Abstract
Aniridia is a pan-ocular genetic developmental eye disorder characterized by complete or partial iris and foveal hypoplasia, for which there is no treatment currently. Progressive sight loss can arise from cataracts, glaucoma, and aniridia-related keratopathy, which can be managed conservatively or through surgical intervention. The vast majority of patients harbor heterozygous mutations involving the PAX6 gene, which is considered the master transcription factor of early eye development. Over the past decades, several disease models have been investigated to gain a better understanding of the molecular pathophysiology, including several mouse and zebrafish strains and, more recently, human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) derived from aniridia patients. The latter provides a more faithful cellular system to study early human eye development. This review outlines the main aniridia-related animal and cellular models used to study aniridia and highlights the key discoveries that are bringing us closer to a therapy for patients.
Keywords: Aniridia, hiPSC, LESC, PAX6, primary cells, retinal organoids, sey mouse, zebrafish
Aniridia is a sight-threatening pan-ocular disorder characterized primarily by partial or complete iris hypoplasia. Other ocular manifestations include foveal and optic nerve hypoplasia, early-onset glaucoma, nystagmus, cataracts, and corneal keratopathy [Fig. 1a–c].[1,2,3,4,5] Aniridia is a rare disease with a prevalence of 1:40,000–100,000 births. The majority of cases are caused by heterozygous mutations resulting in haploinsufficiency of the PAX6 gene, either inherited in a highly penetrant autosomal dominant manner (70%) or caused by de novo sporadic mutations (30%).[1,5] Recent reports have also shown the presence of paternal mosaicism in four aniridia families.[6,7]
Figure 1.
(a) Right anterior segment showing complete iris hypoplasia. (b) Color fundus photograph lacking foveal reflex and (c) Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) of the right macula showing complete foveal hypoplasia. (d) Pax6Sey/+ mouse H and E whole eye sections at postnatal (p) day 60 (top) showing a small eye, lens, and retinal dysplasia, and a thinned P14 corneal epithelium (bottom). (e) Brightfield images (top) and toluidine blue-stained sections (bottom) displaying anterior segment dysgenesis (black arrow), small eye and lens (le) (white arrow), and thickened cornea (co) in 5dpf pax6bSa15822 zebrafish mutant. dpf = days post-fertilization, H and E = hematoxylin and eosin, re = retina
PAX6 and Aniridia
Paired box 6, denoted as PAX6 in humans, is a highly evolutionary conserved transcription factor and has a fundamental role in the development and maintenance of eyes, as well as being expressed in regions of the central nervous system, pancreas, gut, and olfactory epithelium.[8,9,10] PAX6 is located on chromosome 11p13 with 14 exons, but the first three are noncoding.[11] Heterozygous mutations in the mouse Pax6 gene cause the small eye (Sey) mouse, a strain that phenotypically resembles human aniridia [Fig. 1d].[12,13,14] Additional PAX6 homologs have been detected in zebrafish (pax6a and pax6b) [Fig. 1e], quail, and Drosophila.[15,16,17] Overexpression of the PAX6 gene induces the formation of ectopic eyes in Drosophila and Xenopus; for this reason, PAX6 is categorized as the “master regulator” of the eye.[18,19]
It has been demonstrated that PAX6 is highly regulated and dosage sensitive. For this reason, several elements and promoters both within and upstream the gene are involved in precise regulation of its complex spatial and temporal expression [Fig. 1a].[8,20,21,22] The PAX6 protein has two DNA-binding sites – the paired domain and the homeodomain, which are adjoined by a linker region. The DNA-binding ability of the homeodomain is regulated by a proline–serine–threonine-rich transactivation domain (PSTD) that is located immediately downstream of the homeodomain. Equivalently, the paired domain comprises an N-terminal subdomain and a C-terminal subdomain, each binding specific motifs and altering the conformation of the paired domain [Fig. 2b].[8] Canonical PAX6 and PAX6 (5a) are the two main protein isoforms that have been identified in humans; the isoforms are thought to have different downstream targets and are expressed at varying ratios throughout development [Fig. 2b].[8,10,23] Furthermore, a third isoform, Pax6DPD, has been found in mice and has also recently been detected in human retinal organoids.[24,25]
Figure 2.
(a) Human, mouse, and zebrafish PAX6 gene structure (boxes show exons and colors correspond to the respective protein domain as shown in b). (b) The two main PAX6 isoforms in humans. The DNA-binding domains PD and HD are illustrated. CTS = C-terminal subdomain, EE = ectodermal enhancer, HD = homeodomain, LNK = linker region, NTS = N-terminal subdomain, P0, P1, Pα = promoters (blue boxes) and regulatory elements (parallelograms), PD = paired domain, PSTD = proline–serine–threonine domain
Over 600 PAX6 mutations have been observed in aniridia patients, with the most common introducing a premature termination codon (PTC) through nonsense variants or insertion–deletion frameshift variants. In such cases, the PAX6 protein is truncated and likely results in loss of function, or the mutated mRNA transcript is degraded through nonsense-mediated decay preventing translation.[8,26,27] Because of the dosage sensitivity of PAX6, the reduction of protein levels induces haploinsufficiency.[8] A recent longitudinal study of 86 aniridia patients in the UK supported the previous findings that missense variants are associated with milder phenotypes (milder grades of foveal and iris hypoplasia, cataracts, and aniridia-related keratopathy), with the exception to those that disrupt PAX6 DNA-binding activity, such as the c.372C > A, p.(Asn124Lys) variant, which gives rise to a non-aniridia phenotype of microphthalmia and coloboma.[28] Several studies have also shown that PTC and C-terminal extension (CTE) mutations result in more severe phenotypes with poorer visual outcomes.[29,30] The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) of developing cataracts for patients with nonsense variants was 11.8 ± 11.8 years. It developed at a later age in patients with missense (17.2 ± 9.8 years), intronic (18.7 ± 16.2 years), and frameshift (22.9 ± 11.0 years) variants.[31] The mean age ± SD of glaucoma diagnosis was 25.0 ± 17.3 years, with missense (28.5 ± 26.0) and frameshift (50.7 ± 2.3) variants being diagnosed later. Overall, there was no significant difference observed in the mean age of glaucoma diagnosis between the mutation groups (P = 0.22). However, the prevalence of glaucoma was significantly different (P < 0.001), with a higher prevalence in those with whole gene deletions compared to those with frameshift mutations who showed the lowest prevalence.
Animal Models for Aniridia
Given the limited access to the human eye, animal and cellular disease models have been, and continue to be, crucial in identifying the genetics and pathophysiology underlying aniridia.[14,18,32,33] The function and structure of the mature eye is similar across different vertebrate species.[34] Animal models allow us to consider genotype–phenotype correlations, as well as potentiate the identification of molecular pathways of disease progression.[35]
Ever since the discovery of PAX6 homology across different species, Drosophila, zebrafish, quail, Xenopus, and mice have been used to model aniridia, the pathways affected by PAX6 haploinsufficiency, and potential therapies. This review will focus on mice, zebrafish, and cellular models and their contributions to our knowledge of aniridia.
Mouse Models
Advantages of using mouse models
Genomic conservation of 99% between humans and mice has allowed mouse models to be the most commonly explored animal model for biomedical research.[36,37] Mice are suitable for large-scale studies because they are small, have a short generation time, and are relatively cost-effective to maintain.[34,38] The mouse eye is similar to the human eye in terms of physiology, anatomy, and development, with the only major difference in development being the lack of cone-rich macula. Additionally, the size of the mouse eye facilitates morphological analysis.[34] Mice are particularly a good model for congenital aniridia because the human PAX6 and mouse Pax6 genes are homologous and translate into the same amino acid sequence [Fig. 2a].[39]
Generation of mouse models and phenotypes
Pax6 mutations in mice are either spontaneous, chemically/radiation-induced or targeted mutations [Table 1]. The “original” Sey mouse contains a spontaneous mutation and was characterized by Roberts in 1967.[13] Hill et al.,[14] in 1991, demonstrated the link between the Pax6 gene on chromosome 2 and the small eye phenotype. Pax6Sey carries the point mutation c.622G>T p.(Gly208*) that results in a PTC. Homozygous Pax6Sey/Sey mice exhibit anophthalmia and lack nasal cavities and die shortly after birth.[14] However, the heterozygous Pax6Sey/+ mice display iris hypoplasia, abnormal lens morphology, cataracts, corneal opacification, and incomplete separation of lens from the cornea, all of which correspond to patient-related aniridia features.[13,14,32,40] Similar to Pax6Sey, Pax6Sey-Neu and the Pax6Neu series (2Neu–10Neu) contain point mutations (missense or nonsense), with the difference being that the mutation has been chemically induced by ethyl nitrosourea (ENU).[41,42] Except for Pax64Neu and Pax67Neu, all of the discussed mice represent null mutants [Table 1]. More recently, Mohanna et al.[43] have tagged the mutant Sey allele with 3xFLAG, generating a model termed Fey. By doing this, it is possible to quantify Pax6 protein levels that are translated from the corrected mutant allele following gene editing.
Table 1.
Animal (mouse and zebrafish) and cellular models of PAX6 mutant genes
Genotype | Generation of mutation | Mutation details | PAX6 domain | Predominant ocular phenotype | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Mouse | |||||
PAX6Sey/PAX6+ | Spontaneous | Nonsense Exon 7 c. 622G>T p.(Gly208*) | Termination before the HD | Abnormal cornea Abnormal lens Mic | Roberts, 1967[13] |
PAX6Leca1/ PAX6Leca1 | Chemically induced | Missense Exon 10 c. 971T>A p.(Val270Glu) | HD | Fused lens and cornea Mic | Thaung et al., 2002[44] |
PAX6Leca2/ PAX6Leca2 | Chemically induced | Missense Exon 7 c. 586C>T p.(Arg142Cys) | PD | Fused lens and cornea Mic | |
PAX6Leca3/ PAX6Leca3 | Chemically induced | Nonsense Exon 12 c. 1266C>A p.(Tyr369*) | PSTD | Fused lens and cornea Mic | |
PAX6Leca4/ PAX6Leca4 | Chemically induced | Missense Exon 6 c. 354C>A p.(Asn64Lys) | PD | Fused lens and cornea Mic | |
PAX6SeyDey/ PAX6+ | Spontaneous | Intergenic deletion Large deletion of PAX6 gene affecting the Wt1 gene | Whole protein | Coloboma Small lens Cataract Retinal abnormalities Absent anterior chamber Mic | Theiler et al., 1980[45] |
PAX6SeyH/ PAX6+ | Radiation induced | Large deletion of PAX6 gene Likely affects the Wt1 gene | Likely the whole protein | Coloboma Mic | Hogan et al., 1986[32] |
PAX6SeyNeu/ PAX6+ | Chemically induced | Frameshift, G T transversion at the +1 position of a splice donor site, retention of 116 nucleotides of intronic sequence | Lacks 15 amino acids from the C terminus, including the transactivation domain | Abnormal cornea Abnormal lens Anterior chamber defect Mic | Hill et al., 1992[46] |
PAX62Neu/PAX6+ | Chemically induced | Intron 9, 2T>C 5′ splice after 269 | HD | Abnormal iris Abnormal pupil Cataract Mic | Favor et al., 2001[42] |
PAX63Neu/PAX6+ | Chemically induced | Frameshift Insertion Exon 7 598insAla | Deletion of HD, LR, and PSTD | Abnormal iris Abnormal pupil Corneal opacity Fused cornea and lens Cataract Mic | |
PAX64Neu/PAX6+ | Chemically induced | Missense Exon 10 c. 979T>C p.(Ser273Pro) | HD | Abnormal iris Abnormal pupil Cataract Mic | |
PAX65Neu/PAX6+ | Chemically induced | Nonsense Exon 6 c. 517A>T p.(Arg119*) | Deletion of HD, LR, and PSTD | Abnormal iris Abnormal pupil Cataract Mic | |
| |||||
Mouse | |||||
| |||||
PAX66Neu/PAX6+ | Chemically induced | Nonsense Exon 10 c. 1092C>A p.(Tyr310*) | PSTD | Abnormal iris Abnormal pupil Cataract Mic | |
PAX67Neu/PAX6+ | Chemically induced | Missense Exon 4 c.-3A>T | Kozak consensus sequence | Abnormal iris Abnormal pupil Cataract Mic | |
PAX68Neu/PAX6+ | Chemically/radiation induced | Nonsense Exon 10 c. 1092C>A p.(Tyr310*) | PSTD | Abnormal iris Abnormal pupil Mic | |
PAX69Neu/PAX6+ | Chemically induced | Nonsense, deletion Exon 5 7bp 261-267 | PD | Abnormal iris Abnormal pupil Mic | |
PAX610Neu/PAX6+ | Chemically induced | Nonsense Exon 6 c. 469C>T p.(Gln103*) | Deletion of PD, LR, HD, PSTD | Abnormal iris Abnormal pupil Mic | |
PAX6tm1Pgr/PAX6+ | Targeted | Insertion of β-galactosidase The start codon in exon 4 | HD is replaced with a β-galactosidase gene followed by a neomycin cassette | Abnormal iridocorneal angle Abnormal optic cup Anterior iris synechia Fused cornea and lens Absent anterior chamber | St-Onge et al., 1997[47] |
PAX6tm2Pgr/PAX6+ | Targeted | Insertion of loxP sequences flanking the initiator ATG and exons 4-6 | PD | Abnormal iris Abnormal optic nerve Mic | Ashery-Padan et al., 2000[48] |
PAX6Coop/PAX6+ | Chemically induced | Nonsense Exon 10 c. 1033C>T p.(Glu329*) | HD and PSTD | Abnormal iris Corneal opacity Mic | Lyon, 2000[49] |
PAX6Aey11/PAX6Aey11 | Chemically induced | Nonsense Exon 8 c. 644C>T p.(Glu209*) | Loss of entire HD and PSTD | Small eye Corneal adhesion Corneal and lens opacities | Graw, 2005[50] |
PAX6Aey18/PAX6+ | Chemically induced | Splice defect Last base of intron 5a G>A skipping exons 5a and 6 | PD | Small eye Corneal adhesion Corneal and lens opacities | |
PAX6ADD4802/PAX6+ | Chemically induced | Frameshift due to changed splicing intron 8 G>A | Loss of C-terminal, half of the HD | Small eye Corneal adhesion Corneal and lens opacities | |
PAX613214Neu/PAX6+ | Radiation induced | Missense c. 1099T>A p.(Phe272Ile) | HD | Abnormal cornea Fused cornea and lens Abnormal lens Cataract | Favor et al., 2008[51] |
| |||||
Mouse | |||||
| |||||
PAX6132-14Neu/PAX6132-14Neu | Abnormal cornea Abnormal lens Anterior chamber defect Coloboma Mic | ||||
| |||||
Zebrafish | |||||
| |||||
PAX6btq253a/PAX6btq253a (sri) | Chemically induced | Missense Exon 8 c. 770T>C p.(Leu244Pro) | HD | Abnormal cornea Abnormal lens Iris hypoplasia Retinal malformations Shallow anterior chamber Small eye | Heisenberg et al., 1996[52] |
PAX6aka709/ PAX6aka709 | CRISPR/Cas9 | Small deletion Exon 8-12 3011 bp | HD and PSTD | Marginal anterior segment dysgenesis Small eye and lens | Takamiya et al., 2020[53] |
PAX6aka709/PAX6aka709; PAX6btq253a/PAX6btq253a | Chemically induced and CRISPR/Cas9 | PAX6b: Missense Exon 8 c.770T>C p.(Leu244Pro) PAX6a: Deletion Exon 8-12 3011 bp | HD and PSTD | Absent lens Absent anterior chamber Corneal endothelium malformation Small eye | |
| |||||
hiPSCs | |||||
| |||||
UCLi013-A | Patient-derived skin fibroblasts | Missense Exon 7 c. 372C>A p.(Asn124Lys) | PD | Aniridia Cataracts Optic nerve Coloboma Nystagmus Mic | Harding et al., 2021[28] |
CRISPR=clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, HD=homeodomain, hiPSCs=human-induced pluripotent stem cells, LR=linker region, MGI=Mouse Genomic Informatics, mic=microphthalmia, PD=paired domain, PSTD=proline-serine-threonine-rich domain Mouse genotype and phenotype have been taken from MGI database (http://www.informatics.jax.org/). Zebrafish data have been taken from The Zebrafish Information Network (ZFIN) (http://zfin.org/)
Other commonly used mouse models for aniridia carry Pax6 deletions. Pax6Sey-Dey, Pax6Sey-H, and Pax6tm1Pgr (Pax6lacZ) are examples of these models.[54,55] The latter two mutant strains contain large chromosomal deletions encompassing the whole Pax6 gene and culminate in more severe aniridia phenotypes.[9,14] However, in Pax6tm1Pgr mice, the entire sequence encoding the paired domain has been removed and replaced with a β-galactosidase gene followed by a neomycin cassette.[9,47] The aforementioned gene replacement reflects the endogenous Pax6 expression and can be detected in live embryos. This model has recently been utilized by Voskresenskaya et al.[55] to compare the lens defects in aniridia, which revealed there may be differences in the PAX6/Pax6-controlled mechanisms between humans and mice. For example, they found that in humans, unlike mice, PAX6 mutations do not delay lens placode development or alternatively, it recovers from the delay.
Contribution to our knowledge of aniridia
The Sey mouse has been crucial in understanding the pathophysiology of aniridia and testing potential therapeutics. Using mouse models, the dosage sensitivity of the Pax6 gene has been demonstrated and consequently, therapies that target gene dosage of Pax6 have been explored.[20] Nonsense suppression drugs have been shown to inhibit disease progression and rescue corneal, lens, and retinal malformations postnatally.[56,57] More recently, the inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) via small-molecule drugs in Pax6Sey-Neu/+ mice has illustrated upregulation of Pax6 and alleviation of Pax6 haploinsufficiency-related corneal phenotypes.[58] Identification of downstream Pax6 targets in the developing iris and ciliary body and of Pax6-dependent gene regulatory network in the lens are among the other discoveries made using mouse models.[59,60,61]
Limitations
Different mutant mice produce a spectrum of aniridia phenotypes; also, mice that carry genomic deletions could exhibit severe phenotypes that are not observed in patients, making them less appropriate for studying human aniridia.[9] Alternatively, mutations in the mouse could cause a less-severe phenotype than that seen in patients.[55] The small eye mouse, as indicated by the name, develops microphthalmia, a symptom that is not common in human aniridia patients, as one of its main phenotypes. In contrast, foveal hypoplasia, one of the main manifestations in humans, is absent in mice due to the lack of fovea in these animals.[56]
Zebrafish Models
Advantages of using zebrafish models
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have become an increasingly popular organism to study vertebrate development and pathophysiology. Genomic sequencing revealed a significant genetic similarity between humans and zebrafish; 70% of human genes have a zebrafish ortholog and 84% of human disease-causing genes have a zebrafish counterpart.[62] Zebrafish are easy to breed through external fertilization with a large number of eggs (100–200) produced, making them cost-effective to maintain with a short regeneration time of 2–4 months.[63] The transparency of zebrafish embryos enables early visualization of organogenesis. Moreover, zebrafish eye development occurs rapidly with the retinal layers resembling adult-like pattern by 72 h post-fertilization (hpf).[34,63] At this timepoint, a highly organized heterotypical mosaic photoreceptor structure is formed in the retina, which is rich in cone photoreceptors and is remarkably similar to humans.[64] Retinal regeneration is possible in zebrafish, although this does not always occur in the presence of pathogenic variants, resulting in ocular maldevelopment or retinal degeneration.[64] The overall zebrafish corneal structure is evident as early as 5–7 days post-fertilization (dpf) and is similar to that of humans with corneal epithelium, stroma, and endothelium layers.[65]
Generation of aniridia models and phenotypes
About 350 million years ago, zebrafish underwent a whole-genome duplication; consequently, many genes, including pax6, have duplicates (pax6a and pax6b).[66] There has been some division of roles between the two duplicates, with varying ratios of gene expression in different organs and tissues, similar to PAX6 isoforms in humans. This neutral partitioning of role is termed “subfunctionalization.”[66] Zebrafish can be easily genetically manipulated; in the 1990s, large-scale chemical mutagenesis using ENU was carried out in zebrafish, resulting in the generation of thousands of mutants bearing developmental defects. One of the identified mutants is sunrise (sri), a mutant that carries a leucine to proline missense mutation c. 770T > C, p.(Leu244Pro) in the pax6b homeodomain gene [Table 1].[52,66,67,68] The sunrise (sri) mutant was utilized to study the subfunctionalization of the pax6 gene and the spatiotemporal manner in which each ortholog is expressed.[66] Sunrise is the most widely explored zebrafish model with a pax6b mutation and exhibits aniridia-like phenotypes, for example, abnormal lens and corneal structure, thick cornea, iris hypoplasia, retinal malformations, shallower anterior chamber, and a smaller eye.[65,66] The defects in the sri mutant are due to reduced DNA binding. Other than chemically induced mutations, pax6b-mutant fish have been produced via retroviral insertions [Table 1].[69] Several other mutants have been generated by either exposure to ENU or retroviral insertion; however, these have not been phenotypically characterized.
Limitations
Due to the genomic duplication and the consequent subfunctionalization of the pax6 gene, the phenotypes are milder in mutant zebrafish than in aniridia patients. The homozygous sunrise fish have milder phenotypes and can grow into adulthood and breed, suggesting a compensation by the unaffected pax6a gene.[66] Fish that have been injected with both pax6a and pax6b morpholinos show more severe phenotypes, like microphthalmia and general developmental delay.[66]
Human Cellular Models
As discussed previously, substantial genetic and phenotypic distinctions exist between human and animal models; thereupon, patient-derived cells are important in vitro models to investigate human disease mechanisms and test potential therapeutics including drug screening.[70] The use of representative cellular models could reduce or even replace the number of animals used in biomedical preclinical experiments.[71]
Primary cells
Primary cells are generated by isolating the cell type of interest from the patient. As they are not modified, they are useful for studying signaling pathways, pathophysiology, drug efficacy, and toxicity.[34] If a gene of interest is expressed in primary cells, it has the machinery to support protein production, modifications, assembly, and transport, whereas genes that are overexpressed may not have this innate intracellular support. The disadvantage of using primary cells is their senescence as they have limited capacity of growing and dividing in vitro.[34]
Aniridia-Related Keratopathy (ARK) is one of the main manifestations of aniridia in patients and is mainly caused by limbal epithelial stem cell (LESC) deficiency.[72] Cultured LESCs previously extracted from aniridia patients showed a reduction in PAX6 protein.[73] This model was further used to identify morphological and molecular alterations, such as impaired migration and ability to differentiate into corneal epithelial cells, as well as novel PAX6 downstream targets, for instance, ADH7, ALDH1A1, and SPINK7.[73,74,75,76] MEK/extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) signaling pathway repressor drugs, duloxetine and ritanserin, have been recently tested on mutant LESCs and have shown to rescue PAX6 haploinsufficiency and restore PAX6 production.[77,78]
Immortalized cell lines
Continuous (immortalized) cell lines have the indefinite ability to proliferate and generate an unlimited supply of cells. They are generally more robust, easier to maintain, and more cost-effective than primary cells. Immortalized cells are useful for the in vitro study of gene function and their pathological role. Theoretically, the function of continuous cell lines should closely resemble that of primary cells, but the genetic manipulation of the cell lines predisposes them to varied phenotype, function, and responsiveness. For example, ARPE-19 cells lose their characteristic epithelial phenotype, the formation of tight junctions, after a few passages, consequently affecting the other roles of the cells, like fluid homeostasis, that were regulated through the epithelial characteristics.[79] There also exists the risk of further genotypic variation following prolonged passaging and contamination.[80] Roux et al.[72] have used clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 to introduce a PAX6 heterozygous nonsense mutation within an immortalized line of LESCs to establish an aniridia LESC model and, through the use of soluble recombinant PAX6 protein, illustrated a successful rescue of the ARK phenotype by activating the endogenous PAX6 gene.
Human-induced pluripotent stem cells
Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are generated through reprogramming of adult somatic cells and, like embryonic stem cells (ESCs), have the capacity of unlimited self-renewal and differentiation into all adult cell types.[81] hiPSCs circumvent the ethical concerns associated with ESCs, which is mainly the use of human embryos.[82] Patient-derived hiPSC lines are particularly valuable models to study congenital diseases because they carry the same disease-causing mutation (s) as the affected individuals, allowing for the in vitro analysis of molecular pathways involved in disease development. Also, by differentiating into cell types of interest, these become important tools for drug screening and personalized medicine.[28,81] However, they can be costly and difficult to culture with variable differentiation efficiencies.[83] Thus far, only a few hiPSC lines carrying PAX6 mutations have been generated.[28,84] One of these lines has been derived by Zhang et al.[84] from a patient who suffered from optic nerve malformations, but not aniridia. Harding et al.[28] have most recently generated a heterozygous PAX6 missense c. 372C>A, p.(Asn124Lys)-mutant hiPSC line from the dermal fibroblasts of a patient with aniridia, microphthalmia, cataracts, optic nerve coloboma, nystagmus, and type 2 diabetes. There are currently no publications available that explore hiPSC-derived aniridia lines; however, this strategy would provide a novel and valuable human model to study the disease.
3D cellular models (organoids)
Although 2D cellular models provide researchers with information about molecular pathophysiology and drug action, they may not replicate the intercellular signaling or the tissue complexity that exists in vivo.[34,85] Organoids are generated from hiPSCs or ESCs and closely resemble the temporal and spatial developmental stages of human organs in vitro, allowing to study human organogenesis in the early fetal stages.[85,86] Molecular characterization of events taking place in the optic vesicle or early retina is now possible using organoids, hence making it an increasingly popular model for the study of developmental eye diseases.[87,88,89,90,91]
Ocular organoid models are still incapable of fully mimicking the in vivo complexity of the human eye. Retinal organoids are prone to degeneration and loss of orientation as they develop. This drawback is often caused by nutritional deficits and inadequate passive diffusion in the inner layers. Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is an important ocular structure for the maintenance of the photoreceptors in the outer retina. The RPE in organoid cultures does not mature to a functional layer nor correctly localizes around the photoreceptors, making them susceptible to malfunction and degeneration.[92]
Another drawback of current retinal organoids is the lack of three distinctive nuclear layers, leading to disorganization of the rods and cones photoreceptors compared to the human retina in vivo.[93] More importantly, organoids lack vasculature and immune cells, both of which are important components of adult tissues. The variability of the differentiation process and low efficiency in organoid formation are other factors to be considered; different lines vary on differentiation effectiveness and their ability to assemble in 3D structures. To circumvent this issue, methodology improvements as well as isogenic controls are continuously being developed.[86,87]
The use of organoid models has not yet been explored for PAX6-related conditions. The application of retinal and, very recently, corneal organoid technology to aniridia research would be paramount to understand the mechanisms behind PAX6 haploinsufficiency and its effects in the development and homeostasis of these tissues.[94,95]
Management of Aniridia and Potential Clinical Prospects
Management of aniridia is directed at the patient’s symptoms and preserving vision. Regular eye examination and correction of refractive error to improve visual acuity are recommended. Patients with photosensitivity secondary to their iris hypoplasia should use tinted lenses or glasses.[1] For those with cataracts, surgery can lead to improvement in vision,[96] although in one study with a mean of 16.3 years of follow-up, no significant improvement in visual acuity was observed.[31] Serious complications like secondary glaucoma may arise after the surgery. Managing ARK can be achieved by topical preservative-free lubricants in mild cases to slow down the progress. Cultured LESCs have been successfully transplanted in more severe cases of ARK and a variety of culture techniques have since been developed to optimize the transplant.[97] The common transplantation procedure is through injection; however, tissue-engineered grafts for transplantation have been produced by combining the cells with a biomaterial, for example, amniotic membrane.[98] Glaucoma is also initially treated with topical antiglaucoma medications and requires surgery (cyclodiode laser, tube surgery, and trabeculectomy) in eyes that are unresponsive to medical treatment; however, surgical intervention for glaucoma was correlated with a worse visual acuity in the study carried out by Kit et al.[31]
It was previously discussed that topical application of nonsense suppression drugs was tested in mice postnatally, which showed the upregulation of Pax6 and stable rescue of the disease phenotype.[56,57] However, the Phase 3 clinical trial using ataluren (NCT02647359) to treat aniridia through oral delivery failed to meet its endpoints. This may have been due to the adoption of incorrect endpoints and the mode of delivery, that is, a topical application with a focus on corneal parameters may have been more optimal. Mouse models, as well as primary cells, have demonstrated that inhibitors of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway, either directly or indirectly, show promising results with rescue of the aniridia phenotype. Therefore, these are other promising pharmacological agents that could potentially upregulate PAX6 levels and prevent disease progression. The advantage of these drugs would be their availability and not being selective on the type of mutation.[58,77,78] From a practical clinical perspective, family planning and preimplantation genetic diagnosis should be discussed with prospective parents.
Future Directions
Many aniridia mouse models have been identified and characterized that vary in phenotypic severity. Further work in other species, such as the zebrafish, could provide valuable insights due to their genetic homology to humans and their accessible and rapid eye development for the discovery of molecular pathways and testing potential pharmaceutical agents. Furthermore, generation of aniridia hiPSCs and 3D cellular models allows for more in-depth and specific investigation of the genetic causes and genotype–phenotype correlation, especially in fetal development. The patient-derived nature of these models also allows for drug screening and the generation of personalized medicine, thus providing effective treatment options for aniridia patients.
Conclusion
PAX6 is expressed in several tissues including the adult eye, brain, and pancreas. Therefore, the effect of haploinsufficiency extends beyond the ocular tissue, and aniridia is starting to be recognized as a systemic disease.[6] Animal models allow the exploration of systemic manifestations within the whole organism and have thus far been fundamental in our understanding of aniridia, the role of PAX6, and its regulatory mechanisms.[99]
Contributors
The mouse images were kindly donated by Professor Cheryl Gregory-Evans.
Financial support and sponsorship
Wellcome Trust 205174/Z/16/Z and Moorfields Eye Charity provided financial support.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Moosajee M, Hingorani M, Moore AT, et al. PAX6-Related Aniridia. Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al., editors. Gene Reviews. 2003 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cvekl A, Callaerts P PAX6:25th anniversary and more to learn. Exp Eye Res. 2017;156:10–21. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Calvão-Pires P, Santos-Silva R, Falcão-Reis F, Rocha-Sousa A. Congenital aniridia:Clinic, genetics, therapeutics, and prognosis. Int Sch Res Notices 2014. 2014 doi: 10.1155/2014/305350. 305350. doi:10.1155/2014/305350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Parekh M, Poli B, Ferrari S, Teofili C, Ponzin D. Springer: Springer International Publishing Switzerland; 2015. Aniridia:Recent Developments in Scientific and Clinical Research. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hingorani M, Hanson I, van Heyningen V. Aniridia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:1011–7. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Landsend ECS, Lagali N, Utheim TP. Congenital aniridia-A comprehensive review of clinical features and therapeutic approaches. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021;66:1031–50. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lima Cunha D, Owen N, Tailor V, Corton M, Theodorou M, Moosajee M. PAX6 missense variants in two families with isolated foveal hypoplasia and nystagmus:Evidence of paternal postzygotic mosaicism. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021;29:349–55. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00737-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lima Cunha D, Arno G, Corton M, Moosajee M. The spectrum of. Genes (Basel) 2019;10 doi: 10.3390/genes10121050. doi:10.3390/genes10121050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Latta L, Figueiredo FC, Ashery-Padan R, Collinson JM, Daniels J, Ferrari S, et al. Pathophysiology of aniridia-associated keratopathy:Developmental aspects and unanswered questions. Ocul Surf. 2021;22:245–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Samant M, Chauhan BK, Lathrop KL, Nischal KK. Congenital aniridia:Etiology, manifestations and management. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2016;11:135–44. doi: 10.1586/17469899.2016.1152182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Glaser T, Walton DS, Maas RL. Genomic structure, evolutionary conservation and aniridia mutations in the human PAX6 gene. Nat Genet. 1992;2:232–9. doi: 10.1038/ng1192-232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Walther C, Gruss P Pax-6, a murine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS. Development. 1991;113:1435–49. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.4.1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Roberts RC. Small eyes—a new dominant eye mutant in the mouse. Genet Res. 1967;9:121–2. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hill RE, Favor J, Hogan BL, Ton CC, Saunders GF, Hanson IM, et al. Mouse small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene. Nature. 1991;354:522–5. doi: 10.1038/354522a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Martin P, Carriere C, Dozier C, Quatannens B, Mirabel MA, Vandenbunder B, et al. Characterization of a paired box- and homeobox-containing quail gene (Pax-QNR) expressed in the neuroretina. Oncogene. 1992;7:1721–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Krauss S, Johansen T, Korzh V, Fjose A. Expression pattern of zebrafish pax genes suggests a role in early brain regionalization. Nature. 1991;353:267–70. doi: 10.1038/353267a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Quiring R, Walldorf U, Kloter U, Gehring WJ. Homology of the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the Small eye gene in mice and Aniridia in humans. Science. 1994;265:785–9. doi: 10.1126/science.7914031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Halder G, Callaerts P, Gehring WJ. Induction of ectopic eyes by targeted expression of the eyeless gene in Drosophila. Science. 1995;267:1788–92. doi: 10.1126/science.7892602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chow RL, Altmann CR, Lang RA, Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Pax6 induces ectopic eyes in a vertebrate. Development. 1999;126:4213–22. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.19.4213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schedl A, Ross A, Lee M, Engelkamp D, Rashbass P, van Heyningen V, et al. Influence of PAX6 gene dosage on development:Overexpression causes severe eye abnormalities. Cell. 1996;86:71–82. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80078-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Davis-Silberman N, Kalich T, Oron-Karni V, Marquardt T, Kroeber M, Tamm ER, et al. Genetic dissection of Pax6 dosage requirements in the developing mouse eye. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:2265–76. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Davis N, Yoffe C, Raviv S, Antes R, Berger J, Holzmann S, et al. Pax6 dosage requirements in iris and ciliary body differentiation. Dev Biol. 2009;333:132–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pinson J, Simpson TI, Mason JO, Price DJ. Positive autoregulation of the transcription factor Pax6 in response to increased levels of either of its major isoforms, Pax6 or Pax6 (5a), in cultured cells. BMC Dev Biol. 2006;6:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-6-25. doi:10.1186/1471-213X-6-25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kim J, Lauderdale JD Analysis of Pax6 expression using a BAC transgene reveals the presence of a paired-less isoform of Pax6 in the eye and olfactory bulb. Dev Biol. 2006;292:486–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tao Y, Cao J, Li M, Hoffmann B, Xu K, Chen J, et al. PAX6D instructs neural retinal specification from human embryonic stem cell-derived neuroectoderm. EMBO Rep. 2020;21:e50000. doi: 10.15252/embr.202050000. doi:10.15252/embr.202050000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Blanco-Kelly F, Tarilonte M, Villamar M, Damián A, Tamayo A, Moreno-Pelayo MA, et al. Genetics and epidemiology of aniridia:Updated guidelines for genetic study. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) 2021;96(Suppl 1):4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.oftale.2021.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tzoulaki I, White IM, Hanson IM. PAX6 mutations:Genotype-phenotype correlations. BMC Genet. 2005;6:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-6-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Harding P, Lima Cunha D, Méjécase C, Eintracht J, Toualbi L, Sarkar H, et al. Generation of human iPSC line (UCLi013-A) from a patient with microphthalmia and aniridia, carrying a heterozygous missense mutation c.372C>A p.(Asn124Lys) in PAX6. Stem Cell Res. 2021;51:102184. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2021.102184. doi:10.1016/j.scr. 2021.102184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hingorani M, Williamson KA, Moore AT, van Heyningen V. Detailed ophthalmologic evaluation of 43 individuals with PAX6 mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2581–90. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Aggarwal S, Jinda W, Limwongse C, Atchaneeyasakul LO, Phadke SR. Run-on mutation in the PAX6 gene and chorioretinal degeneration in autosomal dominant aniridia. Mol Vis. 2011;17:1305–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kit V, Cunha DL, Hagag AM, Moosajee M. Longitudinal genotype-phenotype analysis in 86 patients with PAX6-related aniridia. JCI Insight. 2021;6:e148406. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.148406. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.148406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hogan BL, Horsburgh G, Cohen J, Hetherington CM, Fisher G, Lyon MF. Small eyes (Sey):A homozygous lethal mutation on chromosome 2 which affects the differentiation of both lens and nasal placodes in the mouse. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1986;97:95–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chang B, Hawes NL, Hurd RE, Wang J, Howell D, Davisson MT, et al. Mouse models of ocular diseases. Vis Neurosci. 2005;22:587–593. doi: 10.1017/S0952523805225075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Harding P, Lima Cunha D, Moosajee M. Animal and cellular models of microphthalmia. therapeutic advances in rare diseases. 2021;2:1–34. doi: 10.1177/2633004021997447. doi:10.1177/2633004021997447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Schofield PN, Sundberg JP, Hoehndorf R, Gkoutos GV. New approaches to the representation and analysis of phenotype knowledge in human diseases and their animal models. Brief Funct Genomics. 2011;10:258–65. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elr031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Krebs MP, Collin GB, Hicks WL, Yu M, Charette JR, Shi LY, et al. Mouse models of human ocular disease for translational research. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0183837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183837. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Brown SDM. Advances in mouse genetics for the study of human disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2021;30:R274–84. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddab153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vandamme TF. Use of rodents as models of human diseases. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014;6:2–9. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.124301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gehring WJ. The master control gene for morphogenesis and evolution of the eye. Genes Cells. 1996;1:11–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.1996.11011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ramaesh T, Collinson JM, Ramaesh K, Kaufman MH, West JD, Dhillon B. Corneal abnormalities in Pax6+/- small eye mice mimic human aniridia-related keratopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1871–8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Favor J, Neuhäuser-Klaus A, Ehling UH. The effect of dose fractionation on the frequency of ethylnitrosourea-induced dominant cataract and recessive specific locus mutations in germ cells of the mouse. Mutat Res. 1988;198:269–75. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(88)90003-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Favor J, Peters H, Hermann T, Schmahl W, Chatterjee B, Neuhäuser-Klaus A, et al. Molecular characterization of Pax6 (2Neu) through Pax6 (10Neu):An extension of the Pax6 allelic series and the identification of two possible hypomorph alleles in the mouse Mus musculus. Genetics. 2001;159:1689–700. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.4.1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mirjalili Mohanna SZ, Hickmott JW, Lam SL, Chiu NY, Lengyell TC, Tam BM, et al. Germline CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing prevents vision loss in a novel mouse model of aniridia. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2020;17:478–90. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2020.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Thaung C, West K, Clark BJ, McKie L, Morgan JE, Arnold K, et al. Novel ENU-induced eye mutations in the mouse:Models for human eye disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:755–67. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.7.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Theiler K, Varnum DS, Stevens LC. Development of Dickie's small eye:An early lethal mutation in the house mouse. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1980;161:115–20. doi: 10.1007/BF00304672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hill RE, Favor J, Hogan BL, Ton CC, Saunders GF, Hanson IM, et al. Mouse Small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene. Nature. 1992;355:750. doi: 10.1038/355750a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.St-Onge L, Sosa-Pineda B, Chowdhury K, Mansouri A, Gruss P. Pax6 is required for differentiation of glucagon-producing alpha-cells in mouse pancreas. Nature. 1997;387:406–9. doi: 10.1038/387406a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ashery-Padan R, Marquardt T, Zhou X, Gruss P. Pax6 activity in the lens primordium is required for lens formation and for correct placement of a single retina in the eye. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2701–11. doi: 10.1101/gad.184000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lyon MF, Bogani D, Boyd Y, Guillot P, Favor J. Further genetic analysis of two autosomal dominant mouse eye defects, Ccw and Pax6(coop) Mol Vis. 2000;6:199–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Graw J, Löster J, Puk O, Münster D, Haubst N, Soewarto D, et al. Three novel Pax6 alleles in the mouse leading to the same small-eye phenotype caused by different consequences at target promoters. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4671–83. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Favor J, Gloeckner CJ, Neuhäuser-Klaus A, Pretsch W, Sandulache R, Saule S, et al. Relationship of Pax6 activity levels to the extent of eye development in the mouse, Mus musculus. Genetics. 2008;179:1345–55. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.088591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Heisenberg CP, Brand M, Jiang YJ, Warga RM, Beuchle D, van Eeden FJ, et al. Genes involved in forebrain development in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development. 1996;123:191–203. doi: 10.1242/dev.123.1.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Takamiya M, Stegmaier J, Kobitski AY, Schott B, Weger BD, Margariti D, et al. Pax6 organizes the anterior eye segment by guiding two distinct neural crest waves. PLoS Genet. 2020;16:e1008774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008774. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Davis J, Duncan MK, Robison WG, Piatigorsky J. Requirement for Pax6 in corneal morphogenesis:A role in adhesion. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:2157–67. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Voskresenskaya A, Pozdeyeva N, Batkov Y, Vasilyeva T, Marakhonov A, West RA, et al. Morphometric analysis of the lens in human aniridia and mouse Small eye. Exp Eye Res. 2021;203:108371. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108371. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2020.108371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang X, Gregory-Evans K, Wasan KM, Sivak O, Shan X, Gregory-Evans CY. Efficacy of postnatal in vivo nonsense suppression therapy in a Pax6 mouse model of aniridia. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2017;7:417–28. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gregory-Evans CY, Wang X, Wasan KM, Zhao J, Metcalfe AL, Gregory-Evans K. Postnatal manipulation of Pax6 dosage reverses congenital tissue malformation defects. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:111–6. doi: 10.1172/JCI70462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rabiee B, Anwar KN, Shen X, Putra I, Liu M, Jung R, et al. dosage manipulation alleviates manifestations of hereditary PAX6 haploinsufficiency in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12:eaaz4894. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz4894. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz4894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang X, Shan X, Gregory-Evans CY. A mouse model of aniridia reveals the in vivo downstream targets of Pax6 driving iris and ciliary body development in the eye. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2017;1863:60–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang X, Gregory-Evans CY. Identification of the downstream targets of Pax6 in the developing iris relevant to aniridia. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:4932. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wolf LV, Yang Y, Wang J, Xie Q, Braunger B, Tamm ER, et al. Identification of pax6-dependent gene regulatory networks in the mouse lens. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Howe K, Clark M, Torroja C, Torrance J, Berthelot C, Muffato M, et al. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature. 2013;496:498–503. doi: 10.1038/nature12111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Richardson R, Tracey-White D, Webster A, Moosajee M. The zebrafish eye-a paradigm for investigating human ocular genetics. Eye (Lond) 2017;31:68–86. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Noel NCL, MacDonald IM, Allison WT. Zebrafish models of photoreceptor dysfunction and degeneration. Biomolecules. 2021;11:78. doi: 10.3390/biom11010078. doi:10.3390/biom11010078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Takamiya M, Weger BD, Schindler S, Beil T, Yang L, Armant O, et al. Molecular description of eye defects in the zebrafish Pax6b mutant, sunrise, reveals a Pax6b-dependent genetic network in the developing anterior chamber. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kleinjan DA, Bancewicz RM, Gautier P, Dahm R, Schonthaler HB, Damante G, et al. Subfunctionalization of duplicated zebrafish pax6 genes by cis-regulatory divergence. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e29. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Haffter P, Granato M, Brand M, Mullins MC, Hammerschmidt M, Kane DA, et al. The identification of genes with unique and essential functions in the development of the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development. 1996;123:1–36. doi: 10.1242/dev.123.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Varshney GK, Sood R, Burgess SM. Understanding and editing the zebrafish genome. Adv Genet. 2015;92:1–52. doi: 10.1016/bs.adgen.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wang D, Jao LE, Zheng N, Dolan K, Ivey J, Zonies S, et al. Efficient genome-wide mutagenesis of zebrafish genes by retroviral insertions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:12428–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705502104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Langhans SA. Three-dimensional in vitro cell culture models in drug discovery and drug repositioning. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:6. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Doke SK, Dhawale SC. Alternatives to animal testing:A review. Saudi Pharm J. 2015;23:223–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2013.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Roux LN, Petit I, Domart R, Concordet JP, Qu J, Zhou H, et al. Modeling of aniridia-related keratopathy by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of human limbal epithelial cells and rescue by recombinant PAX6 protein. Stem Cells. 2018;36:1421–9. doi: 10.1002/stem.2858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Latta L, Viestenz A, Stachon T, Colanesi S, Szentmáry N, Seitz B, et al. Human aniridia limbal epithelial cells lack expression of keratins K3 and K12. Exp Eye Res. 2018;167:100–9. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2017.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Latta L, Gießl A, Zenkel M, Fries FN, Käsmann-Kellner B, et al. Dysfunction of the limbal epithelial stem cell niche in aniridia-associated keratopathy. Ocul Surf. 2021;21:160–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Latta L, Nordström K, Stachon T, Langenbucher A, Fries FN, Szentmáry N, et al. Expression of retinoic acid signaling components ADH7 and ALDH1A1 is reduced in aniridia limbal epithelial cells and a siRNA primary cell based aniridia model. Exp Eye Res. 2019;179:8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Latta L, Knebel I, Bleil C, Stachon T, Katiyar P, Zussy C, et al. Similarities in DSG1 and KRT3 downregulation through retinoic acid treatment and PAX6 knockdown related expression profiles:Does PAX6 affect RA signaling in limbal epithelial cells? Biomolecules. 2021;11:1651. doi: 10.3390/biom11111651. doi:10.3390/biom11111651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Dorot O, Roux LN, Zennaro L, Oved K, Bremond-Gignac D, Pichinuk E, et al. The antipsychotropic drug duloxetine rescues PAX6 haploinsufficiency of mutant limbal stem cells through inhibition of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Ocul Surf. 2022;23:140–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Oved K, Zennaro L, Dorot O, Zerbib J, Frank E, Roux LN, et al. Ritanserin, a potent serotonin 2A receptor antagonist, represses MEK/ERK signalling pathway to restore PAX6 production and function in aniridia-like cellular model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;582:100–4. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Samuel W, Jaworski C, Postnikova OA, Kutty RK, Duncan T, Tan LX, et al. Appropriately differentiated ARPE-19 cells regain phenotype and gene expression profiles similar to those of native RPE cells. Mol Vis. 2017;23:60–89. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kaur G, Dufour JM. Cell lines:Valuable tools or useless artifacts. Spermatogenesis. 2012;2:1–5. doi: 10.4161/spmg.19885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Medvedev SP, Shevchenko AI, Zakian SM. Induced pluripotent stem cells:Problems and advantages when applying them in regenerative medicine. Acta Naturae. 2010;2:18–28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lo B, Parham L. Ethical issues in stem cell research. Endocr Rev. 2009;30:204–13. doi: 10.1210/er.2008-0031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Gao ML, Lei XL, Han F, He KW, Jin SQ, Zhang YY, et al. Patient-specific retinal organoids recapitulate disease features of late-onset retinitis pigmentosa. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:128. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00128. doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zhang H, Ma Y, Yu S, Yang X, Li Y, Guan J, et al. Establishment of a human iPSC line (SDQLCHi010-A) from a patient with optic nerve malformation carrying a heterozygous mutation in PAX6 gene. Stem Cell Res. 2019;41:101611. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101611. doi:10.1016/j.scr. 2019.101611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kim J, Koo BK, Knoblich JA. Human organoids:Model systems for human biology and medicine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:571–84. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0259-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Eintracht J, Toms M, Moosajee M. The use of induced pluripotent stem cells as a model for developmental eye disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:265. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00265. doi:10.3389/fncel.2020.00265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.O'Hara-Wright M, Gonzalez-Cordero A. Retinal organoids:A window into human retinal development. Development. 2020;147:dev189746. doi: 10.1242/dev.189746. doi:10.1242/dev.189746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Lancaster MA, Knoblich JA. Organogenesis in a dish:Modeling development and disease using organoid technologies. Science. 2014;345:1247125. doi: 10.1126/science.1247125. doi:10.1126/science.1247125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Afanasyeva TAV, Corral-Serrano JC, Garanto A, Roepman R, Cheetham ME, Collin RWJ. A look into retinal organoids:Methods, analytical techniques, and applications. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78:6505–32. doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-03917-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Lane A, Jovanovic K, Shortall C, Ottaviani D, Panes AB, Schwarz N, et al. Modeling and rescue of rp2 retinitis pigmentosa using iPSC-derived retinal organoids. Stem Cell Reports. 2020;15:67–79. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Zhang X, Wang W, Jin ZB. Retinal organoids as models for development and diseases. Cell Regen. 2021;10:33. doi: 10.1186/s13619-021-00097-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Fathi M, Ross CT, Hosseinzadeh Z. Functional 3-dimensional retinal organoids:Technological progress and existing challenges. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:668857. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.668857. doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.668857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Dorgau B, Felemban M, Hilgen G, Kiening M, Zerti D, Hunt NC, et al. Decellularised extracellular matrix-derived peptides from neural retina and retinal pigment epithelium enhance the expression of synaptic markers and light responsiveness of human pluripotent stem cell derived retinal organoids. Biomaterials. 2019;199:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Foster JW, Wahlin K, Adams SM, Birk DE, Zack DJ, Chakravarti S. Cornea organoids from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41286. doi: 10.1038/srep41286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Susaimanickam PJ, Maddileti S, Pulimamidi VK, Boyinpally SR, Naik RR, Naik MN, et al. Generating minicorneal organoids from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Development. 2017;144:2338–51. doi: 10.1242/dev.143040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Wang JD, Zhang JS, Xiong Y, Li J, Li XX, Liu X, et al. Congenital aniridia with cataract:Case series. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:115. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0503-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Ahmad S, Kolli S, Lako M, Figueiredo F, Daniels JT. Stem cell therapies for ocular surface disease. Drug Discov Today. 2010;15:306–13. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2010.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Parekh M, Romano V, Hassanin K, Testa V, Wongvisavavit R, Ferrari S, et al. Biomaterials for corneal endothelial cell culture and tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng. 2021;12:2041731421990536. doi: 10.1177/2041731421990536. doi:10.1177/2041731421990536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Barré-Sinoussi F, Montagutelli X. Animal models are essential to biological research:Issues and perspectives. Future Sci OA. 2015;1:FSO63. doi: 10.4155/fso.15.63. doi:10.4155/fso.15.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]