Abstract
This manuscript aims to evaluate the robustness and significance of the water efflux rate constant (kio) parameter estimated using the two flip-angle Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MRI approach with a murine glioblastoma model at 7 T. The repeatability of contrast kinetic parameters and kio measurement was assessed by a test–retest experiment (n = 7). The association of kio with cellular metabolism was investigated through DCE-MRI and FDG-PET experiments (n = 7). Tumor response to a combination therapy of bevacizumab and fluorouracil (5FU) monitored by contrast kinetic parameters and kio (n = 10). Test–retest experiments demonstrated compartmental volume fractions (ve and vp) remained consistent between scans while the vascular functional measures (Fp and PS) and kio showed noticeable changes, most likely due to physiological changes of the tumor. The standardized uptake value (SUV) of tumors has a linear correlation with kio (R2 = 0.547), a positive correlation with Fp (R2 = 0.504), and weak correlations with ve (R2 = 0.150), vp (R2 = 0.077), PS (R2 = 0.117), Ktrans (R2 = 0.088) and whole tumor volume (R2 = 0.174). In the treatment study, the kio of the treated group was significantly lower than the control group one day after bevacizumab treatment and decreased significantly after 5FU treatment compared to the baseline. This study results support the feasibility of measuring kio using the two flip-angle DCE-MRI approach in cancer imaging.
Subject terms: Prognostic markers, Preclinical research, Cancer imaging, Cancer metabolism, Cancer microenvironment, Tumour biomarkers, Tumour heterogeneity, Cancer therapy
Introduction
The water efflux rate constant (kio) is a parameter of interest for oncology studies since cellular water exchange may reflect pathophysiological conditions of the cancer cells1. Cellular-interstitial water exchange may be a sensitive indicator of cellular energy turnover, as the water exchange depends on cell membrane ion-pump activities, a measure of glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration2,3. Increased expression of transmembrane water channels, aquaporins (AQPs), and subsequent increase of cell membrane permeability are associated with angiogenesis, proliferation and metastatic potential in cancer4. Estimation of kio from pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI has shown sensitivity to these different mechanisms of cellular water exchange1. Furthermore, several cancer studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using kio for tumor selection and grading5–7 and predicting treatment response1,8–10 including long term survivability11.
However, achieving accurate and reliable estimation of kio from DCE-MRI data has proven to be non-trivial due to the sensitivity of kio estimation to various experimental conditions, such as MRI scan parameters, arterial input function (AIF) and selection of contrast kinetic models12–14. It was also reported that the degree of water exchange effect on DCE-MRI data depends on scan protocols including the flip angle12,15. This flip angle dependency was leveraged in a previous study16 to improve the accuracy of kio estimation by actively encoding the water exchange effect in the washout phase of the DCE scan with a series of multiple flip angles, i.e., with different sensitivities to cellular water exchange. As the weighting of the water exchange effect changes with the different flip angle segments, one set of contrast kinetic parameters cannot adequately model the data without including the kio term.
The present study aims to evaluate the robustness and significance of the kio parameter estimated using the two flip-angle DCE-MRI approach in GL261 murine glioma model. The repeatability of contrast kinetic parameter measurement and kio was assessed by a test–retest DCE-MRI experiment. The association of kio with cellular metabolism was investigated through consecutive DCE-MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)—Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans. Finally, we assessed the feasibility of kio in evaluating tumor progression and response to chemotherapy.
Methods
Animal model
Six to eight-week-old C57BL6 mice (n = 24; female) with GL261 mouse glioma models were included in this study for repeatability measurement (n = 7), comparison with FDG-PET (n = 7), and assessment of treatment response (n = 10), as described below in detail. For this study to assess the feasibility of using the proposed two-flip angle DCE-MRI method, no power calculation was used to determine the sample size. The mice were inoculated with 1 × 105 GL261 mouse glioma cells suspended in 4μL of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution using a Hamilton syringe for stereotactic intracranial injection into the subcortex (2.5 mm depth). The inclusion criterion was to have successful tumor growth observed by MRI between day 15 and 26 after tumor inoculation. The exclusion criterion was to have any sign of pain and distress. All the mice included in this study meet these criteria. All animals were treated in strict accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and this study was approved by the institutional animal care of use committees (IACUC) at Weill Cornell Medical College and New York University School of Medicine and reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.
DCE-MRI data acquisition
MRI scans were performed on a Bruker 7 T micro-MRI system equipped with an 80-mm transmit-only birdcage coil and a 1H four-channel phased array cryogenically cooled receive-only mouse brain MRI coil. DCE-MRI image acquisition was performed using the 3D ultra-short echo-time (UTE) pulse sequence (TR = 4 ms and TE = 0.028 ms) with 3D Golden angle Radial Sparse Parallel (GRASP) MRI method to achieve an isotropic spatial resolution and to minimize the T2* effect. The pulse sequence was continuously run to acquire 154,080 spokes for 10 min and 13 s16. The two flip-angle DCE-MRI method was implemented by using a series of three flip angle segments (8°-25°-8°) with 51,360 spokes per flip angle segment (image matrix size = 128 × 128 × 128, field of view = 20 × 20 × 20 mm3, and the spatial resolution = 0.156 × 0.156 × 0.156 mm3). The segments with a low flip angle (8°) are expected to have larger effects of the cellular-interstitial water exchange than the one with a high flip angle (25°)16. A bolus of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) in saline at the dose of 0.1 mmol/kg was injected through a tail vein catheter, starting 60 s after the start of data acquisition; gadoxetate disodium (Eovist, Bayer) was used for the repeatability measurement and gadobutrol (Gadavist, Bayer) for comparison with FDG-PET and assessment of treatment response, assuming these two GBCAs work similarly as non-specific contrast agents in tumor. Prior to each DCE-MRI experiment, a 3D T1 map with the same isotropic high resolution was obtained using the same 3D-UTE-GRASP sequence with variable flip angles (8°-2°-12°, 12,776 spokes for each flip angle, total acquisition time = 153 s)16.
DCE-MRI data analysis
Image reconstruction was conducted using the joint compressed sensing and parallel imaging reconstruction method based on the 3D-UTE-GRASP algorithm17 in order to achieve a temporal frame resolution T = 5 s/frame. Arterial input function (AIF) was obtained from the early enhancing vascular voxels following the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method used in our previous study18. The T1-weighted images were used to manually segment tumors. The independently measured pre-contrast T1 map was used to convert the DCE-MRI signal intensity data to GBCA concentration data with the assumption of the tissue relaxivity (r1 = 5.1 s−1 mmol−1 for gadoxetate and 3.3 s−1 mmol−1 for gadobutrol) and a homogeneous radiofrequency transmit field for the volume coil (i.e., ). Pharmacokinetic model analysis was carried out for the whole tumor with the Two Compartment Exchange Model (TCM)19 for GBCA combined with the Three Site Two Exchange Model (3S2X)15,20,21 for water exchange in order to estimate five parameters: interstitial space volume fraction (ve), vascular space volume fraction (vp), blood flow (Fp), permeability surface area product (PS), and water efflux rate constant (kio). Transfer constant (Ktrans) was calculated from PS and Fp (Ktrans = [1-exp(-PS/Fp)] Fp). In addition to kio which reflects the efflux rate constant from the intracellular compartment, we also included a transcytolemmal exchange rate constant defined as (i.e. ), which takes into account the compartmental volume fractions22–24. We assumed that the water fraction fw is 1 in all compartments for simplicity; while the conventional assumption is fw = 0.8 for the normal brain, it is not trivial to find appropriate fw values for the intra- and extracellular compartments in various locations of heterogeneous tumors like the ones included in this study.
Test–retest repeatability
The repeatability of contrast kinetic parameter and kio estimation was measured in the C57BL6 mice with GL261 intracranial tumors (n = 7) between day 15 and day 26 after tumor inoculation in the brain. For each mouse, the DCE-MRI scan with two flip angles was conducted twice with an interval of 30 min between the end of the first DCE-MRI scan and the beginning of the second scan with the T1 mapping followed by the second DCE-MRI. Upon the completion of the first scan, the mouse was moved out of the magnet and then repositioned in the magnet for the second scan. Each DCE-MRI scan included a GBCA injection at the dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. To align the tumor voxels between the first and the second DCE-MRI scans, the images of the second DCE-MRI scan (both T1 map and DCE-MRI) were registered to the images of the first DCE-MRI by applying rigid body transformation through minimization of the sum of mean squared differences between the two 3D image datasets (Fig. 1).
The contrast kinetic parameters and kio of tumor voxels from the two scans were compared at the voxel level using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The contrast kinetic parameter and kio maps of the test and re-test scans were also compared in terms of texture features extracted using the open-source Python package PyRadiomics25. We included 93 features; First Order Histogram Features (n = 18 features), Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM; n = 24), Gray Level Dependence Matrix (GLDM; n = 14), Gray Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM; n = 16), Gray Level Size Zone Matrix (GLSZM; n = 16), and Neighboring Gray Tone Difference Matrix (NGTDM; n = 5). In addition to the contrast kinetic parameter and kio maps, the last frame of the DCE-MR images was included as delayed contrast enhanced images for extracting texture features. Discretization of the dynamic ranges of the contrast enhanced images and parameter maps was performed using a fixed bin width determined by the Freedman-Diaconis rule: W = 2 (IQR) N-1/3, where IQR is the interquartile range and N is the number of pixels26. The default PyRadiomics configuration was used for all other texture feature extraction settings (see http://pyradiomics.readthedocs.io for further information). Statistical analysis of texture feature differences between two images was performed using the paired Student’s t-test. To keep the family-wise error rate to 0.05 for each parameter, we used the significance level for a single hypothesis test of 0.0006.
Comparison of DCE-MRI with FDG-PET
Previous studies have shown that the water exchange across the cell plasma membrane is associated with the expression of the ATP-dependent ion channels2,3. The goal of this experiment is to assess the association between kio as a measure of transcytolemmal water exchange and FDG uptake as a marker for cellular metabolism. Six to eight-week-old C57BL6 mice (n = 7) with GL261 mouse glioma xenograft models were used for this experiment. kio was estimated using the two flip-angle DCE-MRI method. To ensure that the well perfused voxels with sufficient GBCA extravasation were selected for reliable measurement of kio, the top 10% of voxels with the highest signal enhancement ratio were selected for analysis12,20,27–29. This selection was used particularly due to low contrast enhancement of the glioma model used in this study (average Ktrans < 0.1 min-1 for all tumors included for this comparison as shown in Fig. 5). We assumed the kio measured from the most enhancing part of the tumor is representative of the whole tumor for the comparison with the FDG-PET. The DCE-MRI scan was immediately followed by 18F-FDG-PET scan per animal. 18F-FDG PET and computed tomography (CT) scans were performed on an Inveon small-animal hybrid PET/CT scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions). The mice were administered an 18F-FDG bolus (6.45–11.1 MBq/0.1 mL) via tail vein injection. The PET data collected for 5 min after 55 min post injection were used to generate the standardized uptake value (SUV) maps. SUV was calculated as: [decay corrected activity (Bq/mL)]/[animal weight (g)]/[injected dose (Bq)]. Whole tumors were manually segmented from co-registered PET/CT images. Since the low spatial resolution of PET images (1.4 mm isotropic) is not adequate for voxel-level analysis, the mean SUV of the whole tumor was used for the comparison with DCE-MRI.
Assessment of treatment response
Two groups of six to eight-week-old C57BL6 mice (n = 5 per group) with GL261 mouse glioma model were used to investigate the feasibility of using the two flip-angle DCE-MRI approach for longitudinal assessment of treatment response. For the treatment group, pre-treatment DCE-MRI (Pre-Tx) was immediately followed by an intraperitoneal (IP) injection of bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) at 10 mg/kg. After 24 h, mice were scanned again (Tx-1) and subsequently given an IP injection of fluorouracil (5FU, Fressenius Kabi) at 80 mg/kg. A second dose of 5FU (80 mg/kg) was given after 48 h. Post-treatment DCE-MRI (Tx-2) was conducted 24 h after the second 5FU treatment (i.e. 4 days after the pre-treatment DCE-MRI). The control group was treated with sodium chloride solution (10 ml/kg) and imaged at the same time points as the treatment group (Supplementary Fig. 1). Control and treated groups were randomly selected by a co-author (SGK) who was blinded to the animal status and images at the selection. Blinding of treatment group was not used in this feasibility study with a small number of animals. We assumed the benefit of blinding would be insignificant since the data collection and analysis were conducted with a same scan protocol and data processing pipeline.
Results
Repeatability
The DCE-MRI scans were successfully conducted twice for a group of mice (n = 7) included in this experiment. In all mice, the whole tumor contrast kinetic parameter maps and kio from the two scans of a same tumor appear similar to each other (Fig. 2). Among the estimated parameters, the volume fraction measures, ve and vp, show strong correlation between the two scans (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.61 for ve and 0.70 for vp) and no significant difference between them (P = 0.375 for ve and 0.467 for vp; Wilcoxon signed rank test) (Fig. 3). The vascular parameters, PS, Fp, and Ktrans, appear to be greater in the second scan than in the first scan: 41.8% greater for PS (P = 0.109), 261.5% greater for Fp (P = 0.078), and 43.2% greater for Ktrans (P = 0.047) in terms of the median values. In contrast, kio values increased between the first and second scan by 45.2% of the median value (P = 0.156). Of the 93 histogram and texture features extracted from the parameter maps, 9 features in kio maps and one feature in ve and vp maps were found to be significantly different (Supplemental Fig. S1).
kio correlates with SUV
The correlation between the contrast kinetic parameters (including kio) and SUV was assessed using a separate group of mice (n = 7) which had DCE-MRI scan immediately followed by FDG-PET. The 3D maps of contrast kinetic parameters and kio have a relatively high spatial resolution that shows heterogeneous patterns of the tumor tissue, which cannot be appreciated in the SUV maps of FDG-PET with a lower spatial resolution (Fig. 4). The median values of the contrast kinetic parameters from the top ten percent enhancing voxels are compared with the mean SUV values (Fig. 5). The scatter plots in Fig. 5 show that SUV has a positive correlation with kio (R2 = 0.572), kex (R2 = 0.547), a positive correlation with Fp (R2 = 0.504), and weak correlations with ve (R2 = 0.150), vp (R2 = 0.077), PS (R2 = 0.117), Ktrans (R2 = 0.088) and whole tumor volume (R2 = 0.174). Whole tumor SUV compared to whole tumor contrast kinetic parameter and kio maps demonstrated strong correlations with PS (R2 = 0.693) and Ktrans (R2 = 0.651) and weak correlations with all other parameters (Supplemental Fig. 2).
kio is a sensitive marker for treatment response
The intracranial tumors in this study were growing aggressively; the tumors in both control and treated groups approximately tripled in volumes within the 4 days, from 3.10 ± 6.33 uL to 9.88 ± 26.73 uL, between the pre-treatment and Tx-2 (Figs. 6 and 7). While the volume did not show a significant difference between the control and treated groups at any time point, the kio normalized to the baseline value showed a significant difference (P = 0.032) between the two groups at Tx-1. The normalized kio and kex of the control group did not change significantly in the two imaging time points, while those of the treated group decreased significantly (P = 0.008 for both kio and kex) at Tx-2. This pattern of change in kio is observed more clearly in the tumor rims as shown in Fig. 6. The normalized ve and vp increased significantly (P = 0.008) between Pre-Tx and Tx-2 in both groups. In this study with a small number of animals, no significant difference between the two groups was observed in the contrast kinetic parameters and kio without normalization to the baseline values (Table 1).
Table 1.
ve | vp | kio (s−1) | Fp (min−1) | PS (min−1) | Ktrans(min−1) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Pre-Tx | 0.171 (0.091) | 0.037 (0.082) | 0.751 (3.970) | 0.357 (0.826) | 0.059 (0.068) | 0.050 (0.050) |
Tx-1 | 0.180 (0.073) | 0.042 (0.087) | 1.335 (3.395) | 0.694 (0.906) | 0.069 (0.067) | 0.049 (0.046) | |
Tx-2 | 0.213 (0.074) | 0.083 (0.130) | 1.626 (3.020) | 0.505 (0.333) | 0.028 (0.035) | 0.026 (0.029) | |
Treated | Pre-Tx | 0.149 (0.050) | 0.026 (0.022) | 2.250 (1.600) | 0.471 (1.057) | 0.014 (0.017) | 0.014 (0.014) |
Tx-1 | 0.120 (0.096) | 0.025 (0.021) | 1.251 (0.996) | 0.586 (0.595) | 0.014 (0.010) | 0.013 (0.008) | |
Tx-2 | 0.187 (0.062) | 0.034 (0.030) | 0.760 (0.486) | 0.713 (0.787) | 0.021 (0.016) | 0.020 (0.012) |
The parameters normalized to the individual baseline values are shown in the plots of Fig. 7.
Discussion
Quantitative tissue microenvironment parameters measured from DCE-MRI may non-invasively capture the heterogenous properties of a tumor and their changes during tumor progresses and treatment. However, the adoption of these parameters in routine clinical imaging remains challenging and requires more work to establish the repeatability and reproducibility of the DCE-MRI data acquisition and analysis method30. Among the parameters of interest, the water efflux rate constant, kio, is a unique parameter with potential as a biomarker for cellular energy turnover, but has proven difficult to measure12,13. The recently proposed method of using a multiple flip angle approach to actively encode the water exchange effect in the washout phase of the DCE-MRI scan, has demonstrated potential for improving the accuracy and precision of kio estimation. In this present study, we further evaluated the multiple flip-angle method in terms of repeatability, correlation with SUV and sensitivity to treatment response.
We found that the compartmental volume fractions (ve and vp) remained consistent between the test and retest scans while the vascular functional measures (Fp and PS) and kio showed noticeable changes, probably due to physiological changes of the tumor between the two scans. It is not trivial to measure repeatability of DCE-MRI parameters as the subject must fully clear the GBCA before a retest may be performed. On the other hand, aggressive tumors could have continuous changes in their volume and properties as observed in this study with GL261. For our study, hence, we performed a test–retest with a limited time interval of 30 min for GBCA to clear from the body as much as possible before repeating the DCE-MRI scan. We conducted T1 mapping prior to each DCE-MRI scan such that the potential bias of remaining contrast agent in the tissue can be minimized in the contrast kinetic model analysis of the second data set.
Between the test and retest scans, we observed negligible changes in the estimated compartmental volume fraction parameters ve and vp. This is a reasonable outcome as we would not expect the cellular volumetric properties of the tumors to change substantially over the short duration of the experiment. In contrast, we observed noticeable increases in perfusion parameters (Fp, PS, and Ktrans) and an increase in kio. These changes from the first to the second scan may be explained by physiological changes induced by prolonged exposure to isoflurane altering blood flow in the mouse and tumor metabolism. Li et al.31 demonstrated that cerebral blood flow in macaques increased in a dose dependent manner with isoflurane concentration. While isoflurane levels were maintained at low maintenance dosage (1–1.5% in air) throughout the experiment, prolonged exposure likely resulted in increased blood flow due to vasodilation. Furthermore, isoflurane has been shown to upregulate hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF1A) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in cancer32,33. In vitro studies of ovarian cancer cells found that exposure to isoflurane increased angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and migration associated with increased levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 and VEGF34. One of the most prominent adaptations in hypoxic cells is increased glucose uptake and expression of glutamine transporters, to promote glucose catabolism35. The increase in glucose metabolism would lead to an increase in water exchange, i.e. an increase in kio. Hence, although the results of our study did not show a strong repeatability of kio, they may suggest the sensitivity of kio to the metabolic status of the cancer cells.
To better understand and probe the relationship of cellular water exchange with cellular metabolism, we compared kio from DCE-MRI with SUV from 18F-FDG-PET. SUV is widely used as a semi-quantitative measure of glucose uptake and phosphorylation in tissue, an indicator of cellular metabolic activity. High SUV values are known to be associated with poor prognosis36. The correlation between kio and SUV observed in this study further indicates kio as a sensitive parameter for cellular metabolic activity. This observation is also in line with previous studies that showed the cellular water exchange is associated with Na + /K + ATPase activity and ATP-dependent ion channels in the plasma membrane2,37,38. The weak correlation between tumor volume and SUV suggests that the relationship between kio and SUV is more likely driven by energy turnover than the bias of larger tumors acting as an FDG sink.
Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using kio for monitoring and predicting tumor response to treatment and long term survivability1,6,8,9,11. Our present study explored the feasibility of using the multiple flip angle approach to estimate kio during treatment of murine glioma using a combination therapy of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against VEGF, and fluorouracil (5FU), a cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent. Bevacizumab is often used in combination with other cytotoxic therapies as it could be used to normalize tumor vasculature, improving delivery of the secondary chemotherapeutic agent39,40. The effect of this drug combination appears to be captured well by our study, as we observed a decrease both in water exchange and vp in the treated group, despite a persistent increase in tumor volume in both groups. Often, responding tumors do not demonstrate an immediate change in volume, or even grow after the first several treatments. This highlights the importance of biomarkers which may detect tumor response prior to volume reduction. Further study is warranted to establish these DCE-MRI measures as biomarkers to simultaneously measure the anti-angiogenic and cytotoxic effect of a combination therapy.
Limitations of our study includes small cohort sizes used in the individual experiments. While the statistical power is limited by the small cohort size, our study results demonstrate that the multiple flip angle method of DCE-MRI can be used as a robust way to measure kio in cancer imaging studies and can serve as the pilot data to design future studies with larger cohorts. The present study is also limited to single tumor model. Future studies can also include pathological measurements of transmembrane water channels as well as other proteins related to cellular metabolism, such as mitochondria pyruvate carrier, monocarboxylate transport, lactate dehydrogenase A, lactate dehydrogenase B and pyruvate dehydrogenase41.
In this study, we found that contrast kinetic parameters and kio of tumor can be estimated from a multiple flip-angle DCE-MRI data. We have demonstrated that kio has a strong correlation with the SUV from 18F-FDG PET, suggesting the feasibility of using kio as an imaging marker for cellular metabolic activity without using a radioactive contrast agent. The results of this study also support the potential of kio to discern tumors responding to a vascular normalization treatment and cytotoxic chemotherapeutics. Further study with a larger cohort is warranted to establish the cellular water exchange in cancer metabolism and its changes during progression and treatment.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We thank Zakia Gironda and Orin Mishkit of the NYU Preclinical Imaging Core for their expertise and assistance with the 18F-FDG PET study. This work was partially supported by NIH/NCI grants R01CA160620, R01CA219964, and UG3CA22869, as well as the NSF-DMREF (DMR 1728858) and the NYU Shiffrin-Myers Breast Cancer Discovery Fund. The NYU Preclinical Imaging Core is partially supported by NIH grants 5P30CA016087 and P41 EB017183.
Author contributions
K.K. and G.K. wrote the main manuscript text. J.Z. prepared Figs. 1, 2 and 3 and K.K. prepared Figs. 4, 5, 6 and 7. A.D. and J.T. collected data for ‘Repeatability’ experiment and J.Z performed analysis. K.K. collected data and performed analysis for ‘Comparison of DCE-MRI with FDG-PET’ and ‘Assessment of Treatment Response’ experiments. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-023-29991-1.
References
- 1.Springer CS, Li X, Tudorica LA, et al. Intratumor mapping of intracellular water lifetime: Metabolic images of breast cancer? NMR Biomed. 2014;27(7):760–773. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhang Y, Poirier-Quinot M, Springer CS, Balschi JA. Active trans-plasma membrane water cycling in yeast is revealed by NMR. Biophys. J. 2011;101(11):2833. doi: 10.1016/J.BPJ.2011.10.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Loo DDF, Zeuthen T, Chandy G, Wright EM. Cotransport of water by the Na+/glucose cotransporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996;93(23):13367–13370. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.93.23.13367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ribatti D, Ranieri G, Annese T, Nico B. Aquaporins in cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1840(5):1550–1553. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bai R, Wang B, Jia Y, et al. Shutter-speed DCE-MRI analyses of human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) data. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2020;52(3):850–863. doi: 10.1002/JMRI.27118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lowry M, Zelhof B, Liney GP, Gibbs P, Pickles MD, Turnbull LW. Analysis of prostate DCE-MRI: Comparison of fast exchange limit and fast exchange regimen pharmacokinetic models in the discrimination of malignant from normal tissue. Invest. Radiol. 2009;44(9):577–584. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0B013E3181B4C1FE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li X, Priest RA, Woodward WJ, et al. Cell membrane water exchange effects in prostate DCE-MRI. J. Magn. Reson. 2012;218:77–85. doi: 10.1016/J.JMR.2012.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim S, Loevner LA, Quon H, et al. Prediction of response to chemoradiation therapy in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2010;31(2):262–268. doi: 10.3174/AJNR.A1817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tudorica A, Oh KY, Chui SYC, et al. Early prediction and evaluation of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using quantitative DCE-MRI. Transl. Oncol. 2016;9(1):8–17. doi: 10.1016/J.TRANON.2015.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Do RK, Reyngold M, Paudyal R, et al. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived imaging metrics for stereotactic body radiotherapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Preliminary findings. Tomography. 2020;6(2):261. doi: 10.18383/J.TOM.2020.00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chawla S, Loevner LA, Kim SG, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI-derived intracellular water lifetime (T i ): A prognostic marker for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2018;39(1):138–144. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang J, Kim S. Uncertainty in MR tracer kinetic parameters and water exchange rates estimated from T1-weighted dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014;72(2):534–545. doi: 10.1002/MRM.24927/ASSET/SUPINFO/MRM24927-SUP-0003-SUPPINFO.TIF. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Buckley DL. Shutter-speed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Is it fit for purpose? Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;81(2):976–988. doi: 10.1002/MRM.27456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bains LJ, McGrath DM, Naish JH, et al. Tracer kinetic analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT bladder cancer data: A preliminary comparison to assess the magnitude of water exchange effects. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010;64(2):595–603. doi: 10.1002/MRM.22430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Spencer RGS, Fishbein KW. Measurement of spin-lattice relaxation times and concentrations in systems with chemical exchange using the one-pulse sequence: Breakdown of the Ernst model for partial saturation in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J. Magn. Reson. 2000;142(1):120–135. doi: 10.1006/JMRE.1999.1925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang J, Kim SG. Estimation of cellular-interstitial water exchange in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using two flip angles. NMR Biomed. 2019;32(11):1–17. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang J, Feng L, Otazo R, Kim SG. Rapid dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for small animals at 7T using 3D ultra-short echo time and golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;81(1):140–152. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang J, Winters K, Reynaud O, Kim SG. Simultaneous measurement of T1/B1 and pharmacokinetic model parameters using active contrast encoding (ACE)-MRI. NMR Biomed. 2017;30(9):e3737. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brix G, Kiessling F, Lucht R, et al. Microcirculation and microvasculature in breast tumors: Pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR image series. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004;52(2):420–429. doi: 10.1002/MRM.20161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Li X, Rooney WD, Springer CS. A unified magnetic resonance imaging pharmacokinetic theory: Intravascular and extracellular contrast reagents. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005;54(6):1351–1359. doi: 10.1002/MRM.20684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McConnell HM. Reaction rates by nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Chem. Phys. 1958;28(3):430–431. doi: 10.1063/1.1744152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jensen JH, Helpern JA. Effect of gradient pulse duration on MRI estimation of the diffusional kurtosis for a two-compartment exchange model. J. Magn. Reson. 2011;210(2):233. doi: 10.1016/J.JMR.2011.03.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fieremans E, Novikov DS, Jensen JH, Helpern JA. Monte Carlo study of a two-compartment exchange model of diffusion. NMR Biomed. 2010;23(7):711–724. doi: 10.1002/NBM.1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang J, Lemberskiy G, Moy L, Fieremans E, Novikov DS, Kim SG. Measurement of cellular-interstitial water exchange time in tumors based on diffusion-time-dependent diffusional kurtosis imaging. NMR Biomed. 2021;34(6):e4496. doi: 10.1002/NBM.4496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C, et al. Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res. 2017;77(21):e104–e107. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Freedman D, Diaconis P. On the histogram as a density estimator:L2 theory. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete. 1981;57(4):453–476. doi: 10.1007/BF01025868. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Landis CS, Li X, Telang FW, et al. Equilibrium transcytolemmal water-exchange kinetics in skeletal muscle in vivo. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999;42(3):467–478. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199909)42:3<467::AID-MRM9>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sourbron SP, Buckley DL. Tracer kinetic modelling in MRI: Estimating perfusion and capillary permeability. Phys. Med. Biol. 2012;57(2):R1–R33. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/2/R1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Buckley DL, Kershaw LE, Stanisz GJ. Cellular-interstitial water exchange and its effect on the determination of contrast agent concentration in vivo: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of human internal obturator muscle. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008;60(5):1011–1019. doi: 10.1002/MRM.21748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shukla-Dave A, Obuchowski NA, Chenevert TL, et al. Quantitative imaging biomarkers alliance (QIBA) recommendations for improved precision of DWI and DCE-MRI derived biomarkers in multicenter oncology trials. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2019;49(7):e101–e121. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li CX, Patel S, Wang DJJ, Zhang X. Effect of high dose isoflurane on cerebral blood flow in macaque monkeys. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2014;32(7):956. doi: 10.1016/J.MRI.2014.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huang H, Benzonana LL, Zhao H, et al. Prostate cancer cell malignancy via modulation of HIF-1α pathway with isoflurane and propofol alone and in combination. Br. J. Cancer. 2014;111(7):1338–1349. doi: 10.1038/BJC.2014.426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Benzonana LL, Perry NJS, Watts HR, et al. Isoflurane, a commonly used volatile anesthetic, enhances renal cancer growth and malignant potential via the hypoxia-inducible factor cellular signaling pathway in vitro. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(3):593–605. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0B013E31829E47FD. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Luo X, Zhao H, Hennah L, et al. Impact of isoflurane on malignant capability of ovarian cancer in vitro. Br. J. Anaesth. 2015;114(5):831–839. doi: 10.1093/BJA/AEU408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lee P, Chandel NS, Simon MC. Cellular adaptation to hypoxia through HIFs andbeyond. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2020;21(5):268. doi: 10.1038/S41580-020-0227-Y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lucignani G, Paganelli G, Bombardieri E. The use of standardized uptake values for assessing FDG uptake with PET in oncology: A clinical perspective. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2004;25(7):651–656. doi: 10.1097/01.MNM.0000134329.30912.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ruggiero MR, Baroni S, Pezzana S, Ferrante G, Geninatti Crich S, Aime S. Evidence for the role of intracellular water lifetime as a tumour biomarker obtained by in vivo field-cycling relaxometry. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018;57(25):7468–7472. doi: 10.1002/ANIE.201713318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bai R, Springer CS, Plenz D, Basser PJ. Fast, Na+/K+ pump driven, steady-state transcytolemmal water exchange in neuronal tissue: A study of rat brain cortical cultures. Magn. Reson. Med. 2018;79(6):3207–3217. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Presta LG, Chen H, O’Connor SJ, et al. Humanization of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody for the therapy of solid tumors and other disorders. Cancer Res. 1997;57(20):4593–4599. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9377574/ Accessed on 20 December 2021. [PubMed]
- 40.Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al. Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;350(23):2335–2342. doi: 10.1056/NEJMOA032691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ruiz-Iglesias A, Mañes S. The importance of mitochondrial pyruvate carrier in cancer cell metabolism and tumorigenesis. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13(7):1488. doi: 10.3390/CANCERS13071488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.