Abstract
While mpox was well characterised during the 2022 global Clade IIb outbreak, little is known about persistent morbidity. We present interim results of a prospective cohort study of 95 mpox patients assessed 3–20 weeks post-symptom onset. Two-thirds of participants had residual morbidity, including 25 with persistent anorectal and 18 with genital symptoms. Loss of physical fitness, new-onset/worsened fatigue and mental health problems were reported in 36, 19 and 11 patients, respectively. These findings require attention by healthcare providers.
Keywords: mpox, monkeypox, follow-up, sequelae, medium-term follow-up, long-term follow-up, fatigue
In the 2022 global outbreak of mpox (formerly monkeypox), the majority of patients presented with nonspecific prodromal symptoms and localised skin and mucosal lesions, especially affecting the anal and genital regions [1,2]. Most infections were mild, with only 6% of cases requiring hospitalisation and only five recorded deaths out of 25,506 cases detected in the European Union region up to January 2023 [3]. Nevertheless, acute complications like bacterial superinfection, proctitis, penile oedema, urinary retention and paraphimosis were common [1,2,4,5] and severe manifestations were reported, especially among immunocompromised patients [6,7]. Moreover, the later consequences of the disease remain unknown. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate the medium- and long-term morbidity following the acute episode of mpox. In this interim report, we present the results of the medium-term follow-up (3–20 weeks after infection) of a cohort of mpox patients at a sexual health clinic in Antwerp, Belgium.
Prospective follow-up of former mpox patients
Of over 300 mpox patients diagnosed at our clinic between May and October 2022, 169 mpox patients were interviewed during their first presentation and consented to be followed up. The follow-up study was designed to include the following visits: a first visit during the post-acute convalescent stage (intended 3–6 weeks post-symptom onset), and two later visits after 6 months and 1 year. Here, we present the interim results of the first visit only, as data collection for the subsequent visits is still ongoing.
Ninety-five (56.2%) of 169 participants attended the first visit (Table 1). Due to organisational and logistical reasons during the epidemic, only 61 (64.2%) of them attended within the foreseen time frame. The remaining 34 participants returned for their first visit after 7–20 weeks. For transparency, we report the results of these two groups of participants in this report as an ‘early’ and ‘late’ follow-up group, respectively.
Table 1. Population characteristics and severity assessment in mpox patients, Antwerp, Belgium, June–November 2022 (n = 169).
| Characteristics | Time of assessment | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At first visit/diagnosis | At follow-up | |||||||
| All mpox patients (n = 169) |
Follow-up group (n = 95) |
Follow-up group (3–20 weeks) (n = 95) |
Early (3–6 weeks) (n = 61) |
Late (7–20 weeks) (n = 34) |
||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | n | |
| Age in years, median (IQR) | 39 (33–46) | 39 (33–46) | 39 (33–46) | 40 (34–46) | 39 (32.8–53) | |||
| Cis-MSM | 169 | 100.0 | 95 | 100.0 | 95 | 100.0 | 61 | 34 |
| Living with HIVa | 57 | 33.7 | 28 | 29.5 | 28 | 29.5 | 16 | 12 |
| HIV-negative on PrEPb | 68/112 | 60.7 | 40/67 | 59.7 | 40/67 | 59.7 | 24/45 | 16/22 |
| Assumed smallpox childhood vaccination (born before 1976) | 36 | 21.3 | 22 | 23.2 | 22 | 23.2 | 12 | 10 |
| Emergency room attendance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4.2 | 2 | 2 |
| Complicationsc | 17 | 10.1 | 7 | 10.3 | 57 | 60.0 | 38 | 19 |
| WHO performance statusd | ||||||||
| 0 | 110 | 65.1 | 60 | 63.2 | 31 | 32.6 | 19 | 12 |
| 1 | 37 | 21.9 | 25 | 26.3 | 33 | 34.7 | 23 | 10 |
| 2 | 13 | 7.7 | 4 | 4.2 | 23 | 24.2 | 14 | 9 |
| 3 | 7 | 4.1 | 5 | 5.3 | 7 | 7.4 | 4 | 3 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 |
| Missing | 2 | 1.2 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of lesions (adapted WHO classification) [9]e | ||||||||
| 0 | 3 | 1.8 | 3 | 3.2 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 0 |
| 1–4 | 59 | 34.9 | 32 | 33.7 | 23 | 24.2 | 15 | 8 |
| 5–24 | 89 | 52.7 | 47 | 49.5 | 47 | 49.5 | 23 | 24 |
| 25–100 | 17 | 10.1 | 12 | 12.6 | 15 | 15.8 | 13 | 2 |
| > 100 | 1 | 0.6 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 1.1 | 1 | 0 |
| Missing | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8.4 | 8 | 0 |
ART: antiretroviral therapy; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; IQR: interquartile range; MSM: men who have sex with men; PrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis; WHO: World Health Organization.
a All patients living with HIV in this study were on ART.
b Denominators provided indicate all HIV-negative patients in the respective group studied.
c Observed complications: secondary skin infection, tonsillitis, proctitis and urethritis.
d WHO performance status: 0 - Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1 - Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g. light house work, office work. 2 - Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. 3 - Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. 4 - Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair. 5 - Dead. [17]
e Number of lesions at first visit included visible lesions of any stage (vesicle pustule, ulcer, scab or scar) on the skin and mucosa, and were diagnosed and counted by a physician. Number of lesions at follow-up visit reflected the estimated number of lesions observed during the entire mpox episode, reported by the patient.
Data were collected through standardised questionnaires during study visits; Supplementary Material S3 contains the questionnaires for physicians (part 2) and patients (part 1). Not all patients answered questions regarding fatigue and mental health, as these questions were added after revision of the questionnaire on 9 August 2022. Patients were considered to have medium-term mpox-associated morbidity if they reported persistent anorectal symptoms or sequelae, persistent genital symptoms or sequelae, worsening of fatigue, worsening of mental health problems or loss of physical fitness. These criteria were chosen based on our clinical experience with treating acute mpox patients [8], literature on mpox scar formation in endemic countries [9] and fatigue and loss of physical fitness as possible symptoms after viral infections in general [10–13]. In addition, we explored mental health problems as possible consequences of self-isolation and associated stigmatisation. Descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression models were performed in Stata (v14.0, StataCorp).
Overall, 42/61 patients in the early and 22/34 in the late group reported medium-term mpox-associated morbidity (Table 2).
Table 2. Health status assessment of mpox patients at follow-up 3–20 weeks after symptom onset, Antwerp, Belgium, June–November 2022 (n = 95).
| Health status | Follow-up group (early and late) (n = 95) |
3–6 weeks (early) (n = 61) |
7–20 weeks (late) (n = 34) |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | n | n | |
| Follow-up interval after symptom onset, median days (IQR) | 32 (26–51) | 28 (23–32) | 63 (49–91) |
| Persistent symptomsa | 64 | 42 | 22 |
| Anorectal symptoms | |||
| Anorectal symptoms during acute episode | 47 | 33 | 14 |
| - Proctitis during acute episode (clinical diagnosis) | 37 | 24 | 13 |
| No anorectal symptoms during acute episode | 48 | 28 | 20 |
| Ongoing anorectal symptoms among patients with anorectal problems during acute episode (multiple answers possible) | 25 | 17 | 8 |
| - Peri-anal scars at follow-up | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| - Anal pain at rest at follow-up | 13 | 10 | 3 (dayb 44, 58, 90) |
| - Loss of sensitivity due to anal lesions at follow-up | 1 | 0 | 1 (dayb 44) |
| - Anal pain during defaecation at follow-up | 14 | 12 | 2 (dayb 58, 90) |
| Anal receptive sex at follow-up | 19 | 11 | 8 |
| - Anal pain during receptive sex at follow-up | 7/19 | 4/11 | 3/8 (dayb 44, 96, 138) |
| Genital symptoms | |||
| Patients reporting genital lesions during acute episode | 45 | 32 | 13 |
| - Paraphimosis during acute episode | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| No genital symptoms during acute episode | 50 | 29 | 21 |
| Ongoing genital symptoms at follow-up among patients with genital problems during acute episode (multiple answers possible) | 18 | 12 | 6 |
| - Genital scars at follow-up | 11 | 7 | 4 |
| - Loss of sensitivity due to genital lesions at follow-up | 1 | 0 | 1 (dayb 79) |
| - Continued genital pain at rest at follow-up | 9 | 8 | 1 (dayb 107) |
| Having had erection since acute episode | 32 | 21 | 11 |
| - Genital pain during erection at follow-up | 8/32 | 7/21 | 1/11 (dayb 132) |
| Having had penetrative sex since acute episode | 20 | 11 | 8 |
| - Genital pain during penetrative sex at follow-up | 4/20 | 4/11 | 0/8 |
| Physical fitness, fatigue and mental health | |||
| Loss of physical fitness since acute episode | |||
| - None | 46 | 28 | 18 |
| - Mild (normal activities possible) | 25 | 17 | 8 |
| - Moderate (no sport possible) | 10 | 8 | 2 |
| - Severe (no normal activities possible) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| - Missing answer | 13 | 7 | 6 |
| Worsening or new-onset of fatiguec since acute episoded | 19/55 | 14/36 | 5/19 (dayb 43, 58, 71, 131, 132) |
| Worsening or new-onset of mental problemse since acute episoded | 11/55 | 10/36 | 1/19 (dayb 88) |
a Symptoms include scars, anorectal and genital symptoms, loss of physical fitness, fatigue and mental health issues.
b Day of follow-up visit after onset of symptoms of the acute episode.
c For symptoms of fatigue, patients were also asked to fill in the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Data not shown.
d Questions about fatigue and mental health problems were introduced after revision of the questionnaire on 9 August 2022 resulting in a lower number of sample size. Patients were asked if they had fatigue or mental health problems before onset of mpox. If they had pre-existing problems, they were asked if symptoms worsened since start of mpox. If they had no pre-exiting problems, they were asked if they had a new onset of problems since mpox. Worsening of existing problems and new onset of problems were then during the analysis combined as problems triggered by mpox. See questionnaires in Supplementary Material S3.
e For symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress, patients were also asked to fill in the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21). Data not shown.
Post-acute symptoms in the early follow-up group
Of the 61 mpox patients in the early group, 33 had (peri)anal lesions and/or proctitis during the acute disease. Among those, 17 had residual anal pain at follow-up: 10/33 at rest and 12/33 during defaecation. Thirty-two of the early group had genital lesions during the acute infection, of whom 12 reported persistent genital signs or symptoms 3–6 weeks later; 7 had genital scars and 8 genital pain at rest. Among 11 patients who had resumed sexual activity, four reported anal pain during receptive anal sex and another four had genital pain during penetrative sex (Figure 1 and Table 2). Nine in the early group reported moderate to severe loss of physical fitness compared with their pre-illness condition (Table 2). Among the 36 patients who were questioned regarding fatigue and mental health, 14 reported worsened or new self-perceived fatigue and 10 worsened or new mental health problems. Three patients had a Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21) score compatible with moderate to severe anxiety, three with moderate to severe depression and two with an elevated stress level (data not shown).
Figure 1.
Persistent anal (n = 33) and genital symptoms (n = 32) in mpox patients at follow-up 3–6 weeks after symptom onset, Antwerp, Belgium, June–November 2022
FU: follow-up.
Pain is based on a scale of 0–10, where 10 = maximum pain.
Persistent symptoms in the late follow-up group
In the late group, 14 patients had (peri)anal lesions and/or proctitis during the acute disease, of which eight reported residual anorectal signs or symptoms: anal pain at rest (n = 3) and/or during defaecation (n = 2), anorectal pain during receptive sex (n = 3), and scarring (n = 3) (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Persistent anal and genital symptoms (n = 14) in mpox patients at follow-up 7–20 weeks after symptom onset, Antwerp, Belgium, June–November 2022
FU: follow-up.
Pain is based on a scale of 0–10, where 10 = maximum pain. Early group: FU visit 3-6 weeks after onset of symptoms; late group: FU visit 7-20 weeks after onset of symptoms.
At diagnosis, 13 late follow-up patients had genital lesions. Six had residual genital problems at follow-up: genital scars (n = 4), loss of penile sensitivity (n = 1), pain during erection (n = 1) and genital pain at rest (n = 1).
Two late follow-up patients reported moderate to severe loss of physical fitness compared with their pre-mpox condition. Among the 19 patients who were questioned regarding fatigue and mental health, five reported worsening or new onset of fatigue and one reported a worsened or new mental health issue (i.e. mild anxiety). Supplementary Table S1 shows all patients with ongoing symptoms presenting after 6 weeks. Although no clear pattern emerged, persistent pain, especially in the anorectal region, seemed associated with severe pain during the acute episode. Nevertheless, severe pain in the beginning did not always result in persistent symptoms.
Risk factors for medium-term mpox-associated morbidity
Among all 95 participants of our study, the presence of medium-term mpox-associated morbidity was negatively associated with age (odds ratio (OR): 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91–0.99, p = 0.029). We assumed confounding by vaccine status and split age into two groups (< 47 years and ≤ 47 years). No association with age was found in the stratified groups but the younger age group showed four times higher risk for mpox-associated morbidity compared with the older group (OR: 4.41, 95% CI: 1.62–12.03, p = 0.004). Belonging to the younger group was also associated with a 10-times higher risk to develop fatigue (n = 55, OR: 10.4, 95% CI: 1.20–90.09, p = 0.034).
HIV status was not associated with mpox-associated morbidity, nor were the presence of systemic symptoms or complications the number of lesions or WHO performance status during the acute illness. See Supplementary Table S2 for a risk factor and log regression analysis in patients with any persistent symptom and the variables mentioned above. However, genital scarring seemed to be a risk factor for persistent genital pain at follow-up (n = 45, OR: 6.46, 95% CI: 1.33–31.32, p = 0.021).
Discussion
Two thirds of former mpox patients in our study presented with medium-term mpox-associated morbidity 3 to 20 weeks after their initial infection. Half of those who had anorectal pain at diagnosis still had anorectal complaints at follow-up and about one third of those with prior genital lesions had persistent genital issues at follow-up. Other common morbidities included loss of physical fitness and fatigue since the acute mpox episode, which were reported in the early as well as in the late follow-up group of patients. The latter is not surprising, as post-infectious fatigue is a common long-term consequence of many other infectious diseases such as coronavirus disease (COVID-19) or dengue [10-13]. Post-infectious fatigue in COVID-19 and dengue was associated with disease severity [13,14]. In our cohort, variation of mpox disease severity was very limited. However, older age was associated with a lower probability of medium-term mpox-associated morbidity and fatigue. Although the sample size was small and the older age group underrepresented, this observation may be a consequence of smallpox vaccination in individuals born in Belgium before 1976. It is unclear to what extent prior smallpox vaccination has mitigated the impact of mpox, as information about the childhood vaccination status of our participants was inconsistent and unreliable. A possible protective effect of smallpox vaccination against long-term mpox symptoms has not been described but a possible association of a milder course of mpox disease and history of a previous smallpox vaccination has been discussed by some authors [15,16].
New-onset or worsening of anxiety, stress and/or depressive symptoms were found in 20% of participants, mainly in the early follow-up group. Different factors might influence anxiety, stress and depressive mood after mpox; patients were confronted with a new and stigmatising disease, no definitive treatment was available and patients had to self-isolate for 3 weeks.
A major limitation of this study is that 44% of the mpox patients did not return for follow-up. Resolution of symptoms may have been an important reason for not returning to the clinic. Hence, patients with persisting symptoms may be overrepresented in our study. Furthermore, coherent follow-up of all patients during the mpox epidemic was difficult, and several patients presented later than planned. This resulted in a smaller sample size and a larger variation in time to follow-up than foreseen. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge there are no comparable prospective data published on the convalescence phase after acute Clade IIb mpox disease.
Conclusion
A high proportion of mpox patients presented with medium-term mpox-associated morbidity. Although most described health problems might eventually resolve, persistent symptoms may result in a significant reduction in quality of life and require further investigation in longitudinal studies. Most importantly, clinicians should be aware of the pain, scarring and mental health issues that may persist after a seemingly self-limiting illness like Clade IIb mpox.
Ethical statement
Suspects for monkeypox were asked to sign an informed consent form (ICF) if they agreed with further research of their samples and collection of the data and if they agreed to present for follow-up visits. The ICF was approved by the Institutional Review Board of ITM (Ref 1596/22). The ICF for the follow-up questionnaire was approved by the Institutional Review Board of ITM (ref 1628/22) and the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of the University of Antwerp (ref 3797). All patients of this study agreed to FU visits and signed the ICF for the FU study.
Funding statement
The study was funded by the Department of Economy, Science and Innovation (EWI) of the Flemish government.
Data availability
Anonymised data can be shared in agreement with the ITM data sharing policy.
Acknowledgements
We thank the patients for their participation.
Supplementary Data
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Authors’ contributions: NBR designed the follow-up study, was involved in patient management, data analysis and drafted the first manuscript. SB, JR, LVG, MH, CK collected the clinical data. SB and JR helped in designing the study. CB implemented the REDCap database and was responsible for data management. ITM MPX study group was involved in the clinical and laboratory management of the patients or in the laboratory and clinical research of this study. EB, PS, JVG and IB reviewed the first manuscript and gave valuable input at different stages of the study. MVE and KV supervised the molecular routine diagnostic for mpox patients at first diagnosis and during follow-up (laboratory data in preparation), CVD helped in the design of the study and drafted the first manuscript, LL supervised the study and data analysis and drafted the first manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Patrocinio-Jesus R, Peruzzu F. Monkeypox Genital Lesions. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(1):66. 10.1056/NEJMicm2206893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Yakubovsky M, Shasha D, Reich S, Tau L, Friedel N, Halutz O, et al. Mpox presenting as proctitis in men who have sex with men. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;76(3):528-30.; Epub ahead of print. 10.1093/cid/ciac737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Joint ECDC-WHO Regional Office for Europe Mpox Surveillance Bulletin: 18 January 2023. Stockholm: ECDC. [Accessed: 30 Jan 2023]. Available from: https://monkeypoxreport.ecdc.europa.eu
- 4. Mahtani AU, Engome YM, Haider M, Vu TM, Delp C, Katayifci EC, et al. Paraphimosis as a complication of monkeypox infection. J Surg Case Rep. 2022;2022(11):rjac533. 10.1093/jscr/rjac533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Davido B, D’anglejan E, Jourdan J, Robinault A, Davido G. Monkeypox 2022 outbreak: cases with exclusive genital lesions. J Travel Med. 2022;29(6):taac077. 10.1093/jtm/taac077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fink DL, Callaby H, Luintel A, Beynon W, Bond H, Lim EY, et al. Specialist and High Consequence Infectious Diseases Centres Network for Monkeypox . Clinical features and management of individuals admitted to hospital with monkeypox and associated complications across the UK: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;S1473-3099(22):00806-4.; Epub ahead of print. 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00806-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Miller MJ, Cash-Goldwasser S, Marx GE, Schrodt CA, Kimball A, Padgett K, et al. CDC Severe Monkeypox Investigations Team . Severe monkeypox in hospitalized patients - United States, August 10-October 10, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71(44):1412-7. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7144e1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hens M, Brosius I, Berens-Riha N, Coppens J, Van Gestel L, Rutgers J, et al. Characteristics of confirmed mpox cases among clinical suspects: A prospective single-centre study in Belgium during the 2022 outbreak. New Microbes New Infect. 2023;101093. 10.1016/j.nmni.2023.101093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.World Health Organization (WHO). Clinical management and infection prevention and control for monkeypox: Interim rapid response guidance, 10 June 2022. Geneva: WHO; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-MPX-Clinical-and-IPC-2022.1
- 10. White PD, Thomas JM, Kangro HO, Bruce-Jones WD, Amess J, Crawford DH, et al. Predictions and associations of fatigue syndromes and mood disorders that occur after infectious mononucleosis. Lancet. 2001;358(9297):1946-54. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06961-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Löwe B, Andresen V, Fraedrich K, Gappmayer K, Wegscheider K, Treszl A, et al. Psychological outcome, fatigue, and quality of life after infection with shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O104. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(11):1848-55. 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.02.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Seet RCS, Quek AML, Lim ECH. Post-infectious fatigue syndrome in dengue infection. J Clin Virol. 2007;38(1):1-6. 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.10.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mehandru S, Merad M. Pathological sequelae of long-haul COVID. Nat Immunol. 2022;23(2):194-202. 10.1038/s41590-021-01104-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sigera PC, Rajapakse S, Weeratunga P, De Silva NL, Gomes L, Malavige GN, et al. Dengue and post-infection fatigue: findings from a prospective cohort-the Colombo Dengue Study. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021;115(6):669-76. 10.1093/trstmh/traa110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Moschese D, Farinacci D, Pozza G, Ciccullo A, Cossu MV, Giacomelli A, et al. Is smallpox vaccination protective against human monkeypox? J Med Virol. 2023;95(1):e28077. 10.1002/jmv.28077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hoffmann C, Wolf E, Jessen H, Bickel M, Boesecke C, DAIG and DAGNAE . Is there any evidence for milder courses of monkeypox virus infections with childhood smallpox vaccination? Infection. 2022; Epub ahead of print. 10.1007/s15010-022-01923-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Young J, Badgery-Parker T, Dobbins T, Jorgensen M, Gibbs P, Faragher I, et al. Comparison of ECOG/WHO performance status and ASA score as a measure of functional status. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015;49(2):258-64. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


