Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Feb 17;18(2):e0281993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281993

Reported rates of all-cause serious adverse events following immunization with BNT-162b in 5–17-year-old children in the United States

Halinder S Mangat 1,*, Brady Rippon 2, Nikita T Reddy 3, Akheel A Syed 4, Joel M Maruthanal 1, Susanne Luedtke 5, Jyothy J Puthumana 6, Abhinash Srivatsa 7, Arnold Bosman 8, Patty Kostkova 9
Editor: Marwa Shawky Abdou10
PMCID: PMC9937486  PMID: 36800368

Abstract

Vaccine development against COVID-19 has mitigated severe disease. However, reports of rare but serious adverse events following immunization (sAEFI) in the young populations are fuelling parental anxiety and vaccine hesitancy. With a very early season of viral illnesses including COVID-19, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza, metapneumovirus and several others, children are facing a winter with significant respiratory illness burdens. Yet, COVID-19 vaccine and booster uptake remain sluggish due to the mistaken beliefs that children have low rates of severe COVID-19 illness as well as rare but severe complications from COVID-19 vaccine are common. In this study we examined composite sAEFI reported in association with COVID-19 vaccines in the United States (US) amongst 5-17-year-old children, to ascertain the composite reported risk associated with vaccination. Between December 13, 2020, and April 13, 2022, a total of 467,890,599 COVID-19 vaccine doses were administered to individuals aged 5–65 years in the US, of which 180 million people received at least 2 doses. In association with these, a total of 177,679 AEFI were reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event reporting System (VAERS) of which 31,797 (17.9%) were serious. The rates of ED visits per 100,000 recipients were 2.56 (95% CI: 2.70–3.47) amongst 5-11-year-olds, 18.25 (17.57–18.95) amongst 12-17-year-olds and 33.74 (33.36–34.13) amongst 18-65-year olds; hospitalizations were 1.07 (95% CI 0.87–1.32) per 100,000 in 5-11-year-olds, 6.83 (6.42–7.26) in 12-17-year olds and 8.15 (7.96–8.35) in 18–65 years; life-threatening events were 0.14 (95% CI: 0.08–0.25) per 100,000 in 5-11-year olds, 1.22 (1.05–1.41) in 12-17-year-olds and 2.96 (2.85–3.08) in 18–65 year olds; and death 0.03 (95% CI 0.01–0.10) per 100,000 in 5–11 year olds, 0.08 (0.05–0.14) amongst 12-17-year olds and 0.76 (0.71–0.82) in 18–65 years age group. The results of our study from national population surveillance data demonstrate rates of reported serious AEFIs amongst 5–17-year-olds which appear to be significantly lower than in 18-65-year-olds. These low risks must be taken into account in overall recommendation of COVID-19 vaccination amongst children.

Introduction

COVID-19 has caused twice as many hospitalizations amongst unvaccinated 5–11-year-olds and 4-times as many in 12–17-year-olds compared to age-matched vaccinated children [1]. Despite wide availability of vaccines, reports of rare but serious adverse events following immunization (sAEFI) have caused significant vaccine hesitancy amongst parents, with 42–66% reluctant or opposed to vaccination in children [2]. While myopericarditis following vaccination with mRNA vaccines has been reported in young male recipients, causing vaccine hesitancy, the absolute incidence of myopericarditis is 2–6 times lower than in those suffering COVID-19 [3]. This study examines the composite all-cause rates of sAEFI associated with COVID-19 vaccine amongst 5–17-year-olds recipients and reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reported System (VAERS) surveillance registry to estimate COVID-19 vaccine risks amongst children and compare these to adults.

Materials and methods

In this observational study, we analyzed data on sAEFI viz. hospitalizations, life-threatening events, and deaths reported to the VAERS following COVID-19 vaccination amongst 5-17-year-old and compared them to adults 18-65-year-olds between December 13, 2020, and April 13, 2022. All events that occurred up to 42 days after vaccination were included given the time-lags in manifestation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. The study was exempt from institutional ethical review per institutional requirements, as it is secondary analysis of publicly available and anonymized data. No consent was required for the collection of data.

VAERS is a voluntary adverse event reporting system for all vaccines administered to children or adults, established by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [4]. Healthcare providers are required to report any listed adverse event from the VAERS ‘Table of Reportable Events’, such as hospitalization, life-threatening event, death, permanent disability, congenital anomaly, or birth defect that occurs following vaccination within a pre-specified time-period, or any similar adverse event listed as a contraindication to further doses of the vaccine. The VAERS registry includes data on demographics, geographical location, date(s) of vaccination, date(s) of adverse event report, symptoms, recovery, disability, and if there is a report that any healthcare was sought; all entries are anonymized, and data is publicly accessible. Unlike absolute risks, sAEFI rates in VAERS are subject to biases. As stated above, whilst reporting rates of all AEFI range widely (28–72%), sAEFI are more accurately recorded by physicians and reported in hospitals, compared to minor AEFIs seen in primary care [5]. We have previously used similar methodology to report on incidences of reported sAEFIs amongst adults [6].

Exposure

The primary exposures of interest were SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: BNT-162b2 (Comirnaty, Pfizer-BioNTech) for children and BNT-162b2, mRNA-1273 (Spikevax, Moderna) and Ad26.COV2.S (Jcovden, Janssen) for adults. National vaccine administration demographics and vaccine manufacturer data were obtained from the CDC public access portal [7, 8].

Outcomes

We focused on sAEFI viz. hospitalizations, life-threatening events, and deaths attributed to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines due to population level implications. In addition, we included emergency department (ED) visits to determine whether increased visits to ED were related to sAEFI. These four healthcare outcomes are also less likely to be underreported; adverse events serious enough to warrant a hospital visit are mandated to be reported to VAERS [9].

Statistical analysis

The VAERS dataset for all AEFI attributed to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines was downloaded, reformatted, and restricted to vaccines administered between December 13, 2020, and April 13, 2022. Duplicate entries, those with missing vaccination date or manufacturer information were excluded. Data on numbers of 1st, 2nd and booster vaccine doses administered were available, but the adverse events are not reported by dose number; therefore, it was not possible to calculate reported event rates per persons or dose sequence, but rather per total doses administered.

Determination of cumulative reporting rates

Cumulative reporting rates of each reported outcome were calculated for each vaccine and vaccine type. Rates were calculated as cumulative reported sAEFI per 100,000 administered doses for the period for each vaccine, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated. Additional descriptive analyses included the generation of graphical outputs of temporal trajectories of moving 7-day averages of sAEFI for the three vaccines to visualize timelines of reporting rates.

Comparing relative rates for sAEFI reporting between vaccines

A generalized Poisson regression model was used to calculate reporting incidence rate ratios (IRR) for each of the four outcomes (i.e., ED visits, hospitalizations, life-threatening events, and death) with 95% CIs. The model was adjusted for age [grouped as 5–11, 12–17, 18–65 (referent category)] and sex [males and females (referent category)]. All data management and formatting were carried out in Stata 17 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). All statistical analyses were performed in RStudio (1.4.1717).

Results

A total of 467,890,599 vaccine doses were administered to individuals aged 5–65 years and a total of 180,581,278 individuals were fully vaccinated (with 2-doses of mRNA and 1 dose of Janssen) with any vaccine (Table 1). BNT-162b2 was the sole vaccine approved for the 5–17-year-olds during the period of this study though very rare sAEFI were also reported to mRNA-1273 and Ad26.COV2.S possibly from off-label use.

Table 1. Descriptive characteristics of the cohort.

All SARS-CoV2 N(%) BNT-162b2 n (%) mRNA-1273 n (%) Ad26.COV2.S n (%)
Fully vaccinated (%) 180,581,278 108,226,689 (59.93) 57,629,041 (31.91) 14,725,548 (8.15)
Age category (years)
5–11 3,844 (1.00) 3,791 (2.13) 50 (0.03) 3 (0.01)
12–17 14,856 (3.85) 12,455 (7.01) 1,978 (1.13) 423 (1.29)
18–65 367,505 (95.16) 161,433 (90.86) 173,664 (98.85) 32,408 (98.70)
Sex
Female 276,780 (71.67) 125,136 (70.43) 131,003 (74.56) 20,641 (62.86)
Male 106,782 (27.65) 51,218 (28.83) 43,485 (24.75) 12,079 (36.79)
Missing 2,643 (0.68) 1,325 (0.75) 1,204 (0.69) 114 (0.35)
Any Adverse Events (%) 386,205 177,679 (46.01) 175,692 (45.49) 32,834 (8.50)

Characteristics of patients with reported serious adverse events within 42 days of receiving SARS-CoV2 vaccination between December 13, 2020, and April 13, 2022, inclusive. (Data was obtained from the vaccine adverse events reported system (VAERS) registry in the United States). (BNT-162b2 –Pfizer-Biontech; mRNA-1273 –Moderna; Ad26.COV2.S –Janssen)

Amongst all recipients, AEFIs attributed to BNT-162b totalled 177,679 and sAEFI were 31,797. The overall crude cumulative reported rate of sAEFI per 100,000 fully vaccinated was lowest for 5–11 years age group [3.06 (95% CI 2.70–3.47)] followed by 12–17 [18.25 (95% CI 17.57–18.95)] and 18–65 years [33.74 (95% CI 33.36–34.13)] (Table 2). The crude cumulative reported rates per 100,000 fully vaccinated 5–11-year-olds for ED visits were 2.56 (95% CI 2.23–2.94), hospitalizations 1.07 (95% CI 0.87–1.32), life-threatening events 0.14 (95% CI 0.08–0.25) and death 0.03 (0.01–0.10). The respective rates for 12–17-year-olds for ED visits were 14.39 (95% CI 13.79–15.01), hospitalization 6.83 (95% CI 6.42–7.26), life-threatening events 1.22 (95% CI 1.05–1.41) and death 0.08 (95% CI 0.05–0.14) (Fig 1).

Table 2. Crude cumulative reported rates for serious adverse events associated with BNT-162b2 amongst over 5-year-old vaccinated recipients.

Total reported events n (%) Crude cumulative 42-day reported rate (95% CI)
Any reported adverse event 177,679
5–11yrs 3,791 (2.13) 47.78 (46.28–49.32)
12–17yrs 12,455 (7.01) 84.36 (82.90–85.86)
18–65yrs 161,433 (90.86) 188.75 (187.83–189.67)
Any reported serious adverse event 31,797 (17.90) 29.38 (29.06–29.70)
5–11yrs 243 (0.76) 3.06 (2.70–3.47)
12–17yrs 2,694 (8.47) 18.25 (17.57–18.95)
18–65yrs 28,860 (90.76) 33.74 (33.36–34.13)
ED visit 27,774 (15.63) 25.66 (25.36–25.97)
5–11yrs 203 (0.73) 2.56 (2.23–2.94)
12–17yrs 2,124 (7.65) 14.39 (13.79–15.01)
18–65yrs 25,447 (91.62) 29.75 (29.39–30.12)
Hospitalization 8,067 (4.54) 7.45 (7.29–7.62)
5–11yrs 85 (1.05) 1.07 (0.87–1.32)
12–17yrs 1,008 (12.50) 6.83 (6.42–7.26)
18–65yrs 6,974 (86.45) 8.15 (7.96–8.35)
Life-threatening event 2,723 (1.53) 2.52 (2.42–2.61)
5–11yrs 11 (0.40) 0.14 (0.08–0.25)
12–17yrs 180 (6.61) 1.22 (1.05–1.41)
18–65yrs 2,532 (92.99) 2.96 (2.85–3.08)
Death 667 (0.38) 0.62 (0.57–0.66)
5–11yrs 2 (00.30) 0.03 (0.01–0.10)
12–17yrs 12 (1.80) 0.08 (0.05–0.14)
18–65yrs 653 (97.90) 0.76 (0.71–0.82)

Crude cumulative reported rate of serious adverse events occurring within 42 days after SARS-CoV2 vaccination, amongst all recipients of BNT-162b2 recipients above the age of 5 years reported to VAERS between December 13, 2020, and April 13, 2022. Reported rate is expressed per 100,000 patients fully vaccinated with BNT-162b2. CI–confidence intervals; ED–emergency department

Fig 1. Monthly crude cumulative reported rate of sAEFI types occurring within 42 days after SARS-CoV2 vaccination among recipients of BNT-162b in adults (>17 years), and 5–11 and 12–17-year-old children.

Fig 1

Reported rates are expressed per 100,000 patients fully vaccinated. Temporal trends have been smoothed using local polynomial regression lines. A slight increase in all rates reflects the concomitant delta wave in US during winter 2021. The scale is reduced (0–4 per 100,000 & 0–1 per 100,000 for life-threatening events and deaths respectively) in insets to demonstrate minimal risk increase of these events concurrently as well.

Compared to 18–65-year-olds, IRRs in 5–11 and 12–17-year groups were lower for all reported sAEFI except for ED visits in 12–17-year-olds [IRR 1.08 (95% CI 1.04–1.13)] and hospitalizations [IRR 1.60 (95% CI 1.50–1.70)] (Table 3).

Table 3. Incidence rate ratios for reported outcomes.

ED visit Hospitalisation Life-threatening events Death
IRR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI) IRR (95% CI)
Age group (years)
18–65 (referent) 1 1 1 1
12–17 1.08 (1.04–1.13) 1.60 (1.50–1.70) 0.79 (0.68–0.92) 0.17 (0.10–0.31)
5–11 0.34 (0.30–0.39) 0.43 (0.35–0.54) 0.16 (0.09–0.28) 0.09 (0.02–0.37)
Sex
Female (referent) 1 1 1 1
Male 1.02 (0.99–1.04) 2.10 (2.01–2.19) 1.97 (1.82–2.12) 4.28 (3.66–5.01)
Missing 0.40 (0.32–0.49) 0.46 (0.31–0.70) 0.77 (0.44–1.35) 4.57 (2.50–8.33)

Multivariable Generalised Poisson regression model exploring association between the age and outcomes among recipients of BNT-162b2, adjusted for sex. (December 13, 2020, to April 13, 2022, inclusive). IRR–Incidence Rate Ratio; CI–confidence intervals; ED–emergency department.

Males in the whole cohort had higher reported rates for sAEFI. IRRs for age-sex interactions (reference group 18–65-year-old females) showed a higher reported rate of hospitalization for 12–17-year-old males [IRR 1.43 (95% CI 1.24–1.65)].

Discussion

These data demonstrate that overall reported rates of sAEFI amongst children following BNT-162b vaccination in the United States are very low. However, compared to adults, 12–17-year-olds appear to have a higher rate of reported ED visits and hospitalizations, but this did not translate into increase in reported life-threatening events or deaths. The main related clinical diagnosis reported has been myopericarditis, with an estimated incidence of 17/100,000 doses. Of those hospitalized, 96% were only for observation, with 98% discharged home, and very rare deaths [10]. These rates closely mirror both the overall crude rates of reported hospitalizations from VAERS (6.8/100,000 fully vaccinated (2 doses), i.e., 14 per 100,000 doses), as well as rates of composite all-cause life-threatening events and deaths in the surveillance data. Reported sAEFI rates from these post-marketing safety surveillance data are reassuring in that the nationwide data on all-cause sAEFI are limited to hospitalizations (for observation in myopericarditis) but extremely rare life-threatening events or deaths in this age group. We have demonstrated similarly low rates amongst adult age-groups as well [6].

These data are useful to public health officials to reassure anxious parents and adolescents and help enhance vaccine trust. Of the reported 50% of parents willing to have their children receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, only about one-fifth reported that they will actually vaccinate their children within 3 months of their eligibility [11]. Additionally, children who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 via nucleic acid test are more likely to have post-COVID-19 conditions such as systemic symptoms, fever, lethargy, anorexia, myalgia, edema, respiratory symptoms, chest pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, neurological symptoms, or rashes up to 90–120 days after an ED visit [12]. Meanwhile vaccination was associated with preventing ED and urgent care visits among 12-17-year-olds during both Delta and Omicron waves, 89% and 73%, respectively [13] while protecting against severe illness and hospitalization [14].

Limitations

The raw data was obtained from VAERS, a national vaccine safety surveillance database, which is limited by reporting and information biases thus may not accurately assess the absolute incidence of sAEFI but may provide early data on actual reports of sAEFI [4]. However, serious AEFI are more likely to occur in hospitals given they involve hospitalization, life-threatening events, or death. And hospital-based physicians have demonstrated greater reported rates than community physicians who may primarily diagnose milder AEFIs in their outpatient practice [5]. That is why we selected serious adverse events and anticipate greater accuracy in their reporting.

Conclusion

Rates of reported sAEFI after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with BNT-162b2 appear to be very low amongst 5–17-year-old children, particularly when compared to adults. Vaccine-related hospitalizations were reported more often in 12–17-year-old males but did not appear to progress to life-threatening events or death, but the overall reported rates were very low. The low rates of reported sAEFI suggest that BNT-162b2 vaccination is safe in children. As COVID-19 becomes endemic and the cumulative risk of long-COVID increases, safety data from surveillance databases such as VAERS are helpful, and must be utilized to assuage parental anxiety, assist primary care physicians to adequately inform their patients, and for public health officials to promote trust in vaccines. Accurate and timely articulation of these adverse events data are paramount to dispelling misinformation or confusion.

Abbreviations

Ad26.COV2.S

Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine

BNT-162b

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine

CI

Confidence Interval

COVID-19

coronavirus disease 2019

ED

Emergency Department

IRR

Incidence rate ratio

mRNA

messenger ribonucleic acid

mRNA-1723

Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine

sAEFI

serious adverse event following immunisation

SARS-CoV-2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

VAERS

Vaccine Adverse Events Reported Systems

Data Availability

All data files are available from the VAERS database: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Dorabawila V, Hoefer D, Bauer UE, Bassett MT, Lutterloh E, Rosenberg ES. Risk of Infection and Hospitalization Among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children and Adolescents in New York After the Emergence of the Omicron Variant. JAMA. 2022;327(22):2242–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gerber JS, Offit PA. COVID-19 vaccines for children. Science. 2021;374(6570):913. doi: 10.1126/science.abn2566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kuehn BM. Cardiac Complications More Common After COVID-19 Than Vaccination. JAMA. 2022;327(20):1951. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.8061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System: VAERS Data [Internet]. Health and Human Services. 2022 [cited 15 January, 2022]. https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html.
  • 5.McNeil MM, Li R, Pickering S, Real TM, Smith PJ, Pemberton MR. Who is unlikely to report adverse events after vaccinations to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)? Vaccine. 2013;31(24):2673–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mangat HS, Musah A, Luedtke S, Syed AA, Maramattom BV, Maruthanal J, et al. Analyses of reported severe adverse events after immunization with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the United States: One year on. Front Public Health. 2022;10:972464. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.COVID-19 Vaccination Demographics in the United States, National [Internet]. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2022 [cited 15 January, 2022]. https://data.cdc.gov/Vaccinations/COVID-19-Vaccination-Demographics-in-the-United-St/km4m-vcsb/data.
  • 8.COVID-19 Vaccinations in the United States, Jurisdiction [Internet]. 2022 [cited 15 January, 2022]. https://data.cdc.gov/Vaccinations/COVID-19-Vaccinations-in-the-United-States-Jurisdi/unsk-b7fc.
  • 9.Shimabukuro TT, Nguyen M, Martin D, DeStefano F. Safety monitoring in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Vaccine. 2015;33(36):4398–405. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oster ME, Shay DK, Su JR, Gee J, Creech CB, Broder KR, et al. Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021. JAMA. 2022;327(4):331–40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Scherer AM, Gidengil CA, Gedlinske AM, Parker AM, Askelson NM, Woodworth KR, et al. COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions, Concerns, and Facilitators Among US Parents of Children Ages 6 Months Through 4 Years. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(8):e2227437. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Funk AL, Kuppermann N, Florin TA, Tancredi DJ, Xie J, Kim K, et al. Post-COVID-19 Conditions Among Children 90 Days After SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2223253. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tartof SY, Frankland TB, Slezak JM, Puzniak L, Hong V, Xie F, et al. Effectiveness Associated With BNT162b2 Vaccine Against Emergency Department and Urgent Care Encounters for Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Adolescents Aged 12 to 17 Years. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(8):e2225162. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tan SHX, Cook AR, Heng D, Ong B, Lye DC, Tan KB. Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Vaccine against Omicron in Children 5 to 11 Years of Age. The New England journal of medicine. 2022;387(6):525–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2203209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Marwa Shawky Abdou

7 Feb 2023

Reported Rates of All-Cause Serious Adverse Events Following Immunization with BNT-162b in 5–17-Year-Old Children in the United States

PONE-D-22-34028

Dear Dr. Mangat,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Marwa Shawky Abdou, DPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

1. Please note that in order to use the direct billing option the corresponding author must be affiliated with the chosen institute. Please respond by return e-mail so that we can amend your submission or remove this option. We can make any changes on your behalf.

Additional Editor Comments: Please construct abstract more specifically by background, methods, results, and conclusion

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This article describes reports of serious adverse events submitted to the US adverse event surveillance system VAERS. It is a straightforward summary of publicly available data, stratified to provide comparison across 3 age categories. Conclusions are drawn on the lower reporting of serious adverse events in children and adolescents compared to adults as a reference group. The paper is clearly written and provides appropriate analysis and conclusions.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Marwa Shawky Abdou

9 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-34028

Reported Rates of All-Cause Serious Adverse Events Following Immunization with BNT-162b in 5–17-Year-Old Children in the United States

Dear Dr. Mangat:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Marwa Shawky Abdou

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    All data files are available from the VAERS database: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES