Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0281421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281421

Herbal formula PM012 induces neuroprotection in stroke brain

Kuo-Jen Wu 1, Yu-Syuan Wang 1, Tsai-Wei Hung 1, Eun-Kyung Bae 1, Yun-Hsiang Chen 2, Chan-Kyu Kim 3, Dai-Won Yoo 3, Gyeong-Soon Kim 3, Seong-Jin Yu 1,*
Editor: Cesar V Borlongan4
PMCID: PMC9946208  PMID: 36812289

Abstract

Stroke is a major cause of long-term disability world-wide. Limited pharmacological therapy has been used in stroke patients. Previous studies indicated that herb formula PM012 is neuroprotective against neurotoxin trimethyltin in rat brain, and improved learning and memory in animal models of Alzheimer’s disease. Its action in stroke has not been reported. This study aims to determine PM012-mediated neural protection in cellular and animal models of stroke. Glutamate-mediated neuronal loss and apoptosis were examined in rat primary cortical neuronal cultures. Cultured cells were overexpressed with a Ca++ probe (gCaMP5) by AAV1 and were used to examine Ca++ influx (Ca++i). Adult rats received PM012 before transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAo). Brain tissues were collected for infarction and qRTPCR analysis. In rat primary cortical neuronal cultures, PM012 significantly antagonized glutamate-mediated TUNEL and neuronal loss, as well as NMDA-mediated Ca++i. PM012 significantly reduced brain infarction and improved locomotor activity in stroke rats. PM012 attenuated the expression of IBA1, IL6, and CD86, while upregulated CD206 in the infarcted cortex. ATF6, Bip, CHOP, IRE1, and PERK were significantly down-regulated by PM012. Using HPLC, two potential bioactive molecules, paeoniflorin and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, were identified in the PM012 extract. Taken together, our data suggest that PM012 is neuroprotective against stroke. The mechanisms of action involve inhibition of Ca++i, inflammation, and apoptosis.

Introduction

PM012, also known as Gugijihwang-Tang, is a herbal formula with neuroactive effects [1, 2]. PM012 prevented neurotoxin trimethyltin -mediated reduction of glucose metabolism in the whole brain or hippocampus, and improved learning and memory in adult rats [1]. In an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease, PM012 increased BDNF expression, enhanced BrdU and DCX labeling in hippocampus, and ameliorated memory deficit in 3XTg mice [2]. Oral administration of PM012 reduced escape latency in human presenilin 2 mutant transgenic mice [3]. These data suggest that PM012 is neuroprotective and neuroreparative in the CNS. Its mechanism of action is not clear.

PM012 is composed of Corni fructus (13%), Lucii fructuw (26.5%), Rehmannia radix (26.5%), Hoelen (7%), Discoreae radix (13%), Mountain cortex radices (7%), and Alismatis radix (7%) [1, 2]. These ingredients were found to regulate degenerative reactions. Rehmanniae Radix is an antioxidant and can reduce glutamate toxicity [4]. Corni fructus [5], Discoreae radix [6], Mountain cortex radicis [7], and Alismatis radix [8] are anti-inflammatory.

Ischemic stroke accounts for 87% of stroke cases [9] and is a leading cause of adult disability world-wide [10]. Ischemic insult triggers a series of progressive neurodegeneration processes, including glutamate overflow, apoptosis, inflammation, and ER stress, which lead to cell death. Suppressing these processes prevents stroke-mediated degeneration. For example, we previously reported that 2-fucosyllactose reduced ischemia-mediated ER stress and inflammation in brain and improved locomotor behavior in stroke rats [11]. Interestingly, several active ingredients in PM012 also process anti-inflammatory or anti-ER stress properties [12, 13]. PM012 may reduce ischemic brain damage through these actions.

The purpose of this study is to examine the protective actions of PM012 in cellular and rat models of stroke. Here we reported that PM012 reduced glutamate-mediated neuronal cell loss and apoptosis in primary neuronal culture. In addition, PM012 improved behavioral function and reduced brain infarction, inflammation, and ER stress in stroke rats. Our data support the notion that PM012 protects against ischemic stroke-mediated neurodegeneration.

Results

Major components in PM012-determined by HPLC

PM012 (650 mg) was dissolved in methanol (5ml) and filtered. The contents in the solution were examined by HPLC. As seen in the chromatograms (Fig 1), two peaks were found at 254 nm and 280 nm, corresponding to paeoniflorin and 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF).

Fig 1. Quantification of chemicals in PM012 using HPLC.

Fig 1

HPLC chromatograms of two standards (A) paeoniflorin and (B) 5-HMF.

PM012 reduced glutamate-mediated neurodegeneration in primary cortical neuronal culture

The protective effects of PM012 were first examined in rat primary cortical neurons. Treatment with glutamate (100 μM) for 48h significantly reduced MAP2 immunoreactivity (MAP2-ir; Fig 2A, 2B and 2E, p<0.001) and increased TUNEL (Fig 2F, 2G and 2J, p<0.001). PM012 (0.1mg/ml or 1mg/ml, n = 11 per each group) significantly antagonized glutamate-mediated changes in MAP2-ir (0.1mg: Fig 2C; 1mg: Fig 2D and 2E, p<0.001, one-Way ANOVA+NK test) and TUNEL (0.1mg: Fig 2H; 1mg: Fig 2I and 2J, p<0.001, one-Way ANOVA+NK test).

Fig 2. The neuroprotective effect of PM012 in primary cortical neuronal culture.

Fig 2

Representing photomicrographs demonstrate that glutamate (Glu)-reduced (B) MAP2 immunoreactivity and induced (G) TUNEL. Co-administration with PM012 (C, 0.1mg/ml; D, 1mg/ml) attenuated Glu-mediated loss of MAP-ir. (E) PM012 significantly antagonized Glu-mediated loss of MAP2-ir. (G vs. F) Glu increased TUNEL labeling. Co-administration with PM012 (H, 0.1mg/ml; I, 1mg/ml) reduced TUNEL activity. (J) PM012 significantly attenuated Glu-mediated TUNEL activity. *p<0.05, one-Way ANOVA.

PM012 inhibited NMDA-mediated Ca++i in primary cortical neurons

Primary cortical neurons were treated with AAV- gCaMP5 on DIV5 to express a calcium probe gCaMP5, as we previously described [14]. N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA, 5μM) was added to the wells on DIV12 to induce calcium ion influx (Ca++i). Real-time fluorescence images were taken 6 seconds before to 12 seconds after drug administration (Fig 3). NMDA triggered a rapid and time-dependent increase in Ca++i (Fig 3A vs. A1). PM012 suppressed NMDA -activated Ca++i (Fig 3B vs. B1). Time-dependent Ca++i was next analyzed in 44 cells (Fig 3C). PM012 significantly suppressed NMDA -mediated Ca++i (p<0.05, two-Way ANOVA+NK test).

Fig 3. PM012 suppressed NMDA -mediated intracellular Ca++ influx in primary cortical neurons expressing GCaMP5.

Fig 3

Real-time Ca++i images were taken before (A, B) and after (A1, B1) NMDA administration. NMDA (5 μM) triggered a rapid increase in intracellular Ca++ (A1 vs. A). Co-treatment with PM012 suppressed NMDA-mediated intracellular Ca++ signals (B1 vs. A1). (C) Intracellular fluorescence from 44 cells were analyzed. PM012 significantly suppressed NMDA -mediated Ca++i (p<0.05).

Pretreatment with PM012 improved locomotor activity in stroke rats

Thirteen rats received PM012 (50 mg/kg/d, x 2d, i.p.), and 9 received vehicle, starting from 2 days before the MCAo. Another 5 rats did not receive MCAo and were used as naive controls. Locomotor activity was examined 2 days after MCAo. Stroke animals developed bradykinesia. Horizontal activity (HACTV), total distance traveled (TOTDIST), and vertical activity (VACTV) were significantly reduced in stroke animals receiving vehicle (Fig 4, p<0.05, Stroke vs. naive); PM012 significantly antagonized these responses (stroke+PM012 vs. stroke+veh). Treatment with PM012 significantly increased HACTV (Fig 4A, p = 0.002), TOTDIST (Fig 4B, p = 0.010), and VACTV (Fig 4C, p = 0.033) in the stroke rats.

Fig 4. PM012 improved locomotor behavioral function in ischemic rats.

Fig 4

Rats received intraperitoneal injections of PM012 (50mg/kg/d) or vehicle from 2 days before MCAo. Locomotor behavior was examined on day 2 after MCAo. Stroke rats (n = 9) showed a significant reduction in locomotor activity compared to naïve rats (n = 5). PM012 (n = 13) significantly improved horizontal activity (HACTV, p = 0.002), total distance traveled (TOTDIST, p = 0.010), and vertical activity (VACTV, p = 0.033) in stroke rats. *P<0.05, one-Way ANOVA+NK test.

Pretreatment with PM012 reduced brain infarct in stroke rats

A total of 14 stroke rats (vehicle, n = 7, PM012, n = 7) were used for brain infarction analysis. Brain tissues were collected and sectioned into 2 mm slices 2 days after MCAo. Brain infarction was visualized after TTC staining. Typical infarction in stroke animals receiving vehicle or PM012 is shown in Fig 5. The volume of infarction per animal was further analyzed in all animals studied. PM012 significantly reduced brain infarction (Fig 5C; p = 0.007, t-test).

Fig 5. PM012 reduced infraction in stroke rats.

Fig 5

PM012 (50mg/kg/d) was administered to animal 2 days before MCAo. Animals were sacrificed 2 days after stroke. Brain infarction was examined by TTC staining (representing animals receiving A: vehicle or B: PM012). (C) PM012 significantly reduced infarction volume (p = 0.007, t-test). Scale: 10 mm.

PM012 altered the expression of inflammation-related genes in stroke brains

Cortical tissues from the ischemic side (infarcted) and contralateral side (non- infarcted) hemispheres were collected from 14 stroke rats (veh, n = 7; PM012, n = 7) on day 2. The expression of inflammatory markers was examined by qRTPCR. Stroke increased the expression of inflammatory genes, including pro-inflammatory IBA1, IL-6, CD86, and anti-inflammatory CD206 (Fig 6, infarcted vs. non- infarcted, one-way ANOVA). PM012 significantly downregulated the expression of IBA1 (Fig 6A, p = 0.005), IL-6 (Fig 6B, p = 0.002), and CD86 (Fig 6C, p = 0.005) and upregulated the expression of CD206 (Fig 6D, p<0.001) in the infarcted cortex.

Fig 6. PM012 altered the expression of inflammatory markers in stroke brains.

Fig 6

Ischemic stroke significantly increased the expression of (A) IBA1, (B) IL-6, (C) CD86 and (D) CD206 (infarcted vs. non- infarcted). PM012 significantly downregulated (A) IBA1, (B) IL-6 and (C) CD86 while upregulated (D) CD206 (Fig 6D, p<0.001) in the infarcted cortex. *P<0.05, one-Way ANOVA+NK test.

PM012 suppressed the expression of ER stress and apoptotic genes in stroke brains

ER stress and apoptotic markers were examined by qRTPCR. The expression of ER stress (ATF6, BIP, CHOP, IRE1, PERK) and apoptotic (Caspase 3) genes were all significantly upregulated in ischemic side cortices (Fig 7, p<0.05, 1-way ANOVA). PM012 significantly reduced the expression of ATF6 (Fig 7A, p = 0.034), BIP (Fig 7B, p = 0.002), CHOP (Fig 7C, p = 0.001), IRE1 (Fig 7D, p = 0.006), and PERK (Fig 7E, p = 0.013) in the infarcted cortex. Caspase3 was significantly reduced by PM012 (Fig 7F, p<0.001). PM012 did not alter the expression of these genes in the non- infarcted side cortex.

Fig 7. PM012 suppressed ER stress and apoptosis in stroke brain.

Fig 7

The expression of (A) ATF6, (B) BIP, (C) CHOP, (D) IRE1, (E) PERK, and (F) Caspase3 was significantly inhibited by PM012 in ischemic stroke brains. *P<0.05, one-Way ANOVA+NK test.

Discussions

In this study, we demonstrated that PM012 reduced glutamate-mediated neurotoxicity, apoptosis, and Ca++ influx in primary neuronal culture in vitro. In addition, pretreatment with PM012 reduced brain infarction, motor deficits, inflammation, and ER stress in stroke brain. The major finding of this study is that PM012 is neuroprotective against stroke.

After the ischemic injury, oxygen-rich blood supplied to the brain is reduced or blocked. Consequently, the reduction of ATP level triggers the influx of calcium ions into the pre-synaptic neurons, and results in glutamate overflow in the synapse and neurotoxicity. Using the endogenous Ca++ probe GCaMP5, we demonstrated that PM012 antagonized NMDA-mediated Ca++i in neurons. Moreover, PM012 reduced glutamate-mediated TUNEL and the loss of MAP2-ir in the neuronal culture, suggesting that PM012 induces neuroprotection through modulation of Ca++i in primary neurons.

We further examined the protective effect of PM012 in vivo. We demonstrated that pretreatment of PM012 for 2 days enhanced locomotor movements and reduced brain infarction in ischemic stroke rats, suggesting that PM012 is also neuroprotective against stroke in vivo.

Using HPLC, we identified two molecules, paeoniflorin and 5-HMF, in the PM012 extract. Previous studies have shown that 5-HMF antagonized d-galactosamine and TNF-alpha -mediated ER stress and apoptosis in cultured human hepatocytes [13]. Paeoniflorin prevented lipopolysaccharide-induced overproduction of inflammatory marker IL6 and ER stress markers CHOP and GRP78 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells [12] and attenuated all-trans-retinal–induced ER stress in retinal pigment epithelial cells [15].

Inflammation and ER stress are major causes of neurodegeneration after ischemic brain injury. We and others reported that suppression of inflammation or ER stress improved neural functions in stroke animals [11, 16]. These data suggest that paeoniflorin and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural are the active ingredients in PM012, which may induce protection against ischemic brain injury through anti-inflammation and anti-ER stress.

To identify the anti-inflammatory role of PM012 in stroke, we examined the expression of microglia markers in brain. Microglia play an important role in controlling the immune and inflammatory responses after ischemic brain injuries [17]. Two phenotypes (M1 and M2) of microglia with differential actions have been reported [18]. The activation of M1 microglia leads to cell death, while stimulation of M2 microglia increases cell survival [1921]. We demonstrated that PM012 reduced the expression of IBA1, down-regulated M1 markers CD86 and IL6 [22, 23], and upregulated M2 marker CD206 [24, 25]. Our data suggest that PM012 reduced ischemic brain degeneration by modulating M1/M2 microglia in the infarcted brain.

Similar to previous studies, we demonstrated that ATF6, Bip, CHOP, IRE1, PERK, and Caspase-3 were upregulated after ischemic brain injury. PM012 significantly reduced these ER stress responses in stroke brain. Our findings were further supported by the anti-ER stress effects of two major ingredients (i.e., 5-HMF and Paeoniflorin, see Fig 1) in PM012 [12, 13, 15]. Altogether, our data suggest that PM012 reduced ischemic brain injury through the suppression of ER stress.

In conclusions, PM012 reduced neuronal degeneration, activation of microglia, ER stress, apoptosis, and cerebral infarction in stroke brain. We demonstrated that pretreatment with PM012 reduced ischemic brain damage in rats. For clinical implication, this approach (pretreatment with PM012) may be beneficial to patients with a high risk of stroke (i.e., transient ischemic attack) to prevent recurrent ischemic injury. In our future experiments, we will examine the protective effect of PM012 when given early after stroke.

Materials and methods

Materials

PM012 was given by the Mediforum Corporation (Seoul, Republic of Korea). Quality control for PM012 adhered to the specifications and test procedures for drugs was approved by Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in Korea.

Bovine serum albumin, sodium pentobarbital, fetal bovine serum, L-glutamate, NMDA, paraformaldehyde, polyethyleneimine, Triton X-100, and 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) were purchased from the Sigma (St. Louis, USA). Alexa Fluor 488 (secondary antibody), B27 supplement, Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, Neurobasal Medium, and trypsin were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, USA). MAP2 antibody was purchased from the Millipore (Burlington, USA). In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit was purchased from Roche (Indianapolis, USA).

Adult male and time-pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from BioLASCO, Taiwan. The use of animals was approved by the Animal Research Committee of the National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan (NHRI-IACUC- 109097-M1). All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publications No. 8023, revised 1978).

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis

Chromatographic analysis was performed using a LC-4000 HPLC system (JASCO, Japan) with XTerra TM RP18 (4.6 x 150 mm, 5 μL) column (Waters, USA). The mobile phase using gradient elution consist of two solvent systems, acetic acid in water (A) and acetic acid in acetonitrile (B). The flow-rate was 1.0 ml/min and injection volume was 10 μg. The column temperature was set at 25°C.

5-HMF (0.1mg/ml) and paeoniflorin (0.1mg/ml) were dissolved in methanol and used as standards for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of PM012 (2mg/ml). Sample injection volume was 10 μL. Absorbance of column eluate was monitored with a UV spectrometer for 5-HMF at a wavelength of 280 nm and for paeoniflorin at a wavelength of 254 nm.

Primary rat Cortical Neuron (PCN)

Primary cultures were prepared from embryonic (E14–15) cortex tissues obtained from fetuses of timed pregnant rats. The olfactory bulbs, striatum, and hippocampus were removed aseptically, and cortices were dissected. After removing the blood vessels and meninges, pooled cortices were trypsinized (0.05%) for 20 min at room temperature. After rinsing off trypsin with prewarmed Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium, cells were dissociated by trituration, counted, and plated into 96-well (5.0 × 104/ well) cell culture plates pre-coated with polyethyleneimine. The culture plating medium consisted of Neurobasal Medium supplemented with 2% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.5 mM L-glutamine, 0.025-mM L-glutamate, and 2% B27. Cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. The cultures were fed by exchanging 50% of media with feed media (Neurobasal Medium) with 0.5 mM L-glutamate and 2% B27 with antioxidants supplement on days in vitro (DIV) 3 and 5. PM012 (20 mg) was dissolved in saline (1 mL) and filtered. The solution was further diluted in culture media to various concentrations and added to the culture wells.

Real-time intracellular Ca++ measurement in primary neuronal culture

Primary cortical neuronal cultures were infected by AAV-GCaMP5 (3 × 1011 viral genome/ml) on DIV 5 for 1 h. NMDA-mediated Ca++ influx was examined on DIV12 as previously described [14]. In brief, culture plates were placed on a motorized stage (Prior Scientific Inc., Fulbourn, Cambridge, UK) of a Nikon TE2000 inverted microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA). Microscopic images were recorded through a FITC filter from 1 min before to 7 min after drug treatment at a rate of two frames per sec. The intensity of intracellular green fluorescence of single cells was individually measured by the NIS-Elements AR 3.2 Software (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA).

Immunocytochemistry

Cultured cells were fixed with PFA for 1 h and then washed with PBS. Cells were incubated for 1 day at 4°C with a mouse monoclonal antibody against MAP2 (1:500) and then rinsed three times with PBS. The bound primary antibody was visualized using Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse secondary. Images were acquired using a monochrome camera Qi1-mc attached to a Nikon TE2000-E inverted microscope as previously described [14].

In vitro Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase (TdT) -Mediated dNTP Nick End Labeling (TUNEL)

Cultures were assayed for DNA fragmentation using a TUNEL -based method as described by the manufacturer (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit; Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Briefly, 4% PFA fixed cells were permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100 in 0.1% sodium citrate for 2 min on ice. To label damaged nuclei, 50 μL of the TUNEL reaction mixture was added to each sample and kept at 37°C in a humidified chamber for 60 min. Controls consisted of not adding the label solution (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase) to the TUNEL reaction mixture.

The material was examined using a Nikon TE2000 inverted microscope equipped with fluorescence. TUNEL (+) cells were manually counted in 20× images (4 fields per well of 96-well plate).

Animal surgery and drug administration

Rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (35 mg/kg, i.p.). A craniotomy of about 2–4 mm was made in the right squamosal bone. MCAo was induced by ligating the right distal MCA with a 10–0 suture using methods previously described [26]. After 60 min, the suture on the MCA and arterial clips on common carotids were removed to allow reperfusion. Core body temperature was monitored and maintained at 37°C. After recovery from anesthesia, body temperature was maintained at 37°C using a temperature-controlled incubator. Control animals received sham surgery, including craniotomy without MCAo. PM012 (50 mg) was added to saline (1 mL) and then vortexed for 1 min. PM012 (50 mg/kg/d x 2) or vehicle (saline) was given intraperinoneally from 2 days before the MCAo.

Locomotor activity measurements

Animals were individually placed in 42 × 42 × 31 cm open plexiglass boxes. Locomotor activity was recorded with an infra-red activity monitor (Accuscan, Columbus, OH) for 2 h (12-h light and 12-h dark/day) on day 2 (pretreatment experiment) after the MCAo [27]. The monitor contained eight vertical infrared sensors situated 10 cm from the floor of the chamber. Motor activities were calculated by the number of beams broken for 2 h after placement in the chamber. Vertical activity (VACTV; the total number of beam interruptions that occurred in the vertical sensors), total distance traveled (TOTDIST; the distance traveled in centimeters), and horizontal activity (HACTV; the total number of beam interruptions that occurred in the horizontal sensor) were analyzed by the Versamax program (Accuscan, Columbus, OH).

2,3,5-Triphenyltetrazolium Chloride (TTC) staining

Rats were decapitated 2 days after MCAo. The brains were removed and sliced into 2.0-mm sections. The brain slices were incubated in 2% TTC solution for 5 min at room temperature and then transferred into a 4% PFA solution for fixation. The area of infarction in each slice was measured with a digital scanner and the Image Tools program (University of Texas Health Sciences Center).

Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR (qRTPCR)

Cortical tissues from the infarcted and non-infarcted hemispheres were collected. Total RNAs were isolated using TRIzol Reagent (ThermoFisher, #15596–018, Waltham, MA, USA), and cDNAs were synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA by use of a RevertAid H Minus First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific, #K1631, Waltham, MA, USA). cDNA levels for CD86, CD206, IBA1, IL-6, PERK, IRE1, CHOP, BIP, ATF6, caspase3, actin, and GAPDH were determined using specific universal probe library primer-probe sets or gene-specific primers (Table 1). Samples were mixed with TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix (Life Technologies, #4444557, Carlsbad, CA, USA) or SYBR (Luminaris Color HiGreen Low ROX qPCR Master Mix; ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Quantitative realtime PCR (qRT-PCR) was carried out using the QuantStudio™ 3 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Scientific,Waltham, MA, USA). The expression of the target genes was normalized relative to the endogenous reference genes (beta-actin and GAPDH averages) using a modified delta-delta-Ct algorithm. All experiments were carried out in duplicate.

Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used for quantitative RT-PCR.

Gene SYBR Green TagMan
Forward Reverse
CD86 TAGGGATAACCAGGCTCTAC CGTGGGTGTCTTTTGCTGTA
CD206 AGTTGGGTTCTCCTGTAGCCCAA ACTACTACCTGAGCCCACACCTGCT
PERK GAAGTGGCAAGAGGAGATGG GAGTGGCCAGTCTGTGCTTT
IRE1 TCATCTGGCCTCTTCTCTCGGA TTGAGTGAGTGGTTGGAGGC
CHOP ACCACCACACCTGAAAGCAG AGCTGGACACTGTCTCAAAG
Bip TCGACTTGGGGACCACCTAT GCCCTGATCGTTGGCTATGA
ATF6 GGACCAGGTGGTGTCAGAG GACAGCTCTGCGCTTTGGG
Caspase3 GTGGAACTGACGATGATATGGC CGCAAAGTGACTGGATGAACC
IBA1 Rn00574125_g1
β-Actin Rn00667869_m1
GAPDH Rn01775763_g1

Statistics

Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Unpaired t-test, one- or two-way ANOVA, and post-hoc Newman–Keuls (NK) test were used for statistical comparisons, with a significance level of p < 0.05.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Brandon Harvey at the National Institute on Drug Abuse for providing the AAV-GCaMP5 and Dr. Yun Wang at National Health Research Institutes for the critical comments.

Data Availability

This study was supported in part by Mediforum Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea (C10-020), Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 110-2320-B-400-007), Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (CS-111-GP-02).

Funding Statement

This study was supported in part by Mediforum Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea (C10-020), Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 110-2320-B-400-007), Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (CS-111-GP-02).

References

  • 1.Jung EY, Lee MS, Ahn CJ, Cho SH, Bae H, Shim I. The neuroprotective effect of gugijihwang-tang on trimethyltin-induced memory dysfunction in the rat. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:542081. Epub 2013/07/19. doi: 10.1155/2013/542081 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3687724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ye M, Chung HS, An YH, Lim SJ, Choi W, Yu AR, et al. Standardized Herbal Formula PM012 Decreases Cognitive Impairment and Promotes Neurogenesis in the 3xTg AD Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53(8):5401–12. Epub 2015/10/09. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9458-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sohn SH, Kim SJ, Kim Y, Shim I, Bae H. Safety and efficacy assessment of standardized herbal formula PM012. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012;12:24. Epub 2012/03/31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-24 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3342231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cui Y, Yan Z, Hou S, Chang Z. [Effect of radix Rehmanniae preparata on the expression of c-fos and NGF in hippocampi and learning and memory in rats with damaged thalamic arcuate nucleus]. Zhong Yao Cai. 2004;27(8):589–92. Epub 2005/01/22. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dai Y, Hang B, Huang Z. [Inhibition of fructus Corni on experimental inflammation]. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 1992;17(5):307–9, backcover. Epub 1992/05/01. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim MJ, Kim HN, Kang KS, Baek NI, Kim DK, Kim YS, et al. Methanol extract of Dioscoreae Rhizoma inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines and mediators in the synoviocytes of rheumatoid arthritis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2004;4(12):1489–97. Epub 2004/09/08. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2004.07.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Park WH, Joo ST, Park KK, Chang YC, Kim CH. Effects of the Geiji-Bokryung-Hwan on carrageenan-induced inflammation in mice and cyclooxygenase-2 in hepatoma cells of HepG2 and Hep3B. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2004;26(1):103–12. Epub 2004/04/27. doi: 10.1081/iph-120029948 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Baek ME, Jo Y, Chung N, Choi M, Kim JO, Won J, et al. Effect of E-Beam Irradiation on Microbial Load, Stability of Active Components, and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Cnidii Rhizoma and Alismatis Rhizoma. J Med Food. 2019;22(10):1067–77. Epub 2019/08/14. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2019.4429 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145(8):e153–e639. Epub 2022/01/27. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):e139–e596. Epub 2020/01/30. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hung TW, Wu KJ, Wang YS, Bae EK, Song Y, Yoon J, et al. Human Milk Oligosaccharide 2’-Fucosyllactose Induces Neuroprotection from Intracerebral Hemorrhage Stroke. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(18). Epub 2021/09/29. doi: 10.3390/ijms22189881 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8467359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen J, Zhang M, Zhu M, Gu J, Song J, Cui L, et al. Paeoniflorin prevents endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated inflammation in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells via the IRE1alpha/NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Food Funct. 2018;9(4):2386–97. Epub 2018/03/30. doi: 10.1039/c7fo01406f . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jiang ZQ, Ma YX, Li MH, Zhan XQ, Zhang X, Wang MY. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural protects against ER stress-induced apoptosis in GalN/TNF-alpha-injured L02 hepatocytes through regulating the PERK-eIF2alpha signaling pathway. Chin J Nat Med. 2015;13(12):896–905. Epub 2016/01/02. doi: 10.1016/S1875-5364(15)30095-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yu SJ, Wu KJ, Bae EK, Hsu MJ, Richie CT, Harvey BK, et al. Methamphetamine induces a rapid increase of intracellular Ca(++) levels in neurons overexpressing GCaMP5. Addict Biol. 2016;21(2):255–66. Epub 2014/11/08. doi: 10.1111/adb.12193 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8435074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhu X, Wang K, Zhou F, Zhu L. Paeoniflorin attenuates atRAL-induced oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and endoplasmic reticulum stress in retinal pigment epithelial cells via triggering Ca(2+)/CaMKII-dependent activation of AMPK. Arch Pharm Res. 2018;41(10):1009–18. Epub 2018/08/18. doi: 10.1007/s12272-018-1059-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dong Z, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Yang Z, Huang G, et al. Astragaloside-IV Alleviates Heat-Induced Inflammation by Inhibiting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Autophagy. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;42(2):824–37. Epub 2017/06/24. doi: 10.1159/000478626 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Perry VH, Nicoll JA, Holmes C. Microglia in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6(4):193–201. Epub 2010/03/18. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.17 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Michell-Robinson MA, Touil H, Healy LM, Owen DR, Durafourt BA, Bar-Or A, et al. Roles of microglia in brain development, tissue maintenance and repair. Brain. 2015;138(Pt 5):1138–59. Epub 2015/04/01. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv066 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5963417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hu X, Leak RK, Shi Y, Suenaga J, Gao Y, Zheng P, et al. Microglial and macrophage polarization-new prospects for brain repair. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11(1):56–64. Epub 2014/11/12. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.207 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4395497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hu X, Li P, Guo Y, Wang H, Leak RK, Chen S, et al. Microglia/macrophage polarization dynamics reveal novel mechanism of injury expansion after focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2012;43(11):3063–70. Epub 2012/08/31. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.659656 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang L, Zhang X, Wu P, Li H, Jin S, Zhou X, et al. BML-111, a lipoxin receptor agonist, modulates the immune response and reduces the severity of collagen-induced arthritis. Inflamm Res. 2008;57(4):157–62. Epub 2008/07/24. doi: 10.1007/s00011-007-7141-z . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen X, Fu E, Lou H, Mao X, Yan B, Tong F, et al. IL-6 induced M1 type macrophage polarization increases radiosensitivity in HPV positive head and neck cancer. Cancer Lett. 2019;456:69–79. Epub 2019/05/06. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.04.032 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hirose K, Iwabuchi K, Shimada K, Kiyanagi T, Iwahara C, Nakayama H, et al. Different responses to oxidized low-density lipoproteins in human polarized macrophages. Lipids Health Dis. 2011;10:1. Epub 2011/01/05. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-1 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3022593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rebelo SP, Pinto C, Martins TR, Harrer N, Estrada MF, Loza-Alvarez P, et al. 3D-3-culture: A tool to unveil macrophage plasticity in the tumour microenvironment. Biomaterials. 2018;163:185–97. Epub 2018/02/25. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.02.030 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang S, Zhang J, Sui L, Xu H, Piao Q, Liu Y, et al. Antibiotics induce polarization of pleural macrophages to M2-like phenotype in patients with tuberculous pleuritis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):14982. Epub 2017/11/05. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14808-9 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5670217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wu KJ, Chen YH, Bae EK, Song Y, Min W, Yu SJ. Human Milk Oligosaccharide 2’-Fucosyllactose Reduces Neurodegeneration in Stroke Brain. Transl Stroke Res. 2020;11(5):1001–11. Epub 2020/01/04. doi: 10.1007/s12975-019-00774-z . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yu SJ, Airavaara M, Wu KJ, Harvey BK, Liu HS, Yang Y, et al. 9-cis retinoic acid induces neurorepair in stroke brain. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4512. Epub 2017/07/05. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04048-2 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5495771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Cesar V Borlongan

23 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-30310Herbal formula PM012 induces neuroprotection in stroke brainPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 07 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Cesar V Borlongan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1.  Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

“This study was supported in part by Mediforum Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea (C10-020).”

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

“C.K.K., D.W.Y., and K.S.K. are employees of Mediforum Co., Ltd. The National Health Research Institute and Mediforum Co., Ltd. have a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement to develop PM012 as a treatment strategy for neurodegenerative disorders. The authors declare that this study received partial funding from Mediforum Co., Ltd., Korea. The authors further declare that Mediforum Co., Ltd. provided input into dose selection and study design as well as editorial input into the article. The funder was not involved in the writing of this article, or the decision to submit it for publication.”

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please respond by return email with your amended Competing Interests Statement and we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

5. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

6. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files

7. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Both reviewers are enthusiastic about this paper and raised only a few concerns/clarifications that can be addressed with minor revisions.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The study by Dr Yu and colleagues show the potential of a herbal formulation to exert neuroprotection against experimental ischemic stroke. Using both in vitro and in vivo models of stroke, the authors demonstrate that PM12 protects against stroke-induced cell death with functional improvement, including reduction in brain damage and behavioral dysfunctions. These are straightforward results with careful and logical data interpretations and conclusions. Below are minor suggestions that may improve the study:

1. Providing insights into the active ingredients of PM12 that likely mediated the neuroprotective effects will likely provide interest.

2. For the cultured cell type and brain region of interest, the cortex was chosen. However, both cortical and non-cortical cells/tissues, such as the striatum, are damaged in ischemic stroke. Some insights into whether the authors also observed non-cortical protection by PM12 will be interesting. In the in vivo setting, did the authors observed protection of the striatum in addition to the cortex?

3. The experimental design employs a pre-treatment paradigm to show neuroprotection. For clinical application, a short discussion on how the authors will translate PM12 to at-risk stroke patients will be welcomed.

Reviewer #2: Dr Yu and co-authors utilized cell culture and animal models stroke to reveal the therapeutic effects of a herbal formula called PM12. The data show that PM12 exerts neuroprotection in cortical cells and in the cortex of stroke animals. Furthermore, cerebral infarction and locomotor impairments were reduced in PM-12-treated stroke rats. These findings suggest that therapeutic application of PM12 for neuroprotection against stroke. Overall, this is a very interesting study. I have a few simple questions that will only require the authors’ clarification.

1. The dose and timing of PM12 administration in the cell culture and animals will need some rationale. Were dose-response and time-dependent pilot studies conducted to arrive at these present doses and timing?

2. The intraperitoneal route of PM12 delivery in animals will also need clarification. What will be the envisioned clinical route? Also, a brief introduction on whether PM12 is BBB permeable will need to be included.

3. Figure 2, panel J will need lines between bars to indicate which groups are being compared with the “asterisks”.

4. Figure 3 will also need the addition of “asterisks” between the two groups to indicate significance in Ca++ fluoresecence.

5. For Figure 6, maybe instead of “lesioned” and “non-lesioned”, it is best to use “infarcted” and “non-infarcted” to refer to stroke brain pathology.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0281421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281421.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


13 Jan 2023

PONE-D-22-30310

Herbal formula PM012 induces neuroprotection in stroke brain

Dear Editor

We would like to thank the reviewers for the valuable comments. We also like to thank the editor to consider that our paper has merit for publication pending on the revision. We have addressed all the questions raised by the reviewers. Our responses and revision on the manuscript are summarized (in blue color) as follows. We hope that our revised manuscript will be fully acceptable by the journal.

Sincerely yours,

Seong-Jin Yu PhD

Editors' Comments

Reviewer #1: The study by Dr Yu and colleagues show the potential of a herbal formulation to exert neuroprotection against experimental ischemic stroke. Using both in vitro and in vivo models of stroke, the authors demonstrate that PM12 protects against stroke-induced cell death with functional improvement, including reduction in brain damage and behavioral dysfunctions. These are straightforward results with careful and logical data interpretations and conclusions. Below are minor suggestions that may improve the study:

A: We would like to thank reviewer 1 for considering our results are straightforward with careful and logical data interpretations.

1. Providing insights into the active ingredients of PM12 that likely mediated the neuroprotective effects will likely provide interest.

A: The crude ingredients of PM12 were included in paragraph 2 of page 3. Using an HPLC analysis, we found that PM12 contains bioactive molecules paeoniflorin and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (Fig 1), which have potent anti-inflammatory (1) and anti-ER stress effects (2, 3). Inflammation and ER stress are major causes of neurodegeneration after ischemic brain injury. We and others reported that suppression of inflammation or ER stress improved neural functions in stroke animals (4, 5). These data suggest that paeoniflorin and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural are the active ingredients in PM012, which may induce protection against ischemic brain injury through anti-inflammation and anti-ER stress. These discussions were now included in the revised manuscript (page 9, paragraph 1)

2. For the cultured cell type and brain region of interest, the cortex was chosen. However, both cortical and non-cortical cells/tissues, such as the striatum, are damaged in ischemic stroke. Some insights into whether the authors also observed non-cortical protection by PM12 will be interesting. In the in vivo setting, did the authors observed protection of the striatum in addition to the cortex?

A: In this study, a distal MCAo ligation model (i.e., occlusion of the right middle cerebral artery at the distal branch) was used to generate stroke in rats. The major lesion occurred in the ipsilateral cortex, as seen in the TTC staining (Fig 5). We did not examine the biochemical changes in the infarcted side striatum. However, in our recent unpublished observation, we found that PM012 induced protection in striatum in a 6-OHDA rodent model of Parkinson’s disease. The detailed protective mechanisms in striatum warrant further investigation.

3. The experimental design employs a pre-treatment paradigm to show neuroprotection. For clinical application, a short discussion on how the authors will translate PM12 to at-risk stroke patients will be welcomed.

A: We demonstrated that pretreatment with PM012 reduced ischemic brain damage in rats. For clinical implication, this approach (pretreatment with PM012) may be beneficial to patients with a high risk of stroke (i.e., transient ischemic attack) to prevent recurrent ischemic injury. In our future experiments, we will examine the protective effect of PM012 when given early after stroke. (Please see page 10, paragraph 1).

Reviewer #2: Dr Yu and co-authors utilized cell culture and animal models stroke to reveal the therapeutic effects of a herbal formula called PM12. The data show that PM12 exerts neuroprotection in cortical cells and in the cortex of stroke animals. Furthermore, cerebral infarction and locomotor impairments were reduced in PM-12-treated stroke rats. These findings suggest that therapeutic application of PM12 for neuroprotection against stroke. Overall, this is a very interesting study. I have a few simple questions that will only require the authors’ clarification.

A: We would like to thank reviewer 2 for considering our study interesting.

1. The dose and timing of PM12 administration in the cell culture and animals will need some rationale. Were dose-response and time-dependent pilot studies conducted to arrive at these present doses and timing?

A: The doses of in vivo and in vitro experiments were determined by a dose-response study. Multiple doses of PM012 (0.1mg, 0.5mg, and 1mg) were used in cell culture (please see Fig. 1A). In addition, 26 rats were used to determine the dose of PM012 in vivo (veh, n=7; PM50mg, n=7, PM100mg, n=8, PM200mg, n=4). Our data demonstrated 50mg of PM012 was the most effective against ischemic stroke injury (Fig. 1B).

The time of delivery was also evaluated in a pilot study. We found that PM012 was given 2 days before the MCAo induced the best protection. In our future study, we will examine the effectiveness and bioavailability of PM012 (see responses to Q2).

Fig. 1. Neuroprotective effects of the dose-response manner of PM012 in vitro (A) and in vivo (B).

2. The intraperitoneal route of PM12 delivery in animals will also need clarification. What will be the envisioned clinical route? Also, a brief introduction on whether PM12 is BBB permeable will need to be included.

A: PM012 was administered intraperitoneally to the experimental animals. In our future study, we will examine the effectiveness and bioavailability of PM012 after oral administration, as the oral route is more clinically relevant.

The BBB is compromised shortly after the ischemic brain injury. It is possible that the active ingredients of PM012 can pass through the BBB in stroke brain.

3. Figure 2, panel J will need lines between bars to indicate which groups are being compared with the “asterisks”.

A: We have revised figure 2 accordingly.

4. Figure 3 will also need the addition of “asterisks” between the two groups to indicate significance in Ca++ fluoresecence.

A: We have revised figure 3 accordingly.

5. For Figure 6, maybe instead of “lesioned” and “non-lesioned”, it is best to use “infarcted” and “non-infarcted” to refer to stroke brain pathology.

A: We have revised figures 6 and 7 accordingly. Moreover, we have fixed it throughout the manuscript.

References

1. Zhang H, Jiang Z, Shen C, Zou H, Zhang Z, Wang K, et al. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Alleviates Inflammatory Lung Injury by Inhibiting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:782427.

2. Zhu Y, Han S, Li X, Gao Y, Zhu J, Yang X, et al. Paeoniflorin Effect of Schwann Cell-Derived Exosomes Ameliorates Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons Apoptosis through IRE1alpha Pathway. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021:6079305.

3. Zhu X, Wang K, Zhou F, Zhu L. Paeoniflorin attenuates atRAL-induced oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and endoplasmic reticulum stress in retinal pigment epithelial cells via triggering Ca(2+)/CaMKII-dependent activation of AMPK. Arch Pharm Res. 2018;41(10):1009-18.

4. Dong Z, Zhou J, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Yang Z, Huang G, et al. Astragaloside-IV Alleviates Heat-Induced Inflammation by Inhibiting Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Autophagy. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;42(2):824-37.

5. Hung TW, Wu KJ, Wang YS, Bae EK, Song Y, Yoon J, et al. Human Milk Oligosaccharide 2'-Fucosyllactose Induces Neuroprotection from Intracerebral Hemorrhage Stroke. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(18).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers - PONE-D-22-30310R1.docx

Decision Letter 1

Cesar V Borlongan

24 Jan 2023

Herbal formula PM012 induces neuroprotection in stroke brain

PONE-D-22-30310R1

Dear Dr. Yu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Cesar V Borlongan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Cesar V Borlongan

7 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-30310R1

Herbal formula PM012 induces neuroprotection in stroke brain

Dear Dr. Yu:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Cesar V Borlongan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers - PONE-D-22-30310R1.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    This study was supported in part by Mediforum Co., Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea (C10-020), Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 110-2320-B-400-007), Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (CS-111-GP-02).


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES