Introduction: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is difficult to diagnose and carries poorer outcome. Imaging modalities like cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), positron emission tomography (PET) and radionuclide scans have been shown to be helpful in the early detection of CS for its early diagnosis and treatment. 18F-FDG PET/CT in CS provides information related to inflammatory disease activity, early detection and therapy monitoring. Early CS is characterized by normal perfusion and increased focal FDG uptake, whereas tissue damage with abnormal perfusion and increased FDG uptake is seen in advanced CS. Scarring is the potential end-stage of CS, resulting in abnormal myocardial perfusion without FDG uptake. 68Ga-DOTANOC having the high affinity for somatostatin receptors (SSTR) 2, 3 and 5 expressed in inflammatory cells in sarcoid granulomas does not have physiological myocardial uptake compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT. Therefore 68Ga-DOTANOC may offer a better alternative to the non-specific FDG tracer uptake in CS imaging without the need for physiological suppression of FDG uptake prior to imaging.
Materials and Methods: A total of 19 patients who presented in the pulmonary out- patient department (OPD) with biopsy proven pulmonary sarcoidosis in which cardiac involvement was clinically suspected and patients with a primary cardiac abnormality (atrioventricular block, arrhythmia, or heart failure) who presented to the Cardiology OPD, in whom systemic sarcoidosis was diagnosed on the basis of clinical/histopathological features were included in this study. Patients underwent diagnostic tests with cardiac specific imaging procedures CMR, 13N-NH3PET/CT for myocardial perfusion, 18F-FDG PET/CT for glucose metabolism and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for abnormal SSTR expression in the myocardium. Findings of 18F-FDG PET/CT, CMR and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT were evaluated for the agreement among three imaging modalities.
Results: CMR could be done in only 15 out of 19 patients. CMR and 18F-FDG PET/CT were concordant in 13/15 (86.7%) patients and discordant in 2 (13.3%) with a substantial intermodality agreement with Cohen's kappa=0.732 and p value of 0.005 (statistically significant). CMR and 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT were concordant in 12 (80.0%) patients and discordant in 3 (20.0%) with substantial intermodality agreement with Cohen's kappa=0.602 with p value of 0.019 (statistically significant) and 18F-FDG and 68GaDOTANOC were concordant in 14/19 (73.6%) patients and discordant in 5/19 (26.3%) with moderate intermodality agreement with Cohen's kappa =0.469 and p value of 0.040 (statistically significant).
Conclusions: All three modalities; CMR, 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68GaDOTANOC PET/CT have their own advantages and disadvantages. The physiological cardiac suppression with 18F-FDG PET/CT is a tedious process and may not be achieved in many patients, whereas SSTR imaging with 68GaDOTANOCPET/CT has the advantage. In our study, although both 18F-FDG and 68GaDOTANOC PET/CT had strong inter-modality agreement with CMR, the role of these imaging techniques is more complementary. SSTR imaging in CS with 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT seems to be promising imaging modality and worth exploring. Though there is paucity of data to validate its role, but with more sample size and evidence, SSTR imaging has the potential to replace 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis, prognostication and response assessment.
Acknowledgments: This study was supported by the Indian Council of Medical Research Grant number 3/2/June-2021/PG-Thesis-HRD (15).

was 2.30 (SD=0.68).

