Skip to main content
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Brazilian Journal of Microbiology
. 2023 Feb 3;54(1):415–425. doi: 10.1007/s42770-023-00911-9

Detection of virulence, antimicrobial resistance, and heavy metal resistance properties in Vibrio anguillarum isolated from mullet (Mugil cephalus) cultured in Korea

P M Kumarage 1, Sana Majeed 1, L A D S De Silva 1, Gang-Joon Heo 1,
PMCID: PMC9944176  PMID: 36735199

Abstract

In the present study, we identified and characterized 22 strains of V. anguillarum from 145 samples of mullets (Mugill cephallus) cultured in several fish farms in South Korea. They were subjected to pathogenicity tests, antimicrobial susceptibility test, and broth dilution test to detect virulence markers, antimicrobial resistance, and heavy metal resistance properties. All the isolates showed amylase and caseinase activity, followed by gelatinase (90.9%), DNase (45.5%), and hemolysis activities (α = 81.1% and β = 18.2%). The PCR assay revealed that isolates were positive for VAC, ctxAB, AtoxR, tdh, tlh, trh, Vfh, hupO, VPI, and FtoxR virulence genes at different percentages. All the isolates showed multi-drug resistance properties (MAR index ≥ 0.2), while 100% of the isolates were resistant to oxacillin, ticarcillin, streptomycin, and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrobial resistance genes, qnrS (95.5%), qnrB (86.4%), and StrAB (27.3%), were reported. In addition, 40.9% of the isolates were cadmium-tolerant, with the presence of CzcA (86.4%) heavy metal resistance gene. The results revealed potential pathogenicity associated with V. anguillarum in aquaculture and potential health risk associated with consumer health.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42770-023-00911-9.

Keywords: Vibrio anguillarum, Mullet, Virulence, Antimicrobial resistance, Heavy metal resistance

Introduction  

Fisheries and aquaculture products are significant sources of affordable, nutrient-rich food and a foundation for worldwide livelihoods. Production of fisheries and aquaculture totaled 3.6 million tons of finfish, mollusks, and crustaceans in South Korea in 2018 [1]. Mugilidae fish such as red lip mullet (Chelon haematocheilus) and grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) are consumed in South Korea [2]. Production of mullets accounted for 7% of the total finfish mariculture production in South Korea in 2013 and the global production of mullets has estimated at 291,200 tonnes in 2020 [3, 4].

Vibrio anguillarum is a Gram-negative, motile, halophilic pathogenic bacteria in warm and cold water estuarine and seawater environments [5]. It is the most common causative agent of vibriosis in fish, shellfish, mollusks, and crustaceans [6]. Vibriosis is hemorrhagic septicemia, including various symptoms such as enlarged abdominal, internal and external lesions, loss of appetite, and erythema [7]. Significantly, the larval stage of fish is most exposed to disease caused by V. anguillarum, since the immune system of the fish larvae is not fully developed against bacterial infections [8]. Human infections caused by V. anguillarum are not common but can be fatal in immunocompromised patients [9].

In 2013, South Korea announced the country’s first V. anguillarum outbreak in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [10]. There have been outbreaks of V. anguillarum vibriosis in fish and shellfish species in several countries, including the USA, Japan, Canada, Norway, Spain, Taiwan, Denmark, and Scotland [11]. In previous studies, Vibrio infections were reported in mullets, and most cases were caused by the V. anguillarum and V. parahaemolyticus [12, 13]. The pathogenicity of bacteria is defined by the ability to produce virulence factors expressed by virulence genes [14]. Even though several typical virulence factors have been described in V. anguillarum, they are not well characterized. They are motility, extracellular secretions associated with hemolysis and hydrolysis of proteins, lipopolysaccharides, chemotaxis, and multiple iron uptake systems responsible for causing diseases in the host [15].

Antimicrobial resistance of Vibrio spp. is another crucial factor that can enhance their pathogenicity. In accord with Pedersen et al. and Parin et al. [16, 17], V. anguillarum showed antimicrobial resistance towards various antimicrobials such as cloxacillin, ampicillin, sulfamethoxazol-trimethoprime, erythromycin, cephalothin, lincomycin, spiramycin, and colistin. In addition, industrial pollutants like heavy metals have become a considerable threat to aquaculture because heavy metals can be absorbed by marine bacteria and accumulate in the food chain [18]. Copper (Cu), cobalt (Co), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), and chromium (Cr) have been detected as common metal pollutants in aquaculture [19]. Acquisition of heavy metal resistance genes in pathogenic Vibrio spp. linked with antimicrobial resistance properties and vice versa through the co-selection pathways [20].

The current study aims to evaluate the identification and occurrence of virulence markers, antimicrobial resistance, and heavy metal resistance properties of V. anguillarum isolated from mullets cultured in South Korea. We have reported phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of V. anguillarum to be aware of the potential pathogenicity associated with V. anguillarum in aquaculture and the potential health risk associated with consumers.

Materials and methods

Collection of fish samples and necropsy analysis

One hundred forty-five (145) M. cephalus fish samples with clinical symptoms of exophthalmia, hemorrhages on the mouth, operculum, and skin were collected from several fish farms in South Korea in 2020 under a routine pathological examination. Fish samples were packed separately in polythene bags and brought to the lab in a chilled condition. Necropsy analysis was done for all the fish samples.

Isolation and biochemical identification of Vibrio spp.

Bacteria were isolated from the spleen and kidney tissues of each fish by directly streaking on blood agar (MB Cell, Seoul, South Korea) supplemented with 5% (v/v) sheep blood and tryptic soy agar (TSA) (MB Cell, Seoul, South Korea) supplemented with 1.5% (w/v) NaCl and the media were incubated at 25 °C for 48 h. The most significant bacterial colonies were selected and re-inoculated to culture media for obtaining pure culture and processing for further identification. Bacterial identification was made based on standard tests using the Gram staining property, colony morphology, catalase and oxidase reaction, hemolysis, and pigment production [21]. Primary colonies were Gram-negative and curved rod shape on microscopy observation, hemolytic, white pigmented on blood agar and catalase oxidase positive. These colonies were cultured in the thiosulfate citrate bile salt sucrose (TCBS) agar (MB Cell, Seoul, South Korea) plates and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Yellowish or greenish colonies from TCBS media were stabbed and streaked onto triple sugar iron agar (TSI: MB Cell, Seoul, South Korea) tubes. The positive isolates with alkaline or acidic slant with the acidic butt (TSI test) were checked with an oxidase test kit (MB cell, Seoul, South Korea). Oxidase-positive isolates were subjected to a vibriostatic disc diffusion test using DD15 0129 (150 µg) discs (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK) and isolates that are sensitive to the vibriostatic test were biochemically identified as Vibrio spp.

Molecular identification of V. anguillarum

Biochemically identified Vibrio spp. were subjected to PCR assays to identify V. anguillarum isolates. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from presumptively identified Vibrio spp. isolates using the AccuPrep® gDNA extraction kit (Bioneer, South Korea). An initial PCR assay was conducted to identify samples at the Vibrio genus level by recognizing the partial recombinase A (recA) gene [22]. After that, species-level identification was done by PCR amplification of V. anguillarum-specific primer pair (forward primer van-ami8 5′-ACATCATCCATTTGTTAC-3′ and reverse primer van-ami417 5′-CCTTATCACTATCCAAATTG-3′) [23]. A total of 50 µL reaction mixture were used for the PCR assay. It consists of 250 µM of each deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 10 pmol of each primer, 5 µL of 10X Taq buffer with MgCl2, 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (GeneAll, Seoul, South Korea), and distilled water up to 50 µL. The PCR thermocycling with van-ami8 and van-ami417 primer pair involved one initial cycle of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 25 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, and finally, one cycle of 72 °C for 7 min (MultiGene Optimax, USA). The PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1.5% (W/V) agarose gel electrophoresis in 1X TAE buffer with RedSafe™ (Intron Biotechnology) and visualized under UV light. A 100-bp DNA ladder (Cosmo Genetech, South Korea) was used as the molecular weight marker.

Phenotypic pathogenicity test

Previously identified 22 isolates of V. anguillarum were subjected to eight phenotypic pathogenicity tests to determine their virulence factors. All isolates were maintained in the TSA (MB Cell, Seoul, South Korea) with 2% (wt/vol) NaCl for the following pathogenicity tests. TSA supplemented with 0.5% (wt/vol) skim milk was used to detect caseinase production [24]. The clear halos around the bacterial colonies were identified as positive results for caseinase production. The gelatin medium consists of gelatin (120 g/L), peptone (5 g/L), beef extract (3 g/L), and 5% peptone was used to detect gelatinase activity [25]. The inability to solidify the gelatin medium after incubation with the bacteria revealed positive results for gelatinase activity. Amylase activity was examined by adding Gram’s iodine onto the colonies grown in TSA supplemented with 0.2% (wt/vol) soluble starch. After overnight incubation at 37 °C, clear halos around the colonies were identified as positive results [26]. Isolates were streaked on DNase (MB Cell, Seoul, South Korea) test agar to detect DNase activity. 1 N HCl was added to the well-grown colonies and the positive result for the DNase activity was identified by the formation of clear opaque halos around the colonies. TSA supplemented with 1% (vol/vol) Tween 80 and TSA with 5% (vol/vol) egg yolk emulsion (MB Cell, Seoul, South Korea) were used to detect lipase and phospholipase activity [25]. The opaque halo effect around the colonies was considered positive results for phospholipase and lipase activities. Congo red uptake of the TSA media supplemented with 0.08% (wt/vol) Congo red and 5% (wt/vol) sucrose was used to detect slime production [27]. Color changes of the medium and black color colonies were identified as positive results for slime production. Hemolysin activity was determined by streaking the strains on a TSA medium (MB Cell, Seoul, South Korea) supplemented with 5% (v/v) sheep blood. Positive results for α-hemolysis and β-hemolysis were identified as greenish discoloration and a clear zone around the colonies, respectively.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

The disc diffusion test was performed to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of V. anguillarum. A total of 22 antimicrobial agents under the following antimicrobial groups were tested. Penicillins: ampicillin (10 μg), amoxicillin (15 mg), oxacillin (30 μg), and ticarcillin (75 μg); tetracyclines: tetracycline (30 μg) and oxytetracycline (30 μg); phenicols: chloramphenicol (30 μg); aminoglycosides: gentamycin (10 μg), streptomycin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), and kanamycin (30 μg); macrolides: erythromycin (15 μg); quinolones: nalidixic acid (30 μg) and ciprofloxacin (50 μg); carbapenems: imipenem (10 μg) and meropenem (10 μg); ansamycins: rifampicin (5 μg); folate pathway inhibitors: sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (25 μg); cephalosporins: cephalothin (30 μg), cefoxtine (30 μg), and ceftriaxone (30 μg); phosphonic acid: fosfomycin (50 μg) (Oxoid LTD, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England). Antimicrobial resistance was determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines and Escherichia coli ATCC 25,922 was used as a quality control agent in the test [28]. The multiple antimicrobial resistance (MAR) index was calculated by dividing the number of antimicrobials to which the isolates were resistant (a) by the total number of antimicrobials tested (b) MAR = a/b [29].

Heavy metal tolerance assay

As previously mentioned by He et al. [30], the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the tested heavy metals against the isolates were determined using the broth dilution testing method (microdilution). Five metal chlorides, including CuCl2, PbCl2, CrCl3, CdCl2, and HgCl2 (Samchun, Seoul, South Korea), were used to examine the Cu2+, Pb2+, Cr3+, Cd2+, and Hg2+ resistance properties of V. anguillarum isolates. The concentrations of Cu2+, Pb2+, Cr3+, and Cd2+ ranged from 3200 to 625 gml−1, while Hg2+ concentrations ranged from 400 to 0.78 gml−1. In our study, the isolates were considered resistant if the MIC values exceeded that of the control strain (E. coli K-12) as described in He et al. [30].

Detection of virulence, antimicrobial resistance, and heavy metal resistance genes

The prevalence of ten virulence-related genes was screened by the conventional PCR method. Primer pair nucleotide sequences and PCR conditions are listed in Table S1 [3134]. A 20µL of PCR mixture was used to detect each virulence gene. Each sample consists of 0.2 μL of AmpOne Taq DNA polymerase (GeneAll, Seoul, South Korea), 2 μL of 10 × Taq reaction buffer, 2 μL of dNTP mix, 1 μL of each reverse and forward primer, 1 μL of template DNA, and 12.8 μL of PCR water. 1.5% (wt/vol) agarose gel was used to check the PCR amplicons by gel electrophoresis. The same PCR conditions were used to detect sixteen antimicrobial resistance genes (ARG) including extended-spectrum β lactams resistance genes (blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M, and blaIMP), tetracycline resistance genes (tetA, tet, and tetE), plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes (qnrA, qnrB, and qnrS), aminoglycoside resistance genes (strA-strB, aphAI-IAB, and aac(3′)-IIa) and integrons (Intl1 and gene cassette) (Table S2) [35, 36], and four heavy metal resistance genes including copA, CzcA, ChrR, and merA (Table S3) [3739].

Results

Identification V. anguillarum by PCR

In this study, 145 infected fish samples were collected from February to April 2020 in several fish farms in South Korea. A total of 22 strains of V. anguillarum were isolated and identified using biochemical tests and PCR amplification of V. anguillarum-specific genes. The information related to all the strains are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Sample collection data, antimicrobial resistance, intermediate resistant antimicrobials, and MAR index values of V. anguillarum isolated from mullets (M. cephalus)

No Sample collection date Location Organ Isolate No Resistant antimicrobialsa Intermediate resistant antimicrobials MAR index
1 February 5, 2020 Hadong dachi Spleen Va1 AMP, OX, TIC, STR, ERY, NAL, CIP AMOX, OTO, CMP, IPM 0.33
2 February 5, 2020 Hadong dachi Kidney Va2 AMP, AMOX, OX, TIC, STR, ERY, NAL, CIP, IPM OTO 0.43
3 February 5, 2020 Hadong dachi Kidney Va3 AMP, OX, TIC, STR, NAL, CIP OTO, ERY, IPM 0.29
4 February 5, 2020 Hadong dachi Spleen Va4 AMP, OX, TIC, STR, ERY, NAL, CIP AMOX, OTO, IPM 0.33
5 March 13, 2020 Namhe chansan Spleen Va5 AMP, OX, TIC, STR, ERY, NAL, CIP, KF, FOS, IPM AMOX, OTO, KAN, 0.48
6 March 13, 2020 Namhe chansan Kidney Va6 AMP, AMOX, OX, TIC, STR, AMK, ERY, NAL, CIP, IPM OTO, GEN, FOS 0.48
7 March 13, 2020 Namhe chansan Spleen Va7 AMP, OX, TIC, STR, NAL, CIP, FOS, IPM OTO, ERY, FOX, 0.38
8 March 13, 2020 Namhe chansan Kidney Va8 AMP, OX, TIC, STR, NAL, CIP, FOS, AMOX, OTO, ERY, FOX, IPM 0.33
9 March 13, 2020 Namhe gamam Spleen Va9 AMP, AMOX, OX, TIC, STR, NAL, CIP, IPM OTO, GEN, ERY, FOX, FOS 0.38
10 March 13, 2020 Namhe gamam Kidney Va10 AMP, OX, TIC, STR, ERY, NAL, CIP AMOX, OTO, FOX 0.33
11 March 13, 2020 Namhe gamam Spleen Va11 AMP, OX, TIC, STR, ERY, NAL, CIP, IPM OTO, FOX 0.38
12 March 13, 2020 Namhe gamam Kidney Va12 AMP, OX, TIC, STR, NAL, CIP, IPM AMOX, OTO, AMK, ERY, KF 0.33
13 April 6, 2020 Sacheon Spleen Va13 OX, TIC, STR, ERY, CIP, IPM AMP, AMOX, OTO, CMP, NAL, FOX 0.29
14 April 6, 2020 Sacheon Kidney Va14 AMP, AMOX, OX, TIC, STR, NAL, CIP, IPM OTO, ERY, FOX 0.38
15 April 6, 2020 Sacheon Spleen Va15 AMP, AMOX, OX, TIC, STR, ERY, NAL, CIP, IPM TET, OTO, KAN, KF 0.43
16 April 6, 2020 Sacheon Kidney Va16 AMP, OX, TIC, STR, ERY, NAL, CIP, IPM OTO 0.38
17 April 21, 2020 Hadong Mibeob Spleen Va17 AMP, AMOX, OX, TIC, OTO, STR, NAL, CIP, IPM CMP, ERY 0.43
18 April 21, 2020 Hadong Mibeob Kidney Va18 AMP, AMOX, OX, TIC, OTO, STR, NAL, CIP, IPM CMP, ERY 0.43
19 April 21, 2020 Hadong Mibeob Spleen Va19 AMP, AMOX, OX, TIC, STR, NAL, CIP, IPM OTO, ERY 0.38
20 April 21, 2020 Hadong Mibeob Kidney Va20 AMP, AMOX, OX, TIC, STR, NAL, CIP, IPM OTO, ERY 0.38
21 April 21, 2020 Hadong Mibeob Spleen Va21 AMOX, OX, TIC, STR, NAL, CIP, IPM AMP, OTO, ERY 0.33
22 April 21, 2020 Hadong Mibeob Kidney Va22 AMOX, OX, TIC, STR, NAL, CIP, IPM AMP, OTO, ERY 0.33

aAntimicrobials = AMP, ampicillin; AMOX, amoxicillin; OX, oxacillin; TIC, ticarcillin; TET, tetracycline; OXY, oxytetracycline; CMP, chloramphenicol; STR,streptomycin; FOS, fosfomycin; GEN, gentamycin; KAN, kanamycin; AMK, amikacin; ERY, erythromycin; NAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; RD, rifampicin; FOX, cefoxitin; KF, cephalothin; CRO, ceftriaxone; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; OT, oxytetracycline. MAR, multiple antimicrobial resistance

Determination of pathogenicity by phenotypic tests

The results of the eight-pathogenicity tests are summarized in Table 2. According to the results, all the strains were positive for the amylase and caseinase tests. Among all the tested isolates, 90.9% and 45.5% of the strains showed positive results for gelatinase and DNase activity. In the hemolysis test, 81.1% of test strains were screened as α-hemolytic strains, while 18.2% of strains were reported as β-hemolytic strains. None of the strains was positive for lipase, phospholipase, and slime production.

Table 2.

Phenotypic and genotypic pathogenicity profile of V. anguillarum

Phenotypic profile % (No. of isolates/total no.of isolates) Genotypicprofile % (No. of isolates/total no.of isolates)
Amylase 100.0 (22/22) VAC 54.5 (12/22)
Caseinase 100.0 (22/22) ctxAB 45.5 (10/22)
Gelatinase 90.9 (20/22) AtoxR 40.9 (9/22)
DNase 45.5 (10/22) Tdh 31.8 (7/22)
Lipase 0 Tlh 27.3 (6/22)
Phospholipase 0 Trh 22.7 (5/22)
Slime production 0 Vfh 18.2 (4/22)
Hemolysis α 81.8 (18/22) hupO 13.6 (3/22)
β 18.2 (4/22) VPI 9.0 (2/22)
FtoxR 9.0 (2/22)

Prevalence of virulence-related genes

Ten virulence-related genes were analyzed by the PCR, as shown in Table S1 3134. The highest prevalence of virulence gene tested was VAC (54.5%). Other virulence-related ctxAB, AtoxR, tdh, tlh, trh, Vfh, hupO, VPI, and FtoxR genes were detected in 45.5%, 40.9%, 31.8%, 27.3%, 22.7%, 18.2%, 13.6%, 9.0%, and 9.0% respectively (Table 2).

Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and MAR index

Table 1 shows antimicrobial resistance patterns and MAR indexes derived from disc diffusion assay. All the isolates were resistant to oxacillin, ticarcillin, streptomycin, and ciprofloxacin. Resistance to nalidixic acid, ampicillin, imipenem, amoxicillin, erythromycin, fosfomycin, oxytetracycline, cephalothin, and cefoxitin were recorded in 95.5%, 86.4%, 72.7%, 50.0%, 31.8%, 13.6%, 9.1%, 4.5%, and 4.5% of the isolates respectively. In contrast, all isolates were susceptible to rifampicin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ceftriaxone, and meropenem.

Prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant genes

The antimicrobial resistance genes including qnrS (95.5%), qnrB (86.4%), and StrA-StrB (27.3%) were detected (Table 3).

Table 3.

Antimicrobial resistance genes of V. anguillarum

Gene Isolates %
qnrS Va1, Va3, Va4, Va5, Va6, Va7, Va8, Va9, Va10, Va11, Va12, Va13, Va14, Va15, Va16, Va17, Va18, Va19, Va20, Va21, Va22 95.5
qnrB Va3, Va4, Va5, Va6, Va8, Va9, Va10, Va11, Va12, Va13, Va14, Va15, Va16, Va17, Va18, Va19, Va20, Va21, Va22 86.4
StrAB Va2, Va3, Va5, Va7, Va9, Va14 27.3

Heavy metal resistance

A total of 40.9% of the isolates were resistant to cadmium and 86.4% were positive for the CzcA heavy metal resistance gene. In contrast, none of the isolates showed Cu, Hg, Pb, and Cr tolerance for both phenotypic and genotypic tests (Table 4).

Table 4.

Genotypic and phenotypic results of heavy metal resistance of V. anguillarum

Isolate Heavy-metal MIC (μg/mL) Resisted phenotypes Heavy-metal resistant genes
Cu2+ Hg2+ Pb2+ Cr2+ Cd2+ - -
E. coli K12 800 12.5 1600 800 400 - -
Va1 50 3.125 100 800 800 Cd CzcA
Va2 200 3.125 200 400 800 - CzcA
Va3 100 3.125 200 400 400 - CzcA
Va4 200  < 3.125 200 400 400 - CzcA
Va5 200 3.125 200 400 400 - CzcA
Va6 200  < 3.125 200 800 800 Cd CzcA
Va7 100  < 3.125 200 400 400 - CzcA
Va8 25  < 3.125 200 400 400 - CzcA
Va9 100  < 3.125 200 800 400 - CzcA
Va10 100 3.125 200 400 400 - CzcA
Va11 100  < 3.125 200 400 800 Cd CzcA
Va12 100  < 3.125 200 400 800 Cd -
Va13 100  < 3.125 100 400 800 Cd -
Va14 100 3.125 100 400 800 Cd CzcA
Va15 100  < 3.125 100 400 800 Cd CzcA
Va16 10  < 3.125 100 400 800 Cd CzcA
Va17 100 3.125 200 400 400 - CzcA
Va18 100  < 3.125 200 400 400 - -
Va19 100  < 3.125 200 400 400 - CzcA
Va20 100  < 3.125 100 400 400 - CzcA
Va21 100  < 3.125 100 400 400 - CzcA
Va22 100 6.25 200 400 800 Cd CzcA

Discussion

Vibriosis is a considerable threat that caused significant economic losses in aquaculture. Among the pathogenic Vibrio spp., V. anguillarum is the most critical causative agent that causes vibriosis in marine fish and shellfish [12, 13]. Most vibriosis outbreaks were reported during summer and some cases were reported in late spring and early autumn in South Korea [40]. In this study, we studied 22 isolates of V. anguillarum isolated from infected mullets (M. cephalus) cultured in several fish farms located in South Korea. All isolates were subjected to phenotypical and genotypical assays to detect virulence, antimicrobial resistance, and heavy metal resistance properties.

Pathogenicity of V. anguillarum depends on the various virulence factors such as siderophore-mediated iron sequestering systems, motility of bacterial strain, and attachment [15]. In addition, the production of extracellular enzymes such as caseinase, protease, gelatinase, lipase, hemolysins, cytotoxins, dermatotoxin, metalloprotease, and hemagglutinin plays important role in pathogenesis of V. anguillarum infection [5]. In this study, V. anguillarum isolates (100%) were positive for the production of caseinase and amylase. Similar results were observed by Santos et al., Ma et al., and Younes and Gaafar [41, 42, 43]. Among all the tested isolates, 90.9% and 45.5% of the strains showed positive results for gelatinase and DNase activity. In the hemolysis test, 81.1% of test strains were screened as α-hemolytic strains, while 18.2% of strains were reported as β-hemolytic strains. None of the strains was positive for lipase, phospholipase, and slime production.

In contrast to Younes and Gaafar [43], no isolates were positive for lipase and phospholipase activity in our study. Moreover, previous studies showed that Vibrio species have the potential to produce various extracellular enzymes, including caseinase, gelatinase, hemolysins, lipase, phospholipase, amylase, and collagenase [44, 45]. Caseinolytic activity is related to producing potentially fatal toxins [44]. Gelatinase enzymes can degrade collagen, hemoglobin, and biologically active peptides in host cells. DNase is responsible for the hydrolyzation of DNA and propagation of bacterial cells while promoting their pathogenicity [46]. Alpha hemolysis activity reduces the host resistance by inhibiting phagocytosis, whereas beta hemolysis destroys the red blood cells (RBC) in hosts by depleting iron from RBC. Some isolates of V. anguillarum showed both alpha and beta hemolysis in the present study. Hemolysis activity is one of the common virulence factors presented by Vibrio spp. [47, 48].

Virulence genes indicate virulence factors that allow bacteria to infect and damage hosts. Inherited (typical) virulence and atypical virulence genes can be present in pathogenic bacteria [49]. This study contains ten virulence-associated genes, including VAC, ctxAB, AtoxR, tdh, tlh, trh, Vfh, VPI, hupO, and FtoxR which were positive as virulence markers. The highest prevalence of the tested virulence gene was VAC (54.5%). The VAC gene, specific to V. alginolyticus, is responsible for collagenase enzyme production. Previous studies reported that the VAC gene was highly presented in Vibrio spp. [50, 51].

Vibrio spp. can acquire new (atypical) virulence genes from other pathogenic bacteria or environments through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) [52]. The ctxAB gene is encoded for V. cholera-specific toxin [53]. Even though the ctxAB gene is specific to V. cholera, some previous studies and our study showed the prevalence of the ctxAB gene in other Vibrio spp. such as V. alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. harveyi, V. diabolicus, and V. anguillarum [35, 36]. The toxR gene has an essential task in Vibrio spp. as it can be controlled the expression of other virulence genes like ctxAB in Vibrio spp. [54]. This study recorded the V. alginolyticus-specific toxR (AtoxR) gene as the third-highest virulence gene. In contrast, V. fluvialis- specific toxR (FtoxR) virulence gene presented in the lowest amount.

The tdh gene acts as an identification indicator of the pathogenicity of Vibrio spp. which is responsible for the thermostable direct hemolysin [55]. The virulence-related genes, including tdh, tlh, and trh, were reported in Vibrio spp. isolated from fish [56, 57]. In agreement with Doris et al. [58], tdh, tlh, and trh genes were found in several isolates in our study. Moreover, vfh and hupO virulence genes associated with the production of hemolysis in Vibrio spp. were detected in low percentages compared to the previous studies [59, 60].

Therapeutic substances like antimicrobials are used to treat bacterial infections in animals and humans [61]. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogenic microorganisms are formed due to the excessive and improper use of antimicrobials in aquaculture, agriculture, livestock, and human medical fields [62]. Vibrio infections in aquaculture are generally treated with antimicrobials like aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, and third-generation cephalosporins [63].

In our study, 22 antimicrobials were screened in the antimicrobial susceptibility test. All the isolates were reported as multi-drug resistance (MAR) and scored MAR index > 0.2, which is the threshold value to identify the efficacy of antimicrobial activity [64]. In addition, oxacillin, ticarcillin, streptomycin, and ciprofloxacin were found as resistant antimicrobials in all V. anguillarum isolates. Also, more than 50% of the isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid, ampicillin and imipenem (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Antimicrobial susceptibility profile of V. anguillarum isolated from mullet (Mugil cephalus) cultured in Korea. (Resistant Intermediate resistant Susceptible)

Several countries, including Japan, Turkey, China, Norway, and Egypt, have studied the antimicrobial resistance of V. anguillarum [17, 43, 64, 65]. In accordance with the previous study by Parin et al. [17], our study reported similar results that V. anguillarum isolates were resistant to ampicillin and amoxicillin. Similarly, Vaseeharan et al.[64] found that all the isolates were resistant to ampicillin and showed resistance at low rates against nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, and oxytetracycline. Moreover, Pedersen et al. [16] revealed that most of the O2 strains of V. anguillarum were resistant to ampicillin, cephalothin, chloramphenicol, and spiramycin.

Most gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria were susceptible to broad-spectrum antimicrobials like carbapenems (meropenem and imipenem) [65]. In our study, meropenem, rifampicin, ceftriaxone, and trimethoprim antimicrobials were effective against all the isolates of V. anguillarum. Also, most isolates were susceptible to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, gentamycin, kanamycin, and amikacin. Younes and Gaafar [43] reported that V. anguillarum isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin, oxytetracycline, erythromycin, novobiocin, chloramphenicol, and nalidixic acid. Different antimicrobial resistance qualities may exist depending on how the antimicrobials are used in a specific area [66].

ARGs are mobile genetic elements that can transfer from one pathogenic bacterium to another via vertical or HGT [67]. They are responsible for the antimicrobial resistance properties of pathogenic bacteria [68]. The ARGs including qnrS (95.5%), qnrB (86.4%), and StrAB (27.3%) were detected in our study (Table 3). Plasmid-mediated qnr (PMQR) genes confer resistance to quinolone. Three types of resistance mechanisms are employed to protect bacterial cells from quinolone [69]. They are enhanced efflux pumps by PMQR genes, quinolones hydrolysis by aac(6′)-Ib-cr protein, and protection of quinolones target sites by qnr proteins [70, 71]. In addition, some of the isolates tested positive for streptomycin resistance genes (StrAB) in our findings.

The most frequently used class of antimicrobials in aquaculture is beta-lactams. Even though several studies reported beta-lactam antimicrobial genes in Vibrio spp., none of the isolates was positive in our study [72, 73]. In addition, integrons are genetic elements that engage the antimicrobial resistance properties of pathogenic bacteria by integrating and mobilizing the gene cassettes [74]. Similar to the study done by Jeamsripong et al. [75], PCR amplicon was not detected for intl1, integron gene cassettes in our research. The non-appearance of gene cassettes in this study may be caused by early stop codons, a shortage of resistance determinants in gene cassette arrays, a lack of 3′ conserved regions, or a combination of these factors [76].

Heavy metal resistance can be triggered by anthropogenic elements like heavy metals or antimicrobial resistance genes and vice versa [77]. This phenomenon is called co-selection, which is driven by the mechanism of co-resistance [78]. In our study, V. anguillarum isolates were tested against five heavy metals (Pb, Cr, Cu, Cd, and Hg). A total of 40.9% of the isolates were resistant to cadmium and 86.4% were positive for the CzcA heavy metal resistance gene. None of the isolates showed Cu, Hg, Pb, and Cr resistance for both phenotypic and genotypic tests. However, a study by He et al.[30] reported a significant prevalence of Cu and Cr-resistant V. parahaemolyticus isolated from shrimps in China. Also, antimicrobial-resistant Vibrio spp. positive for copA, copB, copC, and nccA heavy metal resistance genes in a previous study [79]. Moreover, Ba, Cd, Co, and Cu resistance were confirmed in V. parahaemolyticus isolated from oysters in Korea [80]. In contrast, none of the V. anguillarum isolates exhibited Cu or Cr resistance in our study. Similarly, all the V. anguillarum isolates were sensitive to the heavy metals Cu, Zn, and Cd in the previous study [81]. Among 19 CzcA gene-positive isolates, only nine isolates were tolerant to cadmium phenotypically in this study. The CzcA gene, which encodes both the cadmium resistance and the cation reflux system that removes metal cations from bacterial cells, can lead to this disagreement [82]. Regardless of cadmium susceptibility, isolates were positive for the CzcA gene [83]. According to the findings of our study, only cadmium among the examined heavy metals was resistant to V. anguillarum. The excessive cadmium exposure in the mullet fish farms may be the reason for this outcome.

Conclusion

In this study, we focused on the exposure of mullets with V. anguillarum and the molecular characterization of isolated strains for the first time in South Korea. The results revealed that V. anguillarum could not be underrated as a pathogenic bacterium in aquaculture because of its virulence factors, antimicrobial resistance properties, and heavy metal resistance properties. The prevalence of virulence determinants showed the pathogenicity of the bacteria and their ability to extend the host range. Mainly, multi-drug resistance properties may impede clinical therapeutics and cause many difficulties in medicating bacterial infections. Therefore, it is necessary to prevent the over usage of antimicrobials by introducing alternative solutions (probiotics, bacteriophage, and bacteriocins), controlling the use of anthropogenic elements like heavy metals and introducing good practices in management through aquaculture to improve the quality and safety of aquaculture production and safety of the consumer’s health.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Professor Shin Gee-Wook of Chonbuk National University’s Bio-Safety Research Institute and College of Veterinary Medicine in South Korea for providing the bacterial strains utilized in this investigation.

Author contribution

PMK and GJH contributed to the conception and design of the study. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by PMK, SM, LADSDS, and GJH. The first draft of the manuscript was written by PMK, and all authors contributed to reviewing and editing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Responsible Editor: Fernando R. Spilki

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References 

  • 1.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2021) Fisheries and aquaculture in Korea. OECD review of fisheries country notes, Korea. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/agriculture/topics/fisheries-and-aquaculture/documents/report_cn_fish_kor.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2022
  • 2.Ko EY, Park JO, Lee KS. Review of fish name on the fishes of the family Mugilidae in Korea and resource utilization. J Mar Life Sci. 2019;4(2):96–105. doi: 10.23005/KSMLS.2019.4.2.96. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Wide Fund for Nature (2016) Korea’s fisheries sector assessment. WWF-Korea. Retrieved from http://www.wwfkorea.or.kr/data/file/english_report/3554271915_gOcBYZPk_5086a59a1852f5d1166c8f523efdfbc9007f532b.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2022
  • 4.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2022) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. FAO. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/3/cc0461en/cc0461en.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2022
  • 5.Naka H, Crosa JH. Genetic determinants of virulence in the marine fish pathogen Vibrio anguillarum. Fish Pathol. 2011;46:1–10. doi: 10.3147/jsfp.46.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Akinbowale OL, Peng H, Grant P, Barton MD (2007) Antibiotic and heavy metal resistance in motile aeromonads and pseudomonads from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) farms in Australia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 30:177–182. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Ransangan J, Mustafa S. Identification of Vibrio harveyi isolated from diseased Asian Seabass Lates calcarifer by use of 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing. J aquat Anim Health. 2009;21(3):150–155. doi: 10.1577/H09-002.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aoki T, Satoh T, Kitao T. New tetracycline resistance determinant on R plasmids from Vibrio anguillarum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987;31(9):1446–1449. doi: 10.1128/aac.31.9.1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sinatra JA. Colby K (2018) Notes from the field: fatal Vibrio anguillarum infection in an immunocompromised patient- Maine. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;67(34):962–963. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6734a5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim SW, Kim JO, Kim WS. Vibrio anguillarum infection in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) during seawater adaption. J fish Pathol. 2014;27(2):133–137. doi: 10.7847/jfp.2014.27.2.133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Toranzo AE, Barja JL. A review of the taxonomy and seroepizootiology of Vibrio anguillarum, with special reference to aquaculture in the northwest of Spain. Dis aquat Org. 1990;9:73–82. doi: 10.3354/dao009073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Burke J, Rodgers L. Identification of pathogenic bacteria associated with the occurrence of ‘red spot’ in sea mullet, Mugil cephalus L., in south-eastern Queensland. J Fish Dis. 1981;4(2):153–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1981.tb01119.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Amany AA, Mona MS. Vibriosis in some fishes molecular characterization of fish pathogenic vibrios. Vet Med J. 2005;53(4):911–923. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huang L, Gao Q, Zhang Y. Community change and pathogenicity of Vibrio. In: Neri V, Huang L, Li J, editors. Infections and sepsis development. London: IntechOpen; 2021. pp. 268–290. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Frans I, Michiels CW, Bossier P, Willems K, Lievens B, Rediers H. Vibrio anguillarum as a fish pathogen: virulence factors, diagnosis and prevention. J fish dis. 2011;34(9):643–661. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2011.01279.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pedersen BK, Tiainen T, Larsen JL. Antibiotic resistance of Vibrio anguillarum, in relation to serovar and plasmid contents. Acta Vet Scand. 1995;36:55–64. doi: 10.1186/BF03547702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Parin U, Erbas G, Yuksel Savasan S, HT, Gurpinar S and Kirkan S, Antimicrobial resistance of Vibrio (Listonella) anguillarum isolated from rainbow trouts (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Indian J Anim Res. 2017;53(11):1522–1525. doi: 10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.7251. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Eom SY, Lee YS, Lee SG, Seo MN, Choi BS, Kim YD, Lim J, Hwang MS. Lead, mercury, and cadmium exposure in the Korean general population. J Korean Med Sci. 2017;33:e9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dahanayake P, Hossain S, Wickramanayake MVKS, Heo GJ. Antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes in Aeromonas spp. isolated from marketed Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) in Korea. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;127:941–952. doi: 10.1111/jam.14355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Matyar F, Kaya A. Antibacterial agents and heavy metal resistance in Gram-negative bacteria isolated from seawater, shrimp and sediment in Iskenderun Bay. Turkey Sci Total Environ. 2008;407(1):279–285. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Farmer JJ, Janda JM. Family Vibrionaceae. In: Brenner BJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. 2. New York: Springer; 2005. pp. 491–494. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim H, Ryu J, Lee S, Kim E, Kim H. Multiplex PCR for detection of the Vibrio genus and five pathogenic Vibrio species with primer sets designed using comparative genomics. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15(2015):239. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0577-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hong G, Kim D, Bae J, Ahn S, Bai SC, Kong I. Species-specific PCR detection of the fish pathogen, Vibrio anguillarum, using the amiB gene, which encodes N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;269(2):201–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang X, Austin B (2000) Pathogenicity of Vibrio harveyi to salmonids. J Fish Dis 23(2):93–102. 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2000.00214.x
  • 25.Liu P, Lee K, Chen S. Pathogenicity of different isolates of Vibrio harveyi in tiger prawn. Penaeus monodon Lett Appl Microbiol. 1996;22(6):413–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1996.tb01192.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rodrigues DP, Ribeiro RV, Alves RM, et al. Evaluation of virulence factors in environmental isolates of Vibrio species. Mem I Oswaldo Cruz. 1993;88(4):589–592. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02761993000400016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Freeman DJ, Falkiner FR, Patrick S. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. J Clin Pathol. 1989;42(8):872–874. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.8.872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.CLSI (2020) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-fourth information supplement M100-S24, CLSI, Wayne, Pa, USA
  • 29.Adenaike O, Olonitola OS, Ameh WCMZ. Multidrug resistance and multiple antibiotic resistance index of Escherichia coli strains isolated from retailed smoked fish. J Nat Sci Res. 2016;6(9):7–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.He Y, Jin L, Sun F, et al. Antibiotic and heavy-metal resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from fresh shrimps in Shanghai fish markets. China Res Int. 2016;23(15):15033–15040. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6614-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bej AK, Patterson DP, Brasher CW, Vickery MCL, Jones DD, Kaysner CA. Detection of total and hemolysin-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish using multiplex PCR amplification of tl, tdh and trh. J Microbiol. 1999;36:215–225. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(99)00037-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liang P, Cui X, Du X, et al. The virulence phenotypes and molecular epidemiological characteristics of Vibrio fluvialis in China. Gut Pathogens. 2013;5(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1757-4749-5-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chakraborty R, Sinha S, Mukhopadhyay AK, et al. Species-specific identification of Vibrio fluvialis by PCR targeted to the conserved transcriptional activation and variable membrane tether regions of the toxR gene. J M Microbiol. 2006;55(6):805–808. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46395-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xie ZY, Hu CQ, Chen C, et al. Investigation of seven Vibrio virulence genes among Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains from the coastal mariculture systems in Guangdong. China Lett Appl Microbiol. 2005;41(2):202–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01688.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hossain S, Wickramanayake MVKS, Dahanayake PS, et al. Occurrence of virulence and extended-spectrum β-lactamase determinants in Vibrio spp. isolated from marketed hard-shelled mussel (Mytilus coruscus) Microb Drug Resist. 2020;26(4):391–401. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2019.0131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.De Silva LADS, Wickramanayake MVKS, Heo GJ. Occurrence of virulence and antimicrobial resistance determinants in Vibrio harveyi isolated from marine food fish cultured in Korea. Microb Drug Resist. 2022;28(2):255–265. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2020.0618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wimalasena SHMP, De Silva BCJ, et al. Prevalence and characterization of quinolone resistance genes in Aeromonas species isolated from pet turtle in Korea. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017;11:34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bouskill NJ, Barnhart EP, Galloway TS, et al. Quantification of changing Pseudomonas aeruginosa sodA, htpX and mt gene abundance in response to trace metal toxicity: a potential in situ biomarker of environmental health. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;60(2):276–286. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00296.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.De Silva BCJ, Hossain S, Dahanayake PS, et al. Frozen white-leg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in Korean markets as a source of Aeromonas spp harboring antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes. Microb Drug Resist. 2018;24(10):1587–1598. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2018.0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Park K, Mok JS, Kwon JY, et al. Food-borne outbreaks, distributions, virulence, and antibiotic resistance profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Korea from 2003 to 2016: a review. Fish Aquatic Sci. 2018;21:3. doi: 10.1186/s41240-018-0081-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Santos Y, Bandín I, Nún˜ez S, , et al. Comparison of the extracellular biological activities of Vibrio anguillarum and Aeromonas hydrophila. Aquaculture. 1992;2(3):259–270. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(92)90075-v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ma L, Chen J, Liu R, et al. Mutation of rpoS gene decreased resistance to environmental stresses, synthesis of extracellular products and virulence of Vibrio anguillarum. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009;70(2):286–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00713.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Younes AM, Gaafar A. Prevalence of pathogenic Vibrio anguillarum among Oreochromisniloticus fish fingerlings infected with saprolegniasis around Qarun Lake. Egypt J Vet Sci. 2021;52(2):257–266. doi: 10.21608/ejvs.2021.67242.1222. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Costa RA, Amorim LMC, Araujo RL, et al. Multiple enzymatic profiles of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains isolated from oysters. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2013;45(4):267–270. doi: 10.1016/S0325-7541(13)70035-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Miyoshi S. Extracellular proteolytic enzymes produced by human pathogenic Vibrio species. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vergis EN, Shankar N, Chow JW, et al. Association between the presence of Enterococcal virulence factors gelatinase, hemolysin, and enterococcal surface protein, and mortality among patients with bacteremia due to Enterococcus faecalis. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35(5):570–575. doi: 10.1086/341977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Park MY, Kim HJ, Choi ST, et al. Pathogenic factors of Vibrio spp. isolated from seawater of Gwangan beach in Busan. J Fish Sci Tech. 2003;5(3):178–182. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hernandez-Robles MF, Natividad-Bonifacio I, Alvarez-Contreras AK, Tercero-Alburo JJ, Quiones-Ramırez EI, Vazquez-Salinas C (2021) Characterization of potential virulence factors of Vibrio mimicus isolated from fishery products and water. Int J Microbiol 2021. 10.1155/2021/8397930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 49.Schroeder M, Brooks BD, Brooks AE. The complex relationship between virulence and antibiotic resistance. Genes. 2017;8(1):39. doi: 10.3390/genes8010039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hossain S, Vidanalage M, Sameera K, et al. Occurrence of virulence and extended-spectrum β-lactamase determinants in Vibrio spp isolated from marketed hard-shelled mussel (Mytilus coruscus). 2020;26(4):391–401. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2019.0131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Sabrina H, De Siva BCJ, Dahanayake PS, et al. Vibrio spp. from Yesso scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) demonstrating virulence properties and antimicrobial resistance. J Food Saf. 2019;39(3):e12634. doi: 10.1111/jfs.12634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Deng Y, Xu L, Chen H, Liu S, Guo Z, Cheng C, Ma H, Feng J. Prevalence, virulence genes, and antimicrobial resistance of Vibrio species isolated from diseased marine fish in South China. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71288-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Waldor MK, Mekalanos JJ. Lysogenic conversion by a filamentous phage encoding cholera toxin. Science. 1996;272(5270):1910–1914. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5270.1910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Okuda J, Nakai T, Chang PS, et al. The toxR gene of Vibrio (Listonella) anguillarum controls expression of the major outer membrane proteins but not virulence in a natural host model. Infect Immun. 2001;69(10):6091–6101. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.10.6091-6101.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Singhapol C, Tinrat S. Virulence genes analysis of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and anti-vibrio activity of the citrus extracts. Curr Microbiol. 2020;77:1390–1398. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-01941-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Khalil SA, Abou-akkada AS, El-hoshy SM. Molecular studies on Vibrio species isolated from imported frozen fish. Global Veterinaria. 2014;12(6):782–789. doi: 10.5829/idosi.gv.2014.12.06.83316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sadat A, El-Sherbiny H, Zakaria A, et al. Prevalence, antibiogram and virulence characterization of Vibrio isolates from fish and shellfish in Egypt: a possible zoonotic hazard to humans. J Appl Microbiol. 2021;131(1):485–498. doi: 10.1111/jam.14929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Doris YW, Di AL, Jeonghwan J, et al. Season-specific occurrence of potentially pathogenic Vibrio spp. on the southern coast of South Korea. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;83(3):e02680. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02680-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fri J, Ndip RN, Njom HA, et al. Occurrence of virulence genes associated with human pathogenic vibrios isolated from two commercial dusky kob (Argyrosmus japonicus) farms and Kareiga estuary in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(10):1111. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gxalo O, Digban TO, Igere BE, et al. Virulence and antibiotic resistance characteristics of Vibrio isolates from rustic environmental freshwaters. Front Microbiol. 2021;11:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.732001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.World Health Organization (2021) Antimicrobial resistance. WHO. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance. Accessed 22 Oct 2022
  • 62.Tendencia EA, Dela Peña LD. Level and percentage recovery of resistance to oxytetracycline and oxolinic acid of bacteria from shrimp ponds. Aquaculture. 2002;213:1–13. doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00017-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zago V, Veschetti L, Patuzzo C, et al. Resistome, mobilome and virulome analysis of Shewanella algae and Vibrio spp. strains isolated in Italian aquaculture centers. Microorganisms. 2020;8(4):572. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Vaseeharan B, Ramasamy P, Murugan T. In vitro susceptibility of antibiotics against Vibrio spp. and Aeromonas spp. isolated from Penaeus monodon hatcheries and ponds. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005;26(4):285–291. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Papp-Wallace KM, Endimiani A, Taracila MA, et al. Carbapenems: past, present, and future. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(11):4943–4960. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00296-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Miranda CD, Kehrenberg C, Ulep C, et al. Diversity of tetracycline resistance genes in bacteria from Chilean salmon farms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(3):883–888. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.3.883-888.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.McMillan EA, Gupta SK, Williams LE, et al. Antimicrobial resistance genes, cassettes, and plasmids present in Salmonella enterica associated with United States food animals. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:832. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Wang T, et al. Assessment of global health risk of antibiotic resistance genes. Nat Commun. 2022;13:1553. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29283-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Jacoby GA, Strahilevitz J, Hooper DC. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;2(2):475–503. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Strahilevitz J, Jacoby GA, Hooper DC, et al. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: a multifaceted threat. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22(4):664–689. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00016-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Martínez JL. Mechanisms of action and of resistance to quinolones. Antibiot Drug Resist. 2019;2(1):40–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00063.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rojas MVR, Matté MH, Dropa M, et al. Characterization of Vibrio Parahaemolyticus isolated from oysters and mussels in São Paulo Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2011;53(4):201–205. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652011000400005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ye L, Li R, Lin D, et al. Characterization of an IncA/C multidrug resistance plasmid in Vibrio alginolyticus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(5):3232–3235. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00300-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hall RM, Stokes HW. Integrons: novel DNA elements which capture genes by site-specific recombination. Genetica. 1993;90(2–3):115–132. doi: 10.1007/BF01435034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Jeamsripong S, Khant W, Chuanchuen R. Distribution of phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes in Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from cultivated oysters and estuarine water. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020;96(8):fiaa08. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Barlow RS, Pemberton JM, Desmarchelier PM, et al. Isolation and characterization of integron-containing bacteria without antibiotic selection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(3):838–842. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.3.838-842.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Adekanmbi AO, Adelowo OO, Okoh AI, et al. Metal resistance encoding gene-fingerprints in some bacteria isolated from wastewaters of selected printeries in Ibadan. South-western Nigeria J Taibah Univ Sci. 2019;13(1):266–273. doi: 10.1080/16583655.2018.1561968. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Baker-Austin C, Wright MS, Stepanauskas R, et al. Co-selection of antibiotic and metal resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2006;14(4):176–182. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2006.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Su J, Zhang Y, Hu T, Ming H, Xie Y, Jin Y, Shi T, Fan J (2022) Prevalence, antibiotic and heavy metal resistance of Vibrio spp. isolated from the clam Meretrix meretrix at different ages in Geligang, Liaohe estuary in China. Front Mar Sci 2022(9): 1–10. 10.3389/fmars.2022.1071371
  • 80.Kang CH, Shin YJ, Yu HS, et al. Antibiotic and heavy-metal resistance of Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolated from oysters in Korea. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;135:69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Svanevik CS, Urdahl AM, Lunestad BT, Norström M, Slettemeås JS, Nilsen H, Storesund J (2021) Screening for antimicrobial- and heavy metal resistant bacteria in copper contaminated areas. Institute of Marine Research M1925:1-42. https://www.hi.no/en/hi/nettrapporter/rapport-fra-havforskningen-en-2021-18. Accessed 12 Oct 2022
  • 82.Nies DH. Efflux-mediated heavy metal resistance in prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003;27:313–339. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00048-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Deredjian A, Colinon C, Brothier E, et al. Antibiotic and metal resistance among hospital and outdoor strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Res Microbiol. 2011;162(7):689–700. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2011.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Brazilian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Brazilian Society of Microbiology

RESOURCES