Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2023 Feb 21;14:970. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36696-6

Real-space imaging of a phenyl group migration reaction on metal surfaces

Zilin Ruan 1,#, Baijin Li 1,#, Jianchen Lu 1,✉,#, Lei Gao 2,✉,#, Shijie Sun 1, Yong Zhang 1, Jinming Cai 1,
PMCID: PMC9944283  PMID: 36810857

Abstract

The explorations to extend present chemical synthetic methods are of great importance to simplify synthetic routes of chemical species. Additionally, understanding the chemical reaction mechanisms is critical to achieve controllable synthesis for applications. Here, we report the on-surface visualization and identification of a phenyl group migration reaction of 1,4-dimethyl-2,3,5,6-tetraphenyl benzene (DMTPB) precursor on Au(111), Cu(111) and Ag(110) substrates. With the combination of bond-resolved scanning tunneling microscopy (BR-STM), noncontact atomic force microscopy (nc-AFM) and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, the phenyl group migration reaction of DMTPB precursor is observed, forming various polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the substrates. DFT calculations reveal that the multiple-step migrations are facilitated by the hydrogen radical attack, inducing cleavage of phenyl groups and subsequent rearomatization of the intermediates. This study provides insights into complex surface reaction mechanisms at the single molecule level, which may guide the design of chemical species.

Subject terms: Scanning probe microscopy, Surface spectroscopy


On-surface synthesis allows fabrication of nanostructures with atomic precision and may follow different routes compared to in-solution chemistry. Here the authors, using scanning probe microscopy techniques, observe a phenyl group migration reaction on three different metal surfaces forming polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which cannot be accessed by in-solution chemistry.

Introduction

Conventional chemical synthesis is mainly based on in-solution chemistry, where the precise control of the products depends on the chemical nature of the precursors and is boosted with the presence of catalytic agents. However, the synthetic routes are often hindered by side reactions due to the complex in-solution environment. As a complementary method, on-surface synthesis is an effective approach to fabricate nanostructures with atomic precision. Furthermore, the nanostructures at different on-surface reaction stages can be explored via nanotechnologies, such as scanning probe microscopy18. So far, strategies employed in on-surface reactions are mostly based on mimicking known in-solution reactions911. Although some recent on-surface progresses reported different synthetic manners compared to in-solution chemistry1214, a more comprehensive study of on-surface reactions to extend the present synthetic protocol as well as the reaction mechanism is highly desirable.

The rearrangement reaction represents a unique class of organic transformations in chemistry1523. Among these, radical aryl migration is of particular interest to the chemical community owing to its potential applications in radical chemistry and organic synthesis2428. Radical aryl migration is the intramolecular radical migration of an aryl group from a carbon or heteroatom to a radical center by forming spirocyclic intermediate or transition state. This migration can be typically terminated by radical pathways such as elimination, β-scission, or H abstraction24. The mechanism of radical aryl migration has been long debated, and a large effort has been dedicated in the search for a unequivocal mechanism. These mechanistic studies are also important to elucidate possible synthetic pathways, based on combining radical aryl migrations with different radical reactions, which might in principle allow to synthesize compounds that are difficult to obtain with more traditional nucleophilic rearrangements or other protocols2836. Therefore, the mechanistic studies of these migration reactions, together with their potential synthetic applications, have become an attractive research field in both radical chemistry and organic synthesis over the past decades.

In this article, we demonstrate the on-surface generations of various polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons via a phenyl group migration reaction on Au(111), Cu(111), and Ag(110) substrates, respectively, which cannot be accessed by in-solution chemistry. The precursor, 1,4-dimethyl-2,3,5,6-tetraphenyl benzene (DMTPB), consisting of a central benzene ring with its six hydrogen atoms substituted by two para-methyl groups and four phenyl groups, undergoes a phenyl migration and cascaded cyclodehydrogenations after thermal treatment. As illustrated in Fig. 1, after annealing of the self-assembled DMTPB clusters at elevated temperature, conventional C–C couplings between phenyl groups in the early stage of the reaction are surprisingly absent (no-go products N1 and N2). Instead, four benzene rings unexpectedly migrate to the para-methyl positions, forming Thiele’s hydrocarbon, which further transforms into fully conjugated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5 via intramolecular cyclodehydrogenation reactions. Employing the state-of-art bond-resolved scanning tunneling microscopy (BR-STM) and noncontact atomic force microscopy (nc-AFM) techniques, we successfully identified the molecular structures of on-surface reaction products and directly captured the cascaded structural arrangements. The phenyl group migration reaction is furtherly evaluated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, which show good agreement with experimental observations.

Fig. 1. On-surface generation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5 via a phenyl group migration reaction in this work.

Fig. 1

The direct cyclodehydrogenations (CDH) between phenyl groups or phenyl group and methyl groups are absent here (no-go products N1 and N2). The phenyl groups migrate to the para-methyl groups and subsequent cyclodehydrogenation produces A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5. Shaded rings with two different colors mark the four phenyl groups and the central benzene, respectively.

Results and discussion

DMTPB precursors 1 were deposited via thermal sublimation at 360 K onto Au(111) surface, which was held at room temperature (RT). Subsequent STM imaging reveals regular linear self-assembly (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 1b), exhibiting alternate bright protrusions. Such features are more pronounced in constant-height STM topography (Supplementary Fig. 1c) and can be assigned to two up-tilted phenyl groups on each side of one methyl group (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). The corresponding chemical model of the molecular chain is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1d, in which the benzene rings colored gray-blue denote the up-tilted phenyl groups with respect to the Au(111) surface. The line profile measured across the tilted phenyl rings shows good agreement with the optimized chemical model (Supplementary Fig. 1e), which collaborates with the assignment. The relative position of DMTPB monomer in the self-assembly suggested that the self-assembled structure is stabilized by π–π and –CH··· π interactions between individual molecules, as illustrated previously37,38.

Fig. 2. Products formed after thermal annealing of DMTPB on Au(111) at 590 K.

Fig. 2

a STM topographies of linear self-assembly of DMTPB on Au(111). b Large-scale STM topography (CO tip, I = 50 pA, Vs = 100 mV) after thermal annealing at 590 K. cg Constant current STM topographies (CO tip, I = 50 pA, Vs = 100 mV) of the products A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5, respectively, as denoted in (b) with dashed yellow circles. hl Constant height BR-STM images (CO tip, Vs = 2 mV) of the products corresponding to (cg), respectively. mq The identified molecular structures of five monomer products corresponding to A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5 in panels hl. Shaded rings with two different colors mark the four phenyl groups and the central benzene in the precursor. Scale bar: a 1 nm; b 7 nm; cl 0.5 nm.

We then slowly increased the temperature to 440 K and annealed the sample to trigger the intramolecular reaction. The ordered self-assembly transformed into individual nonplanar monomers with a very high yield (>95%) for the major product (Supplementary Fig. 3). Further annealing to 590 K induces the planarization, and individual species as well as coupled molecular clusters were formed, as shown in Fig. 2b. Careful inspection of the constant-current STM topographies reveals five main products (labeled as A1 to A5) with different yields (see Supplementary Tab. 1), as listed in Fig. 2c–g. The constant-current STM topographies of these products exhibit rather blur microscopic contrasts arising from the electronic local density of state (LDOS) associated with molecule-orbitals (Fig. 2c–g). By contrast, the constant-height BR-STM images (Fig. 2h–l) with the benefit of a CO-functionalized tip unambiguously reveal the backbone of products A1 to A5 at the single atomic bond level, whereby the corresponding molecular structures are identified (Fig. 2m–q, see also Supplementary Fig. 4). Interestingly, surface-induced chirality is also observed for products A2, A3, and A5 (Supplementary Fig. 5). Based on the structures resolved by the BR-STM imaging, a comparison between the as-synthesized products A1A5 and the precursors indicates rather a complex structural transformation process, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The expected direct C-C couplings between benzene rings or benzene ring and a methyl group are absent after annealing, while the phenyl groups migrate to the methyl groups instead, resulting in the formation of Thiele’s hydrocarbon (referred as 1d) (Fig. 1) and subsequent cyclodehydrogenation isomer products of A1A5 with analogous electronic properties (Supplementary Fig. 6). This hypothesis is supported by a careful inspection of the chemical structures of the major products obtained at 440 K (Supplementary Figs. 79) and the cascaded cyclodehydrogenation reaction at higher temperatures up to 590 K (Supplementary Figs. 10 and 11), as well as some rarely observed products (Supplementary Figs. 12 and 13), which are elucidated and discussed in detail in the Supplementary Information (Supplementary Figs. 78 and 14-17). In fact, we did not observe the four phenyl groups migrated product 1d, while a C–C coupling between two migrated phenyl groups of product 1d was experimentally observed (Supplementary Figs. 7 and 8, product 2), suggesting the lower reaction barrier from 1d to 2 due to its high reactive diradical character (Supplementary Fig. 8). It’s also noticed that product A1 with a high yield at 590 K cannot be obtained directly from the dominating intermediate 2 at 440 K, which suggested a possible ring opening of intermediate 2 at higher temperatures (see Supplementary Tab. 1 and its related discussion for more details). The proposed migration mechanism on Au(111) surface is based on the followings: (i) the carbon atoms in the para-methyl group (methyl-C) are connected to the benzene core, where the original phenyl groups are lost; (ii) the carbon atoms remain in the observed cascaded cyclodehydrogenated products at a higher temperature, which suggests a structural transformation rather than the decomposition of the precursor; (iii) the cascaded cyclodehydrogenations are directly captured by our step-by-step thermal annealing, which agrees well with the possible structural evolution of intermediate 1d; (iv) the cleavages of phenyl rings have also been observed, which is similar to the beginning situation of the migration reaction3941; (v) previous discussion on the role of methyl groups in the early stage of thermal treatment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons indicates that it might lead to the migration of functional groups42.

To probe the feasibility of these proposed reaction pathways, we then performed DFT calculations of reaction pathways for elementary steps from precursor 1 to experimentally observed product 2. Figure 3a shows a detailed step-by-step migration of phenyl groups migration. The reaction mechanism from the precursor 1 to 1a is proposed as follows: The H radicals are easily produced from the initial homolytic cleavage of C–H bonds in the methyl group (Supplementary Fig. 18), and then the radicals would attach the ipso position, i.e., carbon sites in the central benzene ring where phenyl groups connected, forming the intermediate (int1). Subsequently, the phenyl groups are expelled due to rearomatization. Subsequent reactions between the methyl radicals and the expelled phenyl group radicals produce a fully saturated intermediate 1a, interpreted as one phenyl group migrating to the methyl-C (Supplementary Fig. 18). The corresponding energy diagram from DMTPB precursor 1 to the phenyl migrated product 2 at 440 K is shown in Fig. 3b, which gives a reasonable interpretation of the experimental results. Importantly, the oxidative ring closure of methyl groups and the cyclodehydrogenation of adjacent phenyl groups are not energetically favored, which further supports our experimental observations. A detailed comparison of different possible competitive reactions can be found in Supplementary Fig. 19. Specifically, we plot both the energies of the intermediates with and without including enthalpic and entropic effects in Fig. 3b, together with the corresponding optimized structures of the proposed intermediates and observed products on the surface (Fig. 3c). In the transformation, the migrations of the first phenyl and the second phenyl groups result in two energetically more stable intermediates 1a and 1b, implying that the migration can be triggered upon annealing. Although the migrations of the third and the fourth phenyl groups cause an uphill energy of the intermediates, we proposed here that this two steps removal of the hydrogens at this stage will break the reversibility and thus proceed the further migration of phenyl groups. A more detailed reaction coordinate with possible intermediates is further discussed in the Supplementary Information (Supplementary Fig. 20). The migration of all phenyl groups as well as the dehydrogenation produce the intermediate 1d, which has a diradical character, referred to as Thiele’s hydrocarbon, and could easily transform to the experimentally observed product 2 due to its highly reactive nature. The dehydrogenation sequence of the methyl groups is further discussed and compared in detail in Supplementary Figs. 2125 and Supplementary Tabs. 25, from which the most energetically favorable path is illustrated in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Proposed reaction pathway of the phenyl migration reaction.

Fig. 3

a Proposed reaction pathway of the structural rearrangement of precursor 1 to form phenyl-migrated product 2 via a dehydrogenative-induced detachment and migration of phenyl groups. Shaded rings with two different colors mark the four phenyl groups and the central benzene in the precursor. b Energy diagram with (black) and without (blue), including enthalpic and entropic effects for the stepwise phenyl groups migrations. c Top views of the adsorption configurations of different intermediates shown in a on Au(111).

To further test and verify the phenyl migration reaction, we deposited the DMTPB precursor onto a Cu(111) substrate. We observed an ordered self-assembly (Supplementary Fig. 26), which is different from that on the Au(111) surface (Fig. 2a). Subsequent annealing to 420 K formed several monomer products with different yields (Supplementary Tab. 6) as well as molecular clusters, as shown in Fig. 4a. The constant-height BR-STM images (Fig. 4b–e) and corresponding identified chemical structures (Fig. 4f–i) of the monomer products denoted by yellow dashed circles (B1 to B4) in Fig. 4a, which unambiguously confirmed that the phenyl group migration reaction can also take place on the Cu(111) substrate. The chemical structures of B1 and rare species B5 are also complemented by nc-AFM imaging and DFT simulated results, which show good agreements (Supplementary Fig. 27). Interestingly, compared to the DMTPB precursor, the products B1 and B2 lost a benzene ring, revealing that the phenyl groups would be indeed expelled and the reactivity complexity of the migration of phenyl groups. Owing to the on-surface cyclodehydrogenation reaction, other products could be found after thermal treatment at increased temperature (Supplementary Fig. 28). Moreover, we also identified different products of phenyl group migration on a Ag(110) surface after annealing to 460 K (Supplementary Figs. 29 and 30). The successful observation of phenyl group migration on the Au(111), Cu(111) and Ag(110) surfaces demonstrates that the migration is a universal phenomenon and adaptable to surfaces with different catalytic activity and symmetry.

Fig. 4. Products of phenyl migration reaction formed on Cu(111) after annealing at 420 K.

Fig. 4

a STM topography of DMTPB self-assembly on Cu(111). b Large-scale STM topography (I = 50 pA, Vs = 100 mV) of different products after thermal annealing of the DMTPB self-assembly on Cu(111) at 420 K. cf STM topographies (CO tip, I = 50 pA, Vs = 100 mV) of major monomer products, as denoted by yellow dashed circles numbered by B1, B2, B3 and B4 in a. gj BR-STM images (CO tip, Vs = 2 mV) of products B1, B2, B3, B4 correspond to cf, respectively. kn The identified molecular structures of five products corresponding to B1, B2, B3, B4 in panels gj. Shaded rings with two different colors mark the phenyl groups and the central benzene in the precursor. Scale bar: a 5 nm b 6 nm; bi 0.5 nm.

As far as we know, most radical migrations are originally discovered as side reactions. It is hard to obtain final products in a controllable manner, especially in the field of on-surface synthesis. The ultra-high yield of the intermediate product 2 (Supplementary Fig. 3j) implies that this experimentally observed phenyl group migration reaction is a precise on-surface chemical reaction with mono-selection, which can serve as a significantly efficient methodology in preparing synthetically building blocks. The migration with the absence of forming spirocyclic intermediate here also complements the present mechanism of radical aryl migration reaction. Moreover, most early reported radical migrations require the use of toxic reagents and harsh conditions, such as high temperature or high dilution, which do not meet the requirements of green chemistry4345, meanwhile, our results indicate that phenyl group migration reaction could take place on different catalytic surfaces under mild heat treatment without additional complexity.

In summary, we have successfully identified and visualized a phenyl group migration involving the C-C bond cleavage between phenyl groups and the precursor backbone on Au(111) substrate. The subsequent reaction produces various intermediates and products derived from the cascaded cyclodehydrogenations process on the surface, which were directly captured by STM/nc-AFM. DFT calculations confirmed the energetically favored phenyl groups migration scenario. The universality of phenyl group migration of DMTPB precursors is also unambiguously realized on Cu(111) and Ag(110) substrates. The results here provide detailed mechanistic insights into the field of on-surface synthesis and guidance into the design and synthesis of new chemical species.

Methods

Sample preparation

The atomically clean Au(111), Cu(111), and Ag(110) (MaTecK) surfaces were obtained by cycles of argon-ion sputtering and annealing at 800, 785, and 770 K, respectively. The DMTPB molecules (Sigma Aldrich, 99%) were thermally deposited onto substrates by a standard Knudsen cell heating at 360 K, while the substrates were held at room temperature. CO molecules were dosed onto the sample surfaces for tip modification.

STM and AFM measurements

Experiments were performed by using an ultra-high vacuum-low temperature-scanning tunneling microscope (UHV-LT-STM, Scienta Omicron) with a base pressure better than 1 × 10−10 mbar. After deposition and annealing, the samples were analyzed with STM and nc-AFM at 4.2 K. All the STM images were acquired with the constant current or constant height mode by using an electrochemically etched tungsten tip, and all given voltages were applied to the sample with respect to the tip. Nanotec Electronica WSxM software46 was used to process images shown here. nc-AFM measurements were performed at 4.2 K with tungsten tips placed on qPlus tuning fork sensors47. The tips were functionalized with a single CO molecule at the tip apex picked up from the CO-dosed surface. Sensor 1 was driven at its resonance frequency (28214 Hz) with a constant amplitude of 50 pm. Sensor 2 was driven at its resonance frequency (28,248 Hz) with a constant amplitude of 90 pm. The Δz was positive (negative) when the tip-surface distance was increased (decreased) with respect to the STM set point at which the feedback loop was opened.

Calculation details

DFT-based first-principles calculations were performed in a plane-wave formulation with the projector augmented wave method (PAW) as implemented in the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) code. The Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) parametrization of the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was used. The cutoff energy for the plane waves was 450 eV. The vacuum layer is 20 Å between neighboring slabs. In relaxation, atoms in the bottom layer of the substrate were fixed and all the other atoms were relaxed until the atomic forces were less than 0.02 eV/Å. The Brillouin zone was sampled with only the Γ-point in all calculations. A dispersion correction of total energy (DFT-D2 method) was used to incorporate the long-range van der Waals interaction. Simulations of nc-AFM were performed with a modification of the particle probe model code by Hapala et al48. The structure was taken from DFT simulations, and the electrostatic potential was extracted from the Hartree potential49. The simulations involved oscillating a probe particle with an amplitude of 60 pm at a height of 2.88 Å above the substrate. We also used a quadrupole dz2 tip model50, and a tip lateral spring constant of about 0.25 N/m, which proved to give the best agreement with the experiment. Zero-point energy (ZPE), enthalpy, and entropy contributions to free energies at 440 K were calculated from vibrational modes of surface species, which were computed with the finite difference approach as implemented in the VaspGibbs code51.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File (94.8MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The project is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 62271238 and 61901200), the Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects (Nos. 202201AT070078, 202101AV070008, 202101AW070010, 202101AU070043, and 202201BE070001-009), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB30000000), and the Dongguan Innovation Research Team Program. Numerical computations is performed on Hefei advanced computing center.

Author contributions

J.C., J.L., and L.G. conceived and coordinated the research project. Z.R., S.S., and Y.Z. carried out the experiments. B.L. performed the DFT calculations under the guidance of L.G. All authors participated in discussing the data and editing the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Data availability

The data that supports the findings of this study are available within the paper or its Supplementary Information. The raw data are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Zilin Ruan, Baijin Li, Jianchen Lu, Lei Gao.

Contributor Information

Jianchen Lu, Email: jclu@kust.edu.cn.

Lei Gao, Email: lgao@kust.edu.cn.

Jinming Cai, Email: j.cai@kust.edu.cn.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-36696-6.

References

  • 1.Clair S, de Oteyza DG. Controlling a chemical coupling reaction on a surface: tools and strategies for on-surface synthesis. Chem. Rev. 2019;119:4717–4776. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Björk J. Reaction mechanisms for on-surface synthesis of covalent nanostructures. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2016;28:083002. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/28/8/083002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Méndez J, López MF, Martín-Gago JA. On-surface synthesis of cyclic organic molecules. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:4578–4590. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00161a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cai J, et al. Atomically precise bottom-up fabrication of graphene nanoribbons. Nature. 2010;466:470–473. doi: 10.1038/nature09211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang S, et al. On-surface synthesis and characterization of individual polyacetylene chains. Nat. Chem. 2019;11:924–930. doi: 10.1038/s41557-019-0316-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Talirz L, Ruffieux P, Fasel R. On‐surface synthesis of atomically precise graphene nanoribbons. Adv. Mater. 2016;28:6222–6231. doi: 10.1002/adma.201505738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ruffieux P, et al. On-surface synthesis of graphene nanoribbons with zigzag edge topology. Nature. 2016;531:489–492. doi: 10.1038/nature17151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fan Q, et al. Biphenylene network: a nonbenzenoid carbon allotrope. Science. 2021;372:852–856. doi: 10.1126/science.abg4509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xi M, Bent BE. Mechanisms of the Ullmann coupling reaction in adsorbed monolayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:7426–7433. doi: 10.1021/ja00069a048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Held PA, et al. On‐surface domino reactions: glaser coupling and dehydrogenative coupling of a biscarboxylic acid to form polymeric bisacylperoxides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:9777–9782. doi: 10.1002/anie.201602859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kanuru VK, et al. Sonogashira coupling on an extended gold surface in vacuo: reaction of phenylacetylene with iodobenzene on Au (111) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:8081–8086. doi: 10.1021/ja1011542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhong Q, et al. Benzo-fused periacenes or double helicenes? Different cyclodehydrogenation pathways on surface and in solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:7399–7406. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b01267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Krüger J, et al. Decacene: on‐surface generation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56:11945–11948. doi: 10.1002/anie.201706156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Urgel JI, et al. On-surface light-induced generation of higher acenes and elucidation of their open-shell character. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08650-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wallis ES, Lane JF. The Hofmann Reaction. Org. React. 2004;3:267–306. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mach MH, Bunnett JF. Participation of oligochlorobenzenes in the base-catalyzed halogen dance. J. Org. Chem. 1980;45:4660–4666. doi: 10.1021/jo01311a022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Overman LE. Thermal and mercuric ion catalyzed [3, 3]-sigmatropic rearrangement of allylic trichloroacetimidates. 1, 3 Transposition of alcohol and amine functions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974;96:597–599. doi: 10.1021/ja00809a054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Matsuya Y, Ohsawa N, Nemoto H. Accelerated electrocyclic ring-opening of benzocyclobutenes under the influence of a β-silicon atom. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:412–413. doi: 10.1021/ja055505+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schwarz JP. Preparation of acyclic isoimides and their rearrangement rates to imides. J. Org. Chem. 1972;37:2906–2908. doi: 10.1021/jo00983a028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hong SH, Sanders DP, Lee CW, Grubbs RH. Prevention of undesirable isomerization during olefin metathesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:17160–17161. doi: 10.1021/ja052939w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Buncel E. Catalysis in strongly acidic media and the Wallach rearrangement. Acc. Chem. Res. 1975;8:132–139. doi: 10.1021/ar50088a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ireland RE, Mueller RH. Claisen rearrangement of allyl esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972;94:5897–5898. doi: 10.1021/ja00771a062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Blatt AH. The Beckmann rearrangement. Chem. Rev. 1933;12:215–260. doi: 10.1021/cr60042a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen Z-M, Zhang X-M, Tu Y-Q. Radical aryl migration reactions and synthetic applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:5220–5245. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00467A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Eisler S, Tykwinski RR. Migrating alkynes in vinylidene carbenoids: an unprecedented route to polyynes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:10736–10737. doi: 10.1021/ja005557t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Whitmore FC. The common basis of intramolecular rearrangements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1932;54:3274–3283. doi: 10.1021/ja01347a037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nagasawa T, Taya K, Kitamura M, Suzuki K. Novel migrating group in 1, 2-anionotropic reactions: cobalt complexation facilitates 1, 2-shift of alkynyl groups. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118:8949–8950. doi: 10.1021/ja961030y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kitamura T, Zhang B-X, Fujiwara Y. Novel phenyl migration of 1-phenylbenzo [b] thiophenium triflates in the thermolysis. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:2239–2241. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(02)00216-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fan Q, et al. Nanoribbons with nonalternant topology from fusion of polyazulene: carbon allotropes beyond graphene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:17713–17720. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b08060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Krzeszewski, M., Sahara, K., Poronik, Y. M., Kubo, T. & Gryko, D. T. Unforeseen 1,2-Aryl shift in tetraarylpyrrolo[3,2- b]pyrroles triggered by oxidative aromatic coupling. Org. Lett. 20, 1517–1520 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 31.Pavlicek N, et al. Polyyne formation via skeletal rearrangement induced by atomic manipulation. Nat. Chem. 2018;10:853–858. doi: 10.1038/s41557-018-0067-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.He M, Swager TM. Aryl migration on graphene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:17876–17880. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c05965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.He J, et al. Tetrabenzanthanthrenes by mitigation of rearrangements in the planarization of ortho-phenylene hexamers. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2015;51:7245–7248. doi: 10.1039/C5CC00826C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu J, et al. Unexpected scholl reaction of 6,7,13,14-tetraarylbenzo[k]tetraphene: selective formation of five-membered rings in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:2602–2608. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b10399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ajaz A, McLaughlin EC, Skraba SL, Thamatam R, Johnson RP. Phenyl shifts in substituted arenes via ipso arenium ions. J. Org. Chem. 2012;77:9487–9495. doi: 10.1021/jo301848g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dou X, et al. Unexpected phenyl group rearrangement during an intramolecular Scholl reaction leading to an alkoxy-substituted hexa-peri-hexabenzocoronene. Org. Lett. 2007;9:2485–2488. doi: 10.1021/ol0708018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Urgel JI, et al. Negatively curved warped nanographene self-assembled on metal surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:13158–13164. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b05501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nishio M, Hirota M. CH/π interaction: Implications in organic chemistry. Tetrahedron. 1989;45:7201–7245. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)89185-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fan Q, et al. On-surface synthesis and characterization of a cycloarene: C108 graphene ring. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;142:894–899. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b10151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liu J, et al. Open-shell nonbenzenoid nanographenes containing two pairs of pentagonal and heptagonal rings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:12011–12020. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b04718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Skidin D, et al. On-surface synthesis of nitrogen-doped nanographenes with 5–7 membered rings. Chem. Commun. (Camb., U. K.) 2019;55:4731–4734. doi: 10.1039/C9CC00276F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen P, et al. The role of methyl groups in the early stage of thermal polymerization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons revealed by molecular imaging. Energy Fuels. 2021;35:2224–2233. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.YunáDo J. 1, 2-Radical rearrangements of aryl, furanyl and thiophenyl groups from carbon to nitrogen. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1995;16:1607–1608. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bonfand E, Motherwell WB, Pennell AM, Uddin MK, Ujjainwalla F. A novel route to 4-aryl-5, 6-dihydro-1, 2-oxathiin-2, 2-dioxides and related heterocyclic systems. Heterocycles. 1997;46:523–534. doi: 10.3987/COM-97-S63. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.da Mata MLE, Motherwell WB, Ujjainwalla F. Observations on the nature of the tethering chain in the synthesis of biaryls and heterobiaryls via intramolecular free radical ipso substitution reactions. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997;38:141–144. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(96)02237-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Horcas I, et al. WSXM: A software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2007;78:013705. doi: 10.1063/1.2432410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Giessibl FJ. Atomic resolution on Si(111)-(7x7) by noncontact atomic force microscopy with a force sensor based on a quartz tuning fork. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000;76:1470–1472. doi: 10.1063/1.126067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.de la Torre B, et al. Submolecular resolution by variation of the inelastic electron tunneling spectroscopy amplitude and its relation to the AFM/STM Signal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119:166001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.166001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hapala P, Temirov R, Tautz FS, Jelinek P. Origin of high-resolution iets-stm images of organic molecules with functionalized tips. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014;113:226101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.226101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hapala P, et al. Mapping the electrostatic force field of single molecules from high-resolution scanning probe images. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:1–8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bendavid LI, Carter EA. CO2 adsorption on Cu2O (111): a DFT+ U and DFT-D study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013;117:26048–26059. doi: 10.1021/jp407468t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Peer Review File (94.8MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available within the paper or its Supplementary Information. The raw data are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES