Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Feb 18;28(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s10911-023-09529-x

Valine Treatment Enhances Antimicrobial Component Production in Mammary Epithelial Cells and the Milk of Lactating Goats Without Influencing the Tight Junction Barrier

Yusaku Tsugami 1,, Takahiro Nii 1, Naoki Isobe 1
PMCID: PMC9938821  PMID: 36801983

Abstract

The production of antimicrobial components and the formation of less-permeable tight junctions (TJs) are important in the defense system of lactating mammary glands and for safe dairy production. Valine is a branched-chain amino acid that is actively consumed in the mammary glands and promotes the production of major milk components like β-casein; additionally, branched-chain amino acids stimulate antimicrobial component production in the intestines. Therefore, we hypothesized that valine strengthens the mammary gland defense system without influencing milk production. We investigated the effects of valine in vitro using cultured mammary epithelial cells (MECs) and in vivo using the mammary glands of lactating Tokara goats. Valine treatment at 4 mM increased the secretion of S100A7 and lactoferrin as well as the intracellular concentration of β-defensin 1 and cathelicidin 7 in cultured MECs. In addition, an intravenous injection of valine increased S100A7 levels in the milk of Tokara goats without influencing milk yield and milk components (i.e., fat, protein, lactose, and solids). In contrast, valine treatment did not affect TJ barrier function either in vitro or in vivo. These findings indicate that valine enhances antimicrobial component production without influencing milk production and TJ barrier function in lactating mammary glands; thus, valine contributes to safe dairy production.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10911-023-09529-x.

Keywords: Antimicrobial component, Branched-chain amino acid, Mammary gland, Tight junction, Valine

Introduction

Mastitis is the most frequent disease of the mammary glands and causes substantial economic losses in the dairy industry [1]. Mastitis is caused by pathogens such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, which invade through the teat canals [2, 3]. To manage the safety and stability of dairy production, methods for preventing mastitis must be established. During lactation, the mammary glands employ a defense system for protection against mastitis-causing pathogens, part of which are the production of antimicrobial components and the formation of less-permeable tight junction (TJs) [4, 5].

In the mammary glands, various antimicrobial components are produced and secreted into milk [4]. The epithelial cells of the mammary glands produce β-defensin 1, lactoferrin, S100A7, and cathelicidin 7 [6, 7], which show nonspecific antibacterial activity against many pathogens, including E. coli and S. aureus. Defensins and cathelicidins can destroy microbial membranes via cationic charges [8], lactoferrin exhibits bacteriostatic effects through its biding capacity with iron, which is required for the growth of pathogens [9], and S100A7 has antimicrobial activity against E. coli [10]. Therefore, the enhanced levels of these antimicrobial components in milk help prevent the growth of pathogens and mastitis.

TJs are formed between mammary epithelial cells (MECs) and composed of claudins and occludin. TJs regulate the movement of water, ions, and small molecules through paracellular pathways [11]. A claudin subtype at the TJ region determines permeability [12]. In the mammary glands during lactation, claudin 3 is localized at TJs in a concentrated manner and contributes to lowering permeability [13], thereby preventing mixing of blood components into milk and pathogens invading the host body [5]. Therefore, improving TJ barrier function will contribute to the safe and stable management of dairy production.

In the present study, we investigated the ability of valine to regulate antimicrobial component production and TJ barrier function in the mammary glands. Valine is a branched-chain amino acid; branched-chain amino acids account for approximately 40% of amino acids absorbed into the mammary glands [14]. Valine promotes the production of β-casein and α-lactalbumin in cultured porcine MECs [15]. β-casein is an abundant protein in milk, and α-lactalbumin is an enzyme involved in the synthesis of lactose. Valine also promotes milk fat production in cultured porcine MECs [16]. Furthermore, branched-chain amino acids are known to stimulate β-defensin production in the intestines of pigs [17]. Moreover, valine supplementation has been shown to improve intestinal barrier function by regulating the mRNA expression of TJ protein in fishes [18, 19]. Therefore, we hypothesized that valine strengthens antimicrobial component production and/or TJ barrier function without influencing milk production in MECs and the mammary glands. We tested this hypothesis using cultured MECs and the mammary glands of lactating Tokara goats.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Five healthy Tokara goats (milk yield: 70–295 mL/udder/day; weight: 25.6–33.8 kg; age: 2–5 years, parity: 1–2) at the mid-lactation stage and unafflicted by mastitis (no clinical symptoms) were used in the in vivo experiment, in which they were intravenously injected with valine. Goats were individually housed under a 14:10 h light:dark cycle, fed 0.6 kg hay cubes and 0.2 kg barley each day, and had free access to water and trace-mineralized salt blocks. The feed was offered twice daily at 08:00 and 15:00 h, and the feed supply (energy, protein, and minerals) was calculated based on the Japanese feeding standard for sheep (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries in Japan, 1996) as reported previously [20]. The goats were milked manually once daily at 08:00 h. Prior to injections, valine (#V0014, Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan) was dissolved in distilled water at 80 mg/mL, and 6 mL of this solution was intravenously injected at days 0–2 after milking. All experiments were approved by the Animal Research Committee of Hiroshima University (no. C21-20) and conducted according to the Guidelines for Animal Experiments prescribed by Hiroshima University.

Cell Culture

We established an MEC culture model based on a previously described model [21, 22]. Goat MECs (GMECs) were cultured in 24-well plates or 12-well cell culture inserts (0.4 μm pore size; BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA, USA) coated with collagen gel (Cellmatrix Type 1-A; Nitta Gelatin, Osaka, Japan) with a growth medium [Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium/Ham’s F-12 (DMEM/F12) medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum, 5 µg/mL ITS-X (1 mg/mL insulin, 0.55 mg/mL transferrin, 0.67 mg/mL selenium, and 0.20 mg/mL ethanolamine; Wako, Osaka, Japan), 10 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (BD Biosciences), and 5 mM sodium acetate (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan)] for 6 days until confluence. Subsequently, the GMECs were cultured in a differentiation medium [1% fetal bovine serum, 5 µg/mL ITS-X, 1 ng/mL epidermal growth factor, 5 mM sodium acetate, 1 µg/mL prolactin (provided by A. F. Parlow; lot AFP7170E; NHPP, NIDDK, Torrance, CA, USA), and 1 µM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in DMEM/F12 medium]. The upper chamber of the insert was filled with Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for differentiation. After 2 days of culture, the GMECs were treated with valine (#V0014; Tokyo Chemical Industry), which was first dissolved in DMEM/F12 medium at 50 mg/mL and then adjusted to concentrations of 1, 2, and 4 mM using normal DMEM/F12 medium.

The epithelial barrier was evaluated in terms of its transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and the flux of fluorescein through the barrier, following methods reported in previous studies [23, 24]. To measure the TEER, the electrodes of a Millicell-ERS-2 Voltohmmeter (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) were placed in the upper and lower chambers of the insert, and the resistance was measured. To measure fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) permeability, the upper chamber of the insert was filled with HBSS containing 10 µg/mL fluorescein sodium salt (molecular weight: 376; Sigma-Aldrich), whereas the lower chamber was filled with the medium alone. The medium from the lower chamber was collected 3 h after the addition of fluorescein, and its paracellular flux was measured using a fluorometer (excitation: 492 nm; emission: 520 nm).

Analysis of Milk and Blood Samples

Collected milk samples were centrifuged at 1,000 × g and 4 °C for 10 min. Milk fat and skim milk were separated from the somatic cell pellets. The cell pellets were either resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to determine their somatic cell count (SCC), which was measured with a Countess II FL Automated Cell Counter (Thermo Fisher Scientific), or in Sepasol-RNA I Super G (Nacalai Tesque) to extract total RNA. The skim milk was stored at − 30 °C for later use in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The Na+ level was measured using a LAQUAtwin Na-11 pocket meter (HORIBA, Kyoto, Japan). Milk components (fat, protein, lactose, and solids) were measured using a LactoScope Filter (Delta Instruments LLC, Northvale, NJ, USA).

Blood was collected from the jugular vein and transferred to a tube coated with the anticoagulant heparin. Blood samples were then centrifuged at 1,700 × g and 4 °C for 15 min. The leukocyte pellets were washed with distilled water three times and resuspended in Sepasol-RNA I Super G to extract total RNA. Free amino acids in plasma were analyzed using an automatic amino acid analyzer (JLC 500; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) as reported [25].

Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence analyses were performed using the reported methods [26, 27]. The mammary gland tissues were fixed, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Sections of the tissues (3 μm thick) were then air-dried on MAS-coated slides. After deparaffinization, antigen retrieval was performed by autoclaving the sections in a citric acid buffer (pH 6.0) for 20 min at 121 °C. Cultured GMECs on collagen gel isolated from the insert were fixed with methanol for 10 min at − 20 °C and then with 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at 4 °C. Subsequently, the tissue sections and cells were washed with PBS for 10 min, after which they were incubated in PBS-T (PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20) containing 5% bovine serum albumin (MP Biomedicals) for 1.5 h at room temperature. The sections and cells were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit polyclonal antibodies against L-amino acid transporter (LAT)-1 (#ab208776; Abcam, Cambridge, UK, 1:100), LAT3 (#ab254719; Abcam, 1:100), and claudin 3 (#34-1700, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:200) or with mouse monoclonal antibodies against occludin (#sc-133,256; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:200) diluted in PBS-T containing 2.5% bovine serum albumin. To evaluate immunofluorescence, the sections and cells were incubated with secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated goat anti-rabbit, #A32731, 1:400; Alexa Fluor 555–conjugated goat anti-mouse, #A32727, 1:400; both Thermo Fisher Scientific) diluted with PBS-T containing 2.5% bovine serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature. Immunofluorescence images were obtained using a fluorescence microscope (BZ-9000) and processed using analysis software (Keyence, Osaka, Japan).

Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed according to the reported methods [28]. Total RNA from normal mammary gland tissues, cultured GMECs, somatic cells in milk, and leukocytes in blood was extracted using Sepasol-RNA I Super G. Reverse transcription was performed using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan), and RT-PCR was conducted using an Applied Biosystems™ 2720 Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with Brilliant III Ultra-Fast SYBR QRTPCR (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The cycling conditions were 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. The primers used are listed in Suppl. Table 1. Finally, the samples were separated on 2.5% agarose gels and stained with EtBr solution (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

ELISA

To measure the levels of β-defensin 1, lactoferrin, S100A7, and cathelicidin 7, a competitive ELISA was performed as reported in previous studies [6, 7, 29].

A sandwich ELISA was performed to measure the levels of albumin and IgG using an anti-albumin antibody (Life Laboratory Company, Yamagata, Japan, 1:5,000), goat-albumin antibody-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (#A50-103P; Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX, USA, 1:30,000), goat-IgG antibody (#A50-104 A; Bethyl Laboratories, 1:3,000), and goat-IgG antibody-HRP (#A50-104P; Bethyl Laboratories, 1:30,000).

Western Blotting

Western blotting was performed using a reported method [26, 30]. The lysates were lysed in a Laemmli sodium dodecyl sulfate–solubilizing buffer and heated for 15 min at 70 °C. The samples were then separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Immunosignals were detected using claudin 3 (#34-1700, 1:1,000), claudin 4 (#PA5-32354, Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1:1,000), α-tubulin (#GTX628802; GeneTex, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1:10,000), secondary HRP–conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Abcam, 1:5,000), anti-mouse antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, 1:5,000), and Immobilon Forte Western HRP Substrate (Millipore). Images of the bands were obtained using Ez-Capture II (Atto). The bands were quantified using a CS Analyzer 4.0 (Atto).

Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc.). Significant differences at p < 0.05 were determined using one-way ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey’s test (Fig. 2), Student’s t-test (Figs. 3 and 4E), or Dunnett’s test (Figs. 4B and D and 5, and 6). The in vivo experiments were performed using ten udders of five different goats, whereas the in vitro experiments were performed using three different GMECs derived from different goats. In the in vitro experiment, the number of samples was defined as n = 1 for a sample derived from a well.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Influence of valine on antimicrobial component production in cultured goat mammary epithelial cells (GMECs).

Graphs show the intracellular concentrations (A) and secreted concentrations into the medium (B) of β-defensin 1, lactoferrin, S100A7, and cathelicidin 7. Antimicrobial component concentrations were detected using ELISA in GMECs treated with valine at the given concentrations. Control GMECs were affected by valine at 0.45 mM. Asterisks show significant differences (p < 0.05) between groups according to Tukey’s test (n = 12)

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Influence of valine on tight junction (TJ) barrier function in cultured goat mammary epithelial cells (GMECs).

Graphs show the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (A) and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) permeability (B) in GMECs treated with 4 mM valine for 4 days (n = 10–12). (C) Western blotting of claudin 3 and claudin 4 in GMECs treated with valine at 4 mM for 3 days. Graphs show the results of densitometry analysis, with α-tubulin used as an internal control (n = 12). (D) Localization of claudin 3 (green) in GMECs treated valine at 4 mM for 4 days. Occludin (red) was used as the TJ marker. Scale bar, 10 μm

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Influence of intravenous injections of valine on milk yield, somatic cell count (SCC) in milk and milk components, and the tight junction barrier in mammary glands

Tokara goats were intravenously injected with 6 mL of valine at 80 mg/mL on days 0–2. Upper graphs show changes in milk yield (A) and SCC (C) in individual udders, whereas lower graphs (B and D) show changes in the relative values of these variables compared with the average of pretreatment (days − 2 to 0), i.e., the control. Colored lines show the changes in milk yield and SCC derived from the same udder. (E) Milk components (fat, protein, lactose, and solids) on days 0 and 3. Data are means ± SD (n = 10)

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Influence of intravenous injections of valine on the blood-derived components in milk

Tokara goats were intravenously injected with 6 mL of valine at 80 mg/mL on days 0–2. Upper graphs show changes in Na+ level (A), albumin level (C), and IgG level (E) in milk of individual udders, whereas lower graphs (B, D, and F) show changes in the relative values of these variables compared with the average of pretreatment (days − 2 to 0), i.e., the control. Colored lines show the changes in blood-derived components in milk derived from the same udder. Data are means ± SD (n = 10)

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Influence of intravenous injections of valine on antimicrobial component concentrations in milk

Tokara goats were intravenously injected with 6 mL of valine at 80 mg/mL on days 0–2. Left graphs show changes in β-defensin 1 (A), lactoferrin (C), S100A7 (E), and cathelicidin 7 (G) levels in individual udders, whereas right graphs (B, D, F, and H) show changes in the relative values of these variables compared with the average of pretreatment (days − 2 to 0), i.e., the control. Colored lines show the changes in antimicrobial components in milk derived from the same udder. Data are means ± SD (n = 10). Asterisks indicate significant differences (p < 0.05 versus the control) according to Dunnett’s test

Results

mRNA Expression and Localization of LAT1 and LAT3 in Goat Mammary Glands

According to our RT-PCR results (Fig. 1A), the bands of LAT1 (SLC7A5; 123 bp) and LAT3 (SLC7A7; 112 bp) representing mRNA expression were detected in all samples of mammary glands, cultured GMECs, somatic cells in goat milk, and leukocytes in blood. In the mammary glands, LAT1 and LAT3 were localized in the basolateral membranes of epithelial cells (Fig. 1B and C). In addition, single cells in the mammary alveolus or in the stromal region showed positive reactions against LAT1 and LAT3.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

mRNA expression and localization of LAT1 and LAT3 in goat mammary glands.

(A) Bands show the results of RT-PCR for LAT1, LAT3, and RPS18 in mammary glands, cultured goat mammary epithelial cells (GMECs), somatic cells in milk, and leukocytes in the blood of Tokara goats. Immunofluorescence images show the localization of LAT1 (green) (B) and LAT3 (green) (C) in mammary gland tissue. Occludin (red) was used as a marker of most apical regions in lateral membranes. Single cells in the mammary stromal regions (arrows) and the mammary alveolus (arrowheads) showed positive reactions against LAT1 or LAT3 antibodies. Scale bar, 100 μm

Effects of Valine on Antimicrobial Component Production in Cultured GMECs

According to our ELISA results (Fig. 2), cultured GMECs treated with valine at 4 mM for 3 days exhibited significantly increased intracellular concentrations of the antimicrobial components β-defensin 1 (1.4-fold increase) and cathelicidin 7 (1.2-fold increase) compared with those of the control group (valine at 0.45 mM) (Fig. 2A). In addition, to determine the effect of valine on the secretion of antimicrobial components, GMECs were treated with 4 mM valine for 4 days, considering the time-lag between the synthesis of milk components in the cells and their subsequent secretion. Compared with the control group, valine treatment significantly increased the secretion of lactoferrin (1.2-fold increase) and S100A7 (1.4-fold increase) into the medium in the upper chamber (Fig. 2B).

Effects of Valine on TJ Barrier Function in Cultured GMECs

We determined the influence of valine on TJ barrier function in GMECs by measuring TEER and FITC permeability, finding that valine treatment at 4 mM for 4 days did not affect TEER and FITC permeability (Fig. 3A and B). According to our western blotting results (Fig. 3C), the levels of claudin 3 and claudin 4 in GMECs were not affected by valine treatment at 4 mM for 3 days. In addition, using immunofluorescence, we observed the localization of claudin 3 in cultured GMECs (Fig. 3D). In control GMECs, claudin 3 was colocalized with the TJ marker occludin, and the valine-treated GMECs exhibited the same localization of claudin 3 observed in the control group.

Influence of Valine Injection into the Blood on Milk Production and TJ Barrier Function

In lactating goats, we confirmed that an intravenous injection of valine affected plasma concentrations of valine, which were significantly increased 15 min after the injection (0 min: 177.2 ± 11.0 µM; 15 min: 426.5 ± 45.8 µM [p < 0.001]). Valine was intravenously injected daily for 3 days, but the plasma concentration of valine barely changed in this period (day 0: 159.2 ± 45.8 µM; day 1: 164.7 ± 42.0 µM; day 2: 164.6 ± 47.2 µM; day 3: 171.8 ± 52.3 µM; day 5: 174.6 ± 55.0 µM).

Milk yield, SCC, and milk components (fat, protein, lactose, and solids) were not altered by valine injection (Fig. 4). In addition, the levels of the blood-derived components (Na+, albumin, and IgG) in milk were not changed by valine treatment (Fig. 5).

Effect of Valine Injection into the Blood on Antimicrobial Component Production in the Mammary Glands

According to our ELISA results (Fig. 6), the S100A7 levels in milk were increased at days 2–3 after valine treatment by more than 1.2-fold those of the control group (average of pretreatment: days − 2 to 0). In contrast, the levels of lactoferrin and cathelicidin 7 decreased during or immediately after valine treatment.

Discussion

In the present study, valine treatment enhanced S100A7 secretion in both cultured GMECs and lactating mammary glands. S100A7 shows antimicrobial activity against E. coli [10]; therefore, treatment could contribute to preventing E. coli-induced mastitis. In the current study, valine treatment also increased intracellular concentrations of β-defensin 1 and cathelicidin 7 in cultured GMECs. Some pathogens such as S. aureus parasitize MECs and adversely affect milk production; however, increases in antimicrobial component concentrations in MECs can repress such parasitism [31]. Therefore, valine may also contribute to preventing S. aureus-induced mastitis. Overall, our study indicates that valine enhances the production of some important antimicrobial components in lactating mammary glands.

Mammary glands affected by mastitis or in the postweaning stage exhibit disrupted TJ barrier function, which increases SCC or blood-derived components in milk [32, 33]. In the present study, valine treatment did not affect TJ barrier function in either lactating mammary glands or cultured GMECs, and the level and localization of claudins were the same in the control and valine treatment groups. Claudin 3 is a major TJ protein in the mammary glands during lactation, whereas claudin 4 levels increase when inflammation increases [23, 34]. Our findings indicate that valine barely affects the TJ barrier function of lactating mammary glands. An amino acid–based oral rehydration solution containing valine has been reported to repress the disruption of intestinal TJ barrier function caused by total body irradiation [35]. This suggests that valine might improve damage to TJ barrier function, which occurs in mammary glands affected by mastitis. In our previous study, loose TJs in the mammary glands induced high antimicrobial component production by increasing the frequency of antigen exposure [26]. In contrast, valine treatment enhanced antimicrobial component production without affecting TJ barrier function.

In the present study, valine treatment enhanced the secretion of lactoferrin in cultured GMECs, whereas valine injection reduced lactoferrin levels in milk. Lactoferrin is produced by both MECs and leukocytes [22]. In the mammary glands, LAT1 and LAT3 act as transporters of valine [36, 37], and these proteins were expressed in both MECs and leukocytes. Further studies are needed to determine the influence of valine on leukocytes. We found that valine plasma concentrations were normal after 24 h, even when injections were repeated three times; however, the S100A7 and lactoferrin levels in milk were altered by valine injections. Thus, valine was apparently rapidly consumed, including in MECs and leukocytes. Further studies are required to determine whether supplementation of rumen-protected valine also regulates antimicrobial component production.

Conclusion

In this study, we investigated the effects of valine on the antimicrobial component production and TJ barrier function of lactating mammary glands. Valine enhanced the production of some antimicrobial components, but did not affect milk production and TJ barrier function. Therefore, valine treatment could contribute to stable and safe dairy production and the prevention of mastitis via antimicrobial component production.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (16.2KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Yukinori Yoshimura, Masayuki Shimada, Taketo Obitsu, and Takashi Umehara (Graduate School of Integrated Sciences for Life, Hiroshima University) for their helpful advice and technical assistance with our experiments.

Author Contributions

Yusaku Tsugami: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing–Original Draft, Funding acquisition, Project administration, SupervisionTakahiro Nii: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing–Review & EditingNaoki Isobe: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing–Review & Editing.

Funding

This study was supported by the KIEIKAI RESEARCH FOUDATION.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

The original online version of this article was revised: it was noted that due to renumbering of figure citations in the text, the figure images and captions were paired incorrectly. Figure citations, images and captions were amended accordingly.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

3/14/2023

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1007/s10911-023-09533-1

References

  • 1.Jamali H, Barkema HW, Jacques M, Lavallée-Bourget E, et al. Invited review: incidence, risk factors, and effects of clinical mastitis recurrence in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101:4729–46. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Murphy JM. The genesis of bovine udder infection and mastitis; the occurrence of streptococcal infection in a cow population during a seven-year period and its relationship to age. Am J Vet Res. 1947;8:29–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ruegg PL. A 100-Year review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100:10381–97. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-13023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Isobe N. Control mechanisms for producing antimicrobial factors in ruminant mammary gland. Anim Sci J. 2017;88:937–43. doi: 10.1111/asj.12808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baumgartner HK, Rudolph MC, Ramanathan P, Burns V, et al. Developmental expression of claudins in the mammary gland. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2017;22:141–57. doi: 10.1007/s10911-017-9379-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang GW, Lai SJ, Yoshimura Y, Isobe N. Messenger RNA expression and immunolocalization of psoriasin in the goat mammary gland and its milk concentration after an intramammary infusion of lipopolysaccharide. Vet J. 2014;202:89–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang GW, Lai SJ, Yoshimura Y, Isobe N. Expression of cathelicidins mRNA in the goat mammary gland and effect of the intramammary infusion of lipopolysaccharide on milk cathelicidin-2 concentration. Vet Microbiol. 2014;170:125–34. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yeung AT, Gellatly SL, Hancock RE. Multifunctional cationic host defence peptides and their clinical applications. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68:2161–76. doi: 10.1007/s00018-011-0710-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Legrand D, Pierce A, Elass E, Carpentier M, et al. Lactoferrin structure and functions. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;606:163–94. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-74087-4_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Regenhard P, Leippe M, Schubert S, Podschun R, et al. Antimicrobial activity of bovine psoriasin. Vet Microbiol. 2009;136:335–40. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Otani T, Furuse M. Tight junction structure and function revisited. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30:805–17. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Furuse M, Furuse K, Sasaki H, Tsukita S. Conversion of zonulae occludentes from tight to leaky strand type by introducing claudin-2 into Madin-Darby canine kidney I cells. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:263–72. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.2.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kobayashi K, Kumura H. Distinct behavior of claudin-3 and – 4 around lactation period in mammary alveolus in mice. Histochem Cell Biol. 2011;136:587–94. doi: 10.1007/s00418-011-0863-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Metcalf JA, Wray-Cahen D, Chettle EE, Sutton JD, et al. The effect of dietary crude protein as protected soybean meal on mammary metabolism in the lactating dairy cow. J Dairy Sci. 1996;79:603–11. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76405-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang J, He W, Yi D, Zhaoet D, et al. Regulation of protein synthesis in porcine mammary epithelial cells by L-valine. Amino Acids. 2019;51:717–26. doi: 10.1007/s00726-019-02709-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Che L, Xu M, Gao K, Zhu C, et al. Valine increases milk fat synthesis in mammary gland of gilts through stimulating AKT/MTOR/SREBP1 pathwaydagger. Biol Reprod. 2019;101:126–37. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioz065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ren M, Zhang S, Liu X, Li S, et al. Different lipopolysaccharide branched-chain amino acids modulate porcine intestinal endogenous beta-defensin expression through the Sirt1/ERK/90RSK pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64:3371–9. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Luo JB, Feng L, Jiang WD, Liu Y, et al. The impaired intestinal mucosal immune system by valine deficiency for young grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) is associated with decreasing immune status and regulating tight junction proteins transcript abundance in the intestine. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014;40:197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Feng L, Luo JB, Jiang WD, Liu Y, et al. Changes in barrier health status of the gill for grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) during valine deficiency: regulation of tight junction protein transcript, antioxidant status and apoptosis-related gene expression. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015;45:239–49. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2015.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Isobe N, Matsukawa S, Kubo K, Uenoe K, et al. Effects of oral administration of colostrum whey in peripartum goat on antimicrobial peptides in postpartum milk. Anim Sci J. 2020;91:e13365. doi: 10.1111/asj.13365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tsugami Y, Suzuki N, Kawahara M, Suzuki T, et al. Establishment of an in vitro culture model to study milk production and the blood-milk barrier with bovine mammary epithelial cells. Anim Sci J. 2020;91:e13355. doi: 10.1111/asj.13355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tsugami Y, Suzuki N, Nii T, Isobe N. Sodium acetate and sodium butyrate differentially upregulate antimicrobial component production in mammary glands of lactating goats. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2022;27:133–44. doi: 10.1007/s10911-022-09519-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tsugami Y, Wakasa H, Kawahara M, Watanabe A, et al. Adverse effects of LPS on membrane proteins in lactating bovine mammary epithelial cells. Cell Tissue Res. 2021;384:435–48. doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03344-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tsugami Y, Matsunaga K, Suzuki T, Nishimura T, et al. Phytoestrogens weaken the blood-milk barrier in lactating mammary epithelial cells by affecting tight junctions and cell viability. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65:11118–24. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ding LL, Matsumura M, Obitsu T, Sugino T. Phytol supplementation alters plasma concentrations of formate, amino acids, and lipid metabolites in sheep. Animal. 2021;15:100174. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tsugami Y, Nakayama S, Suzuki N, Nii Y, et al. Investigating mammary glands of lactating goats for the presence of tertiary lymphoid organs. Front Immunol. 2022;13:941333. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.941333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tsugami Y, Wakasa H, Kawahara M, Nishimura T, et al. Lipopolysaccharide and lipoteichoic acid influence milk production ability via different early responses in bovine mammary epithelial cells. Exp Cell Res. 2021;400:112472. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tsugami Y, Ishiba Y, Suzuki N, Nii T, et al. Local heat treatment of goat udders influences innate immune functions in mammary glands. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2021;26:387–97. doi: 10.1007/s10911-022-09509-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gunther J, Petzl W, Zerbe H, Schuberth HJ, et al. Lipopolysaccharide priming enhances expression of effectors of immune defence while decreasing expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in mammary epithelia cells from cows. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tsugami Y, Wakasa H, Nishimura T, Kobayashi K. Genistein directly represses the phosphorylation of STAT5 in lactating mammary epithelial cells. ACS Omega. 2021;6:22765–72. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c03107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ochoa-Zarzosa A, Villarreal-Fernández E, Cano-Camacho H, López-Meza JE, et al. Sodium butyrate inhibits Staphylococcus aureus internalization in bovine mammary epithelial cells and induces the expression of antimicrobial peptide genes. Microb Pathog. 2009;47:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2009.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bruckmaier RM, Weiss D, Wiedemann M, Schmitz S, et al. Changes of physicochemical indicators during mastitis and the effects of milk ejection on their sensitivity. J Dairy Res. 2004;71:316–21. doi: 10.1017/S0022029904000366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Korhonen H, Marnila P, Gill HS. Milk immunoglobulins and complement factors. Br J Nutr. 2000;84:75–S80. doi: 10.1017/S0007114500002282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kobayashi K, Oyama S, Numata A, Rahman MM, et al. Lipopolysaccharide disrupts the milk-blood barrier by modulating claudins in mammary alveolar tight junctions. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e62187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gupta R, Yin L, Grosche A, Linet S, et al. An amino acid-based oral rehydration solution regulates radiation-induced intestinal barrier disruption in mice. J Nutr. 2020;150:1100–8. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kanai Y, Segawa H, Miyamoto K, Uchino H, et al. Expression cloning and characterization of a transporter for large neutral amino acids activated by the heavy chain of 4F2 antigen (CD98) J Biol Chem. 1998;273:23629–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.37.23629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Babu E, Kanai Y, Chairoungdua A, Kim DK, et al. Identification of a novel system L amino acid transporter structurally distinct from heterodimeric amino acid transporters. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:43838–45. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305221200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (16.2KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES