Skip to main content
STAR Protocols logoLink to STAR Protocols
. 2023 Feb 7;4(1):102106. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102106

Protocol for quantitative evaluation of the impact of paracrine senescence on cellular reprogramming in cultured cells and mouse models

Jérémy Chantrel 1,2,4,5, Cheng Chen 1,4,5,, Jun Zhang 3, Han Li 1,6,∗∗
PMCID: PMC9937951  PMID: 36853727

Summary

We present a protocol to evaluate the impact of senescence secretome on reprogramming to pluripotency using both cellular and mouse models. First, we describe the in vitro reprogramming procedure using conditioned medium derived from senescent cells. Next, to explore the impact of senescence on in vivo reprogramming, we detail the steps to identify senescent and reprogrammed cells in mouse skeletal muscle, followed by semi-automatic quantification. This protocol can be used to study the effect of paracrine senescence on cellular plasticity.

For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to von Joest et al. (2022).1

Subject areas: Cell Biology, Cell culture, Microscopy, Model Organisms, Stem Cells

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • Protocol for studying the effect of paracrine senescence on cellular reprogramming

  • Assessment of in vitro reprogramming in cultured cells and in vivo reprogramming in mice

  • Steps for co-staining senescent cells with cell-identity markers in tissue

  • Semi-automatic quantification of SA-β-Gal+ senescent cells in tissue sections


Publisher’s note: Undertaking any experimental protocol requires adherence to local institutional guidelines for laboratory safety and ethics.


We present a protocol to evaluate the impact of senescence secretome on reprogramming to pluripotency using both cellular and mouse models. First, we describe the in vitro reprogramming procedure using conditioned medium derived from senescent cells. Next, to explore the impact of senescence on in vivo reprogramming, we detail the steps to identify senescent and reprogrammed cells in mouse skeletal muscle, followed by semi-automatic quantification. This protocol can be used to study the effect of paracrine senescence on cellular plasticity.

Before you begin

Senescence regulates cellular plasticity in cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous manners. The senescence secretome, known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), is crucial for non-cell autonomous functions of senescence. Notably, SASP composition is stress- and cell-type dependent. To identify specific SASP factors important for promoting cellular plasticity, we use a reprogrammable mouse model (i4F), Rosa26-rtTA, and TetO-OSKM. Reprogramming can be induced by the addition of doxycycline (DOX). This protocol is divided into in vitro and in vivo sections. First, we describe the conditioned medium (CM) system to compare the effects of stress-dependent paracrine senescence on in vitro reprogramming. Second, to explore the impact of paracrine senescence on in vivo reprogramming, we detail the specific steps of the co-identification of senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal+) and reprogramming cells (Nanog+) in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of reprogrammable mice. Previously, we’ve shown the combination of injury and DOX administration results in senescence induction and reprogramming of TAs.2 Finally, we describe a semi-automatic image analysis program for quantifying the number of senescent cells in vivo.

The in vitro part of the protocol can be applied to any cellular system of cell fate conversion, with some modifications to the CM supplementation step (see conditioned iPSC medium). The in vivo part of the protocol can be applied to any tissue from i4F mice, with some adjustments in SA-β-Gal staining incubation time, to animals of both sexes and of different ages, from adulthood to age. Moreover, this part of the protocol can facilitate the identification and quantification of senescent cells in physiological and pathological processes, beyond reprogramming.

The materials, reagents, concentrations, and equipment used in this protocol are described in detail below. All the cells used in this protocol are mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) collected at 13.5 embryonic stage following standard protocol.

Before beginning the protocol:

  • 1.

    Derive MEFs from both WT and i4F mice.

  • 2.

    Induce senescence in the WT MEFs.

  • 3.

    Prepare the following solutions listed in materials and equipment.

Institutional permissions

All procedures involving mice, including breeding and experiments, were performed according to the European Community guidelines and protocols approved by the ethics committee of the Institut Pasteur (CETEA).

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCES SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Antibodies

F4/80 (1:200) Invitrogen MA516624
Rabbit anti-Nanog (H22) (2 μg/mL) Cambridge Research Biochemicals (CRB) Custom-made
HRP-anti-rabbit (Ready for use, 200 μL/reaction) Dako K4003

Experimental models: Cell lines

293T/17 (recommended range of passage: 1–7) ATCC ATCC-CRL-11268

Recombinant DNA

Plasmid: pBabe-Ras Gift from William Hahn (viral vectors) Addgene 9051
Plasmid: pCL Eco Naviaux et al.3 Addgene 12371
Plasmid: pBabe-PURO-EGFP(PIG) Gift from Scott Lowe (Lowe Lab Plasmids) Addgene 18751

Experimental models: Organisms/strains

C57BL/6 WT mice (8 weeks old males) Jackson Laboratory 000664
i4F mice (8 weeks old males, JCW; rtTA+/KI; OSKM+/Tg) Gift from Manuel Serrano4 N/A

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) Gibco 31966-021
Fetal bovine serum (FBS), previously inactivated at 56°C for 30 min in a water bath Gibco 10270-106
KnockOut™ Serum Replacement (KSR) Gibco 10828-028
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), without calcium, and without magnesium Gibco 14190144
GlutaMAX™ 100× Gibco 35050-061
Gelatin
Non-essential amino acids 100× Sigma-Aldrich M7145
β-mercaptoethanol Gibco 31350-040
Penicillin/streptomycin (Pen/Strep) 100× Gibco 15140-122
Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) Miltenyi Biotec 130-095
Doxycycline (DOX) Sigma-Aldrich 9891
Fugene6 Promega E2693
Polybrene (0.8 mg/mL stock solution) ABP Biosciences D025
Cardiotoxin Merck Chimie SAS 217503
2-methylbutane Sigma-Aldrich 320404-1L
Tragacanth VWR PROLABO 24437.260
32% Paraformaldehyde (PFA) Electron Microscopy Science 15714
50% Glutaraldehyde Sigma 49629
Triton X-100 Sigma 9002-93-1
X-Gal Euromedex EU0012
Potassium hexacyanoferrate (iii) K3Fe(CN)6 Sigma P8131
Potassium hexacyanoferrate (ii) K4Fe(CN)6 Sigma P9387
MgCl2 Sigma M8266
NP40 Sigma I8896
Normal goat serum (NGS) Thermo Fisher 10189722
Bovine serum albumin (BSA) Sigma A3608
Fast-red Vector H3403
Eukitt ® Quick-hardening mounting media Sigma 03989

Critical commercial assays

DAB staining kit Agilent Technologies France K346811-2
Alkaline phosphatase activity assay Sigma AB0300

Software and algorithms

Fiji 2.9.0 Schindelin et al.5 https://imagej.net/software/fiji/
GraphPad Prism 9.4.1 GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA www.graphpad.com
Python 3.8 Python Software Foundation https://www.python.org/
Anaconda Software Distribution Anaconda Inc. https://www.anaconda.com/products/distribution
PyCharm 2022.3.1 JetBrains https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/

Deposited data

The Showblue code This paper https://github.com/CroixJeremy2/Showblue or https://zenodo.org/record/7528943

Other

P100 plates Corning 353003
6-well plates Corning 353046
Superfrost plus slides Fisher Scientific 10149870
DAKO pen Agilent Technologies France S200230-2
Scanning microscope vs120 Olympus VS120
Inverted cell culture microscope Olympus CKX41
0.20 μm sterile filter Clearline 146560
0.45 μm sterile filter Clearline 146561
Syringe BD Medical 10 mL: 309110
20 mL: 300865
50 mL: 300613
Cork Dutscher Dominique 764020
Ultracentrifuge Beckman Coulter Optima XPN-80 (SW32Ti rotor)

Inline graphicCRITICAL: DAB is a Carcinogenic, mutagenic and reprotoxic (CMR) chemical. It is toxic to reproduction. Always wear proper protective equipment and use it only in a fume hood with filter tips. DAB wastes need to be collected and disposed according to institutional regulations.

Materials and equipment

In vitro cell culture media

For culture senescent MEFs: MEF medium

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Amount
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) 100% 90.50% 500 mL
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) 100% 9.05% 50 mL
Penicillin/Streptomycin (Pen/Strep) 10,000 U/mL 45.25 U/mL (0.45%) 2.5 mL
Total N/A N/A 552.5 mL

Can be stored at 4°C up to 3 months.

For collecting senescent conditioned medium: conditioned MEF medium

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Amount
DMEM 100% 90.50% 500 mL
KSR (KnockOut™ Serum Replacement) 100% 9.05% 50 mL
Pen/Strep 10,000 U/mL 45.25 U/mL (0.45%) 2.5 mL
Total N/A N/A 552.5 mL

Can be stored at −20°C up to 1 month.

For reprogramming: iPSC medium

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Amount
DMEM 100% 82.47% 500 mL
KSR (KnockOut™ Serum Replacement) 100% 14.85% 90 mL
Pen/Strep 10,000 U/mL 49.48 U/mL (0.49%) 3 mL
Non-essential amino acids 100× 1× (0.99%) 6 mL
GlutaMAX™ 100× 1× (0.99%) 6 mL
β-mercapto ethanol 50 mM 98.97 μM (0.20%) 1.2 mL
Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) 1.0 × 107 U/mL 989.67 U/mL (0.01%) 60 μL
Total N/A N/A 606.26 mL

Can be stored at 4°C up to 2 months.

For reprogramming with senescent conditioned medium: conditioned iPSC medium

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Amount for 10 mL
Senescent conditioned medium 100% 82.79% 8.279 mL
KSR (KnockOut™ Serum Replacement) 100% 15% 1.5 mL
Non-essential amino acids 100× 1× (1%) 100 μL
GlutaMAX™ 100× 1× (1%) 100 μL
β-mercapto ethanol 50 mM 2 μM (0.20%) 20 μL
LIF 1.0 × 107 U/mL 1000 U/mL (0.01%) 1 μL
Total N/A N/A 10 mL

Must be prepared freshly: reconstitute senescent conditioned medium with additional KSR and other reagents listed above before use.

DOX solution stock: 1 mg/mL in H2O, stored at −20°C for up to two years.

Senescent cell detection: SA-β-gal staining

SA-β-Gal staining fixation buffer

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Amount
Paraformaldehyde (PFA) 32% 2% 20 mL
Glutaraldehyde 50% 0.2% 1.28 mL
PBS N/A N/A 298.72 mL
Total 320 mL

The fixation solution can be stored at 4°C up to 6 months.

SA-β-Gal staining buffer

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Amount
K3Fe(CN)6 100 mM 4 mM 400 μL
K4Fe(CN)6 100 mM 4 mM 400 μL
MgCl2 (0.20 μm filtered) 1 M 2 mM 20 μL
X-Gal solution 50 mg/mL 0.4 mg/mL 80 μL
NP40 100% 0.1% 10 μL
PBS (pH = 5.5) N/A N/A 9.09 mL
Total 10 mL

Must be prepared freshly on the day required.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: PFA and Glutaraldehyde are hazardous. Always wear proper protective equipment and use it only in a fume hood. PFA wastes need to be collected and disposed according to institutional regulations.

Immunohistochemical blocking solution

Reagent Stock concentration Final concentration Amount
Triton X-100 10% 0.3% 300 μL
Normal goat serum 100% 10% 1 mL
BSA 10% 0.2% 200 μL
PBS N/A N/A 8.5 mL
Total 10 mL

Blocking solutions must be prepared freshly.

Step-by-step method details

PART I: In vitro reprogramming using senescence conditioned medium

Senescent cells generation via oncogene overexpression: Oncogene-induced senescence (OIS)

Inline graphicTiming: 9 days

This section describes how to generate senescent cells via the OIS method.

  • 1.
    Day 1:
    • a.
      Seed HEK293T cells at 5 × 106 cells/P100 plate in MEF medium overnight.
    • b.
      Prepare the plasmid cocktails:
      • i.
        4 μg of pBabe-ras + 4 μg of pCLEco.
      • ii.
        4 μg of pBabe-PURO-EGFP (PIG) + 4 μg of pCLEco.
    • c.
      For each plasmid cocktail, prepare a mix of 24 μL of Fugene6 and 576 μL of DMEM (600 μL total volume), and incubate at room temperature (RT, 20°C–25°C) for 5 min.
    • d.
      Add the plasmid cocktail into the DMEM + Fugene6 mix and incubate for 45 min at RT.
    • e.
      Add the DNA/Fugene6 mix to the HEK293T cells.
      Note: Do not remove the medium from the culture plate, simply add the Fugene6/DNA mix to the medium dropwise with the P1000 pipette, distributing it around the plate.
    • f.
      The same day, thaw one vial of the primary MEFs, and plate all of them onto one P100 plate.
  • 2.
    Day 2:
    • a.
      Replace the HEK293T cells medium with 10 mL of fresh MEF medium.
    • b.
      Seed MEFs at 5 × 105 cells/P100 plate for infection in MEF medium.
  • 3.
    Day 3:
    • a.
      Collect the medium from transfected HEK293T cells and replace with 10 mL of fresh MEF medium.
    • b.
      Centrifuge each medium separately at 2,000 g for 5 min at RT to remove cell debris.
    • c.
      Filter the supernatants with 0.45 μm filters separately.
    • d.
      Add Polybrene (8 μg/mL final concentration).
    • e.
      Repeat the infection one more time after 8–10 h.
  • 4.

    Day 4: Remove the medium, and refresh with 10 mL MEF medium.

  • 5.
    Day 5:
    • a.
      Trypsinize the cells from each plate and reseed them at the 5 × 105 cells/P100 plate with MEF medium containing Puromycin (1 μg/mL).
    • b.
      Plate non-infected WT MEFs at the same condition as the negative control for Puromycin selection.
  • 6.

    Day 7: Refresh the medium with MEF medium containing 1 μg/mL Puromycin.

  • 7.

    Day 9: When there is no MEFs visible from the negative control plate (usually after 96 h), remove the medium and replace with fresh conditioned MEF medium without Puromycin for conditioned medium collection.

Note: At this point, if you perform the SA-β-gal assay, OIS-senescent MEFs will be stained in blue while non-senescent MEFs will not (Figure 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Senescent MEFs and in vitro reprogramming

(A) SA-β-Gal staining of MEFs. Left: Control PIG infected MEFs. Right: oncogene (ras) induced senescent (OIS) MEFs.

(B) Pictures of representative images of reprogrammable MEFs upon Doxycycline treatment (1 mg/mL). Left: pre-iPSC foci characterized by converging cells with bright edges (D4). Middle: Emerging iPSC colony characterized by bright spherical cells in the center (D8). Right: Full iPSC colonies characterized by a clear-reflective edge separation from the surrounding non-reprogrammed cells.

(C) iPSCs colonies stained by the Alkaline phosphatase staining kit (Sigma, AB0300). Left: CM: non-senescent WT MEFs. Right: CM: IR-senescent WT MEFs.

Collection of senescent conditioned medium

Inline graphicTiming: 6 days

This section describes how to collect the conditioned medium from senescent cells.

  • 8.

    After two days in conditioned MEF medium, collect the culture medium from both conditions, and replenish fresh conditioned MEF medium for next rounds of collection.

Note: Senescent conditioned medium can be collected three times (48 h interval).

Note: Make sure to collect the conditioned medium from the non-senescent counterpart (PIG-infected plate), which should be used as the control for senescent conditioned medium.

  • 9.

    For the collected culture medium, centrifuge for 5 min at 500 g at RT.

  • 10.

    Filter the supernatant with a 0.20 μm sterile filter, and store the filtered medium in several aliquots at −20°C.

Inline graphicPause point: Filtered conditional medium can be stored at −20°C for up to 1 month.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Repeated freeze/thaw cycles could greatly diminish the effects of the conditional medium. Therefore, we recommend to aliquot conditional media in proper aliquoted volumes depending on the experimental requirements to avoid repeated freeze/thaw cycles.

  • 11.
    If separation of the exosomes from the soluble fraction is desired:
    • a.
      Centrifuge the conditioned medium at 12,000 g for 30 min at 4°C, and retain the supernatant and discard the pellet.
    • b.
      Ultracentrifuge the supernatant at 100,000 g for 3 h at 4°C, and separate the supernatant from the pellet.
      Note: The supernatant contains the soluble fraction, and the pellet contains the exosomes.
    • c.
      Store the soluble fraction at −20°C in aliquoted volumes.
    • d.
      Wash once by resuspending the exosomes in 1 mL PBS.
    • e.
      Ultracentrifuge at 100,000 g for 3 h at 4°C, discard the supernatant, and keep the pellet.
    • f.
      Resuspend the pellet in 20–50 μL PBS and store it at −20°C.
      Inline graphicPause point: Exosomes in PBS can be stored for up to 1 month at −20°C, or alternatively for up to 1 year at −80°C, avoiding repeated freeze/thaw cycles.

Induction of reprogramming via senescent conditioned medium

Inline graphicTiming: 10–14 days

This section describes how to induce reprogramming in i4F MEFs using senescent conditioned medium.

  • 12.

    Seed i4F MEFs at a density of 5.2 × 102 cells/cm2 (that is, 5.0 × 103 cells per well of a 6-well plate) in MEF medium.

Note: The seeding density of the i4F MEFs is highly dependent on their reprogramming capacity. Therefore, we recommend testing the reprogramming efficiency of individual i4F MEF before this experiment.

  • 13.

    The following day, remove MEF medium, and replace it with conditioned iPSC medium freshly supplemented with DOX (1 μg/mL).

Inline graphicCRITICAL: DOX must be added freshly to iPSC medium because its stability rapidly decreases at 37°C. We recommend changing iPSC medium supplemented with DOX every two days maximum.

  • 14.

    Change the conditioned iPSC medium supplemented with DOX (1 μg/mL) every day.

  • 15.

    After 3 days, change the conditioned iPSC medium to normal iPSC medium freshly supplemented with DOX (1 μg/mL).

  • 16.

    Renew the medium every 2 days.

Note: It takes approximately 10–14 days to generate iPSC colonies using a reprogrammable MEFs system. The experimental length and period of conditioned iPSC medium treatment may vary depending on the reprogramming system implemented. DOX concentration may also be an important factor in reprogramming efficiency for different cell types; thus, we recommend testing different DOX concentrations.

  • 17.
    Once iPSC colonies become visible (Figure 1B), stain the plates with Alkaline Phosphatase staining kit following manufacturer’s recommendations.
    • a.
      Bring both BCIP and NBT solutions at RT.
    • b.
      In the meantime, remove the medium. Wash the plate once with PBS at RT.
    • c.
      Fix cells with 4% PFA for 15 min at RT.
    • d.
      Wash cells three times with PBS at RT, 5 min/wash.
    • e.
      Mix equal volumes of the two component solutions (BCIP and NBT). The mixture should be used within 1 h.
    • f.
      Add the mixed staining solution sufficient to cover the plate, such as 0.5 mL for one well of 6-well plate.
    • g.
      Place the plates on a shaker at RT protected from light and agitate mildly to ensure that the staining solution covers the plate.

Note: A bluish-purple staining will form within 15–30 min (Figure 1C).

PART II: In vivo identification of senescent and pluripotent cells: IHC Co-staining with SA-β-gal staining

Tissue collection and procession

Inline graphicTiming: 1 day

This section describes how to generate cryosections from injured murine skeletal muscle.

  • 18.

    10 days prior of the sample collection, inject cardiotoxin (CTX) into tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of mice of both sex (2-month-old, C57/B6) to injury muscle as previously described.6

Note: Make sure to inject PBS in the TA of the same mouse as non-injured negative control.

  • 19.
    Collect TAs at 10 days post-injury:
    • a.
      Place a small amount of tragacanth gum on a slice of cork.
    • b.
      Extract both TA muscles as previously described.7
    • c.
      To ensure the transverse sections, insert the distal tendon of the TA muscle (1/4 part) into the tragacanth gum and freeze directly in liquid nitrogen cooled isopentane for 40 s as previously described.7
      Note: Make sure the TA muscle is in a perpendicular position and in the center of the cork.
      Inline graphicPause point: The samples can be stored at −80°C up to 2 years.
    • d.
      Generate 10 μm cryosections as previously described.7

Senescence-associated β-galactosidase staining

Inline graphicTiming: 48 h

This section describes how to perform the SA-β-Gal assay on muscle cryosections.

  • 20.

    Allow evaporation of tissue freezing medium for 30 min at room temperature (RT, 20°C–25°C).

  • 21.

    To separate the control and save the antibody (for the immunostaining step), before placing the slides in solution, circle the section with a hydrophobic DAKO pen for IHC staining (Figure 2A).

  • 22.

    Fix the sections for 15 min in SA-β-Gal staining fixation buffer at RT.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: SA-β-Gal staining fixation buffer cannot be replaced by 4% PFA, and cannot be longer than 15 min.

  • 23.

    Quickly wash (<1 min/wash) the slides three times with PBS.

  • 24.

    Incubate the slides in the SA-β-Gal staining buffer at 37°C protected from light for 48 h.

Note: Cover the container with Aluminum foil to prevent evaporation.

Note: For quantitative comparisons, all sections must be stained with the same batch of SA-β-Gal staining buffer to avoid inter-assay variation.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: pH level is critical for the staining solution (pH = 5.5).

  • 25.

    Refresh the staining solution after 24 h.

  • 26.

    Check the slices using an inverted cell culture microscope (OLYMPUS CKX41). Once the blue color is visible (Figure 2A), quickly wash the slices three times with PBS.

Note: The staining duration is tissue section dependent (tissue origin and section thickness). It needs to be optimized first and should be kept consistent for the samples from the same experiment. For example, for the muscle samples, we incubate 10 μm sections for 48 h. For other tissues, the staining need to be optimized further. In general, thicker sections need shorter incubation time than thinner sections. For example, sections from kidney and lung need shorter incubation time than muscle.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The co-staining of SA-β-Gal and Nanog (IHC)

(A) Circle the sections and SA-β-Gal staining.

(B) Incubation in the dark box.

(C and D) Representative of the co-staining. Blue dot is SA-β-Gal positive cell and brown color stained the Nanog (C) and F4/80 (D) positive cell.

Immunohistochemistry staining (IHC)

Inline graphicTiming: 24 h

This section describes how to perform IHC staining targeting Nanog (or F4/80) on muscle cryosections. These procedures are performed following SA-β-Gal staining.

  • 27.

    Quickly wash the slices three times with PBS and put the slides in 4% PFA in PBS for post-fixation for 15 min at RT.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Post-fixation cannot be longer than 15 min.

  • 28.

    Quickly wash the slides three times with PBS and place them in a humid dark chamber (Figure 2B).

  • 29.

    Add 200 μL blocking buffer in every circle (labeled at step 21) for at least 30 min at RT. Prepare Nanog 1st antibody at 1:200 in blocking buffer.

Note: The dilution of 1st antibody depends on different antibody.

  • 30.

    Remove the blocking buffer carefully. Add 200 μL 1st antibody to every circle of all the slides. For the control sections, add 200 μL blocking buffer.

  • 31.

    Incubate the slides overnight at 4°C in a humid dark chamber.

  • 32.

    Put the humid dark chamber at RT for 20–30 min and quickly wash with PBST (PBS +0.3% Triton X-100) three times.

  • 33.

    Add 3% H2O2 in PBS for 20 min at RT.

  • 34.

    Add 2nd antibody (Dako, ready for use, K4003) directly for 90 min at RT in the humid dark chamber.

Note: The duration of the 2nd antibody incubation depends on different antibody.

Note: protect the DAB solution from the light.

  • 36.

    Wash three times with PBST (PBS + 0.3% Triton X-100), 5 min/wash.

  • 37.

    Develop with DAB for 1 min at RT, quickly wash the slides in Milli-Q water three times.

  • 38.

    Counterstain with Fast-red for 10 min at RT.

  • 39.

    Wash in tap water for 10 min.

  • 40.

    Dehydrate in 95% ethanol for 10 min, followed by 100% ethanol baths twice, 5 min each.

  • 41.

    Mount with Eukitt following manufacturer’s recommendations.

  • 42.

    Evaporate in the hood overnight and scan the slides using a scanning microscope OLYMPUS vs120.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: All the primary antibodies dilution and the duration of DAB staining needs to be optimized first.

Note: This protocol can be used for other antibodies, such as F4/80.

PART III: Semi-automatic quantification of senescent cells based on SA-β-Gal staining.

The entire procedure is explained in Methods video S1 (or on YouTube with subtitles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHaThFfpkRY) to guide you in running Showblue.

Methods video S1. How to run Showblue, related to all the steps in PART III

A YouTube video containing subtitles is also available following that link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHaThFfpkRY.

Download video file (21MB, mp4)

Installation of Showblue and its dependencies

Inline graphicTiming: 30 min

This section describes how to install Anaconda, Pycharm, Library cv2 and numpy packages, and Showblue on your computer (macOS or Windows).

  • 43.
    Install these two programs on your computer:

Note: Anaconda allows the installation of Python and the libraries required to implement the Showblue code. PyCharm allows to edit the Showblue code.

  • 44.
    Install dependencies by typing these two lines of code in the Terminal (macOS) or in Anaconda Prompt (Windows).
    • a.
      pip install opencv-python.
    • b.
      conda install numpy.

Note: Several Python libraries are required to support Showblue: Library cv2 (4.4.0.44) and numpy (1.18.5) (compatible with the newest version).

Note: The decompressed folder named “Showblue-main” (or “CroixJeremy2-Showblue-23b35b8” if downloaded via Zenodo) contains all the files displayed in Figures 3A–3C.

Note: on Windows, the content of “start_environment.bat” must be modified as “%windir%\System32\cmd.exe "/K" [the path of anaconda folder]\Scripts\activate.bat [the path of anaconda folder]. For example, if the path to Anaconda is “D:\programs\anaconda”, then the content of “start_environment.bat” must be modified as “%windir%\System32\cmd.exe"/K" D:\programs\anaconda\Scripts\activate.bat D:\programs\anaconda”.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Quantification folder for SA-β-Gal staining

(A) Folder content.

(B) Folder (cfg_fig6) for reference picture.

(C) List of sample pictures.

Preparation of test sample images

Inline graphicTiming: 30 min

This section describes how to prepare the test sample images in order to set up Showblue parameters.

  • 46.

    Choose one representative image from your samples (Figure 4A).

  • 47.

    Crop a part of the image next to the edge (Figure 4B), and save three copies named “file1.jpg”, “file2.jpg”, and “t1.jpg” respectively in the folder named “cfg_fig6” (Figure 3B).

  • 48.

    Label the “blank area” by drawing black scribbles outside of the muscle section via an image editor software (e.g., Fiji, Paint, or Paint X) on “file1.jpg” and save the resulting image as “file1_bk.jpg” in the “cfg_fig6” folder (Figure 4C).

  • 49.

    Label the “inside area” by drawing black scribbles inside the muscle section on “file2.jpg” and save it as “file2_inside.jpg” (Figure 4D).

  • 50.

    Label SA-β-Gal+ cells by drawing white dots on top of them on “t1.jpg” and save it as “t1_pt.jpg” (Figures 4E and 4F).

Note: For samples from different experiments or with different colors, it is necessary to reset the references. A representative image should be selected as a reference. Pre-run the program to set up all preferences following steps 51–53. If there are few false positive or false negative detections, the program quantifies all pictures with the same preferences. Otherwise, the preferences must be adjusted manually, or the reference picture should be changed.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Setting up the reference picture

(A) Selected picture.

(B) Selected part of the picture.

(C) file1_bk for labeling the blank part of the picture.

(D) file2_inside for labeling the inside part of the picture.

(E) t1_pt for pointing out the positive cells.

(F) Zoom in for (E).

Pre-run Showblue to set up automatically the parameters, or manually set up the parameters.

Inline graphicTiming: 10 min–45 min

This section describes how to pre-run Showblue on test sample images (prepared in steps 46–50) to set up automatically Showblue parameters. In addition, this section describes how to adjust manually the parameters if automatic settings are not satisfactory.

  • 51.
    Pre-run Showblue with the annotated test sample images:
    • a.
      On macOS, right-click on the “showblue-main” folder and select “new terminal at folder”. The Terminal will appear, drag the file named show_all_fig_para.sh into the Terminal, and press enter.
    • b.
      On Windows, double click on the start_envrionment.bat file. A window will open, drag into it the file named show_all_windows_fig_para.bat, and press enter.

Note:Showblue will quantify the images automatically. When the quantification is finished, a new file named “data.txt” and a new folder named “process” will be generated in the “showblue-main” folder.

Note:Showblue will also set up all text parameters (cfg_bk.txt, cfg_in.txt, and cfg_pt.txt) in the “cfg” folder automatically according to the labeled images in the “cfg_fig6” folder. If the results are not satisfactory, the text parameters can be further adjusted manually (step 53).

  • 52.

    Check the quantification results in the “process” folder (Figure 5).

Note: The image labeled “blue” displays the number of detected SA-β-Gal+ cells (top left) and the pixels2 surface area of the muscle section (top right) (Figures 5A and 5B). The image labeled “bound” displays the muscle section boundaries that are excluded from the analysis (Figure 5C). And the image labeled “hull” displays the area that is analyzed (Figure 5D).

  • 53.
    Configure the Showblue settings manually if automatic settings are not satisfactory, or if you want to further optimize the detection. The text parameters are located in the folder named “cfg”:
    • a.
      cfg_alpha.txt: the “alpha value” is used to adjust the sensitivity of tissue boundary detection. By default, the alpha value is set to 1. The larger the alpha value, the higher the sensitivity.
    • b.
      cfg_bk.txt: it describes the “mean color value ± the standard deviations (SD)” of the points outside the tissue boundary (background).
    • c.
      cfg_in.txt: it describes the “mean color value ± SD” of all the points inside the tissue boundary.
    • d.
      cfg_pt.txt: it describes the “mean color value ± SD” of the points of interest inside the tissue boundary.
      Note: The color value is defined using an RGB color model. Each of the primary additive colors of red, green, and blue is assigned a value in the range of 0–255.
    • e.
      cfg_shape.txt: the “shape value” is to remove colored cells whose shape is not of interest. The value is set ranging from 0–1. If the value is 0, all colored items are counted as cells, including dye contaminations. When the value approaches 1, the selected cells are closer to the round shape and the counting sensitivity is low.
      Note: Usually, “cfg_alpha.txt” and “cfg_shape.txt” are the two main parameters that need to be adjusted according to the detection results after running Showblue.
Figure 5.

Figure 5

Quantification results

(A) Files labeled “blue” display the number of SA-β-Gal+ cells (top left) and the total surface area (top right).

(B) Zoom in of (A).

(C) Files labeled “bound” display the edge detection of the muscle section.

(D) Files labeled hull display the surface area that is quantified by Showblue.

Run Showblue to quantify all images at the same time

Inline graphicTiming: depends on the computer power, and on the numbers and size of the images

This section describes how to run Showblue on a batch of images.

  • 54.

    Copy and paste all the images that need to be quantified into the “showblue-main” folder.

  • 55.
    Run Showblue:
    • a.
      On macOS, right-click on the “showblue-main” folder and select “new terminal at folder”. The Terminal will appear, drag the file named show_all_fig_para.sh in the Terminal, press enter, and let the computer work automatically.
    • b.
      On Windows, double click on the start_envrionment.bat file. A window will open, drag into it the file named show_all_windows_para.bat, press enter, and let the computer work automatically.

Note: depending on the computer power, and the number and size of images that need to be quantified, this step can vary considerably over time.

  • 56.

    Check all the quantification results in the “process” folder as described in step_52 (Figures 5A–5D).

  • 57.

    Import the “data.txt” file into a spreadsheet (e.g., Microsoft Excel) for further analysis.

Note: Lines in the data.txt are formatted in the following order: [image name]: [counted points]: [pixel area]: [x-pixel]: [y-pixel]: [ratio of the size of the tissue to the image]: [ratio of painted area to the cell].

Note: [pixel area] = [x-pixel] × [y-pixel]

  • 58.

    Calculate the results with this equation:

SAβGal+cells/unitarea=[countedpoints]/[pixelarea]×106

Expected outcomes

The outcome of PART I is a reliable and consistent collection of senescent MEF conditional medium to study the effect of SASP on cellular reprogramming in vitro.1 The composition of the SASP is highly heterogeneous and can have a distinct effect on reprogramming efficiency. Therefore, it is crucial to understand how SASP composition affects different processes and how cellular reprogramming is initiated in a paracrine manner.

Here, we provide a feasible protocol for identifying and investigating the potential molecular mechanisms underlying these two processes. A successful and efficient reprogramming is characterized by the formation of ∼20 iPSC colonies per well of a 6-well plate within 14 days (Figure 1C) and quantified using Fiji.

Co-staining of SA-β-Gal with other markers in tissue samples has been difficult owing to incompatible fixation and staining conditions. Here in PART II, we present a robust protocol to simultaneously identify senescent (SA-β-Gal+) and reprogrammed (Nanog+) cells in the same TA muscle sample collected from reprogrammable mice. Successful co-staining is shown in Figure 2C, with SA-β-Gal staining in blue and IHC staining in brown. No signals were detected in the negative control (non-injured muscle for SA-β-Gal and the section without 1st antibody for Nanog). This protocol can be used to determine the identity of senescent cells in vivo, when combined with cell identity markers. For example, macrophages have an increased lysosomal content and can be positive for SA-β-Gal staining. To determine whether SA-β-Gal+ cells were macrophages, we co-stained for SA-β-Gal and F4/80, a macrophage marker (Figure 2D). Interestingly, although many cells were positive for both markers, we also found that the cells were only positive for SA-β-Gal or F4/80, suggesting a heterogeneous senescent population (Figure 2D).

Quantifying SA-β-Gal-positive cells in vivo is time consuming and subject to user experience. We present a semi-automatic plug-in to facilitate this process. The false-positive or false-negative rates should not exceed 10% (Figure 5B), and calculation of the area should be performed automatically (Figure 5D). Although this program does not accurately count absolute numbers, the relative numbers are reproducible. Therefore, it is crucial to quantify samples from different groups simultaneously. It usually takes 1–2 h to set up the preferences and an hour to collect data with this program. Therefore, it provides an efficient and consistent alternative to the conventional manual counting methods.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Quantification and statistical analysis should be performed by a blinded operator to avoid bias. Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism v9 software.

Limitations

The protocol described here aims to study the impact of paracrine senescence on cellular plasticity in the context of cellular reprogramming to pluripotency. Therefore, a reprogrammable mouse model and an MEF system are used to allow robust and reliable reprogramming induction. The link between senescence and plasticity has also been demonstrated in other physiological and pathological conditions. Therefore, the in vitro conditioned medium method can be modified to study how non-cell- autonomous senescence affects cellular plasticity beyond the reprogramming context. The method used to identify and quantify senescent cells can be applied to characterize in vivo senescence.

For in vitro experiments, the protocol is performed using conditioned medium derived from senescent MEFs only. Paracrine senescence is heterogeneous, which is stress- and cell-type dependent8; thus, conditioned medium from other cell types could be different from MEFs.

It is possible that senescent conditioned medium from certain cell types might prevent reprogramming. We encourage you to report such observations and studies to better understand the link between senescence and cellular reprogramming and plasticity.

In vitro reprogramming is performed using i4F MEFs only. Reprogramming kinetic and efficiency can vary greatly depending on the cell type and reprogramming methods. Therefore, the initial seeding density of the reprogramming cells, DOX concentration, and treatment length of the conditioned iPSCs medium should be determined first.

To ensure accurate quantification, well-preserved tissue sections and high-quality of the SA-β-Gal staining are crucial. In addition, only the samples processed, stained, and analyzed in the same patch can be compared.

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

You don’t obtain any iPSCs colony after applying conditioned medium on i4F MEFs (step 16, Figure 1B).

Potential solution

Make sure the conditioned medium has not undergone more than one freeze/thaw cycle. Precipitates can form and alter conditional media composition, resulting in a poor reprogramming efficiency. We recommend to aliquot your conditional medium in small volumes. Moreover, the initial seeding density of the reprogramming cells might be too low. The reprogramming efficiency might vary significantly from one embryo to another, and by using different reprogramming systems. Therefore, the seeding density should be determined prior.

Problem 2

You don’t see the blue developed after 48 h SA-β-Gal (step 26, Figure 2A).

Potential solution

As described above, make sure pH is 5.5 for the PBS and all the other components for the staining solution are clean without contaminations. For the different tissue and the thickness of the sections, the incubation time is different. If the staining doesn’t work, the incubation time should be optimized. It is crucial to include positive and negative control for each experiment.

Problem 3

Error for installation of library cv2 (step 44).

Potential solution

Sometimes, there is a problem in installing cv2 with the error information as “Could not build wheels for opencv-python which use PEP 517 and cannot be installed directly”. In such a case, it is necessary to run the command “pip install --upgrade pip setuptools wheel” before installing of cv2.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Han Li (han.li@pasteur.fr).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Central Animal Facility of the Institut Pasteur. Work in the laboratory of H.L. is funded by the Institut Pasteur, Centre National pour la Recherche Scientific, and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche, France (Laboratoire d’Excellence Revive, Investissement d’Avenir; ANR-10-LABX-73; ANR-16-CE13-0017; ANR-21-CE13-0006-01). J.C. was funded by the DIM Longévité et Vieillissement fellowship from the Région Ile-de-France.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, H.L.; methodology, J.C., C.C., H.L.; investigation, J.C., C.C., J.Z.; software, J.Z.; writing – original draft, J.C., C.C., H.L.; writing – review & editing, J.C., C.C., H.L.; visualization, J.C., C.C.; supervision, H.L.; funding acquisition, H.L.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102106.

Contributor Information

Cheng Chen, Email: cheng.chen@pasteur.fr.

Han Li, Email: han.li@pasteur.fr.

Data and code availability

The Showblue code generated during this study is available at https://github.com/CroixJeremy2/Showblue. An archived version of record is also available at https://zenodo.org/record/7528943 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7528943).

References

  • 1.von Joest M., Chen C., Douché T., Chantrel J., Chiche A., Gianetto Q.G., Matondo M., Li H. Amphiregulin mediates non-cell-autonomous effect of senescence on reprogramming. Cell Rep. 2022;40:111074. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chiche A., Le Roux I., von Joest M., Sakai H., Aguín S.B., Cazin C., Salam R., Fiette L., Alegria O., Flamant P., et al. Injury-induced senescence enables in vivo reprogramming in skeletal muscle. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20:407–414.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Naviaux R.K., Costanzi E., Haas M., Verma I.M. The pCL vector system: rapid production of helper-free, high-titer, recombinant retroviruses. J. Virol. 1996;70:5701–5705. doi: 10.1128/JVI.70.8.5701-5705.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abad M., Mosteiro L., Pantoja C., Cañamero M., Rayon T., Ors I., Graña O., Megías D., Domínguez O., Martínez D., et al. Reprogramming in vivo produces teratomas and iPS cells with totipotency features. Nature. 2013;502:340–345. doi: 10.1038/nature12586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., Preibisch S., Rueden C., Saalfeld S., Schmid B., et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guardiola O., Andolfi G., Tirone M., Iavarone F., Brunelli S., Minchiotti G. Induction of acute skeletal muscle regeneration by cardiotoxin injection. J. Vis. Exp. 2017:54515. doi: 10.3791/54515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cazin C., Chiche A., Li H. Evaluation of injury-induced senescence and in vivo reprogramming in the skeletal muscle. J. Vis. Exp. 2017:56201. doi: 10.3791/56201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hernandez-Segura A., Nehme J., Demaria M. Hallmarks of cellular senescence. Trends Cell Biol. 2018;28:436–453. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Methods video S1. How to run Showblue, related to all the steps in PART III

A YouTube video containing subtitles is also available following that link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHaThFfpkRY.

Download video file (21MB, mp4)

Data Availability Statement

The Showblue code generated during this study is available at https://github.com/CroixJeremy2/Showblue. An archived version of record is also available at https://zenodo.org/record/7528943 (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7528943).


Articles from STAR Protocols are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES