Skip to main content
RSC Advances logoLink to RSC Advances
. 2023 Feb 21;13(9):6287–6303. doi: 10.1039/d2ra07837f

Synthesis and comparative study of the structural and optical properties of binary ZnO-based composites for environmental applications

B Ben Salem a,, G Essalah a, S Ben Ameur a, B Duponchel b, H Guermazi a, S Guermazi a, G Leroy b
PMCID: PMC9942456  PMID: 36825284

Abstract

The development of photoactive systems to solve serious environmental problems is a key objective of researchers and remains a real challenge. Herein, n–p heterojunction ZnO-based composites were developed to achieve better photocatalytic performance in methylene blue (MB) degradation under natural solar irradiation. The hydrothermal technique was used to synthesize zinc oxide (ZnO)/metal oxide (MO) composites, with a molar ratio of 1 : 1 (MO = Mn3O4; Fe3O4; CuO; NiO). Various characterization techniques were used for the analysis of the structural, morphological and optical properties. X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy analysis (DRS), and Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy analysis (DRS) validated the presence of two phases for each sample, excluding any impurities. Indeed, the ZnO structure was not affected by the coupling with MO, confirming that MO was well dispersed on the surface of the ZnO crystalline lattice for each composite. Eventually, the photocatalytic performance evaluation test of the synthesized photocatalysts was carried out on aqueous MB solution. According to the results, the ZnO/Fe3O4 nano-catalyst showed the best photodegradation efficiency. This result suggests that the formation of Fe3O4/ZnO as a p/n heterojunction reduces the recombination of photo-generated electron/hole pairs and broadens the solar spectral response range, resulting in significant photocatalytic efficiency. Meanwhile, the possible mechanism for degradation of the MB was discussed.


The development of photoactive systems to solve serious environmental problems is a key objective of researchers and remains a real challenge.graphic file with name d2ra07837f-ga.jpg

1. Introduction

During the various industrial processes of the textile industry, significant quantities of organic compounds are released into the wastewater, which increases environmental pollution.1,2 Moreover, this phenomenon is considered to be one of the most important causes of water contamination, which can have harmful effects on humans and surrounding wildlife.3 In particular, methylene blue (MB) is one of among the hazardous and non-biodegradable organic substances frequently used in the textile industries. Moreover, its planar structure makes it highly soluble in water.4,5 Therefore, photocatalytic degradation of MB can be very beneficial to ensure environmental friendliness. In this regard, continuous efforts are made by researchers to develop efficient semiconductor photocatalysts that limit the use of sacrificial agents (H2O2) under natural solar irradiation. Indeed, the use of sacrificial agents for the degradation of organic pollutants is not cost-effective.6,7

Various n-type semiconductor photocatalysts like ZnO and TiO2 have been used to develop photocatalysts for dye degradation.8,9 Compared to TiO2, many studies have focused on ZnO for the treatment of many toxic pollutants.10–12 Due to its remarkable properties, such as low cost, high oxidation, non-toxic nature, high stability to photocorrosion and abundance in nature, zinc oxide is considered the most potential candidate for conversion of solar energy into a useful form of chemical or electrical energy.13 However, unmodified zinc oxide is not considered a strong photocatalyst under visible light due to its relatively high band gap (∼3.37 eV) and rapid charge carrier recombination rate.14,15 Its practical use is strongly limited because it is active in ultraviolet light, which covers about 5% of the solar spectrum.

Therefore, solving this problem is essential to achieve efficient and fast performance. In this context, several studies have been initiated to improve the visible light absorption and electron–hole separation of ZnO by doping with a metal, a non-metal or by coupling with another metal oxide, a non-metal oxide.16,17 One of the fundamental mechanisms of visible light photocatalysis is the ability to initiate electron transfer, resulting in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). These species are often responsible for the degradation of pollutants.

Among them, the p–n junction plays a key role in improving the performance of photodetectors, due to the effect of the integrated electric field generated at the interface, which allows better separation of the photoexcited electron–hole pairs.18,19

Heterojunction of ZnO with other metal oxides with different band edge positions is an excellent strategy to amplify carrier generation and separation under light illumination. All studies have shown that the heterojunction between metal oxides and ZnO improves the stability and reduces the charge transfer resistance in the synthesized particles. In particular, the coupling of ZnO (n-type) with another metal oxide (p-type) can lead to a change in the band gap and results in the separation of electron (e)–hole (h+) pairs under irradiation. Therefore, the electron–hole recombination rate is eliminated and thus higher photocatalytic activity.20

Among the various p-type semiconductor, manganite oxide (Mn3O4), iron oxide (Fe3O4) copper oxide (CuO) and nickel oxide (NiO) are recognized as remarkable co-catalysts to improve the photocatalytic performance of ZnO, due to its interesting electrical, optical and magnetic properties.21–24 On the one hand, NiO is considered as one of the most important p-type semiconductors with gap energy equal to 3.5 eV, which has been widely used in photocatalytic applications. It can improve the efficiency of photocatalytic system for electron–hole pair generation and enhance the photo-decomposition kinetics by coupling with ZnO.25 On the other hand, Mn3O4, Fe3O4 and CuO are important p-type semiconductors with band gaps equal to 2, 2.12, 1.4 respectively.26–28 They have excellent properties including a strong carrier concentration, superior stability and light absorption in the visible region. For a ZnO/MO composite, ZnO regions of type n collect positive charges, whereas MO regions of type p collect negative charges. As a result, charge balance is achieved, leading to better separation of interfacial charge separation and longer charge carrier lifetimes. Therefore, ZnO/MO heterostructures have attracted increasing interest.29–31

Many physical and chemical synthesis methods are used to prepare heterostructured systems, including sol–gel, hydrothermal, co-precipitation and spray pyrolysis. A. E. Ramírez et al.32 are synthesized mixed photocatalysts from transition metal oxides (TMOs), such as Cr2O3, MnO2, FeO, CoO, NiO, Cu2O, CuO, and ZnO by the sol–gel method. E. D. Sherly et al.33 are successfully synthesized some coupled oxides, ZnO–MO (MO = CuO, NiO, ZrO2 and CeO2) using a microwave assisted one pot solution combustion synthesis, which favored the separation of photogenerated carriers. Unlike physical or chemical vaporization methods, hydrothermal synthesis is a simple, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly synthesis route, which is also suitable for mass preparation in industrial production, including synthesis by low-temperature hydrothermal reactions.34,35 Therefore, the hydrothermal method was used to obtain high-quality ZnO-based binary composites.

This work consists in presenting a comparison of the functional properties of ZnO coupled to metal oxides (MO = Fe3O4, Mn3O4, CuO, NiO) for environmental applications. The ZnO heterostructures coupled to the MO were prepared by the hydrothermal procedure under the same conditions. The nature and structural parameters were determined by an X-ray diffraction analysis. UV-visible DRS measurements were performed to estimate the optical gap values and to explore the change in optical properties of ZnO as a result of the coupling process with different metal oxides. In addition, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) curves were recorded to evaluate the vibrational variation of the samples. The surface morphology and the elemental analysis of the different heterostructures of ZnO coupled to the MO were explored by scanning electron microscopy. Based on all these results, we provide some information on the photocatalytic activity under sunlight for the degradation of MB using these binary metal oxides.

2. Methodology

2.1. Materials

In order to prepare the different binary composites, zinc chloride (ZnCl2), manganese(ii) chloride tetrahydrate (MnCl2 4H2O), iron(ii) sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4·7H2O), copper sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO4·5H2O), nickel sulfate hexahydrate (NiSO4·6H2O) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), were used as starting materials and distilled water as solvent. Methylene blue (MB) dye was used as an organic contaminant.

All these products were of analytical grade (purity >99%). They were obtained from Sigma Aldrich, and no further purification was performed on them.

2.2. Synthesis details

The ZnO-based composites were synthesized by a facile one-step hydrothermal route. The successive steps involved in the fabrication of the ZnO/MO (MO = Mn3O4, Fe3O4, CuO and NiO) composites are described in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram describing the preparation steps of the preparation of ZnO/MO composites.

Fig. 1

First, 2 g of zinc chloride (ZnCl2) and a very specific mass of second precursor (MnCl2·4H2O, FeSO4·7H2O, CuSO4·5H2O, or NiCl2·6H2O), with a molar ratio of 1 : 1, were dissolved in 20 ml of distilled water under magnetic stirring at room temperature. Then, 10 ml of NaOH was added drop-wise to the mixed solution every 10 min, then the pH was adjusted to 8 during the process. After 30 min of stirring, the solution was transferred to a Teflon-coated stainless steel autoclave of 50 ml capacity. The autoclave was sealed and heated at 110 °C for 24 hours in an oven and then naturally cooled to room temperature. After the hydrothermal reaction, colored precipitates were formed at the bottom of the autoclave. These precipitates were filtered and rinsed several times with ethanol and distilled water to remove unreacted compounds. Then, they were filtered and dried at 80 °C for 12 hours. Finally, the dried powders were ground. After drying, the obtained samples are in amorphous form. It is therefore necessary to carry out a thermal treatment to obtain crystalline structures and to eliminate all traces of organic chains and solvents. This treatment was performed in an oven, equipped with a programmable temperature controller (T = 500 °C/t = 5 h).

The obtained powders were then used for further characterization.

2.3. Photocatalytic experiment

The photocatalytic activity of the binary composites (ZnO/Mn3O4, ZnO/Fe3O4 ZnOCuO and ZnO/NiO) was evaluated by degradation of an aqueous solution of the methylene blue MB dye (5 ppm) at room temperature under sunlight (time: 11:00 am to 2:00 pm). A total of 50 mg of each photocatalyst powders was loaded into 60 ml of simulating pollutant MB with a concentration of 5 mg l−1. The suspension was magnetically stirred for 60 min in the dark to ensure complete equilibration of adsorption/desorption between the catalyst surface and the organic dye. After this, the suspension was placed under sunlight. Then, each aliquot (∼2 ml) was taken every 30 min, filtered and centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 20 min to separate the catalytic precipitate from the dye solution. Finally, the concentration of MB was monitored by measuring the absorption intensity at 664 nm, using a UV-visible spectrophotometer.

2.4. Characterization

The structural investigations of the prepared samples were carried using a powder X-ray diffractograms (2θ = 5°–70°, Phillips powder diffractometer operating with copper Kα radiation source/λ = 1.54060 Å). The obtained XRD data were processed with X'Pert HighScore software, where the Miller indices (hkl) and their corresponding interplanar distance (dhkl) were identified.

The presence of the metal-oxide groups was studied using a PerkinElmer Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectrometer in transmission mode, in the range 400–4000 cm−1.

The morphological properties and the surface elemental composition (energy dispersive X-ray spectrum) of the synthesized samples were obtained using a scanning electron microscope (Model JEOL JSM7100F) coupled with EDX spectrometer using double-faced adhesive carbon pads (AGG3347N from Agar Scientific). In order to estimate the average grain size, the Image J software was then used.36

The optical properties were studied in the form of pellets using a UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectrophotometer (Model Perkin- ELMER 365, 300–800 nm). The reflectance spectra were recorded between 300 and 800 nm. The photoluminescence measurements were recorded using a Jobin Yvon HR 250 spectrometer at room temperature with an excitation of 266 nm.

The optical absorption spectra were measured by a Shimadzu UV-1800 UV-visible spectrophotometer.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Characterization of the prepared materials

Knowing the key factors involved in photocatalytic activity will help explore the use of MO coupled ZnO in environmental applications. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the relevant physicochemical parameters including crystallite size, shape, composition, morphology and optical gap that could be advantageously related to the photocatalytic activity.

3.1.1. Powder X-ray diffraction study

The crystallinity, phase and purity of the ZnO samples combined with Mn3O4, Fe3O4, CuO and NiO were examined by powder XRD as shown in Fig. 2. Peaks at 2θ of: 31.6 (100), 34.3 (002), 36.2 (101), 47.4 (102), 56.5 (110), 62.7 (103), 67.8 (112), and 69.1° (203) are assigned to hexagonal wurtzite ZnO, space group P63mc (ICDD card no. 01-080-0074). In addition to the primary phase of ZnO, reflections related to the secondary phase of the transition metal oxide are determined. Each composite is therefore a mixture of individual binary oxide phases coexisting in a single material. The I41/amd space group diffraction peaks of the manganese oxide Mn3O4 phase corresponding to the tetragonal structure (ICDD card no. 00-001-1127) are observed at 2θ of: 29.1 (112), 32.8 (103), 36.2 (211), 44.3 (220), 51.1 (105), 54.1 (312), 58.7 (321), 60.5 (224), and 64.9° (314). The Fdm space group peaks of the manganite Fe3O4 phase corresponding to the cubic structure (ICDD card no. 01-089-0688) are appeared at 2θ of: 29.8 (220), 35.1 (311), 42.7 (400), 52.8 (422), and 62.1° (440). The peaks in the C2/c space group of the CuO copper oxide phase corresponding to the monoclinic structure (ICDD card no. 01-080-1268) are exhibited at 2θ of: 32.5 (110), 35.6 (−111), 38.7 (111), 48.8 (−202), 53.3 (020), 58.1 (202), 61.5 (−113), and 66.2 (−311). On the other hand, the peaks at 2θ of: 37.2 (111), 43.2 (200), and 62.7° (220) are assigned to the cubic nickel oxide phase NiO, space group Fmm (ICDD card no. 01-073-1523). Moreover, there is no additional phase or impurity detected, which implies that the obtained materials have high degree of crystallinity.37–40

Fig. 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of ZnO/MO powders.

Fig. 2

The lattice constants (a, b and c) were calculated using the following formulas:

2d sin θ = 1

For ZnO (hexagonal structure):

3.1.1. 2

For Mn3O4 (tetragonal structure):

3.1.1. 3

For Fe3O4 and NiO (cubic structure):

3.1.1. 4

For CuO (monoclinic structure):

3.1.1. 5

where d is the inter-planar distance, h, k and l are the Miller indices. θ is Bragg's angle of diffraction, and λ is the incident radiation wavelength.

Table 1 groups the structural parameters obtained for the different binary composites. The values of the structural parameters of the ZnO phase are according to the data of the ICDD card no. 01-080-0074. In all cases, the static structure factor of the wurtzite phase (c/a ∼ 1.602) remains constant. This indicates that virtually no change was observed in the lattice constants of the ZnO phase, implying that the metal oxide did not diffuse into the ZnO structure, as has been reported in the literature. In fact, the diffusion led to the substitution of Zn ions by transition metal ions and caused changes in the lattice constants of the ZnO structure, which was not observed.41 Therefore, the Mn3O4, Fe3O4, CuO and NiO particles are well dispersed on the ZnO surface for each composite.

Lattice parameters and average crystallite size of the phases obtained from XRD diagrams.
Catalyst Wurtzite phase (ZnO) Metal oxide phase (MO)
a (Å) c (Å) a/c D (nm) a (Å) b (Å) c (Å) D (nm)
ZnO/Mn3O4 3.2519 5.2108 1.6023 18.93 57 500 57 500 92 401 13.14
ZnO/Fe3O4 3.2531 52 123 1.6022 21.53 8.4903 8.4903 8.4903 17.20
ZnO/CuO 3.2524 5.2116 1.6023 16.83 4.6792 3.4213 5.1301 13.16
ZnO/NiO 3.2541 5.2138 1.6022 10.63 4.1683 4.1683 4.1683 13.03

The Debye–Scherer equation was used to determine the average crystallite size (D) and dislocation density (δ).42

3.1.1. 6

where K is the Scherer constant, is λ the X-ray wavelength for the copper source equal to 1.5406 Å, θ is the Bragg angle and β is the full-width at half-maximum (in radians).

The average crystallite size for the ZnO phase coupled to manganese oxide, iron oxide, copper oxide and nickel oxide, was 18.93, 21.53, 16.83 and 10.63 nm, respectively. A diversification of ZnO intensity in different samples can be observed, however, which can affect the FWHM, resulting in a different crystallite size. These values are lower than those reported in literature for powders prepared by other methods, proving the importance of hydrothermal technique.

3.1.2. Fourier transform infrared analysis

The presence of functional groups on the surface of catalysts was confirmed by infrared spectroscopy. Fig. 3a shows the FT-IR spectra for the prepared composites in the range (400–4000 cm−1). However, to clarify the region of interest, the FT-IR spectra are enlarged in a precise range of 400–1400 cm−1 (Fig. 3b). Wide band at 3500–3000 cm−1 detected due to the stretching vibration of the hydroxyl group (O–H). The peak around 1635 cm−1 represents the bending modes of the OH group.43 This is probably a result of the atmospheric humidity affecting the samples when exposed for measurement, especially for ZnO/Fe3O4. This result plays an important role in the photodegradation mechanism.44 Indeed, the adsorbed OH ions can trap charge carriers to produce reactive hydroxyl radicals (OH˙), which function as active sites to remove organic dye molecules. Moreover, the broad band to 1063–1100 cm−1 indicates the existence of SO4−2 in the IR spectrum of ZnO/Fe3O4, ZnO/CuO and ZnO/NiO composites.45 Indeed, the precursors of copper and iron are the sulfate type (CuSO4·5H2O/FeSO4·7H2O). Generally, metal oxides give absorption bands below 1000 cm−1 arising from the inter-atomic vibrations.46 Accordingly, the vibrational bands of the Zn–O bond are around 494, 512, 530 and 532 cm−1.47,48 The FT-IR spectrum corresponding to ZnO/Mn3O4 shows the presence of the vibrational band around 617 cm−1 attributed to the stretching mode of Mn–O.49 Furthermore, IR bands for Cu–O stretching modes are observed at 429, 476, 583, 612 and 653 cm−1.45 For the IR spectrum of ZnO/Fe3O4, detected band in the infrared spectrum at 400 cm−1 can be attributed to the stretching vibration of Fe–O bonds.50 On the other hand, NiO shows IR absorption peaks due to Ni–O vibration at 400 and 618 cm−1.51 No other active mode corresponding to other species such as Zn(OH)2 was detected, in agreement with the XRD analysis which confirms the purity of the prepared samples. Thus, the FTIR spectrum analysis confirmed the presence of two distinct crystal phases in each ZnO/MO composite, which agrees well with the XRD results.

Fig. 3. FTIR spectra of ZnO/MO composites (a) in the range 400–4000 cm−1, and (b) magnified spectra from 400 to 1500 cm−1.

Fig. 3

3.1.3. Surface morphology and elemental examinations

The surface morphology of the as-prepared coupled metal oxides, ZnO/MO (MO = Fe3O4, Mn3O4, CuO, NiO) was examined by scanning electron microscopy SEM analysis. Fig. 4a–d shows the SEM micrographs of ZnO/Mn3O4, ZnO/Fe3O4, ZnO/CuO and ZnO/NiO composites, respectively. The two samples ZnO/Mn3O4 and ZnO/CuO tend to have quasi-spherical shapes with an inhomogeneous distribution with micrometer dimension size that varies between. While, the SEM images of ZnO/Fe3O4 and ZnO/NiO reveals clear nanoparticles of spherical shape. Histograms of the particle distribution constructed by Image J software are used to calculate the average particle size (Fig. 4 (inset)). Regarding the particle distribution of Mn3O4, CuO and NiO coupled ZnO particles, the particles do not possess a uniform size distribution as shown in the histograms. However, this agglomeration is negligible for Fe3O4 coupled ZnO. According to Table 2, these statistics indicate that the particle size is nanometric for iron oxide and nickel oxide and micrometric for manganese oxide and copper oxide. Therefore, ZnO/Fe3O4 and ZnO/NiO can have high specific surface area, which can enhance the adsorption of dye molecules to active adsorption sites in photocatalytic assays, as will be confirmed later.52 Indeed, nanoscale materials have a large active surface area, which promotes the adsorption of organic pollutants and thus improves photocatalytic performance.53,54

Fig. 4. SEM images and Size distribution (insert) of (a) ZnO/Mn3O4, (b) ZnO/Fe3O4, (c) ZnO/CuO and (d) ZnO/NiO and energy dispersive spectra/EDX of (e) ZnO/Mn3O4, (f) ZnO/Fe3O4, (g) ZnO/CuO, (h) ZnO/NiO and (i) Carbon spectra EDX.

Fig. 4

The average particle size of ZnO/MO composites.
Composite The average particle size (nm)
ZnO/Mn3O4 110
ZnO/Fe3O4 41
ZnO/CuO 170
ZnO/NiO 65

Moreover, the prepared powders were examined by EDX to identify the qualitative chemical composition. Fig. 4 shows the EDX diagrams of Fig. 4e ZnO/Mn3O4, Fig. 4f ZnO/Fe3O4, Fig. 4g ZnO/CuO and Fig. 4h ZnO/NiO. These EDX spectra reveal the presence of “Zn”, “Fe”, “Mn”, “Cu”, “Ni” and “O” signals. Moreover, the presence of carbon “C” in the spectra obtained for all the samples Fig. 4) is due to the conductive carbon substrate used as a support during the analysis (see Fig. 4i). No elemental impurities were found within the EDX detection limit. This indicates that the high purity and good crystallization of the fabricated composites are in agreement with the XRD and FT-IR results, confirming the successful formation of the various binary composites.

3.1.4. Optical properties

The optical properties of a photocatalyst have an importance of its photocatalytic efficiency. For the higher photocatalytic performance of zinc oxide, the optical band gap should be shifted to the visible region for better photon harvesting sunlight.55 DRS-UV-vis spectroscopy is used to identify the optical properties and band gap of all four photocatalysts.

The Kubelka–Munk function F(R) (eqn (7)), are presented in Fig. 5 as a function of wavelength.56

3.1.4. 7
Fig. 5. Transformed Kubelka–Munk functions F(R) vs. wavelength λ of (a) ZnO/Mn3O4, (b) ZnO/Fe3O4, (c) ZnO/CuO, (d) ZnO/NiO.

Fig. 5

We notice the presence of two strong absorption edges for each composite: the first one marked by an inflection point around 570, 600, 750 and 350 nm related to the Mn3O4, Fe3O4, CuO and NiO phase respectively, and the second one at ∼400 nm is related to the ZnO phase. The appearance of two kinds of characteristic absorption bands also confirms that each sample is a composite material composed of ZnO phase and other MO phase.

Band gap energy

To determine the gap energy (Eg) of the prepared nanoparticles, we used the Tauc's low (eqn (8)):57

(αhν) = β(Eg) 8

in which α is the absorption coefficient, calculated from the Kubelka–Munk function F(R) through the following equation: Inline graphic, t = 1 mm represents the thickness of the pellet, β is a constant independent of energy or band tailing parameter, h is the Planck's constant, ν is the incident light frequency, and p is the power factor. p-Value is governed by the optic transition type, it can take the following values: 1/2, 3/2, 2 or 3 for direct allowed, direct forbidden, indirect allowed or indirect forbidden transition, respectively. In our case, p is equal 1/2, since ZnO, Mn3O4, Fe3O4, CuO and NiO have a direct band gap, according to the literature.26,58–60

The optical band gap energy was calculated from extrapolating the linear region of the plot of (αhν)2 (x-axis) vs. hν (y-axis) that was determined by the x-intercept (Fig. 6). The energy gap value Eg of the ZnO/Mn3O4, ZnO/Fe3O4, ZnO/CuO and ZnO/NiO was found to be (2.99/2.17), (2.97/2.04), (3.02/1.47) and (3.03/3.31) eV, respectively (Table 3), which significantly lower than those reported in the literature.26,60–62 The combination of ZnO with these metal oxides improved charge separation and increased light absorption. In addition, the creation of an n-p heterojunction between semiconductors with compatible band potentials improves the catalytic efficiency. In fact, the intimate interfaces can act as a transport channel, promoting the separation of electron–hole pairs. These interactions exert an influence on the charge carrier recombination times by forming new Fermi levels located between the valence band (VB) and the conduction band (CB), and thus electron transfer occurs in two steps: the first going from the VB to the local level in the energy band gap, and the second representing the additional jump to the CB.63 Thus, it is possible to define a composite to meet the specific characteristics of use in photovoltaics and photocatalysis. The different ZnO/MO exhibited a lower band gap compared to pure ZnO (3.37 eV). It is possible that the uniform distribution and high ratio of Fe3O4 in the ZnO/Fe3O4 nanocomposite with small spherical shape are the causes of the reduction of the band gap energy of ZnO in the nanocomposite. Therefore, the coupling of ZnO and Fe3O4 with a ratio of 1 : 1 in a nanocomposite reduced the band gap energy and improved the photocatalytic activity of the composite under sunlight irradiation. In addition, ZnO/Fe3O4 was expected to have the fastest decomposition rate for organic compounds. Indeed, for nanomaterials with a lower band gap, electrons can more easily pass from the VB to the CB.

Fig. 6. The Tauc's plot (αhv)2vs. photon energy (hv) for (a) ZnO/Mn3O4, (b) ZnO/Fe3O4, (c) ZnO/CuO, (d) ZnO/NiO.

Fig. 6

Energy values Tables of ZnO/MO composites.
Catalyst Band gap energy (eV)
Wurtzite phase (ZnO) Metal oxide phase (MO)
ZnO/Mn3O4 2.99 2.17
ZnO/Fe3O4 2.97 2.04
ZnO/CuO 3.02 1.47
ZnO/NiO 3.03 3.31

The presence of two optical gaps indicates the formation of n–p heterojunctions and subsequently the confirmation of the binary composite nature shown by XRD and FT-IR.

3.1.5. Photoluminescence study

The PL spectrum can reveal important information about surface defects, oxygen vacancies and surface states, which can significantly affect the photocatalytic process.64Fig. 7 shows the PL spectra of ZnO coupled to OM at the excitation wavelength of 266 nm. Compared to ZnO/NiO, the PL intensity of ZnO/Mn3O4, ZnO/Fe3O4 and ZnO/CuO is remarkably low. This is due to the heterostructure (1 : 1) between ZnO and (Mn3O4, Fe3O4, CuO) which exhibit a response to visible excitation. The low excitation PL spectra show that defects are present in ZnO coupled to manganese oxide, iron oxide, and copper oxide. Unfortunately, they give information that does not allow for judging the quality of the composites. Fig. 8a shows the PL spectrum of ZnO/NiO nanocomposite and the Gaussian emission peak deconvolution. The high PL intensity in the UV region of the spectrum may be due to the rapid recombination of photo-induced electron–hole pairs in this region, while the broad PL peak located in the visible domain indicates an efficient separation of electrons and holes. Therefore, long-lived carriers are gotten in this region. The Gaussian adjustment of PL emission peaks of ZnO/NiO suggests the presence of several individual emissions. The emission peaks in the UV region at 326, 338, 352, and 382 nm are assigned to the emission from the wide band gap metal oxide (NBE). In addition, in the visible region, we observe a violet emission at 410 nm, blue emission at 453 nm, and green emission at 500 nm.

Fig. 7. PL emission spectrum of ZnO/Mn3O4, ZnO/Fe3O4, ZnO/CuO, ZnO/NiO at room temperature.

Fig. 7

Fig. 8. (a) PL emission spectrum for 266 nm excitation wavelength, and (b) schematic band diagram representation of the measured PL emissions in ZnO/NiO composite.

Fig. 8

Fig. 8b illustrates the schematic band diagram for the PL electronic transitions present in ZnO/NiO nanocomposite. Since the Eg values (2.99 and 3.23 eV) are lower than the excitation (266 nm, 4.66 eV), an electron exhibited an electronic transition from the valence band (VB) to a high energy level, leaving a hole in this band. Then, this electron reached the conduction band (CB) by internal conversion (IC).65 The violet emission at 410 nm (3.02 eV) is due to the transition of the electrons trapped at the metal interstitials (Mi) level to the VB. Besides, in a recent study, T. Tangcharoen et al.66 showed that the blue luminescence peak appearing at 453 nm (∼2.73 eV) identifies oxygen antisites (OM) as acceptor defects in the ZnO/NiO nanocomposite. As they showed that emission at around 500 nm (∼2.48 eV) occurred as a result of recombination between the photogenerated hole, trapped in the deep oxygen vacancy and the photogenerated electron trapped in a shallow level, located below the CB.67,68 The presence of oxygen vacancies reduces the effective electron mass, hence the increase in electron mobility.69,70 Therefore, the separation of photo-induced electrons and holes will be enhanced in the nanocomposite, which can lead to enhanced photocatalytic activity. Similarly, Zhu et al. reported that the excellent photocatalytic properties are affected by the contribution of oxygen vacancies in ZnO.71 In fact, the electrons confined by the VO oxygen vacancies can react with the O2 molecules and then produce the radicals responsible for perpetuating the degradation process.72

3.2. Photocatalytic activity study

For this work, the main task is the preparation of binary composites based on metal oxides with unique properties and photoactive under sunlight.

3.2.1. Effect of irradiation time

From the results obtained by UV-vis DRS spectroscopy, it is evident that the prepared composites (heterostructures) were active in the visible region. In order to evaluate the photocatalytic performance of ZnO/Mn3O4, ZnO/Fe3O4, ZnO/CuO and ZnO/NiO various tests are performed and the MB is taken as the standard pollutant for the photocatalytic degradation under sunlight. The change in the intensity of the absorption peak recorded at λmax = 663 nm was monitored to deduce the final performance.

The photodegradation rate η (%) of MB dye is calculated by the following relation:

3.2.1. 9

In which A0 is the absorbance of MB at t0 when the adsorption–desorption equilibrium was completed, whereas A is the absorbance of MB at time t during the photocatalytic treatment.

The results obtained for the catalytic photodegradation of the MB dye tested by the four catalysts show a continuous increase in the percentage removal of the dye with increasing illumination time.

From the photocatalytic dye removal curves of MB dye (Fig. 9), the values of the photodegradation rate value using the photocatalysts ZnO/Mn3O4, ZnO/Fe3O4, ZnO/CuO and ZnO/NiO after 180 min under sunlight is 67, 76, 46 and 64%, respectively.

Fig. 9. The MB degradation rates as a function of sun-light illumination time.

Fig. 9

As a result, the ZnO/Fe3O4 nano-powder exhibits the best photocatalytic performance, which reached a maximum degradation after 180 min. This high photocatalytic performance of ZnO/Fe3O4 nano-powder is attributed to the collective effect of several factors. The XRD results clearly show that the ZnO/Fe3O4 nano-catalyst is well crystalline. Indeed, amorphous or semi-crystalline materials have a very low degradation rate compared to crystalline materials.73,74 Moreover, the shape and particle size of the synthesized material play a key role to obtain a product with high photocatalytic performance because the shape affects the surface properties of the materials.75–77 For ZnO/Fe3O4, SEM confirms the presence of spherical nanoparticles with a homogeneous distribution. In fact, several reports showed that spherical shaped particles have a higher degradation rate compared to other shapes of materials. So during solar irradiation, some of the nanoparticles could easily participate in the photocatalytic reaction, resulting a high performance. Fe3O4 has a band gap equal to 2.12 eV and its combination with ZnO limited their band gap to 2.97 eV. This allows it to absorb visible light wavelengths, which improves the photodegradation process under sunlight. We concluded that the synthesized ZnO/Fe3O4 nano-catalyst has a well crystalline structure, a homogeneous spherical shape and that the optical properties favor its use in the visible region and thus under solar irradiation. These different parameters have essentially contributed to reach a better degradation rate. On the other hand, the low photocatalytic activity of the ZnO/CuO composite can be attributed to the high band gap value of ZnO in this composite (3.02 eV) which cannot be activated well by visible light irradiation. In addition, their morphology has large quasi-spherical grains (>100 nm), which may also decrease the photocatalytic activity.

3.2.2. Kinetic

It is evident from Fig. 9 that the degradation of the tested MB organic dye increases with increasing irradiation time. In order to obtain a better comparison of the photocatalytic efficiencies of the prepared catalysts, a kinetic model analysis was performed.

The Langmuir–Hinshelwood (L–H) kinetic model can be applied according to the following formula:

3.2.2. 10

in which k indicates the photodegradation rate constant.

The fits of the catalytic photodegradation of MB dye using the different composites with the first-order model were evaluated by linear regression of ln(A0/A) versus time t, as shown in Fig. 10. The slopes of the straight lines represent the catalytic photoreaction rate constants k0. The obtained values of photodegradation rate constants and correlation coefficients (R2) for all catalysts are listed in Table 4. The first-order kinetic model fits indicated that the ZnO/Fe3O4 catalyst has a high value of the kinetic rate constant (k = 0.0078 min−1) with a good fit (R2 = 0.98) compared to the other catalysts. This clearly shows that this catalyst has much better photocatalytic properties.

Fig. 10. The Langmuir–Hinshelwood model for the degradation kinetic of MB by ZnO/MO catalysts under sun-light irradiation.

Fig. 10

The kinetic parameters of the studied models for MB photodegradation using different catalysts.
Catalysts K (min−1) R 2
ZnO/Mn3O4 0.0063 0.99
ZnO/Fe3O4 0.0078 0.98
ZnO/CuO 0.0033 0.97
ZnO/NiO 0.0057 0.99

3.2.3. Comparison with previously reported works

A comparison of the photocatalytic activity of ZnO/MO (MO = Mn3O4; Fe3O4; CuO; NiO) for MB degradation with previously reported metal oxide photoactive materials is presented in Table 5. It is evident that our binary ZnO/MO photocatalysts studied in this work showed significantly significant photocatalytic performance compared to other catalytic systems.78–86

Comparison of the degradation rates obtained in this work with other previous works.
Catalyst Pollutant Light source Degradation (%) Time (min) Reference
NiO MB Sunlight 17.7 60 78
ZnO MB Sunlight 68.6 135 79
ZnO NWs MB Sunlight 100 4320 80
ZnO/CuO (50 : 50) MO Visible light 27.7 120 81
Fe3O4/ZnO RhB Visible light 16 105 82
ZnO/Eu2O3/NiO (1 : 1 : 1) MB UV light 80 150 83
Mn3O4 MB HG lamp 21 240 84
ZnO/SnO2 NOx Solar lamp 20 60 85
ZnO/V2O4 MB Xe arc lamp 90 400 86
ZnO/Mn3O4 MB Sunlight 67 180 This work
ZnO/Fe3O4 MB Sunlight 76 180 This work
ZnO/CuO MB Sunlight 46 180 This work
ZnO/NiO MB Sunlight 72.3 180 This work

3.2.4. Proposed mechanism for the photocatalytic degradation

The mechanism of photocatalysis is based on the generation of electrons (e) and holes (h+) under light excitation. For pure ZnO, electrons can be transferred to the conduction band which leads to the creation of holes in the valence band when ZnO is illuminated by UV light.87 The photo-generated e and h+ recombine to reach a lower energy level. Furthermore, the production and recombination of majority charge carriers are two processes that influence photocatalytic performance. Recombination of e/h+ reduces carrier mobility and blocks the participation of the majority of charge carriers in reactions. Prior to recombination, electrons and holes are able to react with toxic molecules and break them down into non-toxic compounds as they migrate to the semiconductor (catalyst) surface.

The coupling of ZnO (n-type) with another metal oxide (p-type) results in the transport of electron–hole pairs between the two semiconductors, depending on the relative positions of the energy bands of ZnO and MO. In addition, the creation of the n–p junction interface {ZnO (n-type)/MO (p-type)} exerts a significant influence on the generation of carriers and the recombination process of electron–hole pairs.88,89

A schematic diagram of the photodegradation mechanism of ZnO/MO composites is shown in Fig. 11, describing the different electron transfers between ZnO and MO. When MO is associated with ZnO, a n–p heterojunction is created. Electrons can move from the n-type semiconductor (ZnO) to the p-type semiconductor (MO) by diffusion, while holes migrate in the opposite direction until equilibrium is reached in the composite. Simultaneously, the n–p semiconductor interface is the site of internal electric field generation. Under the effect of sunlight, the electrons in the valence bands (VB) of MO and ZnO are excited to those in the respective conduction bands (CB). In thermodynamic terms, there is a transfer of photogenerated electrons from the CB of MO to the CB of ZnO, while photogenerated holes are transferred in the opposite direction. As a result, more photogenerated electrons accumulate on the CB of ZnO. In the presence of oxygen, the electron is trapped, forming superoxide radicals that then react with water pollutants.

Fig. 11. The possible photocatalytic mechanism for ZnO/MO photocatalyst.

Fig. 11

The photocatalytic mechanism occurs in three steps:90,91

➢ Oxidation

The reaction produced between h+ and H2O molecule or hydroxyl groups (OH) on the surface of the photocatalyst generated the hydroxyl radicals (OH˙) and (H+), according to the following reactions:ZnO/MO + hv → ZnO (e + h+)/MO (e + h+)n-type ZnO/p-type MO + → (e)ZnO + (h+)MO(h+)MO + OH → OH˙(h+)MO + H2O → OH˙ + H+

➢ Reduction

The dioxide (O2) adsorbed on the surface of the photocatalyst is reduced by electrons (e) to produce superoxide species (O2˙). The (O2˙) undergoes successive reactions (I)–(IV) to give hydroxyl radicals (OH˙), as shown by the following equations:

(e)ZnO + O2 → O2˙ I
O2˙ + H+ → HO2˙ II
2HO2˙ → H2O2 + O2 III
H2O2 + O2˙ → OH˙ + O2 + OH IV

➢ Pollutant degradation

The hydroxyl radicals (OH˙) are known to be very reactive oxidative species; it can degrade pollutants to CO2 and H2O:OH˙ + MB → CO2 (carbon dioxide) + H2O (water)

4. Conclusion

In summary, the ZnO (n)/MO (p) {Mn3O4; Fe3O4; CuO; NiO} heterojunction photocatalysts were successfully synthesized by an inexpensive and eco-friendly hydrothermal method. The structural and morphological results proved that the coupling of ZnO with MO did not provoke the ions substitution in the ZnO lattices and that the hexagonal wurtzite structure is not affected. Optical measurements revealed the presence of two gaps in the ZnO/MO composites with low values. This shows that the coupling reduces the electron–hole recombination rate, which promotes the absorption in the visible region and leads to photocatalytic performance of ZnO/MO under sunlight. The photocatalytic results indicate that the binary nanocomposite catalyst ZnO/Fe3O4 has a great potential for MB removal compared to other catalysts due to its nano-size and their activation in visible light. Therefore, due to its high photocatalytic performance, ZnO/Fe3O4 can be exploited as an effective material for water decontamination. We hope that our study will contribute to the development of ternary and quaternary metal oxide nanocomposites with outstanding performance and low cost to open up new opportunities for ZnO-based nanomaterials in the next generation for environmental applications.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Supplementary Material

RA-013-D2RA07837F-s001

Acknowledgments

Authors gratefully thank the financial support of the Tunisian Ministry of higher education and scientific research, and Campus France within program (PHC Utique project No. 17G1143).

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ra07837f

References

  1. Ahmed J., Thakur A. and Goyal A., Chapter 1: Industrial wastewater and its toxic effects, in Biological Treatment of Industrial Wastewater, 2021, pp. 1–14 [Google Scholar]
  2. Madhav S. Ahamad A. Singh P. Mishra P. K. A review of textile industry: Wet processing, environmental impacts, and effluent treatment methods. Environ. Qual. Manag. 2018;27:31–41. [Google Scholar]
  3. Saleh I. A. Zouari N. Al-Ghouti M. A. Removal of pesticides from water and wastewater: Chemical, physical and biological treatment approaches. Environ. Technol. Innovation. 2020;19:101026. [Google Scholar]
  4. Khan I. Saeed K. Zekker I. Zhang B. Hendi A. H. Ahmad A. Ahmad S. Zada N. Ahmad H. Shah L. A. Shah T. Review on Methylene Blue: Its Properties, Uses, Toxicity and Photodegradation. Water. 2022;14:242. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamad H. N. Idrus S. Recent Developments in the Application of Bio-Waste-Derived Adsorbents for the Removal of Methylene Blue from Wastewater: A Review. Polym. 2022;14:783. doi: 10.3390/polym14040783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pandis P. K. Kalogirou C. Kanellou E. Vaitsis C. Savvidou M. G. Sourkouni G. Zorpas A. A. Argirusis C. Key Points of Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) for Wastewater, Organic Pollutants and Pharmaceutical Waste Treatment: A Mini Review. Chem. Engineering. 2022;6:8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang L. Cai P. R. Liu Z. Z. Role of carbon quantum dots on nickel titanate to promote water oxidation reaction under visible light illumination. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;607:203–209. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sakthivel S. Neppolian B. Shankar M. V. Arabindoo B. Palanichamy M. Murugesan V. Solar photocatalytic degradation of azo dye: comparison of photocatalytic efficiency of ZnO and TiO2. Sol. Energy Mater. 2003;77:65–82. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zheng L. Han S. Liu H. Yu P. Fang X. Hierarchical MoS2 nanosheet@TiO2 nanotube array composites with enhanced photocatalytic and photocurrent performances. Small. 2016;12:1527–1536. doi: 10.1002/smll.201503441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang J. Chen R. Xiang L. Komarneni S. Synthesis, properties and applications of ZnO nanomaterials with oxygen vacancies: a review. Ceram. Int. 2018;44:7357–7377. [Google Scholar]
  11. Weldegebrieal G. K. Synthesis method, antibacterial and photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanoparticles for azo dyes in wastewater treatment: A review. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2020;120:108140. [Google Scholar]
  12. Fang J. Fan H. Ma Y. Wang Z. Chang Q. Surface defects control for ZnO nanorods synthesized by quenching and their anti-recombination in photocatalysis. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;332:47–54. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar S. G. Rao K. K. Comparison of modification strategies towards enhanced charge carrier separation and photocatalytic degradation activity of metal oxide semiconductors (TiO2, WO3 and ZnO) Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017;391:124–148. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kegel J. Povey I. M. Pemble M. E. Zinc oxide for solar water splitting: A brief review of the material's challenges and associated opportunities. Nano Energy. 2018;54:409–428. [Google Scholar]
  15. Thi T. U. D. Nguyen T. T. Thi Y. D. Thi K. H. T. Phan B. T. Pham K. N. Green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles using orange fruit peel extract for antibacterial activities. RSC Adv. 2020;10:23899–23907. doi: 10.1039/d0ra04926c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sanakousar F. M. Vidyasagar C. Jiménez-Pérez V. M. Prakash K. Recent progress on visible-light-driven metal and non-metal doped ZnO nanostructures for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2022;140:106390. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar S. G. Rao K. K. Comparison of modification strategies towards enhanced charge carrier separation and photocatalytic degradation activity of metal oxide semiconductors (TiO2, WO3 and ZnO) Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017;391:124–148. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zheng L. Teng F. Ye X. Zheng H. Fang X. Photo/electrochemical applications of metal sulfide/TiO2 heterostructures. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020;10:1902355. [Google Scholar]
  19. Han S. Pu Y. C. Zheng L. Zhang J. Z. Fang X. Shell-thickness dependent electron transfer and relaxation in type-II core–shell CdS/TiO2 structures with optimized photoelectrochemical performance. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3:22627–22635. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ouyang W. Teng f. He J. H. Fang X. Enhancing the Photoelectric Performance of Photodetectors Based on Metal Oxide Semiconductors by Charge Carrier Engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019;29:1807672. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kulkarni S. A. Sawadh P. S. Palei P. K. Kokate K. K. Effect of synthesis route on the structural, optical and magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 2014;40:1945–1949. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rani B. J. Ravina M. Ravi G. Ravichandran S. Ganesh V. Yuvakkumar R. Synthesis and characterization of hausmannite (Mn3O4) nanostructures. Surf. Interfaces. 2018;11:28–36. [Google Scholar]
  23. Abbas H. Nadeem K. Hafeez A. Hassan A. Saeed N. Krenn H. A comparative study of magnetic, photocatalytic and dielectric properties of NiO nanoparticles synthesized by sol-gel and composite hydroxide mediated method. Ceram. Int. 2019;45:17289–17297. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gnanasekaran L. Hemamalini R. Saravanan R. Ravichandran K. Gracia F. Agarwal S. Gupta V. K. Synthesis and characterization of metal oxides (CeO2, CuO, NiO, Mn3O4, SnO2 and ZnO) nanoparticles as photo catalysts for degradation of textile dyes. J. Photochem. Photobiol., B. 2017;173:43–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Abbas H. Nadeem K. Hafeez A. Hassan A. Saeed N. Krenn H. A comparative study of magnetic, photocatalytic and dielectric properties of NiO nanoparticles synthesized by sol-gel and composite hydroxide mediated method. Ceram. Int. 2019;45:17289–17297. [Google Scholar]
  26. Manikandan A. Vijaya J. J. Mary J. A. Kennedy L. J. Dinesh A. Structural, optical and magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles prepared by a facile microwave combustion method. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014;20:2077–2085. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bai L. Huang H. Yu S. Zhang D. Huang H. Zhang Y. Role of transition metal oxides in g-C3N4-based heterojunctions for photocatalysis and supercapacitors. J. Energy Chem. 2022;64:214–235. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lett J. A. Alshahateet S. F. Fatimah I. Sivasankaran R. P. Sibhatu A. K. Le M. V. Sagadevan S. Hydrothermal Synthesis and Photocatalytic Activity of Mn3O4 Nanoparticles. Top. Catal. 2022:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li Q. Meng J. Huang J. Li Z. Plasmon-induced pyro-phototronic effect enhancement in self-powered UV-vis detection with a ZnO/CuO p–n junction device. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022;32:2108903. [Google Scholar]
  30. Salunkhe P. Bhat P. Kekuda D. Performance evaluation of transparent self-powered n-ZnO/p-NiO heterojunction ultraviolet photosensors. Sens. Actuators, A. 2022;345:113799. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li J. Zhao F. Zhang L. Zhang M. Jiang H. Li S. Li J. Electrospun hollow ZnO/NiO heterostructures with enhanced photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2015;5:67610–67616. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ramírez A. E. Montero-Muñoz M. López L. L. Ramos-Ibarra J. E. Coaquira J. A. Heinrichs B. Páez C. A. Significantly enhancement of sunlight photocatalytic performance of ZnO by doping with transition metal oxides. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78568-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sherly E. D. Vijaya J. J. Kennedy L. J. Meenakshisundaram A. Lavanya M. A comparative study of the effects of CuO, NiO, ZrO2 and CeO2 coupling on the photocatalytic activity and characteristics of ZnO. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2016;33:1431–1440. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kashif M. Fiaz M. Athar M. One-step hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO nanorods as efficient oxygen evolution reaction catalyst. Inorg. Nano-Met. Chem. 2022;52:101–107. [Google Scholar]
  35. Valencia S. Marín J. M. Restrepo G. Study of the bandgap of synthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticles using the sol-gel method and a hydrothermal treatment. Open Mater. Sci. J. 2010;4:9–14. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nyika J. Onyari E. Dinka M. Mishra S. Analysis of particle size distribution of landfill contaminated soils and their mineralogical composition. Part. Sci. Technol. 2020;38:843–853. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhou C. Xu L. Song J. Xing R. Xu S. Liu D. Song H. Ultrasensitive non-enzymatic glucose sensor based on three-dimensional network of ZnO-CuO hierarchical nanocomposites by electrospinning. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:1–9. doi: 10.1038/srep07382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Choi S. H. Kang Y. C. Using Simple Spray Pyrolysis to Prepare Yolk–Shell-Structured ZnO–Mn3O4 Systems with the Optimum Composition for Superior Electrochemical Properties. Chem.–Eur. J. 2014;20:3014–3018. doi: 10.1002/chem.201304118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Farrokhi M. Hosseini S. C. Yang J. K. Shirzad-Siboni M. Application of ZnO–Fe3O4 Nanocomposite on the Removal of Azo Dye from Aqueous Solutions: Kinetics and Equilibrium Studies. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2014;225:2113. [Google Scholar]
  40. Qiao L. Wang X. Sun X. Li X. Zheng Y. He D. Single electrospun porous NiO–ZnO hybrid nanofibers as anode materials for advanced lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale. 2013;5:30423037. doi: 10.1039/c3nr34103h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Badawi A. Althobaiti M. G. Ali E. E. Alharthi S. S. Alharbi A. N. A comparative study of the structural and optical properties of transition metals (M = Fe, Co, Mn, Ni) doped ZnO films deposited by spray-pyrolysis technique for optoelectronic applications. Opt. Mater. 2022;124:112055. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mohagheghi M. M. B. Shahtahmasebi N. Alinejad M. R. The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. Phys. Rev. 1939;56:978–982. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gao Y. Bai L. Zhang X. Yang F. Non-Parallel photo-assisted electrocatalysis mechanism of SnS2/NiO heterojunction for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution Reaction. ChemElectroChem. 2021;8:2087–2093. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhu P. Yin X. Gao X. Enhanced photocatalytic NO removal and toxic NO2 production inhibition over ZIF-8-derived ZnO nanoparticles with controllable amount of oxygen vacancies. Chin. J. Catal. 2021;42:175–183. [Google Scholar]
  45. Khlifi N. Mnif S. Nasr F. B. Fourati N. Zerrouki C. Chehimi M. M. Guermazi H. Aifaband S. Guermazi S. Non-doped and transition metal-doped CuO nano-powders: structure-physical properties and anti-adhesion activity relationship. RSC Adv. 2022;12:23527–23543. doi: 10.1039/d2ra02433k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sajjad M. Ullah I. Khan M. I. Khan J. Khan M. Y. Qureshi M. T. Structural and optical properties of pure and copper doped zinc oxide nanoparticles. Results Phys. 2018;9:1301–1309. [Google Scholar]
  47. Andrade-Guel M. Cabello-Alvarado C. Bartolo-Pérez P. Medellin-Banda D. I. Ávila-Orta C. A. Cruz-Ortiz B. Pliego G. C. Surface modification of TiO2/ZnO nanoparticles by organic acids with enhanced methylene blue and rhodamine B dye adsorption properties. RSC Adv. 2022;12:28494–28504. doi: 10.1039/d2ra04961a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Alshammari A. S. Chi L. Chen X. Bagabas A. Kramer D. Alromaeh A. Jiang Z. Visible-light photocatalysis on C-doped ZnO derived from polymer-assisted pyrolysis. RSC Adv. 2015;5:27690–27698. [Google Scholar]
  49. Saleem M. Varshney D. Structural, thermal, and transport properties of La0.67 Sr0.33 MnO3 nanoparticles synthesized via the sol–gel auto-combustion technique. RSC Adv. 2018;8:1600–1609. doi: 10.1039/c7ra09883a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mao Y. Qiu B. Li P. Liu X. Chen S. M. Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis Zn0.78Cd0.22S/Bi2MoO6 heterojunction to improve photocatalytic performance for hexavalent chromium removal and hydrogen peroxide production. Colloids Surf., A. 2022:129363. [Google Scholar]
  51. Naseri A. Goodarzi M. Ghanbari D. Green synthesis and characterization of magnetic and effective photocatalyst NiFe2O4–NiO nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2017;28:17635–17646. [Google Scholar]
  52. Carrera R. Vázquez A. L. Castillo S. Arce Estrada E. M. Photocatalytic degradation of acetaldehyde by sol-gel TiO2 nanoparticles: Effect of the physicochemical properties on the photocatalytic activity. Mater. Sci. Forum. 2011;691:92–98. [Google Scholar]
  53. Yu H. Huang J. Jiang L. Yuan X. Yi K. Zhang W. Chen H. Steering photo-excitons towards active sites: Intensified substrates affinity and spatial charge separation for photocatalytic molecular oxygen activation and pollutant removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;408:127334. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kanan S. Moyet M. A. Arthur R. B. Patterson H. H. Recent advances on TiO2-based photocatalysts toward the degradation of pesticides and major organic pollutants from water bodies. Catal. Rev.: Sci. Eng. 2020;62:1–65. [Google Scholar]
  55. Pirhashemi M. Habibi-Yangjeh A. Pouran S. R. Review on the criteria anticipated for the fabrication of highly efficient ZnO-based visible-light-driven photocatalysts. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018;62:1–25. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ragain Jr J. C. Johnston W. M. Accuracy of Kubelka-Munk reflectance theory applied to human dentin and enamel. J. Dent. Res. 2001;80:449–452. doi: 10.1177/00220345010800020901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Tauc J. Grigorovici R. Vancu A. Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous germanium. Phys. Status Solidi. 1966;15:627–637. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yasmeen S. Iqbal F. Munawar T. Nawaz M. A. Asghar M. Hussain A. Synthesis, structural and optical analysis of surfactant assisted ZnO–NiO nanocomposites prepared by homogeneous precipitation method. Ceram. Int. 2019;45:17859–17873. [Google Scholar]
  59. Chabri S. Dhara A. Show B. Adak D. Sinha A. Mukherje N. Mesoporous CuO-ZnO p–n heterojunction with high specific surface area for enhanced photocatalysis and electrochemical sensing. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018;6:3238–3252. [Google Scholar]
  60. Qamar M. T. Aslam M. Rehan Z. A. Soomro M. T. Basahi J. M. Ismail I. M. Hameed A. The influence of p-type Mn3O4 nanostructures on the photocatalytic activity of ZnO for the removal of bromo and chlorophenol in natural sunlight exposure. Appl. Catal., B. 2017;201:105–118. [Google Scholar]
  61. Anu A. Abdul Khadar M. CuO–ZnO nanocomposite films with efficient interfacial charge transfer characteristics for optoelectronic applications. SN Appl. Sci. 2019;1:1057. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sharma R. K. Kumar D. Ghose R. Synthesis of nanocrystalline ZnO–NiO mixed metal oxide powder by homogeneous precipitation method. Ceram. Int. 2016;42:4090–4098. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kumar S. G. Rao K. K. Comparison of modification strategies towards enhanced charge carrier separation and photocatalytic degradation activity of metal oxide semiconductors (TiO2, WO3 and ZnO) Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017;391:124–148. [Google Scholar]
  64. Liqiang J. Yichun Q. Baiqi W. Shudan L. Baojiang J. Libin Y. Jiazhong S. Review of photoluminescence performance of nano-sized semiconductor materials and its relationships with photocatalytic activity. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 2016;90:1773–1787. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sharma R. K. Kumar D. Ghose R. Synthesis of nanocrystalline ZnO–NiO mixed metal oxide powder by homogeneous precipitation method. Ceram. Int. 2016;42:4090–4098. [Google Scholar]
  66. Tangcharoen T. Klysubun W. Kongmark C. Synthesis of nanocrystalline NiO/ZnO heterostructured composite powders by sol-gel auto combustion method and their characterizations. J. Mol. Struct. 2018;1156:524–533. [Google Scholar]
  67. Munawar T. Iqbal F. Yasmeen S. Mahmood K. Hussain A. Multi metal oxide NiO-CdO-ZnO nanocomposite–synthesis, structural, optical, electrical properties and enhanced sunlight driven photocatalytic activity. Ceram. Int. 2019;46:2421–2437. [Google Scholar]
  68. Pankove J. I. Jacques I. David A. Optical Processes in Semiconductors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1972;119:156. [Google Scholar]
  69. Empedocles S. A. Neuhauser R. Shimizu K. Bawendi M. G. Photoluminescence from single semiconductor nanostructures. Adv. Mater. 1999;11:1243–1256. [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhang Y. C. Li Z. Zhang L. Pan L. Zhang X. Wang L. Fazal A. Zou J. J. Role of oxygen vacancies in photocatalytic water oxidation on ceria oxide: Experiment and DFT studies. Appl. Catal., B. 2018;224:101–108. [Google Scholar]
  71. Gao Y. Bai L. Zhang X. Yang F. Non-Parallel photo-assisted electrocatalysis mechanism of SnS2/NiO heterojunction for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution Reaction. ChemElectroChem. 2021;8:2087–2093. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhu P. Yin X. Gao X. Enhanced photocatalytic NO removal and toxic NO2 production inhibition over ZIF-8-derived ZnO nanoparticles with controllable amount of oxygen vacancies. Chin. J. Catal. 2021;42:175–183. [Google Scholar]
  73. Gupta V. K. Saravanan R. Agarwal S. Gracia F. Khan M. M. Qin J. Mangalaraja R. V. Degradation of azo dyes under different wavelengths of UV light with chitosan-SnO2 nanocomposites. J. Mol. Liq. 2017;232:423–430. [Google Scholar]
  74. Saravanan R. Sacari E. Gracia F. Khan M. M. Mosquera E. Gupta V. K. Conducting PANI stimulated ZnO system for visible light photocatalytic degradation of coloured dyes. J. Mol. Liq. 2016;221:1029–1033. [Google Scholar]
  75. Saravanan R. Gupta V. K. Narayanan V. Stephen A. Comparative study on photocatalytic activity of ZnO prepared by different methods. J. Mol. Liq. 2013;181:133–141. [Google Scholar]
  76. Gnanasekaran L. Hemamalini R. Ravichandran K. Synthesis and characterization of TiO2 quantum dots for photocatalytic application. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2015;19:589–594. [Google Scholar]
  77. Wang H. Xie C. Zhang W. Cai S. Yang Z. Gui Y. Comparison of dye degradation efficiency using ZnO powders with various size scales. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007;141:645–652. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Khatri A. Rana P. S. Visible Light Assisted Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance of ZnO/NiO Nanocomposites Prepared by Chemical Co-Precipitation Method. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019;19:5233–5240. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2019.16835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Welderfael T. Pattabi M. Pattabi R. M. Photocatalytic activity of Ag-N co-doped ZnO nanorods under visible and solar light irradiations for MB degradation. J. Water Process. Eng. 2019;14:117–123. [Google Scholar]
  80. Mahana A. Guliy O. I. Momin S. C. Lalmuanzeli R. Mehta S. K. Sunlight-driven photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue using ZnO nanowires prepared through ultrasonication-assisted biological process using aqueous extract of Anabaena doliolum. Opt. Mater. 2020;108:110205. [Google Scholar]
  81. Saravanan R. Karthikeyan S. Gupta V. K. Sekaran G. Narayanan V. Stephen A. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of ZnO/CuO nanocomposite for the degradation of textile dye on visible light illumination. Mater. Sci. Eng., C. 2013;33:91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2012.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Shekofteh-Gohari M. Habibi-Yangjeh A. Novel magnetically separable ZnO/AgBr/Fe3O4/Ag3VO4 nanocomposites with tandem n–n heterojunctions as highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalysts. RSC Adv. 2016;6:2402–2413. [Google Scholar]
  83. Shubha J. P. Adil S. F. Khan M. Hatshan M. R. Khan A. Facile Fabrication of a ZnO/Eu2O3/NiO-Based Ternary Heterostructure Nanophotocatalyst and Its Application for the Degradation of Methylene Blue. ACS Omega. 2021;6:3866–3874. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c05670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Rahaman H. Ghosh S. K. Soft-templated synthesis of Mn3O4 microdandelions for the degradation of alizarin red under visible light irradiation. RSC Adv. 2016;6:4531–4539. [Google Scholar]
  85. Chenari H. M. Zamiri R. Tobaldi D. M. Shabani M. Rebelo A. Kumar J. S. Salehizadeh S. A. Graça M. P. F. Soares M. J. Labrincha J. A. Ferreira J. M. F. Nanocrystalline ZnO–SnO2 mixed metal oxide powder: microstructural study, optical properties, and photocatalytic activity. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2017;84:274–282. [Google Scholar]
  86. Aliaga J. Cifuentes N. González G. Sotomayor-Torres C. Benavente E. Enhancement photocatalytic activity of the heterojunction of two-dimensional hybrid semiconductors ZnO/V2O5. Catalysts. 2018;8:374. [Google Scholar]
  87. Ong C. B. Ng L. Y. Mohammad A. W. A review of ZnO nanoparticles as solar photocatalysts: Synthesis, mechanisms and applications. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2018;81:536–551. [Google Scholar]
  88. Das A. Mathan Kumar P. Bhagavathiachari M. Nair R. G. Hierarchical ZnO-TiO2 nanoheterojunction: A strategy driven approach to boost the photocatalytic performance through the synergy of improved surface area and interfacial charge transport. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020;534:147321. [Google Scholar]
  89. Luo C. Li D. Wu W. Zhang Y. Pan C. Preparation of porous micro–nano-structure NiO/ZnO heterojunction and its photocatalytic property. RSC Adv. 2014;4:3090–3095. [Google Scholar]
  90. Dhiman P. Rana G. Kumar A. Sharma G. Vo D. V. N. Naushad M. ZnO-based heterostructures as photocatalysts for hydrogen generation and depollution: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022:1–35. [Google Scholar]
  91. Qi K. Cheng B. Yu J. Ho W. Review on the improvement of the photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of ZnO. J. Alloys Compd. 2017;727:792–820. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

RA-013-D2RA07837F-s001

Articles from RSC Advances are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES