In the published article, there was an error in Table 3 as published. For the non-forensic group, the means and standard deviations were incorrectly reported as 2.55 (0.80) for Understanding and 2.27 (0.83) for Demonstration. The correct Table 3 with the corrected means and standard deviations for Understanding 10.18 (2.67) and Demonstration 8.89 (2.15) and its legend appear below.
Table 3.
Mean scores of forensic (n = 22) and non-forensic clients (n = 22) in TRS-10- items associated with dynamic risk as well as corresponding effect sizes.
| TRS-2-Items | Forensic clients | Non-forensic clients | Effect size a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understanding | Demonstration | Understanding | Demonstration | Understanding | Demonstration | |
| M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | r | r | |
| Prosocial attitudes | 2.55 (0.67) | 2.27 (0.70) | 2.55 (0.80) | 2.27 (0.83) | −0.01 | −0.01 |
| Adequate coping skills/styles | 2.05 (0.65) | 1.68 (0.48) | 2.18 (0.66) | 1.77 (0.61) | −0.11 | −0.06 |
| Adequate intimacy skills | 1.95 (0.79) | 1.64 (0.65) | 1.91 (0.75) | 1.73 (0.77) | −0.03 | −0.05 |
| Good general self-regulation | 2.18 (0.59) | 2.09 (0.61) | 2.09 (0.68) | 1.82 (0.66) | −0.06 | −0.21 |
| Good sexual self-regulation | 1.77 (0.61) | 1.64 (0.58) | 1.45 (0.67) | 1.27 (0.46) | −0.28 | −0.33 |
| Total: functioning on dynamic risk factors | 10.50 (2.35) | 9.32 (2.19) | 10.18 (2.67) | 8.89 (2.15) | −0.09 | −0.11 |
Increasing scores reflect normative functioning and therefore are negatively associated with dynamic risk factors. The exact Mann und Whitney U-Test was used for all comparisons between the subsamples. Regarding the total score, the significance level was set at α < 0.05. For the analysis of the single items, a Bonferroni corrected αcorr = α/5 = 0.01 was used. All comparisons were nonsignificant. aThe effect size r was calculated as Z statistic divided by the square root of the sample size (Z/√N).
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.