Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0281336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281336

Description of Bothriurus mistral n. sp., the highest-dwelling Bothriurus from the western Andes (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae), using multiple morphometric approaches

Andrés A Ojanguren-Affilastro 1,*, Hugo A Benítez 2,3, Hernán A Iuri 1, Camilo I Mattoni 4, Fermín M Alfaro 5,6,7, Jaime Pizarro-Araya 5,7,8
Editor: Michael Schubert9
PMCID: PMC9946213  PMID: 36812178

Abstract

We describe Bothriurus mistral n. sp. (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae) from the Chilean north-central Andes of the Coquimbo Region. This is the highest elevational discovery for Bothriurus in the western slopes of the Andes. This species was collected in the Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary as part of the First National Biodiversity Inventory of Chile of the Integrated System for Monitoring and Evaluation of Native Forest Ecosystems (SIMEF). Bothriurus mistral n. sp. is closely related to Bothriurus coriaceus Pocock, 1893, from the lowlands of central Chile. This integrative research includes a combination of traditional morphometrics and geometric morphometric analyses to support the taxonomic delimitation of the species.

Introduction

The genus Bothriurus is the most widespread taxon among Bothriuridae, occupying most environments of southern South America, from the arid cold areas of southern Patagonia to the tropical rainforests of Amazonia [1]. Despite its high diversity and extended distribution, its presence in high altitudes of the Andes is comparatively marginal [2]. As of now, only three species have been recorded in this environment: Bothriurus bocki Kraepelin, 1911 and Bothriurus trivittatus Werner, 1939, both from Bolivia and belonging to the inermis group [3, 4], and Bothriurus olaen Acosta, 1998, from central Argentina and southern Bolivia, belonging to the burmeisteri group [5, 6]. All these species occur in the eastern slopes of the Andes, and no species of this genus has ever been collected on the western slopes of this mountain range. This absence is particularly intriguing because several Chilean species of Bothriurus occupy arid hilly areas that are environmentally similar to the arid, high Andean slopes [711].

Over the last years our work group has been recording information about the arthropod fauna of Chile via a systematic survey of the whole biota of the country conducted as part of the Integrated System for Monitoring and Evaluation of Native Forest Ecosystems (SIMEF by its Spanish acronym). As a part of this project we have recently performed the first arthropod survey in the protected high-Andean area of the Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary, in the Coquimbo region, central Chile. As a result, our group has managed to collect several species of scorpions, two of which were unknown for the area, including the first high-altitude Andean species of Bothriurus ever collected in the western slopes of the Andes.

In this article a combination of methodologies were used to describe Bothriurus mistral n. sp. from the Chilean central Andes. This species is most closely related to the lowland species Bothriurus coriaceus Pocock, 1893. Herein we combined traditional taxonomy and geometric morphometrics to provide a better understanding of the morphological trait variation between species, and better support the taxonomic delimitation of the new species.

The presence of this new species in the Andean area of Coquimbo region is remarkable not only because this is the first record of this genus for western Andes, but also because this area has been extensively surveyed in the last two decades [1114], with not a single previous record of this genus in the area [11].

Materials and methods

Study area

The fieldwork was conducted in the Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary, located in the transverse valley range in the northernmost part of the Coquimbo Region, in the Andean area of the Elqui valley (Coquimbo Region, Chile) (Figs 1 and 2B and 2C). The area is located 125 km away from La Serena, upstream from the town of Alcohuaz, and 15 km away from the town of Pisco Elqui [15]. The area is a basin head that provides water from the accumulated winter snow and from multiple rocky glaciers [16]. The large number of high-Andean water meadows present in the area provide water regulation through purification. In addition, the vegetation coverage helps to regulate global-scale climate, temperature and precipitation, as well as erosion, holding the soil in place and preventing landslides. They also harbor a high-Andean biota in good conservation status [15]. In the Andean and high mountainous foothills, the predominant soils are poorly developed entisols and aridisols, which are more common in the steep slopes of rocky hills with little vegetation coverage [17, 18]. The precipitation in the area is mostly nival, with a yearly average of 200 mm and high interannual variability [18]; between 2,000 masl and 3,000 masl, the climate type is cold mountain steppe, which is characterized by strong winds, high solar radiation, and higher winter precipitation, especially nival.

Fig 1. Distribution map of Bothriurus mistral n. sp. (black triangles) and distribution of Bothriurus coriaceus in neighboring areas (black circles).

Fig 1

Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary marked with a red line, (Coquimbo Region, Chile).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

(A–D) Living specimens and type locality of Bothriurus mistral n. sp. herein described. (A) Bothriurus mistral n. sp. (B) Bothriurus mistral n. sp. under UV light. (C) Type locality of Bothriurus mistral n. sp. in the Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary (Coquimbo Region, Chile). (D) Aerial view of the type locality.

Specimens where collected at night using with UV lights. Each collection site in the study area was defined as “Conglomerate” following current standards of the SIMEF. Photos of environment and living specimens in the field (Fig 2) were taken by our group using digital cameras or drones with attached digital cameras.

Studied material

Studied and measured specimens of Bothriurus mistral n. sp. correspond to the type series (see below).

Studied and measured specimens of Bothriurus coriaceus: Cuesta Porotitos, [29°45ʹ42.61ʺS, 71°18ʹ14.19ʺW], Elqui Province, Coquimbo Region, 26/X/2011, 1 male, Ojanguren-Affilastro & Pizarro-Araya coll.; 30 km N. Ovalle, [30°22ʹ37.68ʺS, 71°13ʹ55.17ʺW], Limarí Province, Coquimbo Region, 10/I/1984, 1 male, Maury coll.; Los Vilos, [31°55ʹ17.88ʺS, 71°30ʹ52.27ʺW], Choapa Province, Coquimbo Region, 30/IX/1983, 2 males, E. Mary coll.; Quebrada Playa Agua Dulce, 45 km N. Los Vilos, [31°29ʹ25.84ʺS, 71°33ʹ41.82ʺW], Choapa Province, Coquimbo Region, 5–6/XI/1988, 3 males, Maury coll.; same locality and collector, 8/I/1984, 1 male; Juncal, [32°52ʹ34.08ʺS, 70°12ʹ21.39ʺW], (1,980 masl), Aconcagua Province, Valparaíso Region, 5/I/1984, 2 males, Maury coll.; Lampa, [33°17ʹ42.86ʺS, 70°53ʹ37.65ʺW], Metropolitan Region of Santiago, 19/IX/1977, 2 males, Peña coll.; Guayacán, [33°36ʹ56.47ʺS, 70°20ʹ50.58ʺW], San José de Maipo, Cordillera Province, Metropolitan Region of Santiago, 5/I/1984, 3 males, Maury coll.

Taxonomic methodology

The descriptive terminology follows Maury [19] for the hemispermatophores; Vachon [20] for the trichobothria; Loria & Prendini [21] for the lateral eyes; Roig-Alsina & Maury [22] for the male telson gland; and Ochoa et al. [23] for the metasomal carinae, which are abbreviated as follows: DL = dorsolateral, LIM = lateral inframedian, LM = lateral median, VL = ventrolateral, VM = ventromedian. The terminology for pedipalp carinae follows Prendini [24] and are abbreviated as follows: DI = dorsal internal, DE = dorsal external, VI = ventral internal, VE = ventral external. The abbreviations for collections are as follows: LEULS: Laboratorio de Entomología Ecológica, Universidad de La Serena, La Serena, Chile (Jaime Pizarro-Araya); MACN: Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Buenos Aires, Argentina (Martín Ramírez); MZUC: Museo de Zoología de la Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile (Jorge Artigas); MNHN: Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Santiago, Chile (Mario Elgueta). All collection sites were georeferenced using a GPS (Garmin® Etrex model). A distribution map (Fig 1) of Bothriurus mistral n. sp. and neighboring records of B. coriaceus was generated using USGS National Map Viewer (http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/); records of B. coriaceus were taken from Mattoni & Acosta [10], and more recent collection records from LEULS. All National and International collection and transport permits were duly obtained, including those provided by the local community managing the Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary of Estero Derecho.

Nomenclatorial acts

The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new names contained herein are available under that Code from the electronic edition of this article. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix "http://zoobank.org/". The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: 248BD623-4F1A-4676-890F-55A6D9C6A408. The electronic edition of this work was published in a journal with an ISSN, and has been archived and is available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central, LOCKSS and CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina).

Microscopy and images

The measurements, taken using an ocular micrometer, were recorded in millimeters. The hemispermatophores were dissected and then examined in 80% ethanol and photographed under UV and white light. Digital images of pigmentation pattern and habitus were taken under visible light and images of the external morphology under UV light, using a Leica DFC290 digital camera attached to a Leica M165C stereomicroscope, and the focal planes fused with Helicon Focus 3.10.3 (http://helicon.com.usa/heliconfocus/).

Geometric morphometric approach

In order to have a better understanding of the variation between species, a geometric morphometrics approach was performed using landmarks in the metasomal segment V of the males. We used only males due to a lack of females, and because in this genus it is very difficult to clearly separate adult females from subadults. We chose this morphological trait as a trait with significant taxonomical differences between the species. A total of twenty landmarks were digitized (Fig 3), using the software TPSDig2 [25].

Fig 3. General description of the location of the 20 landmarks in the ventral surface of metasomal segment V.

Fig 3

(A) Bothriurus mistral n. sp. (B) Bothriurus coriaceus.

Landmarks of metasomal segment V were defined as this: 1) right rear end of the anal arch; 2) left rear end of the anal arch; 3) ventro-lateral right macroseta of the anal arch; 4) ventro-lateral left macroseta of the anal arch; 5) right distal end of VL carina; 6) left distal end of VL carina; 7) ventro-median right macroseta of the anal arch; 8) ventro-median left macroseta of the anal arch; 9) posterior margin of the right dorsal distal anterior projection; 10) posterior margin of the left dorsal distal anterior projection; 11) right posterior margin of ventral articulation with metasomal segment IV; 12) left posterior margin of ventral articulation with metasomal segment IV; 13) right anterior lateral seta; 14) left anterior lateral seta; 15) joining point between right VL and VSM carinae; 16) right medial lateral macroseta; 17) extreme right external margin; 18) joining point between left VL and VSM carinae; 19) left medial lateral macroseta; 20) extreme left external margin.

The landmarks were aligned using a Procrustes superimposition analysis, by removing size, position and orientation information to standardize the shape of each specimen based on their centroid size [26]. A measurement error (ME) analysis was performed after digitizing the landmarks twice, this data was compared using a Procrustes ANOVA, in which the mean squares (MS) of error should be smaller than the MS of the individual [27].

Since the x and y coordinate were extracted by the Procrustes analysis, the shape variation was analyzed in the entire dataset, using a principal component analysis (PCA) based on the covariance matrix of the individuals’ shape. Since shape changes are associated with changes in size, an allometric analysis was performed using a multivariate regression of shape on centroid size [28]. The residuals were used to investigate the shape variation independent of size [29]. To assess whether there are significant differences between the compared species, a random permutation analysis between groups and a Procrustes ANOVA was performed using the RRPP package in R [30].

Results

Taxonomy

Bothriurus mistral n. sp. Ojanguren-Affilastro, Mattoni, Alfaro & Pizarro-Araya (Figs 110 and Table 1) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1024E801-6EC5-43D8-BC49-F7A5BDD667B1.

Fig 10. Principal component analysis of the multivariate regression residuals of the metasomal segment V shape between B. mistral n. sp. and B. coriaceus, including the average shape wireframe between the species.

Fig 10

The colors of the confidence ellipses represent: orange: B. mistral n. sp., blue: B. coriaceus.

Table 1. Measurements (mm) of Bothriurus mistral n. sp.

Bothriurus mistral n. sp.
Male holotype Male paratype Male paratype Male paratype Female paratype Female paratype Female paratype
Total length 52.10 50.94 48.54 49.41 55.93 49.20 49.02
Carapace, length 6.14 6.06 5.17 6.14 6.22 5.82 5.89
Carapace, anterior width 3.55 3.47 3.31 3.72 4.36 3.55 3.47
Carapace, posterior width 6.38 6.30 5.33 6.38 6.63 6.22 5.88
Mesosoma, total length 16.46 15.40 17.11 16.3 19.56 17.93 16.95
Metasoma, total length 29.50 29.48 26.26 26.97 30.15 25.45 26.18
Metasomal segment I, length 3.47 3.23 2.91 3.47 3.64 2.83 3.23
Metasomal segment I, width 4.68 4.44 3.96 4.36 3.47 4.04 3.96
Metasomal segment I, height 3.45 3.23 2.99 3.55 2.67 2.99 3.07
Metasomal segment II, length 3.64 3.88 3.47 3.79 4.20 3.23 3.23
Metasomal segment II, width 4.20 4.20 3.64 4.04 3.07 3.64 3.64
Metasomal segment II, height 3.39 3.39 2.99 3.55 2.66 2.99 3.07
Metasomal segment III, length 4.04 4.28 3.88 3.79 4.44 3.63 3.64
Metasomal segment III, width 4.12 4.04 3.55 3.88 2.83 3.55 3.55
Metasomal segment III, height 3.47 3.55 3.15 3.47 2.59 3.15 3.15
Metasomal segment IV, length 4.85 4.85 4.04 4.77 4.85 4.04 4.04
Metasomal segment IV, width 3.88 4.04 3.47 3.79 2.75 3.47 3.47
Metasomal segment IV, height 3.39 3.31 3.15 3.47 2.34 2.99 3.23
Metasomal segment V, length 6.63 6.46 5.82 6.38 5.99 5.66 5.66
Metasomal segment V, width 3.52 3.48 3.23 3.42 3.46 3.16 3.23
Metasomal segment V, height 3.15 3.23 2.83 3.15 2.10 2.91 2.91
Telson, length 6.87 6.78 6.14 6.87 7.03 6.06 6.38
Vesicle, length 4.85 4.68 4.2 4.77 3.79 4.44 4.69
Vesicle, width 2.91 2.91 2.51 3.07 2.42 2.91 3.07
Vesicle, height 2.18 2.02 1.86 2.18 2.10 2.26 2.42
Aculeus, length 2.02 2.10 1.94 2.10 3.24 1.62 1.70
Chela, length 9.37 8.88 8.24 9.13 8.08 8.32 8.16
Chela, width 3.31 3.39 2.99 3.47 2.75 2.59 2.59
Chela, height 4.04 4.12 3.55 4.12 3.12 3.07 3.15

Type material

Holotype male: Chile, Coquimbo Region, Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary, El Chañar Refuge, 30°23ʹ3.86ʺS, 70°24ʹ44.97ʺW, 3,034 masl (SIMEF-Project), 24–26/XI/2020, J. Pizarro-Araya, F.M. Alfaro, J. Calderón, A. Castex coll. (MNHN 8376); Paratypes, Conglomerate no. 41141, 30°22ʹ4.78ʺS, 70°25ʹ51.30ʺW, 3,015 masl (SIMEF-Project), 24–26/XI/2020, J. Pizarro-Araya, F.M. Alfaro, J. Calderón, A. Castex coll., 9 males, 2 females (MACN); 1 male, 6 females, 2 juveniles (MNHN); 1 male, 3 females, 1 juvenile (MZUC); 1 male, 7 females, 2 juveniles (LEULS), Conglomerate no. 41142, 30°21ʹ58.26ʺS, 70°22ʹ44.63ʺW, 3,873 masl (SIMEF-Project), 24–26/XI/2020, J. Pizarro-Araya, F.M. Alfaro, J. Calderón, A. Castex coll., 5 males, 1 female (MACN); 1 male, 4 females, 1 juvenile (MNHN); 2 females, 1 juvenile (MZUC); 1 male, 3 females, 1 juvenile (LEULS).

Etymology

The specific name mistral is a noun in apposition referring to Gabriela Mistral, pseudonym of the Chilean poetess Lucila María Godoy Alcayaga (1889–1957), who was born in Vicuña and raised in Monte Grande, both in the Elqui valley (Coquimbo Region), an area adjacent to the type locality of this species. For her poetry work, she was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1945 and was the first Ibero-American woman and the second Latin American person to receive the Nobel Prize. Gabriela Mistral worked as a teacher at numerous schools of the Elqui valley and became a leading thinker as to the role of public education. She was also involved in the reformation of the Mexican education system, and since the 1920s, led an itinerant life due to her work as a consul and representative for international organizations in the Americas and Europe.

Description

Based on the holotype male (MNHN) and paratypes (LEULS, MACN, MNHN, MZUC). Total length, males: 47–57 mm, (N = 10; mean = 52.8 mm); females: 49–56 mm, (N = 3; mean = 51.38 mm). (Measurements of male holotype and male and female paratypes in Table 1).

Colour: Base colour dark yellowish, with dark brown pigmentation pattern in pedipalps, carapace, tergites, metasoma and legs; the remaining yellowish without dark spots (Figs 2A and 4A–4D). Chelicerae with reticular pigmentation on the dorsal margin of manus; external margin of movable finger with a dark spot. Carapace, anterior margin of carapace densely pigmented medially, connecting with two broad dark stripes from the anterior margin to the base of the postocular furrow, lateral margins with an anteromedian wide dark spot, and reticular pigment; posterolateral margins each with a dark spot, surrounded by reticular pigment; ocular tubercle, and area around the lateral eyes dark brown, almost black. Tergites I–VI each with a single transverse dark stripe that covers most part of the anterior margin of each segment, each with internal unpigmented areas on each side; tergite VII similar to segment VI but with a dark spot in the posterior margin and a dark area on the lateral margins. Sternites III–VI with a thin dark stripe on the lateral margin, the rest unpigmented; sternite VII with a thin dark stripe on the lateral margin, medially with faint pigment pattern. Sternum, genital opercula and pectines unpigmented. Metasomal segments I–III: dorsal surface with a dark area in the posterior margin, and a dark area in the articulation; lateral surfaces pigmented in the posterior half of the segment, between LM and LIM carinae, and connecting with ventral pigment; ventral surface with two thin VL dark stripes and a median wide dark stripe, fusing in the posterior half of the segment, but also connected by reticular pattern in the rest of the segment; segment IV similar to segment III but with dorsal surface without the posterior dark area, and with the pigment pattern of lateral margins reduced to a reticulate pigmentation; segment V: dorsal surface with a dark area in the articulation, and faint pigment in DL surface; lateral margins unpigmented; ventral surface with a thin VM stripe, and two wide VL stripes, which become wider towards the posterior margin, fusing in the posterior third of the segment, but connected to each other by reticulate pigment in the anterior two thirds. Telson, vesicle with faint pigment pattern in the ventral margin, the rest unpigmented, dorsal gland of males light yellow; aculeus dark brown. Pedipalps: trochanter with faint reticular pigment pattern; femur with well-developed dark stripes along DI, DE, and VE margins, with DI and DE stripes joining in a big dark dorsal spot occupying almost two thirds of the dorsal surface near the articulation with patella. Patella, with dorsointernal and dorsoexternal dark stripes, connected to each other by dense reticulate pattern on the dorsal surface; internal surface densely pigmented in the dorsal half, ventral surface unpigmented. Chela with faint reticular dark stripes along DI, DM, DS, D, E, V and VM carinae; area near articulation of movable finger, and both fingers, with faint pigment. Legs: coxae and trochanters unpigmented; femora faintly pigmented on the external margin and near articulation with patella; patellae pigmented along external and dorsal margins; tibiae with faint pigment pattern along external and dorsal margins, basitarsi, and telotarsi unpigmented.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

(A–D) Bothriurus mistral n. sp., habitus. (A) Male, dorsal aspect, (B) Male, ventral aspect, (C) Female, dorsal aspect, (D) Female, ventral aspect. Scale bars: 10 mm.

Morphology. Chelicerae: anterior margin of movable fingers strongly curved, more so in males; movable fingers with two small subdistal teeth. Pedipalps: Femur with DI, DE carinae granular, extending only half of the segment, VI carinae, granular, extending the entire length of the segment; with one DI, one D, and DE macrosetae; anterior margin with few scattered granules; dorsally with some granules near the anterior margin, the rest of the intercarinal surfaces smooth. Patella, DI and VI carinae formed by an elevation of the tegument, remaining surfaces smooth (Fig 5E); with one DI and one VI macrosetae. Chela manus (Fig 5A–5D and 5F) robust, length/height ratio, males: 2.02–2.34 (N = 10; mean = 2.23), females: 2.58–2.71 (N = 3; mean = 2.62); length/width ratio, males: 2.47–2.78 (N = 10; mean = 2.64); females: 2.93–3.21 (N = 3; mean = 3.09); internal surface smooth in females (Fig 5F), or with a pronounced, subtriangular projection near articulation of movable finger in males (Fig 5A, 5B and 5D); fingers comparatively short, with a median row of denticles; fixed fingers with six pairs of accessory denticles; movable finger with five external accessory denticles and six internal accessory denticles; the basal external denticle is usually part of the median row. Trichobothrial pattern neobothriotaxic major type C, with one accessory trichobothrium in V series of chela; femur with 3 trichobothria (d, i, e), one macroseta (M1) between d and i; patella with 19 trichobothria (2 d, i, 3 et, est, 2 em, 2 esb, 5 eb, 3 V), with esb2 petite; chela with 27 trichobothria (Dt, Db, 5 Et, Est, Esb, 3 Eb, dt, dst, dsb, db, et, est, esb, eb, ib, it, 5 V), with Et4 petite, Esb forming triangle with Eb1 and Eb2. Carapace: anterior margin slightly convex, with two median setae. Surface: finely granular in the dorsolateral margins in males, smooth in females. Anterior longitudinal sulcus absent, postocular furrow present and well developed, lateral sulci shallow. Median ocular tubercle well developed, placed in the middle of the carapace; interocular sulcus barely visible; median ocelli well developed, facing towards the lateral margins, ca. two diameters apart, with one seta behind each eye. Lateral ocelli pattern type 3A; with three small lateral ocelli on each side of carapace, two of them anteriorly, third ocellus similar in size to the other two, about one diameter above them. Legs: Surfaces smooth. Basitarsi each with two well developed symmetrical pedal spurs. Telotarsi, ventrally with a ventromedian row hyaline setae, and paired ventrosubmedian spines: 1/1 in telotarsus I, 2/2 in telotarsus II and 3/3 in telotarsi III and IV. Ungues curved and short.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

(A–F) Bothriurus mistral n. sp. (A) Left pedipalp chela, male, internal aspect, (B) Left pedipalp chela, male, ventral aspect, (C) Left pedipalp chela, male, external aspect, (D) Left pedipalp chela, male, dorsal aspect, (E) left pedipalp femur, male, external aspect, (F) Left pedipalp chela, female, ventrointernal aspect. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Pectines: Well developed. Tooth count, males: 15–18 (N = 10; median = 17); females: 13–15 (N = 3; median = 14). Sternum: With two conspicuous subtriangular lateral lobes clearly connecting medially, with two macrosetae on each. Genital opercula: Sclerites subtriangular. Tergites: I–VI: surface smooth; tergite VII with posterior margin finely granular, and four carinae reduced to a single posterior granule each. Sternites: III–VI surface finely granular medially in males, smooth in females, with small elliptical spiracles; sternite VII finely granular medially in males, more densely granular in females, with four poorly developed VSM carinae in females. Metasoma: segment I dorsal surface smooth, DL carina formed by scattered granules in the posterior two thirds of the segment, with one DL setae; lateral surface: LSM and LIM carinae restricted to the posterior half of the segment, with some scattered granules between DL and LSM carinae, with one LSM and one LIM setae; ventral surface: females, with four longitudinal carinae occupying the entire length of the segment, two VL and two VSM (Fig 6G); males with smooth tegument (Fig 6H); with eight ventral macrosetae arranged in an anterior row of four macrosetae (two VSM and two VL) and a similar row of four setae in the posterior margin of the segment; segment II similar to segment I, but with a DL macroseta, without LIM macroseta, less granular and with less developed carinae, ventral surface in males and females smooth; segment III: as segment II but even less granular and with less developed carinae, DL and LSM carina restricted to some blunt granules in the posterior margin of the segment, LIM carina absent, reduced to a LIM macroseta, ventral surface smooth, the rest as in segment II; segment IV: surfaces smooth, except for some DL granules in males, macrosetae as segment III; segment V: elongated, length/width ratio, males: 1.80–2.01 (N = 10; mean = 1.86); females: 1.73–1.79 (N = 3; mean = 1.75); dorsal surface smooth, medially with a conspicuous furrow, lateral surfaces smooth, with one DL and three LSM macrosetae, ventral surface with granular tegument (Fig 6C and 6E), VL carinae granular, extending the entire length of the segment, with three VL macrosetae (Fig 6A), VSM carinae longitudinal in the anterior half of the segment, diverging in the posterior half of the segment and connecting with the VL carinae in the posterior quarter, with three rows of two VSM macrosetae each, VM carina longitudinal, occupying almost the entire length of the segment; anal arch with four macrosetae. Telson: vesicle globose (Fig 6A and 6B), being more elongated in males (Fig 6B), ventral surface granular, dorsal surface smooth, in males there is a median conspicuous dorsal tegumentary depression that corresponds to the telson gland; aculeus short and curved, more elongated in males, base of the aculeus comparatively wide and with a small inconspicuous ventral granule.

Fig 6.

Fig 6

(A–J) (A–C, E, G, H). Bothriurus mistral n. sp. (A) Telson and metasomal segment V, female, lateral aspect; (B) Telson, male, lateral aspect; (C) Metasomal segment V, female, ventral aspect; (E) Metasomal segment V, male, ventral aspect; (G) Sternite VII and metasomal segments I and II, female, ventral aspect; (H) Sternite VII and metasomal segments I and II, male, ventral aspect; (D, F–J) Bothriurus coriaceus. (D) Telson, male, lateral aspect; (F) Metasomal segment V, male, ventral aspect; (I) Sternite VII and metasomal segments I and II, female, ventral aspect; (J) Sternite VII and metasomal segments I and II, male, ventral aspect. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Hemispermatophore: distal lamina slender, similar in size to the basal portion, slightly curved in its distal third (Fig 7B and 7C); distal crest parallel to the posterior margin, divided by a transversal ridge and occupying less than the distal quarter of the distal lamina; internal lobe with an external apophysis (Fig 7D), we did not observe any small granule nor crest in the depression between the apophysis and the frontal ridge; basal lobe laminar, distally bilobular; frontal ridge well developed; capsular cavity well developed (Fig 7E).

Fig 7. Hemispermatophore of Bothriurus coriaceus and Bothriurus mistral n. sp.

Fig 7

(A–E) (A) Bothriurus coriaceus, left hemispermatophore, external aspect. (B–E) Bothriurus mistral n. sp. Left hemispermatophore (B) External aspect. (C) Internal aspect. (D) Detail of the internal lobe. (E) Detail of lobe region. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Diagnosis and comparisons

Bothriurus mistral n. sp. is most closely related to B. coriaceus, which occurs in neighboring areas but at much lower altitudes. Both species can be easily told apart by their pigment pattern and morphology. Bothriurus mistral n. sp. is more pigmented than B. coriaceus; the pigment pattern of tergites I–VI is usually restricted to the anterior third of the segment in B. coriaceus (Fig 8C), whereas in B. mistral n. sp. it occupies more than the anterior half of each segment (Fig 8D). Additionally, B. coriaceus only has a median wide stripe in the ventral surface of metasomal segments I–IV (Fig 8A), whereas B. mistral n. sp. has three ventral stripes, two VL and a VM (Fig 8B). Bothriurus coriaceus has more developed ventral carinae in metasomal segment I (Fig 6G–6J). Metasomal segment V is more elongated in B. mistral n. sp. males (Fig 6E), and its length/width ratio ranges from 1.80 to 2.01 (N = 10; mean = 1.86), whereas in B. coriaceus males (Fig 6F) it ranges from 1.61 to 1.76 (N = 10; mean = 1.67). The base of the aculeus in B. mistral n. sp. males is slightly thicker and higher than in B. coriaceus males (Fig 6B and 6D), but this character is highly variable. There are also some conspicuous differences in the hemispermatophores of both species; in B. mistral n. sp. the distal lamina is more elongated and more recurved apically than in B. coriaceus (Fig 7A and 7B), being the distal lamina proportionally shorter and wider in B. coriaceus than in B. mistral n. sp. considering the total length of the hemispermatophore. Hemispermatophore total length/distal lamina length ratio ranges from 1.88 to 1.98 (N = 5; Mean = 1.93) in B. mistral n. sp., whereas in B. coriaceus it ranges from 2.04 to 2.08 (N = 5; Mean = 2.06). Hemispermatophore total length/distal lamina width ratio ranges from 7.71 to 8.23 (N = 5; Mean = 8.03) in B. mistral n. sp., whereas in in B. coriaceus it ranges from 6.31 to 7.16 (N = 5; Mean = 6.81).

Fig 8. Diagnostic characters of pigment pattern of Bothriurus coriaceus and Bothriurus mistral n. sp.

Fig 8

(A, C) Bothriurus coriaceus, (A) metasomal segment IV, ventral aspect. (C) terguite IV, dorsal aspect. (B, D) Bothriurus mistral n. sp. (B) metasomal segment IV, ventral aspect, (D) terguite IV, dorsal aspect. Scale bars: 1mm.

Distribution

Bothriurus mistral n. sp. is only known from its type locality, the Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary (30°23ʹ3.86ʺS, 70°24ʹ44.97ʺW, 3,034 masl), located in the Paihuano mountain range, an area with a surface of 31,680 ha, placed at high altitudes of the north central Chilean Andes (Coquimbo Region, Chile) (Fig 1).

Ecology

The area where Bothriurus mistral n. sp. was collected occupies the sub-Andean floor, which is characterized by the presence of medium-height shrub vegetation and scrublands, with the dominant species Stipa chrysophylla E. Desvaux, 1854, Viviana marifolia Cavanilles, 1804, Cristaria andicola Gay, 1846, Adesmia hystrix Philippi, 1860 (Fabaceae), and Ephedra americana Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd 1806; and the lowermost Andean floor, characterized by a low tropical-Mediterranean shrubland of Adesmia subterranea Clos, Gay, C., 1838, and Adesmia echinus C. Presl, 1791 (Fabaceae) [15, 31].

Bothriurus mistral n. sp. has been found in sympatry with Brachistosternus gayi Ojanguren-Affilastro, Pizarro-Araya & Ochoa, 2018, and with an undetermined, possibly new, species of Brachistosternus.

Geometric morphometric analyses

The measurement error was assessed to avoid any digitizing error in the data. The results of a Procrustes ANOVA showed that the MS values of the individuals exceeded the MS values of error, indicating that there is no ME in the data. The PCA between species showed that the first three components explained 85.9% of the variation in shape between B. coriaceus and B. mistral n. sp. (PC1: 68.1%; PC2: 12.4%; PC3: 5.43%). These results showed that almost all the variation was concentrated in the first dimension of the shape space and could be a size effect. Therefore, a multivariate regression between shape and centroid size was performed that showed a significant size effect of 25% (P < 0.001, after 10,000 permutation rounds) (Fig 9).

Fig 9. Multivariate regression of centroid size (independent variable) and shape (dependent variable) between B. coriaceus and B. mistral n. sp.

Fig 9

The colors represent the different species (blue and orange respectively).

After removing all size (allometric) effect, the PCA of the residuals showed a new shape variation explained by the first three components with a 82% (PC1: 59.6%; PC2: 16.1%; PC3: 6.4%) that suggests that the shape variation between B. coriaceus and B. mistral n. sp. was purely a shape variation (Fig 10).

Discussion

Bothriurus mistral n. sp. belongs to the coriaceus group, which is defined in this contribution and also includes B. coriaceus from north-central Chile, Bothriurus keyserlingi Pocock, 1893 from south-central Chile, and Bothriurus dumayi Cekalovic, 1974 from northern Chile [11]. These species occur in lowlands, or at most, at intermediate altitudes, but never above 2,000 masl. [10]. Bothriurus mistral n. sp. is the first known high-altitude Bothriurus species from the western slopes of the Andes and the first high-altitude species of the coriaceus group. This species seems to be very restricted geographically, being only known from its type locality, despite occurring in a relatively well studied area of the Chilean central Andes [1214]. The lack of previous records of this species could be due to the particular characteristics of the environment where it has been collected, which is an inter-Andean valley surrounding a wetland, a kind of environment usually poorly preserved due to herding, and therefore neglected in arthropod surveys. In this case the exclusion of livestock in the area has preserved an almost pristine environment, representing a rare opportunity to study this kind of Andean wetland. Other neighboring areas with similar environments to the type locality should be surveyed in the future in order to clearly establish the actual distribution of this species. This is a further confirmation that the arthropod fauna of high-altitude environments of the Andes is far more complex and diverse than previously thought.

For this research the inclusion of geometric morphometrics analysis of the metasoma results to be very informative and powerful to discriminate cryptic morphologies [32]. Geometric morphometrics tools have been rarely used in scorpions. Traditionally, some authors used it to evaluate Ecomorphs (morphologies under similar ecological demands) [33, 34], postembryonic stages [35] or in a paleontological way [36], being this contribution the first to use these techniques to improve a taxonomical description in the group.

This is the first time that a geometric morphometric approach is applied to identify two closely related species of Bothriuridae. Our analyses showed very promising results and these techniques could be implemented for other species of the group in the future, specially to solve the systematic position of taxonomically problematic species.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the community of Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary, and to esteroderecho.cl (Coquimbo Region, Chile) for providing field support and logistics access to their plots. We are also grateful to Juan Calderón (ULS) and Alberto Castex (fundacion-indomita.org) for providing field logistics support, and to Francisco A. Squeo and Lutgarda “Lutty” Arriagada (ULS-IEB) for helping to manage the field work in Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary. We also thank Gerardo Vergara (INFOR) for managing the financing of the project Integrated Forest Ecosystem Assessment and Monitoring System (SIMEF by its Spanish acronym).

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

DIDULS PR2121210 and DIDULS PEQMEN212124 projects of the University of La Serena, Chile, and the funding from the Ministry of Education of Chile, through MINEDUC’s performance agreement: Implementation of a competitive model of innovation and creation: preparing the University of La Serena for 2030, ULS19101, ANID FB210006 grant, and the SIMEF project (INFOR-IEB Agreement) to JPA. PICT 2019-597 project by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina) to AAOA.

References

  • 1. Mattoni CI. The genus Bothriurus (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae) from Patagonia. Insect Syst & Evol. 2007; 38:173–192. 10.1163/187631207788783950 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ojanguren-Affilastro AA, Kovarík F. Bothriuridae. In: Kovarík F, Ojanguren-Affilastro AA. Illustrated catalog of scorpions. Part II. Bothriuridae; Chaerilidae; Buthidae I., genera Compsobuthus, Hottentotta, Isometrus, Lychas, and Sassanidotus. Jakub Rolčík Publisher, Czech Republic. 2013. p. 6–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Maury EA. A new Bothriurus from Bolivia (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 1981; 170(1):29–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Maury EA. Redescripción de Bothriurus bocki Kraepelin 1911 (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae). J Arachnol. 1984; 12(3):351–356. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Acosta LE. Descripción de Bothriurus olaen, nueva especie de escorpión de Argentina central (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae). Rev Arachnol. 1997; 12(1):1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Acosta LE, Ochoa JA. Lista de los escorpiones bolivianos (Chelicerata: Scorpiones), con notas sobre su distribución. Rev Soc Entomol Argent. 2002; 61(3–4):15–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mattoni CI. Bothriurus picunche sp. nov., a new scorpion from Chile (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae). Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ. 2002. a; 37(2):169–174. 10.1076/snfe.37.2.169.8587 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mattoni CI. La verdadera identidad de Bothriurus vittatus (Guérin-Méneville, [1838]) (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae). Rev Arachnol. 2002. b; 14(5):59–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mattoni CI. Bothriurus pichicuy sp. nov., nuevo escorpión chileno del grupo vittatus (Scorpiones: Bothriuridae). Iheringia Ser. Zool. 2002. c; 92(4):81–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mattoni CI, Acosta LE. Systematics and distribution of three Bothriurus species (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae) from central and northern Chile. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ. 2006; 41(3):235–250. 10.1080/01650520600798373 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pizarro-Araya J, Ojanguren-Affilastro AA. El orden Scorpiones en Chile: estado del conocimiento, desde la taxonomía a la conservación. Rev Parasitol Latinoam, Número especial Arácnidos comunes de Chile 2021; II: 23–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ochoa JA, Ojanguren-Affilastro AA, Mattoni CI, Prendini L. Systematic revision of the Andean scorpion genus Orobothriurus Maury, 1976 (Bothriuridae), with discussion of the altitude record for scorpions. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 2011; 359:1–90. 10.1206/359.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ojanguren-Affilastro AA, Mattoni CI. A new species of Brachistosternus from Chilean central Andes (Scorpiones: Bothriuridae). Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ. 2006; 41:79–85. 10.1080/01650520500243595 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ojanguren-Affilastro AA, Agusto P, Pizarro-Araya J, Mattoni CI. Two new scorpion species of genus Brachistosternus (Scorpiones: Bothriuridae) from northern Chile. Zootaxa. 2007; 1623:55–68. 10.11646/zootaxa.1623.1.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Comunidad Agrícola Estancia Estero Derecho. Plan de Manejo para la Conservación del Área Protegida Privada y Santuario de la Naturaleza Estero Derecho, Pisco Elqui, Región de Coquimbo, Chile. 2017. pp 77.
  • 16.de Pasquale G, Valois R, Schaffer N, MacDonell S. Contrasting geophysical signatures of a relict and an intact Andean rock glacier. Cryosphere. 2022; 16:1579–1596. 10.5194/tc-16-1579-2022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Squeo FA, Veit H, Arancio G, Gutiérrez JR, Arroyo MTK, Olivares N. Spatial heterogeneity of high mountain vegetation in the Andean desert zone of Chile (30°S). Mt Res Dev. 1993; 13:203–209. 10.2307/3673638 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cepeda J, Novoa J. La cordillera altoandina del valle de Elqui. In: Cepeda J, editor. Geoecología de los Andes desérticos: la alta montaña del valle del Elqui. Ediciones Universidad de La Serena, La Serena, Chile. 2006. p. 41–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maury EA. La estructura del espermatóforo en el género Brachistosternus (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae). Physis (Bs As) sec. C. 1975; 34(89):179–182. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vachon M. Étude des caractères utilisés pour classer les familles et les genres de scorpions (Arachnides). 1. La trichobothriotaxie en arachnologie. Sigles trichobothriaux et types de trichobothriotaxie chez les scorpions. Bull Mus Hist Nat Paris. 3e sér. 1973. [1974]; 140:857–958. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Loria S, Prendini L. Homology of the lateral eyes of Scorpiones: A six-ocellus model. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e112913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Roig-Alsina AH, Maury EA. Consideraciones sistemáticas y ecológicas sobre Brachistosternus (Leptosternus) borellii Kraepelin, 1911 (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae). Physis, Sección C. 1981; 39:1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ochoa JA, Botero-Trujillo R, Prendini L. On the troglomorphic scorpion Troglotayosicus humiculum (Scorpiones, Troglotayosicidae), with first description of the adults. Am Mus Nov. 2010; 3691:1–19. 10.1206/707.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Prendini L. Phylogeny and classification of the superfamily Scorpionoidea Latreille, 1802 (Chelicerata, Scorpiones): an exemplar approach. Cladistics 2000; 16:1–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2000.tb00348.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rohlf FJ. TpsDig, version 2.17. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York, USA. 2013.
  • 26.Rohlf FJ, Slice D. Extensions of the Procustes methods for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 1990; 39:40–59. 10.2307/2992207 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fruciano C. Measurment error in geometric morphometrics. Dev Genes Evol. 2016; 226:139–158. 10.1007/s00427-016-0537-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Monteiro LR. Multivariate regression models and geometric morphometrics: The search for causal factors in the analysis of shape. Syst Biol. 1999; 48:192–199. doi: 10.1080/106351599260526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Benítez HA, Bravi R, Parra LE, Sanzana M-J, Sepúlveda-Zúñiga E. Allometric and non-allometric patterns in sexual dimorphism discrimination of wing shape in Ophion intricatus: Might two male morphotypes coexist? J Insect Sci. 2013; 13:143. 10.1673/031.013.14301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Collyer ML, Adams DC. RRPP: An r package for fitting linear models to high‐dimensional data using residual randomization. Methods Ecol Evol. 2018; 9:1772–1779. 10.1111/2041-210X.13029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Squeo FA, Osorio R, Arancio G. Flora de los Andes de Coquimbo: Cordillera de Doña Ana. Universidad de La Serena, La Serena, Chile. 1994; pp. 176.
  • 32.Benítez HA, Pizarro-Araya J, Bravi R, Sanzana M-J, Alfaro FM. Morphological variation on isolated populations of Praocis (Praocis) spinolai. J Insect Sci. 2014; 14:1–12. 10.1093/jis/14.1.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Coelho P, Kaliontzopoulou A, Rasko M, van der Meijden A. A ‘striking’ relationship: scorpion defensive behaviour and its relation to morphology and performance. Funct Ecol. 2017; 31:1390–1404. 10.1111/1365-2435.12855 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Coelho P, Kaliontzopoulou A, Sousa P, Stockmann M, van der Meijden A. Reevaluating scorpion ecomorphs using a naïve approach. BMC Ecol Evol. 2022; 22:1–10. 10.1186/s12862-022-01968-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gómez M, Flórez E, Hernández L, Medina GEF. Etapas de desarrollo post embrionario de Tityus columbianus (Thorell, 1846) (Scorpiones, Buthidae): enfoque de estimación morfométrica. Mutis. 2017; 7:75. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bicknell RDC, Amati L. On the morphospace of eurypterine sea scorpions. Earth Environ Sci Trans R Soc Edinb. 2022; 113:1–6. 10.1017/S175569102100030X [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Michael Schubert

17 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-27368Description of Bothriurus mistral n. sp., the highest-dwelling Bothriurus from the western Andes (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae), using multiple morphometric approachesPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ojanguren-Affilastro,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that comprehensively addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 01 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Michael Schubert

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please take this opportunity to be sure you have met all of our guidelines for new species. For proper registration of a new zoological taxon, we require two specific statements to be included in your manuscript.

a) In the Results section, the globally unique identifier (GUID), currently in the form of a Life Science Identifier (LSID), should be listed under the new species name, for example:

Anochetus boltoni Fisher sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B6C072CF-1CA6-40C7-8396-534E91EF7FBB

Another LSID for the manuscript itself should also appear within the Nomenclature statement. You will need to contact Zoobank (zoobank.org/About) to obtain a GUID (LSID). You should receive one LSID for your manuscript and a separate, unique LSID for the new species. 

b) Please also insert the following text into the Methods section, in a sub-section to be called "Nomenclatural Acts":

The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new names contained herein are available under that Code from the electronic edition of this article. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix "" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:type="simple">http://zoobank.org/". The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: XXXXXXX. The electronic edition of this work was published in a journal with an ISSN, and has been archived and is available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central, LOCKSS [author to insert any additional repositories].

All PLOS ONE articles are deposited in PubMed Central and LOCKSS. If your institute, or those of your co-authors, has its own repository, we recommend that you also deposit the published online article there and include the name in your article.

Following a recent ruling by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, electronic journals are now a valid format for publication of new zoological taxa. In order to ensure the valid publication of your new species, please be sure to include the updated version of Nomenclatural Acts (above). A complete explanation of our guidelines for publishing new species can be found on our website: http://www.plosone.org/static/guidelines#zoological.

3. Please expand the acronym “MINEDUC” (as indicated in your financial disclosure) so that it states the name of your funders in full.

This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

"We are grateful to the community of Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary, and to esteroderecho.cl (Coquimbo Region, Chile) for providing field support and logistics access to their plots. We are also grateful to Juan Calderón (ULS) and Alberto Castex (fundacion-indomita.org) for providing field logistics support, and to Francisco A. Squeo and Lutgarda “Lutty” Arriagada (ULS-IEB) for helping to manage the field work in Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary. We also thank Gerardo Vergara (INFOR) for managing the financing of the project Integrated Forest Ecosystem Assessment and Monitoring System (SIMEF by its Spanish acronym). AAOA thanks the PICT 2019-597 project by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina). JPA thanks the DIDULS PR2121210 and DIDULS PEQMEN212124 projects of the University of La Serena, Chile, and the funding from the Ministry of Education of Chile, through MINEDUC’s performance agreement: Implementation of a competitive model of innovation and creation: preparing the University of La Serena for 2030, ULS19101, ANID FB210006 grant, and the SIMEF project (INFOR-IEB Agreement)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

 "DIDULS PR2121210 and DIDULS PEQMEN212124 projects of the University of La Serena, Chile, and the funding from the Ministry of Education of Chile, through MINEDUC’s performance agreement: Implementation of a competitive model of innovation and creation: preparing the University of La Serena for 2030, ULS19101, ANID FB210006 grant, and the SIMEF project (INFOR-IEB Agreement) to JPA.

PICT 2019-597 project by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina)  to AAOA."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. We note that Figures 1 and 2 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a) You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1 and 2 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b) If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript submitted describes a new cryptic species of Bothriurus from an unexplored locality in the Chilean Andes. The description is comprehensive and includes high-quality pictures, including photos under UV light, and photos of the male hemispermatophore. I have a few suggestions that could be easily fixed. One potential relevant issue is to incorporate an explanation on how the landmarks where defined in the segment V of both species (e.g., using carinae, macrosetae, relative position etc.). This way other authors could replicate the landmarks across additional species in further contributions.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript “Description of Bothriurus mistral n. sp., the highest-dwelling Bothriurus from the western Andes (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae), using multiple morphometric approaches” represents an important and interesting contribution to the knowledge of the diversity of scorpions in the region of the north-central Andes. The study not only provides the highest elevational discovery for Bothriurus in the western slopes of the Andes, but also uses the geometric morphometrics analyses for the first time to delimit a recent species within this order of arachnids. It is a great pity that the authors failed to add at least the basic characteristics and variability of genetic markers to the morphometric analyzes of the studied species (B. mistral n. sp. and B. corciareus). In that case, the results would have an even better informative value.

It is a relatively short manuscript that is carefully prepared. I have only a few comments about it, which can contribute to a better use of the presented data in possible subsequent studies.

The results represent interesting original data. In my opinion, this manuscript should be accepted for publication in Plos One after correction of some details.

Comments/recommendations:

Material and Methods

Studied material

Lines 111-119: Please add GPS coordinates also to the material of Bothriurus coriaceus.

Nomenclatorial acts

Lines 146-156: I do not understand this whole long passage. In my opinion, it is clear that the code must be followed and that the name is registered in ZooBank. This entire paragraph can only be replaced by the specified internet link to the registered name.

Geometric morphometric approach

Line 175: Seventeen landmarks are mentioned (Fig. 3). However, 20 points are shown in the Fig. 3. It is not clear; how did you define landmark 13 and 14. The position is clearly different between species.

Results

Line 203: Specify the registration collection number of holotype.

Lines 205-206: What does it mean: “J. Pizarro-Araya, F.M. Alfaro, J. Calderón, A. Castex (MNHN)”. All mentioned persons are owners of the collection or collected (leg.) the samples? Please, clarify this information (in the whole Type material).

Line 206: What does it mean: “Conglomerate no. 41141“. It seems to like registration collection number. In this case I don’t understand that this material may be located in different collections (SIMEF-Project, MACN, MZUC, LEULS). Please, clarify this information and add the real registration collection numbers.

Lines 229-230: Specify separately the measurements for holotype and paratypes (include separately this information also in Table 1). The values of Total length from the text do not correspond to the data in Table 1.

Line 234: The holotype is only one individual (male in this case). Please correct the legend.

Table 1. – Here is no variability of the measurements. The morphometric information seems to be important for the characteristic of species. Please present the minimal, maximal, and mean values for all measurements. And separately for holotype and all paratypes.

Line 238: Duplication of Line 234.

Line 240-278: More then one page of color description seems to be very precise description of this characteristic. However, the coloration may be variable, and it is difficult to navigate in a long text. Moreover, the Figs 2A and 4A–4D are not informative in this case. The pigment pattern is used as important diagnostic characteristics. It is a reason I fully recommended to add more detailed pictures (photographs or drawing) of described coloration (with visible pattern, not as in Figs 2A and 4A–4D). it would be best to also add comparison with B. coriaceus.

Line 397: Terms “shorter and wider“ are quite confusing. Please add specific values in both species.

Please, control the formal style of Figure references all over the text. It is mix of “Fig” and Fig.” Moreover “Figure” is not abbreviated in the figure legends. I assume that the formatting of the text will be subject to an even more detailed check by the editorial team.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Jairo A. Moreno-González

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-27368-1.pdf

PLoS One. 2023 Feb 22;18(2):e0281336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281336.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


2 Jan 2023

Response to reviewers

We went through all the reviewers and editors comments. We accepted all suggested changes; we included the LSID of the new species, as well as an additional figure (Fig. 8) an expanded table 1, and a new figure 1 using USGS National Map Viewer (http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/), which is one of the sources suggested by PlosOne. All changes are highlighted with track changes in the “Revised Manuscript with Track Changes”, and an unmarked version of the revised paper is also presented labeled as “manuscript”.

All figures were revised and fixed through “Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool”, as required.

We hope this new version meets the standards of PlosOne as well as the requirements of the editor and the reviewers.

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

-Thank you very much for your suggestion, we revised this aspect of the MS and we hope that now it meets the formatting standards of PLOSOne.

2. Please take this opportunity to be sure you have met all of our guidelines for new species. For proper registration of a new zoological taxon, we require two specific statements to be included in your manuscript.

a) In the Results section, the globally unique identifier (GUID), currently in the form of a Life Science Identifier (LSID), should be listed under the new species name, for example:

Anochetus boltoni Fisher sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:B6C072CF-1CA6-40C7-8396-534E91EF7FBB

-Thank you very much for your suggestion, we have now included LSID of the species in the results section.

Another LSID for the manuscript itself should also appear within the Nomenclature statement. You will need to contact Zoobank (zoobank.org/About) to obtain a GUID (LSID). You should receive one LSID for your manuscript and a separate, unique LSID for the new species.

b) Please also insert the following text into the Methods section, in a sub-section to be called "Nomenclatural Acts":

The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new names contained herein are available under that Code from the electronic edition of this article. This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix "http://zoobank.org/". The LSID for this publication is: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: XXXXXXX. The electronic edition of this work was published in a journal with an ISSN, and has been archived and is available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central, LOCKSS [author to insert any additional repositories].

-Thank you very much for your suggestion. We included and completed this statement and information in the MS.

All PLOS ONE articles are deposited in PubMed Central and LOCKSS. If your institute, or those of your co-authors, has its own repository, we recommend that you also deposit the published online article there and include the name in your article.

Following a recent ruling by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, electronic journals are now a valid format for publication of new zoological taxa. In order to ensure the valid publication of your new species, please be sure to include the updated version of Nomenclatural Acts (above). A complete explanation of our guidelines for publishing new species can be found on our website: http://www.plosone.org/static/guidelines#zoological.

-Thank you very much for your suggestion, we included this information in the article.

3. Please expand the acronym “MINEDUC” (as indicated in your financial disclosure) so that it states the name of your funders in full.

This information should be included in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

-“MINEDUC” is the Spanish acronym of Ministry of Education of Chile, and is already expanded in the funding section. Should we also include this information in the cover letter? If that is the case please let us know this.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"We are grateful to the community of Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary, and to esteroderecho.cl (Coquimbo Region, Chile) for providing field support and logistics access to their plots. We are also grateful to Juan Calderón (ULS) and Alberto Castex (fundacion-indomita.org) for providing field logistics support, and to Francisco A. Squeo and Lutgarda “Lutty” Arriagada (ULS-IEB) for helping to manage the field work in Estero Derecho Private Protected Area and Natural Sanctuary. We also thank Gerardo Vergara (INFOR) for managing the financing of the project Integrated Forest Ecosystem Assessment and Monitoring System (SIMEF by its Spanish acronym). AAOA thanks the PICT 2019-597 project by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina). JPA thanks the DIDULS PR2121210 and DIDULS PEQMEN212124 projects of the University of La Serena, Chile, and the funding from the Ministry of Education of Chile, through MINEDUC’s performance agreement: Implementation of a competitive model of innovation and creation: preparing the University of La Serena for 2030, ULS19101, ANID FB210006 grant, and the SIMEF project (INFOR-IEB Agreement)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"DIDULS PR2121210 and DIDULS PEQMEN212124 projects of the University of La Serena, Chile, and the funding from the Ministry of Education of Chile, through MINEDUC’s performance agreement: Implementation of a competitive model of innovation and creation: preparing the University of La Serena for 2030, ULS19101, ANID FB210006 grant, and the SIMEF project (INFOR-IEB Agreement) to JPA.

PICT 2019-597 project by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina) to AAOA."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

-Thank you very much for your observation. We removed all fundings from the acknowledgements section. Funding information in both parts of the text was actually the same but only presented differently, therefore we consider that there is no need to change the funding statement.

5. We note that Figures 1 and 2 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a) You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1 and 2 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b) If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

-Thank you very much for your comment.

We have now generated a new figure 1 using USGS National Map Viewer (http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/), which is one of the sources suggested by PlosOne. We have included this information in the new version of the MS.

Figure 2 only presents photos taken by our team, with digital cameras or digital cameras attached to drones, we have now clearly stated this in the revised version of the MS.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript submitted describes a new cryptic species of Bothriurus from an unexplored locality in the Chilean Andes. The description is comprehensive and includes high-quality pictures, including photos under UV light, and photos of the male hemispermatophore. I have a few suggestions that could be easily fixed. One potential relevant issue is to incorporate an explanation on how the landmarks where defined in the segment V of both species (e.g., using carinae, macrosetae, relative position etc.). This way other authors could replicate the landmarks across additional species in further contributions.

-Thank you very much for your comments. We agree with your suggestion and we have included in the Methods section an explanation of how each landmark was taken.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript “Description of Bothriurus mistral n. sp., the highest-dwelling Bothriurus from the western Andes (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae), using multiple morphometric approaches” represents an important and interesting contribution to the knowledge of the diversity of scorpions in the region of the north-central Andes. The study not only provides the highest elevational discovery for Bothriurus in the western slopes of the Andes, but also uses the geometric morphometrics analyses for the first time to delimit a recent species within this order of arachnids. It is a great pity that the authors failed to add at least the basic characteristics and variability of genetic markers to the morphometric analyzes of the studied species (B. mistral n. sp. and B. corciareus). In that case, the results would have an even better informative value.

It is a relatively short manuscript that is carefully prepared. I have only a few comments about it, which can contribute to a better use of the presented data in possible subsequent studies.

The results represent interesting original data. In my opinion, this manuscript should be accepted for publication in Plos One after correction of some details.

Comments/recommendations:

Material and Methods

Studied material

Lines 111-119: Please add GPS coordinates also to the material of Bothriurus coriaceus.

-Thank you very much for your suggestion, we included these data in the revised version of the manuscript.

Nomenclatorial acts

Lines 146-156: I do not understand this whole long passage. In my opinion, it is clear that the code must be followed and that the name is registered in ZooBank. This entire paragraph can only be replaced by the specified internet link to the registered name.

-We understand your concern, but this paragraph is added because policies of PlosOne demand authors to include it.

Geometric morphometric approach

Line 175: Seventeen landmarks are mentioned (Fig. 3). However, 20 points are shown in the Fig. 3. It is not clear; how did you define landmark 13 and 14. The position is clearly different between species.

-Thank you very much for your observations. We used 20 landmarks, the number 17 is our mistake, and we fixed it in the new manuscript. Landmarks 13 and 14 correspond to lateral macrosetae. We explained each landmark in the new version of the MS also following the suggestion of the other reviewer.

Results

Line 203: Specify the registration collection number of holotype.

-Done

Lines 205-206: What does it mean: “J. Pizarro-Araya, F.M. Alfaro, J. Calderón, A. Castex (MNHN)”. All mentioned persons are owners of the collection or collected (leg.) the samples? Please, clarify this information (in the whole Type material).

-Thank you very much for your comment, these are the collectors, we specified it in the revised version of the MS.

Line 206: What does it mean: “Conglomerate no. 41141“. It seems to like registration collection number. In this case I don’t understand that this material may be located in different collections (SIMEF-Project, MACN, MZUC, LEULS). Please, clarify this information and add the real registration collection numbers.

-Thank you very much for your comment; the term “conglomerate” refers to collection sites as defined by the standard techniques in SIMEF campaigns. We clarified this point in the revised version of the MS.

Lines 229-230: Specify separately the measurements for holotype and paratypes (include separately this information also in Table 1). The values of Total length from the text do not correspond to the data in Table 1.

-Thank you very much for your suggestion, we included the data of male holotype in table 1, and separated it from paratypes. We also fixed the problem with the inconsistencies in the measurements.

Line 234: The holotype is only one individual (male in this case). Please correct the legend.

-Done

Table 1. – Here is no variability of the measurements. The morphometric information seems to be important for the characteristic of species. Please present the minimal, maximal, and mean values for all measurements. And separately for holotype and all paratypes.

-Thank you very much for your suggestion. We included in the description the variability in several characters which are commonly used in Bothriurid taxonomy (including maximal, minimal and mean values). Additionally we included in the revised version of the manuscript complete measurements of the holotype male, three male paratypes and three female paratypes, therefore presenting the complete measurements of four males specimens and three female specimens, which is in line with most publications in scorpion taxonomy. It is not possible for us to measure the whole group of specimens because most of the material has already been split between collections in two different countries.

Line 238: Duplication of Line 234.

-Fixed

Line 240-278: More then one page of color description seems to be very precise description of this characteristic. However, the coloration may be variable, and it is difficult to navigate in a long text. Moreover, the Figs 2A and 4A–4D are not informative in this case. The pigment pattern is used as important diagnostic characteristics. It is a reason I fully recommended to add more detailed pictures (photographs or drawing) of described coloration (with visible pattern, not as in Figs 2A and 4A–4D). it would be best to also add comparison with B. coriaceus.

-Thank you very much for your suggestions. We understand that the color description is a bit long, but it follows current standards in Bothriurid taxonomy. We agree with the reviewer that the diagnostic characters of color are not well depicted in the presented version of the manuscript; therefore we added the suggested figure of diagnostic characters of B. mistral n. sp. We also added the requested photos of B. coriaceus, as suggested, to make possible a comparison between species (all this in new figure 8).

Line 397: Terms “shorter and wider“ are quite confusing. Please add specific values in both species.

-Thank you very much for your suggestion. We agree with this point and -included these data in the revised version of the MS.

Please, control the formal style of Figure references all over the text. It is mix of “Fig” and Fig.” Moreover “Figure” is not abbreviated in the figure legends. I assume that the formatting of the text will be subject to an even more detailed check by the editorial team.

-Done

________________________________________

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Jairo A. Moreno-González

Reviewer #2: No

________________________________________

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

-Done

Attachment

Submitted filename: Revised response to reviewers-Ojanguren et al. 2022.docx

Decision Letter 1

Michael Schubert

23 Jan 2023

Description of Bothriurus mistral n. sp., the highest-dwelling Bothriurus from the western Andes (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae), using multiple morphometric approaches

PONE-D-22-27368R1

Dear Dr. Ojanguren-Affilastro,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Michael Schubert

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The authors have carefully edited the manuscript based on all the comments and recommendations. For this reason, the article can now be fully supported for acceptance and publication in the journal PLOS ONE.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Jairo A. Moreno-Gonzalez

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Michael Schubert

26 Jan 2023

PONE-D-22-27368R1

Description of Bothriurus mistral n. sp., the highest-dwelling Bothriurus from the western Andes (Scorpiones, Bothriuridae), using multiple morphometric approaches

Dear Dr. Ojanguren-Affilastro:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Michael Schubert

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-27368-1.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Revised response to reviewers-Ojanguren et al. 2022.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES