Skip to main content
mSphere logoLink to mSphere
. 2023 Jan 11;8(1):e00452-22. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00452-22

Commensal Lactobacilli Metabolically Contribute to Cervical Epithelial Homeostasis in a Species-Specific Manner

Nicole R Jimenez a, Jason D Maarsingh a, Paweł Łaniewski b, Melissa M Herbst-Kralovetz a,b,✉
Editor: Vincent B Youngc
PMCID: PMC9942568  PMID: 36629413

ABSTRACT

In reproductive-age women, the vaginal microbiome is typically dominated by one or a few Lactobacillus species, including Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus paragasseri, Lactobacillus mulieris, and Lactobaccillus crispatus, has been associated with optimal cervicovaginal health; however, much is still unknown about how other lactobacilli metabolically contribute to cervicovaginal health. We hypothesized that metabolites of each Lactobacillus species differ and uniquely contribute to health and homeostasis. To address this hypothesis, we utilized a human three-dimensional (3D) cervical epithelial cell model in conjunction with genomics analyses and untargeted metabolomics to determine the metabolic contributions of less-studied vaginal lactobacilli—L. iners, L. paragasseri, and L. mulieris. Our study validated that vaginal lactobacilli exhibit a close phylogenetic relationship. Genomic findings from publicly available strains and those used in our study indicated that L. iners is metabolically distinct from other species of lactobacilli, likely due to a reduced genome size. Lactobacilli and mock controls were distinguishable based on global metabolic profiles. We identified 95 significantly altered metabolites (P < 0.05) between individual lactobacilli and mock controls. Metabolites related to amino acid metabolism were shared among the lactobacilli. N-Acetylated amino acids with potential antimicrobial properties were significantly elevated in a species-specific manner. L. paragasseri and L. iners shared aromatic, but not carbohydrate-derived, lactic acid metabolites with potential antimicrobial properties that may contribute to homeostasis of the cervicovaginal environment. Additionally, L. iners uniquely altered lipid metabolism, which may be a sign of adaptation to the cervicovaginal niche. Overall, these findings further elucidate the metabolic contributions of three key vaginal Lactobacillus species in gynecological health.

IMPORTANCE Lactobacillus species contribute to cervicovaginal health by their production of lactic acid and other antimicrobial compounds. Yet, much is still unknown regarding the metabolic potential of lesser-studied but common vaginal lactobacilli. Here, we used untargeted metabolomics coupled with our 3D cervical epithelial cell model to identify metabolic differences among vaginal Lactobacillus species (Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus paragasseri, and Lactobacillus mulieris) and how those differences related to maintaining homeostasis of the cervical epithelium. Human 3D cell models are essential tools for studying host-bacteria interactions and reducing confounding factors inherent in clinical studies. Therefore, these unique models allowed us to decipher the putative lactobacilli mechanisms that contribute to their roles in health or disease. Metabolic analyses revealed distinct profiles of each Lactobacillus species but also shared metabolic contributions associated with antimicrobial activity: amino acid metabolism, N-acetylated amino acids, and aromatic lactic acids. These patterns provided validation of metabolites associated with health in clinical studies and provided novel targets, including immunomodulatory and antimicrobial metabolites, for postbiotic therapies.

KEYWORDS: Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus mulieris, Lactobacillus paragasseri, N-acetylated amino acids, aromatic lactic acids, cervicovaginal health, global metabolomics, glycerophospholipids, organotypic 3D culture, vaginal microbiome

INTRODUCTION

Studies of the vaginal microbiome provided new insights into its role in vaginal health, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes, and gynecologic cancers (1–11). A healthy female reproductive tract is characterized by lactobacilli dominance, and up to 20 Lactobacilliaceae species have been reported in the lower female reproductive tract (12, 13). Five cervicovaginal microbiome community types have been described. Four are dominated by either Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus paragasseri (recently reclassified from Lactobacillus gasseri), or Lactobacillus mulieris (recently reclassified from Lactobacillus jensenii), and a fifth type is characterized by Lactobacillus depletion and high species diversity (13).

Lactobacilli are pivotal for cervicovaginal health and protect against pathogenic diseases, such as urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted infections, and bacterial vaginosis (BV) (14–19). The protective role of lactobacilli was first attributed to the production of lactic acid, which effectively lowers the local pH and generates an inhospitable environment for pathogenic bacteria (20–22). It is now understood that in addition to the production of lactic acid, vaginal lactobacilli employ multiple exclusionary mechanisms, such as bacteriocins, antimicrobial metabolites, stable colonization, and the heavily debated bacterial production of hydrogen peroxide (23–27).

Although L. crispatus, L. iners, L. paragasseri, and L. mulieris are frequently recovered from the cervicovaginal environment, L. crispatus and L. iners are the most prevalent of these species (25). In the context of vaginal pH modulation, L. crispatus is positively correlated with the lowest pH, L. jensenii and L. gasseri modulate pH at moderate levels, and L. iners is correlated with the highest pH (24). Relative to L. crispatus, L. iners less effectively prevents colonization of the cervicovaginal environment with bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria (BVAB) and often coexists with other anaerobic bacteria (28). Thus, colonization with L. iners is often termed the “transition state,” as the dominance of this Lactobacillus species has been associated with the transition between health and disease and even observed as transitional between hormonal states, such as menses, or after antibiotic usage and sexual activity (29, 30). Among the four most common vaginal Lactobacillus species, L. gasseri is believed to be the most stable community over time (31, 32). L. gasseri has been also shown to inhibit pathogen adhesion to cervical cells (33). Similar to L. crispatus, L. jensenii exhibits protective features, such as immune modulation, antimicrobial properties, and competitive adherence to epithelial cells (24–26, 34, 35). Although L. jensenii and L. gasseri are common in the vaginal microenvironment, key strains of L. gasseri and L. jensenii that are frequently employed in vaginal microbiome research have recently been reclassified to L. paragasseri and L. mulieris, respectively, highlighting the importance of species- and strain-specific investigations (36, 37).

Lactobacilli produce postbiotics, broadly defined as bacterially produced compounds that confer beneficial properties, such as antibiofilm, antioxidant, pathogen-inhibitory, and immunomodulating activities (24). As such, these lactobacilli may be exploited for potential clinical applications and therapies; however, current vaginal probiotics are still undergoing testing and require effective formulation to support optimal gynecologic and reproductive health (38). Some hindrances could be the use of lactobacilli that do not normally dominate the vaginal microbiome and that lack the ability to colonize the environment in the long term (39). Clinically, lactobacilli strains vary in their ability to induce inflammatory cytokines (40), thus further supporting the need for immunometabolic studies leveraging metabolomic data sets. A vaginal L. crispatus isolate, Lactin-V, has been debated for its effectiveness in treating BV and decreasing the abundance of BVAB and whether this treatment is a viable option for all individuals suffering from BV (36–38). Vaginal L. crispatus and L. gasseri have been demonstrated to produce a milieu of immunoreactive proteins (39). Additional clinical studies have indicated that lactobacilli are positively correlated with lactate and 4-hydroxyphenylacetate, isoleucine, leucine, tryptophan, phenylalanine, aspartate, dimethylamine, sarcosine, and pi-methylhistidine, all of which are typically associated with vaginal health (40, 41). However, in vitro studies on the metabolic contributions of vaginal lactobacilli species in the context of human epithelial cells, the first responders to bacterial interaction, are limited. Therefore, our study aimed to provide further insight into the function of these vaginal lactobacilli and relate the findings to those observed in clinical settings.

We recently reported on the metabolomic and immunoproteomic characteristics of select BVAB and two L. crispatus strains by using our well-characterized organotypic three-dimensional (3D) cervical epithelial cell (CEC) model (42). In the current study, we utilized the 3D CEC model to extend previous findings and investigate the metabolic contributions of three common vaginal Lactobacillus strains: L. paragasseri JV-V03 (43–45) (formerly classified as L. gasseri JV-V03), L. mulieris JV-V16 (46, 47) (formerly classified as L. jensenii JV-V16), and L. iners AB-107 (30, 48–50). We focused on the cervix, as this body site is vulnerable to invading STI pathogens and dysbiotic microbiome sequelae, including preterm birth. Our 3D human CEC model accurately resembles ultrastructural features of cervical tissue in vivo and exerts physiologically relevant responses following colonization by various vaginal bacteria (51–55). By integrating our 3D CEC model and global untargeted metabolomics, we identified key metabolites related to epithelial homeostasis and lactobacilli colonization in the cervicovaginal niche. This study provides a foundation for future targeted investigations of these key metabolites and putative postbiotics that could be formulated for clinical modulation.

RESULTS

Vaginal lactobacilli exhibit close genomic similarity.

Our study focused on three well-characterized vaginal Lactobacillus strains: L. paragasseri JV-V03, L. mulieris JV-V16, and L. iners AB-107 (Table 1) (44, 46, 56). All strains were obtained from either the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) or the Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (BEI Resources) and were isolated from the lower female reproductive tract. Genome sequences of these strains were then obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank. Two genomic trees, one constructed utilizing taxonomic lineages identified by NCBI and another constructed from phylogenetic relationships utilizing genomes from the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB). GTDB was utilized as it has the most up-to-date taxonomic classifications. These constructed trees validated previously established vaginal lactobacilli phylogeny (20, 57) (Fig. 1). L. mulieris had the closest relationship to L. jensenii but was also close taxonomically and phylogenetically to L. crispatus, compared to L. iners and L. paragasseri (Fig. 1). This phylogenetic relationship may explain the similar antimicrobial mechanisms employed by L. mulieris and L. crispatus (24, 58, 59). Other species that may be of interest to investigate further that have a close relationship with L. crispatus are L. helveticus, L. acidophilus, L. delbrueckii, and L. delbrueckii B. These species have also been investigated in the gut and vagina as beneficial probiotics (60–62).

TABLE 1.

Genomic characteristics of three vaginal strains used in wet lab experiments

Characteristic L. mulieris L. paragasseri L. iners
Strain JV-V16 JV-V03 AB-107
Accession no. ACGQ00000000.2 ACGO00000000.2 AEPX00000000.1
Isolation site Female urogenital tract Female urogenital tract Vagina
Strain source BEI BEI ATCC
Biorepository taxonomy L. jensenii L. gasseri L. iners
NCBI taxonomy L. jensenii L. paragasseri L. iners
GTDB taxonomy L. mulieris L. paragasseri L. iners
No. of contigs 1 1 7
GC content (%) 34.39 34.81 32.55
No. of plasmids 0 0 0
Contig L50 1 1 1
Genome length (bp) 1,604,632 1,967,870 1,238,993
N50 (bp) 1,604,632 1,967,870 1,229,783
No. of CDSs 1,449 1,925 1,156
No. of tRNAs 55 59 48
No. of repeat regions 40 33 8
No. of rRNAs 10 9 3
No. of hypothetical proteins 299 470 201

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Taxonomic and phylogenetic trees of Lactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus, highlighting vaginally relevant species and recent taxonomic reclassifications. (A) Taxonomic tree constructed for genomes from the genus Lactobacillus in the NCBI repository and taxonomic lineages determined by NCBI’s Taxonomy browser, highlighting the most common vaginal lactobacilli species: L. iners (yellow), L. crispatus (green), L. jensenii and L.mulieris (blue), L. gasseri (black), and L. paragasseri (red). (B) Phylogenetic tree constructed from available genomes from NCBI and GTDB, where all strains are collapsed per species to better view lineages of all current species from both Lactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus genera. Species in bold indicate species that have been identified in vaginal samples from vaginal microbiome literature. The species utilized in the experimental study are in bold and colored: L. iners (yellow), L. mulieris (blue), and L. paragasseri (red).

In contrast, L. paragasseri had the closest phylogenetic relationship to L. gasseri and was observed to be closer taxonomically and phylogenetically to L. iners compared to L. crispatus or L. mulieris (Fig. 1). The only other lactobacilli known to colonize the vaginal environment with a close phylogenetic relationship to this group was L. johnsonii. L. johnsonni has been shown to have metabolic properties that may provide protection against Candida albicans (63, 64). These relationships provide a global picture of the variation of potential metabolic benefits of vaginal Lactobacilliaceae beyond L. crispatus.

L. crispatus JV-V01 was utilized as an additional comparator in genomic analyses, because similar metabolomic analyses were performed in a prior study by Laniewski et al. (42). Shared orthologous genes identified by OrthoVenn2 (65) confirmed that, overall, L. crispatus JV-V01, L. iners ATCC 55185 (AB-1 genome), L. paragasseri JV-V03, and L. mulieris JV-V16 strains were closely related and shared 752 orthologous genes (Fig. 2A). L. crispatus had the largest genome at 2.32 Mb, while L. iners had the smallest genome at 1.38 Mb (Table 1; see also Fig. S1 and Table S1 in the supplemental material). Similarly, GC content differed between L. crispatus (37.10%) and L. iners (33.12%). L. mulieris had a genome size of 1.63 Mb, and L. paragasseri was 1.96 Mb in length, and these two had GC contents of 34.43% and 34.91%, respectively (Table 1, Fig. S1, and Table S1). Low GC content and small genome size are attributed to host adaptation (57, 66, 67) and are observed in vaginal organisms, including vaginal lactobacilli. These differences were also reflected in the orthologous gene profiles, with L. crispatus encoding 1,331 genes (36 unique to the strain), L. paragasseri encoding 1,349 genes (19 unique to the strain), L. mulieris encoding 1,118 genes (10 unique), and L. iners encoding 903 genes (4 unique) (Fig. 2A). Genome annotation of the strains utilized in this study as well as additional whole genomes of strains of L. crispatus, L. iners, L. paragasseri, and L. mulieris were identified by PATRIC (68) and revealed that, overall, the highest average number of genes (197) participated in the subsystem of protein processing, and the lowest number (9) of genes were dedicated to the cellular envelope (Fig. 2B and Table S2). Species-specific differences were exemplified, with L. crispatus and L. paragasseri having a higher average number of metabolism-related genes (200 and 175, respectively) than L. iners and L. mulieris (143 and 117, respectively). However, significant differences were only observed between L. crispatus versus L. iners (P = 0.002) and L. crispatus versus L. mulieris (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2B and Table S2). Intriguingly, multiple-strain analysis revealed that L. crispatus codes for a statistically higher average number of hypothetical proteins (675) compared to L. iners (289) and L. mulieris (320) (P = 0.004 and P = 0.033, respectively) (Fig. 2B and Table S2). The PATRIC protein sorter (68) also identified putative proteins unique to strains: L. crispatus JV-V01 (627), L. iners AB-107 (327), L. mulieris JV-V16 (566), and L. paragasseri JV-V03 (241). Most strains encoded species-specific unique hypothetical proteins (Fig. 2C). Additionally, L. paragasseri had the highest percentage of unique putative metabolic proteins, 28.6% (69/241). In comparison, the other lactobacilli strains had similar percentages of unique metabolic proteins: 14.8% (93/627) for L. crispatus JV-V01, 13.1% (43/327) for L. iners AB-107, and 13.6% for L. mulieris JV-V16 (77/566). L. crispatus had the most nonmetabolic proteins, 8.2% (52/627), with the majority functioning as defense or stress proteins, which may be beneficial for homeostasis in the cervicovaginal environment. Genomic analyses verified that L. paragasseri and L. mulieris are genetically more similar to L. crispatus, whereas L. iners significantly differed from other vaginal lactobacilli.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Orthologous gene clusters, annotated gene subsystems, and unique proteins between key vaginal lactobacilli. (A) Venn diagram, revealing gene clusters shared by the vaginal lactobacilli representatives: L. iners AB-107 (yellow), L. paragasseri JV-V03 (red), L. crispatus JV-V01 (green), and L. mulieris JV-V16 (blue). (B) Bar graph of gene subsystems, annotated by PATRIC from whole-genome sequences and experimental strain representatives. Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn’s tests were utilized to calculate significant differences. Pairwise comparisons in the image are relative to L. crispatus. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. (C) Donut plots of predicted proteins identified by PATRIC to be unique to each Lactobacillus species. Proteins are categorized into the following: hypothetical proteins (light blue), nonmetabolic proteins (medium blue), and proteins related to metabolism (dark blue). Percentages of the putative protein categories are indicated in the panel.

TABLE S1

Genomic characteristic differences between lactobacilli. This table contains overall genomic characteristics (GC content, genome size, coding sequences, proteins with known functions, and hypothetical proteins) and the differences among 26 strains of four Lactobacillus species: L. crispatus, L. iners, L. jensenii or L. mulieris, and L. paragasseri strains were obtained from the GenBank database as of 1 October 2021. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (11.8KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Predicted gene subsystem differences between lactobacilli. This table contains overall annotated genes of 26 lactobacilli strains from L. crispatus, L. iners, L. jensenii or L. mulieris, and L. paragasseri that were categorized into subsystems by PATRIC. The categories were protein processing, metabolism, DNA processing, defense and virulence, RNA processing, energy, cellular processes, membrane transport, cell signaling, and cell transport. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (12.6KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S1

Genomic characteristics of key vaginal lactobacilli. Differences in genomic characteristics of four well-characterized vaginal lactobacilli genomes are summarized. Numbers of coding DNA sequences (CDS), number of known putative proteins, and number of hypothetical proteins observed are shown in the top row. GC content in percentage and genome size in megabases observed are in the bottom row. Circularized whole-genome sequences and sequences from experimental strains of the vaginally relevant Lactobacillus species are in the following colors: L. iners (yellow), L. paragasseri (red), L. crispatus (green), and L. mulieris (blue). Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 1.0 MB (1MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Vaginal lactobacilli colonized the 3D CEC model similarly.

Human 3D CEC models were generated as previously described (53–55). These model systems are valuable for investigating host-microbe interactions as apical and basal polarity and tissue-like cellular organization are recapitulated. To confirm that vaginal lactobacilli strains effectively colonized our 3D CEC model, we performed scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM analysis revealed that L. paragasseri, L. mulieris, and L. iners colonized 3D CEC models, usually in crevices and folds of the epithelial cells (Fig. 3). Lactobacilli strains were visualized as rod-shaped bacteria and exhibited autoaggregation in all bacterial inoculations of CEC. Autoaggregation is mediated by proteins (autoagglutinins) and exopolysaccharides on the bacterial cell surface that contribute to bacterial cell adhesion and protection from environmental stresses (69, 70). Extracellular material was also present in multiple SEM micrographs of L. paragasseri and L. mulieris inoculations, and this may provide additional evidence of formation of a protective autoaggregative biofilm. In contrast, 3D CEC inoculated with L. iners displayed cell blebbing and signs of CEC membrane disruption in multiple SEM micrographs of the CEC inoculated models.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

L. mulieris JV-V16, L. iners AB-107, and L. paragasseri JV-V03 colonize 3D human CEC models. Pseudocolored SEM images of L. mulieris JV-V16 (blue), L. iners AB-107 (yellow), and L. paragasseri JV-V03 (red) demonstrate colonization of 3D CECs. SEM images were captured at 3,500× (top) or 10,000× (bottom) magnification. All vaginal Lactobacillus strains exhibited a bacillus or rod-shaped morphology and colonized 3D CECs in aggregates. CECs colonized by L. iners AB-107 showed signs of cell stress. Arrows indicate extracellular material and bacterial cells that were regularly observed in the lactobacilli autoaggregates.

To investigate the CEC immune response to vaginal Lactobacillus species, we performed a multiplex immunoassay which quantified secreted cytokines (interleukin 1α [IL-1α], IL-1β, IL-1 receptor agonist [IL-1RA], IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α]), chemokines (fractalkine, IL-8, interferon gamma-inducible protein 10 kDa [IP-10], monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 [MCP-1], MCP-3, macrophage inflammatory protein 1β [MIP-1β], and regulated on activation, normal T-cell expressed and secreted [RANTES]), and growth factors (platelet-derived growth factor [PDGF-AA], transforming growth factor alpha [TGF-α], and vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]). Cell culture supernatant protein concentrations from colonized 3D CEC were compared to those in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) controls. In addition, we used the BVAB Lancefieldella parvula as a positive inflammatory control (42). Inoculation of 3D CEC revealed no significant differences in inflammatory chemokine, cytokine, or growth factor profiles (Fig. S2 and Table S4). Taken together, L. parvula induced a proinflammatory response (IL-8, MCP-1, and TGF-α) in 3D CEC to a greater extent than vaginal lactobacilli or the PBS mock-inoculated controls (Fig. S2 and Table S4).

TABLE S4

Student t test results for each individual strain (L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, and L. paragasseri JV-V03) compared to PBS mock-inoculated controls. This table contains statistical t test data from metabolomic analysis of L. iners AB-107 versus PBS controls, L. mulieris JV-V16 versus PBS controls, and L. paragasseri JV-V03 versus PBS controls. Download Table S4, XLSX file, 0.02 MB (19.4KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

L. parvula significantly elevated production of inflammatory protein biomarkers compared to vaginal lactobacilli and PBS mock-inoculated controls in 3D CEC aggregates. Bio-Plex analysis was performed for cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors secreted by 3D human CECs infected with L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, and L. paragasseri JV-V03 for 24 h under anaerobic conditions. TGF-α, IL-8, and MCP-1 were all significantly elevated by L. parvula, while all lactobacilli exhibited no notable change to PBS controls. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc multiple comparisons determined statistical significance. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 1.4 MB (1.5MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Metabolic profiles of host vaginal lactobacilli are functionally different between species.

To decipher how L. paragasseri, L. mulieris, and L. iners modulate the extracellular cervicovaginal microenvironment’s metabolome, we performed global untargeted metabolomics using supernatants collected from 3D CEC experiments. Untargeted metabolomics identified 314 metabolites, of which 103 were significant based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) between the four experimental groups. We utilized principal-component analysis (PCA) and Pearson’s correlation analysis to compare global metabolomic profiles between each species (Fig. 4). Biological replicates from each bacterial condition and PBS controls were distinctly clustered by PCA, although some overlap of L. paragasseri and L. iners metabolic profiles was identified (Fig. 4A). Principal component 1 (PC1) explained 32.4% of the variance, while principal component 2 (PC2) explained 23.8% of the variance scores. PC1 was significantly different (P < 0.001) between all Lactobacillus species and PBS-inoculated controls; PC2 contributed to significant differences (P < 0.001) between L. paragasseri versus PBS-inoculated controls and L. mulieris versus PBS-inoculated controls. Pearson’s correlation analysis demonstrated that for each biological replicate the metabolic profile of the different Lactobacillus species and the PBS-inoculated controls were grouped by species (Fig. 4B). Similar to our genomic findings, L. iners and L. paragasseri exhibited similar metabolic profiles.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Distinct metabolic profiles of L. mulieris JV-V16, L. paragasseri JV-V03, and L. iners AB-107. (A) PCA of metabolic profiles showed moderate clustering between L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, L. paragasseri JV-V03, and the PBS mock-inoculated controls. PC1 and PC2 scores were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests. *, P < 0.05; *, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. (B) Heatmap of Pearson correlation coefficients of metabolic profiles. Clustering was performed using Euclidean distance and Ward linkage of biological replicates for each experimental group. (C) Pie charts of percentages of significantly (P < 0.05) altered metabolites determined by unpaired Student's t test, grouped by superpathway, and compared to PBS mock-infected controls (total number of significantly changed metabolites for L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, and L. paragasseri JV-V03 were 40, 42, and 33, respectively). No significant differences were observed between composition of superpathways as determined by chi-squared test.

To better understand the overall differences of the specific metabolites among tested lactobacilli, we performed Student’s t tests with Welch’s correction and the false-discovery rate (FDR) to compare each Lactobacillus species to the PBS-inoculated controls. Overall, L. paragasseri, L. mulieris, and L. iners significantly (P < 0.05) altered 33, 42, and 40 metabolites, respectively, compared to PBS-inoculated controls (Table S3). Of these, all Lactobacillus species shared 7/54 significantly altered metabolites: alpha-hydroxyisocaproate, 1-methyladenine, 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) lactate (HPLA), cytosine, threonine, tryptophan, and ribulose and xylulose (Table S3, Fig. S3). L. paragasseri, L. mulieris, and L. iners uniquely altered 11, 18, and 19 metabolites, respectively (Table S3, Fig. S3). L. paragasseri and L. iners shared four significantly altered metabolites specific to these bacterial inoculations (Table S3).

TABLE S3

Immunoproteomic differences between L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, L. paragasseri JV-V03, L. parvula DNF00906, and PBS control. This table contains immunoproteomic data of L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, L. paragasseri JV-V03, L. parvula DNF00906, and PBS controls. The cytokines and chemokines that were observed were IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-RA, IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, fractalkine, MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1β, PDGF-AA, RANTES, TGF-α, TNF-α, and VEGF. Download Table S3, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (15.7KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Next, we categorized all significantly altered metabolites by superpathway (amino acid, carbohydrate, cofactors and vitamins, energy, lipid, nucleotide, peptide, and xenobiotics). Metabolites representing the amino acid superpathway were highly altered by all lactobacilli: L. paragasseri (78.79%), L. mulieris (52.38%), and L. iners (55.0%) (Fig. 4C). Metabolites related to the lipid superpathway (3.03%, 2.38%, and 15.0%) and cofactors and vitamins superpathway (6.06%, 2.38%, and 10%) were more abundant in L. iners than in other lactobacilli. In contrast, the nucleotide superpathway (9.09%, 19.05%, and 5.0%) and energy superpathway (0.0%, 9.52%, and 2.5%) were more abundant in L. mulieris than in other lactobacilli. The compositions of the remaining superpathways were not significantly different between the tested Lactobacillus species, potentially indicating a large overlap of function among the vaginal lactobacilli.

To examine alterations of metabolic pathways and their differences among vaginal lactobacilli, we conducted metabolic pathway enrichment analysis with KEGG pathways to identify metabolic pathways that were significantly enriched and the corresponding metabolites that were differentially modulated by each Lactobacillus species (Fig. 5). This analysis revealed significantly (P < 0.05) enriched pathways from all lactobacilli. There were 25, 13, and 2 subpathways significantly enriched by L. iners, L. mulieris, and L. paragasseri, respectively (Fig. 5A and Table S5). L. paragasseri exhibited significantly enriched cysteine and methionine metabolism (enrichment score = 82.77; P = 0.039) and selenocompound metabolism (enrichment score = 94.249; P = 0.039), which participate in amino acid metabolism (Fig. 5A). Most metabolic pathways significantly enriched by L. mulieris belonged to amino acid and carbohydrate pathways, with arginine biosynthesis (enrichment score = 96.11; P < 0.001) being the most highly enriched (Fig. 5A and Table S5). L. iners altered subpathways in amino acid and lipid metabolism; however, the most highly enriched subpathway was the pentose phosphate pathway, which belongs to carbohydrate metabolism (enrichment score = 95.93; P = 0.016) (Fig. 5A and Table S5).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Vaginal lactobacilli metabolic enrichment analysis indicated alterations of amino acid, carbohydrate, and lipid subpathways. (A) Heatmap of metabolic pathway enrichment clustered by Euclidean distance and Ward linkage for L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, and L. paragasseri JV-V03. Subpathways that were significantly enriched (P < 0.05) in metabolite set enrichment analysis are indicated within heatmap cells. *, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. Colored circles indicate the superpathway to which the subpathways are linked. (B) Venn diagrams comparing the most common significantly altered metabolites categorized by superpathway (amino acids, carbohydrates, and lipids) compared to PBS mock-inoculated controls by Student's t test (P < 0.05).

TABLE S5

Metabolite set enrichment analysis significant results for each individual strain (L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, and L. paragasseri JV-V03) compared to PBS mock-inoculated controls. This table reports significant (P < 0.05) statistical enrichment data from metabolomic analysis of L. iners AB-107 versus PBS controls, L. mulieris JV-V16 versus PBS controls, and L. paragasseri JV-V03 versus PBS controls. Download Table S5, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (12.3KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Vaginal Lactobacillus species had significantly differentiated metabolic profiles from mock-inoculated controls. (A) Stacked bar chart of subpathways of significant metabolites identified by Student’s t tests with Welch’s correction and compared to PBS mock-inoculated controls. (B) Venn diagram indicating the unique and overlapping metabolites that were significantly altered (P < 0.05) between the lactobacilli inoculations. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.2 MB (1.2MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Venn diagrams of remaining metabolic superpathways enriched in 3D CEC models inoculated with L. iners, L. mulieris, and L. paragasseri. Metabolite pathway enrichment analysis results are shown for human 3D CEC models inoculated with vaginal lactobacilli for 24 h at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. Venn diagrams with the remaining superpathways from enrichment pathway analysis are also shown. Only L. iners and L. mulieris had significantly enriched pathways for the remaining pathways: the vitamins and cofactors pathway and the xenobiotics and energy pathway. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 1.7 MB (1.7MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

We next compared the relatedness between superpathway enrichment levels among the lactobacilli. Amino acid, carbohydrate, and lipid superpathways were the most prevalent enriched pathways (Fig. 5B and Table S5). Significant (P < 0.05) enrichment of metabolic subpathways belonging to the amino acid superpathway were prevalent among all lactobacilli (Fig. 5B). L. mulieris and L. iners were the only species that enriched carbohydrate metabolic pathways (Fig. 5B). Additionally, L. iners uniquely enriched subpathways participating in lipid metabolism (Fig. 5B). L. paragasseri did not share significantly enriched subpathways with L. iners or L. mulieris. L. iners and L. mulieris shared eight pathways: four in amino acid, two in carbohydrate, one in cofactors and vitamins (nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism), and one in xenobiotics (neomycin, kanamycin, and gentamicin biosynthesis) (Fig. 5B, Fig. S4, and Table S5).

We next sought to identify specific metabolites that were significantly (P < 0.05) depleted or accumulated in the extracellular supernatant after inoculation of a 3D CEC with L. paragasseri, L. mulieris, and L. iners relative to PBS controls (Fig. 6A). CECs inoculated with L. paragasseri, L. mulieris, or L. iners contained significantly elevated metabolites (15, 20, and 18, respectively), while other metabolites were significantly depleted (3 with L. paragasseri; 11 with L. mulieris; and 7 with L. iners). CECs inoculated by all three of these lactobacilli species had respective elevated levels of the following metabolites: alpha-hydroxyisocaproate (P = 0.035, P < 0.001, P = 0.013), 1-methyladenine (P = 0.035, P = 0.004, P = 0.03), cytosine (P = 0.023, P = 0.002, P = 0.03), and ribulose and xylulose (P = 0.038, P = 0.021, P = 0.031). L. paragasseri and L. mulieris in each of their respective CEC inoculations altered five of the same metabolites, and notably, all were conjugated amino acids: N-acetylserine (P < 0.001, P < 0.001), N-acetylthreonine (P = 0.017, P = 0.002), N-acetylasparagine (P = 0.009, P = 0.002), N-acetylglycine (P = 0.02, P = 0.02), and N-formylmethionine (P = 0.026, P = 0.003). L. paragasseri and L. iners shared four metabolites also related to conjugated amino acid metabolites: 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid (P = 0.027, P = 0.013), HPLA (P = 0.008, P = 0.031), phenyllactate (PLA) (P = 0.035, P = 0.046), and indolelactate (ILA) (P = 0.048, P = 0.046). L. mulieris and L. iners shared three elevated metabolites: 2-hydroxy-3-methylvalerate (P = 0.002, P = 0.046), glycerophosphoglycerol (P = 0.002, P = 0.026), and ribose (P = 0.002, P = 0.026), and one depleted metabolite, 5-methylthioadenosine (MTA) (P = 0.006, P = 0.046). L. mulieris uniquely elevated six and depleted nine metabolites; five were amino acid derivatives and eight were involved in the citric acid cycle (Fig. 6B). L. iners uniquely elevated seven metabolites and depleted five metabolites; 10 were involved in amino acid metabolism and four in lipid metabolism (Fig. 6B). L. paragasseri uniquely elevated two amino acid metabolites and depleted two, a cofactor and lipid metabolite (Fig. 6B). Overall, 3D CEC models inoculated with lactobacilli induced significant alterations of metabolites associated with amino acid pathways (Fig. 6). We observed a depletion of cofactors and vitamins, such as nicotinamide derivatives, which are important cofactors in many enzymatic reactions. L. mulieris uniquely modulated metabolites that participate in the tricarboxylic acid cycle. We previously reported comparable results when 3D CEC were inoculated with L. crispatus (42). These analyses support the importance of amino acid and energy metabolism in vaginal lactobacilli metabolism.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Vaginal Lactobacillus species had significant log-fold changes in metabolites related to amino acids, carbohydrates, and lipids. Human 3D CECs were inoculated with L. paragasseri, L. mulieris, or L. iners under anaerobic conditions for 24 h. (A) Volcano plots of L. paragasseri, L. mulieris, and L. iners metabolomic profiles. The x axis represents the log2 fold change values of scaled metabolite intensity values between the bacteria-inoculated samples and PBS mock-inoculated controls. The y axis represents the −log10(q) value of differential metabolite abundances between bacteria-inoculated samples and PBS mock-inoculated controls using an unpaired two-tailed Student's t test. (B) Significantly altered metabolites (Q < 0.05) with a fold change less than −1.5 or greater than 1.5 are colored by superpathway.

Utilization of amino acids and elevation of conjugated amino acids indicated a unique feature of vaginal lactobacilli.

To further elucidate amino acid metabolism in vaginal lactobacilli, we performed subanalyses on two main groups of conjugated amino acid metabolites. N-Acetyl amino acids were the most common amino acid metabolites that were altered by the vaginal lactobacilli. An additional PCA with only the proteinogenic amino acids and their N-acetylated derivatives revealed that the metabolic profiles in PC1, which accounted for 42.6% of the variance (P = 0.813), had great overlap between each species and PBS controls. Only L. mulieris was significantly distinguishable by PC2, which accounted for 19.2% variance (P < 0.001) (Fig. 7A). L. iners and L. paragasseri again exhibited a close metabolic relationship within this subset of metabolites. While hierarchical clustering revealed that, despite the lactobacilli sharing pathways in amino acid metabolism, they differed in terms of the relative abundance of specific amino acids and their N-acetylated derivatives (Fig. 7B). No proteinogenic amino acids significantly differed among the lactobacilli in our log-fold change analysis (Fig. 6A). Relative to PBS controls, L. paragasseri significantly altered N-acetylated amino acid derivatives: N-acetylglycine (P = 0.02), N-acetylarginine (P = 0.008), N-acetylserine (P < 0.001), N-acetylthreonine (P = 0.017), and N-acetylasparagine (P = 0.009). L. mulieris similarly elevated N-acetylated amino acids: N-acetylglycine (P = 0.02), N-acetylhistidine (P = 0.002), N-acetylserine (P < 0.001), N-acetylthreonine (P = 0.002), N-acetylglutamate (P = 0.002), and N-acetylasparagine (P = 0.002). Intriguingly, inoculation with L. iners did not significantly alter metabolites related to proteinogenic amino acids or N-acetylated amino acids. These signatures from log-fold change and hierarchical clustering analyses were also observed in pairwise comparisons using one-way ANOVA (Fig. 7C).

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Vaginal Lactobacillus species alter amino acid metabolites. (A) PCA of amino acid and N-acetylated amino acid metabolic profiles indicated distinct clusters between L. mulieris JV-V16, L. iners AB-107, L. paragasseri JV-V03, and PBS mock-inoculated controls. (B) Heatmap of amino acid and N-acetylated amino acid metabolite relative abundance levels (means of biological replicates). Hierarchical clustering was performed using Euclidean distance and Ward linkage. Asterisks indicate significantly altered metabolites compared by unpaired Student's t test of each Lactobacillus species versus PBS controls: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. (C) Boxplots of N-acetylated amino acids that were significantly altered in the log-fold change analysis compared to PBS mock-inoculated controls, L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, and L. paragasseri JV-V03. Differences were observed between N-acetylated amino acids among all lactobacilli and PBS controls based on ANOVA (P < 0.05) and adjusted for multiple tests by FDR. Significance is indicated by pairwise comparisons; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

It is widely accepted that lactic acid is a key metabolite produced by lactobacilli that maintains homeostasis by lowering the pH of the vaginal environment (26). None of the lactobacilli significantly altered lactic acid metabolites, although L. mulieris significantly depleted glucose (P = 0.01). Despite differences reported in the literature regarding the production of lactate from glucose among vaginal lactobacilli (71, 72), there were no significant differences between the vaginal lactobacilli and PBS controls in our study. However, aromatic lactic acids were significantly altered among the lactobacilli; therefore, to better understand aromatic lactic acid metabolism, we investigated upstream metabolites related to aromatic lactic acid production. Hierarchical clustering and PCA indicated that L. paragasseri and L. iners exhibit unique aromatic lactic acid profiles compared to L. mulieris and PBS controls (Fig. 8A and C). Unlike lactate, which is derived from glucose, these metabolites are derived from aromatic amino acids, such as tryptophan, phenylalanine, tyrosine, and histidine, that are converted to aromatic pyruvate derivatives followed by reduction to an aromatic lactic acid (Fig. 8B). In addition, L. mulieris modulated the relative abundance of tyrosine, tryptamine, and imidazole propionate but not imidazole lactate (Fig. 8A). L. paragasseri significantly elevated the relative abundance of HPLA (P = 0.008), imidazole lactate (P = 0.05), PLA (P = 0.035), and ILA (P = 0.048) relative to PBS controls. L. iners significantly elevated levels of ILA (P = 0.046), PLA (P = 0.046), and HPLA (P = 0.031) relative to PBS controls (Fig. 8B). PCA illustrated the close relationship of L. iners and L. paragasseri regarding aromatic lactic acid metabolism, while L. mulieris clustered closely with PBS controls. PC2 accounted for 22.8% of the variance (P = 0.002) and differentiated the species, while PC1 was indistinguishable (P = 0.365). One-way ANOVA pairwise comparisons of aromatic lactic acids further supported the findings of both hierarchical clustering and log-fold change analysis, indicating elevation of lactic acids by vaginal lactobacilli (Fig. 8D). These results indicate a putative preferential production of amino acid-derived lactic acids by vaginal lactobacilli.

FIG 8.

FIG 8

Vaginal Lactobacillus species elevated abundances of aromatic lactic acids. (A) Heatmap of metabolite relative abundance levels Hierarchical clustering was performed using Euclidean distance and Ward linkage. Asterisks indicate significantly altered metabolites in log-change analysis: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. (B) Diagram of four aromatic lactic acids measured in this study and their metabolic pathways from proteinogenic amino acids. (C) PCA of aromatic lactic acid metabolites showed distinct clustering between L. iners AB-107 and L. paragasseri JV-V03 and between L. mulieris JV-V16 and PBS mock-inoculated controls clustered together. (D) Boxplots of aromatic lactic acids and glucose-derived lactate compared among PBS mock-inoculated controls, L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, and L. paragasseri JV-V03. No significant differences in lactate abundance were observed between any lactobacilli evaluated and PBS controls based on Kruskal-Wallis test (P < 0.05). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

DISCUSSION

Despite numerous studies on vaginal lactobacilli and their association with cervicovaginal health, there is still poor understanding of how specific lactobacilli species metabolically influence cervicovaginal homeostasis. The goal of this study was to identify distinct metabolic contributions in the cervicovaginal environment among key Lactobacillus species other than L. crispatus. This study also provided a context for other gut and vaginally relevant lactobacilli and limosilactobacilli that have close taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships with the strains investigated in this study. Further lactobacilli are abundant in the lower female reproductive tract (vagina and cervix); thus, we studied cervical host-microbe interactions using our well-characterized 3D CEC model (55, 73). CECs are the first line of defense for the host cervical mucosa (74). In addition, lactobacilli exert protective mechanisms in the cervicovaginal microenvironment and prevent the ascension of sexually transmitted pathogens to the upper reproductive tract (75, 76). Protection at this mucosal site may reduce the ascension of bacteria through the reproductive tract, uterine infections, and other gynecologic sequelae, such as preterm birth, pelvic inflammatory disease, endometritis, and cancer (7, 77, 78).

In this study, we evaluated three vaginal lactobacilli (L. paragasseri, L. mulieris, and L. iners). Each species has been implicated in modulating cervicovaginal health status (Table 1). Until recently, the strains utilized (L. paragasseri JV-V03 and L. mulieris JV-V16) were classified as some of the most common species in the vaginal environment: L. gasseri and L. jensenii, respectively (79–82). Additional studies are needed to assess the exact prevalence of L. paragasseri, L. gasseri, L. mulieris, and L. jensenii in cohorts using the latest taxonomic classifications. Here, we investigated the metabolic contributions of these well-characterized vaginal isolates in the cervicovaginal microenvironment using our robust 3D CEC model. This study complements our recently published metabolomics study that investigated the metabolomic influences of L. crispatus JV-V01 (vaginal isolate) and VPI 3199 (type strain) using our 3D CEC model (42) (Fig. 9).

FIG 9.

FIG 9

Synopsis of metabolomic results from 3D CEC models inoculated with L. crispatus JV-V01, L. mulieris JV-V16, L. paragasseri JV-V03, and L. iners AB-107. (A) L. crispatus JV-V01 was reported recently by our lab (47) and used as a key lactobacilli comparator. Amino acid metabolites were significantly altered compared to PBS controls by all strains of Lactobacillus sp. Aromatic lactic acids, derived from amino acids, were significantly elevated in cell culture supernatants of 3D CECs inoculated with L. crispatus, L. iners, and L. paragasseri. N-Acetylated amino acids were significantly accumulated in cell culture supernatants of 3D CECs inoculated with L. crispatus, L. paragasseri, and L. mulieris. These metabolites exhibited potential for antimicrobial capability as well as host immune stimulation, which may be how vaginal lactobacilli contribute to cervicovaginal homeostasis and inhibit ascension of BV-associated bacteria. Further SEM analysis revealed barrier disruption in 3D CECs inoculated with L. iners and an accumulation of lipids. This could signify why L. iners has been associated with both health and disease, as it may disrupt the barrier for host nutrients allowing other bacteria the ability to colonize. CECs inoculated with L. crispatus or L. mulieris also showed altered metabolites related to nucleotide and carbohydrate metabolism. Overall, vaginal lactobacilli share metabolic superpathways mostly in amino acid metabolism but are distinct in their individual metabolite signatures, even exhibiting novel metabolites that may contribute to maintenance of the cervicovaginal environment.

Our genomic analyses of the selected strains validated previous findings on vaginal lactobacilli, such as taxonomic and phylogenetic lineage, genome size, and GC content differences between L. crispatus and L. iners (50, 57). The recent reclassification of the genus Lactobacillus (83, 84) to other genera, such as Limosilactobacillus, further complicates understanding the interactions between host and vaginal lactobacilli and how these microorganisms might benefit human health. However, it is clear that other rarer species identified from the vaginal environment (85–89), i.e., L. helveticus, L. acidophilus, L. delbrueckii, L. delbrueckii B, L. johnsonii, L. fermentum, L. coleohominis, L. coleohominis A, L. vaginalis, L. reutri, L. reutri D, and L. reutri E, require additional scientific attention. More studies are needed, with emphasis on these rare Lactobacilliaceae and their metabolic contributions and potential modulatory effects on the microbiome, especially as some family members are currently targets for use in probiotics therapies.

Additionally, genomic analyses support the hypothesis of putative host reliance of L. iners (29, 30, 50), indicated by L. iners encoding a lower number of genes related to metabolism than other lactobacilli. L. mulieris also exhibited low metabolic potential at the genomic level. However, L. mulieris modulated the broadest number of metabolites from multiple superpathways. These findings further emphasized the need to incorporate in vitro and in silico data together to illuminate the full metabolic picture of vaginal organisms in the cervicovaginal environment.

Using SEM, we confirmed that all vaginal lactobacilli assessed in this study effectively colonized 3D CEC models, thereby supporting the downstream analyses of host-microbe interactions. Adhesion of vaginal lactobacilli serves as a protective barrier against cervicovaginal colonization of other potentially harmful bacteria via competitive exclusion (90). Our findings of lactobacilli forming autoaggregates supported previous studies (91, 92) demonstrating that L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. vaginalis exhibit the greatest capability to form autoaggregates (93). In contrast, we observed signs of cell disruption in 3D CEC models inoculated with L. iners. This finding is supported by previous studies linking L. iners to increased cell permeability and cellular barrier disruptions (94), as well as secretion of a cytolysin (inerolysin) (95, 96).

L. iners and L. paragasseri demonstrated a high degree of similarity in metabolic profiles, supporting their close phylogenetic relationship. Amino acids were the most altered metabolites across all lactobacilli. Our in vitro work validated the same distinction of global metabolome profile clustering of vaginal lactobacilli in a clinical study (97). Furthermore, alterations in amino acid metabolism suggest the importance of amino acid availability for lactobacilli to produce antimicrobial peptides such as bacteriocins or other novel metabolites. Differentially, L. mulieris altered more metabolites related to energy and carbohydrate metabolism, similar to L. crispatus in our previous study (42), further supporting the phylogenetic relatedness between these two species. This is in accordance with clinical studies showing the metabolic characteristics of microbiomes dominated by L. crispatus or L. mulieris to be associated with optimal vaginal health (40). These findings suggest that although less common than L. crispatus, L. mulieris may be more important for optimal cervicovaginal health than previously appreciated. Carbohydrate metabolites were also observed to be altered by L. iners. Owing to the diversity of complex carbohydrates within the cervicovaginal environment, it might be advantageous for bacteria to utilize these carbohydrates as an energy source. Thus, bacteria capable of breaking down host glycans, such as L. iners, could not only outcompete other vaginal bacteria but also may be a way that lactobacilli contribute to carbohydrate cross-feeding in this environment (98, 99).

Previous studies have indicated that vaginal Lactobacillus species differ in amino acid biosynthesis (50). Additionally, genomic analyses of L. iners revealed this species is more reliant on host amino acids than is L. crispatus (50, 100). Our amino acid metabolomic data for L. iners compared to mock-inoculated controls indicated enrichment of amino acids. However, further experiments are needed to determine host or bacterial origin of these metabolites derived. Although all lactobacilli isolated from our study altered metabolites related to amino acid metabolism, their amino acid metabolic profiles differed among each species. Lactic acid bacteria are known to produce branched-chain amino acids (41). Clinical studies have found that high concentrations of valine, leucine, and isoleucine are correlated with a high prevalence of lactobacilli in healthy pregnant women (101, 102). Interestingly, our study indicated that, relative to mock-inoculated controls, all lactobacilli produced levated levels of branched-chain amino acids or related metabolites, such as 2-hydroxy-3-methylvalerate and alpha-hydroxyisocaproate, which are putative antimicrobial properties (103). Others have observed metabolites such as glycerophospholipids being positively correlated with Lactobacillus abundance (104). We also observed an accumulation of glycerophospholipids in response to 3D CEC inoculation with L. iners and L. mulieris. It is thought that in an evolutionary context, the abundance of glycerophospholipids can be linked to the close relationship between a eukaryotic host and its symbiotic bacterial counterpart (105).

In healthy reproductive-age women, vaginal metabolomes exhibit elevated levels of lactic acid and elevated concentrations of amino acids, including isoleucine, leucine, tryptophan, phenylalanine, aspartate, glutamine, and pi-methylhistidine, which correlate with lactobacilli abundance (40, 41, 106–108). Tryptophan, phenylalanine, histidine, and tyrosine are all known to be precursors to aromatic lactic acids. Aromatic lactic acids are lactate derivatives synthesized from aromatic amino acids instead of glucose. The aromatic structure in bacterially derived metabolites has recently been a novel factor in many beneficial host modulations. Kynurenine, a precursor to HPLA, was a distinguishable biomarker for Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal profiles compared to patients with BV (108). Our study further supported these findings by demonstrating that L. iners, L. paragasseri, and L. mulieris metabolic profiles were highly enriched in amino acid metabolites and aromatic lactic acids (Fig. 6 to 8). Aromatic lactic acids were originally identified as antifungal inhibitory compounds in the fermentation and preservation of food products (109). Additionally, these lactic acids play a role in gut homeostasis, from lactic acid bacteria such as bifidobacteria and lactobacilli (110). Fecal phenolic-derived metabolites have also been linked to health and are positively correlated with lactobacilli abundance (111). Interestingly, elevated concentrations of the putative antimicrobial compound PLA were also observed among BVAB and L. crispatus in a recent study (42). Imidazole lactate, however, was unique to L. crispatus in a study by Laniewski and Herbst-Kralovetz, which was also observed in L. mulieris in this study. Recent work has established the role of PLA as an inhibitory compound against urinary pathogens in supernatants from L. crispatus isolated from the bladder (112). Further research is required to define the contributions of these aromatic lactic acids in terms of whether there are differences in l- and d-isoforms of these metabolites and their abilities to inhibit genital pathogens, as well as modulate the host cell and immune response.

N-Acetylated amino acids are of particular interest, as acetylation may protect against enzymatic degradation in low-pH environments (113). Due to the acidification of the environment by lactobacilli, this could explain the elevation of N-acetylated amino acids in the presence of Lactobacillus species, as amino acids may be necessary for other downstream protein pathways. Although our understanding of N-acetylation processes by commensal bacteria is limited, previous research indicated that these metabolites exhibit putative antimicrobial capability and serve as host-interactive molecules, which suggests a similar function in the cervicovaginal microenvironment (114–116). These metabolites, including N-acetylarginine, N-acetylserine, and N-acetylthreonine, were also identified in our previous in vitro study to be elevated following L. crispatus colonization (42). These additional compounds could play a role in cervicovaginal health; however, their mechanistic actions remain to be elucidated.

The limitations of this study are that vaginal Lactobacillus taxonomic reclassification was performed at the time of experimentation. Due to this, we utilized formerly classified strains to L. jensenii (L. mulieris) and L. gasseri (L. paragasseri); however, further studies need to be conducted on strains that are still classified as L. gasseri and L. jensenii (79, 82). This study provided a foundation for additional inquiry into other rare lactobacilli or limosilactobacilli that have been identified in vaginal microbiome samples and whether taxonomic lineage truly does match beneficial metabolic properties. Despite these limitations, our experimentation utilized well-characterized Lactobacillus spp. strains isolated from the female genital tract that have been used in many in vitro studies, therefore providing better cross-comparison of results (44, 46, 57). Further, this study yielded reproducible results in multiple biological replicates. Similarly, three other recent studies using the same experimental model have been published on other key vaginal bacteria (42, 117, 118). Those studies provided further context to physiological mechanisms that are shared and unique among vaginal microbes and their relationship to health and disease. Future studies should be completed on multiple strains to better gauge possible variability or lack thereof in metabolomic profiles. In addition, studies utilizing multiple Lactobacillus species and bacterial mixed cultures (e.g., L. iners with BVAB) will advance our understanding of host-microbiome interactions.

In this study, we identified key metabolic differences between three common cervicovaginal lactobacilli. Lipid metabolism and cofactor and vitamin metabolites were more associated with L. iners. In contrast, energy and carbohydrate metabolism were more associated with L. mulieris, and overall amino acid metabolites were a signature from all tested vaginal Lactobacillus species. This study highlighted key metabolites, such as N-acetylated amino acids and aromatic lactic acids, that could play critically important roles in maintaining health and homeostasis, as well as, defense of the microenvironment via competitive exclusion and protection from colonization and ascension of pathogenic bacteria to the upper female reproductive tract. Coupling our 3D CEC model with metabolomics approaches allowed us to identify key metabolites that distinguish vaginal lactobacilli, as well as lead to the identification of putative antimicrobial metabolites. Future studies can utilize the metabolites identified in this study to further determine their beneficial features, interactions with other vaginal bacteria, including BVAB, and their direct effects on host cells. Furthermore, these metabolites could serve as novel postbiotic therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Culture of the 3D human CEC model.

Human cervical epithelial cells (A2EN) (119) were grown with keratinocyte serum-free medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with epidermal growth factor (5 ng/mL; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), sodium chloride (22 mg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), bovine pituitary extract (50 μg/mL; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and Primocin (100 μg/mL, InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C as previously reported (73). Before seeding, cells were enumerated using the Countess automated cell counter (Invitrogen) and trypan blue exclusion. To generate the 3D CEC model, human cervical epithelial A2EN cells were grown on Cytodex-3 collagen-coated dextran microcarrier beads (Sigma-Aldrich) in a rotating wall vessel bioreactor (Synthecon), as previously described (53–55). Cells were incubated for a 28-day differentiation period with continuous rotation at 20 rpm and provided with fresh medium daily after an initial 3-day period without fresh medium to allow cells to adhere and establish aggregates. After the 28-day differentiation period, 3D CEC aggregates were seeded into 24-well culture-treated plates at the density of 1 × 105 to 5 × 105 cells/mL and used for downstream analyses.

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.

L. paragasseri strain JV-V03 and L. mulieris strain JV-V16 were cultured on De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe agar (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). L. iners AB-107 was cultured on tryptic soy agar (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 5% (vol/vol) defibrinated sheep blood (Quad Five, Ryegate, MT). Bacteria were grown at 37°C under anaerobic conditions and generated using AnaeroPack-Anaero anaerobic gas generator and jars (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). L. paragasseri strain JV-V03 and L. mulieris strain JV-V16 were obtained from the Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (https://www.beiresources.org) (Table 1). L. iners strain AB-107, also known as ATCC 55185, was obtained from ATCC Bioresources Center (https://www.atcc.org/) (Table 1). L. paragasseri strain JV-V03 and L. mulieris strain JV-V16 were isolated from the healthy female urogenital tract, and L. iners strain AB-107 was isolated from a patient with BV. These strains are well-characterized representatives of vaginal lactobacilli (43, 46, 120). Partial genomic sequences were available at NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/) for all three strains. Updated taxonomy was validated by Genome Taxonomy Database (https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/), which is the most up-to-date taxonomic lineage for L. paragasseri JV-V03, formerly L. gasseri (79, 80, 121), and L. mulieris JV-V16, formerly L. jensenii (81, 82).

Lactobacilli coculture with cervical epithelial cells.

Before inoculation, bacteria were grown for 16 to 18 h on the appropriate agar medium, as described above. Bacteria were harvested, resuspended in sterile Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and adjusted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5. Bacterial viability was confirmed using a standard plating assay. To enumerate CFU, the adjusted bacterial cell suspensions were serially diluted in PBS, plated on the respective agar for growth, and incubated for 96 h at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. The 3D CECs were inoculated with bacterial suspensions (20 μL) of an OD600 of 0.5, which corresponded to approximately (1 to 2) × 105 CFU/mL for 24 h at 37°C under anaerobic conditions, as described previously (108).

Taxonomic classification and phylogenetic analysis of species from the genera Lactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus.

To better understand the relationships of Lactobacillus species and the strains included in this study, incorporate genomic trees were constructed. It is important to note that recent reclassification of the genus Lactobacillus led to discrepancies between well-known databases, such as NCBI. Due to this reclassification, the taxonomic relationships of Lactobacillus species were analyzed utilizing the tool PhyloT version 2022.3 (122), which is integrated to work with two public databases: NCBI and GTDB release 207.0 (123). The first generated tree included strains from the NCBI Taxonomy browser (124), which identifies taxonomic lineages of NCBI genomes. This tree incorporated lactobacilli species that are most prevalent in the vaginal microbiome: L. iners (16 strains), L. crispatus (25), L. gasseri (20), L. paragasseri (2), and L. jensenii and L.mulieris (20). NCBI databases do not yet fully recognize the L. jensenii-L. mulieris distinction despite literature published on the separation of these species (81, 82).

Since Lactobacillus reclassification in NCBI is not up to date with these reclassifications, GTDB was additionally utilized. The GTDB-constructed tree included species from Lactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus to provide a broader picture of phylogenetic relationships of these genera, including 926 strains from Lactobacillus species (32 L. iners strains, 161 L. crispatus strains, 41 L. gasseri strains, 40 L. paragasseri strains, 31 L. jensenii strains, and 18 L. mulieris strains) and 452 strains from limosilactobacilli. Limosilactobacillus was included in the analysis, since the recent restructuring of the genus Lactobacillus (83, 84) included several species of Limosilactobacillus identified in vaginal microbiome samples, such as L. vaginalis (8 strains), L. reuteri (225 strains), L. fermentum (102 strains), and L. coleohominis (9 strains), which have also been identified in vaginal microbiome samples. Taxonomic and phylogenetic trees were visualized and edited in iTOL version 6.6 (125).

Genomic annotation of Lactobacillus strains.

To better understand the contributions of these vaginal Lactobacillus isolates, L. crispatus was included in genomic analyses. This species and the ones discussed are the lactobacilli most observed observed in the vaginal environment. L. crispatus strain JV-V01 is a highly characterized strain, and recent metabolomic data of this strain in the 3D cell model are available in Laniewski et al. (42). DNA sequences of L. iners AB-1 (ATCC 55195), L. mulieris JV-V16, L. paragasseri JV-V03, and L. crispatus JV-V01 were obtained from NCBI’s GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). FASTA format sequences were uploaded to PATRIC (Pathosystems Resource Integration Center integration of RAST, the Rapid Annotation Server) (68, 126, 127) for genome annotation.

Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus strains.

To identify the similarity of predicted genes, FASTA-formatted DNA sequences were uploaded to OrthoVenn2 (https://orthovenn2.bioinfotoolkits.net/home) (65). OrthoVenn2 identifies orthologous gene clusters using Markov clustering models and BLASTp alignments, as described previously (128). To identify the differences in overall predictive genomic functionality, a number of genes within subsystems defined by PATRIC (68) were observed and then statistically analyzed. For statistical comparison of these subsystems, 26 bacterial strains with whole-genome sequences from the four Lactobacillus species, L. crispatus, L. iners, L. paragasseri, and L. mulieris-L. jensenii were selected from the GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) as of 1 October 2021. The ggplot2 package visualized grouped bar plots of these data in R version 4.1.2 (https://www.r-project.org/). To analyze the unique predicted protein profiles of the strains of interest, the PATRIC protein sorter was utilized (68). Three discrete categories were made: hypothetical proteins, proteins with known metabolic function, and proteins with nonmetabolic functions. Donut plots of these profiles were visualized with the Canva program.

Cytokine, chemokine, and growth factors multiplex analysis.

Cell culture supernatants were collected from at least three independent replicates of 3D human CECs inoculated with the bacteria described above and used to quantify concentrations of 15 protein targets. PBS-treated cells served as negative controls, and Atopobium parvulum, taxonomically reclassified as Lancefieldella parvula, was used as a positive control. Positive control data were obtained simultaneously, and culture conditions are those described in Maarsingh et al. (129). Cytometric bead arrays were performed using customized MILLIPLEX multianalyte profiling human cytokine and chemokine panel 1, in accordance with manufacturer guidelines. The tested targets included fractalkine, IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1β, PDGF-AA, RANTES, TGF-α, TNF-α, and VEGF. Data were collected and analyzed using a BioPlex 200 platform and BioPlex Manager (5.0) software (Bio-Rad). A 5-parameter logistic regression curve fit was used to determine concentrations. All samples were assayed in duplicate.

Untargeted global metabolomics.

Cell culture supernatants were collected from four independent 3D CEC aggregate batches inoculated with L. paragasseri JV-V03, L. iners AB-107, or L. mulieris JV-V16, along with eight PBS-treated controls, and were sent to Metabolon Inc. (Durham, NC) for untargeted global metabolomics analysis. Metabolites were resolved on a Waters ACQUITY ultraperformance liquid chromatography system (UPLC) and a Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive high-resolution accurate mass spectrometer interfaced with a heated electrospray ionization (HESIII) source and Orbitrap mass analyzer operated at 35,000 mass resolution. The sample extract was dried and then reconstituted in solvents compatible with the four methods. Each reconstitution solvent contained a series of standards at fixed concentrations to ensure injection and chromatographic consistency. One aliquot was analyzed under acidic positive ion conditions, chromatographically optimized for more hydrophilic compounds. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from a C18 column (Waters UPLC BEH C18, 2.1 by 100 mm, 1.7 μm) using water and methanol containing 0.05% perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPA) and 0.1% formic acid (FA). Another aliquot was also analyzed using acidic positive ion conditions. In this method, the extract was gradient eluted from a C18 column using methanol, acetonitrile, water, 0.05% PFPA, and 0.01% FA and was operated at an overall higher organic content. Another aliquot was analyzed using basic negative ion optimized conditions using a separate resolute C18 column. The basic extracts were gradient eluted from the column using methanol and water, but with 6.5 mM ammonium bicarbonate at pH 8. The fourth aliquot was analyzed via negative ionization following elution from a HILIC column (Waters UPLC BEH amide, 2.1 by 150 mm, 1.7 μm) using a gradient of water and acetonitrile with 10 mM ammonium formate, pH 10.8. The mass spectrometry (MS) analysis alternated between MS and data-dependent tandem mass spectrometry scans using dynamic exclusion. The scan range varied slightly between methods but covered 70 to 1,000 m/z. The bioinformatics system consisted of four major components, the Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), the data extraction and peak identification software, data processing tools for quality control (QC) and compound identification, and a collection of information interpretation and visualization tools for use by data analysts. Peaks were quantified using area under the curve. Although proprietary techniques established by Metabolon Inc. can identify a wide array of metabolites, these techniques are currently unable to identify isomeric forms of metabolites. Three batches, two from L. paragasseri JV-V03 and one from L. iners AB-107, and respective PBS control samples were removed due to global outlier values determined by MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/).

Statistical analysis.

Genomic statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal Wallis test in R version 4.1.2 (https://www.r-project.org/). All inoculations and assays were performed as at least three independent replicates. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s adjustment for multiple comparisons was used to statistically analyze the immunoproteomics data in Prism v8 software (GraphPad). Differences in metabolite pathway composition were determined by chi-squared analysis. Hierarchical clustering analysis and heatmap visualization were performed using ClustVis (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/clustvis/) (130) with Euclidean distance and Ward linkage. Metabolite intensity values were median scaled and log transformed prior to performing two-tailed paired Student’s t tests (lactobacilli inoculated versus PBS control). One-way ANOVA was performed using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/) (131), which is integrated with R statistical software and has been validated by Prism v8 software (GraphPad). Principal-component analysis, Pearson’s correlation analysis, and metabolite pathway enrichment analysis were performed in MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/) (131). P values of <0.05 were considered significant in all analyses. Metabolomics results were corrected for multiple testing using the Bonferroni false-discovery rate, and q values were reported. All error bars represent standard deviations.

Data availability.

Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and supplemental material; any additional data can be requested from the corresponding author.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

These studies were supported by the National Institutes of Health NCI supplement from the Office of Research for Women’s Health (3P30CA023074-39S3) and the Flinn Foundation (grant 2244) to M.M.H-K. N.R.J. was supported by the Sidney Hopkins, Mayola B. Vail, and Patricia Ann Hanson Postdoctoral Fellowship award from the Community Foundation for Southern Arizona. N.R.J. and P.Ł. are part of the Guiding U54 Investigator Development to Sustainability (GUIDeS) shared resource through the partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention; the partnership is funded under parallel grants, U54CA143924 and U54CA143925 and are supporting early stage investigators by providing support for publication of this manuscript. We are thankful for the discussions with Phillip B. Hylemon relating to the findings in this report. We also thank Carol Haussler for her critical review of the manuscript. We also acknowledge David Lowry at Arizona State University for his contributions to SEM sample preparation and imaging. Furthermore, we acknowledge the Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository for supplying the bacterial isolates Lactobacillus paragasseri JV-V03 and Lactobacillus mulieris JV-V16 for this research, as well as the ATCC Global Bioresource Center for the isolate Lactobacillus iners AB-107.

M.M.H.-K. supervised this study and led the overall direction, planning, and funding acquisition. N.R.J. conducted all analyses, drafted visualizations, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. J.D.M., P.Ł., and M.M.H.-K. contributed to experimental design and conception. N.R.J., P.Ł., and M.M.H.-K. contributed to the interpretation of the results. N.R.J., P.Ł., J.D.M., and M.M.H.-K. edited, revised, and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Melissa M. Herbst-Kralovetz, Email: mherbst1@arizona.edu.

Vincent B. Young, University of Michigan Ann Arbor

REFERENCES

  • 1.Fettweis JM, Serrano MG, Brooks JP, Edwards DJ, Girerd PH, Parikh HI, Huang B, Arodz TJ, Edupuganti L, Glascock AL, Xu J, Jimenez NR, Vivadelli SC, Fong SS, Sheth NU, Jean S, Lee V, Bokhari YA, Lara AM, Mistry SD, Duckworth RA, Bradley SP, Koparde VN, Orenda XV, Milton SH, Rozycki SK, Matveyev AV, Wright ML, Huzurbazar SV, Jackson EM, Smirnova E, Korlach J, Tsai Y-C, Dickinson MR, Brooks JL, Drake JI, Chaffin DO, Sexton AL, Gravett MG, Rubens CE, Wijesooriya NR, Hendricks-Muñoz KD, Jefferson KK, Strauss JF, Buck GA. 2019. The vaginal microbiome and preterm birth. Nat Med 25:1012–1021. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0450-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Serrano MG, Parikh HI, Brooks JP, Edwards DJ, Arodz TJ, Edupuganti L, Huang B, Girerd PH, Bokhari YA, Bradley SP, Brooks JL, Dickinson MR, Drake JI, Duckworth RA, Fong SS, Glascock AL, Jean S, Jimenez NR, Khoury J, Koparde VN, Lara AM, Lee V, Matveyev AV, Milton SH, Mistry SD, Rozycki SK, Sheth NU, Smirnova E, Vivadelli SC, Wijesooriya NR, Xu J, Xu P, Chaffin DO, Sexton AL, Gravett MG, Rubens CE, Hendricks-Muñoz KD, Jefferson KK, Strauss JF, Fettweis JM, Buck GA. 2019. Racioethnic diversity in the dynamics of the vaginal microbiome during pregnancy. Nat Med 25:1001–1011. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0465-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stout MJ, Zhou Y, Wylie KM, Tarr PI, Macones GA, Tuuli MG. 2017. Early pregnancy vaginal microbiome trends and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 217:356.e1–356.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Callahan BJ, DiGiulio DB, Goltsman DSA, Sun CL, Costello EK, Jeganathan P, Biggio JR, Wong RJ, Druzin ML, Shaw GM, Stevenson DK, Holmes SP, Relman DA. 2017. Replication and refinement of a vaginal microbial signature of preterm birth in two racially distinct cohorts of US women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:9966–9971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705899114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tabatabaei N, Eren AM, Barreiro LB, Yotova V, Dumaine A, Allard C, Fraser WD. 2019. Vaginal microbiome in early pregnancy and subsequent risk of spontaneous preterm birth: a case-control study. BJOG 126:349–358. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brotman RM. 2011. Vaginal microbiome and sexually transmitted infections: an epidemiologic perspective. J Clin Invest 121:4610–4617. doi: 10.1172/JCI57172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Łaniewski P, Ilhan ZE, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2020. The microbiome and gynaecological cancer development, prevention and therapy. Nat Rev Urol 17:232–250. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0286-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xu J, Bian G, Zheng M, Lu G, Chan W-Y, Li W, Yang K, Chen Z-J, Du Y. 2020. Fertility factors affect the vaginal microbiome in women of reproductive age. Am J Reprod Immunol 83:e13220. doi: 10.1111/aji.13220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Boutriq S, González-González A, Plaza-Andrades I, Laborda-Illanes A, Sánchez-Alcoholado L, Peralta-Linero J, Domínguez-Recio ME, Bermejo-Pérez MJ, Lavado-Valenzuela R, Alba E, Queipo-Ortuño MI. 2021. Gut and endometrial microbiome dysbiosis: a new emergent risk factor for endometrial cancer. J Pers Med 11:659. doi: 10.3390/jpm11070659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen C, Song X, Wei W, Zhong H, Dai J, Lan Z, Li F, Yu X, Feng Q, Wang Z, Xie H, Chen X, Zeng C, Wen B, Zeng L, Du H, Tang H, Xu C, Xia Y, Xia H, Yang H, Wang J, Wang J, Madsen L, Brix S, Kristiansen K, Xu X, Li J, Wu R, Jia H. 2017. The microbiota continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relation to uterine-related diseases. Nat Commun 8:875. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00901-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Petrova MI, van den Broek M, Balzarini J, Vanderleyden J, Lebeer S. 2013. Vaginal microbiota and its role in HIV transmission and infection. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:762–792. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huang B, Fettweis JM, Brooks JP, Jefferson KK, Buck GA. 2014. The changing landscape of the vaginal microbiome. Clin Lab Med 34:747–761. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2014.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SSK, McCulle SL, Karlebach S, Gorle R, Russell J, Tacket CO, Brotman RM, Davis CC, Ault K, Peralta L, Forney LJ. 2011. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(Suppl 1):4680–4687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002611107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Donders GG, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaeckerb A, Vereecken A, Van Bulck B, Spitz B. 2000. Pathogenesis of abnormal vaginal bacterial flora. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:872–878. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70338-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gupta K, Stapleton AE, Hooton TM, Roberts PL, Fennell CL, Stamm WE. 1998. Inverse association of H2O2-producing lactobacilli and vaginal Escherichia coli colonization in women with recurrent urinary tract infections. J Infect Dis 178:446–450. doi: 10.1086/515635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pybus V, Onderdonk AB. 1999. Microbial interactions in the vaginal ecosystem, with emphasis on the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis. Microbes Infect 1:285–292. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(99)80024-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cherpes TL, Meyn L, Krohn A, Lurie MA, Hillier JG, Association SL. 2003. Association between acquisition of herpes simplex virus type 2 in women and bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis 37:319–325. doi: 10.1086/375819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Landers DV, Sweet RL. 2003. Bacterial vaginosis is a strong predictor of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Clin Infect Dis 36:663–668. doi: 10.1086/367658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mastromarino P, Di Pietro M, Schiavoni G, Nardis C, Gentile M, Sessa R. 2014. Effects of vaginal lactobacilli in Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Int J Med Microbiol 304:654–661. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pavlova SI, Kilic AO, Kilic SS, So J-S, Nader-Macias ME, Simoes JA, Tao L. 2002. Genetic diversity of vaginal lactobacilli from women in different countries based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. J Appl Microbiol 92:451–459. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhou X, Bent SJ, Schneider MG, Davis CC, Islam MR, Forney LJ. 2004. Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods. Microbiology (Reading) 150:2565–2573. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26905-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Linhares IM, Summers PR, Larsen B, Giraldo PC, Witkin SS. 2011. Contemporary perspectives on vaginal pH and lactobacilli. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:120.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ojala T, Kankainen M, Castro J, Cerca N, Edelman S, Westerlund-Wikström B, Paulin L, Holm L, Auvinen P. 2014. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus crispatus suggests novel mechanisms for the competitive exclusion of Gardnerella vaginalis. BMC Genomics 15:1070. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chee WJY, Chew SY, Than LTL. 2020. Vaginal microbiota and the potential of Lactobacillus derivatives in maintaining vaginal health. Microb Cell Fact 19. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01464-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Petrova MI, Lievens E, Malik S, Imholz N, Lebeer S. 2015. Lactobacillus species as biomarkers and agents that can promote various aspects of vaginal health. Front Physiol 6:81. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Amabebe E, Anumba DOC. 2018. The vaginal microenvironment: the physiologic role of lactobacilli. Front Med (Lausanne) 5:181. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tachedjian G, O’Hanlon DE, Ravel J. 2018. The implausible “in vivo” role of hydrogen peroxide as an antimicrobial factor produced by vaginal microbiota. Microbiome 6. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0418-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gupta S, Kakkar V, Bhushan I. 2019. Crosstalk between vaginal microbiome and female health: a review. Microb Pathog 136:103696. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zheng N, Guo R, Wang J, Zhou W, Ling Z. 2021. Contribution of Lactobacillus iners to vaginal health and diseases: a systematic review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:792787. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.792787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Petrova MI, Reid G, Vaneechoutte M, Lebeer S. 2017. Lactobacillus iners: friend or foe? Trends Microbiol 25:182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Boris S, Barbés C. 2000. Role played by lactobacilli in controlling the population of vaginal pathogens. Microbes Infect 2:543–546. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(00)00313-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gajer P, Brotman RM, Bai G, Sakamoto J, Schütte UME, Zhong X, Koenig SSK, Fu L, Ma ZS, Zhou X, Abdo Z, Forney LJ, Ravel J. 2012. Temporal dynamics of the human vaginal microbiota. Sci Transl Med 4:132ra52. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Phukan N, Brooks AES, Simoes-Barbosa A. 2018. A cell surface aggregation-promoting factor from Lactobacillus gasseri contributes to inhibition of Trichomonas vaginalis adhesion to human vaginal ectocervical cells. Infect Immun 86:e00907-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00907-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Spurbeck RR, Arvidson CG. 2010. Lactobacillus jensenii surface-associated proteins inhibit Neisseria gonorrhoeae adherence to epithelial cells. Infect Immun 78:3103–3111. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01200-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sato N, Garcia-Castillo V, Yuzawa M, Islam MA, Albarracin L, Tomokiyo M, Ikeda-Ohtsubo W, Garcia-Cancino A, Takahashi H, Villena J, Kitazawa H. 2020. Immunobiotic Lactobacillus jensenii TL2937 alleviates dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis by differentially modulating the transcriptomic response of intestinal epithelial cells. Front Immunol 11:2174. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ngugi BM, Hemmerling A, Bukusi EA, Kikuvi G, Gikunju J, Shiboski S, Fredricks DN, Cohen CR. 2011. Effects of bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria and sexual intercourse on vaginal colonization with the probiotic Lactobacillus crispatus CTV-05. Sex Transm Dis 38:1020–1027. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3182267ac4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mastromarino P, Macchia S, Meggiorini L, Trinchieri V, Mosca L, Perluigi M, Midulla C. 2009. Effectiveness of Lactobacillus-containing vaginal tablets in the treatment of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:67–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Antonio MAD, Meyn LA, Murray PJ, Busse B, Hillier SL. 2009. Vaginal colonization by probiotic Lactobacillus crispatus CTV-05 is decreased by sexual activity and endogenous Lactobacilli. J Infect Dis 199:1506–1513. doi: 10.1086/598686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tooli LF, Shirzad M, Modarressi MH, Mirtavoos-Mahyari H, Amoozegar MA, Hantoushzadeh S, Motevaseli E. 2019. Identification of common vaginal lactobacilli immunoreactive proteins by immunoproteomic techniques. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 35:161. doi: 10.1007/s11274-019-2736-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Srinivasan S, Morgan MT, Fiedler TL, Djukovic D, Hoffman NG, Raftery D, Marrazzo JM, Fredricks DN. 2015. Metabolic signatures of bacterial vaginosis. mBio 6. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00204-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ceccarani C, Foschi C, Parolin C, D'Antuono A, Gaspari V, Consolandi C, Laghi L, Camboni T, Vitali B, Severgnini M, Marangoni A. 2019. Diversity of vaginal microbiome and metabolome during genital infections. Sci Rep 9:14095. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50410-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Łaniewski P, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2021. Bacterial vaginosis and health-associated bacteria modulate the immunometabolic landscape in 3D model of human cervix. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 7:88. doi: 10.1038/s41522-021-00259-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Maldonado-Barragán A, Caballero-Guerrero B, Martín V, Ruiz-Barba JL, Rodríguez JM. 2016. Purification and genetic characterization of gassericin E, a novel co-culture inducible bacteriocin from Lactobacillus gasseri EV1461 isolated from the vagina of a healthy woman. BMC Microbiol 16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0663-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pan M, Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Goh YJ, Sanozky-Dawes R, Barrangou R. 2019. Comparative analysis of Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus crispatus isolated from human urogenital and gastrointestinal tracts. Front Microbiol 10:3146. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.03146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hug JJ, Krug D, Müller R. 2020. Bacteria as genetically programmable producers of bioactive natural products. Nat Rev Chem 4:172–193. doi: 10.1038/s41570-020-0176-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Witkin SS, Mendes-Soares H, Linhares IM, Jayaram A, Ledger WJ, Forney LJ. 2013. Influence of vaginal bacteria and D- and L-lactic acid isomers on vaginal extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer: implications for protection against upper genital tract infections. mBio 4. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00460-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nicolò S, Tanturli M, Mattiuz G, Antonelli A, Baccani I, Bonaiuto C, Baldi S, Nannini G, Menicatti M, Bartolucci G, Rossolini GM, Amedei A, Torcia MG. 2021. Vaginal lactobacilli and vaginal dysbiosis-associated bacteria differently affect cervical epithelial and immune homeostasis and anti-viral defenses. Int J Mol Sci 22:6487. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Macklaim JM, Gloor GB, Anukam KC, Cribby S, Reid G. 2011. At the crossroads of vaginal health and disease, the genome sequence of Lactobacillus iners AB-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(Suppl 1):4688–4695. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000086107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.McMillan A, Macklaim JM, Burton JP, Reid G. 2013. Adhesion of Lactobacillus iners AB-1 to human fibronectin: a key mediator for persistence in the vagina? Reprod Sci 20:791–796. doi: 10.1177/1933719112466306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.France MT, Mendes-Soares H, Forney LJ. 2016. Genomic comparisons of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners reveal potential ecological drivers of community composition in the vagina. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:7063–7073. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02385-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gardner JK, Łaniewski P, Knight A, Haddad LB, Swaims-Kohlmeier A, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2020. Interleukin-36γ is elevated in cervicovaginal epithelial cells in women with bacterial vaginosis and in vitro after infection with microbes associated with bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis 221:983–988. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jackson R, Maarsingh JD, Herbst-Kralovetz MM, Van Doorslaer K. 2020. 3D oral and cervical tissue models for studying papillomavirus host-pathogen interactions. Curr Protoc Microbiol 59:e129. doi: 10.1002/cpmc.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Radtke AL, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2012. Culturing and applications of rotating wall vessel bioreactor derived 3D epithelial cell models. J Vis Exp 62:3868. doi: 10.3791/3868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.McGowin CL, Radtke AL, Abraham K, Martin DH, Herbst-Kralovetz M. 2013. Mycoplasma genitalium infection activates cellular host defense and inflammation pathways in a 3-dimensional human endocervical epithelial cell model. J Infect Dis 207:1857–1868. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Barrila J, Radtke AL, Crabbé A, Sarker SF, Herbst-Kralovetz MM, Ott CM, Nickerson CA. 2010. Organotypic 3D cell culture models: using the rotating wall vessel to study host-pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:791–801. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Macklaim JM, Fernandes AD, Di Bella JM, Hammond J-A, Reid G, Gloor GB. 2013. Comparative meta-RNA-seq of the vaginal microbiota and differential expression by Lactobacillus iners in health and dysbiosis. Microbiome 1:12. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-1-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mendes-Soares H, Suzuki H, Hickey RJ, Forney LJ. 2014. Comparative functional genomics of Lactobacillus spp. reveals possible mechanisms for specialization of vaginal lactobacilli to their environment. J Bacteriol 196:1458–1470. doi: 10.1128/JB.01439-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chetwin E, Manhanzva MT, Abrahams AG, Froissart R, Gamieldien H, Jaspan H, Jaumdally SZ, Barnabas SL, Dabee S, Happel A-U, Bowers D, Davids L, Passmore J-AS, Masson L. 2019. Antimicrobial and inflammatory properties of South African clinical Lactobacillus isolates and vaginal probiotics. Sci Rep 9:1917. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38253-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Manhanzva MT, Abrahams AG, Gamieldien H, Froissart R, Jaspan H, Jaumdally SZ, Barnabas SL, Dabee S, Bekker LG, Gray G, Passmore J-AS, Masson L. 2020. Inflammatory and antimicrobial properties differ between vaginal Lactobacillus isolates from South African women with non-optimal versus optimal microbiota. Sci Rep 10:6196. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62184-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bull M, Plummer S, Marchesi J, Mahenthiralingam E. 2013. The life history of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a probiotic: a tale of revisionary taxonomy, misidentification and commercial success. FEMS Microbiol Lett 349:77–87. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fontana A, Falasconi I, Molinari P, Treu L, Basile A, Vezzi A, Campanaro S, Morelli L. 2019. Genomic comparison of Lactobacillus helveticus strains highlights probiotic potential. Front Microbiol 10:1380. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Li T, Liu Z, Zhang X, Chen X, Wang S. 2019. Local probiotic Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii exhibit strong antifungal effects against vulvovaginal candidiasis in a rat model. Front Microbiol 10:1033. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bertolini M, Vazquez Munoz R, Archambault L, Shah S, Souza JGS, Costa RC, Thompson A, Zhou Y, Sobue T, Dongari-Bagtzoglou A. 2021. Mucosal bacteria modulate Candida albicans virulence in oropharyngeal candidiasis. mBio 12:e0193721. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01937-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Vazquez-Munoz R, Thompson A, Russell JT, Sobue T, Zhou Y, Dongari-Bagtzoglou A. 2022. Insights from the Lactobacillus johnsonii genome suggest the production of metabolites with antibiofilm activity against the pathobiont Candida albicans. Front Microbiol 13:853762. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.853762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Xu L, Dong Z, Fang L, Luo Y, Wei Z, Guo H, Zhang G, Gu YQ, Coleman-Derr D, Xia Q, Wang Y. 2019. OrthoVenn2: a web server for whole-genome comparison and annotation of orthologous clusters across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W52–W58. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Glascock AL, Jimenez NR, Boundy S, Koparde VN, Brooks JP, Edwards DJ, Strauss JF, III, Jefferson KK, Serrano MG, Buck GA, Fettweis JM. 2021. Unique roles of vaginal Megasphaera phylotypes in reproductive health. Microb Genom 7:000526. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Yeoman CJ, Yildirim S, Thomas SM, Durkin AS, Torralba M, Sutton G, Buhay CJ, Ding Y, Dugan-Rocha SP, Muzny DM, Qin X, Gibbs RA, Leigh SR, Stumpf R, White BA, Highlander SK, Nelson KE, Wilson BA. 2010. Comparative genomics of Gardnerella vaginalis strains reveals substantial differences in metabolic and virulence potential. PLoS One 5:e12411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wattam AR, Abraham D, Dalay O, Disz TL, Driscoll T, Gabbard JL, Gillespie JJ, Gough R, Hix D, Kenyon R, Machi D, Mao C, Nordberg EK, Olson R, Overbeek R, Pusch GD, Shukla M, Schulman J, Stevens RL, Sullivan DE, Vonstein V, Warren A, Will R, Wilson MJC, Yoo HS, Zhang C, Zhang Y, Sobral BW. 2014. PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D581–D591. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Trunk T, Khalil HS, Leo JC. 2018. Bacterial autoaggregation. AIMS Microbiol 4:140–164. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.1.140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Abdulla A. 2014. Adhesion, auto-aggregation, and hydrophobicity of six Lactobacillus strains. BMRJ 4:381–391. doi: 10.9734/BMRJ/2014/6462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Witkin SS. 2013. Influence of vaginal bacteria and d-and l-lactic acid isomers on vaginal extracellular matrix. mBio 4:e00460-13. doi: 10.1128/mbio.00460-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tachedjian G, Aldunate M, Bradshaw CS, Cone RA. 2017. The role of lactic acid production by probiotic Lactobacillus species in vaginal health. Res Microbiol 168:782–792. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Radtke AL, Quayle AJ, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2012. Microbial products alter the expression of membrane-associated mucin and antimicrobial peptides in a three-dimensional human endocervical epithelial cell model. Biol Reprod 87:132. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.103366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Quayle AJ. 2002. The innate and early immune response to pathogen challenge in the female genital tract and the pivotal role of epithelial cells. J Reprod Immunol 57:61–79. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0378(02)00019-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Holmes KK. 2008. Sexually transmitted diseases, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Medical, Eldersburg, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Baker JM, Chase DM, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2018. Uterine microbiota: residents, tourists, or invaders? Front Immunol 9. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Mitchell CM, Haick A, Nkwopara E, Garcia R, Rendi M, Agnew K, Fredricks DN, Eschenbach D. 2015. Colonization of the upper genital tract by vaginal bacterial species in nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212:611.e1–611.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Vornhagen J, Armistead B, Santana-Ufret V, Gendrin C, Merillat S, Coleman M, Quach P, Boldenow E, Alishetti V, Leonhard-Melief C, Ngo LY, Whidbey C, Doran KS, Curtis C, Waldorf KMA, Nance E, Rajagopal L. 2018. Group B streptococcus exploits vaginal epithelial exfoliation for ascending infection. J Clin Invest 128:1985–1999. doi: 10.1172/JCI97043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Tanizawa Y, Tada I, Kobayashi H, Endo A, Maeno S, Toyoda A, Arita M, Nakamura Y, Sakamoto M, Ohkuma M, Tohno M. 2018. Lactobacillus paragasseri sp. nov., a sister taxon of Lactobacillus gasseri, based on whole-genome sequence analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:3512–3517. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zhou X, Yang B, Stanton C, Ross RP, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen W. 2020. Comparative analysis of Lactobacillus gasseri from Chinese subjects reveals a new species-level taxa. BMC Genomics 21:119. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6527-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rocha J, Botelho J, Ksiezarek M, Perovic SU, Machado M, Carriço JA, Pimentel LL, Salsinha S, Rodríguez-Alcalá LM, Pintado M, Ribeiro TG, Peixe L. 2020. Lactobacillus mulieris sp. nov., a new species of Lactobacillus delbrueckii group. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:1522–1527. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Putonti C, Shapiro JW, Ene A, Tsibere O, Wolfe AJ. 2020. Comparative genomic study of Lactobacillus jensenii and the newly defined Lactobacillus mulieris species identifies species-specific functionality. mSphere 5. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00560-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Salvetti E, Harris HMB, Felis GE, O'Toole PW. 2018. Comparative genomics of the genus Lactobacillus reveals robust phylogroups that provide the basis for reclassification. Appl Environ Microbiol 84. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02052-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, Mattarelli P, O'Toole PW, Pot B, Vandamme P, Walter J, Watanabe K, Wuyts S, Felis GE, Gänzle MG, Lebeer S. 2020. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:2782–2858. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Redondo-Lopez V, Cook RL, Sobel JD. 1990. Emerging role of lactobacilli in the control and maintenance of the vaginal bacterial microflora. Rev Infect Dis 12:856–872. doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.5.856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Islam TAB, Shamsuzzaman SM, Department of Microbiology, Tairunnessa Memorial Medical College, Gazipur, Bangladesh . 2015. Isolation and species identification of enterococci from clinical specimen with their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern in a tertiary care hospital, Bangladesh. J Coastal Life Med 3:787–790. doi: 10.12980/jclm.3.2015j5-95. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hernández-Rodríguez C, Romero-González R, Albani-Campanario M, Figueroa-Damián R, Meraz-Cruz N, Hernández-Guerrero C. 2011. Vaginal microbiota of healthy pregnant Mexican women is constituted by four Lactobacillus species and several vaginosis-associated bacteria. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2011:851485–851489. doi: 10.1155/2011/851485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Garg KB, Ganguli I, Das R, Talwar GP. 2009. Spectrum of Lactobacillus species present in healthy vagina of Indian women. Indian J Med Res 129:652–657. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Damelin LH, Paximadis M, Mavri-Damelin D, Birkhead M, Lewis DA, Tiemessen CT. 2011. Identification of predominant culturable vaginal Lactobacillus species and associated bacteriophages from women with and without vaginal discharge syndrome in South Africa. J Med Microbiol 60:180–183. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.024463-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Borges S, Silva J, Teixeira P. 2014. The role of lactobacilli and probiotics in maintaining vaginal health. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:479–489. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3064-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Pessoa WFB, Melgaço ACC, de Almeida ME, Ramos LP, Rezende RP, Romano CC. 2017. In vitro activity of lactobacilli with probiotic potential isolated from cocoa fermentation against Gardnerella vaginalis. Biomed Res Int 2017:3264194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Tuo Y, Yu H, Ai L, Wu Z, Guo B, Chen W. 2013. Aggregation and adhesion properties of 22 Lactobacillus strains. J Dairy Sci 96:4252–4257. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.D’Alessandro M, Parolin C, Bukvicki D, Siroli L, Vitali B, De Angelis M, Lanciotti R, Patrignani F. 2021. Probiotic and metabolic characterization of vaginal lactobacilli for a potential use in functional foods. Microorganisms 9:833. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Anton L, Sierra L-J, DeVine A, Barila G, Heiser L, Brown AG, Elovitz MA. 2018. Common cervicovaginal microbial supernatants alter cervical epithelial function: mechanisms by which Lactobacillus crispatus contributes to cervical health. Front Microbiol 9:2181. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Rampersaud R, Planet PJ, Randis TM, Kulkarni R, Aguilar JL, Lehrer RI, Ratner AJ. 2011. Inerolysin, a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin produced by Lactobacillus iners. J Bacteriol 193:1034–1041. doi: 10.1128/JB.00694-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Abdelmaksoud AA, Koparde VN, Sheth NU, Serrano MG, Glascock AL, Fettweis JM, Strauss JF, Buck GA, Jefferson KK. 2016. Comparison of Lactobacillus crispatus isolates from Lactobacillus-dominated vaginal microbiomes with isolates from microbiomes containing bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria. Microbiology (Reading) 162:466–475. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Kindschuh WF. 2021. Preterm birth is associated with xenobiotics and predicted by the vaginal metabolome. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2021.06.14.448190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 98.Bonnardel F, Haslam SM, Dell A, Feizi T, Liu Y, Tajadura-Ortega V, Akune Y, Sykes L, Bennett PR, MacIntyre DA, Lisacek F, Imberty A. 2021. Proteome-wide prediction of bacterial carbohydrate-binding proteins as a tool for understanding commensal and pathogen colonisation of the vaginal microbiome. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 7:49. doi: 10.1038/s41522-021-00220-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Tester R, Al-Ghazzewi FH. 2018. Intrinsic and extrinsic carbohydrates in the vagina: a short review on vaginal glycogen. Int J Biol Macromol 112:203–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bloom SM, Mafunda NA, Woolston BM, Hayward MR, Frempong JF, Hussain FA, Xulu N, Dong M, Dong KL, Gumbi T, Ceasar X, Rice JK, Choksi N, Ismail N, Ndung’u T, Ghebremichael MS, Balskus EP, Mitchell CM, Kwon DS. 2021. Cysteine dependence in Lactobacillus iners constitutes a novel therapeutic target to modify the vaginal microbiota. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2021.06.12.448098. [DOI]
  • 101.Laghi L, Zagonari S, Patuelli G, Zhu C, Foschi C, Morselli S, Pedna MF, Sambri V, Marangoni A. 2021. Vaginal metabolic profiles during pregnancy: changes between first and second trimester. PLoS One 16:e0249925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Mutaguchi Y, Kasuga K, Kojima I. 2018. Production of d-branched-chain amino acids by lactic acid bacteria carrying homologs to isoleucine 2-epimerase of Lactobacillus buchneri. Front Microbiol 9:1540. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Pahalagedara ASNW, Flint S, Palmer J, Brightwell G, Gupta TB. 2022. Antibacterial efficacy and possible mechanism of action of 2-hydroxyisocaproic acid (HICA). PLoS One 17:e0266406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Fu M, Zhang X, Liang Y, Lin S, Qian W, Fan S. 2020. Alterations in vaginal microbiota and associated metabolome in women with recurrent implantation failure. mBio 11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03242-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.de Azevedo-Martins AC, Ocaña K, de Souza W, Vasconcelos ATRd, Teixeira MMG, Camargo EP, Alves JMP, Motta MCM. 2021. The importance of glycerophospholipid production to the mutualist symbiosis of trypanosomatids. Pathogens 11:41. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11010041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ling Z, Kong J, Liu F, Zhu H, Chen X, Wang Y, Li L, Nelson KE, Xia Y, Xiang C. 2010. Molecular analysis of the diversity of vaginal microbiota associated with bacterial vaginosis. BMC Genomics 11:488. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Parolin C, Foschi C, Laghi L, Zhu C, Banzola N, Gaspari V, D'Antuono A, Giordani B, Severgnini M, Consolandi C, Salvo M, Cevenini R, Vitali B, Marangoni A. 2018. Insights into vaginal bacterial communities and metabolic profiles of Chlamydia trachomatis infection: positioning between eubiosis and dysbiosis. Front Microbiol 9:600. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Vitali B, Cruciani F, Picone G, Parolin C, Donders G, Laghi L. 2015. Vaginal microbiome and metabolome highlight specific signatures of bacterial vaginosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34:2367–2376. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2490-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Cortés-Zavaleta O, López-Malo A, Hernández-Mendoza A, García HS. 2014. Antifungal activity of lactobacilli and its relationship with 3-phenyllactic acid production. Int J Food Microbiol 173:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Laursen MF, Sakanaka M, von Burg N, Mörbe U, Andersen D, Moll JM, Pekmez CT, Rivollier A, Michaelsen KF, Mølgaard C, Lind MV, Dragsted LO, Katayama T, Frandsen HL, Vinggaard AM, Bahl MI, Brix S, Agace W, Licht TR, Roager HM. 2021. Bifidobacterium species associated with breastfeeding produce aromatic lactic acids in the infant gut. Nat Microbiol 6:1367–1382. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-00970-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Gutiérrez-Díaz I, Fernández-Navarro T, Salazar N, Bartolomé B, Moreno-Arribas MV, López P, Suárez A, de Los Reyes-Gavilán CG, Gueimonde M, González S. 2018. Could fecal phenylacetic and phenylpropionic acids be used as indicators of health status? J Agric Food Chem 66:10438–10446. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Abdul-Rahim O, Wu Q, Price TK, Pistone G, Diebel K, Bugni TS, Wolfe AJ. 2021. Phenyl-lactic acid is an active ingredient in bactericidal supernatants of Lactobacillus crispatus. J Bacteriol 203. doi: 10.1128/JB.00360-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Ren J, Sang Y, Ni J, Tao J, Lu J, Zhao M, Yao Y-F. 2015. Acetylation regulates survival of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium under acid stress. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:5675–5682. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01009-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Christensen DG, Xie X, Basisty N, Byrnes J, McSweeney S, Schilling B, Wolfe AJ. 2019. Post-translational protein acetylation: an elegant mechanism for bacteria to dynamically regulate metabolic functions. Front Microbiol 10:1604. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Dinicola S, De Grazia S, Carlomagno G, Pintucci JP. 2014. N-Acetylcysteine as powerful molecule to destroy bacterial biofilms. A systematic review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 18:2942–2948. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Chen J-K, Shen C-R, Liu C-L. 2010. N-Acetylglucosamine: production and applications. Mar Drugs 8:2493–2516. doi: 10.3390/md8092493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Salliss ME, Maarsingh JD, Garza C, Łaniewski P, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2021. Veillonellaceae family members uniquely alter the cervical metabolic microenvironment in a human three-dimensional epithelial model. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 7:57. doi: 10.1038/s41522-021-00229-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.McKenzie R, Maarsingh J, Laniewski P, Herbst-Kralovetz M. 2022. Immunometabolic analysis of Mobiluncus mulieris and Eggerthella sp. reveals novel insights into their pathogenic contributions to the hallmarks of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 226:316. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.1323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Hjelm BE, Berta AN, Nickerson CA, Arntzen CJ, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2010. Development and characterization of a three-dimensional organotypic human vaginal epithelial cell model. Biol Reprod 82:617–627. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.109.080408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Zevin AS, Xie IY, Birse K, Arnold K, Romas L, Westmacott G, Novak RM, McCorrister S, McKinnon LR, Cohen CR, Mackelprang R, Lingappa J, Lauffenburger DA, Klatt NR, Burgener AD. 2016. Microbiome composition and function drives wound-healing impairment in the female genital tract. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005889. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Putonti C, Akhnoukh V, Anagnostopoulos Z, Bilek M, Colgan J, El Idrissi S, Magnuszewski K, Marino S, Szymulewski M, Tyahla M, Yanchuk V, Miller-Ensminger T, Batrich M, Brassil B, Mormando R, Johnson G, Wolfe AJ. 2019. Draft genome sequences of six Lactobacillus gasseri and three Lactobacillus paragasseri strains isolated from the female bladder. Microbiol Resour Announc 8. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00973-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Letunic I. 2022. phyloT: a phylogenetic tree generator. https://phylot.biobyte.de.
  • 123.Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P. 2022. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D785–D794. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Schoch CL, Ciufo S, Domrachev M, Hotton CL, Kannan S, Khovanskaya R, Leipe D, Mcveigh R, O’Neill K, Robbertse B, Sharma S, Soussov V, Sullivan JP, Sun L, Turner S, Karsch-Mizrachi I. 2020. NCBI taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database 2020. doi: 10.1093/database/baaa062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Letunic I, Bork P. 2021. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Davis JJ, Gerdes S, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Pusch GD, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Yoo H. 2016. PATtyFams: protein families for the microbial genomes in the PATRIC Database. Front Microbiol 7:118. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Wang Y, Coleman-Derr D, Chen G, Gu YQ. 2015. OrthoVenn: a web server for genome wide comparison and annotation of orthologous clusters across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W78–W84. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Maarsingh JD, Laniewski P, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2022. Immunometabolic and potential tumor-promoting changes in 3D cervical cell models infected with bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria. Commun Biol 5(1):725. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03681-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Metsalu T, Vilo J. 2015. ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using principal component analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W566–W570. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Pang Z, Chong J, Zhou G, de Lima Morais DA, Chang L, Barrette M, Gauthier C, Jacques P-É, Li S, Xia J. 2021. MetaboAnalyst 5.0: narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W388–W396. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

TABLE S1

Genomic characteristic differences between lactobacilli. This table contains overall genomic characteristics (GC content, genome size, coding sequences, proteins with known functions, and hypothetical proteins) and the differences among 26 strains of four Lactobacillus species: L. crispatus, L. iners, L. jensenii or L. mulieris, and L. paragasseri strains were obtained from the GenBank database as of 1 October 2021. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (11.8KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Predicted gene subsystem differences between lactobacilli. This table contains overall annotated genes of 26 lactobacilli strains from L. crispatus, L. iners, L. jensenii or L. mulieris, and L. paragasseri that were categorized into subsystems by PATRIC. The categories were protein processing, metabolism, DNA processing, defense and virulence, RNA processing, energy, cellular processes, membrane transport, cell signaling, and cell transport. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (12.6KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S1

Genomic characteristics of key vaginal lactobacilli. Differences in genomic characteristics of four well-characterized vaginal lactobacilli genomes are summarized. Numbers of coding DNA sequences (CDS), number of known putative proteins, and number of hypothetical proteins observed are shown in the top row. GC content in percentage and genome size in megabases observed are in the bottom row. Circularized whole-genome sequences and sequences from experimental strains of the vaginally relevant Lactobacillus species are in the following colors: L. iners (yellow), L. paragasseri (red), L. crispatus (green), and L. mulieris (blue). Statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. Download FIG S1, TIF file, 1.0 MB (1MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S4

Student t test results for each individual strain (L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, and L. paragasseri JV-V03) compared to PBS mock-inoculated controls. This table contains statistical t test data from metabolomic analysis of L. iners AB-107 versus PBS controls, L. mulieris JV-V16 versus PBS controls, and L. paragasseri JV-V03 versus PBS controls. Download Table S4, XLSX file, 0.02 MB (19.4KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

L. parvula significantly elevated production of inflammatory protein biomarkers compared to vaginal lactobacilli and PBS mock-inoculated controls in 3D CEC aggregates. Bio-Plex analysis was performed for cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors secreted by 3D human CECs infected with L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, and L. paragasseri JV-V03 for 24 h under anaerobic conditions. TGF-α, IL-8, and MCP-1 were all significantly elevated by L. parvula, while all lactobacilli exhibited no notable change to PBS controls. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc multiple comparisons determined statistical significance. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. Download FIG S2, TIF file, 1.4 MB (1.5MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

Immunoproteomic differences between L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, L. paragasseri JV-V03, L. parvula DNF00906, and PBS control. This table contains immunoproteomic data of L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, L. paragasseri JV-V03, L. parvula DNF00906, and PBS controls. The cytokines and chemokines that were observed were IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-RA, IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, fractalkine, MCP-1, MCP-3, MIP-1β, PDGF-AA, RANTES, TGF-α, TNF-α, and VEGF. Download Table S3, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (15.7KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S5

Metabolite set enrichment analysis significant results for each individual strain (L. iners AB-107, L. mulieris JV-V16, and L. paragasseri JV-V03) compared to PBS mock-inoculated controls. This table reports significant (P < 0.05) statistical enrichment data from metabolomic analysis of L. iners AB-107 versus PBS controls, L. mulieris JV-V16 versus PBS controls, and L. paragasseri JV-V03 versus PBS controls. Download Table S5, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (12.3KB, xlsx) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Vaginal Lactobacillus species had significantly differentiated metabolic profiles from mock-inoculated controls. (A) Stacked bar chart of subpathways of significant metabolites identified by Student’s t tests with Welch’s correction and compared to PBS mock-inoculated controls. (B) Venn diagram indicating the unique and overlapping metabolites that were significantly altered (P < 0.05) between the lactobacilli inoculations. Download FIG S3, TIF file, 1.2 MB (1.2MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Venn diagrams of remaining metabolic superpathways enriched in 3D CEC models inoculated with L. iners, L. mulieris, and L. paragasseri. Metabolite pathway enrichment analysis results are shown for human 3D CEC models inoculated with vaginal lactobacilli for 24 h at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. Venn diagrams with the remaining superpathways from enrichment pathway analysis are also shown. Only L. iners and L. mulieris had significantly enriched pathways for the remaining pathways: the vitamins and cofactors pathway and the xenobiotics and energy pathway. Download FIG S4, TIF file, 1.7 MB (1.7MB, tif) .

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and supplemental material; any additional data can be requested from the corresponding author.


Articles from mSphere are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES