Abstract
Auricularia cornea Ehrenb (syn. A. polytricha) is a wood-decaying fungi known as black ear mushroom. Earlike gelatinous fruiting body distinguishes them from other fungi. Industrial wastes have the potential to be used as the basic substrate to produce mushrooms. Therefore, 16 substrate formulations were prepared from different ratios of beech (BS) and hornbeam sawdust (HS) supplemented with wheat (WB) and rice brans (RB). The pH and initial moisture content of substrate mixtures were adjusted to 6.5 and 70%, respectively. The comparison of in vitro growth characteristics of the fungal mycelia under the different temperatures (25, 28, and 30°C), and culture media [yeast extract agar (YEA), potato extract agar (PEA), malt extract agar (MEA), and also HS and BS extract agar media supplemented with maltose, dextrose, and fructose revealed that the highest mycelial growth rate (MGR; 7.5 mm/day) belonged to HS and BS extract agar media supplemented with three mentioned sugar at 28°C. In A. cornea spawn study, the substrate combination of BS (70%) + WB (30%) at 28°C and moisture contents of 75% displayed the highest mean MGR (9.3 mm/day) and lowest spawn run period (9.0 days). In the bag test, “BS (70%) + WB (30%)” was the best substrate displaying the shortest spawn run period (19.7 days), and the highest fresh sporophore yield (131.7 g/bag), biological efficiency (53.1%) and number of basidiocarp (9.0/bag) of A. cornea. Also, A. cornea cultivation was processed to model yield, biological efficiency (BE), spawn run period (SRP), days for pinhead formation (DPHF), days for the first harvest (DFFH), and total cultivation period (TCP) by multilayer perceptron-genetic algorithm (MLP-GA). MLP-GA (0.81–0.99) exhibited a higher predictive ability than stepwise regression (0.06–0.58). The forecasted values of the output variables were in good accordance with their observed ones corroborating the good competency of established MLP-GA models. MLP-GA modeling exhibited a powerful tool for forecasting and thus selecting the optimal substrate for maximum A. cornea production.
Introduction
Auricularia is a genus of medicinal mushroom known as edible jelly or wood ear mushrooms and accordingly classified as wood-decaying mushrooms. Growth of this fungus is oftentimes observed on decayed logs and dead branches of trees during the rainy season in the forests around the world [1, 2]. The distribution of Auricularia spp. have been reported in tropical and subtropical areas of the world [3, 4]. It is noteworthy that three mushroom genera viz., Lentinula, Pleurotus, and Auricularia accounted for 63% of the global mushroom production in 2019 [5]. Pleurotus ostreatus production has been marginally increased since 2010 and its rank dropped to third place in 2019. Shiitake and Auricularia spp. production has been significantly enhanced and their position upgraded from second and third in 2010 to first and second, respectively, in 2019 [6]. The nutritional and medicinal attributes of Auricularia spp. have resulted in increasing demand for the domestication of this mushroom [7]. The characteristics of Auricularia, basidiocarp of 3~8 cm (up to 12 cm) diameter, and noticeably ear-like form in brown, distinguish it from other fungi [8]. Moreover, the mentioned fungus has initially gelatinous and elastic properties and then gently becomes dry and fragile in the mature phase [9]. This mushroom is customarily appended to the substrate by a very short stalk and often lateral side. Also, the outward surface is mostly lidded with fluffy grey color and tiny hairs [10]. Nutritionally, the fruit body of this mushroom contains essential elements including minerals, polysaccharides, vitamins, and as well as over 30% of dry weight is a protein [7]. In addition to its importance as a food source, Auricularia spp. can be used for medicinal purposes to produce new therapeutic drugs for many human diseases [11]. The biologically active compounds of Auricularia spp. including polysaccharides showed antitumor, antiviral, antibacterial and antiparasitic and immune system modulation properties [12, 13].
Auricularia is the first mushroom domesticated for industrial purposes due to its nutritional and medicinal properties [7]. Auricularia is a group of native fungi found in the northern forest of Iran, and they can be introduced to the medicinal mushroom industry in Iran because of their potential. The cultivation area of A. cornea Ehrenb (synonym: A. polytricha) is persistently increasing because of high medicinal and economic value [14]. It is shown that fruit bodies of A. polytricha were brighter in the lower temperature (15.4°C) but larger in size at the higher temperature (44.3°C) [15]. A previous study [16] examined the sawdust of the hardwood species including Shorea sp., Falcataria moluccana, and Tectona grandis as basal cultivation substrate of A. polytricha mushroom. The fastest mycelial growth (5.7 mm/day) was recorded for Shorea sp. [16]. Generally, the cultivation period lasted 80 days, and the substrate made of F. moluccana produced the highest yield of fruiting bodies (65.4 g/bag), total dry weight (7.6 g/bag), and fruiting bodies (11/bag). One study [17] was examined the effect of Mansonia altissima sawdust substrate supplemented with additives including Sorghum bicolor chaff, oil palm fiber, corn chaff, brewer grains, and wheat bran (0, 5, 10 and 20%) on the biological efficiency of A. auricula. A 20% increase in all the additives enhanced the biological efficiency of A. auricula [17]. Furthermore, among five additives used in the substrate; wheat bran was introduced as the best case [17]. Knowledge about important properties of suitable substrate for mycelium growth and spawn run is necessary [18–20]. Numerous studies [19–21] have shown that sorghum and millet grain has successfully been applied for spawn preparation. A previous study [22] evaluated the most favorable conditions for mycelial growth and yield of A. polytricha in different culture media as well as grain spawn and fruiting substrates. The fastest mycelial ramification was observed in coconut water gelatin in terms of mycelial thickness and mycelial growth rate (MGR; 13.2 mm/day). On the other hand, sweet sorghum grains showed the highest MGR (16 mm/day). Also, the compound of lime, rice bran, and lumber sawdust had the fastest mycelial run (10 mm/day), the highest yield (254 g/kg), and biological efficiency (30.79%). Another experiment [23] studied A. polytricha cultivation in sawdust amended with 30, 45, and 60% of Zea mays, Pennisetum purpureum, and Panicum repens stalks, respectively. The results revealed that the best substrate for mycelial growth was sawdust amended with P. purpureum stalk with a total colonization period of 32 days [23]. Furthermore, the most suitable substrate for the biological efficiency was sawdust amended with 60% of P. purpureum stalk (148.12%) followed by 30% of Z. mays (145.05%), 45% of Z. mays (144.15%), and 30% of P. repens (136.68%) stalks [23]. Overall, the results showed that the use of Z. mays and P. repens stalks on partially replaced sawdust is feasible to cultivate A. polytricha [23]. Moreover, A. polytricha was cultured using the formulations of oil palm wastes mixed with sawdust [24]. The results showed that the best substrate formulations were sawdust mingled with an oil palm frond (90:10) supplemented with 15% spent grain displaying a MGR of 8 mm/day, and also sawdust mingled with an empty fruit bunch (50:50) plus 10% spent grain showing a MGR of 7 mm/day [24]. Furthermore, the highest total fresh yield (188.9 g/bed) was obtained on sawdust mixed with an oil palm frond (90:10) supplemented with 15% spent grain and 85% moisture content showing biological efficiency (BE) of 288.9% [24]. It was stated that wheat bran added to paddy straw (1:3) showed the minimum days for spawn run (21.3 days), pinhead formation (31.3 days), first harvest (35.6 days), and also the highest yield (147.6 g/bed), and biological efficiency (59.04%) for A. polytricha cultivation.
A large amount of beech (BS) and hornbeam sawdust (HS) is produced in the wood industry in Iran [25, 26]. This solid waste is an environmental concern [27], and its reuse is essential. In this study, BS and HS supplemented with wheat bran (WB) and rice bran (RB) was used as the substrate to assess the compatibility of the substrates obtained endemic existence industrial wastes for Iranian wood ear mushroom production. The substrate combination should be optimized to achieve the maximum yield of A. cornea cultivation. However, the substrate optimization for yield and biological efficiency (BE) enhancement, and also spawn run period (SRP), days for pinhead formation (DPHF), days for the first harvest (DFFH), and total cultivation period (TCP) decrement of A. cornea are time- and cost-consuming. Studying the relationship among input variables “concentration levels of substrate components (BS, HS, WB, and RB)” and output variables “yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea” could facilitate the substrate optimization for the production of this valuable edible and medicinal mushroom. Multivariate statistical techniques including stepwise regression (SR) have been used in the biological data analyses [28–30]. There is no research to study SR for modeling and predicting yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea. SR is a popular data-mining technique involving the selection of the explanatory variables from a group of input variables for building a model [31].
Artificial intelligence (AI) displays superior non-linear fitting and predictive ability to traditional modeling methods comprising regression models [29, 30, 32, 33]. Artificial neural networks (ANNs), likewise known as neural networks, are one subfield of AI connected with brain-inspired algorithms simulating human brain structure and function to find complicated and highly nonlinear relationships amongst factors (input) and parameters (output) variables [29, 32, 33]. Multilayer perceptron-genetic algorithm (MLP-GA; Fig 1) is one of the most popular hybrid learning algorithms displaying superb forecasting ability than traditional statistical techniques for computing the mathematical functions to analyze and decipher unpredictable data sets in plant and fungal research [32, 34, 35]).
Fig 1. Schematic diagram of integrating multilayer perceptron (MLP) with genetics algorithm (GA) for MLP architecture optimization.
The objectives of this research were (a) to optimize cultivation substrate for spawn and fruiting body production, (b) to approximate yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea using regression technique “SR”, (c) to develop MLP-GA models to forecast output variables “yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea” based on the concentration level of cultivation substrate components (input variables “HS, BS, RB and WB”), (d) to compare the performance of MLP-GA and regression method (SR) regarding prediction accuracy of output variables, and (e) to find the most important factors for maximum yield and BE, and also minimum SRP, DPHF, DFFH and TCP of A. cornea.
Materials and methods
Collection of mushroom isolates
The first stage in any mushroom production process is the preparation of the pure mycelial culture of the mushroom isolates (S1 Fig in S1 File). The isolates were collected from unprotected areas of Hyrcanian forests (36°053′11″N, 54°07′14″E and 36°020′54″N, 53°014′24″E) in the north of Iran with guidance of local authority.
Pure culture of mushroom
The purification of isolates was performed by the method of Weber and Webster [36]. The tissue of the isolates was cultured on malt extract agar (MEA; 2%) and then incubated in a dark sterile space at 28°C for 5–8 days. The pure cultures were obtained by sub-culturing on fresh MEA and potato dextrose agar (PDA) media and then allowing the mycelium to fully colonize the Petri dishes. The best strain (AJ01) was determined according to some characters including MGR, density texture, and colony type.
DNA extraction, amplification, sequencing and phylogenetic analyses
The best strain (AJ01) was cultured in PD broth at 28°C with constant shaking for 7 days. The fungal mycelia were freeze-dried and Genomic DNA was extracted with a procedure described by Salehi et al., [37, 38]. ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region was amplified with primers ITS1 and ITS4 [39] and RPB2 using fRPB2-5F and fRPB2-7cR primers [40]. PCR reaction mixtures (25μl) consisted of 1μl genomic DNA (~100ng), 1μl forward and reverse primers (10 pM), and 12.5 μl Premix Taq (TaKaRa Biotechnology Ltd., Japan), and 10.5μl PCR quality water. PCR reaction programs were an initial denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (94°C for 30 s), annealing (55°C (ITS) and 57°C (RPB2) for 30 s), extension (72°C for 1min) and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and purified using a DNA gel extraction kit (Axygen Biotechnology Ltd., China). The purified PCR product was directly sequenced using the same primers by Biomagic Company, China, and manually adjusted with chromas software (www.technelysium.com.au/chromas.html).
Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST; https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was carried to compare new ITS and RPB2 sequences with other sequences (S1 Table in S1 File) accessible in NCBI database. The datasets of combined sequences of ITS and RPB2 were separately aligned using the Q-INS-i algorithm of an online version of MAFFT v.7.205 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) [41]. The Gblocks program (version 0.91b) with all the three less stringent parameters (Allow smaller final blocks, Allow gap positions within the final blocks, and Allow gap positions within the final blocks) was utilized for editing the alignments. The best model for combined sequences of ITS and RPB2 was chosen using PAUP/MrModeltest.2 [42]. Bayesian analyses were carried out using MrBayes 3.1.2 [43] with the general time-reversible model, including a gamma distribution for rates across sites and a proportion of invariant sites (GTR+I+G) model for ITS-RPB2 with three million generations. Dendroscope V.3.2.8 was used for the visualization of output files prepared by phylogenetic programs [44].
Mycelial growth measurement
As MGR for colonizing the substrate is one of the important factors in mushroom cultivation. Therefore, in the first step, MGR was investigated in the different culture media including yeast extract agar (YEA), potato extract agar (PEA), malt extract agar (MEA), HS and BS extract agar media mixed with dextrose, fructose, and maltose as carbon sources at three different temperatures (25, 28, and 30°C). The one agar plug (5 mm diameter) from the stock culture was placed on the center of the surface of Petri dishes and incubated at mentioned temperatures in dark to fully colonize the plate. The MGR of A. cornea was determined by measuring the diameter of the colony in four directions. This experiment was done with four replications. This experiment was designed as factorial on Completely randomized design (CRD) with four replications.
Preparation of sawdust medium for spawn production
The sawdust of two hardwood trees including BS and HS was used for spawn production. WB, RB, and CF are also considered as supplements. To carry out this stage of mushroom production, the different ratios of the sawdust to supplement [70:30, 100:0, and 0:100 (w/w)] were manually mixed. Then water [65, 75, and 90% (v/w)] was added to the mixture of sawdust and supplements after passing off it through a sieve with a pore size of 5 mm diameter. Final moisture content of the substrates was measured by weighing out a small sample of substrates, drying it in an oven, weighing it again and calculating moisture content (%). The medium pH was adjusted to 6.5 with CaCO3 (1%) for the spawn production. Finally, 100 g of each spawn formulization were put in 200 ml heat-resistant glass bottles and sterilized at 121°C under 1.4 atmospheric pressure for 60 min. The pure mycelium was obtained from the previous step for spawn production. One mycelial agar plug (1 cm diameter) of 4-day-old culture was placed on the center of prepared medium surface and incubated at three temperatures (25, 28, and 30°C) to completely colonize the culture medium. MGR was measured in four directions of glass bottles at 3-day intervals after cultivation with five replicates. This experiment was set up on a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications.
Fruiting body production
Sixteen substrate formulations were prepared from the sawdust of two hardwood trees (BS and HS) mixed with WB and RB in different ratios (S2 Table in S1 File) with a moisture content of 70%. The PH of the substrate mixture was adjusted to 6.5 by adding CaCO3. The substrates mixtures (825 g) were packed into the autoclavable polyethylene bags (40 cm in height and 15 cm in diameter). The top of the bags was tightly closed by using sterile cotton strings and sterilized at 121°C under 1.4 atmospheric pressure for 90 min. The bags were inoculated with sawdust spawns (10 g) taken from the previous stage and incubated in dark at 28 ± 1°C, then allowed to fully colonize the substrates. After the colonization stage was completed, the bags were transferred to the mushroom production room, then the top of the bags were removed while slitting by a sharp knife in four vertical directions. The primordial formation was induced by exposing the bags to temperature shock (15–20°C) for three days to stimulate fruiting body production. Air relatively humidity was maintained at 85–90% using flooding the floor and fogging system, and light exposure at 2000 lux set on a 12 h on/off cycle. The yield, number of fruiting body (NFB), BE [Eq (1)], SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP were recorded for each substrate. This experiment was planned on a RCBD with 12 replicates to assess how substrates (S2 Table in S1 File) affected yield, NFB, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP.
| (1) |
Carbon to nitrogen (C/N) analysis in experimental substrates
Carbon to nitrogen ratios (C/N) is one of the most important parameters that must be considered in the evaluation and cultivation of mushrooms. In this study, C/N was measured for spawn and fruiting body production tests [36, 45].
Model development
Normalization of the data set was performed by Box-Cox transformation [46] before the machine learning algorithm test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was likewise used for finding outliers; but, no outliers were observed in the data set. The performance of all the tested models was evaluated using a five-fold cross-validation method with ten replicates. Accordingly, the best predictive model was found on unseen data from the entire data set. Stepwise regression (SR) and multilayer perceptron-genetic algorithm (MLP-GA) models were developed using the training data subset, and the predictive accuracy of the developed models was tested using the testing subset [47].
Multilayer perceptron-genetic algorithm (MLP-GA) model
MLP-GA modeling (Fig 1) was applied to define the effects of BS, HS, WB, and RB concentration levels on yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea. Three-layered feed forward back-propagation neural network was applied for learning and mapping the relationships between inputs (BS, HS, WB, and RB concentration levels) and outputs (yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea). Hyperbolic tangent sigmoid (tansig) and pure lineral (purelin) transfer functions were used for hidden and output layers, respectively.
ANN predictive accuracy is influenced by its architecture, thus, evolutionary algorithms including GA are applied to design the optimal architecture of ANN [48]. The more and less number of hidden neurons than the problem complexity leads to overfitting and underfitting the data, and finally, reduces model performance. Underfitting causes a high error rate on both training and testing (unseen) subsets. Overfitting leads to high error rates on unseen data [49]. GA was applied to establish the fittest MLP structure (Fig 1). An initial population of 50, crossover rate of 0.85, generation number of 500, and mutation rate of 0.01 [32, 50, 51] were fixed for designing optimal MLP architecture. The performance of hybrid MLP-GA models was evaluated by the statistical criteria “coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE) [29, 30, 32, 33].
Sensitivity analysis of the models
Sensitivity analysis of MLP-GA model outputs was performed to find out the importance degree of the model inputs (BS, HS, WB, and RB concentration levels) on its outputs (yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea). The sensitivity of yield, biological efficiency, spawn run, pinhead formation, first harvest, and total cultivation period of A. cornea was measured by variable sensitivity error (VSE) value representing MLP-GA model performance (RMSE) when that specific input variable is nonexistent in the model. The variable sensitivity ratio (VSR) value was computed as the ratio of VSE and MLP-GA model error (RMSE) when all input variables are present in the model. The input displaying higher VSR was recognized as a higher important input variable in MLP-GA model [28, 32, 33]. To make calculated VSRs more easily comparable, they were rescaled within the range [0, 1]. MATLAB [52] software was used to write the mathematical codes for developing and evaluating MLP-GA models.
Results and discussion
Phylogenetic analysis
By analysis of the sequences of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region and RPB2 gene, AJ01 was identified as A. cornea (syn. A. polytricha; Fig 2). The partial sequences of ITS rDNA and RPB2 gene obtained from strain AJ01 were deposited in GenBank (NCBI) under the accession numbers OQ073696 and OQ107064, respectively.
Fig 2. Bayesian tree illustrating the phylogeny of Auricularia species under GTR + G + I model based on the combined sequences of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region and RPB2 gene for Auricularia cornea (AJ01) in this study (bold font in the green area) and related species of this genus (in the yellow area), Elmerina efibulata voucher Yuan4525 was considered as outgroup.
The sequences were aligned using MAFFT software and edited using Gblocks program. Bayesian posterior probabilities higher than 0.50 are given for appropriate clades.
Effects of various media, temperatures, and carbon sources on mycelial growth in petri dish test
The different temperatures, sugars, and substrates significantly (p<0.01) affected MGR, growth period, morphology and growth type. As shown in Table 1 and S2 Fig in S1 File, HS (7.5 mm/day and 5.6 days) and BS (6.3 mm/day and 6.6 days) extract agar media with all three carbon sources “fructose, dextrose and maltose” and the temperature of 28°C displayed the highest MGR and accordingly the shortest period to fully colonize the Petri dish. In contrast, the lowest MGR (2.8 mm/day) was recorded at 25 and 30°C on YEA medium with dextrose as a carbon source. Also, the lowest MGR and consequently the longest period of mycelia completely colonizing Petri dish were observed on PEA, MEA and YEA media containing fructose, dextrose and maltose at 25, 28 and 30°C as well as HS agar extract medium containing fructose and dextrose at 25°C and BS extract agar medium containing fructose, dextrose and maltose at 25°C (Table 1). It was demonstrated that A. polytricha cultured in coconut water gelatin displayed the higher mycelial growth as compared to that in potato sucrose gelatin [22]. A previous study [53] reported that the different media showed significant difference in regard to A. polytricha mycelial growth. Carrot extract agar (CEA; 9.0 cm) was found to be the best media, the next best media were oat meal agar (OMA; 8.9 cm), and malt extract agar (MEA; 8.5 cm) which were significantly superior to PDA (7.7 cm). Also, A. polytricha displayed the highest mycelial growth (8.9 cm) at 30°C, followed by 25°C (8.4 cm) and 20°C (8.2 cm) [53].
Table 1. Mycelial growth rate (MGR; mm day-1) and days for Auricularia cornea fully colonize the Petri dishes on potato extract agar (PEA), malt extract agar (MEA), yeast extract agar (YEA), hornbeam extract agar (HSA), beech extract agar (BSA) with different carbon sources “fructose, dextrose and maltose” at 25, 28 and 30°C.
| Media | Sugar source | MGR | Days to fully colonize the Petri dishes | Linear growth | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25°C | 28°C | 30°C | 25°C | 28°C | 30 oC | |||
| PEA | Fructose | 3.2±0.23de | 3.8±0.33cde | 3.2±0.23de | 13.0±0.88abc | 10.6±0.11bcd | 13.1±0.88abc | + |
| Dextrose | 3.2±0.20de | 3.8±0.23cde | 3.2±0.20de | 13.0±0.81abc | 10.7±0.08bcd | 12.9±0.80abc | ++ | |
| Maltose | 3.2±0.17de | 3.8±0.23cde | 3.2±0.20de | 13.0±0.88abc | 10.8±066abc | 12.9±0.80abc | + | |
| MEA | Fructose | 3.0±0.41de | 3.2±1.30de | 3.0±0.67de | 13.6±0.78ab | 12.8±0.80abc | 13.5±0.35ab | ++ |
| Dextrose | 2.8±0.41e | 3.2±0.90de | 3.0±0.51de | 14.6±0.88a | 13.0±0.80abc | 13.6±0.88b | +++ | |
| Maltose | 3.0±0.23de | 3.2±0.33de | 3.0±0.23de | 13.5±0.88ab | 12.8±0.28abc | 13.7±0.19ab | ++ | |
| YEA | Fructose | 2.8±0.17e | 3.2±0.23de | 3.0±0.20de | 14.6±0.80a | 12.9±0.32abc | 13.5±0.88ab | + |
| Dextrose | 2.8±0.17e | 3.2±0.23de | 2.8±0.17e | 14.6±0.78a | 12.9±0.90abc | 14.6±0.09a | + | |
| Maltose | 3.0±0.41 de | 3.3±1.30de | 3.0±0.67de | 13.4±0.88ab | 13.0±0.22abc | 13.7±0.65ab | + | |
| HSA | Fructose | 4.2±0.33cde | 7.5±0.90a | 5.4±0.51bc | 9.6±0.68cd | 5.6±0.88f | 7.7±0.88def | + |
| Dextrose | 4.2±0.23cde | 7.5±0.33a | 5.4±0.23bc | 9.8±0.08cd | 5.6±0.88f | 7.8±0.66def | + | |
| Maltose | 4.7±0.20bcd | 7.5±0.23a | 5.4±0.20bc | 8.6±0.76de | 5.7±0.88f | 7.9±0.43def | ++ | |
| BSA | Fructose | 4.2±0.20cde | 6.2±0.25ab | 4.7±0.20bcd | 9.6±0.88cd | 6.6±0.88ef | 8.7±0.41de | + |
| Dextrose | 3.9±0.51cde | 6.4±1.30ab | 4.7±0.67bcd | 10.6±0.56bcd | 6.7±0.88ef | 8.7±0.88de | +++ | |
| Maltose | 4.2±0.41cde | 6.2±0.90ab | 4.7±0.51bcd | 10.0±0.44cd | 6.7±0.88ef | 8.8±0.28de | + | |
Linear growth; +: The lowest degree, ++: The mediocre degree, +++: The highest degree. Average values (four replicates) ± standard error are given. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to LSD at 0.01 probability level.
Knowledge about the characteristics of the mushroom mycelium such as MGR, type of mycelium, and growth temperature is essential for wild mushroom cultivation [18–20]. The linear growth and high-density mycelium was recorded on PEA, MEA and BSA with dextrose as a carbon source (Table 1). The hardwood tree sawdust extract agar media displayed the fastest MGR and a short period for colonization of the culture medium (Table 1). The culture media containing YEA are used as a suitable organic source for MGR [54]. In this study, the favorable temperature of 28°C ± 1°C was favorable for all treatments regarding MGR, however, no difference was observed between different temperature for some treatments (Table 1).
Spawn studies
The most important part of mushroom production is spawn quality [55]. According to previous research [56], the ability of mushroom for substrate colonization depends on suitable substrate, and the selection of the supplements such as RB leading to stimulate spawn. The substrate combination of BS (70%) + WB (30%) with moisture content of 75% at 28°C displayed the highest MGR (9.3 mm/day; Table 2). A study [21] reported that adding bran as a supplement to the medium provides a protein element that can enhance MGR (two-folds). Accordingly, grains without supplement resulted in the lowest MGR as observed in 100% millet and millet/sorghum at a 1:1 ratio.
Table 2. Mycelia growth rate (MGR; mm day-1) and spawn run period (SRP) of Auricularia cornea on different substrates obtained from different concentration levels (%) of beech (BS) and hornbeam sawdust (HS), corn flour (CF), wheat (WB) and rice brans (RB) at 25, 28 and 30°C and moisture contents of 65, 75 and 90%.
| Proportion of substrate components (%) | C/N (%) | 25°C and 65% | 28°C and 75% | 30°C and 90% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGR | SRP | MGR | SRP | MGR | SRP | ||
| HS (100) | 111.9 | 2.3±0.63g | 21.8±0.85a | 3.0±0.82defg | 19.0±1.08ab | 3.3±0.63cdefg | 18.3±0.85abc |
| BS (100) | 106.4 | 3.3±0.63cdefg | 18.8±0.85abc | 4.0±0.82cdefg | 17.0±1.08abc | 2.5±0.50fg | 21.5±0.65a |
| HS (70) + RB (30) | 46.9 | 3.3±0.25cdefg | 18.8±0.85abc | 2.5±0.63cdefg | 15.8±0.85cde | 2.8±0.63efg | 19.8±0.85ab |
| BS (70) + RB (30) | 47.2 | 4.3±0.63cdefg | 15.8±0.85cde | 5.0±0.82cd | 13.0±1.08efg | 4.5±0.50cdefg | 15.8±0.85cde |
| HS (70) + WB (30) | 49.1 | 3.3±0.63cdefg | 19.0±1.08ab | 5.0±0.41cd | 12.0±1.08gh | 4.0±0.41cdefg | 16.8±0.85bcd |
| BS (70) + WB(30) | 49.2 | 5.0±0.41cd | 13.0±1.80efg | 9.3±0.63a | 9.0±1.08h | 5.3±0.63c | 12.0±1.08fgh |
| HS(70) + CF(30) | 64.9 | 2.3±0.63g | 21.8±0.85a | 5.3±0.63c | 12.0±1.08fgh | 3.5±0.5cdefg | 18.8±0.85abc |
| BS(70) + CF(30) | 64.1 | 4.3±0.25cdefg | 16.8±0.85bcd | 8.5±0.50b | 11.0±1.08gh | 4.8±0.75cde | 15.0±1.08def |
Average values (five replicates) ± standard error are given. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to LSD at 0.01 probability level.
It is stated that the high rate of colonization could be attributed to the most appropriate proportion of substrate components with high storage of energy and the nutritional components such as nitrogen, carbon, lipids, and minerals [57]. Overall, the most appropriate temperature (28°C), moisture content (75%), and BS extract agar media supplemented with WB resulted in the highest MGR (Table 2). It can be supported by the study of [9] that showed WB increased MGR due to their protein-rich ingredients.
Fruiting body substrate test
The results of an initial assessment revealed that the spawn run period was 19.7 to 41.5 days and additionally, the total period lasted, on average, 43.5 to 60.5 days in bags. For this research, the fruit body of A. cornea was obtained between 30.0 to 51.5 days after the first harvest. The results including SRP, DFPF, DFFH, NFB, yield, BE and TCP for each substrate are shown in Table 3. The different stages of A. cornea fruit body development are presented in S3 Fig in S1 File. In this study, the use of supplements as nutritional additives had a great effect on fruit body production (Table 3), so it can be explained by MGR increment in formulations supplemented with nutritional additives. In this research, BS (70%) + WB (30%) was introduced as the best substrate owing to the shortest SRP (19.7 days), the highest yield of fresh fruit body weight (131.7 g/bag), BE (53.1%), NFB (9/bag) and TCP (43.5 days) (Table 3; Fig 3). According to the previous studies [58, 59], spent grain provides a nitrogen source for mycelial growth in the substrate. However, the previous research [16] reported the shortest SRP (4 days) on the substrate made of Shorea sp. sawdust and the highest yield of fruiting bodies (65.4 g) on substrate obtained from F. moluccana sawdust. Based on the present study, the suitable performance of WB can be attributed to its high protein content which increases the nitrogen level of the substrate. The comparison of growth characteristics of the fungi growing on the different substrate conditions revealed the rate of 21.7 days for SRP of “BS (80%)+WB (20%)” and “BS (70%)+RB (30%)”. However, “BS (70%)+RB (30%)” displayed the higher yield as compared to “BS (80%)+WB (20%)” (Table 3). A previous study [60] reported that the use of different compounds with a lingo-cellulosic source (equal proportions of rice and Leonotis straws) for substrate formulation resulted in biological efficiency increment of P. ostreatus. The results of the present study were also consistent with the findings of another study [17] reporting the addition of wheat bran to the substrate increased the efficiency of the A. auricula mushroom. It was reported that mycelium growth is dependent on the quality of wheat bran’s nutrients [61]. The previous study [62] demonstrated that the substances including proteins, transaminase enzymes, and amino acids in wheat bran enhanced mycelium growth. It was also stated that the woody substrates containing high glucosamine increased fruiting body yield in Pleurotus spp. cultivation. Thus, fruiting body yield could be evaluated by the amount of mycelium grown during the cultivation period. Also, it was indicated that “RB + WB: paddy straw (3:1)” induced the faster mycelial growth of A. polytricha [63]. In the present study, the longest SRP was recorded for non-supplements HS substrate (41.5 days) that was significantly different from non-supplements BS (37.7 days) (Table 3). Between two sawdust without supplements, BS showed the higher yield and lower DFFH than HS while both sawdust (BS and HS) displayed no difference in DFPF, NFB, BE and TCP (Table 3).
Table 3. Effects of different substrate obtained from different concentration levels (%) of beech (BS) and hornbeam sawdust (HS) wheat (WB) and rice brans (RB) on yield, biological efficiency (BE), spawn run period (SRP), days for pinhead formation (DPHF), days for the first harvest (DFFH), number of fruiting body (NFB) and total cultivation period (TCP) of Auricularia cornea.
| Proportion of substrate components | C/N (%) | SRP | DPHF | DFFH | NFB | Yield (g/bag) | BE (%) | TCP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HS(100) | 111.9 | 41.5±0.65a | 46.2±0.85a | 51.5±0.65a | 5.9±0.65cde | 68.7±0.25j | 27.9±0.25g | 60.5±0.90a |
| BS(100) | 106.4 | 37.7±0.48b | 42.5±0.65a | 49.5±0.65b | 5.5±0.55de | 71.7±0.65i | 29.1±0.65g | 60.5±0.93a |
| HS(90)+RB(10) | 77.0 | 31.7±0.48d | 36.7±0.48b | 41.5±0.65d | 6.3±0.65bcde | 87.7±0.85h | 35.5±0.85f | 53.5±0.53b |
| BS(90) + RB(10) | 76.4 | 27.7±0.48f | 33.7±0.48bcd | 39.5±0.65ef | 7.1±0.80abcd | 90.7±0.85g | 36.7±0.85f | 51.5±0.93bc |
| HS (90)+ WB(10) | 111.3 | 25.7±0.17f | 34.0±0.41bcd | 38.5±0.65ef | 7.2±0.45abcd | 88.7±0.85gh | 35.9±0.85f | 50.5±0.46bcd |
| BS(90) + WB(10) | 78.4 | 25.7±0.48g | 32.2±0.48bcde | 37.5±0.65f | 7.5±0.66abcd | 99.7±0.90f | 40.3±0.90e | 49.0±0.90cde |
| HS(80) + RB(20) | 58.2 | 29.7±0.48e | 35.7±0.85bc | 40.5±0.65ed | 7.4±0.65abcd | 111.7±0.85e | 45.1±0.85d | 52.5±0.33bc |
| BS(80) + RB(20) | 58.3 | 23.7±0.48h | 29.2±1.31ed | 38.5±0.65ef | 7.6±0.65abcd | 114.7±0.85d | 46.3±0.85cd | 50.5±0.99bcd |
| HS(80) + WB(20) | 60.5 | 24.7±0.48hg | 31.2±1.31cde | 38.5±0.65ef | 7.8±0.09abc | 114.7±0.05d | 46.3±0.05cd | 50.5±0.75bcd |
| BS(80) + WB(20) | 60.5 | 21.7±0.09i | 28.5±1.55e | 35.5±0.65g | 8.2±0.60ab | 117.7±0.16c | 47.5±0.16bcd | 45.5±0.43fg |
| HS(70) + RB(30) | 46.9 | 27.7±0.21f | 34.0±2.04bcd | 38.5±0.65ef | 8.2±0.65ab | 116.7±0.80cd | 47.1±0.80bcd | 51.5±0.93bc |
| BS(70) + RB(30) | 47.2 | 21.7±0.08i | 29.7±1.80de | 33.5±0.65g | 8.8.6±0.71a | 122.7±0.55b | 49.5±0.55b | 46.5±0.93efg |
| HS(70) + WB(30) | 49.1 | 23.7±0.48h | 31.0±2.29cde | 34.5±0.65g | 8.7±0.65a | 120.7±0.85b | 48.7±0.85bc | 47.5±0.88def |
| BS (70)+ WB(30) | 49.2 | 19.7±0.28j | 27.5±2.53e | 30.5±0.65h | 9.0±0.65a | 131.7±0.85a | 53.1±0.85a | 43.5±0.93g |
| WB(100) | 18.0 | 37.7±0.38b | 47.2±2.29a | 50.5±0.65ab | 4.5±0.10e | 56.7±0.15l | 23.1±0.15h | 60.5±0.93a |
| RB(100) | 17.7 | 34.7±0.48c | 43.7±2.78a | 47.5±0.65c | 4.8±0.62e | 61.7±0.66k | 25.1±0.66h | 59.5±0.33a |
Average values (12 replicates) ± standard error are given. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to LSD at 0.01 probability level.
Fig 3. Auricularia cornea cultivation in “70% beech sawdust + 30% wheat bran” and “100% wheat bran” with moisture content of 70%, and pH = 6.5.
C/N analysis
As shown in Table 3, the different substrates significantly affected all the measured parameters. The sawdust substrates alone (HS and BS) with high C/N (111.9 and 106.4, respectively for HS and BS), and bran substrates alone (RB and WB) with low C/N (17.7 and 18, respectively for RN and WB) displayed the low yield and long SRP. The best condition for the maximum yield and minimum SPR of A. cornea was in the substrates that were firstly: made of two components, bran and sawdust and secondly, they had a C/N of about 49%. The best substrate displaying the highest yield and shortest period of the spawn run was BS (70) + WB (30) with 131.7 g/bag and 19.7 21.7 days of yield and SRP, respectively. The sawdust substrates (HS and BS) and bran substrates (RB and WB) alone had the longest TCP but the sawdust substrates showed a higher BE and yield as compared to bran substrates (Table 3). Although C/N is one of the most important parameters in the cultivation of mushrooms but the mushroom yield depended on the factors, other than C/N ratio, including the type and chemical and physical structure of compounds, vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients of substrate [64, 65].
Regression analysis
The fit of stepwise regression models (exhibited by R2) for predicting yield (0.151), BE (0.478), SRP (0.114), DPHF (0.270), DFFH (0.511), and TCP (0.578) of A. cornea (Table 4) for testing subset showed that these developed SR models can describe 15.1, 47.8, 11.4, 27.0, 51.1 and 57.8% variability in yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea, respectively, when they face data not used in training (Table 4).
Table 4. Statistics on stepwise regression (SR) and multilayer perceptron-genetic algorithm (MLP-GA) models for yield, biological efficiency (BE), spawn run period (SRP), days for pinhead formation (DPHF), days for the first harvest (DFFH), and total cultivation period (TCP) in Auricularia cornea cultivation on different substrates obtained from different ratios of beech and hornbeam sawdust, and wheat and rice brans.
| Models | Training subsets | Testing subsets | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | RMSE | R2 | RMSE | ||
| SRP | SR | 0.13 | 6.013 | 0.114 | 6.263 |
| MLP-GA | 0.9844 | 0.7881 | 0.9691 | 1.206 | |
| DPHF | SR | 0.21 | 6.427 | 0.27 | 5.568 |
| MLP-GA | 0.81 | 3.026 | 0.82 | 2.594 | |
| DFFH | SR | 0.064 | 5.376 | 0.5114 | 5.705 |
| MLP-GA | 0.9654 | 1.01 | 0.9571 | 1.6628 | |
|
Yield
|
SR | 0.078 | 22.702 | 0.151 | 22.308 |
| MLP-GA | 0.9967 | 1.3319 | 0.9935 | 2.1095 | |
| BE (%) | SR | 0.105 | 9.146 | 0.478 | 6.896 |
| MLP-GA | 0.9775 | 1.4179 | 0.9514 | 2.008 | |
| TCP | SR | 0.091 | 4.806 | 0.578 | 6.207 |
| MLP-GA | 0.87 | 1.9143 | 0.86 | 2.5608 | |
R2; Coefficient of determination, RMSE; Root mean square error.
Multilayer perceptron-genetics algorithm analysis
Initially, BS, HS, WB, and RB concentration levels were applied as inputs and yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea as outputs. Subsequently, the outputs were forecasted based on developed MLP-GA models. Plotting the forecasted values against the observed values for the training (Fig 4) subset was performed to assess the performance of established MLP-GA models. The high agreement between the forecasted and observed values of yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea was detected for both training and testing subsets (Table 4). The goodness of fit of established MLP-GA models displayed that they could closely (R2 = 0.99, 0.95, 0.97, 0.82, 0.96 and 86) (Table 4) forecast yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP, respectively, of A. cornea in testing subset, not applied during MLP-GA training processes. Also, established MLP-GA models indicated the balanced statistical values for both training and testing subsets (Table 4). Forecasting the effects of the concentration levels of culture substrate components on yield, NFB, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea pave the way for production enhancement and also production cost decrement of this valuable culinary-medicinal mushroom. It is essential to use an accurate modeling system for validly forecasting yield, NFB, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea based on the concentration levels of culture substrate components (BS, HS, WB, and RB). This is the first report on developing the mathematical models for forecasting yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea based on the concentration levels of culture substrate components.
Fig 4. Prediction of yield, biological efficiency (BE), spawn run period (SRP), days for pinhead formation (DPHF), days for the first harvest (DFFH), and total cultivation period (TCP) in Auricularia cornea cultivation on different substrates obtained from different ratios of beech and hornbeam sawdust supplemented with wheat and rice brans, based on multilayer perceptron-genetic algorithm (MLP-GA) and stepwise regression (SR) models in training subset.

In this research, SR and MLP-GA modeling systems were used to study the relationship between the concentration levels of four culture substrate components “BS, HS, WB, and RB” and the parameters “yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea”, and thus the possibility of forecasting yield, biological efficiency, spawn run, pinhead formation, first harvest and total cultivation period of A. cornea using BS, HS, WB, and RB concentration levels. Predictive modeling has not yet been reported for forecasting yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea.
The results showed that established MLP-GA models could closely forecast yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea (R2 = 0.994, 0.951, 0.969, 0.820, and 0.860, respectively) when meeting unseen data (data of testing subset) (Table 4). Additionally, low hidden neuron numbers (Table 5) as well as the proximity of the error values of testing and training subsets together (Table 4) indicated that overlearning had not occurred in the training process, and established MLP-GA models showed the high generalizability for unseen data [29, 32, 33, 66]. Statistical metrics (RMSE and R2) of the training and testing subsets (Table 4) displayed that tansig activation function in the hidden layer was a rational choice for modeling. Small values of RMSE (Table 4) indicated the great performance of established MLP-GA models for forecasting output variables.
Table 5. Importance (according to the sensitivity analysis) of the different input variables including different concentration levels of beech (BS) and hornbeam sawdust (HS), and wheat (WB) and rice brans (RB) for achieving maximum yield and biological efficiency (BE), and also minimum spawn run period (SRP), days for pinhead formation (DPHF), days for the first harvest (DFFH), and total cultivation period (TCP) of Auricularia cornea using multilayer perceptron-genetics algorithm models (MLP-GA), and also hidden neuron numbers in each developed model.
| Criteria | Variable | Importance value (according to VSRa) | Neuron number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | BS concentration level | 0.059 | 5 |
| HS concentration level | 0.000 | ||
| WB concentration level | 1.000 | ||
| RB concentration level | 0.497 | ||
| BE (%) | BS concentration level | 0.000 | 4 |
| HS concentration level | 0.200 | ||
| WB concentration level | 1.000 | ||
| RB concentration level | 0.092 | ||
| SRP | BS concentration level | 1.000 | 5 |
| HS concentration level | 0.716 | ||
| WB concentration level | 0.000 | ||
| RB concentration level | 0.031 | ||
| DPHF | BS concentration level | 1.000 | 2 |
| HS concentration level | 0.945 | ||
| WB concentration level | 0.002 | ||
| RB concentration level | 0.000 | ||
| DFFH | BS concentration level | 1.000 | 4 |
| HS concentration level | 0.997 | ||
| WB concentration level | 0.000 | ||
| RB concentration level | 0.139 | ||
| TCP | BS concentration level | 0.800 | 2 |
| HS concentration level | 1.000 | ||
| WB concentration level | 0.000 | ||
| RB concentration level | 0.070 |
a Relative indication of the ratio between the variable sensitivity error and the error of the model when all variables are available. Calculated VSR values were rescaled within range [0, 1].
The yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea are the complex biological process requiring highly accurate methods for modeling. MLP-GA hybrid model has been successfully applied for modeling the extremely complicated process in different fungal and plant research [32, 35, 67, 68]. A considerable and growing interest in ANN application can be explained by its impressive achievements in problem-solving in a wide variety of research areas, pliable modeling structure, its ability for modeling highly nonlinear and complicated relationships for extra data that make it outperform traditional statistical method, most incredibly regarding the predictive ability [69]. The high predictive accuracy of the training and testing subsets (Table 4) suggested that established MLP-GA could validly forecast yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea.
Sensitivity analysis of the models
To classify the inputs in terms of their relative importance on model outputs, VSRs were computed by all data (training and testing subsets). VSRs were estimated for each of the outputs (yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea) regarding BS, HS, WB, and RB concentration levels (Table 5). Analysis of the yield model displayed that A. cornea yield was more sensitive to WB concentration level (VSR = 1.000) in culture substrate, followed by RB (VSR = 0.497), BS (VSR = 0.059), and HS (VSR = 0.000) (Table 5). BE displayed more sensitivity to WB (VSR = 1.000), followed by HS (VSR = 0.200), RB (VSR = 0.092), and BS (VSR = 0.000) concentration levels (Table 5). SRP showed more sensitivity to BS (VSR = 1.000), followed by HS (VSR = 0.716), RB (VSR = 0.031), and WB (VSR = 0) concentration levels (Table 5). Accordingly, DPHF exhibited more sensitivity to BS (VSR = 1.000), followed by HS (VSR = 0.945), WB (VSR = 0.002), and RB (VSR = 0.000) concentration levels (Table 5). Also, DFFH displayed more sensitivity to BS (VSR = 1.000), followed by HS (VSR = 0.998), RB (VSR = 0.139), and WB (VSR = 0.000) concentration levels (Table 5). Also, TCP indicated more sensitivity to HS (VSR = 1.000), followed by BS (VSR = 0.800), RB (VSR = 0.070), and WB (VSR = 0.000) concentration levels (Table 5). Notwithstanding the studies on substrate combinations on yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP of A. cornea, the question had remained open: which substrate displays the most effect on the outputs? As previously stated, sensitivity analysis showed that WB, WB, BS, BS, BS, and HS concentration levels are the most important inputs determining yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP, respectively, of A. cornea (Table 5).
Comparison of predictive ability of MLP-GA and stepwise regression models
The statistical values for established MLP-GA models showed so much higher predictive ability than stepwise regression model as computed R2 for MLP-GA models vs. stepwise models was: yield = 0.997 vs. 0.078, BE = 0.978 vs. 0.105, SRP = 0.984 vs. 0.130, DPHF = 0.81 vs. 0.21, DFFH = 0.965 vs. 0.064, and TCP = 0.870 vs. 0.091(Table 4 and Fig 4). This higher predictive ability of MLP-GA model than regression models (Table 4 and Fig 4) was likewise described in other research [29, 30, 32, 33].
Conclusion
MGR, SRP, DFPF, DFFH, NFB, yield, BE, and TCP were studied in this research. Generally, the supplements including WB, RB, and CF added to the BS and HS substrate were useful in terms of the MGR and basidiocarp increment of wood ear mushroom. Overall, WB displayed a high potential for producing native A. cornea mushrooms. Remarkably, WB is rich in nutrients that can be applied for A. cornea cultivation. This study used MLP-GA for modeling yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP, respectively, of A. cornea for the first time. The high accordance between the forecasted and observed values of the output variables (yield, BE, SRP, DPHF, DFFH, and TCP, respectively, of A. cornea) corroborated the good performance of established MLP-GA models. This work recommended MLP-GA as a strong mathematical tool for forecasting the complex and highly non-linear systems like medicinal mushroom production, A. cornea production regarding the concentration levels of cultivation substrate components as a case study, therefore, allowing us to present MLP-GA as a powerful modeling method for forecasting in different areas of plant and fungal systems.
Supporting information
(DOCX)
Abbreviations
- MGR
Mycelial growth rate
- BS
Beech sawdust
- HS
Hornbeam sawdust
- WB
Wheat bran
- RB
Rice bran
- BE
Biological efficiency
- SRP
Spawn run period
- DPHF
Days for pinhead formation
- DFFH
Days for the first harvest
- TCP
Total cultivation period
- SR
Stepwise regression
- AI
Artificial intelligence
- ANNs
Artificial neural networks
- MLP-GA
Multilayer perceptron-genetic algorithm
- MEA
Malt extract agar
- PDA
Potato dextrose agar
- YEA
Yeast extract agar
- PEA
Potato extract agar
- MEA
Malt extract agar
- CRD
Completely randomized design
- CF
Corn flour
- RCBD
Randomized complete block design
- NFB
Number of fruiting body
- C/N
Carbon to nitrogen
- PCA
Principal component analysis
- VSR
Variable sensitivity ratio
- R2
Coefficient of determination
- RMSE
Root mean square error
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Abraham L, Hoffman B, Gao Y, Breuil C. Action of Ophiostoma piceae proteinase and lipase on wood nutrients. Can. J. Microbiol. 1998; 44(7): 698–701. doi: 10.1139/w98-046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Stalpers JA. Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 2001. doi: 10.1079/9780851998268.0000 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Well K. The Jelly fungi, then and now. Mycologia. 1984; 86:18–48. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1994.12026372 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zoberi HM. Tropical Macrofungi: some common species. Macmillan, London, UK. 1972. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Singh M, Kamal S, Sharma VP. Status and trends in world mushroom production-III: World Production of Different Mushroom Species in 21st Century. Mushroom Res. 2020; 29(2): 75–111. doi: 10.36036/MR.29.2.2020.113703 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Singh M, Kamal S, Sharma VP. Species and Region-wise Mushroom Production in Leading Mushroom Producing Countries-China, Japan, USA, Canada and India. Mushroom Res. 2022; 30 (2): 99–108. doi: 10.36036/MR.30.2.2021.119394 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chang ST, Miles PG. Edible Mushrooms and Their Cultivation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl, USA. 1989. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Park WH, Lee HD. Wild fungi of korea. Kyo-Hak Publishing Co. 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Onyango B, Arama P, Palapala V, Wagai S, Gichimu BM. Suitability of selected supplemented substrates for cultivation of Kenyan native wood ear mushrooms (Auricularia auricula). Am. J. Food Technol. 2010; 10: 1–9. doi: 10.3923/ajft.2011.395.403 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mohanan CMacrofungi of Kerala. PhD thesis, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala. 2011.
- 11.Wu F, Yuan Y, Malysheva VF, Du P. Species clarification of the most important and cultivated Auricularia mushroom “Heimuer”: evidence from morphological and molecular data. Phytotaxa 2014; 186: 241–253. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.186.5.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ukai S, Hara C, Kuruma I, Tanaka Y. Polysaccharides in fungi. XIV. Anti-inflammatory effect of the polysaccharides from the fruit bodies of several fungi. J. Pharmacobiodyn. 1983; 6(12): 983–990. doi: 10.1248/bpb1978.6.983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ma Y, Wang C, Zhang Q, Peng X. The effects of polysaccharides from Auricularia auricula (Huaier) in adjuvant anti-gastrointestinal cancer therapy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Pharmacol. Res. 2018; 132: 80–89. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.04.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li X., Yan L., Li Q., Tan H., Zhou J., Miao R., et al. (2019). Transcriptional profiling of Auricularia cornea in selenium accumulation. Scientific reports, 9(1), 1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kim KJ, Kim DM, An HS, Choi JK, Kwon OD. Cultural characteristics of Auricularia polytricha Geon in a high temperature growth room. J. Mushroom 2019; 17(1): 7–11. doi: 10.14480/JM.2019.17.1.7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Irawati D, Hayashi C, Takashima Y, Wedatama S, Ishiguri F, Iizuka K, et al. Cultivation of the edible mushroom Auricularia polytricha using sawdust based substrate made of three Indonesian commercial plantation species, Falcataria moluccana, Shorea sp., and Tectona grandis. Micol. Apl. Int. 2012; 24(2): 33–41. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Adenipekun CO, Lawal R, Isikhuemhen OS. Effect of growth supporting additives on the performance of Auricularia auricula on Mansonia altissima A. chev sawdust. Int. Food Res. J. 2015; 22(5): 2167. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Philippoussis A, Zervakis G, Diamantopoulou P, Bioconversion of agricultural lignocellulosic wastes through the cultivation of the edible mushrooms Agrocybe aegerita, Volvariella volvacea and Pleurotus spp. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001; 17(2): 191–200. doi: 10.1023/A:1016685530312 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Oei P. Small scale mushroom cultivation. Agrodok 2005; 40: 65–66. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stamets P. Growing gourmet and medicinal mushrooms. Ten speed press. Berkeley Toronto. 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Royse DJ. Specialty Mushrooms and their Cultivation. Hortic. Rev. 1997; 19: 59–97. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zurbano LY. Mycelial growth and fructification of earwood mushroom (Auricularia polytricha) on different substrates. KnE soc. sci. 2018: 799–814. doi: 10.18502/kss.v3i6.2421 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liang CH, Wu CY, Lu PL, Kuo YC, Liang ZC. Biological efficiency and nutritional value of the culinary-medicinal mushroom Auricularia cultivated on a sawdust basal substrate supplement with different proportions of grass plants. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016; 26: 263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.10.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Razak DLA, Abdullah N, Johari NMK, Sabaratnam V. Comparative study of mycelia growth and sporophore yield of Auricularia polytricha (Mont.) Sacc on selected palm oil wastes as fruiting substrate. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013; 97(7): 3207–3213. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4135-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ashrafi Najafian M, Shaabani Asrami H, Vosoughi Rudgar Z, Ghorbanian Far M, Heidari A, Rastbod E, et al. Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of beech and walnut wood from Iran and Georgian Beech. Forests. 2021; 12(6): 801. doi: 10.3390/f12060801 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kiaei M, Mosavi Paloj R. Surface roughness in relation to altitude of hornbeam wood. Madera bosques. 2018; 24(1). doi: 10.21829/myb.2018.241964 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gordić D, Babić M, Jelić D, Konćalović D, Vukašinović V. Integrating energy and environmental management in wood furniture industry. Sci. World J., 2014; 2014: 596958. doi: 10.1155/2014/596958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wold H. Multivariate Analysis. Wiley; Academic Press, New York: 1966. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Farhadi S, Salehi M, Moieni A, Safaie N, Sabet MS. Modeling of paclitaxel biosynthesis elicitation in Corylus avellana cell culture using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system-genetic algorithm (ANFIS-GA) and multiple regression methods. PloS one. 2020; 15(8): e0237478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Salehi M, Moieni A, Safaie N, Farhadi, S. Whole fungal elicitors boost paclitaxel biosynthesis induction in Corylus avellana cell culture. Plos one 2020; 15(7): e0236191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Efroymson M. Multiple regression analysis. In: Ralston A., Wilf H.S (Eds.), Mathematical methods for digital computers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 1960; 191–203. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Salehi M, Farhadi S, Moieni A, Safaie N, Ahmadi H. Mathematical modeling of growth and paclitaxel biosynthesis in Corylus avellana cell culture responding to fungal elicitors using multilayer perceptron-genetic algorithm. Front. Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 1148. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Salehi M, Farhadi S, Moieni A, Safaie N, Hesami M. A hybrid model based on general regression neural network and fruit fly optimization algorithm for forecasting and optimizing paclitaxel biosynthesis in Corylus avellana cell culture. Plant Methods. 2021; 17(1): 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13007-021-00714-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ahmadi H, Golian A. Response surface and neural network models for performance of broiler chicks fed diets varying in digestible protein and critical amino acids from 11 to 17 days of age. Poult. Sci. 2011; 90 (9): 2085–2096. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jamshidi S, Yadollahi A, Ahmadi H, Arab M, Eftekhari M. Predicting in vitro culture medium macro-nutrients composition for pear rootstocks using regression analysis and neural network models. Front. Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 274. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Weber RWS, Webster J. Teaching techniques for mycology: patterns of basidiospore and fruiting body germination in Auricularia (Heterobasidomycetes). Mycologist. 2006; 20:105–108. doi: 10.1016/j.mycol.2006.07.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Salehi M, Moieni A, Safaie N, Farhadi S. Elicitors derived from endophytic fungi Chaetomium globosum and Paraconiothyrium brasiliense enhance paclitaxel production in Corylus avellana cell suspension culture. Plant cell, tissue and organ culture. (PCTOC), 2019; 136(1):161–171. doi: 10.1007/s11240-018-1503-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Salehi M, Moieni A, Safaie N. Elicitors derived from hazel (Corylus avellana L.) cell suspension culture enhance growth and paclitaxel production of Epicoccum nigrum. Sci. Rep. 2018; 8, 12053. | doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29762-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications (eds. Innis MA. et al.). Ch. 38, 315–322, Academic Press, New York, 315–322. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liu Y. J., Whelen S. & Hall B. D. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA Polymerase II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16, 1799–1808, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013; 30: 772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nylander JAA. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre. Uppsala University. 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19: 1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Huson DH, Scornavacca C. Dendroscope 3: An interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst. Biol. 2012; 61: 1061–1067. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ezeibekwe IO, Ogbonnaya CI, Unamba CI, Osuala OM. Proximate analysis and mineral composition of edible mushrooms in parts of South Eastern Nigeria. Rep. Opin. 2009; 1(4): 32–36. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Box GE, Cox DR. An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 1964; 26(2): 211–243. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shao Q, Rowe RC, York P. Comparison of neurofuzzy logic and neural networks in modelling experimental data of an immediate release tablet formulation. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006; 28 (5): 394–404. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2006.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yao X. Evolving artificial neural networks. Proc. IEEE. 1999; 87 (9): 1423–1447. doi: 10.1109/5.784219 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Matignon R. Neural network modeling using SAS enterprise miner (Bloomington: AuthorHouse; ). 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Haupt RL, Haupt SE. Practical Genetic Algorithms. In: Ahn C. W. (Ed.) Advances in Evolutionary Algorithms. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2004. doi: 10.1007/3-540-31759-7_2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Abramson M. Genetic algorithm and direct search toolbox user’s guide. Natick: MathWorks Inc. 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Matlab V: 7.10. 0. The MathWorks Inc, Natick, Massachusetts. 2010.
- 53.Priya RU, Geetha D. Cultural and physiological studies on black ear mushrooms, Auricularia polytricha (Mont.) Sacc. and Auricularia auricula (L.) Underw. Mushroom Res. 2016; 25(2): 125–131. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Neelam S, Chennupati S, Singh S. Comparative studies on growth parameters and physio-chemical analysis of Pleurotus Ostreatus and Pleurotus Florida. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2013; 3(1): 163–169. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Goltapeh Mohammadi E. Principles of Mushroom Cultivation. Tarbiat Modarres University Press, Tehran, Iran. 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bahl N Handbook on Mushrooms, 2nd ed. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Ltd., New Delhi, Bombay. 1988. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Narain R, Sahu RK, Kumar S, Garg SK, Singh CS, Kanaujia R.S. Influence of different nitrogen rich supplements during cultivation of Pleurotus florida on corn cobs substrate. Environmentalist. 2008; 13: 67–71. doi: 10.1007/s10669-008-9174-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Townsley PM. Preparation of commercial products from brewer’s waste grain and trub [Protein flours]. Technical Quarterly Master Brewers Association of America. 1979; 16: 130–134. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang D, Sakoda A, Susuki M. Biological efficiency and nutritional value of Pleurotus ostreatus cultivated on spent beer grain. Bioresource Technol. 2001; 78: 293–300. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00002-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Das N, Mukherjee M. Cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus on weed plants. Bioresour. Technol. 2007; 98: 2723–2726. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Uhart M, Piscera JM, Albertó E. Utilization of new naturally occurring strains and supplementation to improve the biological efficiency of the edible mushroom Agrocybe cylindracea. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008; 35(6): 595–602. doi: 10.1007/s10295-008-0321-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shashirekha MN, Rajarathnam S, Bano Z. Effects of supplementing rice straw growth substrate with cotton seeds on the analytical characteristics of the mushroom, Pleurotus florida (Block & Tsao). Food Chem. 2005; 92(2): 255–259. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.07.034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Devi PA, Veeralakshmi S, Prakasam V, Vinothini M. Sawdust and wheat bran substrates for the cultivation of new wood ear mushroom (Auricularia polytricha (Mont.)) Sacc. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2013; 13(12): 1647–1649. doi: 10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2013.13.12.12288 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Tripathy A, Patel AK, Shahoo T.K. Effect of various substrate on linear mycelial growth and fructification of Volvariella diplasia. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2009; 34: 1–4. doi: 10.3923/ajps.2009.566.569 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chang ST, Hayes WA. The Biology and Cultivation of Edible Mushrooms, Academic Press, London, UK. 1978. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lou W, Nakai S. Artificial neural network-based predictive model for bacterial growth in a simulated medium of modified-atmosphere-packed cooked meat products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001; 49 (4): 1799–1804. doi: 10.1021/jf000650m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hesami M, Alizadeh M, Naderi R, Tohidfar M. Forecasting and optimizing Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation via ensemble model-fruit fly optimization algorithm: a data mining approach using chrysanthemum databases. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15(9): e0239901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hesami M, Jones A M.P. Application of artificial intelligence models and optimization algorithms in plant cell and tissue culture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020; 104: 9449–85. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10888-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mahanta J. Introduction to Neural Networks, Advantages and Applications. Towards Data Sci. KDnuggets News. 2017; 17:n28, 96851bd1a207. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(DOCX)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.



