Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2019 Mar 15;7(5):369–371. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30495-8

The nasopharyngeal microbiome and LRTIs in infants

Geraint B Rogers a,b
PMCID: PMC9939732  PMID: 30885621

Acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are a major source of early life morbidity and the principal infectious cause of infant mortality.1 A growing body of research suggests that the microbiome of the upper respiratory tract substantially influences the incidence and severity of LRTIs. The nasopharyngeal mucosa is the first line of defence against airborne pathogens. In addition to the mechanisms of host innate immunity, the commensal microbiota suppresses the expansion of populations of opportunistic pathogens that are common in the nasopharynx—including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Staphylococcus aureus—through a combination of competitive exclusion, suppression of virulence through direct inter-species interaction, and regulation of local immunity.2 Opportunistic pathogens thus have to overcome both host defences and the stabilising effects of the commensal microbiota to proliferate within the upper airways.

In The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, Wing Ho Man and colleagues3 investigate the links between the composition of the nasopharyngeal microbiome and the development of LRTIs in children. They first addressed an issue relating directly to clinical practice: whether assessments of nasopharyngeal microbiota might serve as a proxy for lower respiratory microbiota. To this end, they assessed nasopharyngeal swabs and endotracheal aspirates from a cohort of 29 infants hospitalised for LRTIs who required mechanical ventilation. The correspondence between the two sample types was notable, with near-complete agreement in viral detection and substantial concordance in bacterial community composition. By combining viral and bacterial biomarkers with host factors, the authors were able to correctly discriminate between LRTIs and health in 92% of instances on the basis of analysis of nasopharyngeal swabs, and 100% of instances on the basis of analysis of endotracheal aspirates. In view of the development of increasingly rapid analytic platforms, the ability to use such findings to guide clinical decisions through point-of-care diagnostics, including in the selection of antibiotics, becomes increasingly plausible. The high level of agreement between microbiota composition assessed with nasopharyngeal swabs and endotracheal aspirates is also encouraging with regards to the wider use of nasopharyngeal swabs to gain insight into lower airway microbiology. However, the extent to which the process of intubation itself contributes to this relationship remains unclear.

Man and colleagues also assessed how the composition of the nasopharyngeal microbiome affects LRTI risk in a prospectively enrolled case-control cohort of children hospitalised with LRTIs and a matched cohort of healthy children. They reported that the composition of the nasopharyngeal microbiota—but not bacterial biomass—differed significantly between children with LRTIs and healthy children. Domination of the microbiota by H influenzae and Haemophilus haemolyticus or by S pneumoniae was associated with LRTIs. These differences in microbiota composition persisted even when LRTI was stratified into distinct phenotypes (pneumonia, bronchiolitis, wheezing illness, or mixed), with Haemophilus, Neisseria, and oral taxa over-represented in children with LRTIs compared with healthy controls in each phenotype.

The predominance of Haemophilus spp in the nasopharynx has been associated with LRTIs in several previous studies, and seems to be more common when the resident microbiota have undergone a previous disruption.4 The effect of viral infection or other respiratory insults could result in changes to the composition of the commensal microbiota, including the displacement of keystone commensal taxa, which in turn degrade the microbiota's ability to suppress overgrowth by H influenzae or other common pathobionts and increase the likelihood of LRTI. Such disruption might also reduce the beneficial effect of the commensal microbiome on host response to respiratory viral infection.5 Such a schema could partly explain well described risk factors for LRTIs, including previous antibiotic therapy and respiratory viral infections, exposure to tobacco smoke, and a short duration of breastfeeding, all of which substantially affect the development and composition of nasopharyngeal microbiota.6, 7, 8

The identification of upper respiratory tract microbiome characteristics associated with LRTIs is an exciting development. The application of higher-resolution analytic techniques promises to further define these relationships. In particular, metagenomic approaches could extend models to include fungal and viral commensal populations in LRTIs, or the carriage of specific virulence traits or determinants of antibiotic resistance. Integration of analysis of common host genetic polymorphisms that affect susceptibility to viral and bacterial respiratory infections9, 10 might also help to improve prediction of the risk of LRTI.

Beyond identification of risk, measures that can reduce the incidence of LRTIs are essential. Clearly, efforts to reduce exposure to tobacco smoke, promote breastfeeding, and improve antibiotic stewardship are crucial. However, approaches that might restore immune tolerance and microbiota structure in at-risk infants should also be considered. A large-scale trial11 in rural India showed a significant reduction in the frequency of LRTIs in infants given an oral synbiotic compared with those given placebo. Early-life intranasal administration of probiotics induces immune tolerance, reduces susceptibility to respiratory viral infection, and increases clearance of bacterial pathogens from the lower airways in murine models.12, 13 Such findings suggest the potential value of novel, microbiome-mediated, preventive strategies that aim to reduce host susceptibility, as an addition to pathogen-focused infection-control measures.

graphic file with name fx1_lrg.jpg

© 2019 Steve Gschmeissner/SPL

Acknowledgments

I declare no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Global Burden of Disease Pediatrics Collaboration. Kyu HH, Pinho C, et al. Global and national burden of diseases and injuries among children and adolescents between 1990 and 2013: findings from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 Study. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170:267–287. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Taylor SL, Wesselingh S, Rogers GB. Host–microbiome interactions in acute and chronic respiratory infections. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18:652–662. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Man WH, van Houten MA, Mérelle ME, et al. Bacterial and viral respiratory tract microbiota and host characteristics in children with lower respiratory tract infections: a matched case-control study. Lancet Respir Med. 2019 doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30449-1. published online March 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Biesbroek G, Tsivtsivadze E, Sanders EA, et al. Early respiratory microbiota composition determines bacterial succession patterns and respiratory health in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:1283–1292. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201407-1240OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.De Steenhuijsen Piters WA, Heinonen S, Hasrat R, et al. Nasopharyngeal microbiota, host transcriptome, and disease severity in children with respiratory syncytial virus infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:1104–1115. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0220OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bosch A, de Steenhuijsen Piters WAA, van Houten MA, et al. Maturation of the infant respiratory microbiota, environmental drivers, and health consequences. A prospective cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196:1582–1590. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0554OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Panzer AR, Lynch SV, Langelier C, et al. Lung microbiota is related to smoking status and to development of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill trauma patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197:621–631. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201702-0441OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Korten I, Mika M, Klenja S, et al. Interactions of respiratory viruses and the nasal microbiota during the first year of life in healthy infants. mSphere. 2016;1:e00312–e00416. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00312-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barton SJ, Murray R, Lillycrop KA, et al. FUT2 genetic variants and reported respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses during infancy. J Infect Dis. 2018 doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy582. published online Oct 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Taylor SL, McGuckin MA, Wesselingh S, Rogers GB. Infection's sweet tooth: how glycans mediate infection and disease susceptibility. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26:92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Panigrahi P, Parida S, Nanda NC, et al. A randomized synbiotic trial to prevent sepsis among infants in rural India. Nature. 2017;548:407–412. doi: 10.1038/nature23480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tomosada Y, Chiba E, Zelaya H, et al. Nasally administered Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains differentially modulate respiratory antiviral immune responses and induce protection against respiratory syncytial virus infection. BMC Immunol. 2013;14:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-14-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Medina M, Villena J, Salva S, Vintini E, Langella P, Alvarez S. Nasal administration of Lactococcus lactis improves local and systemic immune responses against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Microbiol Immunol. 2008;52:399–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2008.00050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES