Skip to main content
Karger Author's Choice logoLink to Karger Author's Choice
. 2022 Oct 14;56(6):452–459. doi: 10.1159/000527437

Primary Malignant Brain Tumors following Systemic Malignancies: A Population-Based Analysis

Yubo Wang a, Ziqian Wang a, Cong Hua a, Ying Xu b,*, Yunqian Li a,**, Gang Zhao a,***
PMCID: PMC9945192  PMID: 36244332

Abstract

Background

Several reports have described glioma following different cancers. We assessed the prevalence of primary malignant brain tumors afterward systemic malignancies in patients in the USA based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data.

Methods

The detailed data of patients with primary malignant brain tumors following an initial malignant tumor outside the central nervous system were extracted from SEER. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze patient demographic and clinical characteristics. We also extracted standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) stratified by age, race, sex, history of radiation or chemotherapy, histology findings, and primary cancer site.

Results

We identified 5,212 patients diagnosed with primary malignant brain tumors following systemic malignancies. Most patients had prostate cancer, breast cancer, and skin melanoma as the primary cancer. The median duration between the first diagnosis of cancer and that of the subsequent malignant brain tumor was 53 months. Glioblastoma was the most common subsequent malignant brain tumor type. The prognosis after subsequent malignant brain tumor diagnosis was poor. The SIRs differed most by race, cancer site, and cancer type. Patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia had the highest risk of developing primary malignant brain tumors.

Conclusion

Our study provides a comprehensive analysis of clinical data and the SIRs of patients with primary malignant brain tumors afterward other systemic malignancies. Genetic relationships might play a key role in subsequent malignant brain tumor origin. Our data provide directions for future studies exploring the hidden associations between systemic malignancies and primary malignant brain tumors.

Keywords: Primary brain tumor, Glioma, Cancer, SEER program, CNS disease

Introduction

Glioma accounts for almost 30% of all primary brain tumors and 80% of malignant tumors, and it is responsible for the majority of deaths from primary brain tumors [1]. Although numerous studies have contributed to a greater understanding of the genesis of glioma [2], the origin of glioma remains a topic of controversy in cancer research [3]. There are several reports describing glioma following different kinds of systemic malignancies, such as breast cancer [4, 5, 6, 7, 8] and acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. We have also encountered such cases during our clinical work. Is there a relationship between systemic malignancies and primary malignant brain tumors? Whether the prevalence of primary brain tumors is higher among patients with systemic malignancies? The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute currently collects and publishes cancer incidence and survival data from population-based cancer registries covering approximately 48% of the US population [15]. Multiple primary standardized incidence ratios (MP-SIRs) are the analytic measurements used to perform multiple primary analyses and to test hypotheses that explore theoretical links in the etiology of two cancers. A defined cohort of persons previously diagnosed with cancer is followed through time to compare their subsequent cancer experience to the number of cancers that would be expected based on incidence rates for the general population. We sought to determine whether the prevalence of primary brain tumors is higher among patients with systemic malignancies.

Method

The detailed data of patients with primary malignant brain tumors following a primary malignant tumor outside the central nervous system were extracted from the MP-SIR session of the SEER database. Malignancy was defined according to the behavior code of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology 3 (ICD-O-3), and in situ disease was included. Patients of an unknown age were excluded. Death certificate-only and autopsy-only cases were also excluded. To avoid potential events being ignored, the latency exclusion period was set as 2 months. Single outcome analysis was chosen as the analysis type. Subjects exited the study based on the following dates, whichever occurred first: the date of their first event (diagnosis of any malignant brain tumor), the date of their death, the date at which they were lost to follow-up, or the end date of the study. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients. We extracted the standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) of the MP-SIR session using the SIR table mode, with the patients stratified by age, race, sex, history of radiation or chemotherapy, histology findings, and primary cancer site. The SIR was evaluated based on the observed value, expected value, O/E ratio, and 95% confidence interval. A history of radiation or chemotherapy was identified according to the variable “therapy.” The histology findings were extracted according to the variable “Histology recode − Brain groupings.” The primary tumor site was defined according to the variable “ICD-O-3/WHO 2008 individual sites only.” To make the results more specific, we also extracted the SIRs for patients with particular primary cancers according to a history of radiation or chemotherapy. Finally, we analyzed the pathological type of the subsequent malignant brain tumor, which was defined according to ICD-O-3. The research period was a diagnosis within January 2000 to December 2018. All the data were obtained by using the SEER*Stat 8.3.9 program. The latest database of Incidence–SEER Research Plus Data, 18 registries (November 2020 submission) [16], was adopted.

Results

We indexed 6,061,265 patients with primary malignant or in situ cancer outside of the central nervous system. Of these, we identified only 5,212 patients (0.09%) with primary malignant brain tumors following systemic malignancies. Only 0.16% of the patients with prostate cancer developed brain tumors, which was the highest percentage of all primary cancers studied. The percentages for patients with breast cancer, melanoma of the skin, and ALL were 0.07%, 0.14%, and 0.10%, respectively (Table 1). Among the 5,212 patients, most were first diagnosed with prostate cancer (n = 1,469, 28.2%), breast cancer (n = 776, 14.9%), or melanoma of the skin (n = 587, 11.3%).

Table 1.

Number of patients studied and the number of patients with subsequent primary malignant brain tumors

Sites Persons with event Persons indexed Percentage
All sites 5,212 6,061,265 0.09
Prostate 1,469 917,369 0.16
Breast 776 1,112,058 0.07
Melanoma of the skin 587 419,253 0.14
Urinary bladder 238 229,544 0.10
Kidney and renal pelvis 207 186,735 0.11
Lung and bronchus 178 592,935 0.03
Corpus uteri 156 187,403 0.08
Thyroid 144 167,942 0.09
NHL − nodal 137 155,573 0.09
Sigmoid colon 105 116,004 0.09
Miscellaneous 105 155,162 0.07
NHL − extranodal 90 78,527 0.11
Rectum 86 128,344 0.07
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia 78 60,122 0.13
Cecum 69 83,298 0.08
Ascending colon 58 70,601 0.08
Myeloma 56 78,659 0.07
Ovary 40 82,901 0.05
Small intestine 31 24,488 0.13
Soft tissue including heart 31 41,128 0.08
Other non-epithelial skin 31 21,946 0.14
Tongue 28 42,803 0.07
Larynx 27 45,748 0.06
Rectosigmoid junction 26 43,553 0.06
Acute lymphocytic leukemia 24 23,297 0.10
Vulva 23 38,949 0.06
Descending colon 22 23,114 0.10
Others 390 933,809 0.04

The median duration between the initial cancer diagnosis and the development of a subsequent malignant brain tumor was 53 months, and the median age at diagnosis of the subsequent malignant brain tumor was 70 years old. The prognosis after the diagnosis of subsequent malignant brain tumor was poor, and the median survival month was 6 months. Most of the patients were male (n = 3,256, 62.5%) and non-Hispanic white (n = 4,376, 84.0%). The SIR was found to be significantly higher for male patients than for general population. We then stratified the patients for analysis by race and origin, and the results indicated that the SIR for Hispanic individuals was significantly lower than that for non-Hispanic individuals (Table 2).

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients with subsequent primary malignant brain tumors

Variables Observed Expected O/E 95% CI
Age at diagnosis of first malignant tumor, years
 Mean ± SD 63.49±0.341
 Median 65
Age at diagnosis of secondary malignant brain tumor, years
 Mean ± SD 68.86±0.179
 Median 70
Months between first cancer and secondary brain tumor
 Mean ± SD 64.48±0.685
 Median 53
Survival months after diagnosis of malignant brain tumor
 Mean ± SD 14.15±0.341
 Median 6
Sex, n (%)
 Female 1,956 (37.5) 1,956 1,946.77 1 0.96–1.05
 Male 3,256 (62.5) 3,256 3,069.14 1.06# 1.02–1.1
Race and origin recode, n (%)
 Hispanic (all races) 343 (6.6) 343 432.72 0.79# 0.71–0.88
 Non-Hispanic white 4,376 (84.0) 4,376 4,174.43 1.05# 1.02–1.08
 Non-Hispanic black 297 (5.7) 297 260.5 1.14# 1.01–1.28
 Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander 179 (3.4) 179 140.37 1.28# 1.1–1.48
 Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native 17 (0.3) 17 7.9 2.15# 1.25–3.45

CI, confidence interval.

#

Means p < 0.05.

We listed the SIRs for the primary cancers based on histology for the cancers with the top 15 observed values in Table 3. Patients with codes “9950–9969: chronic myeloproliferative disorders,” “9820–9839: lymphoid leukemias,” “8720–8799: nevi and melanomas,” and “8140–8389: adenomas and adenocarcinomas” had significantly higher SIRs, while patients with codes “8500–8549: ductal and lobular neoplasms” and “8050–8089: squamous cell neoplasms” had lower SIRs. We listed the SIRs for the primary cancers based on site for the cancers with the top 25 observed values in Table 4. We found that patients with ALL, small intestine cancer, other non-epithelial skin cancers, extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma, thyroid cancer, kidney and renal pelvis cancer, and melanoma of the skin had a significantly higher risk of developing primary malignant brain tumors. Patients with breast cancer, laryngeal cancer, and rectosigmoid junction cancer had a lower risk.

Table 3.

SIRs of patients stratified by histology findings

Histology record − broad groups Observed Expected O/E 95% CI
8140–8389: adenomas and adenocarcinomas 2536 2,427.74 1.04# 1–1.09
8500–8549: ductal and lobular neoplasms 713 810.21 0.88# 0.82–0.95
8720–8799: nevi and melanomas 593 451.13 1.31# 1.21–1.42
8120–8139: transitional cell papillomas and carcinomas 255 268.81 0.95 0.84–1.07
8050–8089: squamous cell neoplasms 197 280.69 0.7# 0.61–0.81
9670–9699: nhl − mature b-cell lymphomas 173 148.55 1.16 1–1.35
9820–9839: lymphoid leukemias (C42.1) 101 72.32 1.4# 1.14–1.7
8440–8499: cystic, mucinous, and serous neoplasms 96 101.45 0.95 0.77–1.16
8010–8049: epithelial neoplasms, NOS 78 87.71 0.89 0.7–1.11
9730–9739: plasma cell tumors 56 44.24 1.27 0.96–1.64
9950–9969: chronic myeloproliferative disorders (C42.1) 49 32.54 1.51# 1.11–1.99
8000–8009: unspecified neoplasms 29 24.63 1.18 0.79–1.69
9590–9599: malignant lymphomas, NOS or diffuse 29 21.05 1.38 0.92–1.98
9980–9989: myelodysplastic syndrome 29 27.69 1.05 0.7–1.5
8550–8559: acinar cell neoplasms 25 23.46 1.07 0.69–1.57

CI, confidence interval.

#

Means p < 0.05.

Table 4.

SIRs of patients stratified by cancer site

Site Observed Expected O/E 95% CI
Prostate 1,469 1,418.71 1.04 0.98–1.09
Breast 776 878.65 0.88# 0.82–0.95
Melanoma of the skin 587 442.05 1.33# 1.22–1.44
Urinary bladder 238 256.76 0.93 0.81–1.05
Kidney and renal pelvis 207 149.89 1.38# 1.2–1.58
Lung and bronchus 178 199.04 0.89 0.77–1.04
Corpus uteri 156 138.01 1.13 0.96–1.32
Thyroid 144 102.59 1.4# 1.18–1.65
NHL − nodal 137 124.38 1.1 0.92–1.3
Sigmoid colon 105 108.72 0.97 0.79–1.17
Miscellaneous 105 86.72 1.21 0.99–1.47
NHL − extranodal 90 62.98 1.43# 1.15–1.76
Rectum 86 104.87 0.82 0.66–1.01
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia 78 63.64 1.23 0.97–1.53
Cecum 69 71.74 0.96 0.75–1.22
Ascending colon 58 62.45 0.93 0.71–1.2
Myeloma 56 44.06 1.27 0.96–1.65
Ovary 40 37.8 1.06 0.76–1.44
Small intestine 31 17.31 1.79# 1.22–2.54
Soft tissue including heart 31 24.17 1.28 0.87–1.82
Other non-epithelial skin 31 19.7 1.57# 1.07–2.23
Tongue 28 31.64 0.88 0.59–1.28
Larynx 27 41.02 0.66# 0.43–0.96
Rectosigmoid junction 26 38.54 0.67# 0.44–0.99
Acute lymphocytic leukemia 24 5.14 4.67# 2.99–6.95

CI, confidence interval.

#

Means p < 0.05.

In the whole cohort, patients who did not receive chemotherapy or radiation for primary cancer had a significantly higher incidence of subsequent primary malignant brain tumors. We analyzed the response to radiation therapy and chemotherapy among patients with prostate cancer, breast cancer, melanoma of the skin, and ALL, but we did not find any evidence to prove that patients who received radiation or chemotherapy had higher incidence ratios than their counterparts who did not receive radiation or chemotherapy (Table 5). The subsequent malignant brain tumor types are listed in Table 6. Almost 94% of them were gliomas, and glioblastoma was the most common pathological type of subsequent malignant brain tumor, accounting for 68.4% of all tumors (n = 3,563).

Table 5.

Effect of chemotherapy and radiation therapy on the development of primary malignant brain tumors

Site and treatment Observed Expected O/E 95% CI
All sites
 Chemotherapy record
  Yes 901 904.73 1 0.93–1.06
  None/unknown 4,311 4,111.19 1.05# 1.02–1.08
 Radiation record
  Yes 1,419 1,460.83 0.97 0.92–1.02
  None/unknown 3,793 3,555.08 1.07# 1.03–1.1
Prostate 1,469 1,418.71 1.04 0.98–1.09
 Chemotherapy record
  Yes 11 6.48 1.7 0.85–3.04
  None/unknown 1,458 1,412.23 1.03 0.98–1.09
 Radiation record
  Yes 565 556.12 1.02 0.93–1.1
  None/unknown 904 862.59 1.05 0.98–1.12
Breast 776 878.65 0.88# 0.82–0.95
 Chemotherapy record
  Yes 232 245.95 0.94 0.83–1.07
  None/unknown 544 632.7 0.86# 0.79–0.94
 Radiation record
  Yes 379 446.47 0.85# 0.77–0.94
  None/unknown 397 432.18 0.92 0.83–1.01
Melanoma of the skin 587 442.05 1.33# 1.22–1.44
 Chemotherapy record
  Yes 3 2.19 1.37 0.28–4
  None/unknown 584 439.86 1.33# 1.22–1.44
 Radiation record
  Yes 7 2.57 2.73# 1.1–5.62
  None/unknown 580 439.48 1.32# 1.21–1.43
Acute lymphocytic leukemia 24 5.14 4.67# 2.99–6.95
 Chemotherapy record
  Yes 21 4.87 4.31# 2.67–6.59
  None/unknown 3 0.27 11.3# 2.33–33.02
 Radiation record
  Yes 5 0.78 6.42# 2.08–14.99
  None/unknown 19 4.36 4.36# 2.62–6.81

CI, confidence interval.

#

Means p < 0.05.

Table 6.

Pathology data of the subsequent primary malignant brain tumors

Histology record according to ICD-O-3 Number Percentage
9440/3: glioblastoma, NOS 3,563 68.4
9401/3: astrocytoma, anaplastic 292 5.6
8000/3: neoplasm, malignant 279 5.4
9380/3: glioma, malignant 278 5.3
9400/3: astrocytoma, NOS 233 4.5
9450/3: oligodendroglioma, NOS 107 2.1
9442/3: gliosarcoma 82 1.6
9451/3: oligodendroglioma, anaplastic 64 1.2
9382/3: mixed glioma 59 1.1
9391/3: ependymoma, NOS 41 0.8
9420/3: fibrillary astrocytoma 41 0.8
9421/3: pilocytic astrocytoma, malignant 34 0.7
9441/3: giant cell glioblastoma 30 0.6
9411/3: gemistocytic astrocytoma 20 0.4
9473/3: primitive neuroectodermal tumor 12 0.2
Others 77 1.5

Discussion

Glioma is the most common primary malignant central nervous system tumor, and the prognosis is very poor, especially for patients with high-grade glioma [17]. The origin of glioma remains controversial [3]; several centers have also reported high-grade glioma following different kinds of systemic malignancies. We therefore wondered whether a connection exists between the development of primary malignant brain tumors and other systemic malignancies. The SEER program covers approximately 48% of the US population [15], and the MP-SIR session of the database was designed to aid in comparisons of the incidence of cancer in a defined cohort of persons previously diagnosed with cancer with the incidence of cancer in the general population to test hypotheses that explore theoretical links between the etiology of two cancers. Therefore, we conducted this population-based analysis to investigate the prevalence of brain tumors among patients with systemic malignancies in the USA. We intended to use the diagnosis of primary brain glioma as the end point of the study. However, this is not possible with the SEER program, so we chose a diagnosis of primary malignant brain tumor instead. In this cohort, 93.9% of the subsequent primary malignant brain tumors were found to be gliomas. We also found that 68.6% of all brain tumors in this cohort were glioblastomas according to ICD-O-3. This result is consistent with a previous report that most secondary gliomas are high grade [5, 13]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest population-based analysis of subsequent primary malignant brain tumors to date, and the results provide a better understanding of such situation, especially secondary brain gliomas.

Based on the results shown in Table 1, we found that only 0.09% of all patients with primary cancers outside the brain developed primary malignant brain tumors, and the highest percentage among cancers was just 0.16%. Thus, the development of subsequent malignant brain tumors seems to be a sporadic event, as previously reported [4]. The median duration between the diagnosis of the first cancer and subsequent malignant brain tumor was 53 months. Perhaps because of the poor prognosis of patients with systemic cancer, few primary malignant brain tumors can be detected before the patient's death. We also found that the SIRs differed most by race, cancer site, and cancer type. For example, patients with ALL and endocrine gland cancer had very high SIRs. Therefore, we believe there might be a potential connection between systemic malignancies and primary malignant brain tumors. For the SIR results stratified by cancer site and cancer type, we listed the results with higher observed values. It should be noted that the SEER program data were collected by numerous workers, and the SIRs for cancers with lower observed values were more easily affected by potentially inaccurate data.

Glioma following breast cancer has been reported several times [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. In our cohort, we found that 713 of 5,212 patients developed primary malignant brain tumors following ductal and lobular neoplasms, and 776 of 5,212 patients suffered from primary malignant brain tumors afterward breast cancer. However, the SIR for patients with breast cancer or ductal and lobular neoplasms was lower than that for the general population. This association could be related to the favorable long-term survival of breast cancer patients, which contributes to the development of glioma [4, 8]. Primary brain glioma following ALL has been commonly reported [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Yamanaka et al. [13] conducted a systematic review to characterize the etiology of secondary glioma in ALL patients. The researchers found 98 cases of glioma following ALL in the period between 1964 and 2014, and radiation therapy was administered in 92 cases. Brain radiation therapy, intrathecal and intravenous chemotherapy, and genetic predisposition are believed to be causative factors responsible for subsequent central nervous system tumors in pediatric ALL, and the most important risk factors are believed to be brain radiation therapy and intrathecal chemotherapy [13, 18, 19, 20, 21]. We identified 24 patients with glioma following ALL in our cohort, but radiation therapy was administered to only 5 patients. The ALL patients who did not receive radiation therapy also had a higher SIR, with an O/E value of 4.36, which was significantly higher than that of the general population. Chemotherapy was administered to 21 patients, but we could not confirm whether these patients had received intrathecal chemotherapy or intravenous chemotherapy. However, the SIR of ALL patients who did not receive chemotherapy was also significantly higher than that of the general population. In this study, we did not find any evidence to prove that radiation or chemotherapy caused increased the risk of developing subsequent malignant brain tumors in patients in the whole cohort or those with prostate cancer, breast cancer, ALL, or melanoma of the skin. Therefore, we cannot conclude that radiation therapy and chemotherapy play key roles in the development of primary malignant brain tumors. We believe that it is more likely that genetic predisposition is the most important risk factor. Scarbrough et al. [22] also explored the association between melanoma and glioma risk and concluded that a common genetic predisposition may be responsible for the detected association.

We also found that patients with endocrine gland cancer had a significantly higher risk of developing primary malignant brain tumors than the general population. Hormone replacement therapy has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of glioma [23]. In addition, growth hormones have been reported to have autocrine or paracrine actions in the development and progression of glioma [24]. Thus, we cannot ignore the potential association between hormones and glioma. Wang et al. [25] analyzed the incidence of second primary malignancy in patients with malignant astrocytoma and found that patients with malignant astrocytoma had a significantly higher risk of developing thyroid cancer and leukemia. Thus, it may be worthwhile to focus on the common genetic predisposition of patients with glioma and patients with thyroid cancer or ALL in the future.

There are several limitations of our report that must be considered. First, the prognosis varies greatly for patients with different pathological types of cancer and systemic malignancies. The median duration to the detection of subsequent primary malignant brain tumors was 53 months, and our analysis might have missed a potential relationship between primary malignant brain tumors and some tumors with a very poor prognosis. Second, we were unable to obtain some pertinent details of radiation therapy and chemotherapy, such as how many Grays were used and whether intrathecal chemotherapy was administered. Therefore, we could not explore the effect of radiation therapy and chemotherapy on the development of primary malignant brain tumors in depth. Third, among our cohort, a few patients had more than 2 primary tumors before the detection of subsequent malignant brain tumors, but we only collected and analyzed the data related to the first index tumor and the following brain tumor. This could also affect the comprehensiveness of our study. Despite these limitations, our study represents the most comprehensive retrospective analysis of subsequent primary malignant brain tumors to date. Our results can provide new information regarding the epidemiology of subsequent primary malignant brain tumors in the USA and provide directions for future studies exploring potential genetic associations between systemic malignancies and primary malignant brain tumors.

Conclusion

Our study provides a comprehensive analysis of the clinical data and SIRs of patients with primary malignant brain tumors following other systemic malignancies. Genetic relationships might play a key role in the origin of subsequent primary malignant brain tumors. Our data provide directions for future studies exploring potential hidden associations between systemic malignancies and primary malignant brain tumors.

Statement of Ethics

All the data were extracted from the SEER database. Because the data of the SEER database were available to the public, ethical approval and informed consent were not necessary for this study.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Funding Sources

This work was supported by the S&T Development Planning Program of Jilin Province (YDZJ202201ZYTS073) and Health and Wellness Technology Enhancement Project of Jilin Province (2022LC105).

Author Contributions

Y.B.W. drafted the manuscript. Y.B.W., Z.Q.W., and C.H. acquired the data and conducted the analysis. Y.X., Y.Q.L., G.Z., and Y.B.W. designed the study. All authors critically revised the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

All the data were obtained using the SEER*Stat 8.3.9 program extracted from the SEER database. They can be accessed from SEER (https://seer.cancer.gov/).

Acknowledgment

In memory of Prof. Qi Luo, who devoted his entire life to the advancement of neurosurgery in Jilin Province. Hope you rest in peace.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the S&T Development Planning Program of Jilin Province (YDZJ202201ZYTS073) and Health and Wellness Technology Enhancement Project of Jilin Province (2022LC105).

References

  • 1.Ostrom QT, Price M, Ryan K, Edelson J, Neff C, Cioffi G, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: pediatric brain tumor foundation childhood and adolescent primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018. Neuro Oncol. 2022 Sep 6;24((Suppl 3)):iii1–iii38. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cahill D, Turcan S. Origin of gliomas. Semin Neurol. 2018 Feb;38((01)):005–010. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1620238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alcantara Llaguno SR, Parada LF. Cell of origin of glioma: biological and clinical implications. Br J Cancer. 2016 Dec 6;115((12)):1445–1450. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Maluf FC, DeAngelis LM, Raizer JJ, Abrey LE. High-grade gliomas in patients with prior systemic malignancies. Cancer. 2002 Jun 15;94((12)):3219–3224. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Piccirilli M, Salvati M, Bistazzoni S, Frati A, Brogna C, Giangaspero F, et al. Glioblastoma multiforme and breast cancer: report on 11 cases and clinico-pathological remarks. Tumori. 2005;91((3)):256–260. doi: 10.1177/030089160509100309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Elmariah SB, Huse J, Mason B, Leroux P, Lustig RA. Multicentric glioblastoma multiforme in a patient with BRCA-1 invasive breast cancer. Breast J. 2006 Sep-Oct;12((5)):470–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00307.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chang CC, Tien CH, Tai SH, Chuang MT, Sze CI, Hung YC, et al. High-grade glioma in a patient with breast cancer. Asian J Surg. 2014 Jul;37((3)):162–166. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2012.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hanalioglu S, Hasanov E, Altundag K. Breast cancer and high-grade glioma: link or coincidence? J BUON. 2015 Sep-Oct;20((5)):1378–1379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Borgmann A, Zinn C, Hartmann R, Herold R, Kaatsch P, Escherich G, et al. Secondary malignant neoplasms after intensive treatment of relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood. Eur J Cancer. 2008 Jan;44((2)):257–268. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bien E, Stachowicz-Stencel T, Szalewska M, Krawczyk M, Synakiewicz A, Dubaniewicz-Wybieralska M, et al. Poor-risk high-grade gliomas in three survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia--an overview of causative factors and possible therapeutic options. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009 May;25((5)):619–626. doi: 10.1007/s00381-009-0838-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Alexiou GA, Moschovi M, Georgoulis G, Neroutsou R, Stefanaki K, Sfakianos G, et al. Anaplastic oligodendrogliomas after treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children: report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010 Feb;5((2)):179–183. doi: 10.3171/2009.9.PEDS09154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ahmed I, Krishnamurthy S, Kakkar A, Julka PK, Rath GK. Primary anaplastic astrocytoma of the brain after prophylactic cranial irradiation in a case of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: case report and review of the literature. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2014 Jan;35((01)):86–88. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.133729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yamanaka R, Hayano A. Secondary glioma following acute lymphocytic leukemia: therapeutic implications. Neurosurg Rev. 2017 Oct;40((4)):549–557. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0733-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kajitani T, Kanamori M, Saito R, Watanabe Y, Suzuki H, Watanabe M, et al. Three case reports of radiation-induced glioblastoma after complete remission of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2018 Apr;35((2)):114–122. doi: 10.1007/s10014-018-0316-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Overview of the SEER Program 2020. [cited 2021 Jan]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/about/overview.html.
  • 16.Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER Research Plus Data, 18 Registries (excl AK) Nov 2020 Sub (2000-2018) - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969-2019 Counties. National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research. www.seer.cancer.gov Program, released April 2021, based on the November 2020 submission.
  • 17.Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Waite K, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018. Neuro Oncol. 2021 Oct 5;23((Suppl 3)):iii1–05. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Walter AW, Hancock ML, Pui CH, Hudson MM, Ochs JS, Rivera GK, et al. Secondary brain tumors in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia at St Jude Children's Research Hospital. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Dec;16((12)):3761–3767. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.12.3761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Relling MV, Rubnitz JE, Rivera GK, Boyett JM, Hancock ML, Felix CA, et al. High incidence of secondary brain tumours after radiotherapy and antimetabolites. The Lancet. 1999 Jul 3;354((9172)):34–39. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11079-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Spiegler BJ, Kennedy K, Maze R, Greenberg ML, Weitzman S, Hitzler JK, et al. Comparison of long-term neurocognitive outcomes in young children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with cranial radiation or high-dose or very high-dose intravenous methotrexate. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 20;24((24)):3858–3864. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.9055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pettorini BL, Park YS, Caldarelli M, Massimi L, Tamburrini G, Di Rocco C. Radiation-induced brain tumours after central nervous system irradiation in childhood: a review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008 Jul;24((7)):793–805. doi: 10.1007/s00381-008-0631-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Scarbrough PM, Akushevich I, Wrensch M, Il'yasova D. Exploring the association between melanoma and glioma risks. Ann Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;24((6)):469–474. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Andersen L, Friis S, Hallas J, Ravn P, Gaist D. Hormone replacement therapy and risk of glioma: a nationwide nested case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;37((6)):876–880. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lea RW, Dawson T, Martinez-Moreno CG, El-Abry N, Harvey S. Growth hormone and cancer: GH production and action in glioma? Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2015 Sep 1;220:119–123. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang W. Increased incidence of second primary malignancy in patients with malignant astrocytoma: a population-based study. Biosci Rep. 2019 Jun 28;39((6)):BSR20181968. doi: 10.1042/BSR20181968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the data were obtained using the SEER*Stat 8.3.9 program extracted from the SEER database. They can be accessed from SEER (https://seer.cancer.gov/).


Articles from Neuroepidemiology are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES