Skip to main content
Cancer Medicine logoLink to Cancer Medicine
. 2022 Sep 6;12(3):3684–3695. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5222

Antimicrobial drug use and the risk of glioma: A case–control study

Tareq M Haedenkamp 1,, Michael F Leitzmann 2, Ralf A Linker 1, Christoph Meier 3,4,5, Claudia Becker 3,5, Susan Jick 4,6, Peter Hau 1, Corinna Seliger 7
PMCID: PMC9939229  PMID: 36066038

Abstract

Background

The use of antibiotics has been associated with increased risks of various cancers. Comprehensive information on the association of antibiotic use with the risk of glioma is lacking.

Methods

We performed a large case–control study based on the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD from the United Kingdom. We identified 4423 glioma cases recorded between 1995 and 2020 and matched them to controls (1:10) on the date of diagnosis (i.e., the index date), age, sex, general practice, and number of years of medical history in the database prior to the index date. We conducted conditional logistic regression analyses to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The exposures of interest were the use of antimicrobial drugs, including antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antiprotozoal, and anthelmintic drugs with specific subclasses, where possible.

Results

We found no substantially increased risk of glioma after ever‐use of antibiotics (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03–1.24). The risk did not increase with the increasing number of prescriptions received or with increasing time from first use to cancer diagnosis. The use of polyenes was associated with a weakly decreased risk of glioma (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67–0.96).

Keywords: antibiotics, antifungals, case–control study, glioma, infectious disease


In this large case–control study, we found no substantially increased risk of glioma among users of most antimicrobial drugs. The risk did not increase with increasing numbers of prescriptions received or with increasing time from first use to cancer diagnosis. The use of polyenes yielded a weak inverse association with the risk of glioma, which needs to be confirmed independently.

graphic file with name CAM4-12-3684-g001.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Gliomas are primary brain tumors with a mostly malignant phenotype. 1 Glioblastoma is the most common type of glioma. 2 Glioblastomas are associated with a poor median survival of 15–26 months despite standard therapy with resection, combined radio‐chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with or without tumor‐treating fields. 3 , 4 , 5 Ionizing radiation is currently the only known environmental factor associated with increased risk of gliomas. 6

Antibiotics are among the most commonly prescribed drugs, with around 30% of patients receiving at least one antibiotic prescription per year. 7 Several studies have investigated the association between antibiotic use and risk of different cancers. While some studies have reported an increased risk of several or specific cancers 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 in relation to antibiotic use, other investigations found no association, 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 or no dose‐dependent association. 21 , 22 One study observed an inverse association between use of antibiotics and risk of cervical carcinoma. 23 Only one cohort study based on the Population Registry in Finland reported on the risk of central nervous system (CNS) cancers after antibiotic use and found a slightly increased risk (OR 1.31 after 6 or more prescriptions). 11

Antibiotics may influence glioma risk through direct or indirect mechanisms. Direct mechanisms include effects of antibiotics on cancer stem cells or differentiated tumor cells such as alteration of mitochondrial ribosome function, as reported for macrolides or tetracyclines. 24 Indirect mechanisms include long‐term alterations of the intestinal microbiota, 25 possibly inducing effects on the immune system of the host. 26 The same pathophysiological considerations apply to other antimicrobials like antifungals, antiprotozoals, or antivirals. For example, infection with herpes simplex virus and treatment with acyclovir independently caused dysbiosis in an animal model. 27 Since there is no comprehensive information on the association of antimicrobial drug use with the risk of glioma, we performed a case–control study based on data from a large and validated database.

2. METHODS

2.1. Data source

The data for the current study were obtained from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD. The CPRD is a primary care database with longitudinal medical information on about 11 million patients from more than 670 general practices, representative of the United Kingdom (UK) population with respect to age, sex, and ethnicity. 28 Data on demographic information, prescriptions, clinical events, and patient characteristics are collected by general practitioners and made available for research. 28 Previous studies conducted with the CPRD have shown a high validity of the diagnostic coding system. 29

This study was approved by the Independent Scientific Advisory Committee for Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency database research (protocol no: 19_189).

The study protocol was made available to journal editors and peer reviewers (additional file for review but not for publication).

Data for this study were derived from CPRD primary care data obtained under license from the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. The data are provided by patients and collected by the National Health Service (NHS) as part of their care and support. The interpretation and conclusions contained in this study are those of the authors alone.

2.2. Cases

Cases were all patients aged less than 90 years at first glioma diagnosis between 1995 and 2020. We used Read codes to identify patients with an incident diagnosis of glioma (see Table S1). The index date was defined as the date of the first glioma diagnosis minus 1 year to account for the lag time between tumor development and detection. In order to include only incident glioma cases and to ensure enough history in the database to ascertain exposure, we included only patients with at least 3 years of active history in the database before the index date. We excluded all patients with a history of any other cancer, recorded alcoholism or human immunodeficiency virus infection prior to the index date.

2.3. Controls

We matched 10 controls to each case on index date, age (plus/minus 2 years), sex, general practice (where it was possible), and number of years of medical history in the database prior to the index date (plus/minus 2 years). We applied the same exclusion criteria to controls as to cases. Furthermore, patients with a history of craniotomy in the year before the index date were not eligible to be controls in order to minimize the risk of using control patients with unrecorded glioma diagnosis. We described a similar approach for identification of cases and controls in a previous paper. 30 , 31

2.4. Exposures

In this study, the term “antibiotic” refers to antibacterial drugs specifically. The term antimicrobial drugs refer to the entire group of antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antiprotozoal, and anthelmintic drugs.

The use of antibiotic drugs, defined as at least 1 recorded prescription for an antibiotic drug, was the exposure of interest in this study. First, we assessed antibiotic use as a combined variable for any antibiotic drug, and then we investigated the following common antibiotic classes separately: penicillins, cephalosporins, and other beta‐lactams, chloramphenicol, macrolides, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, sulfonamides and trimethoprim, linezolid, lipopeptides, lincosamides, tetracyclines, nitrofurantoin, nitroimidazole derivates, quinolones, rifamycins, drugs against mycobacteria, and lastly a group of other remaining antibiotics. Additionally, we classified antibiotics by mechanism (inhibitors of cell wall synthesis, protein synthesis, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) synthesis, folic acid synthesis) and by bactericidal versus bacteriostatic action. We also explored exposure to antiviral, antifungal, antiprotozoal, anthelmintic drugs, and topical antimicrobial drugs, and to specific subgroups of drugs (antivirals against herpes simplex virus, hepatitis viruses, human immunodeficiency virus and influenza, echinocandins, imidazoles, triazoles, polyenes, and other antifungals).

We defined ever‐use of antibiotics as one or more antibiotic prescriptions before the index date. We further examined the dose‐dependency of the association by exploring the number of prescriptions before the index date (1 prescription, 2–4 prescriptions, ≥5 prescriptions). Cut‐off values were primarily based on quartiles and median value of number of prescriptions of any antimicrobial drug and adjusted because of small case numbers in the category with most prescriptions. We also explored time since first prescription (1–5 years, 6–10 years, 11–15 years, >15 years).

Finally, we assessed the association between history of infectious disease and the risk of glioma. We considered infections of the central nervous system, pneumonia, other infections of the respiratory tract, sepsis, fungal infections, gastrointestinal infections, hepatic and biliary infections, urogenital infections, malaria, tuberculosis, syphilis, and skin infections as specific exposures.

2.5. Statistical analysis

We conducted conditional logistic regression analyses to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

In univariate analyses, we investigated the influence of potential confounding variables including body mass index (BMI) (closest recording prior to the index date), smoking status (closest recording prior to the index date), common comorbidities (asthma, chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, hypertension, stroke, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), epilepsy, renal disease) and use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressive drugs. We assumed that patients with comorbidities and those under treatment with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs tend to have more infections. We only included variables that significantly altered the beta‐estimate of the risk estimate of glioma by >10% in the final multivariable analysis. Infectious diseases were included in the multivariable model a priori, irrespective of the results of the univariate analysis.

We stratified all analyses by sex, age group (<40, 40–60, >60 years), and glioma subtype.

We also conducted tests of linear trend by modeling the median value of each category of the number of antibiotic prescriptions, the time since first prescription, and the duration of exposure as a continuous variable in the multivariable model, the coefficient for which was evaluated using a Wald test.

We considered a two‐sided p‐value of <0.05 as statistically significant. We corrected p value thresholds of the analyses of specific antibiotic drugs for multiple testing according to the Bonferroni method. We performed those corrections separately for the main antimicrobial classes, classifications by mechanism, and specific antibiotics because the drugs were the same in each of these categories.

We used SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc) to perform statistical analyses.

3. RESULTS

We identified 4423 glioma cases and 44,230 matched controls, with a mean (SD) age of 54 (±19.54) years and with slightly more men (55.1%) than women (44.9%). Matching on general practice was possible for 42,789 controls (96.7%). Cases had a mean history in the database of 11.8 years prior to the index date. A total of 880 cases (19.9%) had a World Health Organization grade I/II/III glioma, 1910 cases (43.2%) had glioblastoma, and 1633 cases (36.9%) had a glioma that was not further specified. More information on basic characteristics of cases and controls is depicted in Table 1. In accordance with the CPRD guidelines, we show no results that contain less than five events.

TABLE 1.

Patient characteristics of glioma cases and their matched controls

Cases (n = 4423) Controls (n = 44,230) Crude OR (95% CI) p value
Number (%) Number (%)
Sex
Male 2437 (55.1) 24,370 (55.1)
Female 1986 (44.9) 19,860 (44.9)
Age group
0–39 930 (21.0) 9279 (21.0)
40–59 1404 (31.7) 14,042 (31.8)
≥60 2089 (47.2) 20,909 (47.3)
Number of recorded years prior to the index date
≤5 519 (11.7) 5138 (11.6)
6–10 1482 (33.5) 14,608 (33.0)
11–20 1922 (43.5) 19,481 (44.0)
>20 500 (11.3) 5003 (11.3)
Smoking status
Smoker 662 (15.0) 7320 (16.6) 0.84 (0.77–0.92) <0.001
Past‐smoker 1093 (24.7) 10,784 (24.4) 0.96 (0.88–1.04) 0.296
Non‐smoker 2062 (46.6) 19,348 (43.7) 1.00 (reference)
Unknown 606 (13.7) 6778 (15.3) 0.74 (0.65–0.84) <0.001
BMI (kg/m2)
<18.5 29 (0.7) 553 (1.3) 0.52 (0.36–0.76) 0.001
18.5–24.9 1222 (27.6) 12,159 (27.5) 1.00 (reference)
25–29.9 1315 (29.7) 12,623 (28.5) 1.04 (0.96–1.13) 0.361
≥30 772 (17.5) 7748 (17.5) 0.99 (0.90–1.10) 0.910
Unknown 1085 (24.5) 11,147 (25.2) 0.95 (0.85–1.05) 0.286
Comorbidities
Asthma 571 (12.9) 5823 (13.2) 0.98 (0.89–1.07) 0.624
COPD 110 (2.5) 1320 (3.0) 0.82 (0.67–1.01) 0.051
Arrhythmia 125 (2.8) 1176 (2.7) 1.07 (0.88–1.29) 0.509
Congestive heart failure 51 (1.2) 722 (1.6) 0.70 (0.52–0.93) 0.010
Myocardial infarction 120 (2.7) 1497 (3.4) 0.79 (0.65–0.96) 0.012
Hypertension 1065 (24.1) 10,905 (24.7) 0.96 (0.89–1.04) 0.341
Stroke 146 (3.3) 1684 (3.8) 0.86 (0.72–1.02) 0.078
Hyperlipidemia 450 (10.2) 4726 (10.7) 0.94 (0.84–1.05) 0.258
Diabetes 270 (6.1) 3084 (7.0) 0.86 (0.75–0.98) 0.023
DVT 86 (1.9) 616 (1.4) 1.41 (1.12–1.77) 0.005
Epilepsy 206 (4.7) 712 (1.6) 3.04 (2.59–3.57) <0.001
Renal disease 130 (2.9) 1075 (2.4) 1.22 (1.01–1.47) 0.036
Comedication Number of prescriptions
NSAIDs 0 1879 (42.5) 19,275 (43.6) 1.00 (reference)
1–9 1982 (44.8) 19,320 (43.7) 1.06 (0.99–1.14)
≥10 562 (12.7) 5635 (12.7) 1.03 (0.93–1.15)
Opioids 0 2989 (67.6) 30,632 (69.3) 1.00 (reference)
1–9 1104 (25.0) 10,192 (23.0) 1.12 (1.04–1.21)
≥10 330 (7.5) 3406 (7.7) 1.01 (0.89–1.14)
Corticosteroids 0 3320 (75.1) 33,247 (75.2) 1.00 (reference)
1–9 983 (22.2) 9558 (21.6) 1.03 (0.95–1.11)
≥10 120 (2.7) 1425 (3.2) 0.84 (0.69–1.02)
Immunosupressants 0 4378 (99.0) 43,711 (98.8) 1.00 (reference)
1–9 11 (0.3) 155 (0.4) 0.71 (0.38–1.31)
≥10 34 (0.8) 364 (0.8) 0.93 (0.65–1.33)

Note: No correction for multiple testing was performed.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug.

We considered a two‐sided p value of <0.05 as statistically significant. These results are indicated in bold.

In univariate analyses, cases were less likely to be smokers than controls (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77–0.92). Low BMI (BMI < 18.5) was associated with lower risk of glioma (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.36–0.76) compared to normal weight. Congestive heart failure (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52–0.93), myocardial infarction (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.96), and diabetes (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75–0.98) were comorbidities with an inverse relation to glioma, whereas DVT (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.12–1.77), epilepsy (OR 3.04, 95% CI 2.59–3.57) and renal disease (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01–1.47) showed an increased risk. Concomitant use of opioids, NSAIDs, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressive drugs had no impact on risk of glioma (Table 1).

When we performed univariable analyses of various infectious diseases to assess their potential as confounders, none of the specific infectious diseases investigated (pneumonia, other respiratory tract infection, fungal infection, gastrointestinal tract infection, hepatitis and biliary tract infection, urogenital infection, and skin infections) were materially related to the risk of developing glioma (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Infectious diseases and the risk of glioma

Infectious disease Cases (n = 4423) Controls (n = 44,230) Crude OR (95% CI) p value
Number (%) Number (%)
Any infection 3038 (68.69) 29,808 (67.39) 1.08 (1.00–1.17) 0.045
CNS infection 20 (0.5) 162 (0.4) 1.24 (0.78–1.97) 0.386
Pneumonia 94 (2.1) 992 (2.2) 0.95 (0.76–1.17) 0.610
Other respiratory tract infection 2325 (52.6) 23,307 (52.7) 0.99 (0.93–1.07) 0.852
Sepsis 15 (0.3) 141 (0.3) 1.06 (0.62–1.82) 0.820
Fungal infection 362 (8.2) 3594 (8.1) 1.01 (0.90–1.14) 0.885
Gastrointestinal tract infection 500 (11.3) 4728 (10.7) 1.07 (0.97–1.18) 0.199
Hepatitis and biliary tract infection 47 (1.1) 406 (0.9) 1.16 (0.86–1.58) 0.346
Urogenital infection 541 (12.2) 5277 (11.9) 1.03 (0.93–1.15) 0.525
Malaria 7 (0.2) 58 (0.1) 1.21 (0.55–2.64) 0.647
Tuberculosis 40 (0.9) 446 (1.0) 0.90 (0.65–1.24) 0.500
Skin infection and abscess 1420 (32.1) 13,715 (31.0) 1.06 (0.99–1.14) 0.110
By latency (years)
Pneumonia
Never 4329 (97.9) 43,241 (97.8) 1.00 (reference)
<5 20 (0.5) 287 (0.7) 0.70 (0.44–1.10)
5–10 26 (0.6) 166 (0.4) 1.56 (1.03–2.36)
>10 48 (1.1) 536 (1.2) 0.89 (0.66–1.21)
p value for trend 0.554
Other respiratory tract infection
Never 2100 (47.5) 20,926 (47.3) 1.00 (reference)
<5 661 (14.9) 6369 (14.4) 1.04 (0.94–1.14)
5–10 673 (15.2) 7023 (15.9) 0.95 (0.86–1.05)
>10 989 (22.4) 9912 (22.4) 0.99 (0.89–1.09)
p value for trend 0.612
Fungal infection
Never 4061 (91.8) 40,636 (91.9) 1.00 (reference)
<5 135 (3.1) 1144 (2.6) 1.19 (0.99–1.43)
5–10 100 (2.3) 1056 (2.4) 0.95 (0.77–1.17)
>10 127 (2.9) 1394 (3.2) 0.90 (0.74–1.10)
p value for trend 0.996
Gastrointestinal tract infection
Never 3923 (88.7) 39,505 (89.3) 1.00 (reference)
<5 163 (3.7) 1570 (3.6) 1.05 (0.89–1.24)
5–10 147 (3.3) 1377 (3.1) 1.08 (0.91–1.29)
>10 190 (4.3) 1778 (4.0) 1.08 (0.92–1.27)
p value for trend 0.349
Hepatitis and biliary tract infection
Never 4376 (98.9) 43,830 (99.1) 1.00 (reference)
<5 5 (0.1) 57 (0.1) 0.88 (0.35–2.20)
5–10 7 (0.2) 56 (0.1) 1.26 (0.57–2.78)
>10 35 (0.8) 287 (0.7) 1.22 (0.86–1.74)
p value for trend 0.215
Urogenital infection
Never 3882 (87.8) 38,954 (88.1) 1.00 (reference)
<5 176 (4.0) 1654 (3.7) 1.07 (0.91–1.26)
5–10 152 (3.4) 1401 (3.2) 1.10 (0.92–1.31)
>10 213 (4.8) 2221 (5.0) 0.96 (0.82–1.12)
p value for trend 0.243
Skin infection and abscess
Never 3003 (67.9) 30,518 (69.0) 1.00 (reference)
<5 539 (12.2) 4982 (11.3) 1.10 (1.00–1.22)
5–10 426 (9.6) 4684 (10.6) 1.08 (0.96–1.20)
>10 455 (10.3) 4684 (10.6) 0.99 (0.88–1.11)
p value for trend 0.681

Note: Not reportable (<5 events): Syphilis. We performed Bonferroni correction for multiple testing of p value thresholds. Significant results after Bonferroni correction are indicated by an asterisk (*).

Abbreviations: CNS, central nervous system.

We considered a two‐sided p value of <0.05 as statistically significant. These results are indicated in bold.

We considered comorbidities and co‐medications that were statistically significantly associated with glioma risk as potential confounding factors along with every specific infectious disease. We included the corresponding variables in the multivariable analysis of antimicrobial drug use.

First, we investigated the role of any antimicrobial drug use. Despite reaching statistical significance, the relative risk of glioma for ever‐use of antibacterials, in general, was not substantially increased (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03–1.24), nor was there an association with the use of antivirals, antifungals, antiprotozoals, or anthelmintics (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Ever‐use of antimicrobial drugs and risk of glioma

Antimicrobial drug Cases (n = 4423) Controls (n = 44,230) Adjusted OR (95% CI) p value
Number (%) Number (%)
Ever‐use
Antibiotics/Antibacterials 3491 (78.9) 34,212 (77.4) 1.13 (1.03–1.24) 0.008 *
Antivirals 192 (4.3) 1970 (4.5) 0.96 (0.82–1.12) 0.617
Antifungals 967 (21.9) 9551 (21.6) 1.01 (0.92–1.10) 0.874
Antiprotozoals 319 (7.2) 3119 (7.1) 1.02 (0.90–1.15) 0.780
Anthelmintics 86 (1.9) 881 (2.0) 0.96 (0.76–1.21) 0.740
Antibiotics by mechanism
Bactericidal 3317 (75.0) 32,403 (73.3) 1.13 (1.03–1.23) 0.006 *
Bacteriostatic 1337 (30.2) 13,416 (30.3) 0.99 (0.92–1.07) 0.754
Cell wall inhibitors 3194 (2.2) 31,251 (70.7) 1.10 (1.01–1.20) 0.020
Inhibitors of protein synthesis 1737 (39.3) 17,510 (39.6) 0.98 (0.91–1.05) 0.549
Inhibitors of DNA/RNA synthesis 1022 (23.1) 10,384 (23.5) 0.97 (0.89–1.05) 0.392
Inhibitors of folic acid synthesis 140 (3.2) 1234 (2.8) 1.16 (0.96–1.41) 0.127
Specific antibiotics
Penicillins 3058 (69.1) 29,871 (67.5) 1.10 (1.01–1.19) 0.021
Cephalosporins and beta lactams 866 (19.6) 8715 (19.7) 0.97 (0.89–1.06) 0.520
Macrolides 1261 (28.5) 12,825 (29.0) 0.97 (0.90–1.04) 0.375
Sulfonamides and trimethoprim 140 (3.2) 1234 (2.8) 1.16 (0.96–1.41) 0.127
Lincosamides 18 (0.4) 131 (0.3) 1.36 (0.82–2.24) 0.231
Tetracyclines 923 (20.9) 9360 (21.2) 0.98 (0.90–1.06) 0.602
Nitrofurantoin 178 (4.0) 1731 (3.9) 1.01 (0.85–1.20) 0.914
Nitroimidazole derivates 723 (16.4) 7330 (16.6) 0.97 (0.89–1.07) 0.575
Rifamycins 6 (0.1) 131 (0.3) 0.48 (0.21–1.10) 0.081
Quinolones 495 (11.2) 4930 (11.2) 0.99 (0.89–1.10) 0.894
Antimycobacterials 12 (0.3) 172 (0.4) 0.72 (0.40–1.29) 0.266
Specific antivirals
Effective against influenza 8 (0.2) 64 (0.1) 1.25 (0.60–2.61) 0.556
Effective against herpes simplex virus 185 (4.2) 1909 (4.3) 0.95 (0.81–1.11) 0.520
Specific antifungals
Imidazoles 6 (0.1) 41 (0.1) 1.43 (0.60–3.37) 0.418
Triazoles 719 (16.3) 7174 (16.2) 0.99 (0.90–1.09) 0.848
Polyenes 169 (3.8) 2017 (4.6) 0.81 (0.67–0.96) 0.017
Other antifungals 192 (4.3) 1787 (4.0) 1.07 (0.92–1.25) 0.385
Topical antimicrobial drugs
Topical antibiotics 2534 (57.3) 24,582 (55.6) 1.07 (1.00–1.15) 0.052
Topical antifungals 1852 (41.9) 18,196 (41.1) 1.02 (0.95–1.09) 0.605
Topical antivirals 205 (4.6) 1731 (3.9) 1.18 (1.01–1.37) 0.033

Note: Adjusted for: BMI, smoking, diabetes, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, epilepsy, renal disease, opioid use, and infectious diseases. Not reportable (<5 events): Aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, glycopeptides, linezolid, lipopeptides, other remaining antibiotics, antivirals against hepatitis and human immunodeficiency virus, echinocandins. We performed Bonferroni correction for multiple testing of p value thresholds.

*

Significant results after Bonferroni correction.

We considered a two‐sided p value of <0.05 as statistically significant. These results are indicated in bold.

There was no material interdependence between the use of antibiotic drugs according to mechanism of action and risk of glioma (Table 3).

When we examined specific antimicrobial drugs there was no meaningful relation between ever‐use of penicillins and risk of glioma (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.19). By comparison, use of polyenes, which are a specific class of antifungals, yielded an inverse association with the risk of glioma (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67–0.96) (Table 3).

Results did not change materially upon stratification by age and glioma subtype. In analyses stratified by sex the Ors for ever‐use of antibiotics, bactericidal drugs, cell wall inhibitors, and penicillins were not materially different in women compared to men. In contrast, the use of folic acid synthesis inhibitors was related to an increased glioma risk in women (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.07–1.80), but not in men (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.70–1.26).

There was no association between number of prescriptions for any of the antibiotics or microbials and risk of glioma when we examined the numbers of prescriptions recorded before the index date. (Table S2). Time of first antimicrobial use showed no importance regarding the risk of glioma. For 1 to 5, 6 to 10, 11 to 15, or more than 15 years since first prescription, use of polyenes showed inverse, albeit statistically non‐significant ORs of 0.88, 0.79, 0.69, and 0.75, respectively, but the test for linear trend was statistically significant (p value for trend 0.016) (Table S3).

After correction for multiple testing, the only associations that remained statistically (but likely not clinically) significant were those of ever‐use of total antibiotics and bactericidal antibiotics to risk of glioma.

4. DISCUSSION

In this large case–control study based on 4423 glioma cases and 44,230 controls, we found no association between the use of antibiotics and a materially altered risk of developing glioma, regardless of type of antibiotic, cumulative dose (number of prescriptions), or timing of use.

While there are many studies that investigated the effect of antibiotic use on other cancers, especially colorectal cancer and breast cancer, 8 , 10 , 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 , 32 to date, there is no specific information on the association between antibiotic use and the occurrence of gliomas.

A nested case–control study from New Zealand included 6678 patients with any cancer and found positive associations of breast cancer, lung cancer, and colorectal cancer with use of antibiotics. In that study, 95 cases had brain tumors that were not further classified and previous use of antibiotics was not associated with brain tumor risk. 9 A cohort study based on the Population Registry in Finland examined antibiotic use between 1995 and 1997 in more than 3 million healthy individuals and ascertained 134,070 cancers during follow‐up between 1998 and 2004, 4351 of which were some form of brain tumor. The authors of that study observed an increased risk of brain tumors after antibiotic use. 11 However, the study did not provide information on the classification of brain tumors. Conclusions from their results are therefore limited, as brain tumors include more than 200 distinct entities and only around 24.5% of brain tumors are gliomas. 2

Antibiotics may be associated with risk of cancer in several ways: First, a direct mechanism of action is conceivable. Doxycycline, azithromycin, tigecycline, and the antiparasitic drug pyrvinium pamoate inhibit sphere formation in several cancer stem cell lines, presumably by targeting mitochondrial ribosome function. 24 Penicillins are classical beta‐lactam antibiotics that act through acylation of the active site of the bacterial cell wall transpeptidase. 33 To our knowledge, there is no information available on direct effects of penicillins on tumor cell growth. Another intriguing link between antibiotic use and glioma risk are mechanisms involving alterations of the intestinal microbiota. We previously reported a positive association between inflammatory bowel diseases, that usually show dysbiosis, and the risk of glioma in patients younger than 40 years. 31 The half‐life period of most antimicrobial drugs is only a few hours, which raises the question how these drugs could possibly have an impact on the development of gliomas years after their first prescription. It is well documented that antibiotic use leads to long‐lasting perturbations of the microbial diversity in the gut both in humans and animal models. 25 , 34 , 35 A recent meta‐analysis showed that antibiotics including penicillins such as amoxicillin, increase the abundance of enterobacteriacea. 36 A strong depletion of anaerobic bacteria is observed after use of the penicillin piperacillin. 36 Numerous antibiotics are associated with a decrease in butyrate‐producing bacteria. 36 Perinatal administration of beta‐lactams leads to lower serum levels of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in infants. 37 SCFAs play an important role in maturation and function of microglia of the CNS 38 and could therefore represent a candidate for the interaction of antibiotic‐induced alterations of the intestinal microbiota and glioma risk. Furthermore, alterations of the intestinal microbiota modulate immunological cells not only in the gut, but also in the peripheral blood by mechanisms involving SCFAs, 39 , 40 as well as serum cytokine levels. 41 A dysfunctional immune system plays an important role in the pathophysiology of gliomas. 42 Apart from SCFAs, penicillins modulate serum levels of other metabolites such as those of serotonine and bile acids. 43 , 44 The results of our study suggest a slightly increased risk of glioma after use of penicillins, but not of other antibiotics. However, an OR of 1.1 derived from observational data may be explained by residual bias or confounding and cannot be considered to be a clinically important finding. Furthermore, underlying infections could also explain the observed associations. To address this, we included various infectious diseases in our multivariable model. This did not alter the risk estimates, but we cannot rule out residual confounding.

There was no dose–response found in this analysis. The effect of antibiotics on the risk of glioma did not change with increased number of prescriptions. However, as antibiotic drug use leads to long‐lasting alterations of the intestinal microbiota, 25 , 34 , 35 a single prescription could in theory result in long‐term perturbations of serum levels of SCFAs, tryptophane metabolites, and secondary bile acids. We did not find evidence for this in this study.

Interestingly, we observed an inverse relation between use of polyenes and risk of glioma. Polyenes are broad‐spectrum antifungal drugs acting by formation of ion‐channel like complexes in interaction with ergosterol. 45 In spite of its high toxicity, amphotericin B, and nystatin are effective systemically acting polyenes still in clinical use for treatment of invasive fungal infections. 45 We found no previous epidemiologic study that investigated associations between the use of polyenes and glioma incidence. Experimental data show that amphotericin B is able to inhibit sphere formation in brain tumor‐initiating cells in vitro by activation of microglia and macrophages. 46 Mice with glioma that receive amphotericin B show longer survival periods. 46 Another study with rat glioma cell lines also suggests anti‐tumor efficacy of Amphotericin B. 47 We were not able to document a dose–response relation in our study, but only 12 glioma cases received five or more prescriptions compared to 115 cases that received one prescription. Due to their high toxicity, polyenes are usually restricted to severely ill patients with no other therapeutic alternatives. 45 This might lead to lower detection rates of subsequent glioma in these patients whose prognosis is limited by severe infection. This is supported by our observation that cases with an increasingly long period since their first prescription of polyenes showed a reduced risk of glioma.

Epilepsy, DVT, and use of opioids were associated with a higher risk of glioma. These associations could be explained by reverse causation in patients with undiagnosed glioma, because these conditions were recorded before the index date. In order to reduce the possibility of reverse causation and to account for the lag time between tumor development and detection, the index date was set 1 year before diagnosis of glioma.

Cases and controls with Human Immuno deficiency Virus [HIV] infection were excluded from the study and we could not identify any cases with HIV antiviral prescriptions. However, we identified four controls (0.009%) that received HIV antivirals. Other indications for these prescriptions like post‐exposition prophylaxis are possible. However, we cannot fully rule out missing diagnosis coding.

This study has some limitations. Lack of hospital data is the main limitation. Specifically, we might have missed information on severely ill patients with repeated antimicrobial drug administration over a long period. Similarly, we did not have information on the use of antibiotics in hospital and may have missed the use of intravenously administered antibiotics such as glycopeptides, which are administered predominantly in inpatient care. However, in 2020, around 72.7% of all antibiotics in England were prescribed by general practitioners and only 12.8% by hospital physicians. 48 Antibiotics lead to alterations of the intestinal microbiota. However, alterations of the intestinal microbiota could also occur after other potentially confounding environmental changes such as the intake of probiotics as a dietary measure. This represents a limitation of our study, because, unlike antibiotics, these products are usually available over the counter and therefore not recorded by general practitioners. Another limitation of our study is possible non‐compliance with the prescribed drugs. Self‐reported non‐adherence was described as being around 10%–11% in two European countries. 49 However, non‐compliance includes missing single doses or leftover doses in most cases. It is unlikely that not even a single dose of a prescription is taken. In addition, all data that were investigated in this study were recorded by general practitioners. Thus, missing or delayed documentation of prescriptions or misclassification of diagnoses is possible. Nonetheless, this is unlikely to play an important role, as the validity of the CPRD GOLD database has been demonstrated multiple times, 29 and general practitioners often record diagnoses supplied by oncologists. Another potential limitation is that many years of life may not be covered by the database as cases and controls have a mean age of 54 years and a mean history of 11.8 years prior to the index date. This means that the exposure assessment in this study is based on a considerably long observation period, but does not reflect the life‐time prevalence of antimicrobial use in cases and controls. We only considered patients with at least 3 years of active history in the database and we showed detailed analyses for the association of antimicrobial drug use with glioma incidence stratified by time after diagnosis covering over 15 years. Furthermore, if misclassification occurred, it was most likely non‐differential, which would have biased the potential effect toward the null. Thus, an increased risk of glioma may have been weakened to some degree by misclassification. Furthermore, adjustment for socioeconomic status was not possible because such information is not regularly recorded in the CPRD. In order to account for this, we matched controls to cases based on general practice, because persons of the same geographic area tend to be of a comparable socioeconomic status. The association between ever‐use of antibiotics and glioma risk was most pronounced in patients older than 60 years of age. The incidence of glioma is higher in older patients 2 and older patients are more likely to have ever received antibiotics, leading to possible bias. However, our statistical test for interaction by age remained non‐significant.

Our study has several strengths. To date, no previous study has provided specific insights on the association between antimicrobial drug use and incidence of glioma. The CPRD includes data on more than 11 million patients with acceptable quality for research purposes. 28 We were able to perform a large case–control study with 4423 glioma cases. Another major strength of our study is that, in contrast to many other case–control studies, recall bias caused by self‐report plays only a minor role, since the data in the CPRD are prospectively collected by general practitioners. 28

In conclusion, we investigated associations between antimicrobial drugs and the risk of subsequent glioma in a large population‐based case–control study with 4423 glioma cases and 44,230 controls. We did not find evidence for an increased risk of glioma in ever‐use of antibiotics as a group or in subgroup analyses. We observed an inverse association between use of polyenes and incidence of glioma. Further research is necessary to independently confirm these results and to clarify possible underlying mechanisms that could be harnessed for therapeutic interventions.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Christoph R. Meier: Data curation (equal); project administration (equal). Claudia Becker: Data curation (equal); project administration (equal). Corinna Seliger: Conceptualization (equal); methodology (equal); supervision (equal). Michael Leitzmann: Conceptualization (equal); methodology (equal); resources (lead). Peter Hau: Conceptualization (equal); supervision (equal). Ralf Linker: Conceptualization (equal). Susan Jick: Data curation (equal); project administration (equal). Tareq Marius Haedenkamp: Conceptualization (equal); formal analysis (lead); methodology (equal); writing – original draft (lead).

ETHICS APPROVAL

This study was approved by the Independent Scientific Advisory Committee for Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency database research (protocol no: 19_189). Informed consent was not required as the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) provides anonymized data from medical records. This study is based in part on data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink obtained under license from the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. The data is provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and support. The interpretation and conclusions contained in this study are those of the author/s alone.

Supporting information

Table S1

Table S2

Table S3

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Pascal Egger for the excellent advice regarding technical issues and programming. This work was supported by the Else Kroener‐Fresenius Stiftung (Tareq M. Haedenkamp). This work was performed in the framework of the Regensburg Brain Tumor Center (Zentrum fuer Hirntumoren, ZHT; https://www.ukr.de/zentren/zentrum‐fuer‐hirntumoren/index.php).

Haedenkamp TM, Leitzmann MF, Linker RA, et al. Antimicrobial drug use and the risk of glioma: A case–control study. Cancer Med. 2023;12:3684‐3695. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5222

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the authors with the permission of the CPRD.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:1231‐1251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Waite K, Kruchko C, Barnholtz‐Sloan JS. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:iii1‐iii105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, et al. Effect of tumor‐treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:2306‐2316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987‐996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Gorlia T, et al. Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CENTRIC EORTC 26071‐22072 study): a multicentre, randomised, open‐label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1100‐1108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Inskip PD, Linet MS, Heineman EF. Etiology of brain tumors in adults. Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17:382‐414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Dolk FCK, Pouwels KB, Smith DRM, Robotham JV, Smieszek T. Antibiotics in primary care in England: which antibiotics are prescribed and for which conditions? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:ii2‐ii10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Boursi B, Mamtani R, Haynes K, Yang Y‐X. Recurrent antibiotic exposure may promote cancer formation–another step in understanding the role of the human microbiota? Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:2655‐2664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Didham RC, Reith DM, McConnell DW, Harrison KS. Antibiotic exposure and breast cancer in New Zealand. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;92:163‐167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Dik VK, van Oijen MGH, Smeets HM, Siersema PD. Frequent use of antibiotics is associated with colorectal cancer risk: results of a nested case‐control study. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:255‐264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kilkkinen A, Rissanen H, Klaukka T, et al. Antibiotic use predicts an increased risk of cancer. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:2152‐2155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Knekt P, Adlercreutz H, Rissanen H, Aromaa A, Teppo L, Heliövaara M. Does antibacterial treatment for urinary tract infection contribute to the risk of breast cancer? Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1107‐1110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tamim HM, Hajeer AH, Boivin J‐F, Collet J‐P. Association between antibiotic use and risk of prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:952‐960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Tamim HM, Hanley JA, Hajeer AH, Boivin J‐F, Collet J‐P. Risk of breast cancer in relation to antibiotic use. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17:144‐150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zhang H, García Rodríguez LA, Hernández‐Díaz S. Antibiotic use and the risk of lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:1308‐1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Velicer CM, Heckbert SR, Lampe JW, Potter JD, Robertson CA, Taplin SH. Antibiotic use in relation to the risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2004;291:827‐835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Daniels NA, Chen Y‐H, Bent S. Antibiotic and anti‐inflammatory use and the risk of prostate cancer. BMC Res Notes. 2009;2:57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. García Rodríguez LA, González‐Pérez A. Use of antibiotics and risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:616‐619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Kaye JA, Jick H. Antibiotics and the risk of breast cancer. Epidemiology. 2005;16:688‐690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Sørensen HT, Skriver MV, Friis S, McLaughlin JK, Blot WJ, Baron JA. Use of antibiotics and risk of breast cancer: a population‐based case‐control study. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:594‐596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wang J‐L, Chang C‐H, Lin J‐W, Wu L‐C, Chuang L‐M, Lai M‐S. Infection, antibiotic therapy and risk of colorectal cancer: a nationwide nested case‐control study in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Cancer. 2014;135:956‐967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yang B, Hagberg KW, Chen J, et al. Associations of antibiotic use with risk of primary liver cancer in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Br J Cancer. 2016;115:85‐89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Tamim HM, Musallam KM, Al Kadri HMF, Boivin J‐F, Collet J‐P. Antibiotic use and risk of gynecological cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159:388‐393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lamb R, Ozsvari B, Lisanti CL, et al. Antibiotics that target mitochondria effectively eradicate cancer stem cells, across multiple tumor types: treating cancer like an infectious disease. Oncotarget. 2015;6:4569‐4584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Dethlefsen L, Relman DA. Incomplete recovery and individualized responses of the human distal gut microbiota to repeated antibiotic perturbation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4554‐4561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Belkaid Y, Hand T. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014;157:121‐141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ramakrishna C, Mendonca S, Ruegger PM, Kim JH, Borneman J, Cantin EM. Herpes simplex virus infection, acyclovir and IVIG treatment all independently cause gut dysbiosis. PloS One. 2020;15:e0237189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Herrett E, Gallagher AM, Bhaskaran K, et al. Data resource profile: clinical practice research datalink (CPRD). Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:827‐836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Khan NF, Harrison SE, Rose PW. Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60:e128‐e136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Seliger C, Ricci C, Meier CR, et al. Diabetes, use of antidiabetic drugs, and the risk of glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18:340‐349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Anssar TM, Leitzmann MF, Linker RA, et al. Autoimmune diseases and immunosuppressive therapy in relation to the risk of glioma. Cancer Med. 2020;9:1263‐1275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lu SSM, Mohammed Z, Häggström C, et al. Antibiotics use and subsequent risk of colorectal cancer: a Swedish Nationwide population‐based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022;95:1825‐1833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Yocum RR, Rasmussen JR, Strominger JL. The mechanism of action of penicillin. Penicillin acylates the active site of Bacillus stearothermophilus D‐alanine carboxypeptidase. J Biol Chem. 1980;255:3977‐3986. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Korpela K, Salonen A, Virta LJ, et al. Intestinal microbiome is related to lifetime antibiotic use in Finnish pre‐school children. Nat Commun. 2016;7:1‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Leclercq S, Mian FM, Stanisz AM, et al. Low‐dose penicillin in early life induces long‐term changes in murine gut microbiota, brain cytokines and behavior. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Zimmermann P, Curtis N. The effect of antibiotics on the composition of the intestinal microbiota—a systematic review. J Infect. 2019;79:471‐489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Arboleya S, Sánchez B, Solís G, et al. Impact of prematurity and perinatal antibiotics on the developing intestinal microbiota: a functional inference study Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Erny D, de Angelis A, Hrabě L, et al. Host microbiota constantly control maturation and function of microglia in the CNS. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:965‐977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Furusawa Y, Obata Y, Fukuda S, et al. Commensal microbe‐derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature. 2013;504:446‐450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Arpaia N, Campbell C, Fan X, et al. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T‐cell generation. Nature. 2013;504:451‐455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Schirmer M, Smeekens SP, Vlamakis H, et al. Linking the human gut microbiome to inflammatory cytokine production capacity. Cell. 2016;167:1125‐1136.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Grabowski MM, Sankey EW, Ryan KJ, et al. Immune suppression in gliomas. J Neurooncol. 2021;151:3‐12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Ge X, Ding C, Zhao W, et al. Antibiotics‐induced depletion of mice microbiota induces changes in host serotonin biosynthesis and intestinal motility. J Transl Med. 2017;15:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Zhu C, Gong H, Luo P, et al. Oral administration of penicillin or streptomycin may alter serum serotonin level and intestinal motility via different mechanisms. Front Physiol. 2020;11:605982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Carolus H, Pierson S, Lagrou K, van Dijck P. Amphotericin B and other polyenes—discovery, clinical use, mode of action and drug resistance. J Fungi (Basel). 2020;6:321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sarkar S, Döring A, Zemp FJ, et al. Therapeutic activation of macrophages and microglia to suppress brain tumor‐initiating cells. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:46‐55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Vainshtein VA, Nikolaevich LN, Sultanova GG, et al. Effect of chemically transformed macrocyclic polyene antibiotics on tumor cells. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2019;166:735‐738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. UK Health Security Agency (2020–2021) . English surveillance programme for antimicrobial utilisation and resistance (ESPAUR) report. GOV.UK, 2020–2021. Accessed April 04, 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/english‐surveillance‐programme‐antimicrobial‐utilisation‐and‐resistance‐espaur‐report
  • 49. Pechère JC, Hughes D, Kardas P, Cornaglia G. Non‐compliance with antibiotic therapy for acute community infections: a global survey. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;29:245‐253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

Table S2

Table S3

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the authors with the permission of the CPRD.


Articles from Cancer Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES