1, the F value of 30.66 indicates that the above mentioned model is significant. On the other hand, the calculated F value of lack of fit of 1.56 indicated that it was not significant relative to the pure experimental error and confirms the reliability of the model. The p values from Table 1 were used to check the significance of each of the factors and interaction between them. The value of prob F less than 0.05 for a variable implies that its effect is significant at the 95% of confidence interval16,70,71. Values greater than 0.1 display that the variable is not significant. Hence, the effects of terms A, B, C, D, AB, AC, AD, A2, B2 and D2 are significant to explain the model.

The model created was in the coded format and is shown in Eq. 1. Thus, the final second-order polynomial equation is:

Yield=+48.24+13.69A+8.36B+1.87C-3.46D+3.46AB-3.93AC-4.17AD+2.22A2+1.38B2+3.03D2 1

Another statistical parameter of the model, a coefficient of determination adjusted for the number of parameters in the model relative to the number of points in the design, was 0.9416. This value showed that the model was trustworthy in predicting the response and, at least 94.16% of the variability in the data, could be defined by the second-order polynomial model. The R2pred and R2adj values were 0.7788 and 0.9109, respectively, that show good fitness of the model because these values are in reasonable agreement with together, as the values should differ by no more than 0.272,73. The adequate precision is a measure of the signal to noise ratio and a quantity greater than 4 is desirable74. At this investigation, adequate precision of 20.572 is a good signal to noise ratio and proves the ability of model to navigate the design space (Table 2)75. These statistical values along with lack of fit tests display that the quadratic model is adequate to predict the response (the yield of isoamyl acetate (4)).The relationship between the experimental values and predicted values are denoted in Fig. 8. It can be seen from this Figure that the experimental values are very close to those predicted using the model equation, showing linear distribution with R2 = 0.9416. This value showed that this experimental model is acceptable and reproducible.

Table 2.

Other statistical parameters of this model.

Std. Dev 5.50 R – Squared 0.9416
Mean 54.54 Adj R-Squared 0.9109
C.V %10.08 Pred R-Squared 0.7788
PRESS 2174.48 Adeq Precision 20.572

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Relationships between the experimental and predicted values.

The best approach to predict the relationships between responses, variables and interactions is the contour and three-dimensional plots. As shown (Figs. 9, 10), three-dimensional (3D) response surfaces and two-dimensional (2D) contour plots illustrate the effects of different variables on the response. In these plots, two variables are changed, whereas the other variables are kept constant and they describe the type of interactions between two tested variables and the correlations between response and variables levels. 3D response surface and contour plot in Fig. 9 illustrate the influence of interaction between the reaction temperature (A) and molar ratio of acid: alcohol (D) on values of time (B) and catalyst loading (C) were set to 165 min and 25.5 mg, respectively. These results clearly show that at temperature of 56.5 °C, enhancing the molar ratio of reactants had no significant effect on the yield of isoamyl acetate (4) whereas at 98 °C lower yields were obtained when higher molar ratio of reactants are used16,76. Moreover, Fig. 10 display relationship between reaction temperature (A) and catalyst 3 loading (C). It can also be seen that by increasing the reaction temperature to 98 °C, substantial yields were achieved. However, higher loadings of the catalyst had no significant effect on the yield of reaction.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Three-dimensional response surface (a) and contour plot for reaction temperature (A) versus molar ratio of acid: alcohol (D) (b).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Three-dimensional response surface (a) and contour plot for reaction temperature (A) versus catalyst loading (C) (b).

The main purpose of the response surface methodology (RSM) is detecting the optimal conditions to maximize the percentage of the yield of the favored product (response). For this purpose, four factors were measured in the range of (± 1) to optimize the process while the response (the yield of isoamyl acetate (4)) was fixed to a maximum value77. According to this method, the optimum values of the factors under solvent-free conditions were 15.7 mg for the catalyst 3 loading, 1:3.7 molar ratio of isoamyl alcohol: acetic acid, 98 °C for the reaction temperature, and 219 min for the reaction time. The yield of the desired product under optimal experimental conditions (91%) is in excellent agreement with the predicted value (89%). Good settings between the experimental and predicted values show the credibility and adequacy of the model to predict the yield of isoamyl acetate (4) by esterification of isoamyl alcohol with acetic acid under solvent-free conditions. The crude reaction mixtures were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC–MS). The results are shown in the Supplementary Material.

To demonstrate the efficiency of this methodology, Table 3 compares the ability of various heterogeneous catalysts in the esterification reaction of isoamyl alcohol with acetic acid, which represents significant excellence of the ball-milled seashells compared to the most of introduced catalytic systems in terms of catalyst loading, temperature and yield.

Table 3.

Comparison of the performance of various catalysts versus ball-milled seashells (3) in the esterification of isoamyl alcohol (1) with acetic acid (2).

Entry Catalyst Temp (°C) 2:1 mol ratioa Catalyst loading (mg) Time (min) Yield %
1 NaX 120 1:1 2000 240 9278
2 NaY 120 1:1 2000 240 8878
3 β-MnO2 124 1:1.8 144 210 9238
4 SO4–2/TiO2 130 7:1 3.2b 300 9416
5 Lipase 30 10:8 12c 480 7520
6 Lipase 37 2:1 60d 480 6423
7 Cs(K)XH3−X PW12O40TPA 180 1;1 500 8079
8 Ball-Milled seashells 98 3.7:1 15.7 219 91e (this work)

aMolar ratio of acid:alcohol.

b3.2 wt % with respect to acetic acid.

c12% (w/w) enzyme.

d60 IU of immobilized lipase.

eAverage of two runs at optimal conditions.

A plausible mechanism for the reaction of isoamyl alcohol (1) and acetic acid (2) in the presence of ball-milled seashells (3) to afford isoamyl acetate (4) is outlined in Fig. 3 (See Supplementary Information). The unique catalytic properties of the ball-milled seashells, as a biodegradable, eco-friendly, and recyclable nano-biocomposite, can be related to synergic effect of the aragonite microcrystalline form with the reinforcing chitin fibers and protein chains compared to the calcite one in commercial CaCO3 samples as well as the porosity and hygroscopic properties of the material. According to the proposed mechanism, the oxygen of the carbonyl group of acetic acid (2) is activated by the Ca2+ species of the seashell (3) as well as hydrogen bondings of the OH or even NH groups of chitin fibers and protein chains, respectively, to produce intermediate (I)41,46,57,8082. These interactions make the carbonyl group more susceptible to the nucleophilic attack of isoamyl alcohol (1) and forming intermediate (II). Then, by intermolecular proton transfer and removal of a water molecule, the isoamyl acetate (4) is formed.graphic file with name 41598_2023_29568_Figa_HTML.jpg

Experimental section

Isoamyl alcohol and acetic acid were purchased from Merck Chemical Company and used without further purification. The seashells were collected from the southern coast of Caspian Sea, Babolsar, Iran. The ball mill was a Retsch MM 400 swing mill. 10 mL stainless steel ball mill vessels were used for preparation of seashells nano-biocomposite. Two stainless steel balls with 12 mm diameter were used, and the milling frequency was at 25 Hz at the ambient temperature. Yields were obtained using a FID-gas chromatography Shimadzu 2010 instrument equipped with BP5 (30 m, 0.25 mm) column. The oven temperature was maintained at 60 °C, elevated to 200 °C at a rate 10 °C/ min, and was held for 2 min. The injection volume was 1.0 mm3. Samples were prepared by adding 0.004 g of n-dodecane, as an internal standard, and 5 mL of toluene as solvent. GC–MS chromatograms were recorded on a PerkinElmer Clarus 680 using nitrogen as the carrier gas. FTIR spectrum of the catalyst was obtained using a Shimadzu-8400S spectrometer in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 using KBr pellet. SEM images were prepared using a KYKY instrument (model EM-3200). The XRD pattern of the catalyst was obtained using TW 1800 diffractometer with Cu Ka radiation (k = 1.542 Å). Chemical analysis was performed using EDX model Philips XL-30. The Saeshell surface was mounted on the AFM stage and the triboscope recording unit with transducers and leveling device was placed on the top of a NanoScope III E 164 | 164 mm2 XY piezo scan base. The tip radii were obtained from direct AFM measurements of the tip apex region in tapping mode. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed by using a Bahr company STA 504 instrument. Statistical analysis and response surface graphs were generated using the Design-Expert 7 software (State Ease Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA).

Experimental design and optimization of esterification of acetic acid with isoamyl alcohol by RSM

Optimization of the reaction conditions for the synthesis of isoamyl acetate (4) was accomplished using RSM to evaluate the effects of some reaction variables on the yield of the esterification of isoamyl alcohol with acetic acid. In this work, according to the elementary studies and the procured results from the previous studies four variables including reaction temperature (A), reaction time (B), catalyst loading (C) and molar ratio of acetic acid: isoamyl alcohol (D) were chosen as the most effective variables on the yield of the isoamyl acetate (4). A 5-level 4-factor RCCCD was employed at this study. Total experimental points of N, there is a combination of factorial (Nf), star (Nα), and central (N0) experiments with 2F, 2F and N0 points, respectively. This can be expressed as Eq. 216, in the present study, six experiments were performed in the center of design to allow the estimation of pure error and reproducibility. Hence, the total number of required experiments was 30 (Eq. 1).

N=2F+2F+N0=16+8+6=30 2

The coded and the actual values of the factors are shown in Table 4. The combination of the levels of factors in actual values along with experimental response was presented in Table 5. In this paper, a quadratic-order polynomial model was used to calculate the predicted yield and was fitted in the following equation Eq. 358:

Y=b0+i=1nbiXi+i=1nbiiXi2+i=1nj=i+1nbijXiXj 3

where Y is the response (% yield), b0, bi, bii, and bij, are constant, linear, interaction and quadratic coefficients, respectively, and xi, and xj are the coded experimental parameters, which influence on the response. All data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) to predict the model and evaluate the significances of the variables and interactions.

Table 4.

Ranges and levels of the experimental parameters.

Factor Symbol  − α  − 1 0  + 1  + α
Temperature/°C A 25 56 77 98 130
Time/min B 30 111 165 219 300
Catalyst loading/mg C 1.0 15.7 25.7 35.3 50.0
Molar ratio of alcohol: acid D 1.0 3.7 5.5 7.3 10.0

Table 5.

RCCCD and experimental data for a 5-level 4-factor response surface methodology.

Run Aa Ba Ca Da Yield (%)b
1 56 219 35.3 3.7 47
2 77 165 25.5 5.5 46
3 98 219 15.7 7.3 84
4 77 165 25.5 5.5 50
5 98 219 15.7 3.7 91
6 77 165 25.5 5.5 50
7 77 165 1.0 3.7 37
8 98 111 15.7 3.7 74
9 98 219 35.3 3.7 84
10 56 219 15.7 7.3 41
11 98 111 35.3 3.7 69
12 98 111 35.3 7.3 51
13 25 165 255 5.5 31
14 130 165 25.5 5.5 88
15 77 165 25.5 5.5 40
16 77 165 50.0 5.5 50
17 56 11 35.3 3.7 41
18 77 165 25.5 5.5 45
19 56 111 15.7 3.7 31
20 77 165 25.5 55 45
21 56 219 35.3 7.3 54
22 56 111 35.3 7.3 46
23 77 165 25.5 1.0 76
24 77 165 25.5 5.5 54
25 77 300 25.5 5.5 77
26 56 111 15.7 7.3 32
27 56 219 15.7 3.7 42
28 98 111 15.7 7.3 52
29 98 219 35.3 7.3 77
30 77 30 25.0 25.5 31

aA, B, C, and D parameters are reaction temperature, reaction time, catalyst loading and molar ratio of alcohol: acid, respectively.

bYields were determined by GC analysis.

5.0 g of beach-collected seashells were rinsed thoroughly by distilled water and then heated in refluxing 96% EtOH for 1.0 h to remove any organic impurity. Seashells were removed from EtOH and air dried. Then, the air-dried seashells were washed with water and dried at 70 °C for 1.0 h. The as-treated seashells were put in a ball-mill vessel and milled at 25 Hz frequency for 3.0 min to afford a fine powder. The obtained powder was characterized by common spectroscopic, microscopic and thermal gravimetric analysis.

General procedure for preparation of the ball-milled seashells nano-biocomposite (3). The esterification of isoamyl alcohol with acetic acid was performed in a round-bottom flask equipped with a reflux condenser and a magnetic stirrer. Different molar ratios of isoamyl alcohol (1) to acetic acid (2) and catalyst loadings of ball-milled seashells (3) were used at different reaction temperatures and times illustrated in Table 4. During the reaction, the water was eliminated from the reaction mixture by absorbent property of seashells. After completion of the reaction, the obtained mixture was cooled to room temperature. The liquid phase was separated from the catalyst by filtration and analyzed by means of GC and GC–MS instruments. Furthermore, the obtained isoamyl acetate (4) was characterized after purification through known solvent extraction procedures by FTIR spectroscopy (See Supplementary Material).

Conclusion

Pure seashells powder was prepared by ball milling and used, as a multifunctional nano-biocomposite catalyst and natural source of CaCO3 in its aragonite microcrystalline form with fixed CO2, for the esterification of isoamyl alcohol with acetic acid under environmentally-benign conditions. Also, the reaction conditions for the synthesis of isoamyl acetate, as an industrially important compound, were optimized using response surface methodology with a five-level three-factor rotatable circumscribed central composite design. The obtained results confirmed that RSM is more advantageous than the traditional single parameter optimization in that it saves time, environment and substrates as well as reduces costs substantially. Other advantages of the current protocol include excellent yield, short reaction time, lower catalyst loading and required temperature, the use of an inexpensive, naturally occurring and easily prepared nano-biocomposite material having appropriate thermal stability and working under solvent-free conditions as well as no use of corrosive Bronsted acids, toxic azeotropic solvents or water adsorbents, and simplicity of the procedures for both nano-biocomposite preparation and isoamyl acetate synthesis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the catalytic activity of the pure ball-milled seashells for organic transformations. Hence, other organic reactions including named multi-component reactions promoted by ball-milled seashells have been investigated in our research group and the results will be published in due course.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (554.5KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the financial support from The Research Council of Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran (Grant No 160/20969) for their support. We would also like to acknowledge the support of The Iran Nanotechnology Initiative Council (INIC), Iran.

Author contributions

A.H.F. worked on the topic, as his MSc thesis, and prepared the initial draft of the manuscript. Prof. M.G.D. is the supervisor of Mr. Fattahi. Also, he edited and revised the manuscript completely. Prof. J.H.C. interpreted some experimental data and revised the initial draft of the manuscript.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-023-29568-y.

References

  • 1.McElroy CR, Constantinou A, Jones LC, Summerton L, Clark JH. Towards a holistic approach to metrics for the 21st century pharmaceutical industry. Green Chem. 2015;17:3111–3121. doi: 10.1039/C5GC00340G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zimmerman JB, Anastas PT, Erythropel HC, Leitner W. Designing for a green chemistry future. Science. 2020;367:397–400. doi: 10.1126/science.aay3060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sheldon RA. Metrics of green chemistry and sustainability: Past, present, and future. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018;6:32–48. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Anastas, P. T. & Williamson, T. C. in Green Chemistry, Vol. 626 ACS Symposium Series Ch. 1, 1–17 (American Chemical Society, 1996). 10.1021/bk-1996-0626.ch001.
  • 5.Clark HJ. Green chemistry: Challenges and opportunities. Green Chem. 1999;1:1–8. doi: 10.1039/A807961G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dekamin MG, Eslami M. Highly efficient organocatalytic synthesis of diverse and densely functionalized 2-amino-3-cyano-4 H-pyrans under mechanochemical ball milling. Green Chem. 2014;16:4914–4921. doi: 10.1039/C4GC00411F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eze AA, et al. Wet ball milling of niobium by using ethanol, determination of the crystallite size and microstructures. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01916-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gorrasi G, Sorrentino A. Mechanical milling as a technology to produce structural and functional bio-nanocomposites. Green Chem. 2015;17:2610–2625. doi: 10.1039/C5GC00029G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li LH, Glushenkov AM, Hait SK, Hodgson P, Chen Y. High-efficient production of boron nitride nanosheets via an optimized ball milling process for lubrication in oil. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:1–6. doi: 10.1038/srep07288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mac Naughton, G. E., Rolfe, S. A. & Siraj-Blatchford, I. E. Doing Early Childhood Research: International Perspectives on Theory and Practice (Open University Press, 2001).
  • 11.Evangelisti L, et al. The borderline between reactivity and pre-reactivity of binary mixtures of gaseous carboxylic acids and alcohols. Angew. Chem. 2017;129:3930–3933. doi: 10.1002/ange.201612231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gaspa S, Porcheddu A, De Luca L. Metal-free oxidative cross esterification of alcohols via acyl chloride formation. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016;358:154–158. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201500912. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fiorio JL, Braga AH, Guedes CLSB, Rossi LM. Reusable heterogeneous tungstophosphoric acid-derived catalyst for green esterification of carboxylic acids. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019;7:15874–15883. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01579. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Karimi B, Mirzaei HM, Mobaraki A. Periodic mesoporous organosilica functionalized sulfonic acids as highly efficient and recyclable catalysts in biodiesel production. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012;2:828–834. doi: 10.1039/c2cy00444e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tran TTV, et al. Selective production of green solvent (isoamyl acetate) from fusel oil using a sulfonic acid-functionalized KIT-6 catalyst. Mol. Catal. 2020;484:110724. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2019.110724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Afshar S, et al. Optimization of catalytic activity of sulfated titania for efficient synthesis of isoamyl acetate by response surface methodology. Mon. Chem. Chem. Mon. 2015;146:1949–1957. doi: 10.1007/s00706-015-1533-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chng LL, Yang J, Ying JY. Efficient synthesis of amides and esters from alcohols under aerobic ambient conditions catalyzed by a Au/mesoporous Al2O3 nanocatalyst. Chemsuschem. 2015;8:1916–1925. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201403469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lozano P, Bernal JM, Navarro A. A clean enzymatic process for producing flavour esters by direct esterification in switchable ionic liquid/solid phases. Green Chem. 2012;14:3026–3033. doi: 10.1039/c2gc36081k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Su L, Hong R, Guo X, Wu J, Xia Y. Short-chain aliphatic ester synthesis using Thermobifida fusca cutinase. Food Chem. 2016;206:131–136. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Güvenç A, Kapucu N, Kapucu H, Aydoğan Ö, Mehmetoğlu Ü. Enzymatic esterification of isoamyl alcohol obtained from fusel oil: Optimization by response surface methodolgy. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007;40:778–785. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Torres S, Baigorí MD, Swathy S, Pandey A, Castro GR. Enzymatic synthesis of banana flavour (isoamyl acetate) by Bacillus licheniformis S-86 esterase. Food Res. Int. 2009;42:454–460. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2008.12.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ando H, Kurata A, Kishimoto N. Antimicrobial properties and mechanism of volatile isoamyl acetate, a main flavour component of Japanese sake (Ginjo-shu) J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015;118:873–880. doi: 10.1111/jam.12764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ghamgui H, Karra-Chaâbouni M, Bezzine S, Miled N, Gargouri Y. Production of isoamyl acetate with immobilized Staphylococcus simulans lipase in a solvent-free system. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2006;38:788–794. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.08.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Romero M, Calvo L, Alba C, Daneshfar A, Ghaziaskar H. Enzymatic synthesis of isoamyl acetate with immobilized Candida antarctica lipase in n-hexane. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2005;37:42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.12.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Borges ME, Díaz L. Recent developments on heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production by oil esterification and transesterification reactions: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012;16:2839–2849. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li K-T, Wang C-K, Wang I, Wang C-M. Esterification of lactic acid over TiO2–ZrO2 catalysts. Appl. Catal. A. 2011;392:180–183. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Clark, J. H. & Rhodes, C. N. In Clean Synthesis Using Porous Inorganic Solid Catalysts and Supported Reagents, Vol. 4, (Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 2000). 10.1039/9781847550569
  • 28.Dekamin MG, et al. Sodium alginate: An efficient biopolymeric catalyst for green synthesis of 2-amino-4H-pyran derivatives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016;87:172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.01.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Melfi DT, dos Santos KC, Ramos LP, Corazza ML. Supercritical CO2 as solvent for fatty acids esterification with ethanol catalyzed by Amberlyst-15. J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2020;158:104736. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2019.104736. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Azudin NY, Mashitah M, Abd Shukor SR. Optimization of isoamyl acetate production in a solvent-free system. J. Food Qual. 2013;36:441–446. doi: 10.1111/jfq.12060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ćorović M, et al. Immobilization of Candida antarctica lipase B onto Purolite® MN102 and its application in solvent-free and organic media esterification. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2017;40:23–34. doi: 10.1007/s00449-016-1671-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu C, Luo G. Synthesis of isoamyl acetate catalyzed by ferric tri-dodecylsulfonate. Riyong Huaxue Gongye. 2004;34:403–405. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Narwal SK, Saun NK, Dogra P, Gupta R. Green synthesis of isoamyl acetate via silica immobilized novel thermophilic lipase from Bacillus aerius. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2016;42:69–73. doi: 10.1134/S1068162016010118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pizzio L, Vázquez P, Cáceres C, Blanco M. Tungstophosphoric and molybdophosphoric acids supported on zirconia as esterification catalysts. Catal. Lett. 2001;77:233–239. doi: 10.1023/A:1013218307792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Saha, B., Alqahtani, A. & Teo, H. T. R. Production of iso-Amyl Acetate: Heterogeneous Kinetics and Techno-feasibility Evaluation for Catalytic Distillation. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 3(1), 10.2202/1542-6580.1231 (2005).
  • 36.Osorio-Viana W, Ibarra-Taquez HN, Dobrosz-Gomez I, Gómez-García MÁ. Hybrid membrane and conventional processes comparison for isoamyl acetate production. Chem. Eng. Process. 2014;76:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2013.12.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fang, M. et al. Synthesis of isoamyl acetate using polyoxometalate-based sulfonated ionic liquid as catalyst. Indian J. Chem. Sect. A53A, 1485–1492 (2014).
  • 38.Yang Z, Zhou C, Zhang W, Li H, Chen M. β-MnO 2 nanorods: A new and efficient catalyst for isoamyl acetate synthesis. Colloids Surf., A. 2010;356:134–139. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.01.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang Z, et al. Kinetic study and process simulation of transesterification of methyl acetate and isoamyl alcohol catalyzed by ionic liquid. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015;54:1204–1215. doi: 10.1021/ie503853v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dohendou M, Pakzad K, Nezafat Z, Nasrollahzadeh M, Dekamin MG. Progresses in chitin, chitosan, starch, cellulose, pectin, alginate, gelatin and gum based (nano)catalysts for the Heck coupling reactions: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021;192:771–819. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Valiey E, Dekamin MG, Alirezvani Z. Melamine-modified chitosan materials: An efficient and recyclable bifunctional organocatalyst for green synthesis of densely functionalized bioactive dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole and benzylpyrazolyl coumarin derivatives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;129:407–421. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dekamin MG, Kazemi E, Karimi Z, Mohammadalipoor M, Naimi-Jamal MR. Chitosan: An efficient biomacromolecule support for synergic catalyzing of Hantzsch esters by CuSO4. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016;93:767–774. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Valiey E, Dekamin MG, Bondarian S. Sulfamic acid grafted to cross-linked chitosan by dendritic units: A bio-based, highly efficient and heterogeneous organocatalyst for green synthesis of 2,3-dihydroquinazoline derivatives. RSC Adv. 2023;13:320–334. doi: 10.1039/D2RA07319F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dekamin MG, Azimoshan M, Ramezani L. Chitosan: A highly efficient renewable and recoverable bio-polymer catalyst for the expeditious synthesis of α-amino nitriles and imines under mild conditions. Green Chem. 2013;15:811–820. doi: 10.1039/C3GC36901C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Alirezvani Z, Dekamin MG, Valiey E. Cu (II) and magnetite nanoparticles decorated melamine-functionalized chitosan: A synergistic multifunctional catalyst for sustainable cascade oxidation of benzyl alcohols/Knoevenagel condensation. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:17758. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53765-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rostami N, Dekamin M, Valiey E, Fanimoghadam H. Chitosan-EDTA-Cellulose network as a green, recyclable and multifunctional biopolymeric organocatalyst for the one-pot synthesis of 2-amino-4H-pyran derivatives. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:8642–8642. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10774-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Frindy S, el Kadib A, Lahcini M, Primo A, García H. Copper nanoparticles stabilized in a porous chitosan aerogel as a heterogeneous catalyst for C−S cross-coupling. ChemCatChem. 2015;7:3307–3315. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201500565. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Pettignano A, et al. Alginic acid aerogel: A heterogeneous Brønsted acid promoter for the direct Mannich reaction. New J. Chem. 2015;39:4222–4226. doi: 10.1039/C5NJ00349K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Schnepp Z. Biopolymers as a flexible resource for nanochemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:1096–1108. doi: 10.1002/anie.201206943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Khrunyk Y, Lach S, Petrenko I, Ehrlich H. Progress in modern marine biomaterials research. Mar. Drugs. 2020;18:589. doi: 10.3390/md18120589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lee I. Molecular self-assembly: Smart design of surface and interface via secondary molecular interactions. Langmuir. 2013;29:2476–2489. doi: 10.1021/la304123b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Shaheed N, Javanshir S, Esmkhani M, Dekamin MG, Naimi-Jamal MR. Synthesis of nanocellulose aerogels and Cu-BTC/nanocellulose aerogel composites for adsorption of organic dyes and heavy metal ions. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:18553. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97861-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Abdullah, M. A. et al. Processing Aspects and biomedical and environmental applications of sustainable nanocomposites containing nanofillers. In Sustainable Polymer Composites and Nanocomposites, (eds Inamuddin et al.) 727–757 (Springer, Cham, 2019). 10.1007/978-3-030-05399-4_25
  • 54.Dekamin MG, et al. Alginic acid: A highly efficient renewable and heterogeneous biopolymeric catalyst for one-pot synthesis of the Hantzsch 1,4-dihydropyridines. RSC Adv. 2014;4:56658–56664. doi: 10.1039/C4RA11801D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ilkhanizadeh S, Khalafy J, Dekamin MG. Sodium alginate: A biopolymeric catalyst for the synthesis of novel and known polysubstituted pyrano[3,2-c]chromenes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;140:605–613. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dekamin MG, et al. Alginic acid: A mild and renewable bifunctional heterogeneous biopolymeric organocatalyst for efficient and facile synthesis of polyhydroquinolines. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;108:1273–1280. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rostami N, Dekamin MG, Valiey E. Chitosan-EDTA-cellulose bio-based network: A recyclable multifunctional organocatalyst for green and expeditious synthesis of Hantzsch esters. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2023;5:100279. doi: 10.1016/j.carpta.2022.100279. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta. 2008;76:965–977. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hill WJ, Hunter WG. A review of response surface methodology: A literature survey. Technometrics. 1966;8:571–590. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1966.10490404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hamidi F, et al. Acid red 18 removal from aqueous solution by nanocrystalline granular ferric hydroxide (GFH); optimization by response surface methodology & genetic-algorithm. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08769-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Han X-X, et al. Syntheses of novel halogen-free Brønsted–Lewis acidic ionic liquid catalysts and their applications for synthesis of methyl caprylate. Green Chem. 2015;17:499–508. doi: 10.1039/C4GC01470G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rehman K, et al. Operational parameters optimization for remediation of crude oil-polluted water in floating treatment wetlands using response surface methodology. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08517-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kamari S, Ghorbani F, Sanati AM. Adsorptive removal of lead from aqueous solutions by amine–functionalized magMCM-41 as a low–cost nanocomposite prepared from rice husk: Modeling and optimization by response surface methodology. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2019;13:100153. doi: 10.1016/j.scp.2019.100153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sanati AM, Kamari S, Ghorbani F. Application of response surface methodology for optimization of cadmium adsorption from aqueous solutions by Fe3O4@SiO2@APTMS core–shell magnetic nanohybrid. Surf. Interfaces. 2019;17:100374. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2019.100374. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Guner SG, Dericioglu A. Nacre-mimetic epoxy matrix composites reinforced by two-dimensional glass reinforcements. RSC Adv. 2016;6:33184–33196. doi: 10.1039/C5RA25049H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Shao Y, Zhao H-P, Feng X-Q. Optimal characteristic nanosizes of mineral bridges in mollusk nacre. RSC Adv. 2014;4:32451–32456. doi: 10.1039/C4RA04902K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jaji AZ, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and cytocompatibility of potential cockle shell aragonite nanocrystals for osteoporosis therapy and hormonal delivery. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2017;10:23. doi: 10.2147/NSA.S113030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Çam M, Aaby K. Optimization of extraction of apple pomace phenolics with water by response surface methodology. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:9103–9111. doi: 10.1021/jf1015494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Iwuchukwu IJ, et al. Optimization of photosynthetic hydrogen yield from platinized photosystem I complexes using response surface methodology. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2011;36:11684–11692. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hu C, et al. Characterization and photocatalytic activity of noble-metal-supported surface TiO2/SiO2. Appl. Catal. A. 2003;253:389–396. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(03)00545-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Noda LK, de Almeida RM, Probst LFD, Gonçalves NS. Characterization of sulfated TiO2 prepared by the sol–gel method and its catalytic activity in the n-hexane isomerization reaction. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2005;225:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2004.08.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Jalali-Heravi M, Parastar H, Ebrahimi-Najafabadi H. Characterization of volatile components of Iranian saffron using factorial-based response surface modeling of ultrasonic extraction combined with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis. J. Chromatogr. A. 2009;1216:6088–6097. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.06.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sendzikiene E, Sinkuniene D, Kazanceva I, Kazancev K. Optimization of low quality rapeseed oil transesterification with butanol by applying the response surface methodology. Renew. Energy. 2016;87:266–272. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Das R, Sarkar S, Bhattacharjee C. Photocatalytic degradation of chlorhexidine—a chemical assessment and prediction of optimal condition by response surface methodology. J. Water Process Eng. 2014;2:79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nandiwale KY, Galande ND, Bokade VV. Process optimization by response surface methodology for transesterification of renewable ethyl acetate to butyl acetate biofuel additive over borated USY zeolite. RSC Adv. 2015;5:17109–17116. doi: 10.1039/C4RA14771E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Soltani RDC, Safari M. Periodate-assisted pulsed sonocatalysis of real textile wastewater in the presence of MgO nanoparticles: Response surface methodological optimization. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2016;32:181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tan KT, Lee KT, Mohamed AR. A glycerol-free process to produce biodiesel by supercritical methyl acetate technology: An optimization study via response surface methodology. Biores. Technol. 2010;101:965–969. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Nagaraju N, Peeran M, Prasad D. Synthesis of isoamyl acetate usin NaX and NaY zeolites as catalysts. React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 1997;61:155–160. doi: 10.1007/BF02477528. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pizzio LR, Blanco MN. Isoamyl acetate production catalyzed by H3PW12O40 on their partially substituted Cs or K salts. Appl. Catal. A. 2003;255:265–277. doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(03)00565-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Dekamin MG, Karimi Z, Farahmand M. Tetraethylammonium 2-(N-hydroxycarbamoyl)benzoate: A powerful bifunctional metal-free catalyst for efficient and rapid cyanosilylation of carbonyl compounds under mild conditions. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012;2:1375–1381. doi: 10.1039/C2CY20037F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Dekamin MG, Sagheb-Asl S, Reza Naimi-Jamal M. An expeditious synthesis of cyanohydrin trimethylsilyl ethers using tetraethylammonium 2-(carbamoyl)benzoate as a bifunctional organocatalyst. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009;50:4063–4066. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.04.090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Alirezvani Z, Dekamin MG, Valiey E. New hydrogen-bond-enriched 1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl) isocyanurate covalently functionalized MCM-41: An efficient and recoverable hybrid catalyst for convenient synthesis of acridinedione derivatives. ACS Omega. 2019;4:20618–20633. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information. (554.5KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES